I. the Episcopal Synod to Judg it in one to K. in the other to L. in the other to M. The Persians did better who made but one Judg though 't were an Horse by first Neighing at the Sun-rising to declare his Master Successor to the Crown of Persia than to dispute it with Thousands of Men and Horses vomiting their Votes in Blood How joyfully would Rome Triumph in the Spoils of Self-divided Protestants slaughter'd with their own hands This would be the sad effect of divided Parliaments divided Houses and divided Kingdoms according to what Christ himself deel res Matth. 12.25 Every Kingdom divided against it self is brought to desolation and every City or House divided against it self cannot stand 3. It divides the Head from the Bodies for a Prince cannot be Omnipresâ—nt if he is in Person wiâ—h any One of his Parliaments the other Two are without their Head but if the Three Parliaments are united in one Body then is there one Body and one Head 4. The Head which is separated from any of the Bodies is insensible of the Pains Distempers and Dangers of those Bodies from which it is separated those Members who are Elected as Natives of England to serve in Parliament cannot be but ignorant of the true State of Scotland and Ireland and Scotland and Ireland of one another and both of the true Staâ—e of England but when they sit altogether in one House they can inform one another and his Majesty and give him a full prospect at once of the true State of all his Kingdoms and the Affairs in them Parliaments divided delayed with Nine Negatives 5. Parliaments divided by Hundreds of Miles distance by Land and passage over Sea are most dangerously dilatory in all Affairs of War and all other matters concernâ—ng publick safety for every Vote to raise Money or if it be but to relieve a Garrison must pass Nine Negatives or Nine Affirmatives Three in the Parliament of England Three in the Parliament of Scotland and Three in the Parliament of Ireland before which will be passed and executed Nine Towns may be taken 6. This Dilatory danger of Division of Houses sufficiently appears in the Higher and Lower House though neither divided by Lands nor Seas And how much Time is wasted in fruitless Messages from one to another till the opportunity and what is contended for is lost whereas if they had sate in one House and the Matters to be carried by plurality of Votes there must have been an expeditious Dispatch Coke mentions some Records wherein appears that when there was a necessity of Levying Money for a War the Commons would assent and the Lords refuse Rex accersitis Regni Barombus tractabat cum iisdem de Regni Regimine deque pecuniali subventione sibi ferenda sed proceres regiis votis tum minime paruere Et 18. E. nu 14. The Commons Granted Money but the Lords would Grant none In the time of H. 4. the Commons would have Granted an Aid but Subsidium denegatum fuit Proceribus renitentibus Walsingham saith p. 475. His diebus clerus populus primo quintam decimam postmodum tricesimam bonorum suorum Regni Angliae in subsidium concesserunt So here is no mention made of the Lords which is always done when they give where by it seems they evaded the Subsidy 29. Eliz. The Commons desired the Lords they would join with them in a Contribution or Benevolence to the Queen the Lords gave Answer They would leave the Commons to themselves and they would Rate themselves which they did at the Rate of Two Shillings in the Pound The like 13. E. 3. n. 7. b. 18. E. 3. n. 10.20 E. 3. n. 11.27 E. 3. n. 8.4 R. 2. n. 13. When the House of Commons had offer'd to grant an Aid if the Clergy who had the Third part of the Land would pay the Third part of the Aid the Clergy Answer'd They were not to pay Aid by Parliament but will'd the Commons to do their Duties and they would do their own All which Examples shew That more Houses than one are a great clog in all matters concerning Publick Safety and a far greater are many Parliaments remote one from another 7. There can be no Pledges given of Peace and Unity but by the Union of Parliaments wherein each Nation in One House give themselves as Pledges of Amity one with another 8. There can be no Love without it which is the greatest Bond of Union for Ignoti nulla Cupido how can they be acquainted where they can neither see nor hear one another and how can they Love where they are not acquainted 9. Parliaments United strengthen one another against the common Enemies like the Cable made of many Cords which holds the Ship of the Commonwealth at safe Anchor against all the fury of Winds and Waves and cannot be broken or like the Arrows when bound in a Sheaf invincible when separated easily broken 10. When separated either Parliaments or Houses it is easier for Enemy-Princes to corrupt Members with Money for it is easier for the Shepherd to watch one Fold and secure it against the Wolf than many the corruption likewise is easier of Messengers between Parliament and Parliament and House and House than of the Members who may casily in travelling have opportunity of spreading false News Bruits and Rumors and cause thereby Misunderstanding between the King and his Parliament and People and between every Parliament and House one against another whereas there need no Messengers if only one House of Parliament Secrecy of Union 11. The more Parliaments and Councils there are the less Secrecy there was at Rome but one only Senate and what Livy lib. 48. mires at there was no Privy-Councel for matters of State allowed but all matters of Peace and War were transacted in the Senate prudently enough though Livy hesitate as to the Prudence and the Secrecy of this great numerous Senate was so close that none of the Ambassadors of Greece or Asia could fish out either by Friends or Money amongst so great a number of Senators what Eumenes his business there who had Audience in the Senate was a thing impossible to be done where there is a Senate and a Privy-Councel or a Plurality of Supreme Senates 12. One dissentient Parliament or House standing divided may clog or betray the Defence of the rest it is already mention'd how often Dissension between the Higher House and House of Commons have stopt Military Provision against the common Enemy and how often fell it out in the same man er at Rome That when Recruits and Supplies were to be sent to an Army in the Field Discords were importunately raised between the Senate and the Tribunes of the People whereby the Enemy commonly obtained his Design of Stopping the Raising new Forces against them for the Tribunes of the People sate not in the Senate but were a divided State having a Negative on their Votes but no Vote
for State-Assairs So of the Grisons Yet do the Cantons remain in the nature of several Commonwealths with several Laws and Customs which Union is very imperfect Livy lib. 2. complains of this defect of Union of Councils in Rome and saith Profecto si essent in Republica Magistratus nullum futurum fuisse Romae nisi publicum consilium nunc in mille Curias Concionesque cum alia in Esquiliis alia in Aventino fiant Concilia dispersam dissipatam esse Rempublicam And by this doth Tacitus confess it was that Rome Conquer'd Great Britain Nec aliud adversus validissimas gentes pro nobis utilius quà m quod in commune non consulunt rarus duabus tribusque Civitatibus ad propulsandum commune periculum conventus ita dum singuli pugnant Vniversi vincuntur Neither saith he was there any thing so profitable for us against the most valiant Nations as that they had no Common Council a rare matter it was amongst them to have a Convention of Two or Three Cities against the common danger so while they every one fought single they are all Conquer'd Whereas if Great Britain had been then united under one King and one Parliament of the whole Island they perhaps might have as well said of his second Landing as of his first Territa quaesitis ostendit terga Britannis So doth Justin mention of the States of Greece every one of them had at last their Councils apart and fought single whereby one after another they were all overthrown What hath United the Heptarchy of the Saxons and the mixture of Danes inseparably but the equal Mission of their Representatives to the same Parliament and what did Unite the Noble Remainder of Britains to England but the Statute of 27. H. 8.26 Enacting That all Persons born in Wales should enjoy all Liberties Privileges and Laws as other Subjects in England do and should send their Knights and Burgesses to the same Parliament with them The Glory of a King is the multitude of his People and what more Glorious for a King who hath the Royal English Scotish Irish and British Blood United in him who is the Head than to have the same United in his Parliament who is the Body Let it not offend if I mention here the late Experience of Union of the Three Parliaments in one House by the late Usurper seeing we are commanded to learn Wisdom though from the Serpent and if he under so great disadvantages of Opposition made great Benefit the lawful Prince may make far greater thereby and his Subjects likewise by his Favour participate of the same I cannot deny that it was my Fortune though I never sought it to be chosen for a County and to serve in that great Convention at Westminster Anno 1656. called then a Parliament wherein the Parliaments of England Scotland and Ireland were Convened and United in One with the same facility as they are Convened to sit in Three Places and there being then a War designed against Spain it was wonderful to see with what Expedition and Courage all things were moved towards the Design and what an Endearment it was between the Three Nations to meet be acquainted eat drink and converse together about the Common Concernments Having consider'd so far of the great Benefits of an Union of the Three Parliaments of the Three Kingdoms in One it may not be amiss next to consider the Requisits necessary to perfect the same 1. Whether an Union of Crowns be necessary to perfect an Union of Parliaments and Kingdoms It seems for the Affirmative 1. Because where the Natural Person of a King is One if the Politick Person or Capacity is not made One the one Politick Capacity may be divided against the other in the same Natural Person as on the Succession of King James to Queen Elizabeth the Queen of England had declared War against the King of Spain the King of Scotland was in Peace with them so in the diverse Rights of Two Crowns there was War and Peace at one time between the same Persons the like Doubts may arise Whether the Royal Assent may pass contrary Politicks Acts and Laws in the Parliament of one Nation to what he hath pass'd in the other in reference to the contrary Rights of each Crown Whereas if both are consolidated and made one no contrariety of Acts can happen 2. It is as dangerous to have Two Crowns as Two Marble-Chairs for they may be kept in several places and the more easily may an Usurper happen on the possession of one of them and the Vulgar be deluded to think Possession of those Signs of Supreme Honor to be equal to the Right and besides that a Fatality will follow them 3. Seeing it hath pleased God to make the Head of the Three Kingdoms One men ought to follow his Example and make the Crowns One 4. The continuance of several Crowns is apt to continue a perpetual memory of Hostilities between the Kingdoms 2. Whether an Unity of Protestant Churches is necessary to an Union of Protestant-Kingdoms It seems for the Affirmative Because if Protestant-Churches divide one against another the Kingdoms will be a Prey to the Papist and the Protestant will have none to Unite 3. Whether permission of Protestants to Excommunicate Protestants is consistent with the Unity of Protestant-Churches Neg. If the Pope Excommunicate Protestants it Unites them the firmer but if they Excommunicate one another they denounce War and destroy one another with their own hands and leave the Spoils to be divided by the Pope An Elegy on Protestants in the late Civil Wars Excommunicating Protestants LVgeat in trisidis jam moesta Britannia flammis Et doleat jam fulminibus percussa trisulcis Intonuit falsus nebulosa Tibride Petrus Et Magicis stolidum perterruit Artibus Orbem Piscator Twedae retonat multisque cachinnis Rupibus ingeminans sua fulmina misit ab Altis Becketi Lemures contra hunc torsere minaces A Thamisi gelidas Vulcania tela per auras Heu non Oceanus circum vaga Littora fusus Nec freta compescant tantis ardoribus ignes Risit Romanus Tarpeia Rupe Tyrannus Cumque suis inquit sese immisere Gebennis Pontifices Britonum per mutua vulnera tandem Ne sic deficerent inferno gurgite flammae Ipse super terram viventes igne cremabo Ecce jocum mintrat mus rodens Rana coaxat Et cum limosis ineunt certamina juncis Milvus spemque suam motis circumvolat alis Ipse paludosam sic vellem carpere Ranam Et sic ridiculum vellem discerpere Murem Englished LET Britain mourn who burns in triple Fires And struck with threefold Thunder-bolts expires A Peter false from Tyber in a Cloud By Magick Art did Thunder it aloud The Fisher-man of Tweed with many Mocks Return'd his Thunder double from the Rocks Proud Beckets Ghost ' gainst him from Thames broke forth And with Vulcanian Darts fired the North. What Ocean which her wandring Shores doth drench Or
THE Night doth vanish when the Sun appears And from all Clouds the smiling Morning clears Romish Night-Ravens flie ye filthy Fowls And all ye Ceremonial Bats and Owls And Weather-cocks whose painted Feathers strange With every Wind God's Moral Law would change His Law is light the Sun outshines the Torch Which blindly Virgins led to the Church Porch Ye Meadows deck your selves with flowry pride Hear of an Holy Marriage and a Bride Not given by Man but God so great aad wise And by him Married as in Paradise With Beauty bright as Fire but chast and cold As Snow he Crowned her and not with Gold The Issue fair who did not Prophesie Sacred Religion Justice Liberty And Property providing of the best Both Bread and Wine for every Marriage Feast The Morall Law The Ceremonial Law Marriage by the Morall Law of God Vindicated Against all Ceremonial Laws of Popes and Bishops destructive to Filiation Aliment and Succession and the Government of Familyes and Kingdomes The Lord hath been a Witness betweene thee and the Wife of thy youth Mal. 2.14 1680. Linea Recta Proefertur Transversali RELIGION IUSTICE LIBERTY PROPERTY TO THE READER THE Writers both of Nature and Policy agree That the Original of all humane Society was Marriage by which Families were first composed consisting of Men their Wives and Children and after Commonwealths composed of those Families when by the multiplication of Generation they were grown so numerous as to be no longer able to preserve their Religion Liberty Propriety and Lives against one another without some Union of all obnoxious to receive or do Injuries under such Form of Government as was by the whole or major part of the Fathers of Families in their General Conventions of themselves or Representatives Consented and Covenanted for the common Peace and Happiness of all to both which no Constitution of Laws was more necessary than those which concern'd Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession whereon not only private but publick Peace and War often depended and therefore Marriage being the Ordinance of God and not of Man it was impossible to lay any secure Foundation of the Rights of the same except on the Moral Law of God and no other was long observed either by the Jews or Gentiles than what was as Christ saith from the beginning till to break in pieces the Divine Tables of the same the Devil and the Priest conspired together to set up the Golden Calf of their Ceremonies and that Gods Ordinance should be null and void without them and no probation should be admitted of their performance but the Certificate of the Bishop or High-Priest by which as to matter of Succession to Inheritances and Kingdoms They bound their Kings with Chains and their Nobles with Fetters of Iron God was pleased to make the Contention concerning a Marriage between H. 8. and the Pope the occasion of breaking off some of the Links and of being a beginning of the Protestant Religion and Liberty and I hope he doth now offer the like or a greater occasion of propagating both to the present Age and Posterity and not only to break all the Reliques of the Chains but to file off the Collars themselves whereby the Bishop of Rome and the Provincial Bishops have long so gauled the Necks of Princes and People through all Christendom to the easing of which Burdens I should be glad if thou and so many other more fit than my self would lend your hands but seeing so many seeming to sleep in the midst of so great a danger I hope it ought not to offend if I hereby endeavour to awaken you and to be therein as I ought to be to my Power Your Servant Will. Lawrence THE CONTENTS Of the First Book BY what Law Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession ought not and ought to be Judged p. 1. Not to be Judged by the Law of Moses or Customes of the Jews p. 2 Not to be Judged by the Laws and Customes of Heathen Nations p. 10 Not to be Judged by the Law Civil Canon or Feudal p. 21 Not to be Judged by the Law of Mahomet p. 26 Not to be Judged by Ecclesiastical Laws p. 31 All Allegations of Coke in behalf of Ecclesiastical Laws answer'd ib. Of the mischiefs ensue from Ecclesiastical Laws p. 43 1. All Ecclesiastical Laws of Marriage were invented by Daemons Pagan Priests or Popes ib. The History of the Devil appearing in the shape of Christ to Dr. d ee and tempting him and his Seer Kelly to Community of Wives p. 45 All prohibition of Marriage or Meat in any Ceremony or Circumstance not prohibited by the Moral Law of God came from the Devil p. 52 2. The Final Causes of all Ecclesiastical Laws of Marriage variant from the Moral Law of God were Lust Covetousness and Ambition of the Priest p. 53 3. They pester the Three Kingdoms with an unnecessary and excessive multitude of Laws p. 57 4. They corrupt the choicest Protestant Wits in their Education with Principles of Popery and Slavery p. 59 5. They introduce divers weights and measures of Justice in the same People ib. 6. They compell the Subjects ad aliud Tribunal than Caesars Judgment Seat ad aliud Examen than per legem terrae ad aliud judicium than legale judicium Parium ib. 7. They expose the Subjects to Circuit of Action Subornation Perjury and to be ground between two Milstones of interferring Jurisdictions Spiritual and Temporal 8. Papal Laws of Marriage are inconsistent with a Protestant Priesthood ib. Not to be Judged by such Laws of England Scotland or Ireland as are Reliques of Popery and contrary to the Law of God Of the Law making Marriage a Sacrament p. 65 Of the profound Popery of the Common Lawyers of Transubstantiation of two Persons into one Person and the mischiefs thereof p. 66 A Note taken at Kings-Bench-Bar of the miraculous Transubstantiation of a Shoulder of Mutton betwixt a Man and his Wife p. 71 Of the Law of Transubstantiation of the Children of the Wife into the Children of the Husband if within the Four Seas and of Intails p. 72 A further descant on the words of Littleton and Coke concerning the same and of Intails on Marriages depending thereon p. 73 75 Of the barbarous Law of Illegitimation or making Children incapable to succeed to the Goods of their Parents the Reformation thereof by the Emperor Anastasius and the Deformation of the same again by the Strumpet Theodora and succeeding Popes and Bishops p. 79 That unlawful Marriages of Parents ought not to Illegitimate their Children p. 80 Illegitimation of Children shews Popes and Bishops worse than Pagans Infidels Beasts Monsters Serpents p. 82 Intails Feminine cut off by Adoption or Institution by the Father of his natural Children Heirs ib. Of the Law of Consensus non Concubitus facit Matrimonium p. 83 Of the Pagan Goddess Juno and the Popish Mother of St. Kentigern both got with Child without a Man p. 85 Of the
henceforth all Iustices of or in the Courts where any Plea is or shall be depending taken or moved in which Pleas so depending taken or moved Bastarvy shall be alledged against any person party to the same Plea and thereupon an Issue joyned which by the Law ought to be certified by the ordinary that the Iudges or one Iudge of or in the Courts where the said Plea is or shall be depending taken or moved before the time that any Writ of Certificate pass out of the same Court to the Ordinary to certifie upon the Issue so joyned or to be Ioyned shall make a Remembrance under their Seals or his Seal at the suit of the Demandant or Tenant Plaintiff or Defendant in the Plea in which the Bastardy is or shall be alledged reciting the Issue that is joyned in the same Plea of Bastardy and certifying to the Chancellor of the King of England for the time being to the intent that thereupon Proclamation be made in the said Chancery by threé Months once in every Month that all persons pretending any interest to object against the parties which pretendeth himself to be Mulier that they sue to the ordinary to whom the Writ of Certificate is or shall be directed to make their allegations and objections against the party which pretendeth him to be Mulier as the Law of the Holy Church requireth And the said Chancellor having notice of the said Remembrance and Issue joyned and being required by the said Demandant or Tenant Plaintiff or Defendant having the said Remembrance to make the said Proclamation as aforesaid The same Chancellor for the time being shall cause to be made Proclamation in the form aforesaid And the Proclamation so made shall certifie in the Court where the said Plea in which the Bastardy is alledged another time shall be depending And that the Iudges of or in the Court where the same Plea is or shall be depending taken or moved before any Proclamation so to be made in the Chancery make one time such Proclamation openly in the same Court and also another time when the Proclamatâ—on shall be certified by the Chancellor of England and made in the form above rehearsed then the said Iudge shall award the said Writ of Certificate to the Ordinary to certifie upon Issue so joyned or to be joyned and if any Writ of Certificate be made or granted before that all the Proclamations in the form aforesaid be made and certified that then the said Writ of Certificate and the Certificate of the Ordinary thereupon made or to be made shall be void in Law and of none effect And if any Writ before this time be directed to any Ordinary to certifie if the said Eleanor Wife of James be Bastard or not and at this time not certified if it be certified hereafter by virtue of the said Writ that the same Certificate of the said Ordinary so made be void and of none effect Rast pla fo 29.105.261.280.577.609 That one Circuit of Action is too much is well known where 't is unnecessary as on penal Bonds sued at Common Law the party injuried is repell'd from any Plea of Equity either that he paid the Money and the Creditor refuses to deliver up his Bond or to give him an acquittance or that he received an acquittance but it was since burnt by fire or he hath since by any other casualty lost it and forces him to a costly tedious and sometimes inextricable Suit for releif in the Chancery whereby the remedy unless for a very great Sum becomes worse then the disease All which Pleas of Equity and others of the like nature might have been far better determin'd in the same Court of Common-Law as is excellently well done in Scotland by admitting those Pleas of Equity in the same Court and on proof of them restricting the Penalty of the Bond to principal Interest Cost and Damage But here the Birth-right of the Subject wherein not only all his Bonds but Lands and Goods are concern'd is put to a tedious Circuit in the Chancery of Suite and Proclamations and after that again to another Circuit of Action in the Spiritual Court and then again to a third Circuit to Common-Law of Prohibitions and then again to a fourth Circuit back to the Spiritual Court by a Consultation Circuits enough to tire any horse much more any honest man yet shall he never come to the end of his journey at last or if he do he shall be rob'd with Theives and as this Statute mentions if true men fail false Witnesses shall be suborn'd against him which if he had staid in one Court and rid no Circuit at all but the matter had been there tried by Twelve good men and true at a Nisi Prius in his own Country none of these Theives or false Witnesses would have dared to appear as they presume to do in so great a Forest as London in the Chancery Ecclesiastical Courts Affidavits and Examiners Officers there aâ—terrible oppression of the Subjects or if they did they would be easily taken or discover'd There are four mischiefs appear in this Statute caused by Ecclesiastical Laws 1. Circuit of Action 2. Endless delay and costs 3. Subornation and perjury of Witnesses 4. Interfering of Jurisdictions One in ordine ad Spiritualia the other in ordine ad Temporalia one in ordine ad naturalem Equitatem the other in ordine ad Legem communem and as to the same certâ—inly a greater Calamity cannot fall on the miserable Client then to be made a Borderer between two Enemies-Countries an Hare between two Dogs a Mouse between two Cats and a Corne between two Milstones Priesthood changed changeth the Law It is said Heb. 7.12 The Priesthood being changed there is of necessity a change also of the Law Either therefore the Papists Preisthood is not intended to be changed into a Protestant-Priesthood but the whole Papal power translated in time of Popery by the 25. H. 8.21 from Rome to Lambeth must so stand for ever or if it be intended this Papal-Priesthood shall be changed into a Protestant 't is not the changing the Person from Italian to English or the place from Tyber to Thames will do it but 't is the changing of the Laws from Papal to Protestant for Papal Laws and a Protestant Priesthood are no more consistent then Fire and Water Many more great exceptions there are against Ecclesiastical Laws which my great hast forceth me to pretermit CHAP. VI. Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession not to be judged by such Laws of England Scotland or Ireland as are Reliques of Popery and contrary to the Law of God Of the Law making Marriage a Sacrament Of the profound Popery of the common Lawyers of Transubstantiation of two persons into one person and the mischeifs thereof A Note taken at Kings-Bench of the miraculous Transubstantiation of a Shoulder of Mutton between a Man and Woman Of the Law of Transubstantiation of the Children of the Wife
Christ Commands for if as is the Modern practice in Scotland the Lords of the Session never read a word of the Libell'd Summons and they may be Blasphemy or Treason for ought they know yet they set their hands to them as fast as they can be brought and I have my self set my hand to Hundreds of them and that course of Summoning being by Act of Parliament made in time of Popery which we had no power to alter I thought that kind of Justice better than none at all though before Oblatio Libelli it serves to no more Use than our Latitat and Subpoena Offices and others to have a pretence of gathering Money for the People for doing nothing and perhaps if all Truth were spoken for doing Mischief Fourthly If as the ancient Practice was of Sir Thomas More when he was Chancellor of England who used to read over himself in Person every Bill was prefer'd in Chancery and consider whether it were just or no before he would grant a Summons of Subpoena and of Skene in Scotland who as I have been informed there would likewise read the Bills himself before a Summons was granted and if he found them not fit would tear them in pieces and throw them over the Bar. It hath been therefore to no purpose for the Plaintiff to have sent to Judges for Summons who might see that Injustice in his Bill which the Defendant perhaps might not see or might be willing to pass by if it had been first shewn to him at home Fifthly It is unjust for the Plaintiff to make his Oblatio Libelli first to the Judg and to get a Summons thereon before he doth it to the Defendant for the Defendant may perhaps if shewn him shew the Plaintiff so just exceptions against the Bill as may satisfie the Plaintiff himself and save both Parties the Trouble and Cost of going further to Law or he may amend his Bill on such exceptions and if he think it just after amended insist on the same further to shew his bill first therefore to the Defendant though his Enemy if he will except against it is more profitable to the Plaintiff for amendment than if he shewed it his own Councel for a Friend may never shew the Party his Faults as an Enemy will As it is more Just so it is therefore more safe first to make the Oblatio Libelli to the Defendant before it be done to the Judg. Sixthly The Justi dies or time of Returning an Answer cannot be agreed without great Trouble and Cost unless there be first an Emparlance between the Parties without troubling the Judg. Against offend the taking out of Execution on Judgment acknowledged by assent and on Recognizances and Statutes in England and on Registred Bonds in Scotland without Summons or Oblatio Libelli or Warning or Demand Seventhly Because Judges use to take Caution or Plegii de prosequendo of the Plaintiff and the like Pledges of the Defendant purposely to hinder Agreement according to Christ and to set them by the Ears to get in Fees to the Court. 2. That no man ought to be Summon'd before a Judg until a Productio Testium first made to him For Christ saiâ—h If he will not hear thee then take with thee one or two more that in the Mouth of two or three Witnesses every word may be Establish'd whence will follow that the Mock-Probation still falsely mention'd in the end of every Declaration Et inde Producit Sectam and Summons on Motions and Rules of Courts founded on the Infamous Credit of Affidavit-men are abominable Reliques of Popery and Anti-Christian 1. Because they are not produced to the Defendant where he dwells that he may except against their Persons if he hath cause and if he hath none he may see them Sworn and if they Swear false he may have his lawful Remedy against them 2. Because the Affidavit-men are single Witnesses whereas Christ Commands two or three Witnesses 3. They are both such as live in London and Westminster and such as come out of those Parts altogether unknown to the Judges and Masters who take their Oaths if therefore they will proceed on the Testimony of single Witnesses seeing by the Precept of Christ Actor Sequitur forum rei and the Plaintiff is to carry his Witnesses to the Defendant it is far more Just and Equal that the Affidavit be either taken by Commission in the Parish where the Defendant lives or every Minister be Authorized to take the Oath on notice given to his Parishioner to be present if he please at the Taking 4. Because generally the Affidavit-men are Knights of the Post and common Swearers for Hire who will Swear any thing for a Dinner 5. Because Probatio non admittitur in contrarium whereby Courts overflow with Perjury And as is said Jer. 23.10 Because of Swearing the Land mourns 3. That a Defendant can be guilty of no Contumacy till an Oblatio Libelli and a Productio Testium first made to him For Christ says The Plaintiff is not to tell the Church till two Refusals made by the Defendant one to hear him single the other when he haâ—h produced his Witnesses 4. That no Pledges or Distress ought to be taken till Judgment For Ezek. 18.7 says The Debtour ought to be restored his Pledg And Christ Commands on Contumacy shewn by two Refusals immediately to tell the Church so he is to do nothing further till the Sentence of the Church is pass'd and very just for thus far none hath Judged whether his Cause is just and his Brother Contumacious but himself and he ought not to be Judg in his own Case and much less be his own Carver of Execution by Pledges and Distresses on his own Authority without the Sentence of a Judg. Secondly Otherwise the Ass of the Fatherless the Ox of the Widow and the Pledg of the Poor would be taken from them without Hearing of their Cause and the Creditor Land-lord and every other Person would be Judges in their own Case and Carve Execution for themselves Thirdly Though the Poor may be able to give Convenotinal Pledges yet they are not able to give besides Judicial Pledges when they are enforced to sue for their Conventional unjustly seized and detained from them nor though they are able to Mortgage the Right of their little Living to be seized when they fail paying Interest for the Debt yet are they not able to leave Possession by which they must live if the Creditor unjustly enter before a Judgment Declaratory and a true Account made by him and a Return of the over-plus whereto the Mortgage amounted above the Debt So though a Poor man is able to grant a Rent-charge and a Clause of Distress if he be in Arere on paying Interest for the Debt yet if the Creditor wrongfully or excessively Distrain he is not able on a Replevin to give Pledges de Prosequendo and de Returno habendo to take a Conventional Distress therefore or
any Delays by Jeofails Repleaders Arrests of Judgment or Writs of Error another cause was that both Parties and Advocates took the Oath of Calumny that they believed their Allegiance just and true Illud juretur quod lis sibi justa videtur which Oath keeps their Allegiances clean from falsity that I never found so much as one Fiction in all their judicial Proceedings and if the same Oath were but taken here as there I believe there would not one Bill in Chancery or Declaration at Common Law come in for Twenty which now are thrust in by heaps many other causes there are which lessen the labour of a Judg and of the Suitors which for Brevity I omit all which shew the Prudence of that Noble Kingdom where the People enjoy so great Justice with so little Cost and Contention Lastly we could have done more Business than we did had we been set to Act as the Roman Judges every one single without Associates in a Court by himself and how great an Addition to the Publick Treasury as well as advantage to Justice the lessening the number of Judges and turning Fees to Salary will cause is already mention'd A Satyr against the Cruel Preposteration of Ecclesiastical and Temporal Courts in Judicial Proceedings contrary to the Precept of Christ Matth. 18.15 AND will you never learn the skill Which first Subpoena is or Bill Or foremost know with all your wit If Declaration is or writ Or which precede should in your Tale The Capias or Original You which is best who make a pause To Sentence first or hear the Cause With Execution who begin Before a Judgment or a Sin Who grinde and eat the Poor distrest With Tongue and Teeth of Romish Beast For Grace in Anglice's who curse The Rent was bad the Patch is worse Who have no Summons but Surprize Who have no Laws but Treacheries Do you not know there is a Cry Gone up against your Cruelty The Prince himself of Righteousness So foul Oppressions to suppress Descended hath on Earthly Globe And glorious Dy'd his Scarlet Robe In his own blood to keep the Peace And from your Dungeons to release Twelve Trumpets hear 12 Apostles whose Silver sound Doth from the East to West rebound Proclaim'd the Sacred Edict have And Penalty whence none can save Which lest to you should be in vain Ye Adders deaf hear it again If Thee thy Brother or thy Friend Or Enemy hap to offend See thou to warn him do not grudg Twice at the least without a Judg And the last time see thou no less Shew him than thy two Witnesses Or three to make the Fact appear If he shall doubt to him more clear Nor shalt thou him for any thing Unto the Seat of Judgment bring Untill he Litis Contestate Or shew a Contumacious hate That if thou canst thou may'st him prove Thus first at home to win by Love Let every Plaintiff thus his Suit Begin or be for ever mute No form of Strife shall be but this Our express will and pleasure is The Nations Bow and struck with Awe Adore the Justice of the Law And to the dread Tribunal run High as the Clouds bright as the Sun With loud Appeals and further will Upon this Statute draw their Bill Both of Indictment and Complaint And of these Crimes you thus attaint That against this Divinest Act More Fees and greater to exact The furious Plaintiff false or true While hot you bind him to pursue The slow Defendant wrong or right You Bail or Goal to make him fight And Fines on Concords heavy lay To make them your unhappy prey The Debtor travailing to find The Creditor with honest mind Your Outlawries ambush the way And will not suffer him to pay But in your Tolls you take him there And bind him like a filly Dear Or what doth make him as forlorn To death you hunt him with the Horn To make his Skin and Carcass yours You cheat both him and Creditors And while his Plaint each sadly tells You take the Fish and leave the Shells Thus Innocents you lay in Chains Before they know who 't is complains Or what 't is for nor shall they see 't Till all Extortion's paid by Sheet You lay Imbargues and Prizes take Before the War proclaimed you make And Right by Battle try and Wounds Mortal before the Trumpet sounds Your Hell-hounds hunt without a noise Your Snake not rattles but destroys There 's nothing true and nothing Sworn Till Justice is to pieces torn And you who cite not but infest us With your Excessus Manifestus And us torment with great unfitness Dr. Cousins writes in defence of suppressing the names of Witnesses Accusers Excommunication ipso facto without Citation Because you will not name the Witness Your Ipso Facto's make us wonder At Thunderbolts without a Thunder And Bodies Judg in Hell to cast Before the Judgment day is past And deathless Souls make pale and wan Because you Curse before you Ban. No Plea deceives the Judg on high What will you do stand mute or flie All rather or who most repents Burn Popish Forms and Presidents Is it not better then to turn To Flames than you your selves to burn Some way with speed appease his Ire Your pain proclaimed is Hell and Fire Of Summons to answer before a Copy given of what is required to be answer'd This is in Scotland provided for by Act of Parliament and no man is troubled to appear before any Judg to answer before by their Libell'd Summons a Copy is deliver'd to the Person or affixed at the Door of his dwelling House containing all the matters at large to which his answer is required and though the People of England are not yet so happy as to enjoy so great a Privilege on which those invaluable Treasures of their Liberty and Propriety depend yet every Attorny and Clerk of a Court hath it and is free from giving appearance before a Judg or being Arrested till a Copy of the Declaration first deliver'd him and Judgment pass'd against him Attor Ac. 28. The reason why these Lay-Clerks who are Successors in Courts to the old Romish Spiritual Clerk Monopolize this from the whole People only to themselves is Filthy Lucre For first if the Plaintiff were compell'd as he ought to be to make Oblatio Libelli to the Defendant by giving or sending a Copy of his Bill in Chancery or of his Declaration at Common Law to the Defendant at his dwelling House and so likewise the Defendant bound to return his Answer Sealed up directed to be left for the Plaintiff in such Court having Jurisdiction of the Cause as the Plaintiff desired within Fifteen Days after the Service of the Copy at the dwelling House to be by the Officer of the Court deliver'd Sealed to the Attorney of the Plaintiff when he demands the same and the like done on Reply Duply Triply and Quadruply and all Exceptions of Fact or Law Postulations and Motions of
or Sheriff or Lord of the Barony in his County unless he excepted Partiality or other just cause against him 4. A taking of Pledges of the Defendant to appear 5. To make Return of the Writ and left Writs should be Counterfeit the Chancellour was Keeper of the Seal and Sealed them It appears by the Lex Julia de repetundis Chancellour not to sell Writs and Copies of Bills and Answers that the Master of Requests or Canceller was not to take any Fees for these Writs for giving or not giving a Judg out of the Province or County where the Defendant lived for it was a great vexation and oppression of the People to be Summon'd out of the Provinces on malitious Suggestions without cause and our own Parliaments in England have often complained against the same oppression here by the Pope on whose Citations and false Suggestions without cause men were compell'd to give personal Appearances at Rome as many and as often as he pleased if any would but buy there of his Officers a Citation and to prevent this vexatious exaction of Appearances on Writs of men out of their own Counties besides the requiring of Pledges on all Common Law Writs and the enjoining of Pledges to be taken in the Chancery-Writ of Subpoena as in the Lex Julia so is it mention'd in Magna Charta Nulli vendentus nulli negabimus Justitiam vel Rectum which is intended of a Writ of Right and all other Writs whereby Right is obtained for if the Chancellour were not to take Fees and sell his Subpoena's and other Writs he would not so often by them make men Travail thorough Nine Shires to Westminster when they may have better Justice done at home in their own County on no other cause than Fictitious and Malitious Suggestions of the Plaintiff and that he may take a Fee for the same and he would Cancel according to his Office more Petitions and Bills than he would Grant but assoon as Chancellours took Fees for Writs which Sale of Right 't is likely as Polydore says came from the French then no Suit could be begun without Writ all were driven to Westminster Parties Witnesses and Juries unnecessarily and to no purpose but to inrich the Judicatories and undo the People in like manner the Plaintiffs and Defendants ought to give one another mutually Copies of their Bills Declarations and Pleas at the expenses of the Giver which is very small and easie to the Parties and not to be compell'd to buy them of the Chancery or Common Law Officers so the Chancellour had neither his Jurisdiction to Judg of Equity or his Sale of all the Judicial Parts of the same and of the Law with it from the Law of England but A-la-mode de France from the Conqueror till Magna Charta abolished his Tyranny by the Judgment of Peers and of his French Comtes by the 28. E. 1. cap. 8. by which Act that gallant King grants every County the free Election of their own Sheriff after which the Land was free from the Chancellours Troubling men out of their own Counties by his Subpoena's till H. 5. Conquer'd France by which as is usual in other Conquests some Touch of the Diseases and Vices of the Conquer'd will be return'd on the Conquerors and accordingly in the time of his Son H. 6. the Subpoena and a Chancellour with a Pretorian Jurisdiction pretended of Equity with Power of making Laws Edicts and Chancery-Orders and Forms of Writs and to Sentence above all Appeal all which Powers belonged to the Roman Pretor of which the French Chancellour was the Ape and Ours of the French and this pretended Pretorian Jurisdiction ever since hath grown so much A-la-mode partly by making Bishops Chancellors who pretended Supremacy in all matters of Conscience and had in their hands amongst the Superstitious the flaming Sword and Thunder-bolt of Excommunication partly by their Power overtopping and overawing the Common Law Judges and partly by flattering the People with doing Justice in the English Tongue which was very grateful to them and would be as grateful now in the Common Law Courts if they could get it the Chancellours contrary to the greatest Fundamental Laws and Acts of Parliaments of the English introduced on them a most lawless Arbitrary Power and Servility of a Foreign Nation to dispose of their Lands Goods Persons Liberty and Propriety at their pleasure And what is more have assumed like the old Romish Pretors the Power of making Laws Edicts Forms Writs Obligatory to the Subject's Persons Lands and Goods for Coke on the Question In what Text the Common Law is to be found saith In Forms of Writs and Forms of Entries in Courts of Records And Bracton saith Breve ad similitudinem Regulae Juris Formatum So who assumes the Power of making Writs Judicial Edicts Forms and Orders assumes the Legislative Power notwithstanding and above Acts of Parliament to dispose of the Subject's Liberty and Propriety at pleasure yet this have Chancellours done Forming divers Writs in the Register out of their own Heads Lamb. Archeion which always are Formed for the greatest Profit of the Clerks and Courts which make them and not of the People and Episcopal Chancellours have so far in time of Popery deceived Parliaments that Westm 2. cap. 24. gives the Clerks of the Chancery as good as Power to make what Writs they will and the pretence is insinuated by the Clerks De caetero non recedant querentes à cur ' Regis sine remedio or Ne Curia Regis desiceret in Justitia exhibenda whereas none who understands the least part of the Forms of Judicial Proceeding there is who doth not know that the Kings Court if he please may do far better Justice if all the new Writs made by Clerks and all the old Writs in the Register were made a Bonfire all together and none but Copies of Declaaations served without them then 't is possible to do with them which Del gation of Power to Clerks to make Writs must be void for the making of Forms of Writs Edicts or Orders is an Act of Legislation and to give Votes in Legislation is a Personal Office of Trust reposed by the People in their Representative Elected by them and by the known Law no Office of Trust can be Assigned Granted over or Delegated if the Parliament therefore please to enact themselves any Judicial Forms or Orders of Proceeding they ought to be obeyed as Laws but it would be a great injury to the People if they should Grant over the Office of Trust in them to a Chancellour and Clerks never Elected or Intrusted by the People Chancellour of England or Scotland no Pretor Let a French Chancellour be therefore what he will 't is clear no English Chancellour ought to be a Pretor Judg of Equity maker of Laws Edicts Forms or Orders of Judicial Proceeding nor any Chancellour of Scotland the full of the matters of both whose Offices though they may differ
Brother yâ—ur self when Caught you find In snares for others you designed Learn Who ill Principles extends Against his Foes destroys his Friends And when for us you dig a Pit You are the next fall into it It was your Church what er'e it saith Law Latine left and Latine-Faith And Babbled without Mood or Tense In Church and Court and without Sense That blind might lead the blind and they Rob so all pass'd through their dark way You before Hearing first did Curse And Oulaw too to take a Purse Of which too late you now complain And we to help have tri'd in vain The Papist too brought Fictions in And Forgery that foulest Sin The Papists too were the first sharks And sate in Courts Bishops and Clerks And left their Cursed Presidents Of Forms for their wicked Intents Which still continue now and you As well as we begin to Rue At least the Poor of either side Though they touch not the Prelat's Pride And if you Perish by the same Who but your selves now can you blame The Protestant at length Essai'd Although by greater Power dismai'd Forms Fictions and Forgeries By Papist left to blind the Eyes Of Justice and Religion And in a Language still unknown And the High Places of old Baal Which did both Souls and Bodies Thrall To take away and teach their Youth Worship in Spirit and in Truth And Justice too by those who swayed In a True Ballance to be weighed For Fictions and Forgeries Come from the Father of all Lies But still the Protestant in vain To Supreme Power did complain While Papist-Peers in Parliament And Pensioners the Publick Rent Force from the Common's Skin and Bones It was in vain to make our moanes From Justice then with many Jeers You kept and first made us shed Tears Although deceived in your hope Perhaps now from your selves they drop And you and we suffer alike From strokes which you and us did strike Am I not in as bad a Case As you within this Dismal Place And me to make yet in a worse They Outlaw may as well as Curse You have unto the Dreadful Doom Of God Appeal'd which is to come You nothing owe I to the same Appeal and his most Dreadful Name I have committed no Offence ' Gainst men nor ' gainst my Conscience For which I 'm Sentenc'd to lie here And be your Fellow-Prisoner Who Rule the Conscience can but God Or who can change it with a Nod I see not when the Bishop winks Or if I think not as he thinks Or cannot by Implicit Faith Believe what e're the Bishop saith Is' t just because that I cannot I should lie here to Starve or Rot Pap. Brother I 'le freely tell my mind And say where Protestants are kind To Catholicks in Recompence They each enjoy their Conscience And Toleration hath united Not only those before Recited But bloody Wars could not be ceased In Germany 'till Conscience eased On each side was in the same Nation By a mutual Toleration The like in Hungary was acted And no Peace there could be transacted Between the Emperor and them 'Till Grafted both on the same Stem And many other like appear Too many to be Cited here They are not Commons but our Peers Who set us both now by the Ears They Pensions take from Rome and France Poor Us to Tyburne to advance And with some part when 't is espi'd They Pardon Buy and us Deride Why then should English Freedom miss More than our Neighbour Dutch or Swiss Or Driven be to Gaol or Church Conscience and Justice both to Lurch Prot. Brother I 'm not so void of Sense As Punishment on Conscience To wish who in so high degree Suffer for it my self you see But on what Terms the wiser State Will both Religions Tolerate I cannot tell or if no fears They have of Poor but only Peers I know not only this I say We should small Prudence then bewray To trie for others and in vain 'Till our own Liberty we gain Pap. Yet we in this do both agree Though Toleration none there be And both alike for this contend That whether he is Foe or Friend Yet before Hearing he ought not In Cruel Prison Starve or Rot And Magna Charta none can be Of Property or Liberty Unless 't is in the same Expres't Before a Judgment no Arrest 7. The Three Kingdoms condemn one another without Hearing by a Non-Union of their Three Parliaments Of the Fatal Danger threatning all Protestants by the Division of the Three Parliaments of England Scotland and Ireland and the inestimable Benefits ensue the Union of the same in one House Unless the Supreme Judicatory is rightly constituted to Judg between the King and his Subjects Church and Church Kingdom and Kingdom Nation and Nation Possession and Succession and between one Subject and another it is in vain to constitute inferior Judicatories to any of those great ends of Preservation of Religion and Justice Peace and Truth Liberty and Propriety for there being no Supremeequal Judg constitute there will-be no inferior Judg equally constitute and being no equal Judg Supreme or inferior if Kingdoms happen to become Plaintiffs and Defendants one against another for Religion or any other Quariel they are necessitated to condemn one another without Hearing because they agree not by what Judg they will be heard but will like the Scythians worship the Sword and Fortune for the Gods and Judges of the World and begin their Sute one against another with Execution by the unjust Capiases and Outlawries of War and Proclamations of the same by the Trumpet 1. First therefore the great danger these Three Protestant Kingdoms lie under is If any Papist should again as they have by their perpetual Plots hitherto endeavour'd to kindle a Civil War there can be nâ— Judg equal Elected by them able without the Persons Elected sit in one House to punish the Incendiaries and prevent the War Succession of the Crown divided by divided Parliaments 2. If the Succession of the Crown should happen to become contentious between Competitors and the Parliaments continue as they do divided in several Houses and several Places the Three Kingdoms if they depart from the immutable Moral Law of God either to the Ecclesiastical Laws of their several Churches or to the Temporal Laws of the several Kingdoms they may each have several Laws Privileges and Customs of Succession one from another and the Houses of Lords may have different Customs and pretences to Judicatories from Houses of Commons and the Episcopal Assemblies and Synods may pretend several Rights of Judicature from the Law-Courts so every Kingdom may happen to be divided in their Sentence of Succession and one to Judg it to A. another to B. another to C. the House of Lords in one to Judg it to D. in the other to E. in the other to F. the House of Commons to Judg it in one to G. in the other to H. in the other to
with them and were indeed a most imperfect constitution of Defensors of Liberties against Senators permitted to be Hereditary and was no way to be remedied unless the People had taken on them the Election of the Senators as is now done by such Nations as have the Liberty of Parliaments but if Two dissentient Negatives or Houses or Parliaments are joined together in one House where the matter is to be carried by Plurality of Votes there dissentient opinions of the several Members are so far from hurting the Publick as they do the same much Good First by the contrary Dispute of the Question the Truth is the better understood Secondly When two Extremes contend they commonly moderate one another and produce a more temperate Sentence than if the whole Senate were all of the same mind without any Faction so as long as Cato and Caesar made Orations one against the opinions of the other in the Senate it mitigated them to moderation and it was the Contention in the Field and not in the Senate caused so much mischief to the Publick which could not be avoided in such a Senate which was no equal Representative Elected by the People but some Senators so disproportionable in Power as Caesar and Pompey were to the rest Strength of Union 13. Though Confederacy of Foreign Princes ought not to be neglected yet the Confederacy of the Three Parliaments by Union in one House is a far greater assistance than of any Three Foreign Princes Confederated and living in Foreign Palaces and such Three Protestant Parliaments in one House and under one Protestant King are by Gods help of greater Strength and Councel than any Three Catholick Kings and the Pope with them if they should wrongfully confederate against the Protestant Examples of Un on of Parliaments 14. All these and no question more dangers of Disunion and Benefits of the Union of Parliaments were foreseen to the Wisdom of King James of famous memory and how zealously the desire of such an Union was press'd on him by him between England and Scotland appears by the Act 1. Jac. cap. 1 2. And thereby Commissioners of each Nation were appointed to meet and Treat and to reduce their Dâ—ings therein to Writings or Instruments Tripartite every part to be subscribed and sealed by them and one part to be deliver'd to the King the other to the Parliament of England the other to the Parliament of Scotland this was promoted several times in the House and vigorously Seconded by many Noble Protestant-Patriots after which as appears Coke 4th part 347. there started a question amongst the Commissioners whether there could be made a new Kingdom of Great Britain before there was made an Union of Laws which Question was by Command of the King refer'd to all the Judges of England in Trinity Term Anno 2. Jac. who unanimously Resolved Coke being then Attorney General That Anglia had Laws and Scotia had Laws A ridiculous Answer of Judges touching Union of Kingdoms but this new Erected Kingdom of Britannia had no Laws and therefore where the Forms of all Judicial Proceedings of England are Secundum Legem consuetudinem Angliae it could not be alter'd Secundum Legem consuetudinem Britanniae an Answer fitter for Protonotaries than Judges as if no Union were possible to be made of Kingdoms but by Rastall's Book of Entries whereas one word of a Nuper would have salved this horrible objection and but two lines of a Proviso in the Act of Union might have made the Style of their Formality what they would have had it but this unlucky Pedantry of Theirs was a fatal Scourge to Great Britain for in all humane probabilities if there had been then made an Union of Parliament the late Bloody Intestin Wars had never been 3. Jac. cap. 3. A Recital is made of the long and worthy Labours of the Commissioners of England and Scotland and how albeit all things had been by them fully and effectually pursued and accomplished c. Yet for that divers other matters required present Dispatch by the Parliament and the matters concerning the Union might be consider'd as well any other Session therefore the same was defer'd for that time Anno 4. Jac. 1. An Act is made for Repealing certain Acts of Hostility in former Ages made between the two Nations where the Commissioners lost all the Pains they had taken to the discouragement of any other who should thereafter attempt the like so by the Power and Subtlety of the Popish Episcopal Party and Lawyers all whose Interests a Reformation of Laws for Britannia would have crossed the whole business and Attempts of Union have been ever since obstâ—ncted As for Examples In former Histories we find none more free than the Romans to Naturalize their Associates and to make the Natives of the Provinces Citizens of Rome The Grand Seignior takes into his Council the Natives of several Kingdoms yea though Christians when once Educated in his Religion The several States of Greece had not been able to have subsisted against the Persian had they not United themselves in one common Council of State though their Laws and Commonwealths remained several The Netherlands had been never able to have subsisted against the Spaniard had not the Provinces been United in one Staadt-House and Common Council yet is not that Union perfect they remaining still under several Laws and Customs and in the nature of several Commonwealths and therefore not impossible to be again divided as the Grecian States thereby were So were it impâ—ssible for the German Empire to subsist against the Turk were they not United in one Supreme Dyet and Common Councli for a Parliament of Kings in person as the Electors are in Power is better than none at all and better than a Confederacy of Kings by Proxies they remaining in their several Palaces yet in many other respects the Union being of the Prelates and Princes and not of an equal Representative of the People it is liable to perpetual dangers of Civil Wars and the Dividing of one Prince against another who may perhaps as the Captains of Alexander the Great and the Italian Princes in the end set up every one for himself there being nothing to hinder but the Terror of the Neighbouring Turk whereas if the Union were constituted of an Emperor and Parliament equally Elected by the People the Empire were invincible for the Prince were then but one and the Senate but one but this is impossible to be performed except in Protestant Dominions for then must the Pope and Prelates be Cashier'd which no Catholick Prince can or dare attempt How great thanks do we therefore owe to God who hath vouchsafed Protestants so great a Privilege to Unite all their Parliaments if they in blindness and stubborness neglect or resuse not so great a Mercy as perhaps may not again be so easily offer'd The Cantons of the Swiss could not subsist without being United in a Common Council
no Jurisdiction but by Usurpation of so Temporal a Right as Marriage before this Statute let any who thinks he can see Nine Miles into a Milstone once more look into the Statute of Merton before recited and try whether he can screw out of it any word giving the Bishops either a Jurisdiction of Marriage or general Bastardy or that this Statute ever forged so rude a Romish Tool as the two edged Sword of general and special Bastardy to divide the living Child or tear it in peices between the Bishop and the Temporal Judg or how it was then consistent with a Legale Judicium parium to expose a Child no Alien but the King 's Native Subject to be tried for all he had by a then Foraign Ecclesiastical Law and a Judg a sworn Canonical Subject to a Foraign Pope or that the wisdom of that Parliament intended to coin a Chimera of a Distinction without a difference of general and special Bastardy which neither they themselves understood nor any Lawyers which write to this day give any sensibly Interpretation or agree amongst themselves concerning it or that they who made the Statute to oppose the Bishops Jurisdiction of Marriage should create a Notion of general Bastardy which le Scrope says was not in Esse before to give them a new Jurisdiction which was to change the Laws of England which they positively refuse in the Statute it self to change Object 4 No Similitude of fetching the Laws of Athens to Rome and bringing the Romish Laws to England It is further alledged by Coke lib. 5.1 part 9. That as the Romans fetching divers Laws from Athens yet being approved and allowed by the State there they were called Jus Civile Romanorum And as the Normans borrowing all or most of their Laws from England yet baptized them by the name of the Laws and Customs of Normandy So albeit the Kings of England derived their Ecclesiastical Laws from others yet so many as were approved and allowed hereby and with general consent are aptly and rightly called the King's Ecclesiastical Laws o. England To which is answer'd That there is no similitude between making or changing the Laws of the Athenians which were Foraign Laws to become the Laws of the Romans and the making or changing either the Foraign Papal or native Provincial Canons or Ecclesiastical Laws into the King's Ecclesiastical Laws of England For First The Athenian Laws before they were made Denizons of Rome were not admitted in cumulo but Articulated and every Article examined one by one by the Decem viri or Ten Men as our usurped Ecclesiastical Laws were appointed to have been done by the Statute of 25 Hen. 8.19 by the Two and Thirty Men and likewise in time of Edward the Sixth by others but neither succeeded before the same was received for a Roman Law Secondly Such Athenian Laws as were pickt or garbled from the rest were by the Authority of the Legislative Power of Rome both Senate and People caused to be writ in Twelve Tables and inacted to be the Laws of Rome but in England there was never by Authority any Articulation selecting or garbling of Canon Laws effected nor the same reduced into Tables Written or Printed by any Act of Parliament Ecclesiastical Laws in an unknown Language Thirdly The selected Athenian Laws were written in the Roman Language to be understood by the People before they would be received as Roman Laws but there is no such thing in the Ecclesiastical Laws of the Holy-Church concerning Marriage or any thing else but they all still remain in the Language of the Beast and can be neither call'd the Laws of the Church which by the Scripture are forbidden to be spoke in an unknown tongue as appears 1 Cor. 14.19 It is said In the Church I had rather speak five words with my understanding that by my voice I might teach others also then ten thousand words in an unknown tongue It is as utterly unlawful therefore to make that a Law of the Church or an Ecclesiastical Law of Marriage which is in the unknown Language of Latin as it had been to have made any form of Prayer taken from the Romish Church though the Pater Noster it self the form of Prayer of the Church of England while it was in Latin for the Minister would then have been a Barbarian to the English man and the English-man a Barbarian to him and it is as bad for the poor English-man for his Law-sutes in Latin for a Wife in the Court of Arches and other Ecclesiastical Courts as it would be if his Prayers were again in Latin in the Church For though he pay his Lawyers dear to plead his Cause there he cannot understand for his Money whether they call him and his Wife Rogue and Whore or honest People or whether the Judg by his Sentence will give him his Wife or take her from him but by the implicit Faith of an Interpreter as let any one look on the Sentence of Divorce in Kennes Case Coke lib. 7.42 E. he may understand or not understand the same Ecclesiastical Laws are not the Laws of the Land Fourthly The Athenian Laws were not obtruded on the Romans by Conquest of their Bodies by the Temporal Sword or their Souls by the Spiritual Sword of Excommunication but the Ecclesiastical Laws of Marriage have been obtruded on England ever since the Conquest by the superstitious Terrors or actual force of Excommunication either Papal or Episcopal and never by consent in Parliament The suffering of an oppression therefore is no consent nor an abuse against Law an Use Custom or Law neither can a wicked Oppression Use Custom or Law in name only be turned into a Law of England except by consent in Parliament or other humane Power besides it is by the very before recited Statute of Merton declared That the Laws of the Church are not the Laws of England for when the Bishop quarrel'd that the Law of England as to Marriage was not according to the Law of the Church and would have had them changed into the Law of the Church the Earls and Barons with one voice answer'd We will not change the Laws of England Whereby it 's plain the Laws of England and Laws of the Church are opposite Laws and not the same and this is confessed by Coke himself in the exposition of his Statute of Merton 2 part Inst fol. 98. where he saith Here our Common Laws are aptly and properly called the Laws of England because they are appropriated to this Kingdom of England as most apt and fit for the Government thereof and have no dependence upon any Foraign Law whatsoever no not on the Civil or Canon Law other then in Cases allowed by the Laws of England and therefore he saith the Poet spake truly hereof Et penitus toto divisos orbe Britannos So as the Law of England is proprium quarto modo to the Kingdom of England therefore Foraign Precedents are
not to be objected against us because we are not subject to Foraign Laws Again that custom or use of Civil or Canon-Laws or Precedents doth not make Civil or Canon-Law the Law of England appears by the use of Sentences of Philosophers and Poets and Precedents of Historians all as much used in Courts of Records of Courts of Judicature as the Civil or Canon-Law yet doth not this use or custom make these Sentences of Philosophy and Poets and the like to be the Law of England or obligatory to the People of England unless such Sentences of Philosophers and Poets are selected from the rest and inacted or confirmed by Act of Parliament to be hereafter the Laws of England And they are so far otherwise from being Laws of England that Cardinal Woolsey Mich. 21. H. 8. Coram Rege was Indicted That he intended Antiquissimas Angliae Leges penitus subvertere enervare universumque hoc Regnum Angliae ejusdem Regni populum Legibus imperialibus vulgo dictis Legibus Civilibus earundem Legum Canonibus in perpetuum subjugare subducere c Let any shew a sensible reason why the Bishops and Ecclesiastical Judges who actually bring in the whole heap of Civil and Canon Laws to judge of the Marriages Filiation and Succession of the Subjects and amongst them the new coin'd Law at the Council of Trent made when Forein Jurisdiction was abolish'd and thereby actually deprive him of that invaluable liberty to which every Native Subject is born and is confirmed to him by so many Acts of Parliament And those great Fundamental Acts Magna Charta and the Petition of Right to have his Birth-right tried per legale judicium parium deserve not as high a censure by Parliament as Cardinal Woolsey had who only intended to do the same And if any hath any mind to consult besides the Laws and Precedents against Forein Laws and Precedents Bod. lib. 1. of a Common-wealth fo 107 108. will give him some satisfaction Forein Laws become not the Laws of this Land by being used by Lawyers where he saith It was in most strong Terms judged by a Decree in the Court of Paris in the Case of Philip the Second the French King That be was not bound unto the customs of the Civil Law at such time as they who were next kindred would have redeemed of him the Countrey of Guyens howbeit that many both think and write the Prince to be bound to that Law for that they think that Law to be Common to all Nations and not Common to any City And yet than the which Law the Romans themselves in some Cases thought nothing more unreasonable But our Ancestors would not have even our Subjects bound to the Roman Laws as we see in the Ancient Records that Philip the Fair erecting the Parliament of Paris and Mompelier declared That they should not be bound unto the Roman Laws And in the erection of Universities the Kings have always declared That their purpose was to have the Civil and Canon Laws in them publickly professed and taught to make use thereof at their discretion but not that the Subjects should be any way bound thereto lest they should seem to derogate from the Laws of their own Countrey by advancing the Laws of strangers And for the same cause Alaricus King of the Goths forbad upon pain of death any Man to alledge the Roman Laws contrary to his Decrees and Ordinances which M. Charles du Moulin my Companion and Ornament of all Lawyers mistaking is therefore with him very angry and in reproach calleth him therefore barbarous howbeit that nothing was therein by Alaricus decreed or done but that which every wise Prince would of good right have decreed and done For Subjects will so long both remember and hope for the Government of Strangers as they are Govern'd by their Laws The like Edict there is of King Charles the Fair and an old Decree of the Court of Paris whereby we are expresly forbidden to alledge the Laws of the Romans against the Laws and Customs of our Ancestors Yea the King of Spain also hath upon Capital pain forbidden any Man to alledge the Roman Laws in confirmation of their own Laws as Oldrad writeth And albeit there was nothing in the Laws and Customs of their Country which differ'd from the Roman Laws yet such is the force of that Edict that all men may understand that the Judges in deciding of the Subjects Causes were not bound unto the Roman Laws And therefore much less the Prince himself who thought it a thing dangerous to have his Subjects bound unto strange Laws And worthy he is to be accounted a Traitor that dares to oppose strange Laws and strange Decrees against the Laws of his own Prince In which doings when the Spaniards did too much offend Stephen King of Spain forbad the Roman Laws to be at all taught in Spain as Polycrates writeth Which was more straightly provided for by King Alphonsus the Tenth who commanded the Magistrates and Judges to come unto the Prince himself and as often as there was nothing written in the Laws of their Country concerning the matter in Question Wherein Baldus is mistaken when he writeth the Italians to be bound to the Roman Laws but the French no otherwise than so far as they should seem unto them to agree with Equity and Reason For the one is as little bound as the other howbeit that Italy Spain the Countries of Province Savoy Languedoc and Lyonnois use the Roman Laws more then other People And that Frederick Barbarossa the Emperour caused the Books of the Roman Laws to be published and taught the greatest part whereof have yet no place in Italy and much less in Germany But there is much difference betwixt a Right and a Law for a Right still without command respecteth nothing but that which is good and upright but a Law importeth a Commandment for the Law is nothing else but the Commandment of a Soveraign using of his Soveraign Power Wherefore then as a Soveraign is not bound unto the Laws of the Greeks nor of any other stranger whatsoever he be no more is he bound unto the Roman Laws more then that they are conformable unto the Law of Nature which is the Law whereunto saith Pindarus all Kings and Princes are subject From which we are not to except either the Pope or the Emperour as some pernicious Flaterers do saying That those two viz. the Pope and the Emperour may of Right without cause take unto themselves the Goods of their Subjects Object 5 Forein Laws cannot be baptized with the name of the King's Laws without act of Parliament As to what is mention'd of baptizing Forein Ecclesiastical Laws by the name of the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws of England he seems still to mistake and puts baptizing by the name where it should have been confirmation by the name and that confirmation too to be given not by the Bishops but the
who ought only to stand to Caesar's Judgment Seat and to be tried per legale judicium parium for the same According to this principle Henry the first Pope Paschal seeking to incroach on the liberty of the Kingdom writes unto him in this manner Netum habeat sanctitas vestra quod me vivente auxiliante deo dignitates usus Regni nostri Angliae non imminuentur si ego quod absit in tanta me dejectione ponerem Optimates mei totus Angliae populus id nullo modo paterentur Let your Holiness know that by God's help while I live the Dignities and Customs of our Kingdom of England shall not be diminished and though I which God forbid should suffer my self to fall into so dejected a condition my Nobles and whole People of England will never suffer it Object 7 It is further objected in behalf of Trial of marriage by Ecclesiastical Laws that by the Statute of 25 H. 8. c. 19. which gives power to the King to appoint 32 persons to examin the Canons and to continue such as they think fit and abridge the rest It is provided That such Canons Constitutions Ordinances and Synodical Provincials being already made which be not contrariant or repugnant to the Laws Statutes and Customs of this Realm nor to the damage or hurt of the King's Prerogative Royal shall now still be used and executed as they were before the making of this Act till such time as they be viewed searched or otherwise order'd and determined by the said 32 persons or the most part of them which Statute is revived 1 Eliz. 1. To which is answer'd That 1. what is contrariant or repugnant to the Law of God is made void without this proviso and the assuming the Jurisdiction of marriage and dividing Inheritances insuing thereby is before proved to be Anti-Christian for Spiritual persons who alledge themselves Successors of Christ and much more therefore the assuming the Legislative power or giving Laws or Canons for the same 2. It is shewen likewise before that the same power of Legislation and Jurisdiction concerning marriage was usurped by Fire and Faggot and Excommunication and therefore their Canons concerning marriage are not intended or if they were yet this proviso cannot Lawfully preserve such usurpations so contrary to the Law of God 3. It is manifest that all Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Laws and Canons of marriage are contrariant and repugnant to the Laws Statutes and Customs of this Realm as First the Canons then made were That marriage should be a Sacrament and thereby draw to it self Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction which latter Acts of Parliament establishing the Protestant Religion doth thereby abolish the being of marriage a Sacrament and consequently the Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical incident to it as a Sacrament and the Canons which make it so or give any Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction relating to the same 4. All Ecclesiastical Canons of marriage are contrariant and repugnant to Magna Charta and draw the Subject from his liberty propriety and Birth-right ad alias leges aliud examen and aliud judicium then legale judicium parium which Magna Charta of liberties to the Subject hath been confirmed by several Kings succeeding above thirty times Object 8 It is objected Admit there is no Act of Parliament gives Ecclesiastical Courts Jurisdiction of Marriage yet the unwritten Law of Use and Custom which is the Common Law of England and so long toleration gives it To which may be answer'd That by the Canon Laws Malus usus abolendus besides there was never any use of Jurisdiction of marriage in the Ecclesiastical Courts otherwise then in reference to the same as being a Sacrament which being now taken away cessante causa ratione legis cessat lex So likewise where the thing which a Use or Custom concerns is but changed the Use and Custom vanisheth as if by custom a Rate Tith be paid for two Fulling Mills in one House and one of them is changed to a Corn Mill the custom is gone But besides this being malus usus is of it self void and were it never so long used can never grow to have the obligation of the Common Law or to be thereby the Common Law As was well answered by a young Gentleman when complaint was made in Parliament against the wrongful incroachments of the Ecclesiasticks and they alledged for themselves That they had used and accustomed time out of mind to practise what was excepted against He reply'd So have Thieves at Shooter's Hill used time out of mind to Rob there yet the Law allows no such prescription nor doth the forced Toleration of their wickedness by such people as were not able to resist their Robberies oblige Successors to follow their precedents Reasons against Ecclesiastical Laws concerning Marriage 1. Ecclesiastical Laws of Marriage came from the Devils c. The first Reason against Ecclesiastical Laws is in regard of the wicked Authors for all the Laws by which Bishops judge Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession were invented by Daemons Pagan Gods and Goddesses Magicians Aruspices Astrologers South-sayers Priests of Priapus and Venus Jupiter Juno Cybele Flora Diana common Prostitutes Popish Saints Popish Councils Popes or Papists The Canon prohibiting and nulling all Marriage without a Priest in a Temple except by the Pope's good License or Dispensation was made by the Pope and the Council of Trent as appears Ego Concil 147. pt 5. Concil 197. pt 6. as a main Pillar to support their tottering Kingdom against the growing strength of the then Lutheran Protestants All marriage Preists instituted in the Mysteries of Priapus and they took their pious precedents from the old Pagan Priests of Priapus and Venus and they had it from their Damons or Devils That all the ancient Pagan Priests were first initiated in the Mysteries of Priapus before they could be capable to execute the Priests office cannot be denied and is testified by divers Authors and particularly by Cornelius Agrippa de van Sci. p. 738. in these words Sordidissimus Priapus pro Deo habitus hunc coluerunt primi illi Religionum artifices Chaldaei Aegyptii Assyrii Babylonii Arâ—bes Scythae Aethiopes ac perinde tota Africa Asia Europa nec fas erat ullum sacerdotem fieri qui Priapi sacris non erat initiatus Hic est ille Belphegor idolum omnium antiquissimum quod Chamos dictum est à Chamo filio Noe. The filthy Priapus was estemed a God and was worshiped by those first founders of Religion the Chaldeans Egyptians Assyrians Babylonians Arabians Scythians Phoenicians Ethiopians and even all Africa Asia and Europe neither was it lawful for any to be a Priest unless he were first initiated in the Rites of Priapus This is that Belphegor of all other Idols the most ancient which is likewise called Chamos of Cham the Son of Noah Now this was the Law of these Priests for the wicked ends which are after mentioned Dispensation with Incest came
Juvenal Veniet cum signatoribus Auspex and of Ovid Mense malum Maio nubere vulgus ait and they declared to the parties the unlucky Ides Kalends and all the dismal times and days which got the Cheats much money from the foolish people and to continue the same Trade the same was revived by Popes and Councels of Laodicea Iterda and Trent by their prohibitions of Marriage in times of Advent Septuagesima and Rogation Pope Soter made the Law prohibiting Marriage without delivery of the Woman by the Father and receiving a Benediction from the Priest Delivery by the Father and Benediction by the Priest yet Christ saith For this cause shall a man leave father and mother and though a Father may deny to give his Daughter so liberal a Portion if she marry without his consent as he would give with it yet can he not prohibit her to marry and when Rachel said to Jacob Give me children or I die and he in anger replyed Am I God he thereby shews that 't is not the Benediction of the Priest or Pilgrimages to Saints cause fertility or sterility but Children are the gift of God Marriage within the fourth degree Pope Calixtus made the Law prohibiting Marriage within the fourth degree either of Consanguinity or Affinity and others extend the same as well to Spiritual as Carnal kindred The Law prohibiting Marriage without License was first set up by the Priests of Priapus and Venus License to marry And the Priests of Diana her self could no more live without License-money for Marriage then those of Venus which made the Virgins of Greece before they presumed to marry humbly to beg the Goddess's pardon that they left her Nunnery for which they brought good Fees and Offerings to the Priests Power of the Pope translated to the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury The Law of Dispensations Legitimations and Confirmations of Marriages and Children and the whole Papal power therein translated to the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury by 25 H. 8.21 was made by Papists in a time of Popery The Law of Banes was invented by Popes and revived by the late long Parliament Banes and the Laws of New England only translating the Marriage to the Magistrate instead of the Priest Marriage without a Priest or Temple The Law prohibiting marriage without a Priest and a Temple was invented by the Priests of Priapus and Venus and revived by the Pope and Council of Trent In all these Ecclesiastical Laws of Marriage the two Strumpets Theodora of Justinian Strumpets and Theodora of Pope Sergius and that impudent Quean Marozia and other Strumpets of the Popes had a great hand We are like therefore to have excellent Laws in the Bishops Courts and Justice for Marriage Fillation and Succession while the Laws of such Legislators continue All Laws prohibitory of Marriage or Meats came from the Devil Lastly There needed not to those who believe the Scripture this Recital of so many wicked persons to be Authors of this mention'd Ecclesiastical Laws for it is manifest by the Scripture it self that all Laws prohibitory of Marriage or Meats they being things not indifferent but necessary for the preservation of Humane Nature in the least Ceremony or Circumstance where they are not prohibited by the Law of God came from the Devil as appears 1 Tim. 4.1 2 3. Now the Spirit saith expresly That in the latter times some shall depart from the faith giving heed to seducing Spirits and Doctrines of Devils speaking lyes in Hypocrisie having their consciences seared with an hot Iron forbidding to marry and commanding to abstain from meats which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving I conclude therefore that all the fore-mentioned Ecclesiastical Laws prohibiting marriage without their Popish Ceremonies or Circumstances not appointed by God came from the Devil or many Devils The Final causes of the Ecclesiastical Laws concerning Marriage invented by Daemons and the Priests of Priapus and Venus were Lust Covetousness and Ambition of the Priests The second Reason against Ecclesiastical Laws is the wicked ends for which they were invented which were no other but only to satisfie the insatiable Lust Covetousness and Ambition of Priests As to which the Indian Histories mention That in the Kingdom of Molabar neither the King or People are allowed to have a Wife Luft Covetousness Ambition of Priests the only ends of Ecclesiastical Laws of Marriage unless sanctified for him by the first nights Lodging of the holy Bramin who is their Priest which is the reason that there the King's Sons succeed not to the Kingdom but their Sister's Sons for they say they know not the Father but they know the Mother Linschot Little better is done in Catholic Kingdoms often times though not openly yet secretly by those unchristian Bramins the Cardinal Confessors and it is common in Italy for Catholics to jeer one another that their Children are Fils de Prestre The Benyan Indians give their Priests the first fruits of their Wives and think the Marriage will not be blessed without it The Southern Americans in divers parts think it a great Devotion to offer their Daughters to be first defloured by the Priest The Algier Mahometans and the people of other parts of Africa think it a meritorious work to prostitute their Wives to their Morabates or holy Saints whom they esteem their Prophets And Leo Afer who was that Countrey-man tells a story of one of these holy Prophets who came to a Town and espying a handsom Woman being a person of very good quality and great esteem in the Town yet the Prophet took her being at a Bath and lay with her openly in the concourse of a great multitude of people who applauded the Fact as a great honour to the Lady and many of them ran to congratulate her Husband how happy he was to have so holy a Man partner with him in his Wife and when some of the better sort of people whose discretion was a degree above the common superstition of their Religion went and informed the Magistrates of the Town of the foul and shameful act was committed by a Vagabond Prophet and they sent their officers to apprehend him the people rose upon them and would have knockt out the Brains both of Officers and Magistrates had they not speedily desisted Carpenter reporteth from a Monk of Doway That not long ago it was a custom in Biscay a Province in Spain that every Man having married a Wife sent her the first night to the Priest of the Parish which it seems was the Fee due to the Priest for his labour the same day of marrying her in his Temple Carp 193. So it was at the door of the Tabernacle Hophni and Phinehas Sons of the Priest lay with the Women of the congregation 1 Sam. 2.22 To the Temple of Marriage the Popish Priests have of latter times added the Chappel of Ease of Auricular Confession Auricular Confession in a more commodious
them cleérly frustrate and dissolved Further also by reason of other Prohibitions then God's Law admitteth for their lucre by that Court invented the dispensation whereof they always reserved to themselves as in kindred or affinity betweén Cousin-germans and so to the fourth degreé carnal knowledge of any of the same kin or affinity before in such outward degreés which else were lawful and be not prohibited by God's-Law and because they would get money by it keep a reputation of their usurped Iurisdiction whereby not only much discord between lawful married persons hath contrary to God's ordinance arisen much debate and suits at Law with wrongful vexation and great damage of the Innocent party hath been procured and many just Marriages brought in doubt and danger of undoing and also many times undone and lawful Heirs disherited whereof there had never else but for his vain-glorious usurpation beén moved any such question since freédom in them was given us by God's Law which ought to be most sure and certain But that notwithstanding marriages have been brought into such an uncertainty thereby that no marriage could be surely knit and bounden but it should lye in either of the parties power and arbiter casting away the fear of God by means and compasses to prove a pre-contract a kindred and alliance or a carnal knowledge to defeat the same and so under the pretence of these allegations afore rehearsed to live all the days of their lives in detestable adultery to the utter destruction of their own Souls and provocation of the terrible wrath of God upon the places where such abominations were used and suffer'd Be it therefore Enacted by the King our Soveraign Lord the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That from the first day of the Month July next coming in the year of our Lord God 1540. All and every such Marriages as within this Church of England shall be Contracted betweén lawful Persons as by this Act we declare all Persons to be lawful that be not prohibited by God's Law to marry such Marriages being Contract and Solemnized in the face of the Church and Consummate with Bodily knowledge or fruit of Children or Child being had therein betweén the parties so married shall be by Authority of this present Parliament aforesaid Deémed Iudged and taken to be Lawful Good Iust and Indissolvable notwithstanding any pre-contract or pre-contracts of Matrimony not Consummate with Bodily knowledge which either of the parties so married or both shall have made with any other person or persons before the time of Contracting that Marriage which is Solemnized and Consummate or whereof such fruit is ensued or may ensue as afore and notwithstanding any Dispensation Prescription Law or other thing granted or confirmed by Act or otherwise And that no reservation or prohibition God's Law except shall trouble or impeach any Marriage without the Levitical degrees And that no person of what estate degreé or condition soever he or she be shall after the first day of the Month of July aforesaid be admitted to any of the Spiritual Courts within this the King's Realm or any his Graces other Lands and Dominions to any Process or Plea or Allegation contrary to this aforesaid Act. 1. Here it appears what a necessary stroke this Act gave against the usurped power of Ecclesiastical Laws and Jurisdiction in this and other points of Marriage forbidding any Spiritual Courts within this Realm or any his other Lands and Dominions to admit any Process Plea or Allegation contrary to this Act. And although hereby one of the heads of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction was as is said of the Beasts Rev. 13.3 as it were wounded to death yet so great was the subtilty of the Serpent that the Ecclesiastics soon after by abusing the minority of that most pious though young King Edward the Sixth got all what the wisdom and courage of his Father had Enacted against them repealed by the Son 2 3 Ed. 6. cap. 23. Edward the Sixth abused by Papists in his Minority to repeal his Father's Act of Precontracts And thinking themselves therein not sufficiently secure they again procured the same to be repealed by 1 Eliz. 1. In which repeals I can see nothing but a Papist Plot against them both to revive those Ecclesiastical Laws by their own Authority against themselves which might have yielded most dangerous pretences against their own Legitimations and Marriages and Issue if they had happen'd to have had any For certainly no Marriage or Issue can be secure or certain if any fraudulent person may secretly pre-contract or pre-copulate with any vile person and take Bonds of him or her to release the same upon request and then marry another person Ignorant and Innocent and have Children procreate between them and then cause the party who had the pre-contract or pre-copulation to sue and obtain a Divorce against the Innocent person to be Divorced and Children Bastardized and Disinherited and then to give a release to the party conspiring in the fraud How is it possible to avoid this wickedness if pre-contract or pre-copulation should be allowed a sufficient cause to dissolve Marriage Consummate by the Birth of a Child And how is it possible propriety to be if a distinction be not kept between it and contract and between obligation and possession according to the old Rule of Law Rem Domino vel non Domino vendente duobus in jure est potior traditione prior And the Rule of the Civil Law and fundamental of all Nations who have propriety Obligatio non impedit translationem Dominii sed translatio Dominii praecedens impedit obligationem l. si quidem 1. C. de donat inter virum Notwithstanding all which Reasons preceding and likewise those in the mention'd Act of H. 8. The Ecclesiastics though straining their Wits and Eloquence to the highest in the Act of repeal by Ed. 6. yet cannot alledge the least reason except only this That if pre-contract should not dissolve Marriage the parties might part from one another at the Church door and then the Wedding Dinner would be spoiled which surely may be sufficiently and over satisfied by recompence in value were it a Half-Crown Ordinary But a lost Virginity to an Innocent Woman who was married bona fide and knew nothing of this pre-contract and her Child can never be repaired if the Marriage be dissolved Nulla reparabilis Arte Laesa pudicitia est deperit illa semel Propert. The Act of Repeal of the said most excellent Law of Henry the Eighth against pre-contracts follows 2 3 Ed. 6. cap. 23. 2 3 Ed. 6. cap. 23. WHereas in the 32 year of the Reign of the late King of famous memory King Henry the Eighth Because that many inconveniences had chanced in this Realm by breaking and dissolving of good and lawful Marriages yea whereupon also sometimes Issue and Children had followed under
the colour and pretence of a former Contract made with another the which Contract divers times was but very slenderly proved and often but surmised by the malice of the party who desired to be dissolved from the Marriage which they liked not and to be coupled with another There was an Act made That all and every such Marriages as within the Church of England should be Contracted and Solemnized in the face of the Church and Consummate with Bodily knowledge or fruit of Children or Child being had between the parties so married should be by Authority of the said Parliament Deémed Iudged and taken to be Lawful Good Iust and Indissolvable notwithstanding any pre-contract or pre-contracts of Matrimony not Consummate with Bodily knowledge which either of the Persons so married or both had made with any other Person or Persons before the time of Contracting of that Marriage which is Solemnized or Consummated or whereof such fruit is ensued or may ensue as by the same Act more plainly may appear Since the time of which Act. although the same was Godly meant the unruliness of Men hath ungodlily abused the same and divers inconveniences intolerable in manner to Christian Ears and Eyes followed thereupon Women and Men breaking their own promises and faiths made by the one unto the other so set upon sensuality and pleasure that if after the Contract of Matrimony they might have whom they more favoured and desired they could be contented by lightness of their nature to over-turn all that they had done afore and not afraid in manner even from the very Church-door and Marriage Feast the Man to take another Spouse and the Spouse to take another Husband more for Bodily lust and carnal knowledge then for surety of faith truth or having God in their good remembrance contemning many times also the Commandment of the Ecclesiastical Iudge forbidding the parties having made the Contract to attempt or do any thing in prejudice of the same Be it therefore Enacted by the King's Highness The Lords Spiritual Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled That as concerning pre-contracts the said former Statute shall from the first day of May next coming cease be repealed and of no force or effect and be reduced to the estate and order of the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm which immediately before the making of the said Statute in this case were used in this Realm So that from the said first day of May when any cause or contract of Marriage is pretended to have beén made it shall be lawful to the King 's Ecclesiastical Iudge of that place to hear and examine the said Cause And having the said Contract sufficiently and lawfully proved before him to give sentence for Matrimony commanding Solemnization Co-habitation Consummation and Tractation as it becometh Man and Wife to have with inflicting all such pains upon the disobedients and disturbers thereof as in times past before the said Statute the King 's Ecclesiastical Iudges by the Kings Ecclesiastical Laws ought and might have done if the said Statute had never been made Any Clause Article or Sentence in the said Statute to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Of the Law making private Marriage or carnal knowledge between persons not prohibited by the Law of God to marry Fornication Private Marriage or carnal knowledge is of two sorts the one without publick Witness the other without any Witness at all and both by the Popish Laws because if permitted they would spoil their gains are prohibited and called clandestine Marriages The publick Witnesses are the Priest or Magistrate private Witnesses are any other Marriage without Witness nor clandestine not appointed by Law The Law of England makes all private Marriage and carnal knowledge without publick Witness Fornication The Law of Scotland in some cases relieves though there be a defect and no publick Witness of the Marriage by the Priest as appears in the before cited Author Craig Feud 269. If there appear private Witnesses of Men or Instruments but in all cases likewise where there are neither publick or private Witnesses they leave it to be Fornication That which I here affirm against both is Marriage without Witness not Fornication 1. That carnal knowledge between parties not prohibited by the Law of God to marry is not Fornication nor any other Crime though in the highest secrecy and without any Testimony of Men or Instruments whatsoever 2. That privacy of Marriage being not prohibited nor publication commanded by God all parties ought to have liberty of Conscience to use the one or the other according as suits best with their occasions As to the first there are these reasons That private Marriage without Witness is not Fornication nor any other Crime 1. There is no Law of God prohibiting private Marriage without Witness Where there is therefore no Law there is no transgression Rom. 4.15 2. It is before shewen That for any human Law to prohibit Marriage or Meat where not prohibited by the Law of God the same came from the Devil 1 Tim. cap. 4. v. 1 2 3. And that therefore the Law of the Pope and Council of Trent which nulls all Marriages except made before a Priest in a Temple and two Witnesses came from the Devil and the Priests of Priapus and Venus for filthy lucre to the Priests 3. Isa 45.7 It is said I create evil And Isa 5.20 It is said Wo unto them that call good evil and evil good That put darkness for light and light for darkness Here is therefore a curse pronounced against those who if God created not marriage without Witnesses evil of their own heads call it evil and where God created it to be in darkness and natural modesty of their own heads will have it by Torch-light and the whole Parish of Witnesses 4. All Fornication is Polyandry and Confusio seminum whereby the Child cannot know the Father nor the Father the Child but here is no such thing it is impossible therefore to be Fornication Liberty Conscience to marry with or without Witnesses As to the second Point which I am to maintain That privacy of Marriage without Witnesses being not prohibited by the Law of God nor publication commanded by the same no human power ought to presume to prohibit what Marriage God hath not prohibited but all persons ought to be left liberty of Conscience to marry publickly or privately with or without Witnesses as it suits best with their conveniences and occasions as is the use and practice in all other civil Contracts which men do with or without Witnesses as they think best and were never accused of sin if they had no Witnesses whereon to bring their Action only that Party is justly charged with sin who wilfully breaks his Contracts because there are no Witnesses but God to prove it against him Against these Positions I shall first answer the Objections and then shew further Reasons to confirm the same
the Man doth hold his hand by the Priest's hand and the Womans hand by her Husband's hand and all have the Cow by the Tail and then they pour Water out of the Pot on the Cows Tail and it runneth through all their hands and they lave up Water with their hands then the Priest ties them together by the Cloths which done they go round about the Cow and Calf give some Money to the Poor and their Idol and lest the man should think himself married to the Cow and Calf he gives the Cow and Calf to the Priest which is more then they give to the Poor and so they are Man and Wife and whom the Cows Tail hath joined let no Man put asunder which if they do 't were fit the Priest lost his Cow and Calf In Cambaia as Texera reports They have so great esteem of their Cows that a Merchant Banyan spent 10 or 12 Thousand Dukets in the Ceremony of a Nuptial Feast of marrying his Cow to his Friend's Bull for the greater publication of it not suffering it to be private in the Woods and what were the Cow or Calf the better for all this or who could the sooner know whether the Calf were the legitimate Issue of the married Bull or some other in the Woods CHAP. VIII Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession ought only to be judged by the Moral Law of God THE debate of the lawfulness of the Marriage of Henry the Eighth with Queen Katherine having been his Brother's Wife being in Agitation it happen'd that Cranmer who was after Arch-Bishop and in time of Queen Mary Martyr'd and Dr. Stephens and Dr. Fox met at Waltham one day at Dinner where falling in discourse about the case the other Doctors thought the Marriage might be proved unlawful by the Civil-Law but said Cranmer It may better be proved unlawful by the Law of God And so it may be said here Marriage Filiation and Succession may be better proved as it is in truth lawful or unlawful by the Moral-Law of God then by Laws of Moses of Nations of Emperours of Popes of Bishops of Mahomet of England Scotland Ireland or any human Laws in the whole World First Because the Moral Law is the Law of Nature Secondly Because the Law of Nature is the unquestionable Law of God Thirdly Because it is a perfect Law and comprehends in it all the innumerable Cases which are impossible to be contained in any human writing Fourthly Because it is a Law universally given as well to Gentil as to Jew and no Nation in the World exempted from the Jurisdiction of the Moral-Law Fifthly Because it is a Law immutable and endureth for ever and neither Jew Pope Turk nor any Power in Heaven or Earth except the Legislator himself is able to change it The Jews have an old Tradition That God when he Created the World left a great hole in Heaven that if any other God arrogated the glory of the Creation the true Creator might bid him stop that hole first When a Jew shall stop the hole Left in Heaven near the Pole When the Sun is in a Sack And the Stars turn spots of black When the Moon 's in Mah'met 's sleive And a Priest shall Nature shrieve And her Palace turn a Grange Jew Pope and Turk her Law shall change When the Moon her head shall dress In the Western Wilderness When in Heaven for a Sign Charles his Wain shall cross the Line When the Earth and Water shall Make two Globes and not one Ball. Then Oh then what is more strange Nature 's God her Law shall change Chang'd may Second-Nature be But no Eye shall ever see Highest Nature change from Good Though by us not understood Yea though none him see or know He Eternal Good will do Through all Forms though Nature range Nature 's God will never change It will be ask't perhaps by some In what Tables God hath writ the Law of Nature concerning Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession and how it may be read To which I Answer That the Tables are of two kinds the External and Internal and the Readers and Witnesses are of two kinds the External and Internal the External Tables of Marriage are express'd by Christ Matth. 19.4 when the Pharisees question of Divorce whether lawful for a man to put away his Wife for every cause He Answer'd and said unto them have ye not read that he which made them at the beginning made them Male and Female The Male and Female are therefore the External and visible Tables wherein God hath written in living Hieroglyphicks or Figurations of the Sexes his Law of Marriage As to External Tables of Filiation Christ expresseth likewise the same Matth. 18.2 And Jesus called a little Child unto him and set him in the midst of them and said Verely I sayunto you Except ye be converted and become as little Children ye shall not enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little Child the same is greatest in the Kingdom of Heaven And whoso shall receive one such little Child in my name receiveth me But whoso shall offend one of these little ones it were better for him that a Milstone were hanged about his Neck and that he were drowned in the depth of the Sea As to the External Tables of Aliment they are expressed in his own Mother Luke 11.27 Blessed is the Womb that bare thee and the Paps that thou hast sucked The Paps therefore wonderfully prepared to overflow with Milk just against the time the Child is to be born are External Tables wherein God hath written to Innocents in letters as white as Snow that the Mother ought to aliment them with the Milks of her Breasts And when he hath made the Teeth to break through the Coral Gums he writes in those Ivory Tables That the Father ought to provide stronger meat for the Child The Internal Tables are expressed by Paul 2 Cor. 3.3 Written not with Ink but with the Spirit of the living God not in Tables of Stone but in the fleshly Tables of the Heart The External Readers and Witnesses are all Creatures as appears Job 12.7 But ask now the Beasts and they shall teach thee and the Fowls of the Air and they shall tell thee or speak to the Earth and it shall teach thee and the Fishes of the Sea and they shall declare unto thee Go then and ask the Fowls of the Air concerning Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession they will shew thee their Mateing their Pairing keeping true Wedlock their private retirement to secret places their holes their Caves their Nests they build for their young their Males and Females who procreated them and not the Bishops to be Judges to which they belong their Grand-mother Earth their dry-Nurse the Sea their wet-Nurse Provision for them all their feeding their sucking their young their teaching them when able go to their Grand-mother and take their Diet with her
his Women drew away his heart which word includes both Wives and Concubines it had been more true according to the Original and more probable according to the effect They have falsely translated the Seventh Commandment Lo Tinaph to be Adultery Lo Tinaph Latin'd Non Moechaberis doth only signifie Carnal uncleanness in general but they to make all sins equal Lo Tinaph false translated and that they might take as high Commutation-Money for the meanest as the greatest Crime have translated it Adultery which is Species famosior they say pro Toto Genere as is usual in Tropes and Figures but though if they turn Poets they may Feign if Songsters Descant if Commentators Paraphrase if Orators turn in Tropes and Figures yet if Translators of a Law of God it is wickedness for them to use any of these He who is a Translator of any Law especially of one that is Penal is chained ad idem non ad simile verbum verbo curabit reddere fidus interpres every word is to be render'd in no greater or lesser signification in the Language to which it is translated then it was in the Original for where the Legislator prohibits all uncleanness in general and expresses no special Penalty but only on pain of his displeasure here he hath Power to punish the smaller offences with few stripes and the greater with many according to Justice and Equity but if he prohibit specially Adultery and makes no other Law then he giveth liberty to all uncleanness beside what is not specially prohibited for where there is no Law there is no Transgression As Levit. 20.10 It is said The Adulterer and Adulteress shall surely be put to death which being a Penal Law of death never was nor ought to be extended to any lesser uncleanness then Adultery For it is a Rule in all Justice that no Penal Law ought to be extended by Equity the translation is therefore false which extends all uncleanness to Adultery or Adultery to all uncleanness They have falsely translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be Fornication 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 falsly translated Fornication 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies Carnal uncleanness only in general but they on the same account of raising their Commutation-Money have translated it the special crime of Fornication which is for the reasons given before of Adultery falsely translated and the same mischiefs ensue thereby They have falsely translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Tenth Commandment to be the Man Servant and Maid-Servant 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 falsely translated Exod. 20.17 They have translated the Tenth Commandment Thou shalt not covet thy Neighbours Wife nor his Man-Servant nor his Maid-Servant Whereas the Septuagint clean varies both in Words and Order and makes the Commandment thus Thou shalt not covet thy Neighbour's Woman thou shalt not covet thy Neighbour's House nor his Field nor his young Man nor his young Woman the Greek words are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So Amos 2.7 It is said A Man and his Father will go into the samo Young Woman 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They have falfely translated Mamzer and Nothos Bastard wherein are noted the great Errors of Coke Skene and Grotius by following the Bishops translation and other Popish Writers Having recited many of the other false translations relating to Marriage we are now come to the sowlest of them all relating not only to Marriage but all the dependencies of the same Filiation Aliment and Succession And whom have we the ill fortune first to meet by the blind leaders of the blind fallen into this common Ditch but the two famous Fathers of the Law of England and Scotland Coke and Skene who giving implicit Faith herein to Bishops Translations Certificats and other Popish Writers became so far by them deceived as to leave behind them in their writings as follows First Coke Com. Fol. 243 and 244. saith Bastardus dicitur à Graeco verbo Bassaris id est Meretrix quia procreatur à Meretrice and then he saith Aerd signifies Nature and Bastard signifies base natural Then because Reason is very scarce with him he gets an old Rhime and says Manseribus scortum notho Moechus dedit ortum Vt seges spica sic spurius est ab amica But Skene ingeniously confesseth that Bastardus is a barbarous word and that there can be no reason given for it and certainly he so far speaks most true or else was never a barbarous word if this is not which punisheth the innocent Child before it can speak for the sin of the Parents yet he after falls into the like mistake with Coke which will best appear in his own words as you may find them Skene de verb. signific tit Bastardus Where he saith Bastardus in French Bastard ane Barne unlauchfully gotten out with the band of Marriage quhilk word is barbarous and as I suppose na reason can be given quhairfore it is so called bot Gabriell Palaeotus in his buik de Nothis spuriisque filiis cap. 18. alleadgis it to come fra 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quhilk signifies an Huire or common Woman be reason that Bastards are commonly got and procreat with sick Weemen In Greek he is called Nothus for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies that part of the Fathers guids and geare quhilk be the Law of the Athenians leasumly micht be given be the Father to his Bastard Son extending to the Son of Mille Drachmae and therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was called all that was not true or lauchful as writis Budaeus in Pandectas and swa 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cummis fra 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 privativa particula 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 h. 1. Divinum teste Suida because he wantis that quhilk is godlie and lauchful that is ane honest or lawful Birth or Parentage and swa 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dicitur qui non sit legitimus to the quhilk there is na proper Latine word carespondent as Quintilianus testifie lib. 3. cap. 6. nevertheless he is commonly called Spurius fo in lib. 1. ff de posses contr Tabul Spurii dicuntur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 h. e. statione vel seminatione eaque vaga promiscua ubi doctiores 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 legunt quasisparsim concepti like as they are called vulgo concepti in adoptivis 14. de ritu nuptiarum Likewise Spurius was the the proper name of ane man amangis the Romans as Titus or Caius was written with twa letters S.P. and likewise they quha had na certain Father was designed with the said twa letters S. P. and swa by commoun use and consuetude Spurii dicebantur sine Patre as writes Plutarchus in problematibus because their Father and Mother notcht being lauchfully married they have na certain Father quia Pater dicitur quem legitimae nuptiae demonstrant l. 5. ff de in jus vocand and 't is alike to have na Father and to have incertain
committed to the next of Kin c. The Administration being thus granted to the Mother the Sister by th Father's side doth commence Suit before the Ecclesiastical Judg pretending her self to be next of kin and the Mother not to be kin at all to the party Deceased and therefore desireth the Administration formerly granted the Mother to be revoked and committed to her as next kin to the Deceased by force of the said Statute Hereupon the most Learned as well in the Laws of the Realm as in the Civil Law were consulted and both Common Lawyers and Civilians unanimously declared it to be an Article of their Faith contrary to Scripture and common sence that a Mother was not kin to her Son so Judgment was pass'd against the Mother whereby she lost her Son and her money too perhaps some that she gave him And in those days this precedent did so much prevail that many other Judgments passed accordingly against the Mothers Then in Rama was there a voice heard lamentation and weeping and great mourning Rachel weeping for her Children and would not be comforted because they were not yea weeping it over again Qualis populea maerens Philomela sub umbra Amissos queritur faetus quos durus arator Observans nido implumes detraxit at illa Flet noctes ramoque sedens miserabile carmen Integrat maestis late loca questibus implet Yea our Rachel had twice more cause to weep then Philomel for Philomel wept only because her Children were not but Rachel wept both because hers were not and because she must not be kin to them neither And surely her mourning had continued for ever had not in process of time the Tears of Women and the Beauty of Truth for what is stronger then Truth and women against Popery prevailed in England but could not in Scotland because Skene put it on the Father The Child not the Child of the Mother Natural affection no consideration to raise an Use to a natural Son but good to an Adulterate Son who is not so apt to weep as the Mother that he should be no Sib or Kin to his Son But will you not wonder My Lord Coke will present you with a couple of rarer absurdities if possible then this for he saith lib. 10. in Leonard Loveis his Case fol. 83. That if a Woman have a Bastard which he intends a Child not born of a Ceremonial Marriage that this Child is not in truth but only in reputation her Child And therewith agrees Dyer M. 17. 18. Eliz. fo 345. 12 Eliz. 290. And then he in his Commentaries and the Judges in Plowden's Commentaries agree in Sharington and Pledal's Case That if a Man in consideration of natural affection covenant to stand seized of such a piece of Land to the use of his Son this natural affection is a sufficient consideration to raise an Use as they call it and to vest the Estate in the Son though he were the Son of an Adulterer and not the Son of his reputed Father if his Mother were married by a Priest in a Temple and his reputed Father within the four Seas But if the Son be his true natural Son begotten by himself then the consideration of natural affection to his true Son is no consideration to raise an Use nor to pass the Land to him but the same is void and null In the first Case where there is no ground for natural affection they talk all of nature extolling her above all considerations and cry out Naturae vis maxima and Natura bis maxima and give away the Estate from the true natural Child to the false Child of the Adulterer Then in the latter Case where there is a just and righteous cause of natural affection commanded by God to Men and instincted by him to Beasts to provide for their own There they are void of natural affection their blind Eye of the Law must see the Infernal darkness of Fictions in the Law and be shut against the Sun of Truth They pretend the Law of Nature in their words but in their works omnia naturae contraria legibus ibunt Nothus made the true Son and the true Son made Nothus They will not allow natural affection of the true Father to his true natural Child to be a consideration to raise an Use in so much as one Acre of Land where they will allow it to the true Nothus and Fictitious Child of an Adulterer against whom probatio non admittitur in contrarium sufficient to invest him in the thousands of Acres of Seigniories and Baronies 'T is strange that Men who profess Law and Justice should not be ashamed of so gross and repugnant absurdities and contrary not only to all Law and Justice but common sence and reason Reasons shewing further that Mamzer in the Old Testament and Nothus in the New are falsly translated Bastard Mamzer Alienigena 1. The word Mamzer is by the best Criticks affirmed to signifie naturally and properly Alienigena seu de alienae gentis foemina natus And that Deut. 23.2 ought to be translated Alienigena non introibit and not Spurius non introibit or in English a Bastard shall not enter but the Translation ought to be in English An Alien born shall not enter into the Congregation of the Lord even to his tenth generation shall be not enter So as the Law here as the Laws of most other Nations do doth put a distinction in priviledge between Alien and Denizen born and not between unlawful and lawful born for an Alien is as lawfully born as a Denizen but hath not the same priviledge either as to Religion of entring into the Congregation or of acquiring propriety in the Land either by Purchase or Succession for if that should be permitted there would ensue the derision or corruption of all natural Religions by contrary Nations and the buying of one Nation out of their Land by another Enemy Nation who were richer in mony then they And that the intention as well as the words of the Law was only against Aliens born as appears manifestly by the next Verse in the same Chapter where it is said An Ammonite or a Moabite shall not enter into the Congregation of the Lord which as the verse before spake of Aliens in general speaks next of Aliens in special Ammonites and Moabites who being of kindred to the Israelites might have been doubted whether intended to be excluded under the general word Aliens which this naming them specially clears and likewise clears that it is intended the National and not the getting or birth of Children in private Families And this is manifest by the constant practice of the whole Israelitish Nation who had no such thing as Illegitimation of the Children of any Ebrew Woman but whether the Wives were one or many the Children all Succeeded alike to their natural Parents if the Father did not for any special reason or otherwise expresly
devour her Child as soon as it is born The People who are Terrae Filii to be the Earth helping the Woman Prelacy being wroth and going to make War with Dissentient Protestants to be the Dragons being wroth with the Woman and going to make War with the Remnant of her Seed which keep the Commandments of God Old Teslament false translated by Bishops in 848 places and have the Testimony of Jesus Christ And that these are not the only false translations which Bishops make of the Scripture appears by the great Linguist Broughton who in his Advertisements of Corruptions affirms to the then Bishops of England That their publick translations of Scriptures is such as that it perverts the Text of the Old Testament in no less then Eight Hundred Forty Eight places and causeth Millions to reject the New Testament and to run into Eternal Flames Sixthly To shew that Coke needs no other to confute him in the signification of Nothus not to be a Child born out of Wedlock but a plece of his own Rhime I shall recite it which is by him set down Manseribus scortum notho Moechus dedit ortum and is a false Verse for No in Notho is short which might happen by some Error of his Scribe but the true Verse is in Calv. Lex whence I suppose he might have it Sed Moecha Nothis dedit ortum which Moecha signifies an Adulteress which she cannot be unless she is a Married Woman therefore it is plain the Rhime it self confutes him that Nothus is not a Child born out of Wedlock but in Wedlock which is unanswerable as to him because ex ore suo though not as to others who are on better reasons unanswerably answer'd before They corrupt the Press both as to Scripture and Law and interdict Protestants to write against Papists or answer them Act of Parliament against Lollards counterfeit by Bishops Coke 3. part 40. saith There was a Statute supposed to be made 5. R. 2. That Commissions should be by the Lord Chancellor made and directed to Sheriffs and others to Arrest such as should be Certified into the Chancery by the Bishops and Prelates Masters of Divinity to be Preachers of Heresies and notorious Errors their Fautors Maintainers and Abetters and to hold them in strong Prison until they will justifie themselves to the Law of the Holy Church By colour of this supposed Act certain Persons that held Images were not to be worship'd c. were holden in strong Prison until they to redeem their vexation miserably yielded before these Masters of Divinity to take an Oath and did swear to worship Images which was against the Moral and Eternal Law of Almighty God We have said by colour of the supposed Statute c. not only in respect of the said Opinion but in respect also that the said supposed Act was in truth never any Act of Parliament though it was Entred in the Rolls of Parliament for that the Commons never gave their consent thereunto And therefore in the next Parliament the Commons prefer'd a Bill reciting the said supposed Act and constantly affirmed that they never assented thereto and therefore desired that the supposed Statute might be aniented and declared void For they protested that it was never their intent to be justified and to bind themselves and their Successors to Prelates more then their Ancestors had done in times past And hereunto the King gave his Royal Assent in these words Ypleist au Roy. And mark well the manner of the penning the Act for seeing the Commons did not assent thereunto the words of the Act are It is Ordained and Assented in this present Parliament That c. And so it was being but by the King and the Lords It is to be known that of ancient time when any Acts of Parliament were made to the end the same might be published and understood especially before the use of Printing came into England the Acts of Parliament were ingrossed into Parchment and bundled up together with a Writ in the King's name under the great Seal to the Sheriff of every County sometime in Latine and sometime in French to command the Sheriff to proclaim the said Statutes within his Bailwick as well within Liberties as without And this was the course of Parliamentary Proceedings before Printing came in use in England and yet it continued after we had the Print till the Reign of H. 7. Now at the Parliament holden in 5. R. 2. John Braibrook Bishop of London being Lord Chancellor of England caused the said Ordinance of the King and Lords to be inserted into the Parliamentary Writ of Proclamation to be proclaimed amongst the Acts of Parliament which Writ I have seen the purclose of which Writ after the recital of the Acts directed to the Sheriff of N. in these words Nos volentes dictas concordias sive ordinationes in omnibus singulis suis Articulis inviolabiter observari tibi praecipimus quod praedictas concordias sive ordinationes in locis infra Balivam tuam ubi melius expedire volueris tam infra libertates quam extra Publice Proclamari teneri facias juxta formam Praenotatam Teste Rege apud Westm 26. Maij. Anno Regni Regis R. 2.5 But in the Parliamentary Proclamation of the Acts passed in Anno 6. R. 2. the said Act of the 6. R. 2. whereby the said supposed Act of 5. R. 2. was declared to be void is omitted and afterwards the said supposed Act of 5. R. 2. was continually Printed and the said Act of 6. R. 2. hath been by the Prelates ever from time to time kept from the Print A Counterfeit Act Printed by Bishops against Protestants What English Protestant can read this without horror what doth he not observe it why 't is that Counterfeit Act of Parliament 5. R. 2.1382 whereby Bishops usurp to be Judges of the Souls and Consciences of Protestants and to put them in strong Prison till they conform and submit to the will of the Bishop 't is that Counterfeit Act whereby they usurp to be Judges of Heresie and to make Protestants Hereticks when they please 't is that Counterfeit Act whereby they have compell'd the Subjects to swear to worship their Idols 't is that Counterfeit Act whereby they have dragged so many Pious Martyrs to the Stake and burnt them filling the whole Land with fiery Furnaces 't is that Counterfeit Act by which the Bishops have usurped Power to destroy Religion Liberty Propriety and Lives of all Protestant Subjects at their pleasure 't is that Counterfeit Act which was never assented to but disclaimed detested abrogated and declared null and void by the House of Commons 6. R. 2. Anno 1383. and hath been yet most presumptuously caused to be printed as a valid Act by the Bishops being Masters of the Press and the true Act of Abrogation 6. R. 2. Whereon all the Subject hath depends most wickedly suppress'd and never Printed Coke 2.
because in their making there was no Consent of an House of Commons and the House of Commons being but Delegates themselves can not Delegate the Peoples Interest in the Legislative to others for Delegatus non pâ—test delegare it was an Office of Personal Trust reposed in the Persons Elâ—cted to be Members of Parliament to treat with the King and assent to equal Laws in behalf of the People they could not grant over therefore this Office of Trust to Bishops or a Synod or a Council to treat with the King and assent to Laws for the People but every Member of Parliament ought either to refuse to accept of the Election or if he accept to serve in Person All Books of Canons made by Bishops without consent of Parliament void and not by Proxy assign or subdelegate in so great a Trust as to join in making Laws for the Publick Safety and Peace Hence will follow therefore That all Ecclesiastical Canons and Laws of Synods and Councils prohibiting Marriage without Publick Bans or Episcopal Licences and all Canons prohibiting Marriage in time of Advent Septuagesima and Rogation and all Canons prohibiting Marriage within degrees of Consanguinity and Affinity not prohibited by the Moral Law of God and all Canons prohibiting Marriage not made by the Ceremonies of a Priest and Temple and all Canons of the Council of Trent making null and void all Marriages not made before a Priest and two Witnesses are all in themselves utterly void for the House of Commons never assented to their making and all Laws prohibitory of Marriage being before shewn to be contrary to the Moral Law of God and to come from the Devil P. 52. and it being here shewn that they have no consent of Parliament such Books of Canons must in both respects be of necessity null and void as being neither the Laws of God nor Man in England but of the Devil according to which Books of Canons Bishops therefore Judging of Marriage contrary to the Moral Law of God and without any positive Law of Man their Judgment must likewise be void being according to the Law of the Devil and such Persons are no fit Judges who judg according to such Laws 7. They take to themselves the Fines and Penalties of their own Judgments That the Sole and Final Cause why Bishops so eagerly contest for the Jurisdiction of Marriage is Filthy Lucre is shewn before P. 52 53. c. and the same is so great a Pillar of the Kingdom of Anti-Christ that Pope ruin'd where Episcopal Jurisdiction of Marriage is taken away take but away Episcopal Jurisdiction of Maâ—riage the Papal Power is immediately ruin'd in those Provinces wheresoever it is done 1. In regard of the infinite Treasure he heaps hereby which appears before P. 52 53. 2. In regard of the Power he gains hereby over Kings and Princes in assuming to himself the Judgment of Filiations and Successions to Kingdoms 3. By enticing Princes to unlawful Marriages contrary to the Moral Law of God and procuring them to take his Dispensations for thereby such Prince and his Successors will be in great danger as to his Title unless he expose his Interest and Religion to obtain assistance from the See of Rome which made Philip the Second King of Spain who Married Queen Mary so furious to support the Catholick Religion in the Low Countreys by Fire and Sword and to make a Law That none should succeed him in the Government of those Provinces unless he took an Oath to maintain the Catholick Religion there and maintain the Authority of the Church of Rome And this made Queen Mary so cruelly furious against Protestants in England the Title of her Mothers Marriage and her Succession depending on the Popes protection And wheresoever any Prince is promoted by the Popes Canon Laws contrary to the Right of Succession instituted by the Moral Law of God such Prince to defend his Title against the right Heir by the Moral Law of God and his Successors become assured Vassals to the Religion and See of Rome 4. The Pope by procuring and dispensing Marriages of Catholick Ladies with Protestant Princes gains a numerous increase of Catholicks in those Dominions and many times turns the whole Tide to carry Tribute to Tyber But to return to the lesser Rivers the Bishops 't is no small stream of gain flows in to them too by such an unjust Power of Bribing themselves to Injustice by exercising so Arbitrary a Proceeding as to Fine and Commute what they please and putting it in their own Purses which should go to the Publick Treasury 8. They License Dispense and Pardon all Offences against the Law for Money It is to no purpose to make Penal Laws if the Judg hath liberty to License Dispense and Pardon Offences against them and nothing better enables him to do it than to allow a Judg to Fine or Commute and to put the Fine or Commutation Money in his own Purse now the Power of Licensing Dispensing and Pardoning Offences against the Laws of Marriage or any other Law must of necessity so corrupt the Judg as he will protect and increase the Vice he pretends to suppress Hence the Popes Taxa Camerae and the Bishops Courts increase more Fornication and Adultery than aâ—l the loose Women in the Countrey They are therefore no fit Judges of Marriage 9. They cannot be known whether they are Protestants or Papists if Bishops The Laws of Marriage have a very great influence on all Religions and in all Nations but more specially God hath been pleased in England to make the same the chief means and occasion in the time of H. 8. of planting the Protestant it is therefore of very great concern for the Preservation of the same that the Judges of Marriage be Protestants and it cannot be known whether they are so or no if Bishops 1. Because the excess of Riches which the Jurisdiction of Marriage Filtation and Succession especially to Kingdoms carries with it and all other Profits of a Bishoprick joined therewith are so great as may be too much a Temptation to any unless a Saint by Miracle to be of any Religion to obtain them and Christ himself Matth. 19 24. makes this Temptation so difficult to be resisted that he saith It is easier for a Camel to go through the Eye of a Needle than for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven yea he makes a Miracle necessary for any to obtain Riches and Heaven together for he saith Verse 26. With men this is impossible but with God all things are possible And Austin in imitation of this confesseth in effect the same difficile imò impossibile est praesentibus futucis bonis frui It is difficult yea impossible to enjoy the good things of this World and of that to come Damasus Bishop of Rome endeâ—vour'd to convert Praetextatus a great Heathen Phâ—losopher to Christianity he answer'd him Make me Bishop of Rome and I will turn
Commutation Money he pleaseth to Demand for his Remission of this Penance and Pardon of her Sins and that he may have Power to set what Taxes he pleaseth on Gods Ordinance of Marriage and all Acts incident to the same which ought to be free and thereby set to Hire and Sale all Women Lawful and Unlawful and the Successions not only to all private Patrimonies but Kingdoms and thereby fill his Chests with Gold and Silver The Sin or Offence for which the Punishment is Imposed is Child-bearing and nothing else whatever is pretended which is proved by these Reasons 1. If he say That he punisheth the Mother for disobedience to his Ecclesiastical Laws and Canons in not Publishing her Intention to Marry to the Priest in the Temple and the Boys in the Parish and what is the bottom of the Business not paying him his Fees for Publication according to the Canons This is easily Answered by asking who made him a Legislator and Canon-Maker over a Free People and their Children This already is before proved That neither Ecclesiastical nor Temporal Law can be made nor Tax imposed on Marriage or any thing else without the Assent of the House of Commons and that was never given to any Papal or Episcopal Laws or Canons as hath been already proved And as hath likewise been proved All Ecclesiastical Laws and Canons made by any Popes or Bishops Councils or Synods from the beginning of the World to these presents in regard they never had the Assent of the House of Commons in Parliament are utterly Void and Null to bind the People or their Posterity No Law in England for standing in a White Sheet So there being not so much as a Law of Man in England Prohibiting Marriage without a Priest and Temple under the Penalty of standing in a White Sheet and there being no Law there can be no Offence Besides if there were such a Law it is already before shewn that all Laws Prohibiting Marriage Except by a Priest in a Temple are the Doctrine of Daemons and came Originally from Daemons and the Priests of Priapus and Venus and Contrary to the Moral Law of God and Nature the Bishop hath therefore no pretence to Punish the Woman for that 2. There are no other Offences in Bearing a Child which a Woman can commit but breach of Contract Incest Fornication or Adultery As to breach of Contract and Incest the Bishop punisheth Persons Free and not Prohibited by any Law of God to Marry As to Fornication and Adultery the first Offence cannot as hath already been shewn be Committed without Polyandry in the Woman and the second without Polygynecy in the Man But the Bishop punisheth her who bears a Child though the Father and Mother were no way Prohibited to Marry by any Law of God or Man and they were at the time of Begetting the Child both Virgins and neither Guilty of Polyandry or Polygynecy and so still continue Chast and Constant one to another The Bishop therefore punishing such a Woman doth punish her for Child-Bearing or for nothing 3. There is no Probation by two or more Witnesses of any Offence but Child bearing and Probation by Compulsion of the Woman to self-Accusation or by Compulsion of Canonical Purgation are unlawful The Bishop therefore punishing such a Woman if he punish her not for Child-bearing only he punisheth her for Facts whereof he hath no Lawful Probation It being therefore proved That the Bishop punisheth Lawful Child-bearing It appears further That he punisheth the Lawful more than the Unlawful for such Women as are common in Stews or Brothels seldom bear a Child as hath been shewen before and such Women as are Married to Husbands and therefore can only be Guilty of Adultery if the Husband be within the Four Seas of the time of Begeting the Children on their Wives by Adulterers it hath been shewen already That Littleton and Coke will by Fiction have it be believed that these Adulterous Children were got by the absent Husband And that Probatio non admittitur in Contrarium whereby Marriage by a Priest in a Temple is made a Sanctuary for Adulteresses and for Adulterous Child-bearing they are Exempt from punishment but the Poor Lawful Child-bearing Woman against whom there is neither Fact nor Probation of any Crime to be shewen is the Chief Subject of the Bishops punishment a Fact so Barbarous as not to be parallel'd in the Example of Turks Tartars Americans or any Ethniek Nation Except Gaeramantes who have a wicked Custom that if any Married Woman Procreate more than three Children she shall be Divorced from her Husband because a Multitude of Children caused Men to have Covetous hearts and besides the Divorce of the Mother such Supernumerary Children were to be slain before the Parents eyes But Bishops are worse than the Garamantes for they punish though but one Child-bearing whereas the other punish'd not till after Three and exercise those Inhumanities for their Gain against Child-Bearing Women which the Scripture Prohibits to be Exercised to the very Brutes Deuter. 22.6 If a Birds nest chance to be before thee in the way in any Tree or on the Ground whether they be young ones or Eggs and the Dam sitting upon the Young or upon the Eggs thou shalt not take the Dam with the Young But thou shalt in any wise let the Dam go and take the Young to thee that it may be well with thee and that thou mayest prolong thy days The Bird is not any wise to be punished for this Natural Piety to her Young but to be set at Liberty and let go and that they may Defile their Marriages by the Example of the Garamantes with Blood as they do by Example of Priapus and Venus with uncleanness they most Cruelly to that Misery Nature hath Imposed on the Mother in Sorrow to bring forth though of it self of pains Equal with Death and oft tiâ—â—es brings Death add their Punishment of Exposing the Mother to Publick Reproach and Shame which to the Modest is worse than Death And by how much the more Modest the Mother is by so much the more easily is she tempted by the Devil with a Praestat Emori quà m per dedecus vivere to destroy her Infant to cover her own shame and his Pope Gregory intending to Fish in a Deep Pond in Rome near a Nunnery the Water being let out found therein above Six Thousand Sculls of Infants 6000 Infants Skuls found in a Fish-pond so the punishing of Child-bearing Women and Prohibiting Marriage Except by a Priest in a Temple under this Infamous Punishment contrary to the Law of God and according to the Law of Devil who was a Murderer from the beginning caused the Destroying of these Six Thousand Infants and were all the like Instances recited which for Brevity are here to be omitted it would appear That this punishing of Child-births because the Mother went not first to a Priest in a Temple hath Murderd Millions
Language of the Beast into Great Britain and Ireland to infect with the same Plague all Judicatures of these Noble Kingdoms vid. How Satisdation before Judgment came in the Authorities cited Calv. Lex tit vocare They Pledg before Summons Summon before Copy Copy before Oath Punish before Contumacy Judg before Hearing or Probation and Arrest before Judgment It cannot be here objected That I proceed partially against Ecclesiastical Judges seeing the Temporal are here equally Taxed with the same Errors and I contend with the Vices and not with the Persons of either Yet so much I may affirm for Truth and shall after prove against Ecclesiastical Judges that the Papal and Episcopal Forms of Preposteration of Execution before Judgment by beginning the Original Process with Attachments Distresses Exactions of Pledges Bail Mainprize Penalties Forfeitures Confiscations Arrests and Imprisonments before a Coppy of the Declaration given and before Oath of Calumny Hearing Probation or Judgment and Outlawries and Excommunicato Capiendos both before and after Judgment were Originally brought both in the Ecclesiastical and Temporal Courts of the Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland by Romish Bishops and Priests and Parliaments in time of Popery have been so far deceived by them to confirm their Superstitious Formularies in the Temporal Courts in so high a degree as now the Temporal Judges are not able to Reform without the Assistance of an Act of Parliament But I shall first prove that the said Forms are contrary to the Scriptures and Anti-Christian The Texts of Scripture follow Job 24.3 They drive away the Ass of the Fatherless and take the Widows Ox for a Pledg Verse 9. They pluck the Fatherless from the breast and take a. Pledg of the Poor Ezek. 18.7 And hath not Oppressed any but Restored to the Debtour his Pledg Ezek. 33.15 If the Wicked restore the Pledg give again that be had Robbed Amos 2.8 And they lay themselves down upon Cloaths laid to Pledg Psal 37.21 The Wicked borroweth and payeth not again Matth. 5.25 Agree with thine Adversary quickly while thou art in the may with him lest at any time the Adversary deliver thee to the Judg and the Judg deliver thee to the Officer and thou be cast into Prison Verily I say unto thee Thou shalt by no means come out thence till thou hast paid the uttermost Farthing Matth. 18.15 If thy Brother trespâ—ss against thee go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone if he shall hear thee thou hast gained thy Brother But if he will not hear thee then take with thee one or two that in the Mouth of two or three Witnesses every word may be established And if he shall neglect to hear them tell it unto the Church but if he neglect to hear the Church let him be to thee as an Heathen man and a Publican After the Servant who had been forgiven by his Lord Ten Thousand Talents Verse 28 Went out and found one of his fellow-servants which ought him an Hundred Pence and he laid hands on him and took him by the Throat saying Pay me that thou owest And his fellow-servant fell down at his feet and besought him saying Have patience with me and I will pay thee all And he would not but went and cast him into Prison till be should pay the Debt Verse 32. Then his Lord after that he had called him said unto him O thou wicked Servant I forgave thee all that Debt because thou desiredst me Shouldest not thou also have had compassion on thy fellow-servant even as I had pity on thee And his Lord was wroth and delivered him to the Tormenters till he should pay all that was due unto him As to Criminal Proceeding the Texts are 1 Tim. 5.19 Against an Elder receive not an Accusation unless under two or three Witnesses Numb 35.30 Whoso killeth any Person the Murderer shall be put to death by the mouth of Witnesses but one Witness shall not Testisie against any Person to cause him to die Moreover ye shall take no satisfaction for the life of a Murderer which is guilty of death but he shall be surely put to death Deuter. 17.8 If there arise a matter too hard for thee in Judgment between Blood and Blood between Plea and Plea and between Stroke and Stroke being matters of Controversie within thy Gates then shalt thou arise and get thee up into the place which the Lord thy God shall chuse And thou shalt come unto the Priests the Levites and unto the Judg that shall be in those days and enquire and they shall shew thee the Sentence of Judgment From all which may be infer'd 1. That no man ought to be Summon'd before a Judg till a Copy of the Plaintiffs Declaration be first given him For Christ saith If thy Brother Trespass against thee go and tell him his Fault between thee and him alone which is fully performed by giving him a Copy of the Declaration or Bill of Complaint and without it the same cannot be done nor the full State of the Case be Represented to him nor he take time of deliberation for an Answer And from this Precept of Christ will follow first the Ordaining of Editio vocatio in jus simul ex continenti by the Popish Theodor an Bishops in the Civil Law is a corruption and destroying of the Excellent Law of the Twelve Tables Si in jus voces atque eat which is already proved to have implied a Preceding Oblatio Libelli and was the clear Law of Nature and immutable in all Civil Actions 2. That the Law of Scotland of including the Libel in the Summons though it far excel our Summons by Writs yet it is not so perfect as the Precepts of Christ to make the Oblatio Libelli or to give the Copy of the Declaration to the Defendant before Summons for first he must be forced to send many times Hundreds of Miles to a Judg to get a Summons before the Return of which all the business if there is no Contumacy may be far better agreed and ended between him and his Brother at home Secondly If there is no Contumacy as there can be none before a Copy of the Declaration delivered by which the Demand is made it is unjust to lay such a Punishment on a Defendant to run Hundreds of Miles to his great Cost and Trouble in England to appear before a Judg at Westminster and when he comes there no Bill in Chancery nor any Declaration at Common Law is put against him And in Scotland to appear at Edenburgh at a longer day when he was ready and tender'd to satisfie his Brother at home in a shorter and he refused only to put him to Charge and Vexation Thirdly It is unreasonable and unjust that the Plaintiff should be compell'd to send so far for such a Trivial Formality as the hand of a Judg to his Libell'd Summons or to expect no Judicial assistance from it if he gratis make Oblatio Libelli as
Votes whereby no Judgment can be given as in a Ceux que Droit Case where are many Competitors for the same thing A. B. C. D. the first Judg may be for A. the second for B. the third for C. the fourth for D. whereby no Judgment can be given 4. In a General Issue or Special Issue some Jurors may be of the Gonscience that such Witnesses are not above Exception nor to be credited others that they are others that such Evidence doth not conduce to the Issue others that it doth whereby no Verdict could be given were they not compell'd by that unconscionable way of starving them to agree against their Consciences 5. If we come from Judges of the Fact to Judges of the Law who allow themselves better Quarters than the other and will not be kept without Meat Drink Fire or Candle-light till they pass their Sentence yet the Courts in Westminster consisting of the equal number of Four Judges are often divided two against two and what if the Vote of the Chief Justice hear it against the other yet one mans opinion being as good as another yea the Puisne Justice being oftentimes of greater Age and Ability than the Chief his Sentence will not carry the Reputation of Justice neither may it be thought worth the Labour and Cost to have an Associate joined with him if his Vote must be null'd by the others he had been better at first sate and Sentenced alone and of more esteem his Sentence would have been had it never been opposed by a contrary Sentence of greater esteem than that to help which there hath been sometime added a Fifth Judg in England and in Scotland where the number of the Lords of the Session or Judges was Fifteen with a Numero Deus Impare gandet but in neither of these is this happy Imparity so much to be found as in one who cannot be divided in the least proportion against himself whereas Four may be divided Two against Two and Fifteen Eight against Seven which will leave a Sentence very Instable and Suspicious for many times the Minor Party are the Melior 6. In a numerous Court they may all vary in the state of the Question to be Voted if the President should have Power to put what Question to the Vote he pleaseth if he propose either a General Issue or State of the Question the Residue may each raise his Special Question which will need a Decision before the General can be Voted as a Jury often do in a Special Verdict if the President propose a Special Iâ—sue or State of the Question the Residue again may every one raise his particular or Individual State of the Question and think the Special cannot be Voted till the particular be decided whereby they will be able no more to agree in the Special than the General unless used as a Jury none of which Inconveniences can fall out in a single Judg but he easily gives his Sentence in the Roman manner either Absolvo or Condemno or Non liquet in England they use to send two Judges in every Circuit because one sits on Civil Causes in the Nisi prius side by himself and the other on Criminals in the Crown side of the Town-Hall where they come by himself which fashion being imitated in Scotland and two English Judges usually in every one of those Circuits being sent to sit both together in one Criminal Court for there are no Nisi Priuses or Tryals of Civil Actions in the Circuits of Scotland proved inconvenient and though but two they often differing one with another left Business not done or at least much delayed whereas the Custom of Scotland before was much better who used to send but one Judg at a time in their Circuits or Justice Eir whom they call the Justice General 7. Where Justice is appointed to be done by a Quorum it is extream difficult and many times impossible to get them together that this Clog upon Civil Proceedings was brought in by the Romish Bishops to the same intention which is before mention'd to weaken the Roman Tribunes appears from the very name that 't is Latine Restraining Justices of Peace to Quorums destroys Justice and the effect of it destructive to Justice for wheresoever a Justice of Peace is limited to Act single without a Quorum he is as good as to that matter disabled to Act at all especially for the Poor who have most need of them and are not able to draw Quorums together as the Rich may In no less danger is the Publick safety of his Majesty and his Protestant Subjects by Restraining or at least making doubtful the Authority of the Sheriff who is his Majesties Lieutenant Sworn and Vice Consul of his Province or County to oppose a Rebellion or Invasion without a Quorum of Deputy Lieutenants or Justices of Peace who though Persons of great Honour Ability and Valour to serve their King and Country yet if Fetter'd together in Quorums like Plurality of Generals in an Army by how much of higher Courage and Conduct they are by so much the more are they apt by Ambitious Emulation to cross one another To restrain Sheriffs by a Quorum dangerous to Publick safety and bring the Army in confusion whom to follow An Example of which happen'd in the Alarm in Dorset Decemb. 9th 1678. of a Foreign Enemy landed on that Coast which I have the more Reason to remember happening to have been prickt Sheriff but not Sworn for that County when as soon as the noise was spread some ran to the Sheriff some to one Deputy Lieutenant some to another some to one Justice of Peace some to another some gathered together East some Wist some North with great Courage and Resolution to Fight the Enemy wherever they found him but in such a Confusion they knew not who was to Command or who to Obey and pity 't was to see so many stout men so unarmed undisciplined and unprovided as they were and certainly if they are suffer'd so to continue in that and other Countries it is impossible for the Protestant not be Surprized by whatsoever Rebellion the Native or Invasion the Foreign Papist unless God as he hath hitherto done discover their Plots by Miracle Design and Attempt neither doth appear any more ordinary way of Remedy than freeing the Militia from Quorums who without their default may have Popish Spies unknown crept in amongst them which is impossible for any but a single Person to prevent to discover their Councels and cross all their Actings and will be utterly disabled either to Arm Train or Discipline a Militia as were necessary all which would be easily done by a Sheriff who is a single Person if his Ancient Legal Authority were as is most fit restored to him to Act singly for the preservation of his Country without a Quorum and his Honour and Interest would oblige him had he undisputable Authority to Muster Arm Train and Discipline those
Free-born Subject Arbitrarily at their pleasure is contrary to the Acts of Parliament both of Magna Charta and the Petition of Right so late in memory which abolish all Imprisonment both of Nobles and Commons without the lawful Judgment of their Peers so likewise is it contrary to all other Fundamental Laws of the Land made for defence of the liberty of the People which is more necessary and more dear than Life as may appear by the Reasons following 1. There is an Act of Parliament made 15. H. 6. cap. 4. That none shall Sue a Subpoena until he find Surety to satisfie the Defendant his Damages if he do not verifie and prove his Bill to be true this Statute had nipt in the Bud the Overflow of all those innumerable Fictions and Falsities which have since followed in the Suggestions of Bills in Chancery for this being made 15. H. 6. there is no mention made in all the Year-Books of any quarrel between the Common-Law-Judges and a Subpoena till 37. H. 6. which is above Twenty Years after so great a Fright had this Act falling from the Supreme Power put amongst the Froggs though now despised as a dead Logg as likewise are all the rest and it is in vain to make more unless the Honour of these is vindicated by the same Authority that made them for Chancellors as if Jura negant sibi nata they were two-great to be bound by Acts of Parliament though they have not the least pretence to colour their Authority against these Three the greatest Acts for Security of the Subjects against false Imprisonments that ever were made in England for there is no Prescription or Custom of any Court can be alledged against an Act of Parliament be it never so old and there is no Pretence to alledg any against the Petition of Right Chancellour hath no Authority to impose a Fine being in so fresh memory and no longer since than 3. Car. 1. they have trampled under soot the Authority of these Supreme Acts and all lawful Judgments on them 1. To lay Fines on the Subject thus Trin. 3. Jac. did Chancellour Egerton impose a Fine on Sir Thomas Themilthorp for not performing his Decree concerning Land of Inheritance and Estreated the same into the Exchequer and upon Process against him the Party appearing pleaded that the Chancellour had no Authority to impose a Fine the Attorney General Petiit advisamentum Curiae concerning the Authority of the Chancellour and on mature advice It was adjudged That he had no Power to Fine in the Case Coke 4th part 84. 2. To Extend according to which pretended Power the said Chancellour Decreed against Waller certain Lands and for not obeying the Decree imposed a Fine and upon Process out of the Court of Chancery extended the Lands that Waller had in Middlesex whereupon Waller brought his Assise in the Court of Common-Pleas where the Opinion of the whole Court agreed in omnibus with the Court of the Exchequer ib. 3. Not only to proceed to Imprison the Subjects on false Suggestions without taking any Surety of the Complainant according to the Statute to verifie his Bill but without so much as taking his Oath of Calumny to his Bill and have further presumed so high as by their Edicts and Orders of Chancery which they have not the least Authority to make to order the Subjects to be Attached and Imprison'd on every Affidavit of any Knight of the Post and no Probation to be admitted to the contrary and if while the Innocent Party is imprison'd being remote from his Home and suffering great Loss and Damage by this his false Imprisonment he shall at length offer to prove the Affidavit false and Knight of the Post perjur'd he shall be discharged but without any Cost for the great Service the Knight of the Post did the Court to Forswear himself against the Prisoner whereby they get some Fees See here a Chancellour in desiance of Three Acts of Parliament without any Sureties without any Oath of Calumny without any Judgment of Peers publisheth in sight of the Sun his abominable Orders to cast into Prison the most Innocent Person on the false Affidavit of every Perjur'd Knight of the Post yea a single Affidavit as appears by the Orders of the Chancellour and Master of the Rolls Printed 1669. Page 67. and yet they pretend Page 65. under the Title of Commitment that they are tender of the Liberty of mens Persons and of their Imprisonments on Affidavits and confess they are often Malitious and made by one mean and ignorant Person yet in the same breath Page 67. as if they soon forgot or understood not what they said in the beginning of their Order they the next leaf conclude That a single Affidavit of such a malitious mean and ignorant Person yea though he is proved afterwards to be Perjured shall be sufficient to Imprison the Innocent Subject and when he again gets out of Gaol if he can let the Innocent Party be indamaged his whole Estate he shall not have a Farthing Cost for the false Imprisonment and observe the depth of the Reason why given by a Chancellour and as the Printed Orders say with advice and assistance of the Master of the Bolls 't is this as appears Page 68. at the top of the leaf viz. IN RESPECT OF THE OATH MADE AGAINST HIM AS AFORESAID that is to say the Oath though false of a Villain Perjured against the Innocent Person for so is the implication of the Order and likewise though they durst not say so in express terms yet so is the implicit Non Obstante notwithstanding any Law of God or Man or Acts of Parliament to the contrary Doth not here a Chancellour assume the Omnipotent Power of the Pope to dispense with the Laws of God and Men and assume a Power of Imprisoning the Subjects above the King and Parliament yea contrary and in contempt of their Laws he doth for the Law of God and Precept of Christ is known to prohibit the Imprisonment of any No Imprisonment ought to be but where the Witnesses and Party are brought Face to Face without two Witnesses at least and without bringing the Witnesses and the Party accused face to face that he may know them and except against their Persons or Testimony if he hath cause which is never done on an Affidavit And the Laws of the Land Magna Charta and Petition of Right utterly prohibit all Imprisonment of the Subject on Affidavits whether they are true or false without bringing the Witnesses and the Party face to face and a Judgment on such Testimony against him by his Peers and if such Evil Precedents be suffer'd to pass without some example of Justice shewn on them all Acts of Parliament which ever have been or shall be for protection of the Liberty of the Subject Forgery Licensed in Chancery thereby to Imprison the Subject falsely will be vain and to no purpose 4. The Chancellour
in the said Chancery-Orders Printed 1669. presumes to do in the Court of Conscience what was never heard of to be done in the Courts of Turks Infidels or the most Barbarous Judicatories in the World for he is not ashamed publickly to give License to Cursitors and their Clerks to commit Crimen Falsi which we call Forgery by Antedating Writs taking them out of Returns past or of a former Term by reason of which Forgery of Writs and Forgery of Returns Antedated Capiases Proclamations Exigends and Outlawries Antedated have been likewise Forged and Thousands of Poor men unjustly cast in Goals and miserably undone without any Summons or Hearing and these are likewise the damnable effects of the Chancellours Writs by which as by others the Plaintiffs so here the Defendants are destroyed without Hearing and certainly these Crimes of Antedating and Forgery of Judicial Acts though here Licensed by Orders of Chancellors and Protected by Courts by not Licensing Averments against them are by the Civil Law and Laws of Scotland and of many other Nations both of these and Instruments Death and even by our own the imbeselling of a Record by a Clerk and Counterfeiting of Fines is Felony and if the second time so is the Forgery of Deeds Writings and Court-Rolls and deservedly the Offender better deserving death than a Robber on a High-way and why any Crimes of this Nature should be publickly Licensed to the Ruin of all Truth and Justice by any Chancellour in his Chancery Orders is very strange the mischievous effects of which said Attachments on Affidavit and Antedating Writs and Forgery of Outlawries are notoriously known and not complained of here without good Cause and Testimony and some particular experience of my own to my loss who have as well as others suffer'd in an high degree by the false Affidavit of a Fellow who Subscribed and Swore it by a false name and not his own and likewise procured a Forged Outlawry antedated against me It belongs not to a Chancellour to be a Judg of Equity in England 5. It belongs not to the Chancellours Office to be a Judg of Equity or to make Orders Edicts Laws or Writs and thereby to Imprison the Persons and dispose of the Lands and Goods of the Subjects Arbitrarily and at his Pleasure Coke 4. part 82. saith That all Statutes which give Authority to the Chancellour to determin Offences in Chancery are to be intended only in the Ordinary Court there which proceeds in Latine and is Secundum Legem c. and not in any Extraordinary Court which proceeds in English Secundum Aequum bonum and 37. H. 6.14 27. H. 8.18 it is Resolved That the Court of Chancery Proceeding by English Bill is no Court of Record and therefore it cannot bind either the State of the Subjects Lands or the Property of his Goods or Chattels and therefore they there admit he may Imprison the Person Chancellour cannot bind the Subject's Goods not Persons which is not only a Non sequitur but a contrary conclusion follows on it for if he cannot bind the Subjects Goods à Fortiori he cannot bind his Person For the Life is more than Meat and the Body is more than Raiment Luke 12.23 And though those Common Law Judge of H. 6. and H. 8. so sordidly deliver'd the Subject Prisoner to the Chancellour so as they might keep his Lands and Goods to themselves yet had they no more Law or Right to do it than they had to deliver him Prisoner to the Turks or to send him to the Barbado's for the Subject is no Slave neither ought he to be given or sold for one without his own Assent by his Representative in Parliament and having so good a Protection against the Chancellours and Common Law Judges and the Orders and Writs of both as Magna Charta and the Petition of Right both for his Lands Goods and Person they ought to shew some greater Laws than their Writs and Orders of Courts or Forgeries of Clerks before they presume to invade either 6. There being no Law in England which ever Ordained a Chancellour to be a Judg of Equity or to make Edicts or Orders concerning the same he can pretend no Title thereto unless from the Laws of France and to that effect Polydor Virgil saith The Chancery came in with the Conquest to which though my Lord Coke saith Perperam Erravit because the Mirror saith The Constitutions of the ancient Kings were that every one should have out of the Chancery of the King a Writ Remedial for his Flaint without difficulty yet he himself seems to be in the Error and not Polydore for though the name of Chancellour and Chancery was before the Conquest and divers other Countries use the name of Chancellour as well as England yet the greatest part of the Writs came from Normandy and are mention'd in their Customary as who will peruse it shall find but as to the Writ of Subpoena Centum librarum and Arbitrary Power of the Chancellour and to be a Judg of Equity came first from the Conquest and was never used before nor did it belong to the Chancellour's Office either of England or Scotland that having other employment and more than a Chancellour could do though he never troubled himself with Judgment but left the same to the Judges to whom the King Delegated the cause by Writ and this the very name of Chancellour testifieth who was Originally no other than a Master of Requests to the Prince whom he served and on Petitions deliver'd to him by the Subjects if unfit to be Granted he strook cross lines over them like Cancelli or Lettices by which he Cancell'd them and thence had his name of the Canceller or Chancellour as Turn lib. 11. advers c. 25. and not according to that Fictitious Verse of his Power Hic est qui Leges Regni Cancellat iniquas For when was ever any Chancellour in England allowed to Cancel any Roll or Act of Parliament And when these Petitions for Justice were deliver'd by the People to this Master of Requests call'd the Canceller of such of them as were Evil such as were Just he Cancelld not but on behalf of the Petitioner Granted the Princes Rescript or Warrant to the Praeses Provinciae where the cause of Action arose or the Defendant lived for Actor Sequitur Forum Rei which Rescript or Warrant we now call a Writ containing in it self 1. A Questus est nobis a short recital of the Complaint 2. Si A. fecerit te securum a taking Security or Pledges of the Plaintiff de Prosequendo 3. A Summoneas or Summons of the Defendant to appear before the Prince himself or such Judges as he Delegated though out of the Province or County where he lived which was the Reason of taking Pledges of the Plaintiff because he made the Defendant appear many times Hundreds of Miles from his Home when he might in those days implead him before the President
may be easie for the Priests to put Apples Grapes and Nuts in a Coffin and by Night to make fearful Noises Shrieks Groans and Counterfeit Apparitions about Graves and Tombs whence the horror of the very place and darkness make such impressions on timorous Fancies as they shall not dare to approach much less examine the matter and take out the new Body out of the Coffin and put in one had been Buried Seven Years and then a Vault made of purpose to make a noise under ground in the Church and Sofronio know nothing of all this 5. But whether it were Witchcraft or Cheat it is most horrible wickedness to make Use of either under pretence of Church-Discipline or the Worship of God seeing they both come from the Devil Alvarez a Portugal Priest Relates of himself That at the Town of Barva in Ethiopia there appeared a Terrible Cloud of an infinite number of Locusts which at length fell and Devoured the Countrey and that he and another Portuguez Priest took a Consecrated Stone and the Cross and sung the Letany and in this manner went in Procession through the Corn-Fields for the space of a Mile unto a little Hill and there he caused them to take a quantity of the Locusts and made of them a Conjuration which he carried with him in writing which he had made the Night before Requiring them Charging them and Excommunicating them Willing them within Three Hours space to begin to depart towards the Sea or towards the Land of Morez or towards the Desart Mountains and to let the Christians alone and if they obey'd him not he called and adjured the Fowls of the Air the Beasts of the Field and all the Tempests to scatter destroy and consume their Bodies And for this purpose he took the quantity of Locusts and made this Admonition to them that were present in the name of themselves and those which were absent and so let them go and gave them liberty The Locusts began forthwith to depart and in the mean while a mighty Tempest and Thunder arose toward the Sea which drowned all the Locusts in the River and the dead Locusts remained in heaps two Fathom high on the Banks so by the Morning there was not one Locust left alive This Excommunication if true were Conjuring and Witchcraft Flies Excomunicated Peter de Nathal in vita Bernhardi Relates That St. Bernhard denounced the Sentence of Excommunication against Flies Whether this may be call'd Witchcraft or a Silly Prank of St. Simplicius I cannot say but if he could Excommunicate Flies without a Magical Telesme or Inchantment Fishes Excommunicated he shall be the Domitian of Divinity Mere. Gallo lib. 6. p. 592. saith That Anno Domini 1593. The Bishop of Conagtion very malitiously Excommunicated the Innocent Fishes Theodosius a Bishop of Alexandria Dead Excommunicated Excommunicated Origen Two Hundred Years after his Death if he is censur'd only for a Cheat 't is less than so wicked a practice deserves Now though God may permit wicked men to Excommunicate and Daemons Witches wild Beasts and Tyrants to abuse the Bodies of the best men after they are dead they have no Power to touch the Soul And we ought not to fear but contemn their Excommunication for so saith Christ Matth. 10.28 Fear not them that can kill the Body but are not able to kill the Soul but rather fear Him which is able to destroy both Soul and Body in Hell Excommunication of the Devil Devils Excommunicated Mengus de Flagell Daemon Describes part of the Form of the Romish Exorcism to be I Command you Oh Davils who are come to the help of those that vex this Creature of God N. upon pain of Excommunication and Immersion into the Lake of Fire and Brimstone for a Thousand Years that ye yield no Aid and Assistance to these Devils It seems the Devil is of the Society of these Romish Priests otherwise he could not be Excommunicated To grant a Bishop Power of Excommunication is to grant him the Legislative Judicial and Executive Power Excommunication gives the Pope the Legislative Power over all Nations for by this he made his Canon-Law whensoever he pleased to be observed through Christendom by no other Obligation than his Command they should be observed on pain of Excommunication By granting the Power of Excommunication the Legislative Power is granted and the Clergy in Convocation used anciently without asking the Royal Assent to make Canons touching matters of Religion to bind not only themselves but all the Laity without Assent of the Lords and Commons in Parliament It was used in ancient time for Creditors besides other Security to procure Debtors to Swear they would pay them and thereupon there being then no Arrest in the Temporal Courts for Debt they Sued them in the Spiritual Courts on their Oaths and they granted an Excommunicato Capiendo to Arrest them without Bail which were so frequent that E. 1. could not keep his Servants free from Arrest in his Court till to prevent it he caused a Writ De Promulgantibus Sententiam Excommunicationis Capiendis Imprisonendis Commanding to Imprison such as Excommunicated any of them Rot. Parl. 25. E. 1. Intus Henry the Second according to Hovedon would That all such of the Clergy as were Deprehended in any Robbery Murder Felony Burning of Houses and the like should be Tried and Adjudged in the Temporal Courts as Lay-men were But Becket Arch-Bishop of Canterbury stood proudly on the Pontificial Prerogative of the Clergy That no Clergy-man ought to be Tried but in their own Spiritual Courts and by men of their own Coat And if they were Convicted before them they ought only to be deprived of their Office but if they after offended they should be Judged in the Kings Courts This Power of Judgment he drew to his own Court only by his Power of Excommunication A Copy of a Prohibition of Excommunication A true translated Copy of a Writ of Prohibition granted by the Lord Chief Justice and other the Judges of the Common-Pleas in Easter-Term 1676. against the Bishop of Chichester who had proceeded against and Excommunicated one Thomas Watersfield a Church-Warden for Refusing to take the Oath usually tendred to Persons in such Office to Present such who absent from Church by which Writ the Illegality of all such Oaths is Declared and the said Bishop Commanded to Release and take off his said Excommunication c. CHarles the Second by the Grace of God King of England Scotland France and Ireland Defender of the Faith c. To the Reverend Father in Christ Ralph by Divine Providence Lord Bishop of Chichester or any other competent Judg in his behalf whatsoever Greeting We are informed in our Court before our Justices at Westminster on the behalf of Thomas Watersfield That whereas by the Laws of this our Realm of England no Person ought to be Cited to appear in any Court Christian before any Judg Spiritual to
withal Threatens a Proceeding against his Person Becket thereupon flies the Realm and appeals to the Pope and procures an Excommunication from the Pope of such Bishops as kept not their Oath of Canonical Obedience to him who was their Arch-Bishop The King of France Intercedes for Becket and the Pope Threatned Excommunication against the King himself if he Restored him not The King out of a Superstitious Fear of his Excommunication as appears by his Receiving afterward the Servile Penance imposed on him for Becket's death Restores Becket again to his See of Canterbury whither again arrived he continued notwithstanding the favour of the Kings Restauration as bad as before in Prosecuting his Excommunications he had got at Rome against such Bishops as sided with the King of which when the Excommunicated Bishops complained to the King and moved thereby his Passion He cried out Shall I never be quiet for this Priest if I had any about me that lov'd me they would find some way or other to Rid me of this trouble Whereupon Four Knights standing by took their Journey to find the Arch-Bishop whom they found at Church on the steps where they strook him on the Head with their Swords and killed him which though in the manner of doing it was no way Justifiable being without lawful Hearing and Trial Yet 't is very manifest that the Arch-Bishop by the Common Law it self without the trouble of an Attainder by Parliament might have been proceeded against Legally by Indictment of High-Treason and he was manifestly Guilty for it was by the Common Law High-Treason to appeal to a Foreign Prince And likewise for any Subject to bring an Excommunication from Rome against another Subject without the Kings Assent was Treason for this was the ready way to give the Pope Power to Raise Rebellions against the King when he pleased Bishops Traitors to King John The Bishops in the time of King John Conspired with the Pope and the French and the Temporal Barons and the Pope laid an Interdiction or Excommunication on the Kingdom for Six Years Three Months and Fourteen Days during which the Church Doors were shut up and there was neither Exercise of Religion Mass Marriage Baptism or Burial allowed in the Church or Church-Yard 'till the King would Surrender his Crown and take the Kingdom from the Pope and hold it Feudatory from him which the King was by the Treachery of his Bishops deserting him compell'd to do and accordingly he took off the Crown from his Head and laid it at the Feet of Pandulphus the Popes Legate the Pope to dispose of it how he pleased which he kept Three or Four Days from him and would not Restore again but on condition agreed That he and his Successors should hold it of the Pope and pay him for it the Yearly Tribute of a Thousand Marks which was a great Sum in those days besides all the other Tributes and Exactions which the Pope then had from the Subjects but this the King was fain to do before the Excommunication would be taken off from him and his Kingdom which being done and be perceiving himself clear from the Pope Resolved to Raise an Army and be Revenged on the French King whose Pensions had set all this on work against him and accordingly had Levied a very great Army having his Fleet all ready at Portsmouth to have Shipt them The Arch-Bishop of Canterbury thereupon told him He broke his Oath to the Pope at his Absolution if he Warr'd against the French King which in truth the Bishops had themselves by their Treason compell'd Him to To whom the King Replied in a great Passion That he would not defer the Business for his pleasure seeing Lay-Judgment belonged not to him The Arch-Bishop Threatned his Native Sovereign he would Excommunicate him unless he desisted and this was in behalf of a Foreign Prince his Enemy So far could French Pensions prevail with Prelats whereby the King to his great loss was enforced to Dissolve and Disband again his Army in the nick of Time when it was ready for Action Henry the Third the Tempest of the Barons-Wars beginning to Threaten him was asked by Robert Bacon a Frier Predicant What Sea-men feared most that they knew best themselves The Frier Replied My Lard I will tell you It is Petrae Rupes alluding to Petrus de Rupibus The name of the then Bishop of Winchester and under him meaning the whole Body of the Bishops Edward the First that wise and valiant Prince disdaining to be Priest-Ridden as his two Predecessors had been to so great danger of their Persons and Kingdoms and taught by their Experience that it was in vain to think of obliging by Benefits or Oath the Power of those who being a Body United and as it were an Army more firmly Banded under their Arch-Bishop than 't was possible to make the Lay-Nobility to be under their King he began first to Lop off from their Ecclesiastical Auxiliaries such Branches of Royal Power as he could do himself without a Parliament and Anno Reg. 6. Deprived many famous Monasteries of England of their Privileges and took from the Abbot and Covent of Westminster the Return of Writs granted them by the Charter of Henry the third And after he got to be Inacted by Parliament the Statute of Mortmaine against the so enormous Increase of their Temporal Possessions which was so detrimental to the Military Service of the Kingdom and in the Statute of Westminster 2. defalked the Jurisdiction of Bishops and Ecclesiastical Judges He left not here but growing more upon them he Required the Moiety of all their Goods as well Spiritual as Temporal for one year and I think their money and moveables could grow no more the next year which he took in one year And at the first one Sr. John Knight stands up amongst them in their assembly and said Reverend Fathers if any here will Contradict the King's Demand in this Business let him stand out in the midest of this Assembly that his person may be known and seen as one Guilty of the Breach of the King's Peace At which speech they all sate mute and though it put them into Extreme grief and perplexity they yet were fain to yield to his demand Dan. Hist Which if he had been possessed with a dastardly fear of Excommunication he had no more dared to do than his Predecessors Yet some say to be able to deal with his own Bishops he was fain to send the Pope a Furnish of gold for his Chamber to have his Connivence Edward the second Anno Regni 17 after the Overthrow he Received by the Treachery of his own in Scotland Bishops Traitors to E. 2. Caused the Bishop of Hereford to be Arrested and Accused of High treason for aiding the Kings Enemies in their Late Rebellion but he Refused to Answer being a Consecrated Bishop without leave of the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury whose Suffragan he was and who he said was
John Stratford Arch-Bishop of Canterbury on whom the King likewise laid the blame of his Wants writes a proud Letter to the King and desired him and his Council without delay to deliver the said Prisoners otherwise he plainly writes That according to his Pastoral Charge he must proceed to the Execution of the Sentence of Excommunication concluding how notwithstanding it was not his Intention to include the King Queen or their Children so far as by Law they might be Excused It was well for the King he was in the head of a brave Army in France for if he had been single as his Father was they who durst Menace him amongst all his Forces in the Field if he had lost the Day as his Father did were as likely to bring him for a French Pension to as miserable a destruction as they brought his Father but by Gods Providence he proved afterward Victorious but first Replied by another Letter to the Arch-Bishop That Relying on his Council he was first put on the Action of the French and that he had promised and assured him he should not want Treasure to perform the work and that notwithstanding by the negligence and malice of the said Arch-Bishop and his Officials those Provisions Granted him by his Subjects in Parliament were in so slender proportion Levyed and with such delays sent over as he was pressed of necessity to his great Grief and Shame to Condescend to the late Truce with the French though extreme Wants charged with mighty Debts forced him to throw himself into the Gulf of the Usurers in such sort as he began to look into the Dealing of his Officers some of which upon apparant notice of their ill Administration of Justice their Corruptions and Oppressions of his Subjects he removed from their Places and others of mean Degree he Committed to Prison and there detained them to the end he might find out by their Examinations the truth of their Proceedings Then he charges the Arch-Bishop with his own Corruption and declares how himself being under Age had through his ill Council made so many Prodigal Donatives prohibited Alienations and excessive Grants and Gifts that thereby his Treasury was utterly Exhausted and his Revenues diminished and how the Arch-Bishop corrupted with Bribes Remitted without reasonable cause great Sums which were due unto him applying to his own Use or Persons ill deserving many Commodities and Revenues which should have been preserved for his necessary Provisions and concluded Unless he desisted from his Rebellious obstinacy he intended in due time and place more openly to proceed against him and the King before the Arch-Bishop Submitted caused a Letter to be sent to the Pope from the Parliament not to make any more Collations of Benefices in England and prohibited them on pain of Death on any that should present or admit them which Resolute slighting of Excommunication both from Arch-Bishop and Pope though in the very time of War with France made the Pride of the Arch-Bishop stoop and with much ado got himself Reconciled to the Kings favour for which the King was bound to thank God and not the Pope or Bishop who gave him that Victory and Success against the French as neither Pope or Arch-Bishop dared to Excommunicate him Against Richard the Second one of the Articles brought against him to have him deposed was That whereas the Realm is immediately holden of God after he had obtained divers Acts for his own particular Ends he obtained Bulls heavy Censures from Rome to observe and perform them contrary to the Honour and ancient Privilege of this Kingdom whereby appears That even in a time of Popery the Assistance of the Pope and Bishops which were included in it was so far from being a Protection to the King that it was Destructive to him much more is the Assistance of Bishops likely to be Destructive rather than a Safety in a time of Protestancy The Bishop likewise Concurr'd with the rest and accused him That he had taken Money Jewels and Plate from them at his going into Ireland Bishops accuse R. 2. for Trifles to Depose him so far were they from seeking to preserve the Kings Life with those Superfluities of theirs where they could keep them and their Bishopricks together that they shewed their Fidelity to their Native King by endeavouring to destroy him For such Trifles divers other Articles were laid against him in behalf of the Bishops by whose doing only the King was utterly undone Truss 46. And not one of all the Bishops in England or Ireland spoke so much as one word to preserve their Native Sovereigns Life but only one namely Thomas Mercks Bishop of Carlisle Dilemma of danger from Excommunication As to the Dilemma a Prince falls under in expecting safety of Government from the Power of Excommunication of Popes or Bishops either the greater part of his Subjects will be Religious or Superstitious if Religious they will so easily see through the Superstition of Consecration and Excommunication as it will rather Irritate and Provoke them as it did in the late unhappy Civil Wars but if Superstitious will the Pope or Bishop make Use of the great Interest and Strength they gain thereby in the People to advance their pretended Spiritual Sword above the Temporal and their own Supremacy above Temporal Kings and Princes which if Resisted by the Princes of such Subjects hazards their being Deposed and losing Kingdoms and Lives together as appears by the Examples before Recited In the same danger is a Prince who Trusts a Temporal Officer whether Treasurer or other with too much Power of Money as Theocritus Anno 518. caused Amantius an Eunuch to give Justin Amantius the General of the Army a great Sum of Money to give the Soldiers to choose Theocritus Emperour but Justin distributed it for himself and so obtained himself the Empire The Western Emperours first raised the Popes to that height as to Excommunicate the Eastern Emperours the succeeding Popes to return their Advancers due thanks Excommunicated after the Western Emperour The French Kings assisted and after raised the Popes to such height that they Excommunicated Deposed and Poisoned the Western Emperour after by the same Power the French King gave them in thanks they Excommunicated and Assassinated the French Kings The Princes of Sicily and Naples had been mighty defendors of the Papacy but when they had made it mightier than themselves the Succeeding Popes took from them their Sovereignty to themselves As to the Impossibility of Safety of Princes amongst Subjects Educated in fear of Excommunication Subjects Educated in fear of Excommunication dangerous to Princes It is to be Noted as well from the Testimony of approved Authors as from the Scripture it self that amongst the Primitive Christians those who are now called Bishops but in the Original word signifie only Overseers were Parochial Bishops or Overseers and not Provincial and that they were the same with Presbyters and differ'd not in
both were so much concern'd and others for their own private Ambition if therefore Parliaments themselves have not or shall not sufficiently clear Ambiguities and Doubts to answer so many pretences How can it be expected that Ignorant people can clear the same upon their Oath or Conscience 3. It is permitted to Grand Juries when it doth not appear to them whether the Bill is true or false to find an Ignoramus and where the people are totally Ignorant both of the Fact and Law of Supremacy why ought they not to be allowed the same Equity according to the Truth to Answer Ignoramus 4. It is against the known Maxim That Only matters of Fact can be Testified by Witnesses and matters of Law or Right cannot be Testified but by the Law it self 8. An Usurper or Idolater may happâ—n to get the Possession of the Crown How then can a Protestant Swear to the Right of the first in Temporals or of the second in Spirituals 9. It doth not appear how a Protestant may Swear That no Foreign Prince or Person ought to have any Power Authority or Preheminence Ecclesiastical within this Realm and that he doth renounce all Foreign Power in regard it may so happen that a Protestant-Prince hath or may be born beyond Sea and be a Foreign Person and yet on failure of a Lineal Heir may happen to be the next right Heir to a Protestant King after his Decease it may seem therefore to cross Gods Providence to Swear to Renounce or Abjure all Foreign Protestant-Power as to the Succession for the Oath puts no distinction between Protestant and Papal Power but Renounces all alike if they are Foreign Persons Of the Mischiefs which ensue a false Test between Protestant and Papist 1. By the same Power is given to the Favourers of Popery to turn the Edg of all the Penal Statutes made and intended against Papists to destroy the Protestants and the Preteritions and Pardons intended the Protestants are wholly apply'd in favour of the Papist the Plagues designed against the Aegyptians are wholly let loose on the Israelites and the Passeover to which were invited the Israelites is made only a Feast for the Papist So did Bishop Bancrost in the time of Queen Elizabeth persecute all Anti-Papist-Protestants under the name of Puritans and Protected all Dominican Priests Seminaries and Papists under pretence of Opposing the Jesuits by pressing the false Tests of Recusancy to Pray in a Temple to Pray after the Common Form to Receive the Sacrament after the Common Form to take the Oath of Supremacy to use all Episcopal Ceremonies in the Worship of God and the utmost Rigor and Penalties of such Recusancy against the Anti-Papist Protestant who hath been the only Counterpoise against the Papist that he hath not over run the Land and giving Protection to Papists against the very same Tests and Penal Laws so furiously Prosecuted against the Anti-Papist Protestant So did the subtle Gundamore give a new Whet to the High-Commission-Court and turn'd the Edg of the same Originally intended against the Papists to be against the Anti-Papist Protestant And since Bishops have been discharged of that Commission yet the same Course of Bancrofts and Gundamores hath been still continued against the Anti-Papist-Protestants as then under the name of Puritans so since under the name of Fanaticks such Protestants have had the Penalties of Recusancy laid on them when Papists have Compounded for Trifles or been absolutely Pardon'd such Protestants have had the Oath of Supremacy forced on them against their Conscience when Papists have neither had Supremacy nor Allegiance required of them nor their Consciences troubled but have remained absolutely unsworn from so much as any Oath of Fidelity unless to Foreign Princes such Protestants have had their Houses utterly Disarmed and not so much left as sufficient to keep out a Thief when Papists have had their Houses full of Arms and not so much as searched such Protestant's Children have been by the Usurped Power of Bishops Certificates made Bastards because not Married with the Ceremonies of the Book of Common Prayer and this they have done by pretence of the Canon of the Council of Trent a Foreign Jurisdiction long since abolish'd by Act of Parliament but such Bishops have never troubled Papist's Marriages made by Priests or Jesuits with Romish Ceremony nor Null'd them or Bastardized their Children such Protestants have been Excommunicated Cursed and given to Satan when a Dog hath not dared against Papists to move his Tongue such Protestants have been Confiscated and cast into Prison when Papists have Triumphed in Liberty and Propriety 2. Many Able Loyal Zealous Protestant-Ministers are hereby Excluded from Preaching and Teaching the Gospel 3. Many able Loyal and Useful Instruments both in Civil and Military Offices who are Protestants are Excluded and the King and Parliament deprived of their Service 4. The Offices and Arms of the Three Kingdoms are ingross'd into the hands of Persons Recommended by Papists An Essay of the Form of a Test whereat it seems no Protestant can scruple I A. B. do utterly Testifie and Declare in my Conscience and in the presence of God and do believe that the Pope or Bishop of Rome or any Bishop on Earth is not the Head of the Catholick Church nor of any National Church of England Scotland or Ireland and that they are not Infallible and that all such Popes and Bishops as pretend to Supremacy either Spiritual or Temporal or Infallibility without a Sign of Mission from God are Hereticks I believe that the Host Consecrated Crucifixes Images Idols Reliques of Saints or Saints themselves ought not to be Worshipt or Prayed to in Publick or Private and that the Mass is Idolatry I believe neither Popes nor Bishops have any Power or Mission from God to Exact Auricular Confession or to Impose Penance or to give Absolution Indulgence or Pardon of Sin or to Redeem from Purgatory or to give or sell Heaven or Paradise or any Place in the same or to Excommunicate Curse or Deliver to Satan And I do therefore utterly Abjure and Renounce all Absolutions Indulgences Pardons of Sins and Redemptions from Purgatory given or to be given by any such said Popes or Bishops or any deriving Authority from them and defie all their Excommunications And I do Promise and Swear to be True and Faithful to our Sovereign Lord the King his Heirs and lawful Successors So help me God Whether any Test of the Conscience ought to be Penal either to Protestant or Papist It seems not 1. Because to Plant Religion by Penalty is to Plant it by the Sword whereof Christ gave neither Precept nor Example but rather a Prohibition Implicit in his Express Command to Peter Matth. 26.52 Then said Jesus unto him Put up again thy Sword into his place for all they that take the Sword shall perish with the Sword Which though it prohibit not lawful Defence to those who have the Power of the Sword which Peter had