one we must needs be distracted in mind not knowing who hath prescribed that way to us And therefore the Scripture frequently admonisheth us of this thing as you may see in Moses Deut. 6. 4. which passage is cited by Christ himself Mark 12. 29. Hearken Israel thy Lord the God is one Lord. And again in Moses Deut. 32. 39. See that I alone am He and there is no God besides me Esay 44. 6. 8. Esay 45. 5. 14. 21. Esay 46. 9. 1 Cor. 8. 4 5 6. Gal. 3. 20. Eph. 4. 6. 1 Tim. 2. 5. Q. How the third A. Unlesse we believe God to be eternall how can we hope for eternall life from him and so attain the end to which this way doth lead Q. How the fourth A. To believe that God is perfectly just is necessary unto Salvation first that we may perswade our selves that God will make good his Promises to us though we be unworthy Next that we may acknowledge all those trialls to be just which being entred into this way we must of necessity undergo in that they are permitted by God Q. How the fifth A. This is therefore necessary to be known to the end we might not doubt that even our very heart then which nothing is harder to be searched out and from which the chiefest estimate of our obedience is taken lieth alwaies open unto God Q. How the sixth A. Because we could not expect eternall life from the hands of God as the prime Author were we not perswaded that his power is circumscribed with no bounds and limits Againe who would endure so many adversities as are incident to all those that make profession of the Christian Religion were not this perswasion deeply fastned in his heart that all things are in the hands of God and afflictions happen not without his will neither is any thing either in heaven or on earth able to hinder his divine power from accomplishing what he hath promised and we expect from him Q. You have unfolded what things are necessary to be known touching the Essence of God and therefore I pray you now discover what things are very conducible thereunto A. It is very conducible hereunto to know that in the essence of God there is but one Person Q. Demonstrate this I pray you A. Inasmuch as the Essence of God is but one in number there cannot be so many persons therein since a person is nothing but an individuall intelligent Essence Q. Who is this one divine Person A. That one God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ Q. How prove you that A. By the most evident testimonies of the Scripture thus Christ himself Iohn 17. 3. saith This is life eternall that they may know thee Father the onely true God And the Apostle Paul 1 Corinth 8. 6. saith To us there is but one God the Father of whom are all the things we for him And Ephes 4. 6. There is one God and Father of all who is over all and through all and in you all Q. But Christians commonly hold that not onely the Father but also the Son and the Holy Spirit are persons in one and the same Deitie A. I know it well but they are grievously mistaken producing arguments for it out of the Scriptures ill understood Q. What are their arguments wherewith they endeavour to prove their opinion A. The chief are these First they say that the Scripture calleth not only the Father but also the Son and the Holy Spirit God And forasmuch as the same Scripture affirmeth that there is but one God hence they gather that these Three are that one God Q. How must this Argument be solved A. I will first make answer concerning the Son and then concerning the Holy Spirit Q. What answer will you make concerning the Son A. The word GOD is two wayes chiefly used in the Scripture The first is when it denoteth him who both in the heavens and on the earth doth so rule and exercise dominion over all that he acknowledgeth no superior and is so the Author and Principall of all things as that he dependeth on none The other is when it designeth him who hath some sublime dominion from that one God and so is in some sort partaker of his Deïty Hence is it that the Scripture calleth that one God the God of Gods or most high God Psal 50. 1. Heb. 7. 1. And in the latter signification the Son of God is in certain places of the Scripture dignified with the title of a God Q. How prove you that the Son of God is in this latter signification dignified with the title of a God A. From the very words of the Son himself John 10. 35. If he call them Gods to whom the Word of God came and the Scripture cannot be broken say ye of him whom the Father hath sanctified and sent into the world Thou blasphemest because I said I am the Son of God By this speech Christ doth clearly intimate both that the word GOD is somtime attributed unto them in the Scripture who are far inferiour to that one God as also that he called himself the Son of God and consequently a God for no greater reason then because he had been sanctified by the Father and sent into the world Q. But what answer give you concerning the Holy Spirit A. The Holy Spirit is no where in the Scripture expresly called God and though in some places the things of God are attributed to him yet doth it not thereupon follow that he is either God or a person of the Deity since this happeneth for another cause as you shall hear in in its place Q. VVhat is the second argument wherewith they go about to prove the three Persons in one Deity A. It is taken from those places wherein mention is made of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit Q. VVhich are those places A. The first is that where Jesus commandeth his Aposties to make all Nations Disciples baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit Mat. 28. 19. The second is that where the Apostle writeth in this manner There are diversities of Gifts but the same Spirit And diversities of Ministeries but the same Lord. And diversities of Operations but the same God that operateth all the things in all 1 Cor. 12. 4 5 6. And afterwards in the eleventh verse of the same chapter he saith But all these things operateth one and the same Spirit distributing to every one as he will The third is in John 1 Epist 5. 7. There are three that hear witnesse in heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Spirit and these three are one Q. What are we to think of these Quotations A. In generall I answer that these Quotations onely shew that there is a Father Sonne and Holy Spirit which we not only acknowledge but constantly assert so that we pronounce him to be no Christian who is either ignorant thereof or doth not
is therefore called the Word or speech of God because he hath declared the whole will of God to us as John himself seemeth to expound it chap. 1. 18. No man hath seen God at any time the only-begotten Son who is or rather was in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him As he is in the same sense called both Life and Truth And the same may be said of his being called the Image of the invisible God But he is called the expresse Image of his person or substance hereby is meant that God hath already exhibited in him whatsoever he hath promised to us But as to the saying of Christ he that seeth me seeth the Father this is not fit to prove the Divine Nature of Christ since that reason of seeing is not appliable to the Essence of God which is invisible but to the knowledge of those things which Christ as his Fathers Embassador both said and did For proof of this see Joh. 12. 45. Neither lastly can the divine Nature of Christ be evinced from thence namely that all the fulnesse of the Godhead or of Deity dwelleth in him bodily since this word God-head may denote the divine wil see Eph. 3 19. forasmuch as the Apostle doth oppose that speech not to persons but to Philosophy legall ceremonies it is evident that it is meant of the Doctrine of Christ not of his Person But should we take the words as they sound yet could not such a divine Nature as the adversaries have imagined be thence collected For it is true and manifest that the fulnes of Deity or Godhead doth now dwell in Christ even bodily in that his very body is altogether divine as being made both of divine spiritual matter namely that of the heaven see 1 Cor. 15. 45 47 48. and being indued with divine life and divine splendour diviâ—e strength But concerning the word corporally of that we wil discourse somwhat afterwards Q. But where saith the Scripture that Christ had glory with the Father before the world was A. John 17. 5. Now Father glorifie me with thy self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was or as the Greek runneth with the glory which I had before the world was with thee Q. What say you to this place A. Neither can the Divine Nature of Christ be evinced from hence for that Christ might have glory with the Father before the world was and yet not be thereupon God is apparent from 3 Tim. 1. 9. where the Apostle saith of the faithfull that grace was given to them before the world began Besides it is here written that Christ doth beg this glory of the Father which sheweth neither that he was formerly in actual possession therof for then he would have been in possession of it still and consequently needed not as he doth to beg it as the reward of his work nor had a Divine Nature for then his Divine Nature would have supplied him with such glory as he wanted without being beholden to another Wherefore the sense of the place is that Christ beseeches the Father to grant unto him that glory which he had with him in his decree before the world began Q. Where saith the Scripture that the Spirit of Christ was in the Prophets A. 1 Pet. 1. 10. 11. Concerning which salvation the Prophets diligently scarched and inquired who prophesied of the grace that should happen to you searching at what or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ in them did signifie Q. What say you to this A. The spirit here said to be in the Prophets is therefore called the spirit of Christ either by a prolepsis because he is now become the spirit of Christ or because he foresignified the things of Christ as Peter himselfe hinteth saying when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ and the glories that should follow which forme of speech you likewise have 1 Joh. 4. 6. where the spirit of truth and the spirit of error are so called because they speak the things belonging to truth and to error Q. Where saith the scripture that Christ came down from heaven came out from the father and came into the world A Joh. 3. 13. No man hath ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven the son of man that is or rather was in heaven And chap. 16. 28. I came out from the father and came into the world againe or rather on the contrary I leave the world and go to the father and Ioh 17. 18. As thou hast sent me into the world Q What say you to these passages A. That the divine nature of Christ cannot hence be evinced is apparent in that the words of the first testimony namely who came down from heaven may be figuratively taken as in Jam. 1. 17. Every good donation and every perfect gift is from above descending from the father of light and Rev. 21. 2. 10. I John saw the holy City the new Jerusalem descending from God out of heaven But if they ought properly to be taken which we most willingly admit it is apparent that they are not spoken of any other then the son of man who since he of necessity hath a humane person he cannot be God by nature Moreover whereas the Scripture testifieth of Christ that the father sent him into the world we read the same concerning the Apostles of Christ in the words before quoted John 17. 18. As thou hast sent me into the world so have I also sent them into the world But that saying namely that Christ came out from the Father are equivalent with his descending from heaven but his coming into the world is such a thing which the Scripture sheweth to have happened after his nativity see John 18. 37. where our Lord himself saith I was therefore born and therefore came I into the world that I should bear Record to the truth and 1 John 4. 1. It is written that many false prophets were gone out into the world So that from those forms of speech a divine nature of Christ cannot be evinced But in all these speeches is described how divine the beginning of Christs prophetick office was Q. But where is Christ called that one Lord Lord of glory King of Kings and Lord of Lords A. 1 Cor. 8. 6. To us there is one Lord Jesus Christ by whom are all things and we through him 1 Cor. 2. 8. For had they known they would not have crucified the Lord of glory Rev. 17. 14. They shall make war with the Lamb and the Lamb shall overcome them for he is a King of Kings and Lord of Lords and chap. 19. 16. and he hath on his vesture and thigh a name written King of Kings and Lord of Lords Q. What say you to these testimonies A. As to the first the divine nature of Christ cannot be concluded from the Apostles calling him that one Lord. For first he manifestly distinguisheth him from the father whom
whose house is by the sea-side he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do 2 Epist of John v. 7. Many deceivers are entred into the world who confesse not Iesus coming in flesh to be Christ. This is the deceiver and the Antichrist From which places it appeareth that the relative hath not respect to the neerest antecedent but to that which is more remote Wherefore the meaning of those words of Iohn This is the true God and eternall life is thus This whereof I have last spoken is the true God namely he that hath for his Son Jesus Christ and it is also eternall life namely to know the true God and to be in him by his Son Jesus Christ With this accordeth that passage of Christ himself Iohn 7. 3. This is Life eternall that they know thee Father the only true God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ Q. What say you to the fourth A. The words of Iude v. 4. run thus denying the only Master God and our Lord Jesus Christ Form which place because there is but one article prefixed in the Greek they conclude that both descriptions ought to be referred to one petson and consequently to Christ But this observation taken from the unity of the article prefixed to severall words is not perpetuall as appeareth by the inspection of these places in the Greek Mat. 16. 1. Luke 19. 45. Act. 15 41. 1 Thes 1. 8. Heb. 9. 19. Eph. 2. 20. Eph. 3. 5. Wherefore we must have our chiefe recourse to the nature of the thing it self Q. What say you to the fifth A. The fifth testimony is that of Paul Tit. 2. 13. Looking for that blessed hope and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Iesus Christ In which words that the Epithete of great God is referred unto Christ the adversaries endeavour to evince with two reasons the first is taken from the unity of the articles prefixed in the Greek the other from our expectance not of the Father but of the Son The first of which reasons was solved a little before To the second I answer that Paul in the Greek doth not say the glorious appearing of the great God but the appearing of the glory of the great God Now it is certain that Christ shall come to judge the world not only in his own glory but also in the glory of his Father Luke 9. 26. Mat. 16. 27. Again what inconvenience is it to say that when Christ cometh to judge the world God doth come since Christ in judging the world sustaineth the person of God from whom he hath received his authority of executing judgement Q. What say you to the sixth A. The sixth testimony is this Rev. 4. 8. Holy holy holy is the Lord God Almighty who was and is and is to come This passage is therefore by the adversaries referred to Christ because they suppose that none is to come but Christ for he is to come to judge the quick and dead But we must know that that word which is here rendred to come may as well be rendred to be as Iohn 16. 13. Where Christ saith of the Holy Spirit whom he promised to the Apostles that he should tell them things to come that is to be And Act. 18. 21. We read of a feast to come that is to be Again who perceiveth not that when it hath been first said who was and is and it is immediately added and is to come that to come is all one with to be that the speech may in every part be understood of existence and not in the two first clauses of existence in the last of coming Neither is there any one that may not easily observe that the eternity of God is here described which comprehendeth the time past present and future But that which detecteth this grosse mistake is Rev. 1. 4 5. where we read Grace and peace be to you from him that was and is and is to come and from the seven Spirits that are before his Throne and from Jesus Christ the faithfull and true witnesse From which testimony it appeareth that Jesus Christ is quite another then He that is and was and is to come Q. What say you to the seventh A. The seventh runneth thus Take heed to your selves and to the whole flock over which the Holy Spirit hath made you Bishops to rule the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own bloud Act. 20. 28. Whereunto I answer that the name God is not here referred to Christ but to God the Father who is from the beginning of the speech perpetually understood by the name of God and whose bloud the Apostle calleth that bloud which Christ did shed in such a way of speaking and for such 〈◊〉 cause as the Prophet saith That he which toucheth the people of God toucheth the apple of Gods Eye For the exceeding great conjunction that is between God the Father and Christ although they be different in Essence causeth the bloud of Christ to be called the bloud of God the Father especially if it be considered as shed for us For Christ is the Lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the world Whence the bloud shed to that purpose is called the bloud of God himself and that deservedly Neither is it to be passed by that in the Syriack Edition it is not read God but Christ Q. What say you to the eighth A. The eighth runs thus Hereby perceive we the love of God because he laid down his life for us 1 John 3. 16. First therefore you must know that in no Greek edition save the Complutensian nor in the Syriack Translation is the word God read But though this word were read in all copies should therefore the word He be referred to God At no hand Not only for the forementioned reason in answer to the third testimony namely that relatives are not alwaies referred to the persons next going before but also because John referreth the word He sundry times in this Epistle to him that was a great while before named as in the 29. verse of the foregoing chapter where he saith If ye know that he is just know that he that doth justice is generated of him Where by him as both the thing it self and the following words shew is meant the Father although in the words next going before mention had been made of Christ only Q. You have given me satisfaction as to the names of Christ I would now therefore have you explain those quotations that have respect to the works of Christ which the Adversaries imagine are ascribed to him by the Scripture A. They are such wherein they imagine the Scripture attributeth unto Christ that he created the heaven and the earth that he conserveth all created things that he brought the people of Israel out of Egypt that he was with them in the wildernesse conducting them and doing good to them that his glory was seen by Isaiah that he was incarnate Q.
cannot be proved out of that place is evident from the place it self where Christ saith The Father is greater then all and consequently then the Son as the Son himself elswhere confesseth John 14. 28. and that he gave those sheep to Christ Q. But where doth the Scripture call him equal to God A. John 5. 18. Therefore the Iewes sought the more to slay him in that he had not only broken the Sabbath but also called God his own Father making himself equall to God And Phil. 2. 6. Who Christ Jesus being in the form of God thought it not robbery to be equal unto God Q. What answer you to those places A. That Christ is equall to God no way proveth a Divine Nature in him yea the contrary is hence collected For if Christ be equall to God who is God by Nature he cannot possibly be the same God But the equality of Christ with God herein consisteth that by the power which God conferred on him he did all those things and will do them which pertain to God himself as if he were very God Q. Where read we that Christ is the Son of the living God the proper and only begotten Son of God A. Of the first we read Mat. 16. 16 where Peter saith Thou art the Son of the living God And Rom. 8. 32. where the Apostle saith Who God spared not his own proper Son but delivered him for us And Iohn 3. 16. So God loved the world that he hath given his only begotten Son and a little after v. 18. He that believeth not is condemned already because he hath not believed on the name of the only begotten Son of God Q. What do you answer to these places A. From all those attributes cannot be proved any Divine Nature of Christ For as to the first it is apparent that Peter confesseth the Son of Man to be the Christ the Son of the living God who it is certain had not a Divine Nature as they imagine Again the Scripture testifieth of other men that they are Sons of the living God as Paul citeth it out of Hosea Rom 9. 26. and it shall be in the place where it was said unto them you are not my people they shall be there called the Sons of the living God But as to the second and third places in them we read that the proper and only begotten Son of God was not spared but given and delivered to death for us which cannot be said of him that is God by Nature Yea from thence that Christ is the Son of God it is apparent that he is not God otherwise he will be the Son of himself Now the reason why those attributes are ascribed to Christ is this because amongst all the Sons of God he is both the chiefest and most deare to God as Isaac because he was most dear to Abraham and the heir of all things is called the only begotten Heb. 12. 17. although he had a brother Ismael And Solomon is called the only-begotten in the fight of his Mother Prov. 4. 3. although he had more brethren of the same mother 1 Chro. 3. 5. Q. Where is he called the first-born of every creature A. Colos 1. 15. Q. What say you to it A. Neither can it be hence concluded that Christ hath a Divine Nature For since Christ is the first-born of every creature it must needs be that he also is one of the creatures For such is the force of the word first-born in the Scripture that it must of necessity be one of them amongst whom it is the first born as the first-born of sheep is a sheep of asses an asse of men a man But that Christ should be the first-born of creatures in the Old creation the adversaries themselves must not admit unlesse they will become Arrians Wherfore they must confesse that the Lord Jesus Christ is one of the New Creation Whence the Divine Nature of Christ is not only not concluded but it is on the contrary firmly concluded that he hath no Divine Nature But that Christ is by the Apostle called by that name doth hence proceed namely that he both in time and dignity precedeth all other things of the New Creation Q. Where doth the Scripture affirm that he hath all things that the Father hath A. Iohn 16. 15. where Christ himself saith All things that the Father hath are mine And below ch 17. 10. All mine are thine and thine are mine Q. VVhat say you to these places A. The word all as was formerly demonstrated is commonly râ—strained to the subject matter Wherefore from such places no such thing as the adversaries would have can be collected Now the subject matter Iohn 16. is that which the Holy Spirit was to declare unto the Apostles concerning the Kingdom of Christ and c. 17. it is apparent that it is spoken of the Disciples of Christ whom God had given to him whence he also calleth them his own Besides inasmuch as whatsoever Christ hath he hath it from the grant of the Father and not from himself it is hence evident that he hath no such Divine Nature as is imagined Since he that is a God by Nature hath all things from himself Q. But where is Christ called a Father of eternity A. Isa 9. 6. Q. VVhat say you hereunto A. That a Divine Nature cannot hence be proved inasmuch as Christ is for a certain respect called a Father of eternity as may be seen by the words a little before in the same place expressed But it is a wonder that the adversaries urge this place especially according to the English Translation where Christ is called the everlasting Father For this quite subverteth the common Doctrine of the Trinity by confounding the first and second Persons thereof But the words may wel be rendred a Father of eternity or an everlasting Father both because he is the Author of eternall life to them that obey him and liveth for ever to shelter and protect and cherish Christians who are elswhere called his seed See Isa 53. 10. Q. But where are those Elogies given to Christ namely that he is the word or Speech of God the Image of the invisible God the Character or expresse image of his person or substance that he which seeth Christ seeth the Father that in Iesus Christ dwelleth all the fulnesse of the Godhead or of Deity bodily A. Iohn 1. 1. In the beginning was the word compared with Rev. 19. 13. where Christ is called the word of God Col. 1. 15. Heb. 1. 3. Io. 14. 9. Col. 2. 9 Q. What say you to these pleases A. It cannot from thence be concluded that Christ hath a Divine Nature because he is called the Word of God yea the contrary is manifest For since he is the Word of that one God he cannot be that very one God unlesse one wil absurdly and contradictiously say he is the Word of himself Which answer may be given to every one of these testimonies But Jesus
he confesseth to be that one God whom we formerly shewed to be the onely God by nature Again the Apostle by saying that all things are by him sheweth that he is not God by nature Since as we formerly demonstrated this particle by doth not designe the first but the second cause which cannot be affirmed of him that is God by nature And though the scripture somtimes saith of the Father that all things are by him yet is this otherwise understood of him then of Christ For this is spoken of the father because all the middle causes whereby something is done are derived from him and are not such as that God cannot work without them but it is said of Christ that some other namely God who must of necessity therefore be the first cause doth work all things Eph. 3. 9. It is expresly said I need not commemorate that the word all is here to be restrained unto the subject matter as the very article set before it in the Greek sufficienly sheweth Much more these two words us and Father which plainly demonstrate that Paul speaketh onely of all the things that pertain to Christians whence it followeth that Christ is not called that one Lord simply and absolutely but for a certain respect as being he by whom all the things pertaining to Christians are administred As for the second testimony since it is there treated of him that was crucified it is clear that the divine nature cannot thence be concluded since no such thing can be affirmed of the divine nature but only of a man who is therefore called the Lord of glory that is according to the Hebrew Phrase the glorious Lord because he was by God crowned with glory and honour In the third testimony since it is spoken of him who is a lamb clothed with garments whom the same John most openly testifieth to have been slain and to have redeemed us with his blood which thing can by no means be referred to the divine nature it is apparent that the divine nature of Christ cannot thence be asserted but all the things that are in these testimonies ascribed to Christ argue his singular authority given to him by God in relation to the things of the new covenant Question What testimonies of Scripture may be alleadged for believing in Christ and giving divine honour to him Answer John 14. 1. Christ himself saith Yee believe in God believe also in me And John 3. verses 14 15. As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wildernesse so must the Son of man be lifted up that whosoever believeth on him may not perish but have eternall life And John 5. vers 22. 23. The Father judgeth no man but hath given all the judgement to the son that all should honour the son as they honour the Father and Philippians 2. vers 9 10 11. wherefore God hath exceedingly exalted and given him a name above every name that in the name of Jesus every knee should bow of heavenly earthly and infernall things and every tongue should confesse that Jesus is Lord to the glory of God the Father and in sundry other places Question What say you to these testimonies Answer As to the first it is so far from proving that Christ is God by nature that it clearly sheweth him to be a far different one For it openly putteth a difference between Christ and that one God of whom that is here treated the Article added in the Greek doth intimate Now whereas the adversaries say that faith is not to be placed but in God himself this solved by Christ in another place whilest he saith he that believeth on me believeth not on me but on him that sent me whence it is evident that Christ arrogateth not that faith to himself which we ow to God onely for that faith is due to God onely which is terminated in him and which hath respect to him as the prime author of all things but it is clear that such faith is not attributed to Christ for we therefore believe on Christ because he hath obtained of God a power to make us eternally happy and is appointed unto that office whereby it cometh to passe that our faith on Christ is through him directed to God himself as the ultimate end which is attested by Peter saying through him Christ you believe in God that raised him up from the dead and gave him glory so that your faith and hope is on God 1 Epist 1. 21. Question But they alledge out of Jeremy that he is cursed who trusteth in man Ier. 17. 5. An. It is not said absolutely that he is cursed who trusteth in man but he who so trusteth in him as that he maketh flesh his arm that is fasteneth his whole hope in meer humane forces without the assistance of divine power for that is understood by the word flesh to which these words are further added and his heart departeth from the Lord. But we who place our confidence on Christ do not make flesh our arm nor in our heart depart from God yea in trusting on Christ we trust on God himself and so our heart cometh unto God and not departeth from him Q. What say you to the other testimonies which speak of Christs divine honour Forasmuch as all the places that testifie concerning Christs divine honour do also testifie that this honour was given to him at a certain time and for a certain cause it is plain that the divine nature of Christ cannot thence be collected Now whereas the adversaries object that of Isaiah chap. 42. 8. I will not give me glory to another I answer that it is apparent enough what he meaneth by another for he presently addeth nor my praise to graven images In this place therefore God speaketh of them who have no communion with him and to whom if any glory and honour be ascribed it redoundeth not to him But he saith not that he will not communicate his glory with such an one as is dependent of him subordinate to him for by this means no diminution of his glory is made since the whole is referred to him for since the Lord Jesus dependeth of him and is subordinate to him whatsoever honour is given to Jesus redoundeth wholly to God himself Q. I have been in informed touching those places of Scripture which seem directly to respect the son of God I would fain learn those also which are applyed to Christ by a certain accommodation and seem to prove a Divine nature in Christ A. The places are these Isaiah 8. 14. where it is said that he should be a stone of stumbling and rock of offence which Luke chap. 2. 34. and Paul Rom. 9. 32. and Peter 1 Epist. 2. 7. do repeat next Isa 45. 23. where God saith I have sworn by my self that to me every knee shall bow which is applyed to Christ Rom. 14. verse 11. Thirdly Isaiah 41. vers 4. and chapter 44. ver 6. and chapter 48. verse 12. I am the
glory of God A. The things first in order Q. VVhich is the first of them A. Hallowed be thy name Q. Explain this Petition A. In this petition we desire God to assist us every way that we may celebrate his name with words hymns writings and by other means whatsoever Q. VVhat is the second A. Thy Kingdome come Q. Explain this Petition A. In this petition we do beseech God that he would induce us by such means as are best known to himself to consecrate and resign our hearts up to him but more especially by the discovery and obsignation of his truth and choicest promises in our hearts for then God truly reigneth when he exerciseth his Kingdome by the laws of the Gospel in our hearts and mind Quest What is the third Petition Answ Thy will be done as in the Heavens so in the Earth Quest. Explain the meaning of this Petition Answ In this Petition we beg of God that he would vouchsafe us his assistance in performing the obedience due unto him and what is to be expressed in our lives and actions for a man standing in need of much assistance to the performance of those things which God hath commanded him especially under the Gospell for they are such as far exceed his strength there is also in this Petition a tacite confession of our own weaknesse and of our confidence in God and hope which we conceive of his bounty when we dare to beg of him that he would make us no lesse ready to yeild him obedience then the Angels who are in Heaven Quest What are the Petitions that are referred to our use Answ The other three which follow in the same order Quest What is the first Answ Give us this day our dayly bread Quest Explain this Petition Answ Therein we desire God first that he would bestow upon us the gifts of his grace necessary to sustain and cherish our Spirituall life next that he would confer all those things that any wayes pertain to the maintenance of this life Quest What is the second Answ Forgive us our debts as we also forgive our Debtors Quest Explain this also Answ Therein we beg of God not onely to remit those sins which we have committed since we subjected our selves to the lawes of the Gospell but also much more those which we committed before the knowledge of the truth in as much as these are far more grievous and more easily exclud us from the possession of eternall life and cast us into everlasting damnation but whereas it is added As we forgive our debtors it is held that the forgivenesse of sins can at no hand be hoped for unlesse we forgive offences unto others and that from our hearts so that to be quite alienated from all desire of revenge Quest What is the third Petition Answ And lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evill Quest Declare it Answ In this Petition we intreat of God to assist us that we be not over come in afflictions which are sent for the triall of our faith as often as we fall into them by the will or permission of God and that he would keep us from Satan suffering us not to be oppressed with those temptations which he useth as engines to subvert and overthrow us Quest Is it not lawfull to pray otherwise Answ Yes for he neither here or elsewhere forbiddeth it so that our prayer be not such as thwarteth the will of God openly prescribed to us But if we desire any such thing concerning which the will of God is not manifested then is that petition to be wholly submitted to the will of God Quest To what end therefore did Christ command that we should pray in the aforesaid manner Answ That we might know assuredly what things are alwayes and necessarily to be desired of God Quest What else hath the Lord Jesus added to his first precept Answ That we ought to acknowledge him likewise for a God that is such a one as hath divine soveraignty over us and to whom we are bound to exhibit Divine honour Quest Wherein consisteth the Divine honour due to Christ Answ That as we are bound to celebrate him with Divine adoration so we may in our necessities implore his aid now we adore him for his sublime majesty and implore his aid for his divine and Soverain Authority Quest What else pertaineth to the Divine honour of Christ Answ The Administration of his Supper of which you shall hear anon Quest Whence prove you that Divine Adoration is due to Christ Answ There are proofs thereof in many passages of the Scripture and namely John 5. 22. Christ himself saith the Father hath given all Judgement that is according the Hebrew phrase all government and rule to the Son that all should honour the Son as they honour the Father and Phil. 2. 9 10 11. wherefore God hath exceedingly exalted him and given him a name above every name That in the Name of Jesus every knee should bow of things in Heaven on the Earth and under the Earth and that every tongue should confesse Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father Quest But how prove that we may fly to Christ in all our necessities Answ First because he is both able and willing to help us next that we have incitements thereunto both from the Lord himself and also from his Apostles in fine because we have examples thereof in holy men Quest How prove you that Christ is able and willing to help us Answ We will speak of that below when we come to his Kingly and Priestly Office Quest But where hath the Lord or where have the Apostles proposed to us these incitements A. John 14. 13 14 and chap. 15. and chap. 16. 23 24 25. where the Lord himself saith whatsoever you shall ask in my name that is relying on my name and power or directing your prayers to me by name or so to the Father as that I onely be named in the prayers I will do it Rev. 3. 18. I councell thee to buy of me gold tryed in the fire c. and Heb. 4. 14 15 16. where that divine Author writeth after this manner Having therefore a great high Priest passed through the Heavens Jesus the Son of God Let us hold fast the confession for we have not a High Priest that cannot be touched with a fellow feeling of our infirmities but in all things tempted like unto us without sin Let us therefore with boldnesse make our addresses to the throne of Grace that we may obtain mercy and find favour to help in time of need and Rom. 10. 13. Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved Quest Where have you examples hereof Answ Luke 17. 5. the Apostles say Lord increase our Faith in like mannor Mat. 8. 25. Lord save us we perish and Acts 7. 59. where Stephen invocating breaketh out into these words Lord Jesus receive my spirit and again ver 60.
THE Racovian Catechisme VVHEREIN You have the substance of the Confession of those Churches which in the Kingdom of Poland and Great Dukedome of Lithuania and other Provinces appertaining to that Kingdom do affirm That no other save the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ is that one God of Israel and that the man Jesus of Nazareth who was born of the Virgin and no other besides or before him is the onely begotten Sonne of GOD. Printed at Amsterledam for Brooer Janz 1652. To the Christian READER SEeing it hath pleased Almighty God to bring this good discourse to thy sight We are certain wast thou sensible of thy benefit that might redound to thy soul upon the Imbracing of the Doctrine therein contained thou wouldst not look upon it as men now a dayes look upon most Books with a carelesse unresolved resolution to embrace what shall appear to them to be truth but rather to please their curious fancy then nourish and refresh their souls with good and wholsome Doctrine the effects whereof would bring them to happiness We wilt not here make it our work to plead for the excellency of this Discourse but leave that to the Book it self Only our advice to thee is that seeing the things that are therein asserted are built upon plain texts of Scripture without any consequencies and seeing its tendancy is so much to the propagating of holinesse without which no man shall see God and likewise that it is not the opinion of a particular man onely but of severall Churches of Jesus Christ thou wouldst give the more heed to what thou readest Obtain the honour to be like the Noble Bereans by searching in the Scripture whether the things contained therein be so or not beg of God that he would illuminate thy understanding in seaching after the truth and having sound it sear not to own it God will stand by those that stand for him and if he be on thy side it 's no matter who is against thee continually beg of God more and more to confirm thee in the truth and ingage him to make thee yet more wise by improving the wisdome thou hast already obtained Consider how all along the truth or at least that which was most true hath been cryed out against and persecuted under the notion of Error How was our Lord Jesus Christ himself lookt upon as a blaspheamer Yea and put to death on that accompt neither hath the malice of men rested in crucifying their Lord but hath extended much farther even to the killing his Apostles Prophets and Disciples and all upon the same score of blasphemy and Errour What is it that keeps Mahomets Religion in Turkey alive but that it is death to dispute it And what keeps the Popes interest up in Spain and other Countryes but inquisitians and Tortures which are executed on those who deny his supremacy and argue against his Religion And what is it that will keep England from ever having the knowledge of the truth flourish within its Dominion and Terriâ—ories but harkening to those that call themselves ministers who rather then they will part with their reputation in the world and their sat benefices will cry down the greatest truths for blasphemies as it is too apparently in these our dayes otherwise how is it that notwithstanding our Lord Jesus Christ saith He that will be my disciple must deny himself and take up his crosse daily c. and through much tribulation we must enter into the kingdom of God they will rather alter their Religion from Episcopacy to Presbytery and to Episcopacy or any other Religion that the state and the generality of men are of again so they may live at ease and have their bodies well pampered then be a disciple of Jesus Christ upon such tearms yea and rather then they will enter into the kingdom of God through tribulation or persecution they will maintain such a Doctrine and stand up for such a Religion the profession whereof shall never expose them to sufferings for it Yea and if they cannot maintain it by Scripture or reason they will as much as in them lies procure the assistance of the civil Magistrate to enforce it upon the people though it be against their consciences Which if we did but well consider is a sufficient argument to evince the falsenesse of their Religion it being so unlike to the Religion of Jesus Christ and his Apostles of whom we never read that they desired the civill Magistrate to protect them or to establish their Religion by force upon the people for that indeed is but as best the way to make men hypocrites in that the most of men will rather imbrace a Religion against their consciences then suffer any thing for religion A. d therefore seeing the state of things lyes as we have before declared how happy will he be whose Religion is built upon the Doctrine of the Apostles and Prophets Jesus Christ being the chief corner stone that hath the greatest reason of its side that possibly can be imagined doubtlesse it will carry him through all difficulties whatsoever That this discourse is so we leave to thy consideration upon thy weighing of what is contained therein withall seriousnesse and that the truth may never after so long waiting and looking for it be shut out from thee nor any of thy country men desire the Lord still to protect our Governours and put it into their hearts to continue that Liberty which of late through the mercy of Almighty God we have enjoyed That they may never harken so to our pretended Ministers as to suppresse the truth under the Notion of error and blasphemy especially since they and we have hitherto pretended to stand up for the truth and for liberty in practising thereof That the blessing of the Lord may continually attend thee in thy progresse upon this account is and shall be the continuall prayers of Thy friends to love and serve thee in the Lord Jesus Christ Of the holy Scriptures QUESTION I Would fain learn of you what the Christian Religion is ANSVVER The Christian Religion is the way of attaining eternall life discovered by God Q. But where is it discovered A. In the holy Scriptures especially that of the new Covenant Q. Is there then any other Holy Scripture besides that of the New Covenant A. Yes Q. What is it A. The Writings of the old Covenant CHAP. I. Touching the certainty of the Holy Scriptures Q. BUt whence appeareth it that the Holy Scriptures both of the Old and New Covenant are certain and not suspected A. Hence in that there is not onely no cause why it should be doubted of them but evident ground as far as the matter will bear why credence should be given to them Q. How will you make it good that there is no cause why it should be doubted of them especially as to the Scripture of the New Covenant A. There are apparently four causes for which the truth of books may be
believe it But it is evident that these Quotations do not demonstrate the Father Sonne and Holy Spirit to be three Persons in one Divine Essence Q. Yet from such a Conjunction of those three in divine Operations it seemeth somewhat probable that they are three Persons in one divine Essence A. By no means For as to the first place although the Father Son and Holy Spirit be conjoyned in Baptism yet doth it not therefore follow that they are Persons in one divine Essence both for that it is said in the words immediately going before that all power in heaven on earth was given to the Son which cannot possibly agree to him that is a Person in the divine Essence as also because it is no new thing for the Scripture in other things no lesse divine then Baptism to joyn with God such Persons and Things as no wayes pertain to the divine Essence Of Persons you have an example in the first book of Samuel chap. 12. 18. And all the people greatly feared the Lord and Samuel And in Moses Exod. 14. 31. where according to the Hebrew it is read And the people feared the Lord and believed in the Lord and in his servant Moses Of things you have an instance Acts 20. 32. I commend you to God and to the Word of his Grace Ephes 6. 10. Strengthen your selves in the Lord and in the power of his might Q. But they hold he must needs be God into whose name we are baptized A. They are exceedingly mistaken for we read 1 Cor. 10. 2. that the Israelites were all baptized into Moses And Act. 19. 3. that certain Disciples were baptized into the Baptisme of John Although neither Moses were God nor the Baptisme of John a Person much lesse God Q. But it seemeth one thing to be baptized into any ones name and another to be baptized into any one A. By no means For by vertue of the Hebrew Idiotisme it is oftentimes all one to do something into any ones name and into any one as is sufficiently known Neither need we go far for any instance since the matter in hand will readily furnish us for whereas we read in some places that Disciples were baptized into the name of Christ see Act. 8. 16. Act. 19. 5. we read in others that they were simply baptized into Christ Rom. 6. 3. Gal. 3. 27. Q. What answer give you to the second Quotation A. That although divine operations be attributed to God and to the Lord and to the Holy Spirit yet can it not be rightly inferred thence that these three are of one essence Yea the contrary may be thence clearly collected namely that they cannot be of one essence since the Lord and the Holy Spirit are openly distinguished from God whom we formerly proved to be no other then the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ But because together with God mention is here made of the Lord and of the Holy Spirit this is therefore done because the Lord is he by whom God doth work all these things with the concurrent ministery of the Holy Spirit for here he treateth only of those things that appertain unto the faithfull in whom the Holy Spirit worketh Q. What answer give you to the third A. First since it is known that in the more ancient Greek copies and in the Syriack and in the more antient Latin Versions these words are not extant as the chiefest of our Adversaries do shew nothing certain can be concluded from them Again though they were extant in the Scripture yet could it not be thence concluded that there are three Persons in one Divinity For that place speaketh of no other thing then of witnessing that Jesus is the Son of God or the Christ But that this may be attested not only by such as are divine persons but even by such as are no persons at all appeareth by the following words wherein the Apostle saith that there are three that bear witnesse on the earth the Spirit the Water and the Bloud Now when he saith that the former three are one that this is meant of their being one in testimony and agreement but not in essence is apparent by the following verse where the like expression is found and must be taken in such a sense Q. I perceive by your former discourse that there is but one Person in the divine essence and therefore I would now know how the knowledge hereof is very conducible to salvation A. You will easily perceive that if you consider how pernitious the opinion of the Adverse Party is For first that opinion may easily undermine and weaken the belief of one God whilest one while it confesseth but one God another while acknowledgeth three Persons every one whereof is that one God Secondly it obscureth the glory of that one God who is only the Father of Jesus Christ whilest it transferreth it to another who is not the Father Thirdly it may easily pervert the way of salvation whilest it taketh away the difference between the first and second cause thereof and suffâ—reth us not rightly to acknowledge who is the prime Author of our Salvation and how God manageth the same by Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit In sine it greatly hindreth Aliens from embracing the Christian Religion whilest it delivereth such things as are opposite to divine Truth and sound reason From all which inconveniences that opinion is free which holdeth that there is but one Person in the divine essence Of the Will of God Q. YOu have explained to me the things that pertain to the essence of God explain now those things also that concern his Will A. Those things that concern the Will of God are partly such as all men in generall are and ever have been partakers of them partly such as properly belong to those who are to obtaine eternall life Q. What are those whereof all men in generall have ever been partakers of A. They are three in number first the Creation of heaven and earth and all the things that are therein Act. 14. 15. Secondly his care and providence over all things in particular Mat. 10. 29. Lastly the remuneration of them that seek him that is yeeld themselves obedient to him Heb. 11. 6. Q. Why is it necessary to believe that God created heaven and earth A. There are two principall causes thereof The one that God would have us believe it And therefore in the Scriptures both God and his Ministers do so frequently and clearly admonish us thereof as amongst other testimonies you have it in Isaiah chap. 44. 24. I am the Lord that maketh all things that stretcheth out the heavens alone that spreadeth abroad the earth by my self And in Moses Gen. 1. 1. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth And in David Psal 33. 6. By the word of the Lord were the heavens made and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth He gathereth the waters of the Sea together as
thus And Iesus was about thirty years of age when he began being as it was received by Law the son of Ioseph I say if you compare these Texts with the first words of Iohns Gospel Q. What answer you to the second A. Neither is here any express mention made of his being from Eternity from this place the Scripture testifieth that the Son of man that is Jesus Christ as man who it is certain could not possibly have been from Eternity in that he was born at a certain time had been sometimes in Heaven namely when he ascended up thither to receive his message from God Q. What answer you to the third A. In this place the being of Christ from Eternity is not onely not exprest since it is one thing to have been before Abraham another to have been from Eternity but not so much as this namely that he was before his Virgin-Mother For that those words may be read otherwise namely Verily verily I say unto you before he become Abraham I am he appeareth from those places in the same Evangelist where there is the same expressions in Greek as chap. 13. 19. From this instant I tell it you before it come to passe that after it is come to passe you may believe that I am he And chap. 14. 29 Now I have told you before it come to passe that when it is come to pass you may believe Q. What would the sense of that reading be A. Very elegant For Christ admonisheth the Jewes who went about to catch him in his words that whilst they had opportunity they should believe him to be the Christ or Light of the world before the Divine Grace that Christ offered to them was taken away from them and translated to the Gentiles Now that those words I am he are to be supplyed in the same manner as if he had said I am the Christ will appear by comparing Mark 13. 6. with Math. 24. 5. See also Iohn 8. 24. 28. Again that those words Before he become Abraham do signifie what we have said may be discovered by the meaning of the word Abraham which as the Scripture Gen 17. 5. doth hint signifieth a Father of many Nations Wherefore since Abraham did not become Abraham indeed that is a Father of many Nations until the grace of God manifested in Jesus Christ redounded unto many Nations in that he was before the Father of but one Nation it is apparent that the meaning of these words which we have brought is genuine and true Q. What are the testimonies of the Scripture wherein they think the being of Christ from Eternity is not expressed yet may be deduced thence A. Those which seem to attribute some things to the Lord Jesus from Eternity but others at a certain and determinate time Q. What are those places that attribute certain things to the Lord Iesus from Eternity A. They are those from whence they endeavour to evince that Christ was begotten out of the Essence of the Father from Eternity Q. From what places do they endeavour to evince that Christ was begotten out of the Essence of the Father from Eternity A. From these chiefly Mich. 5. 2. And thou Bethlchem Ephrata though thou be least amongst the thousands of Iudah yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be Ruler in Israel whose goings forth have been from the beginning from the dayes of Eternity And Psalm 2. 7. Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee And Pal. 110. 3. Where according to the vulgar translation it is read From the womb before the morning star have I begotten thee And Prov. 8. 23. where Wisdome saith of her self I was begotten from Eternity Q. How must one answer these quotations A. Before I make an answer to each you must know that that generation out of the Essence of the Father is impossible For if Christ had been begotten out of the Essence of the Father either he had taken part of the Essence or the whole he could not take part of the Essence because it is not dividable nor the whole since it is one in number and therefore incommunicable Q. What answer is to be given to the first quotation A. This passage maketh nothing for Christs generation out of the Essence of the Father from eternity in that mention is here made of a beginning and of dayes which have no place in eternity And these words which in the vulgar translation are rendred From the dayes of eternity are read in the Hebrew From the dayes of age but the dayes of age are the same with the dayes of old as Isa 63. 9 11 Mal. 3. 4. So that the sense of the place is that Christ should fetch the Original of his Birth from the very beginning and from the antient times that is from that time when God established a King over his people which was done in David who was both a Bethlemite and the Author of the Stock and Family of Christ It is further observable that those words Have been are not found in the Hebrew and therefore nothing compelleth us to understand them rather then some others as namely have been determined or appointed or fore-known which last word is taken out of the Apostle Peter 1 Epist 1. 19. 20. Q. What say you to the second A. Neither is there any mention touching the generation of Christ out of the Essence of the Father from eternity for the word to day inasmuch as it denoteth a certain time cannot signifie eternity And that God begate him doth not evince that it was out of his own Essence especially considering that these words as Interpreters observe were in the first sense spoken of David of whom it is certain that he was neither begotten from eternity not out of the Essence of God Besides the Apostle Paul applyeth the same words to the resurrection of Christ Acts 13 33. and the divine Author to the Hebrews alledgeth them to demonstrate the glorification of Christ whereby he became an High-Priest Hebr. 5. 5. Finally it is apparent from the Scripture that God begeteth sons otherwise then out of his Essence thus are the faithful said to be begotten of God Iohn 1. 13. 1 Iohn 3. 9. 1. Iohn 5. 1. 4. Iames 1. 18. Q. What say you to the third A. We must know that in the vulgar and Greek versions that place is ill rendered for it is read otherwise in the Hebrew namely From the womb of the morning thou hast the dew of thy youth or Birth In which words he either speaketh of the perpetual vigour of Christs life which should be continually fresh and flourishing or else of the multitude of Christians that should issue from him and be in number equal to the drops of the morning dew Q. What say you to the fourth A. That you may the better perceive the thing you must know that the Adversaries reason from this place in this manner The Wisdome of God was begotten from
given glory to him all the things both in the heavens and on the earth were by him reformed and reduced to another state and condition in that he became the Head of Angells and Men who before acknowledged God only for their Lord. Q. What say you to the fourth testimony A. That it is not here said that the Son made the world but God made it by the Son Now that the word world may not only signifie that which is past and present but also that which is to come is confessed And that it is here spoken of the world to come is evident from hence namely that the same Author affirmeth that by him whom God hath appointed heire of all things the world was made For Jesus of Nazareth was not appointed heire of all things before God had raised him up from the dead which is apparent because then at length all power in heaven and earth was given to him by God the Father in the donation of which power and not in any other thing that inheritance of all things is contained Q. What answer you to the fifth A. This testimony doth not expresly speak of Christ but of God But forasmuch as this divine Author doth apply it unto the Son of God it is to be considered that the words expresly speak not of one thing but of twain chiefly The one whereof is the creation of heaven and earth the other is the abolition of the things created Now that this Author doth not referre the first unto Christ is from hence apparent namely because he proposed to himself to demonstrate not that excellency of Christ which he hath from himself but that which he obtained by inheritance and whereby he was made better then Angells as appeareth from the fourth verse of this first chapter of the Hebrews of which kind of excellency since the creation of heaven and earth neither is nor can be it is evident that this testimony was not alledged to prove that Christ created the heaven and earth Since therefore the first cannot be referred to Christ it is apparent that the latter only pertaineth to him and that therefore because God will abolish both the heaven and earth by Christ when he judgeth the world by him Wherein the excellency of Christ shall so far surpasse that of Angels that the very Angels shall therein minister to him Which latter speech since it could not be understood without the words going before wherein mention is made of the heaven and earth inasmuch as it is joyned to them by the word they the author was therefore necessitated to repeat them also For if other sacred Writers do in that manner cite testimonies of the Scripture when they are pressed with no necessity much more ought this Author so to do when he was necessitated thereunto Q. Where do sacred VVriters do so A. Amongst many other testimonies you have that of Mat. 12. 18 19 20 21. Where it is very evident that the 19. v. only pertaineth to the purpose of the Evangelist since his intention was to shew the reason why Christ would not have himselfe be made manifest Again Act. 2. 17 18 19 20 21. where also the 17. 18. ver only make to the purpose of the Apostle which is to shew that the H. Spirit was poured out upon the Disciples and in the same ch v. 25 26 27 28. where it is clear that the 27. ver only is ê‘ertinent to the businesse in hand since the Apostle intendeth to prove that Christ could not be detained by death Finally in this very ch to the Heb. v 9. where it is apparent that these words Thou lovedst righteousnesse and hatedst iniquity are not pertinent to what the divine Author goeth about to prove namely that Christ is made better then Angels Q. With what testimony do the adversaries go about to prove that Christ conserveth all created things A. From that place Heb. 1. 3. where it is said That Christ upholdeth all things by the word of his power Q. What say you to this testimony A. That the word all in this as well as in other places doth not designe all things without exception but is referred to those things only that pertain to the Kingdom of Christ as the Article in the Greek set before the word all to limit it doth sufficiently declare shewing that it is to be understood only of all the things of a certain kind Besides the Greek word which is by the English Translators rendered upholding ought to have been rendered carrying which hath rather the signification of ordering and mannaging then of conserving as that which is annexed namely by the word of his power seemeth to intimate Q. By what testimony prove they that Christ brought the children of Israel out of Egypt A. Out of Iude's Epistle vers 5. Iesus having saved the people out of Egypt did the second time destroy them that believed not Q. What answer make you hereunto A. That the word Iesus is extant in no Greek copie but instead thereof the word Lord is here read so that this testimony no whit proveth what the Adversaries intend Q. But whence prove they that Christ was with the Israelites in the wildernesse and conducted them and did good to them A. From that passage of Paul 1 Cor. 10. 4 They all drank the same spirituall drink for they drank of the spirituall rock that followed them but that rock was Christ As also from the 9. ver of the same chap. where the Apostle saith Neither let us tempt Christ as some of them tempted and perished by Serpents Q. What answer give you to these places A. As to the first the Apostle doth not at all say that Christ was in the wildernesse with the people of Israel and did good to them For though he write that the Rock whereof the people drank was Christ yet doth not he therefore assert that Christ was indeed there because those words of Paul may be figuratively taken Now whereas he calleth that Rock spirituall this doth nothing advantage the cause of the adversaries since that Rock may be called spirituall although it were Indeed materiall for the same cause that the meat was called spiritual namely in that it contained in it a mystical sense as in the Revelation John saith That the great City where our Lord was slain is spiritually called Sodom and Egypt Rev. 11. 8. Moreover in that he faith that the Rock followed them it is to be understood of the water issuing out of the Rock and following the people through the wildernesse which before was destitute of running water or at least of such as was potable To which Isaiah ch 43. 20. doth allude where he saith The beast of the field shall honour me the Dragons and the Ostriches for I have given them waters in the wildernesse and rivers in the desert to give drink to my people my Chosen As for the second testimony namely Let us not tempt Christ as some of them
tempted From these words likewise it can not be shown that Christ was indeed tempted in the wildernesse For instance should any man say let us not be refractory to the Magistrate as some of our Ancestors were it could not thence be concluded that the same numericall Magistrate is in both places designed Now if there be found in the Scriptures such kinds of speaking wherein the like speech is referred to him whose name was a little before expressed without any repetition of the same person this hap'neth in such a place where no other besides him whose name was expressed can possibly be understood as Deut. 6. 16. Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God as thou temptedst in Massah But in this speech of the Apostle whereof we speak another then Christ may be understood as Moses the Angel c. see Num. 21. 5. Q. From what place prove they that the glory of Christ was seen by Isaiah A. From Iohn 12. 41. These things spake Isaiah when he saw his glory and spake of him Q. What say you hereunto A. First that these words are not of necessity to be referred to Christ inasmuch as they may be referred to God the Father For the words that are set a little before are spoken of the same namely he hath blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts Again the glory which Isaiah saw might be yea was not a present but a future glory For it is proper to Prophets to see the things that are to come Whence likewise they were called Seers 1 Sam. 9. 9. Finally although you understand these words of that glory which was then present and seen by Isaiah yet is it one thing to see one's glory another thing to see himself for in the glory of that one God Isaiah likewise saw the glory of the Lord Christ for the Prophet there saith The earth is full of the glory of the Lord. Which thing was then accomplished when Jesus Christ first appeared to the people of the Jewes and afterwards was preached to the whole world Q. From what testimonies of Scripture do they endeavour to demonstrate that Christ was as they say incarnated A. From Iohn 1. 14. where according to their Translation it is read The Word was made flesh And from Phil. 2. 6 7. Who Christ Jesus being in the form of God thought it not robbery to be equal to God But made himself of no reputation taking upon him the form of a servant being made in the likenesse of men And being found in fashion as a man he humbled himself c. from 1 Tim. 3. 16. Great is the mystery of godliness God was manifested in flesh And frō Heb. 2. 16. For verily he took not on him the nature of Angels but he took on him the seed of Abraham And from 1 Ioh. 4. 3. Every spirit that confesseth Iesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God And lastly from Heb. 10. 5. Wherfore entring into the world he saith Sacrifice offering thou wouldest not but a body hast thou prepared for me Q. What say you to the first testimony A. That it is not there said that God was incarnated or that the divine Nature assumed a humane For it is one thing to say The Word was made flesh another that God was incarnated as they say or that the divine Nature assumed a humane Besides these words The Word or rather the Speech was made flesh may and ought to be thus rendred The Word was flesh Thus the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is rendred verse 6. of this very chapter There was a man sent by God his name John And Luk. 24. 19. Who was a Prophet great in word and deed And these places with sundry others shew that it may be so rendred But that it ought to be so rendred the order of the Evangelists words sufficiently teacheth for it would have been incongruous to have said that the Word was made flesh that is as the adversaries would have it assumed a Humane Nature after he had already spoken those things of the Word which followed the Nativity of Jesus Christ as namely that John the Baptist gave testimony of him that he was in the world that his own received him not that to them who received him he gave power to become the Sons of God Q. How is that to be understood that the Word was flesh A. That he by whom God perfectly revealed his whole will and who had been therefore by John called the Word or Speech was a man of the same constitution with others and subject to the same infirmity afflictions and death For in this sense the Scripture useth the word flesh as appeareth from those places where God saith My spirit shall not alwaies strive with man for that he also is flesh Gen. 6. 3. And Peter out of Isaiah saith All flesh is grasse 1 Pet. 1. 24. Q. What say you to the third A. It is one thing to say that Jesus Christ being in the form of God took the form of a servant and that the Divine Nature assumed a Humane For here the form of God cannot design the Divine Nature in that the Apostle writeth that Christ emptied himself of that form But God can by no means empty himself of his nature Neither doth the form of a servant denote a humane nature since to be a servant is referred to the fortune and condition of a man But neither is it to be concealed that the writings of the New Covenant doth use the word form elswhere but once namely Mark 16. 12. and that in such a sense wherein not the nature but exteriour fashion is signified whilest it saith that Jesus appeared to two of his Disciples in another form Q. But from those words which the Apostle presently after subjoyns namely He was found in fashion of a man doth it not appear that he was as they say incarnated A. At no hand For it is said of Sampson Judg. 16. 7. 11. that if such and such a thing was done to him he should become as a man And Asaph Psa 82. denounceth to those whom he had called Gods Sons of the most high that they should die like men notwithstanding it is certain it cannot be said that they were as the adversaries say incarnated Q. But how do you understand this whole place A. Thus that Christ who conversed in the world as God doing the works of God and receiving divine worship did when God so willed and the salvation of man required become as a servant and vassall and as one of the vulgar men when he of his own accord suffered himself to be bound whipt and crucified Q. What say you to the third A. First that in many ancient copies and in the vulgar Translation the word God is not here found so that nothing certain can be concluded out of this place Again though we read the word God there yet is there no cause why it should not be referred to the Father
since it may of him be affirmed that he was manifested in Christ and the Apostles who were flesh And though it be afterwards according to the vulgar translation read that he was received up into glory yet is it in the Greek he was received in glory that is with glory or gloriously Q. What then is the sense of this place A. That you may the better perceive it I will cite the whole Thus therefore the Apostle saiâ—h God was manifested in flesh was justified in spirit was seen of Angels was preached to the Gentiles was believed in the world was received in glory The meaning of all which is this The Christian Religion is full of mysteries For God that is the divine Will touching the salvation of men was perfectly discovered by weak and mortall men and yet notwithstanding by reason of the miracles wrought by the spirit in confirmation of the Gospel it was acknowledg'd for true The same was at length perceived by the Angels themselves preached not only to the Jews but also to the Gentiles and not only generally believed but entertained with the greatest glory and magnificence Q. What say you to the fourth A. In it there is not so much as a resemblance of an Incarnation since the divine Author doth not say took but taketh nor humane nature but the seed that is the posterity of Abraham And indeed to shew the invalidity of the argument taken from this place there needs no more then to consult the various reading of the English Translators set in the margin Q. What then is the sense of this place A. The meaning of the Author is that Christ is not the Saviour of Angels but men who being subject to afflictions leath which thing he before exprest by the participation of flesh bloud therfore Christ of his own accord submitted himself to the same that he might free the faithfull from the fear of death and succour them in all their afflictions Q. What say you to the fifth A. Here likewise is nothing to assert the incarnation as they term it For wheras it is read in the ordinary Bibles Every spirit that confesseth Jesus to be come in the flesh is of God The Greek hath it Every spirit that confesseth Iesus Christ come in flesh or Every spirit that confesseth Iesus come in flesh to be Christ That is Every spirit is of God that confesseth Iesus who discharged his Embassie on the earth without any worldly pomp ostentation in the most humble manner as to his outward presence with the greatest contempt finally indured a most ignominious death to be the Christ or King of the people of God Q. VVhat say you to the sixth A. Here also is no mention of any Incarnation since the world whereinto this Author here saith that Christ entred to performe his offering is as hath been formerly shown the vvorld to come Whence to enter into the world doth not here signifie to be born but to passe into the heaven Again by body in those words A body hast thou prepared me may be understood an immortall one Q. What then is the sense of the place A. That God while Jesus was entring into heaven furnished him with such a body as was very suitable fit to discharge his Priestly Office Q. You have hitherto explained the places of Scripture from whence they endeavour to prove that which is not found there I entreat you therefore now to alledge those places from whence they draw wrong conclusions A. The Scriptures from whence they draw their wrong conclusions either directly concern Christ or are referred to him by a certain accommodation Q. What are those that directly have respect to Christ A. They are such wherein Christ is called either a God or one with God or equall to God or the Son of the living God or the proper or only begotten Son of God or the first born of every creature or having all things that the Father hath or the Father of eternity or the Word of God or the Image of the Invisible God or the Character of his substance or he who being seen the Father is seen or in whom the fulnesse of Deity dwelleth bodily or that had glory with the Father before the world was or whose Spirit was in the Prophets or that came down from heaven came out from the Father and came into the world was sent by the Father into the world or the only Lord Lord of Glory King of Kings Lord of Lords and to whom Faith and divine honor pertaineth Q. In what places of the Scripture is the word God attributed to Christ A. Joh. 1. 1. The Word was a God And c. 20. 28. Thomas saith to Christ My Lord and my God And RoÌ„ 9. 5. writeth that Christ is a God over all to be blessed for evermore Q. What say you to these passages A. That it cannot from thence be demonstrated that Christ had as the adversaries speak a Divine Nature may to omit what hath been formerly spoken be made appear from hence namely that it is spoken in the first testimony touching such a word as was with God In the second Thomas calleth him his God in whose hands and feet he found the prints of the nails and in his side the print of the spear And Paul saith that he who was of the Fathers according to the flesh was over all a God to be blessed for evermore All which it is cleer cannot possibly be said of him that is God by Nature For from the first it would follow that there are two Gods whereof the one was with the other As for the other twain namely to have the prints of wounds and to be of the Fathers do altogether pertain to a man which that they should be ascribed to him that is God by Nature is very absurd But if any one to cloak the businesse pretend the distinction of Natures we have formerly removed that and taught that this distinction is not to be endured Q. Where doth the Scripture teach that Christ is one with the Father A. John 10. 29. 30. Where the Lord saith The Father that gave me the sheep is greater then all and none can snatch them out of the Fathers hand I and my Father are one Q. What say you to this proof A. When it is said that Christ is one with the Father it cannot be thence evinced that he is one with him in Nature as the words of Christ himself spoken to the Father about the Disciples to demonstrate see Jo. 17. 11. Father keep them in thy name whom thou hast given to me that they may be one as we are one And afterwards v. 22 The glory which thou hast given me have I given them that they may be one as we are one Now that Christ is one with the Father this ought to be taken of unity or onenesse in will or power as to the businesse of mans Salvation Yea that the Divine Nature of Christ
Lord lay not this sin to their charge Also 2 Cor. 12. 7 8. Lest I should be too much elevated with the excesse of Revelation there was given to me a prick in the flesh an Angell of Satan to buffet me that I might not be elevated whereupon I besought the Lord that he might depart from me also 1 Thes 3. 11. Now our very God and Father and our Lord Jesus Christ direct our way unto you besides this may be farther seen in all the Apostolick salutations wherein they wish Grace Mercy and Peace As from God the Father so also from his Son Jesus Christ unto the faithfull Quest But is not the first Commandment of the decalogue altogether changed by this addition namely that we ought to acknowledge Christ for a God and celebrate him with Divine honour Answ At no hand for the Commandment it self is not changed in as much as all the worship that is given to Christ redoundeth to the glory of that one God the Father but the reason and manner of worshipping is changed for before Christ God was worshipped immediately but under Christ mediately Besides that law forbiddeth us to have other Gods before the Lord God and Christ is not an other God but in that very worship which is given to him subordinate to that one God it is apparent that that law is no way changed since it is well known that subordinate things are not opposite to one another Quest Is Divine Honour and Worship so attributed to Christ that there is herein no difference between him and God Answ Yes very great for we adore and honour God as the first cause of our Salvation but Christ as the second or to speak with Paul God the Father as him of whom are all the things the Lord Christ as him by whom are all the things 1 Cor. 8. 6. Quest What think you of those men which doe not invocate Christ nor think that he must be adored Answ That they are no Christians since indeed they have not Christ for though in words they dare not deny him yet in reality they do Quest You have shewed that next to God Christ ought to be worshipped tell me whether any one else is to be worshipped Answ None for neither is there any Divine testimony from whence it may appear that to any other but Christ Divine soverainty over us is given and whereas at this day in the Church of Rome some divine Authority is attributed to the Virgin Mary and to the Saints that is wholly built upon their own opinion Quest Can they not justly be excused since they doe it to this end that they may thereby give worship to God Answ No for in the worship of God it is not enough to ground our selves upon opinion though never so specious but thereunto there is need of the very truth it self otherwise that worship ought justly to be accounted for Idolatry Quest I perceive that none but God and Christ is to be worshipped but may we not invocate the Virgin Mary and the Saints not that they themselves may bestow any thing upon us but impetrate it by their prayers unto God and Christ Answ It is no wayes lawfull for the reason a little before declared as also because in those things that concern the worship of God one ought to be most certainly perswaded that the things which are done may be done according to the will of God But no testimony can be produced out of the sacred Scriptures from whence it may appear that the Virgin Mary and the other Saints either have any care of those things that are done by us or any knowledge or at least are able to hear our Prayers of which things never the lesse he ought to be perswaded who would addresse his prayers to them Quest I suppose I now perceive what force this precept hath in the Christian Religion come therefore to the second Answ The second is this Thou shalt not make to thy self any Graven Image c. Quest What is the meaning of this precept Answ That no Image is to be made to the end it should be adored and worshipped nor any such Image as may occasion such adoration and worship Quest What are those Images which men make to the end they should be adored and worshipped Answ Such as are made out of an opinion and shadow of Religion Quest In what manner is such adoration performed Answ Not onely when Images themselves are worshipped but when the worship is performed before them and when they are religiously cloathed but much more when Tapers are lighted before them Incense burned Vowes made to them and Pilgrimages undertaken to them Quest But they say these things are not exhibited to the Images themselves nor the Images themselves adored but those whom they represent Answ This shift availeth them not for in that prohibition there is no mention of such a difference that this should be done for the Images sakes or not but the people are enjoyned not to do the thing at all But that this evasion is not to be admitted the example of the Calf which the Israelites made in the Wildernesse and of those Calves which Jeroboam made for the Israelites in the Land which the Lord had given them to possesse For it is certain that the worship that was given to those Calves was in the intention of the Israelites not given to Calves themselves but to the Lord God of Israel whom they thought to be represented by them neverthelesse that worship was repugnant to the will of God as appeareth sufficiently out of the sacred Story Quest How will you prove that the Israelites worshipped God in the Calf that was made in the Wildernesse Answ That appeareth from the fact of Araon and the People From the fact of Aaron because being inforced by the prayers of the people to make them a God that might goe before them he framed that Calf But it is certain that Aaron had no other God besides the Lord which is also apparent from hence namely in that Aaron when he was about to dedicate that Calf saith of him Tomorrow is a solemnity to the Lord Exod. 32. 5. From the fact of this people because they said of the Calf that he was the God which brought them out of the Land of Aegypt for this whole action of bringing them out of the land of Aegypt by the hand of Moses was performed under the expresse name of the Lord himself Quest How will you prove the same concerning those Calves that Jeroboam made for the People A. First because those calves were proposed to the people by Jeroboam to be worshipped with these words behold thy God O Israel that brought thee up out of the land of Egypt 1 Kings 12. 28. Besides it is evident from the very history yea therein expressed that those calves were therefore framed by Ieroboam lest the people should go to Ierusalem to worship the Lord for they would never have desisted to go to
not be covetous Q. VVhat is it to be covetous A. To desire more then is necessary for the maintenance of the life both of you and yours Heb. 13. 5. 1 Tim. 6. 8 9 10 11. Q. How is that done A. Whilst men beyond their private and just necessity do either get or lay up Luke 12. 15. c. Q. VVhat is the just necessity pertaining to the maintenance of our life A. Food and raiment and such things without which the present life cannot be conserved Q. To what uses then ought Christians to convert those things that exceed just necessity A. Either to the use of the Divine Glory or to the relief of the Poor especially the Domesticks of the Faith yet with such caution as that they do nothing with an aime to their own private Glory which Christ teacheth in those words Let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doth Mat. 6. 3. Q. VVhat measure is to set to food and raiment A. Such as that neither luxury nor bodily pleasure be found in us Q. How may luxury and bodily pleasure be avoided A. When we fit the use of meat and drink to the procurement of health afford such rayment to the body wherein neither luxury nor levity appeareth Q. VVhat do you call luxury in the use of meat and drink A. Gluttony and Drunkenesse whereunto pertaineth Revelling which our Saviour forbiddeth as the writings of the New Covenant plainly shew Luke 21. 34. Rom. 13. 14. Gal. 5. 21. Q. VVhat is the ninth precept A. Thou shalt not bear false witnesse against thy neighbour Q. VVhat pertaineth to this precept A. All lying whatsoever which not onely proceedeth from a minde desirous to deceive but also from levity Besides all sorts of back-biting and detraction and condemning Rev. 21. 8. Ephes 4. 25. 1 Pet. 2. 1. Mat. 7. 1. Luke 6. 37. Q. VVhat is the tenth precept A. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours house nor his wife c. Q. VVhat is it to desire ones neigbbours house A. It is to determine in ones heart to grasp that which is our neighbours though it be by any unjust means Q. VVhat is added to this precept under the New Covenant A. That it is not onely unlawfull to desire that which is our neighbours in that manner but so to set our minds upon it that though we doe not resolve to gain it yet we take some delight in our hearts from the very desire thereof For what is unlawfull for a Christian to do or possesse he must not so much as desire CHAP. II. Of the speciall Precepts delivered apart by Christ Q. YOu have explained to me the Precepts of Christ which are contained in the Commandements of God delivered by Moses and such as are added unto them by Christ it remaineth that you explain those also which Christ hath proposed in particular and by name A. They are twofold for the one hath respect to manners the orher to outward religious acts commonly called ceremonies Q. VVhat are they that have respect to manners A. These the deniall of ones self the bearing of the crosse and imitation of Christ Matt. 16. 24. Q. VVhat is self denyall A. The renouncing of our private wills and evill lusts and worldly and carnall interests Q. VVhat are these Interests A. Such as pertain either to the pleasure of the flesh or riches or pride of life which Iohn comprehendeth in these words love not the world nor the things in the world for whatsoever is in the world the lust of the flesh the lust of the eyes and the pride of life is not of the father but of the world 1 Epist 2. 15. 16. All which Iohn doth not only forbid to be sought with the prejudice of health or injury of others or contumely but if they happen unto the faithfull without these indirect means he would have them to be despised and contemned Q. VVhat is the manner of bearing the crosse A. It is when a man is prepared in mind not onely to undergo all sorts of afflictions but even a most bitter and ignominious death for Christs sake together with a voluntary receiving and suffering thereof when occasion is offered Q. VVhat is the imitation of Christ A. It is the composure of our life according to the rule of his life Q. VVherein doth it consist A. In the exercise of those vertues which the Lord Jesus proposed to us in himself as in a living pattern Q. VVhat are those vertues A. The chief are confidence in God perfect love humility and assiduity in prayer Q. VVhat is confidence in God A. You shall hear of that hereafter Q. VVhat is love A. It hath respect either to God or to our neighbour Q. VVhat is perfect love towards God A. To love him with all the heart with all the Soul with all the strength Q. VVhat is love towards our neighbour A. That is directed either towards a brother or towards an enemie Q. VVherein consisteth perfect charity towards a brother A. That we even lay down our life for him which the Lord Jesus calleth his new commandement Iohn 13. 34. whence it appeareth that a brother is to be loved not onely as our selves but above our selves Q. VVhat is it to lay down our life for a brother A. Not onely to make no spare of other things but to bring our life it self into hazzard that we may save a brother as we see an example thereof proposed by Paul in Priscilla and Aquila and Epaphroditus Rom. 16. 3. 4. Phil. 2. 30. Q. VVherein consisteth love towards an enemy A. As an enemy is of sundry sorts so also is the love towards him For to those that curse us we are bound to wish well to those that hate us to do good for those that afflict and persecute us to pray when they ask we must give to them when they hunger and thirst we must give them meat and drink and when in a true and proper necessity they will borrow of us we are not to reject them Mat. 5. 42. 44. Luke 6. 27 28. Rom. 12. 20. Q. VVhat is humility A. It is the submission of our mind although we be chief persons and the readiness to perform the meanest offices for the least of the faithfull wherof he gave a pattern in himself when he washed his disciples feet Phil. 2. 34. John 13. 4. 5. Q. What is assiduity in Prayers A. It is the most frequent lifting up of our heart to God in every place and commending our necessities to him and not onely ours but the necessities of all the faithfull yea of all men but especially of Kings and all that are in Authority Q. With what things ought those that tray to be furnished A. They ought to confide in God not doubting but that he is able to give what they desire They ought also to ask according to the will of God that is those things which God hath promised They ought finally to fulfill the will of God
Redemption the difference onely lyeth herein that in this redemption of ours there is none that receiveth any thing by way of ransome which must of necessity come to passe in a true Redemption Quest VVhy doth the holy Spirit rather make use of a Methaporicall expression then of a proper one Answ Both because this Metaphoricall expression was already in most frequent use in the Old Covenant as also because the great love labour and cost of God and Christ is more elegantly set off thereby for a deliverance may possible happen without cost or love but so great a redemption could not be effected without great cost and love Quest What say you to this that Christ is a Mediatour between God and Men or of the New Covenant Answ Since we also read in the Scripture that Moses was a Mediatour namely between God and the people of the Old Covenant Gal. 3. 19. neither doth it any wayes appear that he satisfied God it cannot be certainly collected from Christs being a Mediatour of God and Men that he made any satisfaction to God for our sins Q. Why doth the Scripture attribute to Christ the name of a Mediatour A. Because he made in the Name of God a New and Eternall Covenant with Men and declared to us the whole Will of God whereby we have an accesse to God Q. What say you to this that Christ reconciled us to God A. First it is no where said in Scripture that God was reconciled to us by Christ but onely that we by Christ or his death were reconciled to God as you may see in all the places wherein mention is made of this reconciliation as Rom. 5. 10. 2 Cor. 5. 19 20. Ephes 2. 16. So that such a satisfaction cannot thence be evinced yea the opinion of the adversaries is rather clearly refuted thereby Quest VVhat think you of this reconciliation Answ That Christ shewed to us who by reason of our sins were enemies of God and alienated from him a way how we might be converted to him and so reconciled Quest VVhat say you to Christs bearing our sinnes Answ The satisfaction cannot be asserted from hence because it is said of God himself Exod. 34. 7. and Numb 14. 18. according to the Hebrew context That he sheweth mercy to thousands and beareth iniquity and sins which in our Translation is rendred forgiveth iniquity and sins And Moses Levit. 10. 16 17. saith to the sons of Aaron wherefore have ye not eaten the sin-offering in the Holy-place seeing it is most Holy and God hath given it you to bear the iniquity of the Congregation to make attonement for them before the Lord. And Numb 18. 1. the Lord saith to Aaron Thou and thy sons and thy Fathers house with thee shall bear the iniquity of the Sanctuary and thou with thy sons with thee shall bear the iniquity of your Priesthood And Mat. chap. 8. 17. saith expresly that when Christ cured many diseases among the people then was that fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah He took our infirmities and bore our diseases Isai 53. 4. Neverthelesse neither did God nor the sons of Aaron or Aaron himself satisfie for the sins and iniquities of any nor Christ for the diseases of men Quest What therefore is the meaning of these words Answ That Christ took away from us both our sins and the punishment of them as perfectly as if he had born them on his own Body or carryed them away into a far Country as the Scripture elsewhere saith that he is the Lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the world John 1. 29. and that he was once offered that he might bear or take away sins of many Heb. 9. 21. Quest What say you to this that Christ is called a propitiation 1 John 2. 2. Answ The satisfaction is not necessarily concluded hence because the Scripture saith that God himself proposed Christ as a propitiation Rom. 3. 25. As also because the cover of the Ark is called a propitiation or propitiatory Heb. 9. 5. where in the Greek you have the same word that is found in the foregoing place of the Romans But it is evident that it did not satisfie God Finally it is one thing to satisfie another thing to propitiate appease or make favourable since he that is appeased or made favourable may remit and abate much of his right whereas he that is satisfied abateth nothing Q. But what is your opinion concerning this thing A. That God did and doth in a wonderfull manner yeild himself propitious and favourable to us in Christ and hath by him revealed to us all the things that he would have us know especially when he delivered his son to death whence the Apostle in the forequoted place added these words by his Bloud Q. What answer you to those testimonies wherein it is delivered that by the sacrifices of the Old Covenant the death of Christ was figured and shadowed forth Answ First we must know that not all the Sacrifices of the Old Covenant figured the death of Christ but only the killing of that Beast which every year was slain and with whose bloud the High-priest went into the Holy of Holies Which killing as it was not the Sacrifice it self but a certain preparation thereunto and an inchoation thereof but the Sacrifice it self was then performed when the High-priest entred with the Bloud into the Holy of Holies so also the death of Christ was not his Sacrifice but a preparation thereunto and inchoation thereof but the sacrifice it self was then performed when Christ entred into the Heaven itself whereof you shall here more anon Besides although those Sacrifices had shadowed forth the death of Christ yet doth it not thence follow tha God was by the death of Christ satisfied for our sins since the Scripture no where testifieth that those Sacrifices had such power as to satisfie God for sins And yet it is necessary that between the Figure and thing Figured there should be some similitude and proportion Q. What think you of those Sacrifices A. That by them the sins of the people were expiated or attoned that is by the intervening of those Sacrifices the remission of sins graciously decreed by God was brought to effect CHAP. IX Of Faith Q. I Have understood those things which Gods part pertain to the New Covenant explain these also which on our part seeme to belong to the same A. That which on our part belongeth to the New Covenant is Faith on our Lord Jesus Christ Q. What is Faith on our Lord Jesus Christ A. This Faith is in the Scripture set forth under a double consideration sometimes it noteth that Faith which is not necessarily attended with Salvation sometimes that which is so attended Q. What is that Faith which is not necessarily attended with Salvation A. It is a bare assent to the Doctrine of Christ as true which that it is not of necessity attended with Salvation appeareth from the example of those Rulers John 12.
first A. The Apostle doth not there speak of a will and endeavour to obey the commandments of God for this would be repugnant to all the Scriptures which inculcate nothing more frequently then an endeavour to live according to the Commandements of God but of such a will and endeavour whereby we prevent God and move him to propose his benefits to us Which that it is so appeareth from the very position of the Apostle which is such Not all who are born of Abraham according to the flesh are truly his sons and such as to whom the promises of Eternall Happinesse made to the seed of Abraham doe belong but only those whom God vouchsafeth that Grace without any regard had to their birth according to the flesh of which sort are they that have believed in God through Christ of what parents soever they are descended and by this means are become the children of Abraham according to the Spirit Whence it followeth that righteousnesse and salvation are not to be fetched from the Law of Moses which was sometimes delivered to the posterity of Abraham and Israel according to the flesh but by the Faith of Jesus Christ which hath since been proposed for ever by the same God to the Spirituall sons of Abraham and Israel And this is the genuine meaning of the place Wherefore as we willingly consent that there is no man who by his willing and running could or can obtain to move God to conferre some benefit upon him so in like manner after God hath offered Grace that a man either cannot accept and embrace the Grace offered or guide his life according to the prescript of the Divine Will we account a pernicious Errour Q. What say you to the second A. This way of drawing likewise doth not take away the liberty of our will for neither is it done in such a manner as that God should offer violence unto men but God by holding forth the excellency and certainty of his promises doth draw men unto his Son Now that this manner of drawing is not made by force or violence first appeareth from what our Saviour sub-joyneth in the same place where he explaineth that way of drawing saying They shall be all taught of God He therefore that hath heard from the Father and learned he commeth unto me John 6. 45. where it is clear that to be drawn by the Father is no other then to hear from the Father and to be taught And how that is done appeareth from the words of Christ a little after expressed Not that any man hath seen the Father but he that was from God he hath seen the Father ver 46. Again it is perspicuous that that way of drawing pertaineth unto all to whom the declaration of the Gospell doth come as may be easily collected from that place where Jesus saith When I am lifted up from the Earth I will draw all men unto me John 12. 32. Q. VVhat say you to the third A. That this passage taketh not away the liberty of the will may hence appear in that here is no mention made of God who ordained those men to Eternall Life but it is onely said simply that they believed as many as were ordained to Eternall Life which may be understood of the men themselves that they were ordained that is fit and set in a posture to embrace the doctrine of Christ and so to lay hold on Eternall Life therein proposed as it is spoken a little before in the same Chapter in a thing contrary to this namely that others judgeth themselves unworthy of Eternall Life Acts 13. 46. And as Christ saith afterwards Act. 18. 10. That he had much people at Corinth for no other cause then that they were apt to become his people Q. VVhat are the testimonies pertaining to certain persons A. Amongst others those wherein it is written that God hardneth the heart of Pharaoh and that Judas who was an Apostle of Christ did betray his Lord that the Scripture might be fulfilled from whence the Adversaries inferre that he was forced thereunto Q. What say you to these places A. I confesse that God doth sometimes so reject certain men from his Grace that they can neither repent nor be amended But those works and actions of God doe no wayes if we speak simply take away Free-will since those examples wherein they appear are singular Which God would therefore have extant because the men when they might did neverthelesse refuse to obey God and therefore God had been for a long time worthy that God should execute his judgments upon them which he when he thought did accordingly execute upon them of which sort was Pharaoh who had long before afflâ—cted the people of God and Judas who had been long before a Thief and covetous person and therefore God made use of them to perpetrate such horrid deeds CHAP. XI Of Justification Q. SInce I understand what Faith is and how far forth in our power now shew what we get by that Faith A. By Faith on Christ we get Justification Q. What is Justification A. It is when God accounteth us for just which he doth then when he doth both forgive our sins and endue us with Eternall Life concerning which Paul openly testifieth whilst he saith that the happinesse of a man consisteth herein that God imputeth righteousnesse to him Rom. 4. 6. And then addeth out of the 32 Psalme that blessed is the man to whom the Lord imputeth not sinne Q. Is none then justified without Faith in Christ A. None at all But this is to be understood of that time since Christ hath been revealed Concerning which those words of Peter also are to be understood That there is no name under Heaven given among men whereby we must be saved but the name of Jesus Act. 4. 12. For as to the time that went before the Revelation of Christ this cannot be affirmed thereof For although all men that ever believed in God shall by Faith be justified as may be openly gathered from Heb. 11. Yet notwithstanding that way of Justification was not comprehended in the Covenant given by Moses but meerly depended of the Grace of God Whereas now the manner of Justification by Faith in Christ is contained in the very New Covenant Whence their Faith did not include Faith in Christ and therefore the Apostle saith that Faith came by the Gospell Gal. 3. 22 23 24 25. So that they were not justified by Faith in the Son of God but by Faith on God himself alone Q. But that place Act. 15. 11. seemeth to oppugne this opinion where the Apostle Peter saith that we hope to be saved by the Grace of the Lord Jesus as well as they that is the Fathers A. In this place the word they is not referred to the Fathers immediately before mentioned for neither is it here treated of them but to the Gentiles of whom it is here purposely discoursed who are sundry times in the same speech opposed to
the believing Jewes as the Jewes to the believing Gentiles For thus we read God therefore who knoweth the heart gave testimony unto them that is the Gentiles having imparted the Holy Spirit unto them as also unto us Jewes neither hath he put a difference between us and them having purified their hearts by Faith And now why tempt ye God to put a yoke meaning the Law of Moses on the necks of the Disciples that is the Gentiles which neither we nor our Fathers were able to bear Yea by the Grace of the Lord Jesus c. Neither is it any impediment to this interpretation that word Fathers is nearer then the word Disciples as we have formerly shewn from the places which we alledged on a like occasion Also neither is that of any moment that the word they is of the Masculine and the Word Gentiles in the Greek of the Neuter gender for the word Gentiles is elsewhere found in the Scripture either joyned with a masculine gender or related thereunto vide Mat. 28. 19. But if this will not be here admitted we say that the word they is commodiously referred to the word Disciples going before which is of the masculine gender Of Christs KINGLY Office Q. I Have perceived all things pertaining to the Prophetick Office of Christ proceed I pray you to his other Offices namely the Kingly and Priestly A. Thus then the Kingly Office of Christ falleth under a two-fold consideration both of the Kingdome it self and of the people subject thereunto Q. VVhat is the consideration of the Kingdom it selfe A. Namely that God hath placed Christ being raised from the dead and taken up into Heaven at his right Hand having given to him all power both in Heaven and on Earth and put all things in subjection under his feet that he might govern defend and Eternally save those that believe in him Quest Where are these things extant Answ The Scripture is full of them but the Apostle Paul giveth a singular attestation thereunto Ephes 1. 19 20. c. where he saith that God the Father put forth the exceeding greatnesse of his power when he raised Jesus Christ from the dead and set him at his right hand in the Heavenly places far above all Principality and Authority and force and Lordship and every name that is named not onely in this world but in the world to come c. and the Apostle Peter Act. 5. 30 31. saith that the God of their Fathers had raised up Jesus whom the Jewes had slain hanging him on a tree And that he had exalted him to be a Prince and Saviour to give Repentance and Remission of sins to Israel Q But the Adversaries say that Christ raised himself Answ They are exceedingly mistaken since the Scripture saith manifestly in infinite places that God the Father of Christ raised him from the dead Which is so true that the writings of the New Covenant in many places not expressing the Name of God doe thus describe him He that raised Jesus Christ from the dead Rom. 4. 24. chap. 8. 11. Q. How cometh it to passe that they hold such an opinion A. They think it is hinted in some passages of the Scripture as when Christ John 2. 19. saith Destroy this Temple and in three dayes I will raise it up And afterwards John 10. 17 18. Therefore the Father loveth me because I lay down my life that I may take it again None taketh it from me but I lay it down of my self I have power to lay it down and power to take it again And Peter 1 Epist 3. 18. Christ once suffered the just for the unjust that he might bring us to God being mortified in the Flesh but quickned in the Spirit Q. What answer you to the first Answ First I answer that so few obscure and figurative places ought not to be opposed to so many and perspicuous ones so that a few obscure places should explain many perspicuous ones but rather the few and obscure places should be interpreted according to the tenour of the many and perspicuous ones Again as to the first testimony the sense may be that Christ being brought again from the dead should raise up or erect his Body namely when God had put life again into it But indeed in such figurative expressions not so much the words in particular as the sense is to be attended especially if the obvious and literall sense seem to contain in it somewhat that is false and repugnant to other places of the Scripture Yet neverthelesse if any man will obstinately urge that expression I will raise it up let him consider first that the Scripture is wont to say a man doth a thing which he onely causeth to be done or is the occasion thereof thus Jeremy chap. 38. 23. saith to Zedekiah Thou shalt be taken by the hand of the King of Babylon and thou shalt burn this City with fire for so the Hebrew context hath it And John 12. 25. He that hateth his life or rather soul in this world shall keep it unto Eternall life Yet neither did Zedekiah if you speak properly burn the City nor doe those that suffer death for the Word of God properly keep their Soul Secondly in as much as the Jewes demand of Christ that he should doe a Signe it was necessary that he should so shape his answer as if he himself were to doe the thing he speaketh of otherwise he had not so oppositely answered them yet that his words might carry a sufficient intimation that he himself should not properly do the work it is observable that in the Greek he omits the particle I saying onely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which had it been inserted would have clearly shewn that he had truly raised himself though even then it could not have been thence firmly collected that he did it by his own power and consequently was the most High God Quest How thence is the place to be understood Answ As if Christ should say though you take me out of the way yet shall I after three dayes be raised from the dead and restored which will be a clear signe that I was sent by God Q What say you to the second A. This speech doth not prove that Christ when he was dead had some power in him to raise himself since we read of believers that power is given to them to become the Children of God that is immortall though it be certain that God enduing them with immortality will make them his sons John 1. 12. so that the meaning of the passage is this I have power to lay down my life because I have received this commandment from my Father whose command giveth sufficient power and authority for the doing of any thing I have also power or right or priviledge as the Greek will bear to take it or receive it as the Greek may also be rendred because the Father hath promised that if I lay down my