though under the eye and care of endearing friends yet sometimes may feel the want of a parental wing I am not without fears that this Orphane Treatise may complain of som Errata's through the Authors unexpected death the slow progresse of the Presse and my great distance from it The God of truth teach thee how to profit break every shell that thou mayest taste of the kernel clear up truths to thy apprehension and imprint them upon thy heart so prayes he who beggs thy prayers for him because he is Thine in our Lord Jesus Samuel Beresford A Scheme of the whole This Treatise contains 1. An Introduction 2. The body of the Treatise The Introduction doth contain 1. The figurative acceptions of the word Covenant 2. Requisites in a Covenant properly so called Chap. 1. 3. A distribution of Covenants into the in several kinds 4. Seven Reasons of Gods dealing with men in a Covenant way 5. The Covenant between God and man defined The body of the Treatise contains a distribution of the Covenant into the Covenant of Works Chap. 2. Covenant of Grace The Covenant of Grace is considered 1. In the general nature of a Covenant 2. Joyntly with the Covenant of Works 1. As considered in the general nature of a Covenant we may observe 1. A Covenant in the proper nature of it between God and fallen man asserted Chap. 3. 2. This explained in several propositions 1. The Covenant of Grace is between God and man and not between God and Christ Chap. 4. 2. The outward and not the inward Covenant is a Covenant properly so called 1. Asserted and argued Ch. 5. 2. Cleared in 6 positions Ch. 6 3. The conditionality of the Covenant of Grace 1. In five arguments proved Ch. 7. 2. Objections answered Ch. 8. Ch. 9. 4. God keeps up his sovereign y 1. In the power and authority of his Law Ch. 10 11 12. 2. In exercise of Discipline and correction for sin Ch. 13. 2. Consider joyntly with the Covenant of Works we see 1. Their agreement in eight particulars Chap. 14. 2. Their differences 1. In the Covenants themselves 2. In the Conditions annext Differences in the Covenants are 1. Primae The Covenant of Works was entered in mans integrity Chap. 15. The Covenant of Grace was entered in mans fallen condition 2. A prima ortae Differences à prima ortae The Covenant of Works was for mans preservation of Grace for mans restitution Ibid. The Covenant of Works had its precedency in time of Grace followed after Asserted Objections answered The Covenant of Works was of small time in use of Grace is of everlasting continuance chap. 16. The Covenant of Works had no Mediatour Asserted Objections answered of Grace was in and by a Mediatour Asserted Works incumbent on the Mediatour held forth 1. To bring men into a capacity of Covenanting 2. To bring men within the verge of the Covenant 1. By his tender of it 2. Shaping the heart for it 3. To bring the soul up to the termes of the Covenant 4. To crown those that come up to the terms of it chap. 17. Differences in the conditions 1. Supposed on Gods part Death threatned Life promised The same in both Asserted Objections answered chap. 18. 2. Real on mans part 2 Differences asserted 1. In the Covenant of Works the conditions were in mans power of Grace they are not performed without special grace Asserted in 6. Reasons chap. 18 Objections answered chap. 19 2. In the Covenant of Works the conditions kept man within himselfe of righteousnesse chap. 20 of Grace the conditions carry man out of himself to be righteous by anothers righteousnesse 3. In the Covenant of Works conditions were for mans preservation Ibid. of Grace conditions were for mans reparation 3. Conditions discovered 1. Serviceable for mans returne to God which is Faith 1. Explained the sense of it given and reasons evincing it Chap. 21 2. In 4. Propositions cleared 1. God will not justifie a wicked person 2. Man hath no righteousnesse of his own for justification 3. Man hath a righteousnesse of grace tendered Ibid. 4. This righteousnesse is made ours by Faith Asserted Explained 1. Faith in the Sovereignty of God doth not justifie 2. Faith justifies as an instrument 3. Objections answeâ—ed chap 22. 1. Asserted Ib. 2. Object answ 4. Corollary drawn A justified man is fitted for every duty Ibid. 2. Serviceable for mans reparation in his qualifications to hold up communioÌ„ with God which is repentance 1. Objection a prevented It is not the same with faith Chap. 23. 2. Duty explained In the pre-requisite godly sorrow Asserted in six particulars limited Ibid. In the essentials Privative Cessation from sinne Ibid. Positive Returne to God 3. Objections answered 1. Joyntly against Faith and Repentance They are mans conditions not Gods chap. 24. 2. Particularly against repentance it self 1. It is not hereby made a Covenant of Works 2. Repentance necessarily flowing from Faith is not thereby diserabled Ibid. from being a condition in the Covenant of Grace 4. Degree of obedience required in our returne 1. Perfection of degrees not called for of God in Covenant 2. Covenant of Grace doth not call for perfection and accept sincerity Asserted Objections answered 3. Our Evangelical righteousnesse is imperfect Chap. 25. 4. Covenant of Grace requires and accepts sincerity 4. Corollaries drawn 1. Necessâ—â—y of a constant standing Ministery to bring men into Covevenant with God and to bring them up to the termes of it 1. Explained 2. Asserted 1. In seven reasons evincing that such a Ministery is established 2. In reasons evincing such a Ministery to be thus established 3. Objections answered Joel 2. 28 29. Vindicated ch 26 Jer. 31. 31. c. Vindicated 2. Schooles and Nurseries of learning in order to a gifted Ministery Asserted Chap. 27. Objections answered 3. Orderly way of admission of men into a Ministerial function necessary 1. Asserted by several reasons Chap. 28. 2. Explained by distinguishing of Callings 3. Ordination defined in the parts of it explained 4. Ministers of Christ must bring their people up to the termes of the Covenant 1. Explained 2. Asserted Chap. 29. Objections answered 5. People in Covenant must come up to the termes of the Covenant Chap. 30. The Covenant of Grace is either the Old or New Covenant In which observe 1. Agreement in 6 particulars Chap. 31. 2. Differences Chap. 32. Differences 1. Real in six particulars 2. Supposed or imaginary Nine Positions premised for a right understanding of the Old Covenant Chap. 33. Differences themselves assigned Differences assigned are 1. Laying the Old Covenant too low 2. Putting too great a restrainâ— on the New I. Laying the Old Covenant too low 1. Supposing it to consist of meere carnal promises 1. Interests to which this deives Popish Socinian Antipaedobaptistical Chap. 34. 2. Contrary asserted and the spiritualty of the Old Covenant maintained 2. Supposing it to be a mixt and no pure Gospel Covenant Chap. 35. 1. Meaning enquired
and upon him when the work was done he might have been justly annihilated If merit be taken in a proper sense Adam in innocency was too low for it all his work being an homage due no profit redounding to God and the work bearing no proportion to the reward But a more superabundant measure of Grace is seen in Gods entrance into covenant with man in his fallen condition and infinitely more savor is shewn in his reconciliation then in his preservation Therefore this by way of eminency hath the honour to be stiled the covenant of Grace the other retaines the name of the covenant of Works These two bearing these denominations have their respective agreement and differences which are to be enquired into but before I reach those it is necessary that somewhat be spoken to assert a covenant of grace in Gospel-times and to give us some further light for a right understanding of it CHAP. III. A Covenant in the proper nature of it between God and fallen man asserted BEfore I proceed any further in this work one great rub that lies in the way is to be removed otherwise not only all that which I have said but also all that which I shall speak on this subject will fall to the ground and that is their objection that say that God hath not entred any covenant properly so called with fallen man He hath by way of Sovereignty laid commands upon man Of free grace hath made rich and large promises by way of legacy bequeathed life and salvation to him but hath entred no covenant properly so called as these say with him which is purposely done to avoid those conditions which are asserted in this covenant If this stand the division before laid down of a Covenant into a Covenant of Works and a Covenant of Grace necessarily falls such a division must not be suffered where any one member of the division is not If therefore there be no covenant of God with fallen man nor no such thing as the covenant of Grace there can be no such division of the covenant and all agreement or differences assigned will be between an entity and a non-entity between that which hath a reality and a meer Chimaera A covenant therefore in the proper nature of it is to be asserted and the speedâ—est way to make this good is to prove from Scripture the name and the thing that the word Covenant is there and the thing in the proper nature of it which the words hold out and all of this respective to the transactions between God and fallen man The word we finde in places without number it were a needlesse labour to give instances when every Reader is able to furnish himself with such multitudes But when this cannot be denyed the impropriety of the speech is objected It is called by the name of a Covenant as is said when in strict propriety of speech it is no covenant But to avoid this the thing it self may be as easily proved as the word and when we have nomen and nominis rationem then we have a covenant not equivocally not yet analogically but properly so called And here I may deal liberally with any adversary and undertake to make proof not only of all the essentials of such a covenant in Scripture but the usual adjuncts not onely of all that makes up the nature but all accessories usually added to the solemnity of covenants The essentials or real properties of a covenant are contained in the usual definitions which afterwards we shall see laid down from several hands all of which are in short comprised in these words A mutual consent of parties with stipulation on both sides Parties consent and mutual engagement is all that is required to the same being of a covenant when two parties agree and either of them both have their conditions to make good there is a covenant or bargaine see it exemplified in several instances given Chap. 1. All of these we finde in that one place Deut. 26. 17 18 19. in the covenant that God enters with his people Thou hast avouched the Lord this day to be thy God and to walk in his wayes and to keep his Statutes and his Commandments and his Judgements and to hearken to his voice And the Lord hath avouched thee this day to be his peculiar people as he hath promised thee and that thou shouldest keep all his Commandments And to make thee high above all Nations which he hath made in praise and in name and in honour and that thou mayest be an holy people unto the Lord thy God as he hath spoken There are the Covenanters God and his people There is consent on both parties Thou hast avouched the Lord hath avouched And there is a stipulation on both sides On Gods part To make them high above all Nations which he hath made in praise and in name and in honour On the peoples part To keep all his Commandments to be an holy people There are covenant-mercies from God to his people unto which of grace he engages himself and there are covenant-duties unto which man stands engaged Psal 103. 17 18. But the mercie of the Lord is from euerlasting to everlasting upon them that fear him and his righteousnesse unto childrens children to such as keep his Covenant and to those that remember his Commandments The usual solemnities of a covenant are also found in the transactions between God and his people as well as the essentials of it 1. Covenants used to be written for memorial for posterity and so is the covenant between God and man as in Old so in New Testament-times These things are written that you might believe and that believing you may have everlasting life John 20. 31. 2. Covenants used to be confirmed with outward visible signes as the killing of beasts Gen. 15. Jer. 34. this was done in the old administration Exod. 24. Half of the blood was sprinkled upon the Altar to denote Gods entering of Covenant vers 6. The people also were sprinkled with blood to shew their voluntary entring into covenant vers 8. And in the new dispensation a new and unheard of ratification was used the blood of the Mediatour of the Covenant Math. 26. 27 28. This Cup is my blood in the New Testament which was shed for you and for many for the remission of sins This latter is a plain allusion to the former in which you may finde 1. A threefold agreement Either of both these were covenants 2. Either of both these had their ratifications and confirmations 3. Either of both were confirmed with blood 2. A threefold difference 1. The former was the Old covenant which was antiquated This is the New 2. The former was ratified and sanctified with the blood of beasts This is ratified and sanctified in the blood of Christ 3. That blood could never take away sin Heb. 10. This was shed for many for remission of sins Thirdly covenants use to be confirmed by seal so is
250 Salvation Put for saving Ordinance p. 299 300 Schooles See Vniversity Scholar The name of Scholar is applied to man of learning justified p. 176 c. Scruple Corinthians had their scruples about their unequal marriages p. 350 They had their scruple concerning their issue upon such marriage ibid. Their scruples arose not from the Apostles words 1 Cor. 5. 9. p. 352 In all probability from Ezra 9 and 10 Chap. p. 354 The Apostle brings not formal concluding Arguments to prove the lawfulnesse of such marriage-society but removes scruples concerning their state with their issue p. 360 c. Seal Title to the seal necessarily followes from interest in the Covenant p. 422 Separation In what cases necessary p. 280 c. In what cases unwarrantable p. 283 Members of particular Church-congregations ought much rather to endeavour the reformation of abuses than to make separation p. 276 Corruption in conversation scarce admits of separation p. 283 Corruption in Discipline scarce admits of separation p. 284 Old non-Conformists thoughts about it p. 285 Master Cottens indulgence towards it p. 286 Togather Churches out of Churches in a way of separation unwarrantable p. 288 Sorrow A prae-requisite to repentance p. 137 Cautions concerning it p. 139 Sovereignty Held up of God in mans estate of grace In keeping up his Commandments p. 54 In exercise of Discipline p. 77 Spirit It s office in the work of Assurance p. 197 The immediate test of the Spirit questioned p. 198 Cautions that some have put to it overthrow it ibid. T. Tradition Distinguished p. 418 Not the bottome of infant-baptism p. 419 U. Unclean IS not Bastardy 1 Cor. 7. 14. p. 357 Universities In order to a gifted Ministry necessary p. 173 174 Reasons assigned ibid. Examples of them in Old Testament-Scriptures and Ecclesiastical Writers p. 174 175 Objections answered p. 174 175 W. Weaknesse All weaknesses not Covenant-breaches p. 294 Will-worship Infant-Baptism no will-worship p. 437 c Work Of mans salvation begins in an habit not act p. 112 Works In what manner called for in the Covenant of Grace p. 146 Wrath. Covenant-interest without coming up to the termes of the Covenant delivers not from wrath p. 315 316 A Table of those Scriptures which are occasionally cleared briefly illustrated or largely vindicated in this Treatise Genesis CHap. Verse Page 1. 28. 101. 2. 17. 9 100. 3. 17. 37. 9. 9 10. 36.  27. 237 204. 17. 1. 2.  7. 43 422.  8. 301.  9. 423  7 9 10. 422. 301 297. 23. 15 16. 3. 27. 34. 4. 48. 14. 186. Exodus 12. 48. 209. 13. 14 15. 228. 19. 25. 213. 20. 18. 213. 21. 2. 2. 24. 6 8. 12.  7 8. 206. 34. 7. 122.  30 33. 214. Leviticus 1. 4. 186. 8. 10. 187. 24. 14. 186. 25. 39 c. 405. Numbers 6. 22 23. 397. 20. 12. 78. Deuteronomy 4. 1. 216.  13. 30 2110 c. 5. 1 2. 15.  33. 216. 6. 4. 232.  24 25. 216. 7. 7 8. 343. 9. 26 27. 303. 10. 16. 228. 12. 5. 68. 24. 16. 469. 26. 17 18. 11 15 210.  18 19. 7. 29. 1 2 3 c. 230 231.  1 4. 166.  10 11. 15. 30. 6. 107 2116.  16. 216. 33. 10. 176. 34. 9. 186. 1 Samuel 8. 15. 17. 11. 12. 3. 19. 20. 174. 2 Samuel 1. ult 83. 12. 8 9. 13 84 85. 2 Kings 6. 1. 174. 2 Chronicles 34. 22. 175. Esther 6. 13. 7. Job 4. 18. 91. 5. 23. 2. 37. Psalmes 2. 8. 237. 4. 8. 7. 16. 35 c. 26.  45. 26. 24. 5. 48. 44. 17. 152. 50. 1. 15 294.  16 17. 141. 72. 11. 238. 74. 7 8. 442. 78. 8 10. 255.  34. 234.  34 c. 159. Chap. Verse Page 79. 12. 48. Psalmes 86. 9. 238. 94. 19. 7. 105. 12 13. 48. 106. 35 36. 453. 110. 3. 131. 119. 6. 159.  12. 218. Proverbes 3. 11 12. 78. 5. 12. 167. 20. 2. 217. Canticles 1. 4. 105. Isaiah 2. 3. 54. 4. 1. 25. 24. 1 2 3 c. 253 254. 26. 12. 145. 42. 6 7. 2. 53. 10 c. 14 112. 54. 5. 13. 55. 1 2. 49.  5. 238.  7. 141. 58. 6 7. 21. Jeremiah 2. 5. 193. 14. 14. 181. 22. 15. 21.  15 16. 109. 23. 13 14. 175. 27. 15. 181. 31. 31 32 33. 20. 170.  32 33. 259.  33. 2 107. 34. 12. 2.  15 16. 192.  18 c. 253. Ezekiel 13. 22. 189. 16. 20 21. 406 26. 35. 25 c. 107. 39. 23. 81.  23 24. 194. Hosea 2. 18. 3.  19. 12.  19 20. 247. 4. 14. 80. 6. 6. 172.  Joel  2. 28 29. 168 319. Amos. 3. 1 2. 224. 7. 14 15. 169. Habakkuk 3. 17 18. 135. Zephaniah 3. 2. 142. Zechariah 1. 4. 446. 13. 12. 169.  5 6. 180. Malachi 1. 11. 162. 2. 6. 179. Mathew 3. 2. 136. 4. 12 17. 136. 5. 20. 147.  48. 153 c. 8. 11 12. 305. 10. 42. 413. 11. 13. 75. 16. 5. 206. 19. 13. 186.  14. 393. 21. 23. 170.  31 32. 432. 22. 21. 437. 28. 19. 235 162.   412.   473.  20. 163. 22. 14. 239 267. 20. 16. 239. Mark 6. 5. 186.  12. 136. 11. 7. 170. 10. 14. 393. 12. 34. 114. 10. 16. 186. 9. 41. 413. Luke 7. 5 9. 441 442.  29 30. 433. 10. 16. 75. 14. 27 33. 252. 18. 16. 393. 20. 21. 170. 24. 25. 416.  25 26. 215.  44. 55. John 3. 16. 34. 5. 39. 215.  46 47. 211. 6. 44. 105. 7. 37. 128. 8. 51. 34. 10. 10. 100. Chap. Verse Page 11. 40. 12. 26. 31. 12. Acts. 2. 16. 168.  38 39. 426 c. 318.  39. 415. 3. 19. 190.  25. 412. 5. 31. 190. 7. 51 52. 466. 8. 17. 186. 10. 43. 190.  47. 460. 11. 12. 95. 13. 2. 186. 14. 23. 183. 15. 17. 128.  18. 132. 16. 14. 139. 18. 7. 441. 20. 7. 415.  21. 136 137.  29. 167. Romanes 2. 22. 439.  28. 37. 3. 1. 22.  19. 123.  20. 138.  21. 123.  21 22. 218.  31. 56. 7. 1 2. 58 59. 9. 1 2 3. 394.  6 7 8. 298 309 c.  9 10 11 12. 298.  25. 258. 10. 3. 117 214. 11. throughout 304.  1 2. c. 323.  6. 126.  28 29. 334. 1 Corinthians 2. 6. 155.  12. 198.  14. 166. 4. 7. 110. 5. 5 6. 287.  11. 449. 7. 14. 349 c. 403 464. 9. 5 6. 443.  9. 74.  13 14. 164. 10. 3. 229.  17. 415.  26. 163. 11. 28. 414.  30. 79. 12. 12. 18.  28. 184. 14. 21. 54.  34. 56 57. 15. 58. 143. 2 Corinthians 3. 12 13. 214. 6. 16. 258.  17. 140. 10. 7. 78. 13. 11. 153 154. Galatians 1. 12. 182. 2. 15. 305 306. 3. 8. 18.
him away And that it is not only a misery that must be repayredâ—y a change of Pastors but also a sin which must be reâ—â—est by the change of your lives For if your uâ—worthinesse have driven your teacher is to a corner and you sinn'd him into his grave your Repentance and Humiliation must raise another out of his ashes So great so saa so generall is this losse that I am ready to excuse my self and think it more reason then passion if in my solitary mournings and retired complaints I cry out My Father my Father the horsemen of England and the Charriot thereof To tell you of his worth in a measure proportionate to my experience would require too long a discourse from your Infant-Orator And to tell you of your losse I have said too much already which although it do not answer many of your expectations yet I hope may conduce to the affecting of you to an aâ—tention to him whose eloquence can represent your losse and whose wisedome can teach you how to make the best use of it ERRATA Pag. 1. line ult for And read In. p. 2. l. 24. a Ruler r. the Rule p. 5. l. 16. for This r. Thus. l. 17. for This r. Thus. p. 12. l. 11. for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 13. for Art r. out p. 20. l. 28. dele and wise The Authours dissent from some â— AdvertisemeÌ„â—s to the Reader concerning the present work A double request made to the Reader Dissertatio de morti Christi Cap. 1. pag. 1. Figurative acceptions of the word Covenant Requisites in a Covenant Distinctions of Covenants Mutus pactio disarum partium quâ altera alterise ecritis conditionibus obligar ad aliquid faciendum dandum aut accipiendum adhibitis signis Symbolis externis ad solennem testificationem confirmationis causa ut promissio sit inviolabilis Sic Ursinus Reasons why God deals with man in a Covenant-way The Covenant between God and Man defined God entered Covenant with man in his estate of integrity Grace is the fountain and first rise of every Covenant of God with man In the usual accessories on solemnities Arguments evincing a Covenant in the proper nature of it The outward and not the inward Covenant is properly a Covenant The outward Covenant is most usually in Scripture called by the name of Covenant Men enjoy priviledges of ordinances and interest in Sacraments upon account of the outward Covenant Posit 2. Posit 3. Posit 4. Posit 5. Posit 6. The Covenant of Grace calls for conditions from man Arguments for a conditional Covenant A grand objection against the conditionality of the Covenant of Grace answered * Antecedens falsâ â—ititur hypothesi quâ—si verbis illis formula foederis gratiae contineretur Contrà verò foedus propriè obligationâ—â— duaâ—um partium certis utrinque conditionibus complecti certum est qualem hoc loco extare probare non potest ideoque nec foedus propriè est a Testamentum Grace 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sumitur 1. Propriè pro suprema animi seu voluntatis nostrae 〈◊〉 de eo quod post mortem nostram fieri cupimus sic Testamentum morte testatoris ratum est nondum enim valet cum 〈◊〉 testator 2 Impropriè prâ— paectione 〈◊〉 foederè quod viventes inter seiuire solent b Nomen Testamenti sumi non debet iâ— proprie 〈◊〉 pro eo quod fit ab 〈…〉 sed pro foedere 〈…〉 ut bene animadvertis Pererius c Aliquid dandum est consuetudini Testamentum propriè justam voluntatis 〈◊〉 de eo quod quis post mortem de 〈◊〉 suis fieri velit Graeci propriè 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vocant d Quamviâ— enim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 si vocis eâ—ymoâ— attendas non plus sonet quà m dispositionem apud authores Graecos Baeudaeo teste in commentariis Gracae linguae significet in genere pactum conventum pollicitationem constaâ— tamen vulgarem 〈◊〉 ejus significationem esse quâ denotes idem quòd apud Latinos Testamentum id est voluntatis decretum de co quod quis post mortem suaâ—fierâ— velit e Foedus N. T. foedus est quia est mutuum inter Deum homines salutis promissae obedientiae fidei ab hominibus debitae pactum simul Testamentum est quia hoc foedus promissa filii Dei morte per eam haereditate crelesti à Deo sancitum est adeo ut non iâ—â—merio ut foedus Testamentarium Testamentum foederis ob concursum utriusque queat appellari Indè constat simpliciter quidem esse foedus ratione pacti mutui Dei fidelium sed secundùm quid esse Testamentum ratione modi partis ac potioris in foedere nempe promissionis gratiae quâ Deus nobis promittit se fore Deum nostrum propitium vitam aeternam daturum tanquam haereditaâ—em merito obedicntiae mortis Filii sui f Circumscriptionem hujus nominis ex typis atque umbraculis legis demonstrat paulò pùst ver 15. sequentibus Apostolus Cùm omnino statuit Dei gratiam eo luculentiorem heminibus explicatam esse quòd suis non foedus sed Testamentum dederit Quia foedus conditiones mutuas fuisset habiturum quas si altera pars non praestet foedus est irritum Testamentum verò liberalitatis gratiae citra ullam conditionem instrumentum est ex quo hoeredes vocantur instituuâ—tur citra contemplationem ullius officii quod ab ipsis proficisci possit g Non hoc voluit Paulus in Epistola ad Hebraeos cap. 9. ex simplici vocis significatione arguere sed ex ipsius foederis circumstantiis h Quod Lxx. Theodotio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dixerunt Symmachus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hoc est pactum vel foedus vertit quae est propria significatio Hebraicae vocis Berith Quae vox non legitur in V. Tâ— pro dispositione Testamentariâ i Foedus Dei est mutua pactio inter Deum homines quâ Deus confirmat hominibus se futurum eis propitium remissurum peccata donaturum justitiam novam Spiritum Sanctum vitam aeternam per propter Filium Mediatorem vicissim homines se obligant Deo ad fidem poenetentiam hoc est ad recepiendum verâ fide hoc tantum beneficium ad praestandam Deo veram obedientiam k Foedus est pactum Dei cum homine de foelicitate aeterna certâ conditione ci communicanda ad Dei gloriam Pactum cùm dicimus intelligimus mutuam Dei hominis obligationem ex stipulatione intervenientem ut utrimque reddatur quod promissum est Duae ergo sunt partes foederis 1. Promissio Dei de vita aeterna 2. Obligatio hominis ad observationem conditionis a Deo praescriptae Prima est libera secunda est necessaria Further obctions against the conditionality of the Covenant answered Mans fall by sin was no
disobligation to obedience a Cùm itaque homo jaceret sub maledictione ad obedientiam amplius non obligabatur quia coli ab eo Deus ampliù◠non volebat b Nam quòd coli à creature sua Deâ—â— vult favâ—râ—is est The Sovereignty of God is held up 1. In keeping up his commandments The Law hath a commanding power over beleeevers Rom. 7. 1 c. vindicated The Law bindes the whole of man * Authorities vouchsafed for the perfection of the Moral Law as a Rule a Lex ista Dei quae in Decalogo continetur est perfectissima regula ad vitam hominis dirigendam b Ut legem istam Dei eo loco habeamus quo debemus i.e. ut non aliter de eadem cogitemus quam ut de vitae nostra unica forma tanquam de illa norma quae nullum habet defectum sed perfecta est in sese perfectionem omnem à nobis requirit c Ipsa lex Christi est exactissima perfectissima regula Sanctitatis justitiae d Passim in Scripturis confirmatur quae perfectionem legis divinae mirificè extollunt e Tam perfecta est haec lex ut nihil ei in praeceptis moralibus aut à Christo aut ab Apostolis ipsius additum fuerit quoad exactionem bonorum operum normam sub novo Testamento sit adducta f Obligans omnes creaturas rationales ad perfectam obedientiam internam externam g De perfect â obedientiâ quam Lex requirit h Variis autem corruptelis omnibus temporibus olim nunc depravata est doctrina de perfect â obedientia quam Lex Dei requirit i Est praeceptio divina continens piè justeque coram Deo vivendi regulam requirens ab omni homine perfectam perpetuam obedientiam Arguments evincing the perfection of the Moral Law a Exceptions taken against the perfection of the Law b 1. Exception 2. Exception 3. Exception 4 Exception 5. Exception 6. Exception The Covenant of Works was entred into in mans state of integrity The Covenant of Grace was entered into in mans fallen condition The Covenant of Works was to mans preservation The Covenant of Grace was to mans restitution The Covenant of Works was first in time The Covenant of Grace in order of time followed after The Covenant of Works was a small time in force The Covenant of Grace is of everlasting continuance The Covenant of Works had no Mediatour Sol. Cujus enim participatione justi sunt ejus comparatione nec justi sunt Aug. ad Orosium contra Priscil cap. 10 Sol. The Covenant of grace is by a Mediatour Christ brings man into a capacity of covenanting with God Christ brings man within the verge of the Covenant 1. By his tender of it 2. By shaping the heart for it Christ brings up to the terms of the Covenant Christ crowns those that come up to the terms of the covenant Difficulties removed Faith is a duty of the moral Law The Covenant of grace not commensurate with election Conditions in the Covenant of works and the covenant of grace of Gods part seem to be the same Life promised in the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace is one and the same Death threatned in the Covenent of Works and in the Covenant of Grace is one and the same The conditions in the CovenaÌ„t of works were in mans power QuaÌ„ veluti aureo quodam fraeno pars inferior parti superiori pars superior Deo facile subjecta contineretur Bellar. De. Grat. primi hominis cap. 5. The conditions in the Covenant of Grace are not performed without special assistance Reasons Jer. 31. 33. cleared a Si filius miles acceptis à patre naturalibus ordine atque armis strenuè militaret sicque forsit an in superbia erigeretur inflatus quomodo in ipso cradicaretur superbia plantaretur humilitas Si ei ab aliquo diceretur Non glorietur omnis mile in conspectu patris sui Ex ipso enim est in militia ut qui gloriatur iâ— patre suc glorietur quid habes quod non accepisti Si autem accepisti quid gloriaris quasi non acceperis Posset enim rationaliter respondere dicendo quare non deberem de mea militia glâ—riari Accepi quidem à patre meo natural a mea quia nullus generat semetipsum accepi ordinem quia nulli conceditur infig nire semetipsum accepi arma qui a similitur caeteri militum non nascebar armatus nec sum fabor armorum debitum tamen usum istorum qui omnibus praevalet non accepi ab alio sed habeo me ex meipso crebas victorias fama celebri diâ—lugatas non accepi ab alio sed â—abeo ex mâ—ipso Pro hujusmodi igitur in me ipso merito gloriabor in alio autem nihil sic de quolibet milite Jesu Christi Necessity of the concurrence of grace Habitus infusi infunduntur ad mâ—dum acquisitorum The conditions in the Covenant of Works kept man within himself for righteousnesse The conditions in the Covenant of Grace carry a man out of himself to be righteous by anothers righteousnesse The conditions in the Covenant of works were for mans preservation in present happinesse The conditions in the Covenant of grace are for mans reparation Reasons convincing Faith to be a condition of the Covenant of grace In what sense faith is here taken Propositions tending to clear the point in hand The acceptation of Christ as a Lord doth not justifie Faith justifies as an instrument Fides percipit justificationem efficit sanctificationem a Quà m primum ergo instrumentum principali agenti non subservit instrumenti naturam a mittit Quae realâ—m evidentem mutationem extrinsecus nullam infert Transiens actio est quae revera mutationem infert A justified man is fitted for every duty to which God is pleased for to call Faith and Repentance are distinct graces and not one and the same Godly sorrow is a prerequisite to repentance Some degree of soul-shaking by the Law necessary Limits put to this doctrine of godly sorrow The essentials in repentance are 1. Privative Cessation from sinne 2. Positive A returne to God and an holy walking with him The Objection retorted Faith and repentance are our conditions not Gods Sol. Via ad regnum non causa regnandi Arguments evincing that Faith and Repentance are our conditions and not Gods in the proper conditional covenant In what manner Works are called for in the Covenant of Grace Repentance necessarily flowing from Faith is not thereby disabled from being a condition in the Covenant of Grace Perfection of degrees is not so called for of God in Covenant that upon failing it the mercies promised in Covenant are lost a Si quis dixerit baptizatos per baptisimum ipsum solius tantùm debitores fidei fieri non autem universa legis Christi
extreams the one much prejudicial to the Reader in Treatises of this nature to give us a bare skeleton of bones and sinewes leaving their Readers to clothe them with skin and flesh These serve better to help their memories that are already seen in the subject then to help those with satisfaction that are not already verst in it Memoriae mater ingenii noverca I would learned Amesius in his Medulla Theologiae Cases of Conscience and other learned Works had not affecting brevity herein been defective Sure I am the Reader might well wish that learned Camero's work De triplici foedere had by his own hand been more inlarged that he had spoken more fully where his Reader may see cause justly to close with him and given in his Reasons especially in several differences which he assigns beteewn the Old which he calls the subservient Covenant and the Covenant of Grace where many suppose they have cause to dissent from him The other extream might be the Readers benefit but would have been my burthen and that is an enlarged full discourse on every particular Divinity-head that may occur in the handling of this Subject a way which reverend Master Ball intended I have heard it from those that received it from his own mouth that his purpose was to speak on this Subject of the Covenant all that he had to say in all the whole body of Divinity a work that the whole Church might wish had not Divine providence determined otherwise that he had enjoyed life to finish That which he hath left behinde gives us a taste of it and the advantage the Church might have received by it I have thought it enough to handle each particular so as might well answer expectation in reference to the present subject To speak of Christ as a Mediatour of the Covenant and to set forth the distinct parts of his work in such mediation without handling the whole of the work and all the Offices incident to his Mediatorship To speak of his death ratifying the Covenant of grace waving the controversie of the extent of it in the intention of God or purpose of Christ It is sufficient to me to assert Faith to be a condition of the Covenant necessary to be put in by us to attain the mercies in the Covenant to speak of it so far as is here concerned without a large Treatise of the nature requisites and life of it so I may say of godly sorrow cessation from sin sincerity of obedience and the like Thirdly Those particulars relating to this subject which are most controverted and in this age disputed I have spoke to more at large to instance in some The conditions of the Covenant of Grace as well to the an sint whether there be any such conditions at all which in our times by several hands out of several Principles is denyed Or the Quae sint what these conditions be laying down rules and helps for the better discovery of them The supposed differences between the old and new Whether such that offer injurie to the Covenant under which the Fathers lived under Moses his administration or before his dayes making it a meer carnal Covenant consisting of temporal promises as the possession of the Land of Canaan and protection there or at the least a mixt Covenant and no pure Gospel-Covenant and the seals suitable Or such that put too great a limit to the Covenant in Gospel-times vesting it onely in the elect regenerate excluding all professed ones not yet regenerate not onely from Covenant-mercies but all Covenant-terms not admitting any to stand in any relation to God but those only whom his Spirit hath changed making the call of God in the largest sense convertible with Election and the seal of Baptism to be of no greater latitude unlesse by mistake mis-applied than the seal of the Spirit and determining it in the persons of the elect about which the meer congregational men and the Antipoedobaptists agreeing in the former do differ that they excluding the seed and leaving them in the same condition hope of education excepted with the Heathens In these and some others as the Reader may meet withall I have been more large in such things where all agree or where it much skills not whether we agree or differ as in what place whether on earth or heaven man had enjoyed immortality in case he had not sinned what need we to administer matter of contention our work is to make up breaches were it possible so far as it may stand with truth and not to widen them Fourthly I have not so tied up my self to the expresse immediate doctrine of the covenant but that I have occasionally drawn Corollaries or Inferences leading to other things of neer relation to and necessary dependance upon this of the Covenant I shall not need to give instance the Reader all along will meet with them such as I thought would be useful and to the judicious not ungrateful some of them practical that the whole of the Book might not be found to be Polemical ayming at least at that which the Poet so cries up Omne tulit punctum qui miscuit utile dâ—lci Fifthly For that part in which Infant-Baptisme and its grounds are particularly vindicated from Antipoedobaptists the Reader may see their arguments and corrupt glosses are examined onely as according to my method laid down I have been necessitated and so that the Covenant had not been vindicated according to my duty in case that had been neglected And here those that please to heed may see First the dependance that this Controversie about Infant-Baptisme hath on the doctrine of the Covenant that a Scripture Covenant cannot be asserted but Infant-Member-ship Infant-Baptisme in the latitude as now generally used by Pastors in their Congregations must be upheld Secondly the order in which this controversie is here carried may so much the rather invite the Reader to it seeing what is in opposite Authors laid down scatteringly without regard to any head of doctrine in the Covenant to which it doth relate here it is reduced to its proper place and carried on in that manner as an orderly Treatise and not a personal conflict following adversaries no farther than as they stand in the way to cloud the truth that is there prosecuted and though many advantages are hereby neglected that might have been taken which adversaries use to prosecute to the uttermost and these adversaries would to the height have improved yet I am very well pleased making it my businesse that my Reader may not be troubled but edified Thirdly the Scriptures that are produced and ordinarily agitated in this controversie of Infant-Baptism are not only urged but a just Analysis of the context opened the full scope and drift laid down so that it may appeare that the words are not enforced but of themselves in their native strength commend that doctrine to us that of Jerome Apol. adversus Jovinian much takes with me Commentatoris
into 2. Grounds Examined Enervated II. Putting too great a restraint on the New Covenant 1. Limitting it alone to the Regenerate 1. To which something is spoke 1. By way of concession that sundry Divines seeme to speak to that purpose 2. By way of Avoidance from their owne words 2. Contrary asserted 1. In Old Testament-times 1. By confession of the advesarie 2. By Scripture-testimony 36 2. In New Testament times 1. by New Testament Scriptures Mat. 28. 19 Mat. 22. 24 Heb. 10. 29 1 Pet. 2. 9 37 2. By Arguments of sundry sorts ch 38 3. Objections answered ch 39 4. Corollaries drawn 1. Professed Beleevers are under a Covenant of Grace and not a Covenant of Works chap. 40 2. Interest in a Church-state is of equall atiude with the Covenāt c. 41 3. Such Covenant-interest is sufficient to give accesse to and interest in particular visible Churches chap. 42 4. Dogmatical Faith entitles to Baptisme chap. 43 5. Impenitence and unbelief in professed Christians is a breach of Covenant chap. 44 Five Positions concerning particular Churches 1. Where nothing is wanting to the being of a Church yet much may be wanting for the wel-ordering 2. A people in a vicinity ought to associate themselves 3. Professing Christians upon tender ought to be received 4. Reformation of abuses is the work of Christians rather than separation 7. Rules concerning separation 5. Together Churches out of Churches unwarrantable 2. Terminating it onely in the person actually entring excluding the issue in which 1. Question stated as to Abrahams natural issue Chap. 45 2. Arguments concluding the natural issue of Abraham to be in Covenant Chap. 46 3. New-Testament Testimonies evincing it Ibid. 4. Objections from Rom. 9. 6 7 8. answered Chap. 47 5. The extent of it to the issue of Beleevers in New-Testament times 1. Asserted Chap 48 2 Proved 1. By Scripture testimonies Rom. 11. 16. Chap. 49. 50 1 Cor. 7. 14. Chap. 51 Galat. 4. 29 Chap. 52. Matth. 19. 14. Marke 10 14 Luke 18. 16. Chap. 53 2. By several arguments Chap. 54. 6. Corollary for Infant-Eaptisme Chap. 55 1. By Arguments asserted objections answered 2. The reality of connexion between the Covenant and the Seal vindicated Chap 56 3. Sin of Sacriledge upon the repulse charged Ch. 57 4. The title of all infants of professing parents asserted Chap. 58 7. Practical uses concerning parent and issue inserred Ch 60 1. All possible engagements to holinesse of life Ibid. 2. Parents must see that their childrens breeding answer their birth 3. There is great danger in opposing Gods Covenant-people 4. Consolation from this Birth-priviledge 1. In reference to Nations 2. In reference to single persons 1. Themselves 2. Their posterity The Analytical Table being chiefly intended for and suited to learned capacities the vulgar Reader may here see the whole of the following Treatise as it is digested into Chapters and these easily found by the pages opposite to them Chap. 1. AN Introduction into the whole page 1 Chap. 2. The Covenant of God entred with mankinde distinguished page 8 Chap. 3. A Covenant between God and fallen man in the proper nature of it asserted page 10 Chap. 4. The Covenant of grace is between God and man and not between God and Christ page 13 Chap. 5. The Outward and not the Inward Covenant is a Covenant properly so called page 19 Chap. 6. Six positions tending to clear the thing in question page 24 Chap. 7. The Covenant of Grace calls for conditions from man page 33 Chap. 8. A grand Objection against this Doctrine answered page 36 Chap. 9. Further Objectious against the former Doctrine answered page 48 Chap. 10. God in the dayes of the Gospel keeps up the power and authority of his Law The obligation of it is still inforce to bind the consciences of Beleevers page 53 Chap. 11. The Moral Law is a perfect rule of righteousnesse page 62 Chap. 12. The Moral Law bindes as it was delivered by the hand of Moses page 73 Chap. 13. God entring a Covenant of Grace with his people keeps up his Soveraignty in exercise of Discipline in the correction and chastisement of his people for sinne page 77 Chap. 14. 〈…〉 between the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace page 86 Chap. 15. Differences between the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace page 87 Chap. 16. A further difference between the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace page 91 Chap. 17. Works incumbent upon the Mediatour of the Covenant of Grace page 93 Chap. 18. Further differences between the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace page 99 Chap. 19. Objections against the former Doctrine answered page 113 Chap. 20. Further differences in the conditions in the Covenant of Works and the conditions in the Covenant of Grace page 115 Chap. 21. Faith is a condition of the Covenant of Grace page 118 Chap. 22. Objections against the conditionality of Faith answered page 130 Chap. 23. Repentance is a condition of the Covenant of Grace page 136 Chap. 24. Objections against the conditionality of repentance answered page 144 Chap. 25. What degree of obedience the Covenant of Grace calls for from Christians page 148 Chap. 26. The necessity of a Ministry to bring men into Covenant with God and to bring them up to the termes of it page 160 Chap. 27. Schooles and Nurseries of learning in order to a gifted Ministry necessary page 173 Chap. 28. An orderly way of admission of men into the Ministerial function necessary page 180 Chap. 29. Ministers of Christ must bring their people up to the termes of the Covenant pressing the necessity of faith and repentance page 188 Chap. 30. A people in Covenant must come up to the termes of the Covenant being engaged to God they must answer their engagements page 190 Chap. 31. The distribution of the Covenant of Grace into the Old and New Covenant with the harmony and agreement that is found between them page 202 Chap. 32. Differences assigned between the Old and New Covenant page 205 Chap. 33. Positions tending to clear the first Covenant under Old Testament-dispensations page 210 Chap. 34. The Old Covenant was not made up of meer carnal promises but contained New Govenant-promises that were spiritual and saving page 219 Chap. 35. The Old Covenant was a pure Gospel Covenant and not mixt page 224 Chap. 36. The Covenant of Grace admits Christians in Gospel-times in a state of unregeneration and is not limited in the bounds of it to the elect regenerate page 231 Chap. 37. New Testament-Scriptures asserting the latitude of the Covenant of Grace in Gospel times page 235 Chap. 38. Arguments evincing the Covenant of Grace in Gospel-times in that latitude as before is asserted page 248 Chap. 39. Objections against this latitude of the Covenant answered page 257 Chap. 40. Professed beleevers are under a Covenant of Grace and not a Covenant of Works page 262 Chap. 41. Interest in a Church-state is of equal latitude
with the Covenant page 267 Chap. 42. A man in Covenant with God and recieved into the universal Church visible needs no more to give him accesse to and interest in particular visible Churches page 270 Chap. 43. A dogmatical faith entitles to Baptisme page 289 Chap. 44. Impenitence and unbelief in professed Christians is a breach of Covenant page 294 Chap. 45. The question stated concerning the birth-priviledge of the issue of beleevers page 295 Chap. 46. Arguments concluding the natural issue of Abraham Isaac and Jacob to be taken into Covenant page 301 Chap. 47. Rom. Chap. 9. Verse 6 7 8 vindicated page 309 Chap. 48. The Covenant in New Testament times takes in parents with their children page 316 Chap. 49. Rom. 11. 16. vindicated page 323 Chap. 50. Arguments from a late hand for ingraffing into the Church invisible and breaking off from it answered page 330 Chap. 51. 1 Corinth 7. 14. vindicated page 349 Chap. 52. Galat. 4. 29. vindicated page 366 Chap. 53. Mat. 19. 14 Mark 10. 14. Luke 18. 16. vindicated page 393 Chap. 54. Reasons evincing the birth-priviledge and covenant-holinesse of Believers and their issue page 401 Chap. 55. A Corollary for Infant-Baptisme Infant-baptisme by arguments asserted page 410 Chap. 56. The reality of connexion between the Cavenant and initial seal asserted page 422 Chap. 57. The with-holding Infants of Christian parents from baptisme is the sin of Sacriledge page 437 Chap. 58. The children of all that are Christians in profession are by vertue of Covenant-interest to be recieved into the Church by baptisme page 448 Chap. 59. A defence of the former Doctrine respective to the latitude of Infant-Baptisme 468 page 458 Chap. 60. The application of the whole in several inferences page 478 A TREATISE OF THE Covenant OF WORKS AND OF THE Covenant OF GRACE CHAP. I. An Introduction into the whole I Shall not make it my businesse for an Introduction into this Work to enquire after the derivation of the word Etymologies are known to be no definitions The denomination being usually given from some adjuncts variable according to times places and not from any thing that is of the essence of that which is enquired after in which those are highest in Criticismes in giving their judgements of them can yet ordinarily go no higher then conjecture The common acception of the word in Scripture is that which will give the greatest light in finding out the nature of Scripture covenants which as most other words is variously used Sometimes is used Properly implying a covenant in deed and truth strictly so called and containing all the requisites of a Covenant in it Sometimes Tropically for that which contains some parts and adjuncts of a covenant and so carries some resemblance to and stands in some affinity with it This Tropical figurative and the native proper sense must be carefully distinguished and may by no meanes be confounded by those that will understand the true nature of a covenant and avoid those manifold mistakes into which some upon this a lone account have been carried The figurative acceptions of the word are diverse sometimes the homage required or duty covenanted for is called a covenant by way of Synechdoche seeing a covenant between a Superiour and Inferiour doth comprize it so Jerem. 34. 13. I made a Covenant with your fathers in the day that I brought them out of the Land of Egypt which Covenant is no other then the Law that he gave them Exod. 21. 2. Sometimes the promise annext is called by the name of a covenant by a like Synechdoche Gen. 17. 7. I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant to be a God unto thee and to thy seed after thee Gen. 9. 11. Sometimes the Seal is called by the name of a Covenant by way of Metonymy of the adjunct serving to ratifie and confirme a covenant Gen. 17. 10. This is my covenant which ye shall keep between me and you and thy seed after thee every man-childe among you shall be circumcised Sometimes Christ the Mediatour of the covenant is called by a like figure the covenant Isa 42. 6 7. I will give thee for a covenant of the people and light unto the Gentiles Sometimes the Lord Christs undertaking to work the graces covenanted for in the hearts of his people in the way of his power exerted in the conversion of sinners is called by the name of a covenant Jerem. 31. 33. This is the covenant that I will make with the whole house of Israel after those dayes saith the Lord I will put my law in their inward parts and write it in their hearts of which more in its own place Sometimes a covenant is taken for that peace which usually followes upon covenants Job 5. 23. Thou shalt be in league with the stones of the field and the beasts of the field shall be at peace with thee Hos 2. 18. In that day I will make a covenant for them with the beasts of the field and with the fowles of heaven and with the creeping things of the ground and I will break the bowe and the sword and the battel out of the earth and will make them to lie down safely When yet neither a Law nor a Promise nor Seal annext nor yet the Mediatour or any undertaking of his can be a covenant properly so called A Law from God with a Promise annext assented to by man is a covenant and when a Seal is added there is a condescension to our weaknesse for the more abundant ratification and confirmation of Gods stability in his Promises In our enquiry after such covenants which God in his gracious condescension is pleased to enter with man the general nature of a covenant must be held every species must partake of its Genus We must not make Gods covenant with man so farre to differ from covenants between man and man as to make it no covenant at all we must also observe that which differences it from covenants meerly humane that covenants divine and humane be not confounded together In order to which we must know that in every covenant properly so called these requisites must concur First it must not be of one alone but at least of two parties one can make no bargain or agreement Secondly there must be a mutual consent of these parties When Nahash the Ammonite offered to make a Covenant with Israel on condition that he might thrust out all their right eyes 1 Sam. 11. 2. the Israelites refusing and running the hazard of a fight rather then undergo it here was no covenant Thirdly each party must engage themselves one to another for performance of somewhat covenanted for whether debt duty or promise When Abraham agreed with the Hittites for a burial place for foure hundred Shekels Gen. 23. 15 16. There was a covenant properly so called having apparently in it all requisites of a covenant So also in
consolation An up-right-hearted man findes abundance of peace in his covenant entered with God when he prayes and seeks the greatest mercy in prayer he is able to say In thy faithfulnesse answer me and in thy righteousnesse Psal 143. 1. Paul can say that God the righteous Judge shall give him a Crown of righteousnesse 2 Tim. 4. 8. Having engaged by covenant righteousnesse ties him to make good his engagements This is Gods end in his entrance of covenant and ratification of it by oath consequently in committing it to writing and confirming it by seal That by two immuntable things in which it was impossible for God to lie we might have a strong consolation who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us Heb. 6. 18. These strong consolations were the end of God in ratifying his Covenant They are the support and Spirit reviving cordials to his people in Covenant See the result of the Psalmists meditations In the multitude of my thoughts within me thy comforts delight my soul Psalme 94. 19. I will both lay me down in peace and sleep for thou Lord only makest me dwell in safety Psalme 4. 8. The Lord is my light and my salvation whom shall I feare The Lord is the strength of my life of whom shall I be afraid Psal 27. 1. Sixthly for the greater terrour of the adversaries of his people when they see themselves engaged against them and God stands in a covenant unviolable engaged for them when they see that their work is to ruinate and destroy him that God will save Hence it is while their Rock sells them not one of them chases a thousand and two put ten thousand to flight Deut. 32. 30. Paul in bonds can make Felix tremble on his Throne Acts 24. 25. Hamans wise-men and Zeresh his wife spake words of terrour upon experiment made If Mordecai be of the seed of the Jews before whom thou hast begun to fall thou shalt not prevaile against him but shalt surely fall before him Ester 6. 13. Seventhly the Lord hereby puts a name and an honour upon his people David took it to be an honour to be related to Saul and so to become the sonne of a King much more then is it an honour to be brought into this relation to God This honour have all the Saints and they are taken into covenant for honour sake The Lord hath avouched thee this day to be his peculiar people as he hath promised thee and that thou shouldest keep all his Commandments and to make thee high above all Nations which he hath made in praise and in honour and that thou mayest be an holy people to the Lord thy God Deut. 26. 18 19. They are the portion the inheritance the children the espoused ones and whatsoever else that speaks a neer relation is theirs This was Gods way of dealing I doubt not with the Angels though we being not interested in it there is no necessity that it should be written for our learning Sure we are it was his way of dealing with man as well before his fall as presently shall be shewn as out of more abundant grace and condescension for his restitution And not mentioning for present any more then that which is essential in the covenant of God with man I suppose it may be thus held out to us A mutual compact or agreement between God and man upon just and equal termes prescribed by himself in which God promises true happinesse to man and man engages himself by promise for performance of what God requires This description here laid down comprizes the way of God in every one of his covenants with man both before and after his fall under Old and New Testament-revelations all that is essential in any covenant that he enters Equals covenanting do either of them article and indent but God condescending to a covenant man must not article but must assent and engage for performance of what is prescribed otherwise it will hear the nature of a Law but not of a Covenant It is true all men are bound upon tender from God to accept It was the sin of Jewish and heathenish people to stand out whensoever the Gospel was preached but they were no covenant-people till they gave their assent and then they were received as a covenant-people and baptized Exceptions cannot be taken against or challenge made of this definition of covenants in general nor of the covenant which God in particular entereth with man and these standing they will give us light and afford us singular help for a right understanding of the covenant of God entered with man in the several species and distinct wayes of administration of it CHAP. II. The Covenant of God entered with mankinde distinguished THere is a two-fold covenant which God out of his gracious condescension hath vouchsafed to enter with man The first immediately upon the creation of man when man yet stood right in his eye and bore his image the alone creature on earth that was in a capacity to enter covenant We have not indeed the word covenant till after man was fallen nor yet in any place of Scripture in reference to the transactions past between God and man in his state of integrity neither have we such expressions that fully and explicitely hold out a covenant to us but we finde it implied and so much expressed from whence a covenant with the conditions of it is evinced That Law with the penalty annext given to our first parents Gen. 2. 17. Of the tree of knowledge of good and evil thou shalt not â—at for in the day that thou eatest thou shalt surely die plainly implies in it a covenant entred man was in present possession of life that is according to Scripture phrase happinesse in his whole person full and compleat according to his present capacity This is to be continued aâ— is there evidently implied till sinne dispossesse him of it Till he sin he shall not die As long as he persists in his integrity his life is to be continued of which the Tree of Life as is not to be doubted was a Sacrament The second God was pleased to enter with man upon his fall which was a covenant of reconciliation the most unhappy variance between earth and heaven having intervened The former is usually called a â—ovenant of Works the latter is called a covenant of Grace though indeed the fountain and first rise of either was the free grace and favour of God For howsoever the first covenant was on condition of obedience and engaged to the reward of Works yet it was of Grace that God made any such promise of reward to any work of man when man had done all even in that estate which was commanded he was still an unprofitable servant he had done no more then duty and no emolument did thence accrew to his Maker It was enough that he was upheld and sustained of God in the work to live in him
totally cast off in Judah neither did God cast off Judah Ahaz was of the worst of Kings and yet his posterity was reckoned among the people of the Lord. Had the Jews at that time been as severe disputants against a covenant-state as are risen up now the Church of God had wanted an Hezekiah He had never lived much lesse wrought so happy a Reformation in the Church of God 2. Those that are lookt upon by men as in Covenant with God and so ordinarily judged as the people of Israel were by the Name that they bear their abode in the Church the profession that they make and so accordingly stiled are truely and really in Covenant A man may know a man to appertain to such or such a person because he sees him in his family hears him call him Master sees him sometimes at least in his work and knows him to have the repute of his servant Though to know him to be a faithful servant requires more diligence of enquiry and a stricter scrutiny So a man may be as easily known to appertaine to Jesus Christ The same Characters make him known all that is required to being in covenant is visible open evident but sincerity of heart in covenanting is invisible and secret And therefore the Jew outwardly Rom. 2. 28. is called by the Vulgar Vatablus Tremelius Arias Montanus and Castalio Judaeus in manifesto by Calvin Judaeus in aperto by Beza Judaeus in propatulo The Jew inwardly is called Judaeus in abscondito or occulto Their Church or covenant-station giving them those great advantages after mentioned was open and manifest Those that say Lord Lord as Mat. 7. 21. are of those that avouch God to be their God and God avoucheth them to be his people And therefore when they come with their sacrifices though in their sinnes and God upon that account testifies against them yet he sayes I am God even thy God It is confess'd by an eminent adversary that we must judge those that make profession to be in Covenant with God we must give them the name of Christians and men in covenant with God and we must use them as Christians in works of Charity and Ordinances and Church-communion and so must use their children as Christians children And seeing reason to judge so according to Scripture-character of men in covenant they are so Either in this we judge right or else we proceed upon mistake If we judge aright then all is well If we mistake then all in these proceedings is null Water hath been applyed to the child of such an one but no Sacrament dispens'd and according to a mans hopes thoughts or feares of his fathers regeneration are his hopes thoughts and feares of his own baptisme and consequently of his interest in Church-communion for this stands or falls according to his fathers interest or non-interest in the covenant A grand Rule is laid down by the said Authour That a serious Professour of the faith is to be taken for a true Beleever and this being laid down more are added If this Proposition were a Scripture-Maxime then it would have borne a farther superstruction but being neither found there nor any proof made that it is any way deduced thence mother and daughters may all justly be called into question and seeing he cannot but know that very many as to the thing for which it is produc'd which in order to admission to Ordinances will utterly deny it he might have dome well to have made some essay to have proved it I do yeeld that charity is to hope the best but but that we should put our charity to it or our reason either for probability or certainty when we no where so taught and have a more sure rule for our proceeding I see no reason I can scarce meet with a Minister that sayes and I have put the question to many of the most eminent that I know that he baptizeth any infant upon this ground of hope that the parent is regenerate but still with earnest vehemence professes the contrary I desire the Reader to consider Master Cobbets third and fourth Conclusions in his just Vindication page 46. 52. There is a bare external being in the Covenant of Grace saith he of persons who possibly never shall be saved Concl. 3d. The Church in dispensing â—n enjoyned initiatory seal of the Covenant of Grace loâ—keth unto visibility of interest in the Covenant to guide her in the application thereof Nor is it the saving interest of the persons in view which is her rule by which she is therein to proceed Concl. 4th Visibility of interest and saving interest are there oppos'd See also Master Hudsâ—n pag. 249. John Baptist did not in his conscience think they had all actually really and compleatly repented and reformed themselves whom he baptized but he baptized them unto repentance Matth. 3. 11. and they by receiving the same bound themselves to endeavour the practise thereof It were a sad case for Ministers if they were bound to admit none or administer the Lords Supper to none but such as were truly godly or that they judged in their conscience to be so or were bound to eject all that they judged were not so 3. Mans obligation of himself in covenant unto God upon the termes by him proposed necessarily implies Gods obligation to man Where God makes tender of the Gospel by his Ministers to any one out of covenant there he makes tender of the Covenant and where a person or people professedly accept that is engage themselves as myriads of thousands did through the Acts of the Apostles this person this people each man of them is in covenant As Scripture calls them by the name of Saints Disciples Beleevers Christians so we may call them Covenanters They have all a sanctity of separation which Camero sayes is real and arguments are drawn from thence to a right in Baptisme There is in most of them if not in all some graces that are real either common or saving and a covenant doth not wait till the termes be kept and the conditions made good before it hath the being of a covenant And whether these be every way sincere or any way dissembling yet it is acknowledged that they really oblige themselves And God howsoever dissembles not but is bound by himself upon his own terms which they profedly accept to confer all that the covenant holds forth so that wheresoever man is obliged there a compleat covenant is made up for Gods tender goes before and man is the last party and compleats the Covenant 4. Sinceriâ—y and integrity of heart or fully reality in a mans intentions to stand to the whole of a Covenant is not of the offence and being of it Both parties stand engaged upon their respective termes though one part should have unsincere intentions A wife is a wise and the marriage is compleat when both parties have publickly express'd consent though she hold a resolution to be stubborn refractory
beleeveth not shall be damned Except ye repent ye shall all likewise perish There are then conditions in this covenant Fifthly from the absurdities that will follow upon the denial of conditions on mans part in the covenant First then man is out of danger of being faulty in the covenant he can be no covenant-breaker He cannot be charged that his heart is unsteady in it This of it self is plaine He that is tyed to nothing fails in nothing he that is engaged to no servce neglects no service As God hath that glory that he keeps covenant so man hath that Priviledge that he is not in a capacity of breaking of it The Church might have spared that Apology for themselves that they had not dealt falsely in the covenant Psal 44. 17. seeing they were under no such engagement that they could falsifie or in any such capacity of being false but we finde God complaining against his People for breach of covenant Jerem. 11. 10. Isa 24. 5. Psal 78. 10 37. we finde him giving out his threats to avenge the quarrel of his covenant Levit. 26. 25. Master Baxters Questionist who seems contrarily minded thought it an exception of validity That it follows from his doctrine that the New covenant is never violated by any I am sure it follows from this doctrine that it is not in any capacity of violation Secondly then we may say as the Apostle in another case Our preaching is in vain at least to salvation vaine the Gospel in mans mouth is no power of God to salvation In faith or unbelief in a penitent or unrepentant condition in holinesse or disobedience God will save he looks neither at faith uprightnesse or any qualification when in a covenant-way he engages himselfe to conferre salvation In case God doth not regard it to what end is there any paines to work a people to it This I know some Assertours of this doctrine will disclaime but let them shew how they will avoid it CHAP. VIII A grand Objection against this doctrine answered HEre an objection of weight by reason of the difficulty of some Scripture-Texts on which it is grounded is to be taken into consideration It is true saith one that in covevenants usually there is a mutual contract and there are mutual performances to which persons are engaged thereby But for the thing it is certaine that however the words of foedus pactum in Latine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greek covenant in English be used the Hebrew Berith and the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used in the Old and New Testament do not alwayes import a mutual contract and mutual performances God is said to establish a Covenant with all living Gen. 9. 9 10. between whom and God there neither is nor can be a mutual contract and performance And the term rendred covenant is not only rendred Testament but also the holy Writers do illustrate the New covenant rather by the metaphor of a Testament then of a covenant 1 Corinth 11. 25. Gal. 3. 15. Heb. 9. 16 17. and where the Promises are set down without any reciprocal contract or duty exprest Heb. 8. 10 11 12. and 10. 16 17. Rom. 11. 26 27. This argument is against all being of covenants as well as the conditionality of them as indeed if conditions be denied all being of a covenant is destroyed and therefore it might have been well brought in where the covenant it self was asserted as militating against the very being of it But it cannot conveniently be held out in both places and therefore it must be considered here and for answer let us first take what is granted that usually in covenants there is a mutual contract and that these words Latine and Greek be used to imply such covenants in which there are mutual contracts and mutual performances and to which persons are engaged on both sides and then let us examine what is affirmed concerning those two words Berith and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the contrary And for the first who does not know that the word is sometimes used for a covenant improperly so called A bare command Jer. 34. 13. A bare Seal Gen. 17. 10. is as we have heard called a covenant And so a bare promise here in the place quoted is called a covenant likewise Not that beasts and birds can covenant but they shall be as secure from the judgement there mentioned as though there had past a mutual contract in the strongest engagements Eliphaz shewing the priviledges of the godly saith Job 5. 23. They shall be in league with the stones of the field the same word is in both places shall we now say that a league or covenant is no act of reason because man is in league and covenant with stones which are unreasonable creatures or rather shall we say with Master Caryl in his Exposition To be in League with stones is an improper and allusive speech stones are not capable of the formalities of a League So we say for God to make a covenant with unreasonable creatures with beasts birds and creeping things is an improper and allusive speech likewise Birds Beasts and creeping things are in an incapacity of covenant Gomarus handling that question of Universal Redemption in his Comment on Gal. 1. a Patron of the Lutherans as he calls him disputing for it from the form of the covenant of Grace as that Disputant stiles it Gen. 3. 17. where the seed of the woman is promised to break the Serpents head denies that those words containe the forme of a covenant because it is certain as he sayes that a Covenant properly so called containes an obligation of two parties with conditions on both sides which cannot be proved saith he in those words and therefore it is not a covenant properly so called From which learned hand we see 1. That a covenant properly so called is of two parties 2. That both parts have their conditions 3. That there is a covenant between God and man properly so called in which God and man are both obliged 4. That no Scripture-expression holds out this covenant that holds not out these conditions This is the proper acception for which we contend and improper acceptions as they do not hold forth the nature of a covenant so we confesse they do not imply mutual contracts or mutual performances So that the Argument is brought to this A covenant sometimes in an improper sense is said to be made with those that cannot make mutual contracts therefore a covenant is no mutal contract nor hath any mutual engagements We might as well argue that because a stone is called a witnesse Josh 24. 27. a heap of stones is so called Gen. 31. 48. which have neither eyes nor ears to see or hear what is done or said nor yet a tongue to utter it therefore there is no use of eyes or ears or of a tongue in any one that is brought for a witnesse As the Hebrew word Berith is improperly used
in some Old Testament Texts is used as also the Latine word Foedus in prophane Authors All of which shews no more but that the word in the exact denotation and largest sense of it imports no more then an ordination or disposition yet that hinders not but that as Interpreters generally render it so the received and accustomed use of it is to hold out a covenant bargaine or agreement As the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in its largest sense comprizes any Assembly even for civil uses Acts 19. 39. yea rude congregated routs verse 41. yet in the generally received sense it is taken for holy Assemblies So it is with Berith the word may admit of a large sense but the received sense is with more restriction The Jews had their covenants man with man Abraham with Abimelech Gen. 21. 72. Isaac with Abimelech Gen. 26. 28. Laban with Jacob Gen. 31. 44. And this was the word whereby they did expresse their covenants And as the word Church is sometimes used improperly for Church Members that make not up a whole Church The Church in Aquila and Priscilla 's house Rom. 16. 5. Sometimes for Church-officers Matth. 18. 17. Tell it to the Church who could not be the whole Church whereof infants are a part or as all must confesse women who yet are no competent judges so there are improper acceptions of the word covenant when the proper sense is that which hath been held out which is a mutual compact or agreement on terms and Propositions The learned observe that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 properly answers to the word Berith Ravanellus observes out of Hierome that Aquila and Symmachus did so translate it and Rivet on Genes Exercit. 135. saith That which the Septuagint and Theodotio call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that Symmachus translates 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pactum foedus which saith he is the proper signification of the Hebrew word Berith which word is not read in the Old Testament for the ordering of a mans Will or Testament Now it is not denyed but the word foedus and pactum in Latine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greek covenant in English do signifie mutual contracts in which there are mutual performances and so the Hebrew word Berith in like manner this being according to the learned the genuine signification of it And if this were not the received signification of it how did the Objection before mentioned ever come into any mans head that the Apostle did bewray ignorance in the Scripture-use of the word in applying it to a mans Will or Testament and what needed so much pains for his defence in it Hierome on those words Gal 3. 17. This I say that the Testament confirmed of God saith If any compare the Hebrew volumes and other Editions with the translation of the Septuagint he shall find that where Testament is written it doth not signifie a Testament but a Covenant which in the Hebrew tongue is called Berith And in case Gods whole dispensations and Gospel-communications as Junius would have it be a Testament onely and no covenant why is the world so abused with the word foedus pactum in Latine covenant in English By which all men understand that which we call a covenant no man understands a Testament why do we say covenant of Works covenant of grace if the former onely were a covenant properly and the other a Testament as though we should cal an Eagle and a Lion both by the common name of a bird perswading that a Lion were a bird as well as an Eagle yet if it were a Testament properly so called it would not overthrow the conditionality as Mr. Grayl out of Swynborn shews Testaments have their conditions How comes it to pass that Scripture holds out so frequently that similitude of a marriage Is 54. 5. Hos 2. 19. 2 Cor. 11. 2. Eph. 5. 32. to set out this transaction A marriage contract is not a mans Testament hath a wife barely a Legacie and doth she enter no covenant with her husband How comes it to passe that turning aside from God after other lovers is called in Scripture by the name of whoredomes adulteries which is the breach of a marriage-covenant and how is sin against God called a dealing falsely with God we cannot deale falsely in the covenant if it be not a covenant but a Testament men may carry themselves unthankfully but falsehood argues an engagement How is it that we finde in Old and New Testament-Scriptures mutuall engagements between God and his people of God to them of them to him in case God hath vouchsafed them a Legacie by Testament in the death of his Son and left them out of covenant And how is that without Covenant without Christ without God without Hope with the Apostle are one and the same when yet all people that have hope in Christ are out of covenant There be that say The holy Writers do illustrate the New covenant rather by the Metaphor of a Testament then a covenant These seeme to make it neither a Covenant nor a Testament Every one knows that a Metaphor is a figure whereby a word is carried out of its proper signification into some other that carries resemblance with it In case there be a metaphor in that expression then it is not proper but borrowed But as I beleeve that Abraham spake not by a Metaphor to God when he said Gen. 18. 25. Shall not the Judge of all the world do right God absolving and and condemning the sons of men giving rewards and inflicting penalties is a Judge properly so called so I do not think that God spake in any Metaphor to Abraham when in the chapter before Gen. 17. 7. he saith I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee God is a Judge of all the earth properly so called and he hath entred a covenant with his people properly so called likewise It is true that we understand that relation of God to his people more clearly by the Analogy that it bears to Judges that are set up among men for absolution of the innocent condemning of the guilty And so we are holpen in our understandings of the covenant of God entred with his people by Analogy with the covenants that are among men but in neither of both of these is the word taken out of its proper sense and applyed to any other that it will not properly bear I finde indeed an eminent Divine affirming That a covenant is not so properly said to be with God and man as between man and man not denying the duty which man owes to God nor the engagement by which he is obliged but freely yeelding both and sticking only at the consent on mans part which among men he sayes is requisite and doth mutually concur to make the covenant valid But neither in the covenant of nature or grace is this consent anteceding the validity of the covenant required in man This I confesse
I am not able to reach Nothing with me is more plain then that consent is pre-required in both these covenants Adam I confesse as it is objected was bound to consent yea I will yeeld more that it is no more possible to conceive Adam to deny consent then the Sunne to be without light seeing in his natural motion he was carried in that way of full conformity to God that the Sun may as well be dark as Adam averse from the will or tender of God yet if we could conceive a dark Sunne it could not be a light to rule the day so if we could conceive Adam denying consent to God in the tender of covenant Adam had not been in covenant For fallen man it is clear what held the Pharisees out of the New covenant but their non-consent rejecting the counsel of God against themselves Luk 7. 30. as also those Jews Act. 13. who contradicting and blaspheming judged themselves unworthy of eternal life The covenant was tendered to all those Gentile Nations and Cities where the Gospel was preached and all were bound to yeeld assent but where there was assent of faith there the covenant was entered where assent is denied there they remained strangers from the covenants of promise in the same way of Gentilisme as though the Gospel had never been tendered or the Name of Christ held forth So that these things considered I doubt not but I have made it appear That there is a mutual contract and mutual performances to which persons are engaged not only usually in covenants but in all covenants And that it is of the general nature of covenants that there should be such a convertibility as that both must if not seal some contracts are without seals yet contract or performe and where a seal is vouchsafed must accept of it and that the definition of the covenant in the general is vindicated That God hath entred a covenant properly so called with man with fallen man in which there is a contract of this nature and engagements to mutual performances God condescending to it of grace and man obliged to it by duty yet accepting voluntarily Which as the former might be confirmed by the authority of Divines of eminency Mr. Ball speaking of the covenant of God in the general entred with man saith It may be thus described A mutual compact or agreement betwixt God and man whereby God promiseth all good things specially eternal happinesse unto man upon just equal and favourable conditions and man doth promise to walk before God in all acceptable free and willing obedience expecting all good from God and happinesse in God according to his promise for the praise and glory of his great Name And Vrsin in his Catechisme page 91. defining a covenant in the general nature of it as before he saith it is A mutual agreement between God and man whereby God confirmes to man that he will be merciful forgive their sinnes give them a new righteousnesse his holy Spirit and everlasting life in and by his son the Mediatour In like manner men tie themselves to God for faith and repentance that is by a lively faith to receive this mercy alone and to yeeld true obedience to God And Lucas Trelcatius in loco de foedere thus defines it The covenant is an agreement to God with man concerning eternal happinesse to be communicated to man upon a certain condition to the glory of God And then explaining himself he says When we say an agreement we understand a mutual obligation of God and man by a stipulation intervening that what is promised on both parts may be performed And farther saith There are two parties of the covenant 1. The promise of God concerning everlasting life 2. The obligation of man for performance of the condition prescribed of God the first is free the second is necessary And in conclusion such a bottome I believe is laid in the Introduction that will bear the whole fabrick that follows after Junius and Gomarus are as opposite as may be one to the other in this dispute about the covenant as may be seen in the Appendix to the first chapter But they both agree in this that every covenant of necessity is to have mutual engagements and performances Gomarus denies that the promise Gen. 3. 15. containes the covenant of grace because no conditions are there mentioned And Junius to avoid conditions denies that there is any such thing as a covenant between God and man for if it were a covenant he sayes it must have conditions Therefore according to them both if we grant a covenant we must grant conditions and the full nature of the covenant is in no Scripture laid down where we have not these engagements or conditions laid down likewise Some think to reconcile all this by the various acception of the word Sometimes it is soused in Scripture that the free promise of God is thereby signified and the restipulation of our duty withit God requiring man to engage by covenant to that which he might require did there no promise intervene yet sometimes in Scripture covenant doth signifie the absolute promise of God without any restipulation and of this kinde is that covenant in which God promiseth to give to his elect faith and perseverance to which promise there cannot be conceived any condition to be annexed which is not comprehended in the promise it self So Learned Camero de triplici foedere Thes 1. 2. For this absolute covenant here spoke to I desire the Reader to observe what the same learned Authour hath farther in his third Thesis This distinction of the Covenant doth depend upon the distinction of the love of God for there is a love of God to the Creature from whence every thing that is good in the creature hath wholly flowed and there is the acquiescent love of God in the creature and this the creature hath received not for any thing from it self but from God as it was loved with that first love of God that love for better understanding we call Gods primary or antecedent this Gods secondary or consequent love from that we say doth depend both the paction and fulfilling of the absolute covenant from this depends the fulfilling of that covenant to which is annexed a restipulation not so the paction for that we say depends on the first love This antecedent love is wont to be called Amor benevolentiae which can be no more then a purpose or resolution in God for good to man The second is wont to be called Amor complacentiae a love of delight or content How the former can be a covenant or any covenant properly so called depend upon it as preceding the latter I do not see First this goes before the giving of Christ the gift of Christ is an effect of it Joh. 3. 16. Now God covenants not with man without the Mediator as Camero himself acknowledges and therefore this that precedes can be no covenant made
Secondly a covenant plainly argues an agreement at least in tender from one and professed acceptation from the other party A covenant of parties at a distance either party holding his distance respective to that where the distance is held is the greatest absurdity Now in this absolute covenant as it is called there is not so much as a tender from God much lesse an acceptance from man and so as yet a distance held and therefore no covenant or agreement Thirdly this supposed absolute covenant Jer. 31 33. Heb. 8. 10. hath mercies of two sorts graces priviledges And though men contend that the promise of grace is absolute seeing there is nothing pre-required of us for the writing of this Law in our hearts yet the priviledge of remission of sins hath its conditions Act. 10. 43. Act. 13. 38 39. Act. 3. 19. Fourthly none can claim any interest in or take any comfort from this absolute covenant depending on the antecedent love of God preceding the conditional covenant depending on the consequent love of God before he hath entered the second which is conditional and performed the conditions and knows that he hath performed them This is clear it is made all say with the Elect now none can claime his interest till he knows his Election which is made sure only by our saith and new obedience by the knowledge that we have of our faith and new obedience But it is enough to me that a covenant comprizing a restipulation of our duty is here confest which is the Gospel way to salvation without which the acquiescent love of God is not attained As to that Text Heb. 8. 10. the Reader may see more elsewhere CHAP. IX Further Objections against the former doctrine Answered THe covenant of grace entred with fallen man saith one is called an everlasting covenant and Heb. 8. 12. God saith I will be merciful to your iniquities and your sinnes will I remember no more Now suppose there were conditions for man to performe and man did faile in those conditions what were become of the covenant Ans The conditions failing of the covenant is broke the everlasting covenant is broke which though it seeme a contradiction to some yet it is not so to the Prophet Is 24. 5. They have transgressed the Law changed the Ordinances and broken the everlasting Covenant It is said to be everlasting because it shall not be antiquated for another to succeed it or at least that man is not to put a period to it so Circumcision and the Passeover are Ordinances for ever not that non-entring into it never break or transgresse it The Elect of God Regenerate do indeed keep covenant so do not all that enter into it There are frequent Scripture-complaints of Breach of covenant Secondly It is said Man hath no tie upon him to perform any thing whatsoever with covenant as a condition that must be observed on his part let the covenant it self be judge in this case mark it in Jeremy Ezekiel or in Heb. 8. Answ In those Texts there are graces mentioned as Gods work on the soule and priviledges promised to be enjoyed Whatsoever is there set forth as Gods work upon the soul is also required of man as duty namely to be renued in the spirit of his mind Eph. 4. 23. To make him a new heart and a new spirit Ezek. 18. 31. That the Word of Christ dwell in him richly in all wisdome Col. 3. 16. It will be hard for any to point out a promise of this nature but it may be answered with a command as an obligation unto duty As the precepts must not thrust out the promise nor duty shoulder out free grace So the promise must not destroy the precept In that of Jeremy conditions on mans part are included so as by the assistance of grace to be performed The tie lies upon us on pain of losse of all that the covenant promiseth and bearing all that-it threatneth Thirdly Suppose saith one there should be a fault of performing in this Covenant whose were the fault Answ The fault is his who is chidden in Scripture and beaten for it namely those that did flatter God with their mouth and lied unto him with their tongues whose heart was not right with him nor were sledfast in his covenant Ps 78. 36 37. They upon whom he will bring a sword to avenge the quarrel of his covenant Lev. 26. 25. are in the fault Fourthly if there be conditions then the covenant is not free gifts must be of absolute grace and bounty if a condition be required the freedome of the gift is destroyed Answ This is true of such conditions where there is merit in the condition whereby benefit accrues to him that engages by promise holding proportion with the reward But here is nothing indented by way of covenant but that homage which is naturally due which God may challenge from us as creatures without either engagement unto or exhibition of any reward at all for their paines and what he may require without reward when he covenants for it the reward is free If Abraham had made Eliezer of Damascus his heir upon his faithful service the inheritance had yet been a free gift and of grace conferr'd upon him Make the Proposition universal All conditions in promises destroy the nature of a gift in the thing promised and then it is to be denied A covenant of grace would then be a contradiction seeing it is no covenant as hath been demonstrated without a condition Then the Prophet doth contradict himself in the tender of a covenant in the most free manner as is possible Isa 55. 1 2. Ho every one that thirsteth c. even their conditions are required Incline your ear and come unto me Hear and your soul shall live Let the wicked for sake his way the unrighteous man his thoughts and let him return unto the Lord and he will have mercy upon him and unto our God for he will abundantly pardon Here are free promises with conditions Men who have not that sovereignty account their gifts free and yet require conditions from them on whom they are conferred An Alms-house is founded and endowed with revenue conditions are put upon the Almes-people to reside in such an house assigned to wear clothes of the colour and forme prescribed or whatsoever else the Founder please and yet the gift is free Finally God cannot covenant with man and keep up his sovereignty if we leave out obedience in the Articles of the covenant The covenant is upon equal termes if subjection be excluded to be a God in covenant and not require subjection is the highest of contradictions A Learned Writer after a large discourse held of the right that Redeemed ones have to the death of Christ before beleeving saith Here may be observed the mistake of those who winde up the merit of Christ as affecting God as I may so speak unto a conditional engagement viz. that we shall be made partakers of
the fruits of it upon such and such conditions to be by us fulfilled It will be worth our labour to enquire what is meant by the conditional engagement unto which he says some winde up the merit of Christ as affecting God with it doth he mean such conditions that as causes or impulsive motives take with God to enter such engagement If this be the meaning I shall freely yeeld that there is no such conditional covenant that there is no such condition in any Covenant of God with man In this sense Master Culverwell in his Treatise of Faith page 143. takes it Having mentioned several conditional promises in which faith is expressely required and such wherein it is necessarily understood he saith In all which faith is necessarily understood for the obtaining of the benefit promised But yet in all these faith is no condition properly so called moving God to promise life But taking it in this restrained sense as moving God to promise life he much mistakes himself where he saith That it confounds the Law and the Gospel taking away a chief difference between the covenant of works and the covenant of grace page 141. Seeing there was no condition thus understood in the covenant of works There was not any such good accruing to God by any thing that Adam was to do that upon it or for it God should make the promise of life God hath no motives out of himself to confer his rewards Conditions taken in such a sense will make the covenant of grace and the covenant of works all unconditional But taking the word condition in the sense as it is in ordinary use and as it properly signifies for duty in covenant indented agreed upon and assented to on performance or neglect of which the promise stands or falls it is plain that there are such conditions in both covenants equally in one as the other The necessity of the concurrence of grace to the work of faith will as soon make it no duty as no condition and many denying the one have learnt to deny either of both as well duties as conditions Mr. Culverwel therefore consesseth that faith in some sort may be called a condition because the promise of life is made to persons qualified with faith page 143. and this conditional promise well understood saith he page 141. may be born And if understood with such a restraint as the word will not suffer we confesse Christians must not acknowledge it This being premised let us look into the reasons brought to back the former assertion First All such conditions if spiritual blessings are part of the purchase of the death of Christ and if not are no way fit to be conditions of such an attainment Answ They are so parts of his purchase that they are also our act The act of man by the power of God God gives faith and gives repentance yet we beleeve and we repent we may as easily reconcile Christs purchase with the nature of a condition as Gods free gift of grace with our duty If the gift were of grace and no duty required then there were force in the argument This ridgidly followed will disingage man from all obedience to God seeing all power to obey is part of the purchase of Christ Secondly It cannot be made apparent how any such conditional stipulation can be ascribed to God Answ We finde such a one in Scripture ascribed to God no condition can in more plain terms be held our In case we cannot see how it can be it were safer to lay our hands on our mouths and acknowledge our weaknesse then to withstand so clear evidence He is pleased to give his Reasons First saith he It leaves no proper place for he merit of Christ Answ This reason I can by no means reach Christ may merit and upon what terms he pleases confer what he hath merited Duty in us excludes merit in Christ as well as conditions imposed upon uâ— See Ball on the covenant page 133. Secondly It is very improperly ascribed to God c. Stipulation or engagements upon conditions that are properly so do suppose him that makes the engagement to be altogether uncertain of the event thereof for which the authority of Lawyers is quoted If conditions among men be of such uncertainty it doth not thence follow that it is so in those conditions which God imposes on performance of which he conferres the mercies which he gives in promise If there be so much difference between moral hope and that Christian grace which is wrought by the Spirit that the one is only possible conjectural uncertain and doubtful the other assured and never failing The one often ending in shame The other never making ashamed Then there may be a like difference in the conditions assigned by man and those assigned by God Men may be still uncertain yet God may be assured the event being not left to contingency or the freedome of mans will which is supposed to stand in aequilibrio but determined by the act of grace which is not hid from him whose hand works it in the hearts of his people This might seem to carry far rather force against all conditions in the first covenant which is yet granted to be conditional which for performance was meerly suspended on mans will but hath no colour against the conditions of the second covenant which God works of grace as he requires of sovereignty One is pleased to say Surely they are wide if not very wilde who affirm that all the stipulations on the part of God upon the death of Christ are upon a condition which himself knows to be impossible for them to perform to whom they are made which among Wise men are always accounted nugatory and null And may not the like be said of exhortations promises threats commands God as well knows our disability to answer these as to fulfil conditions yet they are neither wide nor wilde that acknowledge such exhortations promises threats commands without abilities in fallen man to answer them farther then the concurrence of grace that is in Christ Jesus strengthens them There are many more Objections raised by others which the Reader may see brought in by Mr. Grayl and Mr. Woodbridge and fully answered CHAP. X. God in the dayes of the Gospel keeps up the power and authority of his Law The obligation of it is still in force to binde the consciences of beleevers THe last Position that I shall premise is That God in his entry of covenant with man in sinne doth so manifest his free grace that he still keeps up his Sovereignty so exalts mercy that he loseth nothing of his rule and authority His chief aime is to exalt the glory of his free grace and to set out the riches of his great mercy that so noble a species as that of mankinde might not for ever perish yet he quits not man of his subjection and obedience When the Angels fell some stood whether the fallen or persevering number
covenant-keeping or punishments in case of covenant-breaking The one the Lord promises The other he threatens I finde no material difference in the conditions on Gods part in these covenants Life is promised in both in case of covenant-keeping and death is threatned in both in case of covenant-breaking Some indeed have endeavoured to finde a great difference in the life promised in the covenant of works and the life that is promised in the covenant of grace as also in the death that is threatned in the one and the other and thereupon move many and indeed inextricable difficulties What life man should have enjoyed in case Adam had not fallen And what death man should have died in case Christ had not been promised From which two endlessely more by way of consectary may be drawn by those that want neither wit nor leisure to debate them In which the best way of satisfaction and avoidance of such puzling mazes is to enquire what Scripture means by Life which is the good in the covenant promised and what by Death which is the evil threatned Now for the first Life containes all whatsoever that conduces to true happinesse to make man blessed in soul and body All good that Christ purchases and heaven enjoys is comprised under it in Gospel-expressions I am come that they might have life and that they may have it more abundantly John 10. 10. He that hath the Son hath life and he that hath not the Sonne hath not life 1 John 5. 12. On the contrary under Death is comprised all that is injurious to man or mankinde that tends to his misery in soul and body The damnation of Hell being called death the uttermost of evils being the separation of soul and body from God John 8. 51. 1 John 3. 14. Sinne which leads to it and is the cause of it is called death in like manner Ephes 2. 1. And the separation of soul from the body being called death sicknesses plagues are so called in like manner Exâ—d 10. 17. Now happinesse being promised to man in covenant only indefinitely under that notion of life without limit to this or that way of happinesse in this or that place God is still at liberty so that he make man happy where or how he pleaseth to continue happinesse to him and is not tied up in his engagement either for earth or heaven And therefore though learned Camero in his Treatise de triplici foedere Thes 9. with others makes this difference between the covenant of works and the covenant of grace In the covenant of Works which he calls nature life was promised and a most blessed life but an animal life in Paradise in the covenant of Grace a life in Heaven and spiritual And Master Baxter in his Aphoris of Justification page 5. saith that this life premised was only the continuance of that state that Adam was then in Paradise is the opinion of most Divines Yet with submission to better judgements I see not grounds for it seeing Scripture no way determines the way and kinde of this happinesse promised and in case that we take liberty to say that when long life is promised upon earth in many texts of Scripture that the promise is made good though it faile on earth in case it be supplied in heaven life being the marrow of the promise much more then is it made good when it is indefinitely promised without limit to a man whil'st on earth in case it be made good by his translation into heaven And indeed there are strong probabilities heaven being set out by the name of Paradise in Christs speech to the thief on the crosse and in Pauls vision in that rapture 2 Cor. 12. if we may make such a supposition of mans standing now he is fallen that he should not have continued a life of immortality on earth but have been translated into heaven He had that blessing from God as other living creatures to be fruitfull and multiply Gen. 1. 28. and how the world could have contained all those individuals at once which to eternity man should propagate cannot be imagined And to conceive that an end in time should be put to propagation when an animal life in the use of the creature should be continued is scarce consistent with reason But a thousand of these God can expedite when we are at a stand He promised life and he could have made it good and we see he limited not himself where or how to conferre it And what I have said of life promised the same I say of death threatned in case man upon sinne be brought into a state of misery Justice is done and the threat takes hold where and howsoever this misery be suffered whether it had been in sorrows and horrours on earth in separation of the soul first for torments and the body to follow or in a speedy dispatch of soul and body to hell Gods way of execution after the sinne committed on those that are not by Christ ransomed does not argue that the penalty in the covenant necessitated him to it might not he at once have poured out the whole of his vengeance on vessels of wrath when yet we know that he takes time for the execution of it A Learned Writer enquiring into this death that was here threatned saith that the same damnation that followed the breach of the second covenant it could not be When I suppose it rather should be said that in substance and kind it can be no other Infidels that were never under any other covenant then that of works and covenant-breaking Christians are in the same condemnation there is not two hells but one and the same for those that know not God and those that obey not the Gospel of Christ 2 Thes 1. 8. Neither is there any Limbus or distinct place for infants in original sinne and out of the covenant of grace Neither can I assent to that speech To say that Adam should have gone quick to hell if Christ had not been promised or sinne pardoned is to contradict the Scriptures that makes death temporal the wages of sinne It were I confesse to presume above Scripture but I cannot see it a contradiction of Scripture A burning Feaver a Consumption Leprosie Pestilence c. are in Scripture made the wages of sinne yet many go to hell and misse those diseases And if it be said Scripture so makes death the wages of sin that all must suffer it I answer Those Scriptures are all of them leges post latae appointed of God as his way upon mans fall neither absolute justice nor yet the penalty threatned necessitating him to that way of proceeding He takes the same way where his justice hath already satisfaction Those that are priviledged from death as the wages of sinne thus die God tied not up his own hands as States do their Judges and ministerial officers to one way of execution and this his way with the unbeleeving is voluntary and
know not their Election it is not as yet made sure by them So that as to us it is without any determinate object None can say my interest is in this Promise These were delivered to the whole body of Israel when not one in many did reap the benefit of them Mr. Baxter therefore makes them Prophecies De eventu Prophecies of what shall happen I suppose they may be fitly called the declaration or indication of Gods work in the conditions to which he engages and of the necessary concurrence of the power of his grace in that which he requires As Austin and others have interpreted that which is affirmed of our Saviour That he is the true light which enlightneth every man that comes into the world John 1. 9. not to be so understood that all in the world are enlightned by him for many are in darknesse but that all that are enlightned have light by his light explaining it with this similitude Such a Schoolmaster teacheth all the children in a Town that is all that are taught he teacheth Some go to no School at all so these Promises I will circumcise your heart and the heart of your seed All of their seed that are circumcised in heart he circumcises and so in all the other none of all these are done without his special work This was little heeded by the generality of the people of the Jews if they minded duty it was well they little thought of assistance through grace Tugging it out by their own strength and looking for no more from heaven than that which they had in hand Therefore entring Covenant and walking in their own strength they brake Covenant and were never able to rise to the duties of it as is hinted in that of Jeremy Therefore God promises a new covenant in which there shall be a full discovery and right understanding of the meaning of the Covenant I will write my Law in their hearts I will put it into their inward parts So that as the commandment of love was a new commandment so this covenant was a new covenant both given of old both a new cleared for a right understanding There was nothing wrong saith Mr. Dixon in the former Covenant but it was imperfect and all things in it were not expressed clearly Annot. on Heb. 8. 7. That which was chiefly defective as it seems was this here mentioned and therefore Mr. Baxter sayes well that this place doth comprize but part of the covenant not the whole though he be taken up by another for it in these words God saying expressely this is my Covenant to say it is not is not to interpret the Word but to deny it God sayes to the People of Israel Is not this the fast that I have chosen to loose the bands of wickednesse to undo every burden If any one should interpret that Text would he say the whole of a Religious Fast is there exprest and a full definition of a Fast laid down or would he instead of interpreting deny that Scripture So also that of James Jam. 1. 26. Pure religion and undefiled before God the Father is this To visit the fatherlesse and the widow and to keep a man unspotted of the world Will any say that the whole of Religion is set out in that Scripture or will he be put to it to deny the Scripture I suppose he would rather say that that which those Jews to whom Isay speaks did in use to do Religious Fasts with supply of that which Isay calls for in which they were defective makes up a Religious Fast compleat That which the scattered Tribes did in Religion with what James further calls for would render a man entirely Religious So also that of Jeremy 22. 15 16. Shalt thou reigne because thou closest thy self in Cedar Did not thy father eat and drink and do justice and judgment and then it was well with him He judged the cause of the poor and needy and then it was well with him was not this to know me saith the Lord Will any say that that was all the knowledge that Josiah had of God or will he say rather that this was an evident proof of the sincerity of it so I say that which the Jews already understood to be in the covenant together with that which those places of Jeremy and the Hebrews further hold forth set out the entire nature of a covenant and so in all of them Scripture is interpreted not denied And whereas one affirmes that there is no condition on mans part in those texts in question an adversary of all conditions on mans part in the covenant replyes If you mean such conditions that God requireth of us yet worketh in us it is there punctually exprest As Gods work it is there indeed exprest but not as our duty which lame understanding of the covenant hath wrought as much mischief in our age setting up free grace without any eye upon his sovereignty looking at Gods work and not at all on mans duty as their looking at duty in that age without eye had to the power of grace to enable for it Hence are those desperate counsels Sit still do nothing doing undoes you and that not toward Dilemma Art thou out of Christ thou mayst break thy heart in working and profit nothing Art thou in Christ then all is wrought to thy hands And so doing still is vain and Mr. Baxters Questionists like demands How can you make it appear that according to the new Covenant we must act for life and not only from life or that a man may make his attaining of life the end of his work and not rather obey it out of thankfulness and love To which I suppose he hath received a satisfying and if throughly weighed a sadning answer Appendix p. 78. 79 c. Fifthly This appears in that differencing work which is seen among men here in the flesh There is a great difference between those that are of God and those that are in the world that lies in wickednesse This is from the power of grace enabling to answer to that unto which God in covenant calls and not from the different improvement of any power of man or the exercise of that freedome of will which together with the whole species of mankind he hath received The Apostle puts the question Who hath made thee to differ 1 Cor. 4. 7. In which he intends to stop all mouths from boasting as appears in the next words If any therefore shall answer in Grevenchovius his words as I have seen them quoted or in any words that hold out or inferre the same thing I make my self to differ The Apostle will not sit down by it He expressely tells us It is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that sheweth mercy Rom 9. 16. If grace makes the difference and not man then grace enables man to go higher than his own power and to go higher than any power that can
onely begotten Son that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life Mark 16. 16. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved but he that beleeveth not shall be damned Acts 10. 43. To him give all the Prophets witnesse that thorough his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sinnes Acts 13. 38 39. Be it known unto you therefore men and brethren that through this man is preached unto you forgivenesse of sinnes And by him all that beleeve are justified from all things from which ye could not be justified by the Law of Moses Acts 16. 31. Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved and thy whole house Rom. 3. 25. Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood Rom. 10. 4. Christ is the end of the Law for righteousness to every one that believeth In all these texts and several others faith is required of men in covenant and if men did not engage to beleeve they could not be so much as professed covenanters This is in reason further evident 1. That which gives us interest in the Mediator of the covenant without which we have no title to him or portion in him is a condition of the covenant This is plain of it self without interest in the Mediator of the covenant we are as though no covenant were entred and the former distance held up But it is faith that gives us interest in Christ the Mediatour He dwells in us by faith Ephes 3. 17. He is set forth a propitiation through Faith in his blood They that believe receive him John 1. 12. Others hold a distance from him To as many as received him to them he gave power to be the sonnes of God even to those that beleeve in his Name 2. That which receives all that grace gives must needs be a condition of the covenant of grace This is as plain to be under a covenant of grace and void of the gifts of grace is a vain entrance upon it and the reception of the gift is a condition necessarily requisite But Faith receives all that grace gives It is of Fath that it might be of grace Rom. 4. 16. God gives nothing at least tending to eternity but he puts it into the hands of Christ He is the Fathers treasury and store-house Col. 1. 19. It pleased the Father that in him all fulnesse should dwell And that of his fulnesse we should all receive Joh. 1. 16. And faith receives al from him He that believeth out of his belly flowes rivers of living water Joh. 7. 38. 3. That which interest us in and gives title to all priviledges of a people in covenant with God through Christ is a condition of the covenant This is plaine the end of the covenant being to conferre those priviledges upon us But Faith interests us in and gives title to all these priviledges Paul is sent to the Gentiles to turne them from Satan to God to bring them out of Satans kingdome and to bring them in a covenant-way into Christs Kingdome That they may receive forgivenesse of sins and an inheritance among them that are sanctified saith Christ by faith that is in me Christ is the object of a Christians faith on whom it is terminated Faith which is in Christ receives that leading priviledg forgivenesse of sins without this priviledge we are strangers to all other priviledges Being under sinne we are heires of wrath and in no capacity of mercy Faith interests us in this Acts 10. 43. To him give all the Prophets witnesse that through his Name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins Acts 13. 39. And by him all that beleeve are justified from all things from which ye could not be justified by the Law of Moses Rom. 3. 25. Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood to declare his righteousnesse for the remission of sinnes that are past through the forbearance of God Faith interests us in the consummating priviledge an inheritance among them that are sanctified He that believeth hath everlasting life John 6. 40. Faith interests us in all intermediate priviledges which a man in covenant can enjoy in the way to this inheritance Adoption of sonnes is this way obtained John 1. 12. Gal. 3. 26. Pacification of Spirit Serenity and tranquility of minde Isa 26. 3. Rom. 5. 1. Boldnesse at the throne of grace Ephes 3. 12. There is no priviledge bottomed on Christ that hath foundation in him but Faith receives Faith then must be a condition of the covenant 4. That which puts into a capacity to receive the mercies of the covenant held forth in Promise is a condition of the covenant and the want of it strips off all hope and expectation of it But Faith puts into a capacity to receive all the graces of the covenant given in promise Said I not unto thee if thou wilt beleeve thou shalt see the glory of God John 11. 40. God exerts and glorifies his power in great things for good unto those that exercise the grace of Faith Paul saw the Creeple had faith to be healed Acts 14. 9. Sure if there be such a thing as a condition in any covenant in the world any such thing as a conditional covenant then sure faith is a condition of the covenant of grace Some conceive an absolute covenant made of God for grace as Jer. 31. 33. This with me is very disputable and I have given my reasons But the covenant made to grace must needs suppose grace There is no covenant for happinesse made with any creature but upon termes and conditions For further clearing of this point we must know that faith is considered under a double notion First as an instrument or if that word will not be allowed as the way of our interest in Christ and priviledges by Christ Secondly as an inherent grace or Christian duty to which both the Law and the Gospel call The radical grace from which others flow though not in their being yet in their farther growth and encrease I speak of Faith now in the first acception Neither as a part or any way a working cause of the farther progresse in inherent righteousnesse so it will come in the second place but as interesting us in another righteousnesse and so I say it is a condition in the covenant of grace immediately serviceable for our returne to God and reconciliation in Christ For clearring of which I shall clear it in some propositions First God will by no means justifie a wicked person no man in sin shall stand and live in his sight He that hath made a Law to forbid it ordained hell for the punishment of it will not justifie the person that is convinced and found guilty of it Some say it is against his essence The justice of God which is God ties him to take vengeance sure I am it is against his declaration of himself
Exod. 34. 7. when he sets out his name in several particulars this is one by no means clearing the guilty Some indeed have said conceiting with themselves thereby to promote free grace that God justifies sinners as sinners which as it must needs if true bring in the salvation of all à quatenus ad omne valet argumentum then a man need no more but sinne to conclude his salvation and the more sinne the stronger evidence so it is utterly destructive to the Gospel and overthrows the whole work of Christs merit as the Apostle saith If righteousnesse be by the Law then Christ is dead in vaine Galatians 2. 21. So we may safely say If a man be justified as a sinner without a righteousnesse So that the truth is God justifies as righteous what he esteems as an abomination in man that he doth not himself but this in man is an abomination to him He that justifieth the wicked and condemneth the just even they both are an abomination to the Lord Proverbs 17. 15. Secondly Man hath no righteousnesse of his owne to bring in plea for his justification in which he can appeare before God in judgment This will be plaine if we consider the wayes of acquital where proceedings are just and legal This must be either as innocent when a man can plead not guilty to that which is given in charge So did David when Cush the Benjamite did traduce him Psalm 7. 3. If I have done this if there be iniquity in my hands And so did Paul to the charge of Tertullus Acts 24. 13. Upon this account Pilate was willing to have acquitted Christ I finde no fault in this man Luke 23. 4. Or else by way of satisfaction or discharge of the penalty which the Law imposeth so in all penal Lawes when the penalty is borne the delinquent is discharged Man cannot be acquitted as innocent his guilt is too palpable There is no men that sinneth nâ—t saith Solomon 1 Kings 8. 4 6. The Scripture hath concluded all under sinne Gal. 3. 22. The Law speaks that language that every mouth may be stopped and all the world may become guilty before God Rom. 3. 19. Man is under that guilt that he is wholly silenced which renders the way of salvation by works impossible Neither can he be acquitted by way of satisfaction where the way of pure justice is held the debtor under charge can never come out till he hath paid the uttermost farthing Mat. 5. 26. Which here amounts to such an heighth that man may be ever paying but never able to satisfie Our guilt is according to the majesty of him whose Law is transgressed and wrath incurred This is seen in Devils and damned souls who bear in their own persons the reward due to their sinnes That man that must suffer it in his own person may well say with Cain My punishment is greater then I can bear Gen. 4. 13. Thirdly Man in this sad and perplexed estate hath yet a righteousnesse of grace tendered him a righteousnesse without the Law but witnessed by the Law and the Prophets Rom. 3. 21. And this is by way of discharge of his guilt by anothers suffering Our name was in the Obligation in case of sinne to suffer death Christ was pleased by consent and covenant with the Father to put in his and as he was thus obliged so he suffered the just for the unjust that he might bring us to God 1 Pet. 3. 18. We brake the Law and he bore the penalty whether idem or tantundem the same in specie or the same in value is scarce worth dispute So that it be yeelded that justice was answered and the Father satisfied and that we come out not on our own but our sureties account And this as I yet conceive is by Christs passive obedience His suffering in the flesh is our freedom his death is our ransome There needs no more than innocency not to die and when guilt is taken away we stand as innocent no crime then can be charged upon us But to reign in life as the Apostle speaks to inherit a crown there is farther expected which we not reaching Christs active obedience imputed to us not adding to ours but being in it self compleat is accounted ours and we are discharged And whereas some say Object that being freed from death upon that very account we reigne in life and therefore in case his sufferings deliver us from death they necessarily confer upon us life there is not nor can there be conceived any medium between them I answer Answ It is true of our natural life and death A man not dead is alive But taking death in Scripture-sense for the wages of sin which comprizes as we have heard all misery and life for an immarcessible crown of glory there may be a medium conceived between them and is not onely conceived but assigned by Papists in their Limbus infantum Neither will it serve to say that Christs active obedience served onely for a qualification to fit him for the work of suffering none but innocent man free from sin could be a sacrifice for sinne seeing Christ had been innocent though he had never come under the Law to have yeelded that obedience His person had not been as ours under the Law unlesse of his own accord he had been made under the Law Gal. 4. 4. Somewhat might be said for the subjection of the humane nature in Christ the manhood of Christ which was a creature but the person of Christ God-man seemes to be above subjection Much may be said for the subjection of the Sonne of David so considered he may say with David I am thy servant and the sonne of thy handmaid but not so of the Lord of David had he not for our sakes made himself a servant We know the mortality of the humane nature yet Christ had never died unlesse he had made himself obedient unto death neither needed he to have served unlesse he had humbled himself Phil. 2. to take upon him the forme of a servant See the confession of Faith agreed upon by the Assembly of Divines chap. 8. sect 5. and Dr. Featlies speeches upon it Fourthly This righteousnesse of Christ whether passive or active or both passive and active is made ours by faith This is our way of interest and appropriation of it to our selves Faith and no other grace this grace and no other Gospel-work gives us title and therefore as it is called the righteousnesse of God so also the righteousnesse of faith These two are promiscuously used and taken for one another Rom. 10. 3 4. Phil 3. 8. Called the righteousnesse of God being the free gift of God wrought by Christ who is God denied to be our own righteousnesse being neither wrought by us or inherent in us called the righteousnesse of faith not of works not of love not of patience or meekness It is alone faith and none of these graces that puts out it selfe to receive it
Spirit This conviction unto change is hardly without compunction remorse and terrours in the soul It was not the single case of the Corinthians but common with other Christians as the natural work of godly sorrow that it worketh repentance not to be repented of 2 Cor. 7. 10. I will not stand to diâ—â—â—â— whether any ever are exempted from this preparatory work I question not Gods prerogative I am upon enquiry after his usual method I know some instance in Matthew who being called suddenly followed Christ and we heare nothing of any work upon his spirit to trouble But who knows whether Matthew a Jew were not called by grace before this call to an Apostleship and if not in grace whether it necessarily followed in that instant The like is objected of Lydia The Lord opened her heart that she attended to the things that were spoken of Paul Acts 16. 14. without any sorrow or trouble in spirit is mentioned Neither is there mention of any joy or rejoycing in spirit and she by many is believed also to have been a Proselyte Yet this of godly sorrow must be understood with some limit 1. An equal degree of sorrow and preparative work is not necessary in all One mans terrours and heart-breakings are no necessary precedent for all others to reach 2. An high degree is not necessarily required of any God can come sooner in with Gospel-cordials after Law-convictions unto one than another 3. No man hath reason to quarrel his conversion because his sorrow hath not been like some others each man hath not like paine in cure of a like malady 4. None should beg of God overwhelming and amazing shakings and humiliations of Spirit God better knows their frame than they understand themselves 5. None can judge of the truth of their repentance by the greatnesse of their trouble It may possibly end in horrour and work nothing better than it self It may only have its present work to cast hell in the face and then the person returne to his old byasse to his sinful pleasures his worldly advantages as Saul to his Musick Cain to his building of Cities yet when God thus plowes it is a hopeful signe he intends sowing and men in this case must not reason themselves to be such soyle on whom no good can be done as though they were past all husbandry of the Lord He can take away a heart of stone and turne a rock into a fruitful field This is Gods method do not dispute but believe 6. Then it is in a degree sufficient when it effects the work for which it serves when it brings the soul out of love with sin takes it out of the paths of sinne when it so works to an apprehension of dangers that it works the soul to cast it self on Christ Jesus When horrours work desires not of ease but of grace of Christ and of whole Christ of pardon of sin and power against sin there is a true work For the essential parts of this grace which I make a Gospel-engagement and condition of the covenant they are privative or positive Privative is the destruction of what hath been Positive is the introduction of what is not Every change hath two termes The one is terminus ad quem which is endeavoured The other is terminus à quo which is left and so in this change which grace works and to which the covenant of grace doth engage The privative part which we are to leave is sin the work of Satan The positive part which we are to endeavour is that which stands in full opposition Forsaking of sin we must follow after righteousnesse and turning from Satan we must turne to God and therefore the Ministery which findes men out of covenant and works them into it is to bring them from darknesse to light from the power of Satan to God Acts 26. 18. The privative part is frequently enjoyned as that which bindes at all times and to all times A man in covenant with God is to have no more to do with sin Cease to do evil put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes Isa 1. 16. Be ye separate touch no unclean thing 2 Cor. 6. 17. Mortifie therefore your members which are upon the earth fornication uncleannesse inordinate affection evil concupiscence and covetousnesse which is idolatry for which things sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience In the which ye also walked sometimes when ye lived in them But now you also put off all these anger wrath malice blasphemy filthy communication out of your mouth lie not one to another seeing ye have put off the old man with his deeds Col. 3. 5 6 7 8 9. Old things with Christians are to be done away This is the duty of all those that pretend to Christ Let every one that nameth the Name of Christ depart from iniquity 2 Tim. 2. 19. All that is in Christ is wholly against it His Prophetick office leads us from it and gives us light to avoid it In his Kingly office his Law is against it and his Priestly office is to redeem from it They that are in Christ and learn him as the truth is in Christ Jesus attaine to it Ephes 4. 22. That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts It is the character of a man in Christ Gal. 5. 24. They that are Christs have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts And this upon peril of bearing their sinne Ezek. 18. 30 31. Repent and turne your selves from all your transgressions so iniquity shall not be your ruine Cast away from you all your transgressions whereby you have transgressed and make you a new heart and a new spirit for why will ye die O house of Israel No man in sinne is for glory 1 Cor. 6. 9. Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God The works of the flesh are manifest which are these adultery fornication uncleannesse lasciviousnesse idolatry witchcraft hatred varience emulation wrath strife seditions heresies envyings murders drunkennesse revellings and such like of the which I tell you before as I have also told you in time past that they which do such things shall not inherit the Kingdome of God Gal. 5. 19 20 21. Upon these termes it is that they obtaine pardon of sinne Isa 55. 7. Let the wicked forsake his way and the unrighteous man his thoughts and let him returne unto the Lord and he will have mercy upon him and to our God for he will abundantly pardon Grace is no where more freely tendred than there Ho every one that thirsteth come ye to the waters and he that hath no money come ye buy and eat yea come buy wine and milk without money and without price Wherefore do ye spend money for that which is not bread and your labour for that which satisfieth not hearken diligently unto me and eat you that
they are our conditions They are conditions on our part and therefore they cannot be Gods That they are ours is made known of God as by the beame of the Sun in his Word And I shall not stand to distinguish of an absolute and conditional covenant that so making the whole in the absolute covenant to be Gods and in the conditional covenant this part to be ours which I know not whether exactly understood the Scripture will beare but in plaine terms deny that they are Gods conditions and affirm them to be ours I know what God speaks in his Word concerning these works That he will write his Law in our hearts and put it into our inward parts That he will take away the heart of stone and give an heart of flesh which implies this work of which we speak I know likewise what in particular is affirmed of Christ that he is the authour and finisher of our faith Heb. 12. 2. that he gives repentance Acts 5. 31. that God grants to the Gentiles repentance to life Acts 11. 18. And I have not forgot what I have said before of the concurrence of grace in the performance of every Gospel-work Yet all this rises not up hither to make them formally Gods act not ours Whose acts they be his conditions they are this is evident But they are our acts We beleeve We repent It is not God that believes It is not God that repents That is an absurdity which Arminians have laboured to charge upon us to render that which we hold of the necessity of the concurrence of grace in these works odious But it is that which the Orthodox party have still disclaimed The Apostle calls upon the Philippians Phil. 2. 12. To work out their own salvation the work is their own as the salvation They are a Beleevers own act and not barely a spontaneous act on which he is carried as a Bird in preparing a nest for her young and Bees in preparing honey for their subsistence in which Phylosophy tells us that they aime at no end but they are voluntary actions of choice done out of choice aiming at salvation as his end The mercy in the Covenant being on these termes tendred With the heart man beleeveth unto righteousnesse Rom. 10. 10. The just lives by his faith Hab. 2. 4. They to turne to the Lord with all their heart Joel 2. 13. They obey from the heart the form of Doctrine whereunto they are delivered Rom. 6. 17. They do the will of God from the heart Ephes 6. 6. Faith and Repentance are mans work which man in covenant does respective to salvation in the covenant tendered Object not Gods But the Apostle some may say in the next words tells us that it is God that works the will and the deed vers 13. There he seems to take them from us and ascribe the formality of them to God In this co-operation of God whether they be formally our works or Gods let Esay determine Isa 26. 12. Thou hast wrought all our works in us When God hath wrought it the work is ours we have the reward of it and we shall beare our sinne in case it be neglected and let the Apostle explaine himselfe Ephes 2. 10. We are his workmanship created in Christ Jesus unto good works which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them God hath ordained good works as a Christians way and walk They are charged upon man as is plain in the context in order to salvation They are the way that we hold in our passage on to that salvation which God of grace vouchsafes and we are Gods workmanship created in Christ Jesus for these ends Our dexterity in holy duties is from the frame into which grace put us So still the work is ours though power for action is vouchsafed of God And the conditions are ours for discharge of which we have yet divine assistance That faith and repentance are our conditions and not Gods take these arguments 1. Those conditions that are not mentioned in the proper conditional covenant as from God but required of God from us are not Gods conditions but ours in that Covenant This is cleare Being there expresly required of us and not so much as mentioned as from God they cannot be his engagement but ours to performe But Faith and Repentance are not mentioned as from God in the proper conditional covenant but required of God from us Therefore Faith and Repentance are not Gods conditions in the proper conditionall Covenant but ours 2. The conditions of a covenant are his that performeth and not his that imposeth This proposition is cleare in reason and confessed by the adversary But we perform and God imposeth Faith and Repentance They are therefore our conditions and not Gods in this covenant 3. Covenant-conditions are theirs that are charg'd with falshood in case of failing in them and non-performance of them This is plaine in all covenants To make conditions and to faile in them is to be false to them But in case of failing in Faith and Repentance man is charged and not God God fails not but man deals falsly Therefore they are mans conditions and not Gods 4. Covenant-conditions are theirs who upon failing in them and not performance of them suffer as covenant-breakers This is clear Israel covenanted to dismisse their Hebrew servants and dismissed them not and Israel suffered for it Jer. 34. But upon failing in Faith and Repentance God suffers not so much as in his Name as a covenant-breaker He is not charged with mens unbelief and impenitence Men themselves suffer Therefore Faith and Repentance are mans conditions not Gods 2. There are objections peculiarly against repentance as it comprises the whole frame of obedience Object as before held forth to disable it from being any Gospel-condition By this means the covenant of Grace will be say some a covenant of works Repentance in this latitude to which we have spoken containes the whole of obedience and being made a condition of the Covenant of Grace Works are introduced and a Covenant of Works re-established As there was grace in the first covenant Answ as you have heard which we call a covenant of Works So works are not wholly excluded from this covenant which we call a covenant of Grace God still keeps up his Sovereignty as you have heard and how this can be done when he leaves man at that wilde freedome not so much as to call for homage from him cannot be conceived his rule even in this covenant is to reward men according to their works Behold I come quickly and my reward it with me to give every man according as his work shall be Rev. 22. 12. Works then are not excluded from this covenant yea Christ the Mediatour of the covenant aforehand tells us Except our righteousnesse exceed the righteousnesse of the Scribes and Pharisees ye shall in no case enter into the Kingdome of heaven Matth. 5.
20. They had their righteousnesse and as was supposed they made a great progresse in the way of righteousnesse yet we must have an exceeding righteousnesse above that which they taught and practised or else there is no salvation in this covenant These two covenants notwithstanding remaine distinct and not confounded together There is a legal righteousnesse such as the Law in the highest extremity of it requires without the least indulgence in case of failing This the covenant of Works calls for and in this we fall short but Christ answers and therefore He is the end of the Law for righteousnesse Rom. 10. 3. and by this we are saved There is a righteousnesse of the Gospel which God in covenant calls for to which it is his Spirit enables and in this we are saved 2. Gospel-obedience is called for in the Covenant but not as any condition of the Covenant Faith is the alone condition obedience necessarily flows from it and follows upon it when once we believe it need not to be conditioned or indented for seeing when we are in Christ by faith we can then do no other than obey I answer This position here laid down that obedience necessarily follows and flows from Faith is a position indeed maintained by the reformed Churches against Papists Arminians Socinians and other opposites of it from which position of ours they inferre as by necessary consequence that all commands requiring obedience are then needlesse and all exhortations reproofs motives and promises to no purpose None either commands or perswades the Heavens to move the Sunne to give light the Fire to give heat or the water to give moisture That which necessarily works is let alone to work and to take its course in working And this Objection taking away this Gospel-condition on this ground is of the same stamp Obedience necessarily flowing from Faith includes Gospel-commands exhortations reproofs as well as Gospel-conditions If God need not to condition and engage for obedience from Beleevers because they thus necessarily obey then he needs not give commands or presse obedience for the same reason when yet the Gospel is full of exhortations commands menaces promises with application to Beleevers to men professing Faith to men in Christ by Faith For satisfaction then of this Popish-Arminian objection we must distinguish of consequents which necessarily flow from their principles Some are natural which of themselves have their effects as those in the objection mentioned Here is neither command imposed condition required nor promise held forth They are not in any capacity of acting or working otherwise than they do Others are moral who work not by way of Physical necessity but are kept in their way by the power of grace upholding which does not exclude but necessarily takes in mans endeavour in the use of meanes to yeeld obedience and to hold on in all patience and perseverance This argument followed home will be of equal force against Faith as a condition as against sincerity seeing Gods Elect shall beleeve as they that beleeve shall yeeld obedience There is a like necessity of faith flowing from election as there is of obedience to flow from Faith as Faith therefore so obedience either of both in their places are covenant-conditions CHAP. XXV What degree of obedience the Covenant of grace calls for from Christians HEre is seasonably moved and is not without some difficulty answered what degree of obedience this new covenant calls for from us that so we may endeavor it and understand our selves when we have by grace attained to it that having entred covenant with God we may not be found of those that have wickedly departed and dealt falsely in the covenant In this there are several opinions which are to come under examination First some say that it is required of Christians in an exact way in a full perfection as of parts so of degrees answering to the perfection of the Law as written in the heart and given on Mount Sinai And so required that obedience in a more low degree will not be accepted or the mercies promised in the covenant obtained which doctrine of theirs rigidly followed stands as that two edged sword Gen. 3. 24. keeping the way of the tree of Life and making the way to salvation unpassable Thus the Councel of Trent If any man shall say that by Baptisme men are obliged to Faith only and not to the observation of the whole Law let him be accursed which Chemnitius in his Examen confesses in a qualified sense might be admitted seeing persons baptised owe subjection but not in the sense which that Canon holds forth being an allusion to that of the Apostle Gal. 5. 3. I testifie again to every man that is circumcised that he is a debtor of the whole Law By which Glosse Baptisme makes Christ of none effect as well as Circumcision as it was taken in the sense of those false Teachers among the Galatians viz. as a leading ceremony of the Law binding to the observation of the whole And so also Bellar. lib. 1. de Baptis cap. 15. Baptisme doth not make us debtors to Faith only but to keep the whole Law and there explaines himself that to deny a man to be a debtor to keep the whole Law may be taken two wayes either so as that to do things against the Law were no sinne as though the Law were abrogated This he confesses Protestants do not say and in that he saith there is no controversie or else so that justification or salvation doth not depend on the fulfilling of the Law but only on the mercy of God by faith applied this he makes the Protestants errour and so brings in justification by the Law and utterly confounds the covenant of works and grace together onely I confesse the businesse seemes much mollified by the explanations that they give of those words fulfilling of the Law First curtelling the Law in taking off the first fomes and motions of actual sinne yea even all that goes before consent of will making it no sinne at all as also multitudes of actions some of them foule enough as not within this verge such which they call by the name of venial sinnes which are besides the Law but not against it bending as some merrily speak but not breaking the Commandments though they would never give us a catalogue of sins mortal or venial nor any certaine mark or character whereby they might be distinguished All these are pared off as no breaches of the Law nor in their own nature deserving the sentence of eternal death and the temporal punishments due to them after death is holpen out by their Indulgences Secondly so helping themselves out with distinctions at least some among them that keeping the Law with them is no other than the grace of sanctification in the very sense as the Orthodox hold it forth He that pleases may read what Jansenius hath chap. 81. of his Harmony Opposing Luther for his denial that
the first and great Commandment in the Law in this life can be fulfilled and charging it with blasphemy Luther having Austins authority in several places as Jansenius confesses for to second him affirming with him that this Commandment in this life cannot be perfected or fulfilled but it is to be fulfilled in the life to come giving his reason As long as there is any thing of carnal concupiscence to be restrained God is not with the whole heart loved The good Bishop knows how by distinction to salve Austin and maintaine his doctrine to be good divinity and denying Luther that favour to leave him under the brand of blasphemy so that the result of all with him is this God is then loved with the whole heart when any one out of inward and sincere affection to God is principally exercised in those things which are of God studying above all things to please him and carefully to observe not one but all his Commandments and that not slothfully and against heart but diligently and cheerfully grieving from the heart if any thing by others or himself through infirmity of the flesh be admitted contrary to the will of God So that some might think all controversie in this point may cease and that the difference between us were no more than a strife of words seeing we do not only confesse that this ought to be done but also urge a necessity of doing of it and they say the Law is fulfilled when it is done But here 1. Much wrong is done to the Law as though it were a rule of our strength not of our duty that it answered and might be applied to each mans impaired strength and weakened abilities or that the Gospel-grace of godly sorrow for sin against the Law were the keeping of the Law making repentance a satisfactory discharge for disobedience When these men cannot bring up mans nature to the streight line of the Law they bring down the Law to the crooked nature of man 2. It is injurious to man puffing him up with conceit of answering the Law setting him up as high as he should be laid low ready to say with the young man in the Gospel All these have I kept from my youth when holding out the Law in its just latitude as it was happily brought home to the Apostles conscience sin would revive and he would see himselfe in a lost condition A second opinion is that the covenant of grace requires perfection in the exactest way without help of these mens distinctions in an equal degree with the covenant of works but with this difference In the covenant of works there is no indulgence or dispensation in case of failing but the penalty takes hold the curse follows upon it But the covenant of grace though it call for perfection such is the exactnesse of it yet it accepts of sincerity such is the qualification of it through grace or the mercy in it If I should take up any opinion in the world for the Authours sake or those that have appeared as Patrons of it then I should embrace this The reverence deservedly due to him that I suppose first manisted himself in it hath caused it to finde great entertainment but upon more than twenty yeares thoughts about it I finde it labouring under manifold inconveniences 1. It establishes the former opinion opposed by Protestants and but now refuted as to the obedience and the degree called for in covenant And if I should be indulgent to my affections to cause my judgement to stoop Dislike of the one would make me as averse from it as an opinion of the other would make me prone to receive it Judgement therefore must lead and affections be waved 2. If this opinion stand then God accepts of Covenant-breakers of those that deale falsely in it whereas Scripture charges it only upon the wicked upon those of whom God complaines as rebellious Deut. 29. 25. Josh 7. 15. Jeremy 11. 10. Jeremy 22. 8 9. Yea it may be charged on the best the most holy in the world lying under the guilt of it according to this tenent 3. Then it will follow that as none can say that they have so answered the commands of the Law that they have never failed they have not if put to answer in the greatest rigour once transgressed so neither can they with the Church make appeale to God That they have not dealt falsely in the Covenant nor wickedly departed from their God Psal 44. 17. Every sinne according to this opinion being a breach of it and a dealing falsely in it 4. Then that great promise of mercy from everlasting to everlasting upon them that fear him and his righteousnesse unto childrens children to such as keep his Covenant and to those that remember his Commandments to do them Psalme 103. 17 18. only appertaines to those that so keep the Law that they sinne not at all against it 5. Then our Baptism-vow is never to sin against God and as often as we renew our covenant we do not only humble our selves that we have sinned but we afresh binde our selves never more to admit the least infirmity and so live and die in the breach of it 6. Then the distinction between those that entered covenant and broke it as Jerem. 31 32 33. and those that have the Law written in their hearts and put into their inward parts to observe it falls all standing equally guilty of the breach of it no help of grace being of power to enable to keep Covenant Each of these five last arguments are replyed to by a distinction of the precept and conditions of the Covenant Men that are sincere break the precept as is said but not the conditions But I know no precepts in covenants which are not conditions Faith and Repentance are Precepts and I think the alone Precepts and I know not neither do I heare of any other Conditions 7. Then it follows that Sincerity is never called for as a duty or required as a grace but only dispensed with as a failing indulged as a want It is not so much a Christians honour or character as his blemish or failing rather his defect than praise But we finde the contrary in Noah Job Asa Hezekiah Zachary and Elizabeth Nathaniel an Israelite indeed that entered covenant and kept covenant Sincerity is a degree towards perfection in obedience and if the command looks no lower than perfection in degree the imperfect degree is not commanded though it be indulged And therefore I conclude that as in the Law there was pure justice as well in the command given as the penalty threatened without any condescension or indulgence So in the covenant there is mercy and condescension as well in the condition required as in the acceptance through grace The Covenant requires no more than it accepts The alone Argument Object so farre as ever I could learn that hath brought some of reverend esteeme heretofore into this opinion is That if
the covenant requires not exact perfection in the same height as the Law calls for it then a Christian may fall short of the Law in his obedience and not sin perfection being not call'd for from him nor any more called for from him than through grace he doth performe he rises as high as his rule and so sins not through any imperfection therefore to make it out that a beleevers imperfections are his sins it must needs be that the covenant requires perfection as to make good that he may be saved in his imperfections it must be maintained that it accepts sincerity But this argument is not of weight Christ entering a Gospel-covenant with man findes him under the command of the Law which command the Law still holds the Gospel being a confirmation not a destruction of it All imperfection then is a sinne upon that account that it is a transgression of the Law though being done against heart and laboured against it is no breach of covenant We are under the Law as men we are taken into covenant as Christians Retaining the humane nature the Law still commands us though the covenant in Christ through the abundant grace of it upon the termes that it requires and accepts frees us from the sentence of it Here is objected What shall we think of those Texts in the New Testament which require us to be perfect 2 Cor. 13. 11. James 1. 4. Yea perfect as God is perfect Matth. 5. 48. reproving weaknesse and infirmity and commanding a going on to perfection Answ We are to think of them as Protestant Dâ—vines ordinarily do in their commenting upon them We deny saith Rivet that the perfection of which Scripture speaks either when it commands us to be perfect or gives testimony of perfection or integrity to some consists in a freedome from sinne Exercit. 52. in Genes pag. 267. The Text quoted out of James serves well to explaine the rest Let patience have her perfect work that ye may be perfect and entire wanting nothing whence we may argue 1. That perfection which Christians may attaine is the perfection that the Apostle calls unto This is plaine in the text He calls for perfection that we may be perfect But Christians can reach no further a degree in perfection than sincerity Therefore the Apostle calls onely to sincerity 2. That is the Apostles meaning where he speaks of perfection that himself gives in as his meaning This is cleare he is the best interpreter of himself But he expresses himselfe by perfect there to mean entire or lacking nothing A perfection of entirenesse or integrality then he meanes a perfection of parts and not of degrees For that text of Paul 2 Cor. 13. 11. Finally brethren farewell be perfect c. let us compare with it that which he testifies of some in Corinth 1 Cor. 2. 6. Howbeit we speak wisdome among them that are perfect that is those that have a right and more full understanding of Gospel mysteries put in opposition to the weaknesse of novices which perfection is according to the Apostle the way to unity of judgement As for the Text Mat. 5. 48. Be ye therefore perfect as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect If it be streined to the highest it calls for a divine increated perfection our adversaries then must yeeld that there is a sicut similitudinis non aequalitatis in that place And if the context be consulted we shall finde that it is opposed to that half hypocritical-righteousnesse which was found in Scribes and Pharisees which all must exceed that enter into the Kingdome of heaven In Heb. 6. 1. a novice-like imperfection in knowledge is reproved and a further growth towards perfection is called for It is further objected If perfection were not the duty of a Christian and unperfectnesse and infirmity his sinne why doth the Apostle groane and grieve under the remainder of his natural infirmities and presse on to perfection Rom. 7. 14. to the 24. Phil. 3. 12 14 The conclusion here is granted The one is a duty the other is a sinne and because of failing in the one and the burden of the other the Apostle groanes Foreseeing that this would be yeelded him there is added by way of objection Or is such unperfectnesse a sinne onely in reference to the rule of the Law and not the rule of the Gospel or that the Law doth but the Gospel doth not call for perfection Answ There is not one rule of the Law as I have demonstrated at large and another of the Gospel seeing the Gospel establishes the Law Onely the Gospel-covenant calls for those sincere desires which grace works to conform us in our measure of the rule of the Law There is yet a third opinion which I may well doubt whether I understand but so farre as I do understand I am as farre from assent to it as either of the former and that is of those who do not only assert a personal inherent righteousnesse as well as imputed against the Antinomians But also affirm that this righteousnesse is compleat and perfect which if it were meant onely of the perfection of the subject as opposed to hypocrisie dissimulation or doublenesse implying that they do not only pretend for God but are really for him that they do not turne to him feignedly as Israel was sometimes charged Jerem. 3. 10. but with an upright heart or of the perfection or entirenesse of the object respecting not one or only some but all commandments which is called a perfection of parts we might readily assent to it The covenant calls for such perfection Gen. 17. 1. Walk before me and be thou perfect and many have their witnesse in Scripture that they have attained to it as Noah Gen. 7. 9. Job Job 1. 1. Hezekiah Esay 38. 3. But a perfection above these is maintained a perfection compleat and full Righteousnesse signifies as is said a conformity to the Rule and a conformity with a quatenus or an imperfect rectitude is not a true conformity or rectitude at all imperfect righteousnesse is not righteousnesse but unrighteousnesse It is a contradiction in adjecto though holinesse be acknowledged to be imperfect in all respects where perfection is expected in reference to the degree that it should obtaine or the degree which it shall obtaine or in reference to the excellent object about which it is exercised or in reference to the old covenant or the directive and in some sense the preceptive part of the new Covenant in all these respects it is imperfect and righteousnesse materially considered is holinesse and therefore thus imperfect but formally considered it is perfect righteousnesse or none this not in relation to the old rule but the new Covenant Upon this account they are charged to discover grosse ignorance that use and understand the word righteous and righteousnesse as they relate to the old rule as if the godly were called righteous besides their imputed righteousnesse only
because their sanctification and good works have some imperfect agreement with the Law of Works This and much more to assert a personal perfect inherent righteousnesse as is said all which as it is here held out to me is new and I must confesse my self in ignorance all over I never took imperfect righteousnesse to imply any such contradiction no more than imperfect holinesse Isaiah I am sure saith All our righteousnesse are as filthy rags Esay 64. 6. No greater charge of imperfection can lie against the most imperfect holinesse than the Prophet lays upon our righteousnesse Neither do I understand how holinesse should be imperfect taken materially and righteousnesse perfect taken formally in reference to a rule We may for ought I know as well make holinesse formal and refer it to a rule and righteousnesse material in an absolute consideration without reference to any rule at all And in such consideration I do not know how there can be perfection or imperfection either in holinesse or righteousnesse it is as they come up to or fall short of the rule that they have the denomination of perfection or imperfection Pauls Gospel-frame whether you will call it righteousnesse or holinesse is set out Rom. 7. full of imperfection yet all this as in reference to the rule as it answered or fell short in conformity to it verse 22. I delight in the Law of God after the inward man And whereas a charge of ignorance is laid even upon learned Teachers that commonly understand the word righteousnesse and righteous as it referres to the old rule I professe my self to have little of their learning but I am wholly theirs in this ignorance I know no other rule but the old rule the rule of the Moral Law that is with me a rule a perfect rule and the only rule The perfection of this holiness and righteousness in mans integrity stood in the perfect conformity to this Law and the reparation of this in our regenerate estate in which the Apostle places the image of God must have reference as to God for a patterne so to his Law as a rule As an image carrying an imperfect resemblance of its samplar is an image So conformity imperfectly answering the rule is conformity likewise A perfection of sufficiency to attaine the end I willingly grant God condescending through rich grace to crown weak obedience in this sense our imperfection hath its perfectnesse otherwise I must say that our inherent righteousnesse is an imperfect righteousnesse in an imperfect conformity to the rule of righteousnesse and without thir reference to the rule there is neither perfection nor imperfection in any action See Doctor Davenant disputing against justification by inherent righteousnesse upon the account of the imperfection of it de justitia habituali pag. 349 and how fully he was perswaded of the imperfection of this righteousnesse appears in sentences prefixt before two Treatises as may be seen in the margent In the last place I shall conclude that sincerity in the way and work of God which Scripture also calls by the name of truth integrity simplicity uprightnesse perfectnesse an heart in the work of God whole and unfeigned is that which the covenant of grace doth require and that which it accepteth This God in covenant gives in charge and this he rewards and crownes The Law stands as a rule and the charge in it is the highest top of perfection without the least indulgence in any case of failing suitable to the abilities that once were put into our hands God in Gospel-condescensions will have this rule eyed with a single and upright heart universally eyed and observed both in our returnes from sin and in our application to God in new obedience This doing of the will of God from the heart with good will-doing service Eph. 6. 6 7. Serving with a willing minde 1 Chron. 28. 9. This preparing the heart to seek the Lord God of our fathers Ezra 7. 10. This delight in the Law of God in the inward man Rom. 7. 22. though it be in much weaknesse and with strength that is little Rev. 3. 8. by reason of inward corruptions Rom. 7. 23. Gal. 5. 17. enemies without Ephes 6. 12. is required of God in covenant and through grace accepted And as faith which as we have heard is the other new covenant-condition brings us into communion with God So this of a sincere heart and walk holds in communion Faith gives accesse to God in grace and through sincerity we walk with God in grace to glory Both of them are called for of God both accepted with God and both of them crowned with glory That in this degree obedience is both required and accepted in the Gospel is evident This where oever it is God observes and eyes 2 Chron. 16. 9. For the eyes of the Lord runne to and fro throughout the whole earth to shew himself strong in the behalf of them whose heart is perfect towards him Herein thou hast done foolishly therefore from henceforth thou shalt have warres These have letters testimonial from heaven Job 1. 8. Hast thou not considered my servant Job that there is none like him in the earth a perfect and an upright man one that feareth God and escheweth evil Gen. 7. 1. Thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation According to the degree of this higher or lower they have praise 2 Chron. 29. 34. The Levites were more upright in heart to sanctifie themselves than the Priests yea where there is integrity in a single act this God notes Yea I know that thou didst this in the integrity of thine heart Gen. 20. 6. These God protects with his omnipotence preserves 2 Chron. 16. 9. The eyes of the Lord runne to and fro throughout the whole earth to shew himself strong in the behalf of them whose heart is perfect towards him He is a buckler to them that walk uprightly Prov. 2. 7. In these God takes pleasure I know my God that thou triest the reines and hast pleasure in uprightnesse 1 Chron. 29. 17. Unto these God speaks peace Do not my words do good to him that walketh uprightly Mich. 2. 7. This the people of God plead with God as an argument to finde favour in his eyes Psalme 26. 1. Judge me O Lord for I have walked in my integrity 1 Chron. 29. 17. As for me in the uprightnesse of my heart I have willingly offered those things Psalme 18. 23. I was also upright before him c. This hath been the high ambition of the servants of God in their most sad troubles to reach David begging mercy saith to God Behold thou desirest truth in the inward parts Psal 51. 6. This hath upheld the souls of the Saints in their greatest difficulties with all joy and consolation 2 Cor. 1. 12. For our rejoycing is this the testimony of our conscience that in simpliciâ—y and godly sincerity not with fleshly wisdome but by the grace of God we
so large in returning praise for the Colossians Giving thanks unto the Father who hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the Saints in light Col. 1. 12. As alone the blood of Christ sets free from hell so alone the Spirit of Christ makes fit for heaven This is done by a double work 1. Of regeneration or first implantation of grace which is called the birth of the Spirit John 3. 5 6. 2. By acting improving carrying on this work of grace which is properly sanctification so that when the Spirit is gone thus farre here is a certainty of the object It is sure nothing more sure than this that a regenerate sanctified man shall be saved But here is more required for a certainty of the subject Here is certitudo de re but more is required to attaine certitudinem de se If Peter do beleeve and repent he shall be saved is out of controversie But that Peter doth beleeve and repent is not alwayes so soone discovered And this is the Spirits work as the former It is not my businesse now to hold out what is the Spirits whole office in concluding our Assurance but to shew that the conditions of the covenant are the bottom ground not of salvation but of our evidence of interest in salvation We must know that we do beleeve and repent before we have assurance and we must first beleeve and repent before we know that we beleeve and repent If before faith and repentance there can be no salvation then before we know we beleeve and repent we cannot be assured of salvation But without faith and repentance there is no salvation Mark 16. 16. He that beleeveth and is baptized shall be saved but he that beleeveth not shall be damned Luke 13. 3. 5. I tell you may but except ye repent ye shall all likewise perish Therefore before we beleeve and repent we cannot be assured of salvation And how assurance can be gained without a practical syllogisme and how a syllogisme can be framed with any other medium than the conditions of the covenant is above my understanding Man is so far from abilities to conclude salvation without faith and repentance that be must conclude himself to be in faith and that he doth repent before he can conclude any interest in it The covenant of God is the ground of our salvation if that be waved all is lost and we must make good our part in the Covenant Grace must assist to answer what the covenant requires or no salvation How is it a covenant if nothing be required and why is it required if it must not be performed To gather up assurance from the conditions of the covenant is a businesse of greater consequence even the highest pitch of Christianity It is a great work to beleeve and repent a greater work to know that we savingly beleeve and repent The work it selfe is difficult no businesse of a lazy soul but to know that the work is aright done is a greater difficulty but that it must be gathered from the conditions is easie to resolve I know some finding the seal of the Spirit and the witnesse of the Spirit mentioned in Scripture in order to assurance will have the whole of the work of Assurance to be carryed on alone by the Spirit and that all is done in us without us They expect a secret whisper from God that we are Gods and no more This witnesse they say must be heeded and our faith and repentance in the work not at all regarded But I would know of those if the Spirit be a seale whether the soul doth not bear the impresse and what this impresse is but the graces of the Spirit The Seale sealing and the impresse made fully answer one the other Sometimes it may dimmely answer where the wax or clay or whatsoever is sealed takes not a full impression but if it answer not it is no Seale The graces that the Spirit works are its impresse and these are the conditions of the covenant and so instead of an objection we have a proofe For the witnesse of the Spirit I desire to know whether it be a single witnesse giving testimony to us without us or a witnesse concurring with our spirits The Text is cleare Rom. 8. 16. The Spirit it self beareth witnesse with our spirits that we are the children of God Our spirits bearing witnesse are our consciences Rom. 2. 5. Their consciences also bearing them witnesse and therefore Master Baxter rightly affirmes That the testimony of the Spirit and the testimony of our consciences are two concurrent testimonies or causes to produce one and the same effect But every conscience cannot witnesse thus with the Spirit or joyne in a concurrent testimony It is the witnesse of a good conscience 1 Pet. 3. 21. Baptism saves saith the Apostle by the resurrection of Christ Explaining himself not the putting away the filth of the flesh not the bare outward act of administration which is worthily set out by the most undervaluing termes when it is put in opposition to the inward work but the answer of a good conscience towards God Baptisme is a seal of the covenant and it engages to what the covenant requires which as we have been still catechized is to beleeve in God and to forsake our sins and when conscience answers that this is done Baptisme is a seale that Christ saves The seale of the Spirit is an impresse of those graces and the witnesse of the Spirit is a clearingup of these graces and giving in testimony to the truth of them opening our eyes to read the characters which it selfe hath made 1 Corinth 2. 12. We have not received the spirit of the world but the Spirit which is of God that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God So that in vaine do men talk of the Spirit that have not on their own hearts the impresse of it or of the witnesse of the Spirit when a renewed conscience cannot concurre in testimony that these engagements are answered in faith and repentance let that Text of the Apostle be considered 1 John 3. 24. He that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him and he in him and hereby we know that he abideth in us by the Spirit which he hath given us I know there are some that admit of all this and freely yeeld that this is a safe way to conclude Assurance from Sanctification Confessing that the Spirit never witnesseth with an unsanctified heart yet they contend for a farther and immediate teste of the Spirit without any consideration had of inherent graces wrought or any reflection made by the the soule upon it selfe in review of any gracious qualifications Yet here they confesse danger and limit this doctrine of theirs with diverse cautions as I have met with some from an eminent hand in a manuscript 1. This is extraordinary as they say very seldome seene or known it is no common way of
conclude our Assurance of happinesse but the determination of that being thus put is easie No man in true grace shall go to hell or misse of heaven God doth not adorne man with that glory to reject him The Apostle exhorts to love not in word nor in tongue but in deed and in truth and for a motive adds Hereby we know that we are of the truth and shall assure our hearts before him 1 Joh. 3. 18 19. But the minimum quod sic when it is that grace may be accounted true is not so easie to determine It is not every faintish desire that is the work on which all this glory rests It must be a work of farther power and efficacy on the soul for satisfaction of which I shall referre the Reader to the learned labours of my much honoured neighbour Master Anthony Burgesse in his spiritual refining CHAP. XXXI The distribution of the Covenant of Grace into the Old and New Covenant with the harmony and agreement that is found between them BY Gods assistance we have been thus farre carried on in the work in hand to finde out the nature of a covenant and Gods way of entring covenant with man And for the more clear discovery of both we have held forth the agreement which is found between the covenant of Works which God entred with man in his state of integrity and the covenant of Grace entred of God with man in his fallen condition as also their respective differences So that all that is essential in this covenant and necessarily required to the attainment of the priviledges and mercies promised in it hath been made known and a compleat definition given with such corolaries and inferences that have been judged necessary Now this covenant thus entred with man in his lapsed estate and hitherto cleared admits of distinction and is distinguished in Scripture by the names of the Old and New Covenant Heb. 8. 13. The first and second covenant Heb. 8. 7. The first some call and not unfitly a covenant of Promise under that covenant Christ was known in promises only and not manifested in the flesh Others call it a subservient covenant being to lead in the second in its full lustre and glory which alone they call a covenant of Grace and make it a third covenant But I shall content my self with the Scripture-termes calling the first Old not because it was first in being but because it is to be abolished and another to succeed the later New because it is never to be antiquated as the Apostle Heb. 8. 13. explains himself Now it must needs contribute much to the clear understanding of the covenant as well of the termes of it as the mercies in it and be a great advantage for the better understanding of sundry both Old and New Testament-Scripture in case the agreement between this Old and New covenant together with their true differences be rightly assigned and those imaginary differences assigned by some erroneous on either hand to the great prejudice of either of the covenants be throughly examined A work of difficulty but were it well followed of singular profit On this by the help of Gods grace I shall adventure and in the first place lay down their agreement afterwards their respective true and real differences and then proceed to examination of such differences which some have assigned which I reserve to the last place seeing in the two first I shall be brief The last will be found a businesse full of tedious difficulty and trouble In several things there is a full agreement between these covenants 1. In the Authour propounding God is the Authour of them both God is the God not of the Jews only who were in the first covenant but of the Gentiles also taken through grace into the second covenant Rom. 3. 29. 2. In the party accepting as specifically considered they are both entred with man Neither Angels nor any other creature articles or is articled with in it and hitherto there is an agreement of both with the covenant of works 3. In the motive or impulsive cause Both of these are of singular grace entred with fallen man in his lost condition there was no hint of this grace before the fall nor any need or use of it being not for mans preservation but his restitution 4. In the Mediatour Christ Jesus who was one and the same in both For though Moses have the name of Mediatour Gal. 3 19. Receiving the lively oracles and giving them to the people Acts 17. 38. as the Judges in Israel had the name of Saviours Nehem. 9. 27. and thereupon Camero makes this difference between the Old and the New covenant That Moses was Mediatour in one Christ in the other Thes 68. yet he confesses that that mediation by the benefit whereof men are truly and effectually united to God belongs only unto Christ De trip foedere Thes Moses work was only to deliver the way of the worship of God in those times and that not in his own name but as a servant Heb. 3. 5. He that Moses did serve of whom he wrote Joh. 5. 46. that Prophet like unto Moses whom God promised to raise Deut. 18. 15. in all ages was Mediatour 5. They agree in the conditions annext Both these covenants have one and the same conditions on Gods part Remission of sins and everlasting happinesse as after shall be shewed more fully They are the same on mans part Faith and Repentance The just then did live by faith Heb. 2. 4. And without faith it was then impossible to please God Heb. 11. 6. Acts 10. 43. To him give all the Prophets witnesse that through his name whosoever beleeveth in him shall receive remission of sins God then called for returne to himself and sincerity in our returnes accepting those that were sincere Ezek. 18. 31. The eyes of the Lord run to and fro through the whole earth to shew himself strong in the behalf of those whose hearts are perfect before him 2 Chron 26. 9. 6. They agree in the unity of Church-felloship constituting one and the same Church of Christ The Church in those dayes in which the Fathers lived is one and the same Church with this in Gospel-times In Gospel-times men come from the East and West and sit down with Abraham Isaac and Jacob in the Kingdome of heaven Matth. 8. 11. One and the same Kingdome receives both Their Faith was terminated upon Christ as well as ours Abraham saw his day and rejoyced John 8. 56. Moses bore his reproach and esteemed it greater then the treasures in Egypt Heb. 11. 26. They did eat the same spiritual meat and did drink the same spiritual drink they drank of the Rock that followed them and the Rock was Christ 1 Cor. 10. 3. The same not among themselves but the same with us They are saved by the same free grace and mercy as we Jews by nature are justified by the same faith in Jesus as
confirmed at large but that others have fully done it and I know not that there is any adversary that appears in it The name of a covenant is frequently given to it Deut. 4. 13. He declared unto you the covenant which he commanded you to performe even ten Commandments See 2 Kings 18. 12. 2 Chron. 6. 11. All the essentials of a covenant before mentioned Parties Consent Conditions are found in it as we may see in that one Text Deut. 26. 17 18. Thou hast avouched the Lord this day to be thy God to walk in his wayes and the Lord hath avouched thee this day to be his peculiar people as he hath promised thee Yea the solemnities of a covenant as before hath been largely shewne are found in it Secondly This covenant delivered by Moses to the people of Israel was a covenant of Grace the same in substance with this under which we live in Gospel-times This is so largely proved to my hand by Master Ball in his Treatise of the covenant page 102 103 104. and Master Burges in his Vindiciae legis page 224 225. that I may spare my paines yet in brief That covenant which teacheth Christ in which men attaine salvation that accepts men upon repentance in which there is pardon of sinne and in which the heart is circumcised of God that is a covenant of grace One of these single will evince it much more in their joynt strength will they conclude it But the covenant delivered by Moses was such a covenant In that covenant Christ was taught John 5. 46 47. Had ye beleved Moses ye would have beleeved me but if ye beleeve not Moses how will ye beleeve my words Whence the collection is plaine Beleevers of Moses are Beleevers of Christ and Rejecters of Moses are Rejecters of Christ See Luke 24. 25 26. with 44 45 46. John 1. 45. Acts 26. 22 23. Rom. 3. 21 22. The Prophecies Promises Types Genealogies Sacraments under that covenant whether ordinary or extraordinary all held forth Christ as might be easily shewn in their several particulars In that covenant the people of the Jews attained salvation and were not only fed with temporal Promises and a covenant meerly carnal not looking above or beyond the land of Canaan as shall be shewen In this covenant men are accepted and received into mercy and favour upon repentance When thou art in tribulation and all these things are come upon thee in the later dayes if thou turn to the Lord thy God and shalt be obedient to his voice for the Lord thy God is a merciful God he will not forsake thee neither destroy thee nor forget the covenant of thy fathers which he sware unto them Deut. 4. 30 31. In this covenant there is pardon of sinne the great priviledge of the New covenant Heb. 8. 12. The Lord proclaimes himself to Moses The Lord the Lord God merciful and gracious long-suffering and abundant in goodnesse and truth keeping mercy for thousands forgiving iniquity transgression and sin Exod. 34. 6 7. See Exod. 32. 31 32. 2 Chron. 7. 14. Psal 25. 11. Psal 51. 12. 7. 9. 14. In this covenant the heart is circumcised another great priviledge of the New covenant Heb. 8. And the Lord thy God will circumcise thy heart and the heart of thy seed to love the Lord thy God All of these any of these hold out a covenant of Grace Thirdly the ten commandments which are called the covenant of God Deut. 4. 13. 2 Chron. 6. 11. all that Moses delivered to Israel being there epitomized holds forth a covenant of Grace and not of Works This appears in the Preface intimating Gods grace and goodnesse to that people bringing them out of the land of Egypt and the house of Bondage Which deliverance had more in it than a bare temporal mercy otherwise their passage through the red Sea could have been no Baptisme as the Apostle calls it 1 Cor. 10. 1. Neither had it been any act of justifying faith in Moses to observe the Passeover which yet the Apostle observes Heb. 11. 28. Then their Rock and Manna had been a viaticum in the way but no Sacrament There God avoucheth himself to be the God of that people I am the Lord thy God and he was a God in covenant to none of man-kinde fallen but by an act of grace It appears in the first commandment where God requires them to accept him and cleave unto him which cannot be done but through Christ It appears in the second commandment in the preceptive part of it which contains the whole ceremonial Law in which pardon of sinne was found through Christ Thither Interpreters reduce all the Sacrifices Types Sacraments of the Jewes It appeares in the reasons annext to that precept which as it threatens judgement on transgressours of the Law so mercy to those that observe it Mercy is an act of Grace and not vouchsafed but in Christ It appears in the fifth commandment in the promise there annext and fastened to it So that this covenant or this summe or epitome of the covenant between God and his people which was put into the Arke and the Mercy-seat or propitiatory set upon it in the most holy place Exod. 26. 34. was a covenant of Grace Fourthly this covenant delivered by Moses and epitomized in the Decalogue being a covenant of Grace it could by no meanes be in the whole and entire nature of it a covenant of Works This is plaine God doth not at once with the same people enter covenant upon so opposite termes These are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 either of them destructive to the other We may argue concerning the covenant as the Apostle doth concerning Election If by grace then it is no more of works otherwise grace is no more grace but if it be of works then it is no more grace otherwise work is no more work This I speak as for their sakes that make it a mixt covenant such a one as Pauls adversaries preacht in the Churches of Galatia so also for their sakes that assert it to be a covenant of Works never undertaking any answer to those arguments which so clearly conclude it to be a covenant of Grace Fifthly What this covenant is to any that it is to all whether it be of works or of grace what it is in it selfe in the tender and termes of it that is the denomination of it This is plaine Mens faith or unbelief Mens obedience or transgression cannot diversifie the nature of that which God doth tender And what God spake to the people he spake to all the people the same to all that he spake to any Exodus 19. 25. Exodus 20. 18. compared and therefore that is a mistake in some that say That the Law is doubtlesse a pure covenant of Works to some men but not to all It is a covenant of works occasionally and accidentally and not only to those which are not related to comprehended in or made
do them that ye may live and go in and possesse the land which the Lord God of your fathers giveth you Deut. 5. 33. You shall walk in all the wayes which the Lord your God hath commanded you that ye may live and that it may be well with you and that ye may prolong your dayes in the land which ye shall possesse Deut. 30. 16. In that I command this day to love the Lord thy God to walk in his wayes and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his judgements that thou mayest live and multiply and the Lord thy God shall blesse thee in the land whither thou goest to possesse it Deut. 6. 24 25. And the Lord commanded us to do all these statutes to fear the Lord our God for our good always that he might preserve us alive as it is this day And it shall be our righteousnesse if we observe to do all these commandments before the Lord our God as he hath commanded us We may so interpret those Scriptures and the Jewes as it appears for a great part did so interpret them that they hold out a covenant of Works when Grace was not at all acknowledged to assist in doing nor Christ known at all to satisfie for failing and to expiate for transgression These seeing nothing but a reward upon labour and punishment in case of transgression They may yet be so interpreted as taking Grace in the Work for change of the heart and putting it into a posture for obedience according to that even in Moses Deut. 306. I will circumcise thy heart and the heart if thy â—eed to love the Lord thy God with all thine heart and with all thy soul that thou mayest live and so these duties are only Gospel qualifications of truth and sincerity of obedience In this sense which they may well bear and I take to be their native sense here is no more than what we finde in the Gospel from Christ and the Apostles They that have done good shall rise unto the resurrâ—ction of life John 5. 28. To them that by patient continuing in well-doing seek for glory and immortality eternal life Rom 2. 5. Where as in many other places we may see that according to the New covenant a man may make the attaining of life the end of his work and the Reader may see phrases of his nature to be New covenant New Testament and Gospel-language unlesse they will charge Christ and the Apostles to have Old Testament-spirits To save a mans self may be so understood as to bear a sense purely legal anti-Evangelical and opposite to Grace or Faith in Christ and so it is used by the Apostle or a phrase very near it For by Grace ye are saved through Faith not of your selves it is the gift of God Eph. 2. 8. Not obscurely shewing that if we are saved of our selves it is not of Grace not of Faith and not the gift of God Yet the phrase may be understood in a Gospel-sense as requiring and implying no more than our endeavour in a state of grace through the assistance of the Spirit to walk in Salvation-way To strive to enter in at the strait gate and to seek the Kingdome of God and the righteousnesse of it and so we finde it used and that more than once in Scriptures 1 Tim. 4. 16. Take heed unto thy self and unto the doctrine in so doing thou wilt save thy self and them that hear thee Ministers taking heed to doctrine save hearers and yet are no saviours in opposition but in subordination to the Lord Jesus Ministers and others taking heed to themselves save themselves and yet are no self-saviours in opposition to free grace the merit of or faith in Christ Jesus Peter in his first Sermon after receiving of the holy Ghost preâ—cht the Gospel yet he urg'd this which some will have to be no other than a covenant of Works Save your selves from this untoward generation Act. 2. 40. And the Apostle preacht no other thing than Christ and him crucified when he called on the Philippians to work out their own salvation with fear and trembling Phil. 2. 12. To be found in our own righteousnesse in that sense that Paul uses it Phil. 3. 8. doth exclude the righteousnesse of faith that was no bottom on which he durst stand yet in the sense that Ezekiel uses it the soul is delivered by it Though Noah Daniel and Job stood before me they would but deliver their own soules by their righteousness Ezek. 14. 14. so Ezek. 18. 22. In his righteousness that he hath done he shall live Noah was an heir of the righteousness of faith Heb. 11. 7. as the Holy Ghost himself witnesseth yet the same Holy Ghost tells us that his own righteousness delivers his soul So Solomon saith Righteousnesse delivers from death he doth not only say it would deliver were it exact and compleat but such as it is it doth deliver Prov. 20.2 David as Paul observes describeth the blessedness of the man unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works Rom. 4. 6. Yet the same David puts blessednesse upon works Psal 112. 1. Blessed is the man that feareth the Lord that delighteth greatly in his commandments Psalme 119. 12. Blessed are the undefiled in the way who walk in the Law of the Lord Blessed are they that keep his testimonies that seek him with the whole heart Ps 128. 1. Blessed is every one that feareth the Lord that walketh in his wayes And so also the Apostle James Who so looketh into the perfect Law of Liberty and continueth therein not being a forgetful hearer but a doer of the word that man shall be blessed in his deed James 1. 25. The Apostle Peter tells us We are kept by the mighty power of God through faith unto salvation 1 Pet. 1 5. Our salvation is not in our own keeping It is not our own care that frees us from destruction yet John saith He that is begotten of God sinneth not and keepeth himself that the wicked one toucheth him not 1 John 5. 18. Here are the same words affirmed and denied and both from one and the same mouth of truth a different sense therefore is to be enquired after A righteousnesse which is the condition of the covenant of Works out of our own inherent strength and abilities in an exact perfection is denied a righteousnesse not of us but through grace wrought in us in sincerity which the covenant of Grace calls for is asserted and required Ninthly Though the whole Law that Moses delivered from God on Mount Sinai to the people and is among the sacred Oracles of God for posterity do containe a covenant of Grace yet the Law is taken sometime in that strict sense as containing a covenant of Works and holding forth life upon condition of perfect obedience So the Apostle Rom. 10. 5 6. puts an opposition between the righteousnesse of the Law and the righteousness of Faith So also Gal. 3. 18. If
letter of the Text then I shall hearken to him in the meane time all indifferent men may well challenge their reason that heed him A second Text holding out the covenant in its ancient latitude we have from our Saviour Christ Matth. 20. 16. and 22. 14. Many are called but few chosen The close of two several Parables The one of the labourers hired into the Vineyard where some claimed a more large pay upon merit The other of the Parable of the Wedding-feast where one intruded without a Wedding garment whence our Saviour inferres Many are called are of the number of guests at the wedding feast are of the labourers in the Vineyard but few are chosen from whence I thus argue If there be a call from God in the times of the New Testament in a farre greater latitude than the grace of Election that of many called few only are elected then the covenant in New Testament-times is not to be restrained to the elect and regenerate but containes all that professedly accept the termes of the covenant and visibly appear a people of God This is evident seeing the call is into covenant all at the Feast were called ones all the hired labourers were covenant-servants To conceive men to be called of God and not to be in covenant with God is a full contradiction The call hath its terminus à quo and its terminus ad quem a state which upon call they leave and a new state on which they enter They are upon this call in a nearer relation to God than the rest of the world otherwise they were the same as ever and not called at all they are not in so neare a relation as men borne of the Spirit so they were elected They have a call by the Word and ministerial outward Ordinances to which they yeeld a professed subjection They have not attained the inward working of the Spirit to a real Sanctification Now for the Assumption that there is a call in New Testament-times in this latitude in a far greater latitude than the grace of Election our Saviour evidently shews in the Text quoted There are those at the feast that are not accepted There are those that are taken into the Vineyard that at the evening of the day do displease there are those therefore that are called into covenant with God and yet are rejected of God a full and a clear Text for covenant-holinesse This is farther evident in those Parables of our Saviour Christ of the field with Wheat and Tares Matth. 13. 24 25. of the draw-net with fishes good and bad Matth. 13. 47. of the floore with chaffe and Wheat Matth. 3. 12. of the great house where there are not only vessels of gold and silver but also of wood and earth and stone some to honour and some to dishonour 2 Tim. 2. 20. In which parables by the floore the field expressely compared to the Kingdome of Heaven and the great house the Church is understood which stands in covenant-relation to God and containes those that are in covenant with God A man in the Kingdome of Heaven is a man in covenant with God unlesse he stood in a covenant-relation he could have no standing there and the comparison were very strangely drawn if this Kingdome thus set out had all that were good none bad in it But of this more when I shall speake to some Corolaries that follow from this Assertion Another Scripture in which the covenant in the ancient latitude is held out is Rom. 11. thoroughout a great part of the chapter There is as all know a large discourse of the Apostasie of the Jews and the call of the Gentiles of the rejection and breaking off of the one and the taking in and ingraffing of the other which I shall presently have a further occasion to open when I shall speak to another pretended difference between the covenant as it stood then and as it stands now In the meane time this is clear into the same Church-state and covenant-latitude from which the Jews fell Gentiles were taken in and do still continue This cannot be denied we being graffed in their stead come in upon like termes as they left They fell from a visible Church state and that latitude of covenant which did receive regenerate and unregenerate justified and unjustified That covenant-latitude then still remaines in the Churches of the Gentiles in Gospel-times Nothing here that I can see can with any colour be objected unlesse any will say that the invisible Church is there spoken to and not the visible that the Jews fell from the invisible body and that the Gentiles in their call are generally taken in into the same fellowship Which as I think few will affirme so I shall have presently occasion to examine If any shall further say that they have this title in Foro Ecclesiae and not in Foro Dei as to men they have so far right that Ministers may not refuse them or in their administrations deny them admittance but in the sight of God who knows their unregenerate unjustified condition they have no title at all I shall refer them to the whole tenor of that chapter where they shall see this engraffing of theirs ascribed to the power of God that it is done by the election of God and mentioned as his gift and choice mercy to that people All of which speak the mind of God in it and his approbation of it This is farther clear in that Text of the Apostle Heb. 10 29. Of how much sorer punishment suppose ye shall he be thought worthy who hath troden under foot the Sonne of God and hath counted the blood of the Covenant wherewith he was sanctified an unholy thing and hath done despight unto the Spirit of Grace Where we see those that are sanctified with the blood of the covenant do tread under foot the Son of God and count his blood an unholy thing have an esteeme of it as that which is common and never devoted at all to God These must needs be granted to be wicked ye cannot be denied to be in covenant being sanctified with the blood of the Covenant There is indeed a threefold interpretation of this Text One of the Arminians and those of that party enemies to perseverance in Grace and they understand by sanctification in this place an internal change and renovation of the soul from whence by Apostasie such persons fall They that will embrace this tenent may indeed say that in the state of sanctification they were in covenant but falling from sanctification they fall from covenant But this is not affirmed by those with whom I have to deale and therefore I shall not lanch out into this controversie Two other interpretations are given by those that are adversaries to this way and make it their work to vindicate this text from these mens glosses The first refers sanctification not to those delinquents that tread under foot
the Sonne of God and do despite unto the Spirit of grace but unto Christ himself Christ was sanctified they say with this blood This indeed clearly takes this Text out of their hands that would from thence inferre the Apostasie of sanctified that is regenerate persons And if this hold it as little serves our purpose Here is Christ in covenant but no reprobate or wicked person in covenant But this reference of the words and the interpretation which is grounded on it hath I suppose come into the thoughts of few Interpreters and it seemes to be very much strained the scope of the place being for aggravation of their sinne that set themselves against the Sonne of God and the holy Spirit The common interpretation which is obvious and clearly held out in the Text fully vindicates it from any favour shew'd to the doctrine of Apostasie of the Saints and fully confirmes the point in hand There is a sanctification by separation for God and dedication to him as there is by inhesion and infusion Master Dixon on the words having so fully spoke my thoughts I had rather expresse my selfe in his words than my own putting the Question How the reprobate can be said to be sanctified by the blood of the covenant answers There is a sanctification to the purifying of the flesh and a sanctification to the purifying of the conscience from dead works to serve the living God Heb 9. 13 14. The sanctification external to the purifying of the flesh consisteth in the mans separation from the world and dedication unto Gods service by calling and Covenant common to all the members of the visible Church and it is forcible thus farre as to bring a man into credit and estimation as a Saint before men and unto the common priviledges of the Church whereupon as men so God also speaketh unto him and of him as one of his people and dealeth with him in his external dispensation as with one of his own people In this sense all the Congregation of Israel and every one of them is called holy yea Core also and his followers Num. 16. 3. The sanctification internall by renovation consisteth in a mans separation from the state of nature to the state of grace from his old conditions to be a new creature indeed by this latter sort a reprobate cannot be called sanctified but by the former he may be called sanctified and that by vertue of the blood of the covenant albeit he should not get any farther good thereby for as the blood of Christ hath vertue to cleanse the conscience and â—â—nue the soul which cometh unto it truely and spiritually so it must have force to do that which is lesse that is purifie the flesh and external condition of the man who cometh unto it outwardly only as the types did under the Law whereupon an hypocrite in the Christian Church must be accounted one of the congregation of the Saints as well as an hypocrite under the Law was so called because Christs blood cannot be inferiour to the Types which were of this force to sanctifie men to the purifying of the flesh Or we may say more shortly There is a sanctification by consecration when any thing is devoted or dedicated unto God and a sanctification by inhabitation of the holy Spirit 2 Cor. 6. 17. 18. Of the former sort the Censeres of Corah Dathan and Abiram are called holy and the reason is given Because they offered them before the Lord therefore they are hallowed Num. 16. 38. And in this sedse all the members of the visible Church even such as afterwards do prove Apostates are sanctified because they offered and offer themselves unto the Lord. But the inhabitation of the holy Spirit is proper onely to the elect and Gods children To the same purpose Paraeus on the words The sanctification of Apostates was not internal saith he but external consisting in the profession of Faith and participation of the Sacraments They were sanctified that is separate from the Jews and Pagans in profession and accounted for true Christians In the same sense as men are ordinarily called Saints as after we shall hear so those that are turned Apostates were sanctified by the blood of the covenant and therefore were men in covenant Neither can all the noise that hath been made about that Text 1 Pet. 2. 9. adversaries take it off but that it speaks fully to hold up a covenant in this latitude and from thence I thus argue If those phrases a chosen generation a royal Priesthood an holy Nation a peculiar people be applied to Christians as to Jewes in an equal latitude to one as to other then it must needs follow that there is a covenant in Gospel-times in like latitude as in the time of the Law including all that accept the termes of the covenant and visibly appeare as the people of God and is not restrained onely to the Elect regenerate The consequence is evident seeing the termes plainly imply a covenant Here is a covnant-people or no where But these termes a chosen Generation a royal Priesthood an holy Nation a peculiar People are applied to Christians as well as to Jewes to one in as great a latitude as to the other That which God speaks to Israel in the wildernesse that Peter speaks to the Church to which he writes All Israelites in Moses dayes all Christians professing in Peters time had those titles when only those that kept covenant were at any time worthy of them and had the comforts of them Here 't is objected that this Text is meant of the Church as it is invisible and so it follows not that it is spoken by the Apostle in that latitude as it was by Moses to the Israelites but in as great a difference as the Church visible stands from the Church as it is invisible but I would wish that it might be taken into more serious consideration First whether the first Verse of this second Chapter be meant only of invisible members Whether the Apostle perswades Regenerate men and only Regenerate men to lay aside all malice and all guile and hypocrisies and evil speakings Secondly whether the third verse be to be thus limited whether the Apostle makes doubt in that manner whether invisible members had tasted that the Lord is gracious and yet the words in both those verses must needs be understood of the same men and under the same notion as these ver 9. The Apostle brings his speech to no full period till ver 11. Those that must lay aside all malice guile c. and those of whom he makes question whether they had tasted that the Lord were gracious are this chosen Generation this royal Priest-hood Thirdly let us more seriously consider the Apostles farther enlargement of this honour of these Christians Which in times past were not a people of God words borrowed from Hos 1. 10. Hos 2. 23 and spoken of the call of the ten revolted Tribes and in
their flesh this signe and seale of the Covenant 2. Upon it they had many and great priviledges yea all Church priviledges followed upon this leading priviledge though otherwise strangers to the Common-weale of Israel now they were look't upon as of Israel 3. Answering unto and in sincerity making good that unto which they do actually engage the whole blessing of the Covenant is theirs They that undertake the termes on which covenant-salvation according to the Gospel is had are actually vested in a a saving covenant but they undertake the termes on which covenant-salvation according to the Gospel is had they are therefore in a saving covenant 4. In case unbelief and impenitence in them be not only Law-transgressions but also Gospel-sins and breaches of a Gospel-covenant then these professed believers are under a Gospel-covenant This is evident They sin not against the Gospel that are not under the Gospel they break not covenant that were never in covenant but their unbelief and impenitence are above Law-transgressions they are Gospel-sins and breaches of covenant as I think need not to be proved and therefore it is plain that they are in covenant Upon this account I confesse I have often marvelled why many eminent and godly Divines do earnestly perswade their people to whom they speak to enter covenant with God giving directions what way they are to take to come into covenant with him telling them that it is of great concernment to them to know under what covenant they are whether under a covenant of Works or a covenant of grace when the same men expressely say that we all entred covenant in baptisme and that unbelief and impenitence at least if not every sin is a breach of our baptism vow and covenant Might not any think that these did perswade to be baptised and that they tell their people that it is of great concernment to know what covenant it is that baptisme seales whether it seales the covenant of Works or the covenant of Grace If we enter in covenant in our baptisme as they truly say that we did as to the Jus in re then how comes it to passe that any that are baptised are out of it and being already actually in it how are they perswaded to enter into it These perswasions therefore and motives to enter covenant I think should be to presse men on to keep covenant and so the directions which they lay down are indeed of divine and excellent use And when they say it so much concernes men to know what covenant they are under I conceive it should rather be to let them know of how great concernment it is to them to see that they have their interest in the mercies of the covenant through grace answering to the termes of it and requisites in it and so the entring of covenant which is done as these say in baptisme and keeping of covenaut or obtaining the mercies of the covenant would not be confounded but distinguished Their labours would likewise be of excellent use which otherwise scarce suit either with their own words or the Scriptures It may be objected that in case they are from under the covenant of Works and under the covenant of Grace then they are exempted from the curse and acquitted from the condemnation which is annext to that covenant which cannot be affirmed of any meer Professour of Christianity in unbelief and impenitence and enough is spoken in this Treatise it self against it To this I answer 1. The curse may follow upon the transgression of the Law as a Law without consideration of any covenant at all whether of Works or Grace and it is not interest in Covenant but interest in Christ which these supposedly such have not that frees from condemnation 2. What if it be yielded that they beare no more than the penalty annext to the breach of the Covenant of grace If the Gospel be consulted that is sufficiently sad and heavy If they be put to beare that nothing more needs to be added to the burden and indeed with submission to better judgments not resolvedly determining any thing it is my thoughts that professed Christians in unbelief and impenitence suffer not upon account of the penalty annext to the breach of the covenant of Works but upon account of the penalty annext to the breach of the covenant of Grace and let not any here object that the transgression of the Law shall not then be laid to their charge for the Gospel bindes us to the obedience of the Law though not in exact perfection yet in sincerity and truth And this I suppose receives strength from that of the Apostle 2 Thes 1 7 8. The Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty Angels in flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God and that obey not the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ which character therof not knowing God Interpreters saith Dr. Slater upon the words generally take to be a description of the Gentiles who though they know God by his Works yet they know him not by his Word and to this he subscribes The other character of not obeying the Gospel of Jesus Christ is as he saith a circumscription of Christians according to Interpreters Gospel-disobedience is then their guilt and upon account of this they suffer Had they believed and yielded sincere obedience which they professed and to which they engaged themselves they had not perished and the want of this appears to be their destruction CHAP. XLI Interest in a Church-state is of equal latitude with the Covenant THen it follows by way of necessary corollary that Church-membership interest in a Church-state is of equal latitude not only the elect and regenerate but all in covenant as before spoken to have their right stand entitled to Church-priviledges And here lest I should be mistaken let me explaine my selfe that my meaning is not ipso facto because in covenant with God and called by his name to entitle them to the Church invisible and so to suppose them lively members living in grace by influence of the Spirit from Christ This would clearly enough contradict that which before I have spoken and were indeed a contradiction in the adject I mean it of a visible Church-state and interest in visible priviledges If any quarrel at the distinction as some have done on either hand endeavouring to take off both members The Church of Rome not admitting any Church invisible and others not brooking any Church but such as consists of invisible members as may appear in their definitions of a particular Church putting in those clauses that belong only to the Church invisible I shall refer them to Doctor John Reynolds in his second Thesis fully bottoming it on that Text Mat. 22. 14. Many are called but few chosen which yet must be confest with judicious Master Hudson that it is not a division into two distinct Churches or species of Churches but a distribution of the subject by the adjuncts
child-bearing The natural posterity which was the birth by Promise we only understand And so the Apostle explaines it Rom. 9. 7 8. Neither because they are the seed of Abraham are they all children but in Isaac shall thy seed be called That is they which are the children of the flesh these are not the children of God but the children of the Promise are counted for the seed Where children of God is taken in the same latitude as Adoption ver 4 comprizing all the visible body of the Jewes as it is also taken Deut. 14. 1. Only those that are borne by Promise are included and all the sonnes of Ishmael and Keturah though their parents were once in Covenant are by Gods special command shut out Neither are all these included for as God cast off Ishmael and his seed so he also cast out Esau and his posterity Therfore the Apostle having brought the former distinction of seeds rests not there but addes verse 10 11 12 13. And not only this but when Rebecca also had conceived by one even by our Father Isaac for the children being not yet borne neither having done any good or evil that the purpose of God according to Election might stand not of works but of him that calleth It was said unto her the elder shall serve the younger as it is written Jacob have I loved but Esau have I hated And therefore the denomination of the seed is in Jacob sirnamed Israel Therefore when the head or if you will the root of the covenant is mentioned in Scripture it is not barely Abraham but Abraham and Isaac to exclude all Abrahams seed of any other line not barely Abraham and Isaac but Abraham Isaac and Jacob. The natural seed of Jacob then not according to ours but Gods own limits is included in that covenant in the full latitude and extent of it Secondly we do not say that this covenant was entred with Abraham as a natural Father nor his seed comprehended as natural children we well know that quâ tale is omne then all natnral parents were in Covenant in that they had natural children and all natural children were in Covenant because they were the natural issue of their parents Abrahams Father was a natural father and Abraham was his natural son yet neither of them upon that account were in covenant we say it was entred with Abraham accepting the termes of it from God for himself and his natural issue all his natural issue not by God himself excluded were in covenant He that made the covenant according to his good pleasure might put limits to it Abraham may be considered 1. As a man the Son of Terah of the race of Adam 2. As accepting of Gods call and receiving his tender for him and his 3. As a faithful and an upright man regenerate and stedfast in covenant It is not as man that God enters covenant in this latitude for Abraham himself was not thus in covenant If he had been in covenant as a man then no man had been out of covenant Neither is it as an upright man before God and keeping covenant for those of his posterity whose hearts were not stedfast were in covenant and did hand it over to their seed But as a professour of the Faith accepting the covenant taking God for his God in contradistinction to false gods he accepted it for himself and for his seed his natural posterity And all that professe the faith hold in the like tenure are in covenant and have the covenant not vested in their own persons only but enlarged to posterity Thirdly we entitle the seed of Abraham as before to spiritual mercies and so the seed of all that hold in the tenure of Abraham to saving grace and life eternal not by an absolute conveyance infallibly to inherit we know though Israel be as the sand of the sea yet a remnant only shall be saved Rom. 9. 27. but upon Gods termes and conditions in the Gospel held out of God to his people Salvation is made over by vertue of covenant to all thus in covenant in that sense as Christ speaks John 4. 22. Salvation is of the Jews In that sense as Christ useth it of Zacheus family This day is salvation come this house Luke 19. 9. In that sense as the Apostle to the Hebrews speaks of it where he sets out the danger of neglecting so great salvation Heb. 2. 3. In that sense as I conceive the Apostle speaks of it where he saith that upon the cal of the Jews All Israel shall be saved Rom. 11. 26 They shall enjoy those priviledges in which salvation upon Gods terms may be obtained and this is all that can by any means be squeezed out of their words that say the covenant of Grace was made of God with Abraham and his natural seed or with beleevers and their seed It is even irksome to read the large businesse that is made to find out our meaning about the covenant of God made with Abraham and his seed and we must per force confesse that we mean it of a covenant infallibly absolutely to conferre grace and consequently salvation To be so in Covenant as that a man cannot fall from it To this end words of mine are produced that I never uttered and several arguments produced against this supposed tenent and authorities multiplied out of Protestant Writers Beza Twisse Wallaeus The Annotations on the Bible Ames Paraeus Downham I am content that all these Worthies shall still stand up in their honour and that this shadow should fall with shame as well as I am that Bellarmine Stapleton a Lapide Becanus Estius should fall with it whose arguments in this controversie one after other have been brought against me To draw all up towards a conclusion All that is necessarily included in Gods entrance of covenant with a people engaging to be their God and taking them for his people is here by this grand Charter of Heaven made over to Abraham and his natural issue by Isaac and Jacob. All their posterity are branches of this root by nature simply considered and they are holy branches by vertue of this covenant which necessarily implies priviledge of Ordinances the fruition of Gods Oracles which are his covenant-draughts without which no people are in Covenant but all are strangers And this priviledge of Ordinances implies also all Priviledges leading to and accompanying salvation and salvation it self upon Gods terms in his word revealed and so before the disputation the Reader hath my supposition CHAP. XLVI Arguments concluding the natural issue of Abraham Isaac and Jacob to be taken into Covenant MY first Argument is taken from the addition annext to this covenant in the words immediately following The Lord having made a covenant in full words with Abraham and his seed he addes and I will give unto thee and to thy seed after thee the land wherein thou art a stranger all the land of Canaan for an everlasting possession and
of the Administrator if by profession of Faith the easie act of the Professor But the ingraffing meant â—om 11. is Gods act from his sole power as is proved from verse 23. where the reason is rendred why the Jewes should be again graffed in is because God is able to graffe them in again Ergo the graffing here is into the visible Church Answ This ingraffing is by a power of God working the heart to a professed subjection to the way of God in Ordinances tendered and assent of heart unto all that is there promised that power that brought Japhet into the tents of Shem Gen. 9 27. That hand of the Lord that was with those that preached the word Act. 11. 21. so that a great number beleeved and turned to to the Lord must bring the Jews back into their former Church-condition How easie soever you take this work to be to bring a people who are strangers to God into a Church-state yet our Brethren in New England have not found it awork so easie to bring the Natives there into a Church-condition nor is it so easie a businesse to bring in the Jewes to this posture of a visible Church-state Have so many prayers been laid out for this work and it is yet not done when it is a matter of such â—ase with man and no need of the power of God for the doing of it We understand a discipling of Gentile-Nations and acknowledge it a work above the power of man and confesse it solely to be in the hand of God We do not speak of the bare admission of men that stand entitled but the working of them to such a title and if an outward profession â—e in the power of mans will yet to bring men or Nations to such a profession cordially to imbrace the Gospel so far as to assent to the truth of it iâ— above man and a work of no such â—ase Argument 2. Secondly That ingraffing which is called reconciliation opposite to casting away that is by Election and giving Faith for 〈…〉 acts can reconcile But the ingraffing here is called reconciliation opposite to casting away verse 15. as may appear in that verse 16. is a reason of the clause about the reception of the Jews vers 15. and the 17. verse is an admonition from the suspition verse 15. that the Jews were cast away which is called breaking off v. 17. Now if breaking off verse 17. â—e the same with casting away verse 15. then ingraffing is the same with reconciliation Ergo ingraffing is by Election and giving of Faith Answ Reconciliation is either graduâ—l or total Either to take in or hold a people in visible communion or else to receive them with an everâ—asting delight in them The former of these Moses obtained for the people of Israel when the Lord upon the sinne of the golden Calfe said Let me alone that my wrath may wax hot against them Exod 32. 10 11 12 13 14. This being premised if any were at fault for a full answer he might easily finde it in the objection it selfe Reconciliation is opposite to casting away The Jewes then by reconcilation are brought into that state out of which they were once cast But they were not cast out of the Church invisible not out of Election and justification but out of a visible Church-state and fellowship Breaking off is rightly said to be the same as casting away and reconciliation the same as ingraffing Their reconciliation or ingraffing is then into that condition from which they were broken out of which they were cast Now they were cast out of the Church visible not out of the Church invisible Their reconciliation brings them into the same Church state which is a reconciliation gradual not total It is here said When any shall shew either a Scripture wherein by reconciliation to God is meant bare vouchsafing a visible Church-state and by casting away and breaking off a lâ—sse of visible priviledges or any approved Writer in the Churches of the Protestants so expounding it I shall begin to suspect that I am mistaken but till then I shall remaine confident I am in the right and shall wonder that any that loveâ— not to wrangle but feares to pervert the Scripture and the truth of God should dare so to interpret it Here I may have many things to say 1. When this Authour pleases he can heap up phrases which are onely once used in a select sense in Scripture and that to uphold this interpretation of holy and unclean 2 Cor. 7. 14. when the context clearly evinces the contrary 2. When he pleases he dare undertake the defence of an opinion held unanimously by all Papists and as unanimously opposed by Protestants as in that of Covenant-holinesse 3. Gomarus Tom. 1. p. 111. observes that World is taken in that sense in Rom. 11. 12 15. as in no other Scripture 4. If reconciliation in no other place be so used yet little is gained seeing as we have seen there are parallel phrases that hold out the same thing to us 5. I shall gratifie him with an Authour an approved Writer in the Protestant Church that so interprets this text in hand that by reconciliation to God is meant no more then vouchsafing a visible Church-state It is Ravanellus who having in his laborious work Thesaurus Scripturae distinguished of a twofold reconciliation 1. Of man with God 2. Of man with his neighbour And defining reconciliation according to our Authours sense of it he goes on and saith Where we are to consider First the name which saith he is taken either properly in the sense already spoken to or lesse properly Rom. 11. 15. Where by reconciliation of the world to God is understood the conversion of the Gentiles to the faith of Christ or they are call to the participation of the favour of God which also is called the salvation of the Gentiles verse 11. and the riches of the world verse 12. Here he may see Faith taken for a bare dogmatical Faith reaching a visible Church-state and not justifying Reconciliation to God taken for the grace and favour of Church-priviledges And the salvation of the Gentiles and riches of the world interpreted to signifie the same thing These phrases are Synonima and they signifie a reconciliation not properly so called but such a one that is opposed to the Reconciliation for which he contends And for the other phrase that by casting away and breaking off is meant a losse of visible priviledges let him consult the last Annotations to those words verse 22. Otherwise thou also shalt be cut off which they enterpret as an unfruitful branch adding this caution as though they had foreseene this Glosse But here it is to be noted that this passage ought to be understood of the outward incorporation into the Church by profession whereof many hypocrites do partake and not of the inward and efficacious ingraffing into the mystical body of Christ by a lively Faith and the
dwells in us by Faith so we in Christ Ephes 3. 17. 2. All ingraffing is into that which gives sap and juice to the ingraffed as the stock from the root to the syens Now Christ gives sap to the Elect beleeving not the Church and therefore it is not into the Church but into Christ 3. If saving faith ingraffe the branch into the Church invisible then the Church invisible is the proper object of such Faith but the Church is no such object of Faith but Christ 4. That supposed ingraffing into the invisible Church is either known to the body invisible or unwitting if know then it is no invisible They have no light to discerne an invisible work if unknown then there could not be such a dispute about the new ingraffing of Gentiles nor complaint of breaking off of the Jewes all being done by an invisible translation and so the subject of the question is taken away To dispute whether ingraffing into the Church be into the Church-visible or invisible is to dispute whether the Mount of Olives be a Mountaine of Earth or Aire I shall assoon finde a Mountaine of Aire in Geography as this ingraffing into the invisible Church in Divinity And here I tie not any up to the word which I conceive in reference to any Ecclesiastical or Spiritual station is not elsewhere used in Scripture but to the thing All that accesse to the Church from Gentile Nations which is so large fore-prophesied in the Old Testament and Historically related in the Acts of the Apostles was an ingraffing into the Church visible and this ingraffing here mentioned The visible Church did immediately receive these new branches and so the whole body of Jews and Gentiles professedly beleeving Ephes 2. 15. became one new man The visible Church communicates sap and juice which is the fatnesse of the Olive in Ordinances This is known by the Church visible they were sensible of and full of praises for the new addition to this number Argument 4. Fourthly That ingraffing is meant verse 17. whereby the wilde Olive is co-partaker of the root and fatnesse of the Olive-tree as is asserted there But such is only Election and giving of Faith Ergo. The minor I prove by considering who the root is and what the fatness of the Olive-tree is 1. Negatively the root is not every beleeving parent Answ I suppose I may answer for my self that I never said that every beleeving parent is the root I willingly yeeld that every beleeving parent is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the root but I affirm that every beleeving parent is a root I cannot reach this mystery that Abraham can be a root of all the branches in Israel reaching down to the Apostles times no intermediate rootes intervening no more then Adam can be a natural root of mankinde to this time without intermediate fathers of our flesh deriving us from him as Jacob with Rachel and Leah was a root from whom Israel sprang as branches of an Olive so Judah and Tamar Boaz and Ruth were roots likewise They built up the house of Israel Ruth 4. 11 12. The house of Israel was this Olive-tree these several Metaphors expressing the same thing the building of the house and bringing out the branches are one and the same All builders are roots these are builders therefore roots Abraham may be called the builder laying the first foundation so the root from whence every branch was derived yet every particular Beleever that had issue a builder a root Those Israelites that had no holinesse of inhesion but only of relation that were members of the Church visible not invisible were fathers by way of communication of this holinesse 1 Cor. 10. 1. All our fathers were under the cloud and all passed through the sea It is as necessary to have intermediate fathers between us and Abraham as to have intermediate mothers between us and Eue. Eve may as well be the mother of all living and no other mother between us and her as Abraham can be the father of the Faithful and no intermediate father to derive from him and communicate to us But his proof is very well worth the hearing that every beleeving parent is not the root For then all the branches should be natural the childe of every beleeving Parent is a natural branch from his father But here Apostle makes the Gentiles branches and a wild Olive graffed in besides nature and the Jews only natural branches growing from the root verse 21 24. The Apostle makes them wilde onely at their first ingraffing and so was all Terahs race wilde likewise till that change of Faith wrought in Abrahams call and the covenant of God entered with him We now are natural as they were and cannot be called wilde but in our first Original Positively he sayes the root is no other then Abraham that Abraham onely is a holy root or at most Abraham Isaac and Jacob. If this have any face of Argument it runnes thus If Abraham be the root and not every beleeving Parent then the ingraffing is by Election and Faith that justifies The truth is the sequel is undeniable on the contrary If Abraham be the root then the ingraffing is not into the invisible Church which he strangely calls by Election but onely into the visible This Master Blakwood saw and faine would have maintained that Christ is the root for ingraffing into Christ and not into Abraham makes a member of the Church invisible If the ingraffing be by a saving Faith only to derive saving Graces personally inherent as a fruit of Election from Abraham then it must needs be that we are Elect in Abraham Abraham may say Without me ye can do nothing and he that beleeveth in me out of his belly shall flow forth rivers of living water and we may say The life that we live in the flesh we live by faith in the sonne of Terah This must necessarily follow if Abraham be the root not only respective to a conditional Covenant but to the grace under condition covenanted It had been more safe for our Authour with Master Blackwood though in contradiction to himself to have made Christ the root when these consequences must follow To which he answers If I made Abraham a root as communicating Faith by infusion or impetration mediatory as Christ this would follow But I make Abraham a root as he is called the father of all them that beleeve Rom. 4. 11. Not by begetting Faith in them but as an exemplâ—ry cause of beleeving as I gather from the expression verse 12. That he is a father to them that walk in the steps of our father Abraham which he had yet being uncircumcised A root not by communication but example an ingraffing not to have any thing communicated from the root but to imitate it is such a Catacresis as may well make all Rhetorick ashamed of it and if the Sun ever saw a more notable piece of nonâ—sense I am to seek what sense is A
case he pleased but will not neither is he bound Sinne no otherwise follows upon reprobation not as a cause efficient but deficient not whereby any thing is removed that is present but that is not supplied which is wanting And Master Ball in his larger Catechism p. 57. Sin is the effect of mans free will and condemnation is an effect of justice inflicted upon man for sin and disobedience But the decree of God which is good is the cause of neither The signes of Reprobation may appear in those that are thus dischurched according to that which is quoted out of Ames but not as an effect of it The severity which God sheweth in not sparing but breaking off these natural Branches is explicitely no more then that which Jesus Christ did threaten against them Mat. 21. 43. That the Kingdome of Heaven should be taken from them and given to a Nation bringing forth the fruits thereof the same which he threatens against Ephesus Rev. 2. 5. in taking away their Candlestick which is the effect of their own sin and not of Gods decree Argument 1. Sixthly If re-ingraffing of the Jewes produceth salvation is by turning them from iniquity taking away their sins according to Gods Covenant then it is into the invisible Church by giving faith But the former is true v. 25. Ergo the latter Answ This Argument well husbanded might haue made three To the first â— say that priviledges enjoyed in a Church-state in Scripture-phrase are the salvation John 4. 22. Seeing Church-members are partakers of sauing Ordinances And the fruition of Ordinances under Gospel-dispensations is a great salvation Heb. 2. 3. And so that Text Rom. 11. 26. all Israel shall be saved must be understood as the last Annotation speaks The body of this people in general shall be brought againe into a way of salvation and re-istablisht into the Church of the whole Israel of God consisting of Jewes and Gentiles And so Diodate That is the body in general shall be put again into a way of salvation and re-established into the Communion of the Church And such men brought into a Church-state are turned from iniquity partially from their former way of iniquity their contradicting and blaspheming having escaped the pollution of the world 2 Pet. 2. 16. of the world that remaines out of the Church of God Their sinne is pardoned quoad hoc and when Moses prayed for the pardon of the sinne of Israel Exod. 32. and God proâ—miseth it 2 Chron. 7. 14. it is so to be understood of a National dardon Argument 7. Seventhly If the re-ingraffing be by vertue of Gods Election and love his gifts of calling then it is into the invisible Church by Election and giving Faith But the former is true v. 28 29. Ergo the latter Answ His Election love and gifts of calling did at the first put them into a visible Church-state and condition Deut. 7. 7 8. The Lord did not set his love upon you nor chuse you because you were moe in number then any people for ye were the fewest of all people But because the Lord loved you and because he would keep the Oath which he had sworne unto your Fathers c. And the same love election and gifts of calling now they are broken off doth re-ingraffte them If this Argument hold it was an invisible Church that was brought out of the land of Egypt Here our Authour sayes with much confidence that he questions not but all Anti-Arminians that understand the controversie will disclaime Master Geree in this answer and acknowledge that the election love gifts and calling meant Rom. 11. 28 29. are by faith into salvation But he is much deceived Those before mentioned understood somewhate and Diodate in his Annotations hath these words God never recals his grace which by absolute decree he wil communicate to some person or Nation to call them to him and to have right to his Covenant Now the election of this people hath been such above all others in the world who being once called have and may fall totally and irreparably which this people cannot without repentance that is to say irrevocable of which God never repents Calvin on the words saith This is to be held that private Election is not here handled but the common adoption of the Nation which in outward appearance seemed for the time to be lost but not cut off from the root And presently after The Apostle argues that the counsel of God whereby he once chose to himself that Nation in peculiar remaineth firme And Paraeus in dubio decimo nono on this chapter understands it of the constancy of the love of God towards his own Nation And most fully in dubio vicesimo where urging Stapletons objection That it seems from this irrevocablenesse of the gifts and calling of God the assurance of grace and salvation cannot follow 1. Because as Stapleton objects and Calvin and Martyr confesse the speech of the Apostle is not to be understood of the election of each particular person but of the common adoption of the whole Nation and this common grace of adoption of the whole Nation was mutual for they fell from this gift To which Paraeus sayes Stapleton's corrupt glosse is easily answered 1. Saith he It is not denied that the Apostle spake this of the Common that is the federal dignity of the Nation of the Jewes and that the irrevocablenesse in God is to be understood yet it is denied saith he that from hence the assurance of particular persons is not concluded yea from the lesse to the greater it is firmly concluded For if the Apostle from common grace do rightly conclude this irrevocablenesse in God much more may it be determined from that grace which is proper Ravanellus in verbum Electio understands Election in v. 28. of common Election as he do also in 1. Pet. 2. 9. Amesius is urged as an adversary yet appears otherwise The Remonstrants giving two answers to this Scripture The second is the self-same in 〈◊〉 with Stapletons To which Amesius replies Coron page 233 234. This is their custome to take one part of a truth and to abuse it for the overthrow or removal of another So that it appears according to him that they spake truth in the denial of this to be meant of the unchangable decree of eternal Election but they abuse this truth in about to avoid the argument drawn from it for perseverance As Jesuites and Arminians do object it so their adversaries freely confesse it I have indeed sometimes in my thoughts doubted how fitly this Text was brought against Arminians for proof of perseverance and estament of assurance yet satisfied my selfe according to what hath been said but since I had any understanding never questioned but it was here applied according to the minde of these Authours to the National priviledge of the Jews the full scope of these Chapters being to dispute the rejection of Israel after
mans Testament no man disanulleth it Gal. 3. 14. The poore must enjoy that which by free gift is setled upon them so a Corporation and so the Ministery in like manner To destroy publick places of necessary and convenient use for advancement of publick worship to alienate lively-hood which is in order to it is to devoure that which is holy reductively holy not by Gods particular institution with limit to that thing or place but by his Warranty and approbation Separation of persons for God is of another sort they that are thus separate God ownes not only as reductively but relatively holy This is either peculiarly in some way of special calling to do such work as is holy of which there were several sorts in the time of the Law Priests Levites Nazarites Singers Porters which will not be denied and in a parallel way Ministers of the Gospel as we have seen 1 Cor. 9. 14. Acts 13. 2. The Holy Ghost said Separate me Saul and Barnabas for the work whereunto I have called them Here an eminent adversary gives in his assent and sayes Pastors and Teachers or Presbyters to teach and governe the Church of God I am assured are a divine institution and a very merciful gift of Christ Ephes 4. 11 12 13. 1 Cor. 12. 28. Acts 14. 23. 1 Tim. 3. 1. Titus 2. 5. to whom people should yield obedience Heb. 13. 7. and yield maintenance liberally 1 Cor. 9. 14. Gal. 6. 6. 1 Tim. 5. 17 18. If any go about to extirpate them let him be accursed as an enemy to Christ and his Church This the evidence of truth forces him to confesse though presently he takes againe all that from them which he had under such an Anathema yielded them He that gives to every Free-man of London in case competently qualified the whole power and authority of the Lord Major to every free Subject of England the whole power of the Lord Chief Justice goes a destructive way for extirpation of those places or functions This I think all will grant when each man may do their work they shall soon have little honour in the naked title Now our Authour gives the work of preaching promiscuously to all Notwithstanding what such and such have said I still conceive saith he that not onely for triall of expectants but also upon other occasions persons not ordained may be permitted yea desired to preach in the Pulpits If all that such have said cannot withstand this conceit me thinkes his Anathema but now pronounced should affect him somewhat Let him take heed lest he let them loose to runne upon so heavy a curse that hangs over those of such principles It were to be wished he would have answered their reasons in a better temper than he hath done other mens or have given in somewhat of his own farther than his bare conceit I confesse he speakes somewhat by way of caution Neverthelesse I am against the courses of many Souldiers and others who against the denial of able Teachers to whom the teaching of the people is committed love to get into the Pulpits of the ablest men to vent their peculiar conceits and often-times their pernicious Errors not regarding to preach to the ignorant the clear Truths of Faith and a holy life in places where they have no Preacher but to new Converts to pervert them and with-draw them from their able Teachers and to disquiet them and their Congregations by frivolous exceptions If they have but their liberty to become Pulpit-men and may consecrate themselves without laying on of hands which is confest to be of divine institution they will soon be their own carvers for the choise of Pulpits They will be the judges of the ability or insufficiency of Ministers gifts where they quarter All shall be clear truths that they vent Break down the Apostles fence that by appointment from Jesus Christ he hath set up Let them be proved and then do the office and then a mound Segges and Bul-rushes will soon be trodden down The God of order hath taken more care The dispensation of the Sacraments is with these every mans work as well as preaching the Word which he notably proves against Master Baxter Doth the Embassage of Christ dispensing of his mysteries beseeching in his stead c. consist saith one in breaking bread delivering it bidding take eat c If it do then a non-preaching Minister who doth these things may yet be an Embassador of Christ and Steward of his mysteries then the breaking bread c. is a converting Ordinance as Mr. Pryn held which Mr. Gillespy and Mr. Rutherford deny If it be granted that this is the whole of a Ministers work is it no part of it are they to do nothing else if they are to do this If it be an edifying Ordinance which neither Master Gillespy nor Master Rutherford will deny it is a part of their function For my part saith he I think to be an Embassador of Christ and to beseech in his stead 2 Cor. 5. 20. to be a Steward of the mysteries of God 1 Cor. 4. 1. are all one as to preach the Gospel and that the Assembly did misalledge the Text 1 Cor. 4. 1. as they have done the other to prove that neither Sacrament may be dispensed by any but a Minister of the Word lawfully ordained Confession of Faith Chap. 27. Sect. 4. Perhaps when the Assembly voted that Text for this purpose they had read that which our Author elsewhere delivers speaking of admission to Baptisme he saith A Minister in this case is to act as a Steward who is to deale according to his Lords will not his own minde Is not Baptisme then one of the mysteries of which they are Stewards or perhaps they thought that the Sacraments are contained in the Gospel and are verbum visibile being teaching signes A man that will oppose so quick-sighted a Society should have said some little at least to purpose It is said that Mysteries of God never signifie Sacraments in Scripture but the Gospel Ephes 6. 19. Rom. 16. 25. I never took those to be opposites but have ever thought that Sacraments are included within the Gospel we have ever taken them for signes and Seales and if they do not teach Gospel-truths and seale Gospel-promises Ministers are not to dispense them nor Christians to intermeddle with them But Chamiers authority is here brought in Scriptur is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 usurpari pro ipso rei sacrae signo profecto impostura est And is not the Quotation of this from him a greater imposture who ever took the bare signe to be the Sacrament then the definition would fall that calls it a visible signe of an invisible grace If marriage be not that great mystery Ephes 5. 32. but the union of Christ and his Church then certainly the Sacraments in which we have that communion and fellowship with Christ 1 Cor. 10. 16. are not excluded from the number of mysteries As there is a
208 Circumcision that painfull signe was the leading initiating seale of it p. 209 Nine positions tending to clear the Old Covenant under Old Testament-dispensations p. 210 211 212 c. See Moses It was not made up of carnal promises p. 219 c. The charge of the Old Covenant to be meerely carnal serves divers interests 1. To bring down all honour and esteem of Old Testament-Scriptures p. 220 2. To take Infants out of Covenant p. 221 3. To keep Infants from Baptisme p. 222 Testimonies evincing the spirituality of Old Covenant-Promises ibid. This Old Covenant was a pure Gospel-Covenant and not mixt p. 224 New Covenant It is held forth by Christ the Mediatour p. 205 It takes in all Nations ibid. 206 It must remain till the end of time ibid. The dedication of it is in the blood of Christ p. 207 Christ already come in the flesh is set forth in it ibid. Truth without type or-shadow held forth in it p. 207 208 Light abounds and knowledge is clear in it p. 208 Baptisme is the initiating seal of it p. 209 It is not limited to the Elect Regenerate p. 231 The meaning of some Orthodox Divines that in some expression seem to deny it p. 233 Severall New Testament-Scriptures evincing it p. 235 c. Arguments asserting it p. 205 Absurdities following upon the restraint of the Covenant to the Elect regenerate p. 252 Objections answered p. 257 It comprizes professed Beleevers and their issue p. 246 The question stated as to the issue of Abraham in severall particulars p. 296 297 c. Arguments from Old Testament-Scriptures evincing the natural issue of Abraham to be in Covenant p. 301. From New Testament-Scriptures p. 304. The grand Objection Rom. 9. 6 7 8. answered p. 309 A second Objection that it is not in that latitude in New Testament-times answered p. 316 1. By Quaeries put p. 317 New Testament-authorities Acts 2. 38 39. Rom. 11. 16. 1 Cor. 7. 14. Gal. 4. 29. Matth. 19. 14. p. 318 3. Arguments evincing it p. 401 c. D. Death WHat in Scripture it implies p. 100 p. 101 The same in the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace ibid. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The proper and most received signification denotes a Testament and not a Covenant p. 38 39 Disciple Vnregenerate persons have the name and outward priviledges of Disciples p. 251 Whole Nations in capacity to be Discipled p. 236 Infants are Disciples p. 413 Discipline God in the Covenant of Grace keeps up his Sovereignty in exercise of Discipline p. 77 78 c. See Separation E. Election INto a Church-state p. 340 The Covenant of Grace not commensurate with Election p. 98 Election leads to salvation without any merit of workes p. 341 See Reprobation Engraffing There is no engraffing into the Church invisible p. 336 Engraffing by Faith according to Election is into Christ. ibid. Engraffing into the true Olive Rom. 11. is into the Church as visible Asserted by Arguments p. 327 c. Errors Have their estimate more or lesse according as they are against Christ p. 280 Some render Christ in an incapacity to be Mediatour ibid. Some are in whole or in part inconsistent with his Mediatorship ibid. Errours either in the foundation or in the superstructure p. 278 In the foundation more neere or more remote p. 279 Epample The Argument that there is no example for infant-baptisme answered p. 414 Extreames In the worship of God dangerous p. 439 F Faith IN Christ commanded in the Moral Law p. 96 c. Is a Condition of the Covenant of Grace p. 118 c. Proposâ—tions tending to clear it p. 122 Reasons to confirme it p. 119 Objections answered p. 130 c. As accepting Christ as a Lord it doth not justifie p. 125 It justifies as an instrument p. 126 Truth explained p. 127 Objections answered ibid. See instrument Faith of profession entitles to Baptisme p. 289 Arguments proving it p. 290 Faith and Repentance our conditions not Gods p. 144 Faith of profession Entitles to the Church visible p. 334 May be lost p. 333. 334 Flesh Birth after the flesh gives a visible title to Church interest p. 370 c. Children of the flesh those who in course of nature come from Abraham ibid. G. Gentiles SInners of the Gentiles Gal. 2. 15. what it implies p. 305. 306 Engraffing of the Jewes and the Gentiles Rom. 11. is into the Church visible p. 327 See Engraffing Church of Jewes and Gentiles one p. 328. Gomarus His answer to the Anabaptists Argument draw from Rom. 9. 6 7. p. 313 c. Gospel Where it is tendered and recieved there is a Covenant p. 161 Where it is tendered and refused there is no Covenant ibid. Grace Is the Fountaine and rise of every Covâ—â—nant of God with man p. 9 The necessity of the concurrence of Grace in mans conversion p. 111 Arguments evincing it p. 104 c. Objections answered p. 113 c. Sufficiency of Gospel-grace in the Old Covenant to convince men of sin for not beleeving p. 215 H. Holy Holinesse HOlinesse of relation of infusion p. 326 One and the same holinesse in every branch of the Olive Rom. 11. ibid. Holinesse not legitimation p. 357 Not regenerate with the Apostle 1 Cor. 7. 14. ibid. See places Holinesse of relation of persons p. 440 Of unreasonable creatures ibid. Persons holy in some peculiar way of service p. 444 In a more general way as separate from Idols to God p. 447 Heaven See Kingdome I. Jew A Jew by nature is one in Covenant by birth p. 306 Infant Those little ones that Christ recieved and blessed were infants p. 394 They were infants of Parents in Covenant p. 394 395 They were themselves in Covenant ibid. They were admitted upon a common right and no special priviledge above other infants in Israel ibid. They were admitted to a Church-priviledge p. 397 The Disciples excluded them upon their minority and Christ will have that to be no bar for their admittance p. 399 Infant-Baptisme By Arguments asserted p. 410 c. Objections answered p. 411 c. Infants of all Christian Parents have right to Baptisme p. 448 Infants of wicked Parents p. 448 Of misbelieving Parents p. 449 Of ignorant Parents ibid. Of illegitimate birth p. 450 Of excommunicate persons p. 468 Right of infants of Apostates discussed p. 453 Infants have right to Baptisme as from immediate so from mediate Parents p. 465 Infants within the verge of Baptism-institution p. 411 412 Infants of Christian Parents entitled to the Lords Supper by jus ad rem not jus in re p. 436 Instrument The Word the outward Faith the inward instrument in justification p. 129 Faith more aptly said to be an instrument in justification than the word ibid. Relative actions have not their instruments fitly and properly so called as those that are absolute p. 127 Faith is the instrument of man in the work of justification and because of man in a work of this nature it
is not unfitly called in instrument of God p. 128 See Faith Justification Ishmael In Covenant when circumcised p. 296 Not to be branded with bastardy ibid. He and his seed cast out of Covenant p. 298 Justification Mans concurrence in it necessarily required in it as an acceptant not as agent p. 127 It is a transient act of God not an immanent p. 132 It is not from eternity p. 131 c. A justified man an an fitted for every duty to which God calls p. 135. See Faith Instrument K. Kingdome of Heaven IN what sense taken Matth. 19. 14 c. p. 399 The Hinge of the contraversie concerning infants interest in Covenant hangs not on the interpretation of those words ibid. Anabaptists reasons not sufficient to prove it to be meant of the Kingdome of Glory p. 400 Though understood of the Kingdome of Glory it serves not to discovenant or dischurch infants p. 401 L. Law COnsidered as a Covenant to give life is inconsistent with the Gospel p. 55 Moral-Law hath a commanding power over Beleevers ibid. By Arguments asserted ibid. Objections answered p. 58 In what sense a dead husband p. 59 See Moses A rule of our duty not of our strength p. 151. Life What in Scripture it implies p. 100 The same in substance in the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace ibid. A Medium may be concieved and is by some assigned between life and death in Scripture acceptation p. 123 Lord. The acceptation of Christ as Lord doth not justifie p. 125 Love To do a thing out of obedience to the Law and by love not opposite p. 61 Love cleaves to Christ for communion but recieves him not for justification p. 125 M. Master Marshal VIndicated p. 435 Mediatour A foure-fold work respective to the Covenant incumbent on the Mediatour p. 93 c. See Christ Moses Metaphor God's entring Covenant with man no Metaphor p. 10. 37 Ministers Must bring their people up to the termes of the Covenant in pressing the necessity of Faith and Repentance p. 188 c. They must not sever the promise from the duty p. 189 Ministry The necessity of a Ministry to bring me into Covenant and to bring them up to the termes of the Covenant p. 160. Reasons evincing that God hath appointed such a Ministry to be perpetuated through all ages p. 162 c. Reasons evincing the necessity of such an established Ministry p. 165 c. Objections answered p. 168 169 An orderly call from God into the Ministerial function necessary p. 180 Reasons assigned p. 181 182 Several wayes of calling to the work of The Ministry p. 182 See Ordination Ministry-maintenance p. 442 Moses The Law as delivered by Moses bindes Christians p. 73 74 75 He delivered a Covenant to the Jewes p. 210 He delivered a Covenant of Grace to the Jewes p. 210 211 In his time commands were frequent and full the directive and maledictive part for discovery of sin were open and clear but promises for eternity little known p. 213 He was a Mediatour in type N. Nature TAken for Birth-priviledge or descent from Ancestors p. 307 Taken for qualifications of nature ibid. Jewes by nature had priviledges above Gentiles p. 307 308 O. Obedience See Righteousnesse Olive THe whole universal Church visible Rom. 11. p. 325 Fatnesse of the Olive glory of Ordinances p. 326 Ordination An orderly call by way of Ordination into the Ministerial function necessary in all not gifted by immediate revelation p. 182 Ordination described ibid. Men in Ministerial function are to act in Ordination p. 182 183 They are to set men apart as Presbyters and Elders p. 184 Ordination not to be passed but upon examination and tryal p. 140 To be solemnized with fasting and prayer p. 185 186 Imposition of hands to be used p. 187 Objections answered ibid. P. Pardon NAtional and personal p. 343 My People That phrase applied in New Testament-Scriptures to those that stand invisible relation to God p. 258 Places for worship In New Testament-times have their warranty In what sense holy p. 441 Places holy by divine institution by divine approbation p. 439 Positions concerning places for worship in Gospel-times p. 441 Not in equipage with the Temple and Tabernacle ibid. Temple and Tabernacle had the pre-eminence in four Particulars ibid. Our places of meeting by good warranty called Churches p. 441 c. Position This Position that the Moral Law hath no commanding power over Believers examined p. 58 That position concerning the Old Covenant to be both a Covenant of Works and a Covenant of Grace examined p. 210 Power Necessary in the call of Nations to a visible Church-state p. 330 Priviledge See Birth Professors Who to be accounted so before men p. 450 Promises Made to the wiked made good to the believing and penitent p. 190 Absolute promises yield not peace to him that is wanting in the conditions of God required ibid. p. 47 Objections answered p. 190 Spiritual promises rare and obscure under Moses his administration p. 213 Scriptures evincing the spirituality of Old Testament-Promises p. 222 Temporal promises annexed as appendants to spiritual in the Old Covenant p. 226 Children of Promise All the seed of Abraham by Isaac born by vertue of that miraculous promise p. 298 Q. Quaeries PVt to those that restraine the New Covenant to the Elect regenerate p. 234 c. Put to those that put a limit to the New Covenant respective to the issue p. 317 R. Reconciliation GRadual or total of persons of Nations p. 331 Repentance A distinct grace from faith p. 136 A condition of the Covenant of grace ib. Considered in the prae-requisites p. 137 In the essential parts of it ibid. Privative part which is cessation from sin is required in Covenant p. 140 Positive part which is a returne to God and an holy walk with God is required in Covenant p. 142 See Righteousnesse Objections answered p. 144 c. Reprobation No cause of unbelief or sin p. 341 It leads not to condemnation without merit of sin as Election leads to Salvation without merits of works ibid. Righteousnesse What degree of righteousnesse is required in the Covenant of Grace p. 148 Perfection of degrees is not so required that upon the defection of it the penalty is incurred p. 149 Perfection of degrees is not required and sincerity accepted p. 151 Reasons assigned ibid. c. Objections answered p. 153 Our Evangelical righteousnesse is imperfect p. 155 c Sincerity is required and accepted p. 112 c. Root and Branch Denote parent and childe Rom. 11. 16. p. 325 Root Abraham Isaac and Jacob. ibid. Every natural parent a Root p. 338 Every natural believing Parent an holy Root ibid. Abraham a Root by communication not by example p. 399 S. Sacraments ARe Gospel mysteries p. 446 Sacriledge Defined p. 440 With-holding infants of believing parents from Baptism is Sacriledg p. 437 c. Saints Vnregenerate persons have the name and outward priviledge of Saints p.
 14. 127.  16. 16 17.  18. 218.  19. 18.  17. 42 48. 4. 29. 366.  30. 424. 5. 3. 149.  6. 137 143.  19 20. 141.  21. 143. 6. 6. 442. Ephesians 1. 18. 166.  19. 105. 2. 1 2. 104 105.  6 12. 94.  8. 113 217.  10. 105 145.  12. 161 208 408.  14. 55. 3. 17. 127 128. 4. 11 12. 162,167 179. 5. 6. 142. 6. 4. 479.  6 7. 157. Philipians 2. 6 14.  12. 144 145.  13. 112 131. 3. 5 6. 116. Colossians 1. 12. 196. 3. 5 6 7 8. 140.  16. 171. Thessalonians 2. 12 13. 120 135. 5. 12 13 164.  11. 171. 2 Thessalonians 2. 15. 419 3. 14. 469. 1 Timothy 1. 22. 185. 3. 6. 185. Chap. Verse Page  10. 185. 4. 8. 135.  13 15. 174.  14. 183.  16. 217. 5. 22. 187. 6. 11. 142.  17 c. 200. 2 Timothy 2. 15. 185.  19. 140  20. 240 268. 4. 8 6. Titus 1. 5. 183.  7 8. 185.  16. 452. 2. 14. 257. 4. 4. 249. Hebrewes 4. 2. 129 135. 6. 1. 137.  18. 7. 8. 13. 268.  12. 48. 9. 16 17. 39.  19 20 21. 206. 10. 1. 207.  4. 93 214 207.  26. 90.  29. 241 c. 12. 5 6 7 79. 13. 17. 164. James 1. 4. 153 154.  25. 218.  26. 109.  27. 22. 2. 8. 57.  21. 125. 1 Peter 2. 9. 243 c. 1. 15 16. 74. 3. 18. 123.  21. 197. 2 Peter 2. 22. 194. 1 John 3. 18 19. 201  21. 292.  21 22. 200.  â—4 198. Revelation 3. 19. 79. 11. 15. 237 18. 4. 259. 21. 3. 258. 22. 12. 147. FINIS Paul's last Farewel OR A SERMON PREACHED At the Funerall of that Godly and Learned Minister of JESUS CHRIST Mr. THOMAS BLAKE By Anthony Burgesse Pastor of the Church at Sutton-Coldfield in Warwickshire With a Funeral ORATION made at Mr. Blakes death by Samuel Shaw then Schoolmaster of the Free-School at Tamworth LONDON Printed for Abel Roper at the Sun against S. Dunstans Church in Fleet-street 1658. To the Reader READER THat I might satisfie the desire of some worthy Freinds I do here present unto thee a Sermon with very little alteration preached at the Funerall of that Godly and Learned Minister of Jesus Christ Mr. Blake now with God Being the rather induced thereunto because I know the memory of his Name will be very gratefull and welcome to such who were acquainted with him How sadly his death was laid to heart the deportment of many at that time did abundantly manifest and Although I cannot speak the same which Nazianzen affirmeth concerning the Funeral solemnities of Basil how that many thousands were there valedictory Sermon we know not whether the matter or the affection in the delivering of it be more admirable It 's milk that cometh hot from the breast excellent matter without hearty affections is like a Messenger without feet and a Bird without wings I shall not make a Sermon upon his Sermon onely in the general by that discourse we have a description of a Pastor and Officer in the Church in Idea and in subjecto In Idea or in the Thesi there the Apostle describeth such by their name and titles they are Overseers and Elders v. 17. from the efficient cause the Holy Ghost hath made them so from the relation they are in The People are their Flock and they are Gods Church And lastly from the dignity and high thoughts put upon them by Christ they were purchased with his own blood shall we think our labor our pains our sweat too much when Christ thought not his blood too much To enter upon the Controversie who these Elders and Overseers were is repugnant to the occasion at this time Then you have this office in subjecto in Hypothesi in the practice of it you have the rule of a Pastor and the example of a Ruler and that is in Paul himself O the zeal watchfulness the diligence the courage the purity of aime and ends which he professeth in his Ministerial discharge not that he speaketh these for ostentation but imitation for he would not have said thus much of himself saith Grotius on the place but that hereby he would leave a patern or form of life to all successors Insomuch that no Minister reading Pauls expressions of himself in this place but may cry out O me a clod of earth to such a Star Ice to such a Fire a worm to such an Angel Though he were a Paul as some think his name denoteth little in stature of his body yet he was a Gyant in Gifts and Graces so that Papists themselves cannot but give the pre-eminence to Paul above Peter in respect of Doctrine and Ministerial abilities He was the earthly Angel the Cor Christi the Tuba Evangelii as the Ancients call him yet I am not of Amyraldus his minde consider in cap. 7. ad Rom. who denying the Interpretation of the seventh of the Romans to be understood personally of Paul thinking this would be injurious to the Grace of God sanctifying of him and making him so eminent a Servant in his Church He affirmeth that if God pleased so to adorn Paul with the gifts of the Spirit that he should in this life arrive at that fulness and perfection of holiness which other Believers obtain no where but in Heaven that thereby he might be propounded as a perfect example to all Christians and his Ministry be more happily efficacious here was not saith he any thing to be blame-worthy But though we grant Paul to have an elder Brothers portion in the Graces and Gifts of Christ so that if no Minister could be saved unless he were a Paul wo be to us all yet that Paul was not above the combate of the flesh and spirit within him appeareth partly in that careful keeping down of his body 1 Cor. 9. 27. lest sin should prevail as also in those buffetings of Satan which he was exercised with that he might not be lifted up above measure 2 Cor. 12. 7. Well however it be the Apostle having both by rule and example as you heard described what a Minister or Pastor is to be we have the consequent of this in my Text When he had thus spoken thus of himself and thus of a Gospel-Minister he kneeled down and prayed There are two actions of the body mentioned in Prayer which denote that excellent deportment that should be at that time in the soul kneeling of the body that denoteth self-humiliation lifting up the hands that implieth faith and confidence Thus descendendo ascenditur how hardly do the people of God keep these two Graces co-operating together but either their Humiliation abateth their Faith or their Faith hindreth their Humiliation both these together are the Calidum and the Humidum which maintain the life of holy Duties he Prayed
making blessed There are many promises in Scripture made to Abraham and the seed of Abraham and there is much difference among interpreters to which of these promises this text refers The Reader if he please may consult Paraeus on the words and Junius in his parallels but to what text soever it is that these words do refer I am confident that the Apostle speaks not of any blessednesse received by covenant but a promise of making Nations blessed and this is not indeed to seeds as of many but to seed as of one which is Christ which I gather by comparing the words in hand with v. 8. of the same chapter and the Scripture foreseeing that God would justifie the Heathen through faith preached before the Gospel to Abraham saying In thee shall all Nations be blessed This is the promise that this Text holds out which is not a covenant for blessednesse but a promise to make blessed repeated againe verse 19. The Law was added because of transgressions till the seed should come to whom the promise was made which is not Christ collectively or mystically but personally considered not entring covenant but as Mediatour of the covenant So that this text serves nothing for this purpose A learned Writer indeed sayes It is beyond my brain to conceive that God should immediately make a Covenant with us who were children of disobedience and of wrath who could not be capable of any such covenant and conditions That Christ hath a hand to bring us into covenant before was yeelded and how far he hath a hand further to carry on the covenant may be yet further considered but man is a party in covenant and as God may make promises and give good things to fallen man so he may enter covenant with him likewise CHAP. V. The outward and not the inward Covenant is a covenant properly so called WHereas there is an usual distinction almost in all that write or speak of the covenant of a double covenant between God and his people one external and the other internal one passing outwardly and the other inwardly kept and observed Or as Dr. Preston expresseth it a single and double covenant which I shall forbear to examine seeing I know there is a right meaning though I much doubt whether there be in the Reader a right understanding My second Proposition shall be that it is the external Covenant not the inward that exactly and properly is called by the name of a Covenant and to which priviledges of Ordinances and title to Sacraments are annext This Proposition occasioned by this received distinction is of three heads which in case the Reader please he may subdivide into three distinct Positions 1. The outward and not the inward Covenant is most exactly and properly called by the name of a Covenant which I thus make good 1. That covenant to which the definition of a covenant doth belong hath exactly and properly the nature of a covenant this none can deny The definition sets out the nature of the thing defined But the definition most actly belongs to the outward covenant not to the inward This is plain An agreement of parties on tearms and Propositions is the definition of a covenant Now the outward covenant is an agreement on tearmes and Propositions as I have abundantly declared in that covenant God engages himself to man for his happinesse and man engages to faith and obedience The inward covenant hath no tearmes or Propositions at all for man to make good upon account of his covenanting seeing the performance of the conditions of the Scripture-covenant is his very entrance into the inward covenant He that believes and repents keeps covenant nothing more is expected of God or promised by man But beleeving and repenting is the first closing with God in covenant according to them that speak of an inward covenant 2. A covenant to perform conditions is a covenant properly so called But the outward covenant not the inward is a covenant to perform conditions This is plain The conditions in the inward covenant are the covenant 3. That which confounds entrance into covenant and keeping of covenant is no covenant properly so called In a covenant properly so called these are distinct But the inward covenant confounds entrance into covenant and keeping of covenant and therefore in exact propriety of speech is no covenant 2. The outward and not the inward Covenant is most usually in Scripture called by the name of a Covenant which is plaine in that they that have no part or portion in the inward covenant are yet still spoken of in Scripture as people in covenant God calls all Israel his people and that upon covenant termes Deut. 29. 10 11 12 13. Al of those that thus covenanted with God were not in the inward covenant This people at their worst and the wrost among them are called the people of God as by those that were strangers to this covenant These are the people of the Lord say the men of Babylon and are gone forth out of his land Ezek. 36. 20. so also by the Lord himself Jer. 2. 32. Can a Bride forget her attire yet my people have forgotten me dayes without number How often doth God own Israel as his people when he yet brands them as a rebellious revolting stiff-necked treacherous and adulterous people They that forsake the covenant of God that break covenant that deale falsely in it upon whom God brings a sword to avenge the quarrel of his covenant are in the outward not in the inward covenant But such there be among Gods covenant-people as he frequently complaines that break covenant c. These are not then in his inward but outward covenant The great objection is and all that carries colour against this Jer. 31. 32 33. where the Lord differencing the Old and New covenant saith This is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel and the house of Judah not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt which my Covenant they brake although I was an husband to them saith the Lord But this shall be my Covenant that I will make with the house of Israel After those dayes saith the Lord I will put my Law in their inward parts and write it in their hearts and will be their God and they shall be my people That is alone the inward covenant and the elect regenerate are alone within it The inward covenant then is called in Scripture a covenant and is in exact propriety of speech a covenant For answer I shall have further occasion to speak to this Text. In this place I shall only put some Queries 1. Whether those that carry this Text to an unconditionate covenant and restrain it alone to that which they call the inward covenant do not make the covenant in the time of the Law and that in Gospel-times essentially
different and consequently either make two covenants of grace distinct in kind or thrust all that were under the Old covenant out of all hope of salvation contrary to all Interpreters who make these covenants one in substance See the last larger Annotations on the words 2. Whether such an Interpretation do not utterly contradict New-Testament-light which holds out the New covenant in like latitude with the former in which many are called but few are chosen and where conditions are as explicitely and fully required as in Old Testament dispensations 3. Whether when Scripture speaks of things in opposition to mens erroneous conceits for a further Explanation of them and rectifying mens judgements in them it do usually lay down a full compleat and formal definition to which nothing is to be added or whether it doth not usually supply that in which men through mistake were defective and short And whether those Texts Esay 58 6 7. Is not this the fast that I have chosen to loose the bands of wickednesse to undo the heavy burdens and to let the oppressed go free and that ye break every yoak Is it not to deal thy bread to the hungry and that thou bring the poor that are cast out into thy house when thou seest the naked that thou cover him and that thou hide not thy self from thy own flesh Jer. 22. 15 16. Did not thy father eat and drink and do justice and judgement and then it was well with him He judged the cause of the poor and needy and then it was well with him was not this to know me saith the Lord Jam. 1. 27. Pure Religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this to visit the fatherlesse and widows in their affliction and to keep himself unspotted from the world are not parallel to this text in their way of delivery And in case we cannot finde a full definition of a religious Fast in that of Esay nor the whole of it that makes up saving knowledge in that of Jeremy nor the whole that makes Religion compleat in that of James why is it that we should earnestly contend that the full nature of a covenant is in this text exprest being fully parallel in the way of delivery to those other texts Thirdly it is upon the account of the outward Covenant and not the inward that men enjoy priviledges of Ordinances and interest in Sacraments Men that are so far honoured as to enjoy an outward covenant have just title to these priviledges It is in behalf of the Jew outwardly that the Apostle having so decryed his condition respective to the approbation of God puts the question What advantage hath the Jew what profit is there of Circumcision Rom. 3. 1. The Jew and Circumcision are there one A Jew outwardly and circumcision in the flesh go there in equal latitude He that by nature is a Jew as Paul speaks Gal. 2. 15. is of the circumcision And to these the Oracles of God are committed The instruments deeds and evidences of the covenants say the last Annotations It was the priviledge of Israel Psal 147. 19. Rom. 3. and then the priviledg of no other Nation Now it is the priviledg of all ingraffed in their stead This is confest even by a great part of those that understand the inward covenant or covenant keeping to acceptation almost whensoever they mention a covenant in that they baptize infants upon covenant grounds even all their infants that make a covenant profession and that upon just warranty It is further plaine in reason The outward covenant must have priviledges suitable to it self otherwise there is no manner of benefit or advantage of it This priviledge of the Sacrament is suitable being outward as the covenant is outward This is elsewhere spoken to at large and therefore I shall hear forbear I have indeed been challenged for this distinction of an outward and inward covenant as though I had been the sole Authour of it when all know that it is a distinction that of a long time among Divines hath been in common use and in case it had not been commonly received I should have forborne the use of it As I heard Mr. Ball once in discourse say that he denyed any such distinction of an outward and an inward call to the Ministery all calling being external unlesse the man called were a Prophet that which men terme an inward call being onely qualifications fitting for the work So that I deny in exact propriety of speech the inward covenant is any covenant but the answer of the soul unto that which the covenant requires And whereas it is said of me by way of conjecture It is probable that he thus distributes them from the blessings promised whereof some are inward and some outward for though he explain not himself fully yet I know no other sense that it will bear To this I say that I thus distinguish them to apply my self to the Readers understanding that hath been accumstomed so to call them and further I say that men that barely covenant and keep not covenant have onely priviledges that are outward They are visible Church-members and they have visible Church-priviledges and those who answer to covenant engagements which usually is called the inward covenant have priviledges both outward and inward A Jew outwardly had outward priviledges A Jew inwardly that is he that answered to his outward profession that worshipped God in spirit hath both those that were outward and inward It is further said It is evident that his outward Covenant hath no seal for it is a Covenant de sigillis conferendis If therefore it have a seal it is either the same which is promised or some other What this Authour means when he says it is a covenant de sigillis conferendis I am to learn If he mean that the seal follows the covenant and is put to after the covenant so it is in all covenants whatsoever He sayes they no where tell us what is the seal of their outward covenant me thinks we had no need to tell what the seal of that covenant was that the Jew entered was it not circumcision and did there not another follow viz. the Passeover Now I tell him that Circumcision and the Passeover were and Baptisme and the Lords Supper are seales of this covenant The Nation of the Jewes were in covenant as our Authour though he would yet must not deny They were not all in the inward covenant and yet they had these seales He says we are bound to give the seals to such Vocation which is effectual only to bring men to an outward profession of saving faith is larger then election and makes men such whom we are bound to baptize And such we say have right to them And to help him a little further Those men that he sayes the Church must baptize though without right we say are truely in covenant and have right when he knows what a childe he is to baptize he