the true and legal Title abiding in the House of York See to prove this Brook Parl. pl. 105. 1 H. 7. 4. v. The second Instance is that of King Henry the Seventh This King while he was Earl of Richmond together with many Lords and Commons that took his part were all attainted of High Treason by the Parliament of Richard the Third Afterwards at the Battel of Bosworth the Earl obtain'd the Victory and slew Richard in the Field and on the same day assum'd the Crown upon him and presently afterward summon'd a Parliament On the first day of this Parliament say our Books of Law and Histories all the Judges of England were assembled in the Exchequer Chamber to resolve a very rare and perplex'd Case viz. What should be done about the reversal of the said Parlementary Attaindors of the King and divers Lords and many Knights Citizens and Burgesses that were to sit in Parliament that day And after mature Deliberation had among themselves they all Resolved That for all the Lords and Commons that were attainted they advised them not to sit in Parliament till an Act of Parliament was passed by the other Lords and Commons not attainted and assented to by the King for the reversal of those Attaindors and after the Reversal then all of them to sit in the Houses For that it was not convenient that any should sit as Judges in those Houses that were attainted But concerning the King himself they unanimously Resolved That the Crown takes away all defects in Bloud and Incapacities by Parliament And that from the time the King did assume the Crown the Fountain was cleared and all the said Attaindors and Corruptions of Bloud and other Impediments absolutely discharged And yet the said King Henry the Seventh was onely King de facto also the legal Title as I have before observed abiding in the House of York See to prove all this the Books of 1 H. 7. 4. v. Fitz. Parl. pl. 2. Brook P. Statutes pl. 37. 175. Plowden's Com. 238. v. Lord Barkley's case Co. 7 Rep. 12. â— Calvin's case Co. 1 Inst 16. a. Jenk centuries 203. Lord Bacon's Hist H. 7 fol. 13. All in express terms And if the Influence and Operation of Law be so forcible and vigorous in Cases of colourable and specious Title onely as that of the said King Henry the Seventh was as I shall demonstrate at large in the sequel of this Discourse how much more will it be where there is Proximity of Bloud and undoubted Right The last Instance is that of Queen Elizabeth an Instance of fresh and recent memory This Princess had been bastardiz'd and render'd incapable of Succession to the Crown by solemn Act of Parliament and yet notwithstanding upon the Death of Queen May the said Queen Elizabeth succeeded to the Crown And Sir Nicholas Bacon Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Oracle of the Law in that Age and upon whom the Queen altogether relied in matter of Law and who no doubt in a Case of that Importance had consulted all the Judges of England was clear of Opinion saith Cambden That there needed not any formal Repeal of the said Act as there never was any because saith the same Author the Law of England had long before pronounced Coronam semel susceptam omnes omnino Defectas tollere That the Crown once obtain'd doth absolutely wipe out all Defects whatsoever And in this Point the Civil Law agrees also with the Common Law of England for Vpian a famous Doctor tells us That the possession of the Crown purgeth all Derects and maketh good the Act of him in Authority although he wanteth both Capacity and Right Moreover by the Laws of England the right Heir becomes absolute and perfect King in the very moment that the Crown descends upon him though he happen to be at the same time in the remotest parts of the World and before he be actually Crown'd And therefore King Edward the first though at the time of his Father's Death he was absent in the Holy Land in War against the Infidels yet he was immediately acknowledg'd here by the whole Realm for their King And in his return homewards did Homage to the French King for the Lands which he held of him in France and repressed certain of his Rebellious Subjects in Gascoign and yet he was not crown'd till almost two years afterwards And the Case of his Sacred Majesty that now is was very like for he began his Reign from the moment of that fatal and impious Stroke given to his Royal Father of ever glorious Memory and yet his present Majesty was not at that time in England And this is expresly resolved to be the Law of this Nation by all the Judges of England Mich. 1. Eliz. Dyer's Rep. 165. a. So King Henry the sixth Edward the fourth Henry the seventh summon'd Parliaments condemn'd Traitors made Grants and did all other Acts which a crowned King may do before their several Coronations And the like was done by King Henry the eighth Edward the sixth Queen Mary Queen Elizabeth King James King Charles the first and His Gracious Majesty that now is For coronation is but an Ornament and Solemnization of the Royal Descent but no part of the Title and the Kings of England are to all Intents and Purposes compleat and perfect Kings before Coronation and so it was expresly resolved by all the Judges of England 1 o Jacobi in the Cases of Watson Clarke and Sir Walter Raleigh which in a matter so clear shall suffice Having thus as I conceive made my Point good and impregnable Viz. That the next Heir of the Blood cannot be excluded from the Succession by Act of Parliament I come now to answer certain Objections which some Men I perceive are fond of and do not a little glory therein and the most considerable of them are three in Number First say they there are several Instances of Kings of this Realm whose Titles to the Crown depended purely upon the Election of the People and Acts of Parliament and not upon Proximity of Blood and Inherent Birth-right as to go no higher the Titles of King John Henry the fourth Henry the seventh Moreover Henry the eighth entail'd the Crown upon himself and his Children by Act of Parliament And these Establishments by Parliament were look'd upon as good Titles to the Kings in Possession and bars against the next Heirs I Answer they were never look'd upon as good Titles to the Kings in Possession or bars against the right Heirs neither ought they to be deemed so as doth most evidently appear by the former part of this Discourse And which I shall now farther demonstrate by Enquiry into the Titles and Circumstances of each particular King mentioned in the Objection First for King John it is plain he was King de facto but not de jure for he invaded the Crown against the Right of his Nephew
contrariant to the Laws of God and Nature are ipso facto null and void So then I am here to prove two Things First That the Succession to the Crown is inseparably annexed to proximity of Blood by the Laws of God and Nature Secondly That Statute-Laws contrariant to those Laws are null and void That the Succession of the Crown by the Laws of God is inseparably annexed to proximity of Blood appears plainly by that Statute-Law or Statute of Judgment as it is there call'd which God himself with his own mouth pronounced for the ordering the Descent of Honors and Possessions Numb chap. 27. which are there by his immediate direction to be conferr'd by Birth-right and Propinquity of Blood and not by the Election or Discretion either of Moses their Supreme Magistrate or the Community of the People a part or both in conjunction And there Verses 9 and 10 it is expresly enjoyn'd by the same Divine Authority That if a Man have no Son or Daughter his Inheritance shall descend upon his Brother The preference likewise and prerogative of Primogeniture in point of Dignities and Possessions is of the same Divine Institution as appeareth in several places of the Holy Scriptures As where God said to Cain of his younger Brother Abel His desires shall be subject unto thee and thou shalt rule over him Again where he forbiddeth the Father to disinherit the First-born of his double Portion because by right of Birth it is due unto him And lastly where he maketh choice of the First-born to be sanctifi'd and consecrated to himself Consonant hereunto are the Suffrages of the Fathers and Doctors of the Civil or Imperial Law St. Hicrom writeth That a Kingdom is due unto the First-born St. Chrysostome saith The First-born is to be esteemed more Honourable than the rest Bodine the Great French Lawyer tells us That it is not enough that the Kingdom go in Succession but that it descend also upon the eldest issue Male where he is next of the Blood sic enim Ordo non tantùm Naturae Divinae Legis sed etiam omnium ubique Gentium postulat For so saith he not only the Law of God and Nature but also of all Nations doth require And Baldus a famous Doctor of the Civil Law saith semper fuit semper erit c. Always it hath been and always it shall be That the First-born and next of Blood succeedeth in the Kingdom Wherein he is followed with open Cry of all the choice Interpreters both of the Canon and Civil Law as namely Panormitanus Hostiensis Corsetta Alciat and innumerable others Now what hath been said here of Primogeniture in Point of Succession to the Crown is said likewise with equal consequence of proximity of Blood For by the Civil Law if a King have issue five Sons and the First-born die before the Succession fall or if he being possess'd of the Kingdom die without Heirs of his Body his right of Primogeniture devolveth unto the next in Blood and if he dyeth in like manner then unto the third and so likewise to the next in Order And herein Albericus a famous Doctor is most express in Point And Baldus saith That Succession hath reference to the time of Death and respecteth the Priority that is then extant And again He is not said the First-born in Law who dyeth before the Fee openeth but he who at that time is eldest in Life And of the same Opinion is Alciate for as Celsus saith primus is dicitur ante quem nemo sit He is first who hath none before him And herein the Common Law of this Nation accordeth with the Civil Law And therefore the second Son of the King of England after the Death of the First-born is eldest Son within the Statute of 25 Ed. 3. where it is enacted That it shall be high Treason for a Man to compass the Death of the King 's eldest Son and Heir c. So if the first Son dye in the Life time of the King his Father the second Son forthwith becomes Primogenitus or First-born within the Charter of King Edw. 3. for the Dutchy of Cornwal as it was resolved in the case of Prince Charles upon the Death of his elder Brother Prince Henry By which it appeareth that Proximity of Blood is ennobled with all the Prerogatives and Preferences of Primogeniture But leaving this way of arguing the Point to be farther illustrated and pursued by the Church-men and Civilians I shall for the most part derive my own Proofs thereof from the Authority of the Common and Statute-Laws of England from Records of Parliament and other Eruditions of that kind as best sorting with my Person and Profession and a Discourse of this nature First then it is most evident That all the Human Acts and Powers in the World cannot hinder the Descent of the Crown upon the next Heir of the Blood I do agree they may hinder the possession and enjoyment and so they have often done by open Hostilities and Violence but I say they cannot hinder the Descent And the reason is plain because this is a Dowry which the great King of Kings hath reserved to his own immediate Donation and hath plac'd above the reach of a mortal Arm and Mankind can no more hinder or intercept this Descent than it can the Influences of the Stars or the Heavens upon the sublunary World or beat down the Moon And this though perspicuous enough in it self I shall farther prove anon in my last Reason of this Point by irrefragable Authorities of the Common Law of England and in my Answer to the second Objection This being so I shall add That in the very moment of the Descent the Person on whom it descends by the Law of this Nation becomes compleat and absolute King to all intents and purposes And so it was expresly Resolv'd by all the Judges of England 1 o Jacobi Watson and Clarks Case And the same Person being thus compleat and absolute King by the said Descent I do then farther add That the Ligeance and Fidelity of the Subject is due to that person by the immutable Law of Nature And so it was solemnly adjudged by the Lord Chancellor and all the Judges of England in the Exchequer Chamber in the great Case of Calvin 6 Jacobi Coke's 7th Rep. 12. v. 13. a. c. 25. a. And herewith concurs the Principal Secretary or Amanuensis of Nature I mean Aristotle who writes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By the Law of Nature the Father hath the Rule over his Children and the King over his Subjects And Seneca the Philosopher hath a saying not unlike Natura commenta est Regem Nature saith he did first find out a King And for this Reason it is that our Statute-Laws do so frequently stile the King our Natural Liege Lord and the People Natural
and that giveth the Kingdoms of men to whom he will as the holy Scriptures tell us And who being the Creator of Nature can alone when it pleaseth him controul her Methods and Operations as appeareth by the Interruptions of the Succession in the cases of David Solomon Jehu and the like And they that from these and other instances of this nature do fancy they may maintain the Lawfulness of impeaching the Succession of the Crown in the true Line may as well infer that they may lawfully rob and spoil their Neighbours because God commanded the Israelites to spoil the Egyptians In those cases we are bound to the Law but not to the Example I come now to Records of Parliament which shall be three in number First that of the 39 H. 6. wherein the daring Rich Plantagenet D. of York by his Council exhibited to the Lords in full Parliam a Writing containing his Right and Claims to the Crowns of England and France Against which Claim it was objected on the King's part That the same Crowns had been entailed by Act of Parliament upon the King's Grandfather King Henry the Fourth and the Heirs of his Body from whence the same King Henry the Sixth did lineally descend The which Act say the King's Friends there is of Autoritee to defeat eny mannere Title made to eny person for so are the words To which Objection the said Duke of York answereth I shall cite the words of the Record as they are entered up in the old English That if King Henry the Fourth might have obteigned and rejoysed the seyd Corones of England and Fraunce by Title of Enheritaunce Descent or Succession he neither needed nor would have desired or made them to be granted to him in such wise as they be by the seyd Act. The which taketh noo place neither is of any force or effect against him that is right Enheritor of the seyd Corones as it accordeth with God's Laws and all natural Laws saith the Roll. And this Answer of the Duke of York to the King's Title and his said Claim is afterwards by express Act of the same Parliament declar'd and recognized to be good true just lawful and suffisaunt as it is there worded And at the same time for preventing Effusion of Bloud an Accord by the free consent of the said Duke is likewise established That King Henry the Sixth shall during his Life enjoy the Crown and that from thenceforth the Duke of York should be reputed Heir Apparent to the Crown The next Record is that of 1 Ed. 4. wherein after that Parliament hath in a long Pedigree disclos'd the Title of the same King Edward to the Crown as being in a right line descended from Lionel Duke of Clarence third Son to King Edward the Third and upon the death of his Father the above mentioned Richard Plantagenet next Heir of the Bloud Royal they immediately add these very words Knowing also certainly without doubt and ambiguity that by God's Law and Law of Nature he i. e. King Edward the Fourth and none other is and ought to be true rightwys and natural Leige and Soveraigne Lord. And that he was in right from the death of the seyd noble and famous Prince his Father very just King of the same Realm of England So here it is most expresly declared by two Parliaments of different Complexion and Interest and therefore the more remarkable that the Succession of the Crown of England is inseparably annexed to Proximity of Bloud by the Laws of God and Nature And that a Title of this Sublimity and Grandeur is not at all impeachable even by Act of Parliament And besides the said Parliament of 39 H. 6. doth make the same Declaration to the manifest prejudice of the Title of the King in possession who was ordained also by the same Accord to reign over them during his Life and whom for that reason it must be presum'd they would have favour'd if they had found but the least colour so to have done The last Record is the Statute of Recognition made in the first year of King James by the whole Parliament in which among other things They do in most humble and lowly manner I shall all along use the very words of the Act beseech His most Excellent Majesty that as a Memorial to all Posterity it might be publickly declar'd and enacted in the High Court of Parliament That they being bound thereunto by the Laws of God and Man did with unspeakable Joy recognize and acknowledge that immediately upon the Decease of Queen Elizabeth the Imperial Crown of the Realm ofEngland c. did by inherent Birthright and lawful and undoubted Succession descend and come to His most Excellent Majesty as being lineally justly and lawfully next and sole Heir of the Bloud Royal of this Realm And that by the goodness of God Almighty and lawful Right of Descent His Majesty was King of England c. And to this Recognition we do say they most humbly and faithfully submit and oblige our selves and posterities for ever untill the last drop of our bloud be spent And all the Judges of England some time after in the great Case of Calvin in the Exchequer Chamber do resolve That King James his Title to the Crown was founded upon the Law of Nature viz. by inherent Birthright and Descent from the Bloud Royal of this Realm So that this Parliament doth not in the least manner pretend to give any Title to King James or his Posterity by their own Act and Establishment but on the contrary doth expresly recognize that the same King 's Right and Title to the Crown doth accrue to him by the Laws of God and Man onely as the said Judges do by the Law of Nature viz. as next and sole Heir of the Bloud Royal. By all which it doth most manifestly appear That in the Opinion of the three several Parliaments the Succession of the Crown is united to Proximity and Nextness of Blood by the Laws Divine Natural and Human And a threefold Cord of this Sanctimony and Strength is not easily broken to say nothing of the said Resolution of all the Judges of England in the Point which as our Books tell us in matters of Law is of the most sacred Authority next unto the Court of Parliament This being thus made out I come now to prove That Statute-Laws contrariant to the Laws of God and Nature are ipso facto null and void And here I shall first observe That by a profound Polity of our Law the sole Power of expounding Statute-Laws whether relating to Church or State is intrusted and lodged in the Judges of the Common Law as King Charles the first hath noted in his Speech to both Houses upon passing the Bills of 3 d of his Reign And as the Authorities of Law are very clear now the Judges have exerted this constructive Power in expounding Statute-Laws sometimes even null and void
also to a King in Possession though he claim too by Inherent and undoubted Birth-right for the same Reason which the People may think sufficient to exclude the Right Heir may when they please be deem'd valid enough also to depose and eject the lawful Possessor of the Crown Thirdly No Person or Community of Mankind can give away or transfer a thing which they never had in them to give And of this Nature is the Right of Succession to the Crown which is not the Gift of Man but the immediate Dowry of God Nature and the immutable Customs of the State This may be prov'd by the Scriptures Fathers Councils Canon Civil Common and Statute-Laws of which I shall give only a Tast Fourthly The Succession of the Crown to the next Heir of the Bloud is one of the highest most essential and undivided Rights of the Crown and a Pearl of the most transcendent Oriency and Magnitude in the Imperial Diadem of England And the Kings of England themselves their Chancellors Treasurers and all other the great Officers of State their Privy Counsellors and the Judges who are onely to expound all Statutes by which this Right of Succession may be violated are all by provision of the Law solemnly sworn upon the Holy Evangelists to maintain and defend the Rights of the Crown and that they suffer no Disinherison or Damage to accrue thereto And every Member of the Commons House who is to be a Party to the making these Laws of Reprobation by the Statute of Eliz. is obliged before he enter or have voice in the said House to swear that he will to his power defend all Jurisdictions Privileges Preheminences and Authorities united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm and if he do not he shall be deem'd no Member of that House and shall receive also further Punishment And the Oath at this day to be taken in the Court Leets all over the Kingdom by every Subject above 12 years old is That he will be true and faithful to our Sovereign Lord King Charles the Second and his Heirs c. And it is remarkable that in the Parliament of 42 Ed. 3. the Lords and Commons being demanded their Advice by the King in a matter relating to the Crown did answer with one voice That they could not assent to any thing in Parliament that tended to the Disinherison of the King and his Heirs or the Crown whereunto they were sworn And Sir Edward Coke commenting upon that Record saith That it is Law and Custom of Parliament That no King can alien the Crown from the right Heir though by consent of the Lords and Commons And in another place he saith That King John 's Resignation of the Crown to the Pope was utterly void Because saith he the Royal ' Dignity is an Inherent inseparable to the Royal Bloud of the King descendable to the next of Bloud of the King and cannot be transferr'd to another thus he And which is much more the Parliament of 1 Jacobi do recognize That the Crown of England did descend upon King James by inherent Birthright as being lincally justly and lawfully next and sole Heir of the Bloud Royal. And to this Recognition they do submit themselves and Posterities for ever untill the last drop of their Bloud be spilt And further do beseech his Majesty to accept of the same Recognition as the first fruits of their Loyalty and Faith not only to His Majesty but also and to his Royal Progeny and Posterity forever for so are the words So here this Parliament do oblige themselves and Posteritics which we are to defend and maintain the Succession of the Crown not onely to King James but also to his Royal Progeny and that not in a general way to any of his Bloud but onely to such Person to whom it shall be due by inherent Birthright and Proximity of Bloud as they recognize it was to the same King James So then the Succession of the Crown to the next Heir of the Bloud being a fundamental Right of the Crown and a Right annexed and secured to the same Heir not onely by the Laws Divine Natural and Humane but also as I have clearly proved by the Obligation and Sanctimony of National Lawful Recognitions and Oaths it doth evidently follow That the Parliament of England cannot by Law alter or violate the said Succession contrary to the same National and Legal Recognitions and Oaths Lastly The right Heir of the Crown cannot be barr'd or excluded by Act of Parliament Because the Accession and Descent of the Crown in an instant absolutely purgeth and dischargeth all Obstructions and Incapacities whatsoever created by the same Act of Parliament And the reason given in our Books of Law is Because say they upon Descent of the Crown immediately a Body Politic is superadded to the Body Natural of the King 's and these two Bodies in an instant become Consolidate Consubstantiate and Indivisible in one and the same Royal Person and thereupon the Body Politic which is the more worthy and sublime Nature and that is in no wise subject and obnoxious to the humane Imbecillities of Death Infancy Crime or the like draweth from the Natural Body all Imperfections and Incapacities whatsoever and in a moment endows and ennobles the same Natural Body with the Divine Embellishments and Perfections of the Politic. As it hath been frequently resolved by the Judges of England Plowd Com. 238. v. Lord Barkley's case Et ibid. 2 3. a. v. the case of the Dutchy of Lancaster Coke's 7th Rep. 10. a. Calvin's case And in the same Calvin's case 12. a. a Case argued by the Lord Chancellour and all the Judges of England it is affirmed That the King 's being a Body Politic is founded upon Necessity and the deepest Polities and Wisdom of our Law And why so Because saith that Case expresly Hereby the Attaindors and Disability of him that hath Right to the Crown are avoided lest in the interim there should be an Interregnum which the Law will not suffer This I shall now proceed to make good by two great and impregnable Instances drawn out of our Books of Common Law Histories and Records The first is that of King Henry the Sixth who being discomfited in Battel by King Edward the Fourth was in the first of the same King Edward disabled from all Regiment and attainted of High Treason by Act of Parliament The said King Henry some years afterwards by the assistance of the great Earl of Warwick was restor'd again to the Crown and held a Parliament And the Judges of that time were all of opinion That notwithstanding the Parliament of Edward had disabled Henry from all Government and attainted him of Treason that yet in the same moment that Henry reassumed the Crown the said Parliamentary Incapacities were to all intents discharged and avoided And yet Henry was at first but onely King de facto