fault where it is vpon our selues and vpon our owne Sinnes for though the many multitude say it was a good world with them When they sacrificed vnto the Queene of Heaven yet the King of Heauen knowes what a wofull time it was for Man when the Crucifixe was kissed with the kisses of their Mouthes and Iesus Christ was crucified againe with the workes of their hands and when they changed The trueth of God into a lye and Worshipped and serued the creature made a god with their owne hands Rom. 1.15 More then the Creator who is blessed for euer Amen And if we would be free from plagues free from punishments let vs free our selues from sinne I know that feare of Poperies comming againe with superstitions hath spread it selfe ouer the face of this whole Iland but alas Wee feare where no feare is for I dare confidently affirme that it neuer was his Maiesties minde nor the purpose of the State to bring in Idolatry and superstition into this land againe Cantic 5.3 for We haue washed our feete and shall we foule them againe But the secrets of State is more then either I can perceiue or most of you well vnderstand Or if they did yet were it vayne Quia non est concilium contra Dominum because no deuice of man can subuert the truth of God vnlesse our sinnes doe prouoke our God Reuel 2.5 Nulla nocebit aduersitas si nulla dominetur iniquitas Gregor Cyprian to remoue our Candlesticke and to take away our light and therefore though all the Iesuites of the world and all the Cardinals of Rome nay though all the Deuils of Hell should doe their worst against vs yet if we feare our God and forsake all Sinne the diuels may haue all their seruants before they all shall be able to hurt any one seruant of the Lord quia non plus valet ad deijciendum terrena paena quam ad erigendum diuina tutela 1 John 4.4 because He that is in vs is greater then he that is in the World and is more able to preserue vs then the Prince of darkenesse is to destroy vs. That wee should turne to the Lord our God And therefore if you thinke Poperie to be euill and would be free from superstition neuer feare the State nor lay the blame on others but leaue your sinnes and Turne to the Lord your God with all your hearts and with all your soules and you shall see the Saluation of the Lord which hee will shew vnto vs this day Exod. 14.13 for the Egyptians whom you haue seene and feare you shall see them againe no more for euer the Lord shall fight for you and you may be sure no euill shall happen vnto you it shall not come nigh your dwelling for the onely way to escape all punishments is to forsake all sinnes Neither doe I say this as if we could be cleane from sinnes for I know it was Nouatus his error and we must all know it for an error Hieron adversus Pelag. that a Christian after Baptisme doth not sinne and it was but a Pellagian conceite before him inuented by Pythagoras that the exercise of Vertue rooteth out all the seede of Vices Matth. 7.18 for a Bad tree cannot bring foorth good fruit and in some things sayth the Apostle I feare I may say as it is in our last English translation in many things wee Sinne all Iames 3.2 1 Iohn 1.8 And if wee say wee haue no sinne wee deceiue our selues and there is no trueth in vs. But I say this that we should haue a feruent desire not to sinne and to say with the Prophet O that my wayes were made so direct that I might keepe thy Commandements and that wee would endeuor pro virili to the vttermost of our abilities not to sinne and labour alwayes with the Apostle Acts 24.16 to keep a cleere conscience in all things both before God and Man Thirdly Seeing all miseries death and damnation are as iustly inflicted vpon the sinner as the poore Souldier may iustly claime his little stipend we should not complaine against God Sueton. in vita Vesp C. 10. with Vespasian Immerenti sibi vitam aripi that he tooke away his life without any fault of his or without any fayling on his part but we should with the Leuites in Nehemiah with Daniel with Ieremie and with all the rest of the men of God commend the Lord and condemne our selues saying surely thou art iust in all that is come vpon vs thou hast dealt truely Nehem. 9.33 but wee haue done wickedly And thus I haue shewed thee O man quid sit malum what is euill and you haue heard a large discourse of Sinne and the most lamentable effect and wages of Sinne And now it is a thousand to one that the first thing many one of vs will doe is to goe home or perhaps afore wee goe home to sinne some to sweare some to their whores some to be drunke some to deceiue and most of vs to some sinne or other But if euer any of you doe for those sinnes receiue this pay remember I haue told you what you should haue Death for the wages of Sinne is Death and I can doe no more but pray to God that he would giue vs grace to forsake Sinne that we may escape Death through Iesus Christ our Lord To whom with the Father and the Holy Ghost three distinct Persons of that one eternall in diuided Essence be giuen as is most due all prayse and glory for euer and euer Amen A Prayer O Blessed God which hast created Man we doe acknowledge that thou hast made him righteous but he sought out many inuentious and hath most grieuously sinned against thy diuine Maiestie and thereby hath most iustly pulled vpon himselfe and all his posteritie all miseries death and damnation But thou desirest not the death of a Sinner but rather that hee should turne from his wickednesse and liue And therefore we doe confesse our sinnes we doe detest our sinnes and we doe most humbly pray thee euen for thy mercies sake to bee mercifull vnto vs to deale with vs not according to our offences but according to thy Grace to giue vs Grace to serue thee that so we mâ—y be deliuered from our iust deserued punishment and be receiued into thine euerlasting fauour to prayse and magnifie thy blessed Name for euer and euer Amen A wearied loathed Life I leade content with onely Sadnesse To see my selfe opprest with Sinne and with this worlds Madnes I alwayes striue with wicked Sinne yet doth my Sinne preuaile I therefore hate my Selfe because my Sinnes I cannot quaile And I doe likewise wish for Grace that I might neuer offend But truely serue my Master Christ and please him to my end And yet I see this tyrant Sinne and wicked men doe wrong me To Hell the one to Miserie th' other still would throng me But reason bids
spoken or written by the best of men And this is the narrowest way to expresse him and yet we can reach no further for as he is in himselfe he is as I said before a light of an infinite brightnesse 1 Iohn 1 5. in whom is no darkenesse at all and as the Apostle saith Hee dwelleth in the light that none can attaine vnto 1 Tim. 6.16 no Eagles eye can fully look vpon the brightnesse of his light no vnderstanding can comprehend the incomprehensible excellency of his Maiestie and therfore we must rest our selues contented to know him so as we are able to conceiue of him and to expresse him so as our slender speech will giue vs leaue Casman in thest de Deo And thus we finde three speciall wayes of expressing what he is First by way of negation by remouing from him what we finde in the creatures or what euer is said of any of them Aug in l. de cognit verae vit de verbis dom ser 38. as when with the ancient Philosophers wee say God is not the Sunne not the Moone not a Man not mooueable not finite c. this is the best part of our Knowledge of him as Saint Augustine saith when we know rather what he is not That there are three especiall wayes of expressing what God is then what he is For as a curious Statue is composed and perfected by hewing and cutting something still from it and not by adding any thing vnto it So is our God knowne of vs by denying him to be such and such things as are common to the creatures and by paring away humane conceits from him when we goe about to conceiue what he is Secondly by way of affirmation and perfection as when wee do analogically and in respect of certaine similitudes ascribe vnto God the best and most excellent things that can be found in any creatures and so we say he is great strong faire mercifull iust c. Thirdly By way of supereminency and transcendent excellency as when we ascribe to God whatsoeuer excellencies that are spoken or may be spoken of him farre aboue all the excellencies of all other creatures whatsoeuer and so we doe referre and reduce all excellencies vnto him as vnto the common cause of them all or as vnto the fountaine from whence all these little channels of excellencies doe flow And therefore we say not onely in the concrete that God is iust mercifull wise strong good That the abstract names of all excellencies are onely proper vnto God and such like but also in the abstract that he is iustice mercy wisedome strength and goodnesse it selfe which cannot be said of any creatures for that all the best excellencies of the chiefest creatures are but as little sparkes in respect of a huge infinite fire or as a few drops of raine in comparison of the whole Ocean Sea if we should compare them to the excellency of God Nay we should find their wisedomes follie their strength weakenesse their beauty baldnesse and all their goodnesse to be nothing in respect of the goodnesse of God for he chargeth his Angels with folly and the Heauens are not cleare in his sight saith holy Iob. A description of God by way of 1 Negation 2 Affirmation 3 Supereminencie Now according to these three wayes God is described to be an immortall inuisible incomprehensible spirituall infinite eternall Essence the cause of all causes and the Author of all excellencies Here is a boundlesse Ocean and a very large description of God and I may sooner loose my selfe in the prosecuting of the same then to finde him fully as he is in any place which is fully and truely in euery place Aug. de trinitate But I remember that excellent rule of Saint Augustine Cauendum est ne dum de deo cogitamus non possumus inuenire quid sit aliquid de eosentiamus quod non sit We must take great heed least in seeking to know what God is we thinke him to bee what he is not and therefore that I may not erre in this point I will say no more but with himselfe which knowes himselfe best that he is Iehoua this he is and this is his Name for euer and as the old saying is Conueniunt rebus nomina saepe suis of all his Names this is the onely Name that doth expresse the Essence and the Nature of God for all other Names are but adiuncts expressing Qualis est essentiae Of what manner of being hee is as Eternall Omniscient Omnipotent or else qualis non est what he is not as Immortall Inuisible incomprehensible or deriued from the roote of this as Eheich 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as some would haue it but Iehoua Nomen tetra grammaton This Name of foure letters the most Venerable and Ineffable Name amongst the Iewes as Galatinus saith deriued of Haiah Galat. l. 2. c. 9. The name Jehoua is the most proper Name of God as the Hebritians note which signifieth Esse an euerlasting being Est solummodo proprium essentiale nomen Dei is the onely proper and Essentiall Name of God Because all the other names of God whereof Saint Hierome collecteth nine besides Iehoua and such as are deriued from the roote thereof are names attributed vnto him in respect of his workes either internall as Father Sonne and Holy Ghost and such like which are names attributed vnto him Hieron in epist ad Marcell in respect of the inward operations of God or else externall as El Shadai Lord Creator and such like which are names attributed vnto him in respect of his outward workes as Galatinus sheweth And therefore when Moses desired to know the Name of God God nameth himselfe Eheich Ascher Eheich Exod. 3.14 which the Sept. translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I am that I am putting the present Tense for the future Tense is my Name and it is all one as if hee had said more plainely Hee that was hee that is and hee that euer shall be For if you looke neuer so farre backe you shal neuer finde where his being began or if you inquire neuer so curiously into the time to come you shall neuer finde likelihood of his ending for Thou art God from euerlasting and world without end saith the Psalmist and so Yesterday to day 1 Tim. 1.17 and the same for euermore saith the Apostle and in this respect he is called the King of Ages which hath made the times Esay 57.15 and doth inhabit eternity Moreouer it is obserued that in this name Iehoua besides many other Mysteries that the more curious searchers into the same doe collect there is not onely shewed the being of God but also the manner of that being that is the three manner of subsistings in that one simple and eternall being or the Trinity of persons in that Vnity of Essence And I confess that seeing
and then gaue them to vs Per manus eorum By the hands of them which brought them vnto vs for he is the giuer of euery good and perfect gift Iames 1.17 and all other things are but the instruments whereby hee conuayes and sends those gifts vnto vs 1 Cor. 9.7 And therefore why should we not wholly dedicate our selues and ours vnto the seruice of God For who planteth a Vineyard and eateth not of the fruits thereof And yet God may iustly say of vs Filios enutriui Esay 1.2 I haue nourished and brought vp Children but they haue despised me for though he made man and made all things for man yet cannot all these things make man to serue him as he ought to doe but that euery one of vs will follow after the lusts and concupiscence of his owne flesh which as the Poet saith Et nocitura placet placitura nocet Doth euen wound vs when it most delighteth vs. Thirdly seeing God giueth being vnto all his promises Psal 146.4 and keepeth his promise for euer as he hath done already in sending a Ioshua to giue the Land of Canaan vnto the Israelites and especially in sending Iesus Christ to giue eternall life vnto all beleeuers And that dicta Iehouae sunt dicta pura The words of the Lord are pure words That we should neuer doubt of Gods promises 2 Pet. 2.4 Wee should expectare impâ—â— aâ— â—em neuer doubt of the performance of Gods promises nor say with those incredulous Athiests in the second of Peter 2.4 Where is the promise of his comming But we should beleeue them to be as sure and as certaine as if they were already accomplished For he is Iehoua that will giue them their being in their appointed time Matth. 24 3â— Heauen and Earth shall passe away but his Word shall not passe That shall be surely accomplished CHAP. IV. Of the word LORD and how many wayes it is taken and of the reasons to perswade vs to serue him I Might now passe vnto the second part but that the translating of this word Iehoua by our last Translators into the word Lord for so we reade it The Lord the Lord God mercifull and gracious c. must here stay me a while For searching into the reason why Iehoua should be translated Lord Why Iehoua is translated Lord. I found that the seauenty Interpreters doe translate it so in euery place and that because 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from whence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is deriued signifieth I am which is the same in effect as Iehoua and also because he is properly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Lord of any thing Qui plenum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in eadem rem habet Which hath full right and a most absolute authority ouer the same thing for Dominus primo dicebatur à domo He was at the first called Lord which was the Master of the House and had full right and authority ouer all the Houshold and wee finde that none but God alone can simply and absolutely say that he hath full right and authority ouer any thing in the World because he onely is the Maker and preseruer of all things and of euery thing Polanus Syntag. l. 2. c. 6. and therefore all other Lords are but Lords vnder him and from him and he onely is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord of himselfe and so indeede Lord of Lords And in this respect we finde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord and Iehoua to be equiualent and to fall into the same thing That God onely is an absolute Lord. Tertul. in Apol. c. 34. Lamprid. in Alex Seuer and therefore Augustus the first founder of the Roman Empire refused to be called Lord and so did Alexander Seuerus and diuers others because they thought the name of Lord to be too high a title for so meane Creatures as they knew themselues to be But we distinguish betwixt a Lord simply and a Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in some respect In the first sence none is Lord but God alone and therefore in this respect our Sauiour saith Be not you called Lords but In the second sence Dicam plane imperatoreâ—â— Dominum Tertul. quo sup saith Tertullian I may and will call the Emperor Lord and so saith Obadiah vnto the Prophet Elias Art not thou my Lord Elias 1 Reg 18.7 Because God which gaue them their rule and dominion in his stead hath also innobled them with his own names Et ego dixi dij estis And I my selfe saith God haue called you gods Psal 82.6 and haue giuen these names vnto you to be called Gods and so Lords And yet they should remember Saint Peters rule 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Not to Lord it so as to ouer-rule Gods people or as Saint Augustine saith Non dominandi superbia sed officio consulendi Not for the loue of Soueraignty but in a desire to doe them good and to imitate God himselfe Parcere subiectis debellare superbos To defend and helpe the innocent and to punish the wrong doer And so you see how Iehoua is rightly translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord because truely and absolutely hee alone is Lord of all things as the sole giuer of their being That we should feare and serue our Lord. Malach. 1.6 Psal 24.2 and preseruer of them in that being And this should incite vs to feare and to serue this our Lord for Si Dominus vbi timor If I am a Lord where is my feare The Prophet Dauid saith that the Earth is the Lords and all that therein is because he hath founded it vpon the Seas and prepared and established it vpon the flouds And so this Iehoua is our Lord because he made vs and hath giuen vs our very being and yet wee finde that hee is our Lord in a more excellent respect for as those Aug. de ciuit Dei l. 19. c. 15. which by right of warre might iustly be put to death and yet were redeemed and preserued aliue were called seruants and those that redeemed them were called their Lords so are we called Gods Seruants and he our Lord not onely because he made vs but also because when we might haue beene iustly put to eternall death for our sinnes we were redeemed and saued by the death of Iesus Christ And in this respect we finde that although the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost be each one of them our Lord as our Creator and the giuer of our Being yet is Christ generally and most commonly throughout all the New Testament called our Lord as if this name were now wholly and solely to be appropriated vnto him Why Christ is most properly called Lord. because he is our sole Sauiour and Redeemer And therefore seeing the very name of a Seruant doth include seruitium a seruice to be performed vnto our Lord and Sauiour
will aske touching my former illustration why is power ascribed to the Father Wisedome to the Son Quest and goodnesse to the Holy Ghost whereas all and each of the three persons haue the same power wisedome and goodnesse Saint Augustine answereth that amongst the creatures Resp it is wont to be obserued that in a Father is found a defect of power by reason of his antiquitie in a Sonne is seene ignorance by reason of his youth and inexperience of things and in the name of a Spirit there seemeth to be a kinde of fearefull vehemency Esay 52. as Quicscite ab homine cuius spiritus in naribus eius Whose Spirit is in his nostrils and therefore least the like might be thought to be in these Diuine persons we find power ascribed to the Father wisedome vnto the sonne and goodnesse vnto the Holy Ghost whereas indeed each one of them is of the same power wisedome and goodnesse as the others bee And although the Essence of God can neither be diuided nor distinguished yet the three subsistences or the three diuers manner of being in the Diuine Essence which we call the three persons The three persons are distinguished one from another two waies Father Sonne and Holy Spirit may be distinguished two wayes 1. By their personall actions 2. By their nominall relations First the actions of the persons are either 1. Outward or 2. Inward The outward workes of God are common to each person of the Trinity First all outward actions are called communicable because although after a sort they are appropriated to each person as the Father to send the Son and to create the world the Son to be sent to be Incarnate to redeeme mankind and the Holy Ghost to appeare in the form of a Doue like clouen tongues of fire to worke in our hearts for our consolation and sanctification yet Opera Trinitatis ad extra sunt indiuisa these outward workes of the Trinitie are so indiuisible that we cannot so properly ascribe them to any one but we finde that they may be likewise ascribed to any other for as Nazianzen truly affirmeth of the three persons themselues Non possuÌ„tria discernere quin subito ad vnum referar nec possum vnum cogitare quin trium fulgore confundar So may we say of their outward operations that although they be affirmed of one yet may they presently be referred to all three and so we finde them in many passages of the holy Scriptures as redemption and sanctification to the Father Act. 20.28 1 Pet. 1.2 Creation and Sanctification to the Sonne Iohn 1.3 1 Cor. 1.2 And creation and redemption to the Holy Ghost Psal 33.6 Ephes 4.30 And besides these outward operations are transient voluntary for that God in these things is Liberrimus Agens A free Agent so that he might haue chosen whâ—ther to doe them or not doe them and therefore in all these workes Election Creation Gubernation Redemption Sanctification Glorification there can be ascribed none other cause but quia voluit because he would for whatsoeuer pleased the Lord that did he in Heauen and in Earth in the Sea and in all deepe places And therefore these outward actions and so likewise those names which are giuen vnto these persons in regard of these actions as Creator vnto the Father Redeemer vnto the Sonne Comforter and sanctifier vnto the holy Ghost are not altogether sufficient to expresse the differences of these persons Secondly the inward actions of these persons are 1. Permanent 2. Necessarie 3. Incommunicable First they are so permanent The inward actions of God are euer in doing that as the Sunne doth alwayes beget his beames and both Sunne and beames doe send forth the heate so the Father from all eternity euer did and now doth and euer will beget his Sonne and both Father and Sonne doe spire and breath forth the Holy Ghost and therefore Origen saith excellent well Origen hom 6. in Ierem. Saluator noster splendor est gloriae splendor autem non semel nascitur deinceps desinit nasci c. Our blessed Sauiour is the brightnesse of Gods glory Sed quotiescunque ortum fuerit lumen ex quo splendor oritur toties oritur splendor gloriae Luke 12. but the brightnesse of glory is not once begotten and then afterwards leaues to be begotten but as often as the light riseth from whence the brightnesse springeth so often doth the brightnes of glory arise And our Sauiour saith he is the wisedome of God but the wisedome of God is the brightnesse of that eternall light Et ideo saluator semper nascitur The Father doth euer beget the Sonne And therefore as the Scripture saith Ante colles generat me Before the Mountaines were laid he begetteth me and not as some doe erroniously read it Generauit me He hath begotten me So the truth is that the Sonne of God is euer begotten and the holy Spirit euer proceeding Secondly these inward actions are no voluntary operations The inward actions are necessary I meane such as that the Father might either beget the Sonne or not beget him and the Father and the Sonne might either spire forth the Holy Ghost or not spire him forth but they be so absolutely necessary that they cannot otherwise be Cyrillus l. 1. c 3. thesauri because it is the property of the nature of God the Father to beget God the Sonne as it is for him to be a God so that he can no more relinquish or leaue to beget the Sonne then hee can leaue to be a God as Saint Cyril sheweth And Thirdly these inward actions are so incommunicable The inward actions are incommunicable that whatsoeuer is proper to the one can no wayes be ascribed to the other Quia hoc est proprium patris quod solus est pater quod ab alio non est nisidse For this is the property of the Father that he alone is the Father Et hoc est proprium filij quod à patre genitus est solus à solo hoc est proprium spiritus sancti quod nec genitus nec ingenitus est sed à patre filio aequaliter procedeus and that he is not from any other but onely of himselfe and this is the property of the Son that he alone is begotten of the Father alone coequall vnto him and coessentiall and this is the propertie of the Holy Ghost to be not made not begotten but from the Father and the Sonne equally proceeding And therefore we say that these incommunicable and proper operations of the persons doe so make the true and reall distinction of the persons that the Father cannot be the Sonne nor the Holy Ghost that the Sonne cannot be the Father nor the holy Ghost and that the Holy Ghost cannot be the Father nor the Son so that in a word all three is the same Essence and yet neither of the three can
aegroti quantum ad iustitiam Dei In regard of the state of the patient to free him from sinne and to satisfie the Iustice of God For it behoued the Mediator betweene God and man Ne in vtroque deo similis longe esset ab homine aut in vtroque homini similis longe esset à Deo to haue something like vnto GOD and to haue something like vnto man lest that in all things being like vnto man hee might be so too farre from God or being in all things like vnto God hee might be so too farre from man and therefore Christ betwixt sinfull mortall men and the iust immortall God did appeare a mortall man with men and a iust God with God 1 Tim 2.5 and so the Mediator betwixt God and men was God and man Christ Iesus and fitly too saith Saint Augustine Quia ille congruè satisfacit qui potest debet Because that is most agreeable to reason that he should make satisfaction Two speciall reasons why Christ was made man which ought and can satisfie but we know that none ought to doe it but man and none can doe it but God and therefore God was contented to be made man and that for these two especiall reasons First to shew the greatnesse of his Loue to man First to shew the greatnesse of his loue for hee had seemed to haue loued vs the lesse if he had done lesse for vs but now Quid tam pietate plenum quam filium Dei pro nobis factum esse faenum What can more commend the loue of God to man then to see the word God made flesh for man Iohn 3.16 and therefore the Euangelist to shew the greatnesse of Gods loue to mankinde saith God so loued the world that he gaue his onely begotten Sonne that is to bee incarnate to be made flesh and to suffer death that whosoeuer beleeueth in him should not perish but haue euerlasting life Secondly to erect our hope that was already deiected Secondly to erect the hope and to strengthen the faith of man and to strengthen our faith which was alwayes wauering for wee saw two things that were to be done for man and yet could not be done by any man but such a one as should be God and Man The first was a remoueall of that great euill which suppressed vs. The second was a restoring of that great good that we were depriued of First Magnitude mali The euill that oppressed all men was foure-fold the greatnesse of that euill which suppressed euery man and could not be taken away by any man consisted in foure things 1. The waight of sinne 2. The height of Gods wrath 3. The power of death 4. The tyranny of the diuell And these could not be abolished by any creature but onely by him that created all creatures and can worke all things mightily according to the purpose of his owne will Secondly Magnitudo boni The good that man lost was two-fold the greatnesse of that good which was taken away from all men and could be restored by no man consisted in two things 1. The repairing of Gods image here in this life 2. The enioying of the blessed vision of God in the next life For none could restore the image of God to man but hee that was the liuing image of God Heb. 1.3 and the ingrauen forme of his person and the Kingdome of Heauen none could giue but God that giues it to all that loue him and therefore to take away the euill which we had deserued and to restore vnto vs that good whereof we were depriued God himselfe that made vs was contented to redeeme vs by taking our flesh vpon him Vt natura offendens satisfaceret That the nature offending might make satisfaction and because satisfaction could not be made without bloud for without bloud there is no remission Heb. 9.22 saith the Apostle he was made flesh that he might die and shed his bloud for vs Aug. serm 101. de tempore Vt iniusta mors iustam vinceret mortem liberaret nos iustè dum pro nobis occiditur iniustè That so his vniustly inflicted death might ouercome our iustly deserued death and might most rightly free and deliuer vs because he was most wrongfully slaine for vs as Saint Augustine speaketh Quest 2 Secondly It will be demaunded why the word that is the Sonne should be incarnate and made flesh rather then the Father or the Holy Ghost Resp Why the Son rather then the Father or the Holy Ghost was made man Saint Augustine thinketh that the cause pertained more specially vnto the Sonne then to the Father or to the Holy Ghost for that the Diuell attempted to vsurpe the dignitie and authority of the Sonne of God saying in his heart that he would be like vnto the most highest that is the image of the Father and sought to intrude himselfe into his glory to be the Prince of this world and the Head of euery creature which things were onely proper vnto the Sonne of God and therfore it behoued the Sonne to come into the world to ouercome the Diuell that would haue wronged him and all other men that were to be members of him But we finde many other reasons to shew why the Word was made flesh rather then the Father or the Holy Ghost As First because it is the office of the Word to declare the minde of God First because the Incarnation of God was made for the manifestation of God but we declare and manifest things by words and Christ is the word of the Father the wisedome the knowledge and the interpreter of his Fathers will euen as our word is the interpreter of our minde as Origen and Clemens Alexandrinus doe declare and therefore the word was rightly incarnate that God in him might be seene and heard and vnderstood of vs according to that saying of the Euangelist that which wee haue heard and seene 1 Iohn 1.1 and our hands haue handled of the word of life that declare we vnto you For as he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word in respect of his person which is a name of relation vnto the minde as Sonne is to the Father so is he the word in respect of his office i. e. of his office as he is the second person of the Trinitie for as it is the propertie and office of the eternall minde i. e. the Father to beget the word i. e. the Sonne so it is the propertie and the office of the Word to declare the Minde but because this spirituall inuisible and ineffable Word as he is God could neuer be seene nor heard nor vnderstood of vs therefore was he made flesh that he might be heard and seene And this the Apostle seemes to shew vnto vs when hee saith God heretofore at sundry times Heb. 1.1 and in diuers manners spake vnto the Fathers by the Prophets but in these last
may be said two waies 167 In what sence God willeth sinne 167 Will of Christ two fold 296 301 To doe the will of God will sooner bring vs to know God then to heare his word 571 Wings wherewith we flie to heauen what they be 631 Wine how deceitfull it is 45 Why wisedome is ascribed to the Sonne 273 By the wisedome whereof Salomon speaketh Prou. 8 22. what is meant 285 How hard for the wisedome of God to please foolish man 3â—0 Christ how said to be with God 297 Not as we are said to be with God ibid. To be with God and in God how the same 298 Witnesses of the birth of the Messias 411 WO. Woe trebled to the inhabitants of the earth 46 Christ why borne of a Woman 334 Women why three went together vnto the Sepulchre 519 Why they were all three called by the same name ibid. They were a type of the Church and of euery christian soule 520 How sorrowfull they were ibid. How distinguished and knowne one from the other 521 How they signifie three properties of the Church â— 521 How fearelesse they were in seeking Christ 521 How they laboured to increase the numbers of beleeuers 522 How peaceably they came to the graue 522 Many women were made instruments of great goodnesse 532 Word of God diuided into two parts 12 That the word was before he was made flesh 278 The word GOD no accidentall but an essentiall word 285 The word how he may be said to be created and begotten 289 Words of Dauid this day haue J begotten thee how vnderstood 290 Words of the Apostle he is the first borne of euery creature how vnderstood 290 Words of Saint Luke be shall be called the Sonne of God how vnderstood 248 Words of Salomon the Lord created me how vnderstood 286 Words of Christ my Father is greater then I how vnderstood 300 Words of Christ I came not to doe mine owne will how vnderstood 301 Words of Saint Paul then the Sonne shall be subiect to the Father how vnderstood 301 Words of Christ I came from aboue how vnderstood 344 345 Words of the Apostle God sent his sonne in the similitude of sinfull flesh how vnderstood 346 Words of our Creede he descended into hell how vnderstood 580 581 c. The seauen gratious words that Christ spake vpon the Crosse 486 Christ called the Word because he declareth his father vnto vs. 322 How God can expresse himselfe with one word 307 Why Christ is tearmed the word ibid. How the word GOD resembleth our outward word 308 How it resembleth our inward word ibid. How it differeth from our word 309 Whether it be a name of Christ his person or hâ—â— office 310 Why Saint Iohn vseth the Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word 310 The word why made flesh 317 318 Why the Word rather then the Father or the Holy Ghost 322 The word onely assumed our flesh 326 How said to be made flesh 368 c. All the world without Christ will auaile vs nothing 263 Philosophers striue to proue the world to be eternall 136 World made by God proued 137 World diuided into his seuerall ages 402 To flie the world the next way to finde Christ 571 Workes of our vocation to be followed 13 Outward workes of God common to each person of the God-head 145 274 They are transient and voluntarie ibid. Inward works of God are euerin doing 275 They are necessary and incommunicable i. e. proper to each person 275 Worke of the incarnation how common to the three persons and how proper to Christ the Word 326 God worketh one contrary out of another 351 Workes of Christ testifie him to bee the true Messias 417 Workes of any man testifie what he is ibid. Workes requisite to expresse thankfulnes 507 God worketh all the good that is in the Saints and how God worketh our willingnesse to doe good 530 Good workes what they be 670 God worketh foure wayes with meanes without meanes with weake meanes contrary to meanes 147 Workes of God proue the power of God 159 Our best workes haue need of mercy 185 Workes of mercy of two sorts 232 Outward workes of mercy chiefly sixe 232 God worketh diuers wayes 237 Wormewood wherefore good 527 Worth of the sufferings of Christ how to bee considered 502 Wounds of Christ why reserued by him 572 WR Wrath of God feared by Christ 545 Wrath of God quite turned away by our repentance 195 YO YOuth described and the miseries thereof shewed 69 ZE. ZEno what he said of the Word 312 IEHOVAE LIBERATORI FJNJS
goodnesse teaching vs 1. To be afraid to sinne 2. Neuer to desp of Gods goodn 3. To imitate God in each one of the seauen forenamed points 3. By his iustice and that 1. Negatiuely not making the wicked innocent 2. Positiuely by visiting of the sins of the wicked 1. Vpon themselues 2. Vpon their children where is distinguished of 1. Parents 2. Sinnes 3. Children 4. Punishments This Treatise containeth 1. An Introduction of the excellency of the knowledge of Iesus C. wher is shewed that 1. his life is our chiefest direct 2. himselfe our onely consolatiō 2. An explication of that great mystery of the Incarnation of the Word where is handled 1. Who was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where is shewed 1. That there can be but one God and yet that there are three persons in the vnity of that one essence how these three persons are distinguished 1. By their personal actions 1. outward which are 1. Communic 2. Transcient 3. Voluntary 2. Inward which are 1. Permanent 2. Necessary 3. Incommunicable 2. By their nominall relation Father Son and Holy Ghost And that the person made is the second person of the blessed Trinitie To his father 1. Co-eternall 2. Co-essentiall 3. Co-equall And this is fully proued all obict plainely answered and from thence shewed 1. The greatnesse of Gods loue 2. The craftinesse of Satan 3. The peruersnes of hereticks 4. The vnthankfulnes of men 2. Three especiall things touching the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 viz. 1. What 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth i. e. the Word 2. Why Christ is tearmed the Word 3. Why the Euangelist vseth this word 1. Because this name of Christ was best knowne to the Iewes and to the Gentiles 2. Because it was the fit st word that he could vse to make way for his subsequent discourse 3. The impulsiue and the finall causes of the Words incarnation and the reasons why the Word rather then the Father or the holy Ghost was to be incarnate 2. What he was made flesh where is shewed 1. The manner of his conception the reasons and the end thereof 2. The matter that hee assumed 1. All our humane nature i. e. body and soule 2. All our humane frailties both of body and soule sinne onely excepted And here is shewed many excellent lessons that we ought to learne in respect 1. Of God 2. Of Christ 3. Of our selues 3. How the Word was made flesh or how the two natures diuine and humane doe make but one person in Christ where is shewed 1. The distinction of the two natures diuine and humane that they doe still remaine intire and inconfused is fully proued and the chiefest obiections made to the contrary are plainly answered 2. The vnion of the two natures in one personis explained and 1. The confirmatiō of the truth of this point is shewed and the greatest obie made against it are sufficiently answered 2. The manner of this vnion wherein it consisteth is expressed viz. 1. Not as the Arrians say onely in respect of 1. Cohabitation 2. Will and affection 3. Co-operation 4. Participation of his names and dignities vnto the manhood 2. But in the communicating of the subsistence of the Word with the subsistence of the manhood where is shewed that this vnion is 1. Inconuertible 2. Indiuisible 3. Inconfused 4. Inseperable 5. Substantiall 6. Ineffable 3. The chiefest benefits effects of the said vnion is shewed and that 1. In respect of Christ which are 1. An exēpt from all sin 2. A collation of ineffable graces into the manhood of Christ 3. A communication of the properties of each nature to the person of Ch. Where the obiection of the vbiquit indeuouring to proue the manhood inuested with Diuine properties are fully answered 2. In resp of vs viz our vnion and reconciliation with God all the happinesse we haue in this life or doe looke for in the life to come This Treatise containeth 1 An introduction of the meditation of Christ his death which is 1. Acceptable vnto God 2. Profitable for vs. 1. To hinder sinne 2. To kindle our charity 3. To erect our hope 2. A declaration of the passion of Christ wherein is handled 4. 1. The person suffering which was 1. A Man 2. A iust Man 3. A good Man 4. A King 5. A Priest 6. A Prophet 7. A God whereis shewed who are subiect to most affliction 2. The sufferings of Christ 1. In the garden of Gethsemane 1. Alone where is shewed 1. How the affections of Christ differ from ours in respect of the 1. Obiect 2. Maner 3. Effects 2. The cause of his agony in respect of 1. obiect 2. subiect where is †Explained 1. What might grieue Christ 1. In respect of himselfe 1. The greatnesse of his paine and shame 2. The deferring of his death and punishment 2. In respect of others 1. Small account he saw they would make of his death 2. The greatnesse of their punishment which hee knew they must suffer for that their neglect 2. What Christ might feare 1. The waight of sinne 2 The malice of Satan 3 The wrath of God 2 By others where is shewed 1. The treason of Iudas where is shewed 1. what Christ had done for Iudas 2. why Iudas betrayed Christ 3. how Iudas betrayed him 2. The flight of all the followers of Christ 3. The taking and binding of Iesus Christ 2. Before his Iudges viz. 1. Before Annas where 1. He is examined 1. Of his Disciples 2. Of his Doctrine 2. he is strucken by the hie P. ser 3. he is denied by his stoutest Ap. 2. Before Pilate the first time where hee is accused 1. Of impiety against God 2. Of treaso against Caesar 3. Before Herod where the mystery of cloathing Christ in white is explained 4. Before Pilate the 2. time where his scourging crowning with thorns c. is expressed 3. In Golgotha where is expressed 1. Those things that he suffered on the Cros 1. An accursed 2. A shamefull 3. A painefull 4. a lingring D where also is shewed the generality of his suffering 2. The 7. gracious words that he vttered many other speciall obseruat full of comfort 3. The necessity of Christ his sufferings in respect of the causes viz. 1. Instrumentall 1. The enuy of Satan 2. The malice of the Iewes 3. The couetousnesse of Iudas 4. The desire of the multitude 2. Efficient God himselfe for our sinnes out of the loue he bare to man 3. Finall 1. In resp of men 1 To saue the Elect by the vertue of his death 2. To make the wicked without excuse for neglecting his death 2. In resp of God for the glory of his blessed N. where is shewed that this should teach vs 1. To compassionate his death 2. To make vs thankefull for so great a benefit 3. To cause vs to loue him aboue all things in the world 4. To make vs ready to suffer any thing with him and for his sake 4. The
there cannot be but one Iehoua one infinit eternall being that both the Father the Sonne and the Holy Spirit Each person of the Trinity is the true Iehoua are called each one of them Iehoua as you may most apparently see if you compare the 6. of Esay and the 9. where the great Iehoua saith vnto the Prophet Goe and tell this people heare and vnderstand not see but perceiue not make the heart of this people fat with the 12 of Iohn 41. Where the Euangelist saith that these words of the Prophet were spoken of Christ when hee saw his glory and spake of him and with the 28 of the Acts 25. Where Saint Paul saith The Holy Ghost spake these words by Esayas the Prophet and if you looke into the first of the Reuelations 8. where Christ assumeth the same name vnto himselfe saying I am Alpha Omega the beginning the ending 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which was which is which is to come And so into the 8 of Iohn the 58. where our Sauiour alludeth vnto the same Name saying Before Abraham was I am It doth sufficiently proue each one of these persons to be an infinite God subsisting in that one eternall Essence Zanch. de natura dei l. 1. c. 13. p. 35. because it is most certaine that the Name Iehoua is so propper vnto God that it can be ascribed to none else as Zanchius saith But because many other places of Scripture are more plaine and pregnant to proue this great Mystery of godlinesse I will not insist to wring out an apparant truth from the obscurest places Chrysost hom 2 in Heb. and because as Saint Chrysostome saith Nequue ad loquendum digne de Deo lingua sufficit neque ad percipiendum intellectus praeualet Our tongues are not able to speake worthily enough of God and our vnderstandings are not sufficient to conceiue of him as we ought to doe yea and that De deo loqui etiam vera aliquando periculosissimum est It may be dangerous sometimes to speake truths of God for as Euclides being demaunded of one what God did and in what things he most delighted did most truly answere that he knew not well what he did but he was certaine he delighted not in vaine and curious persons Maxim ser 33. That it is not safe to search too farre into the seeing of God so I say that curiosity in this highest point of Diuinity is very dangerous or as Saint Bernard saith to inquire too farre into this point is peruerse curiositie to beleeue it as the Scripture teacheth is infallible security and to see him as he is is most absolute felicity therefore I will wade no further into this depth but I will exhort and desire you all Potius glorificare eum qui est quam inuestigare quid est Chrysost quo supra hom 2. in Heb. Rather most faithfully to serue him which is then curiously to search what he is Ne in hac illicite curiosi in illa damnabiliter inueniamur ingrati least in this wee be found vnlawfully curious Prosper de vocat gentium and in the other most damnably vnthankefull as Prosper speaketh CHAP. II. How God is the giuer of Being to all Creatures and the fulfiller of all his promises AND yet I must note vnto you Zanch de natura Dei l. 1. c. 18. Why Jehoua is twice repeated that here Iehoua is twice repeated not to make Moses the more attentiue as some doe thinke it for the very speech of God at such a time and in such a manner was enough in my iudgement to moue attention but rather to signifie as I take it that as he is an eternall being in himselfe so he giueth being to all things else viz. 1. To all Creatures 2. To all his promises For First In him we liue we moue and haue our being Acts 17.1.28 saith the most learned Apostle of the Gentiles euen in the streetes of Athens and of him and for him and through him are all things Rom. 11.36 saith the same Apostle vnto the Romans the sole Monarchs of the whole World and so GOD himselfe saith Esay 44.24 I am Iehoua that made all things Which is all one as if hee had said As I am called the Creator because I haue made That all things doe subsist in God and created all things so I am called Iehoua Being because I gaue and doe giue their being vnto all the things that are And it is obserued that as in the Hebrew word Iehoua there is nothing but Consonants Iod He Vau Am which without their prickes that doe stand for the vowels can not be pronounced to shew how ineffable How ineffable is God and how vnexpressable the essence of God is So in the Latine word Iehoua there are contained all the vowels a. e. i. o. u without some of which no word can be spoken no name can be vttered and that in it there is nothing but vowels excepting h. which is no letter but the aspiration of the word to note vnto vs That God is the very life of all things that as the vowels together with the aspiration is the life and as it were the soule of euery word so is Iehoua the Lord God the very life and being as it were of euery Creature that can be named because that of him and for him and through him are all things Rom. 11.36 Non quod illa sunt quod ipse est sed quia ex ipso sunt Not that they are the same Bern. in cant serm 4. that he is but because they haue their existence and perfection from him as Saint Bernard saith Exod. 6.3 This place of Exodus explained Secondly when God saith He was not knowne vnto Abraham Isaac and Iacob by his name Iehouah it is not to be vnderstood of his essentiall being for so they knew him euen by this very name Iehouah as we may see in the fifteenth of Genesis and the seauenth verse and in the eight and twenty of Genesis and the thirteenth verse of the originall Text and so Tremellius reades it Gerard. l. 3 de nat Dei Neither is it to be vnderstood De gradibus diuinarum patefactionum Of the degrees of the diuine manifestations of God as Gerardus saith because sometimes it is the manner of the Scriptures to say that things are then when they are manifested to be Alsted Lexic Theol. c. 2. as it is said of the holy Ghost Quod nondum erat quia nondum innotuerat That he was not because as yet he had not manifested himselfe to be Iohn 7.39 for so he may be said not to be knowne vnto Moses nor vnto any man else because neither himselfe nor any of his names can be knowne of any man 1 Cor. 13. but onely in part as the Apostle sheweth And the example alleaged of the holy Ghost is mis-interpreted because
worke for euer and euer because he cannot non 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not to worke by reason of the necessitie of his immutability those things which are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. aeternorum the acts of eternitie and this power is likewise two-fold The power of God in respect of his inward acts is twofold 1 Speciall 1. Speciall to each person 2. Common to the Father Sonne and holy-Holy-Ghost First The speciall power is that which pertaineth vnto one person and not vnto the other as potentia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the power of begetting is proper vnto the Father and not to the Sonne nor to the Holy Ghost because this Power is his Power as hee is a Father and not as hee is God therefore it is proper and not common because that for the Father to beget and not to be begotten and for the sonne to be begotten and not to beget and for the Holy Ghost to proceede and not to beget nor to be begotten are Proprietates 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 personall proprieties whereby the persons of the Godhead are distinguished betwixt themselues Secondly the common Power 2 Common is that which doth appertaine to each person in generall as well to the one as to the other as the Power of working those internall operations which are common vnto the Father the Sonne and the Holy Ghost such as are those acts of louing each other vnderstanding each other and the like Secondly the Power of God considered All the outward actions of God are comâ— on to each person of the Godhead in respect of his outward operations is that whereby God created all things gouerneth all things and can doe all things whatsoeuer pleaseth him And this is so common to the Father the Sonne and the Holy Ghost that it is most rightly said that opera trinitatis ad extra sunt indiuisa The outward workes of the Trinity are indiuisible that is common to each person And therefore this Power of God in respect of these outward operations though in our Creed it is ascribed vnto the Father lest that because he is called Father we should imagine some defect and impotency to bee in him as to the Sonne we finde Wisedome ascribed lest that because he is called Sonne we might conceit some ignorance or in experience to be in him yet as the wisedome of God Gen. 1.2 Iohn 1.3 Heb. 1.2 Iob 26.13 so is this Power of God and the workes of this Power common to each person of the Deity as we may see in the first of Iohn and the third Heb. 1.2 Gene. 1.2 Iob 26.13 And we find this Power of God to be 1. Proper vnto God 2. Absolute in all things That the power of God is so proper vnto God as that it cannot be communicated to any creature First It is proper yea so proper vnto God alone as that it cannot be communicated to any creature no not to the humanitie of our Sauiour Christ because the humanity existing and hanging vpon the crosse was not able to helpe it selfe but was faine to cry vnto his Father My God my God why hast thou forsaken me And therefore Aquinas doth most truely conclude that the soule of Christ was not capable to receiue into it selfe infinite Power no more then a creature is able to containe or comprehend his Creator and yet I confesse with the Apostle that in him Coloss 1.9 i. e. in the person of Christ dwelleth the fulnesse of the Godhead bodily yea and that the man Christ Iesus receiued grace not by measure Sed vsque ad plenitudinem but euen vnto the fulnesse i. e. so much as a creature is any wayes capable of because the Godhead did Communicate such perfections vnto the humanity as the condition of a creature could possibly beare yet is it manifest that all those perfections and excellencies wherewith the manhood of Christ was indowed and innobled were all of them created excellencies because no attribute of God can be Communicated vnto any created substance because euery attribute of God is God himselfe but whatsoeuer is giuen â—nd bestowed vpon any creature must needs be a created thing and therefore neither the wisdome nor the power nor the goodnes which are attributed vnto God as they are the essentiall properties nay the very Essence of God it selfe can be any wayes communicated to any thing but that which is communicated vnto vs must needes be some other thing from them as the goodnesse which we haue is a created goodnesse and not that nor any part of that goodnesse which is in God and therefore though the Power Wisedome and goodnesse of God as they are God himselfe are indissolubly vnited by a personall vnion vnto the humanity of Christ innobled with all possibly created excellencies yet are they so proper vnto the Deity as that they cannot be communicated to be the Essentiall properties of it or of any other creature whatsoeuer and so the very names of them that they are the properties of God doth sufficiently shew that they cannot be the properties of any other thing Secondly as this Power of God is proper vnto God alone so it is absolute because it is not so limited by the vniuersall Law of Nature That the Power of God is absolute in three respects as if beside or aboue it God could not do any thing that he would but it is plenary and vniuersall because nothing is vnpossible vnto him but that without all limitation or determination he can do all and euery thing which howsoeuer and whensoeuer it pleaseth him And it is called absolute or omnipotent in three respects First because he can doe whatsoeuer he will doe First he can doe what he will Psal 135.6 for whatsoeuer pleaseth the Lord that did he in Heauen and in Earth and in the Sea and in all deepe places and the Wise man saith that he can shew his great strength at all times when hee will and it is worth the obseruing that as he can doe what he will Sap. 11.21 so he c n doe it as he will he need but say the word and they are done Let there be light and there was light Gen. 1.3 He can do any thing without meanes with meanes with small meanes and many times contrary to the nature of the meanes that hee vsually vseth Without meanes as in creating all things of nothing with meanes Hosea 2.21 as to fructifie the earth by the dropping of the cloudes Psal 77.20 with weake meanes as to leade his people out of Egypt by the hands of Moses and Aaron and by the foolishnesse of Preaching 1 Cor. 1.21 to saue those that beleeue and contrary to the nature of meanes Sap. 19.20 as when to let Israel passe through it he caused the red Sea to stand vpon heapes and to preserue the three children Dan. 3.27 he made the fire to forget his owne vertue and not to singe
other by creation then is the second a creature and therefore but one God vncreated and if one bee from the other by generation then the first gaue the second either a part or his whole substance if a part then is God partible may be diuided which cannot be said of such spirituall indiuidible substance and if the first gaue the rest his whole Essence then haue all the same Dietie and so all must be the same Godhead And so Anâ—isthenes saith it was the opinion of the best Philosophers Plures esse Deos populares vnum naturalem That although the people worshipped many Gods yet indeed there was but one onely God by Nature And therefore against the Valentinians thirty couple of gods Jrenaeus contra Valentin and all others that professe many gods it must needes follow euen from reason it selfe that there can be no more gods but one not specificall but numericall i. e. so absolutely one Tertul. l. contra Hermog e. 17. that he is one alone besides whom there can be none other and is therefore called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 onely one for we deny all number in the Deitie vnlesse you meane in the personall proprieties and therefore Gregory Nissen saith well Quod in multitudinem extendere numerum Deitatum eorum duntaxat est Nyssen ad Eustach l. de trin qui laborant multitudinis deorum errore That to extend the number of the Deities into a multitude belongs onely vnto them which doe erroniously maintaine a multitude of gods for the Catholicke faith is this that wee should worship the Trinity in Vnity and the Vnity in Trinity that is Basilius Ep. 141. ad Caesarium the trinity of Persons and the vnity of Essence because all number is to be reiected from the Essence of God saith Saint Basil For the Diuine Essence is so simple and so numerically one that no diuersitie can be giuen whereby the very persons doe differ in regard of the Essence and therefore in respect of this identitie and vnitie of Essence in the three persons of the Godhead our Sauiour saith I am in the Father and the Father in me Iohn 14.10 Wherupon Saint Cyril addeth further for the explanation of the same that we may not say that the Father is from the Sonne nor contained in the Sonne nor the Sonne to be in the Father as we are said to be and to liue in God for that we are onely by the effects of his grace he in the vnitie of his essence i. e. wee are one with God by grace but the Father the Sonne and the Holy Ghost are one by Nature so that whatsoeuer the Father essentially is the Sonne is the same and the holy Spirit is the same That the Essence of God is distinguished into three persons Gen. 1. And yet we must know that this one onely one indiuisible Essence is distinguished into three persons which we call the Father the Sonne and the Holy Ghost for so the Scriptures plainely teach vs as Let vs make man in our image and behold the man is become like one of vs saith the Lord himselfe to shew that in this vnity of Essence there is a plurality of persons and againe the Lord rained vpon Sodom and vpon Gomorrha from the Lord out of Heauen Gen. 19. that is the Sonne rained from the Father as Iustin Martyr Tertullian Epiphanius Cyprian Irenaeus Eusebius Cyrill Sozomen the Councell of Smyrna held in the yeare of Christ 336. Socrates Eccl. hist l. 2. c. 30. wherein Marcus Arethusius against the heresie of Photinus and many others doe so expound that place And so the three men that appeared vnto Abraham and that Heauenly harmony of Cherubims saying Holy holy holy Lord God of Sabboth Esay 6. doe sufficiently declare the Trinitie of persons in the Vnity of Gods Essence Ob. But then it may bee some will say these and the like places are too obscure to confirme the truth of so great a point Sol. Why God did not fully and plainely reueile the mysteries of the Trinitie at the first I answere that God at first would not shew this great mystery vnto all lest that being so prone as they were in the infancie of the Church to fal into Idolatry they should shake off the seruice of the true God therby be drawn to worship many Gods but the more his Church did increase in abilitie to vnderstand the more did God reueile vnto it both this mystery of the Trinitie and also many other mysteries of the Incarnation Passion Resurrection and Ascention of Iesus Christ And therefore what hee obscurely shadowed in the time of the Patriarchs hee did more cleerely shew vnto his Prophets and most plainely in the time of the Apostles proclaime the same vnto all people For Christ bad them goe and baptize all men Matth. 28. in the name of the Father and of the Sonne 1. Iohn 5. and of the Holy Ghost And so Saint Iohn saith there be three that beare witnesse in Heauen the Father the Word and the Spirit And yet these three be but one saith the Apostle For as in one Sunne there are the body of the Sunne the Sunne beames and the heate Aug. de Trinit the beames are begotten of the Sunne and the heate doth proceed both from the Sunne and the Sunne beames but the Sunne it selfe proceeds from none Euen so in the one Essence of God there are the Father the Sonne and the Holy Ghost the sonne is begotten of the Father the Holy Ghost proceeds from both but the Father is of himselfe alone and as the fountaine begets the brooke Jdem de verbis Domim and both the fountaine and brooke doe make the Poole and yet all three is the same water so the father is the Fountaine which begets the Sonne and from the Father and Sonne proceeds the Holy Ghost That there are certaine similitudes of the Trinity to be seene in the creatures and yet is the Deity of all three the same in like manner the fire hath motion light and heate and yet but one fire and in the soule of man there are three faculties the vegetatiue the sensitiue and the rationall and yet but one soule and in all other creatures wee may behold certaine glimpes and similitudes that doe after a sort adumbrate and shadow out this ineffable and inexpressable mysterie for by their greatnesse we may consider the power of the Father by their beauty we may see the wisedome of the Sonne and by their vtilitie we may note the goodnesse of the Holy Ghost God left not himselfe without witnesse no not wholly of the manner of his subsistence if not to proue this blessed mysterie yet at least to illustrate it Thom. p. 1. q 32. art 1. and to proue as Aquinas saith Non esse impossibile quod fides praedicat That those things are not impossible which faith preacheth But it may be some
be the person of the other Secondly from these inward operations of these persons doe proceed the nominall relations of the one vnto the other as father Sonne and Holy Ghost which doe likewise make a true reall distinction of the persons for the Father is not a name of Essence but of relation vnto the Sonne and the Sonne is not a name of Essence but of relation vnto the Father and so the Holy Ghost proceeding is not a name of Essence but of relation to the Father and the Sonne and therefore these names are so proper to each person that the name of the one cannot be ascribed to the other But you wil say that the Sonne is called Father as Esay 9.6 Sol. he is said to be the Father of eternities I answere that the name of Father is taken two wayes 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Essentially 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Personally Ob. First Essentially and so in respect of the creatures each person of the Trinitie may be rightly tearmed Father The name of Father is taken two-wayes Secondly personally and so the first person onely is Father because he onely doth beget his sonne And thus you see that although the Diuine Essence is onely one yet that there are three persons in this one Essence not that the Essence begets either Essence or person but because the person of the Father begetteth the person of the Sonne and both Father and Sonne doe eternally spire and send forth the person of the Holy Ghost Athana 2. Dialog de Trinit But for the manner how the Father begetteth the Sonne or how the Father and the Sonne doe spire and send forth the holy Spirit I must answere as Galenus did Galenus l. 15. de vsu partium 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in a point farre inferior to this which is of infinite profundity How this is done if you enquire you will be taken for one that hath no vnderstanding either of your owne infirmity or of the power of the Creator And the Fathers doe often dehort vs from the curiosity of explaining the manner of diuine mysteries for that worthy Nazianzene saith You heare the generation of the Sonne 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Nazian orat 1. de theolog 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That we should not enquire too farre into the manner of Diuine Mysteries be not curious to know the manner You heare The Holy Ghost proceedeth be not busie to enquire how And in another place he saith Let the generation of God be honoured with silence it is much for thee to haue learned that he was begotten As for the manner how wee grant it not to be vnderstood by Angels much lesse by thee If the Fathers of the Councell of Lateran had followed the councell of this Father they had neuer gone so farre to enquire how Christ is in the Sacrament and so positiuely to conclude it to be by that vnheard vnknowne incredible and impossible way of transubstantiation And therefore if we would not erre with them or beyond them in this point farre more difficult then that let vs not be too curious to enquire how these things can be but let vs faithfully beleeue them to be a Trinity of Persons in the vnity of the Diuine Essence and each person to haue the whole Diuine Essence so communicated vnto it as that all the three persons must needes be co-eternall co-essentiall and co-equall But because the second Person which is the Sonne and which the Euangelist here meaneth by the Word as hereafter I shall shew vnto you was incarnate and made flesh you must giue me leaue to insist chiefly vpon that person and to discusse these three especiall points concerning the same 1. Touching this person how excellent he is 2. Touching this name here vsed why hee is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Word 3. Touching this worke why he was incarnate and made flesh For the first I will onely shew these three things 1. That for time he is God Three things handled touching the person of the Son co-eternall 2. For nature co-essentiall and 3. For dignity co-equall vnto his Father CHAP. III. Of the Coeternity of the Word with his Father That the Word was before he was made flesh FIrst That this Word was before he was made Flesh the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the first vsed here and the second in the fourth Chapter to the Galathians doth make it plaine for that they signifie one that first was and afterwards was made that which hee was not And therefore hee doth not say that the Word was made first and then was made Flesh but that the Word which in the beginning and before all beginnings was in the fulnesse of time was made flesh And this may be further proued by almost infinite arguments as First He is the Sonne of the Father the wisedome and the power of God and therefore either the Father was without a Sonne and then he could be no Father and God was without his wisedome and without his strength or else he was neuer without his Sonne but to say that God was without his wisedome or without his strength Aug. ep 6.6 is most absurd Ergo Non ex tempore genitus est qui cuncta tempora condidit And therefore he was not begotten in time which created all times saith Saint Augustine Secondly He is God for Si Dietas verbi non nostrae est insita carni tum Christus falsi corporis vmbra fuit Either Christ is God or he is no man nor any Sauiour of man and he is no titular God but by Nature God hee is the true Iehoua which was which is and which shall be And therefore euerlasting for thou art God from euerlasting and World without end But That Christ is a true God is proued That he is a true God both apparant Scriptures and vnanswerable reasons drawne from Scriptures doe make it plaine For First from Scriptures First The Scriptures call him the true Ieheua as we may see by the collation and comparing of these places viz. Exodus 3.2.13.4.14.24.20.2 and Acts 7.30.32 1 Cor. 10.4.9 c. And so the Scriptures call him God as Gen. 32.28 Psal 45.7 Esay 7.14 Mathew 3.3 Heb. 1.8 And therefore Saint Iohn saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the Word was God And Christ himselfe saith Iohn 17.3 This is eternall life to know thee to be the onely true God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ For these words are thus to be expounded that they know thee and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ to be the onely true God because these two persons are but the very selfe-same Essence So Thomas saith vnto Christ My Lord and my God Iohn 20.28 And so we finde the same truth expressed Acts 20.28 Rom. 8.5.1 Iohn 3.16 1 Iohn 5.20 1 Tim. 3.16 Psal 47.6 and in many other places of the Scripture which wee may
obuiously meete Secondly by vnanswerable reasons drawne from Scripture First from the incommunicable properties of God and would be here tedious to relate Secondly We may shew the same by infallible and vnanswerable reasons drawne from Scriptures as First From those incommunicable properties of the Deity which are properly ascribed vnto him as First To be Omnipotent Iohn 3.31 Heb. 1.3 Philip. 3.21 Apoc. 1.18 Secondly To remit sinnes not onely instrumentally as the Ministers doe as we see in Mathew 16.19 Iohn 20.23 But absolutely by his owne proper power and authority as wee see in Mathew 9.6 Mar. 2.5.7.9 Luc. 5.20 Thirdly To be in many places at the same instant as Mathew 18.20.28.20 Fourthly To haue the same equall power with the Father Iohn 5.17 c. 16.15 Fiftly To raise himselfe from the graue Rom. 1.4 Ioh. 10.18 Sixthly To send forth and to giue the Holy Ghost Zach. 12.10 Iohn 16.7 Secondly From those relations that he hath with God Secondly from the relations that he hath with God as to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The onely begotten Sonne of God Iohn 1.18 To be the Image of the Father Iohn 14.7.8 9. 2 Cor. 4.4 Coloss 1.15 And to be the very forme of God for the Apostle saith That He being in the forme of God thought it no robbery to be equall with God Therefore he must needes be true God First Because the forme of God is most simple and essentiall and not compounded or accidentall for that in God there is no composition no accidents Et nihil est in Deo quod non sit ipse Deus Nor any other thing which is not God Gabriel Biel. super 1. sentent dist 1. q. 5. Because the Diuine Essence Identificat sibi omnia quae sunt in Diuinis Doth identifie or deifie all things that are in the De ty To bee the forme of God is to be a very God Secondly because the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one existing and being in the forme of God doth plainely signifie the verie nature of God for as his being in the forme of man proueth that hee was a verie man so his being in the forme of God and his iust and lawfull thinking that it was no wrong or robberie to bee equalâ— with God doth most substantially proue that hee was a very God by nature before hee was incarnate and made man for who can bee in the forme of God but verie God or who can rightly be aequall with God Esay 40.18 but God For to whom will yee liken God or what likenesse will yee compare vnto him sayth the Prophet and therefore Saint Basil sayth that to bee in the forme of God is as much Basilius l. 1. cont Eunomium as to exist in the essence of God for that as to take vpon him the forme of a seruant signifieth that our Lord was made partaker of the humane nature so by saying that hee was in the forme of God hee ascribeth vnto him the proprietie of the nature of God Colloss 1.15 and so discussing the words of the Apostle which is the image of the inuisible God he sayth that this image was not made with hands Ambros l. 7. Ep. 47. Aug. l. de fide ad Petrum l. 1. c. 1. de trinit Hiâ—ar l. 12 de trinit Lombard l. 3. dist 5. neither was it the worke of any arte or cogitation but a liuing image yea life it selfe retayning the identitie of the Godhead not in the similitude of any figure but in the substance of the same and so Saint Ambrose Saint Augustine Saint Hillarie Pet. Lombard and diuers others doe most truely interpret this being of him in the forme of God to proue him to be a true and eternall God Thirdly From those Epithets which are ascribed vnto him and are onely agreeable to the Diuine nature Thirdly from the Epithets ascribed vnto him as First To be the author of our Election Iohn 13.18 Secondly To know the secrets of our hearts Matth. 9.4.5 Mar. 2.8 Luke 5.22 Thirdly To Illuminate vs. Iohn 1.9 Fourthly To heare the prayers of them that call vpon him Iohn 14.14 Fiftly To Iudge the quicke and the dead Iohn 5.22 Sixtly To giue vnto his seruants euerlasting life Iohn 5.24 Seauenthly To bee truely rich and so able to doe and to bestow these great rewards vpon his seruants for he that is truely rich must needs be the true and eternall God but Christ sayth the Apostle is rich for hee being rich for our sakes became poore 2 Cor. 8.9 therefore hee must needs bee the true God That Go dis truely rich it appearth hence that he onely is El shadai a God of all sufficiencie and therefore hee sayth Psal 50.12 If I bee hungry I will not tell thee for all the world is myne and all that therein is and he onely may most truely say Mille meae siculis errant in montibus agnae All the beasts of the forrest are mine and so are the cattell vpon a thousand hills Neither is he onely rich in temporall riches Rom. 2.11 but in spirituall gifts and graces also for Saint Paul speaketh of the riches of the Benignitie and Lenitie and long sufferance of God and in Ephes 1.18 He speaketh of the riches of his grace where hee calleth God rich in Mercie or rich in glorie and Rom. 11.33 He crieth out O the deepenesse of the riches both of the Wisedome and Knowledge of God and therefore it is most playne that God is truely rich And that none else is rich but God it may bee as easily confirmed for that euery man if hee doth but consider his owne estate may say with the Prophet Dauid I am poore and in miserie and our wants are a great deale more then our wealth and what we haue wee haue not of our selues but wee haue receiued them from God for what hast thou that thou hast not receiued sayth the Apostle 1 Cor. 4.7 and what thou hast receiued is properly none of thine and therefore as thou camest naked and broughtest nothing into the world so thou shalt returne naked Job 1.21 and carrie nothing out of the world againe But against this you will obiect that the Scripture sayth Ob Abraham Lot Iob and diuers others were very rich and yet no Gods and therefore that euery one which is rich is not a God I answere first that these men were not truely rich Sol. No man in this world is truely rich but were so thought to bee in the opinion of men and therefore so called after the manner of men for he onely is a rich man qui nihil quaerat nihil appetat nihil optet amplius which neither doth nor can seeke nor wish nor desire any more then he hath as Cicero sayth but none of these were such for Abraham and the rest of them did professe that they were pilgrimes and strangers here on earth and therefore sought their countrey aboue
in Heauen Heb. 11.14 And secondly I say that these worldly riches are no true riches but onely vaine and imaginarie riches for they haue made many proude That the riches of this life are not the true riches none better if they had why did the wisest Philosopher so pronounced by the voice of the Oracle cast all his gold into the sea that he might be happie and the wisest among the sonnes of men so pronounced by the voyce of God pray aswell against riches as pouertie Prou. 30.8 and the best kings in this Iland and many other princes in many other countreyes besides the Apostles that forsooke all to follow Christ Matth. 19.27 change their princely thrones for poore cells and their kingly scepter for the diuine Scriptures and therefore he was a better husband then Philosopher that termed these riches goods but hee mended the matter well that called them goods of fortune false goods ascribed to a false patrone for as there is no goodnesse in them so there is no fortune to giue them the meaning therefore as I take it is this Doctor Hall that it is a chance if euer these riches proue good to any for many times they hurt the owners and disquiet others and as many time and ofnter too the worse men haue them and the best men want them and yet they are neuer the better for hauing them nor the other neuer the worse for wanting them for I heare Saint Peter and Saint Iohn the eldest and deerest Apostles say gold and siluer haue I none and I reade that Iudas the youngest and the worst Apostle bare the bagge and I reade that the Deuill sayd all these things will I giue thee and they are mine to giue and that Diues was rich and Lazarus poore and yet now the poore is made rich and caried vp to Heauen and the rich is poore and sent downe to Hell and therefore it is apparant that these false goods can be no true riches and so consequently that none is truely rich but onely God Now to proue that Christ is rich besides the foresaid testimonie of the Apostle our Sauiour himselfe sayth all that the Father hath Iohn 16. are mine of the holy Ghost he sayth he shall receiue of mine and declare vnto you and so the Euangelist sayth that of his fulnesse we haue all receiued Iohn 1.16 and grace for grace and therefore Christ being truely rich inriched with all the riches of the Dietie power strength wisedome goodnesse mercie and such like he must needs be the true and eternall God Fourthly from the proper workes of God Fourthly from the vniuersall effects and proper workes of God for he that created and preserueth and gouerneth all the things that are created is the true and euerlasting God but this word Created all things and doth still sustaine and gouerne all things and therefore he must needs be the true God The maior is cleere of it selfe Gene. 1.1 because as Moses sayth In the beginning God created the Heauen and the earth And The minor is confirmed That Christ created all things Psal 45.7 Psal 102.25 by the testimony of the Holy Scriptures which sayth Thy throne O God is for euer and euer the Scepter of thy kingdome is a right Scepter and in an other Psalm he sayth And thou Lord in the beginning hast layd the foundation of the Earth and the Heauens are the workes of thy hands so the Euangelist sayth that all things are made by this Word Iohn 1.2 and without this Word was made nothing that was made so Saint Paul sayth that all things were created by him aswell those things which are in Heauen as those things which are in Earth Colloss 1.16 And so all the orthodoxe fathers doe subscribe vnto the same trueth for Ignatius speaking of Christ vseth the verie words of the Euangelist that he was in the world and the world was made by him Jgnatius in ep ad Tarsenses Iust Mart orat 1. ad graecos and yet the world knew him not and Iustin Martyr sayth that by this Word both Heauen and Earth and all other creatures were created and Irenaeus l. 2. c. 2. against heresies Athenagoras in his apollogie for the Christians Clemens Alexandrinus l. 1. Pedagogi Tertullian in his Apollogetico Saint Cyprian in his second Booke against the Iewes and many more doe largely That Christ gouerneth all things and plainely proue by inanswerable arguments that all things were created by this Word And that Christ gouerneth all things the Author of the Epistle to the Hebrewes sayth Heb. 1.2.3 that he beareth vp all things with his mighty Word and our Sauiour sayth vnto the Iewes my father worketh yet and I worke Iohn 5.17 and Saint Paul sayth that hee is before all things 1 Colloss 17. and that by him all things doe consist Fiftly from the prayers which all Saints haue made Fiftly from the prayers of the Saints and that Diuine worship which they exhibited and which indeed is due to him for we are to pray to none but to God because wee beleeue in none but in God and because none but God can at all times heare vs and at any time helpe vs Iohn 5.23 but prayers shall bee euer made vnto Christ and dayly shall be praysed 1 Ioh. 2.22.23 sayth the Psalmist and so the Saints doe and euer haue prayed vnto him Rom. 14.11 as vnto the onely God Philip. 2.10 which can deliuer them out of their distresse and therefore this Word that was made flesh did make all flesh and is indeede the true and eternall God as wee may see in Prouerbes 8.12 Iohn 1.1 Apoc. 1.8 and as I haue by these inanswerable arguments sufficiently proued vnto you The obiections of the Arians against the eternall Godhead of Christ But against this eternall generation and euerlasting Godhead of this Sonne of God both the old Arians and the new vpstarte Ministers of Transiluania that like euill weeds did spring vp out of Arius his ashes doe obiect and indeuour with the witt of hell to proue that this God of Heauen was no God before his incarnation and was made man for Ob. 1 First They doe obiect that Saint Luke sayth hee shall be called the Sonne of God therefore he was not called before his incarnation Esay 9. and so Esayas saith that vnto vs a child is borne and vnto vs a sonne is giuen and he shall be called wonderfull the mighty God and the prince of Peace and therefore as Magistrates are not called Magistrates before they are made Magistrates so was not hee called the mighty God before hee was borne and giuen vnto vs This was the opinion of Arrius and Seruetus that the Sonne of God was nothing before his incarnation but onely a decree in the mynde of God to make this man Iesus Christ and to replenish him with abundant gifts of the Dietie
it were of the like nature with God Fourthly they affirme that although the word it selfe is not found in the Scriptures yet that the full sense and meaning of the word is plainely found Aug. tract 79. In Joh. Cyrillus l. 1. de trinit as Saint Augustine doth most excellently proue out of those words of our Sauiour I and my Father are one Iohn 10. And that it is deriued from the Scripture for it is deriued of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Essence and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is deriued of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Lord saith of himselfe Ego sum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I am he that is or I am that I am Exod. 3. And therefore seeing this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their verball winde shakes no corne nor cannot derogate any thing from the coessentiality of this word with his Father they proceed against the matter And so Secondly they doe obiect against the truth of the matter declared by this Word And First they argue thus Whose wils are diuers their natures Ob. 1 and essences are diuers but the will of the Father and of the Sonne are diuers for the Sonne saith vnto his Father Father if it be possible Matth. 26.39 let this cup passe from me neuerthelesse not as I will but as thou wilt therefore their Essence must needes be diuers Sol. That Christ as he hath two Natures so he hath a two-fold Will. I answere that the proposition is to be distinguished for whose wils are diuers hauing the same natures their natures must be diuers but in Christ there are two natures diuine and humane and therefore that his will is diuers or not the same will as his fathers is in respect of his humane nature though it be alwayes subiect and agreeable to the same we easily grant but that his will in respect of his diuine nature is any wayes different or diuers from his Fathers will we vtterly deny and we say not that the whole person of Christ but that Christ in respect of his diuine nature as he is the second person of the Trinitie is co-essentiall vnto his Father and therefore though the will of Christ as he is the Sonne of man be not the same as his Fathers will is yet that doth not proue the will of Christ as hee is the Sonne of God to be not the same as his Fathers will is because Christ hath a two-fold will the one as he is the eternall Word and the other as he is made Flesh Ob. 2 Secondly they say he that is mediator betwixt God and men is not of the same essence with God but Christ is the Mediator betwixt God and men 1 Tim. 2.5 saith the Apostle therefore he cannot be of the same essence with God Sol. That there are two sorts of Mediators I answere that the proposition is to be distinguished for it is true of such a mediator as Moses was the Messenger of God to men but it is false of such a Mediator as reconcileth wicked men to God by appeasing his wrath and making satisfaction for their sinnes for that no man can do so but he that is God by nature Now Saint Paul sheweth Christ to be such a Mediator as doth appease the wrath of God and therefore he sheweth euen thereby that Christ must needes be a God by nature and of the same Essence with his Father Ob. 3 Thirdly they say Christ is a Mediator and an Aduocate with God but he is no Mediator nor Aduocate with himselfe therefore himselfe is not of the same Essence with God Sol. I answere that the Name of God is to be taken two wayes First Essentially and so Christ is a Mediator with God Secondly Hipostatically for any person of the God-head and so Christ also is Mediator with God if you vnderstand God for the person of the Father not excluding the Sonne or the Holy Ghost for otherwise it is false because he is not onely Mediator with the person of the Father but also with himselfe and the Holy Ghost So likewise in the conclusion if you take God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the person of the Father we yeeld Christ is not God because God the Sonne is not nor cannot be God the Father And to the minor I say That Christ reconcileth vs to himselfe that Christ may bee said to bee a Mediator with himselfe if we consider the office of mediation Nam sacrificij modum non sicut vnus quidam ex nobis sacerdotibus affert seruiliter For he doth not seruilely like some of vs or any vnder the Law bring the substance of our sacrifice vnto the Priests which should first offer for themselues and then for the sinnes of their people because he hath nothing herein common with vs that he should receiue it at our hands to offer it for vs but as he is our sacrifice himselfe Cyrillus l. de recta fide ad reginas Sic sibi ipsi conciliat per ipsum in ipso patri So he reconcileth vs vnto himselfe and through himselfe and in himselfe vnto his Father as Saint Cyrill saith Fourthly they say If he be of the same essence with the Father Ob. 4 then is he essentially in the Father but he is not essentially in the Father for the Word was with God and not in God John 1.1 saith the Euangelist but to be with God signifieth not to be in God but without him as a booke held in my hand is with me though it be not in me therefore Christ is not essentially in the Father consequently not of the same essence with the Father To this Fulgentius answereth diuers wayes Sol. 1. If all that is sayd to be with God be without God Fulgent in resp ad obiect Arrianorum and all that is sayd to bee in God bee within him then are wee neerer vnto God then the Sonne of God for here you see he is sayd but to be with God and we are sayd to be in God 1 Cor. 8. for there is but one God the Father by whom are all things and wee in him sayth the Apostle but this is most absurd to say that wee are neerer vnto God then the Sonne of God and therefore it is as absurd to say that all which is with God is without God and all that are sayd to be in him to be within him Secondly Hee proueth that to be with God or with man doth not alwayes signifie to bee without God or without man for it is sayd that the vngodly reasoned with themselues Wisd 2.1 but when a man reasoneth he doth it within himselfe and not without himselfe C. 4.1 and it is sayd that the memoriall of Vertue is immortall because it is knowne with God and with men but it cannot be knowne with men vnlesse the memorie thereof be within men John 14.15 and so our Sauiour Christ sayth If any man loue mee and will
dayes he hath spoken vnto vs by his Sonne for this is all one as if he had said that the word heretofore was vttered by other mens mouthes but now after he was made flesh he spake and reueiled his Father vnto vs by his owne voyce and with his owne proper mouth for so Tertullian saith that he which spake vnto the Fathers was this word GOD and so Saint Paul sheweth when hee brings in God saying The Word is neere vnto thee euen in thy mouth Rom. 10.8 and in thy heart and then he expoundeth this word of Christ saying This is the Word of Faith which we preach for they preached Iesus Christ so Saint Iohn himselfe seemeth to shew this reason why he had called Christ the Word when he saith John 1.18 The onely begotten Sonne which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared for this is all one as if he had said This onely begotten Sonne is therefore the Word because he declareth the minde of God vnto vs so when he saith what we haue heard of the Word of life i. e. he is therefore the Word because we haue heard him and so when he saith There be three that heare witnesse in Heauen 1 John 5.7 the Father the Word and the Spirit for why should he say the Word when as the name of Father required that he should rather say the Father the Sonne and the Spirit but because the Sonne as the word of the Father doth beare witnesse vnto vs of his Fathers will and therefore seeing it was the office of the Word to declare the minde of God it belonged vnto the Word to be made Flesh that he might be heard and seene of vs. But then it may be obiected that the Holy Ghost should be incarnate as well as the Sonne for Saint Basil saith Ob. Whether the Holy Ghost is termed the Word that the Holy Ghost is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word as well as the Sonne and that hee is therefore called the Word because hee is the interpreter of the Sonne euen as the Sonne is the interpreter of the Father for he shall teach you all things saith Christ and to proue this he citeth those words of the Apostle that we should take the sword of the Spirit which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Word of God and those words in the first Chapter to the Hebrewes that Christ beareth vp all things with the word of his power Basilius l 5. c. 11. contra Eunom Sol. or his mighty Word that is his Holy Spirit saith Saint Basil To this Aquinas answereth that Saint Basil herein speakes improperly for that the Sonne of God alone is properly called the Word and that Saint Paul by the sword of the Spirit which is the Word of God doth not vnderstand the Holy Ghost but the word which came vnto the Prophets and was left vnto vs in the holy Scriptures and that the words of the Author to the Hebrewes are to be vnderstood of the command of Christ as if the Apostle had said that Christ beareth vp all things and gouerneth all things by his mighty command or according aâ— himselfe defineth Victorinus in l. aduers Arrium and would haue all things to be as Victorinus saith or else that Christ sustaineth all things by his mighty word that is after an Hebrew phrase by himselfe which is the mighty Word of his Father Maldonat in Iohn 1. as Maldonate saith Secondly the Word was made flesh Propter ordinem seruandum Secondly because God would obserue good order in all things because God which is the God of order would keepe good order in all things As First that the world might be repayred by the same instrument by which it was created but the Father made all things by his Word therefore he would redeeme mankinde by his Word Secondly that he which was the essentiall and vncreated image of God might restore that created image of God which was corrupted in vs. Thirdly that the naturall Sonne of God might make vs the adopted sonnes of God Fourthly that the Sonne by his example might teach vs the obedience of sonnes Thirdly because God would shunne all inconueâ—iences that might arise if he had not beene incarnate Thirdly the Word was made flesh Propter vitandum inconueniens because God would auoide all absurdities that otherwise might seeme to ensue for if the Father had beene incarnate then there had beene two Fathers and two Sonnes the Father in the Deitie had beene the Sonne in the Humanitie and the Sonne in the Dietie had beene the Father of the Humanity and neither of them had beene of himselfe without beginning but he that was the beginning of the Sonne in the Deitie had had his beginning from the Sonne in the humanitie but now he that is from the Father in the Deitie is likewise from the Father in the humanitie and he that is the Sonne in the Deitie is likewise the Sonne in the humanitie and if the Holy Ghost had beene incarnate then there had beene two sonnes one in the Deitie and another in the humanitie Et nomen filij ad alterum transiret qui non esset aeterna natiuitate filius And the name of Sonne had passed to another which was not a Sonne by an eternall natiuitie and therefore in all respects it was fittest and agreeable to all reason that the Word should be incarnate and made flesh as Saint Augustine saith But against this it will be obiected Ob. that seeing Opera trinitatis ad extra sunt indiuisa The outward workes of the Trinitie are indiuisible and common to each person so that whatsoeuer any one of them doth it is done by each one and that this is an outward worke of the Trinitie common to each person each person being an agent in this action the Fathers power the Sonnes wisedome and the Holy Ghost his goodnesse all concurring in this incarnation For First how can the Creator and the Creature That all three persons were the makers of the flesh of Christ especially a creature relapsed from God be ioyned together without great power the power of ioyning the disagreeing elements was very great the power of ioyning them to a created spirit was greater but hypostatically to ioyne a creature disioyned from his Creator vnto an vncreated spirit must needes be the greatest power that can be And therefore this incarnation of the Word could neuer haue beene done without the infinite power of God Secondly how can the first and the last be vnited together without great wisedome for this Word was the beginning yea before the beginning of all things and Adam was the last of all Gods creatures And therefore the Word God and the flesh of man could neuer be vnited without infinite wisedome Thirdly how can the Creator communicate himselfe so neerely vnto his Creatures without the greatest goodnesse that can be for it was a great benignity and kindnesse of
God to communicate himselfe vnto all creatures by his presence and it was a greater kindnesse to communicate himselfe to all the godly by his grace but it is the greatest of all to vnite himselfe hypostatically by his spirit vnto our flesh And therefore this could not be done without infinite goodnesse and so in this respect we find this worke of the incarnation ascribed to each person for the Father sent me saith our Sauiour and I came into the world saith he of himselfe and the Holy Ghost shall come vpon thee and the power of the most high shall ouer shadow thee whereby thou mayst conceiue saith Gabriel vnto the blessed Virgin And therefore seeing the whole Trinitie was the Maker of this Word flesh how can it be but that the whole Trinitie should be incarnate and made flesh Sol. That the Son onely assumed our Flesh I answere that this worke of the words incarnation is to bee considered 1. Inchoatiue 2. Consummatiue As it was inchoated and begun As it is consummated and finished In the first sense it is common to all the three persons of the Trinitie for it was made by them all three but in the second sense it was proper onely vnto the Word because it was assumed onely by the Word Aug. in Enchyrid C. 38. as Saint Augustine sheweth for as if three Maides should spinne and make a garment and then put it vpon one of them to weare all three should be the makers yet but one should be the wearer of the same Euen so though the Father did appoint Christ a body and this body was conceiued by the Holy Ghost yet neither the Father nor the Spirit did assume that body but only the person of the Sonne of God and therefore Saint Augustine saith truly Idem Ser. 3. de temp that Impleuet carnem Christi pater spiritus sanctus sed maiestate non susceptione The flesh of Christ was filled with the Maiestie of the Father and of the Holy Ghost but it was onely vnited to the person of the Word Ob. But then againe it may be obiected that seeing the nature of the Father and the nature of the Sonne be the very same for they be both 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the very selfe-same essence as I haue sufficiently shewed vnto you before and the whole diuine essence is in euery one of them therefore how can it be but the Sonne being incarnate the Father should be incarnate also Sol. To this we answere briefly that although the nature of the Father and the nature of the Sonne be the very same yet Aliter est in patre aliter est in filio This very selfe-same essence is otherwise or after another manner in the Father The diuine nature limited in the person of the Sonne was made Flesh and after another manner in the Sonne and therefore we say that the Diuine nature simply considered cannot be said to be incarnate Sed natura diuina determinata limitata in persona filij But the diuine nature limited and determined in the person of the Son And this Saint Augustine doth most excellently expresse against the Iewes saying O Iudae Cytharam respice c. Behold O Iew the Harpe when it yeelds sweet and pleasant tune there be three things that seeme to concurre alike the skill the hand and the string and yet there is but one sound heard Ars dictat manus tangit chorda resonat The Art or skill directeth the hand toucheth and the string onely soundeth Tria pariter operantur they doe all three worke alike and yet neither the skill nor the hand doe yeeld the sound but onely the string Sic nec pater Operatio in tribus constat sed quemadmodum ad solam chordam soni redditio sic pertinet ad solum Christum carnis humanae susceptio nec spiritus sanctus susceperunt carnem tamen cum filio pariter operantur So neither the Father nor the Holy Spirit did assume the flesh and yet they did all agree in the working and making of this flesh but as the string alone doth yeeld the musicall harmony so the word alone did assume the flesh the worke is seene in all three but as the sound of the musicke pertaineth vnto the string alone so the assumption of our flesh pertayneth to the word alone and if any incredulous Iew with Nichodemus demaunds how this Word should be made flesh of a Virgin without the helpe of man let him tell me how Aarons rod Aug. de incarnat Dom. cont Iudaeos being a drie sticke could blossome and beare ripe Almonds and I will tell him how the Virgin did conceiue and beare a Sonne but he cannot tell the former though the lesser miracle and therefore no wonder that I cannot expresse the latter which is so ineffable a mysterie saith Saint Augustine And so you see the first Branch of this Text touching the person who was made the Word the Sonne the second person of the blessed Trinity fully discussed BRANCH II. CHAP. I. Of Christ his apparition before his incarnation and of the conception of Christ the manner of it and the reasons why hee was so conceiued 2. Branch Tres misturas fecit omnipotens illa maiestas in assumptione carnis nostrae ita mirabiliter singularia singulariter mirabilia vt talia nec facta nec facienda sint amplius super terram SEcondly We are to consider what hee was made Flesh for the Word was made Flesh Saint Bernard saith God did three workes three mixtures as hee calleth them in the assumption of our flesh so singularly wonderfull and so wonderfully singular that the like were neuer made before nor shall be made hereafter vpon the face of the Earth Coniunct à quippe sunt ad invicem Deus homo mater virgo fides cor humanum For now are ioyned together God and our Flesh a Mother and a Virgin a diuine Faith and a humane Heart for the Word and Soule and Flesh haue met and made but one Person These three are one and this one is three not by the confusion of substance but in the vnity of person This is the first and most super-excellent mixture or coniunction The second is a Virgin and a Mother a thing so admirable so singular that since the World beganne it was neuer heard that shee which brings forth a Childe should be a Maide and that shee should be a Mother which still remaines a Virgin The third is Faith and Mans Heart Inferior quidem sed non minus forsitan fortis an inferior copulation but perhaps not deseruing much lesse admiration For it is a wonder to see how the Heart of Man can yeeld Faith and beliefe vnto these two and to beleeue that God should be made Man that shee should remain a Virgin which had borne a Sonne for as Iron and a Gally-cup can neuer be coupled together Bernard Ser. 3.
Alij atque alij aliud atque aliud opinati sunt Diuers men haue diuers iudgements but in diuiding the worlds age into seauen parts I finde most agreeing in the same iudgement and in affirming Christ to be borne in the sixt age of the world the latter end of the same That Christ was borne in the sixt age of the world and why if we follow Damascens account or in the beginning of the same if we follow Saint Augustines account but which soeuer it was in the sixt age that there might be a correspondencie betwixt the workes of creation and of redemption Nam sicut primus Adam conditus fuit sexta aetate ad totius creaturae perfectionem Because that as the first Adam was made on the sixt day to be the complement and perfection of all creatures so the second Adam was made in the sixt age of the world to restore all mankinde vnto their integrity And this teacheth vs patiently to waite for the comming of Iesus Christ for if God deferred the first comming of Christ almost 4000. yeares but did at last fulfill his promise and came in his appointed time we may assure our selues that he will doe the like for his second comming 2 Peter 2 4. against all those that say Where is the promise of his comming Why Christ was borne in the raigne of Augustus and Herod Secondly He was borne in the Raigne of Augustus the two and fortieth yeare of his raigne as Tertullian and Saint Augustine say and in the one and thirtieth yeare of King Herods raigne as Beda saith or the two and thirtieth yeare as Eusebius saith And he was borne in the raigne of Augustus to shew vnto vs first that as Augustus was a temporall monarch so Christ should be a spirituall Monarch for that as the world can no more beare two temporall Monarchs then the heauens can beare two Sunnes Omnisque potestas impatiens consortis erit so the Church of Christ can haue but one head Secondly that as Augustus was the second Emperour so Christ was the second person of the Trinity Esay 9.6 Thirdly that being borne when all the world was at peace and yet taxed we might hereby see that although Christ was the Prince of peace Matth. 11.29 that immaculate Lambe which was meeke and lowly in heart yet he should be taxed for our sinnes and burthened for our transgressions Esay 53.5 And hee was borne in the raigne of Herod i. e. Herod the great to distinguish him from Herod Antipa and Herod Agrippa whereof Ascolanita necat pueros Antipa Iohannem Agrippa Iacobum mittitque in carcere petrum this first killed the children the second Iohn Baptist and the third Iames the brother of the Lord to shew vnto vs as both Saint Chrysostome and Leo obserue Chrysost in Matth. hom 9. Leo hom 3. in Epâ—ph Josephus antiq lib. 14. c 26. Phila de part temp that this is that Shiloh which was for to come because a Prince as Saint Hierome reads it or the Scepter should not depart from Iuda vntill Shiloh came but now Herod Patre Idumes matre ortus Arabica being an Idumean hauing got the Scepter from Iuda by Augustus his meanes and hauing in the thirtieth yeare of his tyrannicall rule destroyed all the Sanhedrim i. e. the Eldership of seauenty Iudges of the house of Dauid it must needs be the Messias must be borne Thirdly Why Christ was borne in December He was borne in December the tenth moneth of the yeare to shew that he came to make satisfaction for the 10. commandements and to shew that as 10. consist of the figure 1. and the cipher 0. so his person did consist of the figure of his Deity and the cipher of our humanity as some Diuines haue obserued Fourthly He was borne in the shortest day of this moneth Three things obseruable in this day of Christs Natiuity which was the fiue and twentieth day in the Winter Solstice in which day three things are obseruable first the Cold is greatest secondly the Sunne is lowest and thirdly thence-forward the dayes begin to increase So Christ was borne in the coldest day to teach vs not to pamper vp our vntamed flesh hee was borne when the Sunne was lowest to teach vs true humility and as when the day is shortest the Sunne is in his Tropicke so called of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to turne because now it turneth towards vs and so increaseth the length of our dayes more and more Ambros ser 2. de Natiuit and ascendeth vp into the Heauens higher and higher so from the day of Christs Natiuity the fauour of God is turned to vs our comforts are increased and the Kingdome of Heauen is inlarged for as Iohn Baptist saith I must decrease and he must increase John 3.30 so we find that after the birth of Iohn Baptist which was in the longest day as the Sunne descended so the obseruation of the ceremoniall and iudiciall Lawes decreased for the Law and the Prophets continued vntill Iohn but after the birth of Christ Matth. 11.13 which was in the shortest day as the â—unne thence ascended so the Kingdome of Heauen increased more and more Fiftly He was borne vpon the first day of the Weeke That Christ was borne vpon the first day of the Weeke which is our Saboath i. e. vpon the Sunday as Rupertus Antoninus Bonauenture Petrus de Natalibus S. Augustine and others doe affirme Vt quo die dixerat fiat lux facta est eiusdem diei nocte oriretur in tenebris lumen rectis corde retinens ordinem mirabilium suorum That vpon the same day as he said Let there be light and it was so there should spring vp light for them that are true of heart and therefore Saint Augustine saith that this day was euer venerable because that on this day God the Father began to create the world on this day God the Sonne began to redeeme the world on this day God the Holy Ghost began to sanctifie the world when he appeared on the Apostles Act. 2.3 like clouen tongues of fire on this day God made the light on this day was the true light produced that lighteneth euery one that commeth into the world John 1.9 on this day the children of Israel came out of Egypt on this day Christ came out of his graue and like enough that on this day Christ will come to giue vs an euerlasting rest and therefore we should alwayes sanctifie this day aboue all the dayes of the yeare that when he commeth he may not finde vs singing in the Tauernes but seruing him in his Church Tertul. l. 6. c. 9. contra Marc. Sixtly Tertullian and Saint Augustine say that he was borne in the night-time in the time of darkenesse because he came to dissolue the workes of darkenesse Luc. 2.8 and to proue this they alledge not onely what Saint Luke saith that the Shepheards
and my fury it vpheld me for as no man could take away his life from him he laid it downe himselfe as a man layeth downe his garments so though there was none to helpe him yet was it vnpossible that any or all his enemies should keepe away his life from him hee had equall power to take it vp as hee had to lay it downe at his pleasure and therefore St. Peter saith Act. 2.24 Ob. Act. 5.30 Act. 2.24 cap. 4.10 Ephes 1.20 Rom. 8.11 Sol. that he loosed the sorrowes of death because it was vnpossible that he should be holden of it But against this it may be obiected that the God of our fathers is said to haue raised vp Iesus from the dead and so in many places the suscitation and resurrection of Christ is ascribed vnto the Father and therefore Christ did not raise himselfe I answere that this doth not shew he raised not himselfe but it sheweth that the resurrection of the manhood of Christ is the indiuisible worke of the blessed Trinity essentially common to all the three persons for as the Father raised him so he raised himselfe for whatsoeuer the Father doth I doe saith Christ and so the holy Ghost raised him and therefore this rather confirmeth the truth of his resurrection by his owne power and vertue then any waies seeme to infringâ— the same Neither was it onely prophesied that he should rise againe from the dead but it was also more particularly shewed Hosea 6.2 that he should rise againe the third day for the Prophet Osee speaking of our Sauiour Christ saith after two dayes hee will reuiue vs and in the third day he will raise vs vp and we shall liue in his presence and Christ himselfe more plainly saith Matth. 12.40 that as Ionas was three dayes and three nights in the Whales belly so should the sonne of man be three dayes and three nights in the heart of the earth And the reason why hee was so directly to rise againe the third day may be said to be to fulfill all predictions That God foreshewed Christ should rise againe the third day that were fore-spoken concerning him that so the Scriptures might be fulfilled as our Sauiour himselfe doth testifie and so the Angell said that he was risen as he said and he said that he should rise againe the third day And this he said 1. Formerly in the old Testament 2. Lately in the new Testament First by his Prophet Osee hee said in plaine termes that in the third day he would raise vs vp i. e. his Son vnited to vs or else our flesh assumed by his Son but because as many of vs do now heare the Sermon and hate the Preacher praise his words and neuer practise the matter so did the Iewes then heare the prophesies but kill the Prophets retained the words but neuer beleeued the true substance of the matter therefore God did not onely by these dead letters but also by most liuely figures expresly shew that the Messias which should be slaine should in the third day be raised vp for Typicall testimonies shewing that Christ should rise the third day Gen. 22 4. First Isaac going with his Father to be sacrificed as a true type of that eternall Priest which was sacrificed for all men vntill the third day was no better then a dead man but at the third day he was reuiued restored and as it were raised againe from the dead Secondly Ioseph being sold to Egypt and sent by God to be a ruler next vnder Pharaoh Gen. 41.1 as Christ is vnder God his Father that he might be a type of this eternall King vntill the third yeare was no better then a dead man but in the third yeare hee was deliuered and made gouernour ouer all the land of Egypt Ionas 2.2.10 Thirdly Ionas being sent into the land of Niniue that hee might be a type of that great Prophet which the Lord our God had promised to raise vnto vs out of our brethren for three dayes was no better then a dead man lying all that while in the whales belly but after three dayes he was deliuered out of the belly of Hell and vomited out vpon the dry land All these fore-told the resurrection of Christ and therefore Christ to fulfill all these did rise againe the third day Christ himselfe shewed that he should rise againe the third day Secondly Neither did these preach louder vnto the Iewes that the Messias which was to come should rise againe the third day then Christ himselfe did vnto his Apostles that he would rise againe the third day for as soone as euer Saint Peter in the name of them all had confest that hee was the Christ the Sonne of the liuing God he did presently professe vnto him and the rest how hee must be killed and raised againe the third day and therefore to performe his owne words spoken by himselfe aswell as his Fathers words spoken by the Prophets hee would be mindefull of his promise and rise againe the third day and this the Angels doe excellently note when they said vnto the Women Luk. 24.6 Remember how he spake vnto you while he was yet in Galilee saying The Sonne of man must be deliuered into the hands of sinnefull men and be crucified and the third day rise againe An exceeding comfort vnto vs all that Christ will euer performe his word fulfill his promise and obserue his time to a minute for he is not as man that he should lie and therfore we should euer giue credence vnto his words for he will performe them all in their appointed times But here it may be demaunded Ob. why God appointed and decreed this third day to be the definitiue and set time of his resurrection rather then the second fourth or fifth or any other day before or after To this I answere that God is liberrimus agens Sol. That we are not curiously to search the reason of Gods free actions a free worker of his owne affaires and it is not for vs to know the times and the seasons which the Father hath kept in his owne power but as he doth whatsoeuer pleaseth him so hee doth them whensoeuer it pleaseth him Secondly I say that we find very excellent reasons that it pleased God to reueile vnto vs why Christ raised himselfe the third day that is 1. In respect of his enemies Christ raised himselfe the third day in three respects 2. In respect of his Disciples 3. In respect of all beleeuers First His enemies First of his enemies both in respect of the praedictions of the Prophets and the speeches of Christ himselfe knew that the Messias should rise againe the third day and therefore they hyred souldiers and appointed a guard to watch Turtul aduers Iudaeos c. 13. and to keepe the sepulcher that vpon that day this Iesus should not rise lest if he did he might be then thought to be the Messias
office of this Angell here expressed to serue Christ to affright the souldiers and to delight these women to teach them to direct them Reuel 4.8 and to preserue them in all their wayes for as they neuer cease to serue the Lord so they neuer cease to preserue the Saints vntill they cease to serue their God and therefore to vse Saints Bernards exhortation Quantum debet hoc verbum inferre reuerentiam afferre deuotionem conferre fiduciam How ought this doctrine to moue vs and worke in vs reuerence for their presence confidence for their custody and obedience vnto God for so great an argument of his beneuolence vnto man as to giue his Angels charge ouer vs Et quam cauté ambulandum and how warily ought we to walke seeing the Angels of God are euer present with vs when all the men of the world are absent from vs It is reported of a godly Virgin that being often sollicited by a gallant vnto vnlawfull lust at last she yeelded that if hee met her at such a place he should haue leaue to worke his pleasure with her both came to the place appointed and the place was full of people then the mayden told him that now if he pleased he might vse her as he would he answered that now for shame he durst not doe it in the sight of so many men and women then she replyed and thinkest thou that I dare doe that in the presence of God and his holy Angels which thou darest not doe in the sight of mortall men and I wish euery one of vs did so that is to be ashamed to doe those things in the sight of God and his holy Angels Psal 139.2 Velleius paterculus which we are afraid to doe in the presence of men for they alwayes see vs though wee see not them they are about our beds and about our pathes and spie out all our wayes and therefore as Marcus Drusus when one told him he could build him an house of such a forme as that no man might see what he did therein answered that hee liked better of such an Architector as could build his house so as that euery one passing by might plainely see what was done therein so I wish to God that euery one of vs would striue and labour so to liue as it becommeth vs to doe in the sight of God and of his blessed Angels And so we see the Resurrection of Christ fully and plainely shewed vs to the eternall praise and glory of God and to the endlesse ioy and happinesse of all Christians through the said Iesus Christ To whom with the Father and the Holy Spirit be ascribed all power and dominion both now and for euer Amen A Prayer O Blessed God which gauest thine onely Sonne Iesus Christ to suffer death for our sinnes to descend into Hell to destroy our enemies and to rise againe for our iustification and so to declare himselfe mightily to be the Sonne of God and the true Sauiour of all men We most humbly beseech thee to raise vs from the death of sinne from all our sinnes and to giue vs grace to beleeue in thee to be thankfull vnto thee and to serue thee in holinesse and righteousnesse all the dayes of our life that when we shall be laid to rest in our graues we may rest in assured hope to be raised vp by Christ to liue with him for euermore through the same Iesus Christ our Lord. Amen IEHOVAE LIBERATORI FINIS The Sixt Golden Candlesticke HOLDING The Sixt greatest Light of Christian RELIGION Of the Ascention of our SAVIOVR and of the Donation of the HOLY GHOST EPHES. 4.8 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Wherefore he saith when hee ascended vp on high heeled captiuity captiue and gaue gifts vnto men AFter that the blessed Apostle Saint Paul had by many arguments proued vnto the Ephesians that they should earnestly studie The coherence of this verse with what goeth before and most carefully labour to preserue the vnity of the Church of Christ he seemeth in the seuenth verse to answer a certaine obiection that might bee made viz. seeing the graces the gifts and the offices which God hath bestowed vpon his Church are so many and so manifold so diuers and so vnequall some hauing many graces some but few some one gift and some another how can it be that this vnity can be so faithfully preserued therefore the Apostle sheweth that the diuersity and inequality of gifts is not onely no hinderance but is indeed a great furtherance to cherish and preserue the same First Because all these gifts do flow from the same fountaine Iesus Christ Secondly Because they are all giuen and imparted for the same end and purpose that is to gather together the Church of Christ into the vnity of faith The first reason he proueth out of this Prophesie of Dauid who speaking of the Messias triumphing ouer his enemies saith Thou art gone vp on high thou hast led captiuity captiue and receiued gifts for men And The second reason he confirmeth at large in the verses following where he sheweth that Christ gaue some Apostles and some Prophets and some Euangelists and some Pastors and Teachers and all to this end that is for the perfecting of the Saints for the worke of the Ministery for the edifying of the boâ—y of Christ till wee all come into the vnity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Sonne of God Two things contained in this verse And therefore we finde contained in this verse two speciall points First A confirmation of the Apostles alledged reason that all graces doe flow from Christ in these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Wherefore he saith Secondly A Propheticall prediction of the Messias in these words When he ascended vp on high he led captiuitie captiue and gaue gifts vnto men That the Scripture is the best warrant for all Preachers For the first I meane not to stand long vpon it I will onely note this one thing that all we the Teachers of Gods people according to the example of this Apostle nay of Christ himselfe and of all Christs true Schollers should not teach any positiue point of doctrine vnlesse we can either directly or by necessary consequence proue and confirme the same out of the Sacred Scriptures for whatsoeuer hath not authority from the word of God Eadem facilitate refellitur qua probatur may as well be reiected as receiued Hieron in Matth. c. 23. saith Saint Hierom and whatsoeuer is therein contained it requires absolute faith without doubting because as Hugo Cardinalis saith Quicquid in sacris literis docetur veritas est sine fallacia quicquid praecipitur bonitas est sine malicia quicquid promittitur faelicitas est sine miseria Whatsoeuer is caught in the Scripture it is truth it selfe without fallacy whatsoeuer is commanded it is purely good without the commixtion of any euill and whatsoeuer is promised it is perfect felicitie without the least
Triumph of Christ Part. 3 PART III. CHAP. I. Of the speciall ends why Christ ascended into heauen and of the gifts which he giueth to edifie the Church THirdly touching the bounty of Christ set downe in these words and he gaue gifts vnto men we must first reconcile the difference betwixt the Prophet and the Apostle about the same for Dauid saith thou hast receiued gifts for men and Saint Paul saith he giueth gifts to men and I answer that if we vnderstand it literally Dauid receiued gifts which for feare of his power were freely offered vnto him and if we vnderstand it mystically of Christ we finde the saying of both to be true for the Apostle speaketh of the things which Christ doth as God sending forth the holy Ghost and bestowing gifts on men and the Psalmist speaketh of him according to that which the same Christ doth in his body August in Psal 67. p. 289. a. i. which is his Church Thus no doubt saith Saint Augustine but as he is persecuted in his Church so accepit in membris qua dona membra eius accipiunt he receiued and receiueth gifts in men for whatsoeuer is done to them that beleeue in him the same is done to him or else we may say that the Son of God as he was man receiued those gifts from his Father which hee was afterwards to distribute and to giue vnto his Church for so we reade that he being exalted and hauing receiued of the Father the promise of the holy Ghost Act. 2.33 hee hath shed foorth this which we now see and heare and so the originall word which the Psalmist vseth signifieth to receiue that which wee must presently distribute saith Mollerus Mollerus in Psal 68. and therefore the difference is soone ended and the matter in both is true he receiued gifts and he gaue those gifts to men for wee finde as Bonauenture tels vs that our Sauiour ascended for foure speciall ends Christ ascended for foure speciall ends First to receiue his kingdome as himselfe intimateth vnto vs in the nineteenth of Luke and the twelfth verse Secondly to make vs the more earnestly to long for him Quia abijt occultat se Deus vt ardentius quaeratur à nobis because God doth therefore hide himselfe from vs that he may be the more earnestly sought of vs saith Saint Bernard Bernard in cant Thirdly to prepare a place for vs for though in respect of Gods purpose it was prepared for vs before the beginning of the world yet in respect of the effecting and bringing to passe the said purpose it was specially prepared for vs by Christ because he remoued all hinderances and made way for vs to enter into glory 1. by appeasing his fathers wrath 2. by cleansing our consciences from dead workes 3. by opening vnto vs the gates of heauen and 4. by making continuall intercession for vs As Bonauenture speaketh Fourthly to send downe his holy Spirit vnto vs Ioh. 16.17 for so our Sauiour saith It is expedient for you that I goe away Quia nisi dederitis quod amatis non habebitis quod desideratis for vnlesse I goe away the comforter will not come vnto you but if I depart I will send him vnto you Tertul. l. de carne Christi for now saith Tertullian Graetum quoddam commercium inter coelum terram existit celebratum a most gratefull exchange and a friendly louing bargaine was made betwixt heauen and earth that to the inhabitants of heauen should be giuen the flesh of Christ and to vs on earth should be bestowed the comforts of Gods holy Spirit and so the Spirit of God should remaine with vs on earth and our flesh should dwell with them for euer in heauen and then all things to be common betwixt vs eternally and therefore he did not send his Spirit vnto vs before he had ascended into heauen Why Christ would not bestow his gifts on men before his ascention non propter impotentiam sed quia habuerunt corporalem prasentiam not in respect of any impotency that he could not doe it but because we had his corporall presence and because as the raine doth not descend vntill the mist and dew doe first ascend so the gratious raine of Gods Spirit did not fall vpon Gods inheritance to refresh it when it was weary vntill this fruit of the wombe which was as the dew of the morning had first ascended into heauen but as when that little cloud like a mans hand 1 Kings 11. did rise out of the sea there was a sound of much raine so when that humble flesh of Christ was ascended out of this world into heauen then he gaue gifts vnto men Aug. de verbis domini p. 63. b. 1. to 10. But what are these gifts which he giueth Saint Augustine saith it is his holy Spirit Tale donum qualis ipse est such a gift as himselfe is for he gaue himselfe and he giues a gift equall to himselfe because the gift of Christ is the Spirit of Christ but heare the Apostle saith hee gaue gifts and not a gift and therefore though I doe confesse that this holy and blessed Spirit is the author and fountaine of all gifts by whom wee haue remission of sinnes subiection of our enemies and all other gifts of grace and glory sealed vnto vs yet I say that the Apostle herein meaneth not so much the spirit himselfe as the gifts and graces of his Spirit And therefore that wee may the better vnderstand the fulnesse of this point of the bounty of Christ we must consider these foure speciall things Foure points to be considered 1. What manner of gifts they are 2. What gifts are here meant 3. How he doth bestow them 4. On whom he doth bestow them First that the gifts of God are free gifts For the first wee must know that they were gratuita free gifts so the words dedit dona he gaue them and he gaue them as gifts doe sufficiently declare or otherwise si praememeruisti tum emisti non gratis accepisti if thou hadst done any thing to deserue these gifts then hadst thou bought them and not freely receiued them and God had sold them and not giuen them and so they had beene praemia non dona rewards for thy good deedes and not gifts of his meere grace but this point is so cleere that I neede not stand on it Matth. 10.8 Freely you haue receiued saith our Sauiour freely giue for euery one may take of these waters of life freely and may haue these gifts Esay 51.1 like Esayas milke without money or moneyes worth For the second wee must note that the gifts of God are either 1. Temporall Secondly the the gifts of God are of two sorts 2. Spirituall First The temporall gifts he gaue vnto all sorts of men aswell before as after his ascention for wee must note that euery thing which we haue is
people and say hearing yee shall heare and shall not vnderstand and seeing yee shall see and not perceiue Acts 28.25 26. and therefore our Sauiour biddeth vs to goe and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost But it is obiected as Nazianzen saith that he is no where called God but the holy Ghost or the spirit of God Nazian orat 5. de Theol. and therefore he is not God I answer briefely that this is false for Saint Peter said vnto Ananias why hath Satan filled thy heart Acts 5.3.4 to lye to the holy Ghost thou hast not lied vnto men but vnto God And therefore seing the spirit of God created all things and being created preserued them as Moses sheweth Gen. 1.2 the spirit of God moued vpon the waters i. e. to cherish and to retayne them together and now in like manner hee sanctifieth and preserueth vs as Melancthon sheweth in that godly wish which he maketh Spiritus vt Domini nascentia corpora fouit cum manus artificis couderat ipsa Dei Sic foueat caetus qui Christi oracula discunt accendatque igni pectora nostra suo And especially seeing that the holy Scripture doth more plainely testifie the same almost in euery place wee say that the name of the Holy Ghost is first taken for the Essence of God Secondly The name of the Holy Ghost is taken for the gifts and graces of the Holy Ghost as where the Prophet saith Take not thy holy spirit from me Psal 51.11 2 Cor. 13.5 and where the Apostle saith Know you not that Iesus Christ is in you except you be reprobates And againe Rom. 8.9 you are not in the flesh but in the spirit if the spirit of God dwell in you and so when it is said that they were all filled with the Holy Ghost we must vnderstand it of the gifts and graces of the Holy Ghost And these gifts and graces of Gods Spirit are excellently deciphered and set downe vnto vs vnder the properties and conditions of those formes and figures wherein the Holy Ghost did appeare vnto vs and that is if I doe rightly collect them three speciall times The Spirit of God appeared in the likenesse of fiue speciall things First vnto the Israelites 1. In a pillar of cloud by day 2. In a pillar of fire by night Secondly at the Baptisme of Christ he descended vpon him like a Doue Thirdly At the day of Pentecost he appeared 1. Like the rushing of a mighty winde 2. Like clouen tongues of fire First like a cloud First He appeared in a pillar of cloud to shew vnto vs that as the cloud betokeneth 1. A shadowing from heate 2. A sending downe of raine As 1 King 18.45 the Heauens were blacke with cloudes and windes and there was a great raine so the Spirit of God doth ouershadow vs from the heate of the wrath of God it cooleth and refresheth our scorched soules and as the raine maketh the barren earth fertile and fruitfull In what râ—spect the holy Ghost is like vnto waters so doth the graces of Gods spirit make our barren hearts plentifull in all good workes for the Holy Ghost in many places is compared vnto water because that as water 1. Mollifieth the hard earth 2. Fructifieth the barren ground 3. Quencheth the greatest heate 4. Cleanseth the foulest things and so forth So doth the Spirit of God In what respect the Holy Ghost is like vnto water 1. Soften our hard hearts 2. Fructifie our barren soules 3. Quench the heate of lust 4. Clense vs from all our sinnes And so make vs to become fit temples for himselfe to remaine in vs. Secondly He appeared in a pillar of fire Secondly like fire to shew his consubstantiality with the Father and the Sonne saith Nazianzen because God is fire and so appeared in the fiery bush from whence it may be came that custome among the Chaldeans which afterward spread it selfe among many other Nations of the Gentiles to worship the fire for their God whereas indeed they should haue worshipped that God which is fire and did appeare like fire to teach vs that as the fire hath in it saith Oecumenius 1. Calorem 2. Splendorem 3. Motionem 1. Heate to warme mollifie and purifie In what respects the Holy Ghost is like vnto fire 2. Splendor to giue light and to illuminate 3. Motion to be alwayes working Euen so the Spirit of God First Warmeth and heateth the hearts of the godly with a feruent and a fiery zeale of all godlinesse he mollifieth their hard and stony hearts and it consumeth all the drossie substance of sinne and so purifieth their soules from all wickednesse Secondly Iohn 6.13 He illuminateth their hearts with the knowledge of God for he bringeth them into all truth and he maketh their light to shine before men that they seeing their good workes Mat. 5.16 doe glorifie their Father which is in Heauen Thirdly He maketh them alwayes to be in action and neuer idle but as it is said of Christ euer going about doing good Thirdly He appeared like a Doue Thirdly like a Doue when he descended vpon our Sauiour Christ at his Baptisme first because as Bonauenture saith he came not then to strike our sinnes by the zeale of his fury but to beare them and to take them away through the meekenesse of his Passion but on the other side Greg. hom 30. in Euang. hee descended vpon the Apostles like fire because in these which were simply men and therefore sinners he would kindle a spirituall feruency against themselues and cause them to punish those sinnes in themselues by repentance which God had pardoned vnto them through his mercy and secondly he descended on Christ like a harmelesse Doue and not like vnto tongues of fire because Christ was not to be taught Cyrillus hierosol Catech. 7. which is signified by the tongues for his lippes were full of grace nor to be sorrowfull for his sinnes which is signified by the fire because in him there was no sinne but his Doue-like properties were to be shewed that hee was innocent Iohn 1.29 meeke and lowly in heart for as of all the beasts of the field the little silly Lambe is in most respects best qualified and therefore is Christ called the Lambe of God which taketh away the sinne of the world In what respect the Holy Ghost is like a Doue so of all the fowles of Heauen the Doue in most respects is most excellent for she is annunciator pacis the messenger and proclaimer of peace shee brought the Oliue branch vnto Noah she wanteth gall she hath no bitternesse in her she neuer hurts with her bill nor clawes she is full of loue and yet she neuer sings any wanton tune but woo woo is her matutinus vespertinus cantus her mournfull morning and euening song and
therefore the Holy Ghost descended on Christ like a Doue Matth. 3.16 to shew these Doue-like qualities of this Lambe of God and to teach that we must be thus qualified like Doues if we would haue this heauenly Doue this Holy Spirit of God to remaine within vs for on them that are otherwise this Doue hath not yet descended Fourthly like a mighty winde Fourthly He appeared like the rushng of a mighty winde for a true winde it was not saith Oecumenius but the Spirit of God Qui à spirando flando dicitur which from blowing or breathing is called spirit is said to appeare First Like the winde and that for these fiue reasons Iohn 9. â— First As the winde bloweth where it listeth so the graces and gifts of Gods Spirit are giuen to whomsoeuer it pleaseth him for he will haue mercy on whom he will haue mercy Exod. 33.19 In what respect the Holy Ghost is like vnto winde Secondly As the winde scattereth the dust and driueth away the chaffe from the corne so the graces of Gods Spirit doth winnow the consciences of the Saints and driue away all wicked thoughts and cogitations from their hearts Thirdly As the winde carrieth away the ship against the maine streame so will the grace of Gods Spirit carry a man against the current of his naturall inclination for if Socrates by the sole helpe of morall instructions was able to bridle his loose disposition how much more shall those men bee restrained from all lewdnesse which are led by diuine inspiration Fourthly As the winde cooleth and recreateth all those that are scorched with the heate of the Sunne so doth the grace of Gods Spirit recreate all those distressed people that are scorched with the heate of afflictions or burned with the concupiscence of their sinnes Fiftly As the winde will passe vnresistably so will the grace of Gods Spirit worke it owne â—ffect and all the power of darknesse is not able to resist it and therefore Secondly It is said 1 Kings 10.11 that he appeared like the rushing of a mighty winde because that as the mighty winde in the first booke of Kings the 10. and the 11. did rend the mountaines and brake the rockes before the Lord so the grace of Gods Spirit and the Word of God is mighty in operation Why the Holy Ghost is compared to a mighty winde able to shake the stoutest and the proudest man and to breake in pieces the stoniest heart Indeed our people do esteeme our words none otherwise then winde which makes vs spend so much winde to little purpose to weary our selues and scarce to waken them but here let them know that the Spirit of God like Aeolus which shutteth vp the windes in his bagges can when he pleases let out the same in a mighty manner to amaze the consciences of the stoutest Peeres and either to driue away their sinnes Exod 10.19 Psal 1.5 as it droue away the Grashoppers and Locusts that ouerspread the land of Egypt or else to driue them away like the Chaffe from off the face of earth Fiftly He appeared like clouen tongues of fire First Like tongues for though the tongue Fiftly like clouen tongues of fire i. e. such a tongue as is set on fire from Hell as Saint Iames saith is many times the instrument of the Diuell to doe much mischiefe to blaspheme God and to abuse men yet Vt non debent oues odere pelles suas quia induunt eas lupi As the sheepe should not hate their skins because the Wolues doe many times put them on so ought none that is wise reiect that which is good because it is often abused by the bad therefore seeing as Pittacus saith the tongue as it is the worst member in a wicked man so it is one of the best members in a godly man Iames 5.6 Why the Holy Ghost appeared like tongues the Holy Ghost did appeare like tongues First Because as a Father saith Symbolum est lingua spiritus sancti à patris verbo procedentis The tongue is a symbole of the Holy Ghost proceeding from the Word of the Father for as the tongue hath the greatest cognation and the neerest affinity with the Word and is moued by the Word of the heart to expresse the same by the sound of the voyce saith Saint Gregory Iohn 16.14 so the Holy Ghost hath the neerest affinity that may be with the word God and is the expressor of his voyce and the speaker of his will that receiueth of him and reueileth all vnto vs. Secondly Because as the tongues are the sole instruments of knowledge which conuayes the same from man to man for though the soule be the fountaine from whence all wisedome springeth yet the tongue is the channell and the conduite pipe whereby this wisedome this knowledge is communicated and transferred from man to man so the Holy Ghost is the sole Author and Teacher of all truth Christ is the wisedome of God but the Holy Ghost is the Teacher of this wisedome vnto men 1 Cor. 1.21 and it pleased him by this onely way to conuay this wisedome of God vnto men for seeing the world by their wisedome knew not God in the wisedome of God it pleased God through the foolishnesse of Preaching to saue those that beleeue Why he appeared like clouen tongues Secondly He appeared like clouen tongues because all tongues and all languages are alike knowne and vnderstood of God and because this Spirit can teach all men all languages and the gift of tongues is a gift of God Why he appeared like clouen tongues Thirdly He appeared like clouen tongues of fire they were ignitae non politae fiery tongues and not fine polished tongues because the Spirit of God delighteth rather in the zealous and the feruent tongues of Saint Paul and Apollos that warme the heart then in those eloquent tongues of Cicero and Demosthenes that delight the eares for this is the desire of Gods Spirit to kindle the hearts of men and to set them on fire with the loue of God and our brethren So when our Sauiour preached vnto the two Disciples that trauelled towards Emaus they said Did not our hearts burne within vs Luke 24. while hee talked with vs by the way This is the effect of the tongue of the Holy Ghost to worke zeale and feruency in the hearers And so you see the thing wherewith they were said to be filled that is the gifts and graces of the Holy Ghost CHAP. IIII. Of the filling of the Apostles with those gifts of the Holy Ghost and the signes of their fulnesse SEcondly They are said to be filled with these gifts and Dydimus saith that wee cannot be filled with any creature Quia deus solus implet creaturas Because nothing but God can replenish and satisfie his creatures Vnus pellaeo Iuueni non sufficit orbis The whole world is not able to content vs so large
Vocall as Salomon prayed 1 Kings 8.23 Secondly Vocall because words are to be added when we may and can vse the same Thirdly Suddenly which we call eiaculations Thirdly sudden or a lifting vp of our hearts and mindes vnto God vpon any sudden occasion that presenteth it selfe vnto vs. Fourthly Composed prayers Fourthly composed and made with our best wisedomes so Daniel prayed and so all men should doe if they considered into whose presence they goe to speake for if wee muse what to say before a mighty man why should wee not premeditate what to say before wee come to God and therefore the wise Salomon saith Eccles 5.2 bee not rash with thy mouth and let not thy heart be too hasty to vtter any thing before God Fiftly Conceiued Fiftly Conceiued prayers i. e. vpon all new occasions to frame new forme of words to expresse our mindes as the ocsion requireth Sixtly Prescribed Sixtly Prescribed prayers i. e. prayers made by others for to helpe them that are not so well able to compose prayers themselues thus the 136. Psalme that was made by Dauid was sung after Dauids time as we may see in 2 Chron. 20.21.29.30 Seuenthly Priuate Seuenthly Priuate praier when a houshold onely prayes together and so a Christians house is made Gods Church and bringeth a blessing vpon the whole house as the presence of Gods Arke did vpon the house of Obed-Edom Rom. 16.5 Philemon 2. 2 Sam. 6.12 or else when one man prayeth alone according as our Sauiour biddeth when thou prayest i. e. when thou meanest to pray priuately enter into thy closet and shut the doore and thy Father which seeth in secret will reward thee openly And thus euery man should often pray because thus alone wee may powre out the very secrets of our soules before God which we are lothe to doe before the Congregation and because this is the truest triall of a man whether he feareth God or not because hypocrites will do it to be seene of men but the true Christian doth it to be heard of God alone Ob. But you will say that you can haue no conuenient time nor place thus priuately to pray vnto God Sol. I answer that thou canst neuer misse time and place to sin and that priuately and secretly too thy sins doth witnesse this and therefore why canst thou not aswell finde time and place to pray Eightly Publike Eightly Publike prayers when we ioyne our selues with the assemblies of Gods people thus the Corinthians had one place to worship in and thus we ought all of vs to doe because this publike praier doth more honour God when we shew vnto the world that we are not ashamed to professe his Name and it is more powerfull to obtaine for our selues quia impossibile est multorum preces non exaudiri 1 Cor. 11.20 Ioel 2.16 Ion. 3.8 and therefore the Prophet biddeth vs to gather the people together to pray to God and so the King of Niniue did when Ionas threatened the destruction of his people And besides this publike praying is a signe of vnity and a most effectuall meanes to stirre vp one another to serue the Lord. Ninthly Ordinary prayer Ninthly Ordinary when wee obserue our accustomed times and manner of praying for there is no man that hath any care to serue his God or saue his owne soule but as for all other things so specially for this duty of prayer he hath set and appointed times as some morning and euening some at noone-day and so forth to make his prayers and supplications vnto almighty God Tenthly Extraordinary prayer Tenthly extraordinary both in respect of time and manner as when an extraordinary occasion shall moue vs thereunto as either when God bestoweth vpon vs an extraordinary blessing or threatneth some grieuous punishment or when we would obtaine some speciall fauour or expresse some speciall sorrow for some speciall sinnes that wee haue committed then ought we more especially to pray or to praise the Lord so the King of Niniue did when he heard the preaching of Ionas Ion. 3.8 so Dauid after his fall saith Psal 38.8 Vide Psal 32. I haue roared for the very disquietnesse of my heart and my sighing is not hid from thee so Peter when he denied his Master he went out and wept bitterly so Christ a little before his passion did more earnestly pray then euer hee did before with loud cries and teares saith the Apostle and so the Saints doe often pray with sighes that cannot be expressed Rom. 8.26 And so you see how prayer is diuersly distinguished both in respect of the matter and forme of praying CHAP. II. Of the party to whom we should pray and of the place where we ought to pray SEcondly For the party to whom wee should pray To whom we ought to pray God himselfe sheweth vnto vs when he saith Call vpon me in the day of thy trouble and I will heare thee Psal 50.15 so shalt thou praise me And so Christ himselfe when he teacheth vs to say Our Father which art in Heauen and so doth the Holy Ghost when hee moueth our hearts to cry Abba Father And there be three vnanswerable reasons why wee should onely pray to God As Ier. 17.10 First because he onely knowes the secrets of our hearts Ier. 23.23 Secondly because hee onely is omniscient i. e. such a one as knoweth all things Lukâ— 1.37 Thirdly because hee onely is omnipotent which can onely helpe vs. That we should pray to none but God Ecclus. 49.1 And therefore concerning the blessed Virgin we honour her name we reuerence her memoriall and with all generations we call her blessed and of the blessed Saints we say that their remembrance is like the composition of the perfume that is made by the art of the Apothecary It is sweet as honey in all mouthes and as Musicke at a banquet of wine but to pray to any of them wee haue neither precept from God nor practise in the ancient Church nor promise in Gods Word to be heard and themselues neither doe desire it nor can deserue it and therefore to seeke to God by the helpe of them as to the King by his Fauorites we leaue it to be vsed in Kings Courts and not in Gods Church Ambros in Rom. c. 1. v. 22. as Saint Ambrose speaketh and we will onely pray to him in whom we onely beleeue i. e. to the onely God who doth at all times heare vs and can at any time helpe vs and if any other dare offer prayers vnto any Origen l. 5. contra Celsum Con. Laod. Can. 35. Nisi soli domino Deo But onely to the Lord God as Origen speaketh we doe with the Councell of Laodicea anathamatize all such for praying vnto the creatures and relinquishing their Creator which is blessed for euermore Thirdly touching the place where wee are to pray I say Matth.
like King Therons Coursers that were neuer weary of running that so they may escape all the fiery darts of Satan and finish their course with ioy when they shall receiue that Crowne of righteousnesse which the Lord hath prepared for them that loue him And thus dearely beloued you see that although man for his sinne was eiected out of Paradise and subiected to all miseries yet through the mercy of God in sending his Sonne to be made man to suffer for man to ouercome the diuell sinne and death to raise himselfe from death to ascend to Heauen to send his holy Spirit to fill our hearts with his heauenly graces wee shall if we beleeue in him and serue him praise his Name for all his blessings loue one another and pray one for another attaine vnto euerlasting happinesse Vnto the which happinesse the Lord of his goodnesse bring vs all through Iesus Christ our Lord to whom with the Father and the Holy Spirit be ascribed as is most due all Glory and Honour and Praise and Thankes and Power and Maiesty and Dominion both now and for euermore Amen A Prayer O Eternall God and our most gratious Father wee most humbly beseech thee for Iesus Christ his sake to forgiue vs all our sinnes which we acknowledge and confesse to be more in number then the sands of the Sea which cannot bee numbred cleanse vs O Lord with the bloud of Christ and plant in vs those heauenly gifts and graces whereby wee may be inabled to serue thee as we ought to doe in holinesse and righteousnesse all the dayes of our life increase our faith stirre vp our hope and kindle our loue and our charity both towards thy selfe and all men for thy sake giue vs patience to vndergo without offending thee whatsoeuer miseries this wicked world shall any wayes heape vpon vs blesse our gracious King the Prince and all the royall issue blesse all the Ministers of thy Church and all the Magistrates of this Common-wealth Grant O Lord thy grace vnto thy Ministers that they may faithfully preach the Word of truth and sincerely liue a most vpright and a godly life grant to the Magistrates thy grace O God to defend right without remissenesse and to punish vice without maliciousnesse and because we are all thy creatures the workes of thy hands made by thee preserued by thee and inioying all we haue life and liuelihood from thee O Lord be mercifull vnto vs all and remember that we are but dust consider O consider that we are but as grasse not able to doe what we would not able to doe any thing that is good vnlesse thou dost it in vs O then let our soules liue and wee will praise thy Name we will magnifie thee for euer and euer for all the blessings that we haue receiued from thee our Creation Redemption Sanctification Preseruation and our assured hope of Glorification and all other graces whatsoeuer through Iesus Christ our Lord. Amen A Soliloquie of the Author O Eternall God thou hast created me and I haue offended thee thou hast redeemed me and I still continued vnthankefull vnto thee and yet thou hast heaped many blessings vpon me and giuen me grace to be desirous to serue thee and according to my poore and weake ability to shew forth these lights vnto thy Church I confesse O Lord whatsoeuer is ill herein is onely mine and whatsoeuer is good is truely thine and therefore I desire thee to pardon mine euill and to make me thankefull for thy good and so to accept that worke done by thy grace that it may be crowned with thy glory I doe not long for any worldly thing the whole world lyeth in wickednesse but I desire my soule may be married vnto thee to liue with thee for euermore and therefore O blessed God seeing that as I haue none in heauen so I haue none in earth but onely thou to be my helper I beseech thee to be my redeeming kinsman to preserue my wearied body from the malice of this world and to preferre my disconsolate soule vnto euerlasting ioyes through Iesus Christ mine onely Sauiour Amen IEHOVAE LIBERATORI FINIS THE TABLE AB ABstaine from sinne is from God 205 God neuer absolueth vnrepentant sinners 242 Absurdities God shunneth in all things 324 Absurdities of the Lutheran doctrine touching the communication of properties 377. c. Absurdities following the high-Priest saying that the Disciples stole Christ away 564 Nature not able to shew the reason how the world should be made 138 God able to doe what he will 147 To hinder what he will not haue done ibid. To doe more then he did or doth or will doe 148. 149. c. Phrases of being able or not able how to be vnderstood 158 God able to produce any thing of nothing 163 God able to forgiue all sinnes 164 God not able to doe contrary to what hee decreed 165 Not able to doe things contrary to his Nature 165 Gods ability to helpe vs a great comfort to the godly 177 Absurdities of the doctrine of transubstantiation 174 God able to saue men without the Incarnation of his Sonne 320 None able to know God as hee is in himselfe 120 Abstract names of all excellencies most proper vnto God 122 Goodnesse of God abused by the wicked 225 Abuse of Christ not paralelled in any age 474 AC To be an Accepter of persons what it is 210 We should acknowledge whence wee haue all our goodnesse 211 Inward actions of God euer in doing necessary incommunicable 275 Christ how falsly accused by his enemies 471 Whereof accused before Pilate and how false those accusations were 472 Acts meerely voluntary no sinnes 15. 32 Actuall sinne what it is 10 All actions adiudged according to the disposition of the will 55 Act of punishment least agreeable to Gods nature 195 No act can exceed the power of the agent 209 Actors in the Tragedy of Christ his Passion who they were 421 Gods free actions not curiously to be searched into 555 Chiefest Acts of Dauid types of Christ 617 AD Adam sinning we all sinned 3 Adams fall brought on vs a two-fold euill 3 What God commanded Adam how small a thing it was 98 Adamant how mollified 5â—6 Aduersity makes the Saints more resplendent then prosperity 207 Aduersity and affliction not simply good ibid. AE Aescilus how he came by his death 613 AF. Affirmatiue precepts how many viz. 248. 230 Christ why afflicted by God 496 Affections of Christ how they differ from ours in three respects 444 AG. Agony of Christ what was the cause thereof 443 The seuerall ages of the world 402. 403 Agents that there be three sorts 162 Christ borne in the sixâ— age of the world and why 403 Age of man diuided into foure parts 68 AL. How all we haue is from God 129 All men taste of Gods goodnesse 201 How all men may be said to hate the Preachers 435 Alcestes how deerely she loued her Husband 425 AN. Anabaptists heresie what
children of the wicked not punished for their fathers sinnes 247 A childe how conceiued in the wombe 337 God chooseth no man in respect of any thing that is in man 211 Christ the word the summe of all things 258 Signified by all the most memorable things of the old Testament 258 Christ would not reueale himselfe to the world all at once â—59 To know him is the onely thing that makes vs happy ibid. Christ despised all vanities 260 Suffered all miseries ibid. Christ the most perfect patterne of all vertue 260 Christ knowne suppresseth all vices 261 He alone is all sufficient to supply all our neede 262 Without Christ the whole world will auaile vs nothing 263 Christ onely should be preached by all Preachers 266 The Name of Christ should be alwayes in our mouthes to be honored not to be blasphemed 267 Christ in the Father not as we are in the Father 270 Christ a true God proued 278. 279. c. Christ is truely rich 281 Christ created all things and gouerneth all things 283 Christ prayed vnto 283 Christ began to be a God existing in the manhood when he was made flesh 248 Christ no accidental but an essential word 285 Christ how he may be said to be created and begotten 289 Christ made the beginning of our wayes 288 Christ demaunds the earth as man and giueth heauen as God 290 Christ how the first begotten and how the onely begotten Sonne of God 291 Christ how God of himselfe 293 How said to be with God and in God 298 Christ equall to the Father 299 Christ after what manner conceiued 335. Not of the Essence but by the vertue of the Holy Ghost ibid. Christ conceiued a perfect man in the first moment of his conception 337 How wonderfully he was made man ibid. Christ why conceiued of a Virgin 338 How he commeth from Adam ibid. Christ made a perfect man 340 That he had a true body 341 c. Christ made subiect to all humane frailties 351 Christ how hee hath performed all things for vs. 360 Christ an infallible patterne for all men to imitate 360 Christ brought vs more good then we lost in Adam 361 Christ how made inuisible vnto the Iewes 387 Christ how he came in the dores being shut ibid. How he walked vpon the seas 388 How he appeared to S. Paul 388. 389. c. Christ came from Nathan and not from Salomon 3â—8 Christ why born in the raigne of Augustus 404 Why in the sixt age of the world 403 Why in December 405 Christ what manner of person he was 429 That he was a man ibid. A iust man ibid. A good man 430 A King a Priest a Prophet 431 A true and eternall God 432 Christ his sufferings expressed 436. c. His whole life a continuall suffering 437 Christs sufferings chiefly in three places 437 Christ suffered in soule ibid. Christs first degree of suffering in being made passible 438 Christs sufferings most admirable 439 Christ why he went out to be taken 439 Why out of the citie 440 Why into the garden 441 Christ whether wholly destitute of all diuine assistance 447 How lightly he esteemed of death 446 Christ how by his death he ouercame death 84 Christ deliuered from what he feared 448 Christ to vndergoe the punishment of all others ibid. Christ how he sought to reclaime Iudas 461. c. Christ how handled presently after he was taken 464 Christ why he chose Iudas to be his Apostle 459 Christ how crowned with thornes 475 Christ why he came not down from the Crosse 481 Christ dead is still persecuted raged at 482 Christ how said to be euery where 540 Christ no where to be found but in the Church 545 Church the fittest place for publique prayers 711 Church how to rule her children 520 Church how subiect to afflictions 520 CL. Clytoriaâ— Well what it effecteth 528 Cloathing Christ in white what it signified 473 CO. Comforts that we haue from Christ his being subiect to infirmities 361. 362 Whatsoeuer God commandeth is no sinne 166 God compelleth not his seruants to doe good 530 To compell others to sinne the practise of most wicked sinners 25 Manner of Christ his comming to iudgement 622 623 Gods commandements few short light and profitable 99 The least comfort denied in hell 87 What communicates most goodnesse vnto others is euer best 197 That we should confesse our sinnes 113 Conuersion to God not to be deferred 24 That we should confesse our sinnes the diuell cannot abide 28 An excellent consideration of Saint Augustine 51 Consciences of the wicked opened before they die 80 We can conceiue but the least part of Gods excellencie 118 What are contrariâ— to the nature of God 152 How contradictories destroy each other 153 God cannot doe contradictories proued 154 That we should not contest about trifles 265 Consultation in heauen about the restitution of man 319 God worketh one contrarie out of another 351 Contentednesse requisite in any state 410 Conception of Christ ineffable 336 Consideration of Christs sufferings most admirable 439 Condemnation of all the infidels that would not beleeue in Christ grieued Christ 454 That we should condole the sufferings of Christ 506 Conuersion of a sinner first wrought by God 529 Conuersion of any man not to be despaired of 533 Contempt of vanities most requisite for Preachers 642 Constancie most requisite for Preachers 642 643 Conquest of Christ ouer Satan not onely by suffering but also trampling him vnder feete 583 Couetousnesse what a horrible sinne 460 To be auoided 704 Couenant with hell should be broken 26 Colours vsed by the ancients to expresse diuers things 474 The great courage of the Apostles presently after the resurrection of Christ 576 Corporall presence of Christ no where now but in heauen 545 Christ not corporally present in any secrets 546 547 Correction how burthensome to children 69 No cost to be spared to get truth 217 CR. All creatures heape miseries on man 74 All creatures haue their being from God 125 The creatures haue many impressions of Gods goodnesse infixed in them 256 All creatures how inriched with good 201 Foure crying sinnes 41 No creature can be capable of infinitenesse or of infinite perfections 156 Crueltie of Satan against the Preachers 644 CV Custome of ancient times to expresse our mindes by visible signes 680 Cup that Christ was to drinke of what it was 444 Cup which dranke vp killed Christ but ouerceme not Christ 449 Curiositie to be shunned in searching out the manner of diuine mysteries 277 Curiositie to be auoided in searching what God is 122 124 Custome of sinning makes the sinner bold to sinne 20 It makes the greatest sinnes seeme no sins 21 It bindeth vs in sinne 22 It indammageth the soule 23 And makes the sinners almost incurable 65 DA. DAmage receiued by Adam two-fold 3 What a danger it is to neglect publique prayers 717 Dauids words This day haue I begotten thee how to be vnderstood 290 Dangerous to
from sinning 204 From punishments 205 Goodnesse of God most of all seene in our afflictions 206 All our goodnesse to bee ascribed to God 208 To the glory of Christ 264 We can doe no good of ourselues 209 The boundlesse goodnesse of Gods prouidence 257 Many impressions of Gods goodnesse infixed in the creatures 2â—6 Best good we can doe vnto our children is to serue God 251 Not to doe good a sinne 230 Gods goodnesse how abused by the wicked 225 Ill-gotten goods neuer thriueth 253 No good in the Saints but what God worketh in them 2741 Why goodnesse is ascribed to the holy Ghost 273 Gospell biddeth and forbiddeth many things which the Law doth not 12 Gospell in the Law and Law in the Gospell 224 GL Glorification of a body taketh not away the essentiall properties of a body 170 Glory of Christ should be chiefly aimed at by all Preachers 266 GR. Grace not â—raduced from the best parents 8 Word gracious what it signifieth 190 Three speciall things ibid. God is gracious in all respects 191 Graces especially bestowed vpon the elect 2â—4 Grace of iustification what it is 208 Grace of sanctification what it is ibid. Grace of glorification what it is ibid. Graces of God denied vnto the children for the fathers sinnes 251. and why 252. Graces of God not giuen in the like measure to all men 602 We ought to examine what graces we haue 646 Chiefest graces of God Faith Hope Charitie 647 Graces of Christ to sanctifie our soules are two-fold 645 Grace of Christ ought in all things to be extolled and our selues extenuated 265 Great sinnes must haue great repentance 23 Great mens sinnes are great sinnes 37 Great men haue no excuses for their sinnes 38 Great men haue no priuiledge to sinne 39 Their state very dangerous 39. 40 How subiect to dangers 704 Father how greater then Christ 300 Great sinnes punished with great punishments 92 Great men how they vse to deale with the poore 235 What Christ grieued at in the garden 540 541. c. Griefe of Christ on the Crosse aggrauated by all circumstances 4â—1 Growth of sinne how to be hindred 108 A gradation in the loue of God 202 HA. HAbituall sinnes hardly repelled 23 Harlots how they deceiue men 45 Haynousnesse of sinne seene in three respects 97 To hazard all in defence of truth 217 HE. Heart to be carefully watched 14. Hell paines how intollerable 86 Heathens how they extolled the power of God 161 Hebrewes often vse the present tense for the future tense 288 The head alwaies chiefly opposed 304 Christ borne in the raigne of Herod and why 404 Heretickes how wicked to deny the God-head of Christ 305 Herod what he did to Christ 473 Hell in the Article of our Creede signifieth not the graue 582 Hell destroyed by Christ three waies 583 That there be three heauens 624 The man Christ in the highest part of heauen 623 And why 626 Nothing so heauie as sinne 631. Hearing of Gods Word a speciall meanes to get grace 677 Diuers sorts of hearers 678 Heresie of Nonatus 112 593 Of Pellagius ibid. Of Arrius and his obiections answered 284 285. c. 293 c. 299. c. Heresie of Apelles and Apolinaris 343 Of the Anabaptists 344 Of Samosatenus 363 Of Eutychos 367 368 Of Cerinthus and of Nestorius concerning the person of Christ and their obiections answered 374 Heresies to be shewed and why 392 HI Euery one laboureth to hide his sinnes 19 None can hide his sinnes from God 19 HO. No sinner excluded from hope of pardon 224 Honorius his childishnesse 267 268 Word Homousius not first inuented by the orthodox fathers 29â— Iustified as it is vsed ibid. Holy Ghost whether tearmed the word or not 323 Our hope supported by the meditation of Christ his passion 426 Holy Ghost a true God proued 659 Holy Ghost appeared in the likenesse of fiue speciall things 660 And why 661 c. Holy Ghost how we may know whether wee haue it or not 672 Christ why he went out of the house to be taken 439 Hope what it is and how it differeth from faith 649 Hope two-fold ibid. Humane hope what it doth and diuine hope what it doth 650 Euery hope in God maketh not happie 651 To want the Holy Ghost is marke of a lost one 674 HV Humanitie of Christ onely suffered 438 Humanitie of Christ not capable of infinite excellencies 146 Humane acts how said to be done by God 165. 166 Humilitie of Christ 349 Seene in the incarnation of Christ 358 JA. IAmes most like vnto Christ 461 JD Idlenesse a furtherance to sinne 13 Idolatrie a great master-sinne 41 How horrible it is 238 IE Iewes why they beleeue not Iesus the Sonne of Mary to be the true Messias 561 Iehouah the essentiall and most proper name of God 122 123 It signifieth an eternall being 123 In hebrew containeth nothing but consonants in latine nothing but vowels and why 125 Knowne to Abraham Isaac and Iacob 126 Why translated Lord. 130 131 Christ true Iehouah 278. c. Iesuites what they say to proue transubstantiation 172 Iewes rightly vnderstood Christ teaching himselfe to be equall to the father 300 Reiection of the Iewes grieued Christ 454 Iewes how cunningly they sought to incense Pilatâ— against Christ 472 IG Ignorance two-fold 26 355 Simple Ignorance doth extenuate a sinne 27 Affected ignorance trebleth the sinne 28 Wilfull ignorance what a fearefull sinne ibid. Christ was ignorant of some things and how he may be said to be ignorant of any thing 356 Ignorance of Gods power the cause of many heresies 134 135 How ignorant many men are of the chiefest points of christianitie 395 IM Immortalitie how to be attained 128 Impossible things for God to doe of two sorts 185 Impossible for God to make the things which are not to haue beene 167 Image of God could be repayred by none but by God 321 We are apt to imitate our Parents 247 252 Wherein we ought to imitate God 228 To imitate Christ the safest way to walke 360 IN. How ineffable God is 125 Sinnes of infirmitie what they are 30 No man free from them ibid. Knowne by foure speciall notes 31 Infirmities of Christ proue the manhood of Christ 347 Our infirmities why Christ did vndertake them 352 Infirmities of how many sorts 352 Infirmities not sinfull two-fold 353 What infirmities Christ tooke on him ibid. Incarnation of the Word why decreed for our saluation 318 Incarnation of Christ what benefit it bringeth 359 The greatest argument of Gods loue 257 That wee are not in God as Christ is in God 298 Christ as man for euer inferiour to his Father 302 Condemnation of all infidels grieued Christ 454 Infamie described and the miseries thereof shewed 68 Three things should expell ingratitude from vs 706 God looketh into the intention of the heart 54 Inuocation for two things 700 IO. Iosephus what he writ of Christ 577 Iohannes Alexandrinus what he did 265 IR. Sinne called irremissible three wayes
227 IV Iudas what benefits he receiued from Christ 458 Why chosen to be an Apostle 459 Why made the Purse-bearer ibid. Why he betraied Christ ibid. Why he gaue them a signe 461 How sought to be reclaymed by Christ 461 462 What his treason should teach vs. 461 His arrogancie and iniquitie how great 461 Why he kissed Christ 461 That it is a iust thing to punish sinne 90 Iustice is often peruerted with men 91 God iudgeth all men according to what they haue actually done 95 Euery one according to his desert 92 God most iust proued 91 God in the strictnes of his iustice might inflict more punishmeÌ„t vpon the damned 187 Whatsoeuer he doth is iust 237 Iustice of God taken diuers waies 237 Iustice of God requireth a day of iudgement 245 How it stands with God iustice to punish the fathers sinnes vpon the children 245 Iustice and truth how they pleaded against man 319 That we should as well feare Gods iustice as hope for mercie 244 Iudgements of God must be threatned when his mercies doe not allure vs. 696 Iustification what it is 208 Christ Iustified by his enemies 429 KI KIngdome of heauen could be giuen by none but by God 321 Kisses that there be fiue kindes 460 Kings and Magistrates to be prayed for and why 734 KN. God knoweth best when to helpe vs. 724 Knowledge most necessary for Preachers 642 Adams desire of knowledge brought ignorance vpon vs all 58 Sinnes of knowledge most fearefull inexcusable sinnes 29 And yet we doe what we know to be fearefull sinnes 29 The excellencie of our knowledge makes our sinnes the more horrible 30 All knowledge of God extinguished by sin 64 Three wayes of knowing God 120 We are not able to know him as hee is in himselfe 120 Knowledge of Gods power the foundation of our faith 134 We know many things negatiuely as what God is not which we know not positiuely 176 We know what God cannot doe though we know not what he can doe 176 To know Christ the onely thing that makes vs happy 259 It suppresseth all vices 261 The Gentiles had a measure of the knowledge of God 311 The diuels know God and the mysterie of the Trinitie 314 Knowledge of Christ two-fold 356 Knowledge of Iesus Christ the chiefest knowledge in the world 391 The diuell chiefly laboureth to corrupt it 391 We know not what is good for our selues 726 LA. LAbour vndertaken vpon hope of reward 1 Labourer presently to haue his pâ—ay ibid. Law of nature and of all nations teacheth to punish sinne 90 Lawes of men like a spiders web 91 Law of God like an yron net ibid. Lawes must bee made according to rules of mens abilitie to keepe them 210 Law in the Gospell 224 That the law was not created 286 To keepe Gods lawes made Dauid wiser then his teachers 571 Law of God giuen to be kept not to be talked of 600 Languages and readie speech requisite for preachers 641 LE. Letters how vsed by the ancient to signifie diuers things 473 LI. God the verie life of all things 125 Life of Christ a continuall suffering 437 A good life what it effecteth 601 Bad life what euill it doth 601 The wicked are lifted vp to bee throwne downe 612 Life of Christ a continuall suffering 437 LO Loaues of bread how multiplied by Christ 174 God onely absolute Lord. 131 Lord and Iehoua equiualent ibid. Lord taken two waies ibid. Men may be called Lords 131 Our Lord should bee feared and serued for three speciall reasons 132 Christ most properly called Lord. 132 Logos what it signifieth 306 Why vsed by the Euangelist 310 The best knowne name of Christ among the Iewes 311 God loueth not the wicked 189 Loue of God in giuing Christ to be incarnate how great it was 303 To loue God is not to offend him 305 Loue of the Father seene in giuing Christ to be incarnate 357 Loue of Christ seene in his incarnation 359 Our loue to God increased by the meditation of Christ his Passion 424 Loue of God to mankinde moued him to giue his Sonne to die for man 498 How great his loue was to man ibid. Loue of Christ to man how vnspeakable 499 How deerely we ought to loue Christ 508 To loue one another how wee are bound vnto it 511 Want of loue the cause of all mischiefe in the world 511 We ought to loue all men ibid. Loue of money what it doth 565 Loue shewed foure wayes 693 That there is a gradation in the loue of God 684 Man lost a two-fold good 321 LV Vntamed lusts what an odious sinne 240 Saint Lukes words he shall be called the Sonne of God how vnderstood 248 Lutherans what they teach concerning the vnion of the two natures of Christ 377 Lutheran doctrine what absurdities it brings foorth 377 MA. MAn following his vocation is the safer from Satan 13 Man receiued power to beget man like himselfe 7 Manner how euerie sinne is committed fourefold 26 Sinnes of malice haue two violent properties 32 Malice of Satan restrayned 178 Man what a poore and a miserable thing 104 Manhood described and the miseries therof 70 Manner how the Father begetteth the Sonne or the Holy Ghost proceedeth is ineffable 227 Manner of diuine mysteries not curiously to be searched into ibid No man truly rich 281 Malice of Hereticks seene in denying the God-head of Christ 305 Not to marrie with wicked sinners 109 Mankinde produced three waies before Christ his time 333 Manner how Christ was conceiued 335 It is ineffable 336 Christ made a perfect man 340 Marcion his heresie 343 Macedonius his heresie ibid. Manichaeus his heresie ibid. Manhood of Christ seene by the sufferings of Christ 343 Word made flesh why the Euangelist saith 369 How one thing may be made another thing three waies 37â— Manhood of Christ how adored 383 Mary rightly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the mother of God 385 Mary of what Tribe she was 397. 398 Mathew and Michoa how reconciled touching the place of Christ his birth 407 Magi what they beleeued Christ to be 4â—3 Man of al creatures most subiect to sufferings 434 Malice of Satan Christ prayed against 456 Malchus how he vsed Christ 467 Masters that are ill make ill seruants 467 Malice of the Iewes against Christ 495 517 Manner of Christs suffering incomprehensible 5â—2 Mary Magdalen a sinnefull woman 529 How shee liued after her conuersion 533 Mary Magdalens how many there were 568 Why not suffered to touch Christ 568 Magistrates in what sence to be feared 538 Manhood of Christ how said to bee euerie where 5â—4 Martyrs how constantly they professed Christ 577 Manna had twelue wonders in it 703 ME. Memorie what an excellent facultie it is 60 Wherein it excelleth all other faculties ibid. God recommendeth all his benefits vnto it ibid. How defiled by sinne 61 How faithfull to record vaine and vile things ibid. How faithlesse to retaine good things 61 What we should alwaies remember 62 Meditation of
64 Sin of man in many things more haynous then the sinne of Satan 106 The cause of all our miseries 111 What it is 166 In euery sinne two things to be considered ibid. Sinne and death indissolubly linked together 2 Sinne the roote of death ibid. How farre it spread it selfe 3 Sinne originall or actuall 3 Sinne to haue any thoughts of sinne 13 Actuall sinne what it is 10 Not a meere priuation ibid. An erring from Gods will 11. How it creepeth secretly and insensibly like a Serpent 12 18. How it increaseth inwardly outwardly 12 Not resisted how it will necessarily increase more and more 22 Sinne is inwardly increased three waies 12 Sinne some way voluntarie or no sinne 15 Sinne outwardly increaseth foure waies 17 It is compared vnto a witch 46 It brought on man a treble death 49 Sinne against the Holy Ghost what it is 227 Sinne irremissible three waies ibid. No sinne so great but God can forgiue it ibid. Sinnes not traduced from the parents vnto the children 246 Our sinnes drew Christ to bee incarnate 318 Sinne expelled by the meditation of Christ his Passion 422 Our sinnes crucified Iesus Christ 497 Sinne brought feare into the world 540 The more sinfull we are the more we ought to feare ibid. Sinne ought speedily to bee forsaken for two reasons 589 Sinners how they condemne God to iustifie themselues 24 Sinners all excepting Christ 2 No sinner excluded from hope of pardon 224 Three sisters of the destinie signifie God 312 SL God how slowe to reuenge 193 194 SM Small things suffered doe grow great and doe much hurt 42 Small sinnes ought to be resisted 43 What a small matter it was that God commanded Adam 98 What a small matter it is that God requireth of vs. 99 SO. Christ the Sonne of God not as we are the Sonnes of God 291 The Sonne why made flesh rather then the Father or the Holy Ghost 322 Sorrowes and sufferings of Christ exceeded all other sorrowes 486 Sorrow is two-fold 354 Soule whether traduced from the parents 4 Not created from the beginning 6 Not created as God infuseth them 6 Soule the seate of sinne 7 Soule immortall yet hath a kinde of death 51 Soules diseases what they be 63 That Christ had a true humane reasonable soule 348 Soule of Christ after it parted from the body descended into the place of the damned 582. 619. 620 SP. God spareth none for his greatnesse if they offend him 40 He spareth the wicked for good mens sake 187 We ought to spare no cost to get the truth 217 To spare wicked men is not good 222 That we should speak nothing but truth 221 Examples of spitefull sinners 33 34 How fearefull is their state ibid. Spirituall and eternall punishment how they differ 250 ST Our state in Christ better then that which we lost in Adam 361 Starre of Christ spoken of by the Gentiles 412 What time it appeared 414 What effects it wrought in the Magi. 415 Christ why hee stayed so long before hee came 401 Why he would not stay any longer 402 Iudas why made steward 459 SV. Christ of the same substance with his Father 292 Made of the substance of his mother 342 How subtilly Satan deales with men to make them bold to sinne then to despaire 41 Christ suffered all miseries 260 Who most subiect to sufferings 435 Christ suffered both in soule and body 437 His first degree of suffering was to be made passible 438 Consideration of Christ his sufferings most admirable 439 The sufferings of Christ before his Iudges 465 The grieuous sufferings after hee was condemned by the high Priest 471 Sufferings of Christ how alone sufficient to satisfie for all sinnes 502 Sufferings of the Saints how they doe profit the Church 503 Sufferings how they doe comfort and confirme all Christians 504 Sufferings of Christ teach vs how to suffer 509 That we ought to suffer two waies 509 To suffer with Christ and for Christ how readie and willing we ought to be 510 Sufferings of Christ were voluntarie 491. 492 How generall they were 483 How vnspeakable farre more then are expressed by the Euangelists 484 Sufferings of Christ not imaginarie but true reall sufferings 484 God prouideth sufficient for euerie man 704 Suggestions vnto sinnes are sinnes 12 How they are to be auoided 13 The surest signe of saluation 652 Why Christ became our suretie 497 SW Continuall swearing what a dangerous sin 241 SY That we sympathize in the sufferings of our brethren 510 TE TEares are speciall meanes to preuaile with God 52 Best way to teach is to lay a good foundation 392 A perfideous tempting of God what a horrible sinne 239 The temporall things of this life to be prayed for 703 The testimonies that proue Christ to be the true Messias 411 412 c. Testimonâ—e of the Apostles to be beleeued for two speciall reasons 572 Text of Salomon Pro. 8.22 whether corrupted by the Arrians 287 TH. That we ought to be thankfull vnto God for all we haue 129 How we ought to be thankfull to God for giuing the Word to be incarnate 305 For the sufferâ—ngs of Christ 506 Thankfulnesse to be expressed by workes 507 Theator where the Tragedy of Christ his Passion was acted was Ierusalem and why 421 Third day why the appointed day of Christ his Resurrection 555 The fittest day for Christ to rise in respect of his person 556 Christ rising the third day did paralel our creation and left a patterne of our condition 558 What we ought to thirst after 488 Thomas whether he was with the EleueÌ„ when Christ appeared to them the first time 573 Thoughts that are wicked bring forth wicked works 14 Three persons in one essence of God 272 Three things handled touching the person of the sonne 277 Three sisters of the destinie what they signifie 312 Three wonderfull things obseruable in making the Word flesh 328 Three things measure all durations 400 Three things obseruable in the day of Christ his natiuitie 405 Three things that moue attention 420 Three things effected in vs by the meditation of Christ his Passion 422 Three things moue vs to loue any one 425 Three things happened to Christ in Gethsemane after his bloudy sweaâ— 458 Threefold argument vrged by the Iewes to moue Pilate to crucifie Christ 476 That there is a three-fold necessitie 491 The three women seeking Christ signifie three properties of the Church 521 Three things required to make an action good 524 Three things excellent in the Angels 535 Christ how he remained three dayes in his graue 559 560 Three dreadfull enemies of man 582 Three things considered about our spirituall ascention 630 Three sorts of men excluded from the Paschall Lambe 682 Three sorts of Preachers 697 Three reasons to moue vs to thankefulnesse 705 A three-fold voice of the creature ibid. Three reasons to driue away ingratitude from vs. 706 Three degrees of thankfulnesse 707 Three reasons to moue vs to pray for our Ministers
labyrinths because iarring and iangling about errours they let passe the maine grounds of truth and striuing to finde out new wayes they doe quite forget the old way which is the good way and are become almost ignorant of the first and chiefest Principles of Religion Such is the pollicie of Satan to busie their heads about the lesse needfull Controuersies thereby to make them the lesse diligent to inquire after the most necessary counsels of their saluation And therefore considering with my selfe what the Apostle saith that hee desired to know nothing but Iesus Christ and him crucified I haue applyed my selfe to treate of these ensuing Theames I confesse my manner of handling them is like my selfe plaine and homely without any gorgeous garments of Rhetorical ornaments because I euer desired to speak rather for the edification of my hearers then for the oftenstation of my selfe but I assure you the matter is like them from whom I receiued it sound and good fit to feede all those Christians that desire rather to haue their hungry soules fedde with the sincere milke of Gods Word then their itching eares tickled with the inticing speech of mans wisedome for they doe containe the knowledge of our selues how poore and miserable we are become by sinne the knowledge of the true and eternall God and the knowledge of Iesus Christ God and Man then whom there is no greater no better which few lessons are alone able to make vs happy I neede speake no more of the worke let it speake for me I referre all to God who esteemeth of our indeauours not by their euent but by our intent but remembring that presenting your Honours with a Booke I must not make a Booke of an Epistle I onely desire you to accept these notes of a Schollers obseruation who desires not so much to make himselfe knowne as to acknowledge his duty to God and his desire to doe him seruice to extoll his name in Heauen and not to gaine himselfe a name on Earth and to haue all his thoughts and workes to honour Christ or to be dishonoured himselfe for no Christian So with my daily prayers for you and all yours I humbly take my leaue and rest Your Honours true seruant and most humble Chaplaine in all Christian seruice euer to be commanded GR. WILLIAMS TO THE RIGHT REVEREND FATHER IN God IOHN Lord Bishop of Saint Asaph and to the Right VVorshipfull the truly Honoured Sir IOHN WYNNE Knight and Baronet all grace and happinesse in this life and eternall happinesse in the life to come Right Reuerend Father I Write not this vnto your Lordship by base flattery to beg any thing of you for I doe endeauour alwayes to support my meane estate by meditating on the Apostles lesson in any state to be contented and I know that as we came naked into this world so we shall all returne naked hence againe but I presume to affixe these few lines vnto these my poore labours to assure the world of mine vnfained ioy to see your Lordship placed in that seate of gouernment wherein you are in a certaine hope that as Saint Paul said of Timothy according to the prophesies that went afore of you that is the Propheticall expectation that all men conceiued of you and the faire promises that your Religious and alwayes vpright carriage hath made vnto vs your Lordship will be a great comfort and a Diuine blessing vnto that whole Diocesse wherein you liue I know it is the practise of many I dare not say of any Bishop either basely to sell their spirituall promotions or sinisterly to bestow them on their friends their kinsmen and alliances and yet I say not the Church of England doth imitate that painted Harlot of Babylon nor that Ierusalem iustifieth Samaria but as Demodocus said of the Milesians they were no fooles and yet they did the same things that fooles did so I feare that we may say of many in the Church of England we are no Pagans no Popes no Papists no worldlings no carnall men and yet though I say not that any man doth ill yet I doubt wee doe not all well not much better then they vse to doe herein I confesse the Apostle noteth it as a vice of the latter times to be without naturall affection but if gifts blinde the eyes of the wise that they peruert iudgement I doubt not but this carnall loue of flesh and bloud will sometimes with Mydas preferre Pan before Apollo and this naturall affection to kinred being vnworthiest will not onely deiect the mindes of painefull men and cause men rather to seeke to be allied to others then to attaine vnto any worth in themselues but it must also turne to the hurt and detriment of the whole Church of God and doth apparantly shew such spirituall Patrons to be indeed carnally minded for do not the Publicans and Sinners euen the same and therefore though I wish all men to abound in loue and affection vnto their Kins-folkes yet in this case I would to God that all of vs Deut. 33 â—8 wold imitate Leui who saide vnto his father and to his mother I haue not seene him neither did he acknowledge his brethren nor knew his owne children but obserued Gods word and kept his couenant that we would set God alwayes before our eyes Neither doe I say this to deny that men should doe for their kinsfolke being worthy men but that they should not doe this neglecting others farre more worthy and laying aside all sinister respects would doe onely what should be most for Gods glory for the encouragement of painfull Preachers and for the best benefit vnto the people of God for if Christ being lost by Mary and Ioseph could not bee found among his owne friends and kins-folkes these men should take heed they finde him not among theirs I could say more of this point and yet not so much as Saint Bernard saith vnto Eugenius of many other points like to this but this will serue to be a witnesse against some at the dreadfull day and perhaps to stirre vp as much rage against my selfe as the Iewes had against Saint Stephen for speaking this truth against them that vse such dealing against God If it doth I say as Saint Chrysostome said of the rage of that cruell Empresse If they keepe me poore I know Christ had not an house to put his head in if they silence me and thrust me out of their Sinagogue so was that poore man that confessed Christ and the Apostles inioyned not to speake in the Name of Christ if they cast me into prison so was Ieremy Saint Peter Saint Paul and many more If I be forced to flie my Countrey I haue that beloued Iohn and that Atlas-like Athanasius for presidents of the like vsage or whatsoeuer else should be done vnto mee I haue the holy Martyres for my fellow sufferers and I will neuer count my life deere vnto me so I may finish my course with ioy
both Body and Soule not that the Soule begetteth a Soule That man and all other creatures receaued power to produce creatures like vnto themselues Totum generat totum hoc est corpus generat corpus mediante anima anima generat animam mediante corpore Psal 51.5 or the Body begetteth a spirit but that as all other creatures receiued power from God to produce creatures like vnto themselues as the seede of the vegetatiue to bring forth vegetatiue creatures and the sensible sensible creatures so man consisting both of Body and Soule should beget a creature like vnto himselfe consisting of the same parts for otherwise sinne must needes bee in the body before the Soule be infused for if the schoole of the naturalists be to be belieued the Soule is not infused into the Body vntill the thirtieth as some or fortieth day as some affirme and yet the Psalmist saith that he was conceiued in sinne therefore both Body and Soule were both conceiued at once or else corruption was in the Body before the infusion of the Soule and this liuing Soule by this dead flesh must needes be defiled which is most absurd for as Saint Augustine sayth of Adam It was not his corruptible flesh which made his Soule to become sinnefull but his sinnefull Soule made his flesh subiect to corruption so it must needes be in the sonnes of Adam Gene. 5.3 that not our flesh corrupts our Soules but both body and soule are conceiued in sinne both produced of sinfull seede and so sinne principally resides in the Soule and not in the Body because the Soule giues life and motion vnto the flesh hence it is that Adam hauing defiled both his Body and Soule is sayd to haue begot a childe in his owne image i. e. sinfull and polluted like himselfe both in regard of his body and Soule Bosquierus de finibus bonorum lib. 1. con 6. p. 27. Nam Adam vt persona publica sibi ac suis aut sapiebat aut delirabat for now Adam standing in paradise a publique person as I told you before was to make or to marre himselfe and all his posteritie and therefore if this roote had continued holy the branches had beene likewise holy but the tree prouing to be euill Rom. 11. the fruit could not possibly be good Math. 7.18 for a bad tree cannot bring forth good fruit sayth our Sauiour and therefore Adam sinning all his seede are become sinnefull all his ofspring tanquam serie continuata as in a continued line doe like corrupted branches of a rotten tree bring forth still corrupted fruits and so make all their generation so soone as they are begotten liable to the curse of God for that first transgression for the reward of sinne is death and the Prophet Dauid sayeth Psal 51.2 hee was shapen in wickednesse and conceaued in sinne Iohn 3.6 and our Sauiour sayth that which is borne of flesh is flesh i. e. he that is borne of a sinnefull man can be nothing else but a sinnefull man That Gods graces are not traduced from the best parents not that a godly man begets a godly man for the graces of Gods spirit are not begotten in our carnall generation but they are giuen from aboue in our spirituall regeneration and a man begets his childe not as he is spirituall but as hee is a creature consisting of body and soule and therefore whosoeuer is borne of flesh and blood must needes be tainted and corrupted with sinne and wickednesse for flesh heere is not taken pro natura carnis sed pro vitiosa qualitate totius hominis for the single nature of flesh but for the corrupted qualitie of the whole man as Saint Paul excellently sheweth when hee sayth in my flesh dwelleth no goodnesse Rom. 7.8 i. e. in the corrupted nature of a naturall man there is no grace there is no goodnesse And therefore hoc virus paternum this hereditarie poyson as Paulinus calleth it What we learne from this doctrine this our originall sinne that is inbred in euery man since the fall of the first man may sufficiently serue to teach vs. First to iustifie God First to iustifie God for inflicting death vpon euery man though man should doe nothing else to procure his death quia damnati antequam nati because euery one is guilty of this sinne and therefore of death before hee commeth to this present life for the reward of sinne is death and therefore the death of children and infants that haue done no actuall sinne doth proue them tainted with this sinne because death cannot be iustly inflicted vpon those that are no wayes infected with sinne for the reward of sinne is death but you see they are subiect vnto death and therefore you may know they are tainted with sinne Secondly Secondly to be humbled this may serue to teach all those that stand so much vpon the honour and dignity of their naturall birth to consider whâ—t they are and what they haue thereby a sinnefull corrupted and contagious being children of wrath subiects to death slaues of damnation be they Kings Princes Nobles what you will this is all they haue or can haue by their naturall birth Iohn 3.6 for whatsoeuer is borne of flesh is flesh i. e. all things that parents can conuaye vnto their children is but a corrupted natural being yea though the parties should be sanctified themselues and thereby procure their children to bee receiued and reputed members of the visible Church before men yet can they not infuse Grace Perkins in Jud. 1. nor produce sanctified children in the sight of God For though we reade of some that were sanctified in their Mothers wombe as Ieremie Iohn Baptist and the like Ier. 1.5 yet this sanctifying grace was infused by God and not traduced from their parents Luke 1.44 and therefore this should make all men to be of an humble spirit and to reioyce more in their second birth in the Baptisme that they haue receiued it may bee by the hands of some meane Minister and their begetting vnto the faith of Christ by the preaching of the word of God then in all that glory and excellencie that they haue gotten from their naturall parents for they did but make vs Men these must make vs Christian men And thus you see that by the guilt of Adams sinne euery childe of Adam deserues eternall death before he comes to this present life But because we would be sure enough of death wee will hasten it and draw it on as it were with cart-ropes throughout all our life and we will not haue it sayd Ezech. 18.2 our fathers haue eaten sower Grapes and the childrens teeth are set on edge or that Adam sinned we are punished nam errauimus cum patribus for we haue sinned wil sinne with our fathers more then our fathers we will drinke iniquity like water and adde vnto our originall corruption
the Euangelist speakes not there of the person of the holy Ghost nor yet of the inuisible bestowing of the gifts of the holy Ghost for so they euer knew him to be and his gifts to be giuen vnto the Saints and therefore they did vse to pray with the Psalmist That God would renew a right spirit within them Psal 50.11.12 But the meaning of the Euangelist is that the gifts and graces of the holy Ghost were not as yet plentifully visibly and miraculously giuen because that Iesus was not yet glorified for that according to the prophecie of Dauid Psal 68.18 Christ was first to ascend vp on high and to leade captiuity captiue and then in that manner to bestow gifts on men But these words that he was not knowne vnto them by his name Iehouah are to be vnderstood of the performing and accomplishing of those promises which he made vnto them of the giuing of the Land of Canaan vnto them and their posterity for the words going before I haue appeared vnto them by the name of Almighty God and the words immediately following and I haue established my couenant with them to giue them the Land of Canaan the Land of their pilgrimage wherein they were strangers doth make it sufficiently plaine that the meaning of the holy Ghost is this videlicet that although by the creation of the World and the destruction of the same and so by the restauration and the continuall preseruation of the World and of themselues especially in all their pilgrimage Vide Zanch. de nat Dei l 2. c. 13. hee had sufficiently shewed himselfe vnto them to be Almighty yet by the giuing of the Land of Canaan vnto them and their posterity he had not shewed himselfe a fulfiller and accomplisher of his promise because that same promise of giuing them the Land of Canaan though it was faithfully made vnto Abraham yet was it not fully accomplished vntill the dayes of Iosuah And therefore God hereby would giue Moses That God is a faithful performer of all his promises and vs all to vnderstand that as he is an eternall Iehouah or being in himselfe and the giuer of being vnto all Creatures so would hee performe and giue being vnto all his promises and as hee was now mindfull to accomplish this promise which hee made with Abraham of giuing the Land of Canaan so would he be as mindfull to performe that great promise which hee chiefly aimed at and intended by this viz. of giuing eternall life vnto Abraham and all his faithfull Children for wee must vnderstand that whatsoeuer was done or said vnto the Patriarchs and Fathers of the Old Testament 1 Cor. 10.11 Omnia in figura contingebant illis They were but Types and Figures and had relation vnto farre more excellent things and therefore the chiefe meaning of God herein is that although he had but promised vnto Adam that the seede of the Woman should breake the Serpents head Gen 3 15. Gen 22.18 and vnto Abraham that in his seede all the Nations of the Earth should be blessed and should through the said seede be brought to possesse and enioy the euerlasting Canaan and had not as yet performed the same in their time yet as now hee intended by him and especially by Iosua to giue vnto the posterity of Abraham the temporall Land of Canaan as their owne eyes should immediately see so he would as certainely in his due time by and through Iesus Christ whereof Iosua was but a type and figure giue vnto all the faithfull sonnes of Abraham the possession and inheritance of the spirituall Canaan that is eternall life and then they should all see and perceiue him to be as true a Iehouah that is as true a performer and giuer of being vnto this his promise of their redemption and eternall saluation as they doe see him and know him to be an eternall being in himselfe and the giuer of being id est The Creator of all the things that be or as the Children of Israel doe see him to performe his promise of giuing the Land of Canaan vnto the posterity of Abraham And so much for the most especiall things that we may obserue out of this name Iehouah CHAP. III. Of the vsefull instructions that we may gather out of the former Doctrine WEll then beloued Brethren let vs apply this truth vnto our selues and first seeing that good is no good which wanteth perpetuity as Nazianzen saith and that God onely is that eternall being which hath and giueth immortality it teacheth vs where to seeke for our eternity Indeed of our selues we shall be euer for though God made vs Ex nihilo How wee may attaine vnto immortality Out of nothing yet he did not make vs Ad nihilum To returne to nothing There may be a dissolution of soule and body for a time but there cannot be an annihilation of neither because they must be re-vnited againe to remaine for euer but euer without God in eternall misery and therefore seeing it is a deadly immortality to be immortall onely for immortall torments we ought to ascend to him and be vnited to him if wee would be happy and desire to make our immortality profitable vnto vs. 1 Pet. 2.11 Heb. 13.14 Why then should we place our rest on Earth where we be strangers and pilgrimes and haue no continuing Citie and not rather crie to God Claud l. 2. in Eut. Eripe nos tandem seruilibus eripe regnis Reuel 6.10 How long tarriest thou holy and true or when commest thou O good God to free vs E lutulentis manum operibus from this more then Egyptian bondage in this wicked world and to bring vs Lord vnto thy selfe where we shall haue a most hapâ—â— bâ—ing and a most glorious Kingdome without ending For here alas Mille parit luctus mortalibus vna voluptas We haue a thousand bitter sighes for euery little smile Et praeterit iucunditas non redditura manet anxietas non peritura And our little pleasure will soone vanish and yet leaue a sting and a torment that shall neuer be finished but in thy presence there is fulnesse of ioy Psal 16.12 and at thy right hand there is pleasure for euermore Secondly seeing we and all things else haue our being from God Iupiter est quodcumque vides quocunque moueris Lucan l. 9. That we ought to be thankfull vnto God because we hâ—ue all things from God For whatsoeuer we are or wheresoeuer we are we are all and haue all from God Why then should we be so vngratefull and so vndutifull as we are vnto God For had we not had our being all the titles of honours all the confluence of wealth and all the pompous things that we haue from Parents Kings Masters Friends or whom you will had auailed vs nothing nay had wee not had these things from God wee had had nothing at all because hee gaue them their being
Rursus labefacta cadebat religio then hee thought it could not bee that there should bee any God because he cared not as he thought for the righteous people Euen so I must needes confesse that when I consider the sincerity of that Religion which wee teach the summe of it plainely expressed in the Scriptures and the end of it tending onely to the glory of God I doe assure my selfe that we haue amongst vs the very Truth of God but on the other side when I consider Quomodo commutauerunt veritatem Dei in mendacium How many of vs doe change this Truth of God into a lye when they doe liue cleane contrary to what they Professe and some of the best of vs euen of the Teachers of this Truth doe leade our liues not onely as they doe whom we daily condemne for such intollerable corruptions vnbeseeming Christians but also in many things as Pagans who know not God It makes me often muse and Nicodemus-like to aske how can these things be John 3. to haue the Truth amongst vs and yet to haue such pleasure in vanity and to seeke after leasing Psal 4. For our Sauiour prayeth for his seruants that God would sanctifie them through the Truth Iohn 17.17 and yet behold the fruits of our Sanctification It was said of old Mos est praelatis praebendas non dare gratis ô Monachi vestri stomachi sunt amphora Bacchi vos estis Deus est testis turpissima pestis Sed bene nummatis aut corum sanguine natis And now the world saith of some of vs Wee sell our Churches we purchase Lands we raise our sonnes to worldly honours we suppresse whom we lift though neuer so good we raise our friends though neuer so bad and what not What should I say any more what say they can Rome doe more or what more doe we then the Heathens doe or as our Sauiour saith Doe not the Publicans and Sinners euen the same and if these things be done in a greene tree If this be the life of vs that are as the light of the world what shall we say of others which by Profession are lay secular men I take God to witnesse before whom I stand and by whom I shall be iudged that I haue admired and often grieued at my heart not onely to heare what perhaps the aduersaries of the Truth or some lewd dissolute men that neither loue God nor his Ministers but are euer ready to speake the worst of all for the offence of few might falsely say against vs but also to see how dissolute how worldly and how conformable to the world boone companions fashionable to all Companies a great many of vs doe liue Nec Iouis imperium nec Phlegetonta timent And therefore I wonder not that the simple are brought to their nonplus to see Truth and Wickednesse thus linked together in the same persons Rom. 1.18 But when I consider what the Apostle saith that the Gentiles did hold the Truth in vnrighteousnesse I must needs acknowledge that wicked men may haue the theoricke knowledge of the Truth and teach this Truth vnto others and yet be castawayes themselues for so our Sauiour saith that many shall come in the last day and say Lord open vnto vs for we haue prophesied in thy Name and done many great workes through thy Name to whom the Lord shall answer I know you not depart from me you workers of iniquity Rom. 3.3 Besides as the Apostle saith of the Iewes What if some did not beleeue shall their vnbeliefe make the faith of God without effect God forbid c. 10.16 or what If all did not obey the Gospell or that some of the branches be broken off Shall this hinder the saluation of the rest God forbid So I may say of vs What if some of vs what if many of vs euen the best of vs should be as the world saith we are should that preiudice the rest and especially the Truth of God God forbid I hope I may boldly say it that the world cannot say nor any man in the world deny it vnlesse he putteth on the face of the father of lies but as we haue had many Reuerend and faithfull Bishops many graue and painfull Preachers that haue spent their strength in the expressing and sacrificed their deerest bloud in defending this Truth so wee haue still many worthy and godly Bishops and many holy and heauenly Ministers Parcite paucorum diffundere crimē in omnes Spectetur meritis quilibet apte suis that doe most vprightly walke in the Truth of God and shall these be condemned and reproached for the offence of others Shall all be blamed for the offence of few No God forbid let euery horse beare his owne burthen for euery man shall be iudged according to his owne workes And therefore though as in the field of Gods Church there are Tares as well as Wheat so in our Priestly dignity there are many amongst vs that are not of vs of whom I vnderstand what I said before that are like Statuae Mercuriales which shew the way to others but walke not one steppe themselues or like those skilfull Cookes that dresse good meate for others but taste not a bit thereof themselues or rather that feed not the flocke at all but feed themselues vpon the flocke of Christ and gather wealth to themselues in steed of gayning soules to God yet let GOD be true and euery man a lyar and let not the wicked life of some men scandalize this eternall Truth of God we haue it now amongst vs It was purchased by paines preserued by blood and most gloriously continued to this very day and I doe assure my selfe that as there were seauen thousand men in Israel which bowed not their knees to Baal 1 Kings 19.18 so there be many thousands of men in England that if they wanted Inke to defend that Diuine Truth which we doe Professe would maintaine the same with their deerest blood and I boldly set it downe that if Satan should be let loose to persecute the Saints of God I doe vnfainedly wish my burning bones might first giue light vnto all them that desire to walke in this Truth But we haue more cause to pray to God to defend the Defendor of this Truth not onely by his Royall Authority whereby wee doe inioy this Truth in a blessed peace but also by his owne Diuine Penne and industry whereby he shewed himselfe Esse quod est to be of the Truth indeed rather then any wayes in the least manner to feare or suspect the disturbance of the same for God who is abundant in Truth will preserue his owne Truth for euermore And therefore seeing that though some of vs be wicked yea though all of vs should be wicked and depriue our selues of happinesse which I hope our greatest enemies will not dare to say yet doth not that make the Truth of God of none effect Let vs be Gens
kindred of a Traytor were thereby tainted and disparaged by the Macedonian Law And therefore we must abridge God of that which we see iust in man or else we must yeeld it is iust in God to visite and to punish the sinnes of the Fathers vpon the Children But For the second That for the Fathers sinnes the Child should be spiritually punished or inflicted with criminall punishments it seemeth more then strange and therefore Aquinas and many others thinking thereby to reconcile this place of the Law That God will visite the sinnes of the Fathers vpon the Children And that of Ezechiel where God saith The innocent Childe shall not beare the iniquity of his wicked Father doe say that God here doth vnderstand it of temporall punishment or corporall castigation which God often times layeth vpon the Children for their Fathers sinnes But in Ezechiel God meaneth that he will not spiritually punish or eternally plague the Childe for the Fathers sinne And I confesse that that place of Ezechiel is to be vnderstood that God will not eternally punish the Childe simply for the Fathers sinne for God vseth not to punish any one man for the sinne of any other man But as the Lord saith himselfe The soule which sinneth Ezech. 18.4 A difference betwixt spirituall and eternall punishment that soule shall dye yet I say that in Ezechiel he denyeth not what here he affirmeth and that hee meaneth the same thing in both places if both be rightly vnderstood for I make a great difference betweene a spirituall and an eternall punishment that God will eternally punish the Childe for the Fathers sinne I vtterly denye but that hee will spiritually punish the Childe for the Fathers sinne I see neither place denying it For as here hee doth not say that hee will eternally punish the Childe for his Fathers sinnes so there he doth not say that hee will no way spiritually punish the Childe for the Parents faults but as here his meaning is not that he will inflict any positiue euill vpon the sonnes of the wicked for the wickednesse of their Parents but that for the iniquity of the Parents hee will shut his hands and with-hold his grace from their Children and so willingly and iustly suffer them to commit the like or worse sinnes then their Fathers did because we being all naturally borne in sinne inclined and prone to all euill if God doth not by his sanctifying and preuenting grace preserue vs wee shall be sure enough of our selues without any intrusion or infliction of any positiue euill from God to fall from one wickednesse to another and to commit all sinnes euen with greedinesse So there his meaning is not to deny the with-holding of his grace from the Children of the wicked which is all that here hee threatneth but that he will not inflict any positiue punishment vpon them for their Fathers sinnes And therefore though God saith in Ezechiel that he will not punish the Children for their Fathers faults i. e. by any positiue punishment yet doth hee not denie That God denyeth his graces vnto the Children for the Parents sinnes but that the priuatiue punishment of denying his grace vnto them for their Fathers sinnes should be inflicted vpon them and that suffering of vs to sinne or not hindering of vs to sinne iustly inflicted vpon vs for our Fathers sinnes is a most lamentable and a most fearefull thing because such Children so iustly refused to be helped by GOD and so deseruedly left in the councell of their owne hands shall bee sure of sinnes enough of their owne to be plagued for that they shall neuer neede to say Ezech. 18.2 The Fathers haue eaten sowre grapes and the Childrens teeth are set on edge or that they are punished for their Fathers sinnes And so you see how God visiteth the sinnes of the Fathers vpon the Children and yet punisheth euery man but for his owne sinnes The first he doth by a spirituall desertion and deniall of grace vnto the Children for the Fathers sinnes and The second hee doth by a positiue infliction of punishment vpon euery man according to his owne sinnes for As he promiseth to blesse the Children of the godly for the loue that he beareth vnto their Parents as hee saith vnto Abraham Gen. 17.7 I will be thy God and the God of thy seede after thee So hee denyeth his grace many times vnto the Children of the wicked for the very hatred that he beares against their Fathers sinnes as most innumerable wofull examples doe make it plaine for you see the Iewes forsaking God to be forsaken of God to this very day and that bloud of Christ which their Fathers spilt to remaine vpon the Children of so many generations And we see so many Nations of men suffered Luc. 1.79 To sit in darkenesse and in the shadow of death as the seauen Churches of Asia and many other famous places of Greece and other Countries because their Fore-fathers haue forsaken their first loue and through their negligence haue extinguished the light of Truth And being thus left of God and depriued of grace what can be left in them or deriued from them but the fruits of that naturall corruption which is ingraffed in all men And therefore as it is truly said of all the off-spring of Ieroboam that being bereft of grace and left vnto themselues euen for their Fathers sinnes They walked in the wayes of Ieroboam 1 Kings 15.34 the sonne of Nebat which made Israel to sinne So we may say of the Children of wicked Parents that being left as they were borne in their pure naturals for their Fathers impieties they doe imitate the same workes and tread in the same steppes or worse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then their Fathers did And so it falles out true that as an euill Crow brings forth an euill egge so euill Parents doe bring forth for the most part euill and wicked Children God in iustice visiting the iniquity of the Parents vpon the Children vnto the third and fourth generation And so you see how God visiteth the iniquity of the Fathers vpon the Children Why God with-holdeth his graces from the Children of the wicked by with-holding his grace from them and how iust it is with God to doe the same because hee is a debtor to no man and the reason why he dealeth thus with the sonnes of men is First To shew the height of his hatred against sinne fire is kindled in his wrath and it shall burne to the bottome of hell and if his wrath be kindled yea but a little Blessed are all they that put their trust in him Psal 2.12 Secondly To punish the offenders as I said before in their dearest flesh to see if their loue to their Childrens welfare will make them any wayes feare to sinne for we see many men so obdurate and so hard-hearted vnto themselues as that they care not what is done or what becomes
speake and therefore I will rather bathe my selfe in those fountaines of Gods admirable loue wherby he imbraced Mankinde the Epytome of the whole world and especially the Church of Christ the epytome of this epytome before it was created and pittyed the same when it was fallen and promised to restore it and to reuiue it when it was dead and to shew his mercy vnto it Gods promise touching the Incarnation of the Word Gen. 3.15 when it was in miserie for he said first in Paradise that the seede of the woman should breake the Serpents head And afterwarâ—s to Abraham that in his seed all the Nations of the earth should be blessed and then to Dauid Gen. 22.18 that of the fruit of his body he would raise one to sit vpon his seate And so more and more cleerely vnto the rest of the succeeding Prophets and I will chiefely insist vpon that chiefest token of Gods loue Psal 132.12 and that greatest argument of Gods goodnesse towards vs the most mercifull fulfilling of these gracious promises so much desired and so long expected by all the blessed Patriarchs and Prophets and all the rest of the holy men of God for when the fulnesse of time came God sent his Sonne made of a woman Gal. 4.4 made vnder the Law to redeeme them that were in bondage vnder the Law that we might receiue the adoption of children And this my Text doth fully and plainely shew vnto vs. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the Word was made flesh The most excellent speech that can be vttered is euer measured saith Fulgentius by these two properties breuity and suauitie and here is both in this Text few words full of matter and the sweetest matter that euer was heard God made Man and therefore I may say of these words that they are all in all and as Saint Hierome saith of the Catholike Epistles of Saint Peter Hieron ad Paulin Saint Iohn Saint Iames and Saint Iude Breues esse pariter longas That in these few words are contained all words all things all matters For the summe of all knowledge is Diuinitie this is the Lady and Mistresse all other Arts and Sciences are but seruants like Penelopes handmaides helpes and meanes to bring vs to the speech of this chaste mistresse the summe of all Diuinity is the Scripture for this is sufficient to make the man of God perfect 2 Tim. 3.17 Rom. 1.16 being instructed to all good workes the summe of the Scripture is the Gospel for the Gospell is the power of God vnto saluation to euery one that beleeueth and the summe of the Gospell is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This word that is made flesh for these things i e. the Gospell are written That you might beleeue Iesus Christ to be the Sonne of God Iohn 10.31 and that in beleeuing you might haue eternall life Christ the Word the sum of all things This is Verbum abbreuiatum That contracted word into which all words are reduced as the Riuers into the Seas from this Word they came vnto this Word they tend and within this Word they are all contained for he is the First hee is the Last he is α Legis ω Euangilij The beginning of the Law and the end of the Gospell Velatus in Veteri reuelatus in Nouo Testamento Veyled and shadowed in the Old reueiled and exhibited in the New Testament All the men of note and all the names of dignity were but types of this eternall Word promised in that preached in this there shewed vnto the Fathers in Types here manifested vnto vs in Truths for the Tree of Life the Arke of Noah the Ladder of Iacob the Mercy seat the Brazen Serpent and all such mysticall Types and typicall Figures that we reade of in the Old Testament what were they else but Christ obscurely shadowed before he was fully reueiled and so all the men of Note Noah Isaac Ioseph Moses Aaron Iosua Sampson Dauid Salomon Kings Priests Prophets Titles of Dignities Names of Honour or whatsoeuer else was ascribed to them to expresse their Soueraignty Omnia in figura contingebaâ—t illis 1 Cor. 10.11 Esay 9.6 Aug. in Soliloq c. 31. they were onely vsed to expresse those transcendent excellencies which these personall types did adumbrate and shew most properly to belong vnto this King of Kings This mighty Counsellor and this Prince of Peace For as Saint Augustine tels vs that hauing gone through all creatures and inquired of them for God each one of them did answere I am not he Iohn 1.20 Sed per ipsum sum quem quaeris in me But I haue my being from him whom thou seekest in me so if we would runne ouer the whole classie of the Patriarchs and Prophets to inquire for Christ wee should finde that they would euery one of them answere with Iohn Baptist I am not the Christ but doe looke and expect for him and trust in him as well as you And to speake all in a word the whole word of God containeth nothing else but this Word God for the world being not worthy and our weakenesse being not able to behold the brightnesse of his comming all at once and so God himselfe being not willing suddenly in an instant Christ would not roueile himselfe vnto the World all at once to shew wholly so rich a Iewell he did at sundry times and in diuers manners sometimes in types sometimes in prophesies before his Incarnation sometimes in parables sometimes by similitudes and sometimes by his myracles in the time of his Apostles before his Ascention and since that time plainely with open face reueile himselfe and cause himselfe to be preached vnto all people so that in very deed we might if we had our spirituall eyes alwayes opened Behold and find this word God either couertly shadowed or else plainely expressed almost in euery page in euery verse in euery line in euery word of the whole Word of GOD. And therefore vnhappy is that man To know Christ is the onely thing that makes vs happy which though he knoweth all things else knoweth not this Word but happy and blessed is that man which knoweth this Word though he know none other words in the world and he that knoweth this Word and knoweth all other things together with this Word is neuer a whit the happier for the knowledge of all other things but he is onely happy for the knowledge of this onely Word for this is eternall life to know thee and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ Iohn 17.3 and as one truely saith Haec est nobilissima scientiarum scientia nobilissimorum scire 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 factum carnem This the noblest of all Sciences and the fittest Science for the noblest men to know that the Word was made flesh Nam omnia habemus in Christo omnia in nobis Christus Because we haue all things in Christ and Christ is all things
this rather then they will leese their vayne and wanton pleasures So foolish are they and ignorant euen as it were beasts before him I haue read of Honorius a Roman Emperour that when one told him Rome was lost he was exceedingly grieued and cried alas alas for he supposed it was his henne so called which he exceedingly loued but when it was told him it was his Imperiall Citie Rome that was besieged by Alaricus and was now taken and lost then his spirits were reuiued that his losse was not so great as he imagined we may well thinke this to bee a simple and a childish disposition and yet our selues are worthie of the same condemnation for if we leese a little wealth a little pleasure a little vanitie things of themselues good for nothing because of themselues they can make nothing good and then as the prouerbe goeth that is too deere of a farthing which is good for nothing yet for these trifles wee will vex and fret weepe and wayle Zechar 12.11 and our mourning wil be Like the mourning of Hadadrimmon in the valley of Megiddo but when we leese our soules in the desarts of sinne and when wee leese our God for sinne then with the Israelites wee sit downâ— to eate and drinke and rise vp to play Exod. 32.6 But seeing as the Emperor Seuerus sayd though wee bee all things and haue all things that the world can afford vs yet all things will auayle vs nothing without this thing because as I said before Christ is all things and all things without Christ are nothing seeing with Ixion they doe imbrace a cloud for Iuno a shadow for the body trash for treasure and a short momentarie dreame of pleasure in stead of the true and eternall rest which seeke their rest but not in Christ and seeing as hee sayth himselfe it is eternall life to know him with his father John 17.3 to bee the true and eternall God I will therefore craue your Christian patience and desire your carefull attention to hearken vnto the seuerall parts of this text and to retaine in your memories those chiefest obseruations that I shall collect from the same all I cannot and as I would I cannot I must ingeneously confesse it Nam mysterium singulariter mirabile mirabiliter singulare for it is a mysterie singularly wonderfull and wonderfully singular and indeede the mysterie of all mysteries and therefore Si profundum in profundo non reperiam humanam fragilitatem non diuinam potentiam confundo If I doe not handle the same as I ought to doe I shall but bewray mine owne humaine frailtie and no wayes impeach or disparage this diuine veritie And because as it is the first the greatest the chiefest and the comfortablest point of all Christian Religion so it hath beene and is and I feare euer will be most chiefely oppugned and depraued on all sides by all sorts of enemies and wicked Heretickes therefore as this mine introduction is somewhat large yet not to large either preparation or expectation for so great a matter as followeth after so you must giue mee leaue to insist the longer about it and not Myndus-like to suffer my porch to bee greater then my towne And if I shall seeme harsh in the prosecution and not giue full satisfaction vnto your desires and expectation you must know that they are poynts to informe the iudgement and apprehension and not to moue or to inflame the affection and therefore harder a great deale and more painefull for vs to handle them then to treat of any morall poynts of exhortation and though they be lesse delectable for the present yet are they farre more profitable for the future time especially vnto them that will most seriously consider them and most carefully remember them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the Word was made flesh In which words as you may easily see the holy Euangelist setteth down the incarnation of this eternall Word and I for the fuller explanation of the same The whole treatise deuided into two parts must desire you to consider these two things 1. The summe and substance of this Words Incarnation 2. The chiefest cirumstances requisite for its explanation The 1. is heere fully expressed The 2. is from the other Euangelists plainely collected Touching the first here are three especiall things expressed 1. The thing that was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Word 2. The thing that it was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Flesh 3. The manner of his making 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it was made Or playner thus 1. Who was made 2. What it was made 3. How it was made the Word Flesh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Not created not changed but made for the Word was made Flesh and of these by Gods helpe in order CHAP. II. Of the Trinitie of Persons in the Vnitie of Diuine Essence The first branch of the first part FIrst We must consider who was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Word was made for the vnderstanding of which point wee must know that the diuine Essence is onely one impartible and indiuisible For so the Scripture teacheth vs Deut. 6. c. 32. heare O Israel the Lord thy God is one God and therefore know you that I am God alone and besides mee there is none other sayth the Lord himselfe 1 Cor. 4.8 and so Saint Paul sayth wee know that there is none other God but one Athanas in Symbolo Secondly So the Fathers teach vs for though the Father is God and the Sonne is God and the Holy-Ghost is God yet are there not three Gods but one God sayth Athanasius and these three are one if you consider the Diuinitie and this one is three if you consider the proprietie Nazin orat 3. de Theol. Amb. de fide l. 1. c. 2. sayth Saint Gregorie Nazianzen and so sayth Saint Ambrose Saint Augustine Saint Hillarie and all the rest Thirdly So reason it selfe teacheth vs for God is summum cns the first and chiefest being as himselfe professâ—th I am that I am and we haue learned that of the prince of Philosophers that there cannot bee but one chiefest being Quia ens vnum conuertuntur because that being one are all one Secondly God is infinite and therefore but one because that which is infinite comprehendeth all things within the circle of it selfe Thirdly If there were more Gods then one Reason sheweth that there can be but one God then they must bee either all without beginning or one must proceede from other either by creation or generation that they should be all without beginning is impossible for then it must needs follow that there should be multa principia prima disparata in vna voluntate non conuenientia many first causes and vnequall beginnings that could neuer agree and be of the same minde and will and therefore to say they should bee all without beginnings is most absurd If one be from the
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. Created me in stead of possessed me but I thinke this could not be because Iust Martyr that liued before the Arians were hatched and Athanasius himselfe doth reade it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Created me and therefore Secondly Epiphanius Saint Basil Saint Hierome and others Epiphan heres 69 Basil l. 2. contr Eunom Hieron in ep ad Cypr. doe thinke that the vulgar Edition is not well translated for that the Hebrew word which Salomon vseth should not be translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with a iota but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the middest of the word The first is He created me and the other is he possessed me and therefore Aquila translates it thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And Tremellius Whether the Hebrew word bee rightly translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 created Iehoua possidebat me principio viae suae or ab initio operum suorum as others will haue it And so is the vulgar Latine and our owne last English Translation The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his way And if this be true then those ancient Fathers Saint Athanasius Saint Basil Saint Cyril and others that were much troubled about this place might haue easily answered vnto this obiection of the Arians if they had corrected the Greeke Translation out of the Hebrew Text. But the Iewes contend that the word in the Originall doth aswell signifie to create as to possesse as Rabbi Shelomo Iarchi vpon Genesis 14.19 doth declare for there Moses vseth the same word which Salomon vseth here and although our last English Translation reades it Possessor of Heauen and Earth yet the vulgar Latine and the Septuagint reades it Creator of Heauen and Earth and therefore Thirdly Fulgentius answereth Fulgent in resp ad hanc ob Arrian that although Salomon should say The Lord created me yet could that make nothing against the eternall being of the Sonne of God for that we may easily see Salomon speaketh here of a two-fold generation of the Sonne of GOD. That Salomon speaketh of a two-fold generation of Christ First Of his Incarnation in these words The Lord created me the beginning of his wayes and then Secondly Least we should with Arians imagine that he was not before he was incarnate He sheweth that Ante colles genitus erat Before the mountaines he was begotten and brought forth i. e. In respect of his Diuinity First of his incarnation to be made man That in the first place he speaketh of his incarnation and this making of him to be flesh there followeth none absurdity for though hee speaketh in the present tense or preterperfect tense after the Latines yet is it set downe for the future tense after the manner of the Hebrewes who doe oftentimes especially in things pertaining to God set downe the future tense for the present because they are as certaine to bee done as if they were already done as Tertullian obserueth And the words immediately following To be the beginning of his wayes doth make this exposition the more apparantly true for what is it to be the beginning of his wayes Nisi quod ipse via nobis est factus but that hee was made to be the way for vs to walke in for hee was not made that hee should create new Creatures but that hee might renue those that were lost And therefore Saint Iames vseth the like speech of the godly James 1.18 saying Of his owne will begate he vs with the Word of Truth that wee might be as the first fruites of his Creatures And the Prophet Dauid vseth the like speech of himselfe Psal 51.10 when he saith Create a new heart in me O God And therefore to be the beginning of the wayes of God is to be the first fruites of those that are renued and not of those that are created for if you looke into the workes of Creation you shall heare him say Before the mountaines were setled and before the hills was I begotten Secondly of his eternall generation as he is God That in the second place hee speaketh of his eternall generation it is most manifest for hee changeth his phrase and saith Ante colles genita eram Before the mountaines was I begotten as the Chalde paraphrase hath it or Filiata eram I was sonned his sonne as some translate it for wee must note that created and begotten in the person of the Sonne of God are to bee distinguished or otherwise if we make created and begotten to be the same wee may say that the World was begotten which is most absurd And therefore seeing hee saith that this wisedome of GOD was both created and begotten and that these two words doe signifie two distinct and speciall things wee should consider in what respect hee is said to be created and in what respect he is said to be begotten and then we should plainely see that he is said to be created as he is the Sonne of man and that he is said to be begotten as hee is the eternall Sonne of God for here Salomon sheweth that he is said to be created in respect of that nature wherin he calleth his Father Lord for the Lord saith hee created me But hee calleth his Father Lord in respect of his humane nature and neuer calleth him Lord in respect of his diuine nature for he that is borne a seruant of his Fathers handmaide according to the saying of the Psalmist Psal 116.14 O Lord I am thy seruant and the sonne of thine hand-maide is also begotten of his Fathers Essence according to the saying of Christ Iohn 8. I and my Father are one And therefore though he calleth his Father Lord in respect of his humanity yet doth he neuer call him so but alwayes Father in respect of his Diuinity as I came from the Father and wee saw his glory John 1. as the glory of the onely begotten Sonne of the Father And so you see that these words of Salomon Naz. or 4. de theolog Athan. ser 3. cont Arr. Cyril l. 5. c. 4. 5. 6. 7. Thesauri Aug. l. 1. c. 12. de trinit The Lord created me are to be vnderstood of his incarnation and therefore can proue nothing against his eternall generation And this exposition of Fulgentius is confirmed by Nazianzen Athanasius Saint Cyril Saint Augustine and others And yet Fourthly Saint Hillary in l. de Synodis Aquinas l. 4. c. 8. contra gentes and Bellarmine l. 1. c. 18. de Christo doe answere that the eternall generation of the Sonne of God is sometimes called generation and sometimes creation because it is so ineffable that it cannot be fully expressed by any one word for generation signifieth a production in the same substance but with a certaine mutation of the begetter How the Word may be said to be both begotten created but creation signifieth a production of another substance but without any mutation of the
Creator and the Sonne of God is so produced as that hee receiued the substance of the begetter And therefore in that respect he is said to be begotten but he receiueth it without any mutation or alteration of the begetter and therefore in that respect he may be saide to be created And so he is sometimes said to be begotten and sometimes said to bee created not that any man should thereby denie his eternity and thinke him to be a creature but that from both these words wee might receiue what is fitting and reiect what seemeth to be vnfit for the declaration of this ineffable and inexplicable mystery Ob. 4 Fourthly They doe obiect the words of Dauid Thou art my sonne this day haue I begotten thee And therefore before that day wherein hee was begotten his sonne hee was not his sonne Sol. The words of Dauid are spoken of Christ in respect of his manhood I answere That the words Inquire of me and I will giue thee the Heathen for thine Inheritance and the vttermost parts of the Earth for thy possessions doe sufficiently proue that these words are spoken of his incarnation and not of his eternall generation for how should he according to his Diuinity demand the ends of the Earth for his possessions when as hee giueth the Kingdome of Heauen which is a thousand times more then the Earth to them that loue him And therefore he which according to his God-head possesseth all things with his Father according to the forme of a seruant which hee assumed for our saluation he requireth of his Father that hee might haue The Gentiles for his inheritance and the vttermost parts of the Earth for his possessions Act. 13. And thus the Apostle doth expound this place in the 13. Chapter of the Acts of the Apostles Ob. 5 Fiftly They doe obiect the words of the Apostle that he is The first-borne of euery Creature Coloss â— 15 and therefore created in the number of the Creatures Sol. That the words of the Apostle are to be vnderstood of the humanity of Christ Rom. 8.29 I answere That this is also meant of his humanity for that the Apostle speaketh here of the Creatures restored and not created because he is said to be Primogenitus ex mortuis The first fruites of the dead for if he were called The first fruites of euery Creature according to his Deity by what testimonies can it be shewed that he is The first-borne of the dead before all Creatures when as they could not be said to be dead which were not yet created And therefore the Apostle saith That whom he did foreknow he also did predestinate to be conformed to the Image of his Sonne Iohn 1. that he might be the first-borne among many brethren To shew that he which according to his Deity is the onely begotten Sonne of God without brethren is according to his humanitie c. 3. the first-borne among many brethren for we must vnderstand this difference betwixt the first-begotten Sonne of God and the onely begotten Sonne of God that the first sheweth his humanity whereby he became man the first and chiefest among many brethren and the second his Diuinitie Iohn 1. whereby hee is the eternall Sonne of God without any brethren or otherwise it were in vaine to call him the onely begotten Sonne of God for that hee gaue power vnto others euen as many as beleeue in him to bee made the Sonnes of God and therefore if hee be not his Sonne by nature then without doubt he lost the name and the truth of being the onely begotten Sonne of God after he began to haue many brethren But because none of his sonnes by adoption Fulgen. in resp ad ob Arrian can be said to be the onely begotten sonne of God nor to be the Son of God â—ather then the rest be because the same name of sonnes is acommodated vnto them all although diuers rewards of retribution is promised vnto them according to the diuersitie of â—heir labours therefore is Christ still said to be the onely begotten Sonne of God because though there be many sonnes of God by grace yet there is none but he alone his Sonne by Nature And this difference doth our Sauiour Christ himselfe shew vnto vs when he saith I goe to my Father and to your Father Iohn 20.17 to my God and to your God because he is otherwise my Father and my God then he is your Father and your God for he is my Father eternally by nature and he is yours in time by grace and therefore hee that is first begotten in respect of his man-hood among many brethren is likewise still the onely begotten Sonne of God in respect of his God-head without any brethren And so you see that maugre all the spite of Hell it is most apparantly true that this Word is the true God for time coeternall vnto his Father CHAP. IIII. Of the coessentiality of the word with the Father and the obiections that are made against the same sufficiently answered SEcondly you haue heard of the eternall Godhead of this Word it followeth that I should shew vnto you how for nature he is coessentiall vnto his Father touching which point Athanasius saith Non res quaepiam extrinsecus adinuenta est filij substantia neque ex nihilo inducta est sed ex patris essentia nata est The substance of the Sonne is no outward thing either found or created but begotten of the very Essence of his Father euen as you see the brightnesse springing from the light or the vapour from the water Neque enim splendor neque vapor est ipsa aqua aut ipse sol neque res aliena For neither the light is the Sunne it selfe nor the vapour the water it selfe and yet they are none other things of another kind then be the substances from whence they spring euen so the Sonne issueth from the substance of his Father Et tamen patris sustantia non perpessa est partitionem And yet the substance of the father aâ—mits no partition for as the Sunne remaineth still the same Athanas in ep cont Eusebium and is no way lessened or diminished in respect of those beames that flow from him so the Father suffereth no mutation by hauing begetting Suam ipsius imaginem filium This his Son and eternall image but remaining still the same he begetteth his Son of the same Essence and we find not only all the Orthodox fathers but also the Scriptures plain enough to confirm the same truth for our Sauiour saith I and my Father are one And so S. Iohn hauing spoken of the Father Iohn 10 3â— the Word and the Spirit 1 Iohn 5.7 saith That these three are one And reason it selfe must needs confirme the same for seeing the Diuine Essence is most simple impartible and indiuisible and that the Father is God as none denyeth and that the Sonne is God as I haue already
proued and that the Holy Ghost is God as all the holy Fathers haue as sufficiently confirmed yet that there are not three Gods but one God Athan. in Sym. as Athanasius sheweth therefore it must needs follow that all three haue but one and the selfe-same Essence and consequently that the Sonne is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Patri Consubstantiall or co-essentiall vnto his Father and therefore also hence it must needs follow that as Caluin saith our Sauiour Christ is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A God of himselfe independent as absolute as the Father is And yet for the better vnderstanding of this point how Christ may be said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God of himselfe Thom. p. 1. q. 33. we must consider that Aliud est habere essentiam Diuinam à seipso How Christ is God of himselfe aliud habere essentiam diuinam à seipsa existentem It is one thing to haue his Diuine Essence from himselfe and another to haue his Diuine Essence existing of it selfe To say that the person of the Sonne hath his Diuine Essence that is his personall being from himselfe we cannot because it is from the Father the Father communicating his whole Essence vnto the Sonne and therefore we say that the Sonne Ratione 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in respect of his personall being is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God of himselfe but God of God and Light of Light as the Nicen Councell hath it because the person of the Sonne existeth from the person of the Father but to say that the Sonne hath his Diuine Essence existing of it selfe Idem ibid. is most certaine Quia remota relatione ad patrem sola restat essentia qua est à seipsa for taking away the relation of the Sonne vnto the Father there remaineth but the Essence which is of it sâ—lfe and therefore we say that the Sonne Quoad essentiam absolutam In respect of his absolute Essence is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A God of himselfe because the Essence of the Sonne is the very same that the Essence of the Father is And so to this truth set downe by Caluine Bellarmine himselfe subscribeth Bellar. de Christo But the old and new Arrians cannot endure to yeeld him to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same Essence with his Father but rather 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of some other such like Essence but not of the same substance as Athanasius sheweth Athan. in l. de expositione fidej And therefore they doe obiect First against the Word here vsed by the Fathers to expresse this truth Secondly against the truth and true meaning of the matter contained and declared by this Word Ob. Idem in l. de decret Con. Nicen. First for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 though first found out by themselues yet of all others the Arrians could not indure it as Athanasius witnesseth because as they said neither 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 essence nor 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same essence can be found any where in all the Scriptures Sol. That the word Essence is plainely deriued out of Scriptures Rom 1.20 To this Epiphanius answereth that although the name of essence in plain tearme is not found either in the Old or New Testament yet the sense and signification thereof the Synonomie and aequiualencie of the same is obuiously found in many places for the Apostle speaketh of his eternall power 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Godhead and what is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his Godhead but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the very Essence of God Philip. 2. and so he speaketh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the forme of God but the forme of any thing is no lesse Philosophicall then the Essence of that thing and Saint Peter saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That wee might bee made partakers of the Diuine Nature 2 Pet. 1.4 but the nature of God and the Essence of God are both the same Besides Essence is deriued of esse to be and it is the abstract of the name or Word which in the concrete is called ens being but God is said to be both ens esse Exod. 3.14 the chiefest being and to be in the Scriptures as ego sum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I am that I am and hee that is hath sent me vnto you and therefore if the Scriptures call him ens the being why may not we call him essence for though it cannot be well said That abstract names are most agreeable to God that man is humanitie in the abstract yet because God is most simple by nature we may as well speake of him in the abstract as in the concrete nay the abstract names are more properly agreeable vnto him then the concrete as to say that he is Truth rather then true Wisdome rather then wise iustice Dionys de Diuin nominibus rather then iust and so essence or being rather then to be as Dionysius saith And further we finde the word Essence vsed in the Scripture for where the prodigal Child saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luc. 15.12 Father giue me the portion of thy substance which pertaineth to me he vseth the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to expresse his fathers substance and what is the riches or the substance of God but his Diuinitie and therefore the word Essence is not improper nor altogether inuented without Scripture to expresse the Nature of GOD. And for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 coessentiall or of the same essence That the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same Essence was not first vsed by the Fathers of Athanasius time the fathers answere that it was not first inuented by the fathers of the Nicen Councell as the Arrians falsely affirmed for one of themselues denying the Deitie of Christ said that if they should yeeld Christ to be a true God then must it follow that he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same essence with God whereupon Hosius and the rest of the Orthodox fathers concluded that he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same essence with God and it was vsed long before that time though not controuerted by Dionysius Romanus Dionysius Alexandrinus Origen Theognostus and others as Athanasius affirmeth Secondly they say that it was not so far fetcht as the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of another essence and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the like essence which themselues vsed to deny the coessentiality of the Sonne of God with his Father so free were they to deuise what they would to maintaine errours and so strict against the defenders of the truth Thirdly Luk 6. Deut 7.6.14.2.26 Ambros l. 3. c. 7. de fide they alleadge that the Scriptures vsed the like words as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And Moses calleth the children of Israel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we translate a speciall people or a peculiar chosen people vnto himselfe a people as
himself incomprehensible coessentiall and coequall vnto his father what therefore should hee merit or wherein could he be dignified by his Incarnation more then he was before his Incarnation Gloria eius augeri non potuit nothing could be added vnto his glorie or if it could his loue to vs could not be so great for then it might bee sayd hee did it not onely for our sake but also for his owne sake that himselfe might thereby be the more dignified and exalted but seeing he was so high before that he could not bee higher so great that hee could not greater and so good that he could not be better it is most certainly apparant that he descended from the height of his dignitie vnto the very depth of humilitie to be made flesh onely for our sake and therefore wee may well say that greater loue then this cannot be that he which is the highest chiefest euerlasting God should descend and be made the Sonne of Man that wee might be made the sonnes of the immortall GOD through him How Satan hath euer laboured more to obscure the truth concerning the person of Christ then any other point of doctrine whatsoeuer Secondly we may from hence see both the subtiltie and the cruelty of Satans dealing for he knoweth that this is the greatest benefit that euer man receiued from God the giuing of this Word to be made Flesh this his eternall Sonne to be made man Quia in creatione dedit te tibi Deus Because in thy creation hee did but giue thy being vnto thee but in this his Incarnation hee gaue himselfe vnto thee and therefore Satan would faine obscure this benefit either by debasing the person and perswading vs to beleeue that he was not so excellent as hee was i. e. not a God or if a God not so high not so excellent as his Father was or else by corrupting the action and suggesting vnto vs that hee did not all for our sakes onely but chiefly for his owne merit as if he were ambitious of vaine-glory which is blasphemy to thinke that he might thereby get him a name aboue all other names And this is his vsuall practise to seeke alwayes at the chiefest to corrupt the greatest points and to ouerthrow the strongest pillars of Christian religion Math. 4.3 for he tempted Christ himselfe and would faine haue ouercome him for hee knew that if the Captaine were once conquered then all the Souldiers would soone be vanquished if the Shepheard were once smitten then all the sheepe would be scattered and so since the comming of Christ he stirred vp more and greater heresies concerning Christ either his person or his offices then he did concerning any other point of Christian Religion for as there is no point so great so waighty no point more comfortable then this concerning the person of our Redeemer because this is eternall life to know him to be the true and eternall God Iohn 17.3 So Satan did neuer bestow more paines about any point to ouer-throw it and corrupt it then he did about this same as they that are but meanely read in the Ecclesiasticall stories and counsels may easily perceiue And therefore I haue euer thought no paines too great no discourses too long no time mispent that is spent to discusse this truth and to dispell those cloudes of errours that doe seeke to obscure the dignity and excellency of the person of the Sonne of God Quia bonum est esse hic For it is good to dwell on this Rocke and here to build vs Tabernacles as Peter saith Iuvat vsque morari Thirdly How maliciously Hereticks haue denyed the Godhead of Christ we may from hence see the peruersnesse of wicked Heretickes for that it is not enough for them to offend God but they will deny him to be a God and as the Athiests will be wicked 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the highest degree by serching so farre into God as to say at last there is no God so will they search so farre into the nature of the Sonne of God that they deny him to be a God vntill the vengeance of God doth make them see their abhominable sinnes and therefore we should all take heed that the God of this world doe not so blinde our eyes as to make vs to deny God our Sauiour Fourthly How thankefull we ought to be vnto God for the giuing of the Word to be made flesh wee may from hence consider how thankefull wee ought to be and yet how vnthankefull we are to God for here wee see that more then this he could not doe for man for the highest God to be made man yea a man of sorrowes as I shall by his helpe in my Treatise of his Passion shew vnto you that we might be made the sonnes of God and the heires of ioy and yet we seldome or neuer set this great benefit before our eyes to be thankefull to God for the same for if we did how could we finde in our hearts with the sight of this goodnesse to heape vp such horrible wickednesse as we doe against his Maiestie to blaspheme his name to abuse his Word to dispise his seruants and to be to euery good worke reprobate O beloued remember what our Sauiour saith If you loue me keepe my Commandements Iohn 14.15 and if you be thankefull to God for this his great loue to you to be vilified and made flesh and made of no reputation for you offend not his Maiestie and render not vnto him euill for good and hatred for his good will And so much touching the excellency of the person that was made flesh he that was the true and eternall God co-essentiall and co-equall vnto his Father CHAP. VI. Of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The word here shewed by the Euangelist to expresse the person that was incarnate and what it signifieth and why the Euangelist vseth it SEcondly hauing seene the excellency of the person that was made flesh we are now to consider the Word here vsed to declare that person 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Word touching which I will onely discusse these three points 1. What 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth 2. Why Christ is tearmed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. Why the Euangelist saith here The Word was made flesh rather then the Sonne of God was made flesh What 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth First some say that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth reason and that the Sonne is therefore called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Reason because as reason is most inward with vs so is the Sonne with the Father as Saint Basil and Nazianzen say or because he maketh vs obedient to yeeld vnto reason as Origen saith others will haue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to signifie definition because Christ defineth and expresseth the whole nature of his Father Heb 1.3 he being the brightnesse of his glory and the ingrauen forme of his person as Nazianzen and
God wherein euery one must be well instructed that would be partaker of humane felicitie and happinesse All which doth most apparantly proue that the Gentiles had so much knowledge of the true God as not onely was able I say not with Clemens Alexandrinus to bring them to saluation but to make them without excuse in the day of retribution because that they knowing God glorified him not as God but also as doth exceed the knowledge of many which make profession of Christianity and will no doubt rise in iudgement to condemne them in the latter day And as we see many of them vnderstood many things concerning the most true and euerlasting God so we finde some of them haue deliuered some things concerning this word and Son of God Heron. in ep ad Paulinum for though S. Hierome speaking of this word saith Hoc doctus plato nesciuit This word eloquent Demosthenes was ignorant of it 1 Cor. 1.19 because it is written I will destroy the wisedome of the wise Aug. l. 5. c. 3. de haeresibus and cast away the vnderstanding of the prudent Yet Lactantius saith that Zeno affirmed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word to be the maker of this vniuerse and that Mercurius syrnamed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thrice great did often describe the power and Maiestie of this word and Saint Augustine affirmeth that the said Trismegistus did compose a booke whose title was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e the perfect word and that therein he left written Monas genuit monada in se suum reflexit ardorem Which is as much as if he had said the Father begate the Sonne or the minde begate the word and from both proceeded the Holy Spirit Idem l. 7. c. 9. confess and l. 7. Confess c. 9. hee saith that he saw certaine books of the Platonists wherein he found though not in the same words yet the very selfe-same matter proued by many reasons that in the beginning was the word and the word was with God Saint Cyrill also saith that the Philosophers haue affirmed the essence of God to be distinguished into three subsistences Cyrillus l 8. cont Iulian. and sometimes to haue deliuered the very name of Trinitie and Theodoret doth affirme that Plotinus and Numenius haue collected out of Plato that there are three eternities Bonum mentem vniuersi animam i. e. Goodnesse which answereth the Father that is the fountaine of the Deity the minde which signifieth the Sonne and the soule or life of this whole vniuerse Gen. 1.2 which is the holy Spirit that as in the beginning of the creation he presently moued vpon the waters to sustaine the same Clemens Alex. l. 5. strom so euer since he spireth and preserueth euery liuing thing and Clemens Alexandrinus saith that Plato in his Epistle to Erastus and Coriscus hath manifestly spoken of the Father and the Sonne and so Eusebius likewise and Eugubius and many others haue collected out of their writings that this name of the Sonne 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word Seneca Traged Oedip. was not altogether vnknowne vnto the Gentiles but that as Oedipus in the Poets knew that he had a Father though not who he was so they did conceiue a certaine kinde of knowledge and vnderstanding though vndigested and imperfect ouershadowed as it were with humane reasonings concerning this eternall word God enough to saue them if they beleeued in him or else to make them without excuse if they knowing though not simply Verum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sed aliquid veri 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This true word but something of this word did neglect and not seeke further into the knowledge of the same And this knowledge they might attaine vnto How the Gentiles came to haue any knowledge of the Word God either by 1. The illumination of God himselfe 2. The diuination of the diuels 3. The traditiō of their elders 4. Their owne exceeding diligence to seeke and search after the knowledge of diuine mysteries For First the Apostle saith that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 1.19 what may bee knowne of God that is his eternall power and Godhead God hath shewed it vnto them and as the Deitie it selfe 1 Cor. 13.12 might bee contemplated in his creatures as in a glasse or read by them Basilius hom 11. hexam as in a booke as Saint Basil saith So no doubt but he left therein certaine impressions of the Trinitie of his persons Ph. Mornaeus de veritate relig c. 5. Rom. 1.16 which though they could not fully attaine vnto the knowledge thereof no more then an vnskilfull Arithmetician can finde the iust summe that cyphering characters doe import yet they might perceiue something thereby and know that there was such a thing to be knowne And thus much God himselfe might shew vnto them not as Clemens Alexandrinus thought thereby to bring them vnto saluation because saith he Phylosophy was vnto them as the Law was vnto the Iewes a Schoolemaster to bring them vnto Heauen but that as the Apostle saith They knowing this God and not glorifying him as God nor seeking to be saued by this God might be without excuse in the sight of God August de cognit verae vitae c. 37. Secondly The very Diuels might make knowne the same vnto them for the Diuels beleeue that there is a God and they know him to be but one God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 One in himselfe one in all things and they know him to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The most High and Omnipotent God neither doe they know the Father onely but they know Christ also for the euill Spirit said vnto the Sonnes of Scaeua Acts 19.15 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Iesus I know and they know him to be the Son of God God himselfe as Sozomen out of this verse of Sybill doth declare O lignum foelix in quo Deus ipse pependit I may thee call a happy Tree whereon a God to hang I see And they know the sacred mystery of the Trinity for by them this disticke was related vnto a certaine Egyptian that desired to know this truth Serapis ad Thulem Selneccerus l. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Principio Deus est tum Sermo Spiritus istis Additur aequaeua haec sunt tendentia in vnum The Father Sonne and Spirit all three Are one God of the same eternitie Aug. in Expos Ep. ad Rom. And so the Diuels knowing these things might suggest them and reueale them though aenigmatically and darkely vnto the Sybilles which as Saint Augustine saith were none of Gods Prophets from the Sybils they might bee spread vnto their Priests from the Priests vnto the Phylosophers Poets and Orators and from them they might be divulged and spread vnto the lowest ranke of the vulgar people Neither must we thinke that Sathan did it with intent to doe them
another and yet is not transferred or changed into the nature of the other as a Souldier putting on his armour is made an armed man or a man wearing on his garments is no more a naked but a cloathed man And so the Word is now cloathed with our flesh tâ—e same Word but after another manner before onely subsisting of the Deity now of both natures being made flesh not as water is made wine but as Aaron was made Priest and Dauid King not by changing him into a Priest or King but by beginning to be what they were not and not leauing to bee what they were or because this doth not so fully shew it the Priestly or Kingly dignity being but an accidentall title conferred vpon these persons as a naked man is cloathed and made an apparelled man or a Souldier harnessed and made an armed man when all his harnesse is put vpon him as Theodoret Theodoret in Dialog Saint Augustine and others doe declare And so you see that in our Sauiour Christ the two natures doe still remaine intire inconfused CHAP. II. Of the vnion of these two natures of Christ in one and the selfe-same person and some obiections answered SEcondly touching the vnion of these two natures the Deitie and the Humanity wee must know that although this eternall Word the Sonne of God was so made flesh i. e. a perfect man of the seed of Dauid as that still each nature remaineth intire and inconfused yet we must not imagine that he is therefore two sonnes or two persons as Nestorius thought but that he is one onely person consisting of both these natures And because this point of the vnion of these two natures is not of small moment but is a point full of comfort much opposed and of great difficulty I will diuide all that I meane to say concerning the same vnto these three principall heads First The truth hereof shall be confirmed Three things handled concerning the vnion of both natures in Christ and the obiections of our aduersaries shall be answered Secondly The manner of this vnion wherein it consisteth shal be shewed Thirdly The chiefe benefits and effects thereof shall be declared First for the vnion of these two natures A very good simily of Justin Martyr to expresse the manner of the vnion of the two natures in Christ the Word and the Flesh Iustin Martyr saith Sicut post vnitionem primigenij luminis cum solari corpore c. as after the collection and the vnition of the light with the body of the Sunne no man can plucke them asunder neither doth any man call the one a part the Sunne and the other the light but both of them ioyntly together we terme the Sunne euen so after the vnition of our flesh with this true light the Word No man will call the Word apart to be one Sonne of God and the Sonne of man to be another but he will vnderstand both these together to be one and the selfe-same Christ as by the name of Sunne we vnderstand both the light and the body which containeth the light and as the light and body of the Sunne are two seuerall natures so there be in our Sauiour Christ two distinct and seuerall natures Altera nostra altera nobis superior The one is ours the other is Gods and as the light is actually in the Sunne so that none can seperate it from that body wherein it is fixed and contained Hoc exemplo diuinae vnitionis adducto nos ad magis cognitionem confugimus si non omnino ipsá veritatem assequuti certe quandam similitudinem quae pâ—escrutantibus sufficiat Iustin Martyr de recta confess siue de coessent trinit yet we may easily discerne the nature and the proprietie of each one from the other Sic in vno filio dei vniuersam vim nemo seperauerit ab vnica filietate naturae tameÌ„ eius proprietatem ratione quiuis discreuerit So in that one Sonne of God no man can seperate his whole vertue i. e. of the Word and Flesh from that onely Sonneship and yet in our vnderstandings we may discerne the different proprietie of each nature And so saith the Father By this example we flie vnto the more holy cogitation of the diuine vnion of these two natures and if hereby we be not altogether able to attaine vnto the truth thereof as what can be fully sufficient to expresse so great a mystery yet certainly we haue herein a most excellent similitude which will greatly helpe and contentedly suffice the godly and moderate searchers of this truth The vnity of Christ his person most cleerly proued from Scriptures But indeed the holy Scriptures doe of all other writings most fully and cleerely shew that these two natures doe make but one person in our Lord and Sauiour Iesus Christ for when Christ asked his Apostles whom doe men say that I the Sonne of man am Saint Peter answered that he was Christ the Sonne of the liuing God Matth. 16.13 therefore he is but one person because Saint Peter confesseth the Sonne of man to be the Sonne of the liuing God Verse 16. And the Angel said vnto the Virgin that holy thing which shall be borne of thee Luke 1.35 shall be called the Sonne of God therefore hee is but one person because he which was born of the Virgin was is none other but he that is truly called and is the true Sonne of God And Saint Paul speaking of Christ as he was the eternall Sonne of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 2.3 in respect of his Godhead and as he was the sonne of Dauid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in respect of his Manhood yet doth he not say of his Sonnes as of two but of his Sonne made and declared to be his Sonne to shew vnto vs that as before his making so now after his making he is still but one Sonne one person of the two distinct natures subsisting Iohn 20.31 And Saint Iohn more plainely saith that these things are written that you might beleeue that Iesus is the Christ the Sonne of God that is that Iesus the Sonne of Mary is that same Christ which is the Sonne of God And in his first Epistle he doth almost nothing but confirme this truth that is 1 Iohn 1.1 that there is but one person in the God and man Christ Iesus For Chap. 1. he saith that which was from the beginning which we haue heard which wee haue seene with our eyes therefore he must needs be but one person for to see with their eyes that word which was from the beginning could no wayes be but onely in respect of the vnitie of the person So Chap. 2. he saith Chap. 2. v. 22. Who is a lyar but he that denyeth Iesus to be the Christ So Chap. 3. he saith Chap. 3. v. 16. In this we perceiue the loue of God that he laid downe his life for vs. So Chap.
manner and the matter wherein the true vnion of these natures chiefly consisteth it will easily appeare if we doe but obserue that all this may and doth agree with all the Saints and faithfull seruants of God for First God dwelleth in his Saints as in his Temples for We are the Temples of the Holy Ghost 1 Cor. 3.16 1 Cor. 6.19 and the Spirit of God dwelleth in vs saith the Apostle Secondly The Saints are one with God by will and affection 1 Cor. 6.17 Math. 6.10 for the Apostle sheweth vs plainely that he which is ioyned vnto the Lord is one spirit and wisheth rather that Gods will may be done then his owne as they doe daily in their prayers Thy will be done Thirdly That the Saints are Gods Instruments as be many times the wicked also whereby God worketh many excellent things the same Apostle sheweth where he saith That although there be diuersities of operations 1 Cor. 12.6 Rom. 15.19 yet it is the same God which worketh all in all Fourthly That the Saints are called The Sonnes of God and some of them also said to be Gods 1 Iohn 3.1 by the participation of many graces and titles which God hath giuen vnto them it is most plaine Psal 82.6 for I said you are Gods and the Children of the most High And so the Apostle sheweth Gal. 4.6.7 Gal. 4.6.7 and so in many other places And therefore seeing all the faithfull seruants of God may be truly said to be vnited vnto God in respect of the cohabitation of God in them and of their will and affection agreeable to the will of God and of the working of God in them and the bestowing of his names titles dignities and graces vpon them and that the vnion of this Word with our Flesh i. e. of the Diuine Nature with the humanity is farre otherwise then the vnion of the Saints with God it must needes follow that although it be true that there is a most perfect vnity of cohabitation affection operation and participation betwixt the two Natures of Christ yet this is not all but the vnion of them consisteth in a farre more excellent respect then any and all of these And therefore Secondly Brentius Smidelinus What the Lutherans teach concerning the vnion of the two natures of Christ and the rest of their Lutheran followers doe affirme this vnion of both these Natures to consist in the communication of the properties of the Deity to the humanity of Christ so as they are really transferred and the humanity inuested with the diuine properties And therefore they doe conclude that in respect of this reall communicating and transferring of attributes the manhood of Christ is omniscient omnipotent omnipresent and so forth But how grâ—sse this error is and how derogatory to the truth of Christian Doctrine it will easily appeare if we doe but consider those intollerable absurdities that of necessity must needes follow the same for First The absurdities that must needes follow the Lutheran Doctrine The Father and the Sonne should be hypostatically vnited one to the other and so be made one person for that it is most certaine as themselues must and doe confesse that the Father hath and doth communicate all his essentiall attributes and properties vnto the Sonne and therefore if the vnion of these two Natures consisteth in the communicating of properties the Father and the Sonne must be vnited into one person but this is most horribly absurd Therefore the other Secondly The whole Trinity should be incarnate because all the essentiall attributes of the Deity are common to the whole Trinity and to each person of the Trinity Thirdly The two natures of Christ could not be hypostatically vnited because there are certaine diuine properties which cannot be said to be communicated to the humanity of Christ as to be increated to be infinite to want beginning of time to be Ens independens an independant being and certaine things which Christ in respect of his Flesh had not before his passion and resurrection as to bee impassible immortall and such like Fourthly If this vnion consisted in the communicating of the properties then this transfusion of them must be reciprocall that is as the diuine properties are transfused into the humanity so the humane properties must bee likewise transfused into the Deity And then it must needes follow that as Omnipresency Omnisciency Vbiquity and such like are transfused into the humanity so passibility mortality and such like should be really transfused into the Deity but it were most absurd to say that the God-head is capable of humane fraileties And therefore it is as absurd to say that the Manhood was inuested with diuine Excellencies as they are Diuine And Fiftly If this were true then the humanity should be no humanity at all because freed from humane fraileties and inuested with diuine properties And therefore to expresse truly wherein this vnion consisteth Wherein the vnion of the two natures truly consisteth is shewed Thirdly We say that the vnion of these two Natures consisteth in the communicating of the subsistence of the Word with the humane nature that it assumed i. e. of the very being of the Word with the being of our Flesh so that it is an hypostaticall or personall vnion that is such an vnion as that both natures doe make but one person of Christ euen as the soule and body doe make but one person of man Jn Ep. Alex. Concilij anathem 2. for so saith the Councell of Calcedon the Councell of Lateran the Councell of Toledo Saint Cyril and all the Oxthodoxe Fathers that writ thereof Si quis non confitetur carni secundum subsistentiam vnitum Dei patris verbum anathema sit Whosoeuer confesseth not the eternall Word of the Father to be vnited vnto our flesh according to his subsistence let him be accursed And further wee say that the vnion of these two natures i. e. the God-head as it is limited to the second person of the Trinitie and the Manhood of Christ is 1. Inconuertible 2. Indiuisible 3. Inconfused 4. Inseperable Sixe speciall things obseruable in the vnion of the two natures of Christ 5. Substantiall 6. Ineffable First Inconuertible because neither the Diuine Nature is turned into the humanity nor the humanity into the Deity Secondly Indiuisible because the Natures are so vnited into one person that they can neuer be separated vnlesse we diuide the person of Christ which is most hereticall Thirdly Inconfused because the Natures remaine still intire without confounding either their Essence or their properties or their willes or any other operations whatsoeuer and therefore excepting onely his subsistence which is one that we make him not two persons with Nestorius we do affirme that in Christ there are two natures two willes two naturall proprieties and operations intire and vnmixed that we may not confound them with Eutyches for sith the natures are neither confused How the properties
Quem dixerunt regem Iudaeorum erat Creator Angelorum quem viderunt paruum in praesepio erat immensus in coelo Whom they had called King of the Iewes was the Lord and Maker of the Angels and whom they saw little and poore in the cratch was rich and immeasurable in Heauen Quod non capis quod non vides Fulgentius ser de Epiphania Thom in hymn Animosa firmat fides Praeter rerum ordinem Their faith did shew them that he was their God And so that starre which sent forth these three fore-named beames of light into the hearts of these Wise men did send from thence by reflection three other beames of light for our instruction for here we see this starre wrought in them First Illumination and Faith in their hearts What effects the Starre wrought in the Wise men for when they saw him they beleeued in him Secondly Confession and Inquisition in their Mouthes for when they lost him they made diligent search and inquisition after him saying Where is he that is borne King of the Iewes Deut. 6.16 Thirdly Diligence and Obedience in their Actions for they made hast to goe vnto him and when they came they came not empty-handed but they brought vnto him Gold Frankinsence and Myrrhe Aurea nascenti fuderunt munera regi Thura dedâ—â—e deo myrrham tribuere sepulchro And so herein these Wise men were wise indeed not because they had all the wisedome of the Gentiles but because they did thus seeke and find him In whom are hid all the treasures of wisedome and knowledge Oh that it were so with vs that wee did know him beleeue in him goe vnto him search and seeke him and offer him our selues and ours to doe him seruice Pro myrrha lachrymas auro cor porrige purum Pro thure ex humili pectore funde preces And we shall not neede to fetch gold from Ophire What we shold offer vnto Christ but the gold of a pure Faith which will abide the fiery tryall neither shal we need to goe to the Apothecaries to buy their Frankinsence or Myrrhe but the sweet perfume of deuout prayers and the bitter teares of godly sorrow for out vngodly sinnes these are the most acceptable sacrifices vnto Christ And as the fore-named witnesses which were primitiae Martyrum the first fruits of his witnesses both of the Iewes and Gentiles doe testifie this truth vnto the world so to these are added the testimony of Iohn the Baptist for he was sent to beare witnes of that light Iohn 1.8 and he testified and bare witnesse of him that he was that Lambe of God John 1.29 which taketh away the sinnes of the world And because we should the better beleeue him and his testimonie herein he sheweth how he came to know him to be the true Messias euen by the testimony of the Spirit of truth for I knew him not saith he but he that sent me to baptize with water i. e. the holy Ghost said vnto me vpon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending and remaining on him the same is he which baptizeth with the holy Ghost and I saw saith he and bare record that this is the Sonne of God Iohn 1.33 And then the testimony of all the Euangelists the Apostles the Fathers the Martyres and all the holy Men of God which haue testified and sealed this truth vnto vs some with their words some with their workes and some with their deerest blood That God himselfe testified Christ to be his sonne Matth. 3.17 Secondly if these testimonies of the creatures be not sufficient to proue Iesus the Sonne of Mary to be the Eternall Sonne of God we find God himselfe the Creator of Heauen and Earth testifying the same for though the testimony of Iohn was sufficient Iohn 5.35 to satisfie any man because he was aburning a shining light in whom the Iewes themselues were willing to reioyce for a season as our Sauiour witnesseth yet Christ needed not to receiue testimony from man John 5.36 because he had a greater witnesse then that of Iohn euen the Father himselfe which sent him he bare witnesse of him and with an audible voyce he proclaymed the same twice from heauen saying first at the Riuer Iordan and then on Mount Thabor Matth. 7.5 that he was his Beloued Sonne in whom hee was well pleased John 5.36 And these are sufficient witnesses Quia dicta Iehouae dicta pura Because the words of the Lord are pure words as the Psalmist saith Or if any Athiest will not beleeue these Diuine Oracles let him beleeue his owne eyes If he will beleeue neither Angels Men nor GOD let him beleeue himselfe Matth. 7.16 for the very workes that I doe testifie of me for the workes of euery man doe testifie of him what he is because that is a sure rule of our Sauiour By their fruits you shall know them But then you must not vnderstand their workes as they are reported to bee for so wee are and may be many times deceiued for Iohn came Matth. 11.18 neither eating nor drinking and they said he had a Diuell and our Sauiour came eating and drinking and they said behold a Glutton and a Wine-bibber And the Prophet Dauid saith They laid to his charge things that hee neuer knew So the Christians of the Primitiue Church that were as carefull as men might possible be for their liues to leade a strict and an vpright life yet is it incredible almost to thinke what wicked reports were raised of them and therefore not the workes of man as they are by enuy or malice bruited to be for what will not enuy say but as they are in deed and verity doe manifestly shew what any man is and therefore Christ saith vnto the Iewes If you were the sonnes of Abraham Iohn 8.39 you would doe the workes of Abraham and Saint Iames saith Iames 2.18 Shew me thy Faith by thy Workes for the workes of a man truely considered is an infallible argument to shew what he is so the workes that our Sauiour did while he did liue on earth doe sufficiently proue him to be both God and Man and so his very enemies testified saying He hath done all things well Mark 7.37 he maketh both the deafe to heare and the dumbe to speake and those that doubted of him whether he was the true Messias or not said Iohn 7.31 When Christ commeth will he doe more miracles then these which he hath done and the works that he doth now raigning in heauen doe sufficiently proue him to be the Maker Preseruer Heb. 10.12.13 and Redeemer of men for he sitteth on the right hand of God Rom. 8.34 1 Cor 15.35 Matth. 11 6. making intersession for his Saints and ruling till he hath put all his enemies vnder his feete And therefore I conclude as I began that the Word was made flesh and blessed is he that
is not offended in him Why then O thou incredulous Iew wilt thou not receiue thy Sauiour is it because he came poore without any shew of worldly pompe why that should make all men the rather to imbrace him and the more thankefully to acknowledge him because that he which might haue come in Maiestie Cum caelestibus Attended on by Angels would come in pouerty and haue his bed made cum iumentis among the beasts that perish that so by his comming poore we might be all made rich through him and therefore O Iew I doe aduice thee that as thy Fathers accomplished the decree of God in condemning him so doe thou according to the will of God in beleeuing on him and thou shalt be happy for he that beleeueth in him shall neuer perish To whom with the Father and the Holy Spirit be ascribed all Honour Thankes and Praise both now and for euermore Amen A Prayer O Eternall God who as in all things else so more especially in giuing thy dearest Sonne co-eternall coequall and co-essentiall vnto thy selfe to be made flesh subiect to our humane frailties and in all things like vnto vs sinne onely excepted hast shewed thy goodnesse and thy loue to man to be like thy selfe infinite and incomprehensible we most humbly beseech thee to giue vs grace to know thee and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ to be the onely true God whom to know is eternall life through the said Iesus Christ our Lord. Amen IEHOVAE LIBERATORI FINIS The Fourth Golden Candlesticke HOLDING The Fourth greatest Light of Christian RELIGION Of the Passion of the MESSIAS LVKE 24.46 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And thus it behoued Christ to suffer YOu haue heard dearely beloued how miserably man is distressed by sinne The coherence of this Treatise with the former Treatises how he may be releeued onely by the Mercy of God and how this reliefe is applied vnto vs by the Incarnate Word for he is the true Samaritan that doth helpe the wounded man he is the blessed Angell that doth stirre the poole of Bethesda and giue vertue vnto the water to heale our sores to helpe our soules But alas this Angell as yet is but descended and the waters are not troubled and this Samaritan is but alighted and the poore semi-dead Traueller is not set vp vpon his horse to be carryed towards his Inne that is hee hath not yet entred into the waters of tribulations to saue our soules from drowning in Hell neither hath he put our sinnes vpon his backe that we being freed from the burthen might walke on towards Heauen this resteth yet behind and this Tragedie is yet vnheard and therefore though he much humbled himselfe by his Incarnation yet is that nothing it is but the beginning of sorrowes in respect of his sore and bitter Passion For to redeeme our soules from sinne the deepe waters must enter into his soule and all our sinnes must be laid vpon his backe and for our sinnes It behoueth Christ to suffer Hic labor hoc opus est And this is that which we are now to treat of Thus it behoued Christ to suffer CHAP. I. Of the manifold vse and commodities that we reape by the continuall meditation of the sufferings of Christ Three things that mooue attention THere be three speciall things that doe vse to moue attention 1. An eloquent Author 2. An important matter 3. A compendious breuity And all these three doe here ioyne and meete together in this Text of Scripture For First the Author of these words is Christ Luk. 11.49 First the Author of these words is Iesus Christ the wisedome of God Wisedome it selfe so incomprehensibly wise that all men wondred at the gracious words that proceeded out of his mouth Secondly the summe of these words is the Tragedy of Iesus Christ Secondly the matter is the Tragedie of himselfe the laborious life and the dolorous death of the Sonne of God the chiefest Tragedy of all Tragedies for the Catastrophe hereof hath the effusion of bloud and the mourning not onely of the Sufferer or Parents and Friends but of Heauen and Earth and all the whole world farre more dolefull then the mourning of Hadadrimmon in Valley of Mâ—gyddo The Actors of this Tragedy are Kings Vice-Royes Dukes Scribes Pharises High-Priests Elders of the people The Actors of this Tragedy the Apostles themselues and others all great Christ the King of Kings Herod the great King Pilate the Vice-Roy Annas and Cayphas high Priests Peter and Iudas great Apostles and those that were mute as the Sun the Earth the Stones the Vaile of the Temple and the very Graues did by apparant signes most dolefully bewayle the nefarious death of the Son of God yea more the Angels mourned and the Diuels trembled to behold the same The Theater on which it was acted was Ierusalem The Theater was Ierusalem the very midst and heart of the earth as some imagine according to that saying of the Psalmist Operatus est deus salutem in medio terrae GOD hath wrought saluation in the midst of the Earth Heere is the place where it was acted Hic hic mors vita duello Conflixere mirando Here life and death did striue for victory and here the beholders were men of all Nations Hebrewes Greekes and Romans and the time was their most solemne feast wherein all did â—eete to eate their Paschall Lambe And therefore if there be any Theame that may challenge our eares to lysten and our hearts to meditate vpon the same it is this for this is one of those things that was once done that it might be thought of for euer that it might be had in euerlasting remembrance And the continuall meditation thereof is 1. Acceptable vnto Christ 2. Profitable for vs. For First The continuall meditation of Christs passion what it doth if the rod of Moses which wrought so many miracles in Aegypt and the Manna which fed the children of Israel 40. yeares in the Wildernesse and the Booke of the Law which was deliuered vnto Moses vpon Mount Sinai were to be preserued in the Arke First It is most acceptable vnto Christ as testimonies of Gods loue throughout all generations how much more should we keepe the remembrance of the Crosse of Christ of the Body and Bloud of Christ and of the glad tidings of saluation which we haue by the death of Christ in the Church of God for euermore Our Sauiour gaue but two Sacraments vnto his Church and one of them is chiefely instituted to this end for a remembrance of his suffering for as often as you eate this Bread and drinke this Cup Luc. 22. you shew the Lords death vntill he come 1 Cor. 11.1 And the remembrance of Christs death saith Saint Chrysostome Est beneficij maximi recordatio Chrys hom 8. in Matth. caputque diuinae erga nos charitatis Is the commemoration of the greatest benefit that euer we receiued
sole of his foote vnto the crowne of his head Esay 1.6 there was nothing whole in him but wounds and swellings and soares most full of grieuous paines And in all this his great and grieuous sufferings we must know them to be the sharper in respect of the tendernesse of his body and the senciblenesse of his spirit because as Aristotle saith Quo complexio nobilior quo mens dexterior Aristot l. 2. de anima c. 9. co tenerior esse solet caro The more noble our complexion and the more quicke and nimble is our apprehension the more sencible is our flesh of the least paine and correction but the flesh of Christ of all other men must needes be the most tender The tenderer our flesh and the quicker our spirits the more sensible wee are of paine because as I shewed you before he was soly begotten of a pure Virgin and his minde must needes be most intellectiue and most apprehensiue of all paine because he was of that age which is most sensitiue and therefore the sufferings of Christ in all respects must needes be most insufferable And yet all this was but the least part of his sorrowes not neere the halfe of his sufferings for hee was to wrestle with the wrath of God that was due to vs for our sinnes yea hee was to tread the fiercenesse of the wrath of God Reuel 15.5 And there can be no conflict in the World so great as to grapple with an angry God for the Prophet Dauid speaking hereof Psal 76.7 saith Thou euen thou art to be feared and who can stand in thy sight when thou art angry The Earth trembled and quaked Psal 18. v. 7. 15. the very foundations also of the hilles shooke and were remoued because he was wroth yea the springs of waters were seene and the foundations of the round World were discouered That the sufferings of Christ were a great deale more then are expressed by the Euangelists or then can be conceiued by any man at thy chiding O Lord at the blasting of the breath of thy displeasure And if his anger and displeasure be so great O who can endure the height of his furie who can ouercome by suffering the fiercenesse of his wrath And therefore to shew how vnspeakeable and how dangerous a tâ—ing it is for any man to define what the vnspeakeable sufferings and the incomprehensible feelings of Christ were both in the Garden of Gethsemane before his Iudges and especially vpon the Crosse in Mount Caluarie the Fathers of the Greeke Church in their Lyturgie after they had recounted his bloudy sweate his shamefull crowning his spitefull handling and all the other particular sufferings which are recorded by the Euangelists they doe most excellently conclude 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By thine vnknowne sorrowes and by those infinite sufferings incomprehensible to vs though most sensibly felt by thee Haue mercy vpon vs and saue vs O Lord our God And in all this he truly suffered not imaginarily as some haue imagined Sed vere languores nostros ipse tulit But he truly bare our infirmities and carried our sorrowes Not as the Priests of the Law Leuit. 10.17 which were likewise said to beare the sinnes of the people i. e. typically in the figure but truly in the fact hee bare the punishment of them all and that not in outward appearance as malicious Marcion held it Tertull. contra Marc. l. 4. 8. Aug. de haeresibus ad Quodv heres 46. and afterwards the Manichees maintained it as Saint Augustine saith but as he was a man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 physically and truly so hee endured and suffered all these sorrowes Vere sicut verus homo Most truly as being a true naturall man as Aquinas saith He did most sencibly and feelingly suffer them all for it was not with him as it was with the three Children in the third of Daniel Dan. 3 27. who were cast into the fierie Furnace and yet came out not hauing their hayre singed nor their coates changed nor the smell of fire had passed on them but as Plutarch reports of Coriolanus hee can yet shew his wounds that he suffered and make demonstratiue expressions of his sorrowes farre beyond the apprehension of any man to conceiue them But if any man demand how Christ being God could suffer any paine seeing the Deitie is subiect to no passion Heinsius P. 81. Heinsius answereth that Christ suffered not in respect of the diuine nature which he had as God but in respect of his humane nature which he had as he was Man for though the Deity was in the sufferer yet was it not in the suffering How the Godhead suffered not but sustained the manhood that it might suffer though it was in the Body of Christs passion yet was it not in the passion of Christs Body but as I shewed vnto you before Page 438 the humanity onely suffered and the Deity sustained it that it might suffer because the impotency of the one required the omnipotency of the other Christ being a man that he might suffer and being a God that he might be able so to suffer such insufferable things And therefore we say that Christ in respect of his Deity remained still intire vntouched invulnerable impassible and that very then when his humanity suffered and was dead the Deity liued impassibly and rent the vayle of the Temple sealed vp the Sunne-beames vnder a signet of Cimmerian Cloudes caused the Earth to tremble the Centurion to auerre that Christ was the true and essentiall Sonne of God and raysed vp the interred Carkasses from their graues And we say that it was the humane nature of Christ that stood and suffered vpon the Crosse and in the anguish of its passion breathed out that dolefull complaint euen to the Godhead hypostatically vnited vnto it as well as to the Father and to the holy Spirit saying My God my God Math 27.46 why hast thou forsaken me And although the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the distance betwixt these two Natures be so great and the disparity be so euident as that the one was passible and mortall the other impassible and immortall yet are they so combined and vnited in our Sauiour Christ that although he is not one nature yet is he but one person one Christ one Redeemer and when the humanity suffered and was buried yet was it not neither could it be possibly cast off or forsaken by the Deity vnto which the linkes and ligaments of Gods loue had so strictly and eternally obliged it by an hypostaticall and indissoluble vnion Thus Christ though he was God yet as man Dixit multa gessit mira pertulit dura dura verba duriora verbera durissima supplicia He bore and suffered an incredible paine and vnsufferable sorrowes Esay 53. so great and so grieuous that Esayas may well call him virum dolorum No sorrow like the sorrowes of Christ
How the want of loue is the cause of many mischiefes in the world I onely pray it may neuer be so with any Christian soule that we make not the truth of God with all reuerence be it spoken as a Packe-horse to support our vile desires I am sure if there were more loue and charity among Christians lesse faults lesse errours would appeare to bee in the Church of God then now there seemes to be 1 Cor. 13. for charity suffereth all things beleeueth all things and is euer willing to make faults and errours lesser then they be whereas the want of loue will make the worst of euery thing euery errour to be an Heresie and euery infirmity to be hainous impiety nay want of loue will make sinnes where God made none We ought to loue all men and to hate all vices in whomsoeuer they be and make vertues to be vices whereas perfect charity will neuer hate the man though he be full of iniquity and therefore my conclusion of this point is that as Christ hath loued vs and gaue himselfe for vs so let vs loue Christ and loue one another for Christ his sake and he that doth these things shall neuer fall Part. 4 PART IIII. CHAP. Of the manner of Christs suffering how he suffered all that I haue shewed so as the Prophets fore-told and as the Apostles had seene the same with their eyes The incomprehensible manner of Christ his sufferings FOurthly Hauing heard of the person suffering Christ of the chiefest things that he suffered which are recorded by the Euangelists and of the necessity of that suffering in respect of those causes which did necessitate the same wee are now to cōsider the maner how he suffered expressed in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so to suffer that is so humbly so louingly so meekely so patiently and so euery way in respect of himselfe as that neither the tongues of men nor Angels are neuer able by any like to expresse it by any words to declare it That all predictions touching the Messias were all accomplished in Iesus Christ or by any apprehensions or thoughts of man to conceiue it And so in regard of men as the Prophets had foretold and the Apostles had already seene for so it pleased Almighty God before the comming of the Messias to fore-tell almost euery thing that should happen throughout all the whole life of the Messias euen from the first moment of his conception vnto the very last act of his Ascention that so all men might beleeue in him in whom they saw all those predictions fulfilled none other for the Prophet Esay had said that a Virgin should conceiue and beare a sonne Esay 7.14 Mich. 5.2 Hos 11.1 Esay 9.1 Micheas said that hee should be borne in Bethlehem-Iuda Hoseas foretold of his flight into Egypt and to be briefe the place of his dwelling in the borders of Nepthali the manner of his liuing Healing all manner of infirmities Cap. 53.4 and preaching the glad tydings of saluation and almost euery one of the least particulars that should happen vnto him at his death Zach. 2.9 as how he should be sold and betrayed by his owne Disciple Psal 41 2. how all his followers should flie from him how craftily and maliciously he should be apprehended Esay 53.10 how falsly he should be accused how basely he should be handled buffeted whipped and spitted vpon how vniustly hee should bee condemned and how cruelly he should be fastned vnto the Crosse to die an accursed death and as most accursed betwixt the wicked and how he should be generally mocked his garments taken from him and haue Gall to eate and Vinegar to drinke and what not all was fore-shewed that should happen vnto the Messias and therefore it behoued Christ so to suffer because it was prophesied that he should so suffer And as the Prophets did fore-shew how the Messias should suffer so the Euangelists and Apostles testifie how Christ did suffer all and euery one of those things that were written of him for they were eye-witnesses of the same 1 Iohn 1.1 and soth ey testifie vnto vs that which was from the beginning which we haue heard and seene and our hands haue handled of the Word of life that testifie wee vnto you i. e. that all the things that were written of him which was promised from the beginning wee haue seene them fully accomplished fulfilled in him which liued and conuersed amongst vs and which we preach vnto you Iesus Christ S. Mathew recollects 32. seuerall Prophesies that he saw fulfilled in our Sauiour Christ Saint Iohn addes many other and so doe the rest diuers more So that whosoeuer would with the men of Berea search the Scriptures from the first Booke of Moses vnto the last Prophet Malachy and marke out all the things that were spoken of the Messias that was for to come we shall if we doe but looke finde them all recorded in the writings of the Apostles and Euangelists to be most fully fulfilled in the person of Iesus Christ A sufficient condemnation to all Iewes that still looke for another Christ for why should not they beleeue their owne Prophets they said the Messiah should suffer these things Christ suffered them so as they were prophesied who then can be the Messias but he in whom all these prophecies were fulfilled but Saint Paul tels vs why they will not beleeue in him Why the Iewes beleeue not in Christ Rom. 11. because partly blindnesse is come vpon them vntill the fulnesse of the Gentiles be come in And now Lord if it be thy will open their eyes that they may see this truth and circumcise all infidelity from their hearts that they may beleeue thy Sonne Iesus Christ to be the Sauiour of the world And as this condemneth all vnbeleeuing Iewes so it confirmeth all true Christians in the faith of Christ and I wish to God that as the seeing of all these things fulfilled in Christ makes vs all to beleeue in Christ so the suffering of all these things for vs would make vs all to praise this our Lord Iesus Christ for his goodnesse to feare him in all our wayes to loue him with all our hearts and to serue him truly and faithfully all the dayes of our life O blessed God grant this vnto vs for Iesus Christ his sake To whom with thee O Father and the Holy Spirit three distinct persons of that one indiuided essence be ascribed all praise and glory both now and for euermore Amen A Prayer O Most blessed God that hast giuen thy dearest and thine onely Sonne not onely to be made man subiect to all infirmities but also to suffer all miseries throughout his whole life and in the end to be put vnto a most shamefull painefull and accursed death by wicked men for sinnefull men that hee suffering what wee deserued wee might be deliuered from thy wrath we most humbly beseech
reproue great men 233 Who most subiect to dangers 433 Daughters of sinne are two 82 In the day of Christs natiuitie three things obseruable 435 DE. Death the fruit of sinne 2 Seauen deadly sinnes 40 By death is contained all that is vnder the curse of God 47 67 Death three-fold 49 Death of the soule three-fold 53 Death what it is 67 How largely it extendeth it selfe 75 How vnresistable it is ibid. How expressed by the Egyptians 76 How it shortens life diuers wayes 77 How it taketh men of all ages 78 How it smiteth in euery place 79 How comfortable it is to the godly 79 How terrible to the wicked 80 How it equalizeth the bodies of all men 81 Death of Christ the sole cause that maketh our death happy vnto vs. 84 Death eternall what it is 86 Death of Christ a sufficient satisfaction for the greatest sinnes 164 Death how little Christ respected it 446 Saints at their death supported by God 447 Death of the crosse grieuous in foure respects 479 480 Death of Christ maketh the wicked without excuse 504 Certainty of Christs death shewed in that her rose not til the third day 556 Deceit of sinne how great 44 Deceits no deceits vnlesse cunningly carried 461 Deformitie of sinne greater then we can comprehend 107 Deferring of Christs suffering grieued Christ 451 Wicked men how they deceiue themselues 517 God a debter to no man 531 To defend the truth with the hazard of all that we haue 217 Why God deferreth to giue vs what we desire 723 Delight in sinne maketh vs exceeding sinfull 15 Our deliuerances from punishments to be ascribed to Gods goodnesse 203 God deliuereth not alwaies his deerest Saints from afflictions 206 Christ deliuered from what he feared 448 To derogate from Gods power how great a sinne 161 God denieth his grace vnto the children for their Fathers sinnes 251. Why. 252 Why God denieth what we aske 725 To descend from the crosse easier then to rise from the graue 562 Descention of Christ into hell handled 580. 581 c. proued by Scripture and by the stimonie of antiquitie 484. 618 That Christ descended before hee could ascend 609 Why Christ descended not from the crosse 481 We ought to despaire of no mans conuersion 533 Descending of Christ signifieth the assuming of our flesh 301 Description of God by way of negation affirmation and super eminencie 121 Desire to sinne is an act done 96 Desperate men thinke God cannot forgiue them 139 We ought neuer to despaire of mercie 226 To despaire what a haynous sinne 228 Saints desired nothihg but Christ 264 Demosthenes his Parable vnto the Athenians of the wolues request vnto the sheepe 644 Of the young man that hired an Asse to Megara 678 DI. Christ whether hee died for all men and how 505 To die to sinne what it is 50 a punishment for sinne ibid. To die in sinne what it is 51 Difference betwixt spirituall and eternall punishment 250 How the word God differeth from our Word 309 A great difference betwixt appearing in the forme of man and to be made man 329 Difference betwixt assuming flesh and to bee made flesh 345 Difference betwixt the two-fold generations of Christ and of the Saints 364 Difference betwixt Law and Gospell 3â—4 Difference betwixt the sinnes of the godly and the wicked three-folde 35 Difference betwixt feare and sorrow 449 Philosophers most diligent to attaine to all kinde of knowledge 315 How diligent we ought to be to know Christ 393 Dirt nothing so foule as sinne 52 Diseases of the soule what they be 63 Discontent with God what a heauie sinne 239 Disobedience to God what a haynous sinne 293 Disobedience to parents what a fearefull sinne 240 To distinguish of Gods power reconcileth diuers Authors 150 Dispertion of the Apostles grieued Christ 453 In distresse how wee ought to seeke vnto God 488 Disciples whether they stole Christ from the graue or not 562 Discretion how needfull for Preachers 696 Diuels know God and Christ and the mysterie of the Trinitie 314 Confest Gods power 162 DO Doctrine touching the person of Christ how alwaies opposed by Satan 304 Doctrine of diuinitie how deepe and difficult 392 Whatsoeuer God doth is no sinne 166 Doores being shut how Christ came in 387 Doubting of Gods goodnesse what a fearefull sinne 239 That we should neuer doubt of Gods promises 130 DR To draw neere to vs how God is said 165 M. Drusus desired all men might see what he did 604 EA EArth accursed for the sinne of man 48 EF. The effects that Christs sufferings should worke in vs. 505 EG Egyptians how they expressed death 76 EL. Electionis of some men not of all 203 The elect onely are effectually called 203 Elizabeth the wife of Zacharias of what Tribe she was 397 EN Enemies that besot the godly 177 Enuie of Satan against Christ 493 and why he enuied him 434 Enemies of Christ ascribe to him in mockery what he was in deed 432 433 Enemies of Christ what they testified of him 578 Enemies of man especially three 582 EP. Epicurus confest the world had beginning and shall haue ending 137 EQ Equalitie of sinnes confuted 37 Equitie of eternall punishment for a temporarie sinne shewed in two respects 97 Christ equall with the Father 299 ER. Error of the Philosophers touching the etertie of the world 136 Error of the Vbiquitaries touching the power of God 141 Error of the Iesuites about the power of God 141 Error of Pellagius about the abilitie of mans nature 63 64 Error of Nouatus about sins after Baptisme 112 Errors of the vulgar about the absolute power of God 151 Errors expelled by truth 215 Errors boulstered with lies 175 Error of Saint Gregorie and Saint Bernard confuted 94. 95 Error of Lactantius and Pellagius confuted 63 Error of the Philosophers Stoicks Arist Seleucus Hermias Hermog confuted 136 137 c. Error of the Vbiquitaries shewed 141 Confuted 155. Their Obiect anws 165 Error of Bellarmine and the Iesuites shewed 141. Their Obiections answered 172 c. Error of Saint Hierom. 330 ES. Essence of God in heauen cannot bee seene but in the face of Iesus Christ 118 Essence of God not safe to search too farre into it 124 Essence of God distinguished into three persons 272 The word essence deriued our of Scripture and vsed in Scripture 294 Christ of the same essence with his Father 292. Vnpossible to escape out of the hands of the Angels 337 ET Eternity of Christ proued and the obiections against the same answered 278 279 280 c. Eternall punishment how inflicted for a temporary sinne 94 EV. Eua beleeueth the Deuill 3 The euill that oppresseth euery sinner two-fold 321 Euangelist why hee saith the Word was made flesh rather then man 349 Eutichian heresie what it was 367 c. EX Excuses of sinners to iustifie themselues 24 Excuses of sinners to lessen sinne 110 Examples of wilfull and spitefull sinners 33 Excellency of God cannot be conceiued
death vpon him as well as Iudas his betraying of Christ causeth him to hang himselfe And therefore timenda est ruina multitudinis etsi non magnitudinis We should as well take heed to be destroyed by the smallest Aug. de vera relig in ep 138. as by the greatest things Nam quid interest ad naufragium c. For what skils it whether the Ship suffers wracke from one huge billow that ouer-whelmes her or by some small Leakes which in time doth sincke her So what difference is it Luc 16.21 with Diues to be sent to hell for his daily denyall of his crummes of bread vnto poore Lazarus 1 King 21.16 or with Achab for once taking away of Naboths Vineyard or with our continuall swaggerers for daily swearing and loose-liuing or with the blood-like Caine that doe though but seldome commitimmane and fearefull murthers surely none but this that they doe walke diuers wayes but do meete in the end at the same place And therefore the very heathen man could say Cicerol 1. offic Qua parua videntur esse delicta c. Those sinnes which seeme to be so small as that they scarcely be perceiued to be sinnes by many ought with all care diligence be to auoyded or otherwise we shal find our Sauiours words to be true that for euery moment of time that we haue spent in vaine Matth. 12 39. and for euery idle word that we haue spoken to no purpose we shall render an account at the last day For the reward of Sinne be it neuer so little is Death And so much for the first part the worke done i. e. Sinne. Part. 2. PART II. The payment for Sinne. i. e. Death For the reward of Sinne is death CHAP. I. Of the deceit of Sinne. Of the great deceit of sinne in promising much and performing the cleane contrary YOu saw the Worke you see the Wages and thereby you may see the deceit of sinne Fronte polita Astutum vapido seruat seruat sub pectore vultum For it will appeare at first with a Syrens face most delightful but it wil proue at last to haue a Serpents sting and to be most wofull and you may easily find almost infinite instances of this trueth Gen. 3.6.7 for Eue saw the tree was good for meate and pleasant to the eye and a tree to be desired to make one wise therefore she tooke and did eate and gaue vnto her Husband But then saith Moses their eyes were opened and they knew they were naked naked in body naked in soule naked of all grace and naked of all goodnesse and therefore you see the Serpents promise to make them like Gods made them like Diuells and that the desire of delight and ostentation did worke their griefe and confusion Cle. Al. l. 3. Strom Iustin Martyr apol pro Christianis Sulpit l. 1. de sac hist Gen 6.1.2 So the sonnes of God that is not the Angels as Clemens Alexandrinus Iustin Martyr Sulpitius Lactantius and others thought but the godly sonnes of Seth as Saint Augustine and others doe most truely collect did see the daughters of men that is of the posterity of Caine that they were faire and therfore they tooke them wiues of all that they liked and what could they haue more then to haue their owne desires but what saith the Text when they thought themselues most happy then did they feele the greatest misery for suddenly the flood came and tooke them all away Mat. 24.9 So Saul thought to make aduantage by sauing Agag and the fattest of the Cattle but thereby he lost his Kingdome from his Off-spring 1 Sam. 15.9 So Iereboam thought to establish his Throne by his Idolatry but it proued to roote out all his Posterity 1 King 12.28 and so as the Scripture sheweth we finde the same truth in all other particular sinnes for though the Harlots words be sweet her countenance faire Prouerb 7.27 c. 9.18 and her bed perfumed yet her house saith Salomon is the way to the graue her chamber is the doore of death and her guests are in the depth of Hell and the very Heathen man could say Meritrix meum herum miserum Plantus Truc sua blanditia intulit in pauperiem spoliauit bonis luce honore atque amicis This Harlot with her cogging flattery hath impouerished and vndone my poore miserable Master she hath spoyled and depriued him of all his goods honour friends and all So though stolen waters be sweet and the bread of deceit is pleasant vnto a man yet afterwards his mouth shall be filled with grauell Prou. 20.17 and though the Wine seeme Cos to the drunkard that is to haue colorem odorem saporem an excellent colour in the glasse a pleasant smell in the nostrels and a sweet taste in the mouth yet in the end it will bite like a Serpent Prou. 23 32. it will hurt like a Cockatrice It will Circe-like transforme Men to Swines Virgil and make them with Vlysses fellowes to become worse then the very beasts When as the Poet saith Et pudor probitas metus omnis abest Wee shall finde in them neither feare of God nor shame of face nor scarce any quality or propertie of man besides humane shape for as Propertius saith Vino forma perit vino corrumpitur aetas Propertius l. 2. eleg vlt. Vino saepe suum nescit amica virum By Wine the beauty failes by Wine man waxeth olde Vt Venus enervat vires sic copia Bacchi tentat gressus debilitatque pedes Festus Anieno de ven vino by Wine the wedded wife with strangers will be bold And to be briefe though young men and Gallants doe reioyce in their youth and walke in the wayes of their hearts and in the sight of their eyes that is inioy what pleasure soeuer they will what their eye seeth or what their heart desireth yet in the end God will bring them to iudgement for all those things and then shall their bread in their bellies be turned into the gall of Serpents Eccles 11.9 And so euery sinne is like it selfe like Duke Ioab whose words were smoother then oyle when he saide vnto Amasa Est ne pax mi frater 2 Sam. 20.9.10 Is it peace brother and yet while the tongue called him brother his sword stab'd him to death like an enemie So sinne as it were a cunning Apothecary that writes on the out-side of his boxe Pharmaca medicines when as within there is nothing but Venena poysons Proponit quod delectabile supponit quod exitiale vngit pungit It promiseth wealth but it bringeth woes Reuel 8.13 Woe woe woe to the Inhabitants of the Earth Vae propter culpam vae propter tribulationem mundanam vae propter paenam aeternam Woe for our offences woe for our miseries woe for our eternal punishment and it annointeth vs with oyle
but it stingeth vs to death And so indeed it is like the Deuill Cyprian l. 1. ep 8. a lyer and the father of lies Quia peccatum mentitur vt fallat vitam pollicetur vt perimat Because euery sinne lies that it may deceiue vs and proposeth pleasure that it may bring vs into paine Venerab Beda l. exhort 4 5. Venerable Bede compareth sinne vnto a Witch which transformeth euery man vnto a Monster as Lust maketh a man like a Syren or an Horse to yeane after his neighbours wife Sloth makes him like an Asse or Ostridge Crueltie like a Wolfe or Hyenna Couetousnesse like the rauening Harpies and so euery other sinne makes the poore Sinner to become Monstrum horrendum ingens cui lumen ademptum The most vgly Monster vpon the face of the earth Why then should we not hate this sinne which speaketh friendly vnto vs and promiseth great felicity but in the end brings vs to the extreamest misery Bern. insentent Quia via peccati ingredientes contaminat progredientes obstinat egredientes exterminat Because as Saint Bernard saith sinne in the first entrance defileth in the progresse hardneth and in its going out destroyeth euery Sinner and as Salomon saith of the Harlot her wayes leade vnto death and her footsteps take hold of Hell so the same is most true of sinne and therefore if any man should be asked what hee doth in sinne hee might iustly answer as an old Courtier did when he wâ—s demanded Euery sinne payeth the same wages though it promiseth seuerall pleasures what he did in Court I doe nothing but vndoe my selfe For the reward of sinne is death And here likewise you may obserue that although euery sinne doth not promise the same thing for some sinnes promise pleasure some profit some honour and some one thing and some another yet euery sinne brings vs to the same end and in the end payeth vs with the same reward for the reward of sinne of any sinne is death But because Thriuerus Apoth 19. as many doe make none account of most deadly diseases by reason that they are ignorant of the dangerous effects of the same Ita multi euidenter peccant quia turpitudinem consequentiam peccati perspectam non habent So many men feare not to sinne but doe as smoothly drinke vp the same as pleasant Wine because they doe not vnderstand the filthinesse and wretched effects of sinne and because as if a man might with his outward eyes behold the beauty of vertue and goodnesse mirabilem amorem excitaret sui It would wonderfully inflame their hearts with the loue thereof So if we did behold the loathsomnesse of sinne and consider well the fearefull euents thereof it would make vs with Iob Iob 42 6. to abhorre our selues in Dust and Ashes Therefore I will search a little further into this Labyrinth of sinne and take a little more paines to vnfold the miserable effects of the same for the reward of Sinne is Death When sinne is first committed it wil presently gall and wound our consciences and it will continually shew vnto vs how good a Law is violated how great a Maiestie is offended and how grieuous a punishment we haue deserued and a the Poet saith Occultum quatiante animo tortore flagellum Juven Satyr 13. When the great Tormentor will shake his hidden whip in the soule of the offender then is he troubled night and day walking in the hands of his executioner and sleeping like the Nightingall which hath alwayes a pricke before her breast Neither is this all for the reward of sinne is death Now by Death By Death are vnderstood all the miseries contayned vnder the curse of God we must vnderstand not onely the separation of the body and soule of man but all other things that are comprehended vnder the curse of God for the curse of God and the Death of Man are Voces aequipollentes equiualent termes and doe signifie the same thing and therefore as Saint Paul saith here The wages of sinne is Death So he saith else-where out of Moses Gal. 3.10 Cursed is euery one that continueth not in all things that are written in the Booke of the Law for to doe them And we find that the curse of God for the sinne of man extendeth it selfe 1. To all those creatures that were created and made for the vse of man 2. To all the properties and faculties of each part of man Rom 8 20. and 22. First The creature was made subiect vnto vanity and groaneth and trauelleth in paine vntill now not of it owne accord but by reason of the transgression of man the earth was accursed for his sake and the very Heauens were subiected vnto vanity and as then hee dealt with Adam so euer since he dealeth in like manner with all the sonnes of Adam Psal 107.34 for he maketh a fruitfull land barren for the iniquity of them that dwell therein that is either such as bringeth forth no fruits at all or else such as where Infaelix lolium steriles dominantur auenae How the earth is accursed and her fruits by reason of our sinnes The good seed is ouergrowen with darnell smothered with thornes or spoyled with cockle for though the earth was made to yeeld vs fruits of increase yet instantly vpon our sinning the grounds denied to pay her tribute vnlesse as the Poet sayth iuncto boue aratra trahuntur we doe rippe vp her bowells to fetch it out of her bellie And yet this is not all for though we manure the ground and plant the seede neuer so fayre yet except the Lord giues the increase all our labour is but in vaine And the Lord tells vs plainely that if we cease to sinne and serue our God Psal 107.35 he will make the Wildernesse a standing water and water springs of a drie ground but if we continue in sinne and sow iniquitie Hosea 8.7 hee tells vs plainely wee shall reape but vanitie and if we sow the wind wee shall reape but whirlewind for our haruest And therefore if God stoppeth the windowes of Heauen and withholdeth the raine from vs 1 Reg. 17.1 as he did in the dayes of Elias and so causeth the Heauens to be as brasse and the earth to be as iron vnder our feete the one yeelding no dew the other bearing no fruit or if God openeth the Cataracts and floodgates of Heauen Gen. 7.11 as hee did in the dayes of Noah and so cause the Heauens to weepe and the floods to cary away our fruits before we can carry them into our barnes then must we know Saluian Massaliâ— de guber dei that all this and whatsoeuer of this kinde happeneth to vs is inflicted vpon vs for our sinnes quia ira diuinitatis est paena peccantis because all the grieuous effects of Gods wrath Gen. 3 17. are the iust deserts of mans sinne for cursed is the Earth for