subject to the Prophets As for those words If any thing be revealed to another that sits by let the first hold his peace although they are alledged by some to prove the contrary yet being well considered it will appear also even from those words themselves that they are rather to be meant of something which he had provided to speak before he came into the Congregation then of a sudden extraordinary revelation I confesse as the words are translated they sound something the other way the word by is not in the Greek and we are to read them thus If any thing be revealed to another that sitteth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not that sitteth by It is not the Apostles scope onely to expresse the posture of the man for whether he sate or stood if he had a revelation he was to have the same liberty of speaking Nor is it his scope onely to set forth his being by or present in the Congregation for then he had rather said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But a further matter is intended as we may see by the same phrase used Acts 13. 14. Paul and Barnabas at their first comming to Antioch in Pisidia went into the Synagogue on the Sabbath day and says the Text they sat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In which words also the holy Ghost intends more then barely to record their posture in the Synagogue or to set it down whether they sat or stood It is a phrase both in this place and in the other 1 Cor. 14. importing thus much a placing themselves so in the Congregation as therby giving notice to them that they had something to speak unto the people as appears in that the rulers of the Synagogue after the Lecture of the Law was ended applyed themselvs to Paul and Barnabas without any speech had with them before whereby to have known their minds saying Men and brethren if ye have a word of exhortation to the people speak Whether it was because the Sonnes of the Prophets in Israel were not fixed in one place for the exercise of their function but went occasionally from place to place prophesying in the Synagogues or what else was the cause it seemes that in their Synagogues there was a place provided on purpose in which whoever placed himself the people expected some word of God from them and those who would tender themselves to speak did purposely set themselves in that seat some such custome I suppose it was that occasioned this phrase and so you are to understand that of Paul and Barnabas and this in 1 Cor. 14. If any thing be revealed to another that sitteth that is to another that is provided and tenders himself to speak in such a case says the Apostle he that speaks first is to take but so much time as to leave room for him who is to follow Thus we see that those very words do point us rather to the ordinary provision of the preachers of the word by ordinary gifts and to something whereof they are supposed to be provided by meditation and study before they come into the Congregation then to any extemporary revelation And it is evident from those reasons given before that the Apostle speaketh of such and that as the Preacher is called a Prophet so such provision is there called a revelation To this I may adde what we have found and considered from Rev. 19. 10. compared with Acts 2. 18. Rev. 12. 17. in the former Treatise upon the Covenant of God with Abraham pag. 85 86. 87. namely that now in the times of the New Testament every beleever hath the Spirit of prophesie yea though he be no preacher in the Church as is there shewed from those words of the Angel forbidding John to worship him saying See thou do it not I am thy fellow-servant and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus worship God for the Testimony of Jesus is the Spirit of prophesie This Testimony of Jesus is the whole manifestation of God by Jesus Christ contained as was shewed p. 132 in the Scripture of the Old and New Testament so called because the Lord Christ is that faithful and true Witnesse which God hath taken to himself whereby to give credit to his Gospel in the hearts of his people being fitted for that work as being his Sonne who knows all his bosome thoughts Joh. 1. 18. And as being a distinct person to the Father Joh. 8. 17. 18. for a witnesse must be another person And because of his assuming our nature and so being made one of our number In reference to all which it is that he saith Ye beleeve in God beleeve also in me Joh. 14. 1. Now by that speech of the Angel whoever hath this Testimonie which is the character and priviledge of every beleever in the times of the New Testament Rev. 12. 17. 1. 9. 6. 9. hath the Spirit of prophesie and is therefore a fellow-servant to the Angel by whom the Lord Christ gave the revelation of such prophesies unto his servant John The reason is because whoever hath the Testimony of Jesus hath it not onely in the Letter but hath received the Spirit also Gal. 3. 2. The ministration of the New Testament is a ministration of the Spirit 2. Cor. 3. 8. Therefore he saith that the Testimony of Jesus is the spirit of Prophesie because it is not had without the Spirit No man can say that Jesus is the Lord but by the Holy Ghost 1. Cor. 12. 3. It is a living word if it be an abiding word in any soule 1 Pet. 1. 23. By all which places we see that we in the times of the New Testament are not without the Revelations of God and that in an ordinary way by the use of ordinary gifts we have in effect the same communion with God in the visions of his glory and the discovery of his fatherly affection to us as they had by those extraordinary wayes of Revelation This therefore is another reason of the point namely why those extraordinary wayes are ceased and that what is attained of the manifestations of God to our soules must be had in the use of ordinary gifts in search and study of the Scriptures Reason 3 Because if God had still continued his speaking to his Saints by extraordinary wayes and by persons infallibly inspired such as were the Prophets and Apostles he had taken a course to keep his people at a lower stature in beleeving then is now attained to Had there been advantage in continuing such meanes the personal presence of Christ in the flesh amongst us of all other had been the greatest but we see what our Saviour saith to that Joh. 16. 7. It is expedient for you saith he that I go away implying that there was intended for the Church a better state by his presence with us in the Spirit then what they had by his presence in the Flesh The reason is 1. Because
for the Sabbath day and so the blessing of the house of God is set forth Psal 23. 5 6. As for instance In prayer our heavenly father giveth the Holy Spirit to them that ask him Luk. 11. 13. And by one Spirit are we baptized into one body 1 Cor. 12 13. In the supper of the Lord we have the communion of the body of Christ namely in partaking with our head in the same anointing with the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 10 16. are all made to drink into one spirit 1 Cor. 12. 13. And so in all the rest The worke therefore to be done in this also of hearing the Word is that by the hearing of Faith we receive the Holy Ghost Gal. 3. 2. and that upon our beleeving we are sealed by the holy spirit of promise Ephes 1. 13. that is that there be First A powerful impression by the word upon the soule from the spirits witness to it setting of it home with life and vigour begetting and confirming faith changing the heart subduing it unto the power of the truth of God so making it unto the soul a creating word without which work it is but a dead letter to it Secondly The Image of Christ as it were stamped upon the soule in that impression elsewhere called his being formed in us Gal. 4. 19. in reference to which the word is called an immortal seed that liveth abideth for ever by which we are begotten in the new birth 1 Pet. 1. 23. called also an ingraffed word James 1 18 21 because it turneth us into its own nature and makes us like to Jesus Christ which image consisteth in our likenesse to him in his death and resurrection Philip. 3. 10. in the mortification of sinne and a spiritual resurrection unto newnesse of life Rom. 6. 5. Thirdly A witnesse of the spirit to the soule of our interest in God upon this new birth and giving us the earnest of our inheritance Ephes 1 14. in our enjoyments of him in communion with all the persons of the Trinity Father Sonne and Holy Ghost 1 Joh. 5 6 7 8. Rom. 8. 16. 17. Vse 3. A third use of the point may be a confutation of that opinion entertained by some that there are not now in being any true Ministers of Christ who can as Ambassadours from Christ in the name of God and in his authority speak unto the people because there are none that can take upon them to preach by an infallible spirit The reason alledged is because those who speak so in the name of God as his Ambassadours or as in his stead must do it by a Word which is wholly undoubtedly and meerly true that so they may be certainly known both to themselves and others to be so commissioned from the Lord and that both preachers and hearers may be infallibly assured that it is indeed the word of God which they preach Thus say they the first lawful preaching of the Gospel was performed by word of mouth and that such as was syncere 1 Pet. 2. 2. Sound Doctrine Titus 1. 9. Such as was received not as the word of men but as it was indeed the word of God 1 Thes 2. 13. And therefore since God hath nowhere commanded nor licensed that what was begun by such a word of truth should afterwards be carried on by a word not wholly and meerly true that those who now take upon them to perform that office of a Minister in the worship of God speaking in the name of God and as his Ambassadours unto the people in as much as they cannot pretend to such infallibility do act without commission and are guilty of will-worship and are not to be reputed the ministers of Christ in as much as all Administrations in the Church are to be by his institution and command Now from that which hath been said in opening this point we have a full and satisfying answer unto this namely First that however in laying the foundations of the Church of the New Testament and in setting down the institutions of the worship it was necessary that God should make use of persons of infallible gifts which accordingly was done in Christ and his Apostles and Evangelists yet that it was never intended that the work should be carried on by such but that in building upon those foundations and in the Churches growing up even to the measure of the stature to which it is intended in this world Ephes 4. 12 13. the work of God should goe on and prosper in the hands of his servants by the use of ordinary gifts in studying the Scriptures and in teaching and instructing one another in the knowledge of the Gospel and so as each teacher in the Church hath need to be taught and is supposed to be subject unto errour as hath been shewed from 1 Thes 5. 19. pag. 145. which will yet be more clear from that place if it be considered that those duties there mentioned by the Apostle in that golden chaine from vers 16. to 21. are linked together in such order as they are depending one upon another in a Christians practice as if we should read them thus That ye may rejoyce evermore pray without ceasing for that end in every thing give thanks for that end quench not the Spirit and so of the rest as you would not quench the Spirit despise not prophesie and for that end prove all things and hold fast that which is good for he that proves them not despiseth his teachers doctrine as not worthy to be considered or examined Now this connection betweene these duties being the Apostles scope it appears that the Spirit is quenched by despising that prophesying wherein there may be some errours and mistakes Therefore however the Apostles and Evangelists who were to write the Scripture had an infallible gift yet ordinary Elders of Churches even in the Apostles time had it not but were subject to mistakes as we see in the Angels of the seven Churches Rev. 2. 3. And of the Elders of Ephesus it is said that even from amongst themselves should men arise speaking perverse things to draw away disciples after them Acts 20. 30. Secondly We see also that the state and condition of the Church of the New Testament bespeaketh as much that the Church should be built up by the use of such gifts onely and that extraordinary gifts should cease as hath been shewed in the third Reason of the point God had otherwise in part lost his end in speaking to us by his Sonne of which his speaking one end was that he might bring down the knowledge of himself so farre to our capacity as that in the use of ordinary gifts by search and study of the Scriptures we might understand the great and deep things of God without the help of gifts infallible and extraordinary Thirdly the nature of the office of a Pastour and Teacher in the Church speaketh no lesse in as much as they are
which the Apostle speaketh 1 Cor. 7. 14. be it from their interest in the Covenant of God with Abraham is no argument for Infant-Baptisme because the unbeleeving Jews also are supposed by us to be holy upon the same account and holiness to be taken in the same sense in both places To this I answer Answ First It is true those two places are parallel and in that sense they have been both above alledged to prove that branch of Gods covenant with Abraham concerning a blessing upon posterity in order to the multiplying of beleevers And yet it is as true that there is a great difference between them As for that in 1 Cor. 7. 14. the Apostle therein speaketh of particular persons that they are holy but that is not the meaning of the Apostle Rom. 11. that those particular persons of the Jews who persist in unbelief or that the whole people of the Jewes are now in the times of the New Testament holy in any sense whatever for it is expresly said of them that they are broken off from the holy root v. 20. are cast away v. 15. are enemies and so uncleane and profane and therefore not holy v. 28. But whereas the Jewes are there said to be holy although it is indeed spoken of the whole body of that people yet is it not to be understood as meant of that whole in the full extent thereof but of that people onely in respect of that part thereof or of those persons which either were or in Gods time should be afterwards converted As it is an usual manner of speech in Scripture by a Synecdoche to attribute that to the whole which yet properly peculiarly belongeth to a part as for instance it is said The ten Kings shall hate the Whore and burn her flesh with fire Rev. 17. 16. and yet it is meant but of part of the number for it is said of the same Kings that they shall lament her fall Rev. 18. 9. So it is said of the Theeves that were crucified with Christ that they reviled him Matth. 27. 44. Mark 15. 32. yet it was but one of them that did it the other rebuked his fellow and honoured Christ with that petition to him Lord remember me when thou comest into thy Kingdome Luk. 23. 39. And according to that manner of speaking it might have been also said that the Theeves did acknowledge Christ upon the cross Thus Joh. 12. 34. it is said the people answered him we have heard out of the Law that Christ abideth for ever yet it was but some one or some few among the people not the whole people that made this objection So John 7. 20. Such like phrases do speak rather to the kind or sort then to the particular persons intended by them Thus we are to understand that of the Apostle Rom. 11. when he saith of the people of the Jewes that they are holy namely what properly and peculiarly belongeth to a part even to those of them who either then were or afterward should be converted he ascribeth to the whole and in respect of that part he calleth the whole body of that people holy The reason is because the scope of the Apostle is to set forth the kind or sort of people namely Jews not the particular persons that should be called Now in 1 Cor. 7. 14. his purpose is to assert such particular persons to be holy And that the Apostle is thus to be understood it is evident because else there will be a contradiction in the Text for he saith of the whole people as well that they were cast away and enemies as that they are holy and beloved for their Fathers sake Now that these should be both true of the whole it cannot be and all were not broken off in the Apostles time but some of the branches were cut off v. 17. and blindness did happen to Israel not wholly but in part v. 25. nor is it otherwise at this day And as when he saith of the whole people that they were cast away and enemies it is meant of the whole onely in respect of that refuse part which persist in unbeliefe So when he saith of the whole that they are holy and beloved it must be meant of the whole onely in respect of that better part which either had beleeved or should afterward beleeve Nor is there cause it should seem strange that the Apostle when he saith the lump is holy should referre to them who are yet unborn and so cannot be actually holy if it be considered that the covenant to which the Apostle hath relation in that place was made not only to persons then in being but also unto all posterity and that the lump of which he speaketh is of the same extent and so to be understood as well when he saith the Jewes are holy as when he saith they were enemies and cast away Nor can it be imagined that he should either in the one or the other intend onely those who either then were or should afterward at one certain time be in being but such a lump or whole he meaneth as should have a being successively and part after part therefore may well say of the whole that it is holy though it be onely in respect of a part as yet unborne Now therefore since these two places do so much differ and in as much as in 1 Cor. 7. 14. the Apostle expresly saith of such particular persons that they are holy the argument from thence is strong and pertinent all that which is objected from this other Scripture notwithstanding Vse 5. Hence also we see the reason of our Saviours speech to his Disciples Mark 10. Suffer little children to come unto me and forbid them not for of such is the Kingdom of God Of such that is not as so qualified as was shewed before p. 49 50. But his meaning is that the Kingdom consisteth also of such even of little children I say the reason First why he mentions here the Kingdom upon this occasion saith not of such is the Church of God or of such are my people but of such is the kingdom The reason is because this kingdom of which he speaketh P. 62. is that which was begun in Abraham the greatnesse whereof is founded in a great part in that promise made to him of a blessing upon families and posterity so as upon this account the children of beleevers are to be reputed part of that Kingdom and in beleevers bringing their children unto Christ that promise made to Abraham is in part fulfilled that being a means appointed and designed by God whereby the Kingdom of Christ should grow to its intended greatnesse Secondly the reason also why our Saviour says they should therefore suffer little children to come unto him because the kingdom doth consist of such namely because they being part of that Kingdom the promise of the blessing of the Kingdom did also belong to them And as this is part of the
the Apostle Rom. 10. 6. applyeth to the Gospel in opposition to the Law as in it selfe considered without the Gospel or as a covenant of works Before the Fall the Law was given by God as Lord of his Creature but since the Fall it hath been the Law of the Kingdom of Christ which maketh it cease to be a covenant of works 1. Because Christ in his Kingdome is so our Lord as he is also our Head and we the members of his body and quickened by his spirit and therefore part of our duty therein required is that it be done by his strength Joh. 15. 5. Philip. 1. 11. In the covenant of works the Law was Do this and live but in the covenant of grace it is Do this in the strength of Christ and live 2. Because our state and condition as subjects of his Kingdome dependeth not upon our keeping the Law but upon free grace in Christ by faith although our comfort in that Kingdom and State be much according as we keep or break that Law Joh. 14. 21. He that hath my Commandements saith Christ and keepeth thē he it is that loveth me he shal be loved of my father and I wil love him and will manifest my self to him So we are to understand those words when the Apostle saith we are free from and dead to the Law and are not under the Law but under Grace that is in respect of our state and condition or of the justifying of our persons In the state of innocency Do this and live was the covenant in respect of state therefore Adam had no sooner sinned but he was in a state of eternal death but to us onely in respect of the comforts in that state wherein we are as subjects of the Kingdom of Christ and members of his body Therefore although we are punished for sin yet not with eternal death but with temporal punishments whether corporal or spiritual and that out of love to do us good as from a Father our state in Christ continues still Therfore although we are bound by this Law as subjects of his Kingdome yet we are free from the law in respect of that legal state as under a covenant of works 3. Because however we are punished by Christ for sinne yet the matter is wholly taken up by him in his Kingdom and we are not carried out thence to be punished or thrown to hell Therefore are we free from the Law as to the eternal curse 4. In that when he punisheth for sinne he proceedeth therein according to the nature of the justice of his Kingdom which is the justice of a Father which obligeth him in punishing to aime not only at the glory of his justice but also at the good of the person punished which end if he can attain by sparing he is engaged even in justice and that he may be a righteous Father to spare or if a lesser affliction will do it to take a lesse and although sometimes when he sees cause he will not spare and when a lesser affliction will not do the work he takes a greater and comes with seven times more Levit. 26. yet never to punish any of his children according to the full desert of any sinne He hath not dealt with us after our sins nor rewarded us according to our iniquities Psal 103. 10. Now this is not according to the tenour of a covenant of works for there is no such liberty taken there is no sparing because the end of punishment therein is not the good of the person punished but onely the glory of his justice Thus we see that although one ingredient in the general nature of the Law both before and since the coming of Christ be that it is a command under penalties yet it follows not that either they were or that we now are under a covenant of works I have made so large a digression upon this subject because some do insist so much upon this point against Infant-baptisme alledging that the new Testament is so silent in it for by that which hath been said of the general nature of the Law to be one and the same to the people of God under both Testaments we see clearly the reason of these two things First how God could make the time of the old Testament to be the season wherin he would instruct his people in his Law and that for all ages afterwards according to that of our Saviour The law and the Prophets were until John and since that time the kingdom of God is preached implying that the doctrin of the Law was unfolding until then Secondly why the Lord Christ who is the Apostle of our profession and was faithful to him that appointed him as Moses also was faithful in all his house Heb. 3. 1. that is in all the service of it should speak so little in his new Testament concerning the Law which is the rule which he hath set for the service of that his house namely because he could look upon that for the greatest part to be done already And should he have been more particular therein he had taken his people off from the study of the old Testament which he would not doe since it was written for our learning yea he purposely avoyds it that he might oblige his people to that study His faithfulnesse in the house of God did bespeak it of him Therefore whoever shall confine himself only to the new Testament to finde out the law of Gods worship and service he shall never finde it not onely as to Infant-baptisme but also to all other Ordinances whatsoever because as I said the new Testament speaks of things only by hints here and there for the most part and as supposing many things then already known when that was written and commonly received among his people As for instance he saith of his Church even that Church wherein Timothy was instructed touching his behaviour 1 Tim. 3. 16. and therefore meant of a visible Church that it is his House See p. 28. and the Church of Corinth is said to be the Temple of God 2 Cor. 6. 16. But where is the nature of the house or Temple unfolded in the new Testament For that we must goe to the old and there we finde that a Temple or an house of God must be separated from that which is common and made sacred to his presence and such must a people be who are now his House and Church which presence of his when he totally withdraws he calleth it a profaning or defiling of his Sanctuary Ezek. 24. 21. I will profane my sanctuary the excellency of your strength that is he would make it common and to be as any other place Again the word separate is sometimes used in the new Testament as Acts 13. 2. 2 Cor. 6. 17. which is of necessity to be understood by him that would understand the Ordinances of God and service of his house or the house it selfe for