assembled all together as well Nobles as ignoble and Offa most valiant young man being their Captaine they expelled him from the kingdome which done unanimi omnium consensu by the unanimous consent of all as well Clergy as People they Crowned Offa a King Ceolwulfe King of Mercia An. 820. after one yeares Reigne was for his misâ—â—vernment expulsed by his people abandoning his Crowne and Country for the â—afety of his life Edâ—â—yn King of Mercia and Northumberland for his Misgovernment Tyranny oppression following vaine base wicked Counsellors rejecting the advise of the Wisest and noblest person was by the unanimous consent of all his Subjects removed from all Kingly dignity and deposed in whose place Edgar was elected King An. 957. DEO DICTANTE annuente populo Not to mâ—ntion the story of Archigallo one of our ancient British Kings in times of Paganisme Who giving himselfe to all dissention and strise imagining causes against his Nobles to put them from their goods and dignities setting up ignoble persons in their places and plucking away by sinister wrongfull meanes from the rich their wealth and goods by which he enriched himselfe and impoverished his Subjects was for these his conditions murmured against by his Subjects who of one assent lastly tooke and deprived him of all Kingly honour and dignity when he had Reigned almost five yeares making his Brother Elidurus King of Britaine by one assent in the yeare of the world 4915. Who after five yeares good Reigne feigning himselfe sicke assembled the Barons of the Land and by his discreet words and bearing loving carriage Perswaded them to restore Archigallo to his former honour and regalty and thereupon assembling a Councell of his Britaines at Yorke caused such meanes to be made to the Commons that in conclusion he resigned his Crowne to Archigallo Who being thus restored to his Crowne by joynt consent of the people remembred well the evill life that before time he had led and the punishment hee had suffered for the same Wherefore for eschewing the like danger he changed all his old conditions and became a good and righteous man ministring to the people equity and justice and bare himselfe so nobly towards his Lords and Rulers that he was beloved and dread of all his Subjects and so continued during the terme of his naturall life Nor yet to remember Emerian another old British King who for misordering of his people was deposed by them in the sixth yeare of his reigne and Ydwallo promoted to the Kingdome who taught by Emerian his punishment behaved himselfe justly all the time of his reigne or any more such precedents before the Conquest We finde the Popish Barons Prelates and Commons disavowing King Iohn whom they had formerly elected King for making warre upon them and wasting burning and spoyling the Kingdome like an Enemy and electing Lewis of France for their King to whom they did homage and fealty There are none so ignorant but know that the Popish Prelates Lords and Commons in Parliament Anno 1327. deposed King Edward the second their naturall King for his misgovernment and following and protecting ill Counsellors inforcing him by way of complement to resigne his Crowne threatning else that they would never endure him nor any of his Children as their Soveraigne but disclaiming all homage and fealty would elect some other for King not of his bloud whom themselves should think most fit and able to defend the kingdome After which they elected and crowned his son Edward the third for their King That Anno 1399. King Richard the second for sundry misdemeanours objected against him in 32. Articles in Parliament and breach of his Coronation Oath was judicially deposed by a Popish Parliament by a definitive sentence of deposition given against him which you may read at large in our Historians and Henry the fourth elected and created King in his stead In both which depositions the Popish Prelates were chiefe actors Anno 1462. King Henry the sixth Queene Margaret and Prince Edward their Sonne were by a popish Parliament disinherited of their right to the Crowne and Edward the fourth made King after which King Henry was by another Parliament recrowned and re-established in his kingdome and Edward the fourth declared a Traytor and usurper of the Crowne And not long after Edward taking King Henry prisoner and causing him to be murdered in the Tower another Popish Parliament Anno 1472. abrogated King Henries Lawes and re-established King Edward All this have our Popish Parliaments Prelates Lords and Commons formerly done and that rightly and legally as they then supposed which farre transcends the highest straines of pretended incroachments on his Majesties royalties by the present Parliament Secondly our Popish Parliaments Peeres and Prelates have oft translated the Crown from the right heires setled it on others who had no lawful right or title to it electing and acknowledging them for their onely Soveraigne Lords in which actions the Popish Prelates and Clergy were commonly the Ring-leaders witnesse their electing and crowning of Edward who was illegitimate and putting by Ethelred the right heire after Edgars decease An. 975. Their electing and Crowning Canutus King a meere forrainer in opposition to Edmund the right heire to King Ethelred Anno 1016. Of Harold and Hardiknute both elected and crowned Kings successively without title Edmund and Alfred the right heires being dispossessed and the latter imprisoned aâ—d tortured to death Anno 1036. and 1040. yet after Hardiknutes decease Edward surnamed the Confessor was chosen King by consent of Parliament And the English Nobilities upon the death of King Harold enacted That none of the Danish bloud should any more reigne over them After this Kings death Edgar Etheling who had best title was rejected and Harold elected and crowned King so after William the Conquerors decease Anno 1087. Robert the elder brother was pretermitted and William Rufus the younger brother crowned and established in the Throne After whose death Henry the first his younger brother though not next heire was elected King by the Clergy Nobles and Commons who refused to admit of any King but with capitulations and caveats to their owne liking upon faire promises for reforming bad and rigorous Lawes remission of Taxes exacted on the Subjects and punishment of the chiefe causers of them and a solemne Oath to frame good Lawes and ratifie Saint Edwards Lawes all which he really performed So after the death of Richard the first Iohn Earle of Morton was established and crowned King and his Nephew Arthur the right heire disinherited And he dying his sonne Henry the third was elected and crowned and Lewis made King in his fathers life by the Barons removed The like we finde in the case of K. Henry 4. K. Edw. 4. and Richard the third made Kings by Acts of Parliament by our Popish Prelates and Nobles with the Commons consent upon unlawfull or doubtfull Titles by way of usurpation and the right
in Westminster Church comming to the High Altar before the Clergy and people tooke this solemne Oath upon the Holy Evangelists and many Saints reliques 1. That all the dayes of his life he would be are peace honour and reverence to God and holy Church and the ordinances thereof 2. That to the people committed to his charge he would exercise Right Iustice and Equity 3. That he would abolish naughty Laws and Customes if any were brought upon his kingdome and would enact good Lawes and thesame in good sort keepe and without Mal-engin Which Oath most solemnely taken Baldwin Arch-bishop of Canterbury standing at the Altar forbad him in the name of Almighty God to assume that honour UNLESSE HE HAD A FULL PURPOSE TO KEEPE WHAT HE HAD SWORNE Whereunto Richard ASSENTING and promising by Gods helpe to performe all the premises WITHOUT FRAUD With his owne hand humbly taking the Imperiall Crowne from the Altar delivered it to the Archbishop who set it on his head King Richard deceasing Iohn his younger Brother to put by Arthur the next heire to the Crowne came speedily out of Normandy into England where the great assembly at Northampton to preserve their Rights and Liberties were content to accept of him for their King to yeeld fealty and keepe faith and Peace to King Iohn upon condition onely if he would restore to every of them their Rights which he afterwards violating it was the occasion of great dissentions Comming to London to be Crowned Hubert Archbishop of Canterbury the Pillar of the Common-wealths stability and incomparable for deepe reaching wisedome steps forth in the midst of all the Bishops Lords Barons and others there assembled at his Coronation and spake thus unto them Heare yee all you are in discretion to know that no man hath right or any other fore-title to succeed another in a kingdome unlesse first with invocation for grace and guidance of Gods Spirit he be BY THE BODY OF THE KINGDOME THEREUNTO CHOSEN and be indeed some choyce man and picked out for some eminency of his vertues according to the example and similitude of Saul the first anointed King whom God set over his people though neither the Sonne of a King nor of any royall descent So after him likewise David the son of Iesse the one for being valorous and a person fitting Royall dignity the other for being holy and humble minded To shew that whosoever in a kingdome excelleth all in valour and vertue ought to surmount all in Rule and Authority yet so as that if any of the Of-spring of a deceased King surpasseth others it is fit joyntly to consent in election of such a one This therefore we have spoken in favour of eminent Earle John who is present the Brother of our most illustrious King Richard now deceased wanting an heire of his body whom being provident valiant and truely noble we having invocated the grace of the holy Spirit have all unanimously ELECTED as well in regard of his Merits as of his royall Blood Neither durst any doubt or demurre on these things knowing that the Arch-bishop had not thus defined without cause Wherefore Earle Iohn and all men approving this speech they ELECTED and ASSUMED the Earle for their King and cryed out saying Let the King live But the Arch-bishop being afterwards demanded why he had spoken these things answered That he was assured by some divining foresight that King John would worke the ruine of the kingdome corrupt the Crowne and precipitate it into great confusion And that he might not have the reines free to doe this he OUGHT TO BE CHOSEN BY ELECTION NOT BY SUCCESSION King Iohn at this his Coronation was involved in a threefold Oath namely That hee should love holy Church and its Ministers and preserve it harmelesse from the incursion of Malignants That abolishing perverse Lawes he should substitute good ones and exercise Right judgement in the kingdome of England After which he was adjured by the Arch-bishop in the behalfe of God and strictly prohibited not to presume to accept this honour unlesse he fully purposed in his minde actually to fulfill what he had sworne To which he answering promised that by Gods assistance he would bona fide keepe those things which he had sworne After which he rightly setled the affaires of England by the counsell of his Nobles and then passed over into Normandy But how ill he kept this his Oath with others of this nature and how he violated the Statutes of Magna Charta and De Foresta which he had confirmed with his hand seale Oath Proclamations the Bishops Excommunications yea the Popes Bull within three moneths after he had confirmed them and procured a dispensation of his Oath an abrogation of these Lawes from the Pope making bloody warres upon his Barons and Subjects who confiding to those confirmations and royal promises expected no such strange performances spoyling robbing destroying his people every where in the selfe-same manner as we now are plundered the Histories of his life too manifestly relate which oft put his Crown in danger of utter losse Lewis of France being Crowned King by the Barons in his stead who renounced their allegiance to him for his perjuries and breach of faith and making warre upon them Iohn departing this life his son Henry being but 9. yeares old was proclaimed King through the perswasion of the Earle Marshall and of Pembroke afterwards made his Protector who informed the Lords and Commons that though King Iohn for his evill demeanours deserved their persecution and losse of his Cowne yet his young child tender in yeares was pure and innocent from his Fathers doings Wherefore sith every man is to be charged with the burthen of his owne transgressions neither shall the childe as Scriptures teach beare the iniquity of his Fathers they ought of duty and conscience to beare themselves mildly towards this tender Prince and take compassion of his age And for as much as he was Iohns naturall and eldest sonne and ought to be their Soveraigne let us with one joynt assistance APPOINT HIM our King and Governour let us reneunce from us Lewys the French Kings Sonne and suppresse his people which are a confusion and shame to our Nation and the yokes of their Servitude let us cast from our shoulders Upon which perswasionâ— Henry was presently proclaimed and Crowned King at Glocester And though he were but an infant yet being set before the High Altar he swore before the Clergy and people upon the Holy Evangelists and divers Saints Reliques Ioceline Bishop of Bath dictating the Oath That he would beare honour peace and reverence to God to holy Church and Priests all the dayes of his life He likewise swore that he would maintaine right justice among the People committed to his charge And that he would blot out ill Lawes and unjust customes if there should be any in the kingdome and observe good ones and cause them to be kept by all men
to his estate All these things concluded they ELECTED his son Edward King in the great hall at Westminster with the UNIVERSALL CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE THERE PRESENT and the Archb. of Canterbury thereupon makes there a Sermon on this Text Vox populi vox Dei exhorting the people to invoke the king of kings for him they had then chosen It was further ordered and agreed that during the Parliament time a solemne Message should be sent to the King to Kenelworth Castle where he was kept prisoner to declare unto him not only the determination of the three estates concerning HIS DEPOSING FROM THE KINGDOME but also to resigne unto him IN THE NAME OF THE WHOLE REALME all their homage that before time they had done him and to doe this message there was certaine select persons chosen by the Parliament namely the Bishops of Winchester Hereford and Lincoln two Earles two Abbots foure Barons two Iustices three knights for every County and for London the Cinqueports and other Cities and Burroughes a certaine chosen number with the Speaker of the Parliament whose name was Sir William Trâ—ssell who comming into the Kings presence told him That the Common-weale had received so irrâ— concileable dislikes of his government the particulars whereof had been opened in the Assembly at London that it was resolved never to indure him as King any longer That notwithstanding those dislikes had not extended themselves so farre as for his sake to exclude his issue but that with universall applause and joy THE COMMON-WEALE HAD IN PARLIAMENT ELECTED HIS ELDEST SONNE THE LORD EDWARD FOR KING That it would be a very acceptable thing to God willingly to give over an earthly kingdome for the common good and quiet of his Country which they said could not otherwise be secured That yet his honour should be no lesse after his resignation then before it was onely him the Commonweale would never suffer toraigne any longer They finally told him That unlesse he did of himselfe renounce his Crowne and Scepter the people would neither endure him nor any of his children as their Soveraigne but disclaiming all homage and fealty would elect some other for king who should not be of the blood This message strucke such a chilnesse into the King that he fell groveling to the earth in a swoun which the Earle of Leicester and Bishop of Winchester beholding run unto him and with much labour recovered the halfe dead King setting him on his feet who being come to himselfe the Bishop of Hereford running over the former points concludes saying as in the person of the Commonwealth That the king must resigne his Diadem to his eldest sonne or after the refusall suffer THEM TO ELECT SUCH A PERSON AS THEMSELVES SHOULD JUDGE TO BE MOST FIT AND ABLE TO DEFEND THE KINGDOME The dolorous King having heard this speech brake forth into sighes and teares made at the last this answer to this effect That he knew that for his many sinnes he was fallen into this calamity and therefore had the lesse cause to take it grievously That he much sorrowed for this that the people of the kingdome were so exasperated against him as that they should utterly abhor his any longer rule and soveraignty and therefore he besought all that were there present to forgive and spare him being so afflicted That neverthelesse it was greatly to his good pleasure and liking seeing it could none other be in his behalâ—e that his eldest sonne was so gracious in their sight and therefore he gave them thanks for chusing him their King This being said then was a proceeding to the short Ceremonies of his resignation which principally conâ—isted in the surrender of his Diadem and Ensignes of Majesty to the use of his Sonne the new King Thereupon Sir William Trussell the Speaker ON THE BEHALFE OF THE WHOLE REALM renounced all homage and allegiance to the said Edward of Carnarvan late King in these words following I William Trussell IN THE NAME OF ALL MEN OF THIS LAND OF ENGLAND AND OF ALL THE PARLIAMENT PROCURATOR resigne to thee Edward the homage that was sometimes made unto thee and from this time now forward I defie thee AND DEPRIUE THEE OF ALL ROYALL POWER I shall never be attendant to thee as King after this time After which King Edward the third being solemnly crowned proclaimed his peace to all his people in these words Edward by the grace of God King of England Lord of Ireland and Duke of Aquiâ—ane to N. N. our Sheriffe of S. greeting Because the Lord Edward our Father late King of England by THE COMMON COUNSELL AND ASSENT OF THE PRELATES EARLS BARONS AND OTHER THE CHIEFE MEN AND WHOLE COMMONALTIE OF THE KINGDOM did voluntarily remove himselfe from the government thereof willing and granting that We as his eldest Sonne and Heire should take upon us the rule and regiment of the same and we with the counsell of the Prelates Earls and Barons aforesaid yeelding therein to our Fathers good pleasure and will have taken upon Vs the Governanse of the said Kingdome and as the manner is have received the Fealties and Homages of the said Prelates and Peeres We therefore desirous that Our peace for the quiet and calme of Our people should be inviolably observed do will and command you that presently upon sight of these presents you cause Our Peace to be proclaimed throughout your Bayli-wick forbidding all and every one on Our behalfe under paine and perill of disinheritance and losse of life and limbs not to presume to violate or infringe Our said Peace but that every one pursue or follow his Actions and Complaints without any manner of outrage according to the Laws and Customs of Our Kingdome for We are ready and alwayes will be to administer full right to all and singular complaints as well of poore as rich in Our Courts of Iustice. The second President is that of King Richard the second who being taken prisoner by Henry Duke of Lancaster An. 1399. the Duke soone after on the thirteenth of September called a Parliament in the Kings Name wherein was declared how unprofitable King Richard had been to the Realme during his reigne how he subverted the Lawes pâ—lled the people ministred Iustice to no man but to such as pleased him And to the intent the Commons might be perswaded that he was an unjust and unprofitable Prince and a Tyrant over his Subjects and THEREFORE WORTHY TO BE DEPOSED there were set forth certaine Articles to the number of 32. or 38. as some record very hainous to the eares of many some whereof I have formerly recited and the residue you may read in Hall Grafton Haywood Trussell and others After which Richard was charged with the foresaid Articles there was an instrument made declaring his Answers and how he consented willingly to be deposed the Tenor of which instrument was as followeth This present Instrument made the Munday the 29. day of September and feast
Spensers and other ill Counsellors about this king in the last yeare of his raigne though the King himself were in their Company and taken prisoner by the Forces raised against them for the necessary preservation reliefe and safety of the Queene Prince Nobles Kingdome to be no high Treason nor offence at all namely the statute of 1. E. 3. c. 1. 2. 3. which I shall recite at large Whereas Hugh Spenser the Father and Hugh Spenser the Sonne late at the suite of Thomas then Earle of Lancaster and Leycester and Steward of England by the common assent and vote of the Peers and Commons of the Realme and by the assent of King Edward Father to our Soveraigne Lord the King that now is AS TRAITORS ENEMIES OF THE KING OF THE REALME were Exled disinherited and banished out of the Realme for ever And afterward the same Hugh by evill Councell which the king had about him without the assent of the Peeres and Commons of the Realme came againe into the Realme and they with other proâ—â—cured the said king to pursue the said Earle of Lancaster and other great men and people of the Realme in which pursuite the said Earle of Lancaster and other great men and people of the Realme were willingly dead and disinherited and some outlawed banished and disinherited and some disinherited and imprisoned and some ransommed and disherited and after such mischiefe the said Hugh and Hugh Master Robâ—rt Baldocke and Edmoâ—d Earle of Arundell usurped to them the Royall power so that the king nothing did nor would doe but as the said Hugh and Hugh Robert and Edmond Earle of Arundell did councell him were it never so great wrong during which usurpation by duresse and force against the Will of the Commons they purchased Lands as well by fines levied in the Court of the said Edward as otherwise and whereas after the death of the said Earle of Lancaster and other great men our Soveraigne Lord the King that now is and Dame Isabel Queene of England his Mother by the Kings will and Common Councell of the Realme went over to Francâ— to treate of peace betweene the two Realmes of England and France upon certaine debates then moved The said Hugh and Hugh Robert and Edmond Earle of Arundell continuing in their mischiefe encouraged the king against our Soveraigne Lord the king that now is his sonne and the said Queene his wife and by royall power which they had to them encroached as afore is said procured so much grievance by the assent of the said King Edward to our Soveraigne Lord the King that now is and the Queene his mother being in so great jeopardy of themselves in a strange Country and seeing the Destruction Dammage Oppressions and Distractions which were notoriously done in the Realme of England upon holy Church Prelates Earles Barons and other great men and the Commonalty by the said Hugh and Hugh Robert and Edmond Earle of Arundell by the encroaching of the said royall power to them to take as good Councell therein as they might And seeing they might not remedie the same unlesse they came into England with an Army of men of warre and by the Grace of God with such puissance and with the helpe of great men and Commons of the Realme they have vanquished and destroyed the sayd Hugh and Hugh Robert and Edmond Wherefore our Soveraigne Lord King Edward that now is at his Parliament holden at Westminster at the time of his Coronation the morrow after Candlemas in the first yeare of his reigne upon certaine Petitions and requests made unto him in the said Parliament upon such Articles above rehearsed by the common councell of the Prelates Earles Barons and other great men and by the Commonalty of the Realme there being by his Commandment hath provided ordained and stablished in forme following First that no great man or other of what estate dignity or condition he be that came with the said king that now is and with the Queene his mother into the Realme of England and none other dwelling in England who came with the said king that now is and with the Queene In ayde of them to pursue their said enemies in which pursuite the King his Fatâ—er was taken and put in ward and yet remaineth in ward shall not be molested impeached or gâ—ieved in person or goods in the kings Court or other Court for the puâ—suite of the said king taking and with holding of his body nor pursuâ—te of any other nor taking of their persons goods nor death of any man or any other things perpetrate or committed in the said pursuite from the day the said king and Queene did arme till the day of the Coronation of the same king and it is not the kings minde that such offenders that committed my trespasse or other offence out of the pursuites should goe quit or have advantage of this statute but they shall be at their answere for the same at the Law Item that the repeale of the said Exile which was made by Dures and force be adnulled for evermore and the said Exile made by award of the Peeres and Commons by the kings assent as before is said shall stand in his strength in all points after the tenure of every particular therein contained Item that the Executors of the Testament of all those that were of the same quarrell dead shall have actions and recover the Goods and Chattels of them being of the said quarrell whose executors they be as they of the same quarrell should c. Certainely here was an higher pursuite and levying warre against the King and his evill Councellors then any yet attempted by this Parliament and a warre rather offensive then defensive in which the king himself was both taken and dâ—tâ—ined Prisoâ—â—r and then forced to resigne his Crowne to his sonne yet this is here justified as a necessary just and lawfull warre by an Act of Parliament never yet repealed and all that bare Armes against the king and his ill Councellors yea they who pursued apprehended and imprisoned the king himselfe are as to this particular discharged by the king and whole Parliament from all manner of guilt or punishment or prosecution whatsoever against them Which consideration makâ—s me somewhat confident that this King and the Parliament held in the 25. yeare of his Raigne ch 2. Which declares it high Treason to levie warre against the King in his Realmâ— did never intend it of a necessary defensive warre against a seduced King and his evill Councellors especially by the Votes of both Houses of Parliament who doubtlesse would never passe any Act to make themselves or their Posteritie in succeeding Parliaments Traytors for taking up meere necessary defensive Armes for their owne and the Kingdomes preservation for that had beene diametraâ—ly contrary to this statute made in the very first yeare and Parliament of this King and would have lâ—yd an aspertion of High Treason upon the king himself the Queene his
the long was elected by the Estates of Navarre to be their king in right of his wife but it was upon conditions drawn in writing which they tendered to him and the Queen to subscribe and sweare to before the solemnities of their Coronation in the Estates assembled at Pampelone which they yeelded willingly unto whereof the principall Articles were these 1. First to the Estates to maintain and keep the Rights Lawes Customes Liberties and priviledges of the Realme both written and not written whereof they were in possession to them and their successours for ever and not to diminish but rather augment them 2. That they should disannull all that had been done to the preiudice thereof by the kings their Predecessors and by their Ministers without delay notwithstanding any Let. 3. That for the tearme of 12. yeares to come they should not coyne any money but such as was then currant within the Realme and that during their lives they should not coyne above one sort of money and that they should distribute part of the revenues profits and commodities of the Realme unto the Subiects 4. That they should not receive into their service above foure strangers but should imploy them of the Countrey 5. That the Forts and Garrison of the Realme should be given unto Gentlemen borne and dwelling in the Countrey and not to any stranger who should do homage to the Queen and promise for to hold them for her and for the lawfull Heire of the Countrey 6. That they should not exchange nor engage the Realme for any other Estate whatsoever 7. That they should not sell nor engage any of the Revenues of the Crowne neither should make any Law nor Statute against the Realme nor against them that should lawfully succeed therein 8. That to the first sonne which God should give them comming to the age of twenty yeares they should leave the kingdome free and without factions upon condition that the Estates should pay unto them for their expences an hundred thousand Sanchets or other French money equivalent 9. That if God gave them no children in that case they should leave the Realme after them free with the Forts in the hands of the Estates to invest them to whom of right it should belong 10. That if they infringe these Articles or any part of them the Subiects should be quit of their Oath of subiection which they ought them These Articles being promised and sworne by the king and Queen they were solemnly crowned and the Deputies of the Estates Noblemen and Officers of the Crown took their obedience to them Vpon this agreement all the Castles and places of strength in Navarre were put into the hands of the Estates who committed them unto the custody of faithfull knights in whose keeping they continued a Catalogue of which Castles with the names of the knights that guarded them by the Estates appointment in the yeare 1335. you may read at large in the Generall History of Spaine Before this Anno 1328. the Estates of Navarre assembled at Puentala Reyna to resolve without any respect TO WHOM THE REALM OF NAVARRE BELONGED whether to Edward king of England or to Iane Countesse of Eureux The Estates being adjourned to Pampelone the chief Town of the Realme their opinions were divers many holding that king Edward should have the Realm as Granchilde born of the daughter to Queen Iane daughter to King Henry rather then the Countesse of Eureux in regard of the Sex others with more reason held for the Countesse who was in the same degree but daughter to a Son and Heir to Queen Iane. These prevalled drawing the rest to their opinion whereupon the Countesse was declared true and lawfull Queen of Navarre the Realm having been vacant above four Moneths And untill that she and Count Philip her husband should come and take possession of the Realm they declared the Regent and Viceroy Don Iohn Corberan of Leet Standard bearer of the Realm and Iohn Martines of Medrado Lo here a Parliament of the Estates of Navarre summoned by themselves without a King determining the Right of succession to the Crown appointing a Vicegerent and prescribing such an Oath and Articles to their king as you heard before Anno 1331. king Philip of Navarre to administer justice erected a new Court of Parliament in Navarre which was called New to distinguish it from the old HE AND THE THREE ESTATES of the Realm NAMING MEN WORTHY OF THAT CHARGE Queen Iane and Philip deceasing their son Charles the second surnamed the Bad for his crueltie and ill manners was called by the three Estates of Navarre to Pampelone and there crowned in their Assembly after the manner of his Ancestors swearing to observe the Lawes and Liberties of the Country Aâ—ter which a far stricter Oath was administred to Charles the 3 An. 1390. Anno. 1325. In a generall assembly of all the Estates of Arragon Don Pedro son to the Infant Don Alphonso was sworn presumptive Heir and Successor to the Crown after the decease of his Grandfather and Father the which was there decreed and practised for that Don Pedro Earl of Ribagorca did maintain that if his brother Don Alphonso should die before their Father the Realm did belong to him by right of propriety being the third brother rather then to his Nephew the son of the second brother In this Assembly the Articles of the generall priviledges were confirmed and it was ordained for a Law That no Freeman should be put to the Racke and that confiscations should not be allowed but in Cases of Coyning and High Treason Anno 1328. Alphonso King of Castile treacherously murthering Don Iohn the blinde his Kinsman in his own Court when he had invited him to dinner on all Saints day and then condemning him for a Traitor confiscating his lands a fact unseemly for a King who should be the mirrour of Iustice Hereupon Don Iohn Manuell stood upon his Guard fortified his Castles revolted from the King for this his Treachery allyed himself with the Kings of Arragon and Granado overran the Countries of Câ—stile from Almanca unto Pâ—gnafield the Prior of Saint Iohns Don Fernand Rodrigues hereupon caused the Cities of Toro Zamora and Vailledolit to rebell and shut their gaâ—es against the King and many others likewise reâ—olted from him At last he was forced to call an Assembly of the Estates who gave him Subsidies to ayde him in his wars against the Moors and to conclude a peace with Don Manuel and his other discontented Subjects whom he afterwards spoiling of their lawfull inheritances and pursuing them in their honours and lives by Tyrannous crueltie extending his outragious disdain even to women of his own blood he thereby so estranged most of his Princes and Nobles from him that they revolted from him and jâ—yned with Mahumet king of Granado and the Moors in a warre against him which lasted three or four yeers putting him to infinite troublâ— exations and expences enforcing him to make a
upon demand he raiseth a great Army and takes his Castle On this the King upon better consideration did againe promise and affirme That by advise of his great Councell all that was amisse should be rectified and amended And at the day and place appointed he holds a great conference with the Lords But the evill Counsellers he followed suffered him not to make good his promise For when divers there present greatly in the Kings favour with sundry Preachers and Fryers whom the King was wont to reverence and hearken to Humbly beseeched and earnestly exhorted the King to make peace with his Barons and Nobles and to embrace them with due affection being his naturall Subjects whom without any judgement by their Peeres he had banished destroying their Manours Woods Parkes Ponds and being led and seduced by evill Counsels lesse regarded his faithfull Subjects whose native blood would not permit them to bow downe than Forainers and which is worse called them Traytors by whom he ought to settle the peace order the Counsels and dispose the affaires of his kingdome The Bishop of Winchester offended it seemes at Peeres takes the word out of the Kings mouth and answers That there are not Peeres in England as in the Realme of France and that therefore the King of England by such Iusticiars as himselfe pleaseth to ordaine may banish any offenders out of the Realme and by judiciall processe condemne them Which insolent speech the English Bishops relished so harshly that they presently with one voyce threatned to accurse and excommunicate by name the Kings principall wicked Counsellers of whom Winchester being the foreman appealed whereupon they accursed and I would our Bishops would doe so now if the God-dam-me Cavaliers accurse not themselves sufficiently all such as alienated the heart of the King from his Subjects and all others that perturbed the peace of the Realme and so the hoped Accomodation vanished into greater discontents Hereupon the Earle Marshall and other Lords with their Forces fell pell mell upon the Kings Army slew divers of his Forrainers and in conclusion drew him to such straits that enforced him to be capable of better advise Then Edmund Arch-Bishop of Canterbury elect with other suffragan Bishops bewailing the estate of the kingdome presented themselves before the King at Westminster telling him as his loyall liegeman and O that some Bishop or faithfull person if there be any such about his Majesty would now deale thus clearely with him touching his evill Counsellors That the Counsell of Peter Bishop of Winchester and his complices which now he had and used was not sound nor safe but evill and dangerous to himselfe and his Realme First for that they hated and despised the English calling them Traytors turning the Kings heart from the love of the people and the hearts of the people from him as in the Earle Marshall whom being one of the worthiest men of the Land by sowing false tales they drave into discontentment Secondly that by the Counsell of the said Peter his Father King Iohn first lost the hearts of his people then Normandy then other lands and finally wasted all his treasure and almost England also and never after had quiet Thirdly that if the Subjects had now beene handled according to Justice and law not by their ungodly Counsels these present troubles had not hapned but the Kings lands had remained undestroyed his treasure unexhausted Fourthly that the Kings Councell is not the Councell of peace but of perturbation because they that cannot raise themselves by peace must raise themselves by the troubles dis-inherison of others Fifthly that they had the Treasure Castles Wardships and strength of the kingdome in their hands which they insolently abused to the great hazard of the whole estate for that they made no conscience of an Oath Law Justice or the Churches censures Therefore we O King speake of these things faithfully unto you in the presence of God and man and doe counsell beseech and admonish you to remove such a Councell from about you and as it is the usage in other Realmes governe yours by the faithfull and sworne children thereof To which the King in briefe answered That he could not suddainely put off his Councell and therefore prayed a short respite Nothing had hitherto preserved the King more Than that he could without griefe forgoe any favorites if he were nearely pressed the contrary quality whereof hath beene the cause of finall desolation to so many Princes For though choyce of Counsellers be for the most part free yet by common intendment they should be good or how ever they are or are not it is madnesse to hazard a Crowne or lose the love of a whole Nation rather than to relinquish or diminish a particular dependance for which the publique must not be hazarded nor subverted The King therefore in this point not infortunate commands Bishop Peter from his Court to keepe residence at his Cure without once medling in State affaires removes all his evill Counsellors deprives them of their Offices and puts good men in their places and commands all Poictovians and Foraine Forces to depart the Realme receives all his Nobles unto favour restoring them to their lost Offices Lands Castles admits them into his Court and Councell puts all his ill Counsellours and Delinquent Officers to their legall trials and fines And for Peter Rivales his Treasurer he was so incensed against him for his ill Counsell that he sware he would plucke out his eyes were it not for reverence of his holy Orders And at his Arraignment at Westminster the King sitting in person with his Justices upon the Bench and shooting Rivales through with an angry eye spake thus to him O thou Traytor by thy wicked advise I was drawne to set my Seale to those Treacherous Letters for the destruction of the Earle Marshall the contents whereof were to me unknowne and by thine and such like Counsell I banished my naturall Subjects and turned their mindes and hearts from me By thy bad counsell and thy complices I was moved to make warre upon them to my irreparable losse and the dishonour of my Realme in which enterprise I wasted my Treasure and lost many worthy persons together with much of my Royall respect Therefore I exact of thee an accompt and thou shalt be carryed to the Tower of London to deliberate till I am satisfied And thus were these civill warres and differences reconciled ill Counsellors removed enormities reformed Delinquents punished not without reducing store of coyne to the King and peace established in the kingdome Which History I have more largely recited because most of its passages are Parallel to the Kings and his evill Counsellors present proceedings on the one hand and to the Parliaments in some sort on the other hand in the premises and I doubt not but they will prove parallels in the conclusion to the terrour and just punishment of all ill counsellors Cavalieres and Delinquents the
of Yorke to shew and make report unto the Lords of the Parliament of his voluntary Resignation and also of his intent and good minde that he bare toward his Cousin the Duke of Lancaster to have him his Successour and King after him And this done every man took their leave and returned to their own Upon the morrow following being Tuesday and the last day of September all the Lords Spirituall and Temporall with also the Commons of the said Parliament assembled at Westminster where in the presence of them the Archbishop of Yorke according to the Kings desire shewed unto them seriously the voluntary Renouncing of the King with also the favour which he ought unto his Cousin the Duke of Lancaster for to have him his Successour And over that shewed unto them the Scedule or Bill of Renouncement signed with King Richards hand After which things in order by him finished the question was asked first of the Lords If they would admit and allow that Renouncement The which when it was of the Lords granted and confirmed the like question was asked of the Commons and of them in like manner affirmed After which admission it was then declared That notwithstanding the foresaid renouncing so by the Lords and Commons admâ—tted it were needfull unto the Realme in avoiding of all suspicions and surmises of evill disposed persons to have in writing and registred the manifold crimes and defaults before done by the said Richard late King of England to the end that they might be first openly shewed to the people and after to remain of Record among the Kings Records The which were drawn and compiled as before is said in 38. Articles and there shewed readie to be read but for other causes then more needfull to be preferred the reading of the said Articles at that season were deferred and put off Then forsomuch as the Lords of the Parliament had well considered this voluntary Renouncement of King Richard and that it was behovefull and necessary for the weale of the Realme to proceed unto the sentence of his deposall they there appointed by authority of the States of the said Parliament the Bishop of Saint Asse the Abbot of Glastenbury the Earle of Glocester the Lord of Barkley William Thyrning Justice and Thomas Erpingham and Thomas Gray Knights that they should give and beare open sentence to the Kings deposition whereupon the said Commissioners laying there their heads together by good deliberation good counsell and advisement and of one assent agreed among them that the Bishop of Saint Asse should publish the sentence for them and in their names as followeth In the Name of God Amen We John Bishop of Saint Asse or Assenence John Abbot of Glastenbury Richard Earle of Glocester Thomas Lord of Barkley William Thyrning Iustice Thomas Erpingham and Thomas Gray Knights chosen and deputed speciall Commissaries by the three Estates of this present Parliament representing the whole body of the Realme for all such matters by the said Estates to us committed We understanding and considering the manifold crimes hurts and harmes done by Richard King of England and misgovernance of the same by a long time to the great decay of the said Land and utter ruine of the same shortly to have been ne had the speciall grace of our Lord God thereunto put the sooner remedie and also furthermore adverting the said King Kichard knowing his own insufficiency hath of his own meere voluntarie and free will renounced and given up the rule and government of this Land with all Rights and Honours unto the same belonging and utterly for his merits hath judged himselfe NOT UNWORTHY TO BE DEPOSED OF ALL KINGLY MAJESTY AND ESTATE ROYALL We the Premisses well considering by good and diligent deliberation by the POWER NAME AND AUTHORITIE TO US AS ABOUE IS SAID COMMITTED PRONOUNCE DISCERNE AND DECLARE the same King Richard before this to have beene and to be unprofitable unable unsufficient and unworthy to the rule and governance of the foresaid Realms Lordships and all other Appâ—rtenances to the same belonging and FOR THE SAME CAUSES WE DEPRIUE HIM OF ALL KINGLY DIGNITIE AND WORSHIP AND OF ANY KINGLY WORSHIP IN HIMSELFE AND WE DEPOSE HIM BY OUR SENTENCE DEFINITIUE forbiding expresly to all Archbishops Bishops and all other Prelates Dukes Marquesses Earles Barons and Knights and to all other men of the aforesaid Kingdom and Lordships or of other places belonging to the same Realmes and Lordships Subjects and Lieges whatsoever they be that none of them from this time forward to the foresaid Richard as King and Lord of the foresaid Realmes and Lordships be neither obedient nor attendant After which sentence thus openly declared the said Estates admitted forthwith the same persons for their Procurators to resigne and yeeld up to King Richard all their homage and fealty which they have made and ought unto him before times and for to shew unto him if need were all things before done that concerned his deposing The which resignation aâ— that time was spared and put in respite till the morrow next following And anon as this sentence was in this wise passed and that by reason thereof the Realme stood void without Head or Governour for the time the said Duke of Lancaster rising from the place where he before sate and standing where all might behold him he meekly making the signe of the Crosse upon his forehead and upon his breast after silence by an Officer was commanded said unto the people there being these words following In the name of the Father Sonne and holy Ghost I Henry of Lancaster claime the Realme of England and the Crowne with all the appurtenances as I that am descended by right line of the blood comming from that good Lord King Henry the third and through the right that God of his grace hath sent to me with the helpe of my kiâ—â—e and of my friends to recover the same which was in point to be undone for default of good Governance and due Iustice. After which words thus by him uttered he returned set him down in the place where he before had sitten Then the Lords perceiving and hearing this claim thus made by this noble man either of them frained of other what he thought and after a distance or pause of time the Archbishop of Canterbury having notice of the Lords minde stood up and asked the Commons if they would ASSENT TO THE LORDS WHICH in their mindes thought the claime by the Duke more to BE RIGHTFULL AND NECESSARY FOR THE WEALTH of the Realm and of them all Whereunto they cryed with one voice YEA YEA YEA After which answer the said Archbishop going to the Duke and setting him upon his knee had unto him a few words the which ended he rose and taking the Duke by the right hand led him unto the Kings seat and with great reverence set him therein after a certaine Kneeling and Orison made by the said Duke eâ—e he were therein set And when the King
the Lord Burnell And here upon the Prince in his owne name and of the other forementioned Lords prayed to be excused in case they could not finde sufficient to support their necessary charges And that notwithstanstanding any charge by them accepted in this Parliament that they may be discharged in the end of the Parliament in case nothing shall be granted to support their foresaid charges And because the said Prince should not be sworne by reason of the highnesse and excellency of his Honourable Person the other Lords and Officers were sworne and swore upon the condition aforesaid to goâ—erne and acquit themselves in their counsell well and faithfully according to the tenour of the first Article delivered among others by the said Commons and likewise the Iustices of the one Bench and other were sworne and tooke an Oath to keepe the Lawes and doe Iustice and equall right according to the purport of the said first Article And on the 9. of May being the last day of the Parliament The Commons came before the King and the Lords and then the Speaâ—er in the name of the said commons prayed the King to have full conusance of the names of the Lords of his Counsell and because the Lords who were named before to be of the said Counsell had taken their Oathes upon certaine conditions as aforesaid that the same Lords of the Counsell should now be newly charged and sworne without condition And hereupon the Prince prayed the King as well for himself as for the other Lords of the Counsell that forasmuch as the Bishop of Durham and Earle of Westmorland who are ordained to be of the same Counsell cannot continually attent therein as well for divers causes as are very likely to happen in the Marches of Scotland as for the enforcement of the said Marches that it would please the King to designe other Lords to bee of the same Counsell with the Lords before assigned And hereupon the King IN FVLL PARLIAMENT assigned the Bishop of Saint Davids and the Earle of Warwicke to be of his said Counsell with the other forenamed Lords and that they should bee charged in like manner as the other Lords without any condition A notable President where all the Kings Privy Counsell are nominated and elected by him in full Parliament and their names particularly declared to the Commons before they are sworne to the end that they might except against them if there were just cause who in their Petition and Articles to the King expresse in generall what persons the King should make choise of for his Counsellors and Iudges and what Oathes they should take in Parliament before they were admitted to their places Which was as much or more as this Parliament ever desired and the King may now with as much Honour and Iustice grant without any diminution of his Prerogative as this Magnanimous Victorious King Henry did then without the least deniall or delay In the fiâ—t Yeare of King Henry the fift This King undertaking a warre with France by Advise and consent of his Parliament as honourable to the King and profitable to the Kingdome toâ—which war they liberally contributed Iohn Duke of Bedford was in and by that Parliament made GOVERNOVR AND REGENT OF THE REALME AND HEAD OF THE COMMON-WEALTH Which Office he should enjoy as long as the King was making Warre on the French Nation the Summons of which Parliament issued out by this Duke in the Kings Name See H. 1. c. 1. In the Patent Rolls of 24. Hen. 6. 1 â— pars mem 16. The King grants to Iohn Duke of Exceter the Office of Admirall of England Ireland and Aqultain which Grant is thus subscribed Per breve de privato Sigillo AVCTORITATE PARLIAMENTI So that hee enjoyed that Office by apointment and Authority of the Parliament which was no set standing Office nor place of great Honour in former ages when there were many Admiralls in England designed to severall Quarters and those for the most part annuall or but of short continuance not for life as Sir Henry Spelman shewes at large in his Glossarie Title Admirallus to whom I referre the Reader and Title Heretocâ—us which Heretochs elected by the people had the command of the Militia of the Realme by Sea and Land and this word Heretoch in Saxon signifying properly a Generall Captaine or Leader as you may see there and in Master Seldenâ— Titles of Honour Pag. 605. 606. And sometimes though more rarely an Earle Count or Nobleman Earlederman or Prince Hengist and Horsa being called Heretogan in a Saxon Annall In the 1. yeare of King Henry 6. being but 9. months old when the Crowne descended the Parliament summoned by his Father Henry the 5. as Walsingham writes was continued in which By ASSENT OF ALL THE STATES Humfry Duke of Gloucester WAS ELECTED AND ORDAINED DEFNDER AND PROTECTOR OF ENGLAND in the absence of his elder Brother the Duke of Bedford and all the Offices and Benefices of the Realm were committed to his disposall In this Parliament a strange sight never before seen in England this infant king sitting in his Queen mothers lap passed in Majestick manner to Westminster and there tooke state among all his Lords before he could tell what English meant to exercise the place of Soveraigne direction in open Parliament then assembled to establish the Crowne upon him In the Parliament Rolls of the 1. yeare of this King I finde many notable passages pertinent to the present Theme of which for their rarity I shall give you the larger account Numb 1. There is a Commission in this Infant Kings name directed to his Vncle Humfrey Duke of Gloucester to summon and hold this Parliament in the Kings name and stead and commanding all the Members of it to attend the said Duke therein Which Commission being first read the Archbishop of Canterbury taking this Theame The Princes of the People are assembled with God declares 4. causes for which this Parliament was principally summoned 1. For the good governance of the person of the most excellent Prince the King 2. For the good conservation of the peace and the due execution and accomplishment of the Lawes of the land 3. For the good and safe defence of the Realme against enemies 4. To provide honourable and discreet persons of every estate for the good governance of the Realme according to Iethro his Counsell given to Moses c. Which Speech ended Numb 7. 8 9 10 11. The receivers of all sorts of Petitions to the Parliament are designed and the Speaker of the House of Commons presented and accepted Numb 12. The Lords and Commons authorize consent to and confirme the Commission made to the Duke in the Infant Kings Name to summon and hold this Parliament so that they authorize and confirme that very power by which they sate With other Commissions made under the great Seale to Iustices Sheriffes Escheators and other officers for the necessary execution of Iustice. Numb 13.
by injustice advising him to lovie warre upon his Subjects making evill Iudges and other Officers to the hurt of the King and Kingdome engrossing the Kings eare and usurâ—ing his Royall authority as ENEMIES of the King and OF HIS PEOPLE and by another Act of Parliament it was then provided that no man should be questioned for any felonies or trespasses committed in the prosecution of Hughâ—e de Sponsers the father and sonne which Act runnes thus Whereas of late many great men of the Realme surmised to Sir Hugh le Despenser the sonne and Father many misdemeanors by them committed against the estate of our Lord the King and of his Crowne and to the disinheritance of the great men and destruction of the people and pursued those misdemeanors and attainder of them by force because they could not be attainted by processe of Law because that the said Sir Hughes had accroached to them the royall power in divers manner the said Grandees having mutually bound themselves by oath in writing without the advise of our Lord the King and after in pursuing the said Hugh and Hugh and their alies and adherents the said great men and others riding with banners displaied having in them the Armes of the king and their owne did take and occupie the Chattels Villages Mannors Lands Tenements Goods and likewise take and imprison some of the Kings leige people and others tooke some and slew others and did many other things in destroying the said Hugh and Hugh and their alies and others in England Wales and in the Marches whereof some things may be said Trespasses and others felonies and the said Hugh and Hugh in the Parliament of our Lord the King sommoned at Westminster three weekes after the Nativitie of Saint Iohn Baptist the 15. yeare of his Raigne for the said misdemeanors were fore judged and banished the Realme by a vote of the Peeres of the Land and the foresaid great men in the said Parliament shewed to our Lord the King that the things done in the pursuite of the said Hugh and Hugh by reason of such causes of necessity cannot be legally redressed or punished without causing great trouble or perchance warre in the land which shall be worse and prayed our Lord that of all alliances trespasses and felonies they might be for ever acquitted for the preservation of peace the avoyding of warre and asswaging of angers and rancors and to make unitie in the land and that our Lord the King may more intirely have the hearts and Wills of the great men and of his people to maintaine and defend his Lands and to make warre upon and grieve his enemies It is accorded and agreed in the said Parliament by our Lord the King and by the Prelates Earles Barrons and Commons of the Realme there assembled by command of our Lord the King that none of what estate or condition soever he be for alliance at what time soever made by deed oath writing or in other manner nor for the taking occupying or detainer of Chattels towns Mannors Lands Tenements and goods taken imprisoning or ransoming the Kings leige People or of other homicides robberies felonies or other things which may be noted as trespasses or fellonies committed against the peace of the king by the said great men their allies or adherents in the pursuite aforesaid since the first day of March last past till the thursday next after the feast of the assumption of our Ladie to wit the 19. day of August next ensuing be appealed nor challenged taken nor imprisoned nor grieved nor drawne into judgement by the King nor any other at the suite of any other which shall be in the Kings Court or in any place else but that all such trespasses and Felonies shall be discharged by this accord and assent saving alwaies to all men but to the said Hugh and Hugh action and reason to have and recover their Chattels Farmes mannors Lands tenements wards and marriages according to the Lawes and customes used in the Realme without punishment against the king or damages recovered against the party for the time aforesaid For which end they prescribed likewise a Charter of Pardon annexed to this Act according to the purport of it which every one that would might sue out which Charter you may read in old Magna Charta From which Act of Parliament I shall observe these three things First that this their taking up Armes to apprehend the Spâ—â—seâ—s as enemies to the King and kingdom and marching with banners displayd was not then reputed high Treason or Rebellion against the King though it were by way of offence not of defence and without any authority of Parliament for there is not one word of Treason or Rebellion in this Act or in the Charter of pardon pursuing it and if it had beene high Treason this Act and Charters on it extending onely to Fellonie and Trespasses not to Treasons and Rebellions would not have pardoned these transcendent Capitaâ—l crimes Secondly that the unlawfull outrages robberies and murders committed by the souldiers on the kings leige people and not on the two Spensers the sole delinquents were the occasion of this Act of oblivion and pardon not the Armed pursuing of them when they had gotten above the reach of Law Thirdly that though this were an offensive not defensive warre made without common assent of Parliament and many murthers robberies and misdemeanors committed in the prosecution of it upon the kings leige people who were no Delinquents yet being for the common good to suppresse and banish these ill Councellors enemies Traytors to King and Kingdome the King and Parliament though it such a publicke service as merited a pardon of these misdemeanors in the carriage of it and acquitted all who were parties to it from all suites and punishments All which considered is a cleare demonstration that they would have resolved our present defensive warre by Authoritie of both Houses accompanied with no such outrages as these for the apprehension of such as have beene voted Traytors and Delinquents by Parliament and stand out in contempt against its justice for the defence of the Priviledges and Members of Parliament the Liberties and properties of the subject the fundamentall lawes of the Realme the Protestant Religion now indangered by Papists up in Armes in England and Ireland to extirpate it and the removing ill Counsellors from his Majestie to be no high Treason Rebellion or offence at all against the king but a just and lawful Act the very miscarriages wherof in the generall except in such disorderly Souldiers for whom martiall Law hath provided due punishments deserve a publike pardon both from King and Kingdome And to put this out of Question as no fancie of mine owne we have an expresse Act of Parliament resolving the taking up of Armes by the Queene Prince both but subjects and capable of High Treason in such a case as well as others the Nobles and people of the Realme against these two
treacherously contrary to his League and Oath Berthgwin the 14. Bishop of Landaffe hearing thereof assembled a Synod of his Clergy at Landaffe and solemnly excommunicated the King with all his Progeny and Kingdom by uncovering the Altars casting down the Crosses on the earth and depriving the Countrey both of Baptisme and the Eucharist Whereupon the King unable to endure so great an excommunication with great deiection submitted himselfe to the Bishop and leaving his Kingdom went on pilgrimage into forraign parts for a long space after which returning by the intercession of king Morcant he obtained abâ—olution from the Bishop to whose enioyned penance he submitted himself conferring divers Lands upon the Church And in another Synod at Landaffe under this Bishop King Gurcan for living incestuously with his Mother-in-law was solemnly excommunicated in form aforesaid whereupon he craved pardon resolved to put away his Mother-in-law promised satisfaction by k. â—udhail his Intercessor upon which he was absolved upon promise of amendment of life with fasting prayer and almes after which he bestowed divers Lands on the Church Houell king of Gleuissig contrary to his Oath League trecherously circumverring and slaying Gallun hereupon Cerenhir the 18. Bishop of Landaffe calling a Synod solemnly excommunicated him by laying all the crosses on the ground overturning the Bells taking the Reliques from the Altar and casting them on the ground depriving him of all Christian communion under which excommunication he remained almost a whole yeers space After which this king came bare-foot to the Bishop imploring his absolution from this sentence with many teares which he obtained after publke penance enoyned Not long after the same Bishop and his Clergy in another Synod for the like crime in the self-same forme excommunicated Ili sonne of Conblus till he came bare-footed with teares and prayed absolution which upon performance of enjoyned penance promise of future reformation with prayers fasting almes and the setling of some Lands on the Church was granted him by the Bishop So Loumarch son of Cargnocaun was in a full Synod excommunicated by Gulfrid the 20. Bishop of this See for violating the patrimony of the Church and king Brochuail with his family convented before a Synoâ—e threatned Excommunication enjoyned Penance and satisfaction by the Synode for some injuries offered to to Ciueilliauc the two and twentieth Bishop of Landaffe Mauric King of of Glamorgan was excommunicated by Ioseph the eigth and twentieth Bishop of Landaffe for treachâ—rously putting out the eyes of Etguin during the truce between them After which he was again publikely excâ—mmunicated in a Synode for violating the Sanctuarie of the Church of Landaffe and hurting some of this Bishops servants and not absolved till he made his submission and did his Penance and gave some laâ—ds to the Church for satisfaction of these offence Thus Calgucam King of Morganauc and his whole family were solemnly excommunicated by Herâ—wald the nine and twentieth Bishop of Landaffe in a Synod of all his Clergy onely because one of the Kings followers being drunk laid violent hands upon Bathutis the Bishops Physitian and Kinsman on Christmas day Anno 1056. Whereupon all the Crosses and Reliques were cast to the ground the Bells overturned the Church doors stopped up with thorns so as they continued without a Pastor and Divine Service day and night for a long season till the King though innocent submitted himself to the Bishop and to obtain his absolution gave Henâ—inguinna to him and his Successors for ever free from all secular and royall services in the presence of all the Clergie and people So Richard the tenth Bishop of Bangor excommunicated David ap Lhewelin Prince of Wales for detaining his brother Griffith prisoner contrarie to his Oath repairing to him upon the Bishops word for his safe return who never left vexing him till he had delivered him up to to the King of Englands hands Many such presidents of Prelates censuring and excommunicating their Kings occur in Storie which for brevity I pretermit onely I shall inform you that Iohn Stratford Archbishop of Canterbury in the 14. year of K. Edw. 3 contesting with this King and excommunicating divers of his followers and all the infringers of the Churches Liberties presumed to write thus unto his Soveraign There are two things by which the world is principally governed The sacred Pontificall authority and the royall power of which the Priesthood is by so much the more weighty ponderous and sublima by how much they are to give an account of kings themselves at the Divine audit And therefore the kings Majesty ought to know that you ought to depend on their judgement not they to be regulated according to your will For who doubteth that the priests of Christ are accounted the FATHERS AND MASTERS of Kings Princes and all faithfull Christians Is it not known to be a part of miserable madnesse if the son should endeavour to subjugate the Father the servant the master to himself The Canonicall authority of Scriptures testifieth that divers Pontiffs have excommunicated some of them Kings others Emperours And if you require somewhat in speciall of the persons of Princes Saint Innocent smote the Emperour Archadius with the sword of excommunication because he consented that Saint John Chrysostom should be violently expelled from his See Likewise Saint Ambrose Archbishop of Millain for a fault which seemednot so hainous to other priests excommunicated the Emperour Theodosius the great From which sentence having first given condigne satisfation he afterwards deserved to be absolved and many such like examples may be alleaged both more certain for time and nearer for place Therefore no Bishops whatsoever neither may nor ought to be punished by the secular Power if they chance to offend through humane frailtie For it is the duty of a good and religious Prince to honour the Priests of God and defend them with greatest reverence inimitation of the Pious Prince of most happy memory Constantine saying when the cause of Priests was brought before him You cannot be iudged by any to wit of the secular judges who are reserved to the iudgement of God alone according to the assertion of the Apostle very ill applied saying The spirituall man is iudged of no man 1 Corinth 2. 15. Not mean of Bishops or Clergie-men but Saints alone endued with Gods Spirit not of judging in courts of iustice but of discerning spirituall things and their own spirituall Estates as the Context resolves Thus and much more this Prelate who notwithstanding this text of the Romanes pleads an exemption of all Bishops and Priests from the kings secular power by Divine Authority and arrogates to Priest and Prelates a iudiciary lawfull power over Kings themselves to excommunicate and censure them for their offences And to descend to later times even since the the Reformation of Religion here Iohn Bridges Dean of Sarum and Bishop of Oxfort even in his Book intituled The supremacy of Christian Princes over
had resigned wheâ—upon Ramir raised an Army against him and after 2. yeers warres took him prisoner put cut his eyes and thrust him into a Monastery Iohn the first the 35 King of Castile after the death of Ferdinand King of Portugall claimed that kingdome iâ— right of Eleanor his wife and next Heire but the Portugals elected Iohn a bastard a Knight of the blood Royall for their King and excluded Eleanor Henry the 4. the 38. King of Castile having no children lawfully begotten would have made Elizabeth his bastard daughter heire to the Crown but the Nobles would no wayes permit it and resisting him with all their might preferred his own sister Elizabeth to the Crown and married her to Ferdinand the 6 sonne to Iohn King of Arragon rejecting his spurious daughter And Fâ—ier Iohn de Tâ—ixeraiâ— his Book of The Originall of the Kings of Portugall affirmes that the Kings of Portugall were usually ELECTED BY THE SVFFRAGES AND FREE CHOICE OF THE PEOPLE who had power to conferre the Kingdome on whom they pleased averring that Alfonso 1. 3. and 5. Iohn the 1. Emanuel and Antonio Kings of Portugall were thus elected Which though Duardus Nonius Leo a Portugois Lawyer denyes and seemes to resute yet he grants freely that the Parliament or Assembly of the Estates in Portugall have usually determined the Title Right and ordered the Succession of that Crown in the Cases of these Princes and determined of their Legitimate or spurious birthes That when the Kings of Portugall have dyed without Heires they have BY THE LAW OF ALL NATIONS freely elected whom they thought meetest for their King And that after the death of King Ferdâ—nand they put by Iohn and Ferdinand the â—onnes of King Peter begotten of Agnes de Castro his Concubine from the Crown because they were bastards and moreover enemies to the name and Realme of the Portugois entring with Henry and Peter Kings of Castile in an hostile manner with an Army into the Confines of Portugall wasting them every where and doing great dammages to and committing many murthers among their Citizens for which reason the States assembled at Cotmbri resolved that although they were legitimate yet THEY COULD NOT OBTAIN THE SUCCESSION OF THAT KINGDOME quod se hostes alienos a Portugalia declarassent because â—HEY HAD THVS DECLARED THEMSELVES ENEMIES AND ALâ—ENS TO PORTVGALL And therefore beleeving the Kingdome to be void for want of a right heire to succeed in which case BY THE LAW OF ALL NATIONS THEY MIGHT LAWFVLLY ELECT THEM WHAT KING THEY PLEASED they chose Iohn the Bastard King After which he shewes that Philip thâ— 2. his Tide to the Crown was long debated by and resolved in the Assembly of the States of Portugall in the life of king Henry who summoned all the Pretenders to the Crown to come and declare their Titles to it in a Parliament held at Almâ—erin upon the Petition of the Senate and People who earnestly pressed him that the Title of the crown might be setled and discided during his life to prevent division and câ—vill warres after his death By which it is apparent that the Assembly of the Estates of Portugall is the most Soveraign power and above their kings themselves It is clear that the Gothish kings which reigned in Spain were not hereditary but elective yea censuâ—able excommunicable and desposable by them for their Male-administrations The Generall History of Spaine is expresse that among the Goths they did not reigne by right and succession from Father to Sonne but those were chosen Kings among them which were held worthy which election was made by the Nobility and People and if any one did affect that dignity by any other unlawfull meanes he was excommunicated and rejected from the company of christians as appearâ—s by the 5. Councell of Toledo Thus Vallia the 1. king of the Goths An. 418. Agila the 11. king An. 546. Luiba the 13. king An. 5â—5 Gundamir the 18. king An. 610. Suintilla the 20. king An 621. Tulâ—â— the 23. King An. 642. Bamba the 26. king of Goths an 672. to omit others were elected by the Nobles and people though now and then the Crown went by succession through usurpation rather then right Theodiscle the tenth king of the Goths in Spaine giving himselfe to lusts and adulteries polluted great and honest families corrupted Nobles wives and committed many murthers whereupon the chiefe of the Goths conspiring against him strangled him at Sevill rioting in his banquets and elected Agila for their king So Victrix the 17. king of the Goths a vitious base unworthy Prince was miserably slain by his own people for his vitiousnesse as he sate at Table Suinâ—illa the 20. king of the Goths in the beginning was a good Prince but in the end he grew exceeding covetous and cruell wherefore the Goths made him resign his Kingdome about the yeare 630. and deprived him of the crowne he was likewise excommunicated by the Bishops whose power at that time began to equall that of Kings at the 4. Councell of Toledo which interdicted him with Geilands brother their wives and children the communion and fellowship of the Church and the possession of their goods gotten by violence and tyrannicall meanes and Sisenand his adversary with the consent of the people obtained the Kingdom The 6. Councel of Toledo under Cinthilla the 22. king of Goths about the yeare 686. decreed and by a perpetuall law imposed on the Kings of Spain not to suffer any one to live within their Dominions which was not a Catholike the which their kings should solemnly sweare before they were crowned and if any king should goe against that Law which he had thus sâ—orn he should be excommunicate and accursed in sight of the eternall God and made the fuell of eternall fire which Canon was made not only by the assent of this king his Bishops but likewise with the consent deliberation of his Nobles and great men In the 5. Councel of Toledo under this king it was decreed Câ—n. 2 3 4 5 6 7. That the kings children and faithfull servants after their deathâ— should not be deprived of the lands honours and just rewards by the succeeding kings which had been conferred on them in their lives That no man should aspire to the crowne liceâ—â—iously under pain of excommunication and a divine Anathema whom neither THE ELECTION OF ALL nor the Nobility of the Gothisn Nation had noâ— advanced to this top of honour That none should during the kings life endeavour or use meanes to succeed him after his death nor yet revile the Prince under paine of excomunication All which particulars were raâ—ified by new Canons in the 6. Councell of Toledo under this king Can. 14 15 15 17 18. with this addition That the king being dead none should usuâ—p the kingdome by tyrannicall presumption that none who had been shaven a Monke or dishonestly bald or descended from a servile stocke or a mâ—n of a forraign Naâ—ion unlesse
Castile Anno 1247. The Lawes and Customes of Arragon were reduced into writing by King Iames his appointment and compacted into one body having till that time been observed onely by tradition which Volume was confirmed by the Estates held at Huesca And the same yeere the King of Castile erected a kind of Chancery and standing Court of Parliament of 12. learned men which followed the Court. Anno 1254. Thibald the 2. king of Navarre being but 15. yeers old at the descent of the crown unto him was at 25. yeers of age declared of full age and crowned King in the great church of Pampelone where he did sweare TO PRESERVE AND AUGMENT THE PRIVILEDGES OF THE COVNTRY Afterwards he doing homage to the king of Castile for the Realme of Navarrâ— as his predecessours had done before him and making such a peace with him as the prelates Knights and Commonalties of the Realme in the States had approved yet divers knights and the Inhabitants of the Borough of Sâ— â—â—rmin of Pampelone disallowed this homage this peace and would not subscribe to it as tending to the kings dishonour whereupon the king did punish them by sines but his choller being past some few dayes after considering they were good and faithfull subjects loving his honour and greatnesse and that they resisted his will out of true love and zeale which they owed to the Crowne and their Countrey hee caused their Fâ—nes to be restored Alphonso the 3. fifth King of Porâ—â—gall putting away his 〈◊〉 wife Mahauis without cause after he had children by her and marrying 〈◊〉 hereupon when by no intreaties of Friends or the Pope he would entertaine his first wife again he was excommunicated by the Pope and his Realme interdicted 10 or â—â— yeerspace continuing still obstinate till his first wife dyed after which he was absolved Anno 1260. and in some yeere following there were divers 〈◊〉 concerning the Crown Lands and setling of Portions for the King of Aâ—ragons younger children moved and determined in the Assembly of the Estates of Arragons and the Nobility complaining that their King Iames did bâ—â—ake 〈◊〉 made many Leagues and Factions This matter being debated 〈…〉 Saragossa and then at Exea in the yeare 1265. for pacifying these troubles they enacted That no honours nor military fees should be given to any but to Gentlemen of race and born in the Countrey That no Gentleman should be subject to the 〈◊〉 of Cattell nor to any other That in all controversies which the Nobility might have against the king or among themselves the Magistrate called the Iustice Maâ—or of Arragon should be Iudge being assisted by the Councell That the King should not give the fees and Military rewards allotted to them that doe him service as are coâ—peace of their vertue and valour to any of his lawfull children who by right have their portions in the Realme Anno. 1274. Iames King of Arragon comming to the Councell of Lions desirous thereto be crowned by the hands of Pope Gregory a ceremony whereof he made great account the Pope refused him unlesse he would acknowledge himselfe vassall to the church of Rome and pay the arrerages of the rent which the deceased King Don Pedro his Father had promised the which King Iames would not doe holding it an unworthy thing so to dâ—base the greatnesse of his Crowne and restraine the Liberty of his Realme in any sort And this yeare there were great and continuall Tumults in Arragon the Nobility opposing themselves against the King for composing which differences the Estates of Arragon assembled in Parliament at Exea where king Iames tooke the government and managing of the affaires of the Realme from his sonne Don Pedro and diverse great Dons were there condemned of contumacy and their Lands confiscated by the Iustice Major of Arragon In this Assembly the Nobility pleaded the Priviledges of Catteloyne That the Nobility might quit the Kings obedience in case of controversies and suites especially if there were question of their Liberties and to protest it publikely Anno 1265. Denis the infant King of Portugall desired his Grandfather Alphonso King of Castile to discharge the Realm of Portugall of the homage and vassallage it ought to the King of â—eon who thinking it would be taken ill by the Noblemen his Subjects advised the infant to propound it in an open Assembly called to that end The opinion of Don Nugno de Lara was that by no meanes he should diminish the authority and greatnesse of his Crown which he should doc if he did quit this homage to the King of Portugall For which opinion the King growing angry with him the residue fearing the kings displeasure advised him to doe it Whereupon the Realme of Portugall was freed from all homage and subjection due to the Kings of Leon and Castile For which prodigality the other Nobles and D. Nugno were so much discontented that they made a League with the King of Granado against their own King for dismembring Portugall from the Crown of Leon to pacifie which differences the King used many mediations and at last called an Assembly of the Estates at Burgos the which was held without the Towne for the safety of these Confederates That great Astronomer Alphonso King of Castile who presumed to controule the Author of Nature saying That if he had been at the Creation of the world hee should in many things have been of another opinion and amended Gods workmanship was a most willfull indiscreet unfortunate Prince for his eldest sonne Fernand dying in his life time leaving Alphonso and other issue males behind him Don Sancho his second son resolved to dispossesse his Nephews of the kingdom saying That it was fit that he who was a Knight and learned to govern a Realme were it in warre or peace should raigne after his Father rather then his Nephews sons of his eldest brother who were very young having need of Regents and Governours charges which were affected by great personages who by reason thereof grew into quarrels one with the other to the oppression of the people and hazzard of the Estate After which Don Lope Diaz of Haro pressed the King to declare Don Sancho his sonne his successour in the Realmes of Castile Toledo Leon and other places being his eldest sonne then living to which he giving a cold answer at first having afterwards assembled the Estates in Segobia he was by the King and the Estates consent declared and received as heire to the Crown after his Fathers decease Fernands children being disinherited of their right which fact was then excused and justified because there was no law at that time which did binde the King much lesse the Estates to leave the Realme more to one sonne then to another since which there was a law made and received in the time of Fernand the 5. in the City of Taro where it was decreed by the Estates upon this difficulty That the Children of the elder brother deceased representing their fathers
person should in that respect be preferred before the Vncle Hereupon Queen Violant and Blanche widow to Fernand were so much discontented with the Decree of the Estates disinheriting the eldest brothers sonnes as taking the young children with them they departed out of Castile to Don Pedro King of Arragon where Don Sancho caused his Nephews to be imprisoned whom king Alphonso labouring under hand to get releasâ—d Don Sancho advertised hereof made a league with the Moores of Granado against his Father and by assent of his confederates took upon him the Title of Regency of the Kingdome of Castile and other his Fathers dominions refusing the Title of King during his Fathers life time who was forced to pawn his royall Crown and Iewels to Iacob Abin Ioseph a Moore King of Morocco who aided him willingly against Don Sancho After which in an Assembly of the States at Cordova with the advise of the Noble men and knights of Castile thereupon sent by a Decree pronounced by the mouth of Don Manuel in the name of the whole Nobility Alphonso was deprived of all his Realmes for murthering his brother Don Frederick and burning Don Rues unjustly without any forme of justice or orderly proceedings the breach of the rights and priviledges of the Nobility and the excessive wasting of the treasure of the Realme Vpon this there arose bloody Warrâ—s between the Father and sonne and in the yeere 1282. Alphonso was so vexed with his sonnes proceedings that hee pronounced in the presence of many men of ranke both Clergie and Laity in the City of Sevill The curse of God and his upon Don Sancho a sonne said he disobedient rebellious and a paricide declaring him uncapable and unworthy to reign depriving him of his successions inheritance and discharging the subjects as much as in him lay from all oath and homage which they had done unto him But these were but words which Don Sancho did not much esteem enioying his Fathers kingdomes after his decease in Title as he did before in act and dying king of Custile his hâ—ires succeeded him in that Realme as lawfull heires thereunto Don Pedro the third king of Arragon about the yeare 1283. had many controversies with his Nobles and knights who complained much of his sower disposition and tyrannous manner of Government insulting over the greatest yea against his own blood contrary to all Law and nature Wherefore being ill intreated by him in their freedomes whereof the Townes and Commonalties of his Countries did also complain the Nobility Knights and Gentry for preservation of their Liberties made a Vnion together among themselves and with the people promising and swearing to lâ—t the King and his sonne Don Alphonso who was his Lieutenant Generall understand that if they did not contain themselves within the limits of the Lawes of the Country they would withdraw themselves from their obedience and declare themselves enemies and pursue them by armes that should seek to break them The king hereupon called the Estates to Tarrasone and afterwards to Saragossa where he intreated promised and did all what he could to break this Vnion but he was forced to yeeld and granted to the Arragonians the priviledge they call Generall whereby their Liberties which had been somewhat restrained were again restored the ancient manners of the Country and customes of their ancestours put in practise And moreover there were Laws made for their Kings which they should be bound to obey and for that they were in a mutiny in some places by reason of certain Impositions laid upon salt the traffique thereof was made free by the Estates And the king refusing the judgment of the Iustice Maior of Arragon deposing Pedro Martines Artassone who then exercised it from his Office the Estates soon after at an assembly at Zutaria fortified it with stronger Laws deeming the Iustice of Arragon to be a lawfull Iudge whom the King himself could not displace even in Cases commenced against the King who being cited and not appearing there were Decrees made against him in many instances In the end the King confirmed the Decrees of the Iustice Maior and whatsoever should be concluded by the Estates the Deputies and Councellors having given their suffrages I read in Hieronimus Blanca that about the year 1212. the Arragonians taking it ill that their Liberties gotten with their blood should so many wayes be subverted as then they were by King Pedro the first raised up the Name and forces of a Vnion that with one force and the consent of all one minde as it were being made out of all they might more easily propulse so great injuries but what was then done hereupon is not recorded But the two memorable Priviledges of the Vnion under King Alphonso the third are said to spring from thence Don Alphonso king of Aragon succeeding Pedro Anno 1286. he was admonished by the Estates Ambassadours to come speedily to the Assembly at Saragossa where having sworn and promised the observation of the Customs Rights and Priviledges of the Countrey and received the Oath of fealty from the Deputies he might lawfully take upon him the Title of the King of Aragon the which they said he might not use before this Act and Ceremony according to the ancient customs of Aragon Vpon these summons he came to the Assembly of the Estates to Saragossa took the Oath aforesaid after which he was Crowned Which done there grew in this assembly a great contention touching the reformation of the mannors of Courtiers and the ordering of the Kings house the Noblemen and Deputies of the Estates of Aragon maintaining that the conusance thereof was incident to their charge the King and his houshold servants on the other side denied that there was either Law or custom which tyed the King or his followers to any such subjection In the end it was concluded that the reformation of the Court should be made by twelve of the principall Families the like number of Knights four Deputies of Saragossa and one of either of the other Cities the which should give their voices in that case This Vnâ—on of Aragon obtained likewise a Decree that the King should have certain Councellors chosen to wit four of the chief Nobility four Knights of noble and ancient races four of his houshold servants two Knights for the Realm of Valencia two Citizens of Saragossa and one of either of the other Cities whom they particularly name with a condition that whilest the King should remain in Aragon Ribagorca or Valencia two of those Noblemen two of his servants two Knights of Aragon one of Valencia and the four Deputies of the Realm of Aragon should follow and reside in his Court AS COVNCELLORS APPOINTED BY THE VNION who protested by solemn Deputies sent to the King to that end that if he did not receive observe and maintain those orders THEY WOVLD SEIZE VPON ALL HIS REVENVES and on all the fees Offices and dignities of such Noblemen as should contradict them Thus were
Common-wealth without the Senates or Parliaments assent Neither can hee make new Lawes nor publickly command money in an extraordinary manner nor coine money nor nominate a Successor not with the Senate without the consent of the Nobility whether of Knights or Gentlemens Order By or out of whom all publicke Magistrates and Senators almost are chosen so as now the summe or cheifest power of the Republicke is residing in them So that the Kingdome and Republicke of the Polonians doth not much differ in reason from that of the Lecedae â—onians in ancient times and of the Venetians now An Oath is exacted of the new King when he is crowned to this effect That he shall raigne according to the Lawes and institutes of his Predecessors and will safely conserve to every order and man his right priviledge and benefit confirmed by former Kings nor will he diminish any of the borders or goods of the Realme but will according to his power recover those that are lost from others After all which the Senate sweare fealty to him c. The Revenues Tributes and Customes of the king are all reduced to a certainty the Nobles Clergie are exempted from Taxes The King by the Lawes of King Alexander is prohibed to alien to any one the Lands of the Crowne No new Lawes can be made nor old ones repealed but by the king Senate and Nobles assembled in Parliament And because there is wont to be in highest power a slippery and ready degree to Tyrannie certaine Senators and Councellours are adjoyned to the King who may direct his Councells And Actions to the safety of the Common-wealth and his judgements according to the Rule of justice and equitie and with their wholsome monitions and Councells may as there shall be occasion as it were with certaine living Lawes both informe his minde and moderate his power This Royall Senaâ—e much greater now then in times past consists of a certaine number of men wâ—ich wee call the Senators or Councellours of the REALME who are not admitted to the Councell without an Oath and this Office is perpetuall during life having certaine Honours and Magistracies thereto annexed partly Ecclesiasticall partly Civill It consists of 96. persons in all some of them Bishops others Palatines Knights Castellanes and other Officers of the Realme The Chancellor of the Realme may sâ—gne many things without the Kings Privitie and may deny to seale those things which are contrary to Law though the king command them Most of the great Officers and Magistrates are chosen in Parliament and cannot be displaced but in Parliament and that for some great offence Their Parliaments or Generall Assemblies of the States are held much like ours once every yeare at least and some times every fift or sixth moneth if there be occasion and then they are kept constantly at one place to wit at Petâ—icow or Warsavia in the midst of the Kingdome unlesse it be upon some extraordinary just occasion and then the king by advice of this Councel may sommon the Parliament at another place It is provided by a Law within these 20 yeares That it shall not be lawfull to the King to make a warre without the assent of his Parliament and Great Councell and that the Nobles as oft as there is occasion shall at their owne costs without wages defend the borders of the Realme yet not without the King unlesse it be during the Interregnum but they may not be compelled to goe out of the Realme to any Forraigne warre without wages the Souldiers wages are reduced to a certainety and asseased by publicke consent in Parliament which Orders all Military and Civill Affaires So Cromerus For their carriage towards their ill Kings I shall give you onely a short account Miesco their second King being unfit to governe a man given wholly to his belly ease sleepe pleasure and governed by his Queene thereupon most of his subjects revolted from him and he dying the Polonians at first for many yeares refused to chuse Cazimirus his Son King least he should follow his fathers steps till at last after a long Interregnum when he had turned Monke they elected him King Bolestaus his sonne a man of a dissolute life given to lust and the pest of the Realme was excommunicated by the Bishop of Cracow for his wickednes for which cause he slew him Whereupon the Pope deprived him and Poland of the Crowne and absolved his Subjects from their obedience to him who expelled and forced him to flee out of the Realme into Hungary where he became mad and died Myâ—zlaus the 10. King of Poland exercising tyranny every where upon his people by reason of his power and allies was deposed by his subjects and Cazimirus elected King in his stead He was three or foure times deposed and put by the Crowne Boleslaus who succeeded Henry was deprived of the Monarchy Henry was surprised and most strictly imprisoned Boleslaus was slaine by his Nobles and Vladisiaus Locktect elected King in his stead ravishing virgins Matrons and not reforming things according to promise the Nobles hereupon assembling together An. 1300. abrogated his election as pernicious and chose Wenceslaus King of Bohemia King in his place And not to recite more ancient histories of such like nature King Henry the third of Poland was elected and sworne King upon conditions Which he was to performe Anno 1574. After which he secretly departing out of Poland without the assent of the Nobles to take possession of the Crowne of France within 3. monthes after his Coronation in Poland the Polonians sent Messergers after him to Ferrara Iune 16. 1574. who denounced to him that unlesse he returned into Poland before the 12 of May following they would depose him and elect another King Which he neglecting they in a generall assembly of the Estates at Waâ—saâ—ia deprived him of the Crowne and elected a new King the Chancellor and greatest part of the Counsellers elected Maximilian the Emperoâ—r Some others with the greater part of the Nobility desiring to have one of the Polish blood elected Anne sister of their deceased King Sigismund giving her for husband Stephen Battery Prince of Transylvania and proclaimed him King The Emperour making mary delayes Stephen in the meane time enters Poland marrieth Anne and is crowned King by generall consent Febrâ—ary 8. 1576. who tooke this memorable Coronation Oath prescribed to him by the Nobles I Stephen by the grace of God elected King of Poland great Duke of Lithuania c. promise and sacredly sweare to Almighty God vpon these holy Evangelists of Iesus Christ that I will hold observe defâ—rd and fulfill in all conditions articles and points therein expressed all Rights Liberties Securitus priâ—â—â—â—dges publike and private not contrary to the common Law and Liberties of both Nations justly and lawfully given and granted to the Ecclesiastickes and sâ—culars Churches Princes Barons Nobles Citizens in hâ—bitaâ—ts and any other persons of what state and condition so ever by my goâ—ly
King Iames his owne Tutor in his Booke De Iure Regni apud Scotos and his Rerum Scoticarum Historia Where this their Soveraigne power is so largely vindicated debated demonstrated and the chiefe objections against it cleared so abundantly that I shall not adde one syllable to it but present you with some Historicall examples which confirme it Fergusius the first King of Scotland dying and leaving two sons infants unable to governe the Realme the Scots thereupon considering what dangers might befall them both at home and abroad during their infancy at last concluded after much debate and setled this for a standing law that when any King died leaving his son under age and unfit to governe the next of their kinred who should be esteemed fittest to raigne should enjoy the soveraigne power and that he being dead then the succession of the Crowne should returne to the children of the deceased King being of age to rule which Law continued constantly for many hundred yeeres untill the reigne of Kenreth the third By this Law Feritharis brother to Fergusius abtained the Crowne and reigned fifteene yeeres with much justice and modesty after which his Nephew Ferleg desiring to raigne demanded his Fathers Kingdome of his Uncle who being willing to resigne it to him called an assembly of the estates made an Oration in praise of Ferleg profered to resigne the Crowne unto him But such was all the assemblies love to Feritharis and hatred to Ferleg for this his preposterous affectation of the Crowne that they detested the act and denied the motion both with frownes and verball reprehentions Whereupon Ferleg conspired his Uncles death which being discovered they thought him worthy of death but for Fergusius his fathers sake his life was spared and he onely imprisoned after which making an escape he fled first to the Piâ—ts then to the Britons and in the meane time Feritharis dying by the treachery of Ferleg as was suspected Ferleg by the unanimus sentence of all was condemned and put from his Crowne being absent and his brother Mainus created King Dornadilla the fourth King of Scotland dying leaving Reuther his sonne under age and unfit to raigne the people made Notatus his brother King who playing the tyrant banishing murthering and oppâ—essing the people Donald of Galloway raised an Army against him expostulated with him for his tyranny and wished him to resigne the Crown to Reuther which he refusing to do any justifying his tyranny hereupon Donald gave him batteâ—l slew him and made Reuther King without the peoples suffrages Upon which the Nobles being offended because the power of the Parliament was by this meanes abolished and the election of the supreame Magistrate made onely by one man tooke up Armes both against Ruther and Donald gave them battell twice in one day and tooke Ruther their new King prisoner who afterwards dying and leaving There his sonne an infant scarce ten yeeres old they according to the Law formerly made and received in this case made his unkle Ruther King who after seventeene yeeres reigne voluntarily resigned his Crowne to his Nephew There in whose commendation he made an Oration the people hardly permitting it There soone after growing very vitious and flagitious slaying the Nooles and filling the Realme with robberies the Governours piâ—tying the deplorable state of the Realme resolved to punish him for it of which he being informed fled to the Brittains where he spent his daies in contempt and ignominy not daring to returne Conan a prudent and discreet man being elected Viceroy in the meane time which office he held almost twelve yeeres till the death of There In the reigne of Finnan the tenth King of Scotland that the roots of tyranny might be cut off it was decreed That Kings should command nothing of greater moment to be done but by the authority of the publique Councell Durstus the eleventh King giving himselfe to all deboistnesse first banished his fathers friends from him as the troublesome reprehenders of his pleasures and sending for the most vitious young men to be his familiar companions gave himselfe wholly to luxury and venery He prostituted his wife daughter to the King of Britains to his companions and then banished her At last the Nobles conspiring against him he awaking as it were cut out of sleepe considering that he should finde no place of safety neither at home nor abroad being equally hated of strangers and subjects thought best to counterfeit repentance of his former liâ—e for so he might retaine both his Crowne and in time inflict punishments on his enemies Wherefore recalling his wife from exile he first of all endeavoured to reconcile him selfe to the Britains then calling the chiefest of his subjects to him he ratified with a most solemne oath the oblivion of his former courses he committed every most wicked person to prison as if he reserved them for punishment and religiously promised that he would doe nothing hereafter but by the advice of his Nobles When by these things he had given assurance of his sincere mind he celebrated the agreement with pastimes banquets and other signes of publique gladnesse and now all mens minds being taken up with joy he called most of the Nobility to a supper where when he had shut them up improvident and unarmed in one roome sending in his assasinates he slew them every one This calamity not so much terrifying as exasperating the minds of the rest with new flames of anger they gathered a great army together all men conspiring to take away this detested monster whom they slew in battell together with his wicked confederates After whose slaughter the Nobles putting by Durstus sonnes lest they should imitate their fathers vices elected his brother Even King with unanimous consent who hating Durstus his tyranny had voluntarily banished himselfe among the Picts Even dying leaving a bastard sonne called Gillo he procured himselfe to be elected Viceroy till a new King should be chosen and got the Kingdome confirmed to him but yet not deeming himselfe secure as long as any of Durstus his family remained he treacherously slew Durstus his two eldest sonnes with all his kindred and familiars With which the Nobles being much discontented and fearing worser things privily raised an Army against him who finding himself generally deserted but by a few flagicious persons who feared punishment He was forced to flie in a Fisherboat into Ireland whereupon the Scots created Cadvallus their Vice-roy and after that created Even their King who conquering Gillo in Ireland he was forced to fly into a Cave where he was taken and his head cut off King Even the third not content with an hundred Concubines of the Nobility made a Law That it should be lawfull for every one to marry as many Wives as he could keepe and that the King should have the maydâ—n-head of Noble women and the Nobles of the Plebeans before they were married and that the common peoples Wives should be common for the Nobles Beâ—ides
his vices The king freed of their troublesome company gave himselfe wholy to feaâ—â—ing and venery spending nights and dayes in dishonest sports and pleasures with his dissolute companions and to maintaine his luxurie he pillaged and oppressed his Subjects especially those who were rich and by his disorders fell into a grievous sicknesse which made him a deformed carcasse fit for nothing but to suffer the penalties of his vitious life his Courtiers and companions spoyling the people every where in the meane time Whereupon the Nâ—â—les were enforced to summon a Parliament at Scone where the king was commanded to be present that together with the rest he might consult how to provide for the publicke safety in this precipitate State of things with which â—ommons being awaked he began to consult with his companions what was best to be done for his owne â—afety in these exigenâ—s being unable to resist or flee he resolved to goe to the Parliament hoping to finde some mercy there for his good fathers sake to preserve him from falling into extreame misery but in his way thither he was slaine by the Thane of the Country for his violent ravishment of his daughter his death was acceptable to all because it freed them of such a monster with lesse labour then they expected and Kenneth the third was made King in his place who poysoning his Nephew Malcolme heire to the crown after his decease to settle it on his own posteritie he caused the Lords in Parliament to repeale the ancient Law wherby the Crown discended to the next of kin during the minority of the right heire and to enact that the sonne should 〈◊〉 thenceforth inherite the crowne next after his father through a Minor that the Realme during his Minority should be governed by a Viceroy elected by the Parliament and Nobles till he came to 14 yeeres of age and after that by a Gardian elected by himselfe that if the Kings eldest sonne dyed having issue the issue should inherit before the second brother c. After which the King generally hated for the poysoning of Malcolme was slaine by the practise and command of Fenella He thus cut off Constâ—ntine surnamed the bald sonne of Culen pretending the new Law concerning the discent of the Crowne to be unjust obtained by force and contrary both to the publicke liberty and safety to wit that an inâ—ant commonly governed by a woman being unable to governe or repulse an enemy in times of danger yea a curse of God upon a Realme and therefore not to be endured or setled by a Law especially in those time of warre when they had so many enemies should be preferred before a Kinsman of full age fit to raigne so ambitiously sought the Crowne and made so many friends that he procured himselfe to be proclaimed King at Scone which Malcolme sonne of Kenneth for whose sake this new Law was enacted understanding presently raised all the Forces he could which being conducted by his brother Kenneth Constantine and he in the second encounter were both slaine one of another After whose death Grame the sonne of Duffus usurping the Crowne when he and Malcolme were ready to encounter with their Armes this agreement was made betweene them by Forthred a Bishop that Grame should retaine the Kingdome and the new Law of succession be suspended during his life and Malcolme succeede him after his death After which Grame giving himselfe to all dissolutenesse covetousnesse and oppression and warring upon those Nobles and Councellors who advised him to reforme his evill courses with greater cruelty than any forraigne enemie destroying both men townes cattle fields and making all a common prey hereupon they called in Malcolme out of Northumberland to assist them who encountring Grame on Ascention day tooke him prisoner being deserted of his people wounded in the head and then put out his eyes who soone after dying of sorrow and his wounds Malcholme thereupon summoned a Parliament at Scone and would not take the Crown till the Law concerning the succession made in his fathers raigne was ratified by all their conseâ—ts against which Law Buchanan exceedingly inveighs in the beginning of his seventh Booke as the occasion and increase of all those mischiefes both to King and Kingdome which it was purposely made to prevent This Malcolme after he had raigned long victoriously with much honour in his declining age growing very covetous tooke away the lands he had formerly given to his Nobles for their good service in the wars and punished divers of the wealthiest men so severely that he brought many of them to death others to extreame poverty which injuries lost him all his love honour and so farre exasperated the people that partly out of revenge partly to prevent further oppressions and to provide for their owne securitie corrupting his servants with money they seat their agents into his chamber in the night and slew him Not to mention the murther of King Duncan by Machbed who usurped his Crowne through his pusillanimity this Machbed omitting no kind of libidinousnesse cruelty and tyrannizing over the people for 18 yeares soacâ— together trusting to the predictions of certaine wisards that he should neveâ— be overcome till Bernane wood did come to Dunsinane Castle and that he should never be slaine by any man borne of a woman At last Mackduffe governour of Fiffe joyning himselfe to some few patriots who had escaped this Tyrants sword met at Bernane wood and early in the morning every man bearing a bough in his hand the better to keepe them from discovery tooke Dunsinane Castle by scalado whence Machbed escaping was pursued overtaken and urged to â—ight â—p Mackduffe to whom the Tyrant replyed in scorne that in vaine hee attempted his death for it was his destinie never to be slaine by any man borne of a woman Now then said Mackduffe is thy fatall houre come for I never was borne of a woman but violently cut out of my mothers wombe she dying before I was borne which words so daunted the Tyrant though otherwise valiant that he was easily slaine and Malcolme Conmer the true heire of the Crowne seated in the Throne King Donald being odious and cruell to his subjects they sent for Duncan Malcombes bastard who expelled him the Realme and was created King in his steed who proving harsh cruell and Imperious to his Subjects fell into their hatred and was beheaded in the night by Marpender Earle of Murry corrupted with money by Donald to murther him Donald permitting the Isles to be taken and possessed by Magnus King of Norway and suffering his Realme to be wasted by a secret agreement thereupon the Scots sent for Edgar Malcombes sonne to take possession of the Crowne who entring into Scotland with small forces Donald being deserted by his people betooke himselfe to flight but being apprehended and brought backe to Edgar he was cast into prison and not long after dyed King Malcolm the fourth at a Parliament at Yorke parting with divers of
with Acts 13. 21. And afterward THEY DESIRED A KING and God gave them Saul the son of Cis by the space of forty years All these concurring sacred Texts will infallibly demonstrate that this change of the Iudges into Kings and the originall creation of their Kings and kingdoms proceeded only from the importunity and authority of the people who would not be gainsaid herein not from Gods institution or Samuels approbation who censured and disavowed this their motion though they at last condescended to it all which is elegantly related confirmed by Iosephus Antique Iudaeorum l. 6. c. 4 5 6 7. By all this it is apparent that the congregation and people of the Iews had the Soveraign power in themselves as well as other Nations because the authoritie to alter the whole frame of their former Aristocraticall Government into a Monarchy resided in them though they were taxed forchanging it in Samuels dayes who had so justly so uprightly judged them Secondly it is apparent that the Iudges and kings of the Israelites were not properly hereditary but oft elective by the people and though God did sometimes immediately nominate the persons of those that should reign over them as is apparent by Saul David Ieroboam Iehu others yet the people did constantly confirm make them kings and gave them their royall authority none being made kings by Divine appointment but such as they willingly accepted approved confirmed for their kings Gods previous designation being but a preparative to their voluntary free not restrained or limited election The first king among the Israelites though but over part of them was Abimelech the son of Ierubbaal who was made king by the peoples election Iudges 9. 1 to 7. who having perswaded those of Sechem to elect him for their king thereupon ALL THE MEN of Sechem gathered together and ALL THE HOVSE of Millo went and MADE ABIMELECH KING whence Iotham thus upbraided them and him Verse 14. to 19 Then said all the trees unto the Bramble come thou and reign over us And the Bramble said unto the trees If in truth ye annoint me king over you thèn come and put your trust in my shadow c. Now therefore if ye have done truly and sincerely in that YE HAVE MADE Abimelech KING c And that ye have risen up against my fathers house this day and have MADE Abimelech king c. We read Iudg. 8 21 23. that after Gideon had slain Zebab and Zalmunna with the Midianites The men of Israel said unto Gideon Rule thou over us both thou and thy sons and thy sons son also for thou hast delivered us from the hand of Midiaâ— And Gideon said unto them I will not rule over you neither shall my son rule over you the Lord shall rule over you Where we clearly see the power and right to elect a Ruler and to limit the government to him and his Issue for three Generations only to reside in the peoples free election So Iudges 10. 17 18. and Chap. 11. 1. to 12. When the Children of Ammon were gathered together and encamped against Gilead the people and Princes of Gilead said one to another What man is he that will begin to fight against the children of Ammon he shall be Head over all the Inhabitants of Gilead And the Elders of Gilead went to fetch Iephthah out of the Land of Tob and said unto him Come and be our Captain that we may fight with the Children of Ammon and be our Head over all the inhabitants of Gilead Vpon promise of which dignitie he went with them to Gilead and THE PEOPLE MADE HIM HEAD AND CAPTAIN OVER THEM That the election and making of their Kings belonged of right to all the people is past dispute being so resolved by God himself Deuter. 17. 14 15. When thou art come into the land c. and shalt say I WILL SET A KING OVER ME like as all the Nations that are about me THOV shalt in any wise SET HIM KING OVER THEE whom the Lord thy God shall choose one from among thy Brethren shalt THOV SET OVER THEE THOV MAIST NOT SET A STRANGER OVER THEE Where the power of creating and electing the King is left wholly to the peoples free choice with these generall restrictions that he should be one of their brethren not a stranger and particularly qualified as is there expressed And though God did sometime design and nominate their Kings yet he left the power of approbation and ratification of them free to the people as is apparent by 1 Sa. 8. 18. And ye shall crie in that day because of the King WHICH YE SHALL HAVE CHOSEN you Hence Saul their first King though nominated and designed by God and Samuel was yet approved confirmed and made King by the People Who shouted and said God save the King when Samuel presented him to them 1 Sam. 10. 24. But the children of Belial despising and bringing him no presents Verse 27. after Saul had conquered the Ammonites who besieged Iabesh Gilead The people said unto Samuel who is he that said Shall Saul Râ—ign over us bring the men that we may put them to death Then Saul said There shall not a man be put to death this day for this day the Lord haâ—h wrought salvation in Israel Then said Samuel to the people Come let us go to Gilgal and renew the Kingdom there And ALL THE PEOPLE went to Gilgal and there THEY MADE SAVL KING before the Lord in Gilgal Where Samuel useth this speech to the people concerning Saul Now therefore behold THE KING WHOM YE HAVE CHOSEN and whom Ye have desired the Lordhath set a King over you so that the choice and election of him was as well theirs as Gods And Verse 25. he calls him Your King because chosen and made by as well as for the people Saul being slain by his owne hands the Crown descended not to his sonne by way of descent but David succeeded him by Gods designation and the Peoples election too by whose authority he was made and crowned king being formerly annointed by Samuel to succeed Saul This is irrefragable by the 2 Sam. 2. 4. Where David going up to Hebron by Gods direction the men of Iudah came and there They Annointed David King over the House of Iudah After which 2 Samuel 5. 1. to 5. ALL THE TRIBES OF ISRAEL came to David to Hebron and spake saying Behold we are thy bone and thy flesh Also in time past when Saul was King over us thou wast he that leddest out and broughtest in Israel And the Lord said to thee Thou shalt feed my people Israel and thou shalt be a Captain over Israel So AL THE ELDERS of Israel came to the King at Hebron and King David made a League or Covenant with them before the Lord and THEY ANNOINTED DAVID KING OVER ISRAEL And in the 1 Chron. 12. 23. to 40. Wee have a particular recitall of the numbers of the bands that were ready armed to
the Warre and came to David to Hebron to TVRN the Kingdome of Saul TO HIM and came with a perfect heart to Hebron TO MAKE DAVID KING OVER ALL ISRAEL and ALL THE REST also of Israel were OF ONE HEART TO MAKE DAVID KING Whose title to the Crown being afterward shaken by his sonne Absalom who cunningly usurped it and that by the election of the people too as is evident by Hushai his speech unto him 2 Sam. 16. 18. Nay but whom the Lord and THIS PEOPLE AND ALL THE MEN OF ISRAEL CHOOSE his will I be and with him I will abide compared with 2. Sam. 29. 9 10. And all THE PEOPLE were at strife thorow all the Tribes of Israel saying Absalom whom WE ANOINTED OVER VS is dead c. A cleare evidence the kingdome was then held elective and that the people had the Soveraign power of electing and creating their kings all the people throughout all the Tribes of Israel and the men of Iudah to re-establish David in his Throne being fled out of the Land sent this Message to him Returne thou and all thy servants Whereupon the King returned and all the Tribes went as farre as Iordan to meet and bring him back again to Gilgal David growing old his son Adonijah against his consent accompanied with some great Officers and Courtiers of his party usurped the Crown and was by them saluted King but David hearing of it by Gods election and choise commanded Solomon though not his eldest sonne to be annointed and proclaimed King and to sit upon his Throne in his life time As soon as he was anointed and the Trumpet blew ALL THE PEOPLE said God save king Solomon And ALL THE PEOPLE came up after him and piped with fluits and rejoyced with great joy so that the earth rent with the sound of them So that all Adonijah his company forthwith deserted him and he and Ioab were glad to flee to the hornes of the Altar for shelter After which David assembled all the Princes of Israel the Princes of the Tribes the Captaines of Companies thousands and hundreds the Stewards Officers and mighty men with all the valiant men of his kingdome to Ierusalem then he declared to all the Congregation that God had chosen Solomon to sit upon the Throne of the kingdome of the Lord over Israel and to build him an house c. exhorting them to contribute liberally towards this building which they did and when they had blessed the Lord and offered Sacrifices to him ALL THE CONGREGATION MADE Solomon the sonne of David KING THE SECOND TIME AND ANOINTED HIM unto the Lord TO BE THE CHIEFE GOVERNOVR his first Coronation being but private without the presence and consent of the whole Realme but of those only then present in Ierusalem Then Solomon sate on the Throne of the Lord as king instead of David his Father and ALL ISRAEL OBEYED HIM and all the Princes and mighty men and likewise all the sonnes of David submitted themselves to him as their king after he was thus generally elected and crowned king the 2. time by all the Congregation And after Davids death he was established and strengthened in his kingdome by the peoples voluntary admission and free submission to him From which History of Solomon it is cleare 1. That though David caused Solomon to be first crowned King privately to prevent Adonijah his usurpation yet hee thought that title not sufficient without a second Election admission and Coronation of him by all the People and generall Congregation 2. That till this his second inauguration by all the people he was not generally acknowledged nor obeyed by all as their lawfull king 3. That Gods and Davids designation of Solomon to the Crown did not take away the peoples liberty right and power freely to nominate make and choose their kings their preuious designation being thus accompanied with this tacit condition that the people likewise should freely elect constitute and crown him for their king else what need of this their subsequent concurrent acceptance and second coronation of him for their king by all the congregation if their consents and suffrages were not necessary or how could he have raigned over them as their lawfull king had not the people generally chosen accepted admitted him for their Soveraigne Solomon deceasing Rehoboam his eldest sonne went up to Sechem what to doe not to claime the crown by discent from his Father but by election from the people as the following History manifests FOR ALL ISRAEL were come to Sechem TO MAKE HIM kING if to make him king then he was no king before they had made him as many Divines most sottishly averre against the very letter of the Text and Iosephus who writes That it pleased the Assembly of the Israelites there held that HEE SHOULD RECEIVE THE kINGDOM BY THE IEOPLES CONSENT And Ieroboam and ALL THE CONGREGATION OF ISRAEL came and spake unto Rehoboam saying Thy Father made our yoake grievous now therefore make thou the grievous service of thy Father and his heavy yoake which he put upon us lighter AND WE WILL SERVE THEE because naturally subjects delight in mild Kings who will somwhat descend from their altitudes saith Iosephus This was the condition they propounded to him before they would accept him for their king and upon this condition only would they admit him to reigne over them therefore doubtlesse the disposall of the Crown and limitation of the kings royall power resided in all the congregation who had authority to prescribe their kings what equall and just conditions they pleased And he said unto them depart yet for three dayes then come again to me and the people departed Hereupon Rehoboam consulted with the old men that stood before Solomon his Father while he lived and said how doe you advise that I may answer this people And they spake unto him saying If thou wilt be A SERVANT unto this people this day and wilt SERVE THEM and answer them and speak good words to them THEN THEY WILL BE THY SERVANTS FOR EVER But he forsooke the Counsell of the old men which they had given him and consulted with the young men that were grown up with him and which stood before him and following their ill advise when Ieroboam and all the People came to Rehoboam the third day as he had appointed the King answered the people roughly and forsaking the old mens Counsell he spake unto them after the Counsell of the young men saying My Father made your yoake heavy and I will adde to your yoake my Father chastised you with whips but I will chastise you with scorpions Wherefore the King HEARKNED NOT UNTO THE PEOPLE for the cause was from the Lord c. SO WHEN ALL ISRAEL SAW THAT THE KING HEARKNED NOT VNTO THE ME the People answered the King through indegnation with one voyce writes Iosephus saying What portion have we in David NEITHER HAVE WEE INHERITANC IN THE SONNE OF IESSE that is we have
not intailed our Subjection nor the inheritance of this our Realme to David and his seed for ever but are still free to elect what King we please to thy Tents O Israel Now see to thine House David so Israel departed to their Tentâ— But as for the children of Israel which dwelt in the Cities of Iudah Rehoboam reigned over them the Tribes of Iudah and Beniamin CHOOSING HIM THEIR KING BY THEIR COMMON SVFFRAGES writes Iosephus Then King Rehoboam sent Adoram who was over the Tribute to excuse saith Iosephus the petulancy of his young tongue and to appease the mindes of the enraged vulgar And all Israel stoned him with stones that he dyed therefore King Rehoboam imagining truly that himselfe was stoned in his servant and fearing lest the once conceived hatred should be poured out on his own head tremblingly getting up into his chariot as hastily as he could made speed to flee to Ierusalem Sâ— Israel fell away from the house of David unto this day And it came to passe when ALL ISRAEL heard that Ieroboam was come again that they sent and called him unto the Congregation AND MADE HIM KING OVER ALL ISRAEL c. it being so preordained by God 1 King 12. 26. to 41. Loe here the whole Congregation or Parliament of Israel if I may so stile it had full and free power to reject Rehoboam from the Crown for refusing to subscribe to their conditions to elect Ieroboam for their lawfull King and erect a new Kingdome of their owne divided ever after from that of Iudah which action I shall prove anon to be lawfull warranted by Gods owne divine authority and no sinne nor rebellion at all in the People who never admitted Rehoboam for or submitted to him as their lawfull Soveraigne So Iehu having slain King Ioram Ahabs eldest sonne sent a Letter to Samaria where his other 70 sonnes were brought up to the Rulers and Elders there wishing them to lookout THE BEST AND MEETEST of their Masters sonnes and set him on his Fathers throne and fight for their Masters bouse But they being exceedingly afraid said two Kings â—ould not stand before him how then shall we stand and sent word to Iehu We are thy servants and will doe all that thou shalt bid us WE WILL NOT MAKE ANY KING A clear evidence that the kingdom was then elective and that they had power to choose the meetest man not eldest brother for their king After this Zimri slaying Baasha king of usrael and usurping the Crown the people then encamped about Gibbethon hearing of it that Zimri had conspired and also slain the King Wherefore ALL ISRAEL MADE OMRI Captain of the Host king over Israel that day in the Campe who burat Zimri in his Palace then were the People divided into two parts halfe of the People followed Tibni to make him king and halfe followed Omri But the people that followed Omri prevailed against the people that followed Tibni so Tibni dyed and Omri Reigned being made king onely by the peoples free election without any divine designation So Ioash the sonne of Ahaziah when Athaliah had usurped the Crowne and kingdome of Iudah neer seven years space was MADE KING anointed and crowned by Iehoiadah the High Priest the Captaines of hundreds and ALL THE PEOPLE OF THE LAND who rejoyced at it when he was but 7. yeeres old and Athaliah was apprehended deposed and murthered by them as an Vsurpresse So Amaziah King of Iudah being slain by a Conspiracie at Lachish ALL THE PEOPLE OF IVDAH tooke Vzziah who was but 16. yeers old and MADE HIM KING instead of his Father Vzziah king of Iudah being smitten with Leprosie unto the day of his death dwelt in a severall house Iotham his son in the mean time by common consent was over this house judging the people of the Land Ammon king of Iudah being slain by his own servants the people of the Land slew all them that had conspired against Ammon And THE PEOPLE OF THE LAND MADE Iosiah his sonne King in his stead And after Iosiah his death the PEOPLE OF THE LAND took Iehoahaz the sonne of Iosiah and MADE HIM KING in his Fathers stead in Ierusalem From all which sacred Texts and Presidents as likewise from Hosea 8. 4. THEY HAVE SET VP KINGS But not by mee THEY HAVE MADE PRINCES and I knew it not it is most apparant that the kings of Israel and Iudah were usually elected by and derived their Royall authority from the people who made them kings and received not their kingdomes and Crowns immediatly from God himself by a divine right which may be further conmed by the 1. Macab 9. 28. 29. 30. After the death of Iudas Maccabeus all Iudas his friends came unto Ionathan his brother and said unto him since thy brother Iudas dyed we have none like to him to goe forth against our enemies Now therefore WEE HAVE CHOSEN THEE this day TO BE OVR PRINCE and Captain in his stead that thou maist fight our battells Vpon this Ionathan took the Government on him at that time After Ionathans death the People said unto Simon his brother with a lowd voyce 1 Mac. 13. 8. 9. Thou shalt be our Leader instead of Iudas and Ionathan thy brother fight thou our battels and whatsoever thou commandest us wee will doe And the Iewes and Priests were well pleased that Simon should be their Governour Captain and High Priest and Simon accepted thereof 1 Mac. 14. 41. to 49. Hence Carolus Sigonius de Repub. Hebraeorum l. 7. c. 3. writes That the kings of the Israelites were created by the Suffrages of the People that the Kingdome of Israel was translated to divers Families for their idolaâ—ry that although the kingdome of Iudah were in some sort hereditary yet it was confirmed by the Suffrages of the People which he proves by the example of Rehoboam and others and that they obtained the Royall dignity not onely by inheritance but likewise by the Suffrages of the People as every one may clearly know who shall but consider the Histories of their kings Which plainly refutes the wild impudent false assertion of the Author of An Appeale to thy Conscience newly published p. 13. where thus he writes Observable it is that thorowout the whole Scriptures we read not of Any King I doubt hee never read the Scriptures else he could not be so grossely mistaken THAT WAS CHOSEN BY THE VOYCE OF THE PEOPLE Nor of an Aristocracy that is where the Nobles govern nor of a Democracy that is where the people govern And therefore let them consider how they can answer it at the last day who shall endeavour to change an hereditary kingdome into an elective or any other forme of Government whatsoever that the people doe properly and absolutely make a king is false c. But had this illiterate ignoramus seriously perused the precedent or subsequent Texts here cited with the best Commentators on them or read over advisedly Iosh. 22. Iudges 17. 6. c.
forth with you my selfe also But the people answered Thou shalt not go forth for if we flee away they will not care for us neither if halfe of us die will they care for us but now thou art worth ten thousand of us therefore now is better that thou succour us out of the Citie And the king said unto them Whatsoever seemeth you good that I will doe and thereupon stayed behinde in the City as they advised him So he likewise followed Ioabs advice to go forth and sit in the gate and speak comfortably to the People after his mourning for Absalons death else not one of the People would have tarried with him that night 2 Samuel 19. 1. to 20. and by this means All the people came before him though they had formerly fled every man to his tent and he so engaged them to him That all the people were at strife thorowout all the Tribes of Israel to bring the King back again to Gilgal whence Absalon had chased him Adde to this the 1 Kings 12. 1. to 25. and 2 Chron. c. 10. and 11. where we finde that after Solomons death All Israel came to Sechem to make Rehoboam King and all the Congregation of Israel spake unto Rehoboam saying Thy father made our yoak grievous now therefore make thou the grievous service of thy Father and his heavy yoak which he put upon us lighter and we will serve thee And he said unto them Depart ye for three dayes and then come again and the people departed In the mean time he consulted first with the old men after that with the young men about him what answer he should return who giving contrary advice Ieroboam and all the people coming to him again the third day the King answered the people roughly after the counsell of the young men saying My Father made your yoke heavy and I will adde to your yoke My Father chastised you with whips but I will chastise you with scorpions So when all the people saw that the King hearkned not to them the people answered the King saying What portion have we in David neither have we inheritance in the son of Iesse to your tents ô Israel now see to thine own house David So Israel departed to their Tents and fell away from the house of David unto this day And all Israel called Ieroboam unto the Congregation and made him King over all Iâ—rael And the Text expresly addes this memorable observation Wherefore the King hâ—â—rkned not unto the people for the cause was from the Lord that he might pâ—rform his saying which the Lord spake by Abijah the Shilonite to Ieroboam the son of Nebatâ— Where we see the Kings not hearkning to the people and congregation of Israel in their just request and giving them an harsh answer was a sufficient ground and occasion for them to cast off his government and elect another King to reign over them and that with Divine approbation from God himself Such was the whole peopleâ— and congregations Soveraigne power over their Kings We reade in the 1 Kings 20. 1. to 10. that when Benhadad king of Syria gathered a great Host and sent to Aâ—ab king Israel to resign up all his silver gold Wives Children and pleasant things into the hand of his servants Then the king of Israel called all the Elders of the Lanâ— and â—aid Heark I pray you and see how this man seeketh mischief for he sent unto me for my Wives and for my Children for my silver and for my gold and I denyed him not And all the Elâ—ers and all the people said unto him Hearken not unto him nor consent Wherefore he said unto the messengers of Benhaded tell my Lord the King all that thou didst send for to thy servant at first I will do but this thing I may not do Where the Elders and people both advise and over-rule the King in this matter of great importance both to the Kingdom and Kâ—ng who returned no answer to this publike case without the congregations publik advise So Hezekiah king of Iudah sent to all Israel and Iudah and wrote Letters also to Ephraim and Manasseh that they should come to the house of the Lord at Ierusalem to keep the Passeover unto the Lord God of Israel For Hezekiah had taken counsell and his Princes and all the Congregation in Ierusalem to keep the Passeover in the second moneth for they could not keep it at that time because the people had not sanctified themselves sufficiently neither had the people gathered themselves together at Ierusalem and the thing pleased the King And all the Congregation So they established a Decrée to make Proclamation throughout all Israel from Bersheba even to Dan that they should come to keep the Passeover unto the Lord God of Israel at Ierusalem for they had not done it of a long time in such sort as it was written So the Posts went with the Letters from the King and the Princes throughout all Israel and Iudah c. vers 12. Also in Iudah the hand of God was to give them one heart to doe the Commandement of the King and of the Princes by the word of the Lord and vers 23. And the whole Assembly took Counsell to keep other seven dayes and they kept other seven dayes with gladnesse and All the Congregation of Iudah and Israel rejoyced vers 25. When all this was finished All Israel that were present went to the Cities of Iudah and brake the images in pieces and cut down the Groves and threw downe the high places and the Altars out of all Iudah and Benjamin in Ephraim also and Manasseth untill they had utterly destroyed them all Then all the Children of Israel returned every man to his possession into their owne City In the 2 Chron. 32. 3. When Hezekiah saw that Senacherib was come and that he was purposed to fight against Ierusalem He took Councell with his Princes and his mighty men to stop the waters of the Fountaine which were without the City and they did help him and there was gathered much people together who stopped all the Fountaines c. Adde hereunto that notable Text Ier. 38. 4. to 28. Where when the Prophet Ieremy had prophecied that Ierusalem should be given into the hands of the King of Babylons Army which should take it Therefore the Princes hereupon said unto the King we beseech thee let this man be put to death for thus he weakneth the hands of the men of Warre that remain in this City and the hands of all the people in speaking such words unto them for this man seeketh not the welfare of this people but the hurt Then Zedechiah the King said Behold he is in your hand For the King is not he that can doe any thing against you And Ier. 26. 8. to 29. Now it came to passe when Ieremiah had made an end of speaking all that the Lord had commanded him to speake unto all the people that the Priests the
a certain Epitome of them should be extraordinarily assembled Wee see this order to have been in the kingdome of Israel which by the judgement almost of all polititians was best of all constituted The king had his Bakers Butlers Chamâ—berlaines Masters and Stewards of his House who overlooked his Family the kingdom had likewise its Officers 71. Elders and Captains chosen out of every tribe who might take care of the Republike in time either of peace or warre and finally its Magistrates in every Town who were every one to defend their Rites as the others the whole kingdome which he proves to be above their kings and to over-rule them in the forecited passage Such were the 7. Magi or wise men in the Persian Empire being as it were Consorts of the Royall Honor and who were called the kings eyes and eares with whose judgement we read the kings rested satisfied Such were the Ephori in the Spartan Realm to whom they appealed from the king and who did likewise judge the kings themselves as it is in Aristotle In the Aegyptian kingdome the publike Ministers were elected and assigned to the king by the people onely to this end that he should commit nothing against the Lawes Now as Aristotle every where calls those lawfull kings to whom such Officers are adioyned so likewise he feares not to say where they are wanting that there is not a Monarchy but either plaâ—â—ly a barbarous tyrannie or a domination next to Tyrannie In the Roman State the Senators obtained this place and the Magistrates ufually chosen by the people the Tribune of the Consuls the president of the City and the rest so as there lay an appeale from the king to the people which Seneca cites out of Tullies Book of the Republike and the History of Horatius Tergeminus condemned by the Royall Iudges for the murder of his sister and absolved by the people sufficiently evidenceth But under the Emperours the Senate Consuls Pretors Pretorian Perfects Presidents of Provinces which were given to the people and Senate were therefore all called the Magistrates of the people of Rome Therefore when as by the Decree of the Senate Maximinus the Emperour was iudged an enemy of the Republike and Mazimus and Albinus were created Emperors by the Senate against him the Souldiers took an oath that they would Fathfully obey the people of Rome the Senate Emperor howsoever this law might be violated under tyranny As for the Empires at this day as the Turkish Muscovitish and others of this kind which are rather great Robberies then Empires there is not one of them which if not at this time was not at least in times past governed in this manner But if it be come to passe through the Magistrats fault and sloathfulnes that in some places posterity have received a worser Common weal notwithstanding those who at this day possesse these Offices are bound as much as in them is to revoke all things to their ancient state In the German Empire which is conferred by election there are Princes and Electors as well Laicks as Ecclesiasticks Earles Barons Cities Embassadors of Cities who as they have the care of the Commonweale in their severall places so likewise in generall Assemblies or diets whenthere is needs they represent the Majesty of the whole Empire where they are bound to care that the Republike sustain no detriment by the private endeavours or hatreds of the Emperour Therefore there is one Chancellour of the Empire another of the Emperour other and different Officers besides both of the one and other divers Exchequers divers Treasurers and therfore it is a coÌ„mon saying that the Empire is preferred before the Emperor so as the Emperor may be every where said to do homage to the Empire Likewise in the Realm of Poland the Bishops Palatines Castellans Nobles Deputies of Cities and Counties are extraordinarily assembled in whose assembly onely new constitutions are made and wars decréed But ordinarily the councellers of the Realm of Poland the Chancellor of the Polish Repub. c. although the King in the mean time hath his own Chamberlains Stewards Ministers Domesticks But he who will dispute among the Polonians whether the King or the whole people of the Kingdom represented by the Estates of the Realm be greater doth just like him who should dispute at Venice whether the Duke or the Republike were the superior But what shal we say of those kingdomes which are wont to be carried by succession Verily the thing is no otherwise there The Realm of France which not long since was preferred before the rest both for the excellency of Laws and Orders was thus constituted in times past and although those who hold that place do not sufficiently discharge their duty yet they are not thereby the lesse obliged to do it The king verily hath his great Master or Arch-Steward his Chamberlains Hunters Guaâ—d Butlers and the rest whose Offices heretofore did so depend on the King that he dying themselves seemed also to die in their Office so that even yet after the end of the mourning royall the great Master or Arch-Steward is wont to pronounce certain conceived words wherewith he dismisseth the royall family and bids every one provide for himself Yet notwithstanding the Kingdom of France hath its Officers the master of the Palace who afterwards was stiled the Earl of the Stable the Marshals Admirall Chancellour or great Referendary Secretaries Treasurers and Officers who verily heretofore WERE NOT CREATED BUT IN THE GREAT PUBLIKE COVNCELL of the three Orders of the Clergie Nobilitie and people but since the standing Parliament was ordained at Paris they are not thought setled in their Offices before they be received and approved by the Senate of Paris neither can they be casheer'd without their consent and authority Now all these first plight their faith TO THE KINGDOM that iâ— to all the people after that to the King as the Guardian thereof which is perspicuous even from the very form of the Oath But especially the Earl of the Stable when he is girded by the King with the Liliated sword as appears by the words which he pronounceth is girded to that purpose THAT HE MAY DEFEND AND PROTECT THE REPVBLIKE Moreover the Realm of France hath its Peers as Consuls of the King or its Senators as the Fathers of the Republike every of them denominated from the severall Provinces of the Kingdome to whom the King being to bee crowned is wont to plight his faith as to the whole Kingdome from whence it appeares THAT THEY ARE SVPERIOR TO THE KING These again likewise wear that they will defend not the King BVT THE ROYALL CROWN that they will assist THE REPVBLIKE with their councell and that for this end they will be present in the sacred Councell of the Prince in time of Peace or Warre as manifestly appears out of the formulary of the Peership Therefore by the Law of Lombardy in giving sentences they did not onely
blinde King who could not lead them to the warres in person And Ethodius the 2 d king of Scotland being dull of wit given to avarice and nothing meete to governe the Realme thereupon the Nobles tooke upon them the governmeÌ„t appointing Rulers in every Province so continued them all his reigne leaving him nothing but the bare title of a King not depriving him thereof out of the respect they gave to the family of Fergusius but yet taking away all his regall power And not to multiply cases or examples of this nature Andrew Favine in his Theatre of Honour out of the Chronicle of Lauresheâ—m and Aâ—monius in his 4 th Booke of the History of France relates a notable resolution given by the Parliament Estates of France in this very point In the yeare 803. Lewes the Deâ—onnaire king of France holding his Parliament in May there came thither from strange Provinces two Brethren kings of Vuilses who with frank free good will submitted themselves to the judgement of the said â—arliament to which of them the kingdome should belong The elder of these two brethren was named Miligastus and the yonger Celeaâ—raeus Now albeit the custome of the said kingdome adjudged the Crowne to the eldest according to the right of 〈◊〉 allowed and practised by the Law of Nature and of later memory in the person of the last dead King Liubus father to the two contendants yet notwithstanding in regard that the Subjects by universall consent of the kingdome had rejected the elder brother FOR HIS COWARDISE AND EVILL GOVERNMENT cum secundam ritum ejus gentis commissum sibi Regnum parum digne administraret and had given the Crown to the younger brother FOR HIS VALOVR DISCREETE CARRIAGE after full hearing of both parties BY SENTENCE of PARLIAMENT the Kingdome was adjudged to the younger Brother statâ—â—t ut junior frater delatam sibi à Populo suo potâ—statem haberet c and thereupon the eldest did him homage with oath of Alleigance in the said Parliament and submitted to this sentence And upon this very ground in some of our ancient British and Saxons Kings Reignes when the right heire to the Crowne was an infant unable to defend his kingdome and people against invading enemies the Crowne hath commonly descended to the Vncle or next heire of full age who was able to protect them and repulse their enemies till the right heire accomplished his compleat age as I have elsewhere manifested If then a Kingdome by generall consent may elect a new King to defend and preserve it in case of invasion and eminent danger of ruine by forraigne enemies when their present King either cannot or will not doe his duty in protecting them from their enemies and exposeth them for a prey to their devastations as these examples and authorities conclude they may though I will not positively determine so Then certainely by equall semblable and greater reason subjects may lawfully take up necessary defensive Armes against their Kings when they shall not onely desert but actually invade and wage warre against them destroy and wast them in an open Hostile manner and handle them as cruelly as the worst of enemies such a wilfull unnaturall Hostile invasion being farre worse than any cowardly or bare desertion of theÌ„ when they are invaded by a forraign enemy And if Kings in case of â—otâ—ishnesse or Lunacy may be lawfully deposed from their kingdomes by common consent of their Realmes when they are altogether unfit or unable to governe as Bishop Bilson asserts and I have manifested elsewhere then much more may they be lawfully resisted by force without guilt of Treason or Rebellion when they wilfully and maliciously contrary to their oath and duty cast off their Royall governments the protection of their subjects and wage open warre against them to enslave or ruine them If a Father shall violently and unjustly assault his sonne a husband his wife a master his servant a Major or other inferior Officer a Citizen to murther maime or ruine them They may in such a case by the Law of Nature God man resist repulse them in their owne defence without any crime at all as dayly practise experimentally manifests yea they may sweare the peace against them and have a Writ de securitate Pacis in such cases Therefore by the selfefame reason they may resist the King and his Army in like cases there being no more humane nor divine Law against resistance in the one case than in the other Finally it is the resolution of Iohn Bodin and others who deny the lawfulnesse of Subjects taking up Armes against their Soveraigne Prince or offering violence to his person though he become a Tyrant That if a Soveraigne Prince or King by lawfull election or succession turnâ— a Tyrant he may lawfully at his Subjects request be invaded resisted condâ—mâ—ed or slaine by a forraigne Prince For as of all Noble acts none is more honourable or glorious then by way of fact to defend the honour goods and lâ—ves of such as are unjustly oppressed by the power of the more mighty especially the gate of Iustice being shut against them thus did Moses seeing his brother the Israelite beaten and wronged by the Egyptian and no meanes to have redresse of his wrongs So it is a most faire and magnificall thing for a Prince to take up Armes to releive a whole Nation and people unjustly oppressed by the cruelty of a Tyrant as did the great Hercuâ—es who travelling over a great part of the world with wonderfull power and valour destroyed many most horrible monsters that is to say Tyrants and so delivered people for which he was numbred among the gods his posterity for many worlds of yeares after holding most great Kingdomes And other imitators of his vertue as Dio Timoilion Aratus Harmodius Aristogiton with other such honourable Princes bearing Titles of chastisers and correctors of Tyrants And for that onely cause Tamerlain Emperour of the Tartars denounced warre unto Bajazet King of the Turkes who then besieged Constantinople saying That he was comming to chastise his Tyrannie and to deliver the afflicted people and vanquishing him in battle routed his Army and taking the Tyrant prisoner he kept him in chains in an Iron Cage till he dyed Neither in this case is it materiall that such a vertuous Prince being a stranger proceede against a Tyrant by open forcâ— or fiercenesse or else by way of justice True it is that a valient and worthy Prince having the Tyrant in his power shall gaine more honour by bringing him unto his tryall to chastise him as a murtherer a manqueller and a robber rather than to use the Law of Armes against him Wherefore let us resolve on this that it is lawfull for any stranger Prince to kill a Tyrant that is to say a man of all men infamed and notorious for the oppression murder and slaughter of his subjects and people And in this sort
grievances I ought not to prostitute my selfe to his mercy Neither would this be for the Kings honour that I should consent unto his will which is not grounded upon reason Yea I should doe an injury to him and to Iustice which he ought to use towards his Subjects and to maintaine And I should give an ill example to all by deserting Iustice and the prosecution of right for an erronious will against all Iustice and the injury of the Subjects For by this it would appeare that we loved our worldly possessions more then Iustice it selfe And whereas the Kings Counsellours object that wee have combined with the Kings capitall enemies namely the French Scots Welsh out of hatred and dammage to king and kingdome That of the French is altogether false and that of the Scots and Welsh too excepting the king of Scots and Leoline Prince of North-â—ales who were not the kings enemies but faithfull friends untill by injuries offered them by the King and his Counsell they were by coertion against their wills alienated from their fidelitie as I am And for this cause I am confederated with them that we may the better being united then separated regaine and defend our rights of which we are unjustly deprived and in a great part spoiled Whereas the Kings Counsell propose that I ought not to confide in my Confederates because the King without any great hurt to his Land can easily separate them from my friendship Of this I make no great doubt but by this the iniquity of his Counsellors doth most of all appeare that in some sort they would cause the King to sustaine losse by those whom he specially calls capitall enemies to injure mee who have alwaies beene his faithfull Subject whiles I remained with him and yet would be so if he would restore to me and my friends our right Whereas the said Counsellors say that the Pope and Church of Rome doe specially love the King and kingdome and will Excommunicate all his adversaries which thing is even at the dores because they have already sent for a Legate It pleaseth mee well said the Marshall because the more they love the King and kingdome by so much the more will they desire that the King should treat his Realme and Subjects according to justice And I am well pleased they should excommunicate the adversaries of the Kingdome because they are those who give Counsell against Iustice whom workes will manifest because Iustice and Peace have kissed each other and because of this where Iustice is corrupted Peace is likewise violated Also I am pleased that a Legate is comming because the more discreet men shall heare our justice by so much the more vilely shall the adversaries of Iustice be confounded In which notable discourse we see the lawfullnesse of a necessary defensive Warre yeelded and justified both by the King his Counsell and the Earle Marshall as well against the King himselfe if he invade his Subjects first as any of his Forces who assist him After which the Marshall flew many of his Enemies by an Ambufâ—ado while they thought to surprise him and wasted and spoiled their goods houses lands observing this generall laudable rule which they made to doe no hurt nor ill to any one but to the Kings evill Counsellors by whom they were banished whose goods houses woods Orchards they â—poiled burnt and rooted up The King remaining at Glocester heard of these proceedings of the Marshall but his forces being too weake he durst not encounter him but retired to Winchester with Bishop Peter confounded with over much shame leaving that Country to be wasted by his adversaries where innumerable carcases of those there slaine lay naked and unburied in the wayes being food to the beasts and birds of prey a sad spectacle to passengers which so corrupted the ayre that it infected and killed many who were healthy Yet the Kings heart was so hardned by the wicked councell he followed against the Marshall that the Bishops admonishing him to make peace with him WHO FOVGHT FOR IVSTISE he answered that he would never make peace with him unlesse comming with an halter about his necke and acknowledging himselfe to be a Traytor he would implore his mercy The Marshall both in England and Iâ—eland professed that he was no Traytor that his warre being but defensive was just immutabiliter affirmans quod 〈◊〉 sibi de jâ—re quod suum er at reâ—etere posse Regis Coâ—sil orum sicorum modis omnibus quibus poterat infirmare William Roshanger in his continuation of Matthew Paris speaking of the death of Simon Monfort Earle of Leycester slaine in the Battle of Evâ—sham the greatest Pillar of the Barrons warres useth this expression Thus this magnificent Earle Symon ended his labors who not onely bestowed his estate but his peâ—son also for releiefe of the oppression of the poore for the asserting of Iustice and the right of the Realme he was commendably skilfull in learning a dayly frâ—quenter of divine Offices constant in word severe in countenance most confiding in the prayers of Religious persons alwayes very respectfull to Ecâ—lesiasticall persons He earnestly adheared to Robert Grosthead Bishop of Lincolne and committed his children to his education By his advise he handled difficult things attempted doubtfull things concluded things begun specially such things whereby he thought he might gaine desert Which Bishop was said to have enjoyned him as he would obtaine remission of his sinnes that he should undertake this cause for which he contended even unto death affirming that the peace of the Church of England could never be estaâ—lished but by thâ— materiall sword and constantly averting THAT ALL WHO DIED FOR IT WERE CROWNED WITH MARTYRDOME Some say that this Bishop on a time laying his hand on the head of the Earles eldest sonne said unto him O most deare sonne thou and thy father shall both dye on one day and with one hand of death YET FOR IVSTICE AND TRVTH Fame reports that Symon after his death grew famous by many miracles which for feare of the King came not in publicke Thus this Historian thus Robert Grosthead the most devout and learned Bishop of that age who most of any opposed the Popes Vsurpations and exactions determine of the justice and lawfulnesse of the Barons Warres Walter Bishop of Worcester concurring in the same opinion with Grosthead The same author Rishanger records that the Earle of Glocester a great stickler in these warres against the king with whom at last he accorded signified to the King by his Letters Patents under his seale that he would never â—eure Armes against the King his Lord nor against his Sonne Prince Edward NISI DEFENDO but onelâ— in his Defence which the King and Prince accepting of clearely proves that defensive Armes against King or Prince were in that age generally reputed Lawfull by King Prince Prelates Nobles People I may likewise adde to this what I read in Matthew Westminster that Richard Bishop of
of England and Scotland beene resolved and declared to be no Treason no Rebellion at all against the King by the very same or better reason all circumstances duely pondered our Parliaments present taking up Armes and making a Defensive Warre for the endes aforesaid neither is nor can be adjudged Treason or Rebellion in point of Law or Iustice. In fine the King himself in his Answer to the 19. Propositions of both Houses Iune 3. 1642. Confesseth and calleth God to witnesse That aâ— the Rights of his Crowne are vested in hâ—m for his Subjects sake That the Prinâ—e may not make use of his high and perpetuall power to the hurt of those for whose good he hath it nor make use of the name of publike Necessity for the gaine of his private Favourites and Followers to the detriment of his people That the House of Commons may impeach those who for their owne ends though countenanced with any surreptitiously gotten Command of the King have violated that Law which he is â—ound when he knowes it to protect and to protection of which they were bound to advise him at least Not to serve him in the Contrary let the Cavalleers and others consider this and the Lords being trusted with a Iudiciary power are an excellent screene and banke betweene the King and people to assist each against any Incroachments of the other and by just Iudgements to preserve that Law which ought to be the Rule of every one of the three Therefore the power Legally placed in both Houses Being more then sufficient to prevent and restraine the power of Tyranny by his Majesties owne Confession it must needs be such a power as may legally inable both Houses when Armes are taken up against them by the King or any other to subvert Lawes Liberties Religion and introduce an Arbitrary government not onely to make Lawes Ordinances and Assessements but likewise to take up Armes to defend and preseve themselves their Lawes Liberties religion and to prevent restraine all forces raysed against them to set up Tyranny else should they want not onely a more then sufficient but even a sufficient necessary power to prevent and restraine the power of Tyranny which being once in armes cannot bee restraned prevented repulsed with Petitions Declarations Lawes Ordinances or any Paper Bulwarkes and Fortifications or other such probable or possible meanes within the Parliaments power but onely by Armes and Militarie Forces as reason and experience in all Ages manifest From all which pregnant punctuall domesticke Authorities and resolutions of Ancient Moderne and present times I presume I may infallibly conclude That the Parliaments present taking up necessary Defensive Armes is neither Treason nor Rebellion in iudgement of Law but a iust and lawfull Act for the publicke benefit and preservation of King Kingdome Parliament Lawes Liberties Religion and so neither their Generall Souldiers nor any person whatsoever imployed by them in this War or contributing any thing towards its maintenance are or can be Legally indicted prosecuted or in any manner proceeded against as Traitors Rebels Delinquents against the King or Kingdome and that all Proclamations Declarations Indictments or proceedings against them or any of them as Traitors Rebels or Delinquents are utterly unlawfull uniust and ought to be reversed as meere Nullities It would be an infinite tedious labour for me to relate what Civilians and Canonists have written concerning Warre and what Warre is just and lawfull what not In briefe they all generally accord That no Warre may or ought to be undertaken cut of covetousnesse lust ambition cruelty malice desire of hurt revenge or fer booty propter praedam enim militare peccatum est Whence Iohn Baptist Luke 3. 14. gave this answer to the Souldiers who demanded of him what shall we doe Doe violence to no man neither accuse any man falsly and be content with your wages Ne dum sumptus quaeritur praedo grassetur Which prooves the Warres of our plundring pillaging Cavalleers altogether sinnefull and unjust And that such a Warre onely is just which is waged for the good and necessary defence of the Common-wealth by publike Edict or consent or to regaine some thing which is unjustly detained or taken away and cannot otherwise be acquired or to repell or punish some injury or to curbe the insolency of wicked men or preserve good men from their uniust oppressions which Warres ought onely to be undertaken out of a desire of Peace as they prove out of Augustine Gregory Isidor Hispalensis and others In one word they all accord That a necessary defensive Warre to repulse an Injury and to preserve the State Church Republike Freedomes Lives Chastities Estates Lawes Liberties Religion from unjust violence is and ever hath beene lawfull by the Law of Nature of Nations yea By all Lawes whatsoever and the very dictate of Reason And that a necessary defensive Warre is not properly a Warre but a meere Defence against an unlawfull Violâ—nce And therefore must of necessitie be acknowledged lawfull because directly opposite to and the onely remedy which God and Nature have giuen men against Tyrannicall and unjust invasions which are both sinnefull and unlawfull And so can be no Treason no Rebellion no crime at all though our Princes or Parents be the unjust assailâ—nts Of which see more in Hugo Grotius de Iure Belli l. 2. c. 1. I shall closeup the Civillians and Canonists Opinions touching the lawfulnesse of a Defensive Warre with the words of Albericus Gentilis Professor of Civill Law in the Vniversitie of Oxford in Queene Elizabeths Raigne Who in his learned Booke De Iure Belâ—i Pacis Dedicated to the most illustrious Robert Devoreux Earle of Essex Father to the Parliaments present Lord Generall determines thus Lib. 1. cap 13 pag. 92. c. Although I say there be no cause of warre from nature yet there are causes for which we undertake warre by the conduct of nature as is the cause of Defence and when warre is undertaken because something is denied to to be granted which nature it selfe affords and therefore because the Law of nature is violated Warre is undertaken We say there is a three fold Defence one Necessary another Profitable a third Honest yet wee shall deeme them all Necessary He who defends himselfe is said to be necessitated neither will Baldus have us distinguish whether he defend himselfe his goods or those under his charge whether neere or remote His defence is necessary and done for necessary defence against whom an armed enemy comes and his against whom an enemy prepares himselfe and to such a one the same Baldus truly teacheth ayde is due by compact whom others likewise approve This warre we may say was anciently undertaken against Mithridates and against his great preparations Neither ought wise men to expect till he had professed himselfe an enemy but to looke more into his deeds then words Thus whiles we say necessity we speake not
the king or his invading Forces though they indeavour to subvert Religion Laws Liberties as the Doctor himself states the controversie whose arguments will hardly satisfie conscience being so voyd of reason â—ence yea science The eighth is this None of the Prophets in the old Testament reprehending the Kings of Israel and Iudah for their grosse Idolatry cruelty oppression did call upon the Elders of the people for the duty of resistance neither do we finde the people resisting or taking up Arms against any of their kings no not against Ahab or Manasseh upon any of these grounds Ergo resistance is unlawfull To which I must reply first That none of the Prophets did ever forbid resistance in such cases under pain of Damnation as our new Doctors do now Ergo it was lawfull because not prohibited Secondly that as none of the people werethen inhibited to resist so not dehorted from it therefore they might freely have done it had they had hearts and zeal to do it Thirdly Iosephus resolves expresly That by the very Law of God Deuter. 17. If the King did contrary to that Law multiply silver gold and horses to himself more then was fitting the Israelites might lawfully resist him and were bound to do it to preserve themselves from Tyrannie Therefore no doubt they might have lawfully resisted their Kings Idolatry cruelty oppressions Fourthly Hulderichus Zuinglius a famous Protestant Divine with others positively affirms That the Israelites might not onely lawfully resist but likewise depose their Kings for their wickednesses and Idolatries yea That all the people were justly punished by God because they removed not their flagitious idolatrous Kings and Princes out of their places which he proves by Ieâ—em 15. where after the four Plagues there recited the Prophet subjoynes the cause of them saying Verse 4. I will give them in fury to all the Kingdoms of the Earth that is I will stirre up in fury all the kings of the earth against them because of Manasseh the son of Hezekiah king of Iudah for that which he did in Ierusalem This Manasseh had committed many wickednesses by Idolatrie and the shedding of innocent blood as we may see in the one and twentieth Chapter of the second of the Kings for which evills the Lord grievously punished the people of Israel Manasseh shed over much innocent blood untill he had filled Ierusalem even to the mouth with his sins wherewith he made Iudah to sinne that it might do evill before the Lord Therefore because Manasseh King of Iudah did these most vile abominations above all that the Amorites had done before him and made the Land of Iudah to sin in his uncleanesse therefore thus saith the Lord God of Israel Behold I will bring evill upon Ierusalem and Iudah that whosever shall hear both his ears shall tingle c. In summe if the Iews had not thus permitted their King to be wicked WITHOVT PVNISMENT they had not been so grievously punished by God We ought to pull and cast away even our eye that offends so a hand and foot c. If the Israelites had thus DEPOSED Manasseh by consent and suffrages of all or the greatest part of the multitude they had not been so grievously punished of God So Zuinglius with whom even B. Bilson himself in some sort accords who in desending interpreting his opinion confesseth That it is a question among the Learned What Soveraigney the whole people of Israel had over their Kings confessing that the peoples rescuing Ionathan that he â—â—ed not when Saul would have put him to death Davids speech to the people when he purposed to reduce the Arke all the Congregations speech and carriage toward Rehoboam when they came to make him King with the peoples speech to Ieremy Thou shalt die the death have perswaded some and might lead Zuinglius to think that the people of Israel notwithstanding they called for a King yet RESERVED TO THEMSELVES SVFFICIENT AVTHORITY TO OVERRVLE THEIR KING IN THOSE THINGS WHICH SEEMED EXPEDIENT AND NEEDFVLL FOR THE PVBLIKE WELFARE else God would not punish the people for the kings iniquity which they must suffer and not redresse Which opinion if as Orthodox as these learned Divines and Iosephus averre it not onely quite ruines our Opposites Argument but their whole Treatises and cause at once But fiftly I answer that subiects not onely by command of Gods Prophets but of God himself and by his speciall approbation have taken up Arms against their Idolatrous Princes to ruine them and their Posterities A truth so apparent in Scripture that I wonder our purblinde Doctors discern it not For did not God himself notwithstanding his frequent conditionall promises to establish the Kingdom of Israel on David Solomon and their Posterity for Solomons grosse Idolatry occasioned by his Wives tell Solomon in expresse terms VVherefore for as much as this is done of thee and thou hast not kept my Covenant and my Statutes which I have commanded thee I will surely REND THE KINGDOM FROM THEE and will give it to thy servant Notwithstanding in thy dayes I will not do it for David thy fathers sake but I will rend it out of the hand of thy son Did not the Prophet Abijah in pursuance hereof rending Ieroboams garment into twelve pieces tell him Thus saith the Lord the God of Israel behold I will rend the Kingdom out of the hand of Solomon and will give ten tribes to thee And I will take the Kingdom out of his sons hand and will give it unto thee even ten Tribes and I will take thee and thou shalt reign according to all that thy soul desireth and shalt be King over Israel and I will for this afflict the Seed of David Yea did not ALL ISRAEL upon Solomons death when Rehoboam his son refused to grant their iust requests at their coming to Sechem to make him king use this speech to the king What Portion have we in David neither have we inheritance in the son of Iesse to your Tents ô Israel now see to thine own house David Whereupon they departed and fell away from the house of David everafter and made Iereboam King over all Israel And doth not the Text directly affirm Wherefore Rehoboam hearkned not unto the people for the cause was from the Lord that he might perform the saying which the Lord spake to Abijah unto Ieroboam the son of Nebat After which when Rehoboam raised a mighty Army to reduce the ten Tribes to obedience the Word of the Lord came to Shemaiah the man of God saying Speak unto Rehoboam and all the house of Iudah and Benjamin Thus SAITH THE LORD Ye shall not go up to fight against your brethren the children of Israel return every man to his house FOR THIS THING IS FROM ME They hearkned therefore to the word of the Lord and returned to depart according to the word of the Lord. Lo here a
ever used by the Apostles Evangelists Jewes to expresse the Emperour by but that of Caesar not this of King Therefore Peters Text speaking onely of the King not Caesar cannot be intended of the Romane Emperour as ignorant Doctors blindly fancie Fifthly This Epistle of Peter the Apostle of the Iews was written onely to the dispersed Iews thorowout Pontus Galatia Cappadocia Asia and Bythinia 1 Pet. 1. 1. over whom Herod at that time reigned as King by the Romane Senates and Emperours appointment who had then conquered the Iews and made them a tributarie Province as is evident by Matth. 27. 17 21. Mark 12. 14 16 17. Luke 20. 22 24 25. chap. 23. 2. Acts 17. 7. chap. 25. 8 10 11 12 21. chap. 27. 24. chap. 12. 1. to 24. compared together and by Iosepâ—us the Century writers Baronius Sigonius and others The King then here mentioned to be supreame was Herod or King Agrippa or some other immediate King of the Iews who was their supreame Governour not absolutely but under the Romane Senate and Emperours and made so by their appointment whence called in the Text an Ordinance of man not God Now this King of the Jews as is evident by Pauls Appeal to Caesar from Festus and King Agrippa as to the Soveraign Tribunall Acts 25. and 26. by Iosephus Pâ—ilo Iudâ—us de legatione ad Caium and the consent of all Historians was not the absolute Soveraigne Power but subordinate to the Romane Emperour and Senate who both created and bad power to controll remove and censure him for his misdemeanours yet Peter calls him here Supreame because the Highest Governour under them as we stile our Kings Supreame Governours under Christ. Therefore having a Superiour Governour and Power over him to which he was accountable and subordinate Supreame in the Text cannot be meant of a King absolutely Supreame having no Power Superiour to him but God but onely relatively Supreame in respect of under Governours there actually residing whose Supremacie being forcibly gained onely by conquest not free consent and the ancient native Kings of the Iews being inferiour to their whole Senates and Congregations and to do all by their advice as Iosephus Antiq. Iud. lib. 4. cap. 8. 2. Sam. 18. 3 4. Jer. 38. 45. 1. Chron. 13. 1. to 6. attest will no way advantage our Opposites nor advance the Prerogative of Kings since it extends onely to the King of the Jews that then was who was not simply Supream but a Subject Prince subordinate to the Romane State and Empire and one appointed by a Conquerour not freely chosen and assented to by the people So as all the Argument which can hence be extracted for the absolute Soveraigntie and irresistibility of Kings over their whole Kingdomes and Parliaments is but this The King of the Iews was in Peters time the Supreame Magistrate over that Nation by the Romane Senates and Emperours appointment to whom yet he was subordinate and accountable the Romanes having conquered the Iewes by force and imposing this government upon them without their consents Therefore the Kings of England and all other Kings are absolute Soveraigne Monarches Superiour to their whole Parliaments and Kingdomes collectively considered and may not in point of conscience be forcibly resisted by them though they endeavour to subvert Religion Laws Liberties How little coherence there is in this Argument the silliest childe may at first discern From these Scriptures I descend to Reasons deduced from them against resistance which I shall contract into three ArgumentS The first is this Kings are the Fathers Heads Lords Shepherds of the Common-wealth Ergo They ought not to be resisted in any their exorbitant proceedings it being unlawfull unseemly â—or a Son to resist his Father the Members the Head the Vassals their Lord the Flock their Shepherd To this I answer1 First They are Fathers Shepherds Lords Heads onely in an improper allegoricall not genuine sence therefore nothing can thence be properly inferred They are and ought to be such in respect of their loving and carefull affection towards their Subjects not in regard of their Soveraigne Power over them Therefore when their Tyrannie makes them not such in regard of care and affection to their people their people cease to be such in regard of filiall naturall and sheep-like submission When these Shepherds turn Wolves these Fathers Step-fathers the Subjects as to this cease to be their Sheep their Children in point of Obedience and Submission Secondly If we consider the Common-weal and Kingdom collectively Kings are rather their Kingdoms children then Parents because created by them their publike servants ministers for whose benefit they are imployed and receive wages not their Soveraigne Lords their subordinate Heads to be directed and advised by them not Tyrannically to over-rule them at their pleasure Therefore Paramount and able in such cases to resist them Thirdly Parishioners may no doubt lawfully resist the false Doctrinâ—s and open assâ—ults of their Ministers though they be their Spirituall Shepherds Citizens the violent oppressions of their Maiors though they be their Politique Heads Servants the unjust assâ—ults of their Masters though their lawfull Lords who may not misuse their very Villaines by Law And if Parents will violently assault their naturall children Husbands their Wives Masters their Servants to murther them without cause they may by Law resist repulse them with open force Fourthly A Son who is a Judge may lawfully resist imprison condemne his naturall Father A Servant his Lord A Parishioner his Pastour a Citizen his Major a meer Gentleman the greatest Peer or Lord as experience proves because they do it in another capacity as Judges and Ministers of publike Justice to which all are subject The Parliament then in this sence as they are the representative Body of the Realm not private Subjects and their Armies by their authority may as they are the highest Soveraign Power and Judicature resist the King and his Forces though he be their Father Head Shepherd Lord as they are private men Fifthly This is but the common exploded Argument of the Popish Clergy To prove themselves superiour to Kings and exempt from all secular Iurisdiction because they are spirituall Fathers Pâ—â—stors Heads to Kings who ought to obey not judge and censure them as Archbish. Stratford and others argue But this plea is no ways available to exempt Clergy men from secular Jurisdiction from actuall resistance of parties assaulted nor yet from imprisonment censures and capitall executions by Kings and Civill Magistrates in case of capitall Crimes Therefore by like reason it can not exempt Kings from the resistance censures of their Parliaments Kingdoms in case of tyrannicall invasions We deride this Argument in Papists as absurd as in sufficient to prove the exemption of Clergy men I wonder therefore why it is now urged to as little purpose against resistance of Tyrants and oppressing Kings and
sword he openly commanded him before all to use the same even against his owne person if he governed not the Empire well or violated Law and Equity confessing thereby that he was subject not only to the Lawes but to the sword of Justice too in these Officers hands in case he did offend much more then to the Senate I read of the Emperor Decius elected by the Senate that he preserved the authority of the Senate who compelled him to make his Sonne his companion in the Empire following their Counsell in all matters of Government governing all things with great wisdome and equity by the advice and consent of the Senate to the great contentment of all the Roman People and going into Thracia against the Gothes he left the Government in the hands of the Senate permitting them to chuse a Censor at their pleasure who had Supreme Iurisdiction over all men which office some former Emperors had usurped making themselves Censors So Claudius the second and Tacitus did nothing without the consent advice and counsell of the Senate either in matters of Warre or Peace And Polybius writes expresly That the Roman Emperors Counsels and purposes were efficatious or invalid at the pleasure of the Senate which had power to remove or continue them to encrease or abridge their power and wealth to decree or deny them triumphs towards which they contributed and that they could neither make warre nor peace nor truces without the peoples consent Their Emperors in truth being but their chiefe Generals in their warres at the first in right Thirdly They had power to create one two or more Emperors at once as appeares in their election of Gordianus the Father and Sonne to be Joint-Emperors at once and of Maximius Pupienus and Clodius Balbinus and Gordianus to be Câ—â—sars at once And those who could thus create more Emperors then one when they pleased no doubt had a power above the Emperors Fourthly They had a Soveraigue power judicially to convent censure yea to depose and adjudge their Emperours to death for their tyranny and misgovernment this appeares by the case of Nero that wicked Empâ—rour whom the Senate judâ—cially deposed condemned for his tyranny and misgovernment as a publike enemy to the State adjudging him to have his head fastned to a forke and so to be publikely whipped to death and then precipitated from a rock upon which sentence he being sought for and forsaken of all to a voyd the execution of it murthered himselfe with a poinyard So when Domitiâ—n was slain the Senate assembling the same day caused all his Statâ—es to be throune downe and all the inscriptions and memorials of him to be cancelled defaced and elected Nerva Emperour Didius Iulianus who purchased the Empire by bribing the Soldiers comming to Rome with an Army went to the Senate where assembling such Senators as were present by their decree he was proclaimed Emperour and they presently made his Son in law Cornelius Repentinâ—â—â— Praetor of Rome putting Sulpetianus out of that office and from thence he was caried to the Imperiall Pallace and held for Emperour more through force then good will of any honest men But the people hateing and cursing him at last a full Senate being assembled by the common consent of all the Senators it was decreed that Iulianus should be deprived of the Empire as a man unworthy to rule and Severus proclaimed Emperour to whom two of the principall Senators were sent to yeild him their obedience with the Ensignes of the Empire and Iulianus being generally abandoned they commanded him to be slaine in his pallace Heliogabalus that monster of wickednesse was slaine by the praetorion Souldiers by the Senates and peoples approbation who commanded he should no more be called Antoninus and that in detestation of him no other Emperour should after that be called by this name and that he should be called Tiberinus according to the manner of his death his body being tyed to great stones and sunke in Tiber that it might never be found So Maximinus the Emperour oppressing and Tyrannizing over the people with great cruelty was deposed by the Senate and he with his sonne though already made Caesar and declared Emperour adjudged enemies and Rebels and Gordianus with his Sonne elected and proclamed Emperours by the Souldiers people and Senate of Rome After which they considering the great power of Maximinus to secure the City made great preparations to resist him and writ letters to all their Provinces that all those Governours that Maximinus had there placed should be displaced which direction was generally obeyed and the Governours most of them slain Thereupon Maximinus then in Hungary posts with his Army and Son towards Rome and young Gordianus being slain his Father strangled in the interim the Senate assembled in the Temple of Iupiter chose Maximus Pupienus and Clodius Balbinus Emperours and to please the people which consented not to their elâ—ction they likewise named young Gordianus Caesar and raised forces to resist Maximinus who lying before Aquilia his Souldiers hearing that he with his Sonne were proclamed Rebels at Rome and new Emperours elected came boldly to their Pavilions about noone slew them and sent their heads to Rome By these with sundry presidents of like nature it is apparent that the Soveraigne power and Jurisdiction even after the Roman empire erected continued still in the Senate and people to whom the Emperours were responsible by whom they were deposed yea put to death for their misdemeanours aâ—d offences against the state and oppressions of their Subjects Which power they retained till the Emperours removed their Courts from Rome to Constantinople by which meanes the authority of the Senate and dignity of the Consuls was almost wholly lost by degrees in Iustine the seconds reigne After the seat of the Empire was translated to Constantinople the Senate People Souldiers and Patriarchs of Constantinople claimed a right and power to elect their Emperours to prescribe conditions and Oaths unto them before they were crowned as also a power in some cases to depose them yea execute them as you may read at large in their lives Of which I shall recite some instances Iulian the Apostate dying Iovinian assensu omnium by the joynt assent of all the Souldiers Captains and people was elected Emperor who absolutely refused the Empire saying that he being a Christian would not be an Emperor over Infidels But all men were so pleased with his election that they cryed out aloud saying we are all Christians And for his sake those which were not so resolved to become Christians upon condition that he would accept the Empire which he thereupon accepting with incredible joy and gladnesse they swore obediâ—nce to him and gave him the Imperiall Ensignes He being casually smoothered or death Valentinian the first was by the joynt consent of the Captains and Souldiers chosen Emperour after which the Empire went by descent till the death of Valentinian the second and then Martianus by means
next right heires of the Royall Stock for all which particulars he gives sundry instances in the Kingdomes of Spaine as in Berengaria Blanch the Mother of Lewes of France Ferdinand Sancho the younger sonne of Alfonso Henry the Bastard Iohn King of Portugall Fardinand and Iohn the 2. of Aragon c. corluding That if the King degenerate into a Tirant by subverting Religion Lawes Liberties oppressing murthering or deflowring his subjects the whole Kingdome may not onely question admonish and reprehend him but in case he prove incorrigible after admonition deprive him and substitute another in his place which saith he hath been done more then once in Spain Thus King Peter was publikely rejected for his cruelty to his subjects and Henry his Brother though of an unclean Mother obtained the Crowne so Henry his Nephewes Nephew for his slothfulnesse and evill manners was deposed by the Nobles suffrages and Alphanso his Brother though but a yong child proclaimed King After his death Elizabeth Henry his sister had the chiefe government of the Realmâ— leaving Henry And for a conclusion he addes That such a Tyrannicall King continuing incorrigible after publike admonitions of the whole State if there be no hopes of amendnent may not onely be deposed but put to death and murthered by the whole State or any particular persons by their appointment yea without it a note somewhat above Ela if he be declared a publike enemy by the whole state and in case the whole states cannot publikely assemble by reason of such a Princes knowne notorious tyranny he writes That then in such a case it is lawfull for any private man to murther him to free the Countrey and Kingdome from destruction Adding that it is a wholsome meditation for Princes to be perswaded that if they oppresse the Common-wealth if they become intollerable thorow vices and filthinesse that they live in such a condition that they may not onely be slaine of right but with laud and glory Peradventure this feare will retard some Princes that they give not themselves wholly to be corrupted with vices flatterers and cast bridles upon their fury That which is the chiefe let the Prince bee perswaded that the authority of the whole Common-wealth is greater then his being but one neither let him beleeve the worst of men affirming the contrary for to gratifie him which is very pernicious All these positions of Mariana however other Kings and Kingdomes may relish them especially the last touching private Subjects which few can approve the Parliaments of France doing publike execution on this Book as they had just cause for extolling and justifying the barbaroâ—s murther of their King Henry the 3. by James Clement a Dominican Frier l. 1. c. 6. p. 51. to 57. and justifying the Guises Rebellion are yet authorized as Catholike and Orthodox by the most Catholike King of Spaine and the Emperour of Germany in whose Kingdomes they passe for currant coyne the most dangerous of them being seconded not onely by Hieronymus Blanca in his Aragonensium Rerum Commentariis Iohannis Pistorius Hispaniae Illustratae c. and other Spanish Historians collected by him but likewise by Alvarius Pelagius Cardinall Tolet Capistranus Dominicus Bannes Franciscus Victoria Simancha Patensis Gregory de Valentia Suarez the Doctors of Salamancha Becanus Bellarmine with other Spanish Iesuites Writers who most hereâ—ically affirme That even the Pope alone either with or without a Councâ—ll for heresie as they deem it and obstinacy against the See of Rome may excommunicate censure despose kill or murther any Christian Princes depose them from their thrones dispose of their Crownes to others at their pleasures absolve their subjects wholly from their allegeance and give subjects power to rise up in armes against and murther them by open force or secret treachery which Bishop Bilson truly affirmes to be farre more dangerous and derogatory to Princes then to attribute such a power not to any particular persons but to their own whole Kingdomes and Parliaments onely who being many in number of the same Nation and Religion with and having many dependances on and many engagements by oath duty favours benefits to their Princes lesse malice against them judging onely according to the fundamentall Lawes of the Realme and former presidents of their Anâ—cestors and aiming at nothing but their Kingdomes saâ—ety are like to be more just indifferent Iudges of their Princes actions when questioned then the Pope a meer enemy and forraigner who proceeds by no other authority but what he hath unjustly usurped from Kings and by no other rules but his owne will pride malice honour or profit I have thus given you an account of the Kings of Spaines subordination to their whole kingdomes and Lawes in point of Thesis and positive Doctrine approved by themselves professed by their eminentest Wriâ—ers I shall now procced to Historicall examples to confirme it in point of practise Ordogno the 14. king of Castile summoned 4. Earles of Castile to appeare before him who refused to goe to the warres against the Saracens promising them safe conduct notwithstanding he commanded them to be apprehended imprisoned and slâ—in for whâ—ch bloody Treachery those of Castile rebelled against him rejecting his government and providing for the â—afety of them and theirs Duos Milites non de potentioribus sed de prudentioribus eligerunt quos Indices statuerunt c. They elected two prudent Knights of their owne to be their Magistrates and Iudges to governe them to manage their warres and administer justice to them the one was named Flâ—vius Calvus the other Nunius surnamed de Rasura whose Son Gâ—ndesalvus after his Fathers death was substituted in his place made Generall of the Militia Principatum Militiae addiderunt and his son after him tam à Magnatibus Militibus quam AB VNIVERSIS POPVLIS CASTE LANIS made Earle of Castile and all submitted themselves to his government rejecting the Dominion both of Ordogno and his brother King Froila after him for their tyranny and treachery Alphonso the great King of Gallecia about the yeere of Christ 918. imprisoning his eldest sonne Garsias laying him in irons and exercising other cruelâ—ies was by the practise of his owne Queen Semena and his other sonnes and Nobles so prosecuted and put to such streights that they enforced him to resigâ— his Crown to his sonne Garcias and to deprive him â—elfe of his gâ—uernment in the presence of his sons and the grandees of his Realm after which he requested his sonne to râ—ise and grant him an Army to goe against the Sâ—razens who condescending thereto hee gained a glorious Victory ouâ—r them and so dyed Alphonso sonne of Ordâ—gno King of Castile after 5. yeers reigne out of levity rather then Religion resigned his Crown to Ramire his younger Brother and then turnd Monk about the yeer 939 but not long after casting off his Coul leaving his Monastery he â—egan to â—aise forces and to aspire to the Crown again which he
Prince not so much as once dreamed off in this Text as Court Doctors grosly mistake aâ—d so miserably pervert this Scripture contrary to the sence and meaning translating it from kings to subjects from king rebellion against God to subjects rebellion against men is as the sin of Witchcraft and stubbornnesse is as iniquity and Idolatry BECAVSE thou hast rejected the Word of the Lord he hath also REIECTED THEE FROM BEING KING I will not return with thee for thou hast rejected the word of the Lord and the Lord HATH REIECTED THEE FROM BEING KING over Israel the Lord HATH RENT THE KINGDOM of Israel FROM THEE this day and hath given it to a neighbour of thine that is better then thou Also the strength of Israel will not lie nor repent for he is not as men that he should repent to wit of renting the kingdom from him though he repented that he had made Saul king over Israel because he turned back from following him and performed not his Commandments 1 Sam. 15. 11. 35. After which God said to Samuel How long wilt thou mourn for Saul seeing I have reiected him from Reigning over Israel Fill thine horn with Oyl and I will send thee to Iesse the Bethlemite for I have provided me a king among his sons whereupon he went and annoynted David who succeeded him in the kingdom Sauls posterity being utterly disinherited for his recited sins After this when God setled the kingdom upon David and his seed after him it was upon condition of obedience and threatning of corrections even by men if they transgressed The Lord telleth thee that he will make thee an house and when thy dayes be fulfilled and thou shalt steep with thy fathers then I will set up thy seed after thee which shall proceed out of thy bowels and I will establish the Throne of his kingdom for ever I will be his father and he shall be my son If he commit iniquity I will chastise him with the Rod of men and with the Stripes of the Children of Men that is I will not chasten him immediately by my self but by men my instruments even by Ieroboam and his own subjects the ten Tribes or other enemies whom I will raise up against him and his posteritie 1 Kings 11. 9 to 41. But my mercy shall not depart away from him as I took it from Saul whom I put away before thee And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee yet still upon condition of obedience as is most apparent by Davids speech to king Solomon 1 Chron. 28. 5 6 7 8 9. And the Lord hath chosen Solomon my son to set him upon the throne of the kingdom of the Lord over all Israel And he said to me c. Moreover I will establish his kingdom for ever If he continue constant to do my Commandments and my judgements as at this day Now therefore in the sight of all Israel the Congregation of the Lord and in the audience of our God keep and seek for all the Commandmens of the Lord your God that ye may possosse the good land and leave it for an inheritance for your Children after you for ever And thou Solomon my son know thou the Lord God of thy father and serve him with a perfect heart and with a willing minde for the Lord searcheth all hearts and understandeth all the imaginations of the thoughts If thou seek him he will be found of thee but if thou forsake him he will cast thee off for ever notwithstanding the former Covenant and establishment which was but conditionall not absolute as the renting of the ten Tribes from his son and the determining of the very kingdom of Iudah it self in Zedekiah after which it never returned any more to Davids Line infallibly evidence Hence we read in the 1 Kings 11. that Solomons idolatrous wives turning away his heart from following the Lord and drawing him to commit idolatry in his old age hereupon the Lord grew angry with Solomon Wherefore the Lord said unto him for as much as this is done of thee and thou hast not kept my Covenant and my Statutes which I have commanded thee I will surely rend the Kingdom from thee and will give it to thy servant Notwithstanding in thy dayes I will not do it for David thy fathers sake but I will rend it out of the hand of thy son Howbeit I will not rend away all the kingdom but will give one Tribe to thy Sonne for my servant Davids sake and for Jerusalems sake which I have chosen In pursuance whereof the Prophet Ahijah rending Iâ—roboams garment into 12 peeces said to Ieroboam Take thee ten peeces for thus saith the Lord the God of Israel Behold I will rend the kingdom out of the hand of Solomon and will give tâ—n Tribes to thee BECAVSE THAT THEY HAVE FORSAKEN ME and have worshipped the Goddesse of the Zidonians c. AND HAVE NOT WALKED IN MY WAYES to doe that which is right in mine eyes to keep my Statuts and my judgements as did David his Father howbeit I will not take the whole Kingdome out of his hands but I will make him Prince all the dayes of his life for David my servants sake whom I chose because he kept my Commandements and my Statutes But I will take the Kingdome out of his sonnes hand and give it unto thee even ten tribes And unto his sonne will I give one tribe that David my servant may have a light alway before me in Ierusalem the City which I have chosen to put my name there And I will take thee and thou shalt reigne according to all that thy soule desireth and shalt be King over Israel But what without any limitation or condition at all think you No such matter And it shall be IF THOV WILT HEARKEN VNTO ALL THAT I COMMAND THEE and wilt walk in my wayes and doe that is right in my sight to keep my Statutes and my Commandements as David my servant did that I will be with thee and build thee a sure house as I built for David and will give Israel to thee And I will for this afflict the seed of David but not for ever Loe here both Kingdomes of Iudah and Israel are given and entailed on David Solomon and Ieroboam onely upon condition of good behaviour which not performed they shall be rent from either And was this only a vain idle condition as some deem the Covenants and Coronation oathes of Kings to God and their Kingdoms Surely no for we read experimentall verifications of them in King Rehoboam Who answering all the people and Ieroboam when they came to Sechem to make him King roughly according to the Counsell of the young men and threatning to adde to their yoake instead of making it lighter and hearkning not unto the people FOR THE CAVSE WAS FROM THE LORD that he might perform his saying which he spake by Abijah the Shilomite unto Ieroboam the
Senate he held the Empire onely by force and power Wherefore Caesar although he invaded the Empire by force yet that he might cosen the people at least with some pâ—etext of Law would seem to have received the Empire from the Senate and people But Augustus although he was adopted by Caesar yet he never bare himselfe as heire of the Empire by divise but rather received it as from the Senate and people as did also Caligula Tiberius Claudius whereas Nero who first invaded the Empire by force and wickednesse without any colour of Law was condemned by the Senate Since then no man could be born an absolute King no man can be a King by himselfe no man can reigne without the people Whereas on the contrary the people may both be and are by themselvs and are in time before a King it most certainly appears that all Kings were first constituted by the people Now albeit that from the time that Sons or Nephews imitated the vertues of their parents they seem to have made kingdomes as it were hereditary to themselves in certain Countries where the free power of Election may seem in some sort to have ceased yet that custome hath continued in all well constituted kingdomes that the children of the deceased kings should not succeed untill they were as de nâ—no newly constituted by the people nor should not be acknowledged as heirâ—s to their Fathers but should onely then at length be reputed kings when they had as it were received investiture of the Realme from those who represent the Majesty of the people by a Scepter and Diadem In Christian kingdomes which at this day are said to be conferd by succession there are extant most evident footsteps of this thing For the kings of France Spain England and others are wont to be inaugurated and as it were put into possession of the Realm by the States Senators Nobles and great men of the Realm who represent the universality of the people in the same manner as the Emperours of Germany are by the Electors and the kings of Poland by the Vayuods or Palatines where the intire right is onely by election neither is royall Honour yeelded to them in the Cities of the kingdomes before they have been duly inaugurated Neither also heretofore did they compute the time of the reigne but from the day of the inauguration which computation was accurately observed in France And that we may not be deceived by reason of any continued stories of succession even in those very kingdoms the States of the Realme have oft times preferred a kinsman before a sonne the second sonne before the eldest as in France Lewis the brother before Robert Earl of Dreux also Henry the second brother before Robert Capet the Nephew with others elsewhere Yea and the same kingdome by Authority of the People hath been translated from one Nation and Family to another whiles there were lawfull heires extant from the Merouingi to the Carlingi from the Carlingi to the Capets which hath been likewise done in other Realms as it sufficiently appears out of the truest Histories And that we may not recede from the kingdome of France which hath ever been reputed the pattern of the rest in which I say succession seemes to have obtained greatest strength We read that Pharamond was elected Anno 419. Pipen An. 751. Pipens sonnes Charles the great and Charlemain 768. not having respect of the Father Charlemain being at last taken away 771. the Brothers part did not immediatly accrue to Charls the Great as is usually done in inheritances but by the determination of the people and publike Councell and by them Ludovicus pius was elected An. 812 although he were the sonne of Charles the great Yea in the very Testament oâ— Charles which is extant in Nauclerus he Intreats the People by the Common Councell of the Realm to elect one of his nephews whoÌ„ they pleased as for hi Vncles he bids theÌ„ rest satisfied with the Decréc of the people Whence Charles the bald Nephew by Lewis the godly and Iudith professeth himselfe An elected King in Aimoinius the Historiographer In summe all kings whatsoever from the beginning were Elective and those who at this day strive to come to the kingdome by succession must of necessity be First ordained by the people Finally albeit the people by reason of certain egregious merits hath in certain Realmes used to chuse kings out of the same stock yet they chuse the stock it self nor the branch neither do they so chuse it but if it degenerates They may elect another But even those who are neerest of that stock are not so much born as made kings are not so much accounted kings as the Attendants of kings which Franciscus Hotomanus in his Franco-Gallia cap. 6. 7. 10. prosecutes more at large and manifests by sundry pertinent Presidents and Authorities Secondly that it is apparant by all the premised Histories That in all Empires Monarchies the whole Empire State Kingdome with the Parliaments Senates States Diets publike Officers and generall Assemblies which represent them are the Supreamest Soveraign power superiour to the Emperours Kings and Princes themselves who are subordinate Ministers and servants to them elected created by them for their common good and not absolute Soveraign Lords or Proprietors to rule domineer over them at their pleasure Which conclusion you shall find abundantly ratified and proâ—essedly maintained by Marius Salamonius de Principatu in six severall Books by Iohn Mariana de Rege Regis Instit. t. 1 c. 8. Stephanus Iunius Brutus his Vindicia contra Tyrannos throughout especially p. 91. to 110. the Treatise De Iure Magistratus in Subditos throughout Iustus Eccardus de Lege Regia Henricus Ranzâ—vius Commentarii Bellici lib. 1. c. 3. and elsewhere Georgius Obrechtus an eminent Civill Lawyer Disputationes Iuridicae de Principiis Belli sect 115. to 200. where he thus resolves The inferiour Magistrates as in Germany the Electors Princes Earles Imperiall Cities in France the Peers of France in Poland the Vayuodes or Palatines and in other Kingdomes the Nobles Senators and Delegates of the Estates as they are severally inferiour to the Emperour or King Ita Universâ— Superiores existunt so collectively They are superiour to them as a Generall Councell is above the Pope the Chapter above the Bishop the Vniversity above the Chancellor The Prince saith Pliny the second even the greatest is obliged to the Commonwealth by an Oath as its servant ac ipsa Republica seu Regno Minor est and is lesse then the Republike or Kingdome it selfe by Franciscus Hotomanus a learned French Lawyer in his Franco-Gallia c. 6 7. 10 11. 14 15 16 18 20. Aquinas de Regimine Principum c. 6. by Hemingius Arnisaeus De Auctoritate Principum in populum c. and De Iure Majestatis Sebastianus Foxius De Regni Regisque Institutione Vasquius Controvers Illustrium passim Cavarnuius Contr. Illustr T. 2. 505. n. I. 399. n. 6.
can be no wayes excused or concealed Therefore we as we have fore-written have frequently very earnestly beseeched admonished and required him that renouncing this unbeseeming kind of life he would take the study and labour to himselfe whereby he might recover to the holy Church oft-times imploring his aide as King of Romans and her Advocate peace and tranquillity and to the sacred Empire its prestine honours Dominions and finally its emoluments to the assistance and consolation of the Christian world grievously debilitated and oppressed in this regard Now albeit we have most clearely explicated to the foresaid Lord Wenceslaus and exhibited to him in writing these and other more grievous defects concerning him as King of Romans and the Empire yet having heard his answers and having reiterated our serious exhortations moreover having communicated the businesse to the sacred Roman Sea we have never as yet found him to have amended his manners as became a King of Romans namely to recover peace to the Church principally nâ—cessary to the Christian world also to the sacred Empire its dignities lands and Dominions a thing which is most notoriously knowne throughout all the Provinces of the Empire Therefore because we could no longer neither conceale nor endure the remembred and many other defects touching the sacred Church and Empire with grievous losse and mourning by reason of the instant petitions of the persons aforesaid but especially by reason of the Oath wherewith we are obliged to the same as the next superiour members of the sacred Empire therefore as of bounden duty we were to advise and endeavour how the sacred Empire might be more rightly and wholesomly provided for by whose madde and negligent administration those inconveniences have crept in to the safegard and consolation of the Christian world And verily as He in obeying us had performed an acceptable thing so we have sufficiently and seriously called and cited him so as wee have signified to him that unlesse he should be present at the place and day appointed it would come to passe that both in respect of the petitions exhibited to us as likewise in respect of our Oath we should be compelled to take and enter into such counsels whereby the sacred Empire might be better setled most clearely attesting it in our letters For this purpose we appeared at the place and time prescribed together with our Coelectors sufficiently summoned also with the other Princes and of the sacred Empire expecting from day to day whether the foresaid Lord Wenceslaus would appeare to apply a remedy to the foresaid diseases and from thenceforth more rightly to consult about the affaires of the sacred Empire But he neither vouchsafed to appeare nor yet to send any one to us in the name of a Proctor Wherefore when as by reason of so many pregnant and pernicious defects we had admonished and reproved him very often in private and in friendly manner but after that when we could doe no good before the Princes and Nobles and Cities of the Empire in divers Assemblies not without great and grievous expences yet without any fruit therefore we referred all the fore-mentioned things to the sacred Roman Sea But when as neither then he no whit regarded all those things we could conjecture nothing else from thence but that he had laid downe the care both of the Church and Christian world but especially of the sacred Empire Therefore resolving that this mischiefe destructive to the whole Christian Republike was by no meanes to be any longer borne and tolerated with a minde well confirmed after many and various debates and consultations both betweene our selves as also with other Princes and Nobles of the sacred Empire seriously had for the safety of the Church the consolation of the Christian world the honour and profit of the sacred Empire we have thought meet that the foresaid Lord Wenceslaus should at this time be wholly removed from the Roman sacred Empire and all its dignity as one that is negligent and a destroyer of the Empire and unworthy of it Therefore we John Archbish. in the name of the foresaid Lords Coelectors of the sacred Empire and our owne moved both with the commemorated as also with many other notable defects and causes by this our sentence which we give and pronounce by this our present writing DEPRIVE and REMOVE the foresaid Lord Wenceslaus as an unprofitable negligent waster and unworthy Defender of the sacred Empire from the foresaid Roman Empire and from all his degree dignity and Dominions appertaining to the same denouncing to all the Princes Nobles Knights Gentlemen Cities Provinces and Subjects of the sacred Roman Empire that they are altogether free from all homage and Oath made to the person of Wenceslaus in the name of the Empire requiring and admonishing them under the faith of the Oath wherewith they are obliged to the sacred Empire that they doe not henceforth obey and submit to the said Lord Wenceslaus as the King of Romans nor exhibit or suffer to be exhibited to him any right obedience tribute rent or any other revenue by what name soever it may be called but reserve the said duties for a profitable and idonâ—ous King of Romans hereafter to be substituted by Gods gracious assistance In assurance and testimony of all which things We John Archbishop of Mentz have caused this present Instrument to be made by the subscribed Notaries in this patent forme and our great Seale to be affixed thereunto This premised sentence was read and pronounced by us John Archbishop of Mentz in our name and the names of the Lords Coelectors before remembred under the Castle Lonstein at the Rhene in the Diocesse of Triers reaching towards Brubachium out of a publike Throne erected for the use of a Tribunall the Lords Coelectors sitting there in judgement in the yeare of our Lords Incarnation 1400. the eight indiction on Saturday the twentieth day of the month of August a little before the time of the Nones in the eleventh yeare of the Papacy of our most holy Father and Lord in Christ Lord Boniface the ninth Pope by divine providence in the presence of the most illustrious Princes and Lords John sonne of the most illustrious Prince and Lord Rupert Duke of Bavaria and Count Palatine of Rheine Fredericke Burgrave of Norimberge the Noble Philip Lord of Nassau and Sarbrucke Emichon of Luringen John of Zigenhaim Cunrade Burgrave our Canon of Mentz Earles Bernhard of Westerburg John of Limpurge Rinehard of Honowe Barons Mr. Nicholas Berwin of the sacred Page John of Witenburg and Nicholas Burgman of the Decrees Mr. Herman President of Saint Gerion of Colen Doctors of the Law likewise the valiant Knight Sigfride of Lindow our Vice-Commander in Ringaugia John Bossen of Waldeck our Buggrave Beckelnheim and our trusty Henry Rulman of Dadenberg Gerard of Emerberg Lord in Lantscron Fredericke of Sachenheim Culman of Conâ—ren John of Dalburg Rudolfe of Zeiâ—â—ikon as also many other Lords Knights and Gentlemen spirituall and
not accounted of the family of Christ hath no place in the Arke Yet he who is but a little moved ought no more to doubt whether he ought to aide the afflicted members of the Church then whether he may helpe himselfe since in the Church all are one but rather every one is bound in his place to afford his helpe and assistance to them and so much the more helpe by how much the more riches he hath received from God not so much to be possessed as expended This Church as it is but one so likewise it is universally and intirely committed commended to all Christian Princes severally For because it had beene dangerous to commit the whole Church to any one and to commit the severall parts thereof to particular persons had beene clearely contrary to its unity God hath committed all of it to every of them and its particular parts to any of them Nor yet so as that they should onely defend it but also that they should have a care to propagate it as much as they are able Therefore if the Prince of the Countrey takes care of one part thereof perchance the German or Englâ—sh but yet deserts and neglects the other oppressed part if he be able to relieve it he is judged to have deserted the Church since the spouse of Christ verily is but one which he ought to defend and protect with all his might lest it should be violated or corrupted any where The instauration of this universall Church as private men are bound to promote with bended knees so Magistrates I say are obliged to doe it with their feet hands and all their strength Neither is the Ephesian Church one the Colossian auother and the rest but all these particular Churches are parts of the universall now the universall is the Kingdome of Christ which all private men ought to desire but Kings Princes Magistrates are bound to amplifie dilate defend and propagate every where and against all whomsoever Therefore among the Jewes there was one onely Temple built by Solomon which represented the unity of the Church Now he should be a ridiculous Churchwarden and to be punished who should take care onely to preserve one part safe and sound but suffer the rest to fall to decay likewise all Christian Kings when they are inaugurated receive a sword of purpose to defend the Catholike or universall Church which taking into their hand they point out all the quarters of the world and brandish it towards the East West South and North lest any part thereof should be thought excepted Since then they receive the protection of the Church in this manner without doubt they understand the true not false Church Therefore they ought to doe their endeavour to defend and to restore intirely that Church which they professe to be true and pure Now that thus it was observed by pious Princes examples may teach us In the time of Hezekiah King of Iudah the Kingdome of Israel was long before enthralled to the King of Assyria to wit from the time of King Hoshea therefore if that Church of God onely which is in the Kingdome of Iudah and not also the universall had beene committed to Hezekiah and if the bounds of the Realmes had been to be kept in defending the Church in the same manner as they are in imposing tribute without doubt Hezekiah especially at that season wherein the Assyrians enjoyed the Empire of the world would have contained himselfe But we see that he invited by posts all Israel the subjects I say of the King of Assyria to celebrate the passeover in Ierusalem and moreover that the godly in Israel helped them in pulling downe the high places even in the territories of Ephraim Manasses and the rest So likewise we read that King Iosiah a most godly Prince purged not onely his owne Kingdome but the Realme of Israel likewise then wholly subject to the King of Assyria from the worship of Idols Verily where the glory of God where the Kingdome of Christ are in question no limits no bounds no railes ought to exclude or keepe off the zeale of pious Princes But if peradventure some greater feare hangs over their heads they may remember by the example of these that those who truly feare the Lord can feare no man These examples of pious Princes since the time that the Church which was first circumscribed in Palestina hath beene spread over all the world many Christian Princes have followed Constantine and Licinius were both Emperours he of the East this of the West they were likewise colleagues endued with equall power Now it is known what is commonly spoken That one equall hath no Empire over another equall Yet notwithstanding Constantine made warre with Licinius who being vexed slew the Christians and among them many of the Nobles either for the cause or for the pretext of Religion by force obtaines free profession of Religion for the Christians and finally breaking his faith and reverting to his pristine cruelty he commanded him to be put to death at Thessalonica This I say did Constantine the great whose piety is so much celebrated by the Divines of that age that some of them will have that spoken of him written in the Prophet Esay That Kings should become nursing fathers and Pastors of the Church He being dead the Roman Empire was divided between both his sonnes by equall right no prerogative being annexed to either of them Of them Constans fostered the Orthodox Constantius the elder the Arrians and he verily expelled Athanasius the enemy of the Arrians out of Alexandria Truly if any rules of bounds ought to have beene kept it ought to have beene betweene brethren Yet in the meane time Constans threatned his brother if he restored not Athanasius being ready to doe it by force unlesse Constantius had speedily restored him intirely Now if so be he doubted not to doe this onely for the restoring of one Bishop might he not much more justly doe it where some part of the people is oppressed when they implore assistance when they desire to defend their Religion by the Nobles approbation So likewise Theodosius by the perswasion of Bishop Atticus undertook a warre against Chosroes King of Persia that he might releeve the Christians persecuted for Religion sake although they were truly privat men which surely those most just Princes who enacted so many Lawes and who had so great a care of Law had never done if they had imagined that by this their Act others territories and the Lawes of Nations had beene violated Yea to what end were so many expeditions of Christian Princes into Syria against the Saracens to what end were those Saladinian Dismes so oft imposed to what end so many sociall warres against the Turkes so many Crossadoes indicted against them if it be not lawfull for any Christian Princes even the most remote to free the Church from Tyranny and Christian captives from the yoke of bondage Now with what arguments were they impelled
of the said Scaffold declared and related to all the people how that our Lord the King had taken the said Oath inquiring of THE SAME PEOPLE IF THEY WOULD CONSENT TO HAVE HIM THEIR KING AND LIEGE LORD Who with ONE ACCORD CONSENTED THERETO Which Thomas of Walsingham who relates the whole forme of this Kings Coronation thus describeth Quibus completis Archiepiscopus praecedente eo Marescallo Angliae Henrico Percy convertit se ad omnes plagas Ecclesiae INDICANS POPULO REGIUM JURAMENTUM quaerens SI SE TALI PRINCIPI AC RECTORI SUBJICERE ejus jussionibus obtemperare VELLENT ET RESONSUMESTA PLEBE resono clamore QUOD LUBENTER SIBI PARERE VELLENT Which custome both before and since hath been constantly in this Land observed at the Coronation of our Kings from all these I say it is apparent First that Popish Parliaments Peeres and Subjects have deemed the Crowne of England not meerely successive and hereditary though it hath usually gone by descent but arbitrary and elective when they saw cause many of our Kings comming to the Crowne without just hereditary Title by the Kingdomes Peeres and people free election onely confirmed by subsequent Acts of Parliament which was then reputed a sufficient Right and Title by vertue whereof they then reigned and were obeyed as lawfull Kings and were then and yet so acknowledged to be their right by Election of their Subjects the footsteps whereof doe yet continue in the solemne demanding of the peoples consents at our Kings Inaugurations being seldome or never adjudged an illegall usurpation in any Parliaments whence the statute of 1 E. 4. c. 1. 9 E. 4. f. 2 declares King Henry the 4. 5. and 6. to be successively Kings of England indeed and not of right yet not usurpers because they came in by Parliament Onely Richard the third who treacherously murthered Edward the 5. his Soveraigne and violently usurped his Crowne at first before any Parliament gave it him compelling the Lords and Commons afterwards to Elect him King out of feare after his slaughter in Bosworth field was declared an usurper by Act of Parliament 1 Hen. 7. c. 6. and so adjudged to be by 8 H. 7. f. 1. see 1 E. 4. c. 1 c. 9 E. 4. f. 1 2. and Henry the 7. had the Crown set upon his head in the field by my Lord Stanly as though saith Grafton he had been elected king by the voyce of the people as in ancient times past in divers Realmes it hath been accustomed Secondly that those Kings who have enjoyed the Crown by succession descent or election have still taken it upon the conditions and covenants contained in their Coronation Oathes which if they refused to sweare to the Peeres and people really and bona fide to performe they were not then to be crowned or received as Kings but adjured in the name of God to renounce this dignity And though in point of Law those who enjoy the Crowne by Succession be Kings before their Coronations yet it is still upon those subsequent Conditions both contained in their Coronation Oathes which impose no new but onely ratifie the old conditions in separably annexed to the Crown by the Common Law ever since Edward the Confessors daies and long before as Father Littleton resolves the Office of a King being an Office of the greatest trust of any other which the Common Law binds the King well and lawfully to discharge to doe that which to such Office belongeth to doe as the Oathes of all our Kings to their people really to performe these Articles and Conditions fully demonstrate Thirdly that these Oathes are not meerely arbitrary or voluntary at the Kings pleasure to take or refuse them if he will but necessary and inevitable by the Law and constant usage of the Realm yea of all Christian most Pagan Realms whatsoever which prescribe like Oathes to their Kings From aâ—l which I may firmely conclude that the whole kingdome and Parliament are the Supreame Soveraigne Authority and Paramount the king because they may lawfully and dâ—e usually prescribe such conditions termes and rules of governing the people to him and bind him thus by Oath faithfully to perform the same as long as he shall continue King which Oath our Kings usually tooke or at least faithfully promised to take to their Subjects in ancient times before ever they did or would take an Oath of fealty homage or Allegiance to them as the premises evidence Claus. Rot. 1 R. 2. M. 44. Tenthly Our Parliaments and Kingdome anciently in times of popery and Paganisme have both challenged and exercised a Supreame power over the Crowne of England it selfe to transferre it from the right heire and setle it on whom themselves thought meete to elect for their King and likewise to call their Kings to an account for their mis-government and breach of Oath to the prejudice of their people so farre as to article against them and either by force of Armes or a judiciall sentence in Parliament actually to depose them and set up others in the Throne as the fore-cited presidents of Archigallo Emerian two ancient Brittish Kings of Edwin king of Mercia and others deprived of all honour and kingly dignity by the unanimous consent of their Subjects for their Tyranny Oppression Male-administration vicious lives and others elected and made kings in their places evidence which Acts of theirs they then reputed just and legall I shall cite you onely two presidents of this kind which have meere relation to Parliaments The first is that of King Edward the second who being taken prisoner by his Queen Sonne Nobles for his male-administration the Queen with her sonne by the advice of her Councell summoned an high Court of Parliament at Westminster in the Kings name which began the 16 day of January An. 1325. In which assembly it was declared that this Realm could not continue without an head and governour and therefore first they agreed to draw into Articles the Mis-government of the king that was in prison and all his evill doings which he had done by evill and naughty Counsell And when the said Articles were read and made knowne to all the Lords Nobles and Commons of the Realme they then consulted how the Realme should be governed from thenceforth And after good deliberation and consultation of the foresaid Articles of the Kings evill government they concluded THAT SUCH A MAN WAS NOT WORTHY TO BE A KING NOR TO WE ARE A CROWNE ROYALL And therefore they all agreed that Edward his eldest sonne who was there present and was rightfull heire should be crowned King in stead of his Father SO THAT HE WOULD TAKE ABOUT HIM SAGE TRUE AND GOOD COUNCELL and that from thenceforth the Realm might be better governed then before it had been And it was also agreed that the old king his father should be well and honestly kept as long as he lived according