the Saints not to coine a New Thirdly The Church upon occasion hath added some Explicatory Particles to severall Heads of the Creed especially in the two first Synods of Nice and Constantinople partly to vindicate the Faith from the corrupt Glosses of Hereticks partly the more fully to instruct her Children in the mysteries of Christianity But all these exegeticall Additions referre to some Article or Limbe of this Body of Faith like Physick or nourishiment to the part but make not any new Article thereby to render the Body monstrous The Fathers in those two Synods did neither on the one side dislocate or deprave any limbe of the Creed nor on the other side supplyed any defective member they only gaue a new growth or Augmentation as Burnishing to some Articles or restored that naturall vigour and vitall juce unto some parts which the Hereticks had deprived them off The Nicene Creed that is the Apostles by this meanes become vegete and growen was afterwards used in the Greeke Church yet not presently either that alone or Principally but only once in the year afterward indeed in the time of Timotheus Patriarch of Constantinople which was about six-score yeers after its first composure it was ordained to be used every Sunday But before this we may well presume that the Apostles Creed was used in their Litturgies without these explications except it can be shewen that for foure hundered yeeres and upward they either used no Creed in their Church-service ordinarily which is most improbable or that they used some other Creed which no man yet hath demonstrated To demonstrate this more fully and distinctly it will not be unworthy our labour to compare some Creeds together in which Collation we may contemplate with no small delight and satisfaction The consent of Antiquity in matter of Faith the great care of the Church in preserving that Faith entire and the growing Perfection of our sacred Mother according as shee grew in yeares These Creeds shall be Sixe The Apostles Creed The Easterne Creed or Ierosolymitan set downe by Cyril and compared by Ruffinus The Nicene The Athanasian The Aquileian set downe by Ruffinus and compared with the Easterne and Romane Creeds The Chalcedon Creed And to these we will adde That of the Church of Antioch a good part whereof is set downe by Cassianus Article I. Apost I believe in God the Father Almighty maker of Heaven and Earth East I believe in one God the Father Almighty maker of Heaven and Earth and of all things visible and Invisible Nice hath the same words Aquil. I believe in God the Father Almighty Invisible and Impassible Athan. There is one Person of the Father The Father is God The Father is Almighty Antioch I believe in one only true God maker of all Creatures Visible and Invisible Article II. Apost And in Jesus Christ his only or only-begotten Son our Lord East And in one Lord Jesus Christ the only-begotten Son of God begotten of the Father before all worlds Nic. And in one Lord Iesus Christ the only-begotten Son of God begotten of the Father before all worlds light of light very God of very God begotten not made of one Substance with the Father by whom all Things were made Aquil. And in Jesus Christ his only Unicum Son our Lord. Athan. The right Faith is that we believe confesse that our Lord Jesus Christ the Son of God is God God of the Substance of the Father begotten before the worlds perfect God equall to the Father as touching his Godhead Chalc. We professe the Son our Lord Jesus Christ to be one and the same and all us with one accord pronounce him to be perfect as concerning his Godhead consubstantiall to the Father according to the same Godhead begotten of his Father before the worlds as touching his Godhead Antioch And in our Lord Jesus Christ his only-begotten Sonne the first-borne of every Creature begotten of him before all Worlds and not made very God of very God consubstantiall to the Father by whom the Worlds were framed or Ages set in order and all things made Artic. III. Apost Conceived by the Holy Ghost borne of the Virgin Mary East Incarnate and made man Nic. Who for us men and for our Salvation came downe from Heaven and was incarnate by the Holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary and was made man Aquil. Who was conceived by the Holy Ghost borne of the Virgin Mary Athan. It is necessary to everlasting Salvation to believe rightly in the Incarnation of our Lord Iesus Christ for the right Faith is that we believe and confesse that our Lord Iesus Christ the Sonne of God is God and man Man of the substance of his Mother borne in the World perfect God and perfect Man subsisting of a reasonable soule and humane flesh inferior to the Father touching his Man-hood who although he be God and Man yet he is not two but one Christ one not by conversion of the God-head into flesh but by taking of the Man-hood unto God one altogether not by confusion of substance but by unity of Person For as the reasonable Soule and Flesh is one Man so God and man is one Christ Chalc. We professe the same to be perfect God when he was made man very God and very Man the same subsisting of a Reasonable Soule and Body of the same substance with us according to his Humanity in all things like unto us without sinne the same in these last Daies for us and for our Salvation was borne according to his Manhood of the Blessed Virgin the Mother of God one and the same Iesus Christ the Sonne the Lord the only-begotten made known in two natures without confussion conversion division or seperation thereof the distinction of the natures being not at all taken away by reason of their union but the propriety of each nature being preserved and both meeting in the same Person not severed or devided into two Persons but one and the same only-begotten Son God the Word and Lord Iesus Christ according as the Prophets have from the begining or from above instructed us concerning him yea and Christ himself and as the Creed of the Fathers hath deliverd unto us Antioch Who for our sakes came and was borne of the Virgin Mary Article IV. Apost Suffered under Pontius Pilate was crucifyed dead and buried East Crucifyed and Buried Nic. He was Crucifyed also for us under Pontius Pilate he suffered and was buried Aquil. Crucifyed under Pontius Pilate and buried Athan. Who Suffered for our Salvation Antioch Crucifyed under Ponitus Pilate and Buried Article V. Apost He descended into Hell the third Day he rose againe from the Dead East The third Day he rose againe from the Dead Nic. And the third day he rose againe according to the Scriptures Aquil. The third Day he rose againe from the Dead Athan. Descended into Hell rose againe from the Dead Athan. Descended into Hell rose againe the third Day from the Dead Antioch And the
depositum delivered her from Heaven The occasion of this Creed so revealed was the Heresy of Paulus Samosatenus taken up afterwards by Photinus who denyed the Divinity of our Saviour and consequently overthrew the Trinity which heresy then staggerd many in those Easterne Parts and was therefore condemned in a Synod at Antioch wherof this Paulus was Patriarch The words thereof are these viz. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is There is one God the Father of the living word of the subsisting wisdome the eternall Power and Character the perfect Father of him that is Perfect the Father of the only-begotten Sonne There is one Lord the only Lord from or of the only Lord God of God the character and image of the Fathers Divinity the operative or effectuall word the wisdome which comprehendeth the whole frame of the World the Power which made the whole Creation the True the Invisible the Incorruptible the Immortall the Eternall Sonne of the True Invisible Incorruptible Immortall and Eternall Father And one Holy Ghost having his subsistence of or from God and by the Sonne clearely manifested unto men the perfect Image of the perfect Sonne the quickening life of the Living that Holinesse which is the Author of Sanctification by whom God the Father is manifested who is above all and in all and God the Sonne who is through all The perfect Trinity neither divided nor diversified from each other in Glory Eternity or Majesty There is not therefore in the Trinity ought created or subservient to another Person nor ought superinduced as not existing at first but afterwards added so that the Father was never without the Sonne nor the Sonne without the Holy Ghost but the same Trinity abideth alwaies without the least change or Alteration The Second Creed is that Confession of Faith made by Eusebius Caesariensis before the Fathers of the Nicene Councell and approved of by them and by the Emperour Constantine it runs thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. We believe in one God the Father Almighty maker of all Things both visible and invisible and in one Lord Jesus Christ the Word of God God of God Light of Light Life of Life the only begotten Son the First-borne of every Creature begotten of the Father before all Worlds by whom all things were made who was Incarnate for our Salvation and conversed amongst men suffered rose againe the Third Day ascended unto the Father and shall come againe with Glory to judge both the quick and the dead We believe also in the Holy Ghost See for this Creed Soc. Hist lib. 1. cap. 5. Theod. lib. 1. cap. 12. Athan. Op. Tom. 2. Pag. 48. Edit Commelin The Nicene Fathers added some Passages to this Creed for the fuller conviction of the Arian Heresy and thus proposed it to the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. We believe in one God the Father Almighty maker of all Things both visible and invisible and in one Lord Jesus Christ the Sonne of God the only-begotten of his Father begotten of the substance of his Father God of God Light of Light very God of very God begotten not made consubstantiall to the Father by whom all Things were made both which are in Heaven and which are in Earth who for us Men and for our Salvation came downe was Incarnate made Man suffered and rose again the third Day he ascended into the Heavens and shall come to judge the quick and the dead And in the Holy Ghost Both these Confessions the lesser of Eusebius and the larger of the Councell leave off at the Article of the Holy Ghost because the Arian controversy which was then in agitation required no more not that the Ancient Creed brake off there whence the Arian Bishops who assembled at Antioch Aº 341. When they came in the rehearsall of their Faith to the Article of the Holy Ghost they added 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is If it be needfull to adde so much we believe also the Resurrection of the Dead and the life everlasting See for this Soc. lib. 2. cap. 1. Athan. Tom. 7. pag. 687. Comm. As for the Creed of Eusebius which the Nicene Fathers thus enlarged he prefaceth it with this Elogy which shews its Antiquity and Authority 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. As we have received from the Bishops our Predecessors both in our first Catechising and at our Baptisme as we have learned from the Holy Scriptures and as we have believed and taught both when we were Presbyter and when we came to be Bishop so also now believing we propose this our Faith unto you The Third Creed was framed in the Arian Synod at Antioch for Eusebius Bishop of Nicomedia the great Patron of the Arians being made Bishop of Constantinople by the Emperour Constantius calls a Councell at Antioch the Bishops whereof not daring openly to taxe what had been decreed in the Nicene Councell yet desiring to overthrow privily the consubstantiality of the Sonne with the Father thus altered the forme of the Nicene Creed viz. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Wee Believe consonantly to the Evangelicall and Apostolicall Tradition in one God the Father Almighty Framer and Maker of all Things and in one Lord Jesus Christ his only-begotten Sonne God by whom all things were made begotten of his Father before all worlds God of God entire of the entire only of the only perfect of the perfect God king of the king Lord of the Lord the living Word the Wisdome the Life the true Light the way of Truth the Resurrection the Shepheard the Dore Immutable unalterable the unchangeable Image of the Divine essence Power Councell Glory of the Father the first-born of every creture who was in the begining with the Father God the word as it is said in the Gospell the Word was God by whom all things were made and in whom all things consist who in these last dayes came downe from above was borne of a Virgin according to the Scriptures and made man the mediator of God and men the Apostle of our Faith and Author or Prince of life as he saith I came downe from Heaven not to doe mine owne will but the will of him that sent me who suffered for us and arose for us the third Day and ascended into the Heavens and sitteth at the right hand of the Father and shall come againe with glory and Power for to Judge the Quick and the Dead and in the holy Ghost who was given for the Comfort the Sanctification and Perfecting of Believers acording as our Lord Jesus Christ Charged his Apostles saying Goe and Teach all Nations Baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost It is manifest that the Father is Truly or really the Father the Sonne truly the Sonne and the Holy Ghost truly the Holy Ghost the names not being barely or in vaine imposed but exactly signifying the proper subsistence order
reason challenge a belief contrary to the verdict of so many grave Authors so much Ancienter than he especially in a matter of fact such as this is But I suppose Meletius in those words absolutely denies not that Athanasius was the Author of the Creed now entitled to him but that it is not to be fathered on him as 't is now read in the Westerne Church with the Appendix filioque added thereto by the Bishops of Rome but not Originally inserted as he conceives by Athanasius of which I have already spoken Ob. 8. Nazianzens Testimony concerning Athanasius his Creed or Confession of Faith is to be understood of the latter end of that Synodicall Epistle which he sent to the Emperour Jovianus wherein after he had set downe the Nicene Creed he addes these wordes Nonnulli hanc Fidem a Patribus in Concilio Niceno confirmatam antiquare non sunt veriti alii vero simulant assentiri illi reipsâ autem pernegant dum hanc vocem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 perversè interpretantur iisdemque in Spiritum Sanctum loquuntur blasphemè asserendo eum creatum esse factum per filium That is Some have not been afraid to abrogate this Faith Established in the Nicene Councell others there be who feigne to receive it but in truth reject it whilest they interpret the word Homâ—ousion in a perverse sense the same men speake also blaspheamously against the Holy Ghost affirming that he was created and made by the Sonne Then in the close they say Quinetiam neque Spiritum Sanctum a Patre Filio separârunt sed ei unà cum Patre Filio in unâ sanctae Trinitatis fide propterea quod una est in sancta Trinitate Divinitas gloriam tribuerunt That is Neither did they separate the Holy Ghost from the Father and the Sonne but ascribed glory to him together with the Father and the Sonne in the same faith of the holy Trinity because there is but one Divinity in the holy Trinity Theod. hist lib. 4. cap. 3. Answ Whether or no this fragment this foot this Appendix of an Epistle deserve the Title of a Confession of Faith so venerably esteemed by the Churches of East and West of Libellus a Declaration of a Guift truly Royall and Magnificent with which Titles Nazianzen in that place honours Athanasius his Creed let the impartiall Reader judge Besides we may observe for our fuller satisfaction in this particular 1. That these words which the Objector calls Athanasius his Creed referre not to him and to the Bishops of his Patriarchate who wrote the said Epistle but to the Fathers of the Nicene Councell for they run in the third Person neque separarunt gloriam tribuerunt not in the first neque separavimus gloriam tribuimus Therefore they relate to those Fathers who made the Nicene Creed which is immediatly prefixt not to the Bishops who sent this Synodicall Epistle 2. That this Synodicall Epistle was sent in the name of all the Bishops of Egypt Thebais and Lybia whereas the Confession of Faith written by Athanasius was attested by him only or by very few besides So witnesseth Nazianzen in his forecited Oration Primus ille solus aut cum admodùm paucis veritatem palam apertisque verbis promulgare non dubitavit unam trium personarum Divinitatem essentiam scripto confessus quod multis illis Patribus circa Filium prius concessum fuerat idem ipse postea in asserendâ Spiritus Sancti Divinitate superno afflatu consecutus Atque Imperatori donum vere Regium magnificum offert c. That is He first of all and alone or accompanied with very few doubted not to publish the Truth openly and in expresse Termes professing in writing one Deity and Essence of three Persons and that which God had formerly granted to many Fathers viz. the Nicene concerning the Sonne Athanasius obtained the same afterwards by an inspiration from above to assert the Divinity of the Holy Ghost And he presents the Emperour with a Gift truly Royall and Magnificent c. Of what Creed or Confession of Faith can these Words be understood but of that which now bears the name of Athanasius wherein he so clearely and at large asserts the great mystery of the Trinity in Unity and in particular the Divinity of the Holy Ghost in these words The Holy Ghost also is God such as the Father is such is the Holy Ghost The Holy Ghost is of the Father and the Sonne neither made nor created nor begotten but Proceeding Whereas the Nicene Fathers had only vindicated the Divinity of the Sonne then called in question by Arius and his Adherents as Nazianzen heere tels us 3. Nazianzen informes us here of the Time when Athanasius wrote his Creed when very very few 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 durst openly professe the true faith which must needs be meant of the Times immediatly succeeding the Death of Constantine the Great or when he was first deposed by the Synod of Tyre and banished to Triers by the importune calumnies and violence of the Arian Party in the latter end of his Reigne for then there appeared but three Bishops in the cause with him who were in like manner faine to fly into the West as Sozomen witnesseth lib. 3. cap. 7. Whereas after this in the yeare 347. there was a Synod of Orthodox Bishops called together at Sardica a City of Illyricum who professed the Nicene Faith and when Athanasius sent the forenamed Epistle to the Emperour Jovianus his whole Patriarchate subscribed together with him to the Nicene Creed therein inclosed the Emperour being then a Catholick Wherefore it is most probable that Athanasius first wrote his Creed at Triers or when he fled to Iulius Bishop of Rome for succour which Creed he afterwards sent also with that Synodicall Epistle to the Emperour Iovianus by whom he was restored to his See thereby to confute his Adversaries who would have had the World believe that he was justly condemned as erroneous in the Faith The Epistle he sent in the name of the whole Synod The Creed in his own THE SECOND APPENDIX OF THE Nicene or Constantinopolitan CREED CAP. I. The Reason of the double name of this Creed The Composure thereof The Additionall or Exegeticall Particles inserted into it When and by Whom it was conveied to other Churches and brought into Divine Service THIS Creed hath a double name from a double Councell whereof the one began and the other finisht it It was begun in the First generall Councell held at Nice in Bithynia in the yeare 325 thence called the Nicene Creed But it was recited approved and enlarged as now wee have it by the second generall Councell held at Constantinople in the yeare 381 thence called the Constantinopolitan Creed by many latter writers The Nicene Fathers being 318 in number all subscribed to it except five who adhered to Arius and would not acknowledge the Sonne to be of the same Essence or
being indeed the Articles of the Creed viz That there is but one God who made all things of nothing That this God sent his Sonne our Lord Jesus Christ begotten of the Father before every Creature by whom all Creatures were made He was incarnate and made man assuming a Body like in all things to us but that it was borne of the Virgin being conceived by the Holy Ghost He truly Dyed not in apearance the comon death of all men for he truly rose againe Having converst with his Disciples after his Resurrection he was taken up into Heaven That the Holy Ghost is associate with the Father and Sonne in the same Honor and Dignity there shall be a time for the Resurrection of the Dead when this body which is sowne in corruption shall rise in incorruption and that which is sowne in dishonor shall rise in glory This world was made and had a certaine time of begining and by reason of ' its corruptability shall be at length dissolved That there are certain Angels of God and good spirits which minister unto him in procuring the salvation of man kind He adds at last an other Traditionall Foundation viz. That the Scriptures were written by the Holy Ghost After all he concluds oportet igitur velut elementis ac fundamentis hujusmodi uti That we ought to make use of these as the first Elemens and Grounds of Christian Religion which he accordingly explaines at large in those foure bookes of his entituled therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Principles of Christianity a worke fit for his office of Catachist which he bore for many years in the Church of Alexandria 4. Marcellus Bishope of Ancyra in Gallatia fellowsuferer with the great Athanasius being accused by the Arians of Sabellianisme as Athanasius also was and by their means expeld his Bishoprick flies unto Iulius Bishope of Rome for succour and having long there in vaine expected his adversaries comming by confronting of whom he desired to have accquitted himselfe at length weary of longer stay he takes his leave of Iulius and leaves behind him an Epistle wherein he makes this Profession of Faith exceeding conformable to that of the Apostles as we read it at this Day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is I Believe in God Almighty and in Jesus Christ his only-begotten Sonne our Lord conceived by the Holy Ghost and borne of the Virgin Mary crucifyed under Pontius Pilate and buried the third Day he rose againe from the Dead he ascended into the Heavens and sitteth at the right hand of the Father whence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead And I believe in the Holy Ghost the Holy Church the forgivenesse of sinnes the resurrection of the Body the Life Everlasting But this is not all to shew that this Creed was not of his own framing a little after he subjoynes these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Having received this Faith from the holy Scriptures and being taught it of my spirituall Progenitors or Divine Ancestors I both Preach it in the Church of God and have now wrote it unto thee O Iulius This Epistle with the foresaid Creed inclosed we find recorded by Epiphanius in his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Haeres 72. Now whom doth Marcellus meane by his Progenitors or Ancestors 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to or in God Sure he understands either his Godfathers at the Font or the Bishops of the Church by whom he was instructed in the Ancient Faith Or lastly which seemes to me most probable the Apostles themselves who were the true and proper Fathers or Founders of the Christian Church whence that of S. Paul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Though you have ten thousand Instructers or Pedagogues in Christ yet have ye not many Fathers It followes there 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For in Iesus Christ I have begotten you through the Gospell 1 Cor. 4. 15. 5. S. Basil the Great in his Tract 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 concerning the Creed or Christian Faith sets downe this Symbole or Confession thereof 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is We Believe and professe one only true and good God the Father Almighty of whom are all Things the God and Father of our Lord and God Jesus Christ and one only begotten Sonne of his our Lord and God Jesus Christ the only True one by whom all things were made both visible and invisible and by whom all things consist who was in the Begining with God and was God and afterward according to the Scripture he appeared upon Earth and conversed with men being in the forme of God he thought it not robbery to be equall with God yet he made himselfe of no reputation and taking upon him the forme of a Servant by being borne of a Virgin and being found in fashion as a man he fulfilled all things which concerned him and were written of him according to the commandment of his Father he became obedient to the Death even the Death of the Crosse and the third Day arising from the Dead according to the Scriptures he appeared to his holy Disciples and to the Rest according as it is written he ascended into the Heavens and sitteth on the right hand of the Father from whence he shall come at the end of this world to raise up all and to render to every one according to his workes when the righteous shall be taken into Life Eternall and the Kingdome of Heaven and the sinners shall be condemned to everlasting punishment where their worme dieth not and the fire is not quenched And in one only Holy Ghost the Comforter by whom we are sealed to the day of Redemption the Spirit of Truth Here we have all the Articles of the Creed but two viz. The Beleefe of the Holy Catholick Church and the forgivenes of sinnes which he sets downe in the ensuing words wherein he largely descants on the gifts of the Holy Ghost towards the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. By which Spirit we are sealed unto the day of Redemption the Spirit of Truth the Spirit of Adoption by whom we cry Abba Father which distributeth and effecteth in every one the Graces of God unto edification according to his pleasure the good Spirit which leadeth into all Truth and establisheth all that believe in the true and exact knowledge in the Godly and Spirituall service and worship and true confession of God the Father and his only-begotten Sonne c. Concluding thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thus we think and thus we baptize 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 into a coessentiall Trinity according to the command of our Lord Jesus Christ who said goe and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Sone and of the Holy Ghost A little after he intimates from whom he received the foresaid confession of faith namely from Christ and his Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. I beseech you saith
third Day he rose againe according to the Scriptures Christs descent into Hell as we see in this Collation is expressely set downe but in two Creeds namely this of the Apostles and the Athanasian although the Fathers of the first Ages generally acknowledge it and mention it in their writings for which we may looke back on the Creeds of Thaddaeus and Ignatius set downe before The reason therefore why it is omitted in other Creeds I conceive to be this That they held it involved or presupposed in the following word The third Day he rose againe from the Dead For Christ may not improperly be said to have risen the third Day according to both Parts from the Grave in his Body from Hell a low place especially in comparison of Heaven in his Soule So both Parts in this Rising met together from two severall Places whether they had before Descended both which places are set downe in holy Scripture as the Receptacles of the Dead as well Good as Bad so 't is in either a Rising from the Dead and are joyntly called by the names of Sheol Hades Inferi This also S. Chrysostome in setting downe the Creed passeth by Christs ascension into Heaven as being included in or presupposed by that which followes His sitting at the Right Hand of the Father See Gen. 37. 35. Job 26. 6. Psal 86. 13. 139 8. Prov. 15. 11. Isa 13. 9. Luk. 16. 23. Rev. 1. 18. chap. 20. 13. Artic. VI. Apost He ascended into Heaven and sitteth at the right Hand of God the Father Almighty East And ascended into Heaven and sitteth at the right hand of the Father Nic. hath the same Aquil. the same Athan. He ascended into Heaven he sitteth on the right hand of the Father God Almighty Antioch And he ascended into Heaven Article VII Apost From whence he shall come to judge the quicke and the dead East And he shall come to judge the quicke and the dead Nic. Who shall come againe with glory to judge the quicke and the dead of whose kingdome there shall be no end Aquil. From thence he shall come to judge the quicke and the deade Athan. From whence he shall come to judge the quicke and the Dead Antioch And he shall come againe to judge the quicke and the dead Article VIII Apost I believe in the Holy Ghost East And in the Holy Ghost the comforter who spake by the Prophets Nic. And in the Holy Ghost the Lord and giver of life who proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne according to the Latines who with the Father and the Sonne together is worshipped and glorified who spake by the Prophets Aquil. And in the Holy Ghost Athan There is another Person of the Holy Ghost the Holy Ghost is God the Holy Ghost is of the Father and of the Son Neither made nor created nor begotten but proceeding Article IX Apost I believe the holy Catholick Church the Communion of Saints East One holy Catholick Church Nic. One holy Catholick and Apostolick Church Aquil. The holy Catholick Church Where Ruffinus in his explication interprets Holy by that which preserves the Faith or Religion of Christ entire and opposeth the Church to the Conventicles of severall Hereticks which he calls Concilia vanitatis thus explaining the word Catholick and the Communion of Saints Article X. Apost The forgivenesse of Sinnes East One Baptisme of Repentance for the Remission of Sinnes Nic I acknowledge one Baptisme for the Remission of Sinnes Aquil. The Remission of Sinnes Article XI Apost The Resurrection of the Body East And the Resurrection of the Body Nice And I look for the Resurrection of the Dead Athan. At whose comming All men shall rise againe with their Bodies and shall give an account for their own Workes Aquil. The Resurrection of this Body In the Exposition whereof Ruffinus hath these words Et ideo satis cautâ providâ adjectione Ecclesia nostra Aquilegiensis docet quae in eo quod a caeteris traditur Carnis Resurrectionem uno addito pronomine tradit Hujus Carnis Resurrectionem hujus sine dubio quam is qui profitetur signaculo Crucis fronti imposito contingit That is our Church the Aquileian hath warily and providently added the Pronoune This to the Article of the Resurrection of the Body which is delivered without it in other Churches This Body that is which he toucheth who maketh profession of the Creed having the Signe of the Crosse made upon his Forehead whence we may observe not only the Antiquity of the Crosse in Baptisme but the custome also of the ancient Church in adding some exegeticall particles to the Creed as a Thing publickly received and practised in the Christian World Article XII Apost And life Everlasting East And life Everlasting Nic. And the life of the World to come Athan. And they that have done good shall goe into life Everlasting and they that have done Evill into Everlasting fire Aquil. Incloseth it in the precedent Article of the Resurrection in the explication whereof Ruffinus hath these words Dabitur peccatoribus incorruptionis immortalitatis ex Resurrectione conditio ut sicut Deus justis ministrat ad perpetuitatem Gloriae ista peccatoribus ad prolixitatem confusionis ministret paenae That is Sinners also shall rise to an immortall and incorruptible estate so that as God affourdeth the rightious everlasting Glory he also prepareth the sinners for length of shame and sorrow Ob. 14th That Creed which was neithe made by the Apostles nor by any Generall Councell nor was recieved by the Greeke or Easterne Churches but in the Church of Rome and had beene so long recited and used in the Church now about the yeare 400 that then it was held an Apostolicall Tradition which it is certaine was conveyed also by the Church of Rome to other Churches of the West the Easterne Churches in the meane time using other Creeds that Creed was composed by those who had the Government of the Romane Church but there is nought of this which agreeth not to the Creed that we call the Apostles therefore the Bishop and Presbyters of the Church of Rome composed it Answ This is the summary Argument used to disprove the Authors of the Creed and which we have already answered by Parts For that the Creed was composed by the Apostles we have proved at large both by Authorities and Arguments That it was received for the full sense and substance thereof in the Greeke or Easterne Churche appears both by what we have before cited out of the Greeke Fathers especially Marcellus and Chrysostome as also by the foresaid Parallell of the Jerosolymitan Nicene Antiochian and Athanasian Creeds with the Romane and Aquileian That it was held an Apostolicall Tradition by the Church of Rome before the yeare 400 appeares by the forecited Testimonies of the Laine Fathers Irenaeus Tertullian Ambrose and others That it was convaied by the Church of Rome to other Churches of the West which the Objector invidiously
the latter end of the tenth Century hath these wordes in his Apollogetick which he made to the Kings of France Hugh and Robert Father and Son Primitus de fide dicendum credidi quaÌ„ alternantibus Choris in Francia apud Anglorum Ecclesiam variari audivi Alii enim dicunt ut arbitror secundum Athanasium Spiritus Sanctus a Patre Filio non factus non Creatus sed procedens qui dum id quod est nec genitus subtrahunt Synodicum D. Gregorii se sequi credunt ubi ita est scriptum spiritus sanctus nec ingenitus est nec genitus sed procedens that is I thought meet to speak first concerning the Faith which I find diversly expressed in the French and English Churches for some say as I suppose according to Athanasius The holy Ghost not made nor Created but proceeding from the Father and the Son who in leaving out that particle nor begotten conceive they follow the Synodicall of S. Gregory in which it is thus written The holy Ghost is neither unbegotten nor begotten but proceeding To which words Baron in his Annals ad A. 1001 thus attests Vides lector in his jaÌ„ ante sexcentos annos Symbolum vere ejus esse absque dubitatione credituÌ„ praedicatum thou seest here Reader that above six hundred yeares agoe the Creed which goes under the name of Athanasius was verely believed to be his without the least doubt to the contrary And well might he say so for that ambiguous clause ut arbitror as I suppose in this Testimony of Abbo hath no reference to the Author but to the words and to the various Copies of Athanasius his Creed as appears by the scope and purpose of the Abbot in his Citation 10 That this Creed was asscribed to Athanasius in the Time of Charles the Bald will appeare first out of the second Book of Rathrannus Monke of Corbey written by him against the Greekes a Book not yet extant in Print Secondly out of the first Booke of Aeneas Bishop of Paris written also against the Greeks c. 19. Thirdly out of the Capitulum of Hincmarus Arch-Bishop of Rheims which he gave to the Presbyters of his Diocesse Aº 852. See the first Capit. in Apend Tom. 3-Conc Gall. set forth by Sirmondus But for all three See Armac de Symb. 11. The fourth Councell of Toledo held in the yeare of our Lord 671 according to the edition of Io. Garsia Loaisa and in the third yeare of K. Sisenandus by threescore and two Bishops whereof Isidore of Sevil was one thus professeth its Faith in the words of the Athanasian Creed only somewhat contracting them for thus the Fathers of the councell begin cap. 1. Secundum divinas Scripturas doctrinam quam a Sanctis Patribus accepimus Patrem Filium Spiritum Sanctum unius Deitatis atque Substantiae confitemur in Personarum diversitate Trinitatem credentes in Divinitate unitatem praedicantes nec Personas confundimus nec substantiam seperamus Patrem a nullo factum vel genitum dicimus Christus descendit ad Inferos ut sanctos qui ibidem tenebantur erueret devictoque mortis Imperio resurrexit mortui resuscitandi sunt ab eo Iesu Christo in die novissimo percepturi ab ipso alii pro justitiae meritis vitam aeternam alii pro peccatis supplicii aeterni sententiam Haec est ecclesiae Catholicae fides Hanc Confessionem conservamus atque tenemus quam quisquis firmissime custodierit perpetuam salutem habebit that is According to the Scriptures of God the Doctrine which we have received from the holy Father we professe the Father Sonne and holy Ghost to have the same Godhead and Substance believing a Trinity in a diversity of Persons and an Unity in the Godhead neither confounding the Persons nor dividing the substance we say that the Father was made of none nor begotten Christ descended into Hell that he might deliver the Saints that were there detained and having conquered the Power of Death he rose againe The Dead are to be raised up by him at the last Day to receive from him some for their righteous deeds life eternall others for their sins the sentence of everlasting punishment This is the Faith of the Catholick Church This Confession we preserve and hold which whosoever shall firmely keepe shall obteine everlasting Salvation 12. In two very Ancient Latine Psalters which are in S. Rob. Cottons Library we find Athanasius his Creed together with that of the Apostles conteining the same number of Heads with that of our Dayes In the former Psalter saith the Reverend Learned Armachanus which we gather to be as old as Gregory the first viz. 1050 years both by the old fashion of the Pictures the largenesse of the Characters Athanasius his Creed bears the name of Fides Catholica as it doth also in an other Psalter of S. Lewis 9th extant in King James his Library the other is called Symbolum Apostolorum In the latter Psalter which was once K. Athelstans That of the Apostles hath Symply the name of Symbolum the other is called Fides S. Athanasii Alexandrini The Faith of S. Athanasius Bishop of Alexandria 13. Boethius that great Scholler and Statesman in the Reigne of Theodorick the Goth in his Book De Trinitate hath these words at the Beginning which referre us plainly enough to the Creed of Athanasius Fidei Catholicae haec de Trinitatis unitate Sententia est Pater inquiunt Deus Filius Deus Spiritus sanctus Deus igitur Pater Filius Spiritus Sanctus unus Deus non tres Dii That is This is the Decree of the Catholick faith concerning the unity of the Trinity The Father they say is God the Sonne God the Holy Ghost God therefore the Father Sonne and Holy Ghost are one God not three Gods On which words Venerable Bâ—de our Countryman makes this Glosse Haec est fides quâ credimus quae dicitur Catholica unde in Symbolo Haec est fides Catholica quam nisi quisque crediderit c. Haec est una apud omnes unde Apostolus una fides unum Baptisma that is This is the Faith wherein we believe which is called Catholick whence we say in the Creed this is the Catholick Faith which Whosoever doth not believe c. This Faith is the same among All whence that of the Apostle One Faith One Baptisme 14. S. Augustin in severall Parts of his workes takes whole sentences out of this Creed of Athanasius which shews that it was then extant and used by the Church In his Booke De Trinitate cap. 8. He hath these words Omnipotens Pater Omnipotens Filius omnipotens Spiritus sanctus tameÌ„ non tres Omnipotentes sed unus Omnipotens Ibidem Deus Pater Deus Filius Deus Spiritus sanctus tamen non tres Dii sed unus est Deus that is The Father is Almighty the Sonne Almighty the holy Ghost Almighty and yet there are
none other as the Confession or Creed of Athanasius whose judgment ought to prevaile with us above the the rashnesse of some Novellists who have questioned both the Authority the Author But because this Recrimination of Sabellianisme is but obscurely set downe in the writers of that Age and utterly denyed by some of ours I shall endeavour in a few worrdes to clear it First It was the custome of that Age that when any was advanced to a Bishoprick but more espepecially to a Patriarchall See such as Alxandria was whereof Athanasius was Bishop he sent about his Literae Formatae or Encyclicae wherein he testifyed his Faith unto the Christian world and his communion with the Catholick Bishops and this was in use whether the new Bishop were suspected of heresy or not Now there was far greater Cause for this in the case of Athanasius when he appealed to Iulius Bishop of Rome as the most Eminent Patriarch of the Church and one not engaged in the quarrell between him and the Eusebians For it had litle stood with the gravity impartiall uprightnesse of such a Judge to have presently with an overforward affection received a man into his Communion laden with so many and so heavy Accusations before he had given an Account of his Beliefe which that it was the custome then observed and particularly in the case of Athanasius and his fellowes is plainly set downe by Sozomen lib. 3. cap. 7. where having premised that Athanasius and three other Bishops being thrust out by the Arian faction fled unto Julius for succour he subjoynes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is The Bishop of Rome having learned the crimes objected against each of them after that he found them all agreeing in the Doctrine of the Nicene Councell he received them into his Communion as persons of the same judgement with himselfe Secondly Marcellus Bishop of Ancyra who was the chiefe of those three Bishops that were thrust out by the Arian faction and fled to Rome with Athanasius having formerly accused the Eusebians of the Arian Heresy and convicted them in the Nicene Councell was himselfe also scandalized with the crosse imputation of Sabellianisme whereupon he freely made an Orthodox Confession of his Faith at Rome such as the Synod lately held at Sardica had imbraced Now that Athanasius who was principally hated by the Eusebians had the charge of Heresy recriminated also upon him appears by a passage of the same Julius in his Letter to the Easterne Bishops then Assembled at Antioch 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Now as concerning Marcellus saith he seeing ye have wrote touching him also as of one who thinkes impiously of or against Christ where the particle Also necessarily implies that the Orientall Bishops had accused the rest of the same crime and who but Athanasius as the principall of the Accused See the place in Athan. Apolog. 2. pag. 548. Edit Comm. And his Epistle ad Solitarios two leaves from the beginning Epiphanius also in his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Her 72. tels us that this Marcellus being accused by the Arians of Sabellianisme to Iulius Bishop of Rome voluntarily came to Rome and having long but in vaine there expected the appearance of his Adversaries upon his departure left an Epistle with Iulius wherein he sets downe a Confession of his Faith His case is just parallell to that of Athanasius who was accused of the same Heresy as Epiphanius there witnesseth and in like manner cleared himselfe Thirdly this imputation of Sabellianisme was so pertinaciously urged upon Athanasius by his Arian persecutors that Liberius successor to Julius in the Romane See was constrained to send a short Epistle to him for farther satisfaction wherein having set downe his own Faith concerning the Trinity he addes by way of Antithesis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wherefore I condemne the opinions of Sabellius and Arius and all the forementioned Heresies to everlasting punishment according to the voyce of our Saviour Then he concludes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If thou then agreest with mee Brother Athanasius in this Confession which is the only true Faith received in the holy Catholick and Apostolick Church as in the presence of God and his Christ write unto me thy consent agreement therin with me that so I may be ascertained thereof and without scruple performe thy commands This Epistle of Liberius with the rescript of Athanasius we find extant in the first Tome of Athanasius his workes The same Athanasius in his forecited 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or exposition of the Faith vindicates himselfe from Sabellianisme in these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is We neither make the Father and the Sonne the same Person as the Sabellians doe in this destroying the relation of the Sonne neither doe we attribute to the Father that passible Body which the Sonne tooke on him for the Salvation of the whole world Fourthly Sulpitius Severus lib. 20 hist Tels us that Athanasius was condemn'd of Sabellianisme in a certain Councell by the Arians Adde hereunto that Arius himselfe in his Disputation before Probus the Judge taxeth Athanasius in these words somtimes saith he he makes three appeare One saying But these three are one God then I know not by what strang mixtion he makes them Triforms triple saying And this one God is the Trinity So Geneb To prevent such mistakes and cavils Athanasius hath a chapter in his Workes entitled Quod non tres Dii that there are not three Gods Thirdly As to my last Query in what Language this Creed of Athanasius was originally written I Answer it is most probable that Athanasius first wrote it in Latine as being a Language which he well vnderstood although some have been pleased to deny it and the Creed being exhibited unto Julius Bishop of Rome in a Synod of Latine Bishops My reasons are these First The Latine edition of this Creed is the same in all Copies whereas the Greek Copies vary as Translations use to doe Genebrard in his third booke De Trinitate hath set downe three severall versions there of out of the Latine into the Greeke namely Vulgatam Dionysianam Constantinopolitanam The first is that which is commonly Printed The last is that which the Church of Constantinâ—ple useth The middlemost is so called from Dionysius a Grecian Bishop entitled Zienensis Firmiensis who gave the foreeited Manuscript of the Procession to Lazarus Bayffius the Booke was fairly written by the Learned Nic. Sophianus And to these three which are set downe and compared by Genebrard we may adde a fourth found in an Horologium of Greeke hymnes composed by Thechara a Monke of Constantinople and is set downe by the R. Armach in his Tract de Symb. which besides that it hath much inserted heere and there by the Greeke Translator very much differs in the residue from all the three former as they also doe from each other Secondly As the Bishop of Rome wrote in Latine to the Bishops of the East
Substance with the Father by admitting of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Constantinopolitan Fathers were 150 in number who all assented to this Creed And Damasus Bishop of Rome confirmed it for the westrne Church with the suffrages of his fellow Bishops although not present at Canstantinople either in his Person or by Proctor The Nicene Councell was called against Arius who denyed the Sonne to be Coessentiall and Coeternall with the Father Those Fathers therefore enlarged the second Article of the Creed touching the eternall Divinity of the Sonne of God The Councell of Constantinople was called against Macedonius who denyed the Divinity of the holy Ghost whence those Fathers enlarged the eight Article of the Creed which concernes the Third Person of the Trinity As for the Forme of words or Frame of this Creed it had in the first Place Hosius Bishop of Corduba for the Composer who sate in the Councell of Nice as President or Moderator by the appointment of the Emperour Constantine the Great and therefore subscribed in the first Place before Vitus and Vincentius who were the Bishop of Romes Legats as we may see in Binius Conc. Tom. 1. The Composing of this Creed by Hosius we have witnessed by Baronius A. 325 who took it out of the Epist of Athan. ad Solitarios who was present at the Councell the words of Baron are these Consentientibus Catholicis Episc Arianis pariter assentientibus concepta est Catholicae Fidei formula quâ omnia Arianae haeresis capita truncarentur fuit autem ejus formandae Osius imprimis Architectus sapientissimus de quo haec S. Athanasius cum scribit in Arianos ex verbis eorum in eundem Osium apud Constantium conclamantium Hic princeps est Synodorum siquid scribit ubique auditur hic formulam Fidei in Nicenâ Synodo concepit Arianos ubique pro haereticis traduxit that is By the joynt consent of the Catholick Bishops the Arians also agreeing to it there was Composed a Forme of Catholick Beliefe He that Composed it was Osius that most wise Master-builder concerning whom S. Athanasius in his workes against the Arians thus writeth rehearsing their very wordes wherein they cryed out upon him before the Emperour Constantius This is the chiefe President of Synods who if he write ought is hearkned to every where he composed the Forme of Beliefe in the Nicene Synod and hath traduced the Arians every where for Hereticks But the Additionall Particles or supplement of this Creed was made by Gregory Nyssen an eminent Father in the first Constantinopolitan Councell who perfected and compleated the Forme as we now have it So Nicephorus informes us Eccles Hist lib. 12. cap. 13. From that time forward it was held for one entire Creed and promiscuously called by succeeding Ages sometimes the Nicene sometimes the Constantinopolitan Creed It was caled lthe Nicene for the honour of that Councell which was the first Oecumenicall and the Foundation of all the Rest that followed as also because it was conteined virtually and implicitly in the shorter Creed of that Councell So Marcus Bishop of Ephesus in the Synod of Ferrara Sess 5. Conc. Tom. 4. And it was called the Constantinopolitan Creed because finished in that Councell and brought to that perfection wherein we now see it This Creed according as it was framed in the Nicene Synod far shorter than now we have it we may see in these following Authors viz. Athan. Epist ad Iovianum Conc. Tom. 1. pag. 399. Cod. Can. Eccl. Afric p. 19. Ruff. Eccl. Hist lib. 1. cap. 6. Theod. lib. 1. Hist cap. 12. Socr. lib. 1. c. 5. Cass trip hist lib. 1. cap. 17 Niceph. lib. 1. cap. 12. We have already Englished it in the Twelfth Chapter of the precedent Discourse on the Apostles Creed Now I shall set downe the Originall Greeke which runns thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 After this the Fathers of the Constantinopolitan Councell enlarged this Forme partly by adding some explicatory particles and partly by resuming out of the Apostles Creed those Articles wherein it was defective The Explicatory particles were chiefly touching the Holy Ghost The Articles taken out of the Apostles Creed were those which follow the Article of the Holy Ghost Notwithstanding they omitted three passages thereof which were virtually inclosed in the rest that preceded or followed viz. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God of God because it followes very God of very God 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 both which are in Heaven and which are in earth because there went before by whom all things were made 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is Of the substance of the Father because they thought it sufficiently comprehended in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies more than 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Epiphanius tells us in his Anchoratus viz. A person of one and the same individuall substance with the Father whence the Orthodoxe Christians were differenced from the Arians by the Title of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is of Homoousians or of those who worshipt the Sonne of God under this Title by professing him of the same substance with the Father So then the entire forme thereof as the Westerne Churches now read it by resuming that passage God of God out of the first Nicene forme and adding the word Filioque that is and from the Sonne in the Procession of the Holy Ghost runnes thus the additionall particles being distinguished from the rest by this marke which encloseth them I Believe in one God the Father Almighty maker of Heaven and Earth and of all things visible and invisible and in one Lord Jesus Christ the only-begotten Sonne of God begotten of his Father before all Worlds God of God light of light very God of very God begotten not made being of one substance with the Father by whom all Things were made who for us men and for our Salvation came downe from Heaven and was incarnate by the Holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary and was made man and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate he suffered and was buried and the third day he rose againe according to the Scriptures and ascended into Heaven and sitteth on the right hand of the Father and he shall come againe with Glory to judge both the quick and the dead whose Kingdome shall have none end And I believe in the Holy Ghost the Lord and Giver of life who proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne who together with the Father and the Sonne is worshipped and glorified who spake by the Prophets And I believe one Catholick and Apostolick Church I acknowledge one Baptisme for the remission of sinnes and I look for the Resurrection of the Dead and the life of the World to come That Gregory Nyssen by order of the Second generall Councell held at Constantinople added the particles here inserted is witnessed as I said by Nicephorus Callistus in hist Eccles lib. 12. cap.
13. his words are these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is They the Fathers of that Synod added to that Divine Confession of Faith made at Nice The Glory of the most Holy Spirit as a Person of equall Honour and Glory with the Father and the Sonne Gregory of Nyssa supplying what was defective in that Sacred Creed Not that they were the first framers of those additionall particles for we find them extant before the celebration of this Councell in Epiphanius his Anchoratus and for the most part in Cyrils Catecheses but the first who by their Synodicall Authority confirmed the entire Forme having left out something of the Nicene Creed viz. those three fore mentioned Passages but added more and so commended yea prescribed the whole unto the Christian Church This Creed so enlarged was presently received into the Publick service of the Church for Platina in the life of Damasus tels us Mandavit ut in principio celebrationis quam missam vocant Confessio diceretur ut hodie fit that is Damasus who lived at the time of the Constantinopolitan Creed commanded that in the Begining of Common-service this Creed or Confession should be rehearsed as now we use it And Walafridus Strabo de Reb. Eccles cap. 22. informes us that this was done in imitation of the Greeke Church Illud Symbolum quod nos ad imitationem Graecorum intra missas adsumimus Et mox Ab ipsis ergo ad Romanos ille usus creditur pervenisse Yet for some yeares though it were received into the Greeke Liturgy it was not Constantly used till the Time of Timotheus Patriarch of Constantinople who came to that See in the yeare 511. So Theodorus Lector in the Second Booke of his Eclogae or Collectanea 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. that is Timotheus at the desire of his Friends tooke order that the Creed of the 318 Fathers should be rehearsed at every Communion and this in reproofe of Macedonius who had not received it whereas before it was rehearsed only once in the yeare to wit on the Eve of the Passion at the Time when the Bishop Catechized By this it appeares that it was used Publickly in the Easterne Church though but once in the yeare whereas this Timotheus caused it to be constantly rehearsed at every Communion Not long after this we find it commanded to be used in the third Councell of Toledo a Nationall Councell of 78 Bishops assembled under K. Recaredus whereof Leander Bishop of Sevil was one This Councell was celebrated in the yeare 590 the second canon whereof runs thus Pro reverentia sanctissimae Fidei petitione Recaredi Regis constituit Synodus ut per omnes Ecclesias Hispaniae Galliciae secundum formam Orientalium Ecclesiarum Concillii Constantinopolitani hoc est 150 Episcoporum Symbolum fidei recitetur prius quam Dominica dicatur oratio voce clarâ— praedicetur quo fides vera sit manifesta testimonium habeat ad Christi corpus sanguinem praelibandum pectora populorum fide purificaâ—a accedant that is Out of a venerable regard of the most holy Faith and upon the motion of K. Recaredus the Synod hath ordeined that the Creed of the Constantinopolitan Councell that is of the 150 Bishops should be rehearsed after the use of the Eastern Churches throughout all the Churches of Spaine and Gallicia and that it be openly published before the saying of the Lords Prayer that so the true Faith may be manifested and witnessed and that the Hearts of the People being purifyed by Faith may come to the participation of Christs Body and Bloud From Spaine in likelihood it came over the Pyrenees into France part whereof namely Languedoc and the Country adjacent was then under the Dominion of the Gothish Kings of Spaine And as it was commanded to be rehearsed in the Spanish Churches on purpose to profligate the Arian heresy wherewith all their Princes had bin infected until K. Recaredus so was it more generally received in the Churches of France in the latter end of the 8 Century when Elipandus Archbishop of Toledo and Felix Bishop of Urgell had been condemned of Nestorianisme in two Synods namely at Ratisbone in the yeare 792. And at Frankfort where Charles the great was present in the yeare 794. So Walafridus Strabo de Rebus Eccles c. 22. Apud Gallos Germanos post dejectionem Felicis haeretici sub gloriosissimo Carolo Francorum Rege idem Symbolum latius crebrius in Missarum caepit officiis iterari that is The same Creed viz. the Nicene began to be used amongst the Galles and Germans after the deposition of the heretick Felix under Charles the most glorious King of the French more often and throughout more Churches in the Communion-service And the Synod of Frankfort to prevent the spreading of this Heresy tooke order that together with the Apostles Creed the Nicene also should be diligently delivered for the publick use of the Churches the thirty third Canon of which Synod set forth by Sermondus runs thus Vt fides Catholica sanctae Trinitatis id est Symbolum Constantinopolitanum oratio Dominica atque Symbolum fidei Apostolorum omnibus praedicetur ac tradatur That the Catholick Faith of the holy Trinity that is the Nicene or Constantinopolitan Creed and the Lords Prayer and the Apostles Creed be Preached and Delivered unto All. As for our Church of England it was probably brought hither by Augustine and his fellow Preachers who were sent to convert the Nation by Gregory the Great then Bishop of Rome CAP. II. When and by whom the Particle Filioque was added to the Nicene Creed is historically delivered and at large Severall other causes of the breach betweene the Churches of Greece and Rome IT will not be amisse for a close unto the Discourse on this Creed to shew as far as good Authors give us light the Time when and the Person by whom the Particle Filioque and from the Sonne was added to this Creed which declares the holy Ghost to Proceed from the Sonne as well as from the Father And this I thought fit to adde partly for that the matter is obscure and not generally knowne partly for the compleating of my discourse on this Creed and partly also for to shew the Originall and progresse of so chiefe a cause of Difference betweene the Churches of East and West which hath now lasted for some hundreds of years to which I shall adde some other causes of the Breach and so give a conclusion of the whole Treatise My collections on this Argument I have cheifely from the Learned Vossius who with his wonted industry and fidelity hath acquainted us with what he found recorded concerning it out of the best witnesses of Antiquity viz. Dissert 3a. De 3 bus Symb. The Churches of Spaine where the first who added this Particle to the Creed in a Synod held in Gallicia in the yeare 447 as it is cited by the R nd Armachanus The French Churches
only against their opposers but against all those too who concurre not with them in every tittle and Ioâ—a whether negative Errours condemned or positive Doctrines asserted So that now Ecclesiam quaerimus in Ecclesiâ we have even lost the Church among so many Conventicles we have as many Religions as Families and those too not seldome disagreeing yet all appropriating Salvation to themselves Every one takes upon him to be a Pope the name so much in shew detested and seats himselfe in his usurped Chaire as an infallible Judge guided by the Dictates of the Spirit so that one knows not whom to adhere to especially weake and ignorant Christians are most dangerously scandalized And we heard of one not long agoe in Holland who whether out of Pride or Despaire I know not had contracted the Church within the small compasse of his own Microcosme and upon that Ground true Baptisme being annext unto the true Church he Baptized himselfe thence called the Se-Baptist Now what course might be taken to heale these numerous wounds sure they would all close up of themselves if all Christians would have recourse to this Ancient Catholick and undoubted Rule beleeving as much requiring no more And by the way we may account it none of the least Blemishes in the face of our Church that so many private Catechismes with other Tracts of the like nature have been suffered to fly abroad from every quarter not a few of them for I should offend as much against Truth as modesty to censure all erronious most of them defective in the maine Points yet stuff'd with uncertainties and impertinencies which instead of Fundamentals give us Circumstantials and Appendixes instead of a sound Body of Credenda's haire and nailes if not boiles and botches Thus have the tender Plants in the faire Garden of this Church been partly infected with a poysonous joyce partly made crooked and deformed in their Infancy whilst they have bent themselves towards this or that Pamphleter like those heretofore in the Church of Corinth who said I am of Paul I of Apollo's and I of Cephas and 't were well they had no worse Tutours to the great prejudice of verity and utter bane of unity Now all this might have been prevented if they had not thus from the Birth been put forth to strange Nurses but caused to suck the Brests of their true Mother the Church of England for S. Paul cals the first Rudiments of the Christian Religion Milke a nourishment fit for Babes a good portion of which Milk is contain'd in the Creed which therefore is stiled by S. Cyril Patriarch of Jerusalem ParvuloruÌ„ in Christo lactea Introductio Catech. 4. But before I enter upon the Body of the Creed which I purpose to treat of hereafter as God shall give me life and strength meanes and leasure I conceave it will be expedient if not wholy necessary to lay down by way of Preface or Introduction some Prolegomena which I shall reduce to these five Heads the Bounds of my insuing Discourse 1. That the Apostles were the Authours or Composers of the Creed which beares their Name 2. The Grounds upon which and the Ends for which the Apostles framed it where I shall speak also of the Sufficiency of the Creed for the Rule of the Christian Faith 3. The severall Reasons of the name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is the Title it beares in the Originall Greek 4. The Division or Parts of it 5. By way of Appendix I shall adde two Diatriba's or Discourses concerning the Nicene Creed and that of Athanasius especially the latter because most questioned which the Catholick Church and particulary the Church of England in her eighth Article hath joyntly received with that of the Apostles and are larger explications of it especially in the two maine Points of the Trinity and Incarnation then called in question and perverted by Arius and Macedonius But before I proceed to the handling of these particulars it will be requisite to remove some Doubts which may arise against what I have already writteÌ„ thus clearing my way as I go of al Imaginary rubs obstacles Ob. 1. The denying of the Apostles to be the Authours of the Creed doth not seem to weaken or shake any Ground by which we may prove a Trinity first because every Article of the Creed is confess'd to be in Scripture Then because no other Argument is pretended to be fetcht from the Creed for the proofe thereof but this that the Phrase Credo In is attributed to the Sonne and Holy Ghost as well as to God the Father but not so to the Catholick Church or to the Articles which follow it whereas this seemes to be a groundlesse Proofe for in the Scripture and the best Authours Credere in Deum in Deo Deo are promiscuously taken as signifying the same Thing So we Read Exod. 14. 31. Crediderunt in Dominum in Mosem They beleeved in God and in Moses which the 70 render ' 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thus construing it for a meere Historicall assent So also 1 Sam. 27. 12. Achish beleeved in Davidem in David according to the Heb. that is he beleeved David And 1 Joh. 5. 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he beleeved not in the Testimony is no more but to believe the testimony not to be true The Creed of Nice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And in some auncient Latine Copies of the Apostles Creed we read Credo in Ecclesiam Catholicam in remissionem Peccatorum c. Particularly in a very old MS. in BIBL BODL we have Credo in Spiritu Sancto Sanctâ Ecclesiâ remissione Peccatorum c. Answ Every Article of the Creed is confest to be in Scripture either in expresse words or by necessary Consequence one of which Consequences or Conclusions is the Doctrine of the Trinity gathered by Apostolicall hands and placed in their Creed for who else could Infallibly collect it and impose it on the Faith of Christians As for the particle Credo in which as Stephanus observes in his Thesaurus is a phrase peculiar to Christian Divines it s being applied to the three Persons in the Sacred Trinity to none else in Propriety of speech is a sufficient Argument for the proof of that high Mistery so generally understood by the Latine Fathers S. Aug. Serm. 181. De Temp. upon those words of the Creed Sanctam Ecclesiam Catholicam saith thus Sciendum est quod Ecclesiam credere non tamen in Ecclesiam credere debemus quia Ecclesia non Deus sed domus Dei est we must know that we ought to beleeve the Church not in the Church for the Church is not God but the Household of God Ruffinus in his Exposition of the Creed on the same Article of the Church non dixit in Sanctam Ecclesiam nec in remissionem Peccatorum nec in carnis Resurrectionem si enim addidisset In praepositionem una eademque vis fuisset cum Superioribus nunc
the Diuids of Pythagoras Socrates c but what we find written I Answer The Creed is best preserved by Tradition for the sense and substance of the Articles because daily in publike use in the Catechumen's mouthes and the Liturgies of the Church yet subject to variation in point of expression by reason of severall Tongues and Dialects in the Christian World as also because of some exegeticall Additions interserted upom occasion of some particular Heresies which arose in this or that Church So Lawes are best preserved by continued Practise though somewhat varying if received in diverse Nations as the Romane Lawes are in some specialty of expression or by way of application to the exigence of the Times and Genius of the People in diverse Countries As for the dependance of Tradition it relies not only upon Memory but upon continuall use and Practise a better means of Preservation then Writing which is daily subject to the fraud negligence and ignorance of Transcribers many differences arising from whence have raised no small trouble unto Learned Criticks how to reconcile them or if irreconcileable to descerne the true Copie The Hebrew Bible was preserved entire in the true reading thereof as being constantly used in the Jewish Synagogues without any Points or Vowels written as now we have it and that for many hundred yeares according to the most received Opinion a Thinge infinitely more difficult then the Preservation of the Creed Wherefore we may not without Reason say that a short Summary of the Faith such as the Creed is is best kept by Tradition especially such an one as is in continuall use and Practise whereof the Fathers here cited give us good reason in summe that Non sunt evulganda fidei mysteria nisi Initiatis Magistro Duce seu Interprete ne sc derisui Profanis habeantur aut malignantium Calumniis paâ—eant ne erroneis Ignorantium aut male feriantium glossematis obiiciantur The whole Word of God was committed to writing because large and full of Variety yet occasionally and by Degrees The like may be said of the many long various Discourses of Pythagoras and Socrates committed to Paper by their Schollers Our Saviours Sermons and Discourses were oft very large his Miracles and memorable passages of his Life almost infinite and so could not otherwise be well preserved then by Writing yet Irenaeus tels us that many Christian Nations had no Scripture amongst them in his Time who notwithstanding kept Christianity diligently amongst them by an old Tradition And on the other side the Fathers tell us that where the Scriptures were to be had the Hereticks oft set forth unsound Books under the Apostles names and corrupted the true Copies of Scripture which they got into their Hands by this means seducing many troubling more to neither of which inconveniences a knowne practised breife Tradition is obnoxious As for the doctrine of the Druids it was carefully preserved as long as the Religion stood by an unwritten Tradition now Christianity hath a promise of continuance unto the end of the world Mat. 28. 20. so needs no more to feare a failing of its doctrine then its Disciples If it be farther objected that all in generall are commanded to confesse Christ and to give an account of the hope that is in them 1 Pet. 3. 15. which seems to make against the second Reason assigned by Cyril of Ierusalem That the Creed was of old committed to writing by Irenaeus Tertullian that when these Reasons and exhortations were made by Ruffin Cyril and Chrysologus the Creed was committed to writing both by themselves and others I answer first that those Precepts belong properly to Christians that is to Persons entered into the Church by Baptisme who had the whole Creed explained unto them but if they extend to the Catechumeni the Confession and Account must be understood more indefinitely and at large to wit of those more easie and generall Principles whereof they were informed by their Teachers Secondly the Creed is therefore call'd a Tradition because not committed to writing by the Apostles as the Gospell and Epistles were though in after Ages it were put in writing by the Fathers and Councills for the more publike Conviction of Hereticks Yet it clearly appeares by the fore-cited Fathers who cannot well be thought ignorant of the Churches custome in their own Times that the Creed was not delivered in writing to the Catechumeni but taught them by word of mouth to learne and professe this teaching or delivery not without an explication of the Catechist or Bishop least otherwise they might chance to erre in the meaning withall it was not delivered all together but line after line as they were able to receive it CAP. III. Testimonies of Scripture touching the Composure of the Apostles Creed especially out of S. Pauls Epistles as the places are accordingly interpreted by Divines of good note both Auncient and Moderne Some doubts against these Testimonies solved THUS much for the History of the Creeds Composure and its manner of Conveyance to after Ages But that the Apostles did first Compile and then deliver this Creed by an orall Tradition to the Christian Church will need farther Confirmation I shall endeavour to prove it by Scripture Antiquity and Reason all which I hope will be found to attest this Truth as joynt-witnesses of what hath bin already produced out of Ruffinus And first by Scripture for though the Creed be not expresly set down in any place of the New Testament because the Apostles for the foremention'd reasons thought not good to commit it unto writing yet S. Paul in diverse places of his Epistles not obscurely alludes unto it under severall phrases of speech apt metaphours which we find afteward applied to the Creed by the auncient Fathers as they may be most probably interpreted are so understood de facto by the judgment of good Authors both of the Primitive and latter Times 1. First Rom. 6. 17. The Apostle tels us of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That Forme of Doctrine and expressly cals it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Tradition as the Ancients constantly stile the Creed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ye have obeyed from the Heart that Forme of Doctrine which was delivered you that is whereas before Baptisme ye were the Servants of Sinne now now yee have professed your obedience to the Faith by the publike rehearsall of the Creed delivered to the Church in a set Forme by the Apostles to be openly recited before the Congregation at the time of Baptisme a Custome used from the Beginning and still retained in the Church Thus is the place expounded by Anselme our Learned and Renowned Archbishop of Canterbury Quae doctrina est Forma quia imaginem Dei deformatam restituit which Doctrine saith he is stiled a Forme because it restores the defaced Image of God to wit by Baptisme which the Apostle elsewhere calls The Laver of
who believe in Christ having the Doctrine of Salvation written by the Spirit in their Hearts without inky characters and diligently keeping the old Tradition Believing in one God Maker of Heaven and earth and of all Things therein through Jesus Christ the Sonne of God who out of his most eminent love towards his Creature undertooke to be borne of a Virgin thus uniting God and man in his owne Person he suffered under Pontius Pilate and Rising againe was gloriously receiued into Heaven He shall come againe in Glory the Saviour of those who are to be saved and the Judge of those who are to be condemned casting into everlasting fire the corrupters of the Truth the Despisers of his Father and contemners of his comming 3. Turtullian Lib. 1. adu haeret cap. 13. Having en gaged himselfe in the combate with the whole body of Heretiâ—kes produceth against them the Body of the Faith or Apostolicall Creed under the Title of Regula Fidei which he sets downe in these words Regula est fidei ut jam hinc quid credamus profiteamur illa sc quâ creditur unum omninò Deum esse nec alium praeter mundi conditorem qui universa de nihilo produxerit per verbum suum primò omnium emissum Id uerbum Filium ejus appellatum in nomine Dei variè visum patriarchis in Prophetis semper auditum Postremò delatum ex Spiritu Dei Patris virtute in Virginem Mariam carnem factum in utero ejus ex eâ natum Hominem esse Jesum Christum exinde praedicasse novam legem novam promissionem regni Coelorum virtutes fecisse fixum Cruci tertiâ die resurrexisse in Coelos ereptum sedere ad dextram Patris misisse vicariam vim Spiritus Sancti qui credentes agat venturum cum claritate ad sumendos Sanctos in vitae aeternae promissorum caelestium fructum ad prophanos judicandos Igni perpetuo facta utriusque Partis resuscitatione cum carnis resurrectione that is The Rule of Faith whereby we professe what we believe is this that there is one only God the same with the Creator of the world who made all things of nothing by his Word which he first of al sent forth or which first of all came from him This Word called also his Sonne variously or in diverse Formes appeared in the name of God unto the Patriarches was alwayes heard to speake in the Prophets at length conveyed by the Spirit and Power of God the Father into the Virgin Mary was incarnate in her Womb of her born Man and is Jesus the Christ After this he Published a new Law and the new Promise of the Kingdome of Heaven wrought miracles was fastned to the Crosse rose againe the third Day being taken up to Heaven sitteth on the right Hand of the Father sent the Deputy-power of the Holy Ghost to guide those who believe shall come with Glory to assume the Saints unto the enjoyment of everlasting Life and the Heavenly promises and to adjudge the Profane to everlasting Fire having raised up both Parties by the Resurrection of the Body Then he concludes Haec Regula â Christo ut probabitur instituta nullas habet apud nos quaestiones nisi quas Haereses inferunt quae Haereticos faciunt This Rule instituted as will be proved by Christ himselfe admits of no doubts amongst us but such as Heresies produce and produce Heretiks Thus ye see Tertullian writing in generall as he doth in this Booke against all Heretiks puts downe all the Articles thereof which were opposed by any Heretik either before or in his Age For. 1. Christs descentâ— into Hell is included in the Article of the Resurrection or presupposed by it as in some other Creeds but of this more hereafter 2. The Article of the Catholik Church is not so clearly put downe as the rest because not oppugned till Novatus and Donatus arose which was after Tertullians Death 3. Forgivenesse of Sinnes is implyed in the New Promise of the Kingdome of Heaven whereof this is the First and the Foundation to the rest Yet in another booke of his he makes mention of these two latter Articles namely this of the Church and The Forgivenesse of Sinnes as solemnly profest at Baptisme Cum sub tribus testatio fidei sponsio salutis pignerentur necessariò adilcitur Ecclesiae mentio quoniam ubi Tres id est Pater Filius Spiritus Sanctus ibi Ecclesia quae trium Corpus est That is When the Confession of our Faith and the Covenant of our Salvation are engaged under the Authority of Three the Church is of necessity mentioned with them for where those Three are the Father Sonne and holy Ghost there is that Church also which is the Body of those Three De Bapt adu Quintillan cap 6. And alittle after giving the reason why Christ himfelfe did not Baptize in Person he shewes how incongruous it had beene for him to have used the received forme of the Church Ne moveat quosdam quòd Ipse non tinguebat in quem tingueret In paenitentiam Quò ergò illi Praecursorem In peccatorum remissionem quam verbo dabat In semetipsum quem humilitate celabat In Spiritum Sanctum qui nondum a Patre descenderat In Ecclesiam quam nondum Apostoli struxerant That is Let it not trouble any that Christ himselfe did not Baptize in whose name or to what end should he have Baptized To Repentance Why then had he a fore-runner For Remission of sinnes which he gave by his Word In his owne Name which in humility he concealed In the Holy Ghosts who as yet was not descended from the Father into the Church which the Apostles had not as yet built cap. 11. A litle after him S Cyp. in his Epistle to Magnus being the 76. speaking of the Novatians who retained the old wounted forme of wordes in the baptismall Intertogatories expresseth one of them thus Credis remissionem peccatorum vitam aeternam per sanctam Ecclesiam Dost thou believe the Remission of sinnes and Life Eternall by the Holy Church in which words it is cleare that these two Articles were part of the confession of Faith used at Baptisme that Life Eternall was a distinct Article from that of the Resurrection and that the Particle In which Tert. prefixeth to the Articles of the Church and Remission of sinnes is not significant but redundant seeing that S. Cyp. here omitts it compare his Epist to Januarius c. viz. the 70. in Pamel Edit But in two other Tracts he sets downe the Creed more briefly First lib. de virg vel cap. 1. Regula fidei una omninò est sola immobilis irreformabilis Credendi sc in unicum Deum Omnipotentem mundi conditorem Filium ejus Jesum Christum natum ex Virgine Maria crucifixum sub Pontio Pilato tertia die resuscitatum a mortuis receptum in Coelis sedentem nunc ad
is involved also in the Article of the Generall Judgment as the Account of our workes was If it be objected here that the Creeds or confessions of Faith which we find in the Councels and Fathers cannot be justly called Expositions of the Apostles Creed seeing that those Formes extant in Irenaeus and Tertullian want many Articles which the Creed now hath much lesse have they all which the Creeds of Nice Calcedon and that of Athanasius have I answer that the Creed as it is set downe in Irenaeus and Tertullian is I confesse somewhat defective for which I have before given some Reasons if we will find it full and entire we must have recourse to some famous ancient Church where it was deposited by the Apostles as that of Jerusalem or Rome now to the Creeds of these Churches the Nicene Chalcedon and that of Athanasius have added nothing in substance as appears by what hath been said but only in explication As for Tertullians Creed though it be more imperfectly set downe in his Booke De virg Vel. and that against the heretick Praxeas yet in his Book De Praescrip adv haer Wherein he oppugneth all Hereticks which had infested the Church untill his time some of which scarce left any one Article of the Creed inviolate he sets it downe more fully only he expreseth not distinctly and at large the Article of the Catholick Church and that of Remission of Sinnes for the former had not been yet oppugned by Novatus or Donatus nor the latter by Pelagius who were not then risen notwithstanding we may find even some hints of these wherein the substance of them lies implicitely hid 1. Those words of his qui credentes agat and those other ad sumendos sanctos wherein he expresseth how the Holy Ghost doth guide all Believers and work in them and that our Saviour will come at the last to take the Saints unto himselfe will serve to make up the ninth Article of the Church and Communion of Saints for the Title of Believers is the usuall stile of Christians and of the Christian Church under the New Testament and one Beliefe or Holy Faith is that which makes the Church a Communion of Saints that is of Persons severed and discriminated from those of other Religions but united among themselves Adde hereunto that which the same Tertullian hath in his Booke against Praxeas viz. That the holy Ghost is the Sanctifier of the faith of those who believe in the Father and in the Sonne and in the holy Ghost that is Of the Catholick Church which is a Communion of Saints or Believers 2. Those words applyed to our Saviour That he Preached the new Law and the New promise of the Kingdome of Heaven imply the tenth Article viz. I believe one Baptisme for the Remission of sinnes as it is more amply set downe in the Nicene Creed for by Baptisme we are initiated into this new Law of Christianity and engage our selves to performe it as the condition of the Gospell-Covenant required on our Part as necessary to Salvation whence by a Metonomie 't is taken somtimes as including the Law or doctrine Preached by the Party Baptizing as in that question of our Saviour to the Pharaisees The Baptisme of Iohn whence was it From Heaven or of men Mat. 21. v. 25. Where our Saviours maine end was to convince them that he was the true Messiah from the Word or Testimony of Iohn the Baptist whereby he gave witnesse to him at that time especially when the Pharasees were sent unto Iohn in a solemne Embassy to enquire whether He were the Christ or no Io. 1. v. 19 20 24 26 27. And as by Baptisme we are initiated into this new Law and thereby entituled unto the Kingdome of Heaven and made Inheritours of it so is Remission of sinnes the new Promise the first and newest of the whole Gospell which reconciling us unto God makes us capable of his other Favours to introduce which and prepare us for it Repentance was first Preached by Iohn the Baptist our Saviour and his Apostles Repent for the Kingdome of Heaven is at hand and from which our Saviour tooke his Name thereby signifying the cheife end of his comming Thou shalt call his Name Iesus saith the Angell to Ioseph For he shall save his People from their Sins Mat. 1. 21. 3. As for the last Article viz that of Everlasting Life it is partly implyed in the Article of the Resurrection which as it lookes backward unto Death so it lookes forward on Life Everlasting Death the last enemy being by it subdued partly exprest in the Article of our Saviours Coming to Iudgment the cheife end whereof is setdowne in these words ad sumendos sanctos in Vitae Aeternae fructum to assume his Saints unto the injoyment of Life Everlasting Now this Creed of Tertullian which so nearely symbolizeth with that of the Apostles deserves no meane regard First because he is a very ancient Doctor of the Church as who flourished about the end of the second Century Secondly because his workes are confessedly genuine Thirdly and Chiefly because this Creed of his setting downe was not Framed by him but as he expressely tells us derived from Christ by the mouthes of his Apostles before ever any Heretick appeared in the Church so it was not made because of heresies now risen whereof many arose even in the Apostles Times but before any of them arose not for Remedy but prevention and therefore must needs be very ancient But in the two other places he sets down this Creed or Rule of Faith more imperfectly omitting what made not for his present purpose yet those imperfect Creeds he calls Regulas immobiles irreformabiles inviolable and unchangeable Rules that is in regard of those Heades of Beliefe which he had occasion th … to set downe So that all the Creeds which wee meet with in the Fathers or Councells are to be compared with that which the Church for so many Ages hath acknowledged for the Apostles as so many Copies with the Patterne or Structures with the modell not so well with one another for so they may differ in poynt of quantity and proportion like so many Pictures or Statues made to represent the same body whereof the originall is entire and exactly proportioned but the copies diversely shaped and drawn some too Giant like others too defectively to the middle only or the shoulders If it be farther objected that the Romanists affirme all their new Articles to be only Explications of the old and confesse that Articles cannot increase quoad numerum credibilium sed quoad explicationem yet that we condemne them justly for obtruding those explications as necessary to salvation I answer that the Romanists are justly blamed for obtruding their explications on other Churches as necessary to Salvation because themselves make but a particular Church and yet presume upon a false priviledge of universall primacy and Apostolick Infallibility But as to the Exegericall
contentions dayly growing hotter betweene them had like to have seperated the East and West about a syllabicall difference But Athanasius saith he with much patience and prudence calling unto him and hearing both Parties having examined their meaning and the sense of the words when he found them agreeing in the thing signifyed and at no difference about the doctrine it selfe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 granting them the diversity of their Termes he unites them together in the same Truth Secondly Though we hold it most certaine that the Apostles considered single and apart delivered nothing to the Church either by word or writing but what they were specially assisted in by the holy Ghost and therefore most undoubtedly true yet for ought I know as the holy Ghost revealed not all truths to the Apostles at once no not when he descended on them at the Feast of Pentecost but delayed the manifesting of some till afterwards as for example the Conversion of the Gentiles to Peter in the vision of the sheet Act. 10. So he might not reveale some truthes unto them when they were single and apart but only when they met and consulted together For though every one of them by himselfe was infallible in all necessary Points that is so as to deliver nothing contrary to the Faith or Truth of Christian Religion yet without any Derogation to his priviledge they might need the more especiall assistance of the holy Ghost upon their Assembly to instruct them which Points of Faith were necessary to Salvation which not We have a famous Instance of this recorded Act. 15. For when there arose a great question in the Church of Antioch whether the Gentiles newly converted in Syria and Cilicia should be circumcised and obey the Law of Moses That Paul and Barnabas were sent unto Jerusalem about it v. 2. that the Apostles and Elders came together to consider of this matter v. 6. What needed this considering in a solemne meeting if they had been ascertained what to resolve before they met It followes v. 7. That there was much disputing or debate in the Councell Why not even among the Apostles themselves who were the chiefe members thereof At least this disputing might have been spared or cut short by the Apostles as a thing unnecessary if it had not beene thought a good and needfull Preamble unto a finall Decision If the Church had conceived S. Peter or any other of the Apostles an infallible Judge in this Point with out due examination thereof and the speciall assistance of the holy Ghost in a Synod they might have spared both their meeting and dispute But when there had been much disputing and not before they joyntly determined what Lawes to free them from and what to impose upon them as things necessary to be observed v. 28. Namly the abstaining from Bloud and consequently things strangled v. 29. According to that primitive law given to the Sons of Noah Ge. 9. 4. a Law still observed by the Greek Church by the Moscontieth their neighbour churches of Polād which have admitted the Reformation and long observed generally by the whole Western Church even til the Times of Ludovicus Pius as appeares by his and his Father Charles capitular together with the abstaining from Fornication and things offered to Idols which the Apostle makes a species of Idolatry 1 Cor. 10. 19 20 21. And are more clearly against the Morall Law though not so esteemed by the generality of the Gentiles Then and not before they use that stile It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us that is To us in the Plurall to us assembled together Consonantly to this S. Paul tells us more plainly Gal. 2. 2. that long after his conversion and calling unto his Apostleship he went up to Jerusalem by Revelation and communicated the Gospell which he Preached among the Gentiles unto the Apostles who there resided namely to Iames Cephas and Iohn giving this for a Reason least saith he by any meanes I should run or had run in vaine Gal. 2. 2. Now the composing of the Creed wherein were to be comprised the maine Grounds of Christian Religion was a matter of the highest consequence and so might very well require the joynt and serious deliberation of the Twelve together with the speciall assistance of Gods spirit Thirdly To the Reply against the second Reason I Answer That 't is a groundlesse supposall to think that the Persons to be Baptized in the Apostles times were required to believe only in Iesus Christ or in the Trinity alone for First we find other Principles of Christian Doctrine distinctly set downe in Heb. 6. 1 2. And Preached by the Apostles before they Baptized their Auditors for instance the Article of Remission of Sinnes by Peter Act. 10. 43. And by Paul Act. 13. 38 39. The Article of the Creation of the World by the same Paul Act. 17. 24. Secondly As for beliefe in Iesus Christ the Apostles indeed required it as the maine poynt as we read in the History of the Eunuch Act. 18. 37. and of the Jaylor Act. 16. 31. Yet not as the sole poynt for beliefe in the holy Ghost was also required as appeares by the history of the Disciples at Ephesus Act. 19. 2 3 6. 'T is mentioned therefore as the principall and that which virtually includes all the rest for to believe in Jesus Christ as wee ought is to believe the Doctrine which he taught revealed unto the world from the Father as the guide or light to true Blessednesse now what was this but the Gospell of Salvation whereof the Creed for mater of Doctrinalls is the Epitome consult to this purpose Io. 17. 3. And chap. 3. 13. 36. Thirdly As for beliefe in the most Holy Trinity it gives us more scope as that which comprehends all the Articles of our Faith for as to believe in Jesus Christ implicitely conteines all the mysteries of our Redemption viz. His Godhead Incarnation and Birth Passion Buriall Descent into Hell Resurrection Assension Sitting on the right hand of the Father and second comming to Judgment so to believe in God the Father conteines his workes of Creation and Providence which are the Visible effects of his eternall Power and Godhead Ro. 1. 20. And to believe in the holy Ghost involves the whole worke of Sanctification the applying of Christs Benefits to his Church and compleating the Salvation of mankind which are distinctly set downe in the foure last Articles And this S. Chrysostome teacheth us in his first homily on the Creed already cited where his Text ends thus I believe in the holy Ghost but in his explication he thus unravels the Article and layes it open to view in its full extent who brings us to the holy Church she remiteth our sinnes promiseth the Resurrection of the Body and life everlasting This beliefe therefore in Christ or in the Trinity is not to be nakedly simply understood as if no other Particulars were required but with
relation to those other Articles of the Creed which in them lye hid imbosomed for the History of the Acts doth not expresse Passages at large especially such as were ordinarily knowne and practised as the profession of the Creed at Baptisme but briefly toucheth the heads of things the Evangilists doe the like in relation of speeches miracles of our Saviour so that we are faine to compare thē together to find out the several circumstances and make up the Relation entire To prosecute this point a little farther and illustrate it by the like Instance As the Apostles are said to require Faith in Christ and nought else mentioned of the Persons who came to be Baptized so are they said and that oftner to Baptize in the name of Christ without naming any other Person of the Trinity Act. 2. 38 41. And 10. 48. And 19. 5. And yet we cannot imagine that they omitted the mention of the other two Persons First because it was Christs expresse command that they should Baptize all Nations in the name of the Father and of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost Mat. 28. 19. Secondly because the Christian Church hath alwayes held that as water is the Essentiall matter so this composure of words is the essentiall Forme of Baptisme and so at no hand to be omitted Wherefore when the businesse of rebaptization was agitated in the Nicene Councell it was determined thus That the Persons Baptized with the formentioned Catholick frō should not be rebaptized as being rightly initiated into the Church though by an hereticall hand but as for the Pauliani the Disciples of Paulus Samosatenus who denyed the Trinity and therefore Baptized in a wrong Forme their Baptisme was pronounced null and invalid those who were so illegally initiated were received by a new Baptisme into te Catholick Church Let us say then with that most ancient Father Irenaeus In Christi nomine subauditur qui unxit ipse qui unctus est ipsa unctio qua unctus est unxit quidem Pater unctus est vero Filius in spiritu qui est unctio that is In the name of Christ is to be understood the Anointer the Anointed and the unction wherewith he was Anointed now he who Anointed is the Father the Person Annointed is the Sonne with the Spirit who is the unction Lastly That the Church had need of such a Formula of Beliefe will appeare both by the Reason mentioned in the objection for Heresies infested the Church from the begining to discover which such a Shibboleth was necessary and if those Heresies had not sprung up so early yet such a Symbole was as necessary at first for prevention as afterwards for Triall But of this more in the next chapter Ob. 9 h S. Aug. saith Verba Symboli per Scripturas sparsa sunt inde collecta ad unum reducta That the words of the Creed lye disperst in the Scriptures from whence they are gathered and reduced into a Forme De Symb. Catech. lib. 1. cap. 1. So likwise Paschasius If so how can the Apostles be the Authors thereof For out of the Old Testament they could not gather that Christ was borne of the Virgin Mary or That he suffered under Pontius Pilate And as for the new many of the Apostles were dead before all was written and James before any was written Answ First The Old Testament may well be said to conteine the whole Creed if not expresly and in the history yet typically and in the Prophecy To instance in those two Articles mentiond in the objection to wit our Saviours Birth and Passion Doth not the Prophet Esay say A Virgin shall conceive and bare a Sonne chap. 7. 14. Yea in the present Vnto us a Child is borne chap. 9. 6. And touching his Passion doth not the same Prophet tel us He was wounded for our Transgressions he was bruised for our Iniquities he is brought as a Lambe to the slaughter he was cut off the land of the living chap. 53. 5 7 8. And King David in his person They pierced my hands and my feet Psal 22. 16. comp Zach. 12. 10. As for the names of the Virgin and the Judge they are no such considerable Additions as to make a new or another Article so much may well be borrowed from the history of the Gospell yet the Article not improperly sayd to be extant in the Prophecy Secondly The Death of Iames mentioned Act. 12. 1 2. Is placed by Chronologers in the yeare 44. After our Saviours Birth But the writing of S. Mathewes Gospell a Booke sufficient to supply all those Articles which are not expresly conteined in the Old Testament as placed by them in the yeare 41. And so two or three yeers before the death of Iames. In the same yeere 44. Baronius and Lorinus place the Dispersion of the Apostles into their severall provinces and the framing of the Creed by joynt Consent as a necessary Preparative thereunto the dispersion caused by the persecution of Herod and the doore of Faith being now opened to the Gentiles as God himselfe had informed them by the Vision shewed to Peter before he converted Cornelius Act. 10. 11. and 15. 7. But this is agreed on all Hands that whether this dispersion were sooner as Corn. a lap placeth it Anno Domini 37. or latter as Appollonius cited by Eusebius lib. 5. cap. 17. that S. Mathew wrote his Gospell before it and that in the Hebrew Tongue the language of the Jewes amongst whom and for whose use he wrote it as Irenaeus Origen and others witnesse though it were soon after translated into Greek by Iames the Lords Brother and Bishop of Jerusalem for an Hebrew Transcript thereof was carried by S. Bartholomew into the Indies and found there by Pantaenus of Alexandria Origens Master as witnesse Euseb lib. 5. cap. 9. Ier. de Scriptor Eccles cap. 36. in Pantaeno And another Transcript thereof was carried by Barnabas S. Pauls fellow-Apostle unto the Gentiles whither he was sent which he used alwaies to carry about with him and which was after found buried with him in Cyprus in the time of Zeno the Emperour lying upon his Breast The same Authors also agree that the Creed was framed by the Apostles a little before this generall Dispersion Therefore when we are told that the Ancients place the composing of the Creed in the next yeare after our Saviours Ascension and consequently before the writing of S. Mathewes Gospell the matter is much mistaken Ruffinus and S. Augustine say indeed that the Apostles composed the Creed after our Saviours Ascension and after the Descent of the Holy Ghost at Pentecost but how long after they determine not They agree it was composed before their generall Dispersion into the severall quarters of the World which happened not in S. Stephens Persecution for then they abode all at Ierusalem Acts 8. 1. nor before the conversion of Cornelius by S. Peter Act. 10. For the set
time of Preaching the Gospell to the Gentiles and incorporating them into the Church was not before revealed as appears by the Series of the story now this conversion of Cornelius is placed by Baronius Aº 41. the very same yeare wherein S. Mathews Gospell according to him was written It is most probable therefore that this Dispersion of the Apostles happened in that Persecution of Herod mentioned Act. 12. for presently after this we find Paul and Barnabas solemnely consecrated and sent away from Antioch by the holy Ghosts command for the performance of this great worke the conversion of the Gentiles Ast. 13. 2 3 4. Whereas before the Gospell was Preached unto the Jewes only or at the most unto the Hellenists who were Jewes by Nation or Religion that is Jewish Proselites at least though they speake the language of the Grecians amongst whom they lived This appears Act. 11. 19 20. And to this accord the words of S. Chrysostome Apostoli praedicaverunt Iudaeis longoque temporis spatio caesi slagellati in Iudaeâ manentes ac demum ab ipsis propulsi in Gentes profecti sunt That is The Apostles Preached unto the Jewes and having been a long time scourged and beaten yet abode in Iewry till at length being driven out by them they went forth unto the Gentiles Hom. 70. in Mat. cap. 22. Compare herewith Act. 1. 8. chap. 13. 46 47. Thirdly S. Austins meaning in those words may well be thus construed The Articles of the Creed lye disperst in the Scriptures of both Testaments which in his Time were fully and compleatly extant and were collected from thence That is partly from the Old Testament then written partly from the History of the New which the Apostles were eye and eare-witnesses of and shortly after committed to writing Otherwise we must make him palpably to contradict himselfe for elsewhere he more then once affirmes that the Twelve Apostles composed the Creed which now bears their name and which he there explaines Object 10th If the Creed were composed by the Apostles latter Ages out of respect unto them would not have added ought unto it as we see they did in the Creeds of Nice Chalcedon and that of Athanasius for the Church of Rome was very slow to adde one particle unto the Constantinopolitan Creed viz. Filioque thereby to signify the Procession of the Holy Ghost from the Son as well as the Father though fully perswaded of the Truth thereof so greatly did they respect those 150 Bishops who composed it although they had made some Canons in prejudice of the former Dignity not only of the Alexandrian but of the Roman See Sure succeeding Ages owed far more reverence to the Apostles Answ Succeeding Ages added nothing to the Apostles Creed but only explained some Articles which by reason of their briefnesse or obscurity had been perverted by hereticall Glosses Now this was no disrespect but in honour of the Apostles thus to vindicate their Creed from false Interpretations and so restore it to its primitive Lustre and Integrity Secondly The Constantinopolitan Creed Framed by those 150 Fathers of the Easterne Church had been confirmed by the Church of Rome in the Synod under Damasus no marvaile then if they were not over forward to adde the Particle Filioque without their consents who were the prime Framers of that Creed least by so doing they should seeme to vary as well from themselves as the Fathers of that Councell Howsoever then that Councell might exalt the Dignity of the Constantinopolitan Patriarch now seated in the Head City of the Empire to the seeming prejudice of the Bishop of Rome yet in matter of Faith such as the Creed there was no disagreement at all and so no ground of Alteration If it be replyed That to charge the Creed writen for the capacity of the meanest with obscurity is something hard that to insert ought or adde to it though by way of explication would be thought great presumption that to think they would adde any thing to it who would not endure that of filioque to be put into a Creed of humane Composure when they agreed in the matter is hardly credible Besides that succeeding Ages have added to the Creed in some Particulars is apparent in the Nicene and if those additions be only explications yet to joyne them with the other Articles and to urge them as necessary accounting all those Heretickes who receive them not is all one as to make new Articles or fundamentall Truthes and withall it secretly taxeth the Apostles Creed of insufficiency and obscurity without those Additions I rejoyne First That the Creed in it selfe is plaine for the capacity of the meanest yet the briefnes generally indefinitenes of some Articles hath laid it open to variety of Glosses and those oft Hereticall which hath forced the Church to deliver the true meaning thereof by exegeticall Additions Seconly As for these explicatory Particles the Fathers fecht them not from their owne Braines but from Apostolicall Tradition Conserved in the Church from hand to hand and attested by the writings of precedent Bishops to whom the Apostles both delivered the wordes of the Creed and the true sence of each Article and hence it is that they urged and imposed their explications on the Church as necessary to be believed Neither Thirdly Is the Apostles Creed hereby argued of Insufficiency or obscurity seeing nothing is added to it as if it were Defective in it selfe or explaind as if it were of it selfe obscure 'T is only vindicated by this meanes from corrupt Glosses and restored to its primitive sense and meaning so the Scripture in like manner though cleare in all necessary Points and more copious by far than the Creed yet hath been abused in all Ages by curious and Daring Heads whence so many large comments on it for remedy to this mischiefe and we see dayly that lawes though as clearly framed as may be yet stand in need of Glosses and Additionall Interpretations when abused by reason of their Generality Lastly As to the addition of the Particle Filioque it is not of the same Nature because it was annext to the Creed contrary to the Decree of the third Generall Councell contrary to the mind and open protestation of the Greeke Church which had framed that Creed at Constantinople and by on part of the Church only viz. The See of Rome her adherents in the west Ob. 11h. If after Ages were forced by new succrescent Heresies to adde something unto the Apostles Creed yet sure if they had thought it to be theirs they would never have taken ought frō it for this had been a ready course to make way for new Heresies wheras we find severall Articles of the Creed omitted by them in their new-framed Symboles Answ The Councels and Fathers which have delivered unto us new Symboles or Confessions of Faith occasioned by emergent Heresies or rather explications of the old Creed in some particulars which were
ad divinam doctrinam certa humilitatis atque Charitatis firmitate surgentibus quod multis verbis exponendo esset perficiendum Secondly For the due bounding of our Faith and Charity There are many lesser circumstantiall Points in divinity which Christians may differ about Salva Fide Charitate without prejudice to either but others there be of farre higher Concernment requisite to the very beeing of a true and rightly grounded Christian these we call Fundamentall Points the Nescience of most whereof but the denyall of any is destructive of Salvation whithout ensuing repentance Now it was necessary that these should be knowen and severed from the rest that so the Church might know whome to admit to Baptisme and acknowledg for her Children and on the other side Whom to reject or cut off as Heretickes misbelievers Yea besides that every private Christian might know by this Rule whom to communicate with and whom to fly from and avoid as Heathens and Publicans in our Saviours Language To demonstrate this Father namely that the Creed conteines all Points which a good Christian is bound of necessity to believe I shall produce a Reason or two and thereto subjoine the testimonies of the Ancients which among other Corollaries hence deducible will serve to free the true reformed Churches from that just imputation of Heresy which the Church of Rome hath been pleased to lay upon Them for al of thē generally unanimously imbrace the Creed as appeares by their severall confessions and therfore cannot justly be charged with heresy in the ancient which is the true and genuine acception of the word The reasons are these two which follow First the End for which the Apostles Framed the Creed cannot be imagined to be any other than this viz. To give us a Breviary of the fundamentall Doctrines of Faith Dare we say that the Apostles came short of this their end It must be then either for want of Power or want of will Now to affirme they could not compasse it is little better then Blasphemy and to affirme they would not when they might must needs argue them of grosse negligence in their function and uncharitablnesse to the Christian church faults wholy uncompatible with the Apostolick office and Zeale Secondly The name of Symbole 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Greeke and Regula Fidei The Rule of Faith in the Latine whereby the Ancients style the Creed argue the compleatnesse of it for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies Nota or Indicium the Creed being the note of difference between the true Children of the Church and those who were either unbelievers or misbelievers And the Rule of Faith as Tertullian calls it or The Rule of Truth as Irenaeus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That unerring Rule of Truth which we received in Baptisme from whom Chrysostome and Austin borrowed the terme who opposed the Creed to the Placita of Hereticks and will have them examined ad hujus amussim by the line or Rule of the Creed must be adequate to the Faith or necessary Truth whereof it is a Rule niether larger nor narrower for else it looseth the very nature of a Rule To this Truth the Fathers give in their Suffrages I shall set downe the Testimonies of some who were the most Ancient and the most famous in their Times 1. The Creed is called Breve Evangelium the Epitome or breviary of the Gospell like Homers Workes inclosed in a nutshell according to the saying of S. Bartholomew recorded by Dionys Arear lib de myst Theo. cap. 1. 2. Clem. Romanus in his forecited Epistle Ad Fratrem Domini calls the Creed Summun totius Fidei Catholicae the Summary of the Catholick Faith and farther saith that in it Integritas credulitatis ostenditur The entire or whole Faith of a Christian is declared 3. Ignatius in his Epistle to the Magnesians after he had reckoned up those Heads of the Creed which touched our Saviour concludes thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He who fully knowes and believes these things is Blessed that is as fare as concernes these Articles or this part of the Faith which relates to our Saviour the same holdes in proportion of the rest otherwise not only a right beliefe although full and entire but a good life also are requisite to happinesse 4. Irenaeus tels us that many barbarous Nations who had not the Bookes of Scripture among them yet Sine Charactere vel atramento Scriptam habuerunt per Spiritum sanctum in Cordibus suis salutem Had Salvation wrote in their Hartes by the Finger of the holy Ghost without the helpe of Pen and Inke Where by Salvation he understands the Tradition of the Creed as appeares by the following words so called by a Metonymie because it is a meanes in its kind sufficient to Salvation Thus he lib. 3. cap. 4. The same Father elswhere gives this testimony of the fulnesse of the Creed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is Neither the most able Orator amongst the Pastors of the Church can say more than this for no man is above his Teacher or Master neither he who is weake in speech can distinguish or speake lesse than this Tradition for there beeing one and the same Faith neither he who is able to speake much of it hath augmented it nor he who is able to say litle hath lessened it at all 5. Origen in the preface of his Bookes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith that the Holy Apostles Preaching the Faith of Christ De quibusdam quidem c. Concerning some Points most plainly delivered unto all Believers even the most dull and slow whatsoever they judged necessary where by Necessaries he understandes the Articles of the Creed which he there reckons up 6. Cyril of Jerusalem in his fift Catechesis speaking of the Creed useth these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we comprehend saith he the whole Doctrine of Faith in a few versicles And afterwardes comparing it unto a small graine of mustard-seed which virtually containes many Branches 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so also doth this Creed in a few words comprehend the whole doctrine of Religion which is delivered in the old new Testament 7. Eusebius Galicanus commonly called Emesenus in the begining of his second Homily on the Greed hath these words Hanc nobis fidem velut magnam lampadem Christus adveniens errantibus viam monstraturus exhibuit per quem possit Deus ignotus requiri quaesitus credi creditus inveniri This Faith or Creed saith he like some great Lampe Christ exhibited for his comming thus shewing the way to those in errour By help wherof God who was before unknowne might be sought being sought might be believed on being believed on might be found The same Father in his first Homily derives the name Symbolum from Caena collatitia and then tels us that De utroque Testamento totius Corporis virtus in paucas est diffusa sententias ut facilius animae Thesaurus
The word signifies Tessera militaris a watch-word whereby Souldiers of the same Army or Campe know one an other and discerne themselves from the Enemy Which signification among all the Rest seemes most proper to the Creed because by this profession of the Faith Christians are distinguisht not only from Iewes Turkes and Infidels but more especially from Hereticks those Renegados and Deserters of the Christian Faith For as watch-wordes are most necessary in civill warres where the Difference is between the same Countrymen who use the same Language apparell armes and manner of fighting these being the only signes and tokens whereby they may try those whom they suspect discover whether they be true friends or concealed Enimies so Hereticks professe Christ in outward shew and take his name upon them but doe not truely Preach him secundum Apostolicas Regulas non integris Traditionum lineis nunciantes to use the words of Ruffinus what out of Pride Curiosity or discontent what for gaine or Belly they frame new Doctrines of their owne some besides some against the Foundation which they obtrude upon the Faith of others Now the watch word to discover these false Apostles these Deceitfull workers who transformed themselves into the Apostles of Christ 2 Cor. 11. 13. Was anciently the Creed If upon examination they embraced this in the old Catholick sense they were received as Brethren if not they were rejected and avovded as spies false Brethren Corrupters of the Faith The Heathens also had the like Custome to give for their wathwords the names of their Gods their suposed Deityes as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Minerva and the like what fitter watchword then for a Christian than the profession of his Faith in the true God the thrise-holy Trinity which he makes in the Creed And this may be therefore judged the most proper in this Place and most likely to be intended by the first entitlers because the Ancient Church of God following his Patterne in holy Scripture useth many other the like military Termes and seemeth to delight in the metaphor The Church her self is described Terrible as an Army with Banners Cant. 6. 4. Our Blessed Saviour is styled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The cheife Captaine or Generall of our Salvation Heb. 2. 10. And S. Paul exhorts Timothy whom he had left his Lieutenant at Ephesus to endure hardnesse as a good Souldier of Iesus Christ 2 Tim. 2. 3. In opposition to which that I may give this note by the way the heathen Souldiers under the Christian Emperors got the name of Pagani because when they refused to renounce their Idolatry and so become Christians they were dimissi in Pagos cashiered and sent into the Villages and so returned unto their country Life To proceed our Christian Virtues or graces are styled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Compleat Armour of God Eph. 6. 11. 13. The particulars whereof are there described The grand mysteries of our Salvation have the name of Sacraments given them now Sacramentum properly signifies that Oath of obedience which Souldiers took unto their Generall lastly that part of the Church which here on Earth is styled Millitant that in Heaven Triumphant Suitably then doth the Creed weare the name of Symbolum a watchword The Reason of the name we find given by Clemens Romanus Ruffinus Maximus Taurinensis and Isidore Bishop of Sevil. CAP XI The fourth Head of this Discourse namely The Division or Parts of the Creed THE Apostles Creed hath a double Division among Divines to wit A greater and a lesse The one distributes into foure generall Partes The other Anatomizeth it into twelve Articles limbes or joynts for this is the literall signification of the word Articulus which make up the entire Body of Christian Faith As to the first Division The foure generall Parts of the Creed have for their Object God and man viz. The three Persons of the sacred Trinity and the Church instructing us what we should believe of either 1. The first part is touching God the Father and consists but of one Article 2. The second Part is touching God the Sonne and comprehendeth six Articles 3. The third part is touching God the holy Ghost and consists but of one Article as the first did 4. The fourth Part is concerning the Church and a threefold benefit conferd by God upon it answerable in number to the Persons of the sacred Trinity viz. The Remission of sinnes by the Father Eph. 4. 32. Resurrection of the Body by the Sonne Io. 6. 39. Mat. 24. 31. everlasting Life by the holy Ghost the Spirit of life and Glory Gal. 6. 8. Rev. 11. 11. Pet. 4. 14. Then for the Second division The Creed brancheth it selfe into twelve Articles vsually referred to the twelve Apostles in severall but however answerable to their number The Articles we have already distinctly set downe and compared them with six other succeeding Creeds These twelve Articles are compared by some to the twelve Stones which Ioshua in his passage over to Jericho took out of the middest of Iordan to frame an Altar within Gilgal in memory of having gotten possesion of the promised land For the holy Scriptures wherout these Articles of our Beliefe are taken are the true waters of life a spirituall Iordan The river it selfe was sanctifyed by the the very Person of our Saviour when he descended into it at his Baptisme in which solemnity all his Disciples have since made a Publicke profession of their Faith by attesting to the Creed The twelve Articles thereof compiled into one Body well resemble those twelve Stones framed into an Altar and that Altar erected in memory of the Promises now obteined the heavenly Canaan typifyed by the earthly for the Creed conteines the great benefites of God towards his Church heretofore possessed in shadow but now in substance by vertue of our Blessed Saviours Purchase who was the Antitipe of Iosua In whom the promises of God are yea and Amen 2 Cor. 1. 20. But by others they are more appositely compared to the twelve foundation-stones mentioned in Reve. 21. 14. Which are there said to support the wall of the new Ierusalem and wherein as it is there expresly set downe the Names the twelve Apostles of the Lambe were written This new Ierusalem is Christs Church on Earth for it is there styled The Tabernacle of God with men ver 3. The wall of this Citty is the Faith or professed doctrine of the Church whereby it is guarded against her enimies and seperated from all other Religions And the twelve Stones in the foundation of this wall are the twelve Articles of the Creed which be the Groundes of our Faith the Fundamentalls of Christian Religion To the same sense and purpose S. Paul compares the Church to an holy Temple built upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets Iesus Christ himselfe being the cheife Corner Stone Eph. 2. 20 21. Now this foundation of the Apostles and Prophets cannot be understood of their Persons for they
and Dignity of each Person so named so that they are Three in the manner of Subsistence but one in the Consent Socr. Hist lib. 2. cap. 7. The Fourth was Framed on this occasion Certaine Bishops being sent by Constantius to his Brother Emperour of the West for to give an account of the Casting out of Paulus Athanasius concealed the precedent Formula of Beliefe made at Antioch and exhibited this other of their owne composure viz. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. We believe in one God the Father Almighty Creator and maker of all Things of whom the whole Family in Heaven and Earth is named and in his only-begotten Sonne our Lord Jesus Christ begotten of the Father before all Worldes God of God Light of Light by whom all things were made both in the Heavens in the Earth whether Visible or Invisible who is the Word and the Wisdome and the Power and the Life and the true Light who in these last Dayes was for our sakes made Man and Borne of the holy Virgin was Crucified Dead and Buried and rose againe the third Day from the Dead he ascended into the Heavens sitteth on the right hand of the Father and shall come at the end of the World to Judge the Quicke and the Dead to render unto every one according to his workes Whose Kingdome never ceasing endureth unto all eternity for he sitteth at the right Hand of God not only in this world but also in that which is to come We believe also in the holy Ghost that is in the Comforter whom according to his Promise he sent to his Apostles after his ascent into Heaven to teach them bring all things to their remembrance by whom also the Soules of those who syncerely believe in him are Sanctifyed But those who say the Sonne was made of nothing or of any other Substance and was not of God and that there was a Time when he was not the Catholick Church doth not acknowledge them for her owne Socr. hist lib. 2. cap. 14. The Fift Creed is that which was rehearsed by Vrsacius and Valens two Arian Bishops in the Synod of Ariminum had bin not long before Composed by the Bishops of that Faction in the Synod of Sirmium The Forme is this which followes We believe in one only and true God the Father Almighty Creator Framer of all things in one only-begotten Sonne of God begottten before all Worlds before all Begining before all imaginable Time which we can possibly conceive or comprehend begotten of God without sense or passion by whom the Worlds or Ages were set in order and all things were made the only Son of his Father God of God like unto the Father who begat him according to the Scriptures whose Generation no one knoweth but the Father who begat him This only-begotten Sonne of his we know came from Heaven for the puttting away of sinne by the will of his Father was borne of the Virgin Mary conversed with his Disciples fulfilled every Part of his office according to the will and Councell of his Father was crucifyed suffered and Dyed descended into the lower Partes of the Earth and ordered all things there the Porters of Hell Trembling at his sight he rose againe the Third Day Conversed with his Disciples and after forty Dayes was taken up into Heaven and sitteth at the right hand of the Father and shall come at the last Day in the Glory of his Father to render unto every one according to his workes And in the holy Ghost whom the same only-begotten Sonne of God Jesus Christ promised to send unto mankind the Comforter according as it is writtē I depart unto my Father I will beseech the Father and he shall send you another Comforter the Spirit of truth he shall receive of mine and shall teach you and bring all things to your remembrance As for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 essence because it being set downe by the Fathers without explication and not understood by the People gives cause of offence and because the Scriptures have no such word we have thought good to take it away and to make no mention at all hereafter of it when we speake of God because the holy Scriptures mention not at all the essence of the holy Ghost or the Sonne but we say that the Sonne is like unto the Father in all Things as the holy Scriptures say and Teach Soc. lib. 2. cap. 29. The sixt Confession of Faith is that new Formula which Acacius Bishop of Caesarea in Palestine one of the Arian Party proposed in the Synod of Seleucia by Leo a great officer in the Emperours Court The Forme was this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. We professe and believe in one God the Father Almighty maker of Heaven and Earth of things Visible and Invisible we believe also in our Lord Jesus Christ his Sonne begotten of him without Sense or Passion before all worlds God the Word the only-begotten of God the light the life the Truth the Wisdome by whom all Things were made both which are in Heaven and which are on Earth whether visible or invisible we believe that in the latter Age of the World he tooke flesh of the holy Virgin Mary for the putting away of sinne was made man suffered for our sinnes rose againe was taken up into Heaven sitteh at the right hand of the Father and shall come againe in Glory to judge the Quicke and the Dead we believe also in the holy Ghost whom our Lord and Saviour called the Comforter when he promised to send him to his Disciples after his departure and accordingly sent him by whom also he sanctifyeth those in the Church who believe and are Baptized in the name of the Father and of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost Those who Preach any other Faith than this wee Judge them aliens from the Catholick Church See for this Socr. Hist lib. 2. cap. 32. The Seventh Confession of Faith is that of the Macedonians exhibited by them to Liberius Bishop of Rome when they fled to him and the Emperour Valentinian for succour from the Persecution of his Brother Valens and the Arian Bishop Eudoxius The Forme was this We believe in one God the Father Almighty maker of all things visible and invisible and in one only-begotten God the Lord Jesus Christ the Sonne of God begotten of the Father that is of the Substance of the Father God of God light of light very God of very God begotten not made consubstantiall to the Father by whom all Things were made both which are in Heaven and which are on Earth who for us men and for our Salvation came downe was incarnate and made man suffered and rose againe the third Day he ascended into the Heavens and shall come to Judge the Quick and the Dead And in the holy Ghost But those who say of the Sonne of God that there was a Time when he was not a Time
before he was begotten and that he was made of nothing or had any other Essence or Substance than that of his Father or that he is obnoxious to change or Alteration such as these the Catholick and Apostolick Church of God doth Anathematize Socr. lib 4. cap. 11. THE FIRST APPENDIX Concerning the CREED of Athanasius CAP. I. Two Reasons why this Creed hath been more oppugned than the Rest It s Authority and Author are vindicated in generall more especially touching the severity of the Preface AMongst all the Creeds this of Athanasius hath met with most opposition First because it hath most resolutely and strictly oppugned the Ancient and Moderne Heresies about those great Poynts of the Trinity and Incarnation for whereas other Creeds proceed by way of simple Confession Narration or Exposition of the Faith I Believe c. This runnes in an higher style more directly repugnant to the corrupters of the Christian Faith Whosoever will be saved must believe c. Both in the Beginning and the close requiring an absolute Assent upon paine of Damnation and tacitely anathematizing all the Adversaries of the Faith So that we may compare the Apostles Creed to a Foundation the Nicene and other Exegeticall Creeds that followed unto a Superstructure but this of Athanasius to a Bulwarke or Defensive worke which guards the House and excludes the enemy from approaching no marvaile then it hath been so much oppugned Secondly because it was the worke and composure of a Private man whereas the other Creeds either challenge the Colledge of the Apostles for the Authors or the Catholick Church assembled in a Synod or at least the Tradition of some Patriarchall or other Ancient and famous Church time out of mind whereas this of Athanasius though relying but upon a single Fathers Authority yet speakes much bigger than the Rest and expressely requires a more exact obedience than any of the other Now this double reason hath raised both it and its Author many Adversaries whereof some have styled the Preface of it Proud and Insolent others have denied Athanasius for the Author so to leave it destitute of a Patron and deprive it of the Authority of so eminent a Champion of the Christian Faith a Third sort have more impudently defamed both Worke and Author and styled it Sathanasius his Creed as one Geo Niger and Valentinus Gentilis as Genebrard tells us in his Epistle to Charles Cardinall of Lorraine prefixed to his Book De Trinitate Among all which Adversaries 't is observable that none have either denied the Author or defamed the Creed but such whom the Church hath noted of Heresy and commonly have been the Ring-leaders to the Rest In this heat and fury of opposition it will concerne us calmely to examine the Truth whereby we shall at once vindicate the Credit both of the Creed and its Composer First for the Truth and Esteeme of the Creed it relies not on the Authority of one single Father who composed it though never so famous in his time and all Ages since among the Orthodox Professors but on the Testimony of the Catholick Church which hath received it and commended it to all her Children as the Buckler of the true Christian Faith neither only so but hath received it of old into her Liturgies and still retaines it an Honour not vouchsafed to any other Creed of a Private mans composing Constantinople Rome and the Reformed Churches have joyntly received it and exposed it to publique use although they very much differ in other Poynts a strong argument of its Verity and Authority Secondly For the credit of the Author whosoever consults Ecclesiasticall History and Nazianzens Encomiastick Oration must needs acknowledge his great fame throughout the Christian World for his Learning Vertue and unwearied Constancy in maintaining the true Faith against the Arian Faction under four Emperors Reignes especially under Constantius Valens when they swayed all which Undaunted constancy of his when the other Bishops generally either complyed with the Enemy or kept silence for feare deservedly purchased this peculiar honor to his Creed as the due reward of his unconquered Faith and delivered his Fame unto succeeding Ages with so loud a Trumpe that we heare Cosmas Laurens proclaime Cum ex S. Athanasii Opusculis aliquid inveneris nec ad scribendum Chartas habueris in vestimentis tuis scribe illud So Sophronii Prat. Spirit Thirdly As to the supposed Pride and Insolency of the Preface with which Termes some have been pleased to dignify it as being too stately for a private Mans worke and too peremptorily excommunicating all Christians who out of Ignorance or mysperswasion imbrace not all the following deepe misteryes contained in it they may please also to take notice that the Creed which followes though for the composure it Have Athanasius only for the Author yet the Faith therin set downe and explained is the common received Faith of the Church derived downe from the Apostles to his Times and since commended by our Catholick Mother to succeeding Ages as the Groundworke of Christian Religion most necessary to be first laid and relyed on and therefore may well beare such a Proeme which refers not so much to the Authority of the writer as to the Creed written the composure was a private Mans but the Creed was Publick the Frame of one but the Faith of All. Then for the strict exacting the beliefe of his Creed from all Christians they may please to observe that it was wrote in opposition to the Arians so that it doth not so directly exclude from Salvation the pure Ignorant as the stuborne Heretick nor somuch condemne the bare nescience as the negation of the Faith which was once delivered to the Saints Jud. 3. though I conceive it to be very hard if not utterly impossible for any Christian to be saved who doth not expresly believe the Substance of the Faith therein explayned especialy in those two Points which he so much insists upon viz. The Trinity and Incarnation the Vision or Fruition of the Blessed Trinity being the last End or Happinesse of mankind and the Incarnation of our Saviour with the consequents thereof being the meanes appointed by God for to compasse it So that the great Athanasius shewed not his Pride in prefixing such a Proeme but rather his mercy and Paternall care towardes the Church by a more expresse Declaration of the necessity of the Catholick Faith which some otherwise might have more oscitantly hearkned to and been lesse carefull to entertaine if not awakned by the Terror of this Preface CAP. II. Severall Testimonies Concerning the Author and Authority of the Athanasian Creed Hving premised thus much in way of a generall Vindication I shall now set downe some speciall Testimonies concerning the Author and Authority of this Creed begining with this latter Age wherein it hath begun to be questioned and so by degrees ascending to the Time of Athanasius himselfe thus at length arriving at the Fountaine Head by the
and so rather the Mouth than the Head of the Apostles but there appears no Primacy of order or Jurisdiction over his fellow-Apostles But suppose we should grant said they that Peter had such an unerring paramount privilege yet this might well be personall and annext to his Apostleship not derivable to any Episcopall successour and if derivable why should the Bishop of Rome rather arrogate it to himselfe than the Bishop of Antioch in which City S. Peter first sate Or the Bishop of Alexandria a See instituted by the same Apostle under S. Marke before he ever appointed any Bishop at Rome As for the Grounding of this priviledge on S. Peters martyrdome at Rome where appears any such Dependance or legacy bequeathed by S. Peter that his Infallibility and Supremacy should be annexed to that Chaire alone as to the place of his Death and Buriall 'T is true they confest that the Bishop of Rome was of old accounted Primae Sedis Episcopus The Bishop of the Principall See but withall they said that there was a vast difference between Primacy and Power for if by this pretence he should challenge any Authority or Jurisdiction over the Bishop of Constantinople the Second See Why should not he of Constantinople likewise claime the same Power over the Bishop of Alexandria which is the third And so in like manner Alexandria over Antioch Antioch over Ierusalem An opinion never heard of or entertained in the Church of God The Bishop of Rome therefore had this primacy not by divine right but by humane or Ecclesiasticall that is not from any Apostolicall Priviledge derived from S. Peter but by the graunt of Emperours and Decrees of Councells It was fit that one Bishop should be chiefe for order sake this Honour was given to the Bishop of Rome for the Dignity of his Seat Rome beeing the Head of the Roman Empire For which cause Alexandria had of old the Second place as beeing Praefectura Augustalis the Peculiar of the Romane Emperour so ennobled by Augustus Caesar Antioch the third as the Metropolis of Syria and the Eastern Countryes adjoyning whereas if the preeminency of Sees had been derived from S. Peter the City of Antioch where he sate seven years in person should have beene preferd before Alexandria whether he only sent an other viz S. Marke and appointed him for the first Bishop And for this cause Caesarea too was made the Metropoliticall See of Palestine because it was the seat of the Roman Governor untill the Fathers of the Nicene Councel in honour of Jerusalem where S. James was made the first Bishop of the Christian world and whence the Gospell spread into the whole earth gave the Bishop therof a Patriarchall title that rather of dignity thē Authority for thus runs the seventh Canon of that Councell Quoniam mos antiquus obtinuit vetusta Traditio ut Aeliae id est Hierosolimorum Episcopo honor Deferatur habeat consequenter honorem manente tamen Metropolitanae Civitatis Caesareae propriâ Dignitate that is Because from an old Custome and Tradition honuor hath been given to the Bishop of Aelia that is of Jerusalem let him have Honour accordingly provided that the Dignity of the metropolitan City Cesarea remaine entire For the same cause also when Constantinople was reedifyed made the seat of the Empire and called new Rome by Constantine the Great it was thought fit by the Emperours and succeeding Councells that the Bishop of Alexandria should no longer have the Second but the third Place Constantinople now succeeding in that honour for thus runs the fift Canon of the first Councell of Constantinople Constantinopolitanae Civitatis Episcopum habere oportet Primatus honorem post Romanum Episcopum propter quod sit nova Roma that is The Bishop of Constantinople ought to have the next place of honour after the Bishop of Rome because his City is new Rome And because there could not be two Sedes primae two first or chief Sees the same Councell ordeined that the Bishop of Constantinople should be styled the second Patriarch but in all other things should be of equall Dignity and Authority with the Bishop of Rome So in all the rest whosoever will please to compare the Prelates Sees with the Notitia Imperii shall find that the Church still accommodated her Hierarchy of Mertropolitās Archbishops Bishops unto the state of the Empire the distinction of Provinces and the Dignity of the Cityes according to that ancient Rule Ecclesia est in Republicâ non Respublica in Ecclesiâ The Church is in the Commonwealth not the Common-wealth in the Church 2. The second cause of the Schisme was the Deposition and Excomunication of the Patriarch Photius and of the other Prelats and Abbots his adherents in a great Synod at Constantinople held under the Emperour Basiliu◠and the Patriarch Ignatius in the yeare 869 which businesse was mainly urged and furthered by two Bishops of Rome successively viz. Nicolas the first and Adrian the second 3. The third cause was the Rash and Inconsiderate Zeale of the said Patriarch Photius who first dared to accuse the Romane Church of Heresy because it held that the holy Ghost proceeded from the Sonne as well as from the Father whereas in all former disputes between the Greeks and the Latines whether by word or writing neither party accused his Adversary of Heresy for holding either opinion Yea the Latines Demōstrated that some of the Greeke Fathers spake as they did neither could the Greekes deny it And since this precipitate Censure of Photius not a few of the Romane Divines have in requitall accused the Greeke Church of the same Crime for holding the Contrary 4. The fourth cause was the contention about the Primacy between the Bishops of Rome and Constantinople For Iohn surnamed Iejunator and Cyriacus his successour Patriarchs of Constantinople were very earnest with the emperour Mauritius to obteine the Title Authority of Oecumenicall Patriarchs thereby challenging a Superiority over the Bishops of the whole Christian World from the Dignity of their City which was then the Head of the Romane Empire that of the West being utterly broken and Rome the Ancient Seate thereof for that Cause loosing its former Dignity Now against these their endeavours Gregory the great then Bishop of Rome publickly opposed himselfe and taxed them in expresse Termes of Antichristian ambition saying withall that Dato uni Episcopi universalis Titulo reliquos Sacerdotes honore debito privari The giving of the Title of Universall Bishop unto one doth deprive the other Bishops of their due Honour Yet with in lesse than two years after his Death Boniface the Third his Successour abtained the same Title of the Emperour Phocas which Gregory had so much Decried But the Greeke Prelates would never yeeld to it 5. The fift cause was the busines of Images which brake out after this contention about the Primacy For the Emperour Leo Isaurus and his sonne Constantinus Copronymus