of this Truth taking this for their chiefest Topicks for Maxima locus Maximae Sirs ye know that by this craft we have our wealth Acts 19. 25. For no other reason but covetousness can easily be alledged why the same men should so mainly cry up the Imputation of their own and their Saints imaginary merits and righteousness to the maintaining and filling the supposed Treasure of the Church and yet so mainly cry down the imputation of our blessed Saviour's real and allsufficient merits and righteousness to the exhausting and emptying the Treasures of the people Thus it is clear that pleasure in unrighteousness hath hitherto opposed the Truth in its doctrine making Mammons Chaplains not over zealous to serve God in searching out his Truth that they may believe it or over zealous to serve themselves in not preaching a Truth which they do believe Again why should so many other formidable Truths and reasonings concerning righteousness temperance and judgment to come in and from the mouth of the same St. Paul make a Heathen tremble and not once move so many confident Christians but that this heavenly Truth of Justification by Faith hath been hitherto amongst them not rightly believed or poisoned in its belief and what venome can poison the operations of the soul but onely that of the Serpent the venome of sin turning the grace of our God into wâ—…n onness 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 into petulancy insolency and unsufferable contentiousness for so the Greek Orator hath joyned these together 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Isocr in Panath. contending against not for the Faith once delivered to the Saints or which is all one denying the onely Lord God and our Saviour Jesus Christ Jud. 4. Such men do falsely pretend Faith in Christ who do not deny ungodliness and worldly lusts who do not live soberly righteously and godly in this present world for they cannot look for that blessed hope and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ The Grace of God which bringeth salvation to others will bring the great damnation upon them because they resist that grace betray that Saviour and belye their own Souls For most certainly the greatest miscreants that are would break off their sins by repentance and their iniquities by shewing mercy to the poor if they did with the eye of Faith see a watcher and an Holy one coming down from heaven and saying Hew the Tree down and destroy it Dan. 4. Or if they did hear with an honest and good heart and Faith cometh by no other hearing that word of Christs forerunner in his first coming to save us which is therefore the fittest to put us in mind of his second coming to judge us O generation of Vipers who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the Tree Therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down and cast into the fire Matth. 3. For surely that Faith cannot justifie the sinner which cannot justifie it self a Faith that hath eyes and seeth not the watcher the Holy one coming down from heaven that hath ears and heareth not the crier the voice of one crying in the wilderness prepare ye the way of the Lord make his paths strait A Faith that lets men profess Christâ—…ans but live and act Infidels hardning their hearts stopping their ears closing their eyes lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their eares and understand with their hearts and should be converted and their Saviour the Physitian of Souls should heal them Thus it is also clear That pleasure in unrighteousness hath hitherto poisoned this Truth in its belief making men take phansie for Faith and think themselves in Heaven by their perswasion whiles they are even in Hâ—…ll by theit affections and by their actions not regarding that word which they cannot deny dare not gainsay If ye were Abraham's children who is the Father of the faithful ye would do the works of Abraham Joh. 8. 39. 5. For God gave us not the Articles of our Faith to be like Pharaohs lean kine to eat up the rules of his Commandments the fat-fleshed and well-favoured kine such as were fit for Sacrifices for himself much less such as were offered to himself for Sacrifices Therefore those can be no Gospel Instructions which teach men to devour widows houses nay to devour Gods own house and not onely his house but also his glory and worship under pretence of Faith for of these starveliug Documents we may justly say now and others will be able to say to the worlds end what is said of the starveling kine And when they had eaten them up even all the fat Kine that came up out of the river and fed in the medow This is all the fatness of Sea and Land which their Forefathers had consecrated to the Service and Honour of God it could not be known that they had eaten them but they were still ill-favoured as at the beginning Gen. 41. 21. He that hath commanded us to sanctifie publick Persons as Mininisters publick times as Sabbaths or Festivals publick places as Churches to his own worship will not cannot justifie those who sacrilegiously rob and persecute his Ministers mock and suppress his Sabbaths revile and profane his Churches For it were very strange if such men who are angerly reproved and openly branded for sacrilegious profane blasphemous persons by the Spirit of God should if they still persist in their Sacriledge profaneness and blasphemy be acquitted and absolved for righteous and innocent persons by the Son of God The Spirit of God calleth them enemies adversaries and such as hate him Psal. 14. Therefore surely the Son of God will not make them Saints accept them as friends reward them as servants Such a devouring Gospel as this was never of Gods teaching though it hath been of mens practising to the discountenanceing of Gods Truth and to their own shame and destruction that have practised it For God will never uphold those men in his Truth who discourage others from embracing it 6. Yet as long as Gods Truths are infinitely above all mens discouragements neither are your Priests excusable if they will not embrace them nor ours if they do forsake them notwithstanding both be as much discouraged as either open enemies or false friends and brethren can discourage them What shall the Sons of God come no more to present themselves before their Father because Satan will coâ—…e also among them to present himself before the Lord Shall the the Holy Angels be out of love with their own light because the Devil himself can and doth also appear an Angel of light no more may we be out of love with this heavenly Truth of being righteous by the righteousness of our blessed Redeemer because Hypocrites and Atheists have made it an occasion of or a pretence for their
of God And he gave them that liberty will you call that a hearing of Prayer Then say That hearing of Prayer is not an Act of Grace but of Vengeance for a liberty of doing mischief doth of it self tend to nothing but to the increase of damnation He that seriously considers Prayer to be an elevation of the soul to God will not easily allow it to be an engagement of the soul to the Devil 3. As for Gods hearing the good desires of naturall men that is also in my weak apprehension another exception against this generall Rule God heareth not sinners rather then an exposition of it So far am I from thinking that Aquinas intended to expound this rule by turning it into a question and much further was I from saying That he made a sufficient exposition of it For I must look upon all naturall men as God looks upon them that is as sinners so saith the Text most expresly God looked down from heaven upon the children of men to see if there were any that did understand that did seek God Every one of them is gone back they are altogether become filthy there is none that doth good no not one Psalm 53. 2 3. which is alledged by Saint Paul as a proof that both Jews and Gentiles are all under sin Rom. 3. 9 10 11 12. That is They are all under sin as they are in themselves or as naturall men And therefore as such that is As naturall men or as sinners God heareth them not Hitherto I think the generall Rule is not expounded but excepted and though naturall men may in some respects have good desires yet as such I do not see how they can have good prayers Good desires may be from nature but good prayers are only from grace 4. You may take to your self what liberty you please in some other opinions but scarce in this because it may easily be made destructive of true Christianity For every Christian Divine is bound not only to believe but also to profess That none can properly be said to Pray but only a Christian. And that no Christians prayers whatsoever he be are heard by vertue of his own but only by vertue of Christs intercession The Catholick Church having taught us the belief of both these doctrines by her constant obsecration in all her prayers Through Jesus Christ our Lord And the Holy Ghost having taught it his For no man can say that Jesus is the Lord much less our Lord but by the Holy Ghost 1 Cor. 12. 3. And he must not only say Our Lord but also Our Father that will truly pray that is he must draw near to God in the acknowledgement of Christs Communion and through the Faith of Christs intercession Our Father which art in heaven teacheth us both these Truths In that we call God Father we profess that we pray through his eternall Sons intercession for till he reconciled us we were enemies not children In that we call him Our Father we profess that we pray in his eternall Sons Communion who did graciously teach us to call him Ours because he had made him so Nor can any man say to God Our Father who knows not Christ nor any man that knows Christ truly say it but in that Communion whereof Christ is the Head If nature doth teach men to pray in faith of Christs intercession and in the acknowledgement of Christs Communion saying Through Jesus Christ our Lord then without doubt God may hear the Prayers which proceed from naturall men But if nature doth so indeed then am not I so much bound as I think and willingly acknowledge to Christ and his Church for teaching me to pray so And I had rather disown that is not embrace any mans opinion then disown the least part of my obligation to Christs Catholick Church which doth by me as Saint Paul did by the Galathians travaileth in birth of me till Christ be formed in me that I may offer to God such Prayers as proceed not from my nature but from his Grace and that not through my self but through Jesus Christ our Lord. And much more am I bound not to disown my obligation to my blessed Saviour by whose Grace I am enabled to pray and for whose sake God doth hear my Prayers In the merit of whose unspotted righteousness I offer and present my impure person in the righteousness of whose all-sufficient intercession I offer and present my imperfect prayers before the throne of the heavenly Grace as often as with my heart and not only with my lips I say unto my God Our Father which art in heaven For though men may number their prayers by their repetitions and by their beads yet surely God numbereth them by their sighs and by their grâ—…ans And it were to be wished that all men did likewise so number them having such an heavenly attention in their prayers as to be with Christ and such an heavenly affection as to be in Christ since it is requisite they should have their hearts in and with him in praying whose mediation they desire to have with their Prayers CAP. II. Of Priests Marriage 1. POpe Siricius blamed for speaking dishonourably of marriage and some Papists after him 2. To say that Priests marriage hath been forbidden by the Apostles or the Catholick Church is to accuse both of approving the doctrine of Devils 3. Christ allows of Priests marriage 4. The Popes of Rome did not attempt to forbid it till Siricius his daies 5. The Apostles neither taught nor decreed against it 6 For Priests to marry is not contrary to the Churches precept 7. Nine Popes of Rome the sons of married Bishops Priests and Deacons some in Europe some in Africa some in Asia shew that marriage was lawfull for all those orders of Clergy men in the Catholick Church till near nine hundred years after Christ. That the Prohibition thereof in the Church of Rome was not till the year 1074. by Pope Gregory the seventh 8. The second Canon of the second Council of Carthage rightly interpreted forbids Priests only the use of their marriage at some special feasts 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being rendred secundum priora propria statuta speaks for the truth of the Greek Copies before the Latine The Pope in need of a Provinciall Councill to support his Decree 9. Abrahams being married a good instance for Priests marriage who need look for no better then his righteousness 10. God saying of all It is better to marry then to burn the Church may not gainsay it of Priests 11. The Trullane Fathers blame the Romanists aboout Priests Marriage yet their Canons confirmed by Pope Adrian who in this thwarts Siricius 12. Saint Paul allowed marriage to prevent the danger and not only the guilt of fornication The Church bound to follow his doctrine 13. Saint Pauls thorn in the flesh his poenall afflictions not his sinfull motions or his tribulations not his temptations in the flesh 14. Marriage better allowed
he never so glorious yet he is as far from God as my self for betwixt finite and infinite the distance is infinite whether the finite be glorious or inglorious for be he never so glorious yet he and his glory both are nothing in comparison of him to whom Cherubins and Seraphins continually do cry Heaven and earth are full of the majesty of thy Glory 7. Having vindicated mine own allegation against praying to Saints I come to oppose your Cardinals allegations for it which though they savour much more of learning authority yet not one jot less of impertinency And yet you and all yours swallow them as glib as once you swallowed the holy league and Covenant or as still you are desirous to swallow up all other Churches into your own pretended mother Church that is as that Behemoth swalloweth waters of whom it is said Behold he drinketh up a river and hasteth not he trusteth that he can draw up Jordan into his mouth Job 4. 23. A large swallow you have to let down your own Camels whiles you strain at our gnats not considering the advice of the first Bishop of Hierusalem to his Clergy My Brethren have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ the Lord of glory with respect of persons Jam. 2. 1. If you had not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with respect of persons more then of causes you would rather be exceptious against your own writers for most shamefully misapplying the holy Scriptures to set up your false worship then with ours for rightly applying them to pull it down since it is so much to the dishonour of Christ our Redeemer and to the danger of those Christian souls which he hath redeemed And yet your late writers seeing the unwritten word so unequal a match to grapple with the written word for the Protestants have opened their eyes though God alone can open their hearts and we pray him to open them do labour to prove all your false adorations and false invocations out of the holy Scriptures notwithstanding they are so plainly and so directly against the express letter of the Law of Moses and therefore cannot be according to the letter of the Prophets which are no other then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â—…aw But I will confine my self to your moâ—…â—…ed Dogmatist and desire you with me to consider the strange impertinency and if wilful the stranger imprety of his allegations out of the Text to maintain your invocation of Saints And amongst them all two only shall serve my turn 8. The first is that of Gen. 48. 16. The Angel which redeemed me from all evil bless the lads Hic apertè sanctus Jacob Aâ—…gelum invocavit saith Bellarm. Here holy Jacob did manifestly invocate an Angel If he did 't is manifest he took that Angel for the God of his Fathers Abraham and Isaac for the God which fed him all his life long and redeemed him from all evil for he invocateth none other to bless the lads but only that God so saith the Text God before whom my Fathers Abraham and Isaac did walk the God which â—…ed me all my life long to this day The Angel which redeemed me from all evil bless the â—…ads 'T is palpable all these particulars do concern but one and him Jacob desireth to bless the children If that one were an Angel he did not pray for Gods blessing upon them so the lads were little beholding to him If that one were God he did not pray to an Angel to blesâ—… them so 〈◊〉 â—…olding to your Carâ—… Nay indeed all that are concerned in this Text for the Angel though named yet is not concerned in it are litâ—…le beholding to him for all are losers by this interpretation 1º God loseth his honour of accepting feeding redeeming and blessing his servants 2º Abraham and Isaac lose their God For it was the Almighty God not an Angel that said to Abraham Walk before me and be thou perfect Gen. 17. 1. and God before whom my Fathers Abraham and Isaac did walk saith this Text. 3º The poor infants lose their blessing for t is clear an Angel could not bless them but only ministerially from God 4º Jacob loseth his Religion for he calleth upon a false God if upon an Angel instead of God All these cannot lose by this interpretation the Interpreter himself be no loser therefore though I will not say he lost his honesty by seeking to wrest a text yet I must say he hath lost his authority by seeking to oppose it For it is not an exposition but an opposition of the Text when words are taken Grammatically in their own sense that should be taken Theologically in Gods sense The Grammatical sense of a word is according to its own signification But the Theological sense of a word is according to Gods use of it or Gods application As Genesis 18. 2. The Lord appeared unto Abraham but v 2. Lo three men stood by him And again v. 16. The men rose up from thence yet v. 17. And the Lord said and 't is evident by all Abrahams prayer that it was the Lord appeared unto him for he calleth him the Judge of all the earth v. 25. and v. 33. 't is said The Lord went his way as soon as he had left communing with Abraham If you take this word men Grammatically as 't is in its own signification you must say Abraham prayed to a man But if you take it Theologically as 't is in Gods use or application 't is no less then the Lord appearing in the likeness of a Man and you must say That Abraham prayed only to the Lord So in this Text mis-interpreted by your great Doctor if you take the word Angel Grammatically as it signifies in it self 't is plain Iacob invocated an Angel but if you take it Theologically as God useth it 't is no less then the Lord in the likeness of an Angel and so 't is plain Iacob invocated none but God And truly the one Text might as well have been urged to prove that Abraham invocated a man as the other to prove that Iacob invocated an Angel Both good proofs Grammatically but neither a good proof Theologically For Grammarians look upon words as they signifie in themselves but Divines look upon words as they signifie in their use the reason is because the work of the one is to understand the Thing but the work of the other is to understand the Truth therefore as doubtful Propositions in the New Testament are to be expounded according to the Analogie of Faith in the Apostles Creed that we may have Truth in our Belief So doubtful Propositions in the Old Testament are to be expounded according to the analogie of righteousness in Moses his Decalogue that we may have Truth in our Obedience And as that Proposition This is my body must be taken Theologically that is in the sense of the speaker because taken Grammatically that is in the bare sense of the words it
the authority of a particular Church to defend his Decrees notwithstanding that some others of your profession would fain perswade the world That the Popes Decrees ought to be received and embraced as the infallible rules of the whole Catholick Church 9. Having done my weak endeavour to vindicate the Church I now come to vindicate my self and to make good my decarded instances As for that of Abraham if it reach not Siricius it must content me For if my salvation shall go no further then to be in Abrahams bosom my Religion may seek no further then for Abrahams righteousness And he must be to me a bold Dogmatist who would make me more righteous then my Father who am not righteous but for being his Son And if Saint Paul hath thought fit to argue from Abrahams faith to our faith sure I am not mistaken in my Topicks for arguing from Abrahams righteousness to our righteousness And yet I will give you a better precedent then Saint Paul for I find our blessed Saviour himself so arguing This did not Abraham John 8. 40. 10. As for my instance out of Saint Paul It is better to marry then to burn I think it doth prove Siricius a false Dogmatist for he saith It is not better to marry then to burn and I am sure that both parts of the contradiction cannot be true and dare not imagine That Siricius hath taken the true Saint Paul the false part For if for Priests to marry is to be in the flesh Then clearly it is better for Priests to burn then to marry notwithstanding Saint Paul hath said generally concerning all men It is better to marry then to burn And neither good Reason nor good Religion nor good Manners will allow any man to give an exception upon Gods general Rule or to distinguish where his Law doth not distinguish or to set up an Hypothesis against his Thesis by saying That is unlawfull for some particular men which he hath declared to be lawful for All men or to say That puts a man in the state of sin which God hath said is consistent with the state of righteousness For this is to give earth a Dominion over heaven to allow men a legislative power over God for he that in this manner judgeth the Law doth indeed condemn the Law-giver according to that assertion of the irrefragable Doctor Si enim aliquis effecit aliquid quod non sit determinatum in sacra Scriptura mortaliter peccat quia se constituit supra Deum Halensis Par. 1. qu. 68. num 1. art 2. Therefore I dare not say The Church hath determined that to be unlawful in Any which God hath determined to be lawfull in All For I am in love with that Rule in the Angelical Doctor which he hath improved out of Aristotle as he hath indeed all other Ethicks In his quae arbitrio Judicis relinquuntur viri boni est ut sit Diminitivus Poenarum 22. qu. 67. art 4. ad 1. In those things which the Law hath left to the Judges arbitrement it is the part of a good man to Diminish Punishments and if so Then much more to diminish not to encrease sins What an Heathen hath allowed to be the part of a good man pray let a Christian allow to be the part of his best Mother and not suppose the Church 10 cruel as to be willing to encrease sins when he may not suppose a good man so cruel as to be willing to encrease Punishment 11. This makes me follow the Trullane Fathers who thought it fitter Can. 13. to tax the Roman Church for making a Canon to keep married Priests from cohabiting with their wives then by consenting to such a Canon to bring themselves under the suspition of disparaging or disgracing marriage which God had instituted by his Law and both honoured and blessed by his presence For the whole Gospel say they cryeth aloud What God hath joyned let not man put asunder but if Priests that are married be in the state of damnation let us say not God but the Devil hath joyned them and their wives together and therefore man ought to put them asunder and so call marriage in them not Gods but the Devils institution The same Fathers urge further that of Saint Paul Heb. 13. 3. Marriage is honourable in all to prove it honourable in Priests for that was the whole matter then in debate And I desire you to shew me How in this enuntiation marriage is honourable in All the universal particle All doth signifie All but Priests And yet in another enuntiation Drink ye All of this the same particle All doth signifie none but Priests me thinks by this extraordinary kind of subtilty All is come to signifie None For All is none of the Clergy in one place and none of the Laity in another and in my dull sense the whole company of Christians are either Clergy or Laity I will yet further add the testimony of Adrian that I may oppose a Pope against a Pope both for the credit of this Council and for the truth of this cause For I find him in Gratian speaking these words Sextam Sanctam Synodum recipio cum omnibus Canonibus suis I receive the sixt holy Synod with all her Canons Gr. de consec dist 3. c. 29. He saith I receive the sixt holy Synod so the Council is good as to you who are so zealous for the Pope whatever it be to others He saith with all her Canons so the cause is good against you for this Canon is received among the rest And he that said all this lived above 800. years after Christ so your assertion is not good That the Apostles themselves were the first that taught and decreed that Priests ought to abstain from wives For if Pope Adrian could have alledged the least particle of an Apostolical decree against Priests marriage no doubt he would not have said He received all the Canons meerly for this one Canons sake which had been made of purpose to confute his own Church and Chair of both which he was not a little zealous meerly for following Siricius in being addicted to the contrary opinion chuse you which of the two Popes to follow Siricius or Adrian for both you cannot 12. But you say To burn doth not here signifie to be tempted but to fornicate I cannot think Saint Paul was so zealous to determine that which no man was yet so impudent as to doubt viz. It is better to marry then to fornicate for that is no more in effect then this It is better to be a man then to be a beast which surely was not the doubt concerning which the Corinthians had desired to be resolved Therefore I think this cannot be Saint Pauls meaning It is better to marry then to fornicate and I suppose you will think so too when you shall consider that from this interpretation I can justly make this inference That if Priests do fornicate first they may marry afterwards
that believes the torments of Purgatory can stick to do any Villany if he may be thus absolved for doing it And it is to be seared that some of your party still heighten their absolutions according to their designs which is little less then to make the power of God subservient to the malice of the Devil and to fill the hearts of men with impiety that they may commit sin and with impenitency when they have committed it 3. This and much more might have been said by way of condemning your Church but I desired only to acquit our own and to shew that if we would our selves we might all be sincere and true Penitents because our Church was not really but only seemingly defective in the practice of Pennance For though she wracked no mans conscience yet she so far instructed all that not the meanest of her Communicants who were not Hypocrites could be under the danger and much less under the guilt of Impenitency And I had reason to satisfie my self and others in this point for it is evident by Saint John Baptists first Sermon Mat. 3. 8 9. Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance and think not to say within your selves we have Abraham to our Father That it is in vain for any man to boast he hath Abraham for his Father or as we Christians use to speak He hath the Church of Christ for his Mother who is not a true Penitent Nay it is in vain for any Church to boast of her being the daughter of Abraham or the Spouse of Christ if she follow not his example who first Preached Christ calling upon all that are of her Baptism and are associated in her Communion To bring forth fruits meet for Repentance And upon this ground did Lactantius determine so positively That the true Church of Christ was to be known only by the practice of Pennance Lib. 4. de vera sap cap. 30. Sed tamen quia singuli quique caetus Haereticorum se potissimum Christianos suam esse Catholicam Ecclesiam putant sciendum est illam esse veram in quâ est Confessio Poenitentia quae peccata vulnera quibus subjecta est imbecillitas carnis salubriter curat But because the several Congregations of Hereticks think themselves the best Christians and each his own Church to be the Catholick Church we must know That is the true Catholick Church in which there is Confession and Penance to take care for the healing of those sins and wounds which the infirmities of the flesh bring upon us He saith the Catholick Church is to be known by an Healing Confession and an Healing Penance the same in effect which Saint John Baptist had said before him I knowing that those words Confession and Penance made more noise in your Church then in ours was willing to examine whether we had not the same vertue of them amongst us to heal us as was amongst you to heal you because we had not the same noise of them And I found we had For besides the greater censure of Excommunication in the power of the Bishops and the lesser censure of abstention in the power of all Parochial Priests enabling and requiring them to deny the Communion to scandalous sinners till they had testified their repentance for their sins I fòund that every one of us was put under a necessity of censuring and condemning himself which was the readiest way to bring us all to an ingenuous confession of our sins and to a serious contrition for them For being bound in our daily publick prayers to hear the Ten Commandements from the mouth of the Priest as from the mouth of God kneeling upon our knees and to say at the end of every Commandement Lord have mercy upon us We could not justly be charged for want of an Healing Confession to let pass that at the beginning of our prayers because no sin but was against some one of Gods Commandements and we asking mercy for our transgression of every one did in effect confess our transgressing it And being also bound to say Encline our hearts to keep this Law we could not justly be charged for want of an healing Penance because that wholly consisted in the contrition and conversion of the Heart That Penance most healing the soul which had most broken the heart A broken and a contrite heart O God shalt thou not despise For this Contrition as it is true Penance so it is sufficient for wiping away of all sin from the soul your own Cardinal not only asserting but also assuring this for true doctrine Bellar. li. 2. de de Poenit. cap. 15. Utrum omnia peccata per veram contritionem sive Poenitentiam deleantur Resp. Illud autem affirmamus non ut probabile sed planè ut certum apud Catholicos exploratum nullam esse peccatorum multitudinem vel gravitatem quae per veram poenitentiam non expietur nam Ezech. 18. 33. Deus saepius clamat Nolo mortem Peccatoris sine ullâ exceptione veniam pollicetur omnium iniquitatum si impium serio paenituerit vitae praeteritae cum emendationis proposito Whether all sins are blotted out by true Contrition or Penance I answer we affirm this not only as probable but also as certain and unquestionable amongst Catholicks That there is no multitude or magnitud of sins which is not expiated by true Penance For God himself Ezech. 18. 33. often saies nay swears I will not the â—…eath of a sinner and promises forgiveness without exception of áll iniquities whatsoever if the wicked earnestly repent of his sinful life past and truly purpose amendment for the time to come Here you see he takes true Contrition and Penance for one and the same and saies That is true Contrition when the wicked earnestly repents of what is past and really purposeth amendment for what is to come We have this earnest Repentance professed and practised in our Church for we say Lord have mercy upon us and encline our hearts to keep this Law And we have also this real purpose of amendment for after our repenting we say And write all these thy Laws in our hearts we beseech thee So that having this true Contrition it cannot be denyed but we have also true Penance amongst us that is such a Penance as doth expiate our sins though never so many and great heal our wounds and save our soul If such an Healing Penance as this may not be had without an Healing Confession it is plain we have also an Healing Confession amongst us because we have this Healing Penance If it may t is as plain we need no other Confession then that we have I desire not to implead your Church concerning the exercise of Penance for I see our own wishes it might be restored But I crave leave to say That our Church which requireth us to lay open our consciences daily before the searcher of hearts doth not permit us to conceal any one
but me doth likewise say Thou shall invocate no other but me because invocation is the most proper and the most publick acknowledgement and worship of God For Invocation is required by the first though it is regulated by the third commandement That enjoyns the object and internal affection this only enjoyns the manner and the external expression Therefore Call upon me in the day of trouble Psal. 50. 15. belonging to the affirmative Call not upon any besides me doth belong to the negative precept in the first Commandement since these two are contraries and contraria sunt sub eodem genere posita contraries must be ranked or reckoned under one and the same Head For in vain doth your Cardinal seek to excuse bad words in prayers from the good sense or meaning of him that prays non agitur de verbis sed de sensu verborum Bell. l. 1. de sanct Beat. c. 17. because as a right intention in our prayers is required by the first so also a right expression in our prayers is required by the third Commandement God requirlng us no less to honour his Name by right words and professions in the One then to honour his Nature by right intentions and affections in the other For as we may not honour God with our lips whiles our hearts are far from him So neither may we dishonour him with our lips whiles our hearts are near him For as the one makes us Hypocritical so the other makes us blasphemous worshippers As the one is directly against the internal so the other is directly against the external Act of Religion as the one is against the morality of the first so the other is against the morality of the third Commandement But of this I have spoken elsewhere of purpose to justifie the Religion established and professed amongst us for which so many Orthodox Divines have lately lost their livelyhoods by Protestants and pray they may not come to lose their lives by Papists because I was there bound to shew the irreligion that I found not only in Faction which hath no Liturgie but also in superstition which hath corrupt Liturgie Justif. of the Church of England cap. 3. sec. 3. there you might have seen more work made for you upon the grounds of conscience then you have here made for me only upon the grounds of contention Thither if you please you may go for more of this argument but before you go take this Question along with you not Where was this your Religion of praying to Saints before Luther but where is it now For it is not in any of Gods Commandements concerning Religion nay 't is plainly against them all 'T is against the first in having a false Object and false internal acts of Religion against the second in having a false external act or manner of Religion by way of adoration against the third in having a false external act or manner of Religion by way of invocation or of Praise and Profession As it is not according to Gods Commandements so it cannot be Piety or Religion as 't is against Gods Commandements so 't is moreover impiety and irreligion Therefore boast not any longer of the general profession and practice of this or any other corrupt part of your Religion which you cannot justifie in its substance For 't is a miserable Religion which is to be found only in its exercise according to the purport of the fourth and not also in its substance according to the purport of the three first Commandements A Religion in its Name not in its Nature in its solemnity not in its purity in its followers not in it self That is in one word A Religion not of Gods but of mans making 12. To such a Religion belongs â—…hat Prayer Maria mater gratiae mater misericordiae Tu nos ab hoste protege horâ mortis suscipe which yet your Cardinal boldly imputeth to the universal Church sic loquitur ecclesia universa lib. 1. de Sanct. Beat. cap. 19. though its language speak only the Church of Rome and its rythme speaks only the late and corrupt ages of that Church and its irreligion doth in truth speak no Church For that is no Church whereof Christ is not the Head And he is not the Head of that Church which prayeth to such as he did not pray And he did never pray to his Mother but only to his Father teaching us o say Our Father not Our Mother whâ—…ch art in Heaven We cannot say the words of this Prayer in his Communion we cannot obtain the blessing oâ—… it by his intercession therefore if we wâ—…l â—…e his Church we must put this prayer oâ—… of our meutâ—…es because we dare not put it into His We have no pattern 〈◊〉 sâ—…ch prayers in all the Book of God and 〈◊〉 we can find better Patterns then God hath given we are bound to â—…ollow those of his giving or we shall leave his 〈◊〉 â—…oly Communion and lose his Soâ—…s blessed â—…ntercession in our prayers â—…or as we are sure the eternal Son of God hath â—…ot taught us thus to pray so we may be assured he will not he cannot 〈◊〉 us in this Prayer Esto mihi in Deum Protectorem Psal. 31. 4. will not agree with this Tu nos ab hoste protegeâ—… In maÌ„us tuas coÌ„mendo spirituÌ„ meuÌ„ will not agree with this Et horâ mortis suscipe why should I leave the Communion of Gods eternal Son either in not saying the one or in saying the other For I may no more now venter to have Religion then I may hereafter hope to have a salvation out of his Communion And though it be more like a Heathen then a Christian to say If it be a question of words and of names and of your Law Acts 18. 15. for words are to be regulated in the exercise of Religion according to Gods Law by vertue of the third Commandement no less then thoughts by vertue of the first Gestures by vertue of the second and Deeds by vertue of the fourth yet is that saying very unfitly applyed in the defence of this Prayer For this is as formal an Invocation of the Blessed Virgin as if she were God Calling her the Mother of Grace and Mercy and praying her to protect us in our life and to receâ—…ve us at our death And who can say more then this to God putting but Father instead of Mother who can ask more then this of God This is in effect to say Mater de coels Dea instead of Pater de coelis Deus miserere nobis miseris peccatoribus O blessed Mother of God instead of O God the Father of Heaven have mercy upon us miserable sinners And we ought to say Libera nos Domine Good Lord deliver us not so much in regard of any other evil and mischief as in regard of such Letanies Therefore this Invocation of the Mother of God is faulty in Objecto cultus in modo colendi both in the object
of worship and in the manner of worshipping Iâ—… the object of worship for the Mother of God is not God there 's the breach of the first Commandement In the manner of worshipping for she is called upon with such titles and for such blessings as if she were God there 's the breach of the third Commandement Add to these the manner of Adoration which also generally accompanieth this Invocation and you will see in it likewise the breach of the second Commandement and so cannot but shew your selves strangely Religious in breaking at once all the three Commandements that concern the substance of Religion Here is a false worship materially or extrinsecally in gesture and words and a false worship formally or intrinsecally in a Religious affection to the creature which is due only to the Creator So that you see I did not aggravate bâ—…t diminish the defects of your penance when I said your Confessional Interrogatories were defective as to one for I might have said they were defective as to three Commandements And will you still boast of your uncontroled and uninterrupted exercise of this corrupt Religion Do you think that Gods Church can outweigh Gods Word in the ballance of the Sanctuary or will you avow that for the practice of Gods Church which is disavowed by the Precept of Gods Word Say then you believe the Communion of sinners instead of the Communion of Saints For that is sin which is directly against Gods Law and to communicate in sin belongs to the Communion of sinners not to the Communion of Saints Therefore pray let the Lords Psalter which was composed by the Spirit of God and not the Ladies Psalter which was impiously devised by the phansies of men be accounted the general rule and square of Devotions for Gods Church And when the Spirit of God hath said Rejoyce in the Lord O ye righteous and give thanks for a rememberance of his holiness Psal. 97. 12. setting forth 1º the Communion of Saints O ye Righteous 2º the Religion of Saints wherein they Communicate Rejoyce in the Lord and give thanks for a remembrance of his holiness where we have the object of their Religion the Lord and the internal act thereof Rejoyce and the external act thereof Give thanks and the end or intention of both for a remembrance of his hâ—…liness Do not you perswâ—…de the world that his Church truly so called hath taught the people to say Rejoyce in the Lady O ye Righteous and give thanks for a remembrance of her holiness for that were to say that the Church hath both corrupted the Religion and forsaken the Communion of Saints which is little better then to set up the Devils Chappel instead of Gods Church For these abominable kind of prayers are most unconscioâ—…able because to the abuse of Christian Religion and most uncharitable because to the breach of Christian Communion and 't is for the Devils Chappel not for Gods Church to be guilty of unconscionableness and of uncharitableness 13. Therefore let the men not the Church bear the blame of such corrupt invocations For the Church of Israel did continue and fulfill Joshua's Protestation Aâ—… for me and my house we will serve the Lord Josh. 24. 15. when the men of Israel did for sake it and served Baal and God owns those for his Church which had served him alone saying I have reserved to my self seven thousand men who have not boâ—…ed the knee to Baal Rom. 11. 4. They who had bowed the knee to Baal were not Gâ—…ds reserve they were of the men they were not of the Church of Israel God himself accounting those only for his Church who in that general defection and apostacy had reserved themselves for him and consequently who had in their hearts a secret detestation of the false worship then generally followed if not in their mouthes an open Protestation against it They were all of them either private or publick Protestants privately or publickly protesting against that Religion which served not the Lord and they had no worse a Precedent then Iâ—…shua the very type of Christ the author and finisher of our faith for that their Protestation If the true Religion did constitute Gods Church then why not now though the false made a 〈◊〉 greater noise and shew then the truâ—… the Prophets of God being driven into caves whiles the Prophets of the groves did eat at Iezabels table For an agreement in falsity and irreligion though never so great both shews and makes rather a conspiracy oâ—… sinners then a Communion of Saints Therefore since this Invocation is indeed 〈◊〉 Religion it must â—…ds be 〈◊〉 aâ—…ributed to the true Church of God for â—…hat is constituted and established by the true Religion and is no more a true Church from its falsities then the Moon is a true Moon from its spots or a man is a true man from his Diseases And the Church of Rome is not a true Church from the false Invocation of Saints or any other acts of false worship but from the true Invocation of God and other such acts of true worship which are still maintained professed and practised in that Church And we Protestants justly say That your Religion is the same with our Religion but our Religion is not the same with your susperstition As far as as you pray to God we pray with you at least in vote and desire As far as you pray to Saints we can only pray for you we dare not pray with you And though we may all justly be destroyed for our manifold and grievous offences particularly for serving our selves of God more then serving him in the prosecution of our reformation yet in this respect we may be sure God will never want a Protestant Church because he will never want a true Church If all the world should turn Papists Papists themselves should in this turn Protestants if not openly yet secretly Protesting against the worship which is against the Law of God and forsaking it either explicitly by a new obedience or at least implicitly by an earnest Repentance This kind of Protestantism hath hitherto preserved a true Church in the midst of Poperie and will preserve it to the worlds end if that should continue so long For he that is able out of stones to raise up children unto Abraham is both able and willing out of Papists to raise up children unto himself Dutiful children such as will obey their Fathers commands and therefore will not embrace such a practice of Religion as breaks no less then three of the chiefest of his Commandements or will repent that they have embraced it 14. Therefore we dare not say with your Trent Catechist That the Catholick Church alwaies invocated Saints and worshipped their Reliques Invocationem Sanctorum sanctorumque cinerum cultum quem semper Catholica Ecclesia adhibuit huic legi non repugnare cap. 3. because we cannot but say that such Invocation is repugnant not only to the first and second which
imputativè tantum suum Christus sanctificavit populum Arg. 10. True righteousnesse not Imputative and If Christ sanctified his people not truly but Imputatively whereby He supposes Imputative to be not True Then say that St. Paul did forsake a True for a false righteousness because he forsooke an inherent righteousnesse for an imputative But take heed that in saying so you do not only injuriously callumniate St. Paul chosing to be justified by an Imaginary righteousness but also impiously blaspheme your Saviour by supposing all that he did and suffered for sinners to be made theirs only by Imagination And consequently That Justification is but matter of phansie not of reality which the holy Scripture ascribes only to Imputed righteousnesse For the Text doth plainly say Abraham believed God and it was counted or imputed to him for righteousness Rom. 4. 3. And again v. 5. His Faith is counted for righteousnesse anâ—… v. 6. David describeth the blessednesse of the man unto whom the Lord imputeth righteousnesse without works and again v. 22. It was imputed to him for righteousnesse He that shall consider these Texts and say Imputed righteousnesse is a meer fiction will scarce be able to wash his hands from charging the Holy Ghost with teaching a Fiction and may easily keep the Holy Ghost from washing his heart from the guilt of that charge Pereâ—…ius durst not so thwart the Text cap. 4. ad Rom. disp 2. but saith of Abraham as St. Paul had taught him That though he was just and holy yet his faith not his holinesse was imputed to him for righteousnesse Abraham licet is justus jam esset sanctus propter fidem tamen non propter opera Justitia dicitur esse imputata What a vast difference is here betwixt Two men not only of the same Church I mean of Rome but also of the same order I mean of Jesuits Bellarmine being a zealous Disputant strives to bring the Holy Ghost to his Position Pererius being a judicious Commentator strives to bring his exposition to the Holy Ghost For doubtlesse he had observed the Hebrew words Gen. 15. 6. to which St. Paul here related to be these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Imputavit illud ei in justitiam And he that is the Lord imputed it to him for righteousnesse So the Jewish Doctor Solemon Jarchi who best understood his own dialect glosseth those words He that is â—…oly and blessed imputed it tâ—… Abraham for purity and Justice or righteousnesse because of the Faith through which he had believed him If Abraham were made just by imputed righteousnesse then so also are the sons of Abraham therefore said the Prophet Look untâ—… Abraham your Father Isa. 51. 2. exhorting all the sons of Abraham after the pattern of their Father to trust in Christ as saith our Church in the contents nay as saith Gods holy Spirit in the Text Foâ—… St. Paul argueth from Abrahams Justification to ours That as he was not so we cannot be justified by inherent but by imputed righteousnesse For God is alwaies like himself not one to Abraham another to us therefore as He justified Abraham so He justifieth us And Aquinas gives a demonstrative reason for it saying Tota Ecclesia quae est mysticum corpus Christi computatur quasi una persona cum suo capite quod est Christus 3. par q. 41. art 1. c. The whole Church which is the mystical body of Christ is computed but as one person with its Head which is Christ Abraham the Father of the faithful and all his children are members of one and the same mystical body therefore they have all but one and the same righteousnesse whereby to be justified And Christ is the Head of that mysticall body therefore they all have His righteousness imputed to them for their Justification To set up another righteousness for this is to set up another Head and to set up another Head is to destroy the Body The righteousnesse of the Head is communicated and may be imputed to all the members of his Body because Head and Body make but one Person But the righteousnesse of one member is not communicable and may not be imputed to another member because all the members make several persons forasmuch as the Body whereof they are members is not natural but mystical so we have in the judgment of Aquinas great reason to believe the imputed righteousnesse of Christ but none at all to believe the imputed righteousnesse of the Saints For the Head hath but the members have not a communicable righteousnesse For though the Head and all the members make but one Person mystical yet the members make several distinct persons naturall and several distinct persons as they have their subsistencies so they have their properties and operations both alike incommunicable Each member hath its own righteousness not possibly to be communicated to another because it is confined to its own subject and therefore not truly imputed to another because it is not communicated This is a kind of imputed righteousness which is a meer figment or a fiction but 't is a righteousnesse both taught and imputed by man not by God even in the superfluous or superabunant righteousness of the Saints put into the treasure of the Church if we may believe your Authors to be communicated to those that want merits or satisfaction of their own either merits of their own working or satisfaction of their own making This imputed rightousnesse of man is in truth a meer fiction both in regard of the imputation and in regard of the righteousnesse First In regard of the imputation for it is againg the nature of Justice that one mans righteousness should be imputed for the satisfaction of another mans unrighteousnesse without his consent that is to be satisfied but God hath nowhere declared much less promised his consent to receive such satisfaction So that the imputing one mans righteousnesse to another must needs be vain because God may be thought not to accept it nay more it must needs be sinfull because man may be thought to prescribe if not to extort Gods acceptance And if there be vanity and sin in the imputation we must say there is fiction in it for having its very being in Vanity and sin it cannot have a real but a meer imaginary or fictitious being Secondly This imputed righteousness of men is a meer fiction in regard of the righteousnesse it self For it supposeth the righteousness of the creature to make condigne satisfaction to the Justice of the Creator which is impossible because the one is finite the other is infinite Nay yet farther to heighthen this impossibility at least in our conception though not in truth it supposeth the righteousness of the creature not only to satisfie for its own but also for anothers unrighteousnes whereas it is the opinion of some of the best Scholemen even of Bernard Scotus and Gabriel if we may believe Vasques That no creature can have a righteousnesse adequate
if it said You shall not live unless you do this The Law as a Rule of Righteousness Do this is repeated and reenforced in the Gospel but as a Covenant of Life intimating we shall not live unlesse we do this it is abolished by the Gospel And so much of the Gospel was revealed to the Jews even whiles they were detained under the Law as to let them see they were not saved or delivered because they had performed the Duty but because God would performe the Mercy of his Covenant for this is the only reason that is given of their deliverance out of Egypt God remembred his Covenant with Abraham with Isaac and with Jacob Exod. 2. 24. which is farther explained and confirmed by the Prophet Ezekiel in his story of their rebellions in Egypt in the Wilderness and in the land of Canaan Ezek. 20. where all along the reason of Gods saving and delivering them is only his own undeserved goodness and mercy For when he looked upon their breaking the Conditions then it follows I said I will pour out my fury upon them ver 8 13 21. But when he looks upon his own Promise in the Covenant then it follows But I wrought for my names sake ver 9 14 22. Throughout the whole Chapter there is a kind of dispute betwixt Gods Justice and his Mercy His Justice calling for their destruction but his Mercy interceding for their deliverance And this God would have registred not only by way of doctrine for their instruction but also by way of praise and thanksgiving for their Devotion Hence we find it also recorded in the Psalmes which were the chiefest part of their Liturgy as Psal. 89. If they break my Statutes and keep not my Commandements ver 32. Neverthelesse my Covenant will I not break ver 34. And again Psal. 106. ver 23. He said he would have destroyed them why did he not performe his saying Moses his chosen stood before him in the gap and if we look into Exod. 30. we shall find that Moses stood in the gap and besought God by three arguments 1. By his former benefits which would be lost ver 11. but that prevails not because they had abused them 2. By his own glorious Name which would be dishonoured among the Egyptians vers 12. but niether doth that prevail for better his Name be dishonoured among his Enemies then among his Servants 3. By his Promises made to the Fathers ver 13. and that alone prevailed for after that it presently follows And the Lord repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people v. 14. The cause of their Salvation is wholly imputed to Gods goodnesse which made him promise them mercy before they were his Servants and shew them mercy after they had revolted from his Service And though Christians are grown so wan'on as to dallie with Christ or so bold as to contest with him about their Salvation yet t is clear the Jews did look to be saved only by their Messias which is the same with our Christ For their Faith passed through the blood of all their own daily Sacrifices to the Blood of Christ to which they had relation and from which they had their virtue as appears from the Title of the 22. Psalm as 't is explained in the Chaldee Paraphrast A Psalm to praise God withall at or for the powerful and perpetual oblation of the morning shewing that this Psalm was given to the Priests and Levites that it should be sung by them every morning to direct all their thoughts unto and fix all their hops upon the death and passion of Christ whereof this Psalm was rather a History then a Prophecy through whom alone all their oblations were powerfull and for whom they were Perpetual through whom they were accepted and for whom they were continued 11. And this the Jews themselves did know very well or else their Priests and their Scribes could not so readily have answered That Christ was to be born in Bethlehem and have cited the Prophecie of Micah to justifie their answer Mat. 2. For thus it is written by the Prophet And thou Bethlehem in the Land of Judah art not the least The Prophet had said Thou art the least sc. in thy self but they said and St. Matthew from them Thou art not the least sc. in relation to Christ who was the Gouernour to come from thence for thus both sayings are true in several respects And since 't is very probable that the Priests and Scribes themselves first made this change and that St. Matthew only related the same as he found they had made it T is evident that even in those times of greatest blindness They had light enough to see Christ though they had not Grace enough to receive Him Thus they looked unto Christ in all their worship which shews they hoped for Salvation more from their Faith then from their Obedience even whiles they were held under the Law as the Covenant of Obedience And therefore by the same reason they could not but also hope for salvation more from their Repentance then from their Righteousnesse because their Faith in Christ being commanded and accepted did shew the relaxation of the Law as it was the Covenant of Obedience and consequently did promise the acceptance of unfained repentance instead of impeâ—…able Righteousnesse Hence that General Rule of one of their greatest Doctors R. David Kimchi upon Jonah 3. 9. Omne verbum quod loquitur Deus malefacere filiis hominum est sub conditione si non refipuerint 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Every word which God speaketh threatning to do hurt to the sons of men is to be understood with this condition If they do not repent so that the curses for transgressing the Moral Law which were incurred through default of Obedience were not inflicted but for defect of repentance and that even under the Law whiles it remained in its greatest force as the Covenant of works and of Obedience For even then was it a part of the Jews Faith to believe and of their Religion to give thanks after this manner Praise the Lord O my Soul and all that is within me praise his holy name Praise the Lord O my soul and forget not all his benefits which forgiveth all thy sin and healeth all thine infirmities which saveth thy life from destruction and crowneth thee with mercy and loving kindness Psal. 103. What better Faith can any Christian have then to believe that God for Christs sake forgiveth all the sins he hath committed healeth all the infirmities he hath contracted saveth his life from the destruction he hath deserved And what better Thanks giving can any Christian use then to say Praise the Lord O my soul and all that is within me praise his holy Name Praise the Lord O my soul and forget not all his benefits 12. So that if Christians will not go to the Gospel they may go to the Law if they will not go to the New they may