Vnion Joh. 14.20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father and you in me and I in you that day refers either to the time when the Spirit should be given which is promised v. 16 17 or to the glorisied state spoken of v. 19 upon the effusion of the Spirit men may come to know something of this Union but it will never be fully understood by them till they be in Glory In the opening of it so far as the present state and the height of the mystery will admit of I must look into the Word and keep to that and fetch all from that for 't is Revelation and not Reason which here must give us Light The Word having reveal'd it Reason may be useful as an Handmaid to shadow it out by such and such Resemblances thereby to help us the better to conceive of it but that which must be our first and main Guide about it is Scripture Revelation Now the Scripture speaks of a threefold Vnion 1. There is the Vnion of three Persons in one Nature Of the Vnion of the Three Pexsons of the two Natures in Christ and of the Mystical Vnion 2. There is the Vnion of two Natures in one Person 3. There is the Vnion of Persons where yet Persons and Natures are distinct 1. There is the Vnion of three Persons in one Nature This is in the Trin-Vnity where you have three Persons united in the Godhead the Trinity in Vnity and the Vnity in Trinity One in Three in respect of Nature and Essence and Three in One in respect of Personality This is that ineffable incomprehensible Union which is between the Father Son and Holy Ghost in the same common Nature of the Godhead Of which the Apostle speaks 1 Joh. 5.7 There are three that bear record in heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one Here are Three and yet One Three as to their distinct Personal Subsistences and yet One as to their common Nature This a Mystery to be adored not to be fathomed a * The Union betwixt the Three Persons c. the knowledge of this is not nay cannot be attained unto by the Light of Nature No example can illustrate no Reason Angelical or humane can comprehend the hidden excellency of this glorious Mystery But it is discovered to us by a divine Revelation in the written Word and our Faith must receive and our Piety admire what our Reason cannot comprehend Cheynel of the Divine Trin-Unity ch ◠p. 19 Vide Aquin. p. 1. Qu. 39. Art 1 2. Lombard Lib. 1. Dist 2 3. Mystery much too deep for the Plummet of Reason to reach he that by Reason would go about to grasp it is as foolish as he that would attempt to put the Ocean into a bucket or to grasp the Universe in the hollow of his hand 2. There is the Vnion of two Natures in one Person This is that which we commonly call the Hypostatical Vnion or the Union of the two Natures in Christ his Godhead and his Manhood both making up but one Person You may thus conceive of it 'T is the substantial supernatural conjunction of the two Natures in Christ the Divine assuming the Humane and giving it a subsistence in its self so that both make but one Person and yet so as that the being and properties of both Natures are preserved intire As to this twofold Vnion I am not at present concern'd to speak to them when I shall come to the third Verse I shall have occasion there to speak to the latter 3. There is the Vnion of Persons where yet Persons and Natures are distinct and this is the Mystical Vnion The Mystical Vnion opened that which is betwixt Christ and Believers this I am only now to speak to Concerning which that you may not mistake the Nature of it you must know here is Vnion but no transmutation confusion or commixtion here is the union of persons but not personal union 1. Here is union but no transmutation confusion or commixtion I 'le put them together for brevity sake Believers are united to Christ but yet not so as that they are changed or transformed into the very essence or being of Christ so as to be Christed with Christ as some too boldly speak or that he is changed or transformed into the essence and being of Believers no you must not entertain a thought of any such thing Christ is Christ still and Believers are but Creatures still notwithstanding this Union though they be really and nearly united yet both keep their Natures distinct and are the same after the Union that they were before it As it is in the Persons in the Sacred Trinity (a) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Damasc de Orthod Fide lib. 1. cap. 11. pag. 42 there is Vnion but no confusion they are Essentially one yet they have their personal Properties and distinct Subsistences And as it is in the two Natures of Christ they are under a near Vnion they make but one Person yet for all this they are (b) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Synod Calced distinct the Godhead is not turned into the Manhood nor the Manhood into the Godhead they are united but not confounded or converted for both of them even after this Union do still retain their * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Damasc Dial. cap. 66. essential properties without confusion or conversion So 't is in the Union of Believers with Christ for thus far we may make use of the two former Vnions to open the Mystical Union by they all agree in This though in other things they differ You may take a lower resemblance of it if you please In Man there is a near Vnion between Soul and Body and these two united make up the man * Vide Nemes de Nat. Hom. p. 97. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. yet upon the union the Soul is not turned into the nature of the Body nor the Body into the nature of the Soul they are not confounded though united they yet retain their essence and properties distinct the Soul is the Soul still and the Body is the Body still So it is in the Vnion between Christ and Believers 2. Here is the Vnion of persons but not personal union And here lies the difference between the Mystical Vnion and the Hypostatical Vnion The Hypostatical Vnion is Personal but not of Persons the reason is because in Christ there are two Natures but there is but one Person there is this Nature and that Nature in Christ but not this Person and that Person in Christ as Nestorius held there is in Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 aliud aliud but not alius alius as the Learned express it Christ did not assume the * Vide Lombard Lib. 3. Dist 5. Person of man but the Nature of man into his Person Non assumpsit Hominem Personam sed
his own Son in the likeness c. O the infinite Love Mercy Compassion of God! The weaker was Gods Law the stronger and higher was Gods love O that he should not let us all perish under the Laws impotency that he should imploy One for our recovery who was every way able to do what the Law could not how should we adore his mercy in this But this leads me to the following words in the Text God sent c. where I shall have occasion more fully to press this duty upon you So much therefore for this First Branch of the Words What the Law could not do in that it was weak through the Flesh ROM 8.3 God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh c. CHAP. X. Of Christ's Mission and of God's sending him Man being utterly lost upon the terms of the Law it pleased God to find out and to pitch upon another Way which he knew would be effectual That was the sending of his own Son c. Four things observed in the Words All reduced to three Observations Of Christs Mission How be was sent and sent by God It notes his Praeexistence before his Mission and Incarnation his Personality his being distinct from the Father 'T is opened First Negatively 1. 'T was not Christ's ineffable and eternal Generation 2. 'T was not any local Secession from his Father Secondly Affirmatively 'T was 1. Gods preordaining of him to the Office and Work of a Mediator 2. His qualifying and fitting of him for that Office and Work 3. His authorizing and commissionating of him to engage therein 4. His authoritative willing of him to assume mans Nature and therein so to do and so to suffer 5. His trusting of him with his great designs How was this Sending of Christ consistent with his equality with the Father this answered Two wayes Why was Christ sent answered first more Generally then more Particularly in Four things Use 1. To stir up persons 1. To admire God 2. To admire in special the Love of the Father 3. To love Christ 4. To imitate Christ with respect to his Sending 5. Not to rest in the external Sending of Christ 6. To believe on him whom God hath sent Use 2. This is improved for the Comfort of Believers The Law being weak God pitch'd upon another Course He Sent his Son THe Laws impotency and weakness nay utter inability to recover justifie and save the lost Sinner hath been spoken to I go on to that which thereupon the Wise and Gracious God was pleas'd to do And what was that why to the praise of his glorious grace he sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh The Great God is never at a loss if one Means fails he hath another if all Means fail which fall within the view of the Creature yet God hath his secret reserves and that under the deck which shall no the work Upon Adams Sin all Mankind was lost plung'd into a woful abysse of misery obnoxious to eternal wrath and accordingly God might have dealt with them in the utmost severity of his Justice What is there now to prevent this to give any relief to man in this deplorable State Alas the Sinner cannot help himself the Law stands with a withered arm and can do nothing there 's no Creature in heaven or earth to interpose as to all of these the case was desperate Therefore God * Deus Solus in hâc intricatâ causâ poterat prospicere remedium Streso himself engages to let the world see what He could do * Isa 63.3 He looked and there was none to help therefore his own arm brought Salvation Here indeed was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a God helping at a dead lift in the greatest streights and in the most admirable manner If ever with reverence be it spoken infinite Wisdom was put to it now was the time yet even in this intricate and perplexed State of things That found out a Way which would do the business a Way which none could have thought of but God alone he sent his own Son c None could cry 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to this but God himself this was his alone invention and contrivance The restoring of fal'n man was impossible to the Law yet it shall be done God will take * Noluit proptereà quod Lex imbecillis erat per praritatem humanae naturae opus salutis humanae abjicere quasi non posset per aliam quod ista Legis via non succedebat efficere Musc another strange and wonderful Course which shall do it effectually what his own Law cannot do his own Son can therefore him hee 'll send A very high and costly Way yet rather than all mankind shall perish God will make use of it here 's the very mirror of the Wisdom Love Grace Pity of the blessed God God sending his own Son c. Of the Reading of the words To make the Sense run more smoothly Some turn the Participle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 into the Verb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 reading the Words thus God sent his c if the following Conjunctive particle And be kept in this Reading is not much amiss Some render it in the * Dictio interpretata Mittens Participium est c. et propterea ad servandum Participium Tempus aliqui Interpretes verterunt rectè Activum in Passivum legendo sic Deus filio suo misso in Carne Cajet Passive form Deus misso Filio suo c. * Duplex est Hebraismus unus est óportet supplere Latine Ideò Alter quia Participium Mittens ponitur loco Verbi Misit Tolet. Some would put in the word Ideò therefore Since the Law was weak through the flesh therefore God sent his own Son and for sin c. but as to these things there 's no great difficulty In the whole Paragraph you have Their Division into Four Parts 1. The Act or the Thing done namely the Sending of Christ 2. The Person whose Act this was or the Person sending viz. God the Father God sent c. 'T is a known Rule when the Name or Title of God is set in contradistinction to the Son 't is then taken not Essentially but Personally for the First Person God the Father instances of which are very common 'T is here said God sent his own Son therefore it must be understood of God the Father Christ being his Son and upon that consideration he being stiled the Father And * Mr. Perkins on Galat. 4.4 p. 271. this Person is called God not because he partakes more of the Godhead than the Other Persons Son and holy Ghost do but because he is the first in the Order of the Three Divine Persons and because he is the beginning of the Son and of the Holy Ghost but hath no beginning of his own Person for he doth not receive the Godhead in the Personal consideration of it
justificari nisi ci inseramur uniamur unus spiritus cum eo fiâ—mus Sâ—â—eso the first Adam could do us no hurt were we not descended out of his loyns and in him as our common head and so the second Adam can do us no good unless we be made One with him and in him as our head also If we so be then there shall be gracious communications most blessed derivations from him but if not none of these can be looked for And who would not now desire to be in Christ who would not purchase this priviledge with a world nay who would not give ten thousand worlds for it O that you would all make sure of it Do not trouble your heads with curious enquiries into some difficulties about this union but let this be your business to make sure of the thing The poor low-gifted Christian may get it though the highest gifted man cannot grasp it VSE 3. Directions how to get into Christ But I must direct as well as perswade Methinks I hear some saying How may this blessed Vnion be attained what shall we do that we may be in the number of those who are in Christ Jesus For answer to this I must again refer you to its double bond and ligament the Spirit and Faith and advise you to get both of them Would you have Christ to be one with you then get the Spirit would you be one with Christ then get Faith 1. First get the Spirit which may be done by attendance upon the Word and by Prayer Gal. 3.2 Received ye the Spirit by the works of the Law or by the Hearing of Faith the Apostle means the Hearing of the Gospel or the Evangelical Doctrine The Gospel doth highly conduce to the obtaining of the Spirit for 't is the ministration of the Spirit 2 Cor. 3.8 Do any therefore want this Spirit let them wait upon the Gospel dispensation and publication and through the Grace of God attending that Dispensation they shall have it Let me also recommend Prayer as an excellent means for the procuring of the Spirit O Sirs what will bring you into Christ but the Spirit and what will bring the Spirit into you but Prayer you should be praying for the Spirit though you cannot as yet pray with the Spirit O that you would often go to God and plead with him for the giving of it to you Say Lord we read if any man have not the Spirit of Christ he is none of his now Lord we dread the thoughts of being none of Christs O to be out of Christ is a woful state and we perceive that is our state till we have thy Spirit we hear 't is the Spirit that knits the Soul to Christ till therefore we are partakers of it we cannot be knit to him wherefore we beseech thee to give it to us O whatever thou deniest to us do not deny us this good Spirit Thou hast promised * Luk. 11.13 to give thy Spirit to them that ask him Lord upon our bended knees we ask him of thee O now make good thy promise to us I say do you but thus pray and the thing shall be done a good God never denies his good Spirit to the good Seeker of it 2. Get Faith also This is a Grace highly precious and excellent the Apostle Peter speaks of several precious things and Faith is one of them 't is precious blood 1 Pet. 1.19 't is precious Christ 1 Pet. 2.7 't is precious promises 2 Pet. 1.4 and 't is also precious Faith 2 Pet. 1.1 Now amongst many other things which make it so precious this is one 't is the * Fidei Gratia incomparabilis haec est quod animam copulat cum Christo sicut sponsam cum sponso c. Luther tom 1.466 Grace which unites to Christ The woman consenting to take the man for her Husband upon that the matrimonial union follows so the Sinner consenting to the receiving and obeying of Christ which is one great act of Faith upon this he is united to him this I say makes Faith so precious O this is one of Faith's royal excellences nothing puts a greater worth and glory upon it than this great effect Well then see that you make sure of it are you yet without it in the sad state of unbelief You have no share in and can make no claim to this Mystical Union so long as 't is thus with you you must be put into another state and become true Believers then 't will be well These are the only persons who are in Christ we who believe are in him that is true 1 Joh. 5.20 For whom did Christ ask of his Father that they may be one even as we are one 't was for them that should believe on him Joh. 17.20 c. Therefore let it be your great endeavour to be Believers for let me tell you in the very first moment of believing you will actually be the members of Christ the Soul is in Christ as soon as ever Faith is in it I 'le say no more but only add this As you desire to get Faith first get the Spirit for if you once come to have that Spirit he will most infallibly work Faith in you Of all the several Graces he will not let that be wanting wherever he is The Vses hitherto have been General VSE 4. Several things press'd upon those who are in Christ To admire the Love of God I shall now more particularly direct my self to those who are in Christ Jesus And first is it thus with any of you that you are indeed taken into this near Vnion with Christ how should you admire the love of God! I here consider God personally and so I would excite you to admire the Love of the Father of the Son and of the Holy Ghost for indeed all the Persons have a great hand in this Vnion and the love of each of them in it is very admirable The Father first lays the foundation of it and then he orders the accomplishment of it therefore 't is said 1 Cor. 1.30 Of him i.e. of God the Father are ye in Christ Jesus c. and he also is said to call unto the fellowship of his Son Jesus Christ 1 Cor. 1.9 The Son is willing to be One with you what a condescension is that and he is the person in whom the Vnion is primarily terminated Then the Holy Ghost brings it about as one great Agent therein So that all the three Persons are concerned in the Mystical Union 't is to the Son by the Will of the Father through the agency and operation of the Spirit O let Father Son and Spirit all be adored by you Which that I may the more effectually perswade you to let the Thing it self be considered and how you stand in reference to it To be in Christ Jesus so nearly so indissolubly united to him what mercy is this There are in the Vnion many things of a
held forth in Other places Isa 48.16 Come ye near unto me Christ is the Person here speaking hear ye this I have not spoken in secret from the beginning from the time that it was there am I and now the Lord God and his Spirit hath sent me a full Old-Testament proof of the distinction of the Persons But 't is most plainly held forth in the New-Testament At the Baptism of Christ there was a * Pater auditur in Voce Filius manifestatur in homine Spiritus dignoscitur in Columbâ— August manifestation of God in the Father Son and Spirit the Spirit descended in the form of a Dove the Father gave the Testimony This is my beloved Son c. Christ was the object of it Christ directed his Apostles to baptize in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost which surely he would not have done had there not been a personal distinction betwixt them Joh. 14.16 I will pray the Father and he shall give you another Comforter c. here 's all the Persons as distinct Joh. 14.1 Ye believe in God believe also in me Joh. 12.44 He that believeth on me believeth not on me i. e. on me only but on him that sent me Joh. 5.32 There is another that beareth witness of me and I know that the witness which he witnesseth of me is true many such places might be cited but these may suffice Here 's enough in the Text the same Person considered in the same respects cannot both send and be sent too therefore the Father and the Son are distinct Persons True as * Lib. 2. de Trin. c. 5. Vide Lombard lib. 1. Dist 15. Austine observes in some sense Christ might be said to send himself that is consider him Essentially so he did what the Father did so he sent himself but if you consider him Personally so he did not send but was sent upon which He and his Father are distinct So much for these three things which are but imply'd in Christ's Mission I come more closely to the Thing it self and to the Point which lies before us namely That Christ was sent and sent by God the Father The Redemption of lost Man was a blessed work a most glorious-undertaking never was there any like to it or to be parallell'd with it yet our Lord Jesus would not of his own head engage in it or thrust himself upon it no he must first be sent then and not till then did he undertake it And who sent him surely He who onely had Authority to imploy and commissionate him about such a work viz. God the Father God sent his own Són c. where as hath been already hinted God is to be taken in the * Personalitèr sumpto vocabulo quia opponitur Persona mittens Personâ—e misfae Grynaus Ubi ait quòd Deus misit Filium nominationè Dei Patrem intelligit ad quem Filius refertur Soto Personal Notion and as relating to the first Person This sending of Christ and that by the Father are two Points of such unquestionable verity to all who pass under the denomination os Christians that as to them and with Jews and Heathens I will not meddle 't is not necessary to spend the least time in the proving of them Yet even as to them 't is needful that these Truths should be a little opened and explained In order to which I will endeavour 1. To clear up the nature of the Act. 2. To remove a difficulty or answer an Objection about it 3. To give the Grounds and Reasons of it As to the first the Question is What was the Fathers sending of Christ in what respects is he said to be sent and sent by the Father for I shall open both together The Sending of Christ opened To which I answer 1. Negatively in Two things 1. This Sending of Christ was not his ineffable and eternal Generation or Sonship grounded upon that He was sent who was the Son of God but he was not the Son of God as he was sent nor said to be * Non eo ipsâ— quòd de Patre natus est missus dicitur Filius sed eò quod apparuit huic mundo verbum Caro factum est Aug. de Trin. l. 4. c. 10. Duobus modis dicitur mitti Filius praeter illam aeternam genituram quae ineffabilis est secundum quam etiam missus posset dici ut videtur quibuldam sed mcliùs ac veriùs secundum eam dicitur genitus Lomb. Lib. 1. Dist 15. sent as he was the Son of God his Sonship was the result of his Generation not of his Mission These two are very different things for Christ was begotten of the Father from everlasting but he was sent by the Father the sending being taken in its strict and most proper notion in time * Gal. 4. â— When the fulness of time was come God sent forth his Son c. He was a Son long before he was sent and he was not a Son because he was sent but he was sent because he was a Son 2. Christ's Sending was not any local Secession from his Father Non missus est mutando locum quia in mâ—ndo â—rat Quapropter Pater invisibilis unà cum Filio secum invisibili eundem Filium visiâ—ilem faciendo misisfe eum â—ictus est c. August de Trinit lib. 2. cap. 5. or any local motion from the place where he was to some other place where he was not You must not so conceive of it nor fetch your measures concerning it from your own sending of Persons for there when you send one upon your errand or business he leaves the place where he was and goes to the place where he was not but so it was not with Christ The Father sent him to this lower world yet here he was before the Father sent him from heaven yet as to his Godhead he remained in heaven still He saith indeed * Joh. 16.28 I came forth from the Father yet not so but that he was still with the Father and am come into the world yet not so but that he was there before for he was in the world and the world was made by him Joh. 1.10 again I leave the world and go to the Father he speaks in respect of his bodily presence Look as when Christ ascended he went from earth and yet he was on earth still as to his Spiritual presence for he saith * Mat. 28. ult Lo I am with you unto the end of the world †A quibus Homo abscedebat Deus non recedebat Aug. Tract 78. in Joh. Et abiit hic est rediit nos non dèseruit Idem Tract 50. in Joh. as Man he went from us but as God he is as much with us as ever so when Christ descended he came from heaven and yet he was in heaven still for he tells us ‖ Joh. 3.13 No man hath ascended up into
the words of Christ uttered with reference to God the Father concerning whom he saith that he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from him How was Christ from the Father I answer not only in respect of his Mission by and from the Father that indeed follows immediately upon it and hath sent me but not as the sole or main thing in respect of which Christ is said to be from his Father I conceive his being sent is brought in as a quite Other thing and distinct from that But Christ saith he was from the Father in respect of his eternal Generation by the Father that was the Thing principally intended by him in this Expression As the Holy Ghost is said to be from the Father because of his procession from him that 's the reason I go upon Joh. 15.26 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he proceedeth from the Father so the Son the Second Person is said to be from the Father because of his Generation by him and I find the * Ab ipso inquit sum quia Filius de Patre quicquid est Filius de illo est cujus est Filius Ideò Dominum Jesum dicimus Deum de Deo Patrem non dicimus Deum de Deo sed tantum Deum August Antients thus opening the place Another Text for the proof of this eternal Sonship of Christ is Psal 2.7 The Lord hath said unto me thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee To me this is a very considerable Scripture for the confirming the Truth in hand though our Adversaries I know make a contrary use of it and Some * As the learned Dr. Jackson who saith he dares not insist upon this Text to prove Christ's eternal Generation On the Creed 7. B. Sect. 3. Ch. 25. p. 257. Others who are Friends speaks somewhat diminutively about it 'T is beyond all dispute that Christ was the Person here spoken of 't was not said to David further than as he was a type but to Christ himself Thou art my Son c. thus Some of the †One of which hath this notable passage about this 2d Psalm Magistri nostri quicquid hoc Psalmo canitur de Rege Messiâ interpretati sunt sed secundum verborum sonum ob refutationem Haereticorum be means us Christians convenit ut eum interpretemur de ipso Davide Rabbi Salomon Jarchi Jewish Writers themselves do carry it and the matter of the Psalm with the several expressions in it are only applicable to Christ See Vers 8 9 c. to the end and as to that Verse which I have to do with you have it thrice cited in the New Testament and 't is always apply'd to Christ so Acts 13.33 Heb. 1.5 Heb. 5.5 Well then what doth God here say concerning Christ why Thou art my Son but how did Christ come to be his Son why as he had begotten him for that comes in as the fundamentum relationis Thou art my Son I have begotten thee but when did God thus beget him why from all eternity to day have I begotten thee Various are the apprehensions of men about the import and reference of this word to day and what that matter or period of Time is to which it refers Some make it to point to the time of the rage and opposition of Enemies against Christ spoken of Verse 1. c. Some to the time of the New-Testament-administration Some to the time of Christ's resurrection and advancement as we shall see hereafter But I concur with * Hodie non tempus certum sed aeternitatem designat Est descriptio Naturae aeternitatis optimè come niens omne praeteritum á Deo removers omne futurum à Deo praescindens omnem successionem excludens aeternitatem his omnibus carentem optimè explicans Arnold Catch Racov. Major p. 208. Those who do not understand it of this or that particular determinate day or time but make it to point to and to be expressive of eternity This Eternity is but one day or but one continued Now in which there being no succession whatever God doth from eternity he may be said to do it now or to day So here this day have I begotten thee that is from everlasting True indeed †Non volunt Nostri Vocem Hodie aeternitatem significare sed pro subjectâ materiâ exponi debare quando Deo tribuitur non infringere ejus aeternitatem sed ei propter nos 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 duntaxat adjungi Hoornb de Christo cap. 1. p. 17. the Word it self in its first and strictect sense doth not signifie or import eternity yet because in this place it must be interpreted according to the matter spoken of therefore here it must have that signification the Nature of the Thing so determining it For God's begetting of his Son being an immanent act it must as all acts of that nature are be from everlasting and it being spoken after the manner of men it must be so understood as may best suit with the Nature of God and with the Nature of the Thing which it speaks of When therefore you read thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee 't is as if God had said O my Son I own thee to be so before the world and I here attest that from all Eternity I have begotten thee and that thou art my Son by eternal Generation And thus the great Lights of the Ancient Church in their Contests with the Arrians did make use of and expound it That Text in Prov. 8. is exceeding full and clear Vers 22 23 24 c. The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his way before his works of old I was set up from everlasting from the beginning or ever the earth was When there were no depths I was brought forth when there were no fountains abounding with water Before the Mountains were setled before the Hills was I brought forth this is further with great elegancy set forth Vers 26 27 28. He concludes Vers 29 30. When he gave to the Sea his decree that the waters should not pass his Commandment when he appointed the foundations of the earth Then I was by him as one brought up with him and I was daily his delight rejoycing alwayes before him * Vide Synopsis Critic V. 2. in Cap. 8. Prov. in initio Of whom can all this be understood but of Christ to whom is it applicable but to him who is the Personal Wisdom of God the Father and if so doth it not then plainly hold forth his eternal Existence and also his eternal Generation So Micah 5.2 Thou Bethleem Ephratah though thou be little among the thousands of Judah yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be Ruler in Israel whose goings forth have been from of old from everlasting in the Hebr. 't is from the dayes of eternity If we look into the New Testament this will yet be more clear There
both yet not the same Person When we speak of the communicating of the Divine Essence from the First to the Second and Third Persons we must be understood as was before hinted to speak this of them as Persons or as they are personally considered for that Essence simply and absolutely considered is not communicated to the Son and Spirit but only as it subsists in them as such Persons the Godhead it self they have in and from themselves but their distinct Personalities in which the Godhead subsists are of the Father It being thus from hence it follows that according to the distinction of the Persons there must also be a distinct communication of the divine Essence not that there is one Essence in the Son and another in the Spirit for both are God only that is distinguish'd according to their Personal Consideration and the Personal Properties belonging to them which notwithstanding their oneness in Nature do alwayes remain Well then Christ's Sonship being a Personal thing proceeding not simply from the Divine Essence but as it subsists in the second Person therefore it must be proper and peculiar to him and not common to the Holy Ghost he being another Person and the Divine Nature subsisting in him accordingly with respect to his Personal Properties 2. Because though the same Divine Essence be communicated to both yet not in the same way and manner For though both come from the Father yet 't is in divers respects the Son coming from him by Generation the Spirit by Procession And therefore though both are God and both come from God yet both are not the Sons of God because 't is coming from God in the way of Generation only which entitles to Sonship Thus * Quaeris à me si de substantiâ Patris est Filius de substantiâ Patris est etiam Spiritus Sanctus cur unus Filius sit alius non sit Filius Ego respondeo sive capias sive non capias De Patte est Filius de Patre est Spiritus Sanctus sed ille genitus est iste procedens August contra Maxim lib. 3. cap. 14 Austine answers it Thou askest of me saith he if the Son be of the substance of the Father and the Holy Ghost be of the substance of the Father also why is one the Son and not the Other I answer whether you comprehend it or not the Son is of the Father the Holy Ghost is of the Father but the Son is begotten the Spirit proceeds Thus this great Divine did solve this difficulty stopping here and going no further If any will be so curious as to enquire further wherein the difference lies betwixt eternal Generation and eternal Procession I am not asham'd to give them this answer I cannot tell 't is a mystery far above my reach God hath not revealed it and there is nothing in Nature which will give us any light about it therefore it becomes us rather to adore than to be inquisitive I know the Schoolmen who are privy to all secrets and have a key to open every difficulty though it be lock'd up never so close attempt the opening of it but they had better have let it alone here humble ignorance is better than sawey curiosity I think * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hujus differentiae scire credi ex divina revelatione At 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est nobis incomprehensibile ineffabile Alting Theolog. Prolem loc 3. Problem 38. p. 238. they speak best who say we know and believe there is a difference 'twixt Generation and Procession but what that is and wherein it lies that is to us incomprehensible 'T is time therefore for me to leave this Point and to come to the Application of the main Truth Is Christ thus God's own Son I infer then Use 1. Three Things inferr'd from Christ's Sonship 1. That he is God 1. That he is God Not a meer titular or nuncupative God not a God by Office only not a made God a contradiction in the adject but he is God truly properly essentially Which great Truth is most strongly asserted and proved by various convincing Arguments against Jews Arrians Socinians all the Opposers of it I must not engage in so vast a Subject I 'le only argue from this Relation wherein Christ stands to God as he is his own Son which indeed by its self is sufficient if there was nothing more to demonstrate his Godhead He who is the true Son of God and such a Son of God is truly God but Christ is the true Son of God and such a Son of God his own Son therefore he is truly God c. The Apostle joyns the true Son and the true God together therefore the Argument is good 1 Joh. 5.20 We know that the Son of God is come and hath given us an understanding that we may know him that is true and we are in him that is true even in his Son Jesus Christ this is the true God and eternal Life I do not say that every Son of God is God for the Saints are Sons and yet not God but I say he who is such a Son as God's own proper natural consubstantial coessential only begotten Son he is God where-ever this Sonship is there 's the Deity or the Divine Essence now Christ is thus God's Son therefore he is God What the Father is as to his Nature that the Son must be also now the first Person the Father of Christ is God whereupon he too who is the Son must be God also A Son alwayes participates of his Fathers Essence there is betwixt them more an identity and oneness of Nature if therefore Christ be Gods Son as hath been fully proved he must then needs have * Nisi esset Jesus Christus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Naturâ Deus non esset 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Naturâ seu Naturalis Dei Filius Cloppenb Anti-Smalc c. 3. p. 72. Vide Jacob ad Portum contra Ostorod c. 9. p. 59. Estwick against Bidale p. 442 c. that very Nature and Essence which God the Father hath in somuch that if the second Person be not really a God the first Person is but equivocally a Father Therefore he himself tells us †Job 10.30 I and my Father are one where he is speaking of a far higher oneness than that of Consent or Will only Christ being both the natural Son of God and also his Son by eternal Generation that makes the thing unquestionable for what is that Generation but the Fathers communicating of his own Nature and Essence to him This is that which is done in all Generations for Generation is alwayes the production of another in the same Nature * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Epiph. Haeres 69. p. 750. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Phot. Ep. p. 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Najanz Orat. 35. tom 1. p. 568. like ever begets like as 't is said of Adam he
safe Take the Saints apart from Christ the strongest could not stand take them as joyned and united to him the weakest shall not fall When the first Adam was our head our condition was mutable in him we stood upon very slippery ground but now when Christ is our head we-stand fast and firm * Psal 125.1 even as mount Zion never to be removed 'T is but the same Grace now which we should have had upon our first creation I speak of the kind not of the degree yet 't is not amissible as that was because of our union with another head God will hear their Prayers 9. Are you in Christ this assures you of the audience of your Prayers If ye abide in me saith Christ ye shall ask what ye will and it shall be done unto you◠What an incouraging word is this God will grant your requests for the love he bears you upon other accounts but to be sure he will do this for you you being under such a near conjunction to the Son of his Love Vnion and Communion go together 10. Are you in Christ know then that Vnion and Communion go together and is not this full of comfort As all communion is founded upon union so all union terminates in communion and the closer is the union the fuller is the communion Union with Christ is a very enriching thing it interests a person in all that Christ is or hath this is that fellowship of the Son to which the Saints are called 1 Cor. 1.9 You being in Christ his Person is yours you are his and he is yours My beloved is mine and I am his Cant. 2.16 Upon the Covenant relation God is yours upon the Mystical Vnion Christ is yours You being in Christ all his Attributes are yours his wisdome yours to guide you his power yours to protect you his mercy yours to pity you his All sufficiency yours to supply you and so in the rest As the Father in the Gospel once said to his Son * Luk. 15.31 Son thou art ever with me and all that I have is thine so saith Christ to the believing Soul thou art ever in me all that I am or have is thine Being in Christ you share with him in all his Offices hence you are Kings and (a) Omnes Christiani sant Sacerdotes quia membra unius Sacerdotis August de Civ De◠lib. 20. cap 10. Priests as he is in a spiritual and mystical notion Rev. 1.6 And hath made us Kings and Priests unto God c. 1 Pet. 2.5 Saints are stiled an holy Priesthood and v. 9. a royal Priesthood Being in Christ you bear his name as hath been shown and you partake with him in his high Relations and Dignities he 's a Son of God so are you Joh. 20.17 I ascend to my Father and your Father he 's heir of all things Heb. 1.2 you joynt heirs with him Rom. 8.17 Being in Christ all his Merit is yours his sufferings (b) Caput membra sunt quasi una persona mystica ideo satisfactio Christi ad omnes fideles pertinet sicut ad su◠membra Aquin. 3. p. Q◠49. Art 1. satisfaction are as much to your advantage as if you had suffered and satisfied in your own persons You being in Christ all the (c) Unio haec est spiritualis illa relatio hominum ad Personam Christi quâ jus acquirunt ad omnes illas benedictiones quae ad ipso praeparantur Ames medul lib 1. cap. 26. fect 2. Fides purè docenda est quod per eum sic conglutineris ut ex te Christo fiat quasi una Persona quae non possit segregari ut cum fiduciâ dicere possis ego sum Christus h. e. Christi justitia victoria vita est mea vicissim Christus dicat Ego sum ille peccator h. e. ejus peccata mors mea sunt quia adhaeret mihi ego illi conjuncti enim sumus per fidem in unam carnem os Luther Homo cum fiduciâ possit gloriari in Christo dicere meum est quod Christus vixit egit dixit passus est mortuns est non secus quam si ego illa vixissem egissem dixissem passus essem mortuus essem sicut sponsus habet omnia quae sunt sponsae sponsa habet omnia quae sunt sponsi c. Idem blessings priviledges which he hath purchased are yours as justification atonement adoption access to God c. You being in Christ that very glory which he hath is yours see Rev. 3 2◠Joh. 17.24 Luk. 22.29 You being in Christ all the promises in him are Yea and Amen to you 2 Cor. 1.20 Gal. 3.29 You being in Christ all his victories and triumphs over enemies are yours Rev 2.26 27. Upon Union with Christ you have Vnion too with the * See Sedgw. on the Covenant p. 208. Father and the Holy Ghost In a word you being Christ's all is yours 1 Cor. 3.21 and what can be said further Is not all this enough for your comfort Here 's blessed communion flowing from a blessed union here 's partaking indeed of the fatness of the Olive upon your being ingrafted into it as 't is Rom. 11.17 Vnion secures from Condemnation 11. Are you in Christ then 't is no condemnation so the Text expresly tells you O what a ground of rejoycing is exemption from condemnation what can be sweet to him who is obnoxious to it what can be bitter to him who is secur'd against it this is the happiness of all in Christ Poor Christless Souls are condemned over and over Law and Gospel and Conscience and which is worst of all the great God condemns them but 't is not so with you who are in Christ to you 't is no condemnation You are justified here and shall be solemnly publickly declared to be so at the great day You are in Christ◠not only as the members in the head which is your Mystical Vnion but as the Debtor in the Surety which is your Legal Vnion Christ's payment and satisfaction is yours and God will not fall upon him and you too for payment The Wife under covert is not liable to an arrest or action at Law but all must fall upon her Husband You being married to Christ this supersedes the process of the Law against you if it be not fully satisfied it must seek its reparation at the hands of your spiritual Husband Christ himself as to any condemnatory charge it cannot fall upon you Amongst all the damned in Hell there 's not one in Christ to be found that 's no place for such as are limbs of him And to shut up all upon this Vnion 't is not onely No condemnation but 't is also certain salvation 1 Joh. 5.12 He that hath the Son hath life Joh. 14.19 Because I live ye shall live also Christ the Head is in Heaven and where he is there he will have
Jesus is as much as (b) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Occumenius Lex Spiritus vitae i. e. gubernatio Spiritus vitalis quem suppeditat Christus non solum admonens nos exemplo mortis suae ad charitatis opera perficienda sed etiam operans illam in cordibus nostris Oecolamp by Christ Jesus the Spirit is given and doth work as a regenerating Spirit or the Spirit of life according to the will and good pleasure of Christ 4. (c) In Christo Jesu quia non datur nisi his qui sunt in Christo Jesu Aquin. As this Spirit is given onely to those who are in Christ Men out of Christ have nothing to do with it his Members are onely its Temples without the Spirit there 's no Vnion and without the Vnion there 's no Spirit As the Member doth not participate of the Animal Spirit but as 't is united to the Head so a man doth not participate of the blessed quickening Spirit of God but as he is united to Christ but these things will be more largely insisted upon when I come to the ninth and tenth Verses Now the Words which I am opening mainly point to this what is it which is in Christ Jesus why 't is the Spirit it self therefore (d) Placet supplementum qui ut referatur ad Spiritum in Graeco subaudiatur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quasi scriptum sit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Piscat So Erasm Some also would have an Article inserted here to make the reference to the Spirit more clear thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. Then as to the Third and Last thing the Law of the Spirit that too is in Christ Jesus Thus that mighty power which the Spirit at any time doth exert in the work of Regeneration it is conveyed to a person and doth take hold of him in Christ Jesus that is in and through Christ viz. as this effectual Operation of the Spirit is grounded upon Christ's purchase and is put forth in pursuance of Christ's redeeming love This is a truth which might be largely opened but I fear I have been too long already upon the clearing up of this Branch of the Text And yet I cannot omit to tell you that there 's One reference more which * Quamquam nihil vetat quin illa verba 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 construantur cum verba sequente 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Piscat in Schol. Some do mention as this in Christ Jesus may refer to and be joyned with the Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hath made free Then the Sense would be this 't is by Christ that Saints are made free from Sin and Death whatever spiritual freedome Believers have they owe it all to Christ he hath the great hand in it as the Efficient and meritorious Cause thereof But this I 'le pass by because though it be a thing unquestionably true yet the generally received pointing of the Words will not admit it to be here intended I have now finished the Explicatory part the difficulty of the Words and the different Expositions put upon them all of which may be useful though all are not so pertinent and proper must be my Excuse for my being so redious and prolix upon it Having given you their proper sense and monning I should next draw out those Doctrinal Truths which are contained in them but that I shall not do at present Onely there 's One of them which I shall mention and briefly close with How the Spirit of God is the Spirit of Life 't is this The Holy and Blessed Spirit is the Spirit of Life so he is here expresly stiled the Law of the Spirit of Life Which Words are applied to the Witnesses Rev. 11.11 where 't is said of them that the Spirit of Life from God entred upon them but yet know though 't is the same words yet 't is not the same sense For by the Spirit of Life as applied to the Witnesses nothing is meant but their civil living again in their restunration to their former Power Office Liberties of Service c. but when 't is applied to the Great Spirit of God it carries a quite other and much higher sense in it What 's that why it notes his living in himself and also his being the Cause of Life to the Creature He 's the Spirit of Life 1. Formally 2. Effectively or Causally A few words to each 1. First as to the Formal Notion The Spirit of God is the Spirit of Life as he is a living Spirit as he lives in himself or hath life in himself For as the Father hath life in himself and hath given to the Son to have life in himself Joh 5.26 so the Spirit hath life in himself also And 't is not an ordinary or common life which the Spirit lives but 't is the self same life which the Father and the Son do live he being truly God lives the same increated infinite independent blessed life which the two Other Persons do * Genitivus Hebraico more pro Epitheto ponitur Calvin Est Genitivus Epitheti loco Estius Expositors generally observe that Life when 't is here joyned with the Spirit is not to be taken Substantive but Adjective 't is according to the Hebrew I diome where when two Substantives are put together the Latter of which is in the Genitive Case that is to be rendred as an Adjective or as an Epithete of the Former as the Bread of life is living bread the Water of life is living water the Glory of Grace is glorious Grace c. so here the Spirit of life is the living Spirit Theophylact joyning this Life with the Law going before saith this is spoken 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as if the Law of Life was set in opposition to the Law of Sin and Death but Life is not to be joyned with the Law but with the Spirit himself 2. Secondly the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of life Effectively or Causally He is a quickening a life-bestowing or life-working Spirit in the Creature he makes Sinners to live and is the spring of that heavenly and supernatural life which is in the gracious Soul As he hath life in Himself so he communicates it to Others he is not onely a living Spirit but he is also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a quickening Spirit And this is One of his great acts namely to quicken he 's the Spirit of * 2 Cor. 3.17 liberty and he 's also the Spirit of life he 's a teaching inlightning convincing strengthening comforting purifying Spirit and he 's also an enlivening and quickening Spirit And as the Father and the Son live in themselves and quicken * Joh. 5.21 whom they will so the Holy Ghost too hath life in himself and quickens whom he will as he is said to divide gifts to every one severally even as he will 1 Cor. 12.11 The Spirit is * Oecumen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the
and the world was made by him and the world knew him not Eph. 3.9 c. Who created all things by Jesus Christ by him not as an instrument but as a social or coordinate cause Col. 1.16 17 By him were all things created that are in heaven and that are in earth visible and invisible whether they be Thrones or Dominions or Principalities or Powers All things were created by him and for him And he is before all things and by him all things consist Heb. 1.2 By whom also he made the worlds Now could Christ have thus cooperated with the Father in the Creation and yet not have a being before his incarnation which was so long after the Creation Joh. 1.15 John bare witness of him and cryed saying This was he of whom I spake He that cometh after me is preferred before me for he was before me how was Christ before John Baptist if he did then only exist when he was born for in reference to that John Baptist was before Christ he being born before him Joh. 17.5 And now O Father glorifie thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was mark the latter words with the glory which I had with thee before the world was Phil. 2.6 Who being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 subsisting existing in the form of God c. Joh. 16.28 I came forth from the Father and am come into the world again I leave the world and go to the Father Joh. 6.62 What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before in respect of his Divine Nature or as he was the Son of God Do not these Scriptures sufficiently evince that Christ had a Being before he was Incarnate the drawing forth of their full strength and the answering of the several Cavils and Evasions of the Adversaries about them would fill up a Volume the Learned know where and by * See Arnold Catech. Racov Major de Personâ Christi p. 187. c. Hoorneb Socin Conf. Tom. 2. de Christo cap. 1. Calovius Socin Proflig de Filio Dei controv 1. But especially Placei Disput de Argum. quibus efficitur Christum prius fuisse quà m in utero Beatae Virginis secundum carnem conciperetur This is fully and learnedly discoursed of by Dr. Pearson on the Creed Art 2. p. 213. to p. 237. Whom both of these are fully done This Sending of Christ therefore speaks his existence before he assumed flesh he must have an antecedent Being otherwise he would not have been capable of being * Necesse est ut qui mittitur existat priusquam mittatur fatente Enjedino Calov Socin Proflig p. 183. sent And he was first sent and then incarnate his Mission being antecedent to his incarnation though this be dony'd by the †Misit à se per virtutem Spiritus Sancti genitum ex matte suâ natum ad virilem aetatem perductum non adhuc generandum oriturum quod dictu ipso absonum est Scripturae planè dissonum Slichting Enemies with whom we have to do for God sent him that is appointed that he should assume the bumane nature and this is his being sent in the likeness of sinful flesh as a judicious Expositor descants upon the words Of Christ's Personality 2. Secondly this Sending of Christ speaks his Personality He did not only exist before he took flesh but he existed as a Person he had his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wherein the notion of a Divine Person consists his manner of subsistence distinct from the subsistence of the Father and of the Holy Ghost but this explication of Christ's being a Person more properly belongs to the next head Here I say Christ was a Person by which I mean he was not a thing quality dispensation or manifestation as some fondly and dangerously speak but he was and is a Person having a proper personal subsistence And he must be so or else he could not be the Subject of this Sending 'T is very true God may be said to send or give that which is but manifestative as he sends his Gospel which yet is not a person but only a manifestation of his Will Grace Love Wisdom c. But now in Christ there is something more than bare sending even that which will amount to the proving of him to be nothing less than a Person For he is sent to be incarnate to take the likeness of sinful flesh upon him now a bare Quality or Manifestation are under an utter incapacity of being thus or doing thus who will be so absurd as to assert such a thing If Christ be sent by God the Father and upon that doth assume flesh then certainly he was a Person for none but a Person could do this had the Apostle only said that God sent Christ the Truth in hand had not been so evident at leastwise from this Text but when he adds he sent him in the likeness of sinful flesh this undeniably proves his personality 3. Thirdly it notes the distinction that is betwixt the Father and Christ Which appears not only as One is the Father and the Other is the Son though that evidently infers a distinction for the same Person in the same respects cannot be Father and Son too cannot beget and be begotten too but also as the * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiphan adv Haeres p. 740. See Gerhard Loc. Com. tom 1. cap. 6. p. 263. de personali Filii a Patre S. S. distinctione One sends and the Other is sent The Father and the Son are One in Nature and Essence with respect to which he saith †Joh. 10.30 I and my Father are One yet they are ‖ Una est Patris Filii Spiritus Sancti Essentia in quâ non est aliud Pater aliud Filius aliud Spiritus Sanctus quamvis Personaliter sit alius Pater alius Filius alius Spiritus Sanctus Fulgent lib. 1. de Fid. Ecce dico alium esse Patrem alium Filium alium Spiritum Sanctum Male accepit idiotes quisque aut perversus hoc dictum quasi diversitatem sonet ex diversitate separationem pretendat Patris Filii Spiritus Ter tul adv Praâ—eam Of the distinction of the three Divine Persons See Dr. Cheynel of the Trin-unity c. 7. p. 181 c. et 227. to 248. distinct Persons The number and distinction of the Persons in the Trinity is usually taken notice of by Diviâ—â—s from this Scripture The Apostle faith Theophylact had spoken of the Spirit in the former Verse in this he speaks of the Father and of the Son 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tenching the Trinity And saith * Ex his verbis apparet Divinarum Personarum in Sanctâ Triade Numerus Distinctio Pet. Martyr from these words the number and distinction of the Persons in the holy Trinity doth appear Which great Truth is also frequently
which might be as useful in order to Information as the two Former were in order to Exhortation and Consolation Something hath been spoke for the opening of the Nature and Grounds of Christ's being sent but as to the determination or close application of that to his Person wherein we have to do with Jews and Infidels little hath been spoken I mean in that way and method which is proper to those Opposers of Christ and Christianity Here therefore I should lay down and make good these two Propositions 1. That that Jesus in whom we Christians believe even He who was born of the Virgin Mary suffered under Pontius Pilate was crucified dead and buried and rose again c. I say this Jesus was the very Person whom God sent and consequently that he was the Shiloh or Messias prophesied of 2. That this Jesus was so sent by God to be the true and only Messiah as that besides and after him no other Person is to be expected in that nature or quality to be sent by God Now though these be two as weighty and as Fundamental Truths to us Christians as Christians as any whatsoever and though I could not hope to reach the great Enemies of the Gospel so as to fasten any conviction upon them yet probably I might in the pursuing of this Argument reach some weak Christians so as to confirm stablish them in the belief of these great Truths yet I shall not at present engage in the discussing of these two Propositions First because in so great Points 't is better to say nothing then not to speak fully and throughly to them which if I could other Discouragements being removed hope to do yet here in this place without making the Work in hand too vast and big to be sure I could not Secondly because however pertinent this Undertaking might be to some other Texts to that which I am upon it would not be so pertinent where the Apostles drift and design is not so much in opposition to Jews and Infidels to assert that Christ was the very Person sent of God as to assign for the Comfort of Believers the Way and Course which God took to bring about their Salvation when upon the terms of the Law it was impossible namely he sent his own Son c The Text therefore not tying me to it I may wave it I shall have work enough to go over what the proper and immediate Sense of the Contents of this Chapter will lead me to and therefore I may well cut off what is of a more remote and forraign Consideration So that this shall suffice for the First Observation Christ was sent and sent by God the Father ROM 8.3 God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh c. CHAP. XI Of Christ's being the Natural and Eternal Son of God The Second Observation spoken to Of Christ's being God's Son How his Sonship is attested in Scripture Of his being God's own Son That opened as he is considered both relatively and absolutely That He is the Natural Son of God coaequal coessential coaeternal with the Father is asserted and proved by sundry Scriptures The true Notion and Ground of Christ's Sonship vindicated against the Socinians Where 't is made good against them that He is not the Son of God 1. in respect of his miraculous Conception Nor 2. of his extraordinary Sanctification Nor 3. of his Resurrection Nor 4. of the Dignity and Advancement of his Person Nor 5. of the Father's Special Love to him Nor 6. of Adoption Nor 7. of his Likeness to God But he is the Son of God in respect of his participation of his Father's Essence and of his eternal Generation Some Others besides Socinians somewhat concern'd in this Controversie Of the different communication of the Divine Essence from the Father to the Son and to the Holy Ghost Use 1. In which by way of Inferenee 't is shown 1. That Christ is God 2. That he is a very great and glorious Person 3. That the work of Redemption was an high and costly Work Use 2. Christians from hence are exhorted 1. To study Christ in this Relation as God's own Son Some Directions given about that 2. To believe him and on him as Such 3. To honour and adore Christ 4. To admire the greatness of God's Love Use 3. To draw forth the Comfort wrapp'd up in this Relation of Christ I Proceed to the Third General observed in the Words 2. Observ Christ God's Son and his own Son the Description of the Person sent he is described by his near and special Relation to God as being God's own Son From whence the Second Observation will be this That the Lord Jesus the Person sent by God as you have heard was his Son yea his own Son 1 Joh. 4.14 We have seen and do testifie that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world Here Two things are to be spoken to 1. Christ was God's Son 2. He was God's own Son 1. First Christ was God's Son He was truly the Son of man but not only the Son of man for he was also the Son of God and he was as truly the latter as the former In reference to his Humane Nature he is stiled the * Gen. 3.15 Seed of the Woman the †Gal. 3.16 Seed of Abraham the ‖ Matth. 1.1 Son of David the * Isa 11.1 Jer. 23.5 6. Zech. 6.12 branch of the root of Jesse the Son of man in reference to his Divine Nature he is stiled the Son of God This Relative Appellation or Title is so frequently apply'd to Christ that if I should cite the several Texts where it occurs I must transcribe a great part of the New Testament Several attestations of Christ's Sonship Yet it will not be amiss to take notice of the several attestations there upon record to this great Truth As that of John Baptist Joh. 1.34 I saw and bare record that this is the Son of God That of Nathanael Joh. 1.49 Rabbi thou art the Son of God That of Peter Matth. 16.16 Thou art Christ the Son of the living God That of the Centurion Matth. 27.54 Truly this was the Son of God That of the Eunuch Acts 8.37 I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God That of Martha Joh. 11.27 Yea Lord I believe that thou art the Christ the Son of God which should come into the world The Devils themselves witnessed to it Matth. 8.29 they cryed out saying What have we to do with thee Jesus thou Son of God Mark 3.11 Vnclean Spirits when they saw him fell down before him and cryed saying Thou art the Son of God Christ himself even when he was speaking to God the Father often asserted and pleaded his Sonship And the Father himself in a most solemn and open manner attested it First at Christ's Baptism Matt. 3.17 Lo a voice from heaven saying This is my beloved Son in whom I
am well pleased and then at his Transfiguration Matth. 17.5 Behold a voice out of the cloud which said This is my beloved Son The Apostle 1 Joh. 5.7 8. speaks of the Witness of Heaven and of Earth There are three that bear record in heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one And there are three that bear witness in earth the Spirit and the Water and the Blood and these three agree in one Now what is the thing which they bear witness to 't is Christ's Sonship for that is instanc'd in as to the First and Supream Witness Vers 9. If we receive the witness of men the witness of God is greater For this is the witness of God which he hath testified af his Son You see how fully this Truth is attested and how abundantly God was pleas'd to clear it up in the first promulgation of the Gospel it being the great thing necessary to be known and believed Indeed the Jews as to the Body of them had a vail before their eyes so that they could not discern this near relation of Christ to God they saw the Son of man but they did not see the Son of God they went no higher than * Matth. 13.55 56. Is not this the Carpenters Son is not his mother called Mary and his brethren James and Joses and Simon and Judas and his sisters are they not all with us * Joh. 6.42 Is not this Jesus the Son of Joseph whose Father and Mother we know how is it then that he saith I came down from heaven Nay when Christ plainly and boldly told them that he was the Son of God they could not bear it Joh. 10.33 For a good work we stone thee not but for blasphemy and because that thou being a man makest thy self God you may know what they meant by this by Christ's reply Vers 36. Say ye of him whom the Father hath sanctified and sent into the world Thou blasphemest because I said I am the Son of God Nay they were so offended at it that for this very thing they took away his life Joh. 19.7 The Jews answered him we have a Law and by our Law he ought to die because he made himself the Son of God You have a full account of it Mark 14.61 to 65. Again the High Priest asked him and said unto him Art thou the Christ the Son of the Blessed And Jesus said I am c. Then the High Priest rent his cloaths and said What need we any further witnesses Ye have heard the blasphemy what think ye and they all condemned him to be guilty of death Thus the eyes of that people were then and O that they were not so still so blinded that they could not perceive Christ to be the Son of God but the Lord hath given sufficient evidence thereof to all who do not willfully shut their eyes upon the light 'T is a Truth out of all question to us who are called Christians yet about the Nature and Manner of Christ's Sonship there are some unhappy Controversies rais'd amongst us 2. Secondly Christ was God's own Son so 't is here signanter God sending hîs own Son I have told you in the Original 't is * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Son of himself or his ‖ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 proper Son as 't is Vers 32. God is Christ's proper Father 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 5.18 and Christ here is God's proper Son 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He is not barely a Son but a Son in a special and peculiar manner God's own Son This being a Truth of very high import a most Fundamental Point I will endeavour first to explain and prove it and then to vindicate and make good its true and genuine Notion against Opposers Our Lord Jesus Christ is God's own Son whether you consider him comparatively and relatively I mean How Christ is God's own Son in reference to other Sons or absolutely as he is in Himself abstractly considered from all Other Sons God hath three sorts of Sons By Creation by Grace by Nature 1. Consider him Comparatively And so he is thus stiled to difference or distinguish him from all Other Sons For God hath three sorts of Sons 1. Some are so by Creation or in respect of their immediate Creation by God so the Angels are the Sons of God of whom Divines commonly interpret those passages in Job Chap. 1.6 There was a day when the Sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord Chap. 38.7 When the morning Stars sang together and all the Sons of God shouted for joy So Adam upon this account he being immediately made by God is called the Son of God Luke 3.38 2. Some are the Sons of God by Grace viz. the Grace of Regeneration and Adoption thus Believers are the Sons of God as they are spiritually begotten of him and adopted by him Joh. 1.12 13. As many as received him to them gave he power to become the Sons of God c. which were born not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man but of God Jam. 1.18 Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth c. Gal. 4.3 To redeem them that were under the Law that we might receive the adoption of Sons Eph. 1.5 Having predestinated us unto the adoption of Chrildren by Jesus Christ to himself according to the good pleasure of his will Rom. 8.14 As many as are led by the Spirit of God they are the Sons of God Gal. 3.26 Ye are all the Children of God by Faith in Christ Jesus 1 Joh. 5.1 Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him Then 3. in contradistinction to these there is God's own Son or his Son by Nature one that is a Son of another rank and Order than the former in this respect God hath but One Son namely Christ True Believers are his Sons which speaks the exuberancy of Divine Love towards them * 1 Joh. 3.1 â—â— Behold what manner of Love the Father hath bestowed upon us that we should be called the Sons of God! therefore Christ owns them for his Brethren Heb. 2.11 Both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one for which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren and Vers 17. In all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren But yet they are not Sons as Christ is his Sonship and theirs are of a very different nature differing no less than specifically Upon which account he sometimes appropriates the paternal relation in God unto himself Luke 10.22 All things are delivered to me of my Father c. Joh. 14.2 In my Fathers house are many mansions And elsewhere he distinguishes 'twixt God as being his Father and as being the Father of Believers Joh. 20.17 Go to
Essential Son of God 't is the very Title which they prefix before some of their Treatises in which One would think that they did concur with us holding the same thing which we do and giving the same honour and respect to Christ which we do when in truth there 's no such thing they do but speak fraudulently according to the custom of their * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. See much of the fraud of the Arrians in this in Epiphan adv Haeres lib. 2. tom 2. p. 738 Of them Hilarius speaks to the same purpose Tribuunt Christo Dei nomen quia hoc hominibus sit tributum Fatentur Dei verè Filium quia Sacramento Baptismi verè Dei Filius unusquisque perficitur Ante tempora saecula confitentur quod de Angelis Diabolis non est negandum Ita Domino Christo sola illa tribuuntur quae sunt vel Angelorum propria vel nostra Caeterum quod Deo Christo legitimum verum est Christus Deus verus i.e. eadem esse Filii quae Patris Divinitas denegatur Contra Auxent Mediolan old Predecessors for here 's the Fallacy they me an by all this nothing more than that Christ was the Son of God in regard of his wonderful Conception and Nativity by the Virgin Mary But to pass by their frauds let us come to the thing We say Christ's filiation or Sonship was grounded upon something of a far higher nature than this that he was the Son of God antecedently to it even from all eternity they ground his Sonship upon it only making it but then to commence when he was begotten by the holy Ghost conceived and born by the Virgin Against which dangerous Opinion we argue thus 1. If Christ's Sonship did result from this as the true and proper ground of it then the * Vide Stegm Photin Dip. 16. p. 180. Arnold Catech Racov. major p. 176. Holy Ghost the third Person should rather be intituled the Father of Christ than the First Person because that effect which was the foundation of Christ's Sonship was more immediately produced by him than by the First Person But this is notoriously false for all along in the whole current of the Word Christ is brought in as the Son of the Father and as standing in this relation to the Father and not to the Spirit 2. Christ himself never resolves his Sonship into his miraculous Conception or Birth You find him sometimes professedly treating upon it and giving the world ' an account about it what doth he then ground it upon why he carry's it up to his doing what the Father did Joh. 5.19 to his quickning whom he will even as the Father doth Joh. 5.21 to his having life in himself as the Father hath life in himself Joh. 5.26 to his being one with the Father Joh. 10.30 to his being in the Father and his Father in him Joh. 10.38 He doth not at all mention his miraculous Conception which in all probability he would have done if that had been the proper Ground of his Sonship but he insists altogether upon things tending to the proof of his participating of his Fathers Nature and Essence and by them he designs to make out his Sonship yea and that it was such a Sonship as did render him equal with his Father but this he could not have done either with truth or evidence had he been only the Son of God upon what is here pretended 3. Though Christ's Conception and temporal Generation was very wonderful yet that did but reach to his Flesh or Humane Nature and there terminate Now the Scripture doth not place his great Sonship in his Humane but in his Divine Nature therefore as to that it speaks him to be the * Qui factus est ex semine David secundum carnem hic erit Homo Filius Hominis qui declarandus est Filius Dei secundum Spiritum Sanctificationis hic erit Deus sermo Dei Filius Tertul. adv Praxean Torquetur frustra locus Luc. 1.35 c. A nuda enim conceptione nativitate Carnis ex Virgine manavit non Filii Dei sed Filii hominis appellatio Quod verò Angelus porrò affirmat illud est hâc Filiatione non obstante etiam vocandum Filium Dei adhibitâ exactè particulâ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ad conciliandam utramque Filii Hominis Filii Dei uni Christo tribuendam appellationem per communicationem idiomatum c. Cloppenb Ant. Smalc p. 71. Son and Seed of David or the Son of Man in contradistinction to his being the Son of God And his Sonship to God cannot be grounded upon that which was the ground of his Sonship to Man for where the Sonships are so different they must needs have different Grounds and foundations Pray let these two Texts be well weighed and they will sufficiently prove what I say Rom. 1.3.4 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord who was made of the seed of David according to the flesh and declared to be the Son of God with Power according to the Spirit of Holiness by the resurrection from the Dead Rom. 9.5 Whose are the Fathers and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came who is over all God blessed for ever The sum of all Christ hath two Natures according to which two Natures he hath two distinct Sonships he is the Son of God and he is the Son of Man these different Sonships must have different causes grounds therefore his Conception upon which he was the Son of Man cannot make him also to be the Son of God 4. As to the Text alledg'd by our Adversaries to prove their Opinion there 's a double Answer commonly given to it 1. The particle therefore in it is not causal but illative 'T is not brought in as signifying the Ground of Christ's Sonship but as a note of inference wherein something is inferr'd from what went before The Angel had told Mary that the Holy Ghost should come upon her and the power of the Highest should overshadow her and then adds therefore also the Holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God therefore what may be the force of this word in this place 't is a meer deduction drawn from the premises to this effect Since such a thing shall be done by the Holy Ghost therefore according to what was prophesied Christ shall be called the Son of God The words plainly refer to the prophesie Isa 7 14. Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign Behold a Virgin shall conceive and bear a Son and shall call his name Immanuel The Evangelist brings them in expresly in that reference Matth. 1.21 22 23. And she shall bring forth a Son and thou shalt call his name Jesus for he shall save his people from their sins Now all this was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the Prophet saying Behold a
proper Son of God but how why not only as he was eternally begotten by him but also as he was miraculously Conceived by the Virgin Mary that agreeing to none but only to him And therefore in this Point upon their blending of these things together they are judged by Some * See Peltius Harm Remonstr Socin Art 4. to Socinianize Now though this Opinion doth come incomparably short of that which absolutely deny's Christ's eternal Generation provided that the abettors of it who seem to grant this Generation do state it right that is that they hold Christ to be begotten in the very Nature and Essence of God and therein equal to him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of which there is just matter of doubting as to the * Instit Theol. lib. 4. cap. 32. Person nam'd but now he making the Son in the Deity it self not co-ordinate but subordinate to the First Person I say though this Opinion thus stated be nothing neer so bad as the former yet †Censura Profess Leid in c. 3. p. 51. Trigland in Exam. Apâ—log cap. 5. Alting Theol. Elenc p. 151. c. et p. 181. c. Divines of another persuasion cannot close with it or let it pass without some Confutation The Arguments against it do very much fall in with those which have been insisted upon already 1. First if Christ be the Son of God as eternally begotten with respect to his Divine Nature and also the Son of God as conceived in time c. with respect to his Humane Nature then the Scripture doth groundlesly and needlesly distinguish betwixt his being the Son of God in reference to the one and his being the Son of Man in reference to the other Nature Why doth it make him to be * Rom. 1.3 4. God's Son according to the Spirit of Holiness i. e. his Divine Nature and the Son of David according to the Flesh i. e. his Humane Nature if with respect to both he be the Son of God this is to confound those things which the Scripture makes distinct and places under several references Christ's Sonships as the Son of God and as the Son of Man are two very different things and therefore they cannot have the same foundation 'T is true he who is the Son of Man is also the Son of God but as he is the Son of Man or in what is proper to him as the Son of Man so he is not the Son of God And 't is true these two in concreto may convertibly be predicated each of the other thus the Son of God is the Son of Man and the Son of Man is the Son of God but this is founded not upon the oneness of the foundation of the Relation nor upon the oneness of the two Natures but upon the * Inficiamur Christum esse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. quamvis propter Naturam Humanam personae divinae hypostaticè unitam dicamus etiam in concreto hunc hominem Jefum Deum ac Filium Dei unigenitum esse per communicationem idiomatum c. Cloppenb Comp. Socin p. 38. communication of properties and the union of the two Natures in one Person It comes to this where the relations are distinct the grounds of these relations must be distinct and therefore Christ's Sonship as the Son of God and as the Son of Man being distinct there cannot be one and the same ground of them 2. If this was so that Christ was the Son of God conjunctly upon his eternal Generation and also upon his conception and advancement in time then he would strangely differ in the same relation I do not contradict my self in what I said but now under the former head for there I spake of both the Sonships of Christ which differ very much and must not be confounded but here I speak only of his single Sonship as he is the Son of God which is but one and must not be divided Observe me as the difference of the Sonships of Christ as the Son of God and as the Son of Mary depends upon the difference of their Grounds eternal Generation being the ground of the one and temporal Generation being the ground of the ooher so the oneness of the same single Sonship of Christ as the Son of God depends upon the oneness of the ground of it viz. his Generation by the Father for if you add any other ground to this then Christ ceases to be one Son then he is the Son of God partly by Nature and partly by Grace partly begotten and partly made partly from eternity and partly in time what a strange Son would Christ be upon these terms 3. There can be but one true and proper Cause of one and the same Filiation this hath been already proved Divines are so tender of multiplying this relation of Christ that several of them though they grant the distinction of his Natures and hold his twofold Generation yet they argue but for one Sonship to belong to him for say they Sonship belonging to the Person and being founded upon the Person Christ being but one Person therefore he can have but one Sonship so * 3. p. Quest 35. Art 5. in corpore Art Aquinas argues I concur with †See Durandus Rada c. Junius Martinius Amesius in Hoorneb Socin Conf. tom 2. de Christo c. 1. p. 30 31 32. Others who attribute a twofold Sonship to Christ but then I affirm that each of them have but that one single Cause or foundation which is respectively proper to them 't is only eternal Generation of the Father which makes Christ to be the Son of God and 't is only temporal Generation of the Virgin which makes him to be the Son of Man 4. We say Oppositorum opposita ratio if Christ be the Son of Man only because he was conceived of the substance of his Mother then he is the Son of God only upon the account of his being begotten of the substance of his Father as a * Dr O. ag B. p. 179. Worthy Author argues 5. Whatever is over and above eternal Generation is but manifestative and not constitutive of Christ's Sonship this hath been made out in the several particulars alleadg'd therefore it will be needless to add any thing further upon it I have shown wherein and how Christ is the Son of God his own proper Son I 'le but propound one Question and very briefly Answer it and then I shall have finish'd the Explicatory part 'T is this if Christ be God's Son because in his ineffable Generation the Divine Essence was communicated to him Quest. Of the different Communication of the Divine Essence from the Father to the Son and to the holy Ghost Answ why may not the Holy Ghost the third Person also be stiled the Son of God to whom the same Essence was communicated as well as unto Christ I answer No for two Reasons 1. Because 't is the same Essence in
as may be suitable to his Nature and Relation as he is the infinite God and the eternal only begotten Son of God and what Honour can be high enough for such a Person But more particularly there 's a twofold Honour which you must all give to Christ 1. The Honour of Worship Heb. 1.6 When he bringeth in the first-born into the world he saith And let all the Angels of God worship him God will have his only begotten Son to be worshipped though he be very tender to whom that honour is given Divines do from hence strongly argue yet I know * Remonstr Apolog Cap. 2. 16. Episcop Inst Theolog. lib. 4. sect 2. cap. 34. 35. Some make but little of this Argument to prove the Godhead of Christ thus if religious Worship be God's peculiar if a God be the sole and adaequate object of Divine Worship if no Creature be to share with him therein it being that Glory which he will not give to another Isa 42.8 Matth. 4.10 Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him only shalt thou serve and yet the Father will have Christ to be the proper Object of divine Worship hence it follows that then he is and must be more than meer Man that he is true and very God And surely it would be no better than flat Idolatry in us Christians to give proper and formal religious worship to Christ was he not truly God as well as truly Man Therefore as to this Franciscus David and Christianus Franken both Socinians were in the right against Socinus if Christ was but meer Man the common Principle in which they all agreed then he could not be worshipped with religious Worship without Idolatry whereupon they would not give any such worship to him And as this Worship proves Christ's Godhead so his Godhead is the * Of this see Zanch. de tribus Elohim l. 3 c. 12. Junius Def. Trinit contra Samosat Profess Leid Cens cap. 16. Voetius de Adorat Christi Cheynel Trin-unity very largely p. 334. c. Dr. Stillingfleet of the Idolatry of the c. chap. 2. p. 112 113 114. ground of it for the adaequate immediate proper ground of Divine Worship as attributed to Christ is his divine Nature Essence and Sonship true he as Man is to be worshipped but not because he is Man the Humane Nature of Christ is the Object of Worship but 't is only as 't is taken into Personal Vnion with the Divine As he is Mediator and set in such an Office he is to be worshipped but this is not the proper and fundamental reason thereof for though he never had been Mediator yet Worship would have been due to him as the Father and Spirit are to be worshipped though the Office of Mediator belongs not to them Further the Lord Jesus as he in our Nature hath done such great and excellent things for us is to be worshipped yet this is only a forcible motive and inducement thereunto not the proper ground of it it remains then that the alone reason of Worship given or done to Christ is his being God and the co-equal co-essential Son of God And he being so what an obligation doth this lay upon you to worship him there 's inward worship consisting in the trust fear reverence adoration of the heart there 's outward worship consisting in attendance upon and due observance of Gospel-institutions as Prayer Hearing the Word c in both of these respects let Christ be worshipped by you both are due to him as he is God's own Son Well may you tender your homage to him in this way when Angels themselves bow before him and worship at his throne 2. Secondly there 's the Honour of Obedience which you must also give to Christ This is annexed to the declaration of his Sonship at the same time in which the Father attested that Christ was his Son he enjoyned obedience and subjection to him * Matth 17.5 This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased what follows hear ye him this hearing of Christ is the Creatures obeying of him in all his holy Laws Commands and Institutions and so 't is as if God had said here 's a Person whom I own for my Son in a special and peculiar way whom therefore I have set as * Psal 2.6 my King upon my holy Hill of Sion into whose hands I have put †Matth. 28.18 all power upon whose shoulders I have laid the ‖ Isa 9.7 Government therefore I charge you to hear him and to yield all Obedience and Subjection to him O Sirs 't is God himself and not such a poor worm as I who requires this of you it must be Reverence and it must be Obedience too this high relation of Christ calls for both and believe it without this Obedience he that is God's Son will never be your Saviour for Heb. 5.9 Being made perfect he became the author of eternal Salvation unto all them and to none but them that obey him I have spoken much to press believing on this Son upon you but let me add there must be obeying of him as well as believing on him Obedience is not so of the very essence of Faith but that Faith may very well be defin'd without it yet 't is an inseparable Adjunct or Consequent or fruit of Faith and these two do alwayes concur in the Subject though they be different in themselves and have a different influence upon justification and salvation But that which I aim at is this since Christ is the Son of God and this is clearly revealed to you since this Son hath made known to you in the holy Gospel what his Will and pleasure is how he would have you to live what to do what to shun I beseech you now hearken to him comply with him in all his excellent Commands give up your selves in an universal subjection to his blessed Laws let there be an obediential frame of heart to his whole Will this is indeed to honour him and to honour him in such a way as best answers his Sonship to God and his Lordship over you 4. Branch of the Exhortation To adore the Love of God 4. Fourthly is Christ no lower a Person than God's own Son what cause have we then to admire and wonder at the greatness of God's Love in his sending of him Here 's a glass indeed to transmit and represent unto us the Love of God O how shall we get our hearts affected with it what thankfulness in us can bear any proportion to the mercy before us For God to send to send a Son such a Son in such a manner as follows in the words here 's the Wonder of Wonders God never did the like before and hee 'l never do the like again and blessed be his name there is no need he should 'T would have been admirable mercy if God would have sent some other person upon this errand to redeem
and undefiledness by sin so they did agree He says his Father had prepared him a body Heb. 10. 5. now if the holy God in such a wonderful and immediate manner for such high and glorious ends will prepare him a body to be sure it shall be an holy body and such an one as shall be proper for the attaining of those ends which only an holy body was 'T was indeed upon our account and Christ's putting himself into our stead a passible and mortal body and so far like to sinful flesh but had it not been for that it had neither suffer'd nor dy'd In the Second respect so the whole Humane Nature in Christ was * Habuit Natura Humana quam Christus suscepit speciem peccati non tamen ea revera peccato contaminari potuit P. Martyr sinless He was true and very man but not in the least sinful man he was made man for the sin of man but yet was man without the sin of man That Nature which is so sadly depraved vitiated corrupted in us in him had its primitive original purity and holiness Sin was not so essential or so inseparably twisted into it but that God knew how to separate 'twixt the Nature it self and the deordination of it Christ took the one but not the other The Humane Nature is made up of soul and body both of these in Christ were unstained not having the least macula or spot of sin cleaving to them as 't was an unpolluted undefiled body so 't was also a pure holy spotless Soul The Humane Nature too is attended with such * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. vide Oecum in loc p. 301. affections and such †Particeps factus est infirmitatis non iniquitatis Aug. Trahens de homine mortalitatem non insquitatem Id. tom 3. 〈◊〉 1072. infirmities to all of which Christ submitted so far as they were sinless but no further as to the former he had Anger Sorrow Joy Compassion Love but without the least stain or tincture of sin as to the latter he underwent hunger thirst pain c. but yet under all he was without sin he could suffer but he did not nay he could not sin Hence he 's called God's holy one Psal 16.10 the holy Child Jesus Act. 4.27 the most holy Dan. 9.27 Jesus Christ the righteous 1 Joh. 2.1 God's righteous servant Isa 53.11 He was a Lamb without blemish and without spot 1 Pet. 1.19 holy harmless undefiled separate from sinners Heb. 7.26 't is said of him he did no sin 1 Pet. 2.22 he knew no sin 2 Cor. 5.21 he knew it in a way of imputation for he was made sin but as to any inhesion or commission so he knew it not The Apostle saith he was tempted in all things as we are yet without sin that must alwayes be excepted Heb. 4.15 he challeng'd all his enemies which of you convinceth me of sin Joh. 8.46 He says of himself he always did the things which pleas'd his Father Joh. 8.29 and now 't is said of him in him is no sin 1 Joh. 3.5 so that upon all this it appears that 't was but the likeness of sinful flesh A threefold Holiness in Christ Christ as Man had a threefold Holiness Original Habitual Actual 1. He was Originally Holy David bitterly lamented it that he was shapen in iniquity and in sin did his mother conceive him Psal 51.5 and so 't is with every man that comes into the world in the way of common generation the very foundation of our Being is laid in sin But 't was not so with out blessed Saviour in his Conception the first framing and forming of his Humane Nature there was nothing of sin for he was therefore * Haec est similitudo carnis quia cum eadem sit caro quae nostra non tamen ita facta in utero est nata ficut caro nostra Est enim sanctificata in utero nata sine peccato neque ipse in illâ peccavit Ideo enim Virginalis uterus electus est ad pattum dominicum ut in sanctitate differret caro Dommi à carne nostrâ Ambros conceived in the Virgins Womb in an extraordinary manner by the overshadowing of the Holy Ghost that he might be preserv'd pure from the common pollution so the Angel told Mary Luk. 1.35 The holy Ghost shall come upon thee and the Power of the Highest shall overshadow thee therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God 2. He was Habitually Holy there was in his Nature nothing but an universal rectitude and conformity to the rule and pattern of holiness he had therein grace all grace nothing but grace without the least mixture of habitual corruption We bring with us into the world Natures most wofully depraved such as are a very seed-plot and seminary of all evil but our Lord Jesus had a quite other Nature one that was perfectly sanctified and not in the least tainted with sin This also was brought about by his miraculous and extraordinary formation for had he been begotten as we are his Nature had bee tainted as well as ours is that which is begotten so I would read it rather than that which is born of the flesh is flesh Joh. 3.6 Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean not one Job 14.4 The liquor will taste of the cask into which 't is put as water when it comes from the fountain may be very pure yet if it runs through a dirty pipe it will contract filth so let the Soul as it comes out of God's hands be never so pure yet upon union with the body begotten and propagated in the usual way both it and the nature of the person too will be defil'd therefore to avoid this Chirst was begotten in another way By which means he was also freed from the imputation of Adam's sin for he not descending naturally and seminally from Adam his sin was not imputed nor imputable unto him The Apostle indeed saith Heb. 2.11 Both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one i.e. of one Adam as the common root but they are not both of this one Adam in the same manner for they who are sanctified are of him and from him in a way of seminal propagation but he who sanctifieth was not so whereupon though Adam's sin be imputable and imputed to the former 't is not to the latter As according to the * Alting Theol. Problem prob 8. p. 571. Dr. Pearson on the Creed p. 365. usual illustration Levi being in the loins of Abraham paid †Heb. 7.9 10. tythes in him yet Christ who was also in the loins of Abrabam did not so all men being in the loins of Adam and carnally descended from him sinned in him and became partakers of his guilt but Christ though in some sense he might be said to be in
's no Christian who comes under the former but there are too many Christians who come under the latter As you read of some who profess that they know God but in works they deny him Tit. 1.16 so here all that own the Gospel profess they believe Christ's Incarnation but yet virtually interpretatively consequentially too many of them do no better than deny it Now for you my Brethren I assure my self I need not spend time in warning you against the denial I mean the rank and gross denial of our Lord's Manhood and Incarnation that Antichristianism I hope you will never be guilty of yet two things I would say to you 1. Get such a firm and rooted belief of this Fundamental Doctrine as that there may be no secret doubting about it no not the least doubt stirring in the mind for any doubting may by degrees by little and little work up to the full denial of it 2. That you will take heed not only of the open and direct denial of it but also of all those Opinions and Practises which may amount to a virtual implicit denial of it This minds me of something upon which I crave leave a little to digress that passes betwixt Papists Protestants the former do greatly insult upon the formentioned Texts from which they think they have enough to free the POPE in whatever notion you consider him from the charge of being Antichrist and therefore thus they argue He is Antichrist who confesses not that Christ is come in the flesh but the POPE doth confess this ergo he is not Antichrist this is one of * Vide Whittak ad Sanderi Demonstr Resp p. 765. Sanders his Demonstrations To which t is answered 1. That the Apostle in these Texts doth not define or describe the Antichrist by way of eminency him who was to come afterwards who is set forth 2 Thes 2.3 4 5 6 7 8. 1 Tim. 4.1 but some lesser Antichrists who were already risen up in the Apostles days for he saith even now there are many Antichrists 1 Joh. 2.18 This is that spirit of Antichrist whereof you have heard that it should come and even now already it is in the world 1 Joh. 4.3 2 Joh. 7. Many deceivers are entred into the world c. this is a deceiver and an Antichrist though not the Antichrist As to the grand Antichrist there was a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 about him a let and impediment in his way to be remov'd before he could come 2 Thes 2.7 but for the lesser Antichrists the praecursors of the great one they were already come And 't is probable that the Apostle in these descriptions in special-had his eye upon * Of him as to this see Cyrill Catech. 6. Simon Magus who deny'd that Christ came in true flesh The Argument then so far as 't is grounded upon these Texts only proves that his HOLINESS is none of the little Antichrists of whom John spake as already come which we readily grant for we make him to be the * Vid. Antichristi Demonstrat per Rob. Abbat great Antichrist of whom Paul spake as yet to come 2. Yet our Divines will not wholly acquit him and his party as to this Character of Antichrist for though as to words and profession they confess that Christ is come in the flesh yet implicitly and by * Quanquam P. R. corde credit ore confitetur Jesum esse Christum hoc tamen non integrè ac simplicitèr sed ex parte tantum facit dum Jesu multa detrahit quae Christo conveniunt Christum negat in carne venisse non quidem totidem verbis atque apertè sed per consequens obliquè verè tamen necessario Whittak resp ad Sanderi Dem. p. 768. Consequence they plainly deny it they maintaining those Opinions and Practices which are interpretatively opposite to Christ's incarnation As their burdening the Church with such swarms of unnecessary Ceremonies if the substance be come indeed and they believe it why do they keep up the shadow 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Najanz under the Gospel the shadows vanish the truth and substance being come Their Doctrine of * Pet. Molin in Th. Sedam vol. 1. de Transub p. 2. p. S 31. where he proves Ecclesiam Romanam destruere Naturam Humanam Christi c. Transubstantiation in effect deny's Christ's Body to be a true body for can a true body exist in puncto as they say Christs doth can it be a true body and yet not extense can it be a true body and yet be present in a thousand places at once can it be a body and yet have none of those Adjuncts which are inseparable from a body So again their invading of Christ's great Offices advancing of their own Merits Satisfactions c. with many other things which might be instanc'd in are all and each of them interpretative denyals of our Saviours being come in the Flesh Now Sirs your Religion doth not expose you to this guilt but rather highly secures you from it but take heed you do not draw some opinion or practice into it which may also make you guilty of denying implicitly the Incarnation of the Son of God But I go further 't is not enough for you not to deny this great Truth no nor just to believe it but there must be a firm believing of it a full and steady assent given to it I would assure my self that you do believe the verity of Christ's Manhood the reality of his Flesh the truth of his Incarnation but do you believe it steadily do you come up to a full assent to it are there no wavering doubting thoughts about it are you rooted stablished confirmed in the belief of it This I press'd upon you before with respect to Christ's Sonship and now I am to press it upon you with respect to his Incarnation Whence let me tell you that though the belief of this be not the main vital essential act of faith quà justifying yet 't is absolutely necessary to that which is so for there will be no fiducial reliance upon Christ's Person which is the great act of faith as justifying if antecedently there be not a firm belief of his being made Flesh O therefore see that you be fully settled in your minds as to the unquestionable verity of this great Article of the Christian Religion 'T would be sad if in our circumstances we should fluctuate about it for did all the Old-Testament-Prophesies point to it as old Zacharias tells us they did Luk. 1.70 72 73. As he spake by the mouth of his holy Prophets which have been since the world began c. To perform the mercy promised to our Fathers and to remember his holy Covenant The Oath which he sware to our Father Abraham c. in all which expressions his eye was chiefly upon the birth and incarnation of Christ and have these Prophesies received their full accomplishment and have we
himself our High-Priest is entred into Heaven the Sanctuary not made with hands and there he executes his Priestly Office after a sort for expiation and atonement also To which I reply Christ's entrance into Heaven cannot be deny'd nor that that doth much resemble what was done by the High-Priest under the Law all that being but typical of this Heb. 9.24 For Christ is not entred into the holy places made with hands which are the figures of the true but into Heaven itself now to appear in the presence of God for us And therein we have the second part of his Priesthood the oblation of himself here on earth being the first and his intercession in heaven the second which two must not be divided but conjoyn'd the former must not justle out the latter nor the latter the former Which second part of his Priesthood was necessary partly in respect of Christ himself for the compleating and consummating of his Priesthood the perfection and excellency of which depended upon it for saith the Apostle Heb. 8.4 If he were on earth he should not be a Priest i.e. not a Priest of the highest rank he would come short of the High-Priest and be but as one of the ordinary Priests if he should only offer without and after that not enter into the Sanctuary as the High-Priest did and he only And partly too in respect of Believers that he might not only make his oblation for them in order to impetration which he had done on earth but that he might further present and plead the merit of that oblation in order to application and the actual giving out the benefits purchas'd and merited thereby which was to be done in Heaven therefore this we readily grant and firmly believe But that our Lord 's whole Priesthood doth lie in this or that he only in this place and state doth expiate sin or that his resemblance herein to the High-Priest is sufficient that we utterly deny For 1. The Scripture as hath been proved in drawing the parrallel 'twixt Christ and the Law-Sacrifices doth not instance only in what was done by the High-Priest in the Holy of Holy's but also in what was done by the other Priests in the Temple and in those sacrificial acts which were proper to them as well as to him Nay 2. It mainly instances in these making the resemblance chiefly to lie in the mactation and oblation of those Sacrifices which was done without and therefore it must be Christ's death on the Cross and not his intercession in Heaven which must be meant by them 3. As that which is asserted by our Opposers would utterly destroy all analogie 'twixt Christ and those Priests and the far greatest part of Sin-expiating Sacrifices so it would in truth leave Christ no Sacrifice or oblation at all inasmuch as what he doth in Heaven cannot in any strictness or propriety of speaking come under the notion of an oblation or Sacrifice There indeed is the presenting commemorating pleading of the Sacrifice which he offer'd here on earth but that 's all he improves the Sacrifice there upon the Throne but he made it here upon the Cross he applys the expiation there but he wrought it here 4. 'T is true the High Priest entred into the Sanctuary and there expiated sin but 't was with the blood which had been shed and offered without some of that blood before offered upon the Priest's Altar he carried into the Holy of Holy's and there presented it before the Lord and so made atonement Had he gone in thither without this blood and only have shown himself before God it would have signified nothing what he there did was grounded upon the virtue of the preceding oblation which was only now in a more solemn manner represented before the Lord. Just so it is with our Lord Jesus he entred into Heaven and there intercedes as our High-Priest to his Father but the efficacy of this his intercession is founded upon his blood shed when he was here on earth take away his oblation here and take away his intercession there for 't is that which gives the efficacy and prevalency to this Therefore he 's said to enter into the holy place but how why by his own blood Heb. 9.11 he must first shed his blood here upon Earth and then carry the virtue and merit of it with him into Heaven and so he may expect to do something which upon his meer appearance in Heaven he could not have done So that there must be something in Christ's Priesthood and Sacrifice more than what is proper to him now he is above in correspondency to what was done by the High-Priest in his entring into the Holy of Holy's and there expiating sin I think if all be put together which hath been spoken upon this account the Truth which I contend for is written as with the beams of the Sun therefore I 'le say no more Of the Effect of Christ's Sacrifice viz. the condemning of sin the Second thing propounded to be spoken unto Thus I have finished the first thing propounded for the clearing of the Observation namely Christ's being a Sacrifice for sin Where I have shown that he was a Sacrifice what a kind of Sacrifice he was and when or where he was such a Sacrifice The Second thing propounded to be opened was the Effect or Efficacy of this Sacrifice viz. the condemning of sin and for sin condemned sin in the flesh In this I 'le be but very brief because it falls in with what hath been already insisted upon Here was a strange and wonderful Sacrifice the most costly one that ever was offered up to God therefore surely something that is extraordinary and great must be effected by it and so there was What was that why Sin was cut off taken out of the way as condemned persons use to be its guilt abolish'd or expiated wherein you have heard the condemning of it doth mainly consist How this is set forth by such terms as answer to the Law-Sacrifices I have already shown Heb. 1.3 When he had by himself purged our sins 1 Joh. 1.7 and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin Rev. 1.5 Vnto him that loved us and washed us from our sins in his own blood but there are some other terms by which 't is set forth which have not as yet been mentioned As namely the taking away of sin Joh. 1.29 Behold the Lamb of God that taketh away the sin of the world 1 Joh. 3.5 And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins which taking away of sin was a thing far above the power of the Levitical Sacrifices Heb. 10.4 For it is not possible that the blood of Bulls and of Goats should take away sins So also the finishing and making an end of sin Dan. 9.24 to finish the transgression and to make an end of sins where the finishing of transgression is not the filling up of its full measure
loved us He that * 2 Cor. 5.21 knew no sin was willing to be made sin †1 Pet. 2.24 to bear our sins in his own body vpon the tree to put himself in our stead yea to die in our stead for our sakes to be ‖ Phil. 2.8 obedient to death even the death of the Cross to let out his precious blood for the expiation of sin when nothing else would do it and when all Mosaical Sacrifices were weak he by a far higher Sacrifice undertook the work * Heb. 10.7 Lo I come to do thy will O God was not here love even love †Eph. 3.19 passing knowledge such high affection on his part should draw out high admiration on our part Let me here add we should so admire God and Christ as to love them and to be thankful Have they ‖ Joh. 3.16 so loved us and shall not we return love for love what monsters and prodigies shall we be if after such a manifestation of their love to us there be not reciprocation of our love to them God design'd and prepar'd the Sacrifice therefore he must have our love Christ was the Sacrifice therefore he must have our love too both deserve it both must have it Joh. 10.17 Therefore doth my Father love me because I lay down my life now doth the Father love him for this and shall not we much more did we but think of this Sacrifice and hold our hearts close to it in holy meditation surely it would cause them to love Christ Then I say be thankful yea let your whole Soul upon this go out in thankfulness be ever praising magnifying God for his unspeakable mercy in Christ your Sacrifice your Redeemer your Saviour often call upon your sluggish hearts and say Bless the Lord O my Soul and all that is within me bless his holy name Did God * Rom. 3.25 set forth Christ to be a propitiation did he †Isa 53.5 6. lay upon him the iniquities of you all was the chastisement of your peace upon him and by his stripes are you healed that guilt and wrath which would have ruin'd you for ever are they now both done away so as that they shall never hurt you did Christ die * Mediator noster puniri pro seipso non debuit quia nullum culpae contagium perpetravit Sed si ipse indebitam mortem non susciperet nunquam nos à debitâ morte liberaret Gregor l. 3. moral c. 13. that you might not die but live for ever did you sin and he suffer was the †innocent person punished that the guilty might be acquitted was sin condemned for you who deserv'd to be condemn'd for it what praise and admiration can be high enough for such things as these The JEWS in the day of atonement were to make the trumpet sound throughout their land Lev. 25.9 So we having received the atonement by Christ's Sacrifice should evermore be sounding forth the praises of the most high You reade of the Elders Rev. 5.8 c. they fell down before the Lamb having every one of them harps and golden vials full of odours which are the prayers of Saints And they sang a new son saying Thou art worthy to take the book and to open the seals thereof for thou wast slain and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood c. * Peccat iniquus punitur justus delinquit reus vapulat innocens offendit impius damnatur pius quod meretur malus patitur bonus c. Quò Nate Dei quò tua descendit humilitas quo tua flagravit charitas c. Ego iniquè egi tu poenâ mulctaris ego facinus admisi tu ultione plecteris c. Me ad illicitam concupiscentiam rapuit arbor te perfecta charitas duxit ad crucem ego praesumsi vetitum tu subiisti aculeum c. August in Quest in V. N. Testam Qu. 55. Christians why are not your harps alwayes in your hands why are not your Souls alwayes full of holy affections as the golden Vials full of odours in the remembrance of him who was slain and sacrific'd for you Christ having offered his Sacrifice we are to offer ours 8. Lastly Do you offer to God the Sacrifices proper to you as Christ offered to God the Sacrifice proper to him For expiatory Sacrifices as you need them not Christ's one Sacrifice being every way sufficient for that end so you are not able to come up to them for you can present nothing to God properly and formally expiatory yet there are other Sacrifices which you may offer up to him And though the external and fleshly Sacrifices of the Law are out of date yet there are the internal and spiritual Sacrifices of the Gospel which you now are as much oblig'd to observe and offer as ever the JEWS were the former What are they why you are to present your selves your bodies Souls the whole man a living Sacrifice holy and acceptable to God Rom. 12.1 you are to dedicate your persons to Christ so as to live to him who dy'd for you 2 Cor. 5.15 yea so as to be ready to be offered in sacrifice by dying for him to allude to that Phil. 2.17 You are as an holy Priesthood to offer up spiritual Sacrifices acceptable to God by Jesus Christ 1 Pet. 2.5 which spiritual Sacrifices are spiritual Dutys and Evangelical Worship prophesy'd of Mal. 1.11 in every place incense shall be offered unto my name and a pure offering Here come in * Oratio purè directa de corde fideli tanquam de arâ Sanctâ surgit incensum August in Psal 141. Prayer and Praise those two eminent Sacrifices under the Gospel Psal 141.2 Let my Prayer be set forth before thee as Incense and the lifting up of my hands as the evening Sacrifice Psal 116.17 I will offer to thee the sacrifice of thanksgiving and will call upon the name of the Lord so Psal 107.22 Psal 54.6 Heb. 13.15 By him therefore let us offer the sacrifice of praise to God continually that is the fruit of our lips giving thanks to his name this is set forth as here by the fruit of the lips so elsewhere by the free-will-offerings of the mouth Psal 119.108 by rendring the calves of our lips Hos 14.2 And for the pleasingness of this to God above all the Levitical Sacrifices see Psal 50.13 14. Psal 69.30 31. O this is a Sacrifice which we should often be offering up to God through Christ Jesus Another Evangelical Sacrifice is a broken Spirit than which next to a broken Christ nothing more acceptable to God Psal 51.16 17. For thou desirest not sacrifice else would I give it thou delightest not in burnt-offering The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit a broken and a contrite heart O God thou wilt not despise So also bounty to the poor distressed Saints this is an odour of sweet smell a sacrifice acceptable well