by above thirty seven thousand than they were at the last numbring See I. 23. Many of them it is probable being in the same Crime with Zimri and the Plague falling most heavily upon this Tribe whom Moses in the XXXIII Deuteronomy doth not bless Verse 15 16 17. Ver. 15 16 17. And the Children of Gad after their Families They are reckoned here next to the Simeonites because they lay encamped next to them under the Standard of Reuben II Numb 10 11 c. Of Zephon the Family of the Zephonites c. They are reckoned up in the same manner XLVI Gen. 16. only he that is here called Zephon is there called Ziphion and Osni is there called Ezbon and Arod called Arodi Verse 18 Ver. 18. These are the Families of the Children of Gad according to those that were numbred of them forty thousand and five hundred This Tribe also was less by above five thousand than before I. 25. Verse 19 Ver. 19. The Sons of Judah Er and Onan These were his eldest Sons but died without Issue before the Children of Israel went down into Egypt as it here follows See XXXVIII Gen. 1 2 c. Verse 20 Ver. 20. And the Sons of Judah after their Families were c. Now he reckons those of his Sons who made Families which were three as we read also XLVI Gen. 12. Ver. 21. And the Sons of Pharez were Hezron c. Here he numbers two of Judah's Grand-children as he did one of Reuben's v. 6. only with this difference that these two made Families in Israel which Verse 21 his Grand-son did not they being substituted instead of Er and Onan who died without Children Or rather the Family of Pharez growing very great there was a sub-division made of it into the other Families who were all still Pharezites for Pharez had no other Children but there two to make a Family of that Name but called by these two Names of Hesronites and Hamulites because the Pharezites were grown too big to be but one Family and therefore parted into two Ver. 22. These are the Families of Judah according Verse 22 to those that were numbred of them threescore and sixteen thousand and five hundred This Tribe was very numerous before above all the rest And now this new Generation which sprung up instead of the old who were all destroyed except Caleb exceeded them two thousand So faithful was God to his Promise that this should be a most powerful Tribe See I Numb 27. Ver. 23. The Sons of Issachar after their Families Verse 23 He and Zebulon are mentioned next because they lay encamped together under the Standard of Judah See II Numb 5 6 7. Of Tola the Family of the Tolaites A wonderful fruitful Family and very valiant there being of this one Family Twenty two thousand and six hundred Men in the days of David 1 Chron. VII 2. Of Pua the Family of the Punites He is called Phuvah XLVI Gen. 13. Ver. 24. Of Jashub Who is called Job in the same place Ver. 25. Threescore and four thousand and three hundred Verse 24 This Tribe also was exceedingly increased Verse 25 being near Ten thousand more now than they were at their first numbring I. 29. II. 6. Verse 26 Ver. 26. Of the Sons of Zebulun after their Families There is no change in their Names which are the same without any alteration as when they went into Egypt XLVI Gen. 14. Verse 27 Ver. 27. Those that were numbred of them threescore thousand and five hundred This Tribe likewise was increased above Three thousand since the former numbring See I. 31. And so the whole Camp of Judah was mightily augmented as that of Reuben was diminished Verse 28 Ver. 28. The Sons of Joseph after their Families See XLVI Gen. 20. Verse 29 Ver. 29. Of the Sons of Manasseh of Machir c. This was his only Son but those descended from him by an usual manner of speaking are called Manasseh's Sons also being his Grand-sons Some think indeed that Manasseh had other Sons which they gather from L Gen. 22. but if he had their Families were extinct for none but Machir and his Posterity had any Inheritance in the Land of Canaan XVII Josh 1 2. where the Grand-children are called his Children Machir begat Gilead and of Gilead came the Family of the Gileadites They were not a distinct Family from the Machirites but the very same Machir having no other Son but Gilead Therefore that Family which at first was called Machirites were afterwards called Gileadites or they were indifferently called either by the one or the other Ver. 30. These are the Sons of Gilead of Jeezer Called Abiezer XVII Josh 2. The Family of the Jeezreites c. The Posterity of Gilead grew so numerous that his Sons made Families Verse 30 and not only Housholds So that the name of Gileadites being too general to distinguish them all they were called at length by the name of his Sons Ver. 31 32. Of Asriel the Family of the Asrielites Verse 31 32. c. This and all the rest that follow are mentioned as the Son 's of Gilead for each of whose Children there was a Lot in the Land of Canaan XVII Josh 2. Ver. 33. And Zelophead the Son of Hepher had no Verse 33 Sons but Daughters c. Whose Case is considered in the next and in the last Chapter of this Book where they are ordered to have an Inheritance among their Father's Brethren but to marry into their own Tribe And their Posterity I suppose were called after their grand-Grand-father's name Hepherites for such a Family there was as Moses tells us in the foregoing verse Ver. 34. Numbred of them fifty two thousand and Verse 34 seven hundred If this be compared with I. 35. it will appear that this Tribe was increased above Twenty thousand Which is the greatest Increase of any other and made good the Prophecy of Jacob concerning the Children of Joseph XLIX Gen. 22. Ver. 35. These are the Sons of Ephraim after their Verse 35 Families He is mentioned after Manesseh because he was his younger Brother yet in their Encampment this Tribe had the Standard under which Manasseh marched II Numb 18 c. Of Shuthelah the Family of the Shuthalites c. He is mentioned first also in 1 Chron. VII 20. Where the next Son Becher is called Bered and Tahan called Tahath For time is wont to make great Alterations in the names of Persons and Places Verse 36 Ver. 36. These are the Sons of Shuthelah of Eran the Family of the Eranites He had it seems but one Son whose Children after the usual manner of speaking before noted were called the Sons of Shuthelah though they made a distinct Family under the name of Eranites Verse 37 Ver. 37. Those that were numbred of them thirty two thousand and five hundred Though this proved a very numerous Tribe in future times yet for the present they were fewer by eight thousand than they were in the
fed with Bread and Water of Affliction till his Bowels were sorely pinched c. if we may believe the Jewish Doctors mentioned by Selden Lib. IV. de Jure Nat. Gent. cap. 1. Verse 31 Ver. 31. Moreover ye shall take no satisfaction for the Life of a Murderer If a Murderer would have given all his Estate to save his Life or the Avenger of Blood would have accepted a Compensation or freely let him go the Judges when they had found him guilty could not restore him to the City of Refuge but he was to suffer Death For the Life of him that was slain was not as Maimonides speaks part of the Goods of the Avenger of Blood but belonged to Almighty God who set such a value on a Man's Life that he would not suffer any price to be taken for it See Selden in the same Chapter p. 470. Ver. 32. And ye shall take no satisfaction for him that is fled to the City of Refuge that he may come to dwell in the Land until the death of the High-Priest No Money was to purchase his Liberty to dwell any Verse 32 where else but there till the time appointed by the Law but this Punishment for Man-slaughter was as indispensable as death for Murder And therefore if any Man hapned to kill another in the City of Refuge to which he was confined he was forced to flee to another City of Refuge and there abide till the death of the High-Priest Ver. 33. So ye shall not pollute the Land wherein ye Verse 33 are for blood defileth the Land By this it appears that the next of Kin was bound to prosecute the Murderer unto death for the good of his Country which otherwise would have had a Guilt upon it and that very grievous For they are the greatest Crimes as Maimonides observes which are said to pollute the Land or them or God's Sanctuary viz. Idolatry XX Lev. 3. all the filthiness that is forbidden XVIII 24 25. and Murder here mentioned More Nevoch P. III. cap. 47. And the Land cannot be cleansed of the Blood that is shed therein but by the blood of him that shed it The same Maimonides observes in the XLI Chapter of that Book That it is a piece of Universal Justice to make a Man suffer what he hath made another suffer If he have hurt his Body he must suffer for it in his own Body if in his Money his own Purse must pay for it if he have taken away his Life he must die for it himself And the Punishment can neither be mitigated nor any compensation accepted for it For which he quotes these words and upon this account resolves that if he that was murdered should live a few days or hours after his deadly wound and being in sound understanding should desire he that killed him might not die for it declaring that he freely forgave him his desire was not to be granted but Blood was to be punished with Blood whether he that was slain was a great Man or a mean a freeman or a slave a wise Man or a fool because there is no Sin committed by Men greater than this is Verse 34 Ver. 34. Defile not therefore the Land which ye shall inhabit By suffering a Murderer to live Wherein I dwell This is given as a reason elsewhere See V. 3. why they should put all polluted People out of their Camps because God dwelt in them viz. in his Sanctuary which made this Land be called the holy Land and God's Possession 2 Chron. XX. 11. For I the LORD dwell among the Children of Israel See XXV Exod. 8. The very same was practised among the Athenians with some little Alteration For Demosthenes says it was one of their Laws 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that he who out of fore-thought killed a Man should be put to death And he tells us also that it was not lawful for the Judges to take Money to remit the Punishment after he was Condemned though if the Prosecutors compounded with him or his Friends before-hand and desisted from the Prosecution his Life was saved If he fled from Justice all his Goods were confiscated and he forfeited all the Rights of a Citizen both Civil and Sacred See Sam. Petitus his Comment in Leges Atticas Lib. VII Tit. 1. CHAP. XXXVI Chapter XXXVI Ver. 1. AND the chief Fathers of the Families of the Verse 1 Children of Gilead the Son of Machir the Son of Manasseh c. Not the Fathers of those Families whose Inheritance had been assigned them already on this side Jordan in the Land of Gilead but the other half of the Tribe of Manasseh who were to have their Inheritance in Canaan where the Daughters of Zelophehad also had their Portion as appears from XVII Josh 3 4 c. Come near and speak before Moses and before the Princes the chief Fathers of the Children of Israel Who were met together in a great Assembly as they used to do about Publick Affairs See XXVII 2. XXI XXXII 2. Ver. 2. And they said the LORD commanded my Verse 2 Lord. This shows that one of them was the Mouth of the rest To give the Land for an Inheritance by lot to the Children of Israel See XXVI 52 53. For there the Foundation of all these Doubts was laid And my Lord was commanded by the LORD to give the Inheritance of Zelophehad Which should have faln to Zelophehad had he been alive Our Brather So they called their near Relations Vnto his Daughters Who petitioned him for the Possession which should have been their Fathers and it was granted them See XXVII 6 7. Ver. 3. And if they be married to any of the Sons of the other Tribes of the Children of Israel They being rich many it might be supposed of the other Tribes Verse 3 as well as their own would court them for their Wives and if they should choose an Husband that was not of their own Tribe they represent to Moses the Inconveniencies which from thence would follow Then shall their Inheritance be taken from the Inheritance of our Fathers i. e. Go out of our Tribe to which it originally belonged And shall be put to the Inheritance of the Tribe whereinto they are received Become a part of the Inheritance of that Tribe into which they married So shall it be taken from the lot of our Inheritance For it must have descended unto their Children who were of another Tribe by the Father's side which alone was considered and not the Mothers in this case Verse 4 Ver. 4. And when the Jubilee of the Children of Israel shall be Which was ordained for the preserving Estates in the Tribes and Families to which they originally appertained XXV Lev. 10 13. Then shall their Inheritance be put unto the Inheritance of the Tribe whereunto they are received The Jubilee will not help us in this Case by making their Inheritances return as other Lands do because they are become the Inheritance of another Tribe by the
These words relate only to the Trespass-offerings immediately before-named which were attended with a recompense of the Wrongs done either unto the LORD V Lev. 15 16. or unto their Neighbours VI Lev. 5. V Numb 8 9. Shall be most holy for thee and for thy Sons To be used by none else as it follows in the next verse Verse 10 Ver. 10. In the most holy place shalt thou eat it i. e. In the place where they performed their Sacred Office in that part of the Tabernacle next the Sanctuary which is called most holy in comparison with the rest which were further off because none might enter into it but the Priests alone See Note upon VI Lev. 16. where it is said expresly It shall be eaten in the holy place in the Court of the Tabernacle of the Congregation And see v. 26. and X. 12 13. Every Male shall eat it And none else as the places fore-mentioned expresly limit it II Lev. 3 10. VI. 18 29. VII 6. It shall be holy unto thee Peculiarly separated from the use of all other Persons but only Aaron and his Sons Verse 11 Ver. 11. And this is thine Now he mentions the less holy things as before the most holy which he bestowed upon him and his whole Family The Heave-offerings of their Gift with all the Wave-offerings of the Children of Israel That is the Breast of their Peace-offerings which are here called their Gift which was waved before the LORD and the right Shoulder heaved and then given to the Priest for his Portion VII Lev. 30 31 32 33 34. And so was the right Shoulder of the Ram which was offered for the Nazarite VI Numb 19 20. I have given them unto thee and unto thy Sons and to thy Daughters with thee c. These were not confined to the Males only but might be eaten by their Daughters also X Lev. 14. Every one that is clean in thy House shall eat of it Not only their Wives and their Daughters that were not married but those who were Divorced or Widows and returned to their Fathers House without Children or had Children begotten by a Priest See XXII Lev. 13. together with their Servants also whether bought with their Money or born in their House though not hired Servants or mere Sojourners XXII Lev. 10 11. But these things were to be eaten in a clean place X Lev. 14. somewhere within the Camp as afterward in Jerusalem XII Deut. 6 7 17 18. And no unclean Person permitted to eat of them VII Lev. 20 21. XXII 4. And besides when any Israelite killed an Ox a Sheep or a Goat for his own use he was bound to give the Priest the Shoulder the two Cheeks and the Maw as the Jews understand XVIII Deut. 3. Ver. 12. All the best of the Oyl and all the best of Verse 12 the Wine c. The Greek translate the Hebrew word Cheleb fat by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 marrow XLV Gen. 18. but here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the First-fruits of the Oyl c. signifying these First-fruits were to be of the very best of all the things here mentioned which were to be brought in the beginning of the Vintage and of the Harvest The precise quantity of which is no where determined but they say it was at least the sixtieth part of the whole See XXII Exod. 29. XXIII 19. XVIII Deut. 4. where he speaks of the First-fruits which every private Man was to offer beside which there was a First-fruits offered in the Name of the whole Congregation XXIII Lev. 10 17. All which belonged to the Priests as a Reward of their Service The First-fruits of them which they shall offer unto the LORD them have I given thee Our Mr. Thorndike thus distinguishes the two sorts of First-fruits mentioned here and in other places The one was to be taken by the Priests at the Barn and Wine-Press as he thinks that here spoken of was The other was to be brought to the Sanctuary viz. those mentioned XXII and XXIII Exod. and XXVI Deut. 1 2. The quantity of either of them being in the moderate account a fiftieth part as S. Hierom determines upon XLV Ezek. which is agreeable to the Jewish Constitutions in Maimonides of First-fruits cap. 2. and of Separations cap. 3. But the Scripture XLV Ezek. 13. requires only the sixtieth part See Rights of the Church in a Christian State p. 210. Verse 13 Ver. 13. And whatsoever is first ripe in the Land which they shall bring unto the LORD shall be thine Some take this to signifie the First-fruits of all other things besides Corn Wine and Oyl mentioned in the foregoing Verse But it being a different word from that which we translate First-fruits viz. Biccurim not Reshith it is most likely he here intends either the things first ripe as we translate it before the rest of the Harvest and Vintage or those voluntary Offerings of this sort which any one pleased to make which seem to be intended in these words which they shall bring unto the LORD i. e. of their own good will over and above the ordinary First-fruits The Jews generally understand by Biccurim such things as are ripe before the rest either in the Field as elsewhere whether they were Wheat Barley or any other sort of Grain or Figs Grapes Pomegranets Olives or Dates which they bound about with a Rush and said Let this be for the First-fruits Which every Man might bring in what measure he pleased none being appointed by the Law Every one that is clean in thy House shall eat of it The whole Family of the Priests if they were under no pollution See v. 11. Ver. 14. Every thing devoted in Israel shall be thine Verse 14 Of those things which the Hebrews call Cherem a thing devoted Moses speaks in XXVII Lev. 21 28. And they were either simply devoted in such words as these Let this thing be a Cherem Or with an addition determining it to a certain use Let this be a Cherem offered by me for holy uses The first sort were wholly the Priests but the latter were employed about the Temple or the Vessels of it or the Priests Garments And these devoted things which became the Priests Portion differed in this from Free-will-offerings that every thing which was offered as a Cherem might be eaten only by the Priests in the Holy Place but other Free-will-offerings by the whole Family in any clean place Ver. 15. Every thing that openeth the Matrix in all Verse 15 Flesh which they bring unto the LORD whether it be of Men or Beasts shall be thine That which first came out of the Womb of any Creature was to be the Priests if it were a Male. If a Female were the First-born and a Male followed next that was not the Priests because it did not open the Womb as the Hebrews expound it See XIII Exod. 2. Nevertheless the First-born of Man shalt thou surely redeem and the Firstling of unclean Beasts shalt
in Egypt See this there explained And she bare unto Amram Aaron and Moses and Miriam their Sister Who seems to have been born before Moses if not before Aaron II Exod. 4. Ver. 60. And unto Aaron was born Nadab and Abihu Eleazar and Ithamar VI Exod. 23. where he tells the name of their Mother Ver. 61. And Nadab and Abihu died when they offered Verse 60 strange Fire before the LORD See X Lev. 2. Verse 61 and the third Chapter of this Book v. 4. But Eleazar who was the eldest next to them was now alive and made High-Priest and it is likely Ithamar also being under Twenty years old when the People murmured upon the Report of the Spies and so not cut off with that wicked Generation XVI 29. All this is here recounted to show that the Tribe of Levi was preserved by the blessing of God as well as the rest of the Israelites though they were to have no Inheritance in the Land of Canaan Ver. 62. And those that were numbred of them were Verse 62 twenty and three thousand c. So they were a thousand more than at the last numbring III. 39. For they were not numbred among the Children of Israel But by themselves for the reason following Because there was no Inheritance given them among the Children of Israel For God was their Inheritance as he told them XVIII 20 c. And therefore they were ordered not to be numbred Thirty eight years ago no more than now I Numb 49 c. The Jews are something curious in their Observations upon these words among or in the midst of the Children of Israel from whence they conclude that the Levites might have Lands out of the Bounds of the Land of Canaan though not within it among their Brethren Ver. 63. These are they that were numbred by Moseâ— Verse 63 and Eleazar the Priest who numbred the Children of Israel in the plains of Moab c. By a special command of God v. 1 2 c. Ver. 64. But among these there was not a Man of them whom Moses and Aaron the Priest numbred when they numbred the Children of Israel in the Wilderness of Verse 64 Sinai See the first Chapter of this Book v. 1 2 c. so exactly were God's Threatnings fulfilled as well as his Promises Chapter XXVII Verse 65 Ver. 65. For the LORD had said of them they shall surely die in the Wilderness He had pronounced this irreversible Sentence upon the whole Congregation XIV 23 28 29. where he swears they should not enter into the Land of Canaan because they had brought or entertained an evil report of it See also II Deut. 14 15. And there was not left a Man of them save Caleb the Son of Jephunneh and Joshua the Son of Nun. Whom God promised to spare because they were of another Spirit XV. 24 30 38. And their survival was as remarkable an instance of the truth of God's word as the Death of all the rest CHAP. XXVII Verse 1 Ver. 1. THEN came the Daughters of Zelophehad the Son of Hepher c. Who are mentioned before XXVI 33. just as they are here only their Genealogy is here more fully set out that their Father was the Grandson of Manasseh the Son of Joseph from whom he was lineally descended but left no Sons behind him Now these young Women hearing Moses say as he doth in the foregoing Chapter that the LORD commanded the Land of Canaan should be divided among those that were now numbred and observing that only Males from Twenty years old were numbred v. 2. presently apprehended that they being Females were excluded from having any Inheritance among the Israelites and so the Family of the Hepherites XXVI 32. would be extinguished This was the ground of what follows Whereby it appears that every body was immediately acquainted with the Laws which Moses received from God and that there was a faithful Register kept of every one that was born in every Family and Tribe to prevent all Disputes about the true Heirs to Mens Estates Ver. 2. And they stood before Moses c. To represent Verse 2 before him and the rest of the Judges who were now assembled the Case which I have mentioned Before Moses and Eleazar the Priest and before the Princes and all the Congregation These made up the greatest Court of Judicature that at any time sate For by Princes are meant either the Heads of the Tribes or the highest of the Judges appointed XVIII Exod. called the Heads of the People v. 25. And by all the Congregation is meant the LXX Elders mentioned in this Book XI 24. For they are called col ha edah the whole Congregation and sometimes only Edah the Congregation as R. Solomon observes See Bertram de Republ. Jud. p. 72. Now at the Head of all these sat Moses and next to him Eleazar the Priest By the door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation Near to which this august Assembly it is likely was wont to sit when they met together that Moses might presently if there were occasion go and consult with God himself in any difficult matter that came before them And thus Mr. Selden observes out of Maimonides that in future times the great Sanhedrim followed the Tabernacle sitting sometimes in one place sometimes in another according as that was settled As after they came to Canaan it was first at Shiloh then at Mizpeh and afterwards at Gilgal Nob Gibeon the House of Obed-Edom till at last it was fixed in Jerusalem Lib. II. de Synedr cap. 15. n. 4. As concerning that which the Talmudists say concerning the proceedings in this case of Zelophehad's Daughters nothing certain can be determined But they give this account of it That they first brought this Cause into the Courts appointed by the advice of Jethro XVIII Exod. 21. and began with the Rulers of ten who knowing not what to say to them they went to those of fifty and from thence to the Centurions and at last to the Chiliarchs None of which durst adventure to give Judgment but referred the Cause by reason of its difficulty to Moses who brought it to the SCHECHINAH as they speak i. e. to the Divine Majesty Seld. ib. cap. 16. n. 1. Verse 3 Ver. 3. Saying Our Father died in the Wilderness Among the rest mentioned v. 64 65. of the foregoing Chapter They seem to have drawn up their Cause in the form of a Petition or as Mr. Selden speaks in the Legal Phrase presented a Libel to the Court containing the intire matter of their Petition and that artificially enough And he was not one of them that gathered themselves together against the LORD in the Company of Korah They use the very words of Moses concerning that rebellious Company XVI 11. And instance in this Sin rather than any other either to show that their Father had a due regard to the Authority of Moses who they hoped therefore would be the more favourable to his Posterity or
rather to insinuate that he was not guilty of such a Crime as might make Men justly forfeit what they had for their Children as well as for themselves For all the Family of Dathan and Abiram perished and it is taken notice of as a singular Mercy that the Children of Korah did not XXVI 10 11. But died in his own Sin i. e. For his own Sin which God had declared should not affect the Children XIV 31. For to that General Sin in which all the People were engaged these words seem to refer And so it was his own sin not with respect to the rest of the People for they were all alike guilty but with respect to his Children it being a personal Guilt in which they were not concerned The Jews commonly say that Zelophehad was the Man that was stoned for gathering Sticks on the Sabbath-day For which they have no authority but a fancy of R. Aquiba who is sharply reproved for it by another considerable Rabbi who saith it is a rash Judgment for if it were true since the Scripture conceals it he ought not to have revealed it but hath reproached a just Man for any thing that appears See Selden Lib. II. de Synedr cap. 1. sect 9. And had no Son As was found when the People were numbred XXVI 33. Ver. 4. Why should the name of our Father be done Verse 4 away from among his Family One Family of the Tribe of Manasseh viz. the Hepherites being in danger to be wholly extinguished R. Judah will have the word Name in this place to signifie as much as hereditary possession and so he thinks it signifies XXV Deut. 6. as Mr. Selden observes out of Pesikta Lib. de Successionibus cap. 14. Because he hath no Son Merely for want of Issue-Male when he hath left many Daughters Give unto us therefore a possession among the Brethren of our Father Let us come in for a share among those that are descended from Manasseh Which if they did the Name of their Father could not be thereby preserved but by the Son of one of these Daughters taking upon him not the Name of his Father that begat him but of his Mother's Grand-father viz. Hepher which was ordered afterwards by a general Law XXV Deut. 6. Verse 5 Ver. 5. And Moses brought their Cause before the LORD This was too difficult a Cause though there seemed to be a great deal of Reason on their side to be judged by the great Court before-mentioned and therefore it was referred to Moses alone as other weighty Causes used to be See XV. 32. XXV 4. for neither Eleazar nor any other Person before whom it was brought v. 2. are here mentioned as the Judges of this matter And he durst not judge it though the equity appeared very plain without bringing it before the LORD for his direction which he could have upon all important occasions XXV Exod. 22. VII Numb 89. Verse 6 Ver. 6. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying This shows that the Cause was devolved upon Moses alone for the LORD tells him and no other Person how it should be determined Verse 7 Ver. 7. The Daughters of Zelophehad c. The LORD approves of their Claim and gives a Sentence in their favour Thou shalt surely give them a possession of an inheritance among their Father's Brethren Because the word for them in the Hebrew is of the Masculine Gender some think it signifies they were to be considered as if they had been Sons And thou shalt cause the Inheritance of their Father to pass unto them So that they were to enjoy what would have faln to his share had he been alive ob indutam defuncti patris personam as the Lawyers speak because they stood in the place of their dead Father and represented his Person And accordingly they put in their Claim at the Division of the Land and had their Portion therein according to this Decision XVII Josh 2 3 c. How the Portion was divided among them according to the Hebrew Doctors Mr. Selden shows at large in his Book de Successionibus in bona defunctii cap. 23. Ver. 8. And thou shall speak unto the Children of Israel Verse 8 saying Upon this occasion he passes this special Case into a General Law to be hereafter observed If a Man die and have no Son then ye shall cause his Inheritance to pass unto his Daughter It being a reason as Maimonides observes More Nevochim P. III. cap. 42. that what a Man leaves should come to his Family and to those who are next of Kin to him for the nearer any Person is to us we are inclined by natural affection to have the greater regard to him But all this is to be understood of Land as for Money and moveable Goods which were of his own getting the Father might dispose of them by his Will to whom he pleased Ver. 9. And if he have no Daughter then ye shall give his Inheritance unto his Brethren Unless his Father was alive who undoubtedly the Jews say was Verse 9 the next Heir but not mentioned because it was not necessary Or as some say because it was too sad a thing to speak of a Fathers burying all his Children without Issue See Selden de Success in bona defuncti cap. 12. Where he observes that according to the Rule v. 11. it must come to the Father because he is nearest of kin to it And therefore the Jews interpret this as if Moses had said If he have Daughter he shall give his inheritance to the next of his Kindred to his Father for instance and afterwards ye shall give it to his Brethren i. e. the Children of his Father And the same is to be said of the Grandchildren unto whom the Brethren of a Father dying without issue are heirs For the Grandfather stands in the same relation to a Father that a Father doth to his Son Verse 11 Ver. 11. And if his Father have no Brethren then ye shall give it to his Kinsman that is next of Kin to him of his Family and he shall possess it To his Brothers Children or to those who are descended from them or from his Fathers ' Brethren But no consideration was to be had of his Mother's Kindred as the Jewish Lawyers say who could never be capable of the Inheritance Which they gather not only from these words which determine the Inheritance to his Family i. e. the Family of the Father before-mentioned not to the Family of the Mother but from the frequent mention of the Father of Mischpachoth which we translate Families or rather Kindreds of the Fathers in the Books of Moses Chronicles Ezra and others From whence this solemn Maxim of the Talmudists The Family or Kindred of the Mother is never called by the name of Kindred That is it hath not the effect of a Kindred in Successions to Inheritances Which is the same with that in the ancient Book Siphri Families follow the Fathers as Mr. Selden
Men who are in the same Circumstances with those Women whom he here directs in their Vows Whom he considers in a threefold state before they are married and after marriage and in their widowhood And bind her self by a bond By an Oath wherewith she confirms her Vow as it seems to be interpreted v. 10 13. Being in her fathers house in her youth That is being a part of his Family and still under his government and not married For the Father's power lasts no longer as Grotius observes Lib. II. de Jure Belli Pacis cap. 5. n. 7. In which condition likewise are all Sons who remain in their Father's Family undisposed of in marriage And all Servants who are manifestly in subjection to their Masters and therefore could no more resolve to do what they pleased then the Women here mentioned Ver. 4. And her father heareth her vow and her bond wherewith she hath bound herself The first of these may relate to her simple Vow and the next to an Oath wherewith she binds it to make it firmer Verse 4 Which her Father is supposed to hear either when she spake the words or when she acquainted him with her Vow as in duty she was bound to do And her father shall hold his peace at her If he did not declare that he disallowed what she had promised it was supposed he consented to it Unless he said he would take time to consider and neither allow nor disallow for the present in which case in all reason she was to wait for his Resolution Then all her Vows shall stand c. It was not in his power afterward to disannul any of them if he did not contradict them when he was told of them or after the time he had taken for deliberation Ver. 5. But if her father disallow her in the day that he heareth As soon as he comes acquainted with it Not any of her vows or her bonds wherewith she hath Verse 5 bound her soul shall stand Though she had bound her Vows with an Oath they were not to be performed when her Father had declared his will to the contrary And the LORD shall forgive her The not performing her Vow shall not be imputed to her as a sin Because her father disallowed her Whose consent was supposed to be necessary before the Vow could be binding she being while a part of his Family under his power and not her own Some have fancied that when her Father was dead the Vow revived because then she was at her own disposal but it is plain her Father wholly disannulled the Vow when he did not approve it so that it could not recover a force it never had being made without his consent The same is to be said of a Guardian who was supposed to be in the place of a Father when he died and left his Children to his care And this power was fit to be reserved to Parents as a late learned Man Puffendorf observes not only least Women in their imprudent years should undo themselves by vowing more than their Fortunes could bear but also least the Paternal Estate should be burdened by such Vows or the necessary Affairs of the Family hindred So that this power did not flow from positive Laws but from natural Reason no Body that is subject to another having any right to dispose of those things which are under that power to which they are subject Verse 6 Ver. 6. And if she had at all an husband when she vowed Was a married Woman or espoused to an Husband though still in her Father's House as it appears from v. 10. this must be interpreted when she made this Vow then it was to be considered not what her Father but her Husband under whose power she now was should determine about it Or uttered ought out of her lips wherewith she bound her soul Said any thing which she confirmed by an Oath Verse 7 Ver. 7. And her husband heard it Either was present when she spake it or she told it him afterwards And he held his peace in the day that he heard it Said nothing to signifie his disallowance of it See v. 4. Then her vows shall stand c. As before v. 4. Ver. 8. But if her husband disallow her c. See v. 5. where there is the same Case of a Daughter under the power of her Father as here of a Wife under the power of his Husband Verse 8 Ver. 9. But every vow of a Widow or of her that is Verse 9 divorced wherewith she hath bound her soul shall stand against her The reason of this is so plain that one would think it needed not to have been mentioned because such Women were wholly in their own power being free from their Husbands Therefore it is very probable he speaks here of a Widow or divorced Woman returned to her Father's House as the manner frequently was XXII Lev. 13. who might be supposed to recover his ancient power over her to disannul her Vows as he might before she was married Which is here absolutely condemned for though she lived with him she was her own Woman as we now speak and might dispose of her self and her Goods as she pleased without his consent Ver. 10. And if she vowed in her husbands house or Verse 10 bound her soul by a bond with an oath i. e. Engaged herself in a Vow and perhaps confirmed it with an Oath while she and her Husband lived together or before she was divorced from him Ver. 11. And her husband heard it and held his peace Verse 11 and disallowed it not then all her vows shall stand c. She was bound in this case to make them good after he was dead or she was divorced from him Ver. 12. But if her husband hath utterly made them Verse 12 void on the day he heard them c. Then when she was in her own power by his death or by a divorce she was not bound to make them good because when she made them her Husband under whose power she then was had utterly made them void Ver. 13. Every vow and every binding oath to afflict the soul This shows what the matter of these Vows frequently was to abstain from such or such Meats though in themselves lawful or to fast and eat nothing at all on other days as well as on the great Day of Expiation which was the only Fast ordained by the Law of Moses Her husband may establish it or her husband may make it void There is an excellent Discourse of Maimonides in his More Nevochim P. III. cap. 48. to show that this is most reasonable where he observes that as the Law prohibited some Meats so pious People sometimes vowed to forbear such as were not prohibited that by this means they might learn Contentment with a little or Continence and give a check to an immoderate Appetite From whence the saying among the Doctors That Vows are the hedge of Separation i. e. a great guard
XVII Josh 1. Verse 40 Ver. 40. And Moses gave Gilead unto Machir the Son of Manasseh i. e. To the Children of Machir for he was dead long ago who had a considerable Portion of that half of the Land of Gilead which was given to the half Tribe of Manasseh For one half was given to the Reubenites and Gadites and the other half to them III Deut. 12 13. where Gilead signifies all that Country properly so called neither so much as the whole Territory which these Tribes demanded v. 1. nor so little as was given to Machir v. 15. where Moses says And I gave Gilead unto Machir i. e. to that Family of Manasseh which were properly called Machirites XXVI Numb 29. and to that Family descended from his Son which from him were called Gileadites For as Manasseh had only this Son Machâ—r so Machir had only Gilead but he had many XXVI 30 31 32. who all raised Families And as to the Macharites and I suppose the Gileadites was given a Portion in this Country XIII Josh 29 30 c. so Joshua gave to the rest an Inheritance in the Land of Canaan XVII 2. And he gives a reason in the foregoing verse why he gave Gilead and Bashan to the Posterity of Machir because they were a warlike People inheriting their Father's Valour who was a Man of War and therefore fit to be placed in the Frontiers of that Country Ver. 41. And Jair the Son of Manasseh One of Verse 41 the Posterity of Manasseh by his Mother's side For he was the Grandson of Gilead the Son of Machir by his Daughter 1 Chron. II. 21 22. but his Father was of the Tribe of Judah It seems he joyned with the Children of Machir in their Expedition against Gilead mentioned v. 39. and was so successful that he took several small Towns in that Country and so had his Inheritance among the Children of Manasseh on this side Jordan where they now were There were threescore of them in the whole which were afterward called Cities XIII Josh 13. 1 Kings IV. 23. but he had only twenty three for his Possession 1 Chron. II. 22 23. And called them Havoth-Jair That is the Habitations of Jair For Havah is a dwelling as Bochartus observes in his Phaleg Lib. IV. cap. 29. And among the Arabians the word Havoth properly signifies many Tents orderly disposed in a Ring or Circle which in those Countries made that which we call a Village For Hava in their Language signifies to compass The same he observes in his Hierozoicon P. I. Lib. II. c. 44. p. 466. Verse 42 Ver. 42. And Nobah Who he was we find in no other place but an eminent Person no doubt in some of the Families of the Manassites either of the Machirites or the Gileadites For they only as I take it inherited on this side Jordan Went and took Kenath and the Villages thereof At the same time I suppose that Jair took the Towns above-mentioned of which this was one 1 Chron. II. 23. But though Jair was the chief Conductor in that Expedition yet he kept as I said only twenty three Towns to himself the rest were given to them who accompanied him of whom it is probable Nobah was one And called it Nobah after his own Name But it retained its old name also for St. Hierom says in his time there was a City called Canatha in the Region of Trachonitis not far from Bosra Thus this Country being settled upon these two Tribes and an half the Land of Canaan was divided by God's Command for an Inheritance to the remaining nine Tribes and the other half of the Tribe of Manasseh XIII Josh 7. CHAP. XXXIII Chapter XXXIII Ver. 1. THESE are the Journeys of the Children Verse 1 of Israel which went forth out of the Land of Egypt A brief recapitulation of the Travels of the Children of Israel through the Wilderness whereby the wonderful Providence of God over them appears in their Protection and Preservation from the time they departed out of Egypt till they came to the Borders of the Land of Canaan With their Armies For they marched in an orderly manner as Armies do See XII Exod. 41 51. XIII 18. Vnder the Hand of Moses and Aaron By whom they were conducted as the Ministers of God XII Exod. 1 28 50. Ver. 2. And Moses wrote their goings out according Verse 2 to their Journeys Every removal which they made from the place where they were unto another whither they journeyed By the commandment of the LORD This may refer either to their Journeys which were by God's commandment X. 13. or rather to Moses his writing this Epitome of their Travels of which God ordered him to give a distinct account Which was no unnecessary Work but most useful to Posterity there being no History extant in the World as David Chytraeus well observes except that of the Birth Life Death and Resurrection of Christ which contains so many wonderful Instances of Divine Providence as this of bringing the Children of Israel out of Egypt and leading them through the Red-Sea and through the Wilderness Concerning which Maimonides hath an excellent Discourse in his third Part of More Nevochim cap. 50. the Substance of which is this That it being impossible any Miracles should continue throughout all Generations due care should be taken that the Memory of them be not lost but faithfully preserved by the History and Narration of them in future times Now there being no greater Miracle than the Subsistence of the Children of Israel in the Desert for Forty years a Desert full of Scorpions and Serpents destitute of Water uninhabited through which no Man had been wont to pass as Jeremiah speaks II. 6. where they ate no Bread nor drank Wine or strong Drink XXIX Deut. 6 c. God would have the particular places set down distinctly where they pitched in that howling Wilderness That all Men might be satisfied who would take the pains to examine things by what a marvellous Providence such a multitude of People were fed every day for Forty years together and none might be able to Cavil and say that they travelled through a Country good enough and pitched in habitable places where they might plough and sow and reap or where they might have Herbs and Roots for their Sustenance or where Manna ordinarily came down from the Clouds for Mens support And these are their Journeys according to their goings out As if he had said Having received this Commandment from God this is a true and exact Account which here follows of their Travels from place to place Ver. 3. And they departed from Ramsees See XII Exod. 37. Here in all likelyhood they Sacrificed the Paschal Lamb and were preserved from the destroying Angel which made this place very remarkable for Verse 3 they seem to have been all summoned hither to meet here as in a common Rendevouz as they now speak to be ready to march away when God gave the word of
right of Marriage So shall their Inheritance be taken away from the Inheritance of the Tribe of our Fathers So will their Estate go out of our Tribe without remedy because the Jubilee it self will give us no Relief Verse 5 Ver. 5. And Moses commanded the Children of Israel according to the Word of the LORD Whom I suppose he consulted about this matter as he did when the first doubt was moved about the Inheritance of these Women XXVII 5. and received the answer by which he here commanded the Israelites to govern themselves The Tribe of Joseph In whose name the chief Fathers of their several Families made this representation to Moses as became Men who took care of the concerns of the whole Tribe Hath said well In desiring the Inheritance of these Women might not go out of their Tribe which was prevented by the following Law Ver. 6. This is the thing which the LORD doth Verse 6 command concerning the Daughters of Zelophehad saying Let them marry to whom they think best They were not confined to any particular Persons but might have their choice among those who were descended from the same Stock as it immediately follows Only to the Family of the Tribe of their Father shall they marry Only with these two limitations that they might not marry a Man of another Tribe nor a Man of another Family in their own Tribe For it is very manifest that they are tied to marry into the Family of their Father and accordingly they did actually marry their Cosin-Germans as we now speak v. 11. For this Law was made for the preservation of Families as well as of Tribes as the Law for the Redemption of Lands was And therefore these words the Family of the Tribe of their Father is well translated by Grotius upon I St. Matthew 16. familia stirpis paternae the Family of the Stoâ—k of their Father which was that they desired might not perish XXVII 4. and was the ground of the Law which commanded a Man to marry the Wife of his Brother who left no Issue XXV Deut. 16. Therefore there being several Families in the Tribe of Manasseh XXVI 29 30 31 32. these Women could marry only into the Family of the Hepherites Verse 7 Ver. 7. So shall not the Inheritance of the Children of Israel remove from Tribe to Tribe For by preserving it in the Family to which it was given it was necessarily preserved in the Tribe For every one of the Children of Israel shall keep himself to the Inheritance of the Tribe of his Fathers And not endeavour to get any part of the Inheritance of another Tribe by marrying an Heiress in it Plato himself took care of this that when a Man left only a Daughter his Estate should not be carried by her to a Stranger but she should be bound to marry 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one that was nearest of kin to her And if there was a want of near Kindred 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. it should descend to the Children of her Father's Brother or the Children of the Grandfather some of which he ordains should marry her Lib. XI de Legibus p. 924 925. Edit Serrani Verse 8 Ver. 8. And every Daughter that possesseth an Inheritance in any Tribe of the Children of Israel Here this Law is made general that all Women who were Heiresses as the Daughters of Zelophehad were should do as they are here commanded And this was one of the Attick Laws which as Grotius observes were plainly borrowed from the Law of Moses 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. That an Heiress should not marry out of her Kindred but dispose of her self and Estate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to one nearest of kin to her which was one of the Laws of Solon as Sam. Petitus observes out of Isaeus Pollux and others in his Comment in Leges Atticas Lib. VI. Tit. 1. p. 441. Shall be Wife to one of the Family of the Tribe of her Father Here she is confined to her Family and not merely to her Tribe But this concerned only such as were Heiresses all other Women might marry into what Tribe they pleased as appears by these very Books wherein we read that Aaron himself married the Sister of the Prince of Judah VI Exod. 22. And if any object that this was before the giving of the Law it is evident that Jehoiada a Priest and consequently of the Tribe of Levi married King Jehoram's Sister who was of the Tribe of Judah 2 Chron. XXII 11. And long before this all the Tribes of Israel being in great solicitude how to find Wives for their Brethren of Benjamin did not scruple their having them out of any Tribe if it had not been for their Oath XXI Judg. 18. And to add no more David himself of the Tribe of Judah married Michael the Daughter of Saul who was of the Tribe of Benjamin The Talmudists add that even these Heiresses might marry into what Tribe they pleased after the first Division of the Land by Joshua to which they imagine this Law was restrained it being a common saying among them That it did not belong to any Age but that in which it was made In the following Ages they pretend a Man might purchase Land in any Tribe and possess it alway or have the Inheritance of it by Marriage though he were of another Tribe as Selden shows their Opinion to be Lib. de Successionibus ad Leges Hebr. cap. 18. and Lib. III. de Synedr c. 4. n. 1. and Buxtorf de Sponsal Divortiis sect 44. But this is well confuted by Grotius in his Annotations upon I St. Matthew v. 16. Ver. 9. Neither shall the Inheritance remove from one Tribe to another Tribe This establishes in general what he had said before v. 7. with particular respect Verse 9 to the Daughters of Zelophehad But Moses ben Nachman upon these very words asserts the Talmudick Opinion before-mentioned that this concerns only the present Time not future Ages And puts this Case which is the strongest that can be thought of if a Woman were married into another Tribe after which Marriage her Father and all her Brethren dying without Children the Inheritance fell to her and consequently saith he the Possession must devolve from one Tribe to another into which she had married But according to the Letter of these words the Inheritance was rather to descend to the next of her Kindred than by her be carried out of the Tribe to which it belonged But every one of the Tribes of the Children of Israel shall keep himself to his own Inheritance Shall cleave or stick close to his own Inheritance as the Hebrew word signifies and as the Greek and Latin expresses it The reason of the Command was as Procopius Gazaeus observes to prevent the Confusion of Tribes How the Vulgar Latin came to deviate so much from the Hebrew Text and from the Intention of this Law as it hath done in this and the
is the reason perhaps why these are ordered here in the next words to bring up the Rear They shall go hindmost with their Standards Here the Standard comprehends Ensigns for there was but one Standard for this Camp as there were no more for the other three Therefore the meaning is they shall march hindermost under their several Colours as we now speak Which was ordered for the greater Security of the Sanctuary by the two strongest Bodies marching before and behind where there was the greatest danger Ver. 32. These are those which were numbred of the Verse 32 Children of Israel by the House of their Fathers c. That is Thus were all these Persons disposed under their several Standards whose Number was taken by Moses and Aaron with their Associates I. 44 45. Ver. 33. But the Levites were not numbred among Verse 33 the Children of Israel as the LORD commanded Moses And consequently did not belong to any of these Standards being to make another Camp by themselves I. 47 c. Ver. 34. And the Children of Israel did according to Verse 34 all that the LORD commanded Moses As they gave in their Names when they were to be numbred I. 54. so they now joyned together under such Standards as God appointed So they pitched by their Standards and so they set forward c. Each Tribe encamped under the Standard that was assigned to them and they also marched when they set forward in such order as is here directed Some order no doubt had been observed before both when they rested and when they marched See XIII Exod. 18. but it was not so exact and regular as this form into which they were now cast by God himself nor can we think it was so strictly observed The Jews say that this Camp made a Square of Twelve Miles in compass about the Tabernacle as Dr. Lightfoot hath observed in his Centur. Chorogr CXLVIII and J. Wagenseil more lately in his Annotations upon the Gemara of Sota Cap. 1. Sect. 51. where several of them say that the Camp was three Parasots in compass and a Parasot was four Miles CHAP. III. Chapter III Verse 1 Ver. 1. THese are the Generations of Aaron and Moses Being now to give an account of the Levites who had not been numbred with the rest of the Children of Israel he sets down the descendants of the principal Persons among them viz. Aaron whom he puts in the first place because he was the elder Brother and his Posterity were advanced to the Dignity of Priests and Moses whose Posterity were only Ministers to the Priests as all the common Levites were It may seem indeed at first fight as if he gave an account only of Aaron's Posterity v. 2. But if we look further to v. 27 28. we shall find the Posterity of both here numbred in the Family of the Amramites of which both Aaron and Moses were Amram being their Father from whom the Genealogy of the Children of Moses is derived 1 Chron. XXIII 13 14 c. through their Generations as here those of Aaron Concerning the word Generations See Dr. Hammond on the first of St. Matthew Not. a. In the day that the LORD spake unto Moses in Mount Sinai This Circumstance seems to be particularly specified because at that time Nadab and Abihu who are mentioned in the next Verse were both alive and very eminent Persons XXIV Exod. 1 9 10. though they were now dead at this numbring of the Levites Ver. 2. These are the Names of the Sons of Aaron Verse 2 Nadab the first-born c. There seems no necessity of setting down the Names of Aaron's Sons they not being here to be numbred But it was of great Concernment to have the Distinction preserved between the Priests and the Levites their Offices being very different and therefore Moses here sets down who belonged to the one and who to the other Ver. 3. These are the Names of the Sons of Aaron Verse 3 the Priests which were anointed See VIII Levit. 30. Which he consecrated In the Hebrew whose Hand he filled See XXVIII Exod. 41. XXIX 9. To minister in the Priests Office He would have it noted that Aaron's Posterity were solemnly consecrated to an higher Office than the rest of the Tribe of Levi who were to be their Servants The very name of Cohen carries Dignity in it signifying sometime a Prince as well as a Priest Accordingly the Priests had very little servile Work imposed upon them but their chief business was to draw near to God to present him with the Blood and the Fat and some part of the Sacrifices which might be killed by other Persons This shows that they were God's Familiars insomuch that some Sacrifices were divided between him and them and it was the same thing whether they were consumed on the Alter or eaten by the Priests And those things are said to be given to God which were put into their hands though they never came to the Altar Which is an Evidence of the near relation they had to the Divine Majesty which the Levites had not for they could not come nigh to offer any thing to him no more than the rest of the Israelites but were employed in inferior Services about the Tabernacle that the Priests might wholly attend to the Service of God at the Altar Verse 4 Ver. 4. And Nadab and Abihu died before the LORD c. A little after their Consecration X Lev. 1 c. And they had no Children Which is here recorded that all Posterity might know there were none to be admitted to the Office of Priesthood but such as could derive their Genealogy from Eleazar or Ithamar If the other had left any Sons they would have inherited their Father's Office before Eleazar as Maimonides observes out of Siphre See Schickard his Jus Regium Cap. VI. Theorem XX. And Eleazar and Ithamar ministred in the Priests Office in the sight of their Father The LXX rightly translate it together with their Father Who was the High Priest and they Lower Priests under him And so were all their Sons which it is likely they had in good number For they are appointed v. 38. for the guard of the Tabernacle towards the East And thus the Gemara Hieorosol in the Title concerning Fasting saith That Moses appointed VIII Classes of Priests four of the Family of Eleazar and as many of Ithamar which continued till the time of Samuel the Prophet and David who admitted many more See Selden de Success in Pontif. Cap. I. Ver. 5. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying Now he gives order about the rest of the Tribe of Levi who had been omitted in the late Muster Verse 5 Ver. 6. Bring the Tribe of Levi near and present Verse 6 them They had consecrated themselves to God by a noble Act mentioned XXXII Exod. 29. Which procured them this Blessing to be presented to God and consecrated to him in a solemn manner for such Services as he should assign
a just Right to them and by that solemn Dedication which he then commanded to be made of them unto his uses XIII Exod. 2 12 13. I hallowed unto me all the First-born in Israel c. He separated them unto himself by sparing them when he killed all other First-born but only theirs Mine they shall be Both by that Act of his own and by the Act of the Children of Israel whom he commanded to Sanctifie them to him XIII Exod. 2. XXII 29. they became God's By which it appears that he had not a peculiar Right in the First-born more than in any other of their Children till their coming out of Egypt And therefore the taking of the Levites to be his instead of the First-born is no Argument that the First-born had hitherto been the Priests who ministred unto God till this Exchange of them for the Levites So our learned Dr. Lightfoot seems to infer in his Notes upon this passage The First-born saith he had been Priests till the Consecration of the Levites but now that Function must be confined to that Tribe In which words with due respect be it spoken to that excellent Man's Labours there are several Mistakes For as the Priesthood was not now confined to this Tribe but to one Family in this Tribe that of Aaron so it was not confined to it upon this occasion but he and his Sons were Consecrated before this Exchange of the Levites for the First-born Who were now given to minister unto them but had nothing to do with the Priesthood no more than the First-born had for whom they were exchanged that peculiar Right which God had in the First-born being since their coming out of Egypt Upon all which Considerations we may look upon this Exchange as an Argument rather that the First-born were not Priests in former times than that they were as the Jews fancy and as many have suggested from this very taking of the Levites to be God's portion in their stead For so Menochius himself L. II. de Repub. Jud. cap. 1. asserts from this very place Jus Sacerdotum in Levitas translatum eos loco primogenitorum acceptos quibus hoc jus debebatur that the Right of Priests was transferred to the Levites and they were accepted in stead of the First-born to whom that Right belonged In which there is not a word of truth but only that the Levites were accepted instead of the First-born who had the same Right to the Priesthood that the Levites had that is none at all I am the LORD Who may take whom I please to be imployed in my Service and think it reasonable that those whom I spared when I slew the Egyptian First-born should be mine Ver. 14. And the LORD spake unto Moses There was some reason no doubt why Moses alone is commanded to take the number of the Levites upon this occasion as he alone did v. 16. when Aaron Verse 14 is joined with him in numbring the Israelites I. 3. and in numbring the Levites themselves who were fit for service IV. 2 41 45. nay the chief of the Israelites assisted therein v. 46. And it is most probable he alone was employed to take this account because Aaron was a party in it the Money that was to be paid for so many of the first-born as exceeded the number of the Levites being given to him and to his Sons v. 48. In the Wilderness of Sinai This Command immediately followed the other in the two preceding Chapters before they departed from the Wilderness of Sinai where they had been ever since God delivered the Law to them from that Mountain Ver. 15. Number the Children of Levi after the House Verse 15 of their Fathers by their Families Just as they had numbred the rest of the Children of Israel See I. v. 2. Only those they numbred from Twenty years old and upward but the Levites from a Month old and upward Every Male from a month old and upward shalt thou number them The reason of this difference was that this was the Age at which they were to redeem their First-born XVIII 16. in whose stead the Levites were to be given unto God See v. 40. of this Chapter Ver. 16. And Moses numbred them according to the Verse 16 word of the LORD c. This Charge was committed to him alone v. 10. and he alone as I there observed performed it Ver. 17. And these were the Sons of Levi by their names Gershon and Kohath and Merari The same account we had before XLVI Gen. 11. VI Exod. 16. Verse 18 Ver. 18. And these are the Names of the Sons of Gershon by their Families Libni and Shimei The same is said VI Exod. 17. Verse 19 Ver. 19. And the Names of the Sons of Kohath c. They are mentioned in the same order in that VI Exod. 18 19. Verse 20 Ver. 20. These are the Families of the Levites according to the House of their Fathers These were the principal Families in this Tribe from whence the several Housholds and the Persons in them were derived Verse 21 22. Ver. 21 22. Of Gershon was the Family c. From his two Sons sprung two Families who had in them Seven thousand and five hundred Male Children from a Month old and upward Verse 23 Ver. 23. And the Families of the Gershonites shall pitch behind the Tabernacle westward Where the most holy place was and where they under the Standard of Ephraim lay in the great Camp of Israel II. 18. between whom and the Tabernacle this part of the Camp of Levi pitched Verse 24 Ver. 24. And the Chief of the House of the Father of the Gershonites c. The Commander in Chief as we may stile him or the principal Officer in this part of the Camp of the Levites was Eliasaph the Son of Lael but of what Family he was whether of the Libnites or Shimites is not related Verse 25 Ver. 25. And the Charge of the Sons of Gershon That which was committed peculiarly to their care In the Tabernacle of the Congregation In the things belonging to the Tabernacle for none went into it but the Priests alone Shall be the Tabernacle Not the Boards and Pillars and Bases of it for they belonged to the care of the Sons of Merari v. 36. but the Ten Curtains which were the inward Hangings of it and are called the Mischcan or Tabernacle XXVI Exod. 1. and see the next Chapter of this Book v. 25. And the Tent. The outward Curtains of Goats Hair which are called Ohel the Tent XXVI Exod. 7.12 The Covering thereof The Michse as the Hebrews call it or the Covering of the Tent were the Rams Skins and Badgers Skins which lay outmost of all upon the Curtains of Goats Hair XXVI Exod. 14. And the hanging for the Door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation The outward Vail mentioned XXVI Exod. 36. for the inward Vail which hung before the most holy Place was the Charge of the Kohathites Ver. 26.
And the Hangings of the Court See Verse 26 XXVII Exod. 9. And the Curtain for the Door of the Court XXVI Exod 16. Which is by the Tabernacle and by the Altar round about Or as the Hebrew particle al may be translated is over or upon the Tabernacle c. That is this Curtain at the Door and the Hangings of the Court compassed the Tabernacle and the Altar of Burnt-offerings which stood at the Door of it XL Exod. 19. round about so that they were not exposed to common fight For these Gershonites had nothing to do with the Altar it self which was the Charge of the Kohathites v. 31. And the Cords of it This seems to refer not merely to the Curtain for the Door of the Court but to all that went before viz. the Cords whereby those Hangings were stretched out and fastned by Pins to the Wood-work of the Tabernacle For the Cords of that belonged to the Custody of the Sons of Merari v. 37. and we find Pins and Cords as well for the Tabernacle that is the Hangings as for the Court i. e. the Boards c. XXXV Exod. 18. For all the Service thereof Of this part of the House of God as appears from v. 31 and 36. where this is repeated with respect to the other parts of it Verse 27 Ver. 27. And of Kohath was the Family of the Amramites c. He was the second Son of Levi and had as many more Families sprung from him as from the Eldest among which was the Family of the Amramites of which were Moses and Aaron Verse 28 Ver. 28. In the number of all the Males c. Though there were four Families of the Kohathites and but two of the Gershonites yet the latter were as numerous as they within Eleven hundred Keeping the Charge of the Sanctuary Of what belonged to the holy Place which was committed to their Charge as it follows afterward and they were instructed in it betimes Verse 29 Ver. 29. The Families of the Sons of Kohath shall pitch on the side of the Tabernacle southward Between the Tabernacle ond the Standard of Reuben II. 10. Verse 30 Ver. 30. And the Chief of the House of the Father of the Families of the Kohathites shall be Elizaphan the Son of Vzziel There was a Commander in Chief appointed over this Body of the Levites who was chosen out of the youngest Family of the Kohathites But it is observable there were no Standards belonging to any of these Bodies they being designed for other Service and not for War Ver. 31. And their Charge shall be the Ark and the Verse 31 Table and the Candlestick The Sanctuary as was said before v. 28. being committed to their Custody the Particulars are here mentioned which were the most precious of all the holy Things With which the Kohathites had the honour to be intrusted though a younger Family than those descended from Gershon because Moses and Aaron were of it being of the Family of the Amramites Which is the reason why the Kohathites are reckoned first in the next Chapter v. 2. and that of the XLVIII Cities given to the Levites by Joshua almost half of them fell to their Families XXI Josh 4 5. The Altars Both the Altar of Burnt-offerings and the Altar of Incense And the Vessels of the Sanctuary wherewith they i. e. the Priests minister See XXV Exod. 29. XXXVII 16. And the hanging That is the Vail before the most Holy Place for all other Hangings were under the care of the Gershonites v. 25 26. wherein the Ark was wrapt when they carried it IV. 5. And all the Service thereof Whatsoever belonged to this part of God's House See v. 26. and the Particulars are mentioned in the next Chapter v. 7 9 14. Ver. 32. And Eleazar the Son of Aaron shall be chief Verse 32 over the Chief of the Levites There was one Officer in chief set over each of these great Families of the Gershonites v. 24. of the Kohathites v. 30. and the Merarites v. 35. And over all these Chiefs there is now appointed a supreme Chief who was to govern them as they governed those under them and that was Eleazar who was more than a Levite being the eldest Son of Aaron the High Priest And have the over-sight of them that keep the charge of the Sanctuary But more particularly Eleazar was to super-vise those that had the Sanctuary under their care That is all the Rohathites and Elizaphan their chief v. 20. Verse 33 34. Ver. 33 34. Of Merari was the Family of the Mahlites and the Family of the Mushites c. Nothing is observable of these but that they were the fewest in number being thirteen hundred less than the Children of Gershon v. 22. Verse 35 Ver. 35. These shall pitch on the side of the Tabernacle Northward Opposite to the Kohathites between the Standard of Dan and the Sanctuary II. 25. Verse 36 Ver. 36. And under the Custody and Charge of the Sons of Merari shall be the Boards of the Tabernacle c. Concerning all the things mentioned in this and in the next Verse See XXVI Exod. 15 16 c. XXVII 10 11 12 c. and the next Chapter of this Book v. 31 32. Verse 37 Ver. 37. And their Cords These are different from those before mentioned v. 27. as I noted there Verse 38 Ver. 38. But those that encamp before the Tabernacle towards the East Where the Entrance into it was Even before the Tabernacle of the Congregation Eastward He would have this Station observed as much excelling the rest Shall be Moses and Aaron and his Sons There were but three Bodies of the Levites descended from the three Sons of Levi v. 1. and therefore none left to guard this side of the Tabernacle but Moses and Aaron and their Families who lay between the Standard of Judah and the Tabernacle see Chap. II. v. 3. which was the most honourable Post as I there noted Where the Priests were with great reason placed together with the chief Governor of all Moses because they were to guard the Holy Place that none might go into it but themselves Keeping the charge of the Sanctuary Of the Entrance into it For the charge of the Children of Israel Which it concerned every one of the Children of Israel should be kept sacred See v. 7. And the Stranger that cometh nigh shall be put to Death No Man that was not of the House of Aaron though a Levite was upon the peril of his life to enter into the Sanctuary Of which they had the charge See v. 10. Ver. 39. All that were numbred of the Levites which Verse 39 Moses and Aaron numbred at the Commandment of the LORD This looks like a Contradiction to the Observation I made v. 14.16 But Aaron's numbring here in all Probability is only his agreeing that this was a true Account which Moses took of the Tribe of Levi. For Moses still continues to be alone concerned in numbring the
and let Blood And whosoever suffered a Rasor to pass upon his Flesh was required to wash himself in pure Fountain-water as he shows More Nevochim P. III. cap. 47. Verse 19 Ver. 19. And the Priest shall take the sodden shoulder of the Ram. The left Shoulder which he was to take out of the Pot as it was boiling for the right Shoulder which is called the Heave-shoulder in the next Verse was the Priest's Portion by a Law made before this VII Lev. 32 33. And one unleavened Cake out of the Basket and one unleavened Wafer The Basket of unleavened Bread was ordered to be offered before v. 17. and now he orders one of the Cakes and one of the Wafers mentioned with the Bread v. 15. to be put into the Hands of the Nazarite the rest being burnt I suppose upon the Altar And shall put them into the hands of the Nazarite That he might give them to the Priest in token of his Thankfulness to him for his pains After the Hair of his Separation is shaved And his Vow in a manner compleated as it was immediately after these things were presented unto God Ver. 20. And the Priest shall wave them Both Verse 20 the sodden Shoulder and the Cake and Wafer For a Wave-offering before the LORD See VII Lev. 30 31. This is holy for the Priest with the Wave-Breast and Heave-shoulder These two were the Priests Portion out of all Peace-offerings as I observed before from VII Lev. 34. but in this Peace-offering he had moreover the other Soulder as a special Token of the Nazarite's Gratitude for his Cleansing And after that the Nazarite may drink Wine He was restored to his former Freedom to live as other Men did Ver. 21. This is the Law of the Nazarite who hath Verse 21 vowed and of his Offering to the LORD for his Separation All these things he was bound to perform betore he could be freed from his Vow though he was never so poor Besides that that his hand shall get Besides which he might add if he pleased according to his Ability According to the Vow which he vowed so must he do after the Law of his Separation There was a necessity that he should perform what his Vow obliged him unto according to the Law of Nazariteship though he might voluntarily offer what he thought good over and above his Oblation now that he was executing his Vow His Friends also might joyn with him in the Expense he was at for so many Sacrifices as he was enjoyned to offer or in providing voluntary Offerings beyond his Oblation Thus we read in XXI Acts 23 24. that St. Paul by the advice of St. James and the Elders Jerusalem was at charges with certain Men that had this Vow upon them and purified himself with them Which was agreeable to the Custom among the Jews as Petitus and others have observed out of Maimonides who says others might help the Nazarites to fulfil their Vow and partake with them in it by abstaining from Wine c. for some time as they did Verse 22 Ver. 22. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying The Tabernacle having been lately erected to which the People were all to resort they are invited to it by the Directions here given how they should be dismissed when they came to Worship Which was in such a manner that they might not doubt as R. Menachem glosses but the Divine Benediction would come down upon them from his Celestial Habitation when they devoutly frequented his House here on Earth Verse 23 Ver. 23. Speak unto Aaron and unto his Sons saying Whose proper Office it was to bless the People as it was to offer their Sacrifices and burn Incense XXI Deut. 5. On this wise he shall bless the Children of Israel saying unto them Standing so that they might be seen with their Hands lifted up and spread speaking with a loud voice with their Faces towards the People See IX Lev. 22. Verse 24 Ver. 24. The LORD bless thee and keep thee Give thee all good things and preserve thee from all evil Ver. 25. The LORD make his Face to shine upon thee and be gracious unto thee Be favourable unto thee and pardon all thy Sins Ver. 26. The LORD lift up his Countanance upon Verse 25 thee and give thee Peace Be always with thee to Verse 26 protect and defend thee and give thee perfect Happiness When this Benediction was said in the Sanctuary if we may believe the Jews it was but one and pronounced without any Pause The People keeping a profound Silence but out of the Sanctuary in their Synagogues they made three of it the Priest pausing at the end of every Verse and the People saying Amen to each of them In the Sanctuary also they pronounced the name JEHOVAH which is here thrice repeated but in their Synagogues they used some other name instead of it So the Mischna Sotae Cap. VII Sect. 6. The Repetition of this Name three times in these three Verses and that with a different Accent in each of them as R. Menachem observes hath made the Jews themselves think there is some Mystery in it Which we understand though they do not For it may well be lookt upon by us as having respect to the three Persons in the Blessed Trinity who are one God from whom all Blessings slow unto us 2 Corinth XIII 14. This Mystery as Luther wisely expresses it upon Psalm V. is here occultè insinuatum secretly insinuated though not plainly revealed And it is not hard to show if this were a place for it how properly God the Father may be said to bless and keep us and God the Son to be gracious unto us and God the Holy Ghost to give us Peace Ver. 27. And they shall put my Name upon the Children of Israel To put God's Name upon them was to commend them to his Almighty Goodness or to bless them by calling upon the LORD and beseeching him to bestow all that they desired upon them And I will bless them The Jews from hence observe that God's Blessing in some sort depends upon the Blessing of the Priest Which they thought so necessary that such Priests as were admitted to no other Service might perform this for fear the People should at any time want it So Chaskuin upon XXI Deut. 5. and Jalkut as Wagenseil observes upon the Gemara Sotae Cap. VII Sect. 26. whose words are these The Blessing pronounced by a Priest who hath some blemish in his Body ought to be accounted legitimate Jonathan here paraphrases these words in this manner I will bless them in my WORD or by my WORD Which is the Apostolical Doctrine that God the Father hath blessed us with all Spiritual Blessings in or by Christ 1 Ephes 3. Who with the Holy Ghost is most high in the Glory of God the Father And it is observable that the Jews think it utterly unlawful to add a fourth Benediction to these three though they find one in the
Verses Verse 25 Ver. 25. And the Standard of the Children of Dan set forward c. See concerning him and those mentioned in the two next Verses Chap. II. v. 25 27 29. Which was the rereward of all the Camps throughout their Hosts The Hebrew word Measseph which we translate was the rereward comes from a word which every where signifies to gather together or collect And therefore is here to be so understood and the whole Sentence thus rendred Then set forward the Standard of the Camp of Dan gathering to it all the Camps throughout their Hosts Or according to their Armies as we here translate the last part of these words v. 14 18 22. So Forsterus translates it the meaning being that all the rest of the People who were not a part of the four before-mentioned Camps all under XX Years old who were not able to go forth to War together with the mixt multitude that came with them out of Egypt XII Exod. 38. and all the unclean Persons who were shut out of the Camp V. 2. came after this hindermost Standard of the Children of Dan. Verse 28 Ver. 28. Thus were the Journeyings of the Children of Israel c. In this order they marched when they removed from one station to another Verse 29 Ver. 29. And Moses said unto Hobab His Wives Brother as Theodoret understands it The Son of Raguel the Midianite The Son of Jethro Priest of Midian For Raguel and he are thought by many to be the same Person II Exod. 18. III. 1. or one was the Father and the other the Son and then Hobab was the Grand-son of Raguel Moses his father-in-law These words may either refer to Raguel who is supposed to be Jethro and then it is rightly translated Father-in-law or they may as well refer to Hobab and be translated Brother-in-law For so the Hebrew word Choters sometimes signifies a very near Kinsman It cannot without great staining be otherwise expounded in the I Judg. 16. and IV. 11. After Jethro therefore was gone back to his own Country XVIII Exod. 27. Hobab his Son stayed still with his Sister Zipporah and accompanied Moses all the time he stayed near Sinai Which was not far from Midian Whether he thought to return now the Isrelites were marching away from that Neighbourhood but Moses was desirous to have his company further even to the Land of Promise We are journeying unto the place of which the LORD said I will give it you i. e. To the Land of Canaan for thither God intended to have brought them shortly after this removal as appears from I Deut. 6 7. Come thou with us and we will do thee good See verse 32. For the LORD hath spoken good concerning Israel Promised to bestow a noble Country upon us for our Inheritance Ver. 30. And he said I will not go This was his Verse 30 present Resolution till Moses had further perswaded him But I will depart to my own Land Which he was loth to leave merely in hope of what the Israelites had not yet in possession And to my Kindred With whom all Men love to live and die Verse 31 Ver. 31. And he said i. e. Moses replied Leave us not I pray thee Do not persist in that Resolution but be perswaded to go along with us Forasmuch as thou knowest how we are to encamp in the Wilderness He being a Borderer upon this Wilderness was well acquainted with every part of it and the better able to advise them how to secure their Camp for the Cloud only served to direct them where it should be pitched and defend themselves from the People on all sides that might be injurious to them Which made Moses so earnest with him to stay with them while they had such need of his assistance And thou mayest be to us instead of Eyes To give them Advice and Counsel in any difficulty they might meet withal in the places where they stayed or to direct them how to provide themselves with such things as they wanted For he having lived long thereabouts could not but understand the Neighbouring Countries The LXX understand this Passage as if he desired him to continue to be what he had been hitherto in the Wilderness viz. a good Adviser like his Father Jethro assuring him they would look upon him as an Elder That is have him in great honour Verse 32 Ver. 32. And it shall be if thou go with us Not only stay with us while we are here in the Wilderness but go along with us into Canaan Yea it shall be Depend upon it That what Goodness the LORD shall do unto us the same will we do unto thee Give thee some part of the Possession which God shall bestow upon us Accordingly it appears that as Moses prevailed with him to accompany them so he and his Posterity were settled among the Israelites I Judg. 16. IV. 11. where either he or his Father is called the Kenite who lived in Tents not in Houses after the manner of their Fore-fathers in Midian Ver. 33. And they departed from the Mount of the Verse 33 LORD viz. Horeb in the Wilderness of Sinai where they had stayed a long time I Deut. 6. Three days journey They travelled three Days before the Cloud settled again upon the Tabernacle though it stood still some times but did not descend to give them time for necessary Refreshment and for Sleep See XI 1. And the Ark of the Covenant of the LORD went before them in the three days journey It is said v. 21. that the Sanctuary was carried between the two first Standards and the two last i. e. in the midst of the Camp as we expresly read II. 17. Which Abarbinel thinks is to be understood not of all their Journeys but only this That was the constant order of their March first went the Standard of Judah next that of Reuben after this the Tabernacle of the Congregation then followed the Standard of Ephraim and last of all that of Dan. But now in their first Removal God did them the honour to appoint the Ark to go before them in the front of all the Camps as he did when they passed over Jordan III Josh 6. That is in their first and last Journeys this extraordinary Favour was shown them but in all the rest the Ark went in the midst of them And thus Aben Ezra upon this place This first Removal was not like the rest of their Removals But I see no good ground for this Exposition The plain meaning seems to be That the LORD as their King and Governour led them by the Cloud which was always over the Ark just as a General leads his Army though he be not in the front of it but in the midst from whence he Issues out his Orders To search out a resting place for them There was no need of enquiry after a fitting Station for them but he speaks after the manner of Generals who send Officers before them to take up
mentioned by Mr. Selden L. II. de Synedr Cap. IV. Sect. 2. And indeed the Spirit was not sent upon them to make them Prophets but to make them Governors and Judges And therefore the Gift of Prophecy which God gave them for the present was only to procure them Reverence from the People as an evident Sign that they were chosen by God to be Co-adjutors to Moses in the exercise of his Supream Authority over them And thus I find Theodoret understood it Quaest XX. in Num. The LXX did not prophesie beyond this day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. because God promoted them not to prophesie but to govern Which St. Paul also reckons among other Gifts bestowed upon Christians 1 Corinth XII 26. Now that it might appear God had conferred this Divine Gift of Government upon them they also prophesied the first day that they received it And I do not see why our Translation did not cease may not be interpreted to this sense that is they did not cease all that day while they stood about the Tabernacle Verse 26 Ver 26. And there remained two of the Men. Of the LXX Elders whom Moses ordered to appear and set themselves about the Tabernacle So the Hierusalem Targum these were of the number of the LXX wise Men neither did the LXX wise Men go from the Tabernacle while Eldad and Medad prophesied in the Camp And so R. Levi ben Gersom notes It seems to be plain out of the Text that these two were of the LXX Elders Which our Translators thought necessary to express by adding those words of the For in the Hebrew there is no more said but only there remained two Men. In the Camp Among the rest of the People from whom they would not come Out of Modesty saying They were not equal to such a dignity as the words are in the Gemara Babylonica Tit. Sanhedrin Or perhaps they loved a private life and were afraid of being envied by the People Whom they saw to be so unruly that it made them decline the burden as Saul did when he hid himself among the stuff The name of the one was Eldad and the name of the other Medad We do not find the names of any other of the LXX Elders but only these two who Jonathan saith were Moses his Brothers by the Mother's side And St. Hierom himself mentions such a Tradition that they were his Brethren But there is no certainty of this nor of what others of the Jews say concerning them See Selden Lib. II. de Synedr Cap. 4. Sect. 3. It may be they are mentioned in honour of their vertuous Modesty which made them think themselves unworthy of so high a dignity And the Spirit rested upon them As it did upon those who were about the Tabernacle v. 25. Whereby God marked them out to be in the number of those whom he had chosen to be Assistants unto Moses And they were of them that were written c. Whose Names Moses put into the Summons which he sent to those whom he judged fit to be advanced to this Authority The Jews particularly Solomon Jarchi say they were chosen by the way of casting Lots and according to their manner they tell the Story thus in the place mentioned before in the Gemara Moses say they was in doubt how he should execute God's Command v. 16. because if he did not chuse an equal number out of every Tribe it might be ill taken And if he chose Six out of each of the XII Tribes they would exceed the number of LXX if but five they would fall short of it He resolved therefore at last to chuse VI out of each Tribe which in all were LXXII Persons And in LXX Schedules he wrote the Name of Elder but the other two were Blanks Then mixing all these in an Urn he bad them come and draw And to every one who drew a Schedule that had the Name of Elder in it he said God hath sanctified thee but to him that drew a Blank he said God hath not chosen thee And those two Blanks some of the Jewish Doctors say came into the hands of Eldad and Medad who therefore were left behind in the Camp And this Conceit our very learned Dr. Lightfoot himself entertained saying in his short account of this Chapter That six of a Tribe made up the number of the Sanhedrim which was chosen and two over And those two were Eldad and Medad who were written for Elders but the Lot cast them out that there might be but LXX Yet did the LORD honour them with the Spirit of Prophecy But as this whole Story of the manner of Chusing the Elders is very dubious so other Jews of great Authority say that Eldad and Medad were of the number of the LXX that were chosen Particularly Jonathan saith expresly they were of the number of those whose Schedules came up with the Name of Elder in them But they did not go to the Tabernacle because they had no mind to be Governours Nay the Talmudical Gloss upon the fore-named place of the Gemara saith that when LXX of the LXXII had drawn two of them had Blanks whereby Eldad and Medad knew that the two remaining Schedules had the Name of Elder in them and therefore would not draw them because they were sure not to have Blanks The very same Mr. Selden shows is in other noted Books of theirs So that it is generally received they were in the number of those LXX which were chosen to be joined with Moses in the Government See L. II. de Synedr Cap. 4. Sect. 7. And they prophesied in the Camp Which was a greater thing than if they had prophesied at the Tabernacle Denoting them to be Men so highly in the Favour of God that he would distinguish them from other Men wheresoever they were and not want their Service The Hierusalem Targum relates what each of them foretold for to that he restrains their Prophesying and what they both foretold but it is not worth the mentioning Ver. 27. And there ran a young Man and told Moses Verse 27 and said Eldad and Medad do prophesie tn the Camp The Jews who will seem ignorant of nothing say it was Gershom the Son of Moses who carried these Tydings to his Father Ver. 28. And Joshua the Son of Nun. From Verse 28 whence some conclude that he was none of the LXX Elders though a Man of a most excellent Spirit And indeed this is likely enough he being to succeed Moses and so to become the Head of them The Servant of Moses Who ministred to him as a constant Attendant on his Person XXIV Exod. 13. One of his young Men. The word one is not in the Hebrew which may be translated from among his young Men i. e. The rest of those that waited on him My Lord Moses forbid them Perhaps he thought they could have no Authority not being at the Tabernacle Or rather that their Prophesying too much lessened the Authority
3. XV Josh 1 3. being different from the Wilderness of Sin which lay near to Egypt XVI Exod. 1. Vnto Rehob as Men come to Hamath The City of Rehob lay in the North of the Land of Canaan and fell to the Lot of the Tribe of Asher XIX Josh 28. And it lay not far from Hamath which in after times was called Ephiphania a City which we very often read of afterwards as the bounds of Judaea Northward which Moses saith was unto the entrance of Hamath XXXIV 8. So that they took a Survey of the whole Country from one end of it to the other South and North and also as they passed along observed those Parts that lay East and West For they gave an account of the Canaanites as dwelling by the Sea which was Westward and by the Coast of Jordan which was on the East v. 29. Or if by the Sea we understand not the Western Ocean but the dead Sea as some do yet it appears by these very words that they bent their Course as they passed from South to North unto the Western and Eastern Parts also For Rehob and Hamath both lay at the foot of Libanus one to the North-west towards Sidon and the other to the North-east Verse 22 Ver. 22. And they ascended by the South In their return from searching the Country And came unto Hebron That is Some of them For the words in the Hebrew is not they came as it is they ascended but he came Which demonstrates that they did not go all of them together in a Company for that had been dangerous and might have made them taken notice of but dispersed themselves some going to discover one place some another And it is a probable Conjecture of some of the Hebrew Doctors that Caleb was the Man that went to take a view of Hebron and was so little affrighted at the sight of the Giants there that he was the very Person that afterward drove them out and had this place given him for his Portion For it was in the South part of the Lot of the Tribe of Judah being formerly called Kirjath-Arba XIV Josh 9 12 14. Where Ahiman Sheshai and Talmai the Children of Anak were These were the Grand-children of Arba from whom Hebron had the name of Kirjath-Arba i. e. the City of Arba who was the Father of Anak Whose Family was more eminent than any other in Canaan these three Sons of his being Men not only of great Bulk but Prowess and Valour Bochartus thinks Lib. I. Canaan cap. 1. that Anak signifies as much as the Roman name Toropiatus being like to that Gaul whom Manlius vanquished And Ahiman signifies as much as Who is my Brother importing there was none to be compared with him Sesai he takes to be as much as Sixtius viz. Six Cubits high as Goliath was And Talmai he derives from Talam a Furrow as if he seemed in length to equal a Furrow in the Field These were the People that made the Israelites tremble for it is likely their whole Family were of a very large Stature though not so big as these And indeed they were so very terrible to all their Neighbours that it became a Proverbial saying in those Countries Who can stand before the Children of Anak IX Deut. 2. Now Hebron was built seven years before Zoan in Egypt The Egyptians boasted of the great Antiquity of their Nation and Cities But Moses shows that Hebron was built before the Capital City of their Country For so Zoan was and called in after Ages Tanis lying not far from that Mouth of the River Nile which from thence was called by Plutarch 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 R. Solomon will have it that Hebron was built by Cham one of the three Sons of Noah and the Father of Mizraim from whom the Egyptians descended But of this there is no certainty and the Gemara upon Sota cap. 7. saith It is not likely that a Man would build a House for his younger Son before he had built one for his elder for Canaan was the youngest of all the Sons of Cham X Gen. 6. Yet those Doctors are willing to suppose that Cham built both these Cities and therefore interpret the word banah which is rightly translated built as if it signified fruitful according to XVI Gen. 2. and make the Sense to be That Hebron was seven times more fruitful than Zoan Which is very foolish as upon other accounts so on this that Hebron was a strong place and therefore not fertile Verse 23 Ver. 23. And they came unto the Brook Eshchol A place which lay in a Valley at the foot of the Mountain I Deut. 24. And cut down from thence a Branch with one Cluster of Grapes This was done no doubt in some private place upon the Southern Borders of Canaan just as they were returning to the Camp of Israel again For it would have given the Country too great an Alarm if they had marched in the High-way with this Bunch upon their Shoulders And they bare it between two A great many Authors mention Vines and Grapes of an extraordinary bigness in those Eastern and Southern Countries I need only refer to Strabo who says the Vines in Margiana and other places were so big that two Men could scarce compass them with their Arms and that they produced 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Bunch of Grapes of two Cubits Lib. II. Geograph p. 73. and Lib. XI p. 516. Which is in part justified by Olearius in his late Travels into Persia Book III. where he saith not far from Astracan he saw Vines whose Trunks were so thick that a Man could do no more than grasp them about with both his Arms. And Forsterus in his Dictionarium Hebraicum p. 862. saith there was a Preacher at Norimberg called Achacius who lived as a Monk eight Years in the Holy Land as they call it who told him upon his Sick-bed That in his time there were Clusters of Grapes at Hebron of such bigness that one single Kernel was sufficient to quench his Thirst a whole day when he was sick there of a Tympany J. Conradus Dieterius hath collected a great deal more to this purpose out of Leo Africanus and Nic. Radzivillius and other Authors in his Antiq Biblicae p. 249. And since him the most learned Huetius in his Quaestiones Alnetanae Lib. II. cap. 12. n. 24. where among other things he observes that Crete Chios and other Islands in the Archipelago afford Bunches of Grapes of ten pound weight sometimes of thirty six yea of forty And he mentions Grapes of a prodigious bigness in the Island of Madera Vpon a Staff See IV. 10. And they brought of the Pomegranates and Figs. Which grew in the parts nearest to the place where the Israelites were encamped Ver. 24. The place was called the Brook Eshcol because Verse 24 of the Cluster of Grapes which the Children of Israel cut down from thence That is when the Israelites got possession of the Land
the way and manner of dying this Colour Which being not easie to compass the Jews at this day instead of this Colour are contented to use White See J. Wagenseil upon the Gemara Sotae cap. 2. Annot. 8. Verse 39 Ver. 39 And it shall be to you for a Fringe Or rather it that is the Riband shall be unto you upon the Fringe or to the Fringe added to it to make it the more noted being of a distinct Colour from the Fringe which was of the same Colour with the Garment The Jews say in the Selvedge of which these Fringes were was their upper Garments called Talish being a kind of Cloak That ye may look upon it and remember all the Commandments of the LORD i. e. When they looked down this Fringe and Lace which they saw there might put them in mind of the Duty they owed to God who commanded this not for it self but to remember them that they were a holy People bound to God by peculiar Laws which they should be as careful to observe as to wear these Fringes Hence it was that they who pretended to greater Sanctity than others enlarged these Fringes as our Saviour observes XXIII Matth. 5. i. e. extended them to a greater length so that they swept the Ground which made them more observable as Braunius notes out of the Gemara of Gittim Lib. I. de Vest. Sacerd. Hebr. cap. 3. n. 16. Where he also observes That their Superstition grew so much as with great Subtilty to contrive that these Fringes might be so wrought as to denote the DCXIII Precepts contained in the Law of Moses and so they might be put in mind of ALL the Commandments of the LORD See Buxtorf also in the place before-named and Bishop Montagu in his Apparatus cap. 7. n. 32. And do them Which was the end of remembring them as that was of their wearing them though the Jews proved so foolish as to pride themselves in the bare use of these Ornaments i. e. in their being a select People which ought to have made them more careful to do the whole Will of God And that ye seek not after your own heart Follow not your own Thoughts and Imaginations as Maimonides expounds it More Nevoch P. I. cap. 39. or rather your own desires Or the word seek may import inventing other ways of serving God according to their own fansies And your own eyes Nor follow the Example of others as they were prone to do it appears by their making the Golden Calf that they might have such a visible Representation of God as other Nations were wont to have After which ye use to go a whoring It appears by this that the foregoing words have a peculiar regard to the Worship of God which he speaks of in the beginning of this Chapter from which when they departed they are said to go a whoring from God unto whom they were espoused Verse 40 Ver. 40. That ye may remember and do all my Commandments He would not have them think there was any Sanctity to be placed merely in wearing these Fringes but they were to be considered only as Instruments to call their Duty to remembrance and excite them to the performance of it And so the Jews themselves sometimes call them as Buxtorf observes in the place before-named Means and Instruments of observing the Precepts And be holy unto your God By observing all his Commandments especially keeping themselves from Idols Verse 41 Ver. 41. I am the LORD your God Their Sovereign and Benefactor Which brought you out of the Land of Egypt He remembers them of the most peculiar Obligation they had upon them to observe this Law and all the rest of his Precepts To be your God They were Redeemed by him on purpose when none else could deliver them that they might acknowledge no other God but only him to whom they owed their Liberty to serve him I am the LORD your God This seems to be repeated to encourage them to hope that he would still continue good to them notwithstanding the Rebellion of their Fathers for which he had condemned them to die in the Wilderness Where he would preserve them their Children and at last bring them into Canaan if they would follow his Directions CHAP. XVI Chapter XVI WE have nothing here said to direct us to the Time and Place when and where this new Rebellion hapned but it is very probable as I said XV. 1. that it was in some part of the latter half of the second Year after they came out of Egypt before they removed from Kadesh-Barnea Ver. 1. Now Korah the Son of Izhar the Son of Verse 1 Kohath the Son of Levi. By this it is evident that Korah was Cosin German as we speak to Moses and Aaron for Izhar Korah's Father was the second Son of Kohath as Amram the Father of Moses and Aaron was his eldest Son VI Exod. 18. 1 Chron. VI. 2. And Dathan and Abiram the Sons of Eliab This Eliab was the Son of Pallu the second Son of Reuben as appears from XXVI 5 8 9. And On the Son of Peleth He also was descended from Reuben as well as Dathan and Abiram as the next words tell us Sons of Reuben but of what Family it doth not appear Nor is this Man any where again mentioned no not in the progress of this Conspiracy which inclines me to think that though he entred into it yet he afterward withdrew himself or was so inconsiderable that no notice was taken of him Took Men. The word Men is not in the Hebrew but simply Korah took Which word took being the first word in the Hebrew Text the whole verse may be thus translated Korah the Son of Izhar c. took both Dathan and Abiram the Sons of Eliab and On the Son of Peleth c. That is he drew these into a Conspiracy with him Or he betook himself to a Party as the Chaldee understands it he divided himself with an intention that is to make a Sedition But the Sence is the same if we follow our Translation he took Men that is Complices or Associates with him in his Rebellion By which we may understand the Two hundred and fifty mentioned in the next verse Verse 2 Ver. 2. And they rose up Made an Insurrection in which Korah seems to have been the Ring-leader having drawn the rest into it Which he might the more easily do because the Kohathites and Reubenites lay encamped on the very same side of the Tabernacle II Numb 10. compared with III. 29. by which means they had opportunity often to Conspire together Whence R. Solomon makes this Reflection Wo to the Wicked and wo to his Neighbour The cause of the Insurrection is generally thought both by Jews and Christians to have been that Korah could not brook the Preferment of Aaron and his Family so high above the rest of the Levites who were made only their Ministers III. 6 9. VIII 19. For he thought this was too
Deut. 12. or had its name from him cannot be determined But Hori we are sure was the first Possessor of whom there is any memory of this Mountain Hor which was afterward called Seir from one descended from him and afterward Edom. Verse 23 Ver. 23. And the LORD spake unto Moses and Aaron in Mount Hor. At the foot of the Mount as appears from v. 25. By the Coast of the Land of Edom. XXXIII 37. Verse 24 Ver. 24. Aaron shall be gathered unto his People Shall die v. 26. For he shall not enter into the Land which I have given unto the Children of Israel v. 12. A manifest Token that the earthly Canaan was not the utmost Felicity at which God's Promises aimed because the best Men among them were shut out of it Because ye rebelled against my Word at the Water of Meribah By this word rebelled it appears there was something of Obstinacy in their Unbelief mentioned v. 12. Verse 25 Ver. 25. Take Aaron and Eleazar his Son Speak to them in my Name For it is expresly said XXXIII 38. that they went up at the Commandment of the LORD And bring them up unto Mount Hor. This shows that they pitched their Tents at the bottom of it in a place called Mosera See X Deut. 6. where this seems also to have been the Name of the whole Hill as well as Hor. Ver. 26. And strip Aaron of his Garments i. e. Of Verse 26 his Priestly Robes as Josephus rightly expounds it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mentioned XXVIII Exod. 2 3 c. wherewith he was clothed when he was anointed to the Office of High-Priest VIII Lev. 7 8 9. which he put on I suppose in the Camp and went up in them to Mount Hor that he might die gloriously not in his Robes but immediately after he put them off to be put upon his Son For this stripping him of his Robes was in effect the divesting Aaron of his Office that it might be conferred upon his Son which was done as follows And put them upon Eleazar his Son Which was the investing him with the Office of High-Priest into which he now succeeded in his Fathers stead and was by this Ceremony admitted to it The Talmudists say the manner was first to put on the Breeches then the Coat which being bound about with the Girdle then the Robe upon which was the Ephod and then the Miter and golden Crown See Selden de Succession in Pontif. Lib. II. cap. 8. And Aaron shall be gathered unto his People and die there This was said before in short v. 24. but now the time of his Death is expresly declared immediately after he laid down his Office and had the satisfaction to see his Son inaugurated in his Room and the place of it upon Mount Hor. Of this Phrase Gathered to his People see XXV Gen. 8 17. Ver. 27. And Moses did as the LORD commanded and they went up into Mount Hor in the sight of all the Congregation That they might all be Witnesses Verse 27 of the Succession of Eleazar to the Office of his Father Verse 28 Ver. 28. And Moses stripped Aaron of his Garments and put them upon Eleazar his Son This Moses did as the Minister of God who now translated the Priesthood to another And Aaron died there in the top of the Mount And was buried also there X Deut. 6. For great and heroick Persons were in ancient days usually buried in high Places So Joshua was XXIV 30 33. and Eleazar II Judges 9. and Cadmus and Harmonia who lived near the time of Joshua as Bochartus observes in his Canaan Lib. I. cap 23. And Moses and Eleazar came down from the Mount After they had seen him laid in his Grave by those that attended them This fell out in the fortieth Year after they came out of Egypt on the first day of the fifth Month when Aaron was an Hundred and three and twenty Years old as we read XXXIII 38 39. In the new Moon of the Month which the Athenians called Hecatombaeon the Macedonians I ous and the Hebrews called Sabba as Josephus glosses But that last word should be Ab not Sabba as Jacobus Capellus observes in his Histor Sacra Exotica ad An. 2542. which answers he thinks to the nineteenth of our July And so the Hebrews say in Seder Olam Aaron died on the first day of the Month Ab upon which there is a Fast in their Rituals in memory of it Ver. 29. And when all the Congregation saw that Aaron was dead i. e. Understood as the word See is used XLII Gen. 1. that God had taken him out of the World as Moses and Eleazar told them who Verse 29 also came down from the Mount with him They mourned for Aaron thirty days Till the end of the Month. For so long their Mourning seems in those days to have been continued for great Persons as it was for Moses XXXIV Deut. 8. though a Week sufficed for private Persons Even all the House of Israel Both Men and Women CHAP. XXI Chapter XXI Ver. 1. AND when King Arad the Canaanite In Verse 1 the Hebrew the words are thus placed When the Canaanite King Arad And so they are in the LXX and the Vulgar And Arad may as well signifie a Place as a Person nay there seems more reason to translate the words thus The Canaanitish King of Arad because there was such a City in Canaan mentioned XII Josh 14. and I Judges 16. One of the Sons of Canaan being called Arad as both the LXX and the Vulgar translate the Hebrew word Arvad X Gen. 18. who it is likely gave his Name to this part of the Country the chief City of which was also called after him Which dwelt in the South In the South part of the Land of Canaan towards the Eastern Angle of it near the Dead Sea See XXXIII 40. Heard that Israel came by the way of the Spies Which were sent by the King Arad as many suppose to bring him Intelligence which way the Israelites marched For it being Eight and thirty Years since the Spies sent by Moses went that way or rather they going so secretly that it was not known which way they went it is thought not probable that Moses speaks of them in this place But there is no necessity of taking the Hebrew word Atharim to signifie Spies but it may as well be the Name of a Place as the LXX understood it by whom it is translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And if the situation would agree to it one might probably conjecture the place was so called from the Spies that went from thence by Moses his order to survey the Country For that was a thing so memorable that as it could not well slip out of the Minds of the People of Canaan so they found I make no question after they were gone which way they came into their Country though for the present they passed unobserved and everafter called it the way of
Provocations for their number was within Eighteen hundred and twenty as many as they were at their last muster and partly that the Land they were now going to possess might be the more easily divided among the Tribes in just and equal proportions From twenty years old and upwards throughout their Father's house all that are able to go to war in Israel All this is explained in the first Chapter v. 2 3. Verse 3 Ver. 3. And Moses and Eleazar the Priest spake with them With the Heads of the several Tribes who it is likely were to assist in this numbring as they did in the former I Numb 4 16 17. In the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho saying See XXII 1. Verse 4 Ver. 4. Take the Sum of the People These words are not in the Hebrew but some words of this kind are to be understood that they spake with them about numbring the People from twenty years old and upwards as it here follows As the LORD commanded Moses and the Children of Israel which went forth out of the Land of Egypt He bad them proceed according to the directions God had formerly given in the second month of the second year after they came out of Egypt I Numb 1. Verse 5 6. Ver. 5 6. Reuben the eldest Son of Jacob. This numbring being performed as the former was Moses uses more concise Language in the account he gives of it as he doth in the foregoing verse and in this and those that follow Where he sets down the number of every Tribe and the Families from whence they sprung without saying Those that were numbred of the Tribe of Reuben were c. as he doth I Numb 21 c. The Children of Hanock of whom came the Family of the Hanochites c. The four Sons of Reuben whose Families here follow are mentioned both in Genesis XLVI 9. and in Exodus VI. 14. and are here mentioned again because he intends to set down the Names both of the Children and Grand-children of one of his Sons which he did not before Ver. 7. These are the Families of the Reubenites Verse 7 The word we translate Families rather signifies Nations Gentes or Kindreds as we translate it XXII Psal 27. For all that sprung from those LXX Persons who came with Jacob into Egypt are called by this name of Mispecoth which the LXX here translate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 People Which were divided into Houses as the Hebrews call them and those Houses into particular Persons This is plain from VII Josh 14. where for the discovery of him that had sinned in the accursed Thing God commanded the Israelites to be brought by their Tribes and then that Tribe by the Families belonging to it and that Family which the LORD took by Housholds and that Houshold Man by Man And they that were numbred of them were forty and three thousand and seven hundred and thirty This being compared with I Numb 21. it appears this Tribe was less than it was eight and thirty years ago by near three thousand Men For some whole Housholds had been destroyed as it follows v. 9. Ver. 8. And the Sons of Pallu Eliab He speaks Verse 8 in the Plural Number when there was but one Son of Pallu which is very usual in the Scripture Language See XIX Gen. 29. XXI 7. XLVI 7. and in this very Chapter v. 42. Eliab He doth not say from him came the Family of the Eliabites for he made only an Houshold in the Family as we call it of the Palluites Verse 9 Ver. 9. And the Sons of Eliab Nemuel and Dathan and Abiram The same must be observed of these that Families did not spring from them but they were Housholds belonging to the Family of the Palluites This is that Dathan and Abiram They are here again mentioned partly to set a new Brand upon them for their insolent Rebellion against Moses and partly to show how the Reubenites came to be so diminished Famous in the Congregation See XVI 2. Who strove against Moses and against Aaron in the company of Korah They joyned with Korah who seems to have been the chief Incendiary For he is mentioned first in the XVI 1. When they strove against the LORD Who had appointed Aaron alone to be the High-Priest and his Sons to Minister in the Priest's Office which these Men would have usurped XVI 11. where it is said expresly They were gathered together against the LORD Verse 10 Ver. 10. And the Earth opened her mouth and swallowed them up together with Korah These words seem to import that Korah was swallowed up with Dathan and Abiram as I have observed upon XVI 32. See there But it must be acknowledged that these words may receive another Interpretation and that very natural in this manner The Earth opened her mouth and swallowed them up viz. Dathan and Abiram and the rest mentioned XVI 32. and then the next words veeth Korah may be thus translated and as for Korah who was the great Incendiary when that Company died i. e. he died when the Company which offered Incense died for there is in many places a defect of a word to be supplyed from the word that follows This is a very easie construction and agrees with the Psalmist CVI. 17. where he mentions only Dathan and Abiram's Company as swallowed up and then adds v. 18. A fire was kindled in their Company i. e. in the other Company of Rebels and the flame burnt up the wicked viz. Korah and those that were with him What time the fire devoured two hundred and fifty men XVI 35. If the Interpretation now mentioned of the foregoing words be admitted then Korah must be added to the number of the Two hundred and fifty Men which Moses takes occasion to explain in this place And they became a sign A Monument of God's displeasure against those that affront his Ministers to give warning unto all Posterity not to follow their pernitious Courses Ver. 11. Notwithstanding the Children of Korah died Verse 11 not As those of Dathan and Abiram did but their Family continued famous in David's time For perhaps they left their Father and departed from the Tents of those wicked Men as Moses by God's command exhorted the Congreation XVI 24 26. and they obeyed v. 27. Ver. 12 13. The Sons of Simeon after their Families Verse 12 13. c. His Sons reckoned up here just as they are XLVI Gen. 10. and VI Exod. 15. only one of them viz. Ohad is here omitted because either he had no Children or his Family was extinct before this time The first of them also viz. Nemuel is there called Jemuel and Jachin in 1 Chron. IV. 24. is called Jarib there being some reason in process of time for such alterations Verse 14 Ver. 14. These are the Families of the Simeonites twenty and two thousand and two hundred There was a wonderful decrease of this Tribe in the space of thirty and eight years For they were fewer
observes in the place before-mentioned Who in the next Chapter cap. XIII gives an example drawn up by Maimonides of such a Succession out of the holy Scriptures Amram had two Sons Aaron and Moses as we read VI Exod. 20. If they had both died without Issue Miriam their Sister had inherited And if she had died in like manner the Inheritance of the Family would have reverted to Kohath the Father of Amram Or he being dead to his three Sons the Brethren of Amram viz. Izhar Hebron and Vzziel as the Heirs of Kohath And there would have been no consideration of Primogeniture both because none of them was the First-born and because the Inheritance was not in the Possession of their Father at the time of his Death c. And it shall be unto the Children of Israel a Statute of judgment c. A Law whereby to determine such Matters in future times and to be observed inviolably So that no Father should have power to make any other Settlement but if either by Word or Writing he declared his will to be that his Son should not inherit his Act was null and void As the Jewish Lawyers resolve from these very words a Statute or Decree of Judgment i. e. as I said a Rule whereby to Judge of Succession into Inheritances If therefore a Man made a Will wherein he declared his Daughter or Brethren c. should not inherit in case he had no Son it was void because contrary to this Law See Selden de Successionibus cap. 24. Ver. 12. And the LORD said unto Moses get thee up into this Mountain Abarim Either these words were spoken after all that follows here and in the Verse 12 Book of Deuteronomy or they were repeated again when he had repeated his Laws and inforced them by many excellent Discourses and taught them that famous Song XXXII Deut. where in the conclusion of it v. 49. it is said that very day he bad him go up this Mount Abarim And there we learn also that Abarim was a long Tract of Mountains one of which was called Nebo and the very top of it called Pisgah See XXXIV Deut. 1. And see the Land which I have given to the Children of Israel Take a full view of it as he did from that high neighbouring Mountain III Deut. 17. XXXIV 1 2 3 4. Verse 13 Ver. 13. And when thou hast seen it thou also shalt be gathered unto thy People as Aaron thy Brother was gathered Upon Mount Hor as we read in this Book XX. 23 24. Verse 14 Ver. 14. For ye rebelled against my Commandment in the Desert of Zin c. See Chap. XX. 1 12 24. where all this verse is explained Verse 15 Ver. 15. And Moses spake unto the LORD saying He did not speak those words which follow immediately after God bad him go up Mount Abarim and die but first desired he might be permitted to go over Jordan c. III Deut. 24 25 26. Unless we can think that he made the Prayer there mentioned as soon as the Sentence was passed upon him at the Waters of Meribah which doth not seem so likely Verse 16 Ver. 16. Let the LORD the God of the Spirits of all Flesh c. As soon as he found that God was resolved he should not conduct the People into Canaan he was concerned for nothing but for a fitting Person to take that Charge upon him For he had a most generous publick Spirit wholly intent upon the good of this People The God of the Spirits of all Flesh Who hast not only made the Souls of all Men but knowest their Dispositions See XVI 22. and understandest who are fit for this weighty Employment Set a Man over the Congregation To be chief Ruler and Governour of the People in my place Ver. 17. Which may go out before them and which Verse 17 may come in Before them and which may lead them out and which may bring them in If the latter part of these words be not a mere repetition of the former as is usual then the one relates to their Conduct in War and the other to the management of all their Civil Affairs And both of them seem to be a Metaphor from Shepherds watching over their Flocks That the Congregation of the LORD be not as Sheep which have no Shepherd Having none to govern and take care of them This is a description of the most miserable condition a People can be in and became a Proverb among the Hebrews 1 Kings 22.17 X Zachariah 2. XIII 7. IX Matth. 36. Ver. 18. And the LORD said unto Moses take thee Verse 18 Joshua the Son of Nun. Who had been a long time Servant unto Moses and attended upon his Person XXIV Exod. 13. well known to Moses and perfectly acquainted with his administration A Man in whom is the Spirit Of Courage and Prudence and the fear of God with all other Gifts necessary in an excellent Governour Among which Onkelos reckons the Spirit of Prophecy which is not unlikely And lay thine hand upon him Which was a Ceremony usual in Blessing XLVIII Gen. 14 c. and in setting Men apart and Consecrating them to an Office VIII 10. Upon which followed a more abundant measure of the Spirit as appears from XXXIV Deut. 9. Verse 19 Ver. 19. And set him before Eleazar the Priest and before all the Congregation Being all assembled for this purpose that all might acknowledge him for the designed Successor of Moses and be Witnesses of all that Moses commanded him And give him a charge in their sight He told him before them all what God expected from him and bad him not be afraid to execute it See XXXI Deut. 7 8. Where he sets down the words of this Charge unto which God presently after added one of his own v. 14 15 23. Verse 20 Ver. 20. And thou shalt put some of thy honour upon him Communicate some of thy Authority to him at present and not let him be any longer as thy Minister but as an associate in the Government The word we translate honour being glory in the Hebrew it made Onkelos and other Hebrew Doctors imagine these words have respect to that Splendor which shone in Moses his Face after he came down from the Mount Some of which they suppose was imparted unto Joshua to make him appear more venerable in the Eyes of the People And R. Menachem observes that it is not said impart thy glory but of thy glory to him From whence came that ancient saying the Face of Moses shone like the Sun but Joshua's only like the Moon This might have passed for Truth or at least that hereby was meant some great increase of illustrious Gifts of Mind which procured him such reverence as Moses had if it had been said that God put some of Moses his glory upon him whereas Moses is commanded to do it which makes the first sence most reasonable That all the Congregation of Israel may be obedient
to an holy Life But since through the vehemence of their Affections and Passions many Women are prone to act unadvisedly if Vows were wholly in their power great Inconveniences Dissentions and Confusions might arise in Families whilst this sort of Meat is lawful to the Husband but not to the Wife this permitted to the Daughter but prohibited to the Mother For which reason saith he this Authority was given to the Governours of Families in all things to order them as they saw would be for their profit or detriment Verse 14 Ver. 14. But if her husband Or For if her Husband Altogether hold his peace at her from day to day When he knew what she had vowed as it follows in the end of the verse He establisheth all her vows c. His silence was to be interpreted a Consent to allow what she vowed There was no need to add the contrary which is here to be understood that if he said he did not allow them then they should not bind her Ver. 15. But if he shall any ways make them void Verse 15 after he hath heard them Hinder her from performing her Vow after he had given his consent by saying nothing against it when he heard her make the Vow Then he shall bear her iniquity God will punish him not her for not performing the Vow Paulus Fagius thinks the meaning is that if the first day he heard of her vow he did not disannul it but attempted to do it the next day or the third day after he should bear the blame if the Vow was not made good Ver. 16. These are the Statutes which the LORD Verse 16 commanded Moses between a Man and his Wife between the Father and his Daughter being yet in her youth in her Fathers House It is likely some differences arose in some Families about these Matters and therefore these Laws were made for the settling the power of Husbands over their Wives and Parents over their Children while they were young and continued a part of their Family CHAP. XXXI Chapter XXXI Verse 1 Ver. 1. AND the LORD spake unto Moses saying Not long before his death as appears from the next verse Verse 2 Ver. 2. Avenge the Children of Israel of the Midianites This had been commanded before but no time set for it which now is determined The Moabites are not mentioned because the Midianites seem to have been the first or chief Contrivers of that Mischief which befel the Israelites by the enticements of their Women See XXV 17 18. Afterward shalt thou be gathered unto thy People When he had given a few other Directions concerning their possessing the Countries already conquered and the Land of Canaan XXXII XXXIV XXXV and providing for the Levites there XXXVI God had warned him to prepare for his death before this XXVII 12. but he first let him have the satisfaction of seeing the Midianites punished and gave him some time to settle the Publick Affairs and to make also a long Exhortation to the Israelites to observe all that he had commanded them Verse 3 Ver. 3. And Moses spake unto the People saying He speedily put this Command in Execution which might possibly be in the ninth Month of the fortieth Year Arm some of your selves unto the War He doth not at first determine the number but as many as pleased might offer themselves voluntarily to be ready to obey him And let them go against the Midianites and avenge the LORD of Midian The LORD bad him avenge the Children of Israel v. 2. but Moses bids them avenge the LORD for they had the same interest and were both injured at the same time and by the same means And as God was so gracious as to resent the evil done to Israel so Moses in duty and gratitude to God thought himself bound rather to consider the dishonour that was done to him Whose War this was not only because undertaken by his command but in his quarrel with those who had drawn the Israelites to Idolatry and for the sake of his People Ver. 4. Of every Tribe a thousand throughout all the Verse 4 Tribes of Israel shall ye send to the War When a great many perhaps all the People appeared ready to go to War he ordered that only a select number should be sent of a Thousand out of each of the Twelve Tribes Ver. 5. So there were delivered out of the Thousands Verse 5 of Israel a Thousand of every Tribe Their Officers pickt out this number from among the rest or they were chosen by lot for this Service or they stept out and offered themselves Voluntiers as we speak which the 27th verse may seem to countenance where they are called those that took the War upon them Twelve Thousand armed for war This was but a small number compared with the whole Nation of the Midianites who had five Kings v. 8. But God would have them rely more upon him than upon the multitude of an Host and let them see by their Success against this People that they needed not fear the Conquest of Canaan Ver. 6. And Moses sent them to the war a Thousand of every Tribe He gave them their Commission to fight the Midianites Verse 6 Them and Phinehas the Son of Eleazar the Priest Who was not their Commander in Chief or their General as we now speak for it did not belong to the Priestly Office to conduct Armies and it is said expresly in the words following he went with the holy Instruments c. to be ready to perform all such Sacred Offices as should be required by the General who it is most likely was Joshua It is true indeed that Phineas was a Man of great Courage and had lately performed a singular piece of Service which had won him great Reputation This hath made some think he was the fitter to go and to avenge the LORD of Midian as he had begun to do XXV 8. In after times also in the days of the Maccabees who were of the Family of the Priests the Armies of Israel were led by them against their Enemies But then it must be considered that they were also the Supream Governours of the People and there were no other With the holy Instruments By which Jonathan understands the Vrim and Thummim which some think Phineas carried along with him wherewith to consult the Divine Majesty in case of any difficulty that might arise about the management of the War And to make out this they suppose Eleazar to be old and crazy or labouring under some Infirmity which was the reason that Phineas his Son was substituted in his room to perform this Office See our very learned Dr. Spencer Dissert de Vrim Thummim cap. 6. sect 2. But this may be justly doubted whether Phineas being only the Son of the High-Priest and not yet capable of that Office could be substituted to perform this great Charge which belonged to the High-Priest alone Nor do we find any warrant for consulting the
LORD by Vrim and Thummim but only before the most holy Place See XXVII 21. And therefore it seems to me far more likely that he means the Ark which was wont to be carried in following times into the Field when they went to fight with their Enemies 1 Sam. IV. 4 5. XIV 18. 2 Sam. XI 1. Yea Joshua himself not long after this time ordered the Ark to be carried with Priests blowing the Trumpets before it when he surrounded Jericho VI Josh 4 6 7 c. And therefore the holy Instruments being here joyned with the Trumpets to blow in his hand it makes it the more probable that the Ark may be here meant There being also something in this very Book to countenance this Opinion See XIV 44. but especially XXXII 20 22. But it must be confessed that it is never thus expressed in any other place of Holy Scripture but always called the Ark of God or of the Covenant or the Testimony or the like And therefore perhaps they give the truest sence of these words who take the following words to be an Explication of them That is the Trumpets were the holy Instruments which he carried in his hand And the Trumpets to blow in his hand Which he delivered to the Priests who followed him to sound an Alarm when they went to fight according to the direction X. 8 9. and as the practice was in future Ages 2 Chron. XIII 12. Ver. 7. And they warred against the Midianites Verse 7 It is not certain whether the Midianites came out of their Country to give them battle or they first broke into their Country and then fought their Army As the LORD commanded Moses One would think this meant no more but that they obeyed the Commandment of God before-mentioned v. 2. But the Jews think he hath respect to another particular Commandment which they say was given by Moses when they went out to this War That they should not when they besieged any City begirt it quite round but only on three sides leaving one naked that the besieged might flee away if they pleased by which means effusion of Human Blood was prevented So Guil. Schickart observes out of Siphri in his Mischpat Hammelech cap. 5. Theor. 18. and Mr. Selden since him Lib. VI. de Jure Nat. Gent. cap. 15. where he shows they understand this of all Wars but those against the seven Nations in Canaan and Amalek towards whom this kindness was not shown as appears by the Siege of Jericho But the Laws about managing Wars which are mentioned in the Book of Deuteronomy do not seem to have been yet given though the Jews fancy this Law was now given about Midian and observed ever after And slew all the Males Who were in this fight and did not save themselves by flight Verse 8 Ver. 8. And they slew the Kings of Midian Little Kings called Princes XIII Josh 21. where they are said to be Dukes of Sihon i. e. great Men tributary to Sihon while he continued King of the Amorites But after the Israelites had conquered him they took perhaps the Title of Kings Besides the rest of them that were slain They made not only a great slaughter of the People but killed their chief Commanders who led them on Namely Evi and Rekem and Zur c. They are particularly named that all their Neighbours might be satisfied of the truth of this History And he that is called Zur is thought to have been the Father of Cozbi whom Phineas slew Balaam also the Son of Beor they slew with the sword He had seen such good success of his wicked Counsel which he gave either as he went home or returning again to them See XXIV ult that presuming the Israelites were forsaken of their God he adventured to go along with the Midianites unto this Battle hoping he might curse the Israelites now that iniquity i. e. Idolatry was found among them which he could not do while they were free from it Thus he perished by his own wicked devices and was so far from having his wish that he might die the death of the righteous that is live long that as the Jews say he was slain in the Thirty fourth year of his Age. The Doctors in the Gemara of the Sanhedrim cap. 11. sect 11. ask what did he here To which R. Johanan makes answer he went to receive his Reward for the Death of the Twenty four thousand Israelites which he had procured XXV 9. And thus saith another it hapned unto him according to the Proverb The Camel went to desire horns and they cut off his ears Ver. 9. And the Children of Israel took all the Women Verse 9 of Midian captive and their little ones After they were Masters of the Field as we speak by the overthrow of their Armies they fell upon their Cities and according to the ancient custom in the most bloody Wars they killed only the Men but no Women nor Children XXXIV Gen. 25. 1 Kings XI 16. And so the Law of God afterward required they should do when they took any City that did not belong to the Canaanites XX Deut. 13 14. who were utterly to be destroyed v. 16 17. where he saith Thou shalt save nothing alive that breatheth And they took the spoil of all their Cattle and all their Flocks and all their Goods As belonging to them by the right of Conquest in a just War Verse 10 Ver. 10. And they burnt all their Cities wherein they dwelt and their goodly Castles with fire Made the Country desolate that they who fled might have no encouragement to return again nor be able without great hazzard to settle themselves there where they had not a Fortress left to defend them This was but a necessary care notwithstanding which they had peopled the Country again so well in the space of about Two hundred years that they were able to oppress the Israelites as we read VI Judg. 1. Verse 11 Ver. 11. And they took all the spoil and all the prey both of Men and of Beasts They had possessed themselves of them before v. 9. but now they carried them away Verse 12 Ver. 12. And they brought the Captives and the Prey and the Spoil Here are three different words to express their Booty which they brought to the Camp of Israel The first of which signifies the Women and Children that were taken The second the Cattle and the Flocks though sometimes it includes in it Men and Women and the third their Money and Goods Vnto Moses and Eleazar the Priest and unto the Congregation of the Children of Israel Unto the LXX Elders and Princes of the Tribes who were assembled with them See XXIX 1. as it seems to be expounded in the next verse Vnto the Camp at the plains of Moab c. From whence they marched against Midian and had been encamped there a great while XXII 1. XXVI 3 63. Ver. 13. And Moses and Eleazar the Priest and all Verse 13 the
Moabites as were Heshbon and Elealah also And Nebo Which was given to the Reubenites v. 38. And Beon There is no mention of this place any where else but it is probable was part of the Reubenites Portion being mentioned together with other Places that were given unto them and possibly may be the Place called Baal-Meon v. 38. which they changed into Beon because of the name of Baal but the Moabites when it fell into their hands restored part of its old name calling it Beth-meon XLVIII Jerem. 23. Verse 4 Ver. 4. Even the Country which the LORD smote before the Congregation of Israel And gave it to them for a Possession as he intended to do the Land of Canaan See XXI 24 25. Is a Land for Cattle and thy Servants have Cattle Is very fit for us v. 2. Verse 5 Ver. 5. Wherefore said they if we have found grace in thy sight A Phrase often used by humble Petitioners even by Moses himself when he speaks to God XI 15. Let this Land be given unto thy Servants for a Possession The Israelites in common possessed it hitherto as belonging to them all XXI ult But they desire to have it assigned to them as their particular Portion And bring us not over Jordan We desire nothing in the Land of Canaan Ver. 6. And Moses said unto the Children of Gad and the Children of Reuben shall your Brethren go to War Can you think it reasonable that the rest of the Tribes should fight still for what they are to possess Verse 6 And shall ye sit here And you take up your rest here and settle in their Conquests which they have already made Ver. 7. And wherefore discourage ye the hearts of the Verse 7 Children of Israel from going over into the Land which the LORD hath given them He seems to have suspected that mere cowardise and a vile love of ease made them desire to stay where they were and go no further Which ill Example might dishearten all the rest of their Brethren and make them have the same Inclination to settle in the Land they had conquered and not engage in a War with the Canaanites Ver. 8. Thus did your Fathers i. e. They disheartned Verse 8 all their Brethren When I sent them from Kadesh Barnea to see the Land XIII 3 26. Ver. 9. For when they went up unto the Valley of Eschol Verse 9 Men do not go up into a Valley therefore the meaning is they went up to search the Country as it is said they did XIII 21 22. and went on in their search till they came to the Valley or Brook of Eschol XIII 23. where they cut down a Branch with a Cluster of Grapes to show what Fruit the Country afforded And saw the Land Had taken a full view of the Country They discouraged the hearts of the Children of Israel Represented the People and the Cities to be so strong that they should not be able to deal with them XIII 28 29. That they should not go into the Land which the LORD had given them And therefore perswaded them not to attempt to possess themselves of it For they said expresly we are not able to go against the People for they are stronger than we XIII 31. Verse 10 Ver. 10. And the LORD's anger was kindled at the same time and he sware saying XIV 21 28. Verse 11 Ver. 11. Surely none of the Men that were come out of Egypt from twenty years old and upward XIV 22 29 35. Shall see the Land which I sware unto Abraham Isaac and Jacob. XIV 23. Because they have not wholly followed me See there v. 22. Verse 12 Ver. 12. Save Caleb the Son of Jephunneh XIV 24. The Kenezite A great deal hath been said by many to prove that Caleb is called a Kenezite because his Father's Name was Kenaz And this they prove because Othniel's Father was Kenaz and he was Caleb's Brother XV Josh 17. his younger Brother I Judg. 13. III. 9. So that their Father must have two Names Kenaz and Jephunneh But it is very strange if this be true that Caleb is no where called the Son of Kenaz but constantly the Son of Jephunneh even there where Othniel is just before called the Son of Kenaz 1 Chron. 4.13 15. nor is Othniel any where called the Son of Jephunneh but always of Kenaz And indeed there is a demonstration against this Opinion for Othniel married Caleb's Daughter which by the Law of Moses was utterly unlawful whatsoever the practice might have been before the Law was given Therefore others think it more probable that Othniel was one of his Brother 's younger Sons for Uncles and Nephews are often called Brethren as Abraham and Lot were and that from this Brother whose Name was Kenaz Caleb is also called a Kenezite But this is very absurd for the Name of Kenezzi in the Hebrew denotes the Descendants from one who gave this denomination to the Family which one Brother could not do to another It is most probable therefore that Kenaz was some common Ancestor both of Othniel and Caleb from whom Othniel's Father took also his Name Accordingly we find Jephunneh called a Kenezite in XIV Josh 14. where it is said that Hebron became the Inheritance of Caleb the Son of Jephunneh the Kenezite And Joshua the Son of Nun for they have followed the LORD Fully XIV 24 30 38. Ver. 13. And the LORD's anger was kindled against Verse 13 Israel He had said this before v. 10. but repeats it again to make them the more sensible of a thing that was done Thirty eight years ago and to deter them from giving him the like provocation And he made them wander in the Wilderness forty years till all that had done evil in the sight of the LORD were consumed XIV 31 32 33. XXVI 64 65. Ver. 14. And behold Mark what I say Verse 14 You are risen up in your Fathers stead an increase of sinful Men to augment yet the fierce anger of the LORD towards Israel Are multiplyed to as great a number as your Fathers only to succeed them in their sins and thereby bring down still more heavy Punishments upon the Nation Ver. 15. For if ye turn away from after him As your Fathers did who refused to go and possess the good Land which he had bestowed upon them Verse 15 He will yet again leave them in the Wilderness Lead them back again into the Desert where your Fathers perished and there forsake you And ye shall destroy all this People Who following your example will refuse to go over Jordan v. 5. to take possession of the Land of Canaan Verse 16 Ver. 16. And they drew near unto him As Petitioners are wont to do when they are assured of their Integrity and hope to obtain their request XLIV Gen. 19. And said we will build Sheepfolds here for our Cattle There are five words in the Hebrew Language for Folds for Sheep and Cattle all signifying a place
words are to be understood I observed XXXII 33. Moses gave unto them the Kingdom of Sihon c. Verse 15 Ver. 15. The two Tribes and an half have received their Inheritance on this side Jordan c. By the Gift of God as they themselves understood it XXXII 31. The bounds of which the Hierusalem Targum here undertakes to set down and makes them extend Eastward as far as the great River Euphrates having respect I suppose to XV Genesis 18. and XXIII Exod. 30. Where he sets down the utmost Bounds of the Countries he intended to bestow upon them in future times See there but here only describes the Limits of that Land which they were to enjoy in present possession and was all that God granted to Abraham when he brought him out of Chaldaea and made his first Promise unto him XII Gen. 1 7. XIII 14 15 17. XV. 7. Verse 16 Ver. 16. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying Having told them what they should divide it was proper to appoint some Persons to take care to see the Division made Verse 17 Ver. 17. These are the names of the Men which shall divide the Land Though the Land was to be divided by Lot yet it was fit there should be some Persons to oversee the Business and take care there should be no Fraud in the drawing of them And when they were drawn to prevent all quarrels by determining what Portion those who had too much should give to those who had too little XXVI 54 55. Eleazar the Priest and Joshua the Son of Nun. These were the principal Persons concerned in this great Affair who were so conscientious therein that they did it in the presence of God at the Door of the Tabernacle XVIII Josh 6 8 10. XIX 51. Ver. 18. And ye shall take one Prince of every Tribe Verse 18 to divide the Land by Inheritance They are called in the place last named The Heads of the Fathers of the Tribes of the Children of Israel Ver. 19. The names of the Men are these of the Tribe Verse 19 of Judah Caleb the Son of Jephunneh I have nothing to observe upon this and the following verses to the end of the Chapter but that the Tribes are not mentioned in such order as they were at their first numbring I. 5 6 c. or at their second XXVI 5 c. yet great exactness and a particular direction of God may be noted in their placing here for they are set down according to their situation which they had afterwards in the Land of Canaan as if Moses foresaw who should be next Neighbours one to another For Judah having his Inheritance given him first XV Josh Simeon who is here next mentioned was so near him in the Land of Canaan that he had a Portion given him out of the Lot of Judah which proved too large for that Tribe XIX Josh 9. I Judg. 3 17. Then Benjamin who here follows in the third place was so near to Judah that they never separated when the ten Tribes were rent from them Dan was not far from Judah and the Children of Joseph also were their Neighbours And the rest of the Tribes Zebulun Issachar Asher Naphtali are set down here just in the order wherein their Lots fell to them in Canaan XIX Josh 10 17 24 32. An Evidence that Moses was guided by a Divine Spirit in all his Writings CHAP. XXXV Chapter XXXV Verse 1 Ver. 1. AND the LORD spake unto Moses in the Plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho saying See XXII 1. Hitherto nothing hath been said of the Levites but that they should have no Lot in the Land of Canaan But now God provides that they should have Habitations assigned them to dwell in though they had no Fields nor Olive-yards c. as the rest of their Brethren had They might indeed have been able to purchase Houses for themselves out of the Tithes and other things which God had long ago bestowed upon them for their Portion but it was not fit that God's Ministers should be left without any certain dwelling And besides God would have them live comfortably and not only have Houses but a little Ground about them for their more commodious Subsistence Verse 2 Ver. 2. Command the Children of Israel that they give unto the Levites of the Inheritance of their possession Out of their share that shall fall to them in the Land of Canaan and on this side Jordan Cities to dwell in That they might not be in danger to wander up and down to seek an Habitation And ye shall give also to the Levites Suburbs for the Cities round about them Some Ground lying round about their Cities the reason of which is given in the next verse Ver. 3. And the Cities they shall have to dwell in Verse 3 That they may build Houses for themselves to dwell in Which did not make it unlawful for them to hire or purchase Houses in any other City particularly at Jerusalem or the place where the Tabernacle was settled for we find in Scripture many proofs of their dwelling in other Cities beside these which are here assigned to them And in like manner other People with their permission might dwell with them in these Cities without any breach of this Law And the Suburbs shall be for their Cattle To afford Pasture for their Oxen and Sheep And for their Goods The Hebrew word signifies not only all kind of Houshold-stuff but whatsoever was necessary for them and their Cattle without doors And for their Beasts Horses Asses Mules and all sorts of living Creatures as the Hebrew word signifies But it was not lawful for them to build Houses in these Fields nor plant Vineyards nor sow Corn but they were given them only to make their Dwellings more sweet and that they might have the convenience of Cattle about them for Provisions and all other uses Ver. 4. And the Suburbs and Cities which ye shall give Verse 4 unto the Levites To be their Possession by as good and full a right as their Brethren of the other Tribes had in their Lands which fell to them for their Inheritance by Lot See XXV Lev. 31 32 33. where they themselves are disabled to alienate either the Houses or Fields of their Cities But if they sold a House it was to revert at the Jubilee and the Fields they could not so much as sell till that time Shall reach from the Walls of the City and outward a thousand Cubits round about This space was for their Out-houses as Stables Places for Hay and Straw and such like things and perhaps for Gardens of Herbs and Flowers The Gemara upon the Ninth Chapter of Sota sect 9. saith That under the second Temple the Levites had no Suburbs which were not restored to them after the Captivity of Babylon But there being great care taken that the People shall pay all the Tithe of their ground unto the Levites X Nehem. 37. it is unreasonable to think
to death But here the Hebrew Doctors as Mr. Selden observes distinguish the killing of a Man into three kinds The first was when though it was from pure Ignorance and Error yet there was some Negligence in it which a prudent Man might have avoided The second when a Man kills another ignorantly and cannot be blamed for any negligence because such a thing seldom happens An Example of the first they make to be when a Man coming down a Ladder falls upon another and kills him An Example of the second when going up a Ladder a Man happens to do the same The former is more frequent and therefore they say hath some kind of blame in it the other seldomer and therefore hath none A third kind when any Man kills another out of ignorance and error also but it approaches nearer to voluntary Murder As when a Man intending to kill one Man happens to kill another with a Stone or otherwise In none of these cases they say the Court of Judgment could put any Man to Death And the Cities of Refuge were not provided for the second or third sort but only for the first and that when the Man died presently and did not lye and languish of the Wound for if he did it might be supposed he died by his own negligence or other ways as well as by the Wound In which case there was no need that the Man who wounded him should flee to the City of Refuge nor could the Avenger of Blood meddle with him No more than he could with a Father when he gave his Son or a Master when he gave his Scholar Correction and hapned to kill him The same was the case of him whose Office it was to Arrest Men by Publick Authority and bring them before the Judges if he struck a Man that refused to go along with him and killed him See Selden Lib. IV. de Jure Nat. Gent. juxta Disciplin Hebr. cap. 2. Ver. 25. And the Congregation shall deliver the slayer Verse 25 out of the hands of the avenger of blood If the Court found the Man was killed casually as the Person accused pretended XX Josh 4. then they charged the Avenger of Blood not to prosecute any further Both here and in the foregoing verse and in the next words to these by Congregation is meant the Judges of the City as I observed v. 12. who were to determine in the presence and in the behalf of the People whether the Manslayer was capable of the Priviledge of the City of Refuge or not as we read XX Josh 4 6. Now these things as a very Learned Person of our own argues which were done by the Elders or Judges being said to be done by the Congregation or Assembly of the People in whose behalf they were done it is no wrong to the Holy Scriptures when we say that which they report to have been done by the Church was acted by the chief Power of the Apostles and Elders with the consent of the People For it is manifest in the New Testament that in the Apostles time all the Publick Acts of the Church were passed at the Publick Assemblies of the same As Ordinations I Acts 23. V. 36. Excommunications XVIII Matth. 18 19 20. 1 Corinth V. 4. 2 Cor. II. 10. Councils XV Acts 4 22. other Acts 2 Corinth VII 19. And herewith agrees the Primitive Custom of the Church for divers Ages whereby they gave Satisfaction to the People of the Integrity of their Proceedings and by the same means obliged Superiours to that Integrity by making the Proceedings so manifest and so to preserve the Unity of the Church And from this Interest of the People in such Acts it is at this day that the People of the Church of England are demanded what they have to say against Ordinations and Marriages to be made See Mr. Thorndike in his Rights of the Church in a Christian State Chap. 3. p. 159 c. And the Congregation shall restore him to the City of his Refuge whether he was fled They were to send him back again from the place where he was tried to the City where he had taken Refuge there to remain till the time prescribed in the next words This was more merciful than the punishment inflicted by the Attick Laws which plainly show they were borrowed in great part from Moses for he who slew a Man involuntarily was forced to fly his Country So the Scoliast upon the last of Homer's Iliads 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. It was the manner in ancient times for a Man that had killed another involuntarily to flee his Country and betaking himself to some neighbouring place to sit with his Face covered begging to be expiated But this was only for a certain time as Demosthenes tells us in his Oration in Aristocratem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. The Law requires him that is condemned of killing a Man involuntarily for some limited time to go away and keep at an appointed distance till he can make his peace with the Kindred of him that was slain after which he may return again c. And he shall abide in it Not stir out of the Limits of the City that is beyond the Suburbs and the two thousand Cubits which incompassed them v. 4 5. within which Bounds he was to keep Vnto the death of the High-Priest which was anointed with oyl This looks like a Punishment to the Man-slayer whereby others were taught to be very watchful over themselves lest by negligence they chanced to kill any body and so be forced to leave their own home But Maimonides takes it for a prudent Charity to the Man-slayer and to the Relations of him that was slain For by this means the Man-slayer was kept out of the sight of the Avenger of Blood who might have been tempted some time or other to fall upon him if he had come in his way but by long absence his Anger might be mitigated at least by the Death of the High-Priest the most excellent of all other Persons and most dear to every one in the Nation Which made the Publick Grief so great when he died that Men forgot their private Resentments For nothing could fall out more grievous to all People saith he then the Death of the High-Priest which swallowed up all other Grief More Nevoch P. III. c. 40. And in the mean time the Jews say that the Citizens of the place were bound to teach him some Trade whereby he might provide himself with Necessaries And he had this comfort also during his absence from his own Family that the Mother of the High-Priest sent him many Gifts that he might remain there more contentedly and not pray for the Death of the High-Priest So they tell us in the place fore mentioned Maccoth cap. 2. sect 6. Where they also observe that if a Man killed the High-Priest or the High-Priest himself hapned to kill a Man involuntarily they were to stay in the City of Refuge
two preceding verses I shall not here examine It is sufficient to note that Onkelos hath expressed the Hebrew Text word for word and the LXX do not depart from the sence of it Verse 10 Ver. 10. Even as the LORD commanded Moses so did the Daughters of Zelophehad Accordingly they followed this direction when they came into the Land of Canaan and had received their Portion there Now there being no such words added here as there are in other Cases this shall be unto the Children of Israel a Statute of Judgment XXVII 11. much less a Statute of Judgment throughout your Generations XXXV 29. it led I conjecture the Talmudick Doctors into the fore-mentioned Opinion that this Law concerned only the present Generation Ver. 11. For Mahlah Tizzah and Hoglah and Verse 11 Milkah and Noah the Daughters of Zelophehad Thus they are called both in XXVI 33. XXVII 1. though they are not there mentioned in the same order for Tirzah is there named last who here is named in the second place Perhaps they are set down here in the order wherein they were disposed in Marriage and Tirzah who was the younger was married in the second place Were married unto their Fathers Brothers Sons For Hepher no doubt had other Sons besides Zelophehad who had Issue-male though Zelophehad had not What their Names were or how many of them we do not know but some suppose them to have been six one of which died in the Wilderness without Issue See Selden de Successionibus cap. 23. where he discourses at large of the Portion which fell to them in the Land of Canaan Ver. 12. And they were married into the Families Verse 12 c. In the Margin more exactly out of the Hebrew to some that were of the Families i. e. to one of the Families of Manasseh from whom several Families descended XXVI 29 c. And their Inheritance remained in the Tribe of the Family of their Father The word for Tribe signifies sometimes merely a Family in a Tribe And so the LXX as Grotius observes in the place before-named in this very business uses sometimes the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the former of which signifies a part of a whole Tribe And thus Josephus also uses the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to signifie a Family Mr. Selden hath the same Observation in his Book de Successionibus cap. 18. that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sometimes translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and then it signifies not a Tribe but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 familiam cognationem seu genus sanguine proximum a Family a Kindred or those that are next in Blood But there is no need of these Observations if the words be translated as they may rightly and their Inheritance remained in the Tribe and the Family of their Father See v. 6. Verse 13 Ver. 13. These are the Commandments and the Judgments which the LORD commanded by the hand of Moses to the Children of Israel in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho He began to deliver the Precepts here intended at the XXVIth Chapter See v. 3. and continues them to this place By Commandments seem to be meant the Precepts about the Worship of God Chapt. XXVIII XXIX XXX and by Judgments the Civil Laws about dividing their Inheritances and regulating their Descent to their Posterity and establishing Cities of Refuge for Man-slayers which are expresly called a Statute of Judgment XXVII 11. XXXV 29. Some other things are interspersed as God's Commandment to number the People which was in order to the assigning them their Inheritances proportionable to their Families to execute Judgment on the Midianites and to set down in Writing their Travels in the Wilderness of which I have given an account in their proper places FINIS By reason of the Distance of the Author these ERRATA have hapned which the Reader is desired to Correct Page 5. Line 7. read are reckoned Page 73. Line 29. r. See Levit. II. 15. Page 74. Line 22. r. were signs Page 82. Line 12. r. Rabboth Page 96. Line 4. r. aquatiles Line ult r. so that they might not Page 107. Line 13. r. other shoulder Page 110. Line 2. r. Chaskuni Page 123. Line 31. r. XL. Exod. Page 140. Line 30. r. may teach Page 152. Line 5. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 158. Line 31. r. Acropolis Page 163. Line 10. r. Choten Page 166. Line 31. r. the following story Page 167. Line 3. r. Rise up Page 171. Line 22. r. it is likely Page 190. Line 12. r. Setting forth the Praises Line 20. r. such credit Page 191. Line penult r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 195. Line 21. r. whose Presence Page 198. Line 1. r. kadim Page 201. Line 11. r. but besides that there is Line 12. r. and it is Page 210. Line 28. r. as were never bred Page 216. Line 18. r. not deigning to stay Page 221. Line 21. after July begin a new line Page 227. Line 2. r. Torquatus Page 228. Line 3 4. r. a stony place Page 241. Line 1. dele and that Page 251. Line 7. r. Bitter Line 31. r. Spirit with him Page 282. Line 1. r. The Man shall be Page 284. Line 31. r. And the Garment the Jews say in the Selvedge c. Page 284. Line 33. r. Talith Page 316. Line 19. r. it being broke out Page 332. Line 3. r. where as Page 333. Line 21. r. within the veil Page 335. Line 11. r. Zeback Page 358. Line 7. r. more fit to treat Page 367. Line 7. r. as we may call it Page 387. Line 26. r. Successors of Esau Page 402. Line 19. r. by way of apposition Page 404. Line 24. r. the words are Page 406. Line 30. r. Bootius Page 420. Line 6. r. from Arnon Page 426. Line 1. r. whence Hesychius Line 22. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 433. Line 18. r. Kosem Page 446. Line 9. r. proffer'd him Page 468. Line 9. r. per juga Page 469. Line 7. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 470. Line 15. r. Sepher Cosri Page 482. Line 2. r. Dei nutu Page 501. Line 4. r. Baal-Peor Line 26. r. were called Baalim Page 519. Line 30. r. are reckoned Page 523. Line 14. r. Zelophehad Page 532. Line penult r. who was born Page 539. Line 21. r. being but reason Page 555. Line ult r. pouring out upon Page 556. Line 4. r. Heliogabalus Page 564. Line 18. r. and so doth Page 598. Line 19. r. and what I have Page 618. Line 22. r. Jogbehah Page 634. Line 22. r. to have been places Page 635. Line 9. r. anciently called Abel-shittim Page 673. Line 14. r. XXXI XXXII 2. Books written by Symon Patrick D. D. now Lord Bishop of Ely and Printed for Richard Chiswell THe Parable of the Pilgrim written to a Friend The Sixth Edit 4 to 1681. Mensa Mystica Or a Discourse concerning the Sacrament of the Lords Supper In which