Noah is bidden to take of all meat that is eaten would inferre that Noah preserved of all kinds of plants and seeds in the Arke but that was not needfull except onely for present food for the seeds of herbs might by Gods providence bee preserved in the earth as plants were kept under the water as was the olive ex Mercer QVEST. VII Of the Phoenix whether there be any such COncerning the Phoenix the question is because there is but one of that kind whether it were preserved among other foules in the Arke but I thinke it may be more worthily doubted whether there bee any such Phoenix or no 1. Plixy saith this bird is in Arabia Cardanus and Scaliger in the Mediterranean parts of India being called Semenda 2. Some say that after 500. yeares it dieth Pompon Mela. lib. 3. c. 9. Ambrose others that it liveth 660. yeares Plin. ibid. 3. Some that the Phoenix having made her a neast of divers spices intrare emori goeth in and dieth Ambr. Pompon ibid. other that motu alarum with the flittering of her wings she setteth the stickes on fire and is burned to ashes 4. Pliny addeth out of Cornelius Valerianus that the Phoenix was brought to Rome and openly shewed when Ir. Plantius and Sex Papinius were Consuls the 800. yeare of the City As this may seeme to bee a fable so also the rest For if the Phoenix dye upon her neast how could she be brought to Rome 5. Some also write that the Phoenix hath rostrum trifistulare a bill with three pipes wherewith she singeth melodiously before shee dieth sic Cardanus But Scaliger holdeth this to bee but a fable 6. No other like is that which Pompon Mela and Pliny write that of the ashes of the Phoenix commeth a worme and thereof another Phoenix which being now ready to flye taketh the bones of the old Phoenix with the neast and carrieth it to the City of the Sunne in Aegypt called Heliopolis and there layeth it upon the Altar as it were solemnizing the funerall thereof who seeth not how fabulous a fiction this is devised to countenance Pagan Idolatry and not agreeing with it selfe for if the Phoenix bee burned to ashes how can the bones and neast bee so carried 7. But among the rest this seemeth to be most unlikely that there should never be but one Phoenix at once for what species or kinde of any creature can they rehearse whereof there is never but one and whereas the Lord said to all his creatures increase and multiply this benediction should take no place in the Phoenix which multiplieth not and beside seeing of all creatures there came two and two the male and female into the Arke the Phoenix by this meanes should have perished seeing there was not of this kind male and female to be preserved in the Arke 8. But whereas Ambrose thus writeth Phoenix cum mortua fuerit reviviscit solos non credimus homines resuscitari the Phoenix being dead reviveth can we think then that man only shall not be raised Ambrose in so writing delivereth not his opinion but ex concessis as we say by the received report of the Phoenix among the heathen out of their owne grounds he proveth the resurrection QVEST. VII Whether the Arke were sufficient to containe the beasts with their food for a whole yeare IT is further doubted how the Arke could containe so many severall kinds of beasts and birds and beside sufficient food for them all 1. For the divers kinds of beasts they are reckoned not in all to bee above an hundred and fifty whereof there are 30. kinds of serpents and other creeping things 40. kinds of ravenous beasts which live with flesh which one with another exceed not the bignesse of wolves there are 40. more of other great beasts which one with another in quantity may be thought to bee equivalent to oxen and 40. kinds beside of small beasts which may one with another in proportion answer unto so many sheepe the whole number maketh an 150. All these severall paires of beasts were lodged in the middle region of the Arke which contained 400. cells or cabbins being each in breadth 6. cubits as much in length and nine in height as I have shewed before these roomes are large enough to receive the greatest paire of beasts or if some as the Elephants require a large space many of the rest might bee received in a lesse so that there were cabbins enough twice told to place all the beasts in 2. And if the middle part of the Arke were large enough for the beasts there is no doubt but that the upper story being of the same bignesse sufficed for the birds which though they bee more diverse and variable in their kinds yet are they of farre lesse quantity and so might bee contented with smaller cages 3. And whereas of the cleane beasts there were seven taken of every sort whereof there are ten severall kinds reckoned Deuter. 14. beside the paires counted before we must number five more for every sort of the cleane beasts which will make 50. single and 25. couples which added to the rest will make 175. couples which if they did arise unto 200 there might be found roome enough for them all in the middle division as before is said 4. Now that there was capacity sufficient in the lowest region of the Arke wherein to lay up food for the cattell thus it may appeare 1. Let it bee supposed that there were about 60. paire of beasts as great as oxen 50. paire of the bignesse of wolves and 60. more of the like quantity unto sheep 2. Allow to every wolfe as much food in quantity because they are ravenous as to an oxe and to 4. sheep as much wee shall have as it were an 125. paire and 250. single oxen 3. Then admit that all the beasts did eat of hey which asketh a large roome to lye in whereas other food as of graine and such other may bee layed in a narrower compasse 4. Then allow for every oxe 40. l. of hey in a day as Columella doth apportion it lib. 6. de re Rustic c. 3.50 and 40. l. of hey will easily bee contained in the space of a solide or square cubit so much hey then as will serve 250. oxen in a day will require for layer 250. cubits the layer then for so much hey as will suffice a whole yeare which consisteth of 365. dayes will have no lesse roome than of 85250. cubits it commeth not to 90. thousand cubits 5. Now take the capacity of one of the chambers being 300. cubits in length 50. in breadth 9. in height allowing one cubit for the partition above for otherwise it should be 10. cubits high and it will arise to an hundred five and thirty thousand square cubits for every ranke of cubits containeth 15. thousand so much maketh the length of 300. cubits multiplyed by the breadth of 90. this summe of 1500. being
and a fragrant smell as Aristotle and Plinâ—e write and therefore fitter in this behalfe to be a signe of grace and favour 6. Further their imagination is fond that think there shall be no Raine-bow 40. yeares before the end and destruction of the world by fire because the aire say they must be a long time before prepared by a continuall drinesse for that combustion As though God cannot at once make the world combustible as the raine and flouds were gathered together speedily for the inundation further if there should bee no raine for fortie yeares before the end of the world how should the fruits of the earth be preserved great famine and miserie must needs follow in the world whereas it seemeth at the comming of Christ there shall be pleasant times and full of mirth wherein they shall eat and drinke marry and bee given in marriage as it was in the dayes of Noah Matth. 24.7 Lastly Rupertus opinion wanteth sufficient ground who applieth this covenant signified by the Rainebow wholly unto Christ and maketh it altogether mysticall we deny not but that the Raine-bow being a signe of temporall benefit may be a type and figure of Gods everlasting mercy in Christ as Revel 4.3 the throne of God is described having a Raine-bow round about it yet it is evident that God covenanteth here with Noah for this temporall benefit and with all other creatures and living things to whom the spirituall covenant in Christ appertaineth not And whereas other mysticall significations are made of the Raine-bow as that the two colours of water and fire in the Raine-bow the one blew the other red doe betoken the baptisme of Christ by water and fire and the two judgements of the world the one already past by water the other to come by fire these applications and the like are witty rather and pretty than wise and pithy 8. Further whereas other covenants are made with condition of obedience this covenant is absolute that howsoever mens wickednesse may deserve other particular punishments the Lord will not any more destroy the world with water 9. This covenant the Prophet saith was made with an oath Isay 54.9 and yet no oath is here expressed because the word of God is as sure and stedfast as an oath as the Lord is said to have swore to Abraham concerning the multiplying of his seed Exod. 32.13 and yet no oath is mentioned where that promise is made Gen. 12. and 15.10 Ramban noteth that the Bow being turned with the ends downward and the backe to heaven therein is a signe of mercy for hee that shooteth arrowes holdeth the backe of the Bow from him 11. The Jewes when they see the Bow goe forth and confesse their sinnes and will not looke upon it with their eyes such superstition we allow not but it were meer that the sight thereof would put us in minde of Gods great mercy in sparing the world 12. This speech of the Lord concerning the heavenly Bow was neither uttered to Noah alone and by him to his children as some thinke or to Sem onely and Iapheth of his sonnes but to C ham with the rest whose sinne yet appeared not and this being a temporall blessing as wicked Cham was a partaker in it so the covenant might bee made with him seeing that therein even other creatures also are comprehended ex Mercer QVEST. XI How Gods is said to remember Vers. 15. THen will I remember my covenant 1. Not that God need to have any thing to put him in remembrance but either thereby is meant that God will never forget his covenant in that it shall appeare by the effects that God thinketh of his covenant to performe it or rather it is referred to the faith of men that they shall well perceive that God is faithfull in his promises Calvin so that God is said to remember because he maketh us to know and remember Chrysostome 2. Here it is called a covenant in a large sense for properly a covenant is not without a contract sine dato accepto a promise and a condition but such a covenant is not here made which is extended to the bruit beasts it then here signifies the absolute disposition and gracious purpose of God toward man and all flesh for their preservation Tremel QVEST. XII Whether Noah had more sonnes beside the three that are named Vers. 18. THe sonnes of Noah going forth of the Arke c. Berosus Annianus thinketh that Noah begat other sonnes after the floud to the number of thirty which were called Titanaes of their mother Titaa and that one Tuisco the father of the Germanes was the fourth sonne of Noah Muscul. But all these are fables 1. Because it it like that Moses would have made some mention of those sons at the least in generall as of the other Patriarks before the floud they begat sonnes and daughters Genes 5.2 The text saith that of these three the whole earth was overspread vers 19. But if there had beene other sonnes they also should have increased 3. It need not be marvelled that Noah lived 350. yeares after the floud and begat no children for all this was the time of his old age and Noah being 600. yeare old was not so apt for generation QVEST. XIII Why mention is made of Canaan ANd Cham was the father of Canaan 1. Mention is not made of Canaan the sonne of Cham and the rest of Noahs sonnes children omitted to note the intemperancie of Cham as Chrysostome thinketh because he begat him in the Arke for that is not like that Canaan was borne in the Arke both because mention is made onely of Noah and his wife and his sonnes and their wives that came out of the Arke eight persons in all Gen. 8. ver 16. as also seeing Canaan was the youngest of Chams sonnes Gen. 10.6 it would follow that the three elder sonnes Cush Misraim Puâ— being borne before Canaan and so before the floud should haue entred into the Arke contrary to the Scripture which remembreth but eight persons to have beene saved in the Arke 1 Pet 3.20 2. Neither as Ambrose conjectureth is Canaan mentioned to exaggerate Chams disobedience that having a sonne to whom he was father did forget his dutie to his father and therefore was justly punished with a wicked sonne 3. But this seemeth to be the reason Moses applieth the story to his times when as now the Israelites were going to possesse the land of Canaan that they might know that now was the time when the curse of Canaan and his posteritie should take place sic Muscul. QVEST. XIV Whether Noah was the first inventer of Wine Vers. 20. Noah planted a vineyard 1. Noah is said to be a man of the earth not because he was a great man or lived in the field without Cities as Ramban but because he delighted in husbandry 2. If it be asked whence Noah had these Vine-plants either as Ambrose thinketh they
it must be either of cleane beasts or uncleane but the uncleane nor â—â—y part thereof were not to bee brought into the Tabernacle The cleane beasts were of two sorts either such which they might eat of but not sacrifice as the Hart the Rocbuck and the like but these being uncleane in respect of any religious use because they were not to be sacrificed no part thereof was to be brought into the Tabernacle And as for the cleane beasts which might â—e sacrificed the fat thereof was to be burned upon the Altar Tostat. qu. 6. 2. These spices were of two sorts some were to be tempered and incorporate together to make a soft and liquid ointment and some to be beaten to powder to make a sweet perfume they were to bring them not mixed or compounded but in their simple nature for neither did they know how to compound them but Moses by Gods direction shewed after how they should be made and beside if they had brought the ointment and perfume ready compounded there had beene danger lest they should have prophaned it for their private uses which is straitly forbidden chap. 30. Tostat. qu. 8. QUEST XIV Of the mysticall and morall application of these divers oblations COncerning the spirituall application and end of these divers oblations 1. Beda doth mystically interpret them by the gold he understandeth a sincere faith more precious than gold by silver the confession of faith by the blew or silke colour the lifting up of our hearts to heaven by the purple the sufferings and passions which are endured for the truth by the double scarlet the two fold love of God and our neighbours by the silke the chastity of the flesh by the goats heire whereof they made sackcloth repentance 2. But Rupertus application is more fit and lesse curious by these divers oblations he understandeth the divers gifts which God hath bestowed upon his Church As some he gave to be Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists Haec grandia dona aurum argentum sunt c. These great gifts are as the gold silver and precious stones whereby the spirituall Temple is built 3. Likewise Procopius maketh this morall use that as here the Lord accepteth not only the gold and silver sed neque laâ—aem caprinam aspernatur c. so neither doth he despise even the goats haire if it be offered with a franke mind c. So God refuseth not the smallest and meanest gifts which are offered unto him in faith as our blessed Saviour commended the devotion of the poore widow that threw two mites into the treasury QUEST XV. Of the signification of the Sanctuary and wherefore it was ordained Vers. 8. ALso they shall make me a Sanctuarie 1. Some Hebrew Rabbines as R. Abraham Ab. Ezra doe very curiously by the Tabernacle decipher the three worlds the Intellectuall world where is the seat of God with his Angels for so over the Arke was Gods mercy seat and the Cherubims stretching their wings over it represented the Angels and blessed Spirits And the Materiall world as they would have the blew covering to signifie heaven the vaile the clouds the seven lampes the seven planets by the fire on the Altar and the water in the laver they understand the element of fire and water So the third world which is called the little world which is within man they would have represented by this Tabernacle as in the Arke there were two tables so there is in mans minde understanding and reason as there were divers instruments in the Tabernacle for divers purposes so in man there are divers organicall parts for the naturall functions and operations And in this curious manner the Rabbines goe on pleasing themselves in their owne fansies whereas the Lord ordained not his Tabernacle for any such end or purpose but onely that they might have a place where to professe the worship of God that he might dwell among them and shew them comfortable signes of his presence in hearing their prayers and granting their requests 2. Yea these Rabbines to their curiosity adde impiety for they thinke that God ordained the Tabernacle and the instruments of divers figures and divers mettals Vt diversae virtutes à coelestibus influxae recipiantur c. That thereby divers vertues should have their influence from the celestiall bodies and to this end they say the Temple was afterward built at Jerusalem because of some supernaturall influence in that place more than in others In which Rabbinicall assertion Ab. Ezra bewrayeth 1. Both impiety making God as an Inchanter or Sorcerer working by figures and mettals as Magicians in their inchantments observe such things whereas the Lord by his Law condemneth all such superstitions 2. As also absurdity tying the Lords supernaturall working to certaine places and instruments Gods naturall operation indeed is exercised by such naturall subordinate meanes as he hath appointed but his supernaturall worke is not limited to places nor meanes 3. Likewise an impossibility followeth in making corporall and materiall things the instruments to convey spirituall graces whereas spirituall things are not derived but by spirituall meanes Tostat. qu. 9. 3. But the true ends wherefore the Sanctuary was ordained where these First the Historicall that seeing God had made the Israelites a peculiar people to himselfe that they might have a peculiar kinde of worship from all other nations therefore God appointeth a certaine place with certaine persons and Ministers by whom certaine rites and ceremonies should be performed whereby he would be worshipped with more reverence sanctity and purity than the Gentiles worshipped their gods Tostat. qu. 9. Secondly for the mysticall end Beda saith that this earthly Tabernacle representeth the heavenly unto the similitude whereof we should conforme our selves in earth Si ad Angelorum in coelis consortia tendimus debemus vitam eorum in terris c. imitari If we tend to enjoy the company of Angels in heaven we should imitate their life in earth The Tabernacle also signifieth Christ by whom God is worshipped and in whom God doth manifest himselfe unto us Simler Thirdly every faithfull man is this Temple of God as the Apostle applieth it Ye are the temple of the living God as God hath said I will dwell among them and walke there Whereupon Bernard maketh this morall application Et nos mundemus conscientiam nostram c. And let us purge our conscience that when the Lord commeth paratam in nobis inveniat mansionem he may finde in us a mansion prepared QUEST XVI How the Lord is said to dwell in the Sanctuary Vers. 8. THat I may dwell among them 1. God hath three kinde of temples Habitat principaliter in seipso c. He dwelleth principally in himselfe because he onely comprehendeth himselfe as Apocal. 21.22 The Lord God almightie and the Lamb are the temple of the celestiall Ierusalem Habitat Deus in doâ—â— sacrata c. God also dwelleth in his sacred house by that spirituall worship which is
was a time of abstinency 2. Neither as some that for the more speedy increase of the world children were borne in a shorter time as at 7. moneths 3 Nor yet that Elam and Assur might bee twins both borne at a birth 4. But I rather thinke that Arphacsad might be either the eldest of all or the second of Sems sonnes for the scripture observeth not the order of time in setting downe names as we saw before in rehearsing of Sem Ham and Iapheth QVEST. XVIII Why it is here omitted in the genealog of these fathers and he died FVrther whereas in the Patriarkes lives before the floud it is added and hee died which is omitted here 1. Some thinke it is to shew that Henoch died not a common death as the rest did 2. Some to signifie that none of them perished in the floud 3. Some yet are more curious aâ— Bahai who thinketh this clause and he died to bee here omitted because Messiah was to come of this line whom they hold to be immortall and further he prescribeth Messiah his age that hee should live 837. yeares before the end of the sixt millenary or thousand yeare which hee would gather by the letters of the word Lemarbaty used by the Prophet Isay 9.7 which is of the increase of his government there shall bee no end where the first letter lamed signifieth 30. men 600. râ—sh 200. beth 2. he 5. which maketh together 837. But it is evident to all the world how they are deceived for the six thousand yeare is expired within lesse than 400. yeares and yet their supposed Messiah commeth not and againe Messiah came as well of the line of the fathers before the floud as of them after the floud 4. Wherefore this is more like to bee the reason because then after Adams transgression Moses would shew how the curse tooke place thou shalt dye the death in those long lived patriarkes that although they lived divers hundred yeares yet in the end they dyed Mercerus QVEST. XIX At what age of Terah Abraham was borne Vers. 26. TErah lived 70. yeares and begat Abraham c. Terah lived 205. yeares and died in Charran at what time Abraham was 75. yeares old Genes 12.5 Abraham then was borne when his father was an 130. yeare old not in his 70. yeare for the reconciliation then of these places 1. We need not with Hierome that followeth therein the Hebrewes to say that Abrahams age of 75. yeares is not counced from his birth but from his departure from Vr. of the Chaldes and his miraculous deliverance out of the fire wherein they cast him because he would not worship their Idols for beside that this tradition of Abrahams deliverance hath no sufficient ground to warrant it a great inconvenience will follow it if it bee admitted that Abraham was an 130. yeare old at this time when he is said to bee but 75. which must of necessitie followe if Abraham were borne in the 70. yeare of Therah then it would follow that Isaack borne when Abraham was an 100. yeare old was borne 30. yeare before hee came into the land of Canaan which is contrarie to the Scripture or if they will count those hundred yeares also from Abrahams departure out of Chaldea and that he was indeed an 160. yeares old when Isaack was borne and Isaack was 40. yeare old his father yet living when he tooke Rebeccah to wife Genes 25.20 Abraham should have lived above 200. yeares whereas the Scripture saith he lived but an 175. Genes 25.7 2 Neither is it a sufficent answer that Abraham went out of Charran at 75. yeares of his age long before his fathers death and that Moses doth recapitulate the story afterward as Aben Ezra for Steven saith that God brought him out after his father was dead Act. 7.4 And to say his father was spiritually dead not naturally because he staied still and refused to goe into Canaan living in idolatrie which is the devise of one Andreas Masins cited by Pererius is a forcing of Stephens words which in an historicall narration must be taken properly 3. And with Augustine to make two departures of Abraham into the land of Canaan the one when Terah was yet living being an 105. yeare old and Abraham 75. sojourning there 60. yeares while his father lived in Charran and another after Therâ—hs death whome Abraham might visite before going and comming into Canaan but now he came from thence his father being dead and returned no more that in the first departure his bodie remooved but his affection was toward that place where his father was but now his affection and all was removed This imagination of two departures into Canaan dissenteth from Stephens narration Act. 7. where indeed he speaketh of two journeyes of Abraham one out of Mesopotamia the other out of Charan But into Canaan the Lord brought him after his father was dead v. 4. and not before 4. That also is a meere fancy that the rest of Abrahams age is concealed who should be an 130. when hee is said to be but 75. to this intent because God would keepe secret the end of the world Calvin for this would nothing have helped to the knowledge of that secret the account of yeares past will not tell us what yeares are to come and our Saviour saith the Angels know not of that day and yet they knew very well the age of Abraham 5. Wherefore the best solution is that Abraham though he be named first because of the privilege and preeminencie of his faith yet was not the first borne Terah at 70. yeares began to have sonnes but Abraham was not borne till the 130. yeare of his fathers age for he was but 75. at his fathers death who was then 205. So Noah is said to be 500. yeare old when he begat Sem Cham and Iapheth yet was not Sem borne till two yeares after Gen. 11.10 beside Sarah is held to have beene Abrahams brothers daughther Abraham then could not be the eldest brother for Sara was but 10. yeares younger than Abraham Gen. 17.17 Iun. QVEST. XX. Sarai not sister but neece to Abraham Vers. 29. THe father of Milcha and of Iscah c. 1. Some thinke that this Iscah was not Sarai Abrahams wife but that shee was rather the daughter of Thare and Abrahams owne sister by the fathers side than the daughter of his brother Aran and that it was lawfull then for the halfe brother by the fathers side to marrie his sister sic Clement Alexand. Lippoman Cajetan Scotus 2. Others thinke that Sarai was not the naturall but the adopted daughter of Thare 3. But the truer opinion is that Sarai was the daughter of Haran sister to Lot and Milcah and the same that is called Iscah as may appeare by these reasons thus thinke Iosephus and Augustine Iunius 1. It is like that as Nachor married the one sister so Abraham married the other because it was their great care not
call them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 enchanters R. Levi taketh them to be those which by naturall meanes seeme to doe strange things while their craft is not perceived as here they seeme to make serpents of rods R. Saadias would derive it of chor and atam which signifieth an hole and secret because they did hide in secret holes and places as in graves those whom they consulted with and which gave answer unto them but this seemeth to be curious The fourth word is lahate of lahat which signifieth fire or the blade of a sword as Gen. 3.24 because Magicians use not onely words to enchant with but other instruments Aben Ezra But their enchantments are rather so called because they deceive men making them to take one thing for another as the fight is easily deceived in shaking of a bright sword Borrh. QUEST VIII Of the divers kindes of magick BEsides these here named there were other kindes of Magick as Plinie rehearseth divers as how they divined by water by the aire by the starres by basons shadowes talke with the dead lib. 30. c. 11.2 Augustine out of Proclus and Porphyrius sheweth that they made two kindes of Magick the one was thourgia which by certaine sacrifices and a fained purity of the body and by other rites did invocate as they thought the good spirits the other was called goetia because they used mourning in invocating of spirits and Necromantia because they consulted with the dead 3. Suidas maketh three sorts Mâ—gia art Magicke which was by invocating of the spirits for the effecting of some good worke as they were made to beleeve Goetia which by mourning called upon the spirits of the dead Pharmacia when they used or applied any venomous or poysoned thing Ex Perer. 4. But to know the divers devilish devices which Magicians used we can have no better direction than from the Scripture it selfe Deut. 18.10 Where beside these two kindes before rehearsed of jidgeni the wisard and casheph the Jugler or deceiver there are six more magicall practices set downe The first is Kasam the diviner 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Septuagint such as tooke upon them to tell of things which were lost and to declare hid matters and things to come such as divined by visions as Micah 3.6 The next is meghonen an observer of times Planetarius a Planetary such as by the aspect of the starres moving of the cloudes and by such like tooke upon them to prognosticate not of naturall things but of civill and humane affaires so is the word used Isai. 2.6 They are Southsayers as the Philistims and what the Philistims were we may read 1. Sam. 6. who by the going of the cart and by the way it tooke did take upon them to finde out the author of the plagues that were sent upon them the Septuagint reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such as observe words and use spels The third is nachash an Augur or Conjecturer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such as by the flying of birds or such like doe make conjectures as they that count the crossing of a hare the way ominous and such like The fourth is casheph the plurall whereof is cashphim deceivers touched before The fift is chober chaber the Inchanter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Septuagint that useth inchantment as it is expounded by another word Psal. 58.6 lachash which signifieth to mutter or whisper such as take upon them to charme Serpents and adjure Devils and to doe great cures by hanging inchanted things about the necke or such like the word chabar signifieth to joyne because such have a league and conjunction with evill spirits The sixt is shoel obh that asketh of familiars 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ventriloquus Septuagint that give answers as though a spirit or familiar spake within them for obh signifieth a bottle or the belly swelling and puffed up and ready to brast as Iob. 22.20 The seventh is jâ—dgoni the Wisard spoken of before The eight is doresh el hamethim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that inquireth of the dead such as make men beleeve they can raise up the dead to consult with them whereas it is the Devill in their likenesse as the witch of Endor brought up the Devill in likenesse of Samuel 1. Sam. 28. QUEST IX Of the first author and inventor of art Magick Vers. 11. THese Charmers of Egypt Though Egypt was much given to this devilish invention of Magicke yet neither were they the first founders nor the onely professors of it 1. Most Writers doe make Zoroastres of Persia the author of it as Plinie and Diogenes Laertius Iustinus Plinie writeth of him that hee only of all men that ever were laughed the same day hee was borne and his braine so moved up and downe that it would remove or put off the hand laid upon it which they say was a signe of his great and mysticall knowledge the author of the Scholasticall history saith that this Zoroastres was Ninus who wrote this art Magicke and the seven liberall Arts in fourteene pillars seven of brasse and seven of bricke to preserve them from the destruction of the world one by water the other by fire 2. Concerning the antiquity of Zoroastres hee was neither so ancient as some write that hee was 600. yeeres elder than Plato or five thousand yeeres before the battell of Troy as Hermippus as Laertius citeth him nor yet was he so late as Xantus Lydius maketh him to be but six hundred yeeres before Xerxes expedition into Greece For Zoroastres was in the time of Ninus when Abraham lived from whose birth to the first Olympiad are counted 1268. yeeres and the battell of Troy was 407. yeeres before the beginning of the Olympiades But Xerxes passage into Greece followeth in the 75. Olympiade and Plato his death in the 108 Olympiade by this it is evident that Zoroastres was neither so many yeeres before the first nor so few as the rest imagine 3. But Cassianus deriveth the first invention of Magicke from before the floud for whereas Adam having the knowledge of the celestiall bodies and elements taught the same unto Seth which kinde of knowledge continued uncorrupt in the righteous seed till they joyned in marriage with the posterity of Cain then they abused and prophaned the same to the finding out of superstitious and Magicall devices which wicked inventions they say were preserved by Cain and by him graven in certaine plates of mettall sic Cassianus collat 8. cap. 21. So these devilish practises continued along and were dispersed in the world they were rice in Canaan in Moses time as may appeare by the Lawes made against such in divers places but especially Deut. 18.10 And afterward about the time of the Trojane warre these Magicall studies were much followed as Homers fable of Circes sheweth Orpheus among the Thessalians and Osthanes that accompanied Xerxes in his warre against Greece were famous in this kind Pythagoras and after him Empedocles Democritus Plato seemed to make great
chap. 8 quest 12. and confut 1. 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. God overruleth mens affections Vers. 3. THe Lord gave the people favour in the sight of the Egyptians Hereby wee learne that God hath the ruling and turning of mens affections he can worke them either to favour or disfavour Piscat So the Wiseman saith As the rivers of waters the Kings heart is in the hand of the Lord â—e tâ—â—neth it whither soever it pleaseth him Prov 21.1 Like as the husband man maketh furrowes in his ground and draweth the water which way it pleaseth him and as the sternes man in the vessell doth move it which way he listeth so can the Lord order and governe the streames of mens affections 2. Doct. Godly men have their passions and affections Vers. 8. SO he went out from Pharaoh very angry Even wise and godly men have their affections it iâ— not as the Stoikes taught that there is a vacuity and absence of them in wise and perfect men They are not without affections but they rule them by reason and their reason is sanctified by grace The Apostle saith be angry but sinne not Ephes. 4.26 He alloweth to be angry but not to sinne in anger Christ the most perfect man that ever was had his affections as of anger Marke 3.5 He looked round about him â—â—gerly of joy Luk. 10.21 Iesus rejoyced in spirit of sorrow Matth. 26.38 My soule is heavy unto death of love as Ioh. 13.23 The disciple whom Iesus loved 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against Purgatory BEfore in the third question where it is disputed what Angels God used in bringing the last plague of death of the first borne upon Egypt Pererius sheweth the difference betweene the ministry of the Angels in this life and in the next falling to make mention of purgatory for they cannot doe otherwise for ther lives but upon every occasion broach their owne fansies leaveth it as uncertaine and undiscussed whether the good Angels or the bad should be ministers of purgatory he thinketh not the bad that they should exercise power over them which in their life time did conquere the Devill neither yet will hee have them to be the good It is an unmeet thing saith he that they which shortly should become the fellowes and partakers of the blessed Angels in heaven should bee punished by them Perer. 1. disput in cap. 11. Contra. 1. Let any reasonable man judge whether it be not like that purgatory should be a meere fansie where there is supposed to bee torments and yet no tormentor In that hee thinketh that neither good Angels nor bad are the ministers of those torments I condescend to him who then not Christ I am sure for he hath redeemed them nor yet God himselfe for the Apostle saith Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods chosen it is God that justifiâ—th who shall condemne Rom. 8.33.34 God hath justified them by faith in Christ and being justified there is nothing further to be laid to their charge If then there be no tormenter in purgatory there is no torment in purgatory and so purgatory fire is quite quenched and put out 2. Beside this uncertainty who should be the tormenters there be other maine points not yet resolved of among them concerning purgatory as of the place where it is of the fire what it is corporall or spirituall of the time how long it shall last whether hundred yeeres or thousands of the greatnesse of the paine whether it exceed all the torments and punishments of this life These articles are not yet defined and determined among them as Bellarmine sheweth lib. de purgat from chap. 6. to chap. 14. Therefore we will leave them to their uncertainties and as they make question of the circumstances of purgatory so we will not onely make question of purgatory it selfe but are most sure that it is but an invention of their owne for all they which dye in the Lord that is in the faith of Christ are pronounced blessed and to rest from their labours and their workes follow them Revel 14.13 Here are three arguments against purgatory They which dye in the faith of Christ are blessed but they which are in hell torments for purgatory they make part of hell are not blessed They doe rest from their labours but they which are in purgatory are in labour and paine Their workes follow them for their reward but they which are tormented â—nd punished are not rewarded Therefore wee acknowledge no other purgatory but in this life a perfect purgation of our sinnes in Christ Heb. 12.3 and an imperfect which is by the fiery probation of affliction as S. Peter calleth it Thinke it not strange concerning the fiery triall which is among you to prove you 1. Pet. 4.12 2. Confut. Against the Manichees which reject the old Testament Vers. 10. BVt the Lord hardned Pharaohs heart Hence the Manichees tooke occasion to utter their blasphemies against the God of the old Testament and to reject the Scriptures themselves of the old Testament as proceeding from a God that was a worker of evill in hardning mens hearts These Augustine confuteth at large hom 88. de tempore shewing how God is said to harden the heart without any touch of sinne for thus he writeth Non Pharaonem Dei violentia sed propria impietas obduravit Not any violence from God but Pharaohs owne impiety did harden him And these words I will harden Pharaohs heart he expoundeth thus Cum abfuerit ei gratis mea obduret illum nequitia sua when my grace is from him then his owne wickednesse shall harden him 2. Then he doth illustrate it by this similitude as the water is frozen till the Sun shine upon it then it resolveth and so soone as the Sunne is departed it is bound with cold againe the Sun is not the cause of the freezing of the water but the coldnesse of the water bindeth it selfe so properly God causeth not the heart to be hardned but by the absence of his grace it is hardned 3. But if the question be asked why the Lord suffereth any to be hardned he maketh this answer Aut illorum iniquitati qui obdurari merentur adscribendum aut ad inscruâ—abilia Dei judicia referendum quae plerunque sunt occulta nunquam autem injusta This must â—â—thâ—r be ascribed to their iniquity which deserve to be hardned or it must be referred to the judgements of God which are often hid but never unjust It sufficeth 〈◊〉 to know and beleeve as the Apostle saith Rom. 9. Is there iniquity with God 3. Confut. Against Pererius that thinketh none in this life to be without hope of grace and repentance NOw further whereas Pererius in the treatise of induration moveth this disputation whether any man can be so hardned in this life as that he become altogether impenitent and incorrigible and without hope of grace and resolveth upon the negative part that none in this life are in such
our blessed Saviour said unto Peter Lovest thou me c. Feed my sheepe Ioh. 21.16 Peters discharge of his dutie in feeding the Lords sheepe proceedeth from love 3. Places of Controversie 1. Cont. That an Idoll and an Image are all one Vers. 1. THou shalt make thee no graven image nor any similitude The first word is pesel any thing that is carved or graven the other is temanah similitude both the one and the other is forbidden therefore that is but a vaine distinction of the Romanists betweene idolum an Idoll and imago an image they confesse they worship Images but no Idols such as the Gentiles adored for every similitude of any thing whatsoever is forbidden to be made now their Images are similitudes Let them heare also the testimonie of some of their owne writers concerning this matter Cajetâ—â—â— upon this place saith that it is forbidden exhibere dâ—iâ— in imagine seu idolo signum aliquod honoris to exhibite unto God in an image or Idoll any signe of honour Lippoman also thus writeth Dictio Hebraica est pesel quae est sculptile idolâ—â— sicut vertunt Septuaginta c. The Hebrew word is pesel which is a graven image and an Idoll as the Septuagint turne it and an image as the Chalde readeth c. qua tamen omnia idem sunt which all notwithstanding are the same See more elsewhere of this matter Synops. p. 397. 2. Cont. Against the Popish difference betweene Idoll worship and Idoll service Vers. 5. THou shalt not bow downe to them nor serve them The word is ghabad which Oleaster pronounceth abad Iunius useth to expresse the letter aiu with a double aspiration hhabad the word signifieth to serve as servants doe service to their masters Pelargus then noteth well hereupon that the Popish distinction betweene 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Idoll worship and Idoll service is by this confuted for we are forbidden here to give 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 service unto Idols 3. Cont. Against the Turks that allow of no Images THou shalt not bow downe to them Simply then we are not forbidden to make images for there is great use of pictures in describing of histories drawing of Cards and Mappes and Moses Tabernacle was set forth with the pictures of Cherubs and Salomons brasen Laver stood upon twelve Oxen therefore the curiositie of Turkes is here reproved that abhorre and detest all Images even of beasts yea of flowers whereas they worship a great and abominable Idoll in their minde and with externall adoration that wicked Mahomet 4. Cont. That it is not lawfull to make any Image at all of the Trinitie Vers. 4. THou shalt make thee no graven image Further against the Romanists we observe that it is not lawfull to make any image or similitude at all to represent God the Father the Sonne or the Holy Ghost by Our reasons are these 1. The Scripture speaketh evidently Deut. 4.15 Take heed 〈◊〉 your selves for yee saw no image in the day that the Lord spake unto you Isai. 40.18 To whom will yee liken God or what similitude will you set up unto him Act. 17.29 We ought not to thinke that the Godhead is like unto gold or silver or stone graven by art and the invention of man Rom. 1.23 They turned the glory of the incorruptible God to the similitude of the Image of a corruptible man Out of these places of Scripture these reasons may be gathered 1. From the interdict or prohibition God forbiddeth any image to be made of him 2. From the nature of God which being infinite and incircumscriptible cannot be portraited by an image 3. It is a dishonour unto God to liken him to a corruptible man Vrsin 2. Lactantius useth this reason Images are made of men Vt ex ea solatium capiat absentis thereby to take comfort over him that is absent Supervacua ergo hominis Imago cum prastò est an Image of a man then is superfluous when hee himselfe is present Dei autem cujus Spiritus ac numen ubique diffusum abesse nunquam potest semper utique supervacua Imago Thou an Image of God whose dâ—vine Spirit can never be absent being dispersed every where is alwayes superfluous Lactant. de Origen error lib. 2. cap. 2. 3. Augustine thus testifieth Aut id ipsum quod sedere Pater dicitur flexis poplitibus fieri putandum est 〈◊〉 illud incidaâ—â—us sacrilegium c. Neither whereas God the Father is said to sit must wee imagine it to be done as with bowing of the knees lest wee fall into that sacriledge which the Apostle chargeth them with that changed the glorie of the incorruptible God into the similitude of a corruptible man Talâ— simulachrum nefas est Christiano in templo collocare Such an Image it is a wicked thing for a Christian to set up in the Church much more wicked in his heart c. August de fid Symbol cap. 7. Augustines reason is taken from the incorruptible nature of God grounded upon that place of the Apostle Rom. 1.23 4. Nicephorus lib. 18. cap. 53. reporting of the Jacobites and Armenians which did make the Images of the Father and the holy Ghost saith Quod per quam est absurdum which is a very absurd thing and he useth this reason Imagines eorum sunt quae videri circumscribi possunt Images are of those things which may be seene and circumscribed 5. Ioann Aventin lib. 7. writeth of Iohn the 22. that certaine in the coasts of Bohemia and Austria which pictured the Trinitie like an old man a young man and under the shape of a Dove he held to bee Anthropomorphites and some of them he condemned to the fire 6. Vâ—rro writeth that the Romanes worshipped God 170. yeares without any image Quod si adhuc mansisset castius dii observarentur Which use if it had continued the gods should more chastly and soberly have beene reverenced August lib. 4. de Civitat Dei cap. 31. The making of images of God even in this Heathen writers judgement was a decay of true religion and devotion Ex Simler 7. Plutarke in the life of Numa reporteth that he forbad the Romanes to have any image of the gods under any shape of man or other creature and he giveth this reason Quòd nefas esset praestantiâ—rae deterioribus ad simulare neque Deum aliter quà m mente atringi posse censerent Because they judged it unlawfull to resemble the most excellent things to the baser and that God could not otherwise than by the mindâ— be attained unto The contrary Objections answered 1. Object BUt it will bee thus objected The Scriptures doe ascribe unto God humane parts as â—â—nds eyes feet therefore it is not unlawfull in such manner to describe and resemble God Answ. 1. There is great difference betweene words and deeds God which in Scripture so useth to speake to our understanding yet hath forbidden any such image to be made of
of a brother for the word is used first in this place where it so signifieth from hence then the originall sense of the word must be taken 3. The words of the law are If brethren dwell together now naturall brethren and such as are properly so called are more like to dwell together than kinsmen removed who in a large sense are so called brethren 4. This law is so interpreted in the Gospell where it appeareth by the Sadduces question of seven brethren that successively tooke the one the others wife Matth. 22. that it was so practised 5. It is the opinion of Philo and the Hebrewes as we heard before who are best acquainted with their owne lawes that naturall brethren used so to doe 4. Now the objections on the contrary part are easily answered 1. It is objected that Levit. 18.16 the brother is forbidden to marry his brothers wife Answ. This is a particular exception from that generall law that unlesse in this case onely to raise seed to the brother it was utterly unlawfull to take the brothers widow which was not to uncover her shame but rather to take away her shame in that shee remained childlesse by his brother and it was honourable to the dead in reviving his memory So wee see in other cases that the Lord made some particular exception from his generall lawes As the making of the Cherubims over the Arke was an instance against the second commandement the Israelites robbing of the Egyptians against the eighth commandement Phinehes killing of the adulterer and adulteresse against the sixth commandement 2. Ob. The practice of this law as appeareth Ruth 4. where Boaz not a brother but a kinsman taketh the wife of the dead sheweth the meaning thereof Answ. We deny not but where there was no brother nearer there the next kinsman further off did the duty of the brother and so was it practised upon Ruth 3. Ob. Iohn Baptist simply reproveth Herod because he tooke his brothers wife It is not lawfull for thee saith Iohn to have thy brothers wife Mark 6.18 Answ. It is certaine that Herods brother had issue by his wife Herodias whose daughter danced before Herod and therefore in this case it was not lawfull so that Herod tooke not Herodias for any such purpose to raise seed to his brother but of an immoderate lust 4. Ob. Why then should it not be lawfull still in this case to marry the brothers wife dying without issue Answ. This law of Moses was partly ceremoniall and typicall in preserving the right of the first-borne whereby was prefigured the spirituall birth-right in the Messiah which never should have end partly politicall in maintaining the distinction of families in their tribes whereof the ceremonie is now abolished which onely concerned that people Iun. in Deut. 25. vers 5. QUEST VIII Whether Thamar or Iudahs sinne was greater COncerning this act of incontinencie which Iudah committed with Thamar 1. We refuse the opinion of Rab. Simeon who altogether exempteth Thamar from any fault because she onely desired issue for the hope of the Messiah to be borne of Iudah for this mystery was not as yet revealed Perer. 2. It is certaine that Iudahs sinne was greater than Thamars both in that he brake promise with her concerning Selah as also in that he companied with her not for any issue but carnall lust though he were afterward preferred before his brethren this no more excuseth his fault than if Davids adultery joyned with murther should bee defended because hee was preferred before his brethren of whose seed the Messiah should come 3. Thamars sinne was lesse than Iudahs yet a sinne as Augustine noteth Non eam justificatam sed magis quam se justificatam dicens Iudah saith She was not righteous but more righteous than he lib. 22. cont Faust. cap. 62. Yet her fault is extenuated by these circumstances as Ambrose noteth Non alienum praeripuit thorum She did not usurpe upon anothers bed she stayed till Iudah was a widower she did it not of an inordinate lust Sed successionis gratia concupivit She onely desired to have issue Et ex ea familia quam delegerat And by that family which she had chosen and further after she knew her selfe to be conceived with childe she put on her widowes garments againe and so continued 4. Yet Thamars sin in some respect was greater than Iudahs because she wittingly committed incest with her father in law but Iudah ignorantly Luther Notwithstanding all circumstances considered Iudahs fault was the greater and so he doth justifie her in respect of himselfe 5. But whereas Ambrose further noteth that shee stayed till Selah to whom she was espoused was dead therein is an errour for vers 14. it is given as a reason why Thamar attempted this thing because Selah was now growne and of age and she yet not given unto him he was then at this time alive Beside Selah is numbred among those sons of Iudah that went downe with Iacob into Egypt and onely Er and Onan of Iacobs sonnes are said to have died in the land of Canaan Gen. 46.12 ex Perer. QUEST IX How it came to passe that Iudah discerned not Thamar by her voice Vers. 15. HE judged her to be an whore for she had covered her face c. 1. Not as some reade she had coloured or painted her face whom Aben Ezra doth not without cause reprove 2. Neither is this a reason why Iudah did thinke she was an harlot because she was vailed as Iunius Calvin for harlots use not to be so modest but it is given as a reason why Iudah did not know her Mercer 3. And whereas it may seeme strange that Iudah did not know her by her voice the reason is that being wholly given over to lust and intending no other thing he greatly regarded not the sight of his eyes or hearing of his eares Luther As also it was a just judgement of God upon him to strike him with such a stupidity as not to discerne her Mercer Geneven QUEST X. Whether Iudâ—h were a Iudge Vers. 24. BRing her forth and let her be burnt c. 1. Iudah giveth not sentence against Thamar either as being appointed a Prince and Judge among the Canaanites as Tostatus Cajetanus for it is not like they would suffer a stranger to be a Judge and ruler among them as the Sodomites answer Lot Gen. 19.9 neither as chiefe in the familie had he power of life and death over those of his charge as some thinke for neither doe we reade that any father of families did execute any such justice in their families and Iacob was the chiefe father of these families and therefore it is most like that Iudah giveth advice that Thamar should be brought forth to the place of justice and proceeded against according to the custome and law of that Country Mercer Iun. 2. But whereas she is adjudged to the fire this was not because she was Melchisedecks daughter the Lords
high Priest as the Hebrewes imagine for he died ten yeares before Iacob was borne who was now above 100. yeare old and therefore Melchisedeck could not have a daughter so young to beare children neither was this punishment arbitrary in Iudah and inflicted without law according to his pleasure Burgens for Iudah had no such authority there nor yet as Lyranus and Tostatus was she worthy of the fire because she had committed not simple fornication but adultery because she was by law obliged to the third brother and so in a manner espoused for it was not adultery for the widow of the brother to marrie with some other than the surviving brother else Naomi would never have advised her daughters in law to get them other husbands in their owne Countrey Ruth 1.9 But I rather thinke that Thamars adultery was in this that she had played the whore whereas Iudah had betrothed and espoused her to Selah and that Iudah who never was minded to give Selah to Thamar fearing lest he might die also as is evident vers 11. was very forward to take this occasion to be rid of Thamar that Selah might not marrie her 3. But herein appeareth Iudahs too much rigour and injustice that before the matter was examined gave sentence and was partiall the truth being knowne in his owne cause and further it was a savage part to put to death a woman great with childe which is contrary both to divine and humane lawes for it is written Deut. 24.16 The fathers shall not bee put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers but if Thamar had now died the infant had died with her The Romans had a law that the execution of a woman with childe should be deferred till she had brought forth the same also was practised among the Athenians Aeltan lib. 5. And therefore Claudius the Emperour is noted for his cruelty that spared not to put to death women with childe Perer. ex Dion lib. 57. QUEST XI Wherefore the Midwife useth a red threed and what colour it was of Vers. 28. THe midwife bound a red threed c. 1. It is so rather to be read than with Oleaster a twine or double threed the word sani here used commeth indeed of sanah that signifieth to double which is rather to be referred to the double die and colour than the double matter Iun. Tostatus also is much deceived here that taketh it not for a red but a blacke colour twice died ex Perer. 3. The Midwife tied this red threed as a marke of the first-borne because he first put forth his hand and the purple colour very well agreeth to the birth-right or eldership Muscul. QUEST XII Whence Pharez was so called and whereof he is a type Vers. 29. HOw hast thou broken thy breach upon thee 1. Hierome is deceived that of this word pharatz that signifieth to breake or divide thinketh the Pharises to have taken denomination whereas they had their name rather of Pharas which signifieth to disperse or separate because they were separate from other in profession of life and their apparell Mercer 2. This story hath bin diversly allegorized by the fathers some by Pharez understand the beleeving Gentiles by Zarah the Israelites and by the red threed their bloudy circumcision sacrifices sic Iren. Cyril Some contrariwise will have Phares to signifie the Jewes Zarah the beleeving Gentiles Chrysost. 3. But this Phares is more fitly a type and figure of Christ who hath broken downe the partition wall and hath broken the power of hell and death Mercer And by this strange and extraordinary birth the Lord would have Iudah and Thamar admonished of the sin which they had committed and to be humbled thereby though he in his mercie had forgiven it Calvin 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The difference betweene the apparelling of widowes and wives Vers. 14. SHe put her widowes garment off c. It seemeth that it was the use in those dayes for widowes to be knowne from wives by their mourning and grave apparell in which case more is permitted to women that are married whom the Apostle alloweth to adorne themselves with comely and sober apparell without pride or excesse 1 Timoth. 2.9 to please and content their husbands but widowes having no husbands to whose liking they should apparell themselves ought not to decke themselves to please other mens eyes Luther 2. Doct. Friendship ought alwayes to be joyned with pietie Vers. 20. IVdah sent a kid by the hand of his friend This Hâ—rah Iudahs friend did performe an evill office in being as it were a broker for Iudah who should neither have requested any dishonest or uncomely thing of his friend nor the other yeelded unto it love truth and piety ought not to be separated as Saint Iohn saith Whom I love in the truth Epist. 3.1 Muscul. 3. Doct. Adultery in former times punished by death Vers. 24. LEt her bee burnt We see that even among the Canaanites adultery was judged worthy of death for Iudah inventeth no new kinde of punishment but speaketh according to the law and custome of that Countrey So the Lord himselfe said to Abimelech that had taken Sarai unto him Behold thou art but a dead man for this c. Gen. 20.3 Now although this law as peculiar to that Countrey bindeth not now neither in respect of the kinde of death for by Moses law onely the Priests daughter if she played the whore was burned Levit. 21.9 the rest were stoned nor yet in the inequality of the law for the women offending were burned the men escaped as appeareth in Iudah Calvin whereas both adulterers and adulteresses are alike guilty and though then there was greater cause of keeping their seed uncorrupt for preserving of their lives and the distinction of families in which respect it may be thought somewhat of the former rigour and severity may be abated yet this example condemneth the security and connivence of magistrates in these dayes in the punishing of this sinne when as faults of lesse nature are more severely censured than adultery And whereas the president of our Saviour is urged by some for the mitigation of the punishment of adultery because he would not condemne the woman taken in adulterie it doth not serve their turne for this mercie Christ shewed not to cleare or exempt the adulteresse leaving her to the magistrate but partly to shew that he came not to be a judge in such causes as neither in other like businesses as dividing of the inheritance Luk. 12.14 partly by this example he would teach what is to be required in the person of an accuser not to bee guilty of that crime whereof he accuseth others 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That it is not lawfull upon any occasion to marrie the brothers wife Vers. 8. GOe into thy brothers wife Because in this place as also Deut. 25.5 it is permitted to naturall brethren to marry the wives of their brother deceased