Selected quad for the lemma: father_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
father_n john_n king_n son_n 13,401 5 5.5265 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A48960 Analogia honorum, or, A treatise of honour and nobility, according to the laws and customes of England collected out of the most authentick authors, both ancient and modern : in two parts : the first containing honour military, and relateth to war, the second, honour civil, and relateth Logan, John, 17th cent.; Blome, Richard, d. 1705. 1677 (1677) Wing L2834; ESTC R17555 244,594 208

There are 20 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Office of a King to fight the Battels of his people and rightly to judge them 1 Kings 8. And the Prophet David saith Be ye learned you that judge the Earth Whereto if they also would endeavour to have knowledge in the Principles and Grounds of the Laws of their own Country which they in due time inherit they shall be much the more enabled to govern their Subjects and it is a point of Wisdom in such to acknowledge that Rex datur propter Regnum non Regnum propter Regem And to move the Princes to these things there is an excellent Book Dialogue-wise between a Prince a King's Son of this Realm and Sir Iohn Fortescue a Judge entituled De laudibus Legum Angliae Many that have been Heirs apparent to the Crown of England ever since the Norman Conquest have been taken away either by their natural deaths or by violence during the life of their Ancestors so that they have not attained to the Crown William the only Son of Henry the First was drowned in his passage from Normandy his Father reigning Eustace King Stephen's only Son died mad to the great grief of the King his Father William the eldest Son of King Henry the Second died in the Fourth year of his Age and in the Third year of his Fathers Reign King Henry the Second's Son called Curt-Mantel was in his Father's life time crowned King by the Name of King Henry the younger but died in the life time of his Father Geffrey the fourth Son of the said King died during the Reign of Richard Coeur de Leon his third Brother which King Richard had no Son and so Geffrey was Heir apparent to the Crown King Edward the First had Issue Iohn Henry and Alphons but all three died in their Childhood in their Father's life Edward the Black Prince of famous memory eldest Son to King Edward the Third died before his Father Richard the Third had Issue only one Son named Edward who died without Issue Arthur the eldest Son and Heir apparent to King Henry the Seventh died in the life time of his Father Henry Prince of Wales eldest Son to King Iames also left the World before his Father These Examples may serve as a Mirror for all succeeding Princes and others to see how transitory the Glory of this World is whereof the saying of the Princely Prophet David may never be out of remembrance Psal. 82. I have said ye are Gods and ye are all the Children of the most High but ye shall die like men and ye Princes like others Also divers other Heirs apparent and those that have been in possession of their Crowns have been defeated by Usurpers And namely Robert Duke of Normandy eldest Son to William the Conqueror was defeated of his Birth-right by his two younger Brethren William Rufus and Henry successively one after another and after Six and twenty years Imprisonment having both his Eyes put out died in the Reign of his Brother Henry Maud the sole Daughter of the said King Henry was defeated of her Birth-right to the Crown by Stephen the Son of her Fathers Sister Arthur the only Son and Heir of Geffrey the fourth Son to Henry the Second was next Heir to the Crown after the death of his Uncle Richard the first King of that Name who died without Issue his Father being dead before but his Uncle Iohn Son to the said Henry the Second defeated him not only of his right to the Kingdom but also of his Life and that by starving him King Edward the Second was deposed by his eldest Son who in the life time of his Father took upon him to be the King of England Richard the only Son to Edward the black Prince and next Heir to the Crown after the death of his Grandfather King Edward the Third was defeated both of his Crown and Life by Henry of Lancaster Son to Iohn of Gaunt who was but the fourth Son of King Edward the Third yea although Lionel the third Son of the said King Edward had Issue Philip his only Daughter who by consequence was next to the Crown before the Issue of Iohn of Gaunt which Philip was married to Edward Mortimer Earl of March from whom the House of York by the name of Edward the Fourth are lineally descended For William of Hatfield second Son to King Edward the Third died young without Issue King Henry the Sixth having but one Son named Edward he was slain in the life time of his Father and the King himself deposed by Edward the Fourth and murthered in the Tower So the Act of Parliament made between them for an indented Peace exemplified in our Books of Law Edward and Richard the two only Sons to Edward the Fourth after the descent of the Crown and before the Coronation of Prince Edward were both of them murthered in the Tower by their Uncle Richard Duke of Glocester who thereupon took upon him the Crown although there were remaining alive divers Daughters of the late King Edward the Fourth During these troublesome and tragical times each of the Kings prevailing attainted the other their Adversary of High Treason by Act of Parliament intending utterly to disable them and make them to be incapable by the Law of the Crown And it is a matter worthy of Observation how the Hand of God did not forget to pursue Revenge in these Cases for William Rufus died without Issue Henry his Brother had a Son and one Daughter but his Son died an Infant and his only Daughter Maud was defeated of her Birthright by Stephen King Iohn who defeated Arthur his Nephew of his Birthright and Life lived in continual Wars never enjoyed Peace but was driven to submit himself and subject his Kingdom to the Pope In his time Normandy which King William the First brought with him and which in five Descents continued in actual Obedience of the Kings of England was in the sixth year of his Reign lost until King Henry the Fifth recovered it again and left it to King Henry the Sixth who again lost it in the Eight and twentieth year of his Reign as doth appear both in our Chronicles and in our Books of Law Concerning the violence done to King Henry the Second albeit Edward his Son enjoyed a long and prosperous Reign yet his Successor King Richard was in the like violent manner imprisoned deprived and put to death King Henry the Fourth by whom King Richard was deposed did exercise the chiefest Acts of his Reign in executing those who conspired with him against King Richard His Son had his Vertue well seconded by Felicity during whose Reign by the means of Wars in France the humour against him was otherwise imployed But his next Successor King Henry the Sixth was in the very like manner deprived and together with his young Son Edward imprisoned and put to death by King Edward the Fourth This Eward died not without suspicion of poyson and after his death his two Sons were likewise
Forty years in which time he created eight Barons and had Iura Regalia within the County Of Earls not Palatine which is as ancient as the Conquest there have been principally two kinds but either of them subdivided into several Branches for they either take name of a place or hold their Title without any place Those that take their Name of a place are of two kinds for either the place is the County as the Earl of Devonshire Kent Middlesex or the like or else some Town Castle or Honour as the Earldom of Richmond in Yorkshire Clarence in Suffolk Arundel in Suffex Bathe and Bridgwater in Somersetshire and so forth And those Earldoms which have their Titles without any place are likewise of two kinds either in respect of Office or by Birth By Office as the Earl-Marshal of England called in Latin Comes Marascallus Angliae and is an Office not only of great power being in the Vacancy of the Lord High Constable of England the King's Lieutenant General in all Marshal Affairs but of as great Honour taking place of all Earls except the Lord Great Chamberlain of England and is likewise endowed with many honourable priviledges This Title of Earl-Marshal was by K. Richard the Second first given to Thomas Mowbray Earl of Nottingham whereas before they were simply styled Marshals and after the Banishment of Mowbray he granted it to Thomas Holland Duke of Surrey and that he should carry a Rod or Verge of Gold enammeled black at both ends whereas before they used one of Wood This Office is now by his present Majesty restored to the ancient Family of the Howards Hereditary for ever and is enjoyed by the Right Honourable Henry Howard Earl of Norwich Baron Howard of Castle-Rising in Norfolk and Heir apparent to his Grace the Duke of Norfolk The other sort of Earls are by Birth and so are all the Sons of the Kings of England if they have no other Dignity bestowed upon them And therefore it was said that Iohn afterwards King of England in the life time of his Father Henry the Second was Comites sans terre Earls as other Degrees of Nobility are Offices of great Trust being created by Patent for two principal purposes one ad consulendum Regi in tempore pacis the other ad defendendum Regem Patriam in tempore belli And therefore Antiquity hath given them two Ensigns to resemble both the said Duties For first the Head is adorned with a Cap of Honour and a Coronet of Gold which for distinction is pyramidal pointed and pearled between each pyramid a Flower much shorter th●n the pyramid And the Body is adorned with Robes viz. a Hood Surcoat and Mantle of State with three guards of Fur upon the Shoulders which Robe is an emblem of Counsel and they are begirt with a Sword in resemblance of that they must be faithful and true to defend their Prince and Country An Earl had formerly the Title of Prince but now it is Most Potent and Noble Lord as also The Right Honourable and truly Noble Out of his Superiors presence he may have a Cloth of Estate fringed without pendants and his Countess may have her Train born up by an Esquire's Wife But to the King 's high Council of Parliament no man ought to presume to come before he hath received the King 's Writ of Summons This Constitution was first made by King Henry the Third after the Barons War was appeas'd and by King Edward the Third and his Successors it hath been carefully observed The form of a Writ of Summons to an Earl is as followeth REX c. Vnto his welbeloved Cosin John Earl of Greeting Because by the advice and assent of our Council for certain weighty and urgent businesses concerning us the state and defence of our Kingdom and Church we have ordained to be holden a certain Parliament at our City of Westminster the day of next coming and there together with you and with the Prelates and Great and Noble Men of our said Kingdom to have confidence and treaty commanding and firmly injoyning you upon your Faith and Allegiance whereby you are holden unto us that the dangers and perils imminent of that business considered and all Excuses set apart you be present at the said day in the same place with us and with the Prelates and Noblemen aforesaid to treat and give counsel upon the aforesaid business and hereof fail not as you tender our honour and the safegard and defence of our Kingdom and Church aforesaid Witness our self at Westminster the day of in the year of our Reign In this Writ an Earl is saluted by the K●ng by the Name of Cosin although no Kin and the Writ of Summons to him or any other Peer is particularly directed to himself and not unto the Sheriff of the Country as the general Summons are to Knights and Burgesses of Parliament After a man is created an Earl Viscount or any other Title of Honour above his Title it is become parcel of his Name and not an addition only but in all legal Proceedings he ought to be styled by that his Dignity In the first of King Edward the Third fol. 151. a Writ of Formedon was brought against Richard Son of Alleyn late Earl of Arundel and did demand the Mannor of C. with the Appurtenances c. The Tenant by his Learned Counsel did plead that he was Earl of Arundel and was at the day of the Writ purchased and demanded Judgment of the Writ because he was not named in the Writ according to his Dignity and Title of Honour To which the Demandant saith That at that time when he did purchase the Writ the Tenant was not known nor taken to be an Earl and it is severe Justice if the Writ shall abate without any default in the Plaintiff nevertheless because the truth of the matter was so that the Earldom did descend unto him before the Plaintiff had commenced his Action and purchased his Writ against him therefore by Judgment his Writ was abated although the Tenant was not at that time known to be an Earl But if a Baron be Plaintiff or Defendant it is not of necessity to name him Baron 8 Hen. 6. 10. yet see a distinction of Barons concerning this matter here following And so Reginald Gray was reputed Esquire after the Earldom descended unto him till at last it was published and declared by the Queen and the Heralds that he was Earl of Kent in Right and by Descent although he was not reputed or named Earl before that time But an addition may be used or omitted at pleasure except in special Cases where Processes of style of Supremum Caput Ecclesiae Anglicanae which by Act of Parliament in the 26 th of Hen. 8. cap. 1. and in the 35 th of Hen. 8. cap. 3. was annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm It is no part of the King's style so that it may be omitted in the Summons of Parliament
their Tenures were altered viz. Baronia as appeareth in Matthew Paris A. 1070. fol. 66. and of that Tenure have continued ever since as you may read by the Constitutions of Clarendon in the Reign of Henry the Second and in Glanvile and Bracton But the Tenures of all Abbots and Priors were extinguished by the uniting and coming of them to the Crown by the Statute of Dissolution of Monasteries For though the Nobility of England differ in Titles and certain Ceremonies yet a Baron enjoyeth the same priviledges And by experience it is found That Dukes and all other degrees of Nobility in Cases Criminal are tryed by Barons together with Marquisses Earls and Viscounts as their Peers and Peers of the Realm Nobilitas generally is of the word Nosco signifying in common phrases of speech Men of Generosity of Blood and Degree and therefore it is said Vir nobilis idem est quod notus per omnia or a vulgatus But especially it is applyed and used to express the reward of Vertue in honourable measure Ageneris claritate which being in part of distributive Justice remaineth with the highest Soveraign annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm For as Vertue is the gift of none but of God so the reward thereof with Honour cannot be the gift of any but the Supreme Governour being God's Vicegerent on Earth But when Honour and Arms be bestowed upon any if there shall arise contention between Competitors for the same the ancient policy of this Realm hath ordained a Special Court the Judges whereof in all times having been Right Honourable Personages viz. the Lord High Constable and the Earl Marshal and in latter times the Judge thereof only the Earl Marshal The Jurisdiction of the Court consis●eth in the Execution of that part of distributive Justice which concerneth the advancement and support of Vertue Nevertheless some men there are not duly considering of what principle and parts the Laws of this Realm do consist have laboured to prove that the Questions and Controversies of Nobility and Arms should not be determined by the Laws of the Realm but by the Civil Law framing to themselves many Arguments to prove the same but being of small value I pass them over The Common Laws as also the Laws of Charity used in the Marshals Court do prohibit any Subject of this Realm to receive Titles of Honour and Dignity by gift or donation from a Forreign Prince King or Emperor for it is a thing greatly touching the Majesty of the King and State of his Kingdom Est vis Majestatis inter insignia summae potestatis And if a man shall bring an Action and in the Writ is styled by such a Forreign Title the Defendant may plead in Abatement of his Writ That he is no Duke Marquis Earl or Baron whereupon if the Plaintiff as demanded take Issue the Issue shall not be tryed by the Jury but by the Records of Parliament wherein he faileth And if any English man be created Earl of the Empire or of any other Forreign Nation and the King also do create him into any Title of Honour in England he shall be named in all Judicial proceedings only by such Name and Title as he hath received from the King of this Realm whose Subject he is And if by the King of England he be not advanced to Title of Honour then he shall bear the name only of his Baptism and Surname unless he be a Knight For experience teacheth that Kings joyned in League together by certain mutual and as it were natural power of Monarchies according to the Laws of Nations have dismissed one anothers Subjects and Ambassadors graced with the Dignity of Knighthood A Duke of Spain or of another Forreign Nation cometh into England by the King 's safe Conduct in which also the King doth style him Duke according to his Creation nevertheless in all proceedings in the King's Courts he shall not be so stiled by his Title of Dignity And although the said Noble person be also by the King's Letters Patents and by his Forreign Name and Title of Dignity made Denizon for that is the right Name so called because his Legitimation is given to him Or if he be naturalized by Authority of Parliament wherein he seemeth to be in all things made as a Subject born yet shall he not be styled by his Foreign Titles of Dignity And so it is if a Nobleman of France or elsewhere come into England as Ambassador and by lawful Marriage hath a Son and the Father dieth the Son is by Birth a Natural Englishman yet he shall not bear the Title of Honour of his Father and the reason thereof is because that Title of Nobility had its Original by a French King and not by any natural Operation which thing is well proved both by Authority of Law and Experience in these days If a Postna●us of Scotland or Ireland who in these days is a Natural Subject to the King of England or if any of his Posterity be the Heirs of a Nobleman of Scotland or Ireland yet he is none of the Nobility of England But if that Alien or Stranger born a Scot be summoned by the King 's Writ to Parliament and therein is styled by his Foreign or other Title whereunto he is invested within England by the King 's Grant then and from thenceforth he is a Peer of this Realm and in all Judicial and Legal Proceedings he ought to be so styled and by no other Name And it was the Case of Gilbert Humfrevile Earl of Angus in Scotland of it appertaineth to the Royal Prerogative of the King to call and admit an Alien born to have place and voice in his Parliament at his pleasure although it is put in practice very rarely and that for great and weighty Considerations of State And if after such Parliamentary Summons of such a Stranger born question do arise and the Issue be whether he is of that Title or no it may well be tryed by the Record which is the only lawful tryal in that Case But there is a Diversity worthy of Observation for the highest and lowest Degrees are universal and therefore a Knight Engglish or Stranger born is a Knight in all Nations in what place soever he received his Title and Dignity and so ought of right and by Law to be named in the King's Courts as aforesaid Also if the Emperor the King of Denmark or other Foreign King come into this Realm by safe conduct as he ought for a Monarch or absolute Prince though he be in League cannot come without the King's Licence and safe Conduct but any Subject to such a Foreign King in League may come without Licence In this Case he shall sue and be sued by the Name of Emperor or King or else the Writ shall abate There is a notable President cited out of Fleta where treating of the Jurisdiction of the King's Court of Marshalsea it is said And these things he might
lawfully do by Office that is to say The Steward of the King's Houshold notwithstanding the Liberty of any other although in another Kingdom when the Offender may be found in the King's Houshold according to that which happened at Paris in the Fourteenth year of Edward the First when Engelram of Nogeut was taken in the Houshold of the King of England the King himself being then at Paris with silver Dishes lately stoln at which deed the King of France did claim Cognizance of the Plea concerning that Theft by Jurisdiction of that Court of Paris The matter being diversly debated in the Council of the King of France at length it was Ordered That the King of England should use and enjoy that Kingly Prerogative of his Houshold who being Convicted by Robert Fitz-Iohn Knight Steward of the King's Houshold of the Theft by consideration of the said Court was hanged on the Gallows in St. Germans Field And here by the way may be noted from those recited Books alledged That the person of the King in another King's Dominions is not absolutely priviledged but that he may be impleaded for Debt or Trespass or condemned for Treason committed with in the said Dominions For it is the general Law of Nations that in what place an Offence is committed according to the Law of the said place they may be judged without regard to any priviledge Neither can a King in any other Kingdom challenge any such Prerogative of Immunity from Laws For a King out of his proper Kingdom hath not merum Imperium but only doth retain Honoris titulos dignitatis so that where he hath offended in his own Person against the King in whose Nation he is per omnia distringitur etiam quoad personam And the same Law is of Ambassadors ne occasio daretur delinquendi That Ambassadors are called Legats because they are chosen as fit men out of many and their Persons be sacred both at home and abroad so that no man may injuriously lay violent hands upon them without breach of the Law of Nations and much less upon the person of a King in a strange Land Bracton a Judge of this Realm in the Reign of King Henry the Third in his first Book and eighth Case saith There is no respect of Persons with God but with men there is a difference of Persons viz. the King and under him Dukes Counts Barons Lords Vavasors and Knights Counts so called because they take the Name from the County or from the word Sociati who also may be termed Consules of Counselling for Kings do associate such men unto them to govern the People of God ordaining into great Honours Power and Name where they do gird them with Swords that is to say Ringis gladorium Upon this cause were the Stations and Encampings of Arms called by the Romans Castra of the word Castrare since they ought to be Castrata vel Casta. In this place ought a good General to foresee that Venus Delights be as it were gelded and cut off from the Army So Sir Iohn Fern's Book entituled The Glory of Generosity Ring so called quasi renes girans circundans for that they compass the Reins of such that they may keep them from Incest of Luxury because the Luxurious and Incestuous persons are abominable unto God The Sword also doth signifie the Defence of King and Country And thus much in general of the Nobility of England Now followeth a more particular Discourse of each particular Degree and first of his Majesty the Fountain from whence all these Rivulets and swelling Streams of Honour's Spring The most high and mighty Monarch CHARLES the second by the Grace of God King of Great Britaine● France and Ireland● Defender of the faith ca. The Effiges of the most high and mighty Monarch CHARLES the second by the Grace of God King of Great Britaine France and Ireland De●ender of the faith c●● OF THE KING OR MONARCH OF Great Britain CHAP. II. MONARCHY is as ancient as Man Adam being created Soveraign Lord of the Universe whose Office was to govern the whole World and all Creatures therein His Posterity after his Death dividing into Tribes and Generations acknowledged no other Dominion than Paternity and Eldership The Fathers of Nations were instead of Kings and the Eldest Sons in every Family were reverenced as Princes from whence came the word Seignior amongst the Italians and French and Seignories for Lordship and Dominion of which Seneca makes two kinds viz. Potestas aut Imperium power to command Proprietas aut Dominium Property or Dominion These Empires in the Golden Age were founded upon natural Reverency and Piety their Power was executed with the soft Weapons of paternal perswasions and the greatest penalties that they inflicted upon the most Capital Criminals was the malediction of their Primogenitors with an Excommunication out of the Tribes But as Men and Vice began to increase Pride and evil Examples overshadowed Filial Obedience and Violence entred upon the Stage of the World the mighty Men tru●ling in their own strength oppressed the Feeble and were at length forced to truckle under the tyranny of others more Gygantick than themselves which necessitated them to submit to Government for self-preservation many housholds conjoyning made a Village many Villages a City and these Cities and Citizens confederating established Laws by consent which in tract of time were called Commonwealths some being governed by Kings some by Magistrates and some so unfortunate as to fall under the yoak of a popular Rule Nam Plebs est pessimus Tyrannus The first Chiefs or Kings were men of Vertue elected for their Wisdom and Courage being both Reges Duces to govern according to their Laws in Peace and to lead them forth to Battel against their Enemies in time of Hostility And this Rule proving more safe for the people honourable amongst men and ●●rm in it self than the other most Nations followed it approving the Sentence of Tacitus Pr●stat sub Principo ●alo esse quam nulle Lamentable Experience the Mistress of Fools in some and of Wisdom in others in the Ages sequent necessitated them again to quit the ●orm of Election and to entail the Soveraign Power in the Hereditary Loyns of their Kings to prevent the fatal consequence of Ambition amongst equal pretenders in popular Elections Thus the beginning of an Empire is ascribed to reason and necessity ●ut 't was God himself that illuminated the minds of men and let them see they could not subsist without a Supream in their human affairs Necessitas ●st firmum judicium immutabilis providentiae potestas This Island of Great Britain when Barbarism was so happy as to submit to a Regal Power as Caesar in his Commentaries witnesseth then divided into many Kingdoms under which Government of Kings with some small alterations according to the necessity of times and pleasure of Conquerors it hath flourished descending from the British Saxon Danish Norman and
to the Crown of England shall bear his Coronet of Crosses and Flower de lis with one Arch and in the midst a Ball and Cross as hath the Royal Diadem That his Royal Highness the Duke of York and all the immediate Sons and Brothers of the Kings of England shall use and bear their Coronets composed of Crosses and Flower de lis only But all their Sons respectively having the Title of Dukes shall bear and use their Coronets composed of Leaves only as the Coronets of Dukes not being of the Royal Blood Note That by Order not Creation our present King was admitted Prince of Wales had the Principality with the Earldom of Chester c. confirmed to him by Patent and was allowed to hold his Court apart from the Kings The Prince by the Common Law is reputed as the same Person with the King and so declared by Statute temp Hen. 8. The Civilians say the King 's eldest Son during his Fathers life may be styled King by the Law of Nations because of his so near Relation to the Crown that if the Father die he is ipso momento Rex though he be not crowned A usual custome in Spain and once allowed here to Henry Son of King Henry the Second yet he holdeth his Seigniories and Principalities of the King as Subject to him and giveth the same respect to him as other Subjects do He hath certain priviledges above other persons To him it was permitted by the Statute 24 Hen. 8. cap. 13. to wear Silk of the colour of Purple and cloth of Gold of Tissue in his Apparel or upon his Horse And by the Statute 24 Ed. 3. ca. 2. Takings shall not be from henceforth made by others than the Purveyors of the King of the Queen and of the Prince their eldest Son And that if any mans Purveyor make such takings it shall be done of them as of those that do without Warrant and the Deed adjudged as a thing done against the Peace and the Law of the Land and such as do not in manner aforesaid shall be duly punished To eschew Maintenance and nourish Peace and Amity in all parts of the Realm many Statutes have been made in the Reign of King Henry the Fourth prohibiting the giving of Signs or Liveries to any but Menials nevertheless by the Statute 2 Hen. 4. cap. 21. it is provided that the Prince may give his honourable Liveries or Sign to the Lords or to his Menial Gentlemen and that the same Lords may wear the same as if they were the King's Liveries and that the Menials of the Prince may also wear the same as the King's Menials But afterwards by occasion of divers other Statutes made by sundry Kings for the suppressing o● that enormity of Maintenance and of the general word in them that priviledge of the Prince was abridged or rather taken away therefore the Statute 12 Ed. 4. cap. 4. was made By the Statute 21 H. 8. cap. 13. the Prince may retain as many Chaplains as he pleaseth although all other of the Nobility except those of the Blood Royal are constrained to a certain number and they or any of them may purchase Licence and Dispensation and take and retain two Parsonages or Benefices with Cure of Souls By the Order of the Common Law the King may Levy a reasonable Ayd of all his Tenants as well of those that did hold their Lands of him by Knights Service as in Soccage pur faire fitz Chevalier pur File marrier and the sum of Money was not in certainty Note that the Ayd is not to be recovered before the Son be of the Age of Fifteen years and the Daughter accomplish the Age of Seven years Fitz. Natur. B. 28.6 But in the King's pleasure till by the Statute in the 25 Ed. 3. cap. 11. it was Enacted That for the Knighting his eldest Son and marrying his eldest Daughter as aforesaid the Ayd following shall be demanded and levied viz. of every Knight so holden of the King without mean 20 s. and no more and of every 20. l. of Land holden of the King without mean in Soccage 20 s. and no more And so after this rate for the Lands in Soccage and for Land in Tenure of Chivalry according to the quantity of the Fee By another Statute made in the said 25 th of Edward the Third cap. 2. amongst other things it is declared That to compass or imagine the death of the King 's eldest Son and Heir is Crimen laesae Majestatis or if a man do violate the Wife of the King 's eldest Son and Heir it is High Treason And so the Statute 26 Hen. 8. cap. 13. doth declate And so was the ancient Common Law of this Realm and not a new Law made by the Statute Coke 8. part 28. b. but this Statute is a Manifestation and Application of the ancient Common Law in this Case Because the people were in ambiguity Whether Children born in parts beyond the Sea and out of the King's Dominions should be able to demand any Inheritance within his said Dominions or not It was declared at a Parliament holden at Westminster in the Seventeenth of King Iames for the removing of those doubts That les Enfants du Roy the Children of the Kings of England in whatsoever parts they are born in are able and ought to bear the Inheritance after the death of their Ancestors Read the Statute in Coke's Seventh Part 8. a. where you shall see that though generally the Birth-place is observed yet many times Legiance and Obedience without any place in the King's Dominions may make a Subject born For we see by Experience almost in every Parliament that Ambassadors Merchants and the King's Souldiers do sue therein in such Cases to have their Children Naturalized or made Denisons And in the Articles confirmed by Parliament touching the Marriage between Philip King of Spain and Queen Mary Anno primo Parliamenti 2. cap. 2. a special Proviso was to bar him from being Tenant by the Courtesie of the Crown in case he should have Issue by her and survive which was superfluous because the Common Law would have denied it For this last point see the Lord Chancellor's Speech in the Case Postnati f. 36. But note If an Alien Enemy come into this Realm and his Wife English or Stanger be here delivered of a Child this Child notwithstanding his Birth-place is an Alien born for want of Allegiance in the Parents ibid. King Henry the Third did create Edward his eldest Son the first Prine of Wales and did give unto him the Dominion and Dignity thereof to be holden of him and his Heirs Kings of England And after that time the eldest Sons of the Kings of England have been Princes of Wales and as incident to the State and Dignity of a Prince did and might make Laws and Statutes and use Jurisdiction and Authority as amply as any King of that Nation could do for Wales was a Kingdom in ancient
disinherited imprisoned and murthered by their cruel Uncle the Duke of Glocester who being both a Tyrant and Usurper was justly encountred by King Henry the Seventh in the Field So infallible is the Law of Justice in revenging Cruelties and Injuries not always observing the present time wherein they are done but often calling them into reckoning when the Offenders retain least memory of them But as the saying is Ex malis moribus bonae leges oriuntur so their Tragical and Miserable Combustions have occasioned that the Law hath established more certain Resolutions in all these cases and pretences against the right Heir to the Crown than before For first though a common Opinion was conceived that a Conqueror might freely dispose of the Succession of that Estate which he had obtained by the purchase of his Sword which was the Title pretended for William Rufus yet now in our Books this difference is taken for Law viz. between the Conquest of a Kingdom from a Christian King and the Conquest of a Kingdom from an Infidel For if a King come to a Christian Kingdom by Conquest seeing he hath Vitae necis potestatem he may at his pleasure alter and change the Laws of that Kingdom but until he doth make an alteration thereof the ancient Laws do stand and therefore the case of Rufus the ancient Law of this Realm being That the eldest Son should inherit and that a King in possession cannot devise the same by his last Will or by other Act therefore the said William Rufus was no other than a Usurper But if a Christian King should Conquer a Kingdom from an Infidel and being then under his subjection there ipso facto the Laws of the Infidels are abrogated for that they be not only against Christianity but against the Law of God and Nature mentioned in the Decalogue and in that case until certain Laws be established amongst them the King by himself and such Judges as he shall appoint shall judge them and their causes according to natural Equity in such sort as Kings in ancient times did within their Kingdoms before any certain municipal Laws were given And if a King have a Kingdom by Title of Descent there seeing by the Laws of that Kingdom he doth inherit the Kingdom he cannot change those Laws of himself without consent of Parliament Also if a King have a Christian Kingdom by Conquest as King Henry the Second had Ireland after that King Iohn had given unto them being under his Obedience and Subjection the Laws of England for the Government of that Country no succeeding King could alter the same without Parliament In Succession of Kings a question hath been Whether the King who hath had Sons both before and after he came to the Crown which of them should succeed he that was born before as having the prerogative of his Birthright or he that was born after And for each Reasons and Examples have not been wanting For Xerxes the Son of Darius King of Persia being the eldest Son after the enthroning his Father carried away the Empire from his Brother Arthemones or Artobazanes who was born before his Father came to the Royal Possession thereof So Arceses the Son of another Darius born in the time of his Fathers Empire carried away the Garland from his Brother Cyrus born before his Father came to the Empire So Lewis Duke of Millain born after his Father was Duke was preferred to the Dukedom before his Brother Galiasius born before the Dukedom But notwithstanding these Examples and the Opinion of sundry Doctors to the contrary common use of Succession in these latter days hath been to the contrary and that not without good reason for that it is not meet that any that hath right to any Succession by the prerogative of their Birthright such as all elder Brothers have should be put by the same And this was the pretence of Henry the First against Robert his eldest Brother Also sundry Contentions have risen in Kingdoms between the Issue of the eldest Son of the King dying before his Father and the second Brother surviving who should Reign after the death of the Father the Nephew challenging the same unto him by the Title of his Fathers Birthright and by way of Representation Cok. part 3. cap. 4. the other claiming as eldest Son to his Father at the time of his death Upon which Title in old time there grew a Controversie between Arcus the Son of Arrotatus eldest Son of Cleomenes King of Lacedemonia and Cleomenes second Son of Cleomenes Uncle to the said Arcus But upon debate of the matter the Senate gave their Sentence for Arcus against Cleomenes Besides Enominus King of Lacedemon having two Sons Polydectes and Licurgius Poyldectes dying without Children Licurgius succeeded in the Kingdom but after he had understood that Polydectes Widow had a Child he yielded the Crown to him wherein he dealt far more religiously than either did King Iohn or King Richard the Third For King Iohn upon the like pretence not only put by Arthur Plantaginet his eldest Brother's Son from the Succession of the Kingdom but also most unnaturally took away his life And King Richard the Third to come to the Crown did most barbarously not only slay his two innocent Nephews but also defamed his Mother in publishing to the World that the late King his Brother was a Bastard Our Stories do obscurely note that Controversie of like matter had like to have grown between King Richard the Second and Iohn of Gaunt his Uncle and that he had procured the Counsel fo sundry great Learned Men to this purpose but that he found the hearts of divers Noblemen of this Kingdom and especially the Citizens of London to be against him whereupon he desisted from his intended purpose and acknowledged his Nephews Right And the reason of the Common Law of England is notable in this point and may be collected out of the ancient Authors of the same Glanvile lib. 7. cap. 1. Bracton lib. 7. c. 30. and by Brittan fol. 119. For they say Whosoever is Heir to another aut est haeres jure proprietatis as the eldest Son shall inherit only before his Brothers aut jure representationis as where the eldest Son dieth in the life of his Father his Issue shall inherit before the youngest Son for though the youngest sit magis propinquus yet jure representationis the Issue of the eldest Son shall inherit for that he doth represent the person of his Father And as Bracton saith jus proprietatis which his Father had by his Birthright doth descend unto him aut jure propinquitatis ut propinqui jus excludit remotum remotus remotiorem aut jure sanguinis And yet Glanvile Lord Chief Justice under King Henry the Second seemeth to make this questionable here in England Who should be preferred the Uncle or the Nephew Also it hath been resolved for Law That the possession of the Crown purgeth all defects
Creation of the Prince ended Although at present we have no Prince of Wales yet I shall give you the Badge or Armorial Ensign of Honour appropriate unto them which is as it is here depincted OF DUKES CHAP. IV. THE Title and Degree of a Duke hath been of ancienter standing in the Empire and other Countries than amongst us for the first English Duke was Edward the black Prince created Duke of Cornwal by his Father King Edward the Third by which Creation according to the Tenure of his Patent the Firstborn Sons of the Kings of England are Dukes of Cornwall Nor is there any Creation required for the said Honour although there is for Prince of Wales A Duke is said to be so called à Ducendo from leading being at the first always a Leader of an Army Imperial or Regal and was so chosen in the Field either by casting of Lots or by common Voice and the Saxons called this Leader an Hertzog but now and for some time past it is a Dignity given by Kings and Princes to men of great Blood and excellent Merit In some Countries at this day the Soveraign Princes are called Dukes as the Duke of Savoy Duke of Muscovy Duke of Saxony Duke of Florence and the like All Noblemen at their Creation have two Ensigns to signifie two Duties viz. their Heads are adorned ad consulendum Regem Patriam in tempore pacis and they are girt with Swords ad defendendum Dominum Regem Patriam in tempore belli The Chapeau or Head-attire saith Chassanaeus Dukes were accustomed to wear in token of Excellency it is of a Scarlet Colour lined or doubled Ermin And now Marquisses Earls and Viscounts plead Custome for the use thereof as also for Coronets which his Majesty King Charles the Second hath also granted Barons to wear but with due difference as is also in their Robes which may appear by the Portraiture of the said Degrees here lively set forth His Sword is girt about him and his short Cloak or Mantle over his Shoulders is guarded with four Guards his Coronet is Gold the Cap Crimson doubled Ermin but not indented as those of the Blood Royal are and the Verge which he holds in his hand is also of Gold Dukes of the Royal Line or Blood are reputed as Arch-Dukes and are to have their Coronets composed of Crosses and Flower delis as other Dukes A Duke tantùm shall take place before any Lord that is both Marquis and Earl but a Duke that is both a Marquis and Earl shall precede him The Dukes Marquisses and Earls at their Creations have a Sword put over their Shoulders or girt about them which the Viscounts and Barons have not A Duke may have in all places ou● of the King 's or Princes presence a Cloth of Estate hanging down within half a yard of the Ground so may his Dutchess who may have her Train born up by a Baroness And no Earl without permission from him ought to wash with a Duke The Effigies of the Most Noble George Duke Marquess Earle of Buckingham Earle of Coventry Viscount Villers Baron of Whaddon Knight of the most Noble order of the Garter a. R. While sculp His Royall Highness Iames Duke of Yorke and Albany Knight of the most noble order of the Garter sole Brother to his sacred Majesty King Charles the second coet. The most Illustrious Prince Rupert Count Palatine of the Rhine Duke of Bavaria and Duke of Cumberland Earle of Holderness Governor of Windsor-Castle Lord Leivtenant of Ber●shire Knight of the Garter Nephew to the late King of blessed memory and one of his Ma ●●es most Honourable privy Councell c ● The Right Noble Henry Duke of Norfolk Earle of Arundell Surrey Norwich Earle Marshall of England Baron Howard Fitz-Allen Matravers Mawbrey Seagrave Bruce● Clu●n Oswalds tree Castle Riseing The Right Noble Francis Seumour Duke of Somerset Marquess Earle of Hertford Viscount Beauchamp Baron Seymour ct. The Right Noble George Duke Marquess Earle of Buckingham Earle of Coventrey Viscount Villiers ●●ron of Whaddon Knight of the most noble order of the Garter ct. The Rt. Noble Christopher Duke of Albemarle Earle of Toringto● Baron Monck of Potheridge Beauchamp Teys Kt. of ye. most noble order of ye. Garter Lord Leivtenant of Devon-shire Essex one of the Gentlemen of his matys Bedchamber one of ye. Lords of his most honble privy Coun●● The Right Noble Iames Duke of No●●●uth Buccleuth Earle of Doncaster Dalkeith Baron of Askedale Te●d●l● Whitch●●●●●en 〈…〉 Chamberlaine of Scotland Mas●●r of his Ma ● horse Captain of his life Guard Gouernor of Hull Lord Leivtenant of ye. East Rideing of Yo●k-shire Chancellor of ye. Vniversity of Cambridge Knight of ye. Garter one of ye. Lords of his matys most honble privy Councell ct. The Right Noble William Cavendish Duke Marquess Earle of Newcas● Earle of Ogle Viscount Mansfield Baron Ogle Bertram Bolesmere Kt of th● Garten Ld. Leiutenant of Nottinghamshire Gent of his matys Bedchamber Iustice in Ire of all his matys Parks fforests and Chases Northwards of Trent one of ye. Lords of his matys most honble privy Councell ● The Right Noble Charles Fitz-Roy Duke of Southampton Earle of Chichester Baron of Newbury Knight of the Garter and heyre in Succession to the Dutchy of Cleaveland c● The Right Noble Charles Lennox Duke of Richmond and Lennox Earle of March and Darneley Baron of Settrington and Tarbolton ct. The Right Noble Henry Fitz-Roy Duke of Grafton Earle of Euston Viscount Ipswich and Baron Sudbury ●● A Duke hath the Title of Grace and being written unto is styled Most High Potent and Noble Prince And Dukes of the Royal Blood are styled Most High most Mighty and Illustrious Princes The younger Sons of Kings are by courtesie styled Princes by birth but have their Titles of Duke Marquiss c. from Creation The Daughters are styled Princesses and the Title of Royal Highness is given to all the King's Children both Sons and Daughters The form of a Patent of the Duke of York tempore Iacobi JACOBUS c. To all Archbishops Bishops Dukes Marquisses Earls Viscounts Barons Iustices Knights Governors Ministers and to all Bailiffs and faithful Subjects Greeting Whereas oftentimes we call to mind how many and innumerable Gifts and what excellent Benefits that Great Maker of all Goodness of his own benignity and clemency hath abundantly bestowed upon us who not only by his power hath consociated divers and mighty Lyons in firm Peace without any strife but also hath amplified and exalted the Bounds and Limits of our Government by his unspeakable Providence above our Progenitors with an indissolvable Conjunction of the ancient and famous Kingdoms in the right of Blood under our Imperial Diadem In regard whereof we cannot boast but most willingly acknowledge our fruitfulness and Issue plentifully adorned with the gifts
of Nature which he hath vouchsafed unto us because in truth in the Succession of Children a mortal man is made as it were immortal neither unto any mortal men at leastwise unto Princes not acknowledging Superiors can any thing happen in worldly causes more happy and acceptable than that their Children should become notable in all vertuous Goodness Manners and Increase of Dignity so as they which excel other men in Nobleness and Dignity endowments of Nature might not be thought of others to be exceeded Hence it is that we that great goodness of God which is shewed unto us in our felicity not to pass in silence or to be thought not to satisfie the Law of Nature whereby we are chiefly provoked to be well affected and liberal to those in whom we behold our Blood to begin to flourish coveting with great and fatherly affection that the perpetual memory of our Blood with Honour and increase of Dignity and all praise may be affected our well beloved Son Charles Duke of Albony Marquis of Ormond Count of Ross and Lord of Ardmannoth our second begotten Son in whom the Regal form and beauty worthy Honour and other gifts of Vertue do now in the best hopes shine in his tender years We erect create make and ordain and to him the Name Style State Title and Dignity and Authority and Honour of the Duke of York do give to him that Name with the Honour to the same belonging and annexed by the girding of the Sword Cap and Cirtlet of Gold put upon his Head and the delivery of a Golden Verge we do really invest To have and to hold the same Name Style State Dignity Authority and Honour of the Duke of York unto the aforesaid Charles our second begotten Son and to the Heirs male of his Body lawfully begotten for ever And that the aforesaid Charles our second begotten Son according to the decency and state of the said Name of Duke of York may more honourably carry himself we have given and granted and by this our present Charter we confirm for us and our Heirs unto the aforesaid Duke and his Heirs for ever out of Farms Issues Profits and other Commodities whatsoever coming out of the County of York by the hands of the Sheriff of the said County for the time being at the times of Easter and Michaelmas by even portions For that express mention of other Gifts and Grants by us unto the said Duke before time made in these Presents doth not appear notwithstanding these being Witnesses The most excellent and most beloved Henry our Firstbegotten Son Ulrick Duke of Hellet Brother of the Queen our beloved Wife and the Reverend Father in Christ Richard Archbishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England and also our beloved and faithful Counsellor Thomas Lord Elsmere our Chancellor of England Thomas Earl of Suffolk Chamberlain of our Houshold and our dear Cosin Thomas Earl of Arundel our welbeloved Cosins and Counsellors Henry Earl of Northumberland Edward Earl of Worcester Master of our Horse George Earl of Cumberland and also our welbeloved Cosins Henry Earl of Southampton William Earl of Pembroke and also our welbeloved Cosins and Counsellors Charles Earl of Devonshire Master of our Ordinance Henry Earl of Northampton Warden of the Cinque Ports John Earl of Warwick Robert Viscount Cranborne our Principal Secretary and our well-beloved and faithful Counsellor Edward Lord Zouch President of our Council within the Principality and Marches of Wales and also our welbeloved and trusty Robert Lord Willoughby of Eresby William Lord Mounteagle Gray Lord Chandois William Lord Compton Francis Lord Norris Robert Lord Sidney our welbeloved and faithful Counsellor William Lord Knowles Treasurer of our Houshold and our welbeloved and faithful Counsellor George Dunbar Lord of Barwick Chancellor of our Exchequer Edward Bruce of Kinloss Master of the Rolls of our Chancery and also our welbeloved and faithful Thomas Eareskine of Birketon Captain of our Guard James Lord Barmermoth and others Given by our Hand at our Palace at Westminster in the Second year of our Reign of England c. King Edward the Third in the third year of his Reign by his Charter in Parliament and by Authority of Parliament did create Edward his eldest Son called the black Prince Duke of Cornwal not only in Title but cum feodo with the Dutchy of Cornwal as by the Letters Patents may appear in Coke's Eighth Part in the Pleadings Habendum tenendum eidem Duci ipsius haeredum suorum Regum Angliae filiis Primogenitis dicti loci Ducibus in Regno Angliae ei haereditarie successuris So that he who is hereditable must be Heir apparent to the King of England and of such a King who is Heir to the said Prince Edward and such a one shall inherit the said Dukedom which manner of limitation of Estate was short and excellent varying from the ordinary Rules of the Common Law touching the framing of any Estate of Inheritance in Fee-simple or Fee-tayl and nevertheless by the Authority of Parliament a special Fee-simple is in that case only made as by Judgment may appear in the Book aforesaid fol. 27. and 27 Ed. 3.41 b. And ever since that Creation the said Dukedom of Cornwall hath been the peculiar Inheritance of the King 's eldest Son during the life of the King his Father so that he is ever Dux natus non creatus and the Duke at the very time of his Birth is taken to be of full and perfect Age so that he may send that day for his Livery of the said Dukedom And the said black Prince was the first Duke of England after the Conquest For though Bracton who made his Book in the Reign of King Henry the Third saith sunt sub rege Duces as appeareth that place is to be understood of the ancient Kings before the Conquest For in Magna Charta which was made in the Ninth of King Henry the Third we find not the name Duke amongst the Peers and Nobles there mentioned for seeing the Norman Kings themselves were Dukes of Normandy for a great while they adorned none with this Honour And the eldest Son of every King after his Creation was Duke of Cornwall as for example Henry of Monmouth eldest Son of King Henry the Fourth Henry of Windsor eldest Son of King Henry the Fifth Edward of Westminster eldest Son of King Edward the Fourth Arthur of Winchester eldest son of King Henry the Seventh and Edward of Hampton first Son of King Henry the Eighth But Richard of Burdeaux who was the first Son of Edward the black Prince was not Duke of Cornwall by force of the said Creation For albeit after the death of his Father he was Heir apparent to the Crown yet because he was not the Firstbegotten Son of a King for his Father died in the life of King Edward the Third the said Richard was not within the limitation of the Grant and Creation by
Authority of Parliament made in the Eleventh of King Edward aforesaid and therefore to supply that defect in the Fifth of Edward the Third he was created Duke of Cornwall by special Charter Elizabeth eldest Daughter of King Edward the Fourth was not a Dutchess of Cornwall although she was the Firstbegotten Daughter of Edward the Fourth for the Limitation is to the First-begotten Son Henry the Eighth was not in the life of his Father King Henry the Seventh after the death of his eldest Brother Arthur Duke of Cornwall by force of the said Creation for although he was sole Heir apparent yet he was not his eldest begotten Son And the Opinion of Stamford a Learned Judge hath been That he shall have within his Dukedom of Cornwall the King's Prerogative because it is not severed from the Crown after the form as it is given for none shall be Inheritor thereof but the King 's of the Realm For example whereas by Common Law if a man hold divers Mannors or other Lands or Tenements of divers Lords all by Knights Service some part by Priority and ancient Feoffment and other Land by Posterity and a later Feoffment and the Tenant so seized dieth and his Son and Heir within Age in this case the custody and wardship of the Body and his marriage may not be divided amongst all the Lords but one of them only shall have right unto it because the Body of a man is intire And therefore the Law doth say That the Lord of whom some part of those Lands are holden by Priority and by the same Tenure of Chivalry shall have it except the King be any of the Lords for then though the Tenant did purchase that Land last yet after his death the King shall be preferred before any of the other Lords of whom the Tenant did hold the Priority And so shall the Duke of Cornwall in the same Case have the Prerogative if his Tenant die holding of him but by posterity of Feoffment for any Tenure of his Dutchy of Cornwall although the same Duke is not seized of any particular Estate whereof the Reversion remaineth in the King for the Prince is seized in Fee of his Dukedom as beforesaid Iohn of Gaunt the fourth Son of King Edward the Third took to Wife Blanch Daughter and Heir of Henry Duke of Lancaster who had Issue Henry King of England so that the said Dutchy of Lancaster did come unto the said Henry by descent from the party of his Mother and being a Subject he was to observe the Common Law of the Realm in all things concerning his Dutchy For if he would depart in Fee with any thereof he must have made Livery and Seisin or if he had made a Lease for life reserving Rent with a Re-entry for default of payment and the Rent happen to be behind the Duke might not enter without making his Demand or if he had alienated any part thereof whilst he was within Age he might defeat the Purchaser for that Cause and if he would grant a Reversion of an Estate for life or years in being there must also be Attornment or else the Grant doth not take effect But after that he had deposed King Richard the Second and did assume the Royal Estate and so had conjoyned his Natural Body in the Body Politick of the King of this Realm and so was become King then the possession of the Dutchy of Lancaster was in him as King but not as Duke which degree of Dignity was swallowed up in that of the King for the lesser must always give place to the greater And likewise the Name of the Dutchy and the Franchises Liberties and Jurisdictions thereof when in the King's Hands were by the Common Law extinct and after that time the possessions of the Dutchy of Lancaster could not pass from Henry the Fourth by Livery of Seisin but by his Letters Patents under the Great Seal without Livery of Seisin and with Attornment And if he make a Lease for Life being Duke reserving a Rent with a Re-entry for default of payment and after his Assumption of the Crown his Rent happen to be unpaid he might Re-enter without Demand for the King is not bound to such personal Ceremonies as his Subjects are Therefore to have the said Dutchy to be still a Dutchy with the Liberties to the same as it was be●ore and to alter the order and degree of the Lands of the Dutchy from the Crown the said King Henry the Fourth made a Charter by Authority of Parliament which is entituled Charta Regis Hen. 4. de separatione Lancastriae à corona authoritate Parliamenti Anno Regni sui primo as by the Tenor thereof may appear And so by Authority of that Parliament the said Dutchy with all the Franchises and Liberties was meerly resigned from the Crown and from the Ministers and Officers thereof and from the Order to pass by such Conveyance which the Law did require in the possessions of the Crown But now the possessions of the Dutchy by force of the said Statute stood divided from the Crown and ought to be demeaned and ordered and pass as they did before Henry the Fourth was King yet there is no Clause in the Charter which doth make the person of the King who hath the Dutchy in any other Degree than it was before But things concerning his pleasure shall be in the same estate as they were before such separation insomuch as if the Law before the Charter by Authority of Parliament adjudged the person of the King always of full Age having regard unto his Gifts as well of the Lands which he doth inherit in the right of his Crown or Body Politick it shall be so adjudged for the Dutchy Land after the said Statute for the Statute doth go and reach unto the Estate Order and Condition of the Lands of the Dutchy but doth not extend unto the person of the King who hath the Lands in points touching his person Neither doth that distinguish or alter the preheminences which the Law doth give to the person of the King For if King Henry the Fourth after the said Act had made a Lease or other Grant of parcel of the Dutchy by the Name of Henry Duke of Lancaster only it had been void for it should have been made in the Name of Henry the Fourth King of England And thus stood the Dutchy of Lancaster severed from the Crown all the Reign of Henry the Fourth Henry the Fifth and Henry the Sixth being politickly made for the upholding of the Dutchy of Lancaster their true and ancient Inheritance however the right Heir to the Crown might in future time obtain his right thereunto as it happened in King Edward the Fourth's time but after the said King Edward obtained his right unto the Crown in Parliament he attainted Henry the Sixth and appropriated and annexed the said Dutchy again to the Crown as by the Statute thereof made in the first of the King's Reign
of the most noble order of the Garter c ● The Right Reverend Father in God Henry Compton by Divine permission Lord Bishop of London Deane of his matys Chappel and one of the Lords of his most honble privy Councell brother to the Rt. honble Iames Earle of Northampton The Right Reverend Father in God Nathaniel Crew by divine permission Lord Bishop of Durham Clerk of the Closet● to his Maty and one of the Lords of his most honble privy Councell son to the Rt. honble Iohn Ld. Crew Baron of Steane The Right Reverend Father in God Iohn Pearson by Divine permission Lord Bishop of Chester The Right Reverend Father in God Peter Gunning by Divine permission Lord Bishop of Ely OF THE Lords Spiritual CHAP. VIII ACCORDING to the Laws and Customes of this Realm many are the Ecclesiastical Dignities and Priviledges belonging to the Bishops and Clergymen who in all succeeding Ages have been reverenced with the greatest observance imaginable as being acknowleded by all good Christians to be those Messengers sent and particularly appointed by God to take care of our Souls The Subjects of England are either Clergy or Laymen both which are subdivided into Nobility and Commons Thus we find in our Parliament the Lords Spiritual and Temporal make the Upper House the Commons Spiritual viz. the Clergy elected to sit in Convocation who once had place and suffrage in the Lower House of Parliament and the Commons Temporal viz. the Knights and Burgesses make the Commons Most evident it is by the Consent of all the Councils Fathers Histories and Universal Tradition That for the first Fifteen hundred years continuance of Christianity there is no Example to be found of any Church governed by any Authority Ecclesiastick but that of Episcopacy they were ordained by the Apostles themselves to be their Successors in Christ's Church to have a vigilant eye over the Pastors and Teachers under them as to their Lives and Doctrine for the preservation of Truth and Peace the prevention of Scandal suppression of Heresie and Schism and to have a care of their Flock to bring them to Salvation 'T is not therefore without reason that in all times they have been the first of the two Divisions of the people the Clergy and Laity and as Spiritual Barons take place of Temporal they take their name from the Saxon word Biscoep a Super-intendent or Overseer They are three ways Barons of the Realm viz. by Writ Patent and Consecration They precede all under the Degree of Viscounts and are always placed upon the King 's right hand in the Parliament House They have the Title of Lords and Right Reverend Fathers in God And their Sees by the piety of former times are endowed with fair Revenues for the due administration of what belongs to their places And to keep them from corrupt and sinister affections the King 's most Noble Progenitors and the Ancestors of the Nobility and Gentry have sufficiently endowed the Church with Honour and Possessions Many Priviledges and Immunities were likewise granted to them and the Clergy by the Saxon and Danish Kings as coyning of Money conferring the Order of Knighthood c. which hath been long since appropriate to the Crown Thus Laufranck Archbishop of Canterbury made William the Second Knight in the life time of his Father Of Priviledges remaining some belong to to the Archbishops some to the Bishops as they are so and some to them and all other of the Clergy We read of three Archbishopricks in England before the Saxons came amongst us viz. that of London York and Carleon upon Vske But Christianity being thence expelled by the Pagans the succession of those Sees ceased till it pleased God to restore the Light of his Gospel to the blind Saxons which in this Kingdom had planted themselves by the Ministration of St. Augustin who first preached Salvation to them at Canterbury and was there buried for whose sake they removed the Episcopal See from London unto Canterbury and in process of time placed another Archbishop at ●ork which two Provinces included England and Wales and have Five and twenty Bishops under them Six and twenty Deans of Cathedrals and Collegiate Churches Sixty Arch-Deacons Five hundred forty four Prebendaries many rural Deans and about Ten thousand Rectors and Vicars of Parishes The Archbishop of Canterbury was anciently the Metropolitan of England Scotland Ireland and the Isles adjacent and was therefore sometime styled a Patriarch and had several Archbishops under him His style was Alterius orbis Papa orbis Britannici Pontifex The Date of Records in Ecclesiastical Affairs ran thus Anno Pontificatus nostri primo c. He was Legatus Natus which power was annexed to that See near One thousand years ago whereby no other Legat or Nuntio from Rome could exercise any Legantive power without the King 's special Licence In General Councils he had place before all other Archbishops at the Pope's right Foot Nor was he respected less at home than abroad being according to the practise of most other Christian States reputed the second person in the Kingdom and named and ranked before the Princes of the Blood By the favour of our present King he still enjoys divers considerable preheminences as Primate and Metropolitan of all England hath power to summon the Arch-bishop of York and the Bishops of his Province to a National Synod is primus par Regni preceding not only Dukes but all the Great Officers of the Crown next to the Royal Family He is styled by the King Dei Gratia Archiopiscopus Cantuarii Writes himself Divina Providentia as doth the Archbishop of York other Bishops write Divina permissione and hath the Title of Grace given him as it is to Dukes and Most Reverend Father in God His Office is to Crown the King and wheresoever the Court shall happen to be 't is said the King and Queen are Speciales Domestici Parochiani Domini Archiepisc. Cant. The Bishop of London is accounted his Provincial Dean the Bishop of Winchester his Chancellor and the Bishop of Rochester his Chaplain He hath the power of all the probate of Wills and granting Letters of Administration where the party hath bona notabilia that is Five pounds worth or above out of the Diocess wherein he dieth or Ten pounds worth within the Diocess of London By Statute of Hen. 8. 25. he hath power to grant Licences Dispensations c. and holds divers Courts of Judicature viz. his Courts of Arches of Audience his Prerogative Court and his Court of Peculiars And he may retain and qualifie eight Chaplains which is more by two than a Duke can do The Arch-bishop of York was also Legatus Natus and had that Authority annexed to his See He had all the Bishopricks of Scotland under his Province till the year 1470. He hath the place and precedency of all Dukes not of the Royal Blood and of all great Officers except only the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper
Parliament by Writ as Baron such Heir Male omitting the Husband of the Issue of such Heir Female And this also appeareth by a notable Controversie in the time of Henry the Seventh between Sir Robert Willoughby Lord Brook and Richard Lord Lattimer for the Barony of Lattimer which in effect was The said Lord Brook did challenge the Barony of Lattimer as Co●in and Heir of Elizabeth his Great-grandmother who was Sister and Heir of Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer who died without Issue And hereupon exhibited a Petition to Henry the Seventh in Parliament whereunto Richard Lord Lattimer was called to answer because he then enjoyed the said Title and Dignity The said Richard Lord Lattimer did by his Answer shew That after the death of the said Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer without Issue the said Elizabeth was his Sister and next Heir and married unto Thomas Willoughby Knight second Son of the Lord Willoughby But Henry the Sixth for that the said Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer was dead without Issue and that the next Heir was Female did therefore call to the Parliament George Nevill Knight second Son of Henry Earl of Westmoreland to be Lord Lattimer as Cosin and next Heir Male of the said Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer which George was Grandfather of the said Richard Lord Lattimer Father of the said Richard In debate of which cause the Question now in hand namely Whether a Barony by Writ may descend to the Heirs Female was advisedly considered of by the King and his Nobility in Parliament and in the end adjudged with the said Richard Lord Lattimer which President doth afford us two Judgments in this point And in the time of Henry the Sixth when the Writ was directed to the said Sir George Nevill Knight whereby he was summoned as Lord Lattimer to the Parliament and as Heir Male and not the said Thomas Willoughby Knight husband of the said Elizabeth Heir Female And the second Judgment was given in the time of Henry the Seventh whereby the said Barony was adjudged to the said Richard Lord Lattimer coming out of the special Heir Male against the Lord Brook descended of the general Heir Male. But here in this President before remembred of the Barony of Dacres may be objected to encounter this Conclusion for there was an Heir Female married unto Sir Richard Fines who by the Declaration of King Henry the Sixth was Baron of Dacres in right of his wife And there was also Ralph and Humphrey the Heirs Males before whom the Heir Female was preferred by the censure of Henry the Sixth and Edward the Fourth This Objection is easily answered for although Henry the Sixth through the Princely favour which he bore unto Sir Richard Fines had declared him to be Lord Dacres in right of his wife yet notwithstanding did Ralph Dacres being Heir Male then unto the Lord Dacres and by that name was attainted in Parliament Anno primo Hen. 4. Wherefore the reason why the Heir Male could not be regarded was the said Attainder of the said Ra●ph and Humphrey his brother and therefore when Humphrey in the 12 th of Edward the Fourth laboured to have the said Attainder Reversed he submitted himself to the Arbitrement of the King who to satisfie both Competitors both having deserved of him after he had admitted them to his favour he allowed one to be Lord Dacres and the other to be the Lord Dacres of Gillesland And thus much concerning the second Point Whether a Barony by Writ may descend unto the Heir Female The third Point As concerning the third Point admitting such Descent to be to the Heir Female when there is no Heir Male that may claim the same for then doth this Question take place Whether the husband of such an Heir Female shall enjoy the Dignity in right of his wife or no Wherein we are to rest upon a Resolution had and given to this special Question which was in this manner In the time of Henry the Eighth when Mr. Winby took upon him the style of Lord Talbois in right of his wife having no Issue by her The said King assisted both by Civil and Temporal Lawyers gave Sentence That no husband of a Baroness in her right should use that Style and Dignity until he had by her a Child whereby she should become Tenant by Courtesie unto her Inheritance The special Reasons that occasioned this Sentence were two First It should be convenient for her husband this day to be a Baron and a Peer of the Realm and to morrow by the death of his wife to become none and without the default of the party Secondly If he had Issue by wife and were entituled to be Tenant by the Courtesie of England of his wives Lands if he shall not also bear the Style and Dignity of his Wives Barony then should the Son after the death of his mother dying in the life time of his father be a Baron and Lord without Land for so the father should have the Land as Tenant by Courtesie and the Son the Lordship without Land And thus much said concerning the Nature Quality and Estate of a Baron by Writ and for the Resolution of the several points and Articles of the Question proposed may suffice CHAP. XII Barons by Patent which is the third kind of Barons mentioned in the former Division of Barons THere is also a fourth means of Creation viz. by Act of Parliament but the first two mentioned and this other by Patent is most usual for the Honour of the King for thereby the Donation doth proceed from his Majesty only as from the Fountain of Honour But when the Creation is by Parliament the King ever is one and may be said to be Donor A Baron therefore by Creation by reason of Letters Patents is that noble Person whom the King or any of his Progenitors Kings of this Realm have created Baron by such their Letters Patents began in the Reign of King Richard the Second This kind of Dignity of a Baron shall be of such continuance in Descent or otherwise as shall be limited in the Habendum in such Letters Patents contained for it may be but for the life of him to whom it is given or for term vanter vie as some hold Opinion in the 32 of Hen. 6. for cujus est dare est disponere It may be in special in our general Tayl and this kind of Tayl was usual before the Statute made decimo tertio of Edw. 1. by which Estate Tayl of Lands and Tenements was created as appeareth by the Patent whereby Hubert de Burgo was made Earl of Kent in the time of Henry the Third by these words Habendum sibi haeredibus suis de corpore Margaretae uxoris sui sorors Alexandri Regis Scotiae procreatis pro defectu talis exitus remanere in directis haeredibus dicti Huberti And that Estates intayl are at this Day of Titles of Honour by the said Statute of Westminster the second Question If a
to prejudice him touching his Mothers Inheritance who also did not offend or contrariwise especially in case where the Mother was seized of an Estate in Feesimple either in Lands or Tenements or Title of Honour And this was the case if I be not mistaken of Philip late Earl of Arundel notwithstanding the Attainder of Thomas Duke of Norfolk his Father for he had that Earldom in right of his Mother But they do agree That if the Lands or Tenements or a Title of Honour be given to a man and to his wife in tayl who hath Issue The Father is attainted of Treason and executed though this forfeiture of the Husband shall be no barr to the Wife concerning her interest by Survivorship yet their Issue is barred by the Statute 26 Hen. 8. cap. 13. and his Blood corrupted For in that case the Heir must necessarily make himself Heir as well of the Body of the one as of the other And yet the words of the Statute 32 Hen. 8. cap. 28. are That no Fine Feof●ment or other Act or Acts hereafter to be made or suffered by the Husband only of any Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments being the Inheritance or Freehold of his Wife during the Coverture between them shall in any wise be or make any discontinuance or be prejudicial to the said Wife or to her Heirs or to such as shall have right title or interest to the same by the death of such Wife or Wives but the same Wife or her Heirs and such other to whom such right shall appertain after her decease shall or may then lawfully enter into all such Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments according to their Rights and Titles therein For there is Adversity taken and agreed for Law between a discontinuance which doth imply a wrong and a lawful Baron which doth imply a right And therefore if Land be given to the Husband and the Wife and to the Heirs of their Bodies begotten and the Husband levies a Fine with Proclamation or do commit High Treason and dieth and the Wife before or after Entry dieth the Issue is barred and the Comisee for the King hath right unto the Lands because the Issue cannot claim as Heir unto both And with this doth agree Dyer 351. b. adjudged vide 5 Hen. 7. 32. Cott's Assize Coke's eighth part 27. where it is resolved That the Statute 32 Hen. 8. doth extend only unto Discontinuances although the Act hath general words or be prejudicial to the Wife or her Heirs c. but the conclusion if she shall lawfully enter c. according to their right and title therein which they cannot do when they be barred and have no right title and interest And this Statute doth give advantage unto the Wife c. so long as she hath right but it doth not extend to take away a future barr Although the Statute doth give Entry without limitation of any time nevertheless the Entry must attend upon the right and therefore if the Wife be seized in Feesimple and her Husband levy a Fine with Proclamation unto another and dieth now the Wife may enter by force of the Statute for as yet that Fine is not any barr unto her but her right doth remain which she may continue by Entry but if she do surcease her time and the five years do pass without Entry c. now by force of the Fine with Proclamation and five years past after the death of her Husband she is barred of her right and by consequence she cannot enter And the Statute doth speak of Fine only and not of Fine with Proclamation If there be Father and Son and the Father be seized of Lands holden in Capite or otherwise by Knight's Service the King doth create the Son Duke Earl or other Degree of Nobility and afterwards the Father dieth his Son being within the Age of One and twenty years he shall be no Ward but if the King had made him Knight in the life of his Father he should not have been in Ward after the death of his Father neither for the Lands descended nor for his Marriage though he be within Age. NOBILITY AND LORDS IN REPUTATION ONLY CHAP. XIV THERE are also other Lords in Reputation and Appellation who nevertheless are not de jure neither can they enjoy the priviledges of those of the Nobility that are Lords of the Parliament The Son and Heir of a Duke during his Father's life is only in courtesie of Speech and Honour called an Earl and the eldest Son of a Marquiss or an Earl a Lord but not so in legal proceedings or in the King's Courts of Judicature But the King may at his pleasure create them in the life of their Ancestors into any Degree of Lords of the Parliament And according to the German Custom all the younger Sons of Dukes and Marquisses are called Lords but by courtesie only which Title descends not to their Heirs A Duke or other of the Nobility of a Foreign Nation doth come into this Land by the King 's safe Conduct in which said Letters of safe Conduct he is named a Duke according to his Creation yet that Appellation maketh him not a Duke c. to sue or be sued by that name within this Realm but is only so by Reputation But if the King of Denmark or other Sovereign King come into England under safe Conduct he during his abode here ought to be styled by the name of King and to retain his Honour although not his Regal Command and Power And in this case may be observed by the way That no Sovereign King may enter into this Realm without licence though he be in League All the younger Sons of the Kings of England are of the Nobility of England and Earls by their Birth without any other Creation And if an Englishman be created Earl of the Empire or some other Title of Honour by the Emperor or other Monarch he shall not bear that Dignity in England but is only an Earl in Reputation A Lord or Peer of Scotland or Ireland is not of the Nobility or Peerage of England in all Courts of Justice although he is commonly reputed a Lord and hath priviledge as a Peer OF THE QUEEN CONSORT AND OF NOBLE WOMEN CHAP. XV. A QUEEN so called from the S●xon word Cuningine as the King from Cuning by variation of Gender only as was their manner signifieth Power and Knowledge and thereby denotes the Sovereignty due unto them which they enjoyed in those days and do now in most Nations being capable of the Royal Diadem by the common right of Inheritance for want of Heirs Male But in France by the Salique Law the Sex is excluded from their Inheritance by which they debarred the English Title to their Crown There are three kinds of persons capable of the Title and Dignity of Queen amongst us and each of them different in Power and Priviledge The first is a Queen Sovereign to whom the Crown descends by Birth-right
Civil Law must needs be very ancient for field nor fight cannot be continued without the Law therefore 't is to be presumed it began when Battels were first fought in the World and the bearing of Arms was come to some perfection at the Siege of Troy for Hector of Troy bore Sable two Lyons combattant Or. It is written by an ancient Author called Gesta Trojanor ● that a Knight was made before any Coat-Armour and how Asterial who came from the Line of Iapheth had a Son named Olibion who was a strong and mighty man and when the people multiplyed being without a Governour and were warred upon by the people of Cham they all cryed upon Olibion to be their Governour which accepting of and men being mustered under him his Father made to his Son a Garland of Nine divers precious Stones in token of Chivalry Then Olibion kneeled down and his Father took Iapheth's Faulchion that Tubal made before the Flood and smote him nine times on the right shoulder in token of the nine Vertues of Chivalry Also Asterial gave to his Son Olibion a Target made of an Olive Tree with three Corners two above his Face and one beneath to the ground-ward Principles of Honour and Vertue that every Gentleman ought to be endowed with TO love honour and fear God to walk after his Commandments and to his power defend and maintain the Christian Religion To be loyal and serviceable to his Prince and Country To use Military Exercises To frequent the War and to prefer Honour before worldly wealth to be charitable to the distres●ed and to support Widows and Orphans To reverence Magistrates and those placed in Authority To cherish and encourage Truth Vertue and Honesty and to eschew Riot Intemperance Sloth and all dishonest Recreations and Company To be of a courteous gentle and affable deportment to all men and to detest pride and haughtiness To be of an open and liberal heart delighting in Hospitality● according to the Talent that God hath blest him with To be true and just in his word and dealing and in all respects give no cause of Offence Of Precedency THe Degrees of Honour which are in this Kingdom observed and according to which they have precedency may be comprehended under two Heads viz. Nobiles Majores and Nobiles Minores Those comprehended under Majores are Dukes of the Royal Blood Archbishops Marqui●●es Earls Viscounts Bishops and Barons And those under Minores are Knights of the Garter ●f no otherwise dignified Knights Bannerets Baronets Knights of the Bath Knights Batchelors Esquires and Gentlemen And all or most of these Degrees of Honour are speculatively distinguished the one from the other in their Ensigns or Shields of Honour as shall be shewed in the Chapter of each particular Degree Touching place of Precedency amonst the Peers or those under the Name of Nobiles Majores it is to be observed That all Nobles of each Degree take place according to their Seniority of Creation and not of years unless they are descended of the Blood Royal and then they take place of all others of the same Degree That after the King the Princes of the Blood viz. the Sons Grandsons Brothers and Nephews of the King take place Then these great Officers of the Church and Crown are to precede all other of the Nobility viz. the Archbishop of Canterbury the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper of the Great Seal the Archbishop of York the Lord Treasurer of England the Lord President of the Privy Council and the Lord Privy Seal Next Dukes Marquisses Dukes eldest Sons Earls Marquisses eldest Sons Dukes younger Sons Viscounts Earls eldest Sons Marquisses younger Sons Bishops Barons Viscounts eldest Sons Earls youngest Sons Barons eldest Sons Privy Councellors Judges and Masters of the Chancery Viscounts younger sons Barons younger sons Knights of the Garter if no otherwise dignified which is seldom sound Knights Bannerets Baronets Knights of the Bath Knights Batchelors Colonels Serjeants at Law Doctors and Esquires which may be comprehended under ●ive Heads 1. Esquires unto the King's Body 2. The Descendants by the Male Line from a Peer of the Realm 3. The eldest sons of Baronets and Knights 4. The two Esquires attending upon Knights of the Bath at their making And 5. Officiary Esquires as Justices of the Peace Barresters at Law Lieutenant Colonels Majors and Captains and lastly Gentlemen Note That these great Officers of Court of what Degree soever they are of take place above all others of the said Degree viz. the Master of the Horse Lord Chamberlain of England Lord High Cons●able of England Lord Marshal of England Lord Admiral of England Lord Steward and Lord Chamberlain of his Majesties Houshold So the Secretaries of State if Peers take place of all of that Degree except these great Officers aforesaid Note That the Ladies take place or precedency according to the Degree or Quality of their Husbands ☞ Note That in a Volume lately published by me entituled Britannia being a Description of his Majesties Dominions in page 33. the precedency of the Nobility and Gentry is treated of wherein the Masters of the Chancery are placed next after Serjeants at Law which Error happened through wrong Information their right place being next after Iudges as is here set down Note That it was decreed by King Iames That the younger sons of Viscounts and Barons should yield place to all Knights of the Garter to all Bannerets made under the Standard Royal his Majesty being present to all Privy Councellors Master of the Wards Chancellor and under Treasurer of the Exchequer Chancellor of the Dutchy Chief Justice of the King's Bench Master of the Rolls Chief Justice of the Common Pleas Chief Baron of the Exchequer and to all other Judges and Barons of the degree of the Coif by reason of their Honourable imploy in his Majesties Courts of Justice Note That as there are some great Officers as a●oresaid that take place above the Nobility of a higher Degree so are there some persons who for their Dignities Ecclesiastick Degrees in the Universities and Of●icers in an Army although neither Knights nor Gentlemen born take place amongs● them Thus all Deans Chancellors Prebends Doctors of Divinity Law and Physick are usually placed before most sorts of Esquires All Colonels are Honourable and by the Law of Arms ought to precede simple Knights so are all Field Officers Master of the Artillery Quarter-Master General c. All Batchelors of Divinity Law and Physick all Masters of Arts Barrestors in the Inns of Court Captains and other Commissionate Officers in the Army or those by Patent-places in his Majesties Houshold may equal and some of them precede any Gentleman that hath none of these qualifications But how unjustly these Priviledges are possessed by some of these pretenders and how contrary this usage is to the Laws of Honour see the Chapter of Gentlemen I think it here convenient to give you an Account of the Cavalcade of his M●●●●ties passing through
the former which is by lybelling secret slandering or defaming of others for this privy Backbiter doth not by words impeach his Adversary in so manifest and turbulent manner as the cholerick Menacer in his fury doth but seeming to sit quietly in his Study doth more deeply wound his Fame and Credit than the other boisterous person doth for he in a moment threatneth to do more than peradventure he is either able or hath courage to perform in all his life For his Passion thus discovering the Malice of his Heart doth give his Adversary warning to defend himself from him But this secret Canker the Libeller concealeth his Name hideth himself in a Corner and privily s●ingeth his Reputation and Credit and he knoweth not how to right himself and the greater is this Offence if done to a publick Magistrate or Minister of State for then it may bring a disturbance to the peace of the King and Kingdom And if it be against a private person the staining his Reputation will cause him not to be at quiet in Body and Mind until he hath found his Enemy which many times may lie so secretly hid that he cannot be discovered and then probably one innocent upon some suspicion or other may come to suffer for it Sometimes the malicious Defamer poureth forth his poyson in writing by a Scandalous Book Ballad Epigram or Rhime near the place where the party so abused doth most converse In which cases the Law hath provided that the party delinquent when he is found out and discovered shall be severely punished for he may either be Indicted by the ordinary Course of the Common Law and if it be an exorbitant Offence then by Pillory loss of Ears Whipping c. or the party grieved may have an Action upon the Case against the Offender and recover his Damages And in this it is not material whether the Libel be true or false or the party scandalized be alive or dead or be of a good or ill Name yet our Laws are so made as to punnish him and such like men by a due Course of Justice And to conclude this matter concerning Wrongs done to the Name and Dignity of a Nobleman this may be added That it is usual for any person to usurp the Arms of another Further if a Nobleman's Coat-Armour and Sword of other Gentleman 's bearing Arms at the solemnizing of their Funerals is set up in the Church for the Honour of the deceased and is by the covetousness of the Incumbent that pretendeth right thereunto as Offerings due unto him afterwards taken down or if they be defaced by any other such are to be severely punished as Malefactors And in that case the Action shall not be given to the Widow though she be Executrix or Administratrix of her Husband's Goods for such things which serve for the Honour of the party deceased are not to be accounted inter bona Testatoris And the Heir shall have his Action as the Defender of his Ancestor's Honour But the wrong is offered to the House and Blood and therein specially to the Heir qui est totius geniturae splendor and therefore to him accrueth the right of Action for so it is reported by Sir Iohn Fern in his Glory of Generosity fol. 83. that the Lady Withers Case in 9 Edw. 4. 14. hath been adjudged OF VISCOUNTS CHAP. VII THE next Degree of Honour to an Earl is a Viscount which was anciently a Name of Office under an Earl who being an immediate Officer of the King 's in their County for that their personal attendance was oft-times required at the Court had his Deputy to look after the Affairs of the County which at this day is an Office and called a Sheriff retaining the Name of his Substitution in Latin therefore called Vicecomes But about the Eighteenth of Henry the Sixth it became a Degree of Honour who conferred this Title upon Iohn Lord Beaumont by Letters Patent A Viscount is created by Patent as an Earl hath a Hood Surcoat and Mantle which hath on it two Guards and a half of white plain Furr without Ermins And his Coronet is only pearled with a row of Pearls close to the Chaplet He hath the Title of the Right Honourable and truly Noble or Potent Lord He may have a Taveress in his own House and his Viscountess may have her Train born up by a Woman out of her Superior's presence and in their presence by a Man The Effigies of the Right honble Thomas Belasise viscount Falconbergh of Henknowle Baron Falconbergh of Yarum Ld. Leiuetenant of the North rideing of York shire And one of ye. Lords of his maties most honble Priuy Councell ct R. Whi●● sculp The Rt. Honourable George Sauile Viscount Halifax Baron Sauile The Rt. Honourable Robert Paston Viscoun● Yarmouth Baron Paston of Paston The Rt. Honourable Francis Viscount Nervport ●f Bradford Baron Nervport of High Erc●ll Ld. Leutenant of ye. County of Salop. Treasurer of his matys Household one of ye. Lds of his matys most honble Privy Councell The Rt. Hon●rbl● Thoma● Needham L●rd Viscount Killmurr●y of the Kingdome of Ireland The Rt. Honorable Wi●liam Viscount Brouncker of Lyon● and Baron Brouncker of N●● Castle in the Kingdome of Ireland a. The R t Hon●rable Charles Ld. Fairfax Viscount Emula in the Kingdome of Ireland The Rt. Honorable Maurice Berkeley● Baron Beckeley of Rathdowne Viscount Fitz Harding of ●ear hauen in the Kingdome of Ireland The Right Honourable Leicester Devoreux Viscount Hereford and Baron Ferrers of Chartley. The Right Honourable Francis Browne Viscount Montague The Right Honourable William Finn●● Viscount and Baron Say and Seale The Right honble Edward Viscount Conway Bar●n of Ragley in England and Viscount of Kilultagh in Ireland Leivetenant Generall of the Horse and one of the Lords of his Majestys mo●t honble privy for the said Kin●dome of Ireland The Rt. Honourable Baptist Noel Viscoun● Baron Noel of Ridlington and Elmington And Lord Leiutenant of Rutlandshire The Right Honourable William Howard Viscount and Baron Stafford The Rt. Honourable Thomas Bellasis●● Viscount Folconbergh of Henknowle 〈◊〉 Falconbergh of Yarum Lord Leivtenant of North rideing of Yorkeshire one of the Ld● of his 〈◊〉 Most honble Priuy Councell ●he Rt. Honourable Iohn Mordant 〈…〉 Mordant of Aveland and Baron of Rygate The most Reverend Father in god Gilbert Sheldon by Divine Providence Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Primate Metropolitan of all England one of y● Lords of his matys most honble privy Councell The most Reverend Father in God Richard Sterne by Divine Prouidence Lord Arch-Bishop of Yorke Primate and Metropolitane of England c a. The Right Reverend Father in god Humfrey Hinchman by Divine permission Lord Bishop of London Grand Almoner to his Maty one of the Lords of his matys most honble privy Councell c a. The Right Reverend Father in God Seth by Diuine permission Lord Bisshop of sarum Chancellor
Nobleman and his Progenitors have for a long time been called to Parliament and be a Baron either by Tenure or Writ and have had in regard thereof a place certain in Parliament if afterwards the said Nobleman should be created a Baron of that Barony and by the same name by Letters Patents whether shall he and his Heirs retain his old place in Parliament which he had according to his former Dignity or whether shall he lose his old place and take a new one according to the time of his Creation Answer The Case of the Lord Delaware lately erected a Resolution somewhat answerable to this Question Thomas Delaware in the third of Edward the Sixth being in some displeasure with William West his Heir and Nephew who was Father to Thomas late Lord Delaware and Grandfather to Henry Lord Delaware that Nevis procured by Act of Parliament by which the said William West was during his natural life only clearly disabled to claim demand or have any manner of Right Title or Interest by Descent Remainder or otherwise in or to the Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments Title and Dignity of Thomas Lord Delaware his Uncle c. After the said Thomas Delaware died and the said William West was in the time of Queen Mary attainted of Treason by Verdict but pardoned by the said Queen and afterwards by Parliament in the time of Queen Elixabeth was restored and in the fourth year of her Reign was created Lord Delaware by Patent and took place in Parliament accordingly for that by the said Act of Parliament of Edward the Sixth he was excluded to challenge the former ancient Barony and after he died Now whether Thomas Delaware should take his place according to the ancient Barony by Writ or according to his Father's Creation by Patent was the Question The Opinions of the late Queens Council being his Majestie 's Attorney General and Solicitor were That the acceptance of the new Creation by the said William West could not extinguish the ancient Dignity for that he had not the ancient Dignity in him at that time of his Creation but the Dignity was by the Act of Parliament 3 Edw. 6. in the ballance of suspence or consideration of Law and he thereby utterly disabled to have the same during his life only so as other acceptance could not extinguish that Dignity which he then had not nor could not conclude his Heir who was not disabled by the Parliament 3 Edw. 6. to claim the ancient Barony which Opinion of theirs was seen and allowed by the then Chief Justice of England and Lord Chief Baron and so signified to the Lord Keeper But this to be noted by the Reasons made for the said Resolution though if the said Sir William West had been Baron and entituled and in possession of the ancient Dignity when he accepted the ancient Creation the Law perchance might have been otherwise but that remains as yet unresolved Nevertheless the Rule is Eodem modo quo quid constituitur dissolvitur But by a Grant which is but a matter of Fact a man cannot transfer his Title of Honour And thus much concerning the Degrees of Barons within this Realm upon this occasion for the better understanding and direction of that which followeth to be handled And in this place I think it not impertinent to mention one Case which I met with in our Books of Common Law concerning the Descent of a Title of Honour whereof the Ancestor had Estate in Feesimple there is a Maxim in the Law Possessio fratris in feodo facit sororemesse haeredem But if a man by any of the three means aforesaid be created into a Title of Dignity to him and his Heirs for ever and so have Issue by one wife a Son and a Daughter and hath also a Son by a second wife afterwards the Father dieth and his eldest Son entreth into all his Father's Inheritances and also enjoyeth the Titles and Dignities which his Father had but dieth without Issue In this Case the Dignity shall descend upon the younger Son though he be but of the half blood to him that last enjoyed that Name and Title of descent and shall not descend to his Sister of the whole blood And yet in this case he shall only be her Brother's Heir of all his Feesimple Lands and the reason thereof is because possessio fratris is the name and sole cause which may give Title to her his Sister which faileth in this case of Dignity for it cannot be said that her elder brother was in possession of his Title of Honour no more than of his blood so as neither by his own act nor any act to be done by any other did gain more actual possession if so it may be termed then by the Law did descend to him and therefore the younger brother may well by the Law make himself Heir unto his Father of the Honour that he cannot be heir unto his brother So that this word Possession which is no other than pedis positio extendeth only unto such things of which a man may by h●s entry or other act be possessed and doth require actual possession Coke's third part 92. Having thus much treated concerning the Creations and other things incident to the degrees of Nobility I cannot omit some things concerning the sufficiency and ability of Estate which the Law doth require to be in every of them according to their several Dignities The Common Law which always will decorum and conveniency be observed considering the Charges and Dignities appertaining to these Degrees and Dignities being Offices of principal Service to the King and Realm both in War and Peace hath ordered that each of them ought to have a convenient Portion and Inheritance in Land to support the said Dignity which Supplies are as Sinews conjoyned in the same For in Vertue and Riches as Aristotle confesseth all the old Nobility consisted and which two Properties maketh a good Complement for utilior est sapientia cum divitiis conjuncta Therefore a Knight's Fee which he ought to have is Twenty pounds Land by the year a Baron's thirteen Knights Fees and a quarter and an Earl's twenty Knights Fees For always the fourth part of each Revenues which is by the Law held requisite for the Dignity shall be paid to the King for the Relief As for Example the Relief of a Knight is five pounds which is the one fourth of his Revenue according to the Statute of the first of Edward the Second The Relief of a Baron is One hundred Marks which is also the fourth part of his Revenue And the Relief of an Earl is One hundred pounds al●o the fourth part of his Revenue And it appears by the Records of the Exchequer that the Relief of a Duke amounteth unto Three hundred pounds And this is the reason in our Books that every of the Nobility is presumed in the Law to have sufficient Freehold ad sustinendum nomen onus And to what value
those ancient Fees in the time of Henry the Third and Edward the Fourth at this day do amount unto most men are not unskilful in Coke's seventh part 33. And in Cases of Decay of Ability and Estate as Senatores Romani amoti Senatu so sometimes they are not admitted to the Upper House of Parliament though they still keep their Title and Dignity Sir Thomas Smith de Republica A●glorum 22. and by the Statute made 31 Hen. 8. cap. 10. the Lords have their places prescribed after this manner as followeth viz. These four the Lord Chancellor the Lord Treasurer the Lord President of the Council and the Lord Privy Seal being Persons of the Degree of a Baron or above are in the same Act appointed to sit in Parliament and in all Assemblies and Councils above all Dukes not being of the Blood Royal viz. the King's Uncle Brother and Nephew And these six viz. the Lord Great Chamberlain of England the Lord High Constable of England the Lord Marshal of England the Lord Admiral of England the Lord High Steward of his Majesties Houshold and the Lord Chamberlain also of his M●jesties Houshold by that Act are to be placed in all Assemblies of Council after the Lord Privy Seal according to their Degrees So that if he be a Baron than he is to sit above all Barons or if an Earl above all Earls And so likewise the King's Secretaries being Barons or Earls have place above all Barons or Earls PRIVILEDGES Incident to the NOBILITY According to the Laws of England CHAP. XIII WHEN a Peer of the Realm and Lord of the Parliament is to be Arraigned upon any Trespass or Felony whereof he is indicted and whereupon he hath pleaded Not Guilty the King by his Letters Patens shall assign some great and sage Lord of the Parliament to be High Steward of England for the day of his Arraignment who before the said day shall make a Precept to his Serjeant at Arms that is appointed to serve him during the time of his Commission to warn to appear before him Eighteen or Twenty Lords of the Parliament or Twelve at the least upon the same day And then at the time appointed when the High Steward shall be set under the Cloth of Estate upon the Arraignment of the Prisoner and having caused the Commission to be read the same Serjeant shall return his Precept and thereupon the Lords shall be called and when they have appeared and are set in their places the Con●●able of the Tower shall be called to bring his Prisoner to the Barr and the High Steward shall declare to the Prisoner the cause why the King hath assembled thither those Lords and himself and perswade him to answer without fear and then he shall call the Clerk of the Crown to read his Indictment unto him and to ask him if he be Guilty or not whereunto when he hath answered Not Guilty the Clerk of the Crown shall ask him How he will be tryed and then he will say By God and his Peers Then the King's Serjeant and Attorney will give Evidence against him whereunto when the Prisoner hath made answer the Constable shall be commanded to receive the Prisoner from the Barr to some other place whilst the Lords do secretly confer together in the Court and then the Lords shall rise out of their places and consult amongst themselves and what they affirm shall be done upon their Honour without any Oath to be ministred upon them And when all or the greatest part of them shall be agreed they shall retire to their places and sit down Then the High Steward shall ask of the youngest Lord by himself if he that is Arraigned be Guilty or not of the Offence whereof he is Arraigned and then the youngest next him and so of the residue one by one until he hath asked them all and every Lord shall answer by himself And then the Steward shall send for the Prisoner again who shall be led to the Barr to whom the High Steward shall rehearse the Verdict of the Peers and give Judgment accordingly The Antiquity and Original of this kind of Tryal by the opinion of several Authors is grounded from the Statute of Magna Charta so called not in respect of the quantity but of the weight of it Coke to the Reader before his eight part fol. 2. cap. 29. beginning thus Millus liber homo c. nec super eum ibimus nec super eum mittemus nisi per legale judicium parium suorum But I take it to be more ancient than the time of Henry the Third as brought into the Realm with the Conqueror being answerable to the Norman and French Laws and agreeable with the Custom Feudale where almost all Controversies arising between the Sovereign and the Vassal are tryed per Iudicium parium suorum And if a Peer of the Realm upon his Arraignment of Treason do stand mute or will not answer directly Judgment shall be given against him as a Traytor Convict and he shall not be prest to death and thereby save the forfeiture of his Lands for Treason is out of the Statute of Westminster 1. chap. 12. 15. Ed. 4. 33. Dyer 205. But if he be Arraigned upon Indictment of Felony he may be mute This priviledge hath some restraint as well in regard of the person as in the manner of proceeding As touching the person first the Archbishops and Bishops of this Realm although they be Lords of the Parliament if they be impeached of such offence they shall not be tryed by the Peers of the Realm but by a Jury of Knights and other substantial Persons upon their Oaths the reason thereof alledged is so much as Archbishops and Bishops cannot pass in the like cases upon Peers for that they are prohibited by the Common and Ecclesiastical Laws to be judged of Life and Blood Reason would that the other Peers should not try them for this Tryal should be mutual forasmuch as it is performed upon their Honours without any Oath taken And so by the way you may see the great respect the Law hath to a Peer of the Realm when he speaketh upon his Honour even in a case concerning the life of a man and that of a Peer and therefore ought they much more to keep their Words and Promises in smaller matters when they engage their Honour for any just cause or consideration Secondly as touching these persons no Temporal Lords but they that are Lords of the Parliament shall have this kind of Tryal and therefore out of this are excluded the eldest Son and Heir apparent of a Duke in the life of his Father though he be called an Earl And it was the case of Henry Howard Earl of Surrey Son and Heir apparent to Thomas Duke of Norfolk in 38 Hen. 8. which is in Brook's Abridgment Treason 2. Likewise the Son and Heir apparent of an Earl though he be called a Lord. And all the younger Sons of Kings are Earls
priviledge THE Statute of Westminster 2. cap. 39● saith If the Sheriff return that he cannot execute the Kings precept propter resistentiam alicujus magnatis if it be true he shall punish the resisters by Imprisonment from whence they shall not be delivered without the Kings special commandment In 11 Hen. 4. 15. in homine replegiando against Dame Spencer a Peer of the Realm viz. a Baroness born a Capias was granted because it was an high injury to the person whom she eloigned and in some other cases of great contempt a Capias may be awarded against a Peer An Abbot which was a Lord of the Parliament was impleaded and he did pray priviledge to appear by an Attorney and by the Rule of the Court he could not because the Statute is general and against it but by a special Writ out of Chancery he might and so in case where he doth pray to be received For if a Lord of the Parliament holding Lands of another in Feesimple doth forbear and withhold to do and pay his Service to his Landlord and that by the space of two years whereupon he bringeth a Writ of Cessment which is his Remedy given by Law thereby to recover the Inheritance of the Land But the said Lord for the saving of Tenancy being minded to pay all the Arrearages before Judgment given against him as by the Law he ought to do in this case he must come in proper person and not by an Attorney If a Nobleman be indicted and cannot be found Process of Outlary shall be awarded against him per legem terrae and he shall be outlawed per judicium Coronatorum but he shall be tried per judicium parium suorum when he appeals and pleads to issue If any Lord did depart this Realm as Ambassador and otherwise by the Kings Licence or without Licence and do not return at the King's command or upon the Kings Writ upon his privy Signet the King may seize his Goods and Chattels If a Lord arrested upon a Supplicavit for the peace do refuse to obey the Arrest and make Rescous and the Sheriff do return the Rescous upon such return shall issue an Attachment against the said Lord for his contempt to take his Body and this is a way to obtain the peace against any Lord of the Parliament whereas the party could not have an Attachment against him if the Subpoena had been duly served and peaceably accepted of although the said Lord had not appeared thereupon All Lords are compellable to take the Oath mentioned in the Statute of the 7 th of King Iames chap. 4. And see the Statute of the 7 th of King Iames chap. 6. who have Authority to minister the said Oath unto them If a Baron that holdeth by Baron Tenure have his absence excused by Essoyn he which casteth his Essoyn or Excuse ought to find Surety that the said Essoyn is true But in case of common persons it shall rest upon the Credit and Integrity of the Essoyner wherein a Lord hath lesser priviledge than a common person And whereas the Amercements should be offered per pares the use is to refer them to the Barons of the Exchequer When a Peer of the Realm is Arraigned in any Appeal of Felony he shall not have that priviledge to be tried by his Peers as in case of Indictment but must undergo the ordinary Trial of Twelve men Also in case of Indictment the Defendant though a Peer may not challenge any of his Triers And the Judgment to be given against any Lord of Parliament in cases of Felony or Treason shall be no other than according to the usual Judgment given against common persons And their Execution through the special Grace and Favour of the King is beheading By Attainder of Felony or Treason is corruption of Blood so that their Children may not be Heirs unto them nor to any other Ancestor And if he were a Nobleman before he is by the Attainder made Ignoble not only himself but all his Children having regard unto the Nobility which they had by their Birth And this corruption is so strong and high that it cannot be salved by the King's pardon or otherwise than by Authority of Parliament But here is to be observed That Nobility is not a thing substantial but mere accidental for it may be present or absent without corruption of the Subject whereof it doth depend for experience sheweth That the passing of honourable Titles are restrained by exorbitant Crimes when as Nature in the mean while cannot be thrust away Wherefore though the Lawyers do call Extinguishment of Nobility which happeneth by such hainous Offences committed by corruption of Blood nevertheless they use not this manner of phrase as though Nobility were naturally and essentially in the Honour of Blood more than any other hereditary Faculty but because the right of Inheritance which is by degrees of communication of Blood directed is by that means determined and also in regard of the hatred and detestation of the Crime it is called corruption of Blood And here a Question may arise Whether by Attainder of the Father the Blood be so corrupted that the Son shall also be barred his Mother's Inheritance who hath not transgressed or no They that maintain the Affirmative say That forasmuch as none can be procreated or ingendred according to the course of Nature but of a Father and Mother and must have in him two Bloods viz. the Fathers and Mothers therefore the Law also faith Those Bloods commixt in the person of a man in lawful Marriage do constitute and make him an Heir and that none can be Heir unto any unless he hath both Bloods in him to whom he doth convey himself to be Heir And therefore the Heir of the half Blood shall not inherit because he doth want one of the Bloods which should make him inheritable And upon this reason Britan. chap. 5. saith If a man be attainted of Felony by Iudgment the Heirs ingendred after the Attainder are precluded from all manner of succession in the Heritage as well of the part of the Mother as of the Father for ex leproso parente leprosus generatur filius And when the Father is attainted of Treason or Felony the Blood in respect whereof he is Inheritable being corrupted the same hath but half his Blood that is the Blood of his Mother in him without corruption And with this doth agree Bracton lib. 3. cap. 13. Non valebit felonis generatio nec ad haereditatem paternam nec maternam si autem ante feloniam generationem fecerit talis generatio succedit in haereditatem patris vel matris à quo non fuerit felonia perpetrata Because at the time of his Birth he had two lawful Bloods commixt in him which could not be corrupted by the Attainder subsequent but only as unto that party who did offend But on the Negative part it is said That the Law is not so penal against the innocent Child as
have precedency before all Knights except those of the Garter Bannerets and Privy Councellors they are styled Baronets in all Writs Commissions c. and the addition of Sir is attributed unto them as the title of Lady is to their Wives They are to take place according to the priority of the date of their Patents and no Honour is to be created between Baronets and Barons At the first instituting of this Order King Iames engaged that they 〈…〉 two hundred in number and after the said number should be compleated if any for want of an He●r Male should be extinct there should never any more be created in their room but that the title should diminish to the honour of them remaining But afterwards a Commission was ordained to fill up the vacant places who had instructions also enacted by which the Commissioners were impowered to treat with others that desired to be admitted into the said Dignity which is now allowed without limitation yet with this Proviso that they be of good Reputation and descended of a Grandfather at the least by the Father's side that bare Arms and have also a certain yearly Revenue of One thousand pounds per Annum de claro It is also ordained that they and their Descendants viz. their eldest Sons attaining the full Age of One and twenty years may receive Knighthood and that they shall in a Canton or in an Escocheon which they please bear the Arms of Vlster viz. in a Field Argent a sinister hand couped at the wrist Gules In the King's Army Royal they have place in the gross near the King's Standard and are allowed some peculiar Solemnities for their Funerals Since the first Creation of Baronets in England there hath been several made after the like manner in Ireland as also the Knights of Nova Scotia in the West Indies by King Iames upon the like design that is for planting that Country by the Scotch Colonies and the Deg●●es likewise made Hereditary By the King THE INSTRUCTIONS Within mentioned to be observed by Our COMMISSIONERS WITHIN NAMED FOrasmuch as We have been pleased to authorize you to treat and conclude with a certain number of Knights and Esquires as they shall present themselves unto you with such offers of assistance for the service of Ireland and under such Conditions as are contained in these Presents wherein We do repose great trust and confidence in your discretions and integrities knowing well that in such cases there are so many circumstances incident as require a choice care and consideration We do hereby require you to take such course as may make known abroad both Our purpose and the authority given unto you That by the more publick notice thereof those persons who are disposed to advance so good a Work may in time understand where and to whom to address themselves for the same For which purpose We require you to appoint some certain place and times for their Access which We think fittest to be at the Council Chamber at Whitehall upon Wednesdays and Fridays in the Afternoon where you shall make known to them as they come that those who desire to be admitted into the Dignity of Baronets must maintain the number of thirty foot Souldiers in Ireland for three years after the rate of eight pence sterling money of England by the day And the wages of one whole year to be paid into Our Receipt upon the passing of the Patent Provided always that you proceed with none except it shall appear unto you upon good proof that they are men for quality state of living and good reputation worthy of the same And that they are at the least descended of a Grandfather by the Father's side that bare Arms and have also of certain yearly revenue in Lands of inheritance in possession One thousand pounds per Annum de claro or Lands of the old Rent as good in accompt as One thousand pounds per Annum of improved Rents or at the least two parts in three parts to be divided of Lands to the said values in possession and the other third part in reversion expectant upon one life only holding by Dower or in Ioynture And for the Order to be observed in ranking those that shall receive the Dignity of a Baronet although it is to be wished that those Knights which have now place before other Knights in respect of the time of their Creation may be ranked before others Caeteris paribus yet because this is a Dignity which shall be Hereditary wherein divers circumstances are more considerable than such a Mark as is but Temporary that is to say of being now a Knight in time before another Our pleasure is you shall not be so precise in placing those that shall receive this Dignity but that an Esquire of great Antiquity and extraordinary Living may be ranked in this choice before some Knights And so of Knights a man of greater living more remarkable for his house years or calling in the Common-wealth may be now preferred in this Degree before one that was made a Knight before him Next because there is nothing of Honour or of Value which is known to be sought or desired be the Motives never so good but may receive scandal from some who wanting the same good affection to the Publick or being in other considerations incapable can be contented out of envy to those that are so preferred to cast aspersions and imputations upon them As if they came by this Dignity for any other consideration but that which concerneth this so publick and memorable a work you shall take order That the party who shall receive this Dignity may take his Oath that neither he nor any for him hath directly or indirectly given any more for attaining the Degree or any Precedency in it than that which is necessary for the maintenance of the number of Souldiers in such sort as aforesaid saving the charges of passing his Patent And because We are not Ignorant that in the distribution of all Honours most men will be desirous to attain to so high a place as they may in the Iudgment whereof being matter of dignity there cannot be too great caution used to avoid the interruption that private partialities may breed in so worthy a Competition Forasmnch as it is well known that it can concern no other person so much to prevent all such Inconveniencies as it must do our self from whom all Honour and Dignity either Temporary or Hereditary hath his only root and beginning You shall publish and declare to all whom it may concern That for the better warrant of your own Actions in this matter of Precedency wherein We find you so desirous to avoid all just Exceptions We are determined upon view of all those Patents which shall be subscribed by you before the same pass Our Great Seal to take the especial care upon Vs to order and rank every man in his due place And therein always to use the particular counsel and advice that
illis some Knights were returned upon every Venire Facias By the Statute of Magna Charta cap. 12. It is ordained that Assizes of Novel Disseison and Mortdancester should not be taken any where but within the Countries where they happen by the Justices of Assize and the Knights of the Shire vide Westminster 2. chap. 30. And by the Seven and twentieth of Edward the First chap. 30. de finibus levandis amongst other things it is enacted That for the utility of the Realm and the more assured conservation of the Peace the Justices assigned to take Assizes in all Shires where they take Assizes as it is ordained immediately after the Assizes taken in the Shires shall remain both together if they be Lay and if one of them be a Clerk then one of the most discreet Knights of the Shire being associated unto him that is a Lay-man by our Writ shall deliver the Goals of the Shires as well within the Liberties as without of all manner of Prisoners after the form of the Goal Delivery of those Shires be●ore time used Also in the Statute of Westminster 21. cap. 38. de non ponendis in Assizis Iuratis it is provided that the said Statute shall not extend to Grand Assizes in which it behoveth many times Knights to pass not resident in the County for the scarcity of Knights so that they have Lands in the Shire And by the Law Knights having Land may be returned upon Juries in ordinary Trials between party and party as other Freeholders may be And therefore in a Challenge to the great Assize under Edward the Third one was challenged pur ceo qu'il fait abaner or as the Abridgment hath it a Baronet but it was not allowed and the Reason is given Car s'il soit à Baner ne tient pas per Baronie il serra en l'assise Of the double parity of England that is of Barons and all Dignities above them being Peers of the Realm and all other under them are Peers amongst themselves for notwithstanding that Dignity of Knighthood they are reckoned amongst the Commons And we daily see that Knights do serve in Parliament as Members of the Commonalty Nevertheless the Sheriff in his discretion will not impannel Knights but in special and great Causes As in Cases of Indictments of a Peer of the Realm they are to be enquired and found by Knights and Esquires though their Trial shall be only by their Peers And in 38 Hen. 8. Henry Howard Earl of Surrey Son and Heir apparent of Thomas Duke of Norfolk was attainted of High Treason and was tried also by Knights Esquires and Gentlemen and not by Lords or Peers of the Realm because he was not of that Dignity by Creation Since the use of making every Earl first a Baron of some place which began as most Writers treat about the time of Henry the Eighth it hath been a Custome to style their Heirs apparent Lords and Barons with the Title of their Father's Barony when Viscounts or Baron's Heirs apparent are only styled Esquires but this is only a piece of Civility and of meer fashion yet it is allowed of in Heraldry with whom the Rule is That the eldest Son of every one of a created Degree is as of the next Degree under him which may be applied to Dukes Earls and the like But in Legal Proceedings they enjoy no such matter nor have by their being Heirs Apparent any Prerogative of the greater Nobillty And in case where a Peer of the Realm is party Plaintiff or Defendant in any Action or Suit if the Sheriff do not return one Knight at the least to be of the Jury the said Noble Person may Challenge and for that only cause quash the whole pannel By the Statute of Carlisle 15 Edw. 2. it was enacted That he who levied a Fine should appear in proper person to the intent that his Age Idiocy or other defect might be discovered by the Judges Nevertheless upon Impotency whereby he cannot come in Court two or one of the Justices by the consent of the rest of the Justices shall go unto him and take his Recognizance and if but one of them go he shall take a Knight with him and shall certifie it in the Bench of Record to the intent that all things incident to the fine be examined by them and then the fine may be levied But after this good Statute a worse Custom and Use hath come in place For by a Dedimus potestatem out of Chancery to one Knight and to a Justice of the Peace of the County in such cases is procured and directed to a Knight and two others who perhaps be neither Knights nor Justices but perhaps men of small estimation and unto two or three of them without saying Quorum the Knight shall be one and two of them without the Knight have taken the Recognizance of the Fine ibid. 101. b. But great prejudice this practise of omitting the interposing of the usual Service of Knights in this behalf hath been to many and scandalous to the Law of the Land they sometimes taking Recognizances of a Fine from a Feme Covert as if she were sole and many times acknowledged by Justices If a Tenant do lay an Essoin de morbo lecti he may have a Writ out of the Chancery to warrant it by which it shall be commanded to four Knights to view him and if they see him sick then they are to give him day to the end of a year and a day Note the Register fol. 177. b. Quod Coronator non elegatur nisi sit miles in c. juxta formam Statuti Westm. 1. cap. 10. It is a received Opinion that Knights are excused from attendance at Leets and Britton 29. 36. is cited to prove it And by a large understanding of the intent and meaning of the Statute of Marlbridge chap. 10. For the ancient Common Law had such respect to the Degree of Knighthood that they nor their eldest Sons were compelled to find Pledges in the Leet or Law-days for the Statute of Marlbridge aforesaid was not Introductiva novae Legis for it was before the Conquest And the Common Law is not by this Statute abridged And by the Book called the Mirror of Iustice mentioned in the Preface to Coke's ninth part it is said that Knights are excepted And so it appears that the practice was as well before as immediately after the making of that Statute of Marlbridge and Interpretatio Practica is a principal way and form of Interpretation of Laws The Lord Chancellor's Speech in the Case of Postnati fol. 58. And in Divinity Praxis sanctorum est interpretatio praeceptorum ibid. 66. But a Knight and all Superiors and Inferiors are bound by Law to attend the County or Sheriffs Court wherein he dwelleth and at his peril to take notice of the proceedings thereof For if a Man be Outlawed of Felony at a County Court and one of the same County not
slighted unless he be sufficiently qualified by Birth Parts or other generous Accomplishments or are Knights of the Field who are never abridged of their merited Honour being acquired according to the original Institution of that Degree amongst all Nations And we see our Parliament men our Sheriffs Justices of the Peace and the Honourable Commanders and Captains of Cavalry and Infantry for the most Esquires at their first Election By the Statute 23 Hen. 6. cap. 15. the Knights of the Shires shall be notable Knights or else notable Esquires or Gentlemen born in the same Counties for which they are chosen See the Statute for the preservation of the Game 22 and 23 Car. 2. by which and many other Statutes they are equally priviledged with Knights and other persons of higher Degree To represent therefore an Esquire as now defined is no easie task but according to the ancient Rule I take him for a Foot-Commander The Atchievement of an Esquire differs from the Knight Batchelors only in the Helmet as you may here observe I shall also give you other Examples of Esquires and amongst the rest the Atchievement of my Honoured Friend Robert Logan vulgarly written Login Son and Heir to Iohn Logan Lord of the Mannor of Idbury in Oxfordshire who was of the ancient House of Restalridge in Scotland unfortunately ruined for their Loyalty to Mary Queen of Scots He succeeded his Father at Idbury was High Sheriff of the County a man eminent for his Virtue and Learning amongst whose prayers this Manuscript was found exemplar in his life for Charity and Conversation THE DEFINITION OR DESCRIPTION OF THE GENTRY OR Civil Nobility OF ENGLAND CHAP. XXVI GEntleman Generosus seemeth to be made of two words the one French Gentil honestus vel honesta parente natus the other Saxon Man as if you would say a man well born And under this name are all comprized that are above Yeomen and Artificers so that Nobles are truly called Gentlemen By the Course and Custome of England Nobility is either Major or Minor Major contains all Titles and Degrees from Knighthood upwards Minor all from Barons downwards Mr. William Mainstone Alias Mayneston of ye. Citty of London Merchant Lineally descended from Thomas Mainston of Vrchinfield in Herefordshire Gent Temps Edw ye. 3d. now Maried to Penelope Daughte● To Sr Thomas Iones of Shrewsbury in ye● County of Salop Kt. one of ye. Iustices of his mat ys Court of K-Bench Iohn Bourne of More feilds in the parish of St. Leonards Shoreditch in Middz Dr. in Phisicks● non maried to Eleanor daughter of George Shyres of Wakefield in Yorkshir Batche●●● in Divinity Iohn Rowe of ye. Citty of Bristoll Gent. Lineally descended from ye. antient family of ye. Rowes of Windley hill in Derbyshire Which Said Iohn is now maried to Lucy Sister Coheyre of An●thony Hungerford Son heyre of Anthony Hūgerford of ye. Lea in Wiltshire Esq Mr. Peter Vandeput of the Citty of London Merchant Iohn Btome of Sevenoke in Kent Gent. Ric●ard Btome of Chobham in the Parish of Westham in Ess●●● Gent. Richard Whitworth of Adbaston in the County of Stafford Gentleman Mr. Iohn Vanheck of ye. Citty of London Merchant descended of a Dutchfamily of that name This C●at● Armour●● borne by the Stanleys of Devonshire and is Engraven at the Charge of Mr. Edward Stanley of Bamstable in the Sd● County agreat Lover of Heraldry and Promoter of Publique Vndertakeings Nicholas Eyre of London Gent Descended from a Antient Family of that name Iohn Farrington of ye. Citty of London Merchant descended of ye. Farringtons of Verdon near Faringtonheath in Lancashire a Family of good Account and Antiquity Iohn Gregorie of St. Margarets Westminster in Middlesex Gentleman son of Leiutenant Collonell William Gregorie of East Stockwith in Lincolnshire Esq a great sufferer for his maty in ye. Late Vnhappy warrs Mr. Thomas Shaw of the Citty of London Merchant now Maried to Deborah daughter of Roger Reeva Late Cittizen of London R●lph Marshall Gen̄t Secretary to th● R ● honble William Earle of Craven des●n●ded from ye. family of ye. Marshalls of yorkshire Fran●is Lunde of Parsons Green in ye. Parish of Fūtham in Middlesex Gen̄t descended fr●m the Family of Lunde in ye. County of Yorke● ●●chard Stratford of Hawling and nether Ge●● 〈◊〉 Glocestershire Gen t descended from the● Ancient family of ye. Stra●fords of Farmc●●●n the Said County Thomas Glover of Raine Hill in Lancashire● Gent. now Maried to Rebecca daughter of Ninian Buther Staplehurst in Kent Gent. But if a Gentleman be sued by addition of Husbandman he may say he is a Gentleman and demand Judgment of the Writ without saying and not Husbandman For a Gentleman may be a Husbandman but he shall be sued by his Addition most worthy For a Gentleman of what Estate soever he be although he go to plough and common labour for his maintenance yet he is a Gentleman and shall not be named in legal Proceedings Yeoman Husbandman or Labourer If a Gentleman be bound an Apprentice to a Merchant or other Trade he hath not thereby lost his Degree of Gentility But if a Recovery be had against a Gentleman by the name of a Yeoman in which case no Action is necessary then it is no Error So if any Deed or Obligation be made to him by the name of Yeoman If a Capias go against A. B. Yeoman and if the Sheriff take A. B. Gentleman an Action of false imprisonment lieth against the Sheriff But if A. B. Yeoman be Indicted and A. B. Gentleman be produced being the same man intended it is good If a man be a Gentleman by Office only and loseth the same then doth he also lose his Gentility By the Statute 5 Eliz. chap. 4. intituled An Act touching Orders for Artificers Labourers Servants of Husbandry and Apprentices amongst other things it is declared That a Gentleman born c. shall not be compelled to serve in Husbandry If any Falcon be lost and is found it shall be brought to the Sheriff who must make Proclamation and if the owner come not within four Months then if the ●inder be a simple man the Sheriff may keep the Hawk making agreement with him that took him But if he be a Gentleman and of Estate to have and keep a Falcon then the Sheriff ought to deliver to him the said Falcon taking of him reasonable costs for the time that he had him in Custody A Commission is made to take Children into Cathedral Churches c. one in anothers places where Children are instructed to sing for the furnishing of the King's Chappel These general words by construction of Law have a reasonable intendment viz. That such Children who be brought up and taught to sing to get their living by it those may be taken for the King's Service in his Chappel and it shall be a good preferment to them but the Sons of Gentlemen or any other that are taught to sing for their Ornament or Recreation and not