Creedes for do not they both expound and vnfould that high and obstruse mystery of the Godhead of Christ his identity and equality of substance power and glory with God his Father witnesse those wordes added and vsed in the Councell of Nice about 310. yeares after Christ Deum de Deo Lumen de Lumine Deum verum de Deo vero genitum non factum consubstantialem Patri God of God Light of Light very God of very God begotten not made being consubstantiall to the Father c. Witnesse S. Athanasius his Creed that was made by him in Rome for Confession of his fayth some 15. yeares after that againe wherein there is found that exact manner of speach distinguishing the persons of the Blessed Trinity Qualis Pater talis Filius talis Spiritus Sanctus Such as the Father is such is the Sonne and such is the holy Ghost and then he setteth downe more particulerly the distinctiue appellations and peculiar proprieties belonging vnto euery person as the Father vnbegotten the Sonne begotten of the Father the holy Ghost proceeding asmuch as if in plaine tearmes he had said the Father distinguished with this personall propriety of begetting a Sonne is a Father and no Sonne the Sonne distinguished with his personall propriety of being begotten is a Sonne and not a Father the holy Ghost distinguished by his personall propriety of proceeding is an holy Ghost neyther Father nor Sonne 14. By all which we see the exceeding great authority of the Church in determining these different manners of speach in disclosing this ineffable and inutterable mystery of the Trinity which are not found at all totidem verbis in the Scriptures and therefore were denied by the Scripturian Heretickes for as learned Hosius noteth and it is the obseruation of S. Ambrose against one only article of our Sauiours consubstantiality with his Father they alleaged 50. places of Scripture I meane the Arians who did beare great sway and insinuated themselues into the fauour of the Emperors for the better supporting of their damnable heresies as the Protestants do creepe into the fauour of our King at this day for the vphoulding of their errors and therefore great pitty it was that the Protestants and Arians had not liued in one age togeather that they might haue ioyned hands ech one with another who do so neare resemble ech one the other in their behauiour and manner of proceeding 15. VVell then we see that the former mysteries of the Diety and Trinity could be determined by no other power and authority vpon earth then by that supreme power of the Church for that expresse warrant of Scripture there was none in their pretence for many of these wordes that are now vsed and frequented by the Church in the explication of these Creedes were not then in vse but inuented and applied afterwads by the Church according to the present necessity And yet notwithstanding haue they beene so acknowledged and receaued euer since by all Christendome that the authority of the Church in that behalfe determining and expounding hath stood inuiolable and such as haue not admitted the same haue euer beene reputed and accompted for wicked and damned Heretickes And this is to be noted with attention as before I haue partly touched in generall that albeit the Councell of Nice representing the whole Christiā Church of that age did not nor could not make any new article of beliefe that was not true before but only did more fully and plainely explane and declare such things as the impudency and importunity of Heretickes called into doubt and question so did not the said Councell explayne all that belonged to the diuine persons for they left at Credo in Spiritum sanctum I belieue in the holy Ghost and there brake of not vnfoulding any thing particulerly touching the procession of the holy Ghost from the Father and the Sonne about which there was afterwards so great strife and contention and is to this day with the later obstinate Greekes affirming the same Person to proceed only from the Father not from the Sonne but left that by Gods prouidence to be expounded afterwardes by other Councells when that poynt should be called into question and so it was So that it is more then euident vnto euery one that will not wilfully shut his eyes against the cleare sunne shine of truth that there is left continuall power in the Church to explayne and determine with authority and that irrefragable and vnresistable any doubt neuer so weighty about the Persons of the Trinity or any other article of beliefe or any other high point of diuine mystery that shall arise among Christians and that vnto the worlds last ending euery one vnder paine of dānable obedience against Christs spouse and the holy spirit the director thereof is bound to submit and captiuate his iudgment and vnderstanding thereto and not to stand in contention against the same And thus much of these three Creedes in generall how they are to be reuerenced now let vs descend vnto the seuerall articles and positions therof in particuler The second Consideration NOvv succeedeth our second Consideration about the examining of certaine particulers of these three Creedes how they are receiued and belieued You haue heard before how the Ministers of the Church of England do subscribe vnto the same at their Ordination Now let vs examine whether this English Cleargy notwithstanding all their subscription thereunto do indeed truly belieue them and expound them in the selfe same sense interpretation and meaning as the Generall Councells and ancient Fathers that collected them meant them as they do perswade his Matie they do A man would think that so solemne an Oath taken before an Ecclesiasticall Iudge at the Tribunall of the Church and that for preseruation of Religion and conseruaaion of the integrity of ancient faith laid downe in ancient Creedes and generall Councells should religiously bynd before God and men people of their quality and condition but behold heresy that neither feareth God nor reuetenceth man obserueth no band at all but draweth euery thing to euery mans particuler iudgment and censure and therefore it doth little auaile the ministers of the Church of England to reuerence and receaue the wordes of the Creed whilst they reiect the Churches sense and true meaning of the same to sweare vnto them in wordes by subscription at their Ordinatiō but to forsweare them in deedes by a peruerse and sinister interpretation and exposition And this God willing shal be made good against them in the subsequent Considerations directed and addressed for this especiall purpose 17. First then it is set downe and denounced in the Creed of S. Athanasius read euery sunday in the English Church by order of the communion booke that VVhosouer doth not belieue wholy and inuiolably the Catholicke fayth shall without doubt perish euerlastingly By which Catholicke fayth he vnderstandeth the whole Catholicke fayth and euery article or
bookes of Preisthood doth very well declare 4. And now to come vnto these Councels and to speake particulerly of euery one of them as they lye in order The Councell of Nice was gathered togeather somewhat more then three hundred yeares after Christ and the occasion of this first great Ecclesiasticall Assembly of all the world met togeather by their Bishops in this generall Councell was for the censuring and suppressing of two capitall and damnable heresies that then inuaded and infested the Church of Christ. The first was the heresy of the Arians and this impugned nay flatly denyed the second Person his identity of essence to wit the Sonne his equality of substance and hodhead with the Father granting him to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like vnto the Father but denying him to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same substance with the Father which was the fayth and beliefe of the Catholicke Church in those dayes 5. The second heresy was the heresy of the Quartadecimans concerning the celebrating of Easter-day of which heresy to speake any thing in particuler at this tyme I intend not since it is not to my present purpose only I refer the reader vnto the author of the Three Conuersions of England where this point is both substantially and punctually discussed The mayne point wherof I am to treat in this place is to intimate vnto the Reader how both these heresies of the Arians and the hereticall Quartadecimans were determined censured and anathematized by the authority of this soueraigne and supreme Ecclesiasticall Tribunall I meane the first Generall Councell of Nice which consisted as S. Ambrose obserueth alluding to the iust number of Abraham his souldiers of three hundred eighteene Bishops gathered from all partes of Christendome And this was the first Generall Councell that could be Assembled vntill that time in respect of the most bloudy and cruell persecutions that had continued for the greatest part of the prcedentages 6. And here we are to obserue that albeit that three other Prouinciall nationall Councells are recorded to haue bene celebrated before this of Nice and after that of the Apostles Act. 15. to wit one at Rome of 60. Bishops against Nouatus vnder Decius the cruell Emperour and Cornelius the martyred Pope another at Ancyra in Galatia vnder Dioclesian the third at Neocaesarea vnder Constantines Father and Pope Melchiades according to Prateolus his accōpt yet this Councell of Nyce was the first great glorious Ecclesiasticall tribunall which was publikely erected in the Christian Church for al Nations to repayre vnto after the first planting of the faith of Christ. 7. The second generall Councell was that of Constantinople somwhat more then fifty yeares after in the yeare of our Lord 383. and it consisted of an hundred and fifty Bishops gathered togeather against Macedonius Patriarch of Constantinople who openly denyed and blasphemed against the diuinity of the holy Ghost for which damnable heresy of his both he and all that partaked with his hereticall faction were condemned censured and cast out of the Church and deliuered ouer to Sathan for that they blasphemed against the third sacred Person of the blessed Trinity And this second great and generall Councel was held vnder Gratian and Theodosius Emperours and vnder Damasus then Bishop of Rome 8. The third Generall Councell was that which was assembled at Ephesus almost other fifty yeares after that againe in the yeare of our Lords incarnation 434. This Councell consisted of two hundred Bishops gathered a-against another Archbishop of Constantinople named Nestorius but an Arch-hereticke and it was held vnder the Emperour Theodosius and Pope Celestinus This Nestorius as Vincentius Lyrinensis in his goulden tract against heresies and 17. chapter describeth his heresy whilst he made shew of distinguishing two natures in Christ he suddainly brought in two persons and by an execrable impiety thereby made two Christs the one God the other man the one begottē of God the Father the other borne of the Virgin his mother and therfore he did further auerre that holy Mary was not to be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the mother of God but the mother of Christ because forsooth that Christ which was God was not borne of her but the Christ which was man Hitherto my Authour And for this damnable heresie was Nestorius condemned by this third Councell worthily cast out of the Catholicke Church howbeit I must confesse that I cannot see how Caluin Beza vpon the point of Christs incarnation and hypostaticall vnion with diuers others Protestants following thē can possibly auoid this ould condemned heresy but that Nestorianisme must follow as a necessary consequence of the doctrine which they deliuer vpon the point of Christs incarnation and vnion 9. The fourth generall Councell was that of Chalcedon and this was some twenty yeares and vpwardes after the foresaid counsaile of Ephesus in which Councell there were assembled six hundred and thirty Bishops Archbishops and Patriarches This great assembly was gathered against on Eutiches an Archimandrite or Abbot of Constantinople in like manner who so confounded the natures in Christ that he absolutely denied that there were two distinct natures in him For which monstrous opinion of his differing frō the Canon of Catholick faith he was cōdemned togeather with his fautor partener of his hereticall faction I meane Dioscorus Archbishop of Alexandria as was Nestorius another Archbishop before him for houlding two persons in Christ. And this famous and through the whole Christian world renowned Councell was assebled and held vnder Martian that then swayed the Empire and S. Leo the first then Bishop of the Apostlicall Sea of Rome 10. And now to make vse in generall of that which hath bene spoken concerning the foure Councels by some particuler application and illation the inference must needes be this that if the Church of England do indeed admit and reuerence these foure first Generall Councelles as it should seeme his Maiesty is of opinion it doth and their Acts of Parlament confirme the same then doth it follow by necessary and ineuitable consequence though the conclusion ouerthrow a mayne ground of Protestanticall Religion that they must needes will they nil they graunt the Catholicke Church not only to haue bene visible at this time but also to haue bene in great splendor and magnificence otherwise how could it possibly be that fix hundred and thirty Bishops could assemble and meet so readily togeather and all these for the most part out of the Easterne parts of Christēdome only to speake nothing of the west 11. Furthermore for as much as our English Church in admitting these Councels and that in the greatest Consistory of the Kingdome the high Court of Parliament doth therby acknowledge and condescend vnto that this externall visible Church consisting of good and bad is Christs true Church indued with all the priuiledges aboue mentioned of
of Triall offered and alledged by his Maiesty of England HAVING discoursed at large of the three generall heades to wit Scriptures Creedes Councells in the three precedent Chapters we are now according to order and method both offered vnto vs and accepted of vs to treat of the last generall head in this subsequent Chapter And the subiect we haue how in hand is touching the high esteeme credit and authority to be giuen to the ancient Fathers vnto which his Matie doth appeale in this last place saying thus I do reuerence the ancient Fathers as much and more then the Iesuites do and asmuch as themselues euer craued For what euer the Fathers of the first foure hundred yeares did with an vnanime consent agree vpon to be belieued as a necessary poynt of saluation I eyther will belieue it also or at least wil be humbly silent not taking vpon me to condemne the same But for euery priuate Father his opinion it byndes not my conscience more then Bellarmines euery one of the Fathers vsually contradicting others I will therefore in that case follow S. Augustine his rule in iudging their opinions as I shall find them agree with the Scriptures what I find agreeable thereunto I will imbrace what is otherwise I will with their reuerence reiect So the King And that his Maiesty for his part hath also a good meaning in this as farre as his education and instruction can possibly permitt and further that he is perswaded that he speaketh and meaneth like a good Catholicke and orthodox Christian I do with all diligence and due respect of loyall duty vnto his Royall grace endeauour to perswade myselfe 2. And yet neuerthelesse it is more then euident and apparant yea obuious vnto the eye of any discreet indifferent iudicious and vnderstanding man that his Excellent Grace hath bene notoriously abused and very sinisterly an erroneously informed in sundry passages of this poynt and mayne head concerning the reuerence respect and authority due to the Fathers of Gods Church and that by such Statizing and temporizing Ministers that being no longer able to sustaine their weake false cause quaeipsissimo suo ruit pondere would deriue the shame blame and burden of their now present tottering Religion vpon the person of his Princely Maiesty ingaging him thus in their hereticall quarrell and therefore they suggest from time to time such particulers out of euery generall as serue rather for their owne sinister respects then eyther for the preuention of errour or decision of truth or preseruation of the honour and soueraigne reputation of his Princely Person whence it commeth to passe that they impressionate his Princely hart with their owne particuler humorous passions exagitate his grace with their odious and malitious calumniations bent against the vpright and the innocent in a word they rather auert his affection from ancient Catholicke verity and peruert his iudgement by their erroneous fancy and late vpstart nouelty then lay forth the playne and simple truth vnto his Maiesty though they professe themselues to be Ministers of simple truth eyther in sound substance or sincere circumstance And this God willing we shall discouer by many particuler passages in this present busines and poynt of ancient Fathers that we haue now in hand 3. And first to proceed in order and to beginne with the accusation and imputation laid vpon the lesuits for that they are here charged according to that which hath bene suggested vnto his Maiesty for I will neuer lay this imputation and false accusatioÌ„ vpon his Princely Person that they do not reuerence the authority of the ancient Fathers indeed not so much as his Maiesty doth who saith here as you haue heard That when the Fathers of the first soure huÌ„dred years do with an vnanime consent agree vpon any thing to be belieued as a necessary poynt of saluation his Highnes will belieue it also or at least wil be humbly silent and not condemne the same But he that will peruse and read ouer the learned and manifould laborious volumes of the Iesuites shall find theÌ„ to go much further in this point teaching and constantly asseuering with Vincentius Lyrineusis and with the ioynt agreement of antiquity that the vnanime consent of Fathers vpon any point maketh it an infallible truth Quod Patres Doctores saith Gregorius de Valentia vnanimi consensu circa religionem tradunt infallibiliter verum est VVhatsoeuer the Fathers and Doctours deliuer with one consent about religion that is infallibly true And the same do hold all other Iesuites which also Vincentius Lyrinensis more then a thousand yeares before them doth confirme in these wordes Hos ergo in Ecclesia Dei diuinitus per tempora loca dispensatos quisquis in sensu Catholici dogmatis vnum aliquid in Christo sentientes contempserit non hominem contemnit sed Deum These therefore he meaneth the ancient Fathers and Doctors of the Church giuen and granted by God throughout all ages and places whosoeuer shall contemne them agreeing vpon any one point in Christ in the sense of Catholick Doctrine he contemneth not man but God 4. And this is grounded and proued as the said Valentia noteth vpon that discourse of S. Paul Ephes. 4. where he sheweth how Christ ascending into heauen left his Church furnished and fenced with all kynd of necessary furniture for her present instruction future direction and perpetuall prescruation as with Apostles Prophets Euangelists Pastors Doctors and this vnto the worldes end And the reason of this is that which the foresaid Authour obserueth out of the Apostle himselfe Vt non circumferamur omni vento Doctrinae that we should not be carried hither and thither and tossed vp and downe with euery blast of Doctrine 5. And finally he confirmeth the same by shewing that this great absurdity would otherwayes follow that if the whole consent of Fathers may erre then may they induce the whole Church to erre yea inforce her therunto for that the Church is bound to follow and belieue the vnamine consent of her Pastours Doctors Gouernours and teachers and that throughout all ages of the Church 6. This is the doctrine which I find amongst the Iesuites concerning the accompt and reckoning that is to be made of the vniforme and vnamine consent of Fathers For with Gregory de Valentia as now I haue said doe agree all the most eminent and principall writers of that Society as for example Doctor Petru Canisâ—us in his later Catechisme Cap. 11. Cardinall Bellarmine in his fourth booke de verbo Dei cap. 9. Vasquez tom 1. in primam part Disp. 12. Cap. 1. Maldonatus in 6. Ioan. Tolet vpon the 6. Chapter of S. Iohn and many others which as I take it is a great deale more then here is granted by ProtestaÌ„ts vnto the Fathers since there is no more yet promised and professed then eyther to belieue them or to be humbly silent and not condemne them 7.
ought effectually to moue vs to make great esteeme of their knowledg to intertaine them as we ought and that is highly to reuerence and sincerely to affect the one since out of the confines of this there can be no saluation as also to detest and fly from the other as from a serpent yea as from Sathan that first seducing serpeÌ„t since this bringeth with it assured daÌ„nation 15. For these and the same causes the Ancient Fathers of the Primitiue Church so much commended by his Maiesty as that he referreth himselfe in matter of ReligioÌ„ to their decision as soone as euer these wordes and their mysteries were reuealed in the Church least in time they should be buried in obliuion did presently with their pennes aduance the most high commendations of the one as the only ordinary high way to euerlasting saluation as also by many detestations and execrations depresse the other as the very path to eternall perdition 16. Amongst which Worthies and famous Pillars of the Church the ancient Father Pacianus so highly commeÌ„ded by S. Hier. for his holines aboue 1200. yeares agone wrote a learned Epistle to one Sempronianus a Nouatian Hereticke of the excellency of this name Catholicke for that those heretickes as ours also of this day do made very little accompt of this Name But the holy Father describeth at large how necessary it was for the holy Ghost to leaue vnto vs this Name or rather Syr-name for distinguishing all faithfull Christians from misbelieuers his wordes are very effectuall for this purpose Ego sortè ingressus populosam Vrbem hodie saith he cùm Marcionitas c. I bechance entring this day into a populous Citty and finding there some called Marcionites some Apollinarians some Cataphrigians some Nouatians and others of like Sectes all calling themselues Christians I did not know by what Syr-name I should find cut the Congregation of my people except by the name of Catholickes So he And then proceeding further Certè non ab homine mutuatâ—m est quod per tantae saecula non cecidit Certainely this Name was neuer taken or borrowed of man that hath not fallen or decaied for so many ages And then he alleageth the authority of Catholick antiquity and vniuersall Church namely the authority of S. Cyprian in particuler for the vse of that name against all heresies whatsoeuer concluding thus Quaere ab haeretico nomine noster populus hac appellatione diuiditur cùm Catholicus nuncupatur c. Wherfore our people is distinguished by this appellation from all hereticall names when it is called Catholicke and yet further he saith Christianus mihi nomen est Catholicus verò cognemen me illud nuncupat istud ostendit hoc prober illo significor Christian is my name but Catholicke is my Syrname the first doth name me onely the second doth point me out by the name of Christian I am fignified only but by the Syrname of Catholicke I am tried and examined whether I be a Christion or no. So he 17. This was that high accompt and esteeme wherein that ancient Father of the Primitiue Church S. Pacianus held the word Catholicke after that the Christian Church had appropriated assumed this distinctiue appellation setting it as a most certaine badge or cognisance vpon the breast of the Church in generall and vpon the sleeue of euery member of this Church in particuler and the reason reassumed in the Conclusion is in effect this Appellatio Catholici congregat homogenia dissâ—pat heterogenia that is in plaine termes this name Catholicke maketh a coniunction vniting her owne and it noteth a disiunction separating all Sectaries from her society And here is the wisdome of Salamon euen the wisdome of Almighty God discerning betwixt the true mother and the false this is the true naturall mother of euery child of the Church she will admit no diuision of her child she will haue all or none for Catholicke is her name But to leaue S. Pacianus and to passe to others since that the Scripture requireth that in the mouth of two or three witnesses euery thing should be established where we may note by the way that if the testimony of two or three ordinary witnesses may stint the strife in matter of controuersy and tend to reconciliation in foro saeculi how much more then the vniforme consent of extraordinary witnesses witnessing iudges and iudging witnesses greater then all exception ought to compromise and finally decide the question now in hand in foro Caeli in foro Ecclesiae 18. These witnesses consenting with Pacianus in the premised point of Catholicke were all the ancient Fathers which liued eyther before or after him in the Centuries of Christian religion within the vnity and bosome of their mother the Catholicke Church as namely before him S. Cyprian whome he expresly mentioneth and before him againe old Tertullian one of the most ancient Fathers of the Latin Church whome S. Cyprian the martyr so highly reuerenced and when he would read him he pointed him out thus Da mihi Magistrum And after these two S. Augustine who ascribed so much and that as he thought worthily vnto this name Catholicke as that he feareth not to say that it was one speciall motiue both to draw him to it and to hold him in the visible vniuersall Church of his daies Neyther doth this great Doctor barely affirme it vpon his word and credit which had beene sufficient for vs to haue belieued the same but he yeeldeth a substantiall reason therof in the wordes following Quod non sine causa inter tam varias haereses ista Ecclesia sola obtinuit which very name of Catholicke not without cause this only Church hath obteined among so many heresies as haue sprong vp Againe the same Father positiuely and boldly affirmeth in another place that the word Catholicke was so appropriate to this Church euer since the Apostles in their Creed gaue that Name vnto it as that no Conuenticle of Heretickes whatsoeuer could once fasten vpon the Name themselues or procure the same to be giuen vnto theÌ„ by others And hereupon he concludeth that the very possession of the Name and common opinion of men was a sufficient coÌ„uincing proofe against all Aduersaries that this Church was the true Catholicke Church indeed 19. Hitherto S. Augustine Now if we descend lower to succeding ages of the Church I meane vnto those Fathers that liued after S. Augustine his time we shall find such harmony in vnity such vniforme consent in iudgement touching the true explication of this name Catholick as also the very right explication of that vnto the visible vniuersall Church of their daies that we must hence necessarily inferre that one spirit breathed in all one the same spirit directed all And here I might produce a whole cloud of witnesses to speake in the phrase of the Apostle as namely S. Damascen Oecumenius Theophilact for the greeke Pâ—lgentius S. Gregory the
that to the pit of hell Yet notwithstanding let the Catholick but pursue them and arrest them of sacrilegious Church-theft for stealing this title they dare not stand to try the issue before the Tribunall of the Church but presently as guilty they fly away renouncing their stolne tytle and so it returneth to the right owner And is it any meruaile that maugre their heades they are inforced to this restitution when they are at such opposition amongst themselues as is formerly noted which very opposition it selfe setting all other arguments of the Catholick a part doth euidently shew and demonstratiuely conuince vnto their faces that they cannot be Catholicks indeed because Catholicum vbique vnum as the foresaid Father Pacianus noteth that is Catholicke in Christian Religion which is euery where one and the selfe same For as Christs seamelesse coat was whole intyre and vndeuided it is S. Cyprian his comparison and it is well worthy our obseruation euen so must the spouse and Church of Christ figured by this coate be whole intyre vndeuided and one in it selfe and thereupon saith S. Syprian Possidere non potest indumentum Christi qui scindit et diuidit Ecclesiam Christi He can neuer possesse the coate of Christ who renteth and teareth the Church of Christ. 24. But alas Catholicke Communion and Catholicke Vnion cannot be found much lesse verified in and of Protestant religion not only in those old imagined times ages of their supposed Primitiue Church which they ridiculously and impudently contra scientiam contrae conscientiam do challenge vnto themselues but neither in these very ages wherin they haue peeped out of Chymerian nay out of Infernall darknes and bene knowne to the world by the names of Protestants Lutherans Caluinists and the like I say not in these times can they shew Vbique vnum amongst themselues in mayne and many articles of Christian beliefe And this I can partly speake vpon my owne experience had amongst them for many yeares during which time I could neuer yet God I take to witnes as righteous Iudg find any two of thē agreeing togeather in all points of faith and partly I can proue yt by infinite bookes written by themselues wherin they fall togeather by the eares discouer their owne shame vpon their owne skirts Ephraim against Manasses Manasses against Ephraim both against Iudah that is Lutherans against Caluinists Caluinists against Lutherans yet both like Simeon Leui Fratres in malo in the euill of Schisme and Heresy they can ioyne handes and conspire against Catholicks and Catholick verity And this conuinced my vnderstanding that Protestants could not be Catholicks and therfore I passed to the other syde where I found indeed vbtque vnum euery where one in all points of their beliefe throughout the world togeather with that vniuersality antiquity consent and succession which the foresaid Vincentius Lyrinensis that good old Monke Professour of Euangelical Coūsailes of perfection that liued in S. Augustine his time setteth downe in the name of the whole Catholicke Church in his time as the certaine signes markes and tokens of the true Catholick Church indeed And this much shall suffice for this first Consideration about the wordes Catholicke and Hereticke Let vs passe vnto the second The second Consideration YF the changing of Abraham his name from Abram into Abraham was full of mysticall consolation because it confirmed him in the promyse of the Messias and for that he should be the father of many nations Genes 17 5. if Iacob his name being turned into Israel was fraught with comfort and that for these two especiall reasons first because he had preuailed with God secondly because he should preuaile against men Genes 32. 28. O then how comfortable and how amiable how full of solace heauenly delight ought this glorious through the whol Christiā world renowned name of Catholicke to be vnto vs since it confirmeth vs nay assureth and sealeth vnto vs all Gods promises made vnto the Church it is the Father of many nations comprehending all true beleeuing Christians within the lap and bosome of the Church it preuaileth with God procuring his heauēly benediction and neuer departing without a blessing and it preuaileth against men distinguishing betwixt wolues and sheepe separating all false worshippers from the true belieuers 26. And now as this Name of Catholick began to be vnto me most amiable and comfortable conteyning in it so many priuiledges and prerogatiues and being so highly reputed esteemed and commended by all sacred Antiquity euen from the Apostles dayes downwards vnto our times though Sempronianus the Nouatian Heretick obiected to the forenamed Father Pacianus as the Hereticks do to vs in these dayes that sub Apostois nemo Catholicus vocabatur no man was called Catholicke vnder the Apostles so on the other side comparing contraries together quae iuxta seinuicem posita magis illucescunt which being opposit are the clearer reuealed I considered with all possible attention that the Name of Hereticke was most dreadfull aboue all other names vpō the earth as before I haue noted at large And therfore if euer there were a Cham accursed of his Father as you shall read there was Genes 9. 25. then the Hereticke is this Cham accursed of God the Father and anathematized of the Church his mother This is Benoni that sonne of the mothers sorrow as Rachael pronounced of Beniamin the byrth of this sonne would be the death of his mother he came from her wombe but he will not abide in her bosome agreeing with that of the Apostle Prodierunt ex nobis sed non erant ex nobis nam si fuissent ex nobis permansissent nobiscum Sed vt manifesti sint quod non sunt omnes ex nobis They wēt forth from vs but they were not of vs for if they had beene of vs they would haue remayned with vs. But here by they are manifested not to be all of vs. And therfore to expresse if it be possible in a word the horror of this Name as the childrē of the prophets cried vnto Elizcus the prophet after they had tasted the potage Mors in olla vir Dei mors in olla death is in the pot o man of God death is in the pot Euē so may I more iustly take vp this cōplaint cry out vnto euery man of God that is a true mēber of the Catholick Church that against all Heresy the very name Heretick Mors in nomine Mors in nomine there is nothing but death destruction desolation dānation in this very Name 27. And heere we shall be inforced as it were to ponder vpon this point somewhat more at large and to extend the bondes of this ensuing Consideration especially for so much as concerning vs so neare as it doth this matter cannot be but worthy of our weightiest ponderation and the rather will we the more deliberately consider of this point for
most compassionate nay whose bowels burned with compassion within them towards the greatest and grieuous sinners as for example we read in that notable story of S. Iohn the Euangelist who ranne vp and downe the mountaines againe and againe after the first relapse to gaine a yong man that was a theefe as S. Hierome and other Church storyes witnes yet these selfe same men were so seuere against the enemies of Gods truth that they neuer could so much as indure the very sight and conuersation of an Hereticke And so we haue not only S. Iohn counsailing vs not to salute or conuerse with an Hereticke but also the said Apostle practizing the same euen in his owne person in his heroicall factes whensoeuer any iust occasion was offered For S. Irenaeus who liued in the next age after him and recounted it vpon the relation of S. Policarpe that liued with S. Iohn and happily might be present whē the thing was donne recordeth that S. Iohn being in the Citty of Ephesus at a common bath whither many did resort and vnderstanding that an Hereticke of his time named Cerinthus was within the bath he instantly departed againe would not enter into that bath with him who had departed out of the Church from him could not be perswaded to stay any while there affirming that he doubted lest the very foundation of those bathes would fall downe where such an enemy of God was presēt who had as much as in him lay ruinated the very foundation of Christian Religion denying the diuinity of the Sonne of God A notable example of this great Apostle left to all posterity giuing them a sufficient caueat euen by his owne person and example for auoiding of Heresy and hereticall company 41. And the same Irenaeus in the very same place before cited registreth this story of S. Policarpe himselfe to wit how he reiected and defied an Hereticke named Marcion that met with him and spake vnto him calling the said Marcion Primogenitum Diaboli the first begotten of the Diuell and then the Authour endeth his narration with this most graue and memorable Conclusion saying So great feare had the Apostles and Disciples not to communicate in any one word with any of those that haue adulterated and corrupted the truth euen as S. Paul saith Auoid an hereticall mā after one reprehension knowing that such a fellow is peruerted damned of himself So S. Irenaeus 42. And truly this one point ministred vnto me store of matter and exceedingly enlarged my meditation to consider on the one part how carefull and not only carefull but fearefull these ancient Fathers and Apostles were as Irenaeus testifieth to admit any conuersation or to enter into communication with Hereticks flying them as mōsters serpents and Diuels vpon earth and starting affrighted as it were with the bare name of Heresy and Hereticke and on the other side that now in our dayes the name and thing it selfe is growne to be so common and familiar as that we seeme to haue no sense or feeling therof so senselesse and benummed are we in our spirituall vnderstanding But this proceeds from a supine negligence and carelesse inconsideration for such as seriously ponder and earnestly debate the matter more deeply doe apprehend farre otherwise therof especially such as are addicted to the reading of ancient Fathers the surest refuge and pillars for a resolued soule to rely vpon for true direction in religion in these miserable dayes of Schisme Heresy and Apostasy Nulla saith the old holy martyr S. Cyprian cum talibus commercia copulentur nulla c. And let noe trafficke or conuersation be ioyned with such men noe banquets be made no speach had but let vs be as separate from them as they are separated fugitiues frō the Church 43. And after this Father againe that Atlas of his age and great Saint S. Athanasius writing the life of S. Antony the Monke doth set downe the opinion and feeling of them both in this point S. Antony saith he did so detest Hereticks as that he tould all men that they must not so much as come neere them alleaging the authority of S. Paul for the same who often and seriously talking of Hereticks doth inculcate these wordes Et hos deuita and these you must auoid And yet my author goeth further in this relation of S. Antony adding this that when the said holy man was at the point of death ready to breath out his soule into the hands of his Creator whome he had with all fidelity and seuerity so faithfully serued practising ouer and aboue the precepts of the law Christs high counsailes of perfection he exhorted the standers by especially and aboue all other things to beware of Heretickes and Schifmatikes and to auoid their poison Meumque saith he circacos edium sectamini Seitisipsi quod nullus mihi ne pacificus quidem sermo cum eis vnquam fuerit And do you imitate my hatred towardes them For your selues can beare me witnes that I had neuer so much as any peaceable speach with them This was S. Antony his resolution in this point and this was his last charge that this dying Saynt left vnto his lyuing friends 44. And of the same spirit and iudgment were all other Saints and holy Fathers ensuing that euerliued and dyed in the vnion and communion of the Catholicke Church and namely S. Leo the Great first of that name a most compassionate man other wayes as by his charitable workes of piety well appeared yet in this point of Heresie he was so inflamed with the zeale of God his true Religion so rigorous and seuere against the enemies of God his truth that he burst forth into this vehement exclamation against them Viperea Haereticorum vitate colloquia nihil nobis commune sit cum eis qui Catholicae aduersantes fidei solo nomine sunt Christiani Do you auoid the viperous and serpentine speaches and conferences of Heretickes haue you nothing at all to do with them that being aduersaries vnto Catholicke faith are only Christians in name So S. Leo. And in this point that Heretickes be not Christians but only in name and appellation he hath cōmonly all the ancient Fathers concurring with him with vniforme consent as namely S. Irenaeus S. Cyprian and Tertullian before mentioned which Fathers do euidētly proue that Heretickes are worse then Heathens Pagans or Infidels This argument is handled in like manner by S. Chrysostome and that largely in his 50. Homily ad populum Antiochenum and by S. Augustine in his 21. Booke de Ciuitate Dei cap. 25. by many other Fathers after them the reason whereof is set downe by S. Thomas in the beginning of this second Consideration 45. Vpon these groundes then reasons causes and contemplations the whole streame and ranke of Ancient Fathers do with full consent concurre in this one point do inculcate the same often in their writings to wit that it is
sense requireth the stay of a sure interpretation and this is only that which can make a man a true Catholicke Christian. 50. S. Augustine amongst those manifould cōflicts which he had with the Manichees concerning the Catholicke Church her authority openly and ingenuously professed vnto the said Manichees that he would not haue belieued the Ghospell if the authority of the Catholicke Church did not moue him therunto Whence I do obserue that if we receiue the Ghospell vpon the credit of the Church for that the Ghospell would not be belieued to be the Ghospell vnlesse the authority of the Church did tell vs that it were the Ghospell then followeth it necessarily for the argument is drawne à maiore ad minus that much more should we depend and rely vpon the Church and take from her the true sense meaning and exposition of the Ghospell from whom we haue belieued and receaued that it is the Ghospell and therefore saith the same Father to his friend Honoratns Multò facilius mihi persuaderem Christo non esse credendum quà m de illo quidquam nisi ab his per quos credidissem esse credendum I should much more easily perswade my selfe that we ought not to beleeue in Christ at all then that any thing were to be learned cōcerning him of any man but only of those whom I was taught to belieue in Christ. Can any thing be spoken more effectually for the Authority of the Church since this is the sole cause of his belieuing the Ghospell This is the onely motiue of his imbracing the faith of Christ 51. But now whether Protestants do follow this trade and way of true Catholicisme in their sensing and vnderstanding of Scriptures that is not hard to discouer For when wee come to particuler controuersies and to ioyne issue togeather and that they and their aduersaries do alleage Scriptures and expound the same then doth it appeare as cleare as the sunne who followeth a priuate interpretation and who adhereth to the true Catholicke Churches exposition For the Roman Catholicke first desyring to find out the truth and then willing to imbrace nothing but the truth reflecteth vpon the former interpretation of ancient Church when the present controuersy was not yet in hand and consequently when the exposition cannot be so much as in any semblable reason suspected to be wrested or wrongly interpreted by men of those ages who neither feared nor fauoured any party but must needes be according to the common meaning and sense of the Church in those ancient tymes and this interpretation which the Protestants also in some of their better humours do admit for good the Catholicke followeth vpon this as vpon the rock of God his word truly sensed by the Church he stayeth himselfe buildeth his religion 52. Now the Protestāt being guilty in his conscience and knowing well that antiquity detesteth and hath already anathematized his heresy he by all meanes possible by vociferatiōs and exclamations seeketh to extenuate the authority of this Church much like to the theefe or malefactor who arested by the law to abyde the triall of the same beginneth to raile exclaime against his lawfull ludge and iurours and then in his imagination he deuiseth certaine Chymera's and Idea's of his Church in former times in the ayre of his owne braine which lineally saith he but God knoweth how for he knoweth not descended vnto Luther and Caluin c. And from these people partly and partly from himselfe frameth the Protestant his exposition of Scripture and vpon this foundation buildeeh he all his religion of his owne deuice 53. And albeit all Fathers do not allwaies agree in one and the selfe same sense and exposition of Scripture for that there may be be diuers senses of one the selfe same place of Scripture as before you haue heard at large yet doth the holy Ghost so rune and strike vpon the stringes the tonges and pens I meane of these ancient Wortnies of the Church that all the variety that euer I could find yet amongst them sounded forth a heauenly harmony and neither iarred not yet was dissonant from Scripturs verity or faiths Analogy so farre is the Churches vnity from all contrariety And verily this diuersity of antiquity in the execution of Scriptures without all repugnancy or any contrariety was no small motiue vnto me to imbrace the present Roman Catholicke Religion which all so I found in them for I could not but conclude that as one spirit breathing out these Scriptures intended all these senses so the same spirit guided all And therefore no meruaile that neither the ages wherin such Fathers liued nor any succeeding Century of the Church reprehended their expositions For the wisedome of the spirit euer continued in the Church and thereby they know that such variety breeded no contrariety whilst one Father sensed the Scripture literally another Allegorically and another mystically or Anagogically but yet all to a pious sense and with no obstinate proteruity or animosity against that which the Church did hould or determine for truest 54. And now to come vnto some particuler exposition or Scripture by the Fathers let vs instance in the age of S. Augustine for the Protestants are wont to graunt that the true Church florished in his time and his Maiesty also condescendeth to extend the triall of Controuersies to his time and somwhat further The same Father writing of this Church we haue formerly mentioned proued the same first to be visible and obuious vnto euery mans eyes against the assertion of the Protestants inuisibility of the Church and this he confirmeth out of the wordes of our Sauiour registred by the Euangelist Matth. 5. A Citty vpō a hill cannot be hidden that is to say the Church cannot be inuisible which is many times repeated by the same Father to this effect As also forth of those wordes of the Psalmist Psal. 18. In sole posuit tabernaculum suum he put his tabernacle in the sunne that is he placed his Church in the sight of the world to be seene of all men 55. In like manner the same Father applyeth and expoundeth those wordes of Christ Matth. 5 about the Candle placed on the Candlestick to signify the visibility of the Catholicke Church crying out against them Qui contra lucernam in candelabro positamoculos claudant who willfully shut their eyes against the candle placed on the candlestick Qui tammagnam montem non vident who cannot see so great a hill as the Church is And lastly for conclusion of all he giueth his censure of them in these wordes Quid amplius sum dicturus qùam caecos esse What shall I say more of them but that they are blnd Thus did S. Augustine interpret and apply these Scriptures and many more to this purpose as you shall read throughout his whole Tract de Vnitate Ecclesiae contra Petilianum andels where 56. And the same S. Augustine to
proue that this Catholicke visible Church doth not consist of the good and elect only which is another erroneous position of Protestant Religion and proued largely by S. Augustine to haue bene the heresy of the Donatists and Pelagians their bretheren but of good and bad togeather vnto the worlds end and for confirmation thereof he doth produce interpret those Parables vsed by our Sauiour Matth. 3. to wit of the good corne and chaffe in the floore and of the net cast into the sea that brought vp both good and bad fish and lastly of the weedes and good corne commaunded to be permitted to grow togeather Vpon which place S. Leo the first giueth the glosse thus In extremo iudicio sunt quaedam vrenda flammis sunt alia condenda horreis In the last iudgement some things are to be burned with the flames of dānation other thinges are to be gathered into Gods granary All these places and many more both S. Augustine S. Leo many of the Fathers do interprete of the good and bad that are promiscuously mixed in the Church togeather Do our Protestants follow these expositions 57. Thirdly my foresaid Authour goeth yet further for prouing of a third assertion as contrary to the Protestants as they are opposite vnto truth to wit that this publike and visible Church granted once by Protestants themselues to haue bene the true Church could neuer faile or euer fall away to the worlds end For prouing of which assertion he alleageth sundry passages of holy Writ farre different for interpretation from the Protestants sense His wordes be That Church saith he that was once of all Nations he meaneth the Catholicke is it not now Hath it perished They say so that are not in her O impudent voice Is not she because thou art not in her This abominable and detestable voice full of presumption and falsity susteined by no truth illuminated by no wisedome seasoned with no salt vaine temerarious precipitate and pernicious is preuented and refuted by the holy Ghost c. And then doth he cyte seuerall places of Scripture to proue that notwithstanding all exposition and contradiction of Hereticks that the said visible Church bring once collected of all Nations and placed vpon the open hill and mount of this world and conspicuous vnto the eyes of al could neuer possibly vanish away againe or fall frō Christ as Protestants do falsely charge the Mother Romā Church and consequently they would neuer agree to expound these Scriptures as S. Augustine did But whom shall we rather belieue VVhether is a Luther or a Caluin or S. Augustine to be followed Or which Church his or this of the Protestants is likest to go neare the truth and to light vpon the true meaning of the holy Ghost in expoūding these Scriptures For certaine I am their expositions vary and are repugnant one to the other 58. And in this manner might I proceed in disclosing this great Doctor and famous pillar of the Church S. Austine his iudgement for the exposition of Scriptures concerning all controuersies or the most of them betweene the Catholickes and the Protestants at this day wherein the sayd Father is no lesse perspicuous and copious then as if being an eye-witnesse and an eare-witnesse of all poynts now controuerted he had written in these very dayes of sirife amongst vs. And eyther this is or I know not what can be a manifest demonstration that the holy Ghost guided the pen of this worthy Doctor to taxe and prescribe against the manifould heresies of our times As for example touching the doctrine of Purgatory whome Doctor Field out of a fanaticall spirit and spirit of heresie surchargeth and falsely traduceth of heresy what writer of this time can deliuer and set downe his opinion more resolutely then he doth his prouing the same irrefragably both by the allegation and exposition of sundry passages of holy Scripture as namely by those wordes of our Sauiour Matth. 12. It shall not be remitted vnto him eyther in this life or in the next Whereupon this great Doctor inferreth that some sinnes are remitted in the next consequently there must be a Purgatory And so that place of S. Paul 1. Cor. 3. Euery mans worke shal be tryed by the fire of what sort it is S. Augustine doth also apply to proue the same purging fire to remaine for some sinnes or bad workes in the next life And these expositions of Scripture confirming Purgatory deliuered by S. Augustine and oftentimes reiterated in his workes were neuer reprehended by any as false nor the Father taxed as teaching any erroneous doctrine dissonant from the doctrine and beliefe of the Catholicke Church which doubtlesse he could neuer haue escaped had his assertion of Purgatory bene erroneous liuing in the age of S. Ambrose S. Hierome and other learned Fathers who wanted neyther learning nor zeale to haue both matched him and confuted him had he swarued in ought from sound faith and the doctrine of their present Church and consequently Purgatory was then held for no errour or heresy And the like I might aboundantly proue in many other pointes both out of S. Augustine and sundry other of like antiquity learning and sanctity 59. Finally the conclusion of all this mayne Chapter and Treatise of sacred Scriptures must of necessity fall out to be this that not all belieuing of Scriptures nor appealing vnto Scripture nor sensing of Scriptures nor presuming of the spirit is sufficient to make a man a Christian Catholick for that as hath beene formerly noted forth of S. Bernard many men presume of Gods spirit when it is not but their owne spirit or rather the spirit of Sathā and consequently take or rather mistake their owne spirits expositions for the interpretation of the holy Ghost Againe some when they erre in expounding Scriptures are notwithstanding of opinion that they follow Scriptures when indeed they follow their owne errours So S. Augustine obserueth 60. Thirdly others by a peruerse interpretation make of Christs Ghospell mās Ghospell or that which is worse the Diuells Ghospell as S. Hierome noteth and yet all these with the Diuell and all former heretickes pretend to vrge and build vpon Scripture But no meruaile if all these appeale vnto Scriptures vpon a false confidence thinking that the word of God maketh for them when it maketh against them For let these Scripturians be but marked let them be vnmasked that is as Vincentius Lyrinensis excellenly deliuereth the obseruation against them let not only their sayings but their meanings not their wordes but their senses of Scripture be noted then their bitternes shall be detected their madnes disclosed their new poyson vented forth their prophane nouelties reuealed then the hedge shal be cut then the boundes of Fathers shall be translated then Catholicke faith shall be violated and the Churches position cancelled Hitherto Vincentius 61. The only way then to make a man a true Christian Catholicke indeed if
the ancient Church gathered and assembled foure within the compasse of one age and an halfe and the Protestant Princes and people do bound and border nearer togeather then did the Christians in former tymes which were in a manner dispersed here and there farre and neere ouer the whole face of the earth 27. If reply be made that then there was but one Emperour to affoard his Imperiall consent for the assembling of the Synod now since the diuision of the Empyre into many Dukedomes Princedomes Kingdomes and free States there be many particuler Princes whose wills and iudgements can more hardly be agreed whose assents are with greater difficulty to be required and obtayned I answere this euasion is but a meere collusion and therefore must not be suffered to passe without due reprehension For since the forsaid diuision of the Christian world into seuerall Kingdomes and states many generall Councell haue bene called and gathered amongst Catholickes as before hath bene shewed yea and that in the middest of tumults vproares and garboyles in the temporall estates of the Christian world and this a man of common sense and reason may comprehend imagin to haue byna greater let and impediment vnto the gathering of Generall Councells then any incumbrance and inconuenience that the Protestants surmise or pretend But the truth is heresy and schisme originally grounded vpon proper election priuate inuention stubborne selfwill and proud conceipted iudgment togeather with obstinacy against the Churches authority this I say can neuer abide that exact discussion which a generall Councell doth require For how can the Protestants thus deuided as they are and knowing the weakenes of their owne cause indure parly and treaty eyther with the Catholicks whome they accompt aduersaries or among themselues with their owne Sectaries 28. Not with Catholickes as may be seene by examples of ancient hereticks condēned in these 4. first Generall Councells to wit the Arians in the first the Macedonians in the second the Nestorians in the third and the Eutichians in the fourth who fled what they could those Councells appealing only to Scriptures whereof there is one notable example amongst many others in the last of these foure Councells I meane that of Chalcedon wherein the Archimandrite and Archereticke Eutiches being sent vnto with Notaries from this graue and learned Councell to yield an accompt to the Councell of his hereticall opinion held of one onely nature in Christ after his Incarnation he first bethought him of this euasion to say that he would agree and subscribe to the expositions of the Fathers that had sate in the Nicen Councell and that of Ephesus but this was but meere collusion for thereby he only meant most craftily and heretically to euade and fly both the other two Councells of Constantinople that had already dealt against him and condemned him as also this of Chalcedon that was now gathered against him to heare his cause and to be his iudge 29. But yet secondly for feare that he might yield also to farre in this he added presently an exposition saying Si verè aliquid contingat eos in aliquibus dictis aut falli aut errasse hoc neque se vette reprehendere neque subscribere solas autem Scripturas scrutari tamquam firmiores sanctorum Patrum expositionibus If not withstanding it had happened that the said Fathers of the Nicen and Ephesine Councells had bene deceiued and erred in many of their sayings then would he neither reprehend the same for modesties sake nor yet subscribe therunto but that he for his part would attend himselfe wholy vnto the Scriptures alone as being more firme and sure then the expositions of any Fathers whatsoeuer And is not this spoken like a Protestant 30. Thirdly when he had repeated and vrged againe his blasphemous heresy of one only nature in Christ in presence of those graue and reuerend Prelates that were sent by the whole Synod to take his confessiō and further when he had read vnto them a booke compiled Apologetically for defence of the same heresy he then tould them openly and plainely that this was his faith according vnto the Scriptures and as for the other to wit the Catholicke assertion that Christ consisted of two natures diuine and humane vnited in one person he said flatly Neque se didicisse in expositionil us sanctorum Patrum neque subscriberevelle sicontigerit ab aliquo ei tale aliquid legi quia diuina Scripturae meliores sunt Patrum doctrinis That he had neither learned any such assertion in the expositions of the holy Fathers he meaneth the blessed Fathers of the Nicene and Ephesine Councells nor yet would he for his part admit and imbrace it if any such thing should happen to be read vnto him out of their writinges and his reason was that which is so cōmonly vrged by Protestants for that the diuine Scriptures are better then the doctrines of all Fathers the which though it be true in it self yet was his meaning to deceiue therby as you see thinking by this faire glosle goodly pretence of Scripture to haue auoyded and escaped the tribunall and censure of the Catholicke Church in that time but the Councell condemned his opinion and person notwithstanding his shifting euasions to the contrary 31. And truly the very Consideration of this particuler I meane the conformity of spirits in this ould heretick and diuers of the new Protestants that cry out with sull and open mouth to haue all thinges in Generall Councells tryed by Scriptures alone left in me a very great impression and the matter it selfe seemed vnto me very considerable and worthy of all diligent attention For I patticulerly reflected vpon that sentence of Caluin wherin in my poore iudgment and opinion I rightly compared the two Arch-heretickes togeather and whether I wrong Caluin let his owne wordes witnes and his best fauorites and sectarirs defend their Maister from speaking like an hereticke I meane like Eutiches Nulla saith he nos Conciliorunt Patrum Episcoporum nomina impedire debent quo minùs omnes omnium spirituum ad diuini verbi regulam exigamus verbo Domini examinemus num ex Deo sunt VVe are not to passe for Councels Fathers Bishops it is not in naming of all or any one of them can barre vs from examining all kynd of spirits according vnto the squared rule of Gods word and we may call them vnto accompt sift them by the word of the Lord whether they are of God or no. So far he 32. And here also I remēbred that I had seene the conditions required by the Protestants of Germany when as they were inuited to come vnto the Councell of Trent at the very first gathering thereof and the said conditions were published in a seuerall booke which did beare this Inscription Causae cur Electores Principes c. The causes why the Electors Princes and other addicted to the Cōfession of Augusta do not come to the
of God and renowned pillars of the Catholick Church euer most due vnto them for the expounding of those Scriptures as he did neuer vrge any thing more ernestly or eagerly against heretickes then their authority for exposition of sacred Writ which he knew to be naturally hatefull vnto theÌ„ who were inuentors of nouelty enemies to antiquity false interpreters of Scriptures which all sectaries are as was defined and determined in the second generall Councell held at Ephesus against the Hereticke Nestorius 14. And therfore saith the said S. Augustine vnto Iulian the Pelagian Hereticke Probauimus Catholicorum authoritate sanctorum qui hoc asserunt c. We haue proued this now by the authority of the Catholick Saints that do affirm it against you and they are such men and so great in the Catholick sayth which is spread ouer the world vt vestra fragilis argutula nouitas solo illorum conteratur auctoritate that your vaine and subtile nouelty is crushed wholy by their only authority And then againe Auctoritate primitus eorum vestra est contumacia comprimenda First of all your contumacy is to be repressed or beaten downe by their authority he meaneth the ancient Fathers And this was the principal way that S. Augustine tooke with them though all these Hereticks as forerunners of the Protestants were very frequent in citing of Scriptures as fast as any other Hereticks 15. But S. Augustine will haue the true meaning of holy Scriptures to be sought out by the interpretations of ancient Fathers and so do his wordes flatly proue Tuns saith he limes sanae fidei defenditur quando termini quos posuerunt sancti Patres non transseruntur à nobis imo obseruantur defensantur Then the limit of sound sayth to wit the Canon of Scriptures defended by vs when we do not change and alter the boundes therof placed by the holy Fathers but rather do obserue and defend the same that is we do follow their interpretations and ancient expositions 16. And further yet reasoning of this matter in his second booke de nuptijs concupiscentia to the Count or Earle Valerius I meane concerning the sincere expositions of the ancieÌ„t Fathers to be preferred before the NouellaÌ„ts he saith Quid dicam de ipsis sacrarum liter arum tractatoribus qui in Catholica Ecclesia floruerunt quomodo haec non conati sunt in alios sensus vertere quoniani stabiles erant in antiquissima robustissima fide non autem nouitio mouebantur errore What shall I say of the expositors themselues of Sacred Scriptures which haue florished in the Catholicke Church how they neuer attempted to turne these places alleadged into other senses then from antiquity they had receaued them for that they were most firme and stable in the most ancient and strong sayth and were nothing moued with late hatched errour So he 17. And for confirmation of this hauing alledged the examples both of S. Cyprian and S. Ambrose shewing and prouing out of them that originall sinne was in Infants and that for remedy and remouing thereof they were baptized in the Catholicke Church with the ould Ceremonies of exorcismes and exufflations the Pelagian heretick that not only denied but scoffed at these things calling the vse thereof Manicheisme was answered by S. August thus Hosiste audiat dicere Manichaeos antiquissimam Ecclesiae traditionem isto nefario crimine aspergat qua exorâ—izantur vt dixi exufflantur paruuli c. Let him dare to call those two Fathers Manicheans and let him lay the same wicked crime of Manicheisme vpoÌ„ the most ancieÌ„t traditioÌ„ of the Church by which tradition Infants as before I haue said are exorcized and breathed on at their baptisme that by these meanes they may be translated froÌ„ the power of darkenes of the Diuell and his Angells vnto the Kingdome of Christ. So S. Augustine who added presently that albeit he was scorned at for this by hereticks yet such was his resolution that he burst forth into these wordes following Nos paratiores sumus cumistis viris cum Ecclesia Christi in huiuâ— fidei antiquitate frmati quaelibet maledicta contumelas perpeti quám Pelagiani cuiuslibet eloquij praedicatione laudari We are more ready saith he with these Fathers and with the Church of God rooted in the antiquity of this sayth to suffer abide all kynd of reproches and contumelies then to be exalted with the prayses of any Pelagian eloquence whatsoeuer And doth not this fall iust vpon the neck of al our moderne Protestants Do they not scorne deride and iest as much at these two ancient Ceremonies of Exorcisme Exufflation as euer the Pelagian Hereticks did 18. VVith what face then can they challenge S. Augustine to be theirs Nay is not Pelagius and his ranke of hereticks fitter for their society since they do so iuÌ„p and conspyre togeather and that against S. Augustine and the Catholick Doctors Nay I find S. Augustine to go yet much further in taking vpon him the patronizing of the reuerend ranke of holy Fathers against prophane hereticks though some of those ancient Worthies whome he coÌ„mendeth liued either in his owne time or not very long before him for that eyting their Doctrine against Iulian the Pelagian that made so light accompt of them and scoffed at them he expostulated thus Numquid Iraeneus Cyprianus Retiâ—ius Olympius Hilarius Gregorius Basilius Ambrosius Ioannes Chrysostomus de plebe a fece sellulariorum sicut Tullianè iocaris c. Are Iraeneus Cyprian and the rest here named of the lower house or haue they vulgar seates in your Parlament as out of your Tullian eloquence you do scoffe Are they raysed vp for enuy of you Are they yong souldiars or auditory schollers Are they shipmen Tauerners Hostes Cookes Butchers Are they dissolute yong men made of Apostata monkes c. Whom you by your scoffing vrbanity or rather vanity do exagitate vilify condemne and contemne 19. Thus wrote S. Augustine that holy Saint and great Doctor in Gods Church against the malepert saucinesse of that heretick that so little regarded and so basely accoÌ„pted of the ancient Doctors And hauing alleadged their authorities he maketh this inference of honour and reuerence on their behalfe Talibus post Apostolos Sancta Ecclesia plantatoribus rigatoribus adificatoribus Pastoribus nutritoribus creuit ideo prophanas voces vestrae nouitatis expauit Vnder such planters after the Apostles vnder such waterers builders Pastors and nourishers as these were and are hath the Church growne vp and did tremble at the prophane voyces of your nouelties And a little after repeating againe for honours cause the very same Fathers with addition only of two more of his time to wit Pope Innocentius the first S. Hierome he accompteth their testimony and of such others as held communion and participation with them to be the very speaking voice and liuely oracle of the whole Church and
that it was plaine madnes in the hereticke to make so small accompt of them Nay he further resolued and with mature deliberation concluded that the dogma ticall faith and belief of all these Fathers conspiring and agreeing togeather in one was to be defended against him and against all other such like hereticks as he was no other waies then Christs Ghospell was to be defended against Infidels His words are these 20. Aduersus hanc autem miserabilem quam deus auertat insaniam sic respondendum video libris tuis vt fides queque aduersus te desendatur istorum sicut contra impios Christiprofessos inimicos etiam ipsum defendetur Euangelium Against this miserable desperate madnes of thine which God turne from thee I do see that I must so answere to thy bookes that the faith of these Fathers be defended against thee as the very Ghospell it selfe of Christ is to be defended against impious men and as against the very professed enemies of Christ. So he And yet in another place pressing againe the authority of the said Fathers he doth intreat his aduersary Iulian to belieue these holy Fathers and by them to be made friendes with him yea to be reconciled vnto him and to the Catholicke Church from which he stood as yet separate And is not this the very same offer we make to the Protestants at this day And then S. Augustine going on forwardes in ratifiing their authority saddeth presently for further corroboration of the Doctrine and tradition of antiquity Quod credunt credo quod tenent teneo quod docent doceo quod praedicant praedico istis crede mihi credes acquiesce istis quiesces à me c. What these fathers do belieue I do belieue what they hould I hould what they teach I teach what they preach I preach yeald vnto these and you will yeald vnto me haue peace with these and you will haue peace with me And last of all saith he If you will not by them be made friendes with me at least wise be not you by me made enemy vnto them a goulden sentence and then he goeth forward saying shall Pelagius and Celestinus the Authours of your heresy be of such authority with you that you for their society will leaue the fellowship and company of so many and so great Doctors of the Catholicke faith and Church dispersed from East to West frō North to South and those both ancient and neare vnto our age partly dead and yet partly liuing So he 21. Which speach of S. Augustine doth seeme vnto me so fitly and properly to touch and concerne the Protestants of our dayes who for the loue of Luther Caluin Authors of their nouelties do forgo all the Doctors of the Catholicke Church not only ancient but moderne also as that nothing in my iudgment can be produced of nearer affinity to hould greater correspondency or be more like or more semblable 22. Neither yet doth S. Augustine determine only that the Doctors of the Church are absolutely the best witnesses and iudges in matters of Controuersy that arise and spring vp after their dayes but togeather with his authority which had bene alone sufficient he yealedeth a very substantiall and conuincing reason for the same and it is this that the Fathers could not be partiall iudges of such causes as came into Controuersy after their deaths for that they gaue forth their verdict and iudgment before any controuersy was stirred or moued about the same And thus much do his wordes import as they follow 23. Tunc de ista causa iudicauerunt saith S. Augustine quando cosnemo dicere potest perperà m quicquam vel aduersari velsauere potuisse Nondum enim extiteratis c. The Fathers did iudge of this cause at that time when no man can say that they did wrongfully fauour or disfauour any party For that you Pelagians were not then in the world with whome we might haue contention about this question c. They did not attend vnto any friendship eyther with vs or with you they did not exercise amity or emnity with eyther of vs they were angry neyther with you nor with vs neyther yet had they commiseration towards any of our partes that which they found in the Church they held that which they learned they taught that which they recyued and learned from their Fathers by tradition they taught and left vnto their children We did not as yet plead with you before these Iudges yet by them was our case decided and determined nor you nor we were knowne vnto them and yet do we out of their workes produce their sentences against you VVe had as yet no strife with you nor pleaded any cause and yet haue we conquered you by their verdicts Hitherto are the wordes of S. Augustine 24. VVhich when I had considered pondered well with my selfe as also reflected vpon all S. Augustine his former sentences compared them all togeather and conferred them with the state of our present time and manners of men therein I seemed to behold as in a cleare glasse before the eyes of my vnderstanding the very person and selfe same cause of S Augustine to be in the Catholicke writers of our dayes as contrariwise also that of the Pelagians and of other old heretickes to be in the Protestants the one and the other making like accompt of the ancient Fathers I meane the Catholickes esteeming them highly and standing to their iudgment the others reiecting them where they make against them which as it hath bene sufficiently proued before so might I here adioyne also many other proofes therof if I would spend more time in alleaging their sentences Let M. VVhitakers assertion speake for all who of this matter writeth thus If you argue from the witnes of men be they neuer so learned and ancient we yeeld no more to their wordes in cause of sayth and religion then we perceaue to be agreeable to Scripture Neyther thinke you your selfe to haue proued any thing although you bring against vs the whole consent swarme of Fathers except that which they say be iustified not by the voyce of men but of God himselfe The second Consideration AS my first consideration was wholy conuersant about the iust deserued credit of ancient Fathers agreing to geather in generall eyther in the full voice of all or in the greatest part and consent of them so was my second imployed about the same credit authority of particuler Fathers eyther one or two or more auerring any thing which was not reprehended by others in matters of religion About which poynt I saw lesse ascribed in his Maties Booke vnto their promerited estimation then Catholickes do hold in their Orthodox assertions and much lesse then I my selfe had purposely read and obserued in the former mentioned holy Father S. Augustine concerning that poynt For as his Maiesty yealded lesse to the common consent of Doctors which must
of necessity make the visible Catholicke Church if euer Christ left behind him any Church at all to continew when he writeth that he would eyther belieue them or at least wise would be humbly silent and not condemne them as before hath bene shewed So in this very second point of particuler Fathers I find it thus written by his Maiesty 26. But for euery priuate Fathers opinion saith he it bindeth not my conscience more then Bellarmines euery one of the Fathers vsually cōtradicting of others The first part of which sentēce to wit that euery priuate opinion of euery Father bindeth not a mans conscience in matter of religion is so cleare that it needeth no proofe at all for it cannot be denyed For if the opinion be indeed priuate then is it not truly Catholicke and consequently being not the opinion of the true Church it bindeth no man 27. But for the later period of the sentence being wholy derogatory from the credit of Antiquity that is to say that euery one of the Fathers do vsually contradict others in matters concerning religion this must needes presubpose to haue some fauorable interpretation affoarded it to free it from open iniuring and wronging of the Fathers and so my hope is that this is the meaning of his Excellent Matie to wit that these contradictions supposed to be a mongst the Fathers are only diuersities of iudgment in matters that are not determinately de fide or that do not concerne any articles of beliefe but eyther such matters as S. Augustine saith that may without breach of vnion or charity be diuersly disputed of amongst Catholicke men or els when diuers Fathers do giue diuers senses of Scripture some the literall others the allegoricall and all true all intended by the holy Ghost as we haue formerly noted Now the rule that we must heere obserue concerning these poyntes wherein consent of Fathers is and must necessarily be had is that which Vincentius Lyrinensis an Authour that I can neuer sufficiently commend hath excellently laid downe in his 37. Chapter contra haereses his wordes are these Antiqua Patrum consentio Sanctorum non in omnibus diuinae legis quaestionibus sed solùm in fidei regula magno nobis studio inuestiganda sequenda est The ancient consent of holy Fathers is with great care and study to be both searched out and followed of vs not in all their questionings of holy Writ but only in the rule of fayth 28. And vnto this S. Augustine alludeth where he writeth thus Alia sunt in quibus interse aliquando etiam doctissimi atque optimi regulae Catholicae defensores salua fidei compage non consonant alius alio de vna re melius aliquid dicit veriùs There are some thinges wherein sometimes the most learned and the best defenders of the Catholick rule do not agree amongst themselues but one speaketh better and more truly then another of the selfe same thing but yet without breach of the linke of faith 29. But forasmuch as particuler Fathers do often times set downe and deliuer the publike beliefe of the Church and not any priuate opinions though they seeme to speak priuately and not in name of the whole Church when they mention this or that point concerning religion some certaine rule or note for our better direction and distinction must be set downe and the surest rule to discerne how farre forth priuate Fathers opinions ought to be esteemed or may bind a man in conscience is for a man to consider vprightly in the impartiall iudgment betwixt God and his owne conscience whether that opinion of his if he be but one or theirs if they be many haue bene withstood or gainesaid contradicted or impugned by any other Father or Fathers Synod or Councell Prouinciall Generall or Nationall of the same or other precedent or subsequent ages For if this cannot be made good against any one particuler Fathers opinion then may it more then probably be inferred that forsomuch as this particuler Father was generally reputed for a Catholicke Doctor in his time neuer reprehended taxed noted condemned for this opinion as false doubtfull or erroneous it must needes be I say necessarily inferred and concluded that that very opinion of his was the opinion iudgment and doctrine also of the Catholicke Church in the age and time wherein he liued and of which he himselfe was then a Father and Doctor For if this were not so it cannot be so much as with any probability imagined that this Father could haue taught this opinion in his dayes or diuulged it in his writings vnto posterity without some note or memory of controlment or taxation of the same eyther whilst he liued or after his death 30. And hereby it followeth that albeit this Doctrine should haue but one or two ancient Fathers that do expresly mention it in their dayes other Fathers of the same tyme either not hauing occasion to speake therof or els busied and incumbred about other as weighty poynts yet were this alone sufficient to make vs vnderstand that in their dayes that mention the same the forsaid opiniō of that Father or Fathers was held for Catholick Doctrine throughout the vniuersall Church for that otherwise without all doubt it would thē or afterwardes haue bene descried censured by the carefull vigilant watchmen of Gods Church Neyther can any instance as I imagine be giuen to the cōtrary for that frō the very first infancy of Christianity vnto our dayes it cannot be shewed that any Father or Doctor though otherwise neuer so renowned for wit and learning piety or sanctity did euer beginne any new doctrine or erroneous opinion different from the Catholicke beliefe but that presently the same was excepted against by others And this is more then euident in the particuler cases and slippes of Tertullian Origen Cyprian Lactamius and other ancient Fathers of the Church and yet when any of these transgressed the anciēt boundes innouating any thing frō the receyued faith they were all of them excepted and cryed out against noted taxed for such their priuate erroneous opiniōs as dissenting from publick vnion and Catholick Communion 31. Neyther doth any man in my iudgment explaine this point better then S. Augustine himselfe and therefore as I serued my selfe principally of him in the precedēt Consideration soe do I meane also in this For as on the one side when many Fathers do agree in their opinion against one or few as in the case of S. Cyprian about the rebaptizing of hereticks yt fell out the greater part is there to be preferred before the lesse as the said Father doth often affirme so notwithstanding when no such opposition and contradiction is of the maior part S. Augustine himselfe maketh high and singular accompt of euery priuate Fathers opinion as namely when he extolleth the authority O. S. Hilarius against lulian saving Ecclesiae Catholicae aduersus haereticos acerrimum
they promise silence and when they say they will belieue the Fathers of those first ages when with one vnanyme consēt they shall agree vpon any thing to be belieued as a necessary point of saluation which seldome falleth out in matters especially now in controuersy for that they being busied in other matters as before hath bene touched eyther of writing Apologyes during the times of persecution or in conuerting and instructing the new conuerted Christians or in confuting other hereticks and heresies it must needes be a rare case to find all the Fathers agree togeather with one consent except it were in a generall Councell and to determine that this or that point was a matter of faith article of belief 39. Neither is it absolutely necessary to the purpose that they should do so for that our principall scope and drift being to seeke and trace out from time to time by testimony of the Fathers in euery age where the true Catholicke Church went and whether the Protestants or our Church at this day haue more resemblance vnto her there be diuers other arguments and probable coniectures to seeke out the same atleast wise probably then onely articles of beliefe agreed vpon by vnanime consent As for example sundry Cerimonies vsed in baptisme and other Sacraments as Exorcismes Exsufflations Christening and the like mentioned by S. Augustine and by diuers other anciēt Fathers as also the vse of the Crosse Tapers Candles reuerencing of holy Reliques and kneeling before Pictures Images Crucifixes and other rites testified by the whole Senate of Christian antiquity which though they be not by the said Fathers commended and deliuered as articles of our faith yet these being practised by the Primitiue Church which is graunted to be the true Church and compared to the customes of Protestants and vs in our Churches will easily disclose which of the two they or we do more imitate or impugne the true Church of antiquity But contenting our selues at this time with the onely mentioning of them by the way we will make a short and briefe passage or rather step throughout the foresaid foure or fiue hundred yeares limited vnto vs and this God willing we will do not by citing but laying downe the Fathers authorities themselues in particuler for it would be ouer long as before hath bene said but rather by producing such witnesses who being of most credit with our aduersaries cannot be well mistrusted or discredited to wit the Magdeburgians Centuries who haue in euery age diligently though partially examined the same and how substantiall a proof this is of Catholick religion by the very cōfession concession of their greatest aduersaries I appeale for iudgment vnto the discreet and indifferent Reader The first Age. 40. And as for the first hundred yeares after Christ his glorious Incarnation which is deputed generally vnto Christ and his Apostles age as the chiefe Doctors and Fathers that gouerned the Church and instructed the people in that time I wil take onely the note of one position or article of faith which the said Magdeburgians do gather out of all writers of that age as agreed vpon against the Protestants by the teachers of that age and continued euer after throughout all subsequent ages and this is concerning the Reall Presence of the true body and bloud of our Sauiour in the Supper of our Lord commonly called the Eucharist which point the ancient Fathers against all hereticall Protestantical tropes and figures do proue aboundantly out of the Ghospels themselues out of the Acts of the Apostles out of the Epistles of S. Paul out of the consent of the whole Church in that first age euer after to wit that the wordes of Christ do euidently containe the same being properly and litterally to be vnderstood as they are to be and not by any figure or trope as the Zuinglians Caluinists all other Sectes of Sacramentaries do faythlesly imagine 41. This first prescription then of this important article of fayth the Magdeburgians do fynd to be for vs against all our English Protestants aswell in the very first age vnder Christ and his Apostles as in all other successiue tymes for that in euery age they proue this diligently out of the consent of all Fathers and Doctors of that age to wit that Christ his true body is really present in the blessed Sacrament by the very power and vertue of Christ his owne wordes vsed by the Priest in consecration And if any hereticke demaund a reason of this admirable transmutation I can giue him no other then that which S. Augustine giueth in the like miraculous case it is in his third Epistle ad Volusianum and it is such a one as will suffice any right belieuing Christian if he will not continue an hereticke or an Infidell Hic si ratio quaeritur non erit mirabile si exemplum poscatur non erit singulare demus Deum aliquid posse quod nos fateamur inuestigari non posse in talibus enim rebus tota ratio sacti est potentia facientis Here if a reasō be sought for it is not wonderfull if an example be demaunded it is not singular let vs graunt that God can doe some thing which we must confesse we cannot search out for in such matters as these be the whole reason of the deed is the power of the doer And is not this one substantiall poynt of Popery as our Protestants brand it proued for vs by their owne friends 42. But as for other points of our Religion in controuersy betwixt vs and the Protestants though the Magdeburgians would not willingly graunt them to be so ancient as the first age which we notwithstanding do proue aboundantly in handling of euery controuersie yet do they will they nill they graunt sundry of them to haue begunne and crept in presently after the Apostles in the second age and so continued and increased in number in the third fourth fifth and sixt when all the whole Christian world went cleare with vs that is to say all the doctrine of such as were chiefe Doctors and Fathers for their learning and piety in those tymes and ages as heere shall appeare by a iust view of that which heere briefly I purpose to set downe The second Age. 43. In the second age immediatly after the Apostles the Magdeburgians doe graunt the very principall Fathers of that age to make for vs not only in the foresaid article of the Reall Presence against Sacramentaries but also in sundry other points now in controuersie against the Protestants And first concerning Free-will remayning in man after his fall for proofe wherof they cyte S. Irenaeus lib. 4. cap. 72. contra hareses and that with great indignation and reprehension saying that he wresteth the wordes of the Prophets as also of Christ our Sauiour and S. Paul Multa Prophetarum Christi Pauli detorquet And the wordes which they reprehend in S. Irenaeus are these Prophetae
said Lactantius S. Gregory Nyssen Hilarius Nazianzen S. Ambrose Theophilus Alexandrinus Ephraim and others all Fathers of this age do openly defend the same Whereupon they I mean the Magdeburgians conclude in these wordes I am cogitet pius Lector quà m procul haec aetas in hoc articulo à doctrina Apostolorum desciuerit Now let the godly Reader consider how farre this age departed from the doctrine of the Apostles in this article of good workes But I would thinke it more reason to exhort yea and to beseech the Reader euen as he hath care of the euerlasting welfare and saluation of his soule to consider seriously indifferently setting all kynd of preiudice apart whether it be not more likely that so many learned and holy Fathers that liued with so great admiration of their vertue learning piety in this age should know what agreed with the Apostles Doctrine and what agreed not aswell or as a man would imagine somewhat better then these foure quarrelling Companions the Magdeburgians I meane Illyricus VVigandus Iudex and Faber for these foure do onely subscribe their dedicatory Epistle to Queene Elizabeth vpon the yeare 1560. 73. S. Bernards rule prescription of Antiquity was this Quantò viciniores aduentui Saluatoris tantò mysterium salutis pleniùt perceperunt The nearer the holy Fathers were vnto Christ his incarnation the more fully receaued and perceaued they the mystery of our redemption And yet these foure good fellowes do thus presume to censure the most reuerend and learned ancient Fathers as you see 74. And on this fashion these men go forwardes in setting downe all the 18. or 19. heades of doctrine before mentioned as held by the Fathers of this fourth age to wit Pennance satisfaction inuocation of Saints citing aboue a dozen Fathers of this age for the same of traditions about Virginity monasticall life the like wherein they do so check condēne contemne the said holy Fathers as passeth all modesty must needs be a token of manifest heresy 75. S. Ambrose say they in his second booke ad Marcellinam nimis insolenter pronunciat de virginum meritis Ambrose doth pronounce to insolently of the merit of virginity The like and worse they speake of S. Ephraim and S. Athanasius for that they write of Monkes and namely S. Ephraim that they are perfecti pugnatores paradisi amoenitatem ante oculos habentes perfect fighters that haue before their eyes the sweetnes of paradise These men cry out against this Quid potest monstrosiùs dici contra meritum Christi What can be spoken more monstrously against the merit of Christ 76. And for that S. Ambrose serm 6. de Margarita hath these wordes VVhosoeuer therefore doth honour Martyrs doth honour Christ and he that contemneth Saints contemneth the Lord of Saints which is conforme to the Ghospell the Magdeburgians complaine crying out I am cogitet pius lector quà nt tetra suntista Let the godly Reader consider how horrible these thinges are The godly Reader hath cōsidered and he findes nothing deliuered by these Fathers but the holy Catholicke doctrine And as for your exclamations they are but the barkinges of Vigilantius or rather as S. Hierome more fitly calleth him Dormitantius and other ancient condemned heretickes against the holy reliques of Saintes and Martyrs reuiued and renewed by you againe raked out of the ashes of hell and hellish heresy 77. And finally not to be tedious in going forwards with a copious enumeration of the foresaid articles I do onely admonish the Reader for the last article mentioned of Purgatory how they do produce three Fathers more of this age that held the same to wit Lactantius Prudentius and S. Hierome as they might haue done many more and they add vnto the said former number diuers other articles which the Fathers of this age do teach as of the particuler rules of religious people now in vse De memorijs Martyrum of celebrating the memories of Martyrs in Churches and Altars erected and set vp in their honour De signo Crucis of the externall vse of the signe of the Crosse and miracles that thereby haue happened whereof Prudentius hymno ante somnum writeth thus in commendation of the Crosse and the benefit that redoundeth by vsing this laudable Christian cerimony Crux pellit omne crimen c. the signe of the Crosse keepeth of all sinne from vs. And S. Ephraim lib. de poenit cap. 3. aduifeth vs thus Pingamus in ianuis ac in frontibus nostris c. Let vs paynt the signe of the Crosse in our gates in our foreheades in our mouth in our Breastes c. and many other such sayings of holy Fathers of this age 78. Wherfore to conclude we see that this fourth age agreeth with the former three in all points of doctrine held for Catholicke throughout the whole Christian world at this day And as the Fathers of this age doe consent with their predecessors so shall we see them not dissent from their successours as shall appeare by the next ensuing ages And if this be not a sufficient demonstration of the true Roman Catholick Church and of her doctrine confirmed by all records of antiquity euen by the confession of our aduerfaries the Magdeburgians then let the English Protestants answere vnto this euidence and giue a better if they can But we shall passe further yet to make an insight into two other ages that ensue The fifth and sixt Ages 79. There follow the fifth and sixt age whereof the former is receyued heere by his Maiesty in the second edition of his English Premonition though in the first the first 400. yeares were onely allowed as hath byn sayd and the later was comprehended in M. Iewell his challenge at S. Paules Crosse who promised there openly to allow any of the Fathers or Councells that could be brought within the first six hundred yeares But this publike declamation was but a vaine ostentation of the challenger and this large offer was also restrained and reuoked afterwardes by others both at Paules Crosse and in either of the Vniuersities in so much that Doctor Humphrey in Oxford in a funerall speach made of the said M. Iewell by the former D. Humphrey did not for beare to taxe him openly of inconsideration for his so large and liberall offer of Fathers for six hundred yeares to decide all controuersies 10. But heere in this our affaire and busines we haue now in hand we haue thought good to ioyne both these ages togeather for that in them both the like descent of doctrine one after the other is still to be found the latter repeating and confirming the former And for proofe of this point I shall need to goe no further then to the confession and concession of our aduersaries themselues the Magdeburgians for there they shew for example in the first Century first of Free-will to wit that albeit the Doctors of this age interdum benè sanè videantur loqui tandem
tamen liberum arbitrium in rebus spiritualib us etiam statuunt Albeit the Fathers sometymes speake well and soundly yet at length they affirme that man hath free-will euen in spirituall things And then they beginne with S. Chrysostome alleadging many plaine places out of his workes at large saying Chrysostomus passim liberi arbitrij patronum agit S. Chrysostome doth euery where play the aduocate for free-will From S. Chrysostome they passe vnto S. Augustine and from S. Augustine to S. Cyril and from them to Theodoret Hesichius Thalassius Faustus Marcus Eremita and Ioannes Cassianus all Fathers and Doctors of this fifth age and the same they do in the sixt age alleadging many places out of S. Gregory the first as also out of Euodius Olympiodorus and others 81. Then passe they vnto the article of Iustification shewing that the Fathers of these ages did not ascribe Iustification vnto onely fayth but required also workes for which they alleage large sentences out of S. Chrysostome S. Cyril S. Augustine though more contractedly and out of S. Leo the Great who offendeth them much by saying recta fide bonis operibus peruenitur ad regnum Dei by right fayth and good workes we come to the Kingdome of God And from him they passe to S. Prosper Hesichius Sedulius Primasius Theodulus all of the forenamed Fathers houlding the same erroneous opinion as it pleaseth their Maisterships to call it for that workes are by them euer ioyned with faith and that in the last iudgement Christ shall question with them not so much what they haue belieued as what they haue practized 82. And the same doe they in the next hundred yeares after alleadging for it the writings of Cassiodorus Olympiodorus Andraeas Hierosolymitanus and aboue all and more largely they alleadge aboue a dozen places out of S. Gregory the Great who sayth Vita aeterna ex piae vitae actionibus comparatur Life euerlasting in the next world is prepared and gotten by pyous actions in this life 83. From this article they skip vnto another of the excellency and merit of good workes which article they beginne thus Nimiùm haec aetas bonis operibus adscripsit This fifth age did ascribe to much vnto the good workes of men which they declare largely first out of Chrysostome his writinges saying that he was immodicus Encomiastes bonorum operum an immoderate commender of good workes And from him they passe vnto S. Augustine shaking him also by the sleeue and taking him vp for halting and saying Augustinus etiam nimiùm interdum operibus tribuit Augustine also attributeth some tims too much to good workes Then they passe vnto Pope Leo and shew the same excesse out of him And from these they come vnto S. Prosper to Saluianus to Maximus to Salonius to Thalassius to Theodulus to Eucherius to Paulinus and some others all Doctors and Fathers of this fifth age 84. And then in the sixt age following the same methood vnder their article de bonis operibus they reprehend for ascribing to much therunto S. Gregory the great Euodius Cassiodorus Olympiodorus Fortunatus and Iustus Fathers of the Church and doctors of those dayes 85. There followeth the article of Pennance wherewith they beginne thus Consessioni ieiuniijs alijs ritibus nimiùm vendicat Chrysostomus Chrysostome doth ascribe to much vnto Confession fasting and other rytes of pennance And of the same errours do they condemne Hesichius for that lib. 2. in cap. 6. Leuit. he saith that true pennance doth consist in fasting watching haire-clothes teares prayers and almes-deedes The same errour they ascribe to Maximus Ioannes Cassianus Eucherius Doctors of this fifth age And in the sixt Century they lay the same imputation vpon Cassiodorus and S. Gregory especially chiding him for that he saith Poenitentiam agere est perpetrata mala plangere plangerda non perpetrare This is to do pennance to moane and bewaile our sinnes we haue committed and not to commit againe thinges worthy of bewayling What can be spoken more diuinely by this heauenly Doctor And would a man iudge these men to be Christians daring thus to open their mouthes and publikely to blaspheme 86. I might passe further to alleage much more out of these Magdeburgian Centuriators which they produce out of euery age most manifestly against themselues and their owne cause with this onely fond confidence that all authority and credit of the venerable testimonyes of the ancient Fathers are shifted of by saying only that they are incommodious opinions blots stubble and errours of the Fathers as though the very gleanings of the Fathers were not better then their whole vintage and these blots and stubble and falsely supposed errours were not to be preferred before their best truth But who tould these good fellowes that these were errours VVhat Church euer held them so What Generall Councell euer concluded them so Nay what one Father or one ancient writer the grand heretickes their ancient predecessours excepted did once open his mouth to speake against eyther all or any one of these doctrines If they can disproue any one of these doctrines according to any one of the forenamed challenges Church Councells one Father or many we do faithfully promise to renounce them all as stubble and errours as they speake But if none of these thinges can be made good against any one the least and weakest supposed doctrine then must these doctrines as hitherto they haue stood in the Church for Orthodoxe so must they hereafter continue Catholicke and they themselues for confessing the Fathers to hould them and we withall vrging antiquity that do deny consent of Fathers in any point of doctrine generally receiued by the Church in their dayes can be no lesse then great and rash presumption 87. And yet for full conclusion I must aduertise the Reader to note this one point which in my iudgement is very remarkeable for these Magdeburgians doe scarcely alleadge one place of ten of these that are to be found in the Fathers workes themselues for proofe of the Roman Catholicke Religion as euery man may easely discerne if he please to read the Catholicke writers that make profession purposely to alleadge the places of ancient Fathers as namely Canisius in his large Catechisme Cardinall Bellarmine throughout all his workes Cardinall Baronius Coccius in his Thesaurus Catholicus and others but yet these that the Magdeburgians please to cite are sufficient to daunt the English Protestant his confidence in the ancient Fathers since that they alone of themselues confute and confound both him and his religion With what face then can the English Protestants vaunt that the ancient Fathers are for him And further these few places of many that might be heaped togeather may as I hope suffice to giue his Excellent Maiesty our Soueraigne satisfaction or at leastwise sufficient light by these to passe further and to seeke more sound information of the true faith and beliefe of the ancient Fathers
of the first fiue hundred yeares which his sayd Maiesty most Royally offereth to follow For opening the window vnto which light I haue thought it my bounden duty both before God and man to take this small labour and to lay these few heades of Considerations before the eyes of his Highnes most wise Iudgment and vnderstanding THE SIXT CHAPTER CONTEYNING A BRIEFE CONTEMPLATION of what hath beene hitherto sayd with the Conclusion of the whole to his most Excellent Maiesty AND now hauing handled these points at some more length then at the beginning I had purposed I hope the benignity and Clemency of his Maiestie will take in good part that leauing the Reader I do returne vnto him againe as vnto my most dearly beloued reuerenced and dread Soueraigne to lay before the eyes of his Prudent Consideration the summe of that which hitherto hath beene considered of 2. First then the point of being a true Catholicke according vnto the name and nature of the word is of such importance necessity and consequence as hath beene shewed in the first Chapter that no riches in this world no wealth no treasure no state no power no policy no human felicity may be compared with it as rightly S. Augustine doth intimate And for that your Maiesties eternall weale after the briefe and transitory passage of this life dependeth therof I cannot but most humbly most hartily and most dutifully falling prostrate at your feet beseech you to giue some serious attendance and attention to this high and mayne point of euerlasting saluation to seeke out what is truely Catholicke both in the Church for whose Epitheton the Name was first by the Apostles inuented as also in particuler men who is a true Catholicke and who followeth the rule which the Name describeth to wit he that in Christian Religion followeth vniuersality and not singularity the whole and not a part ancienty and nouelty that which hath bene deliuered and conserued from time to time and not inuented framed and set sorth in later times 3. And for that on the other side heresy is the opposite and contradictory vnto Catholicke Religion for that it maketh choyce of a part to it selfe and therby is held to be the highest sin in the sight of Almighty god that is or can be committed vpon earth for that it ouerthroweth the very foundation of fayth vnder pretence to establish and reforme fayth My desire is so ardent in this point that your Matie should enter into due consideration therof as almighty God beareth wirnesse vnto my soule and spirit that nothing in this life stādeth more neere my hart considering the eternity of the next world the immutable weale or woe therof the vae or euge that ech man is to receaue as well Princes as others and that these earthly Princedomes will seeme but shadowes at that day and not worthy one houre of that glory or misery that is to be gotten or lost by Catholick Religion or heresy in this life And this is my first contemplation and I shall pray Almighty God that it may be also your Maiesties 4. The second is about those foure wayes proposed by your Maiesty for auerring Catholicisme and clearing frō heresy which are the admitting and belieuing of all Canonicall Scriptures the receauing of the three Creedes the approuing the foure first Councells and the acceptance of the Ancient Fathers of the first foure or fiue hundred yeares In all which if with the admitting in words there be also a true Catholicke sense no doubt but they do make a man to be a Catholicke and do condemne heresy But the importance of all standeth in the exposition for to belieue the Scriptures in the sense that I thinke best my selfe or to acknowledge them for Canonicall or not Canonicall as I or some few with me of later times shall please to prescribe or to admit the three Creedes with that exposition of the articles as I and mine shall best allow or the first foure Councells in some thinges and not in other or the first foure hundred yeares of Fathers so farre forth as they in my censure do agree with Scriptures is to reduce all to my owne iudgment a thing most opposite to Catholicisme and proper to heresy as we haue at large declared 5. Wherefore vpon my knees I do most humbly supplicate your Maiesty to consider well of this and especially of the last poynt concerning the ancient Fathers which doth in effect cōtaine all the rest for that these men deliuered vnto vs the Scriptures togeather with the true vnderstāding therof according to the sense of the Church in their dayes these men deliuered vnto vs the three Creedes the first as from the Apostles the other as from the Church the third as from a priuate man but yet approued by the Church these men deliuered vnto vs the first foure generall Councells wherein diuers of themselues sate as Iudges and Bishops and had voyees and suffrages in the same these men were they that examined the controuersies determined the Catholicke doctrine condemned heresies an athematized hereticks and cleared the coastes of all these wicked and turbulent incumbrances which seditious and headstrong spirits had raysed in the Christian world by their contentions 6. And finally these were they whom our Sauiour Christ did vse as sannes to winnow his corne to purge the flore of his Church separating the chaffe from the wheat and eroneous doctrine from the truth wherin they were so zealous and diligent labourers as not the least weed could spring vp in this field of the Church but that these carefull good watchmen and faithfull gardeners did presently note and pursue the same vntill it was eyther rooted out or condemned by the Church and therby as branches cut of from the body of the vine suffered to wither away and to consume of themselues For proofe wherof we may alleadge as many examples as there haue bene different heresies and hereticks in the Christian Church for the space of fifteene hundred yeares which albeit they ruffled much mightily for the time and had often great Princes Kinges Emperors and Potentates to fauour and patronize them as the Protestants haue now your Matie yet are they so consumed in tyme and by vertue of the holy Ghost as the very names of many of them are now scarce remembred and much lesse their arguments reasons proofes and Scriptures which they brought for the same and were it not that in these Fathers bookes who were their enemies some mention is made therof we should scarce know that there had bin such men in the world 7. But on the contrary side the Church that condemned these men and the Fathers and Doctors liuing therin remayned euer both then and after victorious and shal do to the worlds end and still by succession and continuatiō the same Church hath come downe frō age to age one age giuing testimony to another of the purity of the said Church
A notable speach of Vincentius Lyrinensis Prem p 3â— His Maiesties honorable offer Aug. l. 3. de bapt coÌ„t Donat. cap. 15. How the first three Creeds why they were ordained how greatly they are to be reuereÌ„ced The cause of ordayning the Apostles Creed Aug. ser. 181. de teÌ„p Cap. 2. coÌ„t haereses Vbi supra serm 181. de temp Signification of the word Symbol or Creed The great substance of the Apostolicall Creed The Apostolicall Creed no Scripture yet necessary to be belieued Ruff. in Symbolum The force of tradition in the Church A questioÌ„ solued where the voice of the Church may be found De fide ad Gratian. The creed of the couÌ„cel of Nice of S. Athanasius Conc. Nicen l. 4. p. 565. edit Venet. Ambros. de fide Hos. de expresso Dei verbo The great authority left in the Church for deciding Controuersies That the Ministers of EnglaÌ„d belieue notwholy entirely the faith of the 3. Creeds No saluation without belieuing the whole Catholicke sayth entirely ProtestaÌ„ts do not receaue the whole faith but mingled with many heresies Diuers ancient Heresies held now by Protestants * M HuÌ„frey Liech About the Nicene Creed Passim in Epist. ad Polonos l. cont Gentilem 2. lib. de Christ. c. 19. Caluin his Autotheisme hereticall In what particuler article of the Creed English ProtestaÌ„ts do not agree with vs. About Christs desceÌ„ding into hell Lib. 1. hist. cap. vlt. In epist. ad Trallian Bucer in cap. 27. Matth. Caluins horrible opinion about the article of Christs descensioÌ„ into hell Cal. 2. inst c. 16. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Item in Catechismo paruo iteÌ„ psych. item in harmo Euangelica cap. 27. Math. 2. Inst. cap. 16. §. 10. 2. Instit. c. 16. §. 9. A story of the contention of English Ministers about the descent of Christ into hell Psal. 15. Tertul. de praescript A strange ridiculous exposition of the Article DesceÌ„dit ad inferos Tho. Rogers in his 39. articles pag. 15. 16. c. The Church of England aduersary to many of her owne for many hould that Christ desceÌ„ded not into hell at all Thaddaeus Ignatius Iustinus Martyr Irenaeus all antiquity are dreaming Papists in M. Rogers definitiue opinion Credo Ecclesiam Catholicam The visible beginning of the Catholicke Church Lib. 25. in ob c. 24. 5. Vincent Lyrinensis aduersus hareses c. 3. Tertull. de praescript cap. 32. Thè Protestantly meaning about this 9. article 1. Later propositions of the Protestáts about the Church Rogers ar 19. pag. 86. 2. 3. 4. 5. Markes of the Church 6. Ridiculous proofs that the Church may erre Rogers p. 96. Lib. de PoÌ„t à cap. 8. ad finem vsque ad cap. 15. Premonit pag. 35. How the ParlameÌ„t Church of EnglaÌ„d do admit the first foure Generall Councels Why and how these foure first Councels were gathered and how therby it is conuinced that the church caÌ„not err Vide Aug. de vnit Eccles in pluribus locis Mat. 18. 15 16. 17. 18. 1. Tim. 3. 15. Chrys. l. 3. de sacerdot Councell of Nice assembled anno 327. De fide ad Gratian. Anno. 252 Anno. 308 Adno 311. The secoÌ„d generall Councell of ConstaÌ„tinople an 383. The third generall Councell of Ephesus Ann. 434. Lib. 1. Inst. c. 13. §. 9. 23. 24. The 4. generall Councell was that of CalcedoÌ„ 20. yeares after An euideÌ„t declaratioÌ„ that the whole Church cannot erre Aug. in Psal. 101 S. Aug. excellent speach of the perpetuity of the Church Matth. 29. â—0 Application of S. Augustins speaches vnto our Sectaries Aug. in psal 47. That the Church shall neuer Apostatate De vnit Eccles. The inuincible strength of the Church Matth. 23. Why ProtestaÌ„ts do not nor can remedy their diuisions by any Generall or Nationall Councell ProtestaÌ„ts can abide parly and treaty neither with Catholiks nor amoÌ„g theÌ„selues Vide Conc. Calced act 3. p. 163. edit Venet. The terginersation of the heretick Eutiches fully represeÌ„ting the ProtestaÌ„ts Lib. 4. Iust. cap. 9. §. 1â— Vide resp Gaspar VillapaÌ„di ad bas causas ProtestaÌ„ts shifts to auoid comming to Councels Stan. Resc l. 1. de Atheism c The ProtestaÌ„ts disagreemeÌ„to in their meetings Tertul. de praescript Aug. l. 3. cont epist. Parmen c. 4. ser. 11 de verb. Domini c. Particuler points of differeÌ„ces betweene these 4. generall Councels the Protestants of our tyme for doctrine and manners Conc. Neocaes can 1. an 316. The decree of the CouÌ„cel of Nice and Neocaesaraea against the Marriage of Priests Ann. 711. Basil. epist. 1. ad Amphi c. 3. Epiphan hares 59. The answere vnto Caluins obiection about Paphnutius Another Canon of the Councel of Nice about the Reall presence A Canon of the second CouÌ„cell much making against Protestants VinceÌ„tius LyrineÌ„sis his relatioÌ„ of the CouÌ„cell of Ephesus CoÌ„c Ephes. tom 1. cap. 22. in epist. Imperat. Secular men may not meddle in Ecclesiastical consultations CoÌ„c Ephes. tom 1. c. 16 Con. Eph. tom 2. c. 17 The Supremacy of the Pope of Rome coÌ„firmed by the councell of Ephesus The CouÌ„cell of ChalcedoÌ„ CoÌ„c Calc act 1. Ibidem Act. 2. in libel Theodor Ischir SophoÌ„ c Ibid. in subscript coÌ„t DioscoruÌ„ Conc. Calc act 3. tom 2. p. 252. edit Venet. Marriage of Monks and NuÌ„ns forbidden by this Councell Prem p. 35. Aug. l. 2. cont Crescon c. 31. A complaint against the Ministers of EnglaÌ„d for misinforming his Maiesty ValeÌ„t l. 8. Ana. c. 8. Lib. con hareses The opinion of Iesuites about the authority of the Fathers A consequence of great incoÌ„uenience How S. Augustin did not admit the authority of S. CypriaÌ„ in a particuler case The different esteeme that Catholicks Protestants do make of ancieÌ„t Fathers wheÌ„ they agreâ— in one Aug. l. 2. coÌ„ Iulian. Pelag. ver sus finem S. Augustines opinion for the esteem of the Fathers Aug. l. 3. â—ypo Lib. 2. de nuptiis concupis Cap. 29. Scoffes of PelagiaÌ„ hereticks against ancient Cerimonies of Baptisme Aug. ibid. ProtestaÌ„ts become Pelagians in deriding ancient Cerimonies Aug. l. 2. coÌ„t Iulian. Pelagiau How contemptible the authority of heretickes was to S. Augustin in respect of the ancient Fathers Lib. 2. coÌ„t Iulian. circamed Aug. l. 2. coÌ„t Iulian. propefineÌ„ An excelleÌ„t reason of S. Augustine How Catholicks ProtestaÌ„ts do esteem of the testimonies of particuler Fathers Aug. l. 1. coÌ„t Iulian. Pelag. cap. 2. Lib. 1. cont Iulian Pelag cap. 2. Thesurest rule how to iudge of particuler Fathers opinions or assertions about matters of faith When any priuate Father did erre he was presently noted by others Aug. l. 3. de bapt coÌ„tra Donatist c. 4. l. 2. conâ— Cresconâ—â— cap. 32. Aug. lib. 1 contr Iulin cap. 2. One Doctors opinion the doctrine of the Church That the Fathers of euery age for the first 500. yeares did make for catholicks against ProtestaÌ„ts in matters now in coÌ„trouersy Cap. 4. 42. coÌ„t haereses Diuers things may lead vs to discerne the true Church though they be not articles of necessary beliefe Centur. prima lib. 2. cap. 4. 1. About the Reall Presence Magdebur Cent. 2. c. 4 pag. 55. 56. 57. c. 2. About Free will 3. The Doctrine of good workes 4. Whether the Commandements be impossible 5. Externall sacrifice of Christians 6. About traditioÌ„s The primacy of the church of Rome 8. Excellency merit of martyrdome 9. IntercessioÌ„ of Saints 10. About the state of Virginity The conclusion of this age 11. Inuo catioÌ„ of Angels Magd. ceÌ„t 3. c. 4. p. 75 76. deinceps Hom. 1. in EzechieleÌ„ 12. Iustification by good workes 13. The merit of good workes Scriptures Fathers reiected togeather wheÌ„ they fit not the ProtestaÌ„t fancy 14. About peÌ„nance Magd. ceÌ„t 3. c. 4. p. 81. 15. Blessing of the water of baptisme 16. Chrisme and holy vnction in baptisme 17. Prayer vnto Saints Cent. 3. c. 4 p. 85. 86. CeÌ„t. 3. c. 4. pag. 85. 18. The doctrine of Purgatory Cet 4. c. 4. pag. 242. HieroÌ„ ep ad Demetriadem Lib. 8. coÌ„ in Isaiam CeÌ„t. 4 cap. 4. p. 293. Cent. 4. p. 301. Cent. 5. c. 4 p. 501. 502. c. Gregor in 1. Reg. c. 1. Cent. 5. pag. 506. Hom. 34. in Euang. The Fathers iniuriously handled by the Magdeburgians The conclusion ImportaÌ„ce of being a Catholicke The horror of heresie The 4. heads proposed The great profit receiued by the ancieÌ„t Fathers The dangerous estate of belieuing the ProtestaÌ„ts in EnglaÌ„d A strange pittifull case happened to his Maiesty How God coÌ„curreth with the actions of euill men but not with their intentioÌ„s The mark aymed at by the first Ghospellers in Scotland concerning his Maiestie The Epilogue of all Of persecution Persecutor