Selected quad for the lemma: england_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A47102
|
An explanation of the laws against recusants, &c. abridged by Joseph Keble ...
|
Keble, Joseph, 1632-1710.
|
1681
(1681)
|
Wing K115; ESTC R1584
|
133,989
|
274
|
from that Guilt but he shall have judgment and suffer for the same as in Case of high Treason notwithstanding such Submission c. Dalt Cap. 89 tit High Treason is thereby clearly mistaken in extending the benefit of this Submission 3 Jac. 4. § 24. N. 1. generally to all who have been willingly absolved withdrawn or reconciled or have promised such obedience Page 188. CXCVII The Offender may be proceeded against by force of this Act 3 Jac. 4. § 25. N. 1. in any County where he shall be imprisoned for so the word taken is to be expounded and the like exposition hath been made use of 2 and 3 R 2. § 6. N. 2. of Souldiers 1 Jac. 11. § 1. N. 3. of having two Wives living Hutt 131. If the Offence be committed out of this Realm yet it can not be tried upon 35. H. 8.2 § 1. N. 2. for this Act 3 Jac. 4. § 25. N. 1. hath prescribed a special form of a Trial in this Case which must be observed and if such Offender be a Peer of England the Indictment can not be taken before any others than the Justices of Assize and Gaol delivery in the County where he is imprisoned or the Justices of B. R. Hutt 13. the Lord Digbyes Ca. CXCVIII. Alien Page 189. 190. by a Subject of this Realm 3 Jac. 4. § 27. N. 1. is to be understood a Natural born Subject or an Alien Naturalized here by Act of Parliament or made a Denizen of England by the King's Letters Patents but these words here are exclusive of two sorts of Subjects 1. Of an Alien inhabiting this Realm who oweth to the King a local Subjection or Ligeance and is neither Naturalized or made a Denizen for the word Subject is a mark of distinction and must be necessarily exclusive of some persons or other within this Realm and therefore can not be supposed to taken for meer aliens who if neither naturalized or made Denizens are only local Subjects and of the lowest form for if no person inhabiting within the Realm were here intended to be excepted the word Subject would be idle and to no purpose 2. An Alien Naturalized by Act of Parliament in Scotland or Ireland or made Denizen of either of those Kingdoms by the King's Letters Patents is for the same reason out of the meaning of this Branch 3 Jac. 4. § 27. N. 1. altho he live in England for it seems that such a person is still an Alien here and shall not partake of any priviledges in England by his being Naturalized or made Denizen in Scotland or Ireland their Acts or Laws not being obligative or concluding to us in England Vaughan 278.280 c. Crane and Ramsey And therefore the Power here given any one Justice of Peace 3 Jac. 4. § 27. N. 2. to levy the XII d. per Sunday doth not extend to either sort of these Aliens But yet they may forfeit XII d. per Sunday for their absence from Church upon an Indictment on 1 Eliz. 2. § 14. N. 1. and that by force of the General words every person or persons inhabiting within this Realm so that what is said in Doctor Fosters Ca. 11 Co. 63. that this Statute 3 Jac. 4. § 27. N. 1. gives a more speedy remedy for the recovery of the XII d. is not to be understood of all persons within 1 Eliz 2. § 14. N. 1. but only of the Subjects of this Realm in the sense of 3 Jac. 4. § 27. N. 1. And if a man be born within any of the King's Dominions which were such and united with England in their Subjection at the time of his Birth altho he be not born within England yet if he live here he is a Subject of this Realm within the intent of this Act 3. Jac. 4. § 27. N. 1. For Natural Subjection and Legeance are not local or confined to that Kingdom or Countrey where he was born but he is a natural Subject in any of the Dominions belonging at the time of his birth to the Prince under whom he was born and upon that ground it was resolved 7 Co. In Calvin's Ca. that a man born in Scotland after the Union of the two Kingdoms should inherit in England So that a man born in Scotland or Ireland or any other of the King's Dominions which were such and so united at the time of his Bâ—rth if he live in England is punishable by this Act 3 Jac. 4. § 27. N. 1. and any Justice of Peace may grant his warrant to levy the XII d. for his absence from Church CXCIX Proof Page 190. To the Satisfaction of the Iustice of Peace 3 Jac. 4. § 27. N. 2. in this Case the Justice of Peace is sole Judge whether the excuse the Party makes for his absence be sufficient and sufficiently proved and the same can not be brought into question elsewhere by the Party CC. Dayes Page 190. Every Sunday 3 Jac. 4. § 27. N. 1. this repairing to the Church every Sunday must be as well to Evening Prayers as to Morning-Prayers for it ought to be an entire Day and an entire Service by Hutton and Berclay Justices Dalt Cap. 45. tit Recusants Page 190 To Levy 12 d. for every such Default 3 Jac. 4. § 27. N. 2. So that this forfeiture of XII d. may be levyed weekly for it is due for every absence as soon as the Sunday is ended and hath no relation to the forfeiture of XX lb per Month given by 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 1. but the offender may be punished both by 3 Jac. 4. § 27. N. 2. for his weekly absence and by 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 1. for his monthly absence by Coke Ch. J.B.R. 1 Roll 94. Doctor Foster's Ca. CCII. Accessory Page 198 192. Willingly c. keep or harbour 3 Jac. 4. § 32. N. 1. A man freely and of his own accord takes an apprentice or covenant-servant for a certain time and not knowing him or her to be a recusant and such Apprentice or servant forbears to come to Church it seems that the Master shall forfeit nothing altho he keeps them in his house for he doth no more than what the Law will compell him to do during the time agreed on and limited for such apprenticeship or service and this can not be said to be done willingly for it is not in his choice to discharge them untill the time is expired But if the Master before he took such Apprentice or other servant knew him or her to be a Recusant or after their forbearance to come to Church retains them for a longer time than was at first agreed on this is a keeping or harbouring them willingly and he shall be liable to this penalty 3 Jac. 4. § 33. N. 1. Infra 205. Page 192. in his CCIII her or their service fee or Liverty 3 Jac. 4. § 33. N. 1. This extends to all Servants whatsoever although they dwell not in the
this is not like the Case of Jurors upon 2 H. 5. § 2. cap. 3. § 1. N. 2. where t is said that the Juror shall have Lands of the clear yearly value of 40 s. if the debt or damage declared amount to 40 marks in which Case altho it be in the disjunctive debt or damage yet it hath been adjudged that where the debt and damages doth amount to 40 marks it is sufficient and the Juror must have 40 s. per Annum 1 Inst 272. For in that Case the word or is cumulative and debt or damage both amount to no more than one intire thing viz. The value of the Cause or Action depending And it appears plainly to be the intent of the makers of the Law 2 H. 5. Sect. 2. Cap. 3. § 1. N. 2. that no Cause declared to be of the value of 40 Marks shall be tryed by Jurors of a less Estate But in our Case the Lands and Goods are things of different natures one real and the other personal and cannot be regularly reduced under one and the same head and therefore shall not be valued together unless 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 2. had expresly appointed such a valuation 2. But yet if a Popish Recusant hath a lease for years and personal Goods and both do amount in value to above 40. l. he shall be out of the danger of abjuration for altho the lease is in the realty and the goods are personal yet they shall in this Case be valued together For that by this Copulative and 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 2. expresly so appoints without distinguishing between the values of either but makes it sufficient if both of them be of that value 3. Mony secured upon a Mortgage of Lands is within the meaning of these words Goods and Chattels 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 2. And if the Popish Recusant hath above 40. l. owing to him upon such Mortgage he cannot be required to abjure CXXXIII Days Page 137. Within three months next after such person shall be apprehended or taken 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 3. Wingate Crown 80. clearly mistakes the meaning for he saith that a Popish Recusant whose Estate is under value must make the submission prescribed by this Act within three months next after his arrival at his place of abode which is a complicated Error for he quites leaves out him who is to repair to the place where he was born or his Father or Mother dwells he makes the party lyable to such submission before he becomes an offendor by not repairing or not presenting himself and giving in his true name or Travelling above five Miles He speakes nothing of his being apprehended whereas by the Act he cannot be required to abjure until three months after his apprehension and he turns the three months after his apprehension into three months after his arrival all great mistakes and fit to be taken notice of by Justices of Peace whose part it is to require the submission and abjuration that they may not be misled in the Execution of this part of their office by trusting to that abridgment Page 138. CXXXIV Being thereunto required by the Bishop c. 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 3. If the offendor be not before the end of the three months next after his appreliension required by the Bishop a Justice of Peace or the Minister or Curate to make such submission he cannot be required afterwards nor be compelled to abjure by force of this Act but if he be required within the three months to make submission and refuse he may be at any time afterwards warned or required to abjure CXXXV Exile Page 138 139. The Oath of abjuration 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 4. may be in this form or to this effect You shall Swear that you shall depart out of this Realm of England and out of all other the Kings Majesties Dominions and that you shall not return hither or come again into any of his Majesties Dominions but by the licence of our said Soveraign Lord the King or of his heirs So help you God 3 Inst 217. Stamford 119.120 Wilkinson 66. hath set down another form c. resembling that of a Felon c. This hear you Sir Coroner that I J M. of H. in the County of S. am a Popish Recusant and in the contempt of the Laws and Statutes of this Realm of England I have and do refuse to come to hear Divine Service there read and exercised I do therefore according to the intent and meaning of 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 4. c. abjure the Land and Realm of King Charles now King of England Scotland France and Ireland and I shall hast me towards the Port of P. which you have given and assigned to me and that I shall not go out of the high-way leading thither nor return back again c. If I do I will that I be taken as a Felon of our laid Lord the King and that at P. I will diligently seek for passage and I will stay there but one flood and Ebb if I can have passage and unless I can have it in such space I will go every day into the Sea up to my knees assaying to pass over So God me help and his holy Judgment But in alluding to the old Oath for Felony c. Wilkinson is mistaken in the very Offence for which the Popish Recusant is to abjure by force of 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 4. For the Offence is not his Refusal to hear Divine Service for that is but one of the precedent qualifications of the person but the Offence it self is of another nature viz. his not repairing to the place the Statute appoints him or his removal from thence contrary to the Statute or his not presenting himself and delivering his true name as aforesaid Either of these if he be a Popish Recusant within the meaning of this Act is a Crime for which he ought to abjure unless he prevents his abjuration by a timely Submission Nor is the Popish Recusant bound to swear that he will not go out of the high way or return back or will tarry but one Flood and Ebb or go into the Sea up to his knees Nor ought the Coroner or Justices of Peace to require any such Oath of him for this is a new Offence made by a Statute Law which doth not require the strict form of Abjuration as in Case of Felony and altho the Felon were tied to these Circumstances yet the Recusant is not nor shall be a Felon for omitting them but 't is sufficient if he simply abjure as 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 4. directs and go from the appointed Port within the time limited and not return without Licence into any of the Kings Dominions He that thus abjures the Realm doth yet owe the King his Ligeance and remaineth within the Kings Protection Qui abjurat Regnum amittit regnum sed non Regem amittit Patriam sed