Selected quad for the lemma: father_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
father_n	believe_v	faith_n	holy_a	10,213	4	5.4982	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A79926	A sermon preach'd at St. Michan's Church in Dublin, February the 23d, 1700. Upon receiving into the communion of the Church of England, the Honble Sir Terence Mac-mahon, Knt & Barnet and Christopher Dunn, converts from the Church of Rome. : Wherein is an account also of a late controversie, betwixt the author and some Romanists. / By John Clayton, Præbendary of St. Michan's.	Clayton, John, 1657-1725.	1700 (1700)	Wing C4609A; ESTC R37725	14,592	24

oppositum praemissorum tanquam Haeretici arcendi s●nt graviter puniendi Quod nullus Pre●byter sub paena Excommunicationis communicet populum sub utraque specie Panis Vini Item ipsa Sancta Synodus decernit declarat super ipsa materia ut effectualiter puniant eos contra hoc decretum excedentes qui communicando populum sub utraque specie Panis Vini exhortati fuerint sic faciendum esse docuerint si ad paenitentiam redire non curaverint animo indurato per censuras Ecclesiasticas per eos ut Haeretici sunt coercendi Concil Constant Sess 13. Constance command That they be Excommunicated who contrary to their Decree Exhort the People to Communicate in both kinds of Bread and Wine and do take upon them to Administer the Sacrament to the People after that manner and requires that they be treated as Hereticks if they persist in so doing without Repentance The Council of a Binius ex Baronio Not. 1. in Laodicen Concil Hoc Concillium antiqua nobilitate celeberrimum Graecorum atque Latinorum Scriptis celebri memoriae commendatum fuit Laodicea excludes those Books commonly called the Apocripha from the Canon of Scripture And the Canons of this Council were received into the Code b Canon de Libel Distinct 20. Cod. Can. Ecclaes Univer of the Universal Church and confirm'd by the c Concil Chalcedon Act. 4. Act 11. Act. 13. 4th and d Concil Constantinop in Trullo Can. 2. And by Imperial Law of the Emperor Justinian Novel 131. 6th of their General Councils which is directly contrary to the Doctrine of the Church of Rome settled by later Councils The Council of Basil deposed the e Pope Eugenius IV. Constituted Amadeus the Duke of Savoy Pope viz. Felix V. Pope and condemned the Council f Jac. Meyerus in Annalibus Flandr Lib. 16. Basiliense Floren●ium adeo nihil Concordiae habebant ut utrumque alterum Synagogamque Satanae nominaret of Florence The Lateran Council under a Sess 40. habita Maij 4. Anno. Dom. 1515. Concilium Constantiense ubi definit Concilium esse supra Papam reprobatum est in Concilio Florentino Lateranensi ultimo Bellar. de Concil L. 1. C. ● Leo. 10. decreed Infallibility to be in the Pope alone and that he had a Superiority and Supremacy in himself alone above all Councils The Councils of b Sess 45. Constance and c Concil Basil Sess 2. apud Binnium Tom. 8. p. 22. Sess 18. p. 55. Sess 33. p. 95. Sess 38. p. 101. Basil decree the Superiority of a General Council above the Pope and that they have Authority to Decree matters of Faith without him And one of their Decrees runs thus * Concil Basil Sess 23. 37. Consil Const Sess 39 That for the future every one that is to be chosen Pope shall in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost with Heart and Mouth profess to God Almighty and to blessed Peter firmly to believe and hold as long as he shall live the Holy Catholick Faith according to the Traditions of the Apostles and the General Councils and in particular of the General Councils of Lateran Lyons Vienna Constance and Basil and to keep that Faith to a tittle unchanged and to Preach Confirm and Defend it with their Life and Blood And the following Popes till after the time of Eugenius the IV. made this Profession They Decreed also † Concil Basil Sess 2. That General Councils have Authority immediately from Christ and that the Pope himself is bound and obliged to stand to the Declaration and Definition of these Councils And further says This is a d Veritas fidei Catholicae Concil Basil Sess 33. Censendus est haereticus sine interitu salutis Idem Truth belonging to the Catholick Faith which who Pertinaciously resists is to be deemed a Heretick being an Article of Faith which cannot be neglected without the loss of Salvation These Decrees were Establish'd by Pope * Vid. ●inn Concil Basil Sess 29. Sess 38. Martin V. and by virtue hereof John III. and Benedict XIII were deposed and hereby Eugenius IV. was made Pope And yet Popery as they have newly Modell'd it advances a third Position that Infallibility is in the Church somewhere which my Adversary very Candidly to save a fruitless Search fix'd in the Pope and Council together So that here are Three Positions contrary one to another about this Infallibility and place the Infallibility where you please there is accordingly an infallible Determination that there is no such Infallibility in any of them For when they have said all they can on this last Point which seems the strongest and let them set it off with as much Pomp and Ostentation of Words as possibly they can the aforesaid Instances can never be answer'd and it is further manifest that this is only a Collusion and Mask to convey the Pope's Infallibility into the Hearts of the People For when they say the Pope is Infallible General Councils are Infallible the Church is Infallible it is plain they never meant to make three distinct Infallibilities but one Infallibility which must rest virtually in the Pope for otherwise the Church would be always without an Infallible Guide but when a Council sits To evade this they say at other times the Church and Council is virtually in the Pope who by a Synechdoche is Infallible Then the Pope is always Infallible but when a Council sits and hereby is a fresh occasion given for that Flout that was past on the Council of Trent about the Pope's sending to them the Holy Ghost in a Port-Mantue And thus there is nothing more plain then that they Center this Infallibility in the Pope simply But the Papist Mis-represented and Represented * In the Chap of the I fallibility of the Church says He Believes That the Pastors and Prelates of his Church are Fallible What without an Equivocation Does he herein include the Pope Honest Men deliver themselves as plainly as they can possibly contrive especially in such Matters But this seems Equivocal for otherwise why does he lay the Foundation of this Infallibility on such places of Scripture as my Text and the like For there is not one Tittle or Word that can refer to placing an Infallibility in St. Peter in Council only but if their Infallibility be derived hence and founded hereupon it must be in St. Peter simply and yet as if it were out of a Divine Prescience to determine such Disputes and Controversies and Pretensions the very next thing that follows shows that St. Peter was so far from being Infallible that he so grosly Erred as to cause the same Gracious Lord Jesus Christ to say within Five Verses of my Text unto the said Peter Get thee behind me Satan Mat. 16. 23. thou art an offence unto me for thou savourest not the things that be of GOD but those that be of Men. And so