Selected quad for the lemma: father_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
father_n	john_n	king_n	son_n	13,401	5	5.5265	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A64570	A speech of VVilliam Thomas, esqvire in Parliament in May 1641 being a short view and examination of the actions of bishops in Parliament from Anno Dom. 1116 to this present of 1641 in the severall reignes of 23 kings and queens of this kingdome of England, &c. : in all and each of their times it is made to appeare they have been most obnoxious to prince and people and therefore that it is not fit or convenient that they should continue members of that honourable House in which they have beene so disloyally and traiterously affected to regality and no lesse mischievous and pernicious to church and commonwealth.	Thomas, William, Sir, d. 1653?	1641 (1641)	Wing T985; ESTC R8551	19,310	28

Paris calles him Rex Sacerdos had joyned with him Hugh Bishop of Duresme for the parts beyond Humber This Kingly Bishop as Authors deliver did use incredible insolence and intollerable tyranny and commit a most sacrilegious and barbarous out-rage upon the person of Ieffery Archbishop of Yorke and naturall brother to K. R. the first for which afterwards being taken in a Curtesans apparrell and attire velut delicata muliercula hee was banished the Realme Now as it was very difficult to turne such Papall Bishops and Regulos out of Parliament so certainly such Lord Bishops did there worke no little mischiefe to Regall power the subjects liberties and the weale publick Certainly this was not the duty and office of a Bishop surely the Silke and Scarlet Robes of Princes and Iusticiars were as undecent for these Bishops as was the coat of Iron of the Bishop of Beavois taken prisoner by this King which hee sent to the Pope with a vide an tunica silii tui sit an non to which hee made answer That he was not his sonne nor the sonne of the Church For hee had put off the peaceable Prelate and put on the warlicke Souldier tooke a Shield in stead of a Cope a Sword for a stole a Curac● for an Albe a Helm●● for a Miter a Lance for a Bishops staffe perverting the order and course of things Thus we see that a Bishop must destroy mens lives either as a Iusticiar in Court or as a Souldier in Camp Qui si non aliqua nocuisset mortuus est they will doe any thing but what they ought to doe Feed the Flocke they desire rather to sit in Parliament then stand in a pulpit accounting preaching according to B. Iuel so far below their greatnesse as indeed it is above their goodnesse We neither deny or reject Episcopacy or Church government it selfe but the corruptions thereof and we say that the Bishops who stiffely maintained those corruptions have inforced this our distaste When Iacob was forced to depart from Laban for ill usage I conceive that the breach was in Laban not in Iacob So also those that did forsake Babylon God commanding to depart from it lest they should be partakers of their punishment as they were guilty of their crimes did not occasion the schisme or breach but the sinnes of Babylon And we confesse that true it is that we refuse and forsake the present Church government but no further then it hath forsaken pure and primitive institution therefore let none say that wee are desirous of innovation for I thinke we may boldly with the forenamed reverend Bishop Iewel affirme Nos non sumus novatores From K. R. I come to K. Iohn an usurper likewise who was advanced to the Regall Throne by Archbishop Hubert and the Prelates This lewd Bishop unjustly declaring this and all other Kingdomes to bee elective and that no man hath right or fore-title to succeed another in a Kingdome but must be by the body of the Kingdome thereunto chosen with invocation of grace and guidance of Gods holy Spirit alledging further and that most plainly by example of David and Saul that whosoever in a Kingdome excelled all in valour and vertue ought to surmount all in rule and authority and therefore they had all u●an●●●●usly elected Iohn first imploring the Holy Ghosts assistance as well in regard of his merits as royall bloud And thus the Bishops blanch their disloyall assertion with sacred Writ and their lewd devised plot with the holy Ghosts assistance Hereby they rejected the just Title and hereditary succession of Arthur his elder brothers sonne And as he did this disherision unjustly and disloyally so did hee this election lewdly and fraudulently as himselfe after confessed when being demanded the reason of his so doing he replied That as Iohn by election got the Crowne so by ejection upon demerit he might lose the same which after he did endeavour to his utmost and at last effected by depriving him of life and kingdome Let me not be misconceived I know Hubert died eight or ten yeares before him but what he did begin and forward was furthered and pursued by Stephen Langton and other Bishops and Prelates too long to rehearse His other brother being Archb. of York a strange example saith Malm. to have a King ruled by two brethren of so turbulent humours Many of their treasonable acts and disloyalties I will omit and passing by as well particular Bishops and Prelates as Stephen Archdeacon of Norwich and others as also of them in the generall I will onely relate one villanous passage of traiterous disloyalty whereof as good Authours deliver the Archbishops and Prelats were principall Abetters and Conspirers The King being at Oxford the Bishops and Barons came thither with armed multitudes without number and forced him to yeeld that the government should bee swayed by twenty five selected Peeres Thus one of the greatest Soveraigns was but the six twentieth petty King in his owne dominions c. To him succeeded his sonne K. H. 3 who being at Clarkenwell in the house of the Prior of S. Iohns was told by him no lesse sawcily then disloyally if I may not say trayterously that he should be no longer King then hee did right to the Prelates Whereto hee answered What doe you meane to deprive me of my Kingdom and afterward murder me as you did my Father And indeed they performed little lesse as shall hereafter appear But now to take the particular passages in order In this Kings reigne Stephen then Archbishop of Canterbury as we read was the Ring-leader of disorders both in Church and State and no better was Peter Bishop of Winchester But not to speake of them in particular but of them all in generall and that in Parliament at Oxford thus wee read To the Parliament at Oxford saith Matth. Paris and Matth. Westm. came the seditious Earles and Barons with whom the Bishops Pontisice's ne dicam Pharisei those were his words had taken counsell against the King the Lords annointed who sternly propounded to the King sundry traiterous Articles to which they required his assent but not to reckon all the points you shall heare what the same Authours deliver of their intent I will repeat the words as I finde them These turbulent Nobles saith M. West had yet a further plot then all this which was first hatched by the disloyall Bishops which was that foure and twenty persons should there bee chosen to have the whole administration of the K. and State and yearly appointment of all great Officers reserving onely to the King the highest place at meetings Primus accubitus in caenis and salutations of honour in publicke places To which they forced him and his sonne Prince Edward to sweare for feare as mine Authour saith of perpetuall imprisonment if not worse for the traiterous Lords had by an edict threatned death to all that resisted And the perfidious

and wicked Archbishop and Bishops cursing all that should rebell against it which impudent and traiterous disloyalty saith Matth. Paris and Matth. Westm. the Monks did detest asking with what fore-heads the Priests durst thus impaire the Kingly Majesty expressely against their sworne fidelity to him Here we see the Monks more loyall and honest then the Lord Bishops wee have cashiered the poore Monkes and are we afraid of the Bishops Lordlinesse that they must continue and sit in Parliament to the prejudice of the King and people And so we may observe that this traiterous Bishop did make this King as the former had done his father meerely titular From him I passe to his son Edward the first In his reigne Boniface was Archbishop of Canterbury and Brother to the Queene what he and the rest of the Prelats did in prejudice to the regall authority and weale publique I will passe over the rather for that they declare themselves in his sons reigne so wicked and disloyall that no age can parallell of which thus in briefe doth not Thomas De la More call the Bishop of Hereford Arch plotter of treason Omnis mali Architectum and not to speake of his contriving the death of the late Chancellour and other particular villanies he is branded together with Winchester then Chancellour and Norwich Lord Treasurer to occasion the Dethroning of this Prince nay after long imprisonment his very life taken away by Bishop Thorltons aenigmaticall verse though he after denied it Edwardum occidere nolite timere bonum est But this Adam de Orleton alias To●leton and his fellow Bishops in this Kings reigne I may not slightly passe over Therefore I desire wee may take a further view of them First of this Adam Bishop of Hereford we finde that he was stript of all his temporalties for supporting the Mortimers in the Barons quarrell Hee being saith Thomas de la More a man of most subtile wit and in all worldly policies profound daring to doe great things and factious withall who made against King Edward the second a great secret party To which H●nry Burwash Bishop of Lincolne for like causes deprived of his temporalties joyned himselfe as also Ely and others Walter Stapleton Bishop of Exeter a turne-coat left the Queen and came to England to in●orme the King of his Queenes too great familiarity with Mortimer which after cost him his head Perhaps some now as Thomas de la More will say he was therein a good man yet I will take leave to thinke nor doe I feare to speake it This was no part of Episcopall function But I will passe him by not concluding him either good or bad every man may thinke as hee pleaseth I will declare the traiterous and disloyall actions of the other Bishop formerly mentioned This Bishop of Hereford whom I finde called the Queens bosome Councellour preaching at Oxford tooke for text My head my head aketh 2 Kings 4. 19. concluding more like a Butcher then a Divine that an a king and sick head of a kingdome was of necessity to be taken off and not to bee tampered with by any other physicke whereby it is probable that he was the authour of that aenigmaticall verse formerly recited Edwardum occidere c. And well may wee beleeve it for we finde that he caused Roger Baldock Bishop of Norwich the late Lord Chancellour to die miserably in Newgate Not much better were Ely Lincolne Winchester and other Bishops that adhered to the Queene Mortimer and others of her part Nor can I commend those Bishops that were for the King and the Spencers The Archbishop of Canterbury and his Suffragans decreeing the revocation of those pestilent Peers the judgemen given against them judged a● erroneous Thus these Lord Bishops as all in a manner both before and after in stead of feeding the flock o● Christ only plotted dismall warres death and destruction of Christians I might tell you how in this Kings reigne as in others they perswaded the Lords and Peeres of the Realme that they had power and right not onely to reform the Kings House and Councell and to place and displace all great Officers at their pleasure but even a joynt interest in the regiment of the Kingdome together with the King And now will any say No Bishop no King yet one word more before I part with these Bishops What ground-worke they layd and what meanes they used for the ruine of King and Kingdome was it not their working upon the impotence of a womans will insinuating what indignity it was that a she daughter of France being promised to be a Queene was become no better then a waiting woman living upon a pension and so nourishing in her great discontents perswaded her going to France which was the matter and Embrion and as I may say the chiefe cause of common destruction which after ensued God keep all good Princes from hearkning or consenting to the pernitious counsels of such pestilent Priests and prating Parasites To declare all their disloyalties in Parliament and out would fill a large volume But now Brevis esse laboro therefore I onely say that as it was not for their goodnesse but greatnesse that they sat● in Parliament so their sitting there did I thinke I may say almost evert Monarchy yea Regality with what face can they inculcate that aspersion No Bishop no King Certainly by what I have already delivered and shall now declare in the reignes of succeeding Princes it will appeare quite contrary that where Lordly Bishops dominsere and beare rule and sway neither Kings nor Kingdoms themselves or subjects are secure Now to the reigne of King Edward the third did not John Archbishop of Canterbury perswade and incite this King and the Parliament to a most dangerous warre with France whereby the death of millions hath been occasioned To such mischiefe d●e they use their learning and eloquent Orations in Parliament What Epiphanius delivered of Philosophers that they were In re stulta sapientes so may we say of such Bishops that they are In malo publico facundi But to passe by particular men and actions I shall only deliver unto you some notable passages in Parliament Anno 1371. The Parliament did petition the King to have them deprived of all Lay Offices and government they being commonly the plotters and contrivers of all treasons conspiracies and rebellions the very incendi●ries pests and grievances both of tho Church State the chiefest instruments to advance the peoples usurped authority though with prejudice of the kings which they never cordially affected and the Arch-enemies of the Common-wealth through their private oppression covetousnesse rebellion and tyranny when they have been in office as may appeare by Antiquitates Ecclesiae Britannicae in the lives of Anselme Becket Arundel c. Here we see that they never affected the authority of Kings but rather were scourges to their sides and thornes in their eyes Now wee come to Richard the second his