Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	kingdom_n	lord_n	say_a	10,825	5	7.8851	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A25460	Fides Catholica, or, The doctrine of the Catholick Church in eighteen grand ordinances referring to the Word, sacraments and prayer, in purity, number and nature, catholically maintained, and publickly taught against hereticks of all sorts : with the solutions of many proper and profitable questions sutable to to [sic] the nature of each ordinance treated of / by Wil. Annand ...	Annand, William, 1633-1689.	1661 (1661)	Wing A3218; ESTC R36639	391,570	601

of Church did the Apostle Paul write most of his Epistles to the Romans to the Corinthians to the Galathians and as in the text to the Thessalonians that is to the company of believers that lived in and about those Cities and Countries called to be Saints 1. Cor. 1.2 This National Church as the case now stands with us and for the better understanding of some things hereafter to be handled must be divided into the Romish Church and Reformed First The Romish Church by this we understand all those Christians that hold the new invented Doctrine of the Church of Rome that believe as that Church believes and in all points conform thereunto either in point of practice or in point of doctrine Secondly The reformed Church by this we understand those believers whether Nationall or Provinciall that have forsaken the Church of Rome so far as she hath forsaken the truth of the Gospel and cleave to the Ancient Doctrin taught in the Catholick Church whether by the Lord or by his Apostles or by Ministers sent from them whether taught at Jerusalem Antioch Athens or at Rome it selfe disowning the Doctrine of Purgatory praying for the dead worshiping of Saints or what ever as is contrary to true Doctrine such are the reformed Churches of France Helvetia Basil Bohemia Belgie Auspurge Wittemburge Saxony Scotland or England whose Doctrine in these and such other points opposing Rome as may be seen in their publick confessions Now know that all these together are but one and the same Church diversly considered for as the great Se● which is but one sends out her Branches and Rivers which receive names according to the Countries they pass through and become as it were distinst Seas as the British Sea the Germane Sea the Atlantick Sea Even so the Church sending her Doctrine through the Kingdome and Nations of the Earth receives a denomination from the place where she is received and from them whom she washes with water in the name of the Lord and so of old were the Churches of the Corinthians or Thessalonians and so now the Churches of France or England which yet made not severall Churches for as there is but one head one Lord one Faith one Baptisme one Bridegroom one God and one way to ●eaven so there can be but one Church but severall considerations of that one Church which we believe to be holy and Catholick and is the whole society and company of Believees Elected and appointed c. And now we have seen her whom the Lord loves This is the Spouse of Christ only and besides her we know no other this is she whom Men and Devils Hereticks and Infidels for the present labour to destroy and alwayes did desire to root out but all in vain Mathew 16.18 This is she whom Iohn saw as a Bride come down from Heaven adorned for her Husband Revelations 21.2 who is jealous over her and rejoyceth over her as a Bridegroome rejoyceth over his Bride Isa 62.5 He rejoyceth over her with singing Zepha 3.17 This is the body of Christ Ephesians 1.8 which from Christ as from the Head receiveth Life and Spirit by his Spirit she is governed in all things and of whom also she receiveth increase that she growes up Ephe. 4.16 This is she that for her justification by faith in Christ and her mystical union with him is in name and nature a Queen Christs Spouse for her Nobility the new Jerusalem the Brother Sister and Mother of our Lord the first born of God for her illumination perfection defence of Evangelical truth is called the light of the world a Golden Candlestick a Pillar of truth and for her Sanctification of life a peculiar People a vessel of Honour a Garden inclosed the Temple of the holy Ghost Sancta Dei Ecclesia est mater virgo Spousa This is she who from her fruitfulnesse in bringing forth many Children unto God is called a Mother and that is by keeping her Ch●stity pure from the embracements of the world and Sathan is known and esteemed a Virgin and from those engagements that she hath given to the Lord of constant fidelity to him she is honoured as the Lambs wife This is the Vineyard of the Lord which he hath planted in this world warred with his Blood fenced it about with holy Angels builded the winepress of his passion in the midst of her and is dayly gathering out the stones that do offend her This is she whose property it is to vanquish when she is hurt to understand when she is reproved to be in safety when she is forsaken to obtain victory when she is almost over-thrown to be strongest when she is weakest to grow highest when she is most crushed to be most glorious when she is most reproached to be honourably acquitted when she is scornfully condemned to be crowned when she is dishonoured to be rich when she is impoverished to be illustrous when she is despised then she is ne●rest life when death is nearest to her He that is a member of this Church ought not to be calle● a Lutheran nor a Calvinist nor a Protestant no more then to be called a Petrir or a Paulis or a Nicean for following the doctrin of Paul or Peter or for adhearing to the positions of the Councels of Nice or Paphnutians for approving the opposition of Paphnutius in reference to the coelibat life motioned in that Councell since it is the doctrine of no private Person he believes in but of that that hath taught by the Spirit of God to the Saints in all ages therefore he is to be called a Catholick laying the ground of his Salvation on the foundation already and long agoe laid by the Prophets Apostles or Evangelists the opinion and invention of men being no part of his Religion or Articles of his Creed It is true the members of the Church of Rome subscribe themselves Catholicks but falsely many points of the Doctrin of that Church which they have made necessary to Salvation were not known by the Fathers and Teachers of the old Churches Unknown to the Apostles and to their Successors for severall ages when the fire of Purgatory first kindled We know and what Spirit or whose Breath first blew as it hath been demonstrated by Catholick Champions of this Nation and other reformed Churches Their own Histories discover that it hath neither the Spirit nor the word of God for its entry but the Bishop of Romes pollicy the peoples simplicity the Emperours inadvertency and Phochas's treachery for unto these causes may we reduce his Holinesses Supromacy and infallibility the foundation and Basis of all their other errors the Doctrin of Purgatory of Pardons of Auricular confession of Venial sin of Merit of Transubstantiation of Adoration of Saints Communicating under one kind of private Masse of the Pax of the Agnus Dei of Hostly or Ghostly processions we know to be but yesterday so that whosoever takes hold of this Doctrin deserves

hath designed and caused to be delivered to the Church which is his Kingdom to take no notice of those railing accusations which they bring against and cast upon such as are Officers by Apostolical Authority which in the end of their days may heighten their punishment as it doth now their rebellion From all that hath been said we conclude these to be no Churches as they are now constituted for they have now no Gospel Priests Ministers or Teachers no Ministers because no Apostolicall succession bring the line downward from the Apostles and these men as they are now constituted are not to be found they have no succession because no Ordination and no Ordination because not Apostolical and not Apostolical because it is not come to them from the Apostles who were the first Ordained Gospel Ministers and immediately qualified and impowered for the work and bringing in of many to the Gospel and from their hands did the same power issue into others that as every age came up after another so there be those fitted to teach it unto all generations and so the Apostolical succession now the Church is constituted must ought and shal continue to the end of the World whatever Opposition men or Devils Hereticks and Persecutors the two beasts that Sathan useth to destroy the Church canmake against or what ever weapon they can form against it or whatever rayling accusation they can bring against it or whatever contumelious and reproaching specches they can cast upon it Reader It is not to be passed over in silence that Peters sitting in Rome as Bishop thereof nay of his being at Rome at all is doubted by some though famous Historians and antient Fathers that lived near and under these times do in their Histories and Writings affirm it yet Calvin that was almost of that judgement is brought to acknowledge that he dyed there Quia tamen plerique Scriptores in eo consentiunt ne pugnemus quin ibi moriuns sit Only how long he was there is uncertain the Church of Rome say 25 year but that is most improbable The Reasons that they bring against it are not so strong as to cause a man to call in Question ancient History his Apostleship no more hindering him at Rome then it did in Antio●h those of the Circumcision being scattered from their Country And when it is affirmed he was Bishop it is not to be understood that he always resided and constantly abode in Rome perfection and Apostleship might keep him from that which might be the ground of Pauls not mentioning him in Scripture in regard also of Peters being with the Lord in the body and of his seeing of the Lords glory in the holy Mount might he by the Church at Rom● who were beloved of God Rom. 1.7 be chosen to be Bishop possibly not by any formal instalment that is the chief Teacher or Ruler of that Society nothing reflecting to disparage Paul he being also frequent in journies However Eluselius that lived An. 180 writes in his Church-History that Peter and Paul in their going abroad to preach the Gospel to other Nations appointed Linus to Rule the Church of Rome they not tying themselves to any one people since the whole World was their Diocesse After whom succeeded Clesus and then Clemens as before onely with this difference that Eusebius make Anacletus the same with Cletus which other Authors make two different persons making Cletus to Rule 12. year An. Chr. 81. and Anacletus to Rule 9. year An. 103. according to Alsteads Chronology which as is above was followed the Reason of this disagreement might be the identity of their names possibly the distinction of first and second either through persecution or through inobservance of Authors being not observed or not thought necessary This Linus that the Historian records to have been made Bishop of that Church by Peter Paul during their being abroad may nor unlikely be supposed to be that Linus who is mentioned by Paul 2 Tim. 4. ult during his second and closer Imprisonment at Rome immediately before his death Most of them that question these Histories of Peters being Bishop of Rome by which we understand the supream Teacher and Governour of that Church are fearful that should it be granted they might gratifie the Pope too much then it would appear that he was Peters successor which to grant advantages him no more then it would do Demas that ever he followed Paul when he Apostatized from him or that it should be an honour to Ierusalem that Iames the Apostle was Bishop there which is granted nay that Christ who was chief Bishop ever lived there it is known that the Antichrist shall sit in the Temple of God 2 Thes. 2.4 Then it may be in Peters chair he hath therefore little reason to brag of either since his destruction is certainly to come from thence It is to be imagined that before this time the ignorant will wonder the Phanaticks smile the Schisinatickslaugh to hear so much spoken of Rome let all know that the Faith and Grace of the Church of Rome was spoken of throughout the whole World Rom. 1.7 8. It was a holy and pure Church as Ierusalem once was And Ordination being an Ordinance of God is no more to be contemned for it's coming from Rome to Canterbury then it is to be contemned for it's coming from Ierusalem to Rome though that was the slaughterho●se of the Prophets yet Ordination is no bloody Ordinaence though Rome now be the Whore drunk with the blood of the Saints yet Ordination is none of her Bastards Rome was pure from Idolatry from Linus to Silvester the first that was until the year 300. It was somewhat defiled from Silvester the 1. unti Eonis face the third that was until the year 606. It was Antichrist from Boniface the third until Alexander the seventh who is this present year B●shop of Rome 1660. We might show that before Rome was Antichrist Gregory the great sent Austin over into England but it needs not Ordination being none of Romes brats when she is at worst nor none of her bringing forth when she was at best From Christ it came first from Ierusalem that spread over all the World through Rome it came to England he therefore that despiseth this despiseth an Ordinance of Christ come whence it pleaseth for he enjoyned it and in no Ordinance of God ought we to separate from the Church of Rome neither do we but hold as we ought Communion with her The bright Orient Pearl and Jewel of the Church of England in his Apology for the separation of the said Church from Rome declares as touching that we have now done to depart from that Church whose errours were proved and made manifest to the world which Church hath already evidently departed from Gods Word and yet to depart not so much from it as the Errours thereof c. 2. The segregated Congegations in England are not

their superiours their wisdom in such things consisting in yielding surable obedience yet because this Law is spoken against by some it is not amiss for others to speak for it witnesses or Godfathers may be approved 1. From their unspotted Antiquity the Iews used them at their Circumcision and held the child to be cut in their arms we read of witnesses at the naming of the Prophets Son Mahershalalhash-baz Isa. 8.2 whence learned men have concluded ●the rise of Godfathers And since that have they continued in the Church without check from the best of men 2. From the occasion of their further settlement The primitive Christians seeing themselves in Jeopardy every hour of pain death and torture had other witnesses and Trustees besides the Parent who undertook the education of the child in the true religion in case the death of the Parent or otherwise new how soon the like case may befall this age none can predict especially when they know there was ●o great tract of time between King Edward the sixth of gloriou● memory and Queen Mary in such cases Godfathers may be as necessary in England as they were in the Primitive persecution which is one ground of the Law 3. From that love Unity and Concord that by this practice may be preserved among neighbours and believers It is experimentally known that it hath been a quench-fire oftentimes amongst hot spirits may the very n●me of a Godfather hath a power in it to work obedience in another and create peace 4. From that harmless profit that hath accrewed to many by that this is so well known that it needs no inlargement a Godfathers or a Godmothers gift is an ordinarly memorial If it be here said that the charge is great that is undertaken by the witnesses c. It must be known that the Parent is not at all disobliged from his duty the witnesses being but asistants to him The particulars of the Churches charge are these 1. To call upon the infant to hear Sermons as soon as capable of admonition 2. To learn the Creed the Lords prayers and the Commandements 3. With all other things which a Christian ought to know for his souls health for his vertuous bringing up so that when he is brought up in these things the witnesses have done their duty and are absolutely discharged either at confirmation of which by and by or at furthest at the day of marriage It is true it seems to be usually objected that even children were admitted to be witnesses for children but let not the Church of England be blamed for that abuse for she hath appointed that No Person be admitted Godfather or Godmother to any childe as Christening or Confirmation before the said Person so undertaking hath received the Holy Communion Quest. 5. Whether the Cross at baptisme accordin● to the Law of the Church of England be to be aproved Touching the lawful use of the Cross in baptisme we shall speak no other then what the Church of England hath her self spoken concerning this harmless Ceremony in her Canons Ecclesiastical where after a Preface touching the Princely care of King Iames of blessed memory to reco●cile differences by condiscending to remove some things that gave offence which in history we know to be true and in the Canon seems to be implied commends to all her true Members these directions and observations following First It is to be observed that although the Jews and Ethnicks derided both the Apostles and the rest of the Christians for preaching and believing in him who was Crucified upon the Cross Yet all both Apostles and Christitians were so far from being discouraged from their profession by the ignominy of the Cross as they rather rejoyced and triumphed in it yeathe Holy Ghost did by the mouths of the Apostles honour the name of the Cross being hateful to the Jews so far that under it he comprehended not onely Christ Crucified but the force effects and merits of his death and passion with all the comforts fruits and promises which we receive or expect thereby Secondly The honour and dignity of the name of the Cross begat a reverend estimation even in the Apostles times for ●ought that is known to the contrary of the sign of the Cross Which the Christians shortly after used in all their actions thereby making an outward shew and profession even to the astonishment of the Jews that they were not ashamed to acknowlege him for their Lord and Saviour who dyed for them upon the Cross. And this sign they not onely use themselves with a kind of glory when they met with any Jews but signed therewith their children when they were Christened to dedicate them by that badge to his service whose benefits bestowed upon them in baptisme the name of the Cross did represent And this use of the sign of the Cross in baptime was held in the Primitive Church as well by the Greeks as the Latines with one content and great applause At what time if any had opposed themselves against it they would certainly have been censured as enemies of the Cross and consequently of Chrsts merits the sign whereof they could no better endure this continual and general use of the Cross is evident by many testimonies of the ancient Fathers Thirdly It must be confessed that in process of time the sign of the Cross was greatly abused in the Church of Rome especially after that corruption had once possessed it But the abuse of a thing takes not away the lawful use of it Nay so far was it from the purpose of the Church of England to forsake the Churches of Italy France Spain Germany or any such like Churches in all things which they held and preached that as the Apology of the Church of England con●esseth i● doth with reverence retain those Ceremonies which do neith●● damage the Church of God nor offend the minds of sobermen And onely departed from them in these particular points wherein they were fallen both from themselves in their ancient integrity and from the Apostolical Churches which were their first founders In which respect amongst some other very ancient Ceremonies the sign of the Crosse in baptisme hath been re●ained in this Church both by the judgement and practice of those reverend Fathers and great divines in the days of King Edward the sixth of whom some constantly suffered for the profession of the ●ruch and others being exiled in the time of Queen Mary did ●free their return in the beginning of the reign of our late dread Sover●ign continually defend and use same c. 3. Because ind●ed the use of this sign in baptisme was ever accompanied here with such sufficient cautions and exceptions against all Popish superstition and erro●s as in the like cases are either fit or convenient The Church of England since the abolishing of Popery hath ever held and taught and so doth hold and teach that the sign of the Cross used in baptisme is no

to leave every thing done and taught in the Churches of France Spaine or Italy for so they should have denyed the Lord that bought them but the errors or false worship of those Churches It is a cause of laughter to read what use men make of that letter the Pope sent Queen Elizabeth of glorious memory promiseing to ratifie the Common-prayer if she would restore his Supremacy It is as clear as the Sun that the Pope and the Guisel will both of them according to the Proverb play a smal game before they stand out It was lately their main study how to reconcile themselves to the independent who had got the start of them and they have now studyed a new art how to reconcile themselves to the Lord Bishop he being now a corner stone in the Church of England if the Pope use the same policy of all men under heaven they have least cause to declare it since they will truckle with Quaker Ranter they whole brood of bastardly Hereticks to procure unto themselves a supremacy It is worthy of observation that by this the Pope could not pick a quarrel even with the Common-prayer all things therein being so lawfull that he had not impudence to speake against and so exactly composed that he would have established it by Papal Authority without diminution or augmentation And yet it gives no strength at all unto his Kingdom that having these three pillars 1. Infallibility 2. Supremacy 3. Purgatory All which the Common-prayer disowns and renounceth yet the Pope will licence it as he doth English bibles that is because he must he will play at a sm●l ga●e because he hath hopes to win the set he proffered to ratifie Common-prayer not for love to it but to get his hand into the Kingdom of England knowing or at least ho●ing he might get in his arme and by degrees his whole body for the same reason the Guisel truckeled formerly under the Independent and lately with the Anabaptist and now would hold the stirrop to his spi●itual lordship not for love of either but to keep self in credit with the world being concious to himself that from him came all the evils that have befallen either Church or state in the by-past years and least with Cain he should become a vagabond is desireous of any that will befriend him 2. It s giving offence to tender consciences This is a high note and often heard but 1. Who discovered or layd the ground of that offence 2. How easily might that offence be removed if in popular Sermons the innocency and purity of that book were preached the people have for 16 years heard much against it and now they hear nothing at least from you for it no wonder therefore if they be not affected with it We say affected for it seemes to be but a prejudice against that book not conscience that maketh them to oppose the same that being guided by Sripture and reason not spleen and passion When we behold that service rayled at scorned shunned contemned condemned and the users of it scandaled and yet not one sentence word or petition proved unlawfull or not according to scripture we have ground to conjecture that it is stomack not religion maketh them to do so and the over-flowings of their gall not tendernesse of their consciences that makes them to flee out into such depraveing and abusive language They would appear so holy that it is dangerous to offend them or lay a stone of stumbling before them Yet what greater offence can be given then to abuse a national or personall Church by defaming the prayers therein established or by the other made when in the meane time in all their findings one sentence unlawfull in these prayers they cannot find were they as tender as they would seeme to be we should have more argueing lesse rayling The greatest number of them that pretend to receive offence are of that disposition that they desire not to be informed touching those set formes whether by discourse preaching or reading and the other part can produce no unseemly thing in them and yet they being established by good laws and Just authority give still occasion to conjecture that not conscience but wilfulnesse and obstinacy is the mother of their non-conformity There is a God above who often brings mens wicked devices upon their own pate It was pi●y to see commissioners apointed in every county and ministers as their assistants turning cut ministers from their places to the ruine of their familees for not subscribing to the directory or for reading Common-prayer when they were bound by oath law and allegiance to the same and now men that are enjoyned or desireed to read Common-prayer pretend conscience and cry out they are offended and the same persons complain of persecution when the true owners are restored but c. The Reader can bear us witnesse that we have not mentioned that act of Popish Queen Mary who at her first coming to the Crown seeking to Erect popery in England repealed all acts made in the favour of the Common-prayer and altogether abolished it to facilitate that work Nor of the Practise of those Recusants who being under the penalty of a fine if they came not to the publick Churches of this nation in the days of Queen Elizabeth would commonly refraine themselves from hearing Common-prayer and not enter Church being in this Puritanicall untill the preacher was in the pulpit which are arguments of no smal weight to defend that the Common-prayer is not popishly affected the Papists themselves being witnesses To conclude this question seeing that some men do not grow strong and well favoured through holynesse knowledge and sobriety by other ordinances of the Church Common-prayer which they scornfully call po●age is fittest for their weak stomacks and sickly constitutions while those that are strong and of good digestion may receive the more meat and grow in grace and knowledge by their eating that is by a holy using the set formes of the Church together with other dutys Quest. 4. Whether there be not vaine repetitions in those formes This is a grand argument brought by many justifying their non conformity to the Churches liturgy and most heard from those men whose publick prayers were for the most part carried on by empty or at least by many repititons To be brief we must distinguish of repetitions there is a bare repetition and there is a vain repetition 1. Bare repetitions if repetitions of themselves were unlawfull lawfull to be used in prayer that is to repeate or bring over again and again the same thing before asked then many of the Saints of God must be blamed and the son of God must not be Justified who in one prayer repeated the same petition thrice over Mat. 26.44 It is a desireable faculty to vary in prayer yet every one cannot do it and they that can will repeate somtimes 1. Through pinching necessity this made Christ cry earnestly in