a Prince in the plural number but himself In the holy Bible others speak of God in that number 2. The plurality intimated in these expressions is determined to Three in other places of Scripture There are three which bear record in heaven 1 Joh. 5.7 They are represented under the name of The Father the Son the Holy Ghost Mat. 28.19 This was not so clearly revealed in the Old Testament but reserved for a more mature state The Jews being under strong propensions to Idolatry this Doctrine was not then set in the fullest light that no occasion might be from thence taken to confirm them in their errour 3. These Three are not three manifestations only of God If they did import nothing more no reason can be given why the number should be thus confined Since the Creation there have been many signal Manifestations of the Deity far exceeding this number A manifestation supposeth some discovery of that which was secret before and by consequence must be made in time but the holy Scripture attributes Eternity to the Father the Son and the blessed Spirit 4. These Three are not three names only of the same God under divers inadequate conceptions For then when it is said that Christ was baptized the Holy Ghost descended a voice came from the Father the meaning would be that one name of God was baptized another descended in the form of a Dove a third uttered a voice than which nothing can be more incongruous Nay when a command is given to baptised in the name of the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost the sence will amount to no more than this go and baptise in the name of three Names This explication of the Trinity is not reconcileable with the scope of S. John when he asserts that there are three which bear record in heaven For the reason why he mentions three is to evidence that there is a sufficient number of witnesses to testifie that Jesus is the Christ Now if by the Three are meant only three names of the same person the Apostle fails of his end and is represented as guilty of a manifest collusion He does as if a man should undertake to prove Oratory an excellent Art by three witnesses and produce only the three names of the Orator Marcus Tullius Cicero 5. All things required to the constitution of a person belong to them A Person is an intelligent Being which has a peculiar subsistence This definition agrees to the Father the Son and Holy Spirit They have all Intelligence and Knowledge The Father is said to know the Son and the Son the Father The Holy Ghost is stiled a Spirit of Wisdom and Understanding They have peculiar subsistence The Father is without communication from another The Son is from the Father The Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son His procession from the Father is asserted in express words John 15.26 From the Son supposed in the Mission of the Comforter in the same Verse For as the Father is sent of none because he is of himself the Son is sent of the Father because he is of the Father so the Spirit is represented as sent by the Father and the Son because he proceeds from both Now he who is begotten or proceeds must necessarily be distinct from him by whom he is begotten and from whom he proceeds and by consequence have a peculiar mode of subsistence The Father 's being in the Son and the Son in the Father doth not destroy this distinction God is in every man and every man in God In him we live and move and have our Being and yet the discrimination remains betwixt the divine and humane subsistence 6. Such Actions are attributed to these three as belong to none but a person It will be superfluous to instance in those which are ascribed to the Father and the Son All the doubt is about the Spirit and yet the Scripture is very clear in this particular He is said to know will 1 Cor. 2.10 11. 1 Cor. 12.11 Job 33.4 Psal 104.30 create preserve These actions are undoubted indications of a person Actions are attributed to things either properly or improperly Whensoever they are attributed to them in the first sence they are infallible Arguments of suppositality Actiones sunt suppositorum And it is apparent that when they are attributed to the Spirit it is not always in an improper and figurative sence He is said to make intercession Rom. 8. v. If this action be assigned to the Spirit improperly or tropically then it may be properly attributed to the Father who according to the Socinian notion useth the Spirit as a power or virtue to produce what he designs even as those operations which are ascribed to Charity in a tropical sence 1 Cor. 13. properly belong to the Man which is indued with it and makes use of it as a moral power or virtue But Intertercession betwixt the Father and us cannot with any congruity be said to be made by the Father himself The Father is one party and we the other Where there are two parties Intercession supposes the interposition of a third person All this makes it manifest why the Father Son and Holy Ghost are represented in Scripture as Three Persons The personality of the Father is mentioned Heb. 1.3 The Son is said to be his express Image which can import no less than that he is a person like unto his Father The Holy Spirit is said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 another Comforter like unto the Son He is set forth by the demonstrative Pronoun 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an undoubted note of personality If in any humane Writing the matter of which was never drawn into controversie by the pride or prejudice of a Party such expressions as these should occur He shall teach you He shal bring all things to your remembrance He shall testifie of me He will reprove the World He will guide you into all Truth He shall glorifie me and that He who is to do all this proceeds from the Father and is sent by the Son We should account him a very absurd Interpreter that should say that the He so often repeated is not a person nor personally distinct from him by whom he is sent and from whom he proceeds All this is asserted in the Scripture of the Holy Ghost The Socinians willingly grant an eternal personality to the Father but deny it to the Son and the Spirit They say that the Son is a Person but not eternal that the Holy Ghost is neither a Person nor eternal but a Power and Virtue from God or an effect produced by that Power and yet the personality of the Son must be as early as his Filiation and his Filiation or Sonship is undoubtedly eternal The Prophet Micha saies His goings forth have been from old from everlasting c. 5. v. 2. The Spirit cannot always signifie Power or an effect produced by the Power The Spirit and Power are plainly distinguished
Jesus is said to return in the power of the Spirit Luk. 14. S. Paul prays that the Romans may abound in hope thro' the power of the Holy Ghost Rom. 15 14. Mighty signs and wonders are said to be done by the power of the Spirit of God If the Spirit in these places did signifie no more than a divine power the meaning would be that Christ returned the Romans abounded miracles were wrought thro' the power of a Power The Spirit is likewise evidently distinguished from effects or gifts The Apostle saies that There are diversity of gifts but the same Spirit 1 Cor. 12.4 To one is given by the Spirit the word of Wisdom to another the word of Knowledge by the same Spirit v. 8. And that all these worketh this one and the same Spirit So that there can be nothing left in these Texts for the Spirit to signifie but a Person He being manifestly distinguished from the Divine Power and the gifts and products of that Power Now I have finished the second Proposition In the Godhead there are Three Persons 3. These Three are One God Unity is essential to the Deity Plurality proceeds from the fecundity and fruitfulness of Causes but God is of himself without dependence upon any Cause If there be more Gods there must be more Infinites in the same kind which implies a contradiction for one infinite Being contains all perfection not only as considered in the general notion but actually and therefore there is none for any other Deity to be invested with and possessed of in the same manner If there be more Gods they must be distinct one from another This distinction must arise from some diversity in Nature to attribute such diversity to the Divine Nature is to make a dishonourable reflection upon the simplicity of it The Father Son and Holy Ghost are this One God 1. The Scripture plainly asserts that they are one 1 John 5.7 Tho' these words are not found in some Copies yet they are extant in more than they are wanting in and in that which is dubious the decision is according to the suffrage of the major part If such an addition has been made to the Text it must be done before or after the two first General Councils If before it was either accidental or intentional Not Accidental thro' the inadvertency of the Scribe For tho' a Scribe may mistake and leave out letters and words yet it cannot be imagined that he should casually without any design add a whole sentence and not presently upon a review which may be justly presumed in a Writing of such importance discover and correct his errour Not Intentional no good reason can be given why any should industriously make such a spurious insertion before the controversie concerning the Deity of Christ and the Holy Ghost did commence Neither was the addition which is pretended made after the two first General Councils Because the words we speak of are found in those Copies which the Fathers who lived before those Councils made use of S. Cyprian asserts de Patre Filio c. Of the Father Son and Holy Ghost it is written and these Three are One. This gives us just reason to believe that the Copies in which these words are wanting fell into the hands of the Arrians and that a rasure was made by them 2. As the words of S. John assure us that The Father the Son and the Spirit are One so we are assured by other texts of Sacred Writ that this Unity is in the Divine Essence They have all one and the same infinite Nature This is evident by the attribution of the Name Properties and peculiar Operations of the most High God to them None doubt of this relation to the Father The matter is likewise clear concerning the Son and the Spirit Christ is called the mighty God Isa 9.6 God blessed for evermore Rom. 9.5 The true God 1 Joh. 5.20 The most high God Psal 58.17 56. The most High which the Israelites tempted and provoked in the wilderness is expresly called Christ 1 Cor. 10.9 The name of God is never attributed in the sacred Oracles with such emphatical Epithets to any finite Being They are intentionally inserted to signifie that Jesus is stiled God not upon the account of his Embassy from his Father or a deification in the state of Glory but his infinite Nature He who is made God and is not so essentially cannot be said to be the true mighty most High God blessed for evermore As the Name of God so the Properties of the Divine Nature are attributed to him Omniscience Joh. 21.17 Immutability Heb. 1.11 Omnipotence Rev. 1.8 Eternity He is said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is which was which is to come v. 4. Eternity comprehends all differences of time Was he but a meer Creature such perfections could not reside in him A finite Being under the greatest Elevation has not a capacity large enough to entertain and receive such boundless excellencies The peculiar Operations of God are likewise attributed to him as Creation Joh. 1.2 Coloss 1.16 God is said to create all things by Jesus Christ Eph. 3.9 The Son did concur with the Father and the Spirit in this great Work as a co-ordinate cause The Nature of Creation will not admit the interposals of an instrument There being no matter to prepare a physical instrument has nothing to do in the case And Christ is represented as more than a Moral The infinite power whereby all things are made is often ascribed to him which is never done to a meer moral instrument such as the Apostles were in the production of Miracles Conservation is likewise ascribed to him He is said to uphold all things with the word of his power Heb. 1.3 It was usual for the Jews to express the Deity by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 power and therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is here inserted to assure them that Christ sustains the World and prevents its relapse into its primitive Abyss by virtue of his Deity Lastly He is said to work Miracles He made the blind to see the lame to walk the dead to revive This he did not bring to pass by any mutuatitious power When he healed the multitude it is said Virtue went out of him Luk. 6.19 The power whereby he did it was not adventitious but innate When S. Peter wrought a miracle that Christ by whose power it was effected might not be deprived of the glory of it he names him as the principal cause His name thro' faith in his name hath made this man whole Act. 3.16 As the name properties and operations of the Divine Nature are attributed to the Son of God So likewise to the Holy Ghost The Spirit of the Lord 2 Sam. 23.2 is stiled the God of Israel Ananias who lied unto the Spirit Act. 5.3 is said to lie unto God v. 4. The body which is the Temple of the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 6.19 is stiled
the Temple of God 1 Cor. 3.16 He is Eternal Heb. 9.7 Omniscient 1 Cor. 2.10 Omnipresent Psal 139.7 The whole Creation is represented as the effect of his power The host of Heaven Psal 33.6 Man the principal Work of God upon the Earth Job 33.4 The Fish in the Sea Psal 104.3 are all of his formation Before there was any Wind Immeasusque Deus super aequora vasia meabat which is peculiar to the Firmament a work of the second day the Spirit of the Lord is said to move upon the Waters The Chaos by his incubation was digested into Order and brought to a state of Maturation Certainly God who composed the Scripture and declares in it that he will not give his Glory to another would never have assigned his name nature and peculiar operations to the Spirit had he not been of the same Essence with himself To assert that all this is attributed to the Spirit because God makes use of him as an instrument to effect his Work will not remove the difficulty For there is some work attributed to the Spirit to which no instrument can concur as Creation There are other operations in doing of which God cannot be said to use the Spirit according to the sentiments of the Socinians as to know and search his deep things For the Spirit in their apprehensions signifies a Divine Power and it is very incongruous to say that God knows and searches things by his Power This Truth concerning the Trinity in Unity hath been so fully discovered that all sorts of men have taken notice of it The Mind of the Christians before Constantine may be very well known by Athanasuis Orat. 1.121 Ad Serapio tom 1. p. 366. de Spi. Sanâ—â—o Apol. 2. who wanted no opportunity to be acquainted with their Writings He expresly asserts that there was nothing established by the Nicene Synod but what was agreeable to them S. Basil cites several Authorities of the first Centuries for the same purpose In those Writings which are come to our hands there are many evident expressions of this doctrin Justin Martyr speaking of the Father of righteousness saies 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. him and the Son coming from him and the prophetick Spirit we receive and adore Athenagoras in vindication of the Christians whom the Heathens accounted Atheists saies 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. who would not admire to hear them called Atheists who own God the Father God the Son God the Holy Ghost Clemens Alexandrinus ends his Paedagogus with very lively expressions of this Truth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. to the only Father Son c. with the Holy Ghost all in one c. There are Testimonies of the same importance in Tertullian Cyprian Lactantius All these with many others agree that there is but one God and that there are Three which participate of the Deity and that one of them is the fountain of the rest from whence it inevitably follows that they must be personally distinct The fountain and the streams are always different one from the other Indeed there are some things spoken in the explication of this Mystery which are liable to an ambiguous construction as is manifest in the discourse of Justin Martyr with the Jew Tâ—â—â—h and the Treatise of Tertullian against Praxeas This Truth being not then encountred with so direct an opposition as it was in the time of Arrius some degrees of caution in point of expression are wanting and too great a condescension made to the Sentiments of the Philosophers by blending their notions with the ineffable Mystery that it might gain a more ready entertainment among them Such prudential accommodations must not be construed in such a sence as to prejudice the Truth which in other places of the same Authors is clearly acknowledged The clear must not be expounded by that which is obscure but the obscure by that which is clear The Jews have not been without some knowledge of this Mystery Pugio fidei p. 397. Raimundus Martini says that he scarcely ever conferred with any of them who were in any estimation for Wisdom who would not grant that God was Trinus Vnus They have a Tradition that when the Benediction Num. 6.26 was pronounced by the Priest he used when he came to the word Jehova to lift three fingers higher than the rest to denote the Trinity It was their manner to call the Father Son Voisin in Pug. fidei p. 400. and Spirit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Subsistences and to assert the unity of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the infinite God Those words The Lord our God is one God are in Zohar applied to the Trinity 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is interpreted the Father 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Son the second 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Spirit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is added with a great letter in the Hebrew Text to denote their Unity The Hebrew Scholiast says that the repetition of the name of God three times Psal 50.1 2. is to denote the three 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which created the World These are stiled inward persons It is observed that all the names of God have a plural termination Voisin p. 406. p. 400. except Jehova his essential name to import the plurality of Persons and unity of Essence It is a saying among the Cabalists 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. the Father is God the Son is God the Holy Ghost is God Three in One and One in Three By the Abbreviature 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they understand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Father and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Son They say they are put together to express their Unity and that the three Letters do signifie the three Hypostases in one Essence Tho' this Doctrine is very much disguised in the Writings of the Heathens yet there is so much of it left unmask'd as it may be plainly discerned they were not totally strangers to it The chief God among the Persians was stiled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 threefold with relation to this Sacred Mystery The first Hypostasis they called Oramasâ—les the second Mithras the third Arimanes Plato likewise mentions Three 〈◊〉 5. l. 1. l. 3. c. 15. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 These by Plotinus are represented as the three Hypostases which are Principles or first causes in the Universe When Thulis King of Aegypt went to the Oracle of Serapis to inquire Saidas in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who before him could do such exploits as he had done and who would be after him The Answer was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 First God after him the Word and then the Spirit concurring with both Bâ—rnier's Mâ—moirs â—â—m 3. p. 130. The Indians own Three in the Deity known by the names of Brahma Bischen and Mehaâ—denâ— Dervis â—rsielebi a Mahometan acknowledged to a Christian who was disputing with him about Religion that at the commencement of all their Negotiations Epito
de Turc moribu◠c. 4. p. 130. it was their custom to use these words In the name of God of Mercy and of their Spirit If any shall be so in love with his private Sentiments as to deny this Truth which has gained so universal a Testimony upon the account of some difficulties which our shallow Intellects cannot reach to the bottom of he may with the same reason assert there is no such thing as the Ocean because he cannot by his line find the depth of it in every place If all this will not satisfie let him exercise his reason about some difficulties in nature and he will find the existence of things very plain where their contexture is so concealed and intricate that the greatest Wits are at a loss in their disquisition about it If the intricacy of some modes in natural things be no reasonable inducement to deny the reality of the things themselves much less is the ineffable union betwixt the Divine Essence and Subsistence a justifiable plea for the denial of the Sacred Trinity He that shall think fit to try the acuteness of his Intellect about some knots in Philosophy will find the edge of his reason so much blunted in the encounter that it will not be easie for him to perswade himself that it is sharp enough to penetrate into all the Mysteries in Divinity If this will not prevail without an engagement with those difficulties which this Truth is usually assaulted with let a Catalogue be made of them and it will not be difficult for him to make his way thro' them who is armed with the following considerations 1. Altho' there be Three Persons or Subsistences in the Godhead yet there are not three Essences Every Person distinctly considered has an Essence but every person has not a distinct Essence 2. Tho' one finite individual Nature cannot be communicated to Three Persons yet an infinite may If the whole Divine Essence is intimately in all created persons at the same time there is no reason to think but that it may be communicated to three increated Whatsoever is alledged against this Communication holds as strong against the Universal Presence which all acknowledge but those who deny the Deity 3. Finite and infinite perfect and imperfect are not proper predicates of Subsistence but of Being So that when we are interrogated whether the three persons in the Holy Trinity are finite or infinite perfect or imperfect if by Person is meant only a mode of subsistence without the Nature it is a very incongruous question For infinity and finity perfection and imperfection are but modes of Entity and every mode imports variation and one variation cannot properly be predicated of another If by Person is understood the Divine Essence subsisting in a peculiar manner then we answer that every person distinctly is infinitely perfect tho' every person has not a distinct infinite perfection 4. Altho' the three Persons have one and the same Nature yet the Son cannot be said to be the Father or the Spirit the Son The same specifical Nature agrees to Joh Moses and Daniel Every one of them has the whole nature of Man yet we have no reason to assert that Moses is Job or Joh Daniel As there is some thing not contained in the common Nature which doth individuate them So there is a characteristical property appertaining to the Father the Son and holy Spirit whereby they are distinguisht altho' they are all equally interested in the same infinite Essence 5. When it is said that the only God is the Father Jesus Christ is the only God therefore Jesus Christ is the Father the major proposition is peccant For in every proposition the predicate is never less comprehensive than the subject but always of a greater latitude and therefore bears the title of the major term But here the predicate Father is less comprehensive than the subject the only God Now I have finished the Third Proposition The Three Persons are One God 4. This One God is to be Worshipped If we consider him essentially his peerless perfections do justly challenge the deepest veneration They being infinite cannot admit of any additions All that We are capable of doing is to own them with the decent significations of the most humble and submissive regards It is an Article in the Jewish Creed Fag in Deut. c. 14. v. 1. The Blessed God is worthy to be Worshipped It is a principal part of the Confession of the Christian Church Thou art worthy O Lord to receive Glory and Honour It was usual among the Heathens to worship the Head of great Rivers Sax. Will-worship He who considers God as the fountain of all that goodness which circulates in the veins of the Creation can conclude no less than that the most profound veneration is due to him If the Deity be considered personally every person doth require Divine Worship to be directed to him The Father Jo. 4.23 The Son Heb. 1.6 Psal 2.12 Phil. 2.10 S. Stephen directed his Prayer to him Act. 7.59 Ananias enjoyned S. Paul to call upon him Act. 22. v. 16. Salvation is promised to those who express a conformity to this command Rom. 10.13 When we say the Son is to be Worshipped we do not consider him without his humane Nature but as a person consisting both of Divine and Humane Supreme Adoration is given upon the account of the infinite excellency of the Divine Nature This excellency is communicated to the Person which has assumed our Nature and advanced it to the dignity of an Hypostatical union but not to the nature it self And therefore the Worship which is due must not be terminated upon the nature considered abstractedly but the person who is clothed with it This induced Athanasius to say Epist ad Adelph 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Let them know meaning the Arrians that when we Worship the Lord in the flesh we do not Worship a Creature but the Creator cloathed with a created body Neither must our blessed Lord be considered without his Mediatorship Tho' supreme Adoration doth not immediately terminate upon the relation of a Mediator yet it doth upon him who is invested with that Relation Our Saviour in this respect is inferiour to the Father and nothing inferiour to the Deity can challenge Supreme Adoration The taking up the mediatory Office was an act of free Grace and by consequence might not have been done Now that which might have been or not been must be inferiour to that necessary and immutable excellency which is the proper Object of the highest Veneration We must distinguish betwixt the foundation of Worship and the Motives to it Tho' the free acts of the Divine Benignity as redeeming mediating c. are vigorous inducements to Worship yet the sole foundation and immediate object is infinite excellency which will not permit any thing which is inferiour to share with it in the same degree of Honour A Subject may have many motives from the
personal favours of his Prince to pay the Rights which belong to the Crown yet the formal object and reason of his so doing is the Sovereignty and dominion which the Prince is invested with As the Son so likewise the Spirit is the Object of Adoration He is placed in the same rank with the Father and the Son Mat. 28. v. 19. Jo. 1.5 7. and honoured with the attribution of the peculiarities of the Deity as Eternity Immensity Omniscience The dishonour done to him by Blasphemy has as black a character in the Scripture as the dishonour of the Father or Son It is represented as a delinquency of the first magnitude and excluded the benefit of pardon He who is thus dignified and secured by the most severe commination against dishonour must necessarily of right challenge the same degree of Honour and Worship which is due to the Father and the Son The Adoration given to them all must be so directed that we may worship the Trinity in Unity and Unity in Trinity The ground of divine Veneration is the unlimited and peerless perfection of God The motives conducing to it are the benefits which none but so transcendent a Being can conferr The same internal eminency is common to the Three Persons Every external benefit is the product of their joint concurrence They having all an equal interest in the foundation of Religion and the motives conducing to it it is very reasonable when we direct an act of Worship to one that we should not exclude the other When we name the Son only the Father and holy Spirit are to be understood or the Father only the Son and the Spirit or the Spirit only the Father and the Son Consonant to this doctrine are the words of Nazianzen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Let us Worship in Three one Deity and the practice of the universal Church which is apparent by the Latin and Greek Liturgies Now I have done with the fourth Proposition This One God is to be Worshipped 5. This God is only to be Worshiped This is the express assertion of the Holy Scripture the dictate of Reason the sence of the Ancient Church 1. The assertion of Holy Scripture It is the first of the moral Laws Thou shalt have no other Gods but me and placed in the front of the Gospel Him only shalt thou serve In a sense of this appropriate allegiance to Jehovah the Angel did forbid S. John and S. Paul and Barnabas the people of Lycaonia to pay them any Divine Veneration Daniel's refusal of the portion of meat which was first consecrated to an Idol will easily induce us to believe that he had an equal disgust of the Idolatrous worship which was given to him If Abraham's deportment when the Angels appeared had more than a moral or civil respect The Son of God his being in the company will excuse him from Idolatry one of them is expresly dignified with the incommunicable name of the Deity 2. The dictate of reason Worship is either internal or external Internal includes a deep and reverential esteem as an ingredient essential to its nature This esteem must be of an elevation agreeable to the excellency of the Object it is terminated upon There being no object that can be a Rival with the Supreme Being in point of perfection it is not possible that the same esteem which his transcendent dignity challengeth from us should with justice be given to any other External imports a declaration of inward esteem by some outward acts As the Veneration terminated upon God is peculiar and appropriate So must the Acts be which are designed for the signification of it Betwixt the sign and the thing signified there ought to be such a similitude that the one may be known by the other This cannot be done in the present case except there be such an appropriation as we speak of The nature of Divine Supremacy requires in outward as well as inward Worship a discrimination from that which is given to the Creature Earthly Monarchs expect an agnition of their Sovereignty to be made by the payment of an appropriate homage They have some Jewels in their Crown which they will not permit any of their Subjects to wear Tho' Moral and Civil regards may be tendred to a Creature yet if they rise so high as to have any mixtures of those peculiarities which are devoted by nature or institution to signifie Divine Veneration they are as distasteful to God as it would be to a Prince to stand by and see the Allegiance which is due only to himself given to another This Truth is warranted with so much clear reason that those who have had no other advantage but the light of Nature have taken notice of it Among those instructions which Orpheus left with Musaeus Lib. de Monarch Det p. 104 108. This is one 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Adore him alone who is the King of the World It was the advice of Menander 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to honour him alone who is Lord of all Ad Antolycum p. 122. The Verses of the Sibyl in Theophilus Antiochenus are of the same importance 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Laâ—t de â—â—lsa Relig. p. 20. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Ruler of the World alone adore Who ever was and shall be ever more 3. The Sence of the Ancient Church Among those Truths which are owned by the most early Writers this is of the first magnitude that God only is to be Worshipped They never mention the worshipping any thing else as the Sacrament the Cross the Relicks of Saints When they delineate the rites appertaining to the Eucharist there is not the least intimation of that Veneration which the Romanist say is due to the Sacrament They were far from asserting that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quae debetur vero Deo is to be given to it Circumstances purely accidental as the time when the Institution was made the place where the mingling Water with Wine are recorded Those who had leisure to preserve the memory of these circumstances would not have omitted a point so material in case any such thing had been known to be agreeable to the mind of God As for the individual Cross upon which our blessed Lord suffered there could be no Adoration directed to it for the first three hundred years It is confessed that it lay concealed under ground till the time of Helena mother to Constantine the Great Neither is there the least signification of any religious addresses made to artificial imitations of it When the Veneration of the Cross is objected by the Heathens against the Christians Mirâ—â— Fâ—l it is answered by them Cruces etiam nec colimus nec optamus We neither Worship Crosses nor wish for them Bellarmine indeed infers that the objection implies that some such practice was then in use but he may by the same reason perswade us that the Christians Worshipped the Head of an Ass because their
which the ingredients of a humane body are exposed unto To what is received in the Eucharist the primitive Church in relation to the body attributes the power of Nutrition The Analogy of Faith obligeth us to believe that God will not command inhumanity But if the sence of the Church of Rome be true the greatest inhumanity is practised according to his Will What is more savage than to eat the body of a living man much more must it be to champ with our Teeth and swallow down the living Body of our blessed Lord to whom supreme Veneration is due This made a Pagan to say Who dost thou think Cott. in Cicer. de nat Decr. l. 3. can be so mad as to believe that to be his God which he eats It was an abomination to the Aegyptians to eat with the Hebrews Gen. 43.32 The Chaldee paraphrast gives the reason because the Hebrews eat those Cattle which the Aegyptians use to worship Those words except ye eat the flesh of the son of man c. Joh. 6.55 give no countenance to what is asserted by the Church of Rome By Flesh is meant the bread spoken of v. 51. The bread that I will give you is my flesh and by the Bread we are to understand our blessed Lord himself I am the bread of life v. 35. and by eating believing on him as is evident by the consequent words he that cometh to me shall never hunger and he that believeth on me shall never thirst As eating and drinking satisfie our natural appetite so believing in Christ our spiritual By faith we draw out of his fulness and plenitude a supply of our necessities This spiritual Sence is pointed at v. 56. and very agreeable to the manner of speaking amongst the Jews with whom Christ conversed when he spoke the words under consideration Maimon More Nevoâ— par 1. c. 30. The Hebrews use 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comedere not only to express the feeding upon that which conduceth to the nourishment of the body but likewise the acquisition of Learning and Wisdom such as faith imports which tends to the nutrition of the Soul Psal 33. or 34 v. 2. S. Basil says that there is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an intellectual mouth of the inward Man With this we receive the impressions made by external objects and ruminate upon and digest them by meditation All this being considered it is evident that Transubstantiation is contrary to the Holy Scripture 2. Antiquity Those who assert the Body of Christ to be corporally present in the Sacrament and the substance of the Bread and Wine not speak contrary to the sence of all the primitive Fathers Ignatius who lived in the first Century 〈…〉 calls that which is broken and given in the Sacrament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justin Martyr in the second Century Apol. 2. stiles it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and attributes to it a nutritive power in relation to the body Tertullian in the third Century asserts L. 4 cont Marc. that Christ made the bread which he took to be his body that is a figure of his body Origen says L. 8. cont Celsum we have a symbol of thanksgiving to God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bread which is called the Eucharist S. Cyprian affirms 〈…〉 that the Lord calls the bread compounded of many grains his Body Eusebius in the fourth Century terms L. 1 â—emon Evan. c. ult what is received in the Sacrament symbols of the Body and blood of Christ Cyril of Jerusalem stiles it Bread and Wine Catech. Mystagog 1.3 and compares the change which is made by consecration to that in consecrated Oil which doth not lose its old Nature but is dedicated and set apart to a higher use and purpose S. Ambrose affirms L. 4. de Saâ— c. 4. that the Bread and Wine in the Sacrament sunt a â—â—â—e panis vinum altho changed into the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ Gregory Nissen owns that which he calls the Body of Christ by the name of Bread Orat. de San. Bapr and expresseth at large that the Bread and Wine being Consecrated retain their pristine nature even as Baptismal Water an Altar a Priest do after Consecration has passed upon them Gaudentius represents the Sacrament as an image of the passion and figure of the Body and Blood of Christ Tract 2. in Exo. S. Chrysostome in the fifth Century useth these words Epist ad Casâ—arium Monashum Before the Bread is sanctified we call it Bread when the Divine Grace hath sanctified it by means of the Priest it loseth the name of Bread and is held worthy to be called the Lord's Body altho the nature of the Bread doth remain in it and is not called two bodies but the body of the Son S. Austin says Ad Adamantum â— 12. That the Lord doubted not to say This is my Body when he gave the sign of his Body Cyril of Alexandria asserts L. 4. c. 14. in Evang. Joan. that our Lord gave fragments of Bread saying Take eat This is my Body Theodoret affirms 1. Dial. cont Eutyc that our Saviour honoured the visible Symbols with the name of his Body and Blood not changing the nature but adding grace to nature Gelasius is of the same mind De duabus Christi naturis The Sacraments which we receive of the Body and Blood of Christ are a divine thing by means whereof we are made partakers of the Divine Nature and yet the substance of the Bread and Wine doth not cease to be Bellarmine in his Polemical Discourse concerning the Eucharist useth most of the names which I have mentioned to a contrary purpose and brings them into the field with a great deal of pomp His policy seems to resemble that of a great Commander When he had drawn up his Souldiers into a military order and was ready to engage the enemy a great part of them declared they would not fight He being not in a capacity to retreat with honour or security told them that the only kindness which he desired of them was to march to a Hill a little way of and there be Spectators of the courage and fate of their fellow Souldiers hoping they might appear to the enemy as a Reserve and prove as great a discouragement to them as if they had actually engaged them I cannot imagine why these antient Fathers who have so positively declared in the Testimonies above-cited that they will not fight should be continued in view except it be with the like design to impose upon the Faith of those who are strangers to their intentions To the Authorities already produced I might add many more which do evidently manifest that the Church was a stranger to the doctrin of Transubstantiation for many hundred years What might be alledged I will sum up in the following particulars 1. They all agree in an imitation of the stile of Scripture and
call the Bread and Wine in the Sacrament the Body and Blood of Christ 2. They say that they are not so essentially but figuratively and therefore stile them signs Symbols Figures Antitypes Memorials It is usual to call the sign and the thing signified by the same name 3. They affirm that after Consecration the substance of the Bread and Wine remains and the change made is only in respect of Use Office and Dignity 4. They say That they nourish our flesh and blood and have the same effect that other food has and therefore they use to give the remains of the Euchariscical Bread to boyes and to abstain from the Communion upon Fasting days 5. They assert that wicked men do not eat and drink the Body and Blood of Christ but interpret the eating of his flesh Jo. 6. the receiving of him in a spiritual manner namely by Faith 6. When they deny the Eucharist to be a figure or sign they mean a bare sign The Sacrament is more than so It feals and exhibits It is a means whereby we receive the Body and Blood of Christ not only the benefits of them but Christ himself in a spiritual manner as crucified for us and is a real pledge to assure us thereof Tho' the crucified body of Christ is in Heaven yet that spirit which dwells in it being communicated to a worthy Receiver in the Sacramental action we are made to drink into one Spirit it produceth such a union betwixt us and Christ Jesus as laies a clear foundation of Communion with and participation of him 7. When they say there is a mutation in the nature of the Bread they mean by nature the use and property only as is manifest by their own explications Before Consecration it was appropriated to the nourishment of the body but now by Consecration it is exalted to a higher purpose A new dignity is put upon it It becomes a means whereby a worthy Communicant gains Communion with our blessed Lord. 8. When it 's said That the Senses are deceived and no competent judges of the mutation this may be very true altho' the change be Sacramental only The change is not the proper object of sense but of faith The knowledge of it with its effects is conveyed to us by a Divine Testimony extant in the holy Scriptures 9. When it is affirmed That under the species of Bread is given the Body and under the species of Wine the Blood by Species we must not understand the Accidents without their proper subjects This apprehension never entred into the thoughts of the antient Fathers They were perfect strangers to this kind of Philosophy S. Aust l. 4. cal â—â— Tâ—in Serm. de Temp. 38. S. Ambr. l. 4. de Init. By species they understand the specifical nature of a thing and by the species of Bread and Wine True Bread and True Wine as is manifest to any who consult their discourses 10. Where it is said That the Lord who changed Water into Wine could change in the Eucharist Wine into Blood the intention of Cyril is not to make these two conversions in every thing parallel Jerus as is manifest by the words that follow he presently asserts That the eating of Christ's flesh must be understood spiritually and calls the Table mystical and intellectual And therefore all that his words can import is this He who 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 changed Water into Wine by a corporal mutation changed at his mystical Table Wine into Blood not corporally but spiritually and mystically Lastly It must be acknowledged that there are many Hyperbolical expressions in the Fathers Hom 23. in Mat Par. 〈◊〉 as S. Chrysostome and others in relation to the Sacrament The design of them is to secure it from contempt and to elevate and raise the devotion of Communicants They being improper Speeches must not be expounded in such a sence as is inconsistent with what is elsewhere expressed by the same Authors in plain words without any figure They all agree in this in as clear expressions as can be desired That the substance of the Bread and Wine remain in the Eucharist Their Rhetorical flourishes cannot be interpreted to the prejudice of that which is plain and manifest When S. Chrysostome says That Christ mingles himself with us and not by Faith only but indeed makes us to be his Body His meaning is not That there is any corporal mixture or immediate contact betwixt us and his body but that when we receive the figure of his body which is in Heaven the Spirit which dwells in it is communicated to the worthy Receiver and produceth a union betwixt them and therefore what we receive â— 870. he presently calls the Grace of the Spirit Damascen who lived in the eighth Century was one of the first who deserted the Orthodox doctrin of the Fathers He being concerned in the controversie concerning Images and the opposers of them asserting that the Bread and Wine in the Sacrament were the only Image and representation which Christ allowed of himself he was transported with an intemperate zeal and affirmed they were no image or figure at all L. 4. c. sid Oâ—t ◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tho' in these words he did not design any real conversion of the Elements but rather a corporal presence or consubstantiation yet he gave occasion to some in the ninth Age to dispute for a substantial mutation Paschasius Ratbertus was the first who writ seriously and copiously about it as Bellarmine asserts His sentiments about this argument were received with a warm opposition Rabanus Maurus Bertram Joannes Scotus Erigena did strongly assert the contrary doctrin In the tenth Age which was a night of ignorance all things fell asleep controversies were laid aside Darkness did reconcile them as the want of light does various colours In the eleventh Age Berengarius was awakened and did with great perspicuity assert the Truth Tho' the violence of his enemies and infirmity of his nature induced him to submit to a recantation The controversie all this while was managed with so much ambiguity that Joannes Duns Scotus asserts That it was not necessary for any to believe a substantial conversion or Transubstantiation till the Lateran Council held under Innocent the Third in the year 1215. and therefore the master of the Sentences who flourished in the Century before about the year 1145. useth these words What kind of conversion it is 〈…〉 illa 〈…〉 whether formal or substantial I am not able to determine The truth is that Transubstantiation was brought forth by Paschasius confirmed by Innocent the Third and at last so firmly married to the See of Rome by the Council of Trent that there was no possibility of a divorce tho' there is just reason to believe that the most Learned of that Community could heartily desire it The issue produced by this unhappy conjunction is the mutilation of the Sacrament the Adoration of the Host the Sacrince of
Greek Interpreters expound 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Confession The Works whereby he is glorified are either his own or ours The Heavens declare his Glory All the productions of his hands set forth his Power Wisdom and Goodness The Ark with a Propitiatory a lively Emblem of reconciling Mercy is stiled the Glory His blessed Son in whom shines forth the whole constellation of divine perfections The Brightness of his Glory We glorifie him in our Works When we are ingaged in such as are Holy and Good Their similitude to the Divine Will and Nature may without any incongruity be called External Glory They set forth what he is and what he is most pleased and delighted with In the number of such actions we cannot deny a place to Religious Worship it being an humble acknowledgment of those boundless perfections which reside in him Praise is an ingredient diffused thro' all the parts of Worship In Prayer Receiving the Sacraments Reading Hearing his Holy Word we set forth his most worthy Praise and Whoso offereth praise glorifieth God Ps 50.23 It likewise has a propitious aspect upon The eternal Salvation of the Soul The enjoyment of this felicity is to be expected only in Heaven and God has appointed That none shall enter into that blessed place but those who Worship him in this present state The way into the Holy of Holiest by his unchangeable appointment lies thro' the Temple where all the parts of Religious Worship are to be performed The gate which opens into the Celestial Mansions is not only strait but so low that none can enter into it but those who stoop and are ingaged here in humble and submissive agnitions of the Divine Excellency The grand work in Heaven being to perform the most signal acts of Adoration He that is not in some measure inur'd to them in this World is destitute of an aptitude and fitness for that blessed imployment It would be as great a surprisal to any who are totally strangers here to the Hallelujahs and Praises which are due to the most high God to be placed in a moment in the midst of the Heavenly Quire as it was to the Syrian host to be unawares in the midst of Samaria Heaven instead of being a place of rest would be a real disquiet to such unqualified persons Lastly Divine Worship has a tendency to promote The Preservation of the Community It excellently disposeth Princes to govern Their honorary addresses to him who is higher than the highest influence them with a due temper of mind towards their Subjects They cannot but desire to comport with the pleasure of him whom they in sincerity adore and they must necessarily know That it is his pleasure that they should imitate him in the acts of his Clemency and Goodness And such acts are the Cement which unites the Hearts of the Prince and People together and secures the most lasting conjunction to all the parts of the Community It likewise disposeth Subjects to obey They who in the integrity of their hearts Worship the Supreme Being can do no less than pay their acknowledgments to his Vice-gerent Infinite Sovereignty being the object of their Veneration wheresoever they meet with the Type and resemblance of it they cannot pass by it without an expression of their due regards for the proto-types sake We may add to all this That Worship rightly performed draws a perpetuating blessing upon the Community Such Princes as have been most careful to advance the due celebration of it have been attended in their Government with signal Felicities David who made it his first and last work to settle Religion did thereby settle his Kingdom His Subjects were united his enemies dissipated his friends increased But Solomon who divided Divine Worship betwixt Jehova and other Gods had his Kingdom divided Then parts were given to his Servant and but Two to his Son These three particulars The Glory of God The Salvation of the Soul The Preservation of the Community Religious Worship having a tendency to promote it must be our duty when we are ingaged in it so to direct our intentions as to cast our eye upon them But that which challengeth the first place in our thoughts is The Glory of God The reason of this order will be very conspicuous if we consider 1. The Obligations which we lie under to the Supreme Being His favours are so constant and superlative that they admit of no delay but require in the first place in every address to him something to be returned in point of gratitude It is an undervaluing of the kindness we every moment receive to prefer any other duty before it Now by reason God is infinite in Perfection and by consequence uncapable of receiving any thing from us but a decent and becoming acknowledgment and setting forth of his intrinsick Glory this must necessarily take the upper hand of all other ends in our Intentions 2. The glorifying God is the first of those duties which are morally Good It is the Form which constitutes and makes them to be what they are All Good whatsoever is either such as God Wills because it is so or else so because God Wills it The Essence of the first lies in a similitude to the immutable perfection of the Divine Nature of the Second to the sacred determinations of his Blessed Will This similitude in the Creature to God is that which we mean by his External Glory The whole Creation contributes to this purpose so long as it retains such a composure as lively represents his Goodness Wisdom and Power When any part degenerates into a frame dislike to the Idea in the Supreme Being according to which it was made then his Glory is eclipsed 3. The glorifying God is the primary duty which Christian Religion devolves upon us Whatsoever ye do do all to the glory of God 1 Cor. 10.31 Christ the Institutor of our holy Profession was ushered into the World by the Heavenly Host with this Hymn Glory be to God in the highest when he was about to leave it He prayed in these words Father glorifie thy Name The design of his whole Life was to annihilate all these imaginary excellencies which impede the shining of the Divine Glory The People which he has redeemed 1 Pet. 2.9 are said to be A chosen generation That they may shew forth the Praises of him who hath called them out of darkness into his marvellous light His Church is represented with the Moon under her feet to signifie her disgust of all selfish interposals which eclipse the Glory of the Sun of Righteousness He hath made all things for himself Prov. 16.4 that is with a purpose and design to set forth his intrinsick Glory His Glory primarily consists in his peerless and transcendent Goodness He has made his Creatures as so many vessels to entertain the overflowings of it The earth is full of the goodness of the Lord. Psal 33.5 The brightness and splendour of it is visible
If any difficulty arise about the manner of God's operating with the Will which we cannot comprehend we must not let go the belief of that which is clear for that which is obscure Things many times are very perspicous when the modes are concealed He would be accounted very vain who should attempt to deny That there is any such thing as light because it is difficult to explain the way of its emanation from the great Luminary of the World Every Man is sensible of a determining Power within himself That in the midst of his intellectual discussions he has a liberty to make his election of such an object as he apprehends to be most agreeable to himself To deny this because we are not fully satisfied about every mode in the doing of it is the same thing as if we should affirm That there is no such Sence as Seeing because it is not yet agreed whether the Eye perform its office by the entertainment of some Effluviums from the Object or by the help of some pressure only upon the Optic Nerve Now I have done with the second particular namely the strength whereby we are inabled to perform what we are directed to This we must expect from the Spirit of God And now I proceed to the last 3. The acceptance of what we perform is procured by the satisfaction and merit of Jesus Christ In order to the clearing up of this Truth the following steps must be taken 1. The acceptance of our Worship and Service is not upon its own account There are great defects in the best of our performances Our Faith tho' it be unfeigned yet it wants That firmness our Love tho' sincere That fervour which the Law requires The Law is natural and immutable and can no more abate in its demands than the fire can cease to be of a hot nature or the Sun to be a lucid Body If our most plausible actions were examined according to the rigour of it many flames would be discovered in them The Prophet tells us Isai 64.6 All our righteousnesses are as silthy rags The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tho' it be variously interpreted yet all the Glosses agree in charging our most valuable services with imperfection The precedent words justifie the Exposition We are all as an unclean thing The fountain being impure the streams which issue from it will carry with them some signatures of the same impurity The Apostle says We know but in part it is as sure That we love and obey but in part The Will being principally concerned in the Fall must necessarily lie under a depravation equal to that of the Understanding It is a saying among the Rabbins Buxt Rab. Lex rad 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 953. 1602. So long as the just live they are at war with concupiscence They affirm there are Three Sins which daily every man is guilty of Sinful Thoughts want of attention in Prayer evil words The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which they represent as the cause of these miscarriages they tell us That God will bring forth in the world to come and slay before the righteous and the wicked 2. Acceptance is not upon the account of the favour of God without the interposal of satisfaction for sin by satisfaction we must understand the doing of something which repairs the damage which is received by an injury and the quieting thereby the mind of the injured who is provoked by reason of the damage A great injury is done by Sin to the Supreme Rector of the World His Authority is trampled upon and the Majesty of his Law diminished his Government exposed to contempt publick Order unhinged and by this means he is justly incensed The ready way to repair the damage and atone his displeasure is to require That the penalties due to the transgression or such as are equivalent to them be suffered and in them to express his just indignation against Sin and impress upon all such a fear and reverence as the Laws of Heaven do challenge That this should be done antecedently to Pardon and Acceptance is evidently the Will of God declared in the Holy Scripture There we find That there is no acceptance without remission and there is no remission without the shedding of blood and that this blood is the blood of a Mediator thro' which we must have redemption Rom. 3.24 Eph. 4.7 This is the reason why the Divine Amnesty from the time of the Primitive Apostasie has had a constant aspect upon this blood When the Apostle asserts concerning the Mediator if he had been to offer up himself often as the High-Priest entred into the Holy of Holiest every year with the blood of others then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the World He plainly intimates That from the beginning the Father has had a regard to the blood and sufferings of his Son in the remission of Sins Tho' satisfaction was not then made yet it was promised Captives are frequently set free in consideration of the ransom promised before it be actually paid As satisfaction is certainly agreeable to the Will of God So it seems to be sutable to the propensity of his nature Supposing the Creation it is necessary that he have a Soveraignty and Dominion over it and if he be a Sovereign Lord over the Creation he must actually govern it It is a defect to be invested with Power and not to exercise it in relation to the Community and if he governs it must be by Law Government supposeth Obedience Obedience in the Intellectual part of Creation must be an act of the Understanding The Understanding cannot act except it has a knowledge of the Will of him who governs His Will published and made known is a Law If there be a Law it must be holy it being enacted by him who is infinite in purity and sanctity and if it be holy he cannot but love it the same necessity which doth oblige him to love himself will engage him to love the resemblance And if he love his Law he cannot but hate sin which is opposite to it Hatred to that which is contrary to Holiness must be as natural to him as to love and delight in Holiness And if it be natural to terminate his hatred upon sin by an equal necessity he is obliged to punish it For hatred is never found in any without a peremptory desire to do evil to that which is its object and such a desire when it is in one who wills nothing rashly who is armed with sufficiency of power to execute whatsoever he wills who cannot be diverted from execution by any unseen emergency must necessarily take effect and whatsoever evil is done to sin by him who cannot err in his administrations must have the formality of punishment all evil being either the evil of sin or the evil of punishment This penalty must either be inflicted upon the Offender and then there will be no place left for Pardon