But all this so as that no Article of the Confession no point of Doctrine no part of Worship is altered And yet the Brethren have raised such a hue and cry as if the later Bishops yea and Princes not excepting Queen Elizabeth had a design to corrupt the Articles to poison the Worship to impose unestablished things upon the conscience and liberty of the Subject and to punish men for disobedience thereunto As if all Religion were pessundated and Omnia in pejus ruere retro subâ—apsa referri All goes to ruine Thames to Tyber flows Th' Assembly to a Convocation grows As if as Pauls by the Brethrens fautors so the whole Church were like to be an Augaean Stable Well spake Tertullian of their fathers Prescript adv Heres non longè ab initio Scripturas obtendunt hac suâ audacia statim quosdam movent in ipso verò congressu firmos quidem fatigant infirmos capiunt medios cum scrupulo dimittunt They pretend Scripture saith he and by this their confidence they presently move some In disputation they trouble those that are strong they take the weak and send away the middle sort with doubting I conclude that notwithstanding the exceptions of the Brethren the Common-prayer-book as well as the Articles Act for uniformity of Com. prayer is established by Act of Parliament And that therefore If any manner of Parson Vicar or other whatsoever Minister shall preach declare or speak any thing in the derogation or depraving of the said faid Book or any thing therein contained or any part thereof and shall be thereof lawfully convicted shall forfeit c. I have done with the second Head of Objections viz. The establishing of the Liturgy and Worship Subsect 3. Discipline established Object I Come to that against the third the Discipline which they say is not established neither The discipline not establish'd They instance in the Episcopal Courts and Canons the first whereof is Jurisdiction Now the Bishops are of age Answ let them speak for themselves One of them Arch-bishop Whitgift against T. Cartwright Bishops Courts Lord Cant. speech at the censure of Dr. Bastwick c. in the Preface and the greatest in his time doth acknowledge That they exercise their jurisdiction in their Courts by vertue of the Laws and Commissions Royal onely The next in the same rank goes farther and upon occasion of such calumny makes it his suit unto the King and I do humbly in the Churches name desire your Majesty that it may be resolved by all the reverend Judges of England and then published by your Majesty that our keeping Courts and issuing Process in our own names and the like exceptions * Namely by T. Cartwright and others formerly taken and now renewed are not against the Laws of this Realm as 't is most certain they are not Thus far he What can indifferent men desire more then an appeal to all the legal Interpreters the Judges of that Law which they are said to violate and to the supreme Judge and spring-head thereof the King This for their Courts The Canons of the Church K. James As for the Canons Because the King-craft of that Prince which did confirm them as himself calls it is herein question'd as if he understood not what did touch his own prerogative and the Laws for he by his Authority under the Broad Seal confirmed those Canons I shall not take upon me the vindicatâ—on of so great a Person seeing he hath a Grandson and Successor our present Soveraign to do it for him at whose feet and the Laws I shall let that lie the rather because that point is like very shortly to be determined by publick authority So much for Discipline Subsect 4. Of Government Episcopal THe last is Government Episcopal namely and here 25 Edw. 3. Ann. 1350. Necessity of Reform p. 40. illis adhaeret aqua Themselves acknowledge and cite the Act saying That whereas the holy Church of England was FOVNDED in the estate of PRELACY within the said Realm of England by the said Grandfather Edw. 1. and his Progenitors and the Earls and other Nobles of his said Realm and their Ancestors to inform them and the people in the Law of God c. This then is granted to be according to the constitutions of this Nation Legal which is moreover known to all by this That all Acts of Parliament since that foundation have given the precedency of Baronship unto the Bishops the form usually being The Kings Majesty with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal Object doth enact c. Nay but though Episcopacy was established by Law 17 Car. cap. 1. Office of Episcopacy ceased yet it is not so now For the Act of 17 Car. 1.11 repeating the clause of the Act of 1 Eliz. 1. which instals the Queen and her Successors with power of Ecclesiastical jurisdiction the onely ground of the Bishops authority and jurisdiction Reasons for necessity of Reform p. 51 52 53. and repealing that clause did besides the taking away their Votes in Parliament take also away their power authority and jurisdiction and so the very office it self of Episcopacy whereupon the Ordinance of Lords and Commons makes all their grants void since 17 Car. 1. because then their Office expired Answ 1 For answer first in general That it was neither in the purpose nor to speak as the thing is in the power with due observance be it uttered of either Parliament or Prince to take away the powers which are essential and unseparable from the Crown and Office of a King which we see of right to have belonged and with praise to have been executed not onely in the Scripture both by Jewish and Heathenish Princes as by Nebuchadnezzar by Cyrus Dan. 3.29 Ezr. 6. Jon. 2. by Darius by the King of Ninive c. as well as by David Jehosophat Hezekiah and Josiah but also in the primitive Church by Constantine and Answ 2 others after him Besides we may not conceive the Parliament intended to countervene an express Article of the Confession of this Church Artic. 37. of the Civil Magistrate which having named the Queens Majesty saith Unto whom the chief government of all estates of this Realm whether they be Ecclesiastical or Civil in all causes doth appertain That prerogative which we see to have been given always to all godly Princes in holy Scripture by God himself And in particular that it was not the Answ 3 purpose of the King or the two Houses as then they were to take away the office and ordinary jurisdiction of Episcopacy appears evidently in that the King he asserts it to be a main cause of the war Ei kâ—â— Basilic Med. 9. and of his own calamity for that he would not consent thereunto How oft saith the King was the business of the Bishops injoying their antient places Bishops Votes in Parliam and undoubted privileges in the
House of Peers carried for them by far the major part of Lords Yet after five repulses contrary to all order and custom it was by tumultuary instigation obtruded again and by a few carried when most of the Peers were forced to absent themselves In like manner was the Bill against root and branch brought on by tumultuary clamours and schismatical terrors Bill against Episcopacy which could never pass till both Houses were sufficiently thinned and over-awed To which partiality while in all reason justice and religion my conscience forbids me by consenting to make up their Votes to Acts of Parliament I must now be urged with an Army and constrained either to hazard my own A cause of the War defence of Episcopacy and my Kingdoms ruine by my defence or prostrate my conscience to the blind obedience of those men whose zealous superstition thinks or pretends they cannot do God and the Church a greater service than utterly to destroy that Primitive Apostolical and antiently Vniversal government of the Church by Bishops And the King hath the like complaint * Kings declaration to all his loving subjects Aug. 12. 1642. p. 8. print Cambr. else-where So that we see what was the mind and affection the scope and intent of the King and the two Houses as then when that Act passed touching Episcopacy Whence it will follow that as they had no intention nor ever consented to the Bill for it to destroy the office so neither did the Commons think that it was so by that Act of taking away their votes or by recalling of the former clause of 1 Eliz. 1. touching Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction for then they would not have prepared another Act for it which never passed the Houses whilst full nor the Kings assent afterward and so is no Law It remaineth therefore that the intention of the Parliament in the repealing of that clause was onely in reference unto the High-commission Court or other excentrical from the legal jurisdiction of Bishops and raised onely by the Kings prerogative yet of use whilst established but removed not for its unprofitableness as to prevent some greater inconvenience It was their jurisdiction in those cases and upon such special commission from the King that there ceased not their ordinary legal and per se Episcopal power of government in this Church * By Act of this present Parliament for restoring Episcopal jurisdiction As hath been of late more authentically evidenced Answ 4 even before this was printed As for the Ordinance that especially at that time as it could at no time cannot countervene a setled Law Neither have the Houses power to declare any thing against Law as we heard above Lord Cant. speech ubi suprà For close therefore I repeat that suit of his and do humbly in the Churches name desire of his Majesty that it may be resolved not onely by all the Reverend Judges of England A supplication to his Majesty and the two Houses of Parliament but by his Majejesty and both Houses of Parliament and then published by them that the Doctrine and Articles of Religion the Liturgy and Worship the Discipline and Government are not against or besides the Laws of this Realm That so the Church-Governors may go on cheerfully in their duty and the peoples minds be quieted by this assurance that neither the Laws nor their Liberties are infringed as Subjects thereby SECT VII Of the Obligation of the League and Covenant AGain it is objected that there is an engagement for the Reformation of the Doctrine Worship Assemblies Discipline and Government in the solemn League and Covenant therefore they are not to be adhered unto Subsect 1. That the Covenant obligeth not OMitting the elaborate and excellent pains of the University of Oxford in this argument Reasons of the University of Oxford concerning the Covenant 1647. Duplies of the professors of Aberdeen to the Brethr. concerning the Covenant 1638. Dr. Lesly Bish of Down in his Visitation speech Lond. 1638. 1. Argument Because it is opposite to after other Oaths c. Gal. 3.14 18. as also that of the Professors of Aberdeen in Scotland And of the Bishop of Down in Ireland the testimony of the three Kingdoms against it I shall propound only four Arguments to evince first the nullity of its obligation and then from thence collect what it binds yet unto The Arguments touching the former are First from the nature and order of this Oath The second from the power imposing of it The third from the matter of the oath it self The last from the scope and end of its framing and imposing First from the nature and order of this Oath When there are two oaths touching the same things and they contradictory one to another if the former be lawful and obliging the latter cannot be so too but void and null ipso facto Hence it is that our Apostle proveth the invalidity of the Ceremonial Law and Covenant being different from and in some sort opposite to the Covenant of Grace because it was made four hundred years after and so could not make the other void So this Oath and Covenant whereof we now speak being contradictory as shall be seen and is evident of it self to former lawful Oaths and Engagements confirmed by the Laws of the Kingdome as the Oath of Allegiance Supremacy Canonical Obedience Subscriptions to the three Articles and Protestations cannot make those former of none effect and is therefore void being taken as it was unlawful to take it unless the Obligation of the former Oaths and Engagements had been by the same or superiour power relaxed As was done by Hermannus Archbishop of Cullen to his subjects Sleid. Com. l. 18 Ad Ann. 1547. when he was no longer able to protect them Which was not our case Our former Oaths and Engagements were agreeable to Law and Equity both in their matter and authority injoyning them This contradictory to them and by an inferiour power yea by such a power as had not authority to do it which brings me to the second Argument 2. Arg. Because it was in posed by unsufficient power in opposition to the lawful authority namely taken from the power or rather the impotency of the imposers as to this act It is proved above that in the Government the King is Supreme by the Laws But if he were but equal yet in a coordinate power if when one desires to do his duty and is well able thereunto the other shall exclude him and act in opposition not only to him but also to the Laws established by all and impose upon the Subjects who are not obliged but as it proceeds from all to submit and to accept of such impositions if voluntarily is a threefold iniquity and injustice First Unto the person excluded against his will and right Secondly Against the liberty of the Subject who is not liable to injunctions proceeding from some but all Thirdly Against the priviledge
their general exception The next is against the Ceremonies of this Church and of the Common-prayer Book in particular Of the Ceremonies in partic Against which they except these things First that they are not established by Law Secondly that they are superstitious Thirdly that they are scandalous Fourthly that they have been occasions of persecution Fifthly they are burdensom for their number And lastly even by the consequence of the Article 34. of the 2. Homilie of the time and place of Prayer by the very Preface of the Common-prayer Book it self and also the practice of the Bishops they ought to be removed Touching the first that they are not established they endeavour to prove first generally in that the Common-prayer Book is not established secondly particularly because of the Book of 2. and 5 6 Ed. 6. and the Act of Uniformity of Common-prayer Touching the first that they are not established In the Answ to the sixth gen Except because the Common-prayer Book is not established hath been answered above Touching the particular proof here the Brethren do prevaricate not unpalpably and very undutifully traduce Qu. Eliz. and the Parliament that established the Book of Common Prayer P. 34. For first they say that However the Rubrick before the Book of Common-prayer printed in 1 Eliz. directeth to use such Ornaments as were in use in 2 Edw. 6. Ornaments of service yet that is no part of the Book of Common-prayer which the Parliament of 1 Eliz. established because the Book of 5. 6 Edw. 6. hath no such Rubrick or direction and that Act of 1 Eliz. for Uniformity of Common-prayer injoyns all things to be done according to the Book of 5 6 Edw. 6. and none other nor otherwise therefore nothing according to the Book of 2 Edw. 6. which yet * P. 39. afterward they say is good Law So that they make that Parliament very weak and inconsiderate men Answ and indeed meer C. Combs if that word might be used in reference to so awfull an Assembly that what they appointed in the very entrance of the Book by Rubr. they would establish they did by the Act immediately overthrow They appoint such Ornaments in the Book unto the Minister in Divine Service as was in use by Act of Parliament in the second year of Ed. 6. And in the Act they conform the Prayer-book unto that of 5 6. Ed. 6. and none other or otherwise As if the former were not an Exception and a Provâ—so also in the Act it self Act for Uniformity prope sinem Provided alwayes sayes the Act and be it enacted that such Ornaments of the Church and of the Ministers thereof shall be received and be in use as were in the Church of England by the Authority of Parliament in the second year of the Reign of King Edw. 6. untill other order shall be therein taken note by the Authority of the Queens Majesty Note with the advice of her Commissioners appointed and authorised under the Great Seal of England for Causes Ecclesiastical or of the Metropolitane of this Realm Which latter clause of the Act yields a farther Answer to the Breth viz. that if those Ornaments were not otherwise established either by the Act or by the Liturgie yet by this Act Other Ceremonies if they be established by the Queen and her Commissioners and so by the following Princes Q. hath power to ordain Ceremon Rites and Orders Ecclesiastical it is sufficient The like may be said for Ceremonies Rites and Orders appointed by the Book That Act immediately after the former words subjoyning And also that if there shall happen any contempt or irreverence to be used in the Ceremonies or Rites of the Church by the misusing of the Orders appointed in this Book the Queens Majesty may by the like advice of the said Commissioners or Metropolitane ordain and publish such further Ceremonies or Rites as may be most for the advancement of Gods glory the edifying of his Church and the due reverence of Christs holy Mysteries and Sacraments So that here is establishment enough Next they would prove that the Ceremonies in the Common-prayer Book for of those they are speaking are not established by Law Pag. 38. because the Common-prayer Book of 2 Edw. 6. is in some things referred to And particularly as to Ornaments and Rites both by the Rubrick before Common-prayer in the present Liturgy and by the Statute of 1 Eliz. 2. So that as to this point vâ—z of Ornaments and Rites which they named and as to Ceremonies for of those they are speaking and instance in them presently so much of that Book is still in force by Law But that Book hath expresly given a liberty in some of the things here desired to be no further imposed where in the last page thereof called Certain Notes for the more plain Explication and decent Ministration of things contained therein it saith As touching kneeling crossing holding up of hands knocking upon the breast and other gestures they may be used or left as every mans devotion serveth without blame This say the Brethren is still good Law c. wherein they do as well falsifie as prevaricate for neither the Rubrick before the Common-prayer nor the Act for Uniformity do name Ornaments and Rites as the Brethren recite the words but Ornaments only Now the word Rites comprehends the Ceremonies also which are not referred to in this Act but bounded in the Book it self and further liberty given to the Queen about them as we saw above out of the Act. Again they prevaricate for they know it was far from the meaning of that Rubrick they quote in 2 Ed. 6. when it names kneeling crossing and other gestures as things indifferent to be done or left according to every mans devotion Far it was from them to intend the Crosse in Baptism or the kneeling at the Communion or other gesturâ—s establisht in that very Book and by Act of Parliament and the latter whereof they explain by Rubrick in the Book of 5 6. Edw. 6. But the Brethren know they meant these words of such other Crossings and Kneelings and gestures which were many in those times not appointed by the Book So much for the â—stablishment The next is they are superstitious Superstitious Thirdly scandalous Both which have been replyed to above to which I referre for brevities sake only because this Tract is growen farre beyond what I intended The fourth is they have been occasions of persecution to manâ— able and godly peaceable Miniâ—teâ—s and sober Christians With reference to what hath been said above I add Pâ—â—â—â—â—ble Ministâ—â—s first Touching the Ministers that peacâ—â—ble they are not if like the Brethren Who first endâ—avour to enflame the people as well as Parliament and then to cast questions of difference between the King and Parliament â—ag â—â—â— â—â—â—r â— about Prerogative â— as they not obscurely do by quarrellâ—ng the validity of the
formidable examples in the Ministery of those who not without very probable gâ—ounds and weighty advice have receded from their places provided that they could eat their bread in them though perhaps but course or not over-powered with other temptations or distractions Considerable are the words of Calvin to this purpose Ita respicienda est vocatio tua ut ab omnibus avocamentis sensus tuos omnes avertas In Epist ad Philip. cap. 2. 21. Licet alibi opulentiùs vivere At Deus te alligavit Ecclesiae quae tenuitur modò te alat Alibi plus honoris sed eum tibi locum attribuit Deus in quo humiliter vivas A ibi salubrius coelum aut amoenior Regio sed hîc tibi statio ordinata est Optares tibi cum humaniore populo esse negotium offendit te vel ingratitudo vel ferocitas vel superbia denique cum genio moribus Gentis minimè convenit Atqui luctandum est tibi tecum vis quodammodo contrariis votis est afferenda ut spartam quam nactus es colas Which passage truly I left un-Englished but remembring it may do some good unto the * The Wives of Ministers weaker sex 't is this Thou art so to observe where God hath called thee that thou must shut thine eyes from all enticements thence Elsewhere thou maist live more plentifully but God hath bound thee to a Parish which will but keep thee sparingly There is more credit to be had else where but God hath assigned thee a place whâ—re thou must live obscurely The aire is better at such a place and the Country far more pleasant but here thou are appointed Sentinel Thou couldst wish thou hadst to deal with a better natur'd people thou art troubled at their ingratitude at their rudeness at their pride and insolency in a word thou canst not away with the spirit anâ— disposition of the people But thou must wrastle with thy self and offer a kind of force to all opposite affections that so thou maist adorn that Spouse to which thou art engaged Thâ—s far there But the Sauce is not all Vineger He therâ—fore adds in the same place Idem ibid. Eatenus concedendum est Ecclesiae ministris sua quaerere ut non impediantur à quaerendo Christi Regno sed hoc modo jam non dicentur sua quaerere quoniam à praecipuo scopo aestimatur vita hominis Thus far saith he it must be granted unto Ministers to seek their own so as they may not be hindred from seeking the Kingdom of Christ But on this account they are not now to be said to seâ—k their own because we are to judge of a mans way by the scope and end he aimes at Thus he Conc. Nice Can. 16. And the Council of Nice â—ath this Canon Ne de civitate inferiori ad majorem Ecclesiam transire quis ambiat sive Episcopus sive etiam aliùs Clericus That no man be he Bishop or other Clergy-man should endeavour to go from a meaner to a greater place or people Concil Trid. Sess 3. sub Jul. 3. Can. 5. And there is reason for it seeing it is seldom that he can sine magno suo Eccâ—esiae incommodo gregem sibi concreditum relinquere ac non sine Episcopalis dignitatis diminutions Leave the flock entrusted to him without great inconvenience both to himself and them and without disgrace to his ministerial function Psal 92. as the Council of Trent hath it But to return God hath promised to keep us in all our ways whilst we are in our way 2 Sam. 11.1 2. we are under protection Now as was implyed above this degree of spiritual fornication is occasioned sometime as the other was in David Desidosus erat The hand that is not busie will Object the head to wandring still This for the occasion of my Lapse SECT II. The Causes Privative BUt the Causes were as in the former Controversie partly general and privative partly positive and particular The general was that as I had in the former through zeal without knowlâ—dge resisted the Spirit of God so I committed here the same error upon the same grounds against the Word of â—od For why may I not call it the Word of God which was first in it self a truth and that one of main concernment and then spoken when I was leaving my relation and as it were at Farewell when words use to be of most weight and lastly uttered by Dr. Laud Arch-bish of Cant. my honourable Lord and Master one whose place was in solemn manner to declare it Although his person should have been as bad as his who prophesied being the * Joh. 11.51 High-priest It was this viz. An Admonition to adhere unto the Church of England without turnig unto the right-hand or unto the left To which most Sovereign counsel if the Author's self did not in all things correspond as some have published he had therein no servant of me and yet he did confer upon me no common favours By vertue whereof I enjoyed the benefit of the best part of my education and preparation for the Ministery Unto whom living or dead I have not return'd evil willingly But on the contrary being sollicited and that with some kind of intermination to be and afterward cited as a witness against him I appeared not When the Lord Cromwel in Henry the eighth's time Fox Acts Mon. in the life of Cromwel was glaned at by one for having been servant unto Cardinal Wolsey he not onely did acknowledge it but professed also his grateful memory of the benefits he received from him Because his Lordship may have with some though not meriting the like resentment with the Cardinal This for the occasion and cause privative SECT III. Causes Positive THe Causes Positive First 1. Of Recess from the Church I took offence at some things in the Church in the Assemblies the Worship and the Discipline neither perceiving the beam in my own eye nor the beauty of that Spouse that seemed black Cant. 1.4 14. but was comely in the eye of Christ no nor the deformity of the Concubine that was but painted over An adulterous spirit sees beauty in any but his own wife Next 2. Of Access unto Independency I was taken not undeservedly with the good gifts and preaching that I perceived in certain of the Independent way And I did not well apply then what I had sometime done viz. To mark those that caused divisions and offences Rom. 16.17 contrary to the doctrines which I had received and avoid them because they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ but their own bellies and with sweet preaching so Mr. Tindal and flattering words deceive the hearts of the Innocents But the main was a love to that beauty of holiness in Order and Ordinances which they predicated and spake so much of Now Aug. de utilit cred cap.
of Worship in the nerves and sinews of Discipline and in the bones and strength of Government which no true Son of the Church of England can without indignation reflect on Thirdly it striketh at the very beeing and safety of it For first this will both nourish and breed Papists and Separatists when they shall consider that by this Oath we have acknowledged that there is no one part Isa 1. wholly sound in this Church but that from the crown of the head to the sole of the foot there are wounds sores and putrifying corruptions And being the expressions are indefinite they cannot tell what in any part is sound nor know what to cleave unto and so are prepared for apostacy from it 4. Schismaticall illegal oppressive to to the Government of the Church or confirmed therein 4. This Covenant sweareth a Schisme and is an unjust Oath as it is injurious and oppressive to the Government of this Church and the express Law whereby it is established to wit Episcopacy not to insist on the ranking of it with Popery and Superstition The Church of England is founded in Prelacy saith the Luws Of which before And the King in his Oath swears to defend the Rights of this Church Yea this order is by the Laws in force before 17 Car. 11. the very next the King himself in Parliam for so the style runneth the Lords Spiritual and Temporall The right of Episcopacy out of Scripture Antiquity and the late Reformers hath been shewed before and out of the Law of England also Now to swear against a main point of the Law of the Land wherein we have the suffrage of the whole Church and against that order of men both under which Bishops as Cranmer and others special instruments of the Reformation and by influence whereof we first received the Gospel and several whereof sealed it in opposition to Popery and Superstition with their blood Five Bishops being burned viz. Cranmer Arch-Bishop of Cant. Ridley Bishop of London Hooper and Latimer Bishops of Gloucester and Wortester and Ferrar Bishop of St. Davids is such a piece of unchristianity injustice and ingratitude yea and perjury also in those that have subscribed the three Articles and taken the Oath of Canonical obedience that I should wish mine eyes a fountain of tears to bewail it and my quill the pen of a more ready Writer to describe it Pudet haec opprobria nobis c. What shame is it that this should spoken be And nothing to be said to th' contray 5. It is of most dangerous insinuation 5. Of most dangerous insinuation against the dignity person and authority of the King in respect of the Kings Authority Dignity and Person First To his Dignity in putting him after the Parliaments and Kingdoms and yet put the Parliaments before the Kingdoms as if he were inferiour unto both whereas by our Oath of Supremacy we do acknowledge him to be over all persons within these his Realms and Dominions Supreme Governour And have in that and in the Oath of Allegiance and in the Protestation sworn and engaged to maintain his honour and priviledges Secondly It insinuates most imminent danger unto the Kings Person and Authority whilest it engageth to preserve and defend the Kings Majesties Person and Authority in the preservation and defence of the true Religion and Liberties of the Kingdoms Openly implying that both the one and the other may be deserted in case he do not or seems to some not to defend true Religion and the Liberties Thirdly And for his Authority we swear obedience thereunto in the former Oaths indefinitely without such limitations as these are whence these appears to be no less then a treasonable limitation 6. It swears to betray and oppress contrary to Law 6. Is oppressive of the K. faithful subjects and true members of the Church 7. It bettaies the Liberty of the Subject in setting up an Arbitrary power against Law the Kings faithful Subjects and the true sons of the Church because they would keep faith with the one and unity with the other Artic. 4. under the names of Malignants and Hinderers of Reformation 7. It owneth the Houses of Parliament in opposition to the King to be the Supreme Judicatories and acknowledgeth a power in them of punishment to life and estate which is a betraying the Subjects Liberty as also that they may punish as they judge convenient or a Committee from them What is this but to pluck up Magna Charta by the roots which gives this priviledge that no free-born English man shall be punishable in life liberty or estate but by a Jury of his equals c. So that this is an erecting of an Arbitrary Government and destructive to the Fundamental Laws of the Land The same error is committed in the fift Article against those that should any way oppose this kind of union between the two Nations 8. In the sixt and last Article 8. Obliges to a blind a betting of all attempts in the pursuance of it 9. Engages against Repentance it obliges to defend all those that enter into this Covenant in the pursuance thereof which what it infers cannot be foreseen nor how far that clause may be extended 9. It engageth against Repentance which in an Oath of that nature and newness ought not to have been done but that juvat impiis as well as miseris socios habuisse It pleaseth them that have the plague to see That others as themselves infected bee 10. 10. Hypocritical blasphemous towards God scandalous and dangerous to other Churches and Nations Prov. 24. Eccles 10. Matth. 22. Prov. 13. 1 Pet. 2. Lastly In the Epilogue and close of it It is Horridly Hypocritical Blasphemous towards God Scandalous and Dangerous to other Churches and Nations First It is Horridly Hypocritical in acknowledging that we profess before God and the world our unfeigned desire to be humbled for our sins and the sins of these Kingdoms against God and Christ his Son c. And yet at the same time swear to dishonour both and transgress the Gospel which commands obedience of Subjects to their Princes especially in doubtful cases the King holding forth not force but law as well as they and as I am perswaded with better evidence Ezek. 20.27 Secondly It is most blasphemous and a high temptation of Almighty God to pray most humbly unto him to strengthen us by his holy Spirit to live and dye in opposition to the just Laws of the Land in sedition against our natural Prince in schism against the Church and in oppression and violence against our innocent brethren Thirdly It is Scandalous to other Nations and Churches whereby through us the name of God as called upon and professed by the Reformed was blasphemed even among the very Turks Ezek. 36.20 yea our Nation the members of it in peril wheresoever they came as Merchants and Travellers know Lastly Dangerous unto the same Churches First
of the other Ubi videbat cruentum facinus Idem ibid. cap. 1. ibi rursum timebat reatum perjurii Ne Deum offenderet peâ—erando Deum offendit saeviendo Where he saw a bloody villany there he feared the guilt of perjury and lest he should offend God by forswearing there he offended God by cruel murdering saith the same Author Subsect 2. What the Covenant obligeth to THus far hath been shewen that the Covenant in reference to the performance of the contents of it bindeth not Yet doth it bind and oblige very strongly For Ecce sanctus David non quidem juratus sanguinem hominis fudit sed eum falsum jurasse negare quis poterit de duobus peccatis elegit miâ—us sed minus fuit illud in conparatione majoris Nam per seipsum appensum magnum malum est falsa juratio Behold holy David Aug. ubi supra cap. 3. he would not shed a mans blood though he had sworn it But who can deny but that he was forsworn of two evils he chose the least It was indeed the least in comparison of the greater but else of it self false swearing is a great sin Saith the same St. Austin Now great sins do bind and oblige unto deep repentance As Paul in another case 2 Cor. x2 ult I must bewail saith he those that committed these lasciviousnesses and have not repented Job 42. We must as Job did after he had spoken words that he understood not to God even abhor our selves and repent in dust and ashes And with the blessed Apostle we must be humbled as oft as we reflect upon it and think the worse of of our selves as long as we live as he did for his sin though not committed in light as ours was 1 Cor. 15. I am not worthy saith he to be called an Apostle because I persecuted the Church of God So every one of us I am not worthy to be called a Christian a subject of the Kings or a son of the Church because I entred into this Covenant But yet with his comfort and some kind of recompence where he had cone the wrong viz. Yet by the grace of God I am what I am that is a penitent and a convert and as a token of it I laboured more abundantly then they all that had not so offended As 't is also prophesied in this cause some should do Eicon Basilic Medit. 27. Prov. 24.21 22. And let us for the future fear God and the King and not meddle with them that are given to change the government of Church and State for their destruction hath come suddenly and who foreknew the ruine of them both i. e. those that have both deserted God in his Church and the King in the State and Common-wealth Prov. 1.10 And if hereafter sinners in that kind entice thee consent thou not no though they should say Come we will have all one purse For they lay wait for their own blood as we have seen And let us not deceive our selves one horn of this dilemma will wound us Either the Covenant is to be literally kept or else repented of Remember palliations expositions and evasions here will do no good Prov. 28.13 Psal 32. Numb 32.23 For he that covereth this sin shall not prosper And whilst we hold our peace our bones will consume through Gods heavy hand upon us And our sin will find us out For there is no darkness nor shadow of death Job 34.22 where the workers of iniquity may hide themselves saith Elihu And thus far of the general exceptions against the Doctrine Worship Discipline and Government of the Church of England viz. That they are unnecessary inconvenient humane inventions Apocryphal Popish not established by Law And an Engagement and Covenant for the removing or reforming of them CHAP. III. Grounds of Separation and Exceptions particular against the Matter of the Premises SECT I. Against the Articles or Doctrine 2. Exceptions particular against the matter of the premises Independents excepts not Apologet. narrat pag. 29. PRoceed we now unto the Exceptions particular namely against the matter of the Doctrine Worship Assemblies Discipline and Government And first of those against the Articles or Doctrine The Independent or dissenting Brethren acknowledge That in the review and examination of the Articles of our Church so are their words our judgments say they have still concurred with the greatest part of our Brethren neither do we know wherein we have dissented Some Presbyters now do But certain of the Presbyterian Brethren do dissent and object against them first doubtfulness secondly error thirdly tyranny in the act requiring subscription Necessity of Reform pag. 1. c. 1. Doubtfulness and fourthly defectiveness and imperfection First doubtfulness because in the book of Articles now printed and ever since 10 Carol. 1. there is a declaration of his late Majesty to the Articles to this effect 1. That those Articles contain the true Doctrine of the Church of England agreeable to Gods Word 2. That the Clergy upon just occasion may have liberty from the King Kings deelar before the Articles under the Broad Seal to deliberate on such things as make for the establishment of the same doctrine yet so that no varying in the least degree should be endured 3. That no man should put his own sense upon them but take the Articles in the literal and grammatical sense pag. 2. whence the Brethren infer that by this Declaration no Minister shall have liberty to interpret any one of these Articles And therefore they will remain doubtful But first Answ 1 this doubtfulness is not per se and in the Articles themselves but per accidens and in reference to this declaration Again though they are prohâ—bited to put any Answ 2 new sense as the King speaks or their own sense as the Judge in Smiths case Necessity of Reform p. 5. yet are they not forbidden to explain the literal and grammatical sense The Scripture in the fundamentals of salvation also the Laws and Acts of Parliament are so to be taken and yet Divines there and Judges here have ever been allowed to open those senses or else the one must not preach nor the other declare Law Thirdly when unto that liberty Answ 3 granted to the Clergy there is this restraint expresly put upon it viz. That from the Doctrine established the least varying shall not be endured and that nothing shall be concluded contrary to the Laws and Customs of the Land is there not a fair assurance that the present doctrine shall remain fixed and that if any heterodox sense shall be put upon them it shall be lawful to oppose the literal and grammatical sense whether in the Article or Explication Fourthly when the Declaration Answ 4 saith We will that all further curious search be laid aside and these disputes shut up in Gods promises as they be generally set forth unto us in the holy
he maketh little of to the Romans the times and persons differed The Colossians and Galatians had been long in the saith and now put a righteousness and a necessity in those observations The Romans were but weak in the faith and observed those things as religious exercises which yet they might have more conscience of than was requisite but out of weakness onely not out of conceitedness or carnal wisdom So here Effectual course was to be taken to draw off the minds of the people from the opinion they then had of the Bishop of Rome which now being effected we must take heed we go not to the other extreme by continuing of that prayer to alienate more and more those amongst us affected to him from our publick service which the Act against Recusancy not then made doth oblige them to frequent Hence both the precept of King James Act against Recusancy prohibiting bitter invectives and undiscreet railing speeches against the persons of either Papists or Puritans Directions for Preachers anno 1622. Art 5. Dr. Ushâ—r And the practice of those in Ireland related in my hearing by the late Lord Primate not to inveigh against Popery it self but as the Kings words are modestly and gravely when they are occasioned by the Text of Scripture free both the Doctrine and Discipline of the Church of England from the aspersion of either Except 6 To that Exception they have against three Prayers one for the Queen or King another for the Bishops a third for Queen Anne and the Royal Family Additions of Prayers c. onely because not confirmed by Parliament and therefore not to be used without danger of Law In the Reply to the sixth general Exception hath been answered above To the seventh Exception That whereas the Preface of the Common-prayer-book saith That things uncertain vain and superstitious be cut off and nothing ordained to be read Preface Common-prayer but the very pure Word of God the holy Scripture or that which is evidently grounded on the Except 7 same And that the Collects for Christmas day and Whitsunday say That Christs was born on this day and that the Holy Ghost descended as on the other viz. Whitsunday and these to be read seven days after They say first Pag. 29. n. 7. On what Scripture is it evidently grounded that Christ was born on this very day As also that the Holy Ghost descended on that day seeing it is a moveable Feast and that therefore it is gross lying to Answ 1 God and horrible abusing of God in Prayer First we must distinguish betwixt things and the circumstance of them which are especially Time and Place No thing that is no matter of Doctrine or point of Worship requisite to edification in faith and holiness is appointed to be read but out of the very pure Word of God or that which is evidently grounded on the same But as for circumstances of times or names of places they are not either Doctrine of Faith or Matter of the Worship but Appendixes which vary not the substance of the Book 2. In particular Collect for Christmas day On Christmas day they appoint these words ' O God who hast given thy Son this day to be born c. First they do not say as the Brethren unfaithfully relate it this very day then indeed it might have been doubtfull but this day which admits a latitude and doth not binde the understanding to that very day it is sufficient if it be so commonly conceived and taken Aug. Ep. 23. ad Bonif. Saepe ita loquimur ut pascha propinquante dicamus crastinam vel perendinam Domini passionem cum ille ante tam multos annos passus sit Nempe ipso die dominico dicimus hod è Dominus resurrexit cum ex quo resurrexit tot anni transierunt Cur nemo tam ineptus est ut nos ita loquentes arguat esse mentitos nisi quia istos dies secundum illorum quibus haec gesta sunt similitudinem nuncupamus ut dicatur ipse dies qui non est ipse sed revolutione temporis similis ejus Thus we often speak saith the Father that when Easter is coming we say to morrow or two days off is the passion Good Friday so on the Lords day we say the Lord rose to day whereas so many years are passed since wherefore is no man so foolish as to say we lye the Brethrens words because we call those days so by way of similitude and likeness to those wherein such things were done No lye then if we say this day or as this day in Austins judgement but onely in the opinion of those whose like for folly had not then been Again Aug. Januar. Epist 119. c. 1. they might remember that even Antiquity did not celebrate it as an Article of Faith Noveris diem natalis Domini non in Sacramento celebrari sed tantum in memoriam revocari quòd natus sit Thou shalt know saith S. Austin that the day of Christs birth is not celebrated as a Sacrament but onely as a memorial that he was born And therefore needed not such exactness in the very day Thirdly the Church of England in saying this day followed the steps of Antiquity which did so account Nam ille Joh. Baptista natus est sicut tradit Ecclesia octavo calendas julias cùm jam incipiunt dies minui Dominus autem natus octavo calendas Januarias Aug. in Ps 132. prope fin Vid. ut de Temp. Serm. 12. quando jam dies incipiunt crescere For he John Baptist saith the Father was born according as the Church hath delivered it on the eighth of the Calends of July that is the twenty fourth of June when the days now begin to shorten but our Lord on the eighth of the Calends of January that is Decemb. 25. for the Calends must be reckoned backward beginning at the first day of the following moneth when the days now begin to lengthen Collect for Whitsunday Fourthly Touching that of Whitsunday they do not say this day as on the Nativity but as on this day noting as S. Austin said above not a Sacrament but a commemoration onely As on this day which is as much as if the Church had said The memory of this benefit we celebrate on this day as if it had been done therein Which is evident to be the Churches meaning because it needed not the Brethrens tuition to make them understand that Whitsunday is a moveable Feast falling sometimes sooner sometimes later Repeating the Collect seven days To the last of repeating the Collect for these days seven days after as if this were a gross lying to God and horrible abusing of God in prayer I might answer onely that which was said above to the like exception In answer to their exception against the matter of the Artic. n. 6. of not changing the Qu. name into the Kings it foams out their
unto the fifth and last thing the Government under which I comprehend the Ministry as well as Episcopacy both in their Calling and employment First The Ministry To whose constitution it is required that he be orthodox in Doctrine able in parts Conditions requisite to the constitution of a Ministry innocent of life examined by such as are in place so to do that he be not excepted against by the People and solemnly consecrated by prayer and imposition of hands thereunto More we shall not finde in Scripture necessary as by the consideration of 1 Tim. 3. and Tit. 1. Act. 14.23 with other places may appear Now if unto all this God do give evident testimony to his Ministry by his presence therewith both on the hearts of his people and conviction of the adversaries All of them observed in the Church of England Book of Ordination of Ministers Book of Canons Can. 34 and 35. and by appearing for him otherwise there is then a further seal of his Ministry The former six Particulars are all observed in the Church of England in the ordering of Ministers as by the Book of Ordination may appear although perhaps not with that exactness at all times as might be wished And for the seventh and last God hath set to his seal in the plentiful blessing of their Labours 'T is true that one of the Ancients saith Cum ipsa plebs maxime habeat potestatem eligendi dignos sacerdotes Cypr. l. 1. ep 4. vel indignos recusandi That the People especially have the power of choosing good Ministers or refusing those who are bad He doth not mean a jurisdiction and authority but a liberty of accepting or refusing upon just ground alledged touching their conversation not as if the power as People and distinct from the Ministery were in their hands for so he explaineth himself in the same place Vt plebe praesente vel detegantur malorum crimina vel bonorum merita praedicentur The people being present that the crimes of those that are evil may be discovered and the merit of the godly may be declared And a little after he expresseth the same thing more fully shewing the Form of Ordination of Ministers in his time De traditione divina Apostolica observatione servandum est tenendum quod apud nos quoque ferè per provincias universas tenetur ut ad ordinationes ritè celebrandas ad eam plebem cui praepositus ordinatur Episcopi ejusdem provinciae proximi quique conveniant Episcopus deligatur plebe praesente quae singulorum vitam plenissimè novit uniuscujusque actum de ejus conversatione prospexit That is It is to be observed and kept as a divine and Apostolical Institution which is also held by us and almost in all Provinces That for the right Ordination of a Minister the Bishops of that Province do assemble unto that people unto whom the Bishop or Minister is to be ordained and that the Bishop or Minister be ordained in the presence of the people who do know perfectly the life of every one and perceiveth their actions by conversing with them But by this testimony it appeareth That the Interest of the People was a liberty from their knowledge of the life of the person to accept or refuse but that the Election was not wholly by them but the Bishops or Ministry were to regulate the Election which he expresseth in the Epistle before also Nemo adversum sacerdotum collegium quicquam moneret Epist. 3. l. 1. nemo post divinum judicium post populi suffragium post coepiscoporum consensum judicem se non jam Episcopi sed Dei faceret No man saith he would if the Brotherhood did obey their Ordinary according to the Institution of Christ move any thing to wit against the Bishop after the Judgement of the Colledge of Ministers after the divine Approbation after the suffrages of the People and after the consent of the other Bishops c. But that the People should have the power of Election of Ministers Instit l. 4. cap. 4. s 12. Calvin cites against it and approves the Councel of Laodicea Can. 13. Est equidem illud fateor optima ratione sancitum in Laodicensi concilio ne turbis electio permittatur Vix enim unquam evenit ut tot capita uno sensu rem aliquam bene componat ut ferè illud verum est Incertum scindi studia in contraria vulgus primum soli clerici eligebant quem elegerant offerebant magistratui tum ad multitudinem res deferebatur Aut si à multitudine incipiebatur tantum id fiebat ut sciretur quem potissimum expeteret Auditis popularium vota clerici demum eligebant Hunc ordinem ponit Leo Epist 87. expectanda sunt vota Civium testimonia populorum honoratorum arbitrium electio clericorum That is That truly I confess is with very good reason decreed by the Councel of Laodicea Can. 13. Popular Elections not allowed That the Election of Ministers should not be permitted to the People For it hardly at any time comes to pass that so many heads do with one consent compose any business well and that is commonly true which the Poet saith ' The common people being weak 'To several Factions quickly break First therefore the Ministers chose then they offered him to the Magistrate afterward the matter was brought to the people or if the business began with the people it was onely that they might know whom especially they desired which when they understood then the Clergy did choose Thus Calvin Beza also De Minister Grad cap. 23. Quod tota multitudo simul fuit convocata suffragium tulit nec essentiale nec perpetuum fuit i. e. That the People were called and gave their voyce was neither of the essence of the Call nor perpetual And with us Book of Canons Can. 31. the Ordination of Ministers is appointed at four times of the year at which time Prayer and Fasting is enjoyned any that will are permitted to be present See the Book of Ordination proclamation made unto them to except against the persons to be ordained And no Bishop permitted to ordain any not of his Diocess without Letters testimonial Canon 34 35. under pain of suspension But if in this there may be any defect or have been abuse yet we are to consider that of the Church of England saying That in the Primitive Church in the beginning of Lent The Commination at the end of the Liturgy and at the beginning notorious sinners were put to open penance and punished in this world in stead whereof until the said Discipline be restored which thing is much to be wished it is thought good c. may perhaps imply that it would if it might without greater peril reform some other things also among which this of the somewhat more particular approbation or acceptation of the people if it should be found
appellavero But his Letters are extant and to my best remembrance I have heard my Lord Abbot Archbishop of Canterbury say That he had the autographa and Originals in his hands of Beza's Letters wherein he doth pray God to continue Bishops to the Church of England But as I said Note Per te datum est Anglis purae ac sincerae Evangel doctr integra professio ad quam si ecclesiasticae disciplin instauration adjunxeris c. his Epistles are printed I end with that Prayer and Testimony of his in his last Writings wherein without any complaint for want of Discipline as he had done in his former Epistle dedicatory to her of 1564. or about the Government he thus closeth his Dedication of his fifth Edition of his Notes on the New Testament 1598. to the Queen R. tua M. novit si qua est sub coelo extera Civitas Ecclesia quae de R. tuae M. tot populorum tam faeliciter sub ipsius imperio degentium salute incolumitate tum apud se laetetur tum ab omnium bonorum autore soriis perpetuisque precibus petat ut hoc perpetuum esse bonum velit eam esse Genevam That is That your Majesty may know that if there be any Forreign City or Church under Heaven that both in respect of your Majesties safety and welfare and in regard of so many People that so happily live under your Government doth both rejoyce in themselves and also request with serious and incessant prayers from the Author of all good that this may continue for ever it is Geneva If he had not and the Church of Geneva for he speaks in its name been satisfied with our Doctrine Worship Assemblies Discipline and Government at least in the main he could not have so spoken I have done with this Author His Successor though not immediate the renowned Diodate Diodate pag. 3. twice and pag. 11. in his Letter to the Assembly at Westminster in his thrice repeated comparative and superlative commendations of the glory of the English Church calling it the very eye and excellency of all the Churches And that it was whilest under Episcopacy for that time he relates unto in that high pitch and state of Holiness and of Glory that it did excel and out-shine all the Churches upon Earth doth sufficiently declare his judgement of that Government which also it seems he dissembled not at the Synod of Dort as appears by the margine of that Letter D. J. B. late Head of Trinity Hall Cambridge See pag. 286. pag. 6. And it hath been told to my self by a person of credit who was often with him at Geneva that he was wholly Episcopal Zanchy hath delivered his judgement touching his allowance of this Government though he lived under the other Zanchy Tom. 8. Observat in confess sua Aphor. 10 11. capitis 25. ex Buceâ—o But first in his Observations on his Confession of Faith he gives an useful Theorem viz. Fides mea inquit nititur cum primis simpliciter verbo Dei deinde non nihil etiam communi totius veteris Ecclesiae consensu si ille cum sacris literis non pugnet My Faith saith he resteth especially and absolutely on the Word of God Two grounds of Faith and then something also upon the common consent of the whole Antient Church if it be not repugnant unto the Word of God Then the Aphorism Credo enim quae à piis patribus in nomine Domini congregatis communi omnium consensu citra ullam sacrarum literarum contradictionem definita recepta fuerunt ea etiam quanquam haud ejusdem cum sacris literis autoritatis à Spiritu sancto esse Quid autem certius quà m illos Ministrorum ordines Episcopos Archiepiscopos Patriarchas communi totius Reipub. Christianae consensu in Ecclesiâ constitutos receptosque fuisse Quis autem ego sim qui quod tota Ecclesia approbavit improbem c. For I beleeve those things which by the godly Fathers being assembled in the Name of the Lord by common consent without any contradiction unto the Holy Scripture have been defined and received that those things also although they are not of the same Authority with the Word of God yet Useful and lawful decrees of of the Church from the Holy Ghost that they are from the H. GHOST Now what is more certain than that those orders of Bishops Archbishops Patriarchs which hee had mentioned in his confession chap. 25. Aphorism 10 11. of the Ministry have been instituted and retained with the consent of the whole Christian Church Now who am I that I should condemn what the whole Church approveth Thus hee Which is the more to be noted because these Observations of his were written after his confession and for declaration of it Then having at large recited Bucers judgement touching the same things Hee concludes Quid quod in Ecclesiis etiam protestantium non desunt reipsa Episcopi Archiepiscopi Superintendents Episcopi sunt Archiep. mutatis bonis Graecis nominibus in mala latina Vocant Superintendentes Generales Superintendentes Sed ubi etiam neque illa vetera bona Graeca neque haec nova malè latina nomina obtinent ibi tamen solent esse aliquot primarii penes quos fere tota est autoritas Verum ubi de rebus convenit quid de nominibus altercamur What saith he For even in the Protestant Churches Superintendents are Bishops and Archbishops there do not want Bishops and Archbishops in deed and really but they have changed the good Greek Names into ill Latine ones they call them Superintendents and General Superintendents And where neither the one nor the other name is used yet there are some chief men in whose power almost all the Authority does rest Now seeing wee agree in the thing why do wee contend about Names Thus far Zanchy But as it was said of Caesar his battel with Pompey in his speech unto the souldiers hee used this expression Miles fieri faciam parce Civibus altero ad victoriam altero ad gratiam Souldier said hee strike the face spare the Citizen The one expression saith the Historian was for victory the other for reputation So our Author having said enough to secure the cause for Episcopacy yet concludes Non possum nostrorum zelum non amare qui ideo illa nomina oderunt quia mutuunt ne cum nominibus vetus etiam ambitio tyrannis cum ruina Ecclesiarum revocetur Yet I could not saith hee but love the zeal though hee had proved the thing against them of our men who did therefore hate those names because they feared that with the names the former ambition and tyranny to the ruine of the Church would return also But himself did not hate those names for hee dedicates the first part of that his famous work de Tribus Elohim unto the Dr. Grindall Archbishop then of York
hoped every good man had his Retractations either actual or intentional that died in true Faith and Repentance howsoever all had not time to write their Retractations as St. Austin did This for Retractations III. An Evidence further of the sincerity of my own For the Truth of my Return unto the Church take part of a Letter written to a dying friend and neer relation Octob. 8. 60. Immediately after my recovery from my dangerous sickness above mentioned the rather because the matter may do good to some others also the words were these viz. The next thing I would remember you of is that you have according to the course of this world lived in Schism and separation from the Church your Minister and the Ordinances of God in the place where you live and particularly from the holy Communion Remember what the Holy Ghost saith 1 Cor. 11.30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you and many are dead If the prophanation then the total neglect of the Sacrament which argues a contempt of it is often punished in this manner Apply this and see the Exhortations before the Lords Supper in the Common-Prayer-Book where you shall see more of the danger of the neglect of this Ordinance Neither is Schism and withdrawing our selves from the Church in the place wherein wee live and the Ministry and Ordinances there a small sin For it is a rending and defiling and destroying of that particular body of Christ and Church of God Now the punishment is If any man defile or destroy so it is in the Margin of your Bible the Temple of God him will God destroy 1 Corinth 3.17 God is destroying of you in the midst of your years and this is your sin Your Example makes other stones of the spiritual building as one peece in a house falling makes way for another fall off too If all should do so God should have no Church no Ministry no Worship in that place Your Father did not so but waited humbly on God in his Ordinances and made use of such Ministry as God sent though sometimes mean and none of the best and encouraged them What is it then First ask the Lord earnest pardon Next go and bee reconciled to your * Mr. P. of St. 〈◊〉 A man fully conformable tâ— the Church of England Minister let proud men count never so meanly of him Crave his prayers attend upon his Ministry joyn with him in Publick Worship bee admitted to the Lords Table and go not out of the world as a Heathen of no Church and with no Sacraments If you will think on the premises though your condition should bee as the giving up of the Ghost as Job speaks yet God ordinarily works extraordinary things in such cases ' He brings down to the grave and raises up again 1 Sam. 2. Hee kills and makes alive Hee giveth forth the sentence of death and afterwards quickens again 2 Cor. 1. But so that we acknowledge that wee have sinned Job 33. observe that place and read Psal 107. Howsoever you will depart in peace namely in the Communion of Christ his Church and Ordinances and so with them be gathered into the bosome of Abraham there to expect the second appearance of the Great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ If you neglect these things my soul shall mourn in secret for you yet with this comfort that I have in part discharged it But let mee hope better things of you and such as do accompany salvation Consider what hath been said and the Lord give you understanding in all * This Letteâ— to have them 〈◊〉 been sent is 〈◊〉 known to seâ—ral persons iâ— Cambr. whoâ— have seen tâ— Original whâ— also I have 〈◊〉 covered Act. 24. things c. Thus far the Letter And now to put a final period to this large discourse in a word I beseech all men to be perswaded first That I do with the Blessed Apostle beleeve all things that are written in the Law and the Prophets in the Evangelists and Apostles next that I have hope towards God that there shall be a Resurrection both of the Just and the Unjust And lastly that hereupon I exercise my self to have a Conscience void of offence toward God and towards man alwaies with which Petition and Profession I cease and shut up all Sept. 13 Ann. Dom. 1661. Regni Carol. secundi Magn. Britann Franc. Hibern Regis sereniss 13. sed inaudito Dei Consilio Restituti cum eo Ecclesiae secundo * Aâ—t M. 5 Adulationâ— epto iâ— Maii 29. 〈◊〉 mihi nataliâ— per lavacrâ— generationâ— NOVAE 〈◊〉 excurrit Quod utrique secundissimè faustissimeque in perpetuum cedat Votum ex animo quotidian JOHANNIS ELLIS FINIS