Selected quad for the lemma: father_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
father_n	abraham_n	according_a	nation_n	1,151	4	7.1950	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A81727	Gospel-Glory proclaimed before the sonnes of men, in the visible and invisible worship of God. Wherein the mystery of God in Christ, and his royall, spirituall government over the soules and bodies of his saints, is clearly discovered, plainly asserted, and faithfully vindicated, against the deceiver and his servants, who endeavour the cessation thereof, upon what pretence soever. / By Edward Drapes, an unworthy servant in the gospell of Christ.	Drapes, Edward.	1648 (1648)	Wing D2139; Thomason E472_27; ESTC R205811	164,938	187

Arguments First Those persons are onely to be baptized whom Christ gave Arg. 1 Against infant Baptisme a Commission to his Disciples to baptize But Christ gave a Commission to his Disciples to baptize none but visible professors of the Gospell of Christ Ergo Onely professors of faith are to be baptized and so not children because they cannot professe faith The major or the former proposition is evident for if they baptized others then Christ commanded them they set up an Ordinance of their owne and were guilty of will-worship and taught for the Doctrines of God their owne traditions If any one shall deny this I desire he would shew me in the Scripture where the Lord Jesus hath declared his approbation of any mans setting up an Ordiance in his owne house which he himselfe enjoyned not with the reasons for such an assertion and we will fully consider of the matter The second proposition is likewise cleare if we consider the Commission given to his Disciples to baptize we shall see the persons expresly denominated to be believers as first that in Mathew where Christ saith Goe teach all Nations baptizing them From whence many though exceeding ignorantly lay a foundation for infant sprinkling concluding all nations are to be baptized and infants are a part of nations therefore to be baptized not knowing they may as well conclude all Heathens Infidels Barbarians Idolaters and the worst of men or any part of the Nations may be baptized by the same argument but the truth is these words are a cleare deniall of infant Baptisme for they are first commanded to teach the Nations and then baptize them that is to say them that are taught as it is in the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to be referred to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 included in the verb and that this may appeare to be the cleare minde of the spirit we will shew you it cannot be meant otherwise for if he meanes not them that are taught then they have a command to baptize unbelieuers which surely no man that pretends to know Christ dares to affirme But say some they are to baptize those that they teach which teaching is Object their outward declaration of the Word so that to whom they outwardly preach the word they may administer baptism To this I answer first This is not the true meaning of the word taught for the word signifies so to teach as to make Disciples they Sol. were to make Disciples as instruments in the hand of God as co-workers with the Lord and them they were to baptize and if it should bemeant to al to whom the Word was to be preached whethey believe or no this excludes Infants except we affirme we are to preach the Gospel to Infants of daies that are not capable of understanding our words which I think will never be-proved and as it excludes them it includes all unbelievers who hear the word and obey it not which is contrary to truth Again in that Scripture in Marke Goe preach the Gospel to every creature and he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved Faith is still put before Baptisme if any shall yet say Christ gives a Commission to Baptize any other then Believers let them set down where it was given and when and we will seriously weigh that Commission The second and last argument I shall at present propound though the first alone is sufficient against Infants Baptisme is this That which confounds the Church and the world making them both one is altogether unlawfull But Baptisme of Infants doth confound the Church and the world together therefore unlawfull The first is evident and so is the second if we consider that all men by naturall generation are but of this world naturall a naturall man begets a sonne in his own likenesse no man is born a Saint by virtue of his naturall birth the children of Believers and unbelievers are all in one state in respect of visible appearance But may some say that children of Believers are in the Covenant and so Object are not of the world therefore they may be Baptized If they are in the Covenant they are either in the Covenant of grace or some outward Covenant of Church Ordinances if any Sol. say they are in the covenant of grace I say they are all of them so or some of them so that all are not so consider what is said of Esau Ro. 9. and indeed election is no ground of Baptisme to be administred but profession but if you say they are in an outward Covenant I demand the proofe of such a Covenant in the Gospel but if any say there was an outward Covenant of Churchfellowship with Abrahams natural seed so now with the natural seed of all believers be not too hasty in your conclusions consider the Scripture there is now no Seed of Abraham according to the flesh who are the onely people of God but if we believe we are Abrahams children so that as Abrahams naturall seed enjoyed many jewish priviledges so now Abrahams spirituall seed enjoy spirituall priviledges Abraham was in a double capacity as a Father of many Nations in the flesh to whom pertained Circumcision the giving thelaw c. as a Father of the faithfull and so believers are only his seed But the promise is said to be unto them Acts 2. 38. The promise is to you Object and to your children therefore if the promise be unto them why may not they have the Seale of the promise Consider in answer to this two things 1. Those to whom the promise is made are commanded first Sol. to repent and be baptized so that if the bare being in the promise without reference to faith was a sufficient ground for the Apostle to baptize them I see not to what purpose he exhorts them first to repent Secondly consider the restriction of the promise 't is even to as many as the Lord our God shall call which must be restrained only to them whether you take the promise to be meant of remission of sins for this is given to no man but upon believing or if you mean outward ordinances they are onely for the called baptisme Church fellowship breaking bread prayer all are for the called who are onely able to act faith in them But children were circumcised and Baptisme comes in the roome of Circumcision Object therefore may children be baptized This reasoning from Circumcision to Baptisme of Infants will not hold for if you say the ground of both is the same and say they were circumcised because in the Covenant and so children Sol. Baptized if by Covenant you mean the promise of eternall life that was not the ground of circumcising any for many were in that covenant that were never circumcised for in truth 't was not the Covenant but the command of God that was is the ground of submitting to any Ordinance but if you say the Covenant was an outward promise of