a little 2 John 9. Whosoever transgresseth and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ hath not God but he that abideth in the doctrine of Christ hath both the father and the son No man hath the sons Kingdom in his heart but he hath the fathers Kingdom there ton if Christ be the souls husband the soul will acknowledge God that is Christs father to be his father Christs God to be his God the spirit of this son being sent into our hearts makes us willingly and gladly call God Abba father Ga. 4.6 and so we are taught Jo. 5.23 That we should honour the son even as we honour the father and he that honoureth not the son honoureth not the father and what more plain to our purpose then what Christ said to his Disciples Mat. 10.40 He that receiveth you receiveth me and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me which shews us that whosoever receiveth Christ receiveth the father which sent him there is no such thing as a mans receiving of Christs kingdom into his heart in opposition to the fathers Kingdom no man can come to Christ and have his Kingdom set up in his heart except the father which hath sent him draw him Joh. 6.44 And this is the will of the father that sent Christ that whosoever seeth the son and believeth in him should have everlasting life this sheweth us that the father and Christ have one will the same will design Kingdom in the Saints it s the father that setteth up Christs Kingdom in the heart for saith Christ no man commeth unto me except it were given him of the father Jo. 6.65 and so Jo. 8.9 Ye neither know me nor my father if ye had known me ye should have known my father also see how they go together and so Christ telleth us John 1479. He that hath seen me hath seen the father also I might quote twenty Scriptures more to shew the Authors mistake in this particular which is not without danger for here would scare and affright poor souls that they set up Christs Kingdom in their hearts in opposition to the fathers but we see that where any soul receiveth Christ he receiveth the father that sent him Page 326. He saith that the Disciples could cast out those Divels that dwell and acted in hearts unswept and ungarnished but they could not cast out that sort of Divels Mat. 17.14 to 22. which delight to rest in swept cleansed and garnished consciences No question but the Divel hath the strongest hold in those who have been swept and garnished as it is said Mat. 12.43 44. where the Divel is said to walk thorow the dry places seeking rest and finding none by those dry places may be meant the true believers that are baptised with the holy Ghost and with fire and that had the spirit of judgement and of burning this maketh them dry places and though the Divel doth in some particular temptations prevail upon these believers yet the Lord recovers them again that he can find no rest there but those that have only had common grace and enlightnings and so are like houses swept and garnished though the Divel seem to have left such men yet they will find at last a repossessing and their latter end to be worse then their beginning but what manner of Divels were these that are spoken of in this 17. Mat. that they delighted only they were so cleanly to dwell in swept and garnished consciences he that was there possessed it s said v. 15. was lunaticke and have all such men swept and garnished consciences what ground is there for the Author to gather this from hence no question but the Divels delight to dwell in a man that is in the height of profaness and impiety and where they cannot keep men such but they are pricked at the heart and convinced of sin and reform and yet are ignorant of Gods righteousness and go about to establish their own righteousness they are very well content to dwell in such hearts and the reason why they could not cast out the Divel out of the lunaticke person was because of their unbelief Christ saith and this unbelief was not such unbelief as men are condemned for the not receiving of Christ but the faith of miracles is that which is here spoken of I hope that every one that hath true saving faith in Christ cannot cure the lonatick but if they had exercised this faith here spoken of they might have cured the lunaticke person The Apostles had the faith of miracles but they did not alwaies act it not at this time and to overthrow this notion of the Authors we find Luke 9.1 That the disciples had power and authority over all Devils Page 333. He makes the sinning against Christ in his second appearance to be the sin against the Holy Ghost The Author leaves out nothing that might appall and agash the poor soul that won't close with his notions of a higher image and life and here telleth us this is the sin against the Holy Ghost a grievous sin indeed that shall never be forgiven in this world nor in the world to come we have seen before that the Author makes Christ in his second appearance to be namely Christ shining forth in the glory and naked similitude of God but where doth the Scripture make this the sin against the holy Ghost the sin against the holy Ghost is an opposing of Christ and the truth knowingly wilfully and out of meer malice that it is not the pleasure or profit that men find in their wayes that makes them oppose and set themselves against Christ and his wayes but meerly hatred and malice against Christ and this is called the sinne against the holy Ghost because that the person thus sinning hath been so clearly and fully convinced and enlightned by the holy Ghost to the contrary of what he is resolved thus to do unto death this sin against the holy Ghost is not only a falling in the way for so a Saint may fall but a falling away from Christ and the truth and not every falling away from Christ and the truth neither but such a falling away from Christ the truth that is wilful and meerly of malice and hatred to the truth and Christ Jesus and so if a man fall from Christ and leave him in this manner as hath been said whether it be Christ in his first or second appearance as the Author distinguisheth it maketh him guilty of the sinne against the holy Ghost I hasten towards a conclusion lest I should quite tire my selfe and the Reader with these things but I cannot passe over what our Author saith Page 269. Where expounding Rev. 17. where it is said the whore sitteth upon many waters and with her the Kings of the earth have committed fornication he expounds it thus That by the Kings of the earth is meant men in the honour and dignitie of the first Adam's purity and principles that they
and it may be in the same page tells us they go about to establish their own righteousness To conclude this Chapter after the Author hath so cryed up the attainments of men in his first image as we have seen when he hath affirmed them to be called out of the world Christ made their righteousnesse in a way of justification and told us how they are one flesh one body with Christ knit and married to Christ faithful walkers with Christ he tells us very fairly at last Page 361. That these are the devills subjects though he telleth us in that same page that they owne themselves in a professed subjection and conformity to the law of God that is to what is righteous holy and good in its nature and not onely as it is within themselves but as they are made righteous in another viz. Jesus Christ the righteous Truly we never thought the devill had such subjects but the Author could not this Gordian knot if he were set about it for if righteous in Christ in a way of justification and sanctified by his blood how are they the devills subjects nay the Author before had told us they were Christs subjects and a man at the same time cannot be Christs subject and the devils subject a man is translated from the power of darknesse when he is translated into the Kingdome of Christ Thus have we examined the Authors notions concerning men in his first image so full of contradiction to themselves and the truth Now to examine his doctrine about men in his higher image which he maketh a saving state shall be the work of the next Chapter CHAP. IV. Examines the Authors doctrine about his higher Image which he counts a saving state HE tels us Page 7. That this higher Image is the communion of the Holy Ghost 2 Cor. 13.14 which Paul wishes unto them after the grace they had shared in from Jesus Christ our Lord as the common salvation Jude 3. and as the fruit of the love of God the Father This shews the Author to be a Critick indeed as if a man might have the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ and yet be shut out for ever from the love of God the Father and the communion of the Holy Ghost but what is it to have the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ but to have the pardoning strengthning sanctifying quickning grace of the Lord Jesus and he that hath this to be sure hath the love of God he both loveth God and God loveth him and this communion of the Holy Ghost is an effect of the love of God and the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ who giveth the blessed Spirit to those who are partakers of his grace and righteousnesse to sanctifie them wholly comfort them lead them into all truth and seale them to the day of redemption and the common salvation spoken of Jude 3. which the Authour quotes is the grace of God which bringeth salvation to all true Believers Gentiles as well as Jews called there common because this righteousness of God which is by faith in Jesus Christ is upon all and unto all them that believe whether Jews or Gentiles for the same Lord is rich in mercy to justifie and save all that believe on him though they be not Jews by nature but sinners of the Gentiles in this respect is the grace and righteousness that is in Christ called common salvation and not that it is common to them that are eternally saved and to them that perish Page 58. He describes the higher Image to be a beholding of Gods very similitude open and bare faced But is this saving faith to be beholding Gods very similitude open and bare faced as the Authors phrase is Alas we can have no access to him as an absolute God with comfort and for salvation without relation to a Mediator sesus the surety of the better Testament John 14.6 No man commeth to the father but by him and he saveth them that come to God by him Hebr. 7.25 that is true saving faith not the seeing of Gods similitude open and bare faced but how much better doth the Apostle describe faith and saving grace 2 Cor. 4.6 where he calleth it Gods shining into our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ There is a very neere approach to God that the Saints shall have in glory and a glorious view of him in the beatifical vision in glory but that is not faith but glorification not here but hereafter as God told Moses Exod. 33. No man shall see my face and live But blessed be the Lord for ever that he puts us into the clift of the Rock the Lord Jesus and there we see his goodnesse passing before us and hear him proclaming his name the Lord the Lord God gratious and abundant in mercy and that by beleiving in Christ we are his children and that because we are thus his sons he sendeth the spirit of his son into our hearts whereby we can call him Abba Father this is unspeakable comfort to us in our present state that we thus know that we are now the sons of God though yet it doth not fully appear to us what we shall be but we know that when he shall appear even Jesus Christ the righteous that we shall be like him and see him as he is as 1 John 3.3 and however others pretend to see God in his very similitude open and bare faced we confess as 1 Cor. 13.12 that we now see but through a glass darkly though we yet expect at that day break of eternal brightness in Heaven to see face to face and know as we are known That which the Author saith of saving faith and the higher Image p. 75 76. we will grant taking it in a good sense and with this caution that what he there saith is improperly called the newbirth but rather glorification and that his expressions are too liable to mistakes but for quietness sake we will pass them by and come to Page 139. He saith these in the higher Image are under the ministery of Christs second appear ance wherein he doth not only appear a King of righteousness conveying a seed of righteousness answerable to that perfection commanded by the Law but also a King of peace conveying a seed of everlasting peace But the Author must know that where Christ is to any soul a King of righteousnesse he is also a King of peace The peace of God which passeth all understanding for its sweetness and comfort is an effect of Christs righteousness and so saith the Scripture Isaiah 30.17 the work of righteousness shall be peace to wit peace with God the effect of righteousness to wit Christs righteousness quietness and assurance for ever for as Rom. 5.1 being justified by faith that is by Christ and his righteousness believed in we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ so that this is the difference
in his death and sufferings that he partakes of the benefit of that bloody sacrifice such a fellowship and share he hath in Christs sufferings that what Christ did in suffering for his sins is imputed to him by an act of the free arace of the Pather as if he himselfe had done it Again the believer is called into fellowship with Jesus in persecution that he suffers with him is despised with him and thus as the Apostle saith As Christ was so are we in this present World without form or comeliness of no reputation in the worlds account Sometimes Regeneration is set out by a planting into the likeness of Christs death Rom. 6.5 10 11. Christ in that he died he died unto sin once but in that he liveth he liveth unto God and we are planted into the likenesse of his death when as v. 11. we likewise are dead indeed unto sin and live unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord that as it follows v. 12. sin doth not reign in our mortal bodies that we should obey it in the lusts thereof Again sometimes Regeneration is set out by putting on the Lord Jâ—sus Christ as Rom. 13.14 Then it shewes how the true believer puts on the rigteousnesse of the Lord Jesus is willing to be uncloathed of the menstruous rags of his own righteousnesse that he may be cloathed upon with the righteousnesse of Christ Sometimes also it is set out in Scripture by comming unto Christ and taking his yoke upon us as Matth. 11. ult to shew us how the true believer is submitted and given up to Christ is his servant is under his voke under his rule and government is willing to be ruled and governed and commanded by Christ whose commandements are not grievous Sometimes Regeneration is set out by fleeing for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before as in the Gospel so Heb. 6.18 to shew us that the true believer seeth his lost estate without Christ and fleeth unto Christ as a City of refuge from the Avenger of blood and whereas there is mercy and life and pardon and righteousnesse tendred to sinners in the Gospel and open proclamation that whosoever will may come and take of the water of life freely and sorgivenesse of sins grace and glory is preached in Christs name this soule hath laid hold upon this hope set before him accepted of this grace accepted of these terms of mercy and peaee and so layes down armes against Christ True Regeneration is a difficult thing and therefore there is great need of the Seal of the Spirit to satisfie us about the work of grace upon our hearts for there is a counterfeit faith and a counterfeit repentance there is both an acquired faith and an infused faith there is a believing that is only a work of a mans understanding and not the work of the Spirit Rom. 10.10 With the heart man believeth to righteousnesse It is not enough to assent with the understanding it s a marvellous difficult thing to find out the difference between that faith that is of a mans own making upon conviction and illumination and that faith that is wrought by the spirit of God by way of creation and infusion and therefore thousands in the world are everlastingly cheated and cousened in this matter But when a man comes to be outed of himself of self-righteousnesse and self-strength and self-wisedome and close with Christ in a word of grace in a free promise that is the work To rest in legal conviction to rest upon duties and qualifications to rest in amendment of life to rest in Notions and head-knowledge of Christ and free grace these are false rests but for the soul to be nothing and utterly lost in himselfe and to apply the blood and righteousness of Christ is a safe and saving state for this is the will of the Father that sent him That whosoever seeth the Son and believeth on him should not perish but have everlasting life CHAP. V. Treats of Justification and shews that whosoever is justified by Christs blood and made the righteousnesse of God in him is in a sasing state and shall never come into condemation THe Doctrine of Justification was well called by Luther the Doctrine of the standing or falling of the Church of God this Doctrine so necessary so precious hath this Author miserably mistaken Page 118. He tels us that men in his first image who are not yet in a sasing state have Christ for their righteousnesse in a way of Justification and page 119. tells us this Righteousnesse and Justification the world hath in common with true Believers This Doctrine of his is most dangerous and is most highly dishonourable unto Christ making the blood of the Covenant a common and vain thing that men may be made the righteousnesse of God in Christ and yet not be in a saving state which this Author doth in so many words affirm in that page before mentioned therefore let us treat a little of this blessed doctrine of Justification Justification is to be considered either as an immanent or a transient act in God in the first consideration it is a gracious purpose in God from all eternity not to deal with the Elect according to their sins but to absolve them and forgive them all their trespasses Justification considered as a transient act is Gods justifying and absolving the poor sinner in his own conscience and actually imputing Christs righteousnesse to him when he believeth in him that justifieth the ungodly none but those that are eternally saâ—ed are thus justified for men are not justified and unjustified again as this Author fancies Christ hath taken away the curse of the law from them Gal. 3.13 Now as 1 Cor. 15.46 The strength of sin is the Law the strength and power that sin hath to cast any man into hell is from the Law that the Law is broken and the Law is not satisfied but now Christ having for any man taken away the curse of the Law sinne hath no power to condemn that man it hath no strength and power to doe it for it hath its power from the Law and Christ hath satisfied that and is become the end of the Law for righteousnesse to every one that believeth Rom. 10.4 Who can lay any thing to the charge of those that are thus justified by Christ the Law cannot for Christ hath satisfied the Law and paid it the uttermost farthing yea God through the righteousnesse of Christ is a just God in being a Saviour of them that believe in Christ Christ the surety of the better Testament having paid the debt God is just in being the justifier of him that in Jesus Rom. 3.26 Just to deliver them from going down to the pit for whom Christ hath paid a ransome And so Rom. 5.10 For if when we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the blood of his Son much more being reconciled we shall be saved by his life by hum living and reigning in
justification and his having died thus for our sins is as if we had all died the Law fully satisfied To explain a little what Christ according to this blessed Covenant of grace hath done for us in his death and sufferings for our sins 1. He hath taken away the curse of the Law by being thus made a curse for us Gal. 3.13 that the law cannot curse us or condemn us for ever he hath borne the curse of the Law for us that the Law hath lost its sting in Christ it inflicted its curse upon Christ he by the will of God and his own will spontaneously yeilded to it so that now the Law can lay nothing to the charge of the believer because Christ hath payed all thus as Psa 89.19 God laid help upon one that was mighty we could not pay the debt we could not satisfie justice but the Lord hath found out one that was able and willing to do it that was able to bear the curse of the Law and be more then a conquer or if that the Lord Christ hath not satisfied the Law to the full let the Law lay it to his charge then indeed we had not a perfect righteousness and remission of sins but help was laid upon one that was mighty that upon the Crosse said it was finisht all was pay'd all the curse borne all the wrath suffered 2. He purged away our sins by this sacrifice of himself Heb. 1.3 there was a commutation of persons he was made sin for us who himself knew no sin 2 Cor. 5. ult the sins that we had committed he according to the Covenant between him and the father is willing to bear and God laies all our iniquities upon Christ Isa 53. he hath all our sins charged upon him and he purgeth them all away by bearing the punishment of them which makes full satisfaction for them all the Law is satisfied either by our performance of what is required or hearing the punishment for not performing Christ he freely suffers for our sins bears the punishment the just for the unjust and so God accepting of his suffering in our stead according to the agreement between the father and Christ in that behalf we have redemption through his blood even the forgiveness of sins according to the riches of his grace and if this Author will call this but a legal righteousness of Christs and will seek another to be justified by and have remission of sins let him we know that thus our sins are purged away for ever and we can never come into condemnation but are delivered from going down to the pit because Christ hath thus pay'd our ransome the God of all grace according to the Covenant of grace between him and Christ having thus set forth Christ to be a propitiation for our sins through faith in his blood and thus we are justified freely by his grace and all our sins purged away through this redemption which is in Jesus Christ as Rom. 3. and no man is justified through the redemption which is in Jesus Christ but he is justified freely by grace not upon the tenour of the Covenant of works as this Author imagines but upon the tenour of the Covenant of grace 3. Christ thus dying for us and in our stead hath obtained an eternal redemption for us Heb. 9.12 not a temporary redemption and upon the terms of the Covenant of works as this Author supposes Christ tells us John 16.10 that his spirit shall discover unto us that there is perfect and everlasting righteousnesse in him because he goeth to the father and we see him no more he having undert aken to expiate and purge away our sins for ever If he had not fully and perfectly done it the father might have sent him to die again but that maketh it evident that he had pay'd the utmost farthing in that he goeth to the father and we see him no more but there he sitteth down at the right hand of God Thus our redemption in Christ is an eternal redemption never to come into prison again an everlasting peace he hath made between God and us by the blood of his Crosse his righteousnesse and comelinesse he puts upon us which presents us to the father without spot or wrinkle or any such thing for ever 4. Christs death is not only satisfactory but meritorious so that faith and saving grace is Christs purchase also both grace and glory we are blest with all spiritual blessings in him this is the Covenant of grace and surely fitly so called for all in it is meer grace meer grace that God and Christ who had been happy for ever though we had all perished that there should be such blessed counsel and Covenant between them that the second person in the Trinity should suffer for our sins the just for the unjust and that by his stripes we should be healed if ever any thing was grace this was surely that God the Father should appoint his only begotten son to dye for us enemies and ungodly and that application is made of this blood of sprinkling is rich grace also which is the blessing of the New Covenant to give us new hearts faith and holiness is no this blessed Covenant truly enough called the Covenant of grace Iet this Author call it the Covenant of works we see cause enough to call it the Covenant of grace and to cry grace grace unto it Thus we have seen the nature of the Covenant of work and the Covenant of grace and we see there is no justification to be had upon the terms of the Covenant of works as this Author imagines but only by the Covenant of grace but alas this Author not well understanding the nature of the Covenant of works and the Covenant of grace jumbles the Covenant of works and the Covenant of grace together in our justification and so overthrows the Covenant of grace as will appear Page 334. He there saith that the Saints for their justification have the robes of Christs righteousness as they are worn by Christ in his own person made white by himself in his own blood imputed to them for justification of his legall righteousness for their justification upon the â—â—nour of the first Covenant And Page 120. He saith the spiritual seed receive Christ not in part only whereby they have in common with those in the first image all the forementioned benefits viz. calling justification and sanctification upon the tenour of the Covenant of works but in whole whereby they have over and above that which excels possessing and enjoying the riches of both Covenants absolutely and unchangeably From these passages of the Author it is plain indeed hath a perfect analogy with his judgment that the true believer is justified upon the tenour of the Covenant of works as well as a man in the first Image but this is not all his justification but over and above he is justified by the robes of Christs righteousness as they are worn
mysteries in the 13. Chapter of the first booke of his Institutions saith Quos oblectat speculandio intemperies minime placandos suscipio he would not goe about to please those who delight in speculations so as not to be wise to sobriety no more shal I after this short digression let us examine his doctrine concerning Christ Page 2. He maketh Christ to be the similitude of God that is Immanent and eternally abiding in himselfe and as so is unexposed to any creature discerning and page 3. saith in this communion is one with God and is God this is that which up and downe his booke he calls the higher Image the glory of the Father and the like and yet he saith Page 2. and elsewhere that Christ thus considered is not to be taken for the second person of the Trinity but for the witness that is borne by all three Now promising this that it hath beene the way of those that have broached false doctrine in all ages to hide and cloud their opinions with subtil distinctions I ask first how Christ is God but as he is the second person in the Trinity for he makes him God in this state and yet he saith doth not here consider him as the second person in the Trinity Secondly I ask how any witness of the Trinity is God it is somthing from God but is not God for then we shall make so many Gods as there are witnesses to use the Authors words from the Trinity one Michael Servetus was hammering out such notions about Christ But now our Author makes this higher Image Page 12. to be the personal appearance which all the three persons in the Trinity make in Christ and if so he must make Christ none of the three pervons in the Trinity but only with Servetus som appearance Image and Idea from the Trinity but to what purpose should I follow the Author in these his deepe speculations it suffices us to know that our blessed Redeemer is the fellow of the Lord of hosts God equal with the Father though he was found in fashion as a man and humbled himselfe unto death even the death of the Crosse Page 2. He saith Christ in a second sense is the Image of God that proceeds out of his mouth to tabernacle with the creature in a temporary ministration and he saith Page 4. that this is the witness of the second person of the Trinity Before he had made Christ in that first Image the personal appearance witness of the three persons of the Trinity and now tells us of a second Image wherein Christ is and is the witness but of one of the persons of the Trinity but we take Christ to be the second person in the Trinity and not only some witness from him and image that he exhibits to the creature and the Author makes this the state wherein the world have union and communion with Christ which state he by the operation of the third person in in the Trinity was perswaded to offer up and exchange for the higher Image and yet faith he was in the higher Image first such divers and strange doctrine we meet with in that hooke if he was first in the higher Image how could he offer up the lower Image to get into it The Author quotes for these three Images and witnesses of the Trinity the 1 John 5.7 There are three that beare record in Heaven the Father the Word and the holy Ghost and these three are one But I hope that place doth not say it was the witness of the Father to bring forth Christ in one Image and the witness of the word to bring forth Christ into another Image and the holy Ghosts witness to bring him into another but if we mind the eleventh verse of that Chapter we shall see what the record or witness is This is the record that God hath given to us eternall life and this life is in his Son that God hath chosen and appointed Christ and none other to be the Prince and the Saviour to give repentance unto Israel and forgiveness of sinnes neither is there life and salvation in any other and therefore the Apostle v. 10. chargeeth those that believe not this record of God concerning Christ that in him is righteousness and life and will not come to him that they may have life and be saved through him I say he there chargeth such with making God a Lyar by not believing the truth of the Record that the blessed Trinity beare in this behalf and so page 4. he quotes Rev. 1.8 he saith that Christ is there called he that is by way of distinction from himselfe considered as he that was in the witness of the Father and he that is to come in the witness of the holy Ghost This Scripture surely is not a little wrested for the foregoing verse speaketh of Christs second coming behold he cometh with clouds and every eye shall see him and I am Alpha and Omega which shewes the eternity of the Son of God which is which was which is to come the Almighty which is now set downe at the right hand of the Majestie on high which was found in fashion as a man and put to death in the flesh is to come the second time without sin to salvation the same Lord Jesus that after he had purged our sins by the sacrifice of himselfe was taken up to Heaven is to come againe Act. 1.11 Jude 14.15 So that this Scripture will no way serve his purpose nor beare his exposition besides his exposition will be very inconsistent with his owne judgment for he thinks Christ is now in the higher Image brought into it by the third person in the Trinity but if by Christ to come should be meant that Image and state Christ should not be yet in it but it were a thing yet to do Let us see whether a third Scripture which he quotes in many places will favour his judgement and that is Eph. 3.9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the Mystery which from the beginning of the world lay hid in God who created all things by Jesus Christ This place he supposeth holds forth the first and second Image in which the Trinity brought forth Christ let us therefore consider what is meant by this Mystery which from the beginning of the world lay hid in God and how God created all things in Jesus Christ The Apostle is there treating of the Gentiles being partakers of the promise in Christ by the Gospel and of his being imployed of God to preach among them that unsearchable riches of Christs love righteousness and grace and so to make more evident and plain what is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fellowship or dispensation of the Mystery which from the begining of the world lay hid in God which was that he would by Jesus Christ the seed of the woman break the serpents head and save his Elect among which there were not
Christ the Lord our righteousness and so the author tells us that ceasing from his fleshly principles he gets to neere and intimate communion with the Father so then it seemeth he had not such neere and intimate communion with the Father before but we do believe that the very human nature of Christ had of Christ had alwaies very neer intimate communion with the Father excepting the time when it pleased the Father to bruise him and put him to grief when he made his soule an offering for our sins then God hid his face from him that made him cry out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Page 97. He makes Abrahams offering up Isaac spoken of James 2. To hold forth his offering up the first image I need not say much to throw downe his exposition of that place but I shall onely say this that if that act of his were the throwing up of the first image then it should seeme Abraham had not offered it up before and so according to the authors way was not in a saving state which if it were needfull might abundantly be confuted out of Genesis But Page 98. He saith Abraham herein was but the type or figure of Christ who performed this in himself and this act of obedience being imputed to us presents us righteous and without â—lame before the Throne of God But surely if we will put an allegoricall sense upon this passage of Abrahams offering up his son Isaac they do better that make Abraham to represent God the Father herein that offered his Isaac gave his Isaac for a sacrifice for our sins the beloved son in whom he was so well pleased but this author makes Christ both Abraham and Isaac he makes Isaac his fleshly part but I wold have the author follow his allegories a little better and wiselier not to plainly contradict the holy Ghost in his allegories for Gal 4. The holy ghost maketh Ishmael to signifie the covenant of workes and Isaac the covenant of grace and verse 28. So we as Isaac was are the Children of the promise so that when the holy ghost makes Isaac to signifie the new covenant the author is too bold to make him signifie the law and the offering of him to signifie the offering up of a legall state And so this author saith more plainly Page 99. That Christ actually sacrificed the true Isaac crucifiing in himselfe the life of his fleshly seed and legall principles Thus we see how he thwarts the holy ghost who will have Isaac to hold forth the new covenant the free woman the Ierusalem that is above and to hold forth those that are borne after the spirit in that 4. Galath But this author will needs have Isaac to signifie the fleshly seed and legall principles Page 99. He saith that Christ and his whole seed enter into rest by Faith But the author must have a care how he rank Christ and the Saints together and liken them in believing we come to him that is beleive in him and so our troubled weary heavy laden souls enter into rest Matt. 11.28 And there is no such way in the world to get rest for a weary soule but by faith in Christ applying his blood which speaketh better things then the blood of Abel but how Christ needes to enter into rest by faith as we sinfull creatures do is a paradox but as I said before he levels the Lord Jesus and mightily debases him Page 103. He saith that which in the first sense Christs naturall man was a sufferer in consisted in the weakness and disabilitie which was brought upon his fleshly mind to resist the powerfull workings of his faith or spirituall minde A strange passage that Christ had a fleshly carnall minde in him as well as a spirituall minde but we believe there was no fleshly mind in our Redeemer and wonder that this author is so bold as to affirme it and he maketh it the worke of his death and cross to subdue his fleshly minde and if there were such a fleshly mind in Christ Jesus it was no suffering and affliction to have that taken away but rather a great mercy but far be it from us to have such low and mean and base thoughts of our deare Saviour But in the same 103. Page He saith that Christ was thus brought into such a frame of spirit that he was disabled from doing any thing against the truth and thereby qualified to do all for the truth As if there was a time when Christ had such a frame of spirit that he might have acted against the truth and will of God but by taking up the higher image was disinabled from doing so and before that time was not qualified to do all things for the truth and he adds in the same place that this profitable weakness and disability namely not to do any thing against the truth came not all at once upon Christs naturall man but gradually then this author would make him for a time to be in great danger of sinning but that by degrees he grew disinabled from sinning And Page 104. He saith thus in this first part of Christs passive obedience he through the law becomes dead to the law through the law of the spirit of life in the second Adam becomes dead to the law and life of the first fulfilling the whole law of righteousness by being rendred utterly unable to perform one tittle of it in mans first activity and sufficiency or as left alone to the grace strength received by his first covenant principles Let us examine how Christ by the law became dead to the law Paul indeed saith thus of himselfe Gal 2.19 I through the law am dead to the law that is seeing the law spirituality and my owne weakness to keep it that if I be under the law I must needs be under the curse I am dead to the law that is will not put my selfe under it as a covenant of workes to doe it and live but I seeke to have my life hid with Christ in God and to have him to be the end of the law for righteousness to me but Christ could not be dead to the law in this respect for he was able to performe every tittle of it which Paul and we were not able to doe but I say Christ needed not as we to fly from the law as that which is weake and unable through the flesh and inability in us to keep it to bring us unto life and so to goe unto another for righteousness and life and he goes on to make Christ one while keeping the law out of strength that he received by first Covernant principles but afterwards he faith he could not performe one tittle of it as left to those principles thus doth he represent Christ one while obeying upon the principles of the Covenant of works another while he could not obey at upon these principles running into these notions about Christ by slighting the
simplicity of the gospel which is that Christ came into the world to save sinners that he by the appointment of God according to the Covenant between him and the Father as our surety performed the whole will of God in that body prepared him to purge away our sins by the sacrifice of himselfe and the principles upon which he acted were out of obedience to the Father and love to sinners to compass the blessed designe of God his glory and our eternall salvation Page 111. He goes about to shew what was the nature of that wrath from God that Christ was capable of undergoing which to make out he defineth the wrath of God thus saith he wrath as God is capable of exercising it consists in that posture of an enemy and face of displeasure wherewith he cloaths and armes himselfe in Christ the Mediator to Angels or men A strange definition of Gods wrath for if it were so that God is not capable of exercising wrath to Angels or men but as he cloaths and armes himselfe to do it through Christ then I say it will follow that God could not have reserved any of the Angels in chaines of darkness to the judgement of the great day nor could not have damned any of the sons and daughters of men if Jesus Christ had not been Mediator surely the Reader will wonder at this notion of the Authors and he doth not say that God doth exercise wrath in Christ or thorough Christ as if he had meant that God was the most provoked to wrath for slighting Christ and neglecting so great salvation and will execute the fiercenesse of his wrath upon those that trample under foot the blood of the Son of God but he saith that God is capable of exercising wrath no other way but as he cloaths and arms himself in the Mediator God is said to be angry and wrath when in his dealings with the creature he walks contrary to him and sets himself against him suppose it be eternal wrath then God dawns that creature and turneth him into hell and doth the Author think that God could not have done thus if Christ had never been a Mediator between God and us could not God have exercised wrath upon all of us that are the fallen sons of men and appointed us our portions in the dark nooks of hell without CHrist had been the Mediator and this Author will make Christ necessary to be the Mediator and Saviour upon this account that else God could not have exercised wrath upon any of the creatures But I pray how could Christ bear the wrath of God if that it be true that the Author saith that God is not capable of exercising wrath but in Christ the Mediator well we unthankful men instead of admiring the Lords free mercy in Christ whereby we are delivered from wrath to come who hath attoned God made peace and reconciled us to God we fall a disputing that God is not capable of exercising wrath but thorough Christ the Mediator but if it had not pleased the God of all grace to have sent his blessed Son to turne away his wrath from us and reconcile us to himself we should have seen to purpose and by lamentable experience that God could exerâ—ise wrath without Christ the Mediator CHAP. III. Shews that the highest attainments of the natural man come very far short of what this Author assignes to him and proves his misinterpreting abundance of Scripture about this matter AS this Author doth exceedingly debase Christ marring his visage who is altogether lovely often saying he had a fleshly mind and fleshly principles which were to be subdued in him so on the other hand he cries up the natural mans attainments far above that which any natural man ever arrives at and indeed takes the most of the Characters of a true Believer and claps them upon a natural man And so page 117. That Christ may be the received Lord and Christ in the heart and give a participation and fellowship with him in spirit by the power and presence of himself there either in his first or second appearance and all along he maketh the receiving of Christ in his first appearance only to be no saving state and yet he saith in this state Christ may be the received Lord and Christ in the heart and give the soul a participation and fellowship with himselfe in spirit But how plainly doth the Holy Ghost confute him John 1.12 That to as many as receive him to them gave he power to become the sons of God and Rom. 8.17 If sons then heirs heirs of God and coheirs with Jesus Christ So that wheresoever Christ becomes the received Lord and Christ in the heart eternal salvation at that very time is come to that soul forasmuch as he is made the child of God by faith in Jesus Christ or by receiving Christ which are all one as that 1 John 12. makes plain yea this Author saith that such a soule Christ gives a participation and fellowship with himselfe in spirit but then is not this soul in a safe and saving state for Christ to give a soul fellowship with himself in the fathers love to make him a sharer in his death blood and righteousness and spirit and he that is thus called into fellowship with Jesus Christ is surely in a saving state and by the way I would note this to the Reader that whereas now the Gospel is preached more then in former ages so that many places and poor souls that have sat in darkness see a great deal of light that way and men are told much of Christs being the way the truth and the life and are earnestly pressed and invited to receive Christ that they might have life it 's now one of the devils grand designs to make men believe that men may receive Christ and have fellowship union and communion with him and yet not be in a saveing state but be under the Covenant of works all this while thinking if this doctrine would take it would keep thousands from Christ therefore it concerneth us to way lay his designs and unmask him that transforms himself into an Angel of light that under pretence of carrying us higher would beguile us of the simplicity that is in Christ the sure way of life and salvation by receiving of Jesus Christ the Lord our righteousness and truly for ought I know this Author is the first that ever broacht this doctrine in print that a man might receive Jesus Christ and have fellowship with him in spirit and be made the righteousness of God in him and yet not be in a saving state for the Arminians never had the face to say it was not a saving state if they continued in it Let us examine the Scripture he quotes one is 1 Cor. 10. the beginning of that chap especially the fourth ver that the Jews did all eat of the same spirituall meate that was Manna our fathers did eate Manna in the wilderness that
God unto salvation 1 Pet. 1.5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as in a strong guard or garrison that the Devil can never take as he did Adams state by craft when the serpent beguiled Eve yea when Satan desires to have us that he may winnow us as wheat Christ prayes for us that our faith faile not but he that hath begun his good work in us to have our faith and hope in Christ will perform it to the day of Jesus Christ the righteousness of Christ is imputed to no man but by an act of the free grace of the Father and being so freely imputed its continuance is certain and for ever God by his mighty power keeps them from drawing back to perdition keeps them in a way of believing and preserves them to the heavenly Kingdome eternal life is freely given them by Christ and therefore they shall never perish neither shall any man be able to pluck thâ—â— out of his hands John 10.27 28. CHAP. VI. Treats more particularly of the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace and the difference between them THe Author to make his Doctrine more taking up and down his Book would perswade the Reader that those that he saith are called Orthodox doe but seek their life and righteousnesse from the Covenant of Works and that we may be made the righteousnesse of God in Christ and yet be but under the covenant of works This we have touched before and here by the grace of God shall more particularly treat of First then Let us consider what the Law and Covenant of Works is It calls for full and perfect obedience on our part with promise on Gods part to give life thereupon and threatning death and damnation to him that disobeyes that the soule that sinneth it shall dye as Gal. 3.10 As many as are of the works of the Law are under the curse for it is written Cursed is every one that continueth not in every thing that is written in the Book of the Law to doe it which shewes us how the Law curses and condemnes all that are under it upon the least transgression and disobedience and therefore as the Apostle saith here being we have all sinned as many of us as are under the Law and not under grace are under the curse and if under the curse of the law then its false that the Author saith in many places of his Book that a man may have Christ made righteousnesse to him in a way of justification and yet be but under the law and covenant of works for a man cannot at the same time be both justified and be under the curse and we see whoever is under the covenant of works is under the curse and so consequently it is a mistake that the Author holds that such have Christ made righteousnesse to them in a way of justification According to the law and covenant of works the least sin damnes a man one vaine thought one idle word brings the vengeance of eternal fire every disobedience receiveth such a just recompence of reward therefore saith the Scripture Rom. 4.15 The Law worketh wrath for where no Law is there is no transgression no man under the covenant of works can be justified as this Author imagines for the law and covenant of works worketh wrath sets justice against us and makes all the world become guilty before God Rom. 3.19 No man is absolved under the covenant of works and hath remission of sins but all become guilty before God Hence also 2 Cor. 3. 6,9 the covenant of works is said to kill the Gospel only to make alive the covenant of works to be the ministration of condemnation the covenant of grace to be the ministration of righteousnesse and so Rom. 7.8 Without the law sin is dead hath no power to condemn us for the strength of sin is the law and Paul ver 11. saith by it to wit the law sin slew him Adam was the primus faederatus in the covenant of works the Lord Jesus the second Adam in the covenant of grace The first Adam was a common person in that covenant of works and stood in the room of all mankind he Broke the conditions of that covenant and there can be no renewal of that covenant of works no coming to life that way that covenant is broken and so all the world become guilty before God there is no receiving of Christ upon the terms of this covenant of works as this Author saies page 118. and in many other places and in the same page saith that we are made the righteousnesse of God in Christ upon the tenour of that covenant for we have seen that by the covenant of works we stand upon our own obedience not upon Christs we have our life in our own righteousnesse not in Christs it is by the Gospel the covenant of grace that any man comes to have Jesus Christ made of God unto him wisedom righteousness sanctification and redemption which Covenant of grace comes next to be explained This Covenant of grace whereof we now speak was made principally with Christ as the common person representing all the elect as the Covenant of works was made with Adam a common person representing all mankind and Christ Jesus is said Isa 49.8 to be given for a Covenant to the people the father and Christ having struck hands in that Covenant of grace and peace between them both Now this Covenant of grace is a blessed compact and agreement between the father and Christ Jesus that Christs soul should be made an offering for our sins that he should purge away our sins by the sacrifice of himself reconcile us to God by the blood of his Crosse and that God would be our God remember our sins no more accept us in him the beloved justifie us sanctifie us bestow upon us grace and glory and blesse us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly things in him this is that which we count to be the Covenant of grace and let this Author if he can shew that this is but the Covenant of works Our standing in the Covenant of works depended upon Adams obedience while he stood we stood when he fell we fell our standing in the Covenant of grace depends upon Christ that while he is righteous we are righteous that are found in him and so Christ tells us John 14.19 because I live ye shall live also he hath performed that commandement that he received of the father to lay down his life for his sheep and so God is reconciled for ever in the volumn of Gods book it is written of Christ that he should thus do the will of God in bedring the chastisement of our peace in the body prepared for him Heb. 10 Christ according to his agreement and Covenant with the father to purchase eternal life grace and glory for those whom he had given him did bear our sins in his own body upon the tree was delivered for our offences and rose again for our
in notions and opinions as others do in other opinions but we use to count it great uncharitableness to charge all of a judgement with that which some being of that judgement do hold but if all of that judgement were of this mind the Author should be of it for he holdeth universal redemption yet I hope he doth not rest there nor own or reject others as they hold or hold not with him in that point but the Author misrepresents others judgements as well as the udgement of those that are for general redemption Page 199. He tells us those that differ from those that are for general redemption do evidently contradict and deny unto them most clear certain and undeniable truths and all that which they say concerning conditional reprobation freewil falling away and the like as relating to the children of the first Covenant will find that from the Scriptures which will justifie it The Author is very confident and profuse in his accusation of the Anti-Arminians and too highly exalts their opinions that are for universal redemption as if they were the very Gospel calling their opinions most clear certain and undeniable truths but what are their opinions that are most clear and undeniable truths why he saith their opinions of conditional reprobation freewil falling away and the like as relating to the children of the first covenant Let us hear their opinions and first of conditional reprobation The Arminiuns opinion is that there is no absolute and irrevocable but only conditional decree of predestination to damnation or salvation and that the number of the elect and reprobate is not so certain but that is may be diminished or augmented and that the primary cause of the decree of reprobation not of its execution is the praeconsideration and praevision of sin and not the meer will and pleasure of God And is their opinion such a plain and most undeniable truth their doctrine is such that notwithstanding Gods decrees either to life or death there might either none have been saved or none damned And according to their doctrine the grace of election is made voyd for if it were not Gods free will and pleasure that was the primary cause of the reprobates reprobation and non-election but works foreseen then consequently it was not Gods free will and pleasure that was the cause of the elects election but their works foreseen and then fare well that discriminating grace and love of God from all eternity neverthelesse we still make sin the cause of damnation but Gods free pleasure the cause of Gods non-electing and passing men by in his eternal counsels resolving to leave them in their sins and to condemnation for their sins Concerning free will the Arminians hold that there is a sufficient universal grace derived upon all men by which they may believe and be saved if they will And is this most clear and evident in the Scripture no the contrary is evident in the Scripture Isa 53.1 John 6.44 45. John 12.38 39 40. Page 205. He saith that the flesh of Christ may be received and eaten either worthily or unworthily men not distinguishing between Christs living body and his crucified body The Author if he had pleased might in this case have considered of the old distinction of the Martyrs of eating and receiving panem demini and panem dominum of that which is the sign and sacrament and the thing it self no man but the true believer eats of the bread of life the Lord Jesus for hic edere est credere by eating is meant believing but he saith they do not distinguish between Christs living body and crucified body Alas the same body of Jesus Christ that was crucified is a living body for it was impossible for that holy one to see corruption and it is not the meer body of Jesus Christ considered as living or crucified that saveth us as Christ telleth us in that case it is the spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing Page 225. He saith Abraham was justified before God by that faith wrought out in Christ his head The Scripture telleth us that by Christs obedience we are made righteous and that we are justified by his blood but no where that we are justified by the faith that is wrought out in Christ we are justified by his righteousness imputed to us not by the faith that Christ had the Author seemeth all along to have many wide mistakes about the righteousness by which we are justified when the Scripture telleth us we are justified by the faith of Christ the meaning is that we are justified by Christ believed in not that we are justified by the faith which he had And so he saith in the same 225. page that faith considered as abiding in Christ and not in us is that which properly justâ—fieth the believer But Christ though in some sense he had faith that is to say he trusted in the father that he would carry him through the work of bearing our sins and that he would so accept of his bearing the chastisement of our peace that he would deliver us from going down to the pit because of the ransome that he paid and believed that he should see his seed that the pleasure of the Lord should prosper in his hands yet he had not such faith as in Scripture is called saving and justifying faith for he was no sinner that he received another for his righteousnes The Author leaving the simplicity of the Gospel runs in vain and unscriptural notions in those things Page 291. He saith that Christs Disciples were called the children of the bride-chamber and yet then had no higher knowledg of him then in his fle shly glory and perfection The place he mâ—aneth is Matth. 9.15 which holdeth forth no such thing but what a forrowing there should be in the Disciples when they were deprived of Christs bodily presence but that was not a depriving of them of that which the Author calleth the first Image but â—â—vay what fleshly glory and perfection was 〈◊〉 Christ that the Disciples should know Christ only in that Alas he had no fleshly glory and perfection his visage was marred more then any of the sons of men Isa 52. never was so glorious a person so obscured as he was insomuch that the people said is not this the Carpenters son his fleshly glory and perfection was so little that those which looked only at that could see no form nor comeliness in him wherefore they should desire him let the Author have better thoughts of the Disciples then that they followed Christ and left all for him only for his fleshly glory and perfection no they saw him with better eyes they saw him to be Jehovah their righteousness the only begotten son of God full of grace and truth Page 300. He maketh this the great sin of those in the first Image that they set up the sons Kingdom in their hearts in competition with and opposition to the fathers View the Scriptures