perceive by this Commission that hath been read that we are authorized by the King's Majesty to hear and determine all Treasons Felonies and other Offences within this County But because this Commission is upon a special occasion the Execrable Murther of the blessed King that is now a Saint in Heaven King Charls the first we shall not trouble you with the Heads of a long Charge The ground of this Commission was and is from the Act of Oblivion and Indempnity You shall find in that Act there is an Exception of several persons who for their Execrable Treasons in sentencing to Death and signing the Warrant for the taking away the Life of our said Sovereign are left to be proceeded against as Traytors according to the Laws of England and are out of that Act wholly excepted and fore-prized Gentlemen You see these Persons are to be proceeded with according to the Laws of the Land and I shall speak nothing to you but what are the words of the Laws By the Statute of the twenty fifth of Edward the third a Statute or Declaration of Treason it is made High-Treason to compass and imagine the Death of the King It was the ancient Laws of the Nation In no Case else Imagination or Compassing without an Actual Effect of it was punishable by our Law Nihil officit Conatus nisi sequatur Effectus that was the old Rule of Law But in the case of the King His Life was so pretious that the Intent was Treason by the Common Law and Declared Treason by this Statute The reason of it is this In the case of the Death of the King the Head of the Commonwealth that 's cut off and what a Trunk an inanimate Lump the Body is when the Head is gone you all know For the Life of a single man there 's the Life of the Offendor there 's some Recompence Life for Life But for the Death of the King what Recompence can be made This Compassing and Imagining the cutting off the Head of the King is known by some Overt-Act Treason it is in the wicked Imagination though not Treason Apparent but when this Poison swells out of the Heart and breaks forth into Action in that case it 's High-Treason Then what is an Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death Truly it is any thing which shews what the Imagination is Words in many cases are Evidences of this Imagination they are Evidences of the Heart Secondly As Words so if a man if two men do conspire to Levy War against the King and by the way what I say of the King is as well of the King dead as living for if a Treason be committed in the Life of one King it is a Treason and punishable in the Time of the Successor Then I say in case not only of Words but if they conspire to Levy War against the King there 's another Branch of this Statute the Levying of War is Treason But if men shall go and consult together and this is to kill the King to put Him to Death this Consultation is clearly an Overt-Act to prove this Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death But what will you say then if men do not only go about to conspire and consult but take upon them to Judge Condemn nay put to Death the King Certainly this is so much beyond the Imagination and Compassing as 't is not only laying the Cockatrice's Egg but brooding upon it till it hath brought forth a Serpent I must deliver to you for plain and true Law That no Authority no single person no community of persons not the people Collectively or Representatively have any coercive power over the King of England And I do not speak mine own Sence but the words of the Laws unto you It was the Treason of the Spencers in King Edward the Second's Time in Calvin's case second Report The Spencers had an opinion that all Homage and Allegiance was due to the King by reason of the Crown as they called it And thereupon say the Books and Records they drew out this execrable Inference among others That if the King did not demean himself according to Right because he could not be reformed by Law he might per aspertee that is by sharp Imprisonment but this was adjudged horrid Treason by two Acts of Parliament Gentlemen Let me tell you what our Law-books say for there 's the Ground out of which and the Statutes together we must draw all our Conclusions for matter of Government How do they Stile the King They call Him The Lieutenant of God and many other expressions in the Book of Primo Henrici Septimi Says that Book there The King is immediate from God and hath no Superior The Statutes say That the Crown of England is immediately subject to God and to no other Power The King says our Books He is not only Caput Populi the Head of the People but Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Commonwealth The three Estates And truly thus our Statutes speak very fully Common Experience tells you when we speak of the King and so the Statutes of Edward the Third we call the King Our Sovereign Lord the King Sovereign that is Supreme And when the Lords and Commons in Parliament apply themselves to the King they use this Expression Your Lords and Commons your faithful Subjects humbly beseech I do not speak any Words of my own but the Words of the Laws Look upon the Statute primo Jacobi there 's a Recognition that the Crown of England was lawfully descended on the King and His Progeny The Statute it self was read to which it is desired the Reader will be referred These are the Words of the Act. And this is not the first precedent for you shall find it primo Eli. cap. 3. They do acknowledge the Imperial Crown lawfully descended on the Queen the same Recognition with this Before that because we shall shew you we go upon Grounds of Law in what we say Stat. 24. Hen. 8. cap. 12. Whereas by sundry old authentick Histories and Chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the world governed by one Supreme Head and King having the Dignity and Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of the same c. 25 Hen. 8. c. 21. there it is the people speaking of themselves That they do recognize no Superiour under God but only the King's Grace Gentlemen You see if the King be immediate under God he derives his Authority from no body else if the King have an Imperial Power if the King be Head of the Commonwealth Head of the body Politick if the body Politick own him obedience truly I think it is an undenied consequence He must needs be Superiour over them Gentlemen This is no new thing to talk of an Emperour or an Imperial Crown Do not mistake me all this while It is one thing to have an Imperial Crown and another
Terrours of that Presence of God that was with his Servants in those days However it seemeth good to him to suffer this Turn to come on us and are Witnesses that the things were not done in a Corner I have desired as in the sight of him that searcheth all hearts whilest this hath been done to wait and receive from him Convictions upon my own Conscience though I have sought it with Tears many a time and Prayers over and over to that God to whom you and all Nations are less than a Drop of water of the Bucket and to this moment I have received rather Assurance of it and that the things that have been done as astonishing on one hand I do believe e're it be long it will be made known from Heaven There was more from God than men are aware of I do profess that I would not offer of my self the least Injury to the poorest Man or Woman that goes upon the Earth That I have humbly to offer is this to your Lordships You know what a Contest hath been in these Nations for many years Divers of those that sit upon the Bench were formerly as Active Court Pray Mr. Harrison do not thus Reflect on the Court This is not to the Business Mr. Harrison I followed not my own Judgment I did what I did as out of Conscience to the Lord. For when I found those that were as the Apple of mine Eye to turn aside I did loath them and suffered Imprisonment many years Rather then to turn as many did that did put their Hands to this Plough I chose rather to be separated from Wife and Family than to have Compliance with them though it was said Sit at my Right Hand and such kind of Expressions Thus I have given a little poor Testimony that I have not been doing things in a Corner or from my self May be I might be a little mistaken but I did it all according to the best of my understanding desiring to make the Revealed Will of God in his Holy Scriptures as a guide to me I humbly conceive That what was done was done in the name of the Parliament of England that what was done was done by their Power and Authority and I do humbly conceive it is my Duty to offer unto you in the beginning that this Court or any Court below the High Court of Parliament hath no Jurisdiction of their Actions Here are many Learned in the Law and to shorten the Work I desire I may have the help of Councel Learned in the Laws that may in this matter give me a little assistance to offer those Grounds that the Law of the Land doth offer I say what was done was done by the Authority of the Parliament which was then the Supreme Authority and that those that have Acted under them are not to be questioned by any Power less than them And for that I conceive there is much out of the Laws to be shewed to you and many Presidents also in the Case Much is to be offered to you in that according to the Laws of the Nations that was a due Parliament Those Commissions were issued forth and what was done was done by their Power And whereas it hath been said we did Assume and Usurp an Authority I say this was done rather in the Fear of the Lord. Court Away with him Know where you are Sir You are in the Assembly of Christians Will you make God the Author of your Treasons and Murthers Take heed where you are Christians must not hear this We will allow you to say for your own Defence what you can And we have with a great deal of Patience suffered you to sally out wherein you have not gone about so much for Extenuation of your Crimes as to Justifie them to fall upon others and to Blaspheme God and commit a new Treason For your having of Councel This is the reason for allowing of Councel when a man would Plead any thing because he would Plead it in Formality Councel is allowed But you must first say in what the Matter shall be and then you shall have the Court's Answer Lord Finch Though my Lords here have been pleased to give you a great Latitude this must not be suffered that you should run into these damnable Excursions to make God the Author of this damnable Treason Committed Mr. Harrison I have two things to offer to you to say for my Defence in Matter of Law One is That this that hath been done was done by a Parliament of England by the Commons of England assembled in Parliament and that being so whatever was done by their Commands or their Authority is not questionable by your Lordships as being as I humbly conceive a Power Inferiour to that of an High Court of Parliament That 's one A second is this That what therefore any did in obedience to that Power and Authority they are not to be questioned for it otherwise we are in a most miserable Condition bound to obey them that are in Authority and yet to be punished if obeyed We are not to Judg what is lawful or what is unlawful My Lords Upon these two Points I do desire that those that are Learned in the Laws may speak too on my behalf It concerns all my Countreymen There are Cases alike to this you know in King Richard the Second's Time wherein some Question had been of what had been done by a Parliament and what followed upon it I need not urge in it I hope it will seem good to you that Councel may be assigned for it concerns all my Countreymen Councel You are mistaken if you appeal to your Countreymen They will cry you Out and shame you Mr. Harrison May be so my Lords some will but I am sure others will not Mr. Sollicitor Gen. These two Points my Lords are but one and they are a new Treason at the Bar for which he deserves to dy if there were no other Indictment It is the Malice of his heart to the Dignity and Crown of England I say this is not matter for which Councel can be assigned Councel cannot put into Form that which is not Matter Pleadable it self It is so far from being true that this was the Act of the Supreme Parliament of the People of England that there was nothing received with more Heart-bleeding than this Bloody Business But that the World may not be abused by the Insinuations of a man who acts as if he had a Spirit and in truth is possessed I will say That the Lords and Commons are not a Parliament That the King and Lords cannot do any thing without the Commons Nor the King and Commons without the Lords Nor the Lords and Commons without the King especially against the King If they do they must answer it with their Head for the King is not accountable to any Coercive Power And for the Prisoner to Justifie his Act as if it were the Act of the Commons of England
demand that wicked Judgment before the Court pronounced it and he was the man that did against his own Conscience after he had acknowledged that he was a wise and gracious King yet says he That he must dye and Monarchy with him there in truth was the Treason and the cause of that fatal blow that fell upon the King This was his part to carry on how he did it as a wicked Counsellor we shall prove to you and the wages and reward of the Iniquity that he did receive James Nutley Sworn Councel Pray tell the Circumstances of the Prisoners Proceedings at Westminster Hall when he did exhibite a Charge against the King Mr. Nutley My Lords the first day of bringing his Majesty to his Tryal was Saturday Jan. 20. 1648. Before they sate in publick they that were of the Committee of that which they called the High Court of Justice did meet in the Painted Chamber which was in the forenoon of that day Being there I did observe that there was one Price a Scrivener that was writing of a Charge I stood at a great distance and saw him write and I saw this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar near thereabouts where it was writing I think it was at the Court of Wards This charge afterwards a Parchment writing I did see in the hands of this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar. A very little after that they called their names they did adjourn from the Painted Chamber into Westminster Hall the great Hall The Method that they observed the first thing was to call the Commissioners by name in the Act the pretended Act for trying the King was read that is when the Court was sat the Commissioners were called by their names and as I remember they stood up as their names were called The next thing was reading the Act for the trying of his late Majesty After that was read then this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar presented the Parchment Writing which was called the Impeachment or Charge against his Majesty Mr. Bradshaw was then President of that Court and so called Lord President he commanded that the Prisoner should be sent for saying Serjeant Dendy send for your Prisoner thereupon the King was brought up as a Prisoner and put within a Bar And when the Court was silenced and settled this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar did deliver the Charge the Impeachment to the Court and it was read The King was demanded to plead to it presently Here I should first tell you that upon the Kings first coming in there was a kind of a Speech made by Mr. Bradshaw to the King in this manner I â—hink I shall repeat the very words Charles Stuart King of England the Commons of England assembled in Parliament taking notice of the effusion of blood in the Land which is fixed on you as the Author of it and whereof you are guilty have resolved to bring you to a tryal and Judgment and for this cause this Tribunal is erected There was little reverence given to his Majesty then which I was troubled at he added this further That there was a charge to be exhibited against him by the Solicitor General I think this Gentleman was so called at that time and he called to him to exhibit the Charge and this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar did deliver an Impeachment a Parchment writing which was called a Charge against the King at that time which was received and read against him Coun. Did you ever see the Charge which was now shewn to Mr. Nutley Mr. Nut. My Lords I do believe that this is the very Charge I am confident it is the same writing I have often seen him write and by the Character of his hand this is the same Council Go on with your story Mr. Nut. My Lords immediately upon the delivery of this Charge of Impeachment which was delivered in the Kings presence after it was read the King was demanded to give an answer to it His Majesty desired to speak something before he did answer to the pretended Impeachment for so his Majesty was pleased to call it He did use words to this purpose saith he I do wonder for what cause you do convene me here before you he looked about him saith he I see no Lords here where are the Lords upon this Mr. Bradshaw the President for so he was called did interrupt his Majesty and told him Sir saith he you must attend the business of the Court to that purpose you are brought hither and you must give a positive answer to the Charge saith the King you will hear me to speak I have something to say before I answer after much ado he was permitted to go on in the discourse he was in so far as they pleased His Majesty said I was in the Isle of Wight and there I was treated with by divers honourable persons Lords and Commons a treaty of peace between me and my people the treaty was so far proceeded in that it was near a perfection truly saith he I must needs say they treated with me honourably and uprightly and when the business was come almost to an end then saith he was I hurried away from them hither I know not by what Authority now I desire to know by what Authority I was called to this place that is the first question I shall ask you before I answer the charge It was told him by Mr. Bradshaw the President that the Authority that called him hither was a lawful Authority he asked him what Authority it was the second time it was answered him by the President that it was the Authority of the Commons of England assembled in Parliament which he affirmed then to be the Supream Authority of this Nation the King said I do not acknowledge its Authority Authority if taken in the best sense it must be of necessity understood to be lawful therefore I cannot assent to that I am under a Power but not under an Authority and there are many unlawful Powers a Power that is on the high way I think I am under a Power but not under an Authority you cannot judge me by the Laws of the land nor the meanest Subject I wonder you will take the boldness to impeach me your lawful King To this purpose his Majesty was pleased to express himself at that time with more words to that purpose The King went on to further discourse concerning the Jurisdiction of the Court Bradshaw the President was pleased to interrupt him and told him several times that he trifled out the Courts time and they ought not to indure to have their Jurisdiction so much as questioned Court Pray go on Mr. Nutly This Gentleman at the Bar I did hear him demand the Kings answer several times a positive answer was required of the King the K. often desired to be heard and he interrupted him again and again several times and at length it was pray'd that the charge that was exhibited against him
business and to make people gaze upon you without any Ground Axt. I am upon my life I hope you will hear me patiently L. ch Bar. God forbid but we should Axt. I do desire to assert my Authority if any thing was done upon the House of Lords and Commons I do not come here to justifie their Actions I was not concerned in it My next Plea is this that if a House of Commons can be charged Guilty of High Treason as a community the distributive Body must needs be Guilty Court If there should have been 20 or 40 men come out of the House of Commons and should Murther a man they must answer for that it is not the community that can do such an Act of Treason these persons that you call a House of Commons there was but 26 of them and these must be the people this is the state of the case and when you have thrust out thrice the number of those remaining only those can serve your turn L. Annesly Mr. Axtell I am very sorry to see you in that place and it troubles me as much to hear you vent that for an Authority which you know your self was no Authority you would now for your defence for life and it is reason you should make as full a defence for life as you can you would shelter your self under that Authority which I am sorry I must say were one of the greatest Violators of you cannot forget how near a close of this bloody war by the mercy of God this Nation was when the Army interposed whose Trade it was to live by War when they had felt so much of the sweet of War they would not suffer the people to enjoy peace though the Lords and Representatives in Parliament had agreed to it A Treaty was begun terms of peace propounded and agreed to this you cannot forget and will have no need of Notes or Books to help your Memory when the people Groaned under the miseries of War and thirsted after Peace then came up the Army who were servants to the Parliament till that time taking upon them the Authority you cannot forget that your self was one of the number that came to offer accusations against the majority of the Commons House calling them Rotten Members the House of Lords was not then suffered to sit they would not joyn in that Ordinance that was preparing for the Tryal of the King when the Lords had refused they were no longer fit to be Lords neither then comes in a new Authority which we never heard of before a remnant of the House of Commons joyning with the Army that had driven away the greatest part of the House of Commons for in all Assemblies and Courts the major part must determine or no determination after this course was taken then is an Act set on foot they take upon them by Votes of their own to be the Parliament of England that the supreme power of the Nation is in the Representatives of the people who were they those few only that remained almost all the Cities Counties and Burroughs of England had none left to represent them they were driven away by Force then was this Act of Parliament such an Act as was never heard of before set on foot and passed as an Act by a few of the House of Commons if you can plead this for your defence this is the Act that you must shelter under But you know the Lords and Commons had Unanimously resolved for peace and so agree with the King if this Act will be any defence you may plead it to the full and this is all you have to say therefore go upon no Forreign matter Axt. If it please your Lordship that worthy Lord that spoke last is pleased to say that I was one of the persons that did accuse some of those Members of Parliament truly my Lord I never did come to the Commons Bar but once presenting a petition and for my hand either in charging any of the Members or Secluding any of them I never had any hand in that matter this is all to that part Next I Humbly conceive here I must ground my bottome and if I perish I perish by a Judgement in a Parliament My Commission that did Authorize me to obey my General was given me when the Lords and Commons sate in Parliament I had no other Commission then this my Lord Fairfax commanded the Army after the Kings Death by the like Commission I did but my duty in going to my Regiment the General saith go to such a place stay there if I refuse by the law of War I Dye if I obey I am in danger likewise I say my Commission was given me by the Lords and Commons and therefore I hope my Lord that what I have said and offered in that particular is not Truthless but of Weight Court The Effect of your Commission is only to make you an Officer Axtell My Commission bears date the 27th of March 1648. Ten months before the Kings Death we had no other Commissions therefore I humbly conceive the question will be this in point of law and I humbly desire it may be Truly and Fairly stated by your Lordship and these Honourable Jugdes that whether a man being guided by the Judgment of the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament and having declared their Judgments and Exposition of that Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third and Acting only by that Judgment of Parliament and under their Authority can be questioned for Treason That my Lord is a question that I do humbly think is a point in law and that you will please fairly and truly to state it whether I am within the compass of that Statute whereupon I am indicted Councel My Lord We do not charge him with any thing that he did Act under the colour of his Commission or with any thing he did before that but that which we charge him with are rhe Acts that he did at the Tryal of the King shew us your Commission from the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament for Tryal and Execution of the King you say something we do not charge him for any thing done by Vertue of that Commission but with those violent Acts that he did in encouraging the Souldiers to cry Justice Justice Execution Execution and all those other Violent Actions of his own malicious heart against the King We humbly beseech you he may answer to that which is the charge against him and that is the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the late King and his declaring that by those overt-acts that we have proved My Lords we desire that the Prisoner at the Bar may remember that he is not Indicted for levying War against the King if so then that Sir which you offer might be given as a Plea and we should have spoken to it but you are Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King and that which we have given in Evidence
in that Case one was called the Banishment of Hugh Spencer and the other is in 1. Edward 3. upon the Roll. My Masters In the first of Henry the Seventh you shall find it in the printed seven Books he saith That as to the Regality of his Crown he is immediately subject unto God Mark the Doctrine of the Church of England Gentlemen I do not know with what Spirit of Equivocation any Man can take that Oath of Supremacy You shall find in the Articles of the Church of England the last but one or two it is that Article which sets forth the Doctrine of the Church of England they say That the Queen and so the King hath the Supreme Power in this Realm and hath the chief Government over all the Estates of the Realm the very words are so this was shortly after making the Act the Articles were in 1552 and she came in 1558 or 1559 it is to shew you the King hath the chief Government over all the Estates within the Nation and if you look upon it you shall find it was not only the Judgment of the Church but of the Parliament at the same time They did confirm this Article so far that they appointed that no Man should take or be capable of a Living but those that had taken that Oath God forgive those Ministers that went against it The Queen and the Church were willing that these should be put into Latin that all the World might see the Confession of the Church of England and of the People of England you may reade it in Cambden I have told you how and wherein the chief Power consisted not in respect the King could do what he would no the Emperors themselves did not challenge that but this they challenge by it That they were not accountable to Man for what they did No Man ought to touch the Person of the King I press it to you in point of Conscience you see in the Scripture in Psalm 51. the Psalm of Mercy whereby we ask pardon of God for our great Offences I think none of you in this condition but will join in this you know the Adultery and Murder that David committed this penitential Psalm was made for that What doth he say Against thee thee only have I sinned c. tibi soli peccavi Domine not because he had not sinned against Man for 't is plain he had sinned both against Bathsheba and Vriah too But because he was not liable to the Tribunal of Man he was not bound nor accountable to any Man upon Earth And now my Masters I beseech you consider that some of you for ought I know suddenly and some of you for ought I know not long after all of us we do not know how soon must come to make a right account to God of what we have done After this Life you enter into an Eternity an Eternity of Happiness or of Woe God Almighty is merciful to those that are truly penitent the Thief upon the Cross and to all that are of a penitent heart You are Persons of education do not you go on in an obstinate perverse course for shame of Men even this shame which you now have and which you may have when you come to die a sanctified use may be made of it you pay to God some part of that punishment which you owe to him for your sins I have no more to say but the next thing I have to do is to give the Sentence the Judgment which truly I do with as unwilling a heart as you do receive it You Prisoners at the Bar the Judgment of the Court is this and the Court doth award that c. And the Lord have mercy on your Souls Court adjourned till Friday morning seven a Clock Friday Octob. 19. 1660. Set William Heveningham to the Bar. Serjeant Keeling May it please your Lordships the Prisoner at the Bar William Heveningham hath been indicted of High-Treason for compassing and imagining the Death of the late King of blessed memory he has been tried the Jury has found him guilty I do humbly move your Lordships in the behalf of the King that you will proceed to Judgment Clerk William Heveningham hold up thy hand what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Heveningham My Lords I have nothing more to say than I said formerly only I plead the benefit of the Proclamation and cast my self upon the Mercy of our most gracious Sovereign and desire your Lordships to be Mediators on my behalf Lord Ch. Baron By the Act of Indempnity of which you claim the Benefit and we ought to take notice of it we are to proceed to Judgment but no Execution of this Judgment is to be until by another Act of Parliament by consent of the King it shall be ordered And therefore I need not speak any more of that or any Exhortation to prepare your self for Death our work is only to give Judgment The Judgment of the Court is this and the Court doth award that you the Prisoner at the Bar be led back to c. And the Lord have mercy upon your Soul THus having given the Reader a most impartial view of every Passage occurring in this so solemn and legal Indictment Arraignment Trial and Condemnation of these twenty nine black Regicides with their several Pleas and Defences in their own words It may be also some additinal satisfaction to let the Reader know the time and manner of the Death of such of them who were according to the Sentence Executed For their last Discourses and Prayers as they were made in a Croud and therefore not possible to be taken exactly so it was thought fit rather to say nothing than give an untrue account thereof chusing rather to appear lame than to be supported with imperfect assistances ON Saturday the 13th of October 1660 betwixt nine and ten of the clock in the Morning Mr. Tho. Harrison or Major General Harrison according to this Sentence was upon a Hurdle drawn from Newgate to the place called Charing-Cross where within certain Rails lately there made a Gibbet was erected and he hanged with his face looking towards the Banqueting-house at Whitehall the place where our late Sovereign of eternal memory was sacrificed being half dead he was cut down by the common Executioner his Privy Members cut off before his Eyes his Bowels burned his Head severed from his Body and his Body divided into Quarters which were returned back to Newgate upon the same Hurdle that carried it His Head is since set on a Pole on the top of the South-East end of Westminster-Hall looking towards London The Quarters of his Body are in like manner exposed upon some of the City Gates Monday following being the sixteenth of October abouâ— the same hour Mr. John Carew was carried in like manner to the same place of Execution where having suffered like pains his Quarters were also returned to Newgate on the same Hurdle which carried him His Majesty was pleased to give upon intercession made by his Friends his Body to be buried Tuesday following being the sixteenth of October Master John Cook and Mr. Hugh Peters were about the same hour 〈◊〉 on two Hurdles to the same place and executed in the same manner and their Quarters returned in like manner to the place whence they came The Head of John Cook is since set on a Pole on the North-East end of Westminster-Hall on the left of Mr. Harrison's looking towards London and the Head of Mr. Peters on London-Bridg Their Quarters are exposed in like manner upon the tops of some of the City Gates Wednesday October 17 about the hour of nine in the 〈◊〉 Mr. Thomas Scot and Mr. Gregory Clemenâ— were â—ought â—n several Hurdles and about one hour after Master Adriâ—n Scroop and Mr. John Jones together in one Hurdle were carried to the same place and suffered the same death and were returned and disposed of in like manner Mr. Francis Hacker and Mr. Daniel Axtel were on Friday the 19th of October about the same time of the morning drawn on one Hurdle from Newgate to Tiburn and there both Hanged Mr. Axtel was Quartered and returned back and disposed as the former but the Body of Mr. Hacker was by his Majesties great favour given entire to his Friends and buried FINIS 3. Jan. 1647.
out of a few persons that makes a Parliament We see as before so still it is your course to blow the Trumpet of Sedition Did you ever hear or can you produce instances of an Act of Parliament made by the House of Commons alone though this was not the House of Commons as you heard before Ca. Neither was there ever such a War or such a precedent Court Nor we hope never will be Pray remember you were returned to serve in the House what was that Writ that summon'd your appearance You had no manner of ground in the world to go that way that you did Coun. We pray that the Prisoner at the Bar give us pationce a little to repeat that to him which your Lordships have been so often troubled with declaring this is not the first or second time that in this publique Assembly it hath been said That neither the Lords nor the Commons jointly nor severally have any power at all to proceed upon the Person of the King That it is not in their power to condemn any man in England without the good pleasure of the King much less the King himself and that this is the great Liberty of the people of England that it should be so and it was the first breach and invasion of our Liberty that that first Parliament made and which you justifie in the name of the Lord. In this case to throw us upon Debates of the War and to talk here of the causes and reasons of that quarrel which ended in such a Tragedie For this person to come here with this confidence and to justifie it but that he knows he cannot be in a worse condition one would wonder it should fall from any man that hath any regard of himself it is all one to them that perish whether they fall by one sin or multitudes He makes no scruple to multiply Treasons I do beseech your Lordship he may not offer as he hath begun but that the Jury may proceed Court All the Court are of the same opinion not to hear any thing like the former Discourses Ca. I desire I may be heard I have not compassed the Death of the late King contrived the death of the King what I did I did by Authority Court This is not to be heard You have heard what hath bin said to you There could be no such Authority neither was nor could be but you would by a wyre-lace bring it in by this You have confessed the Fact which must be left to the Jury L. Ansley I think you were present in the House of Commons when that Vote passed for agreement with the King in the Treaty at the Isle of Wight You know the King having condescended to most of the desires of This Parliament there was a debate in the House and a conclusion that they were grounds for peace You know the Lords and Commons did resolve to agree with their King when that was done that would not satisfie you and other Members of the House Then you go and contrive new ways you contrive a new fashioned Parliament the driving away many Members by power which you could not do by the Law of the Land Nay the Parliament had Declared against that which you pretend is by Authority is no Authority for a few of you set up an Arbitrary Parliament of a few of your selves when you had driven away the rest This kind of Parliament gives you the Authority you pretend to You were saying that the Parliament was called at first the Lords and Commons by the King according to the ancient Constitutions of the Laws Did such a Parliament give you such Authority as you pretend to and Act of Parliament as you call it which was but an Order of some of the Commons and but a few of them you can have no manner of Justification and therefore your Plea must be over-ruled as yesterday it was in the like Case You are indicted upon a cleer Act of Parliament of 25. Edw. 3. and you defend your self upon pretence of an Act of Parliament which hath been over-ruled as no Act. Ca. I am a stranger to many of these things which you have offered and this is strange You give evidence sitting as a Judge L. Ch. Bar. You are mistaken it is not Evidence he shews you what Authority that was an Authority of 26 Members How is this Evidence Mr. Carew if you have any thing more of Fact go on If you have nothing but according to this kind of discourse I am commanded to direct the Jury Ca. I am very willing to leave it with the Lord if you will stop me that I cannot open the true nature of those things that did give me ground of satisfaction in my Conscience that I did it from the Lord. Mr. Sol. I do pray for the honour of God and our King That he may not be suffered to go on in this manner You have been suffered to speak you have said but little only Sedition You pretend a Conscience and the fear of the Lord when all the world knows you did it against the Law of the Lord your own Conscience the light of Nature and the Laws of the Land against the Oaths you have taken of Allegiance and Supremacy Ca. Gentlemen of the Jury I say I shall leave it with you This Authority I speak of is right which was the supreme Power it is well known what they were Coun. It is so indeed many have known what they were L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Carew You have been heard what and beyond what was fit to say in your own defence that which you have said the heads of it you see the whole Court hath over-ruled To suffer you to expatiate against God and the King by Blasphemy is not to be endured it is suffering poison to go about to infect people but they know now too well the old saying In Nomine Domini In the Name of the Lord all mischiefs have been done that hath been an old Rule I must now give directions to the Jury L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury Ca. I have desired to speak the words of truth and soberness but have been hindered L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury You see the Prisoner here at the Bar hath been Indicted of Treason and this was for Compassing and Imagining the Death of our Soveraign Lord K. Charles the First of blessed Memory The Indictment sets forth several overt-Acts to prove this Imagination for otherwise it is secret in the heart the Fact it self the Treason it self is the Imagination of the heart The overt-Acts that are laid down in the Indictment to prove this That they did consult and meet together how to put the King to death That they did sit upon him And thirdly That they did sentence him to death and afterwards he died You heard what is proved against the Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar by several Witnesses His own Confession That he signed the Warrant for Summoning and
Gentlemen I shall begin to shew you that which all of you might remember that is your oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy and to add to this that obligation which all this whole Nation did oblige themselves to by the Parliament without question then rightly represented and in being the first of K. James whereby to shew you that not only persons but the Body politick of the Nations not only the single Members but the Members in both houses of Parliament were loyal and obedient subjects to the King their head even to yeeld a natural and humble Obedience and Allegiance I told you the Act of the 1. of K. James when K. James came first into Engl. We the Lords and Com. representing the whole People of the Nation the very words of the Act are so primo Jacobi Chapter the first Representing the whole Body of the Nation do acknowledge an humble natural Leige Obedience to the King as Supreme his Heirs and Successors And in the name of themselves and all the people humbly submit themselves untill the last drop of their bloud be spent in defence of the King and his Royall posterity and therefore they did oblige themselves and all the People of England as far as they could represent them the words are more full then I can express them and indeed it is so dark I cannot read them They did acknowledg to be bound to him and his Imperial Crown Remember these were not words of Complement you shall find that they all of them and so did so many of you as were Members of Parliament yea all of you before you came into the House of Commons did take the Oath of Allegiance which was made after this Recognition the third and fourth of King James or otherwise were not to be Members What was that Oath of Allegiance that you took it was That you should defend the King his Person that is in 3 Jacobi Chapter the fourth his Crown and Dignity What was it Not only against the Pope's Power to depose but the words are or otherwise look into the Act and reflect upon your Conscience and you shall find that all did swear to defend the King his Crown and Dignity and there it is called Imperial Crown I would have you lay this to heart and see how far you have kept this Oath Gentlemen In the Oath of Supremacy which you all took therein you did further acknowledg that the King was the only Supream Governour of this Realm Mark the words I will repeat them that you may lay it to heart you that have more time to apply it to your Fact and you that have less time for ought I know you have reason to consider what I have to say you sware then That the King by the Oath of Supremacy which all of you have taken or ought to have taken if any of you have not taken it yet notwithstanding you are not absolved from the obligation of it but most of you did take it there you sware that the King is the only Supream Governor of this Realm and you sware there that you would defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preeminencies and Authorities granted or belonging to the King's Highness His Heirs and Successors or united and annexed unto the Imperial Crown of this Realm For the first If the King be Supream then there is no co-ordination Non habet majorem non habet parem that word Imperial Crown is at least in nine or ten several Statutes it is the very word in this Act that was made lately in pursuance of former Acts concerning Judicial Proceedings And so in the time of King Charles they acknowledged him to be their Leige Sovereign I say that word Supream and so the word Imperial Crown is in the first of Queen Elizabeth the third and the eighth of Elizabeth the twenty fourth of Henry the Eighth Chap. 12. there it is said this Kingdom is an Imperial Crown subject to none but God Almighty Before these times you shall find in the sixteenth of Richard the Second the Statute of Praemunire the Crown of England subject to God alone I will go higher William Rufus some of you are Historians and you shall find the same in Eadmerus and also in Matthew Paris shortly after William Rufus his Time when he wrote to the Pope he challenged and had the same liberty in this Kingdom of England as the Emperor had in his Empire mistake me not I speak only as to the Person of the King I do not meddle of Rights between the King and Subjects or Subject and Subject you see in this Case concerning the Death of his Majesty's dear Father and our Blessed Sovereign of happy memory he doth not judg himself but according to Law that which I assert is as to the Person of the King which was the priviledg of Emperors as to their Personal Priviledges if he had offended and committed an Offence he was only accountable to God himself I will come back to what I have said You swore to be faithful to the King as Supreme The King of Poland hath a Crown but at his Oath of Coronation it is conditioned with the People That if he shall not govern according to such and such Rules they shall be freed from their Homage and Allegiance But it differs with our King for he was a King before Oath The King takes his Oath but not upon any condition this I shew you to let you see that we have no coercive Power against the King The King of England was anointed with Oil at his Coronation which was to shew that Absolute Power I do not say of Government but of being accountable to God for what he did The Law saith The King doth no injury to any Man not but that the King may have the imbecilities and infirmities of other Men but the King in his single Person can do no wrong but if the King command a Man to beat me or to disseize me of my Land I have my remedy against the Man though not against the King The Law in all Cases preserves the Person of the King to be untouched but what is done by his Ministers unlawfully there is a remedy against his Ministers for it but in this Case when you come to the Person of the King what do our Law Books say he is they call it Caput Reipublicae salus Populi the Leiutenant of God and let me tell you there was never such a blow given to the Church of England and the Protestant Religion There was a Case and that of the Spencers you shall find in the 7th Report of the Lord Cook in Calvin's Case that Homage is due to the King in his Politick Capacity and then they made this damnable Inference That therefore if the King did not demean himself as he ought that he should be reformed pure aspertee by asperity sharpness or Imprisonment but these were condemned by two Acts of Parliament in Print that they could not do that even
Imprimatur J. BERKENHEAD 1660. AN EXACT and most IMPARTIAL ACCOMPT OF The Indictment Arraignment Trial and Judgment according to Law of Twenty Nine REGICIDES THE Murtherers Of His Late SACRED MAJESTY Of Most Glorious Memory Begun at Hicks-Hall on Tuesday the 9th of October 1660. And Continued at the Sessions-House in the Old-Bayley until Friday the nineteenth of the same Moneth Together with a SUMMARY of the Dark and Horrid Decrees of those Caballists Preparatory to that Hellish Fact Exposed to view for the Reader 's Satisfaction 〈◊〉 Information of Posterity London Printed for R. Scot T. Basset R. Chisâ—ell and J. Wright 1679. A SUMMARY by way of Premise of the dark Proceedings of the Cabal at WESTMINSTER Preparatory to the Murther of His late Sacred Majesty Taken out of their own Journal-Book THe Commons Resolved That no further Addresses be made to the King by themselves nor by any other without leave of both Houses And those that do to incur the Penalty of High-Treason And Declare They will receive no more Messages from Him And Enjoyn That no Person whatsoever receive or bring any Message from Him to Both or either Houses or to any other Person 15. Jan. 1647. The Lords concurred to these Votes 17. August 1648. The Commons concur with the Lords That these Votes for Non-Addresses be Revoked 20. November 1648 The Army present their Remonstrance to the Parliament for bringing Delinquents to Justice 24. November 1648. The Treaty at the Isle of Wight Voted to continue till the twenty seventh of November 1. December 1648. Master Hollis presents an Account of the Treaty with the King And the same day information was brought them of the King 's being removed from Carisbrook to Hurst Castle 5. December 1648. The King's Answer to the Propositions Voted a Ground for the House to proceed upon for Settlement of the Peace of the Kingdom 6. December 1648. The Members were secured by Colonel Pride 7. December 1648. The House of Commons appointed a day of Humiliation Peters Caryl and Marshal to perform the Duty The several Votes For Revoking the Votes for Non Addresses to the King For a Treaty to be had with Him That His Answers to the Propositions were a Ground for Peace Voted Dishonourable and Destructive 23. December 1648. A Committee was appointed to consider how to proceed in a way of Justice against the King and other Capital Offenders 28. December 1648. An Ordinance for Trial of the King was read 1. January 1648. Declared and adjudged by the Commons That by the Fundamental Laws It is Treason in the King of England for the time being to levy War against the Parliament and Kingdom 2. Jan. 1648. The Lords disagreed to this Vote and cast it out and the Ordinance for Tryal of the King Nemine contradicente 3. Jan. 1648. The same Vote was again put to the question in the House of Commons and carried in the Affirmative 4. Jan. 1648. Master Garland presents a new Ordinance for erecting an High Court of Justice for Tryal of the King which was read the first second and third time assented to and passed the same day And Ordered no Copy to be delivered Same day Resolved That the People are under God the Original of all just Powers That themselves being Chosen by and Representing the People have the Supreme Power in the Nation That whatsoever is Enacted or Declared for Law by the Commons in Parliament hath the force of a Law and the People concluded thereby though Consent of King and Peers be not had thereunto 6 Jan. 1648. The Commissioners for Tryal of the King are Ordered to meet on Monday then next at two of the Clock in the Painted-Chamber Their days of sitting were 8 10 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 of January 1648. Painted-Chamber Monday 8 January They chose Ask Dorislaus Steel and Cook to be their Councel and other Officers And sent out their Precept under their Hands and Seals for Proclaiming their Court in Westminster-hall to be held in the Painted-Chamber on the tenth Which Precept is all of Ireton's Hand-writing Journal of the Court fol. 6. And Tuesday the 19th The Commissioners Ordered That the Proclamation be made in Cheap-side and at the Old-Exchange And appointed a Committee to consider of the matter of Government of making a new Great Seal and not using the name of a Single Person Wednesday the tenth They chose Bradshaw who was absent for their President and Say pro tempore who gave Garland thanks for his Pains about the business of the Court Fol. 72. And appointed their Councel to prepare and prosecute their Charge And a Committee to consider for carrying on the Tryal Whereof Millington Garland and Martin were three Friday the twelve Waller and Harrison are desired to attend the General to appoint Guards to attend the Court. And Titchbourn and Roe with others to prepare for the Solemnity of the Tryal and to appoint Workmen c. Fol. 16. The Charge to be brought in on Monday And Waller Scot Titchbourn Harrison and others to consider of the place for Tryal and Report the next day Saturday the thirteenth Upon Garland's Report Ordered The Tryal be where the Courts of King's Bench and Chancery sate in Westminster-Hall fol. 20. Monday the Fifteenth The Councel brought in a Draught of the Charge And a Committee appointed to advise therein and compare the Evidence therewith fol. 21. And they and others to consider the manner of bringing the King to his Tryal And that day Titchbourn delivered a Petition to the Commons in the name of the Commons in London in Common-Council differing from the Lord Major and Aldermen The Substance was for bringing the King to Justice Which was Ordered to be Registred in the Books of Common-Councel Wednesday the 17th The Charge recommitted to the Committee Fol. 24. Thursday the 18th Tichbourn excused the absence of Mr. Steel and nothing then else done Fol. 29. Friday the 19th Upon Millington's Report of the Charge and Form of words for exhibiting it Ordered That the Attorney or in his absence the Solicitor exhibit it Fol. 30. And Waller Harrison and others to appoint thirty to wait upon the King and twenty upon the President Saturday the 20th Forenoon Ordered That Mildmay deliver the Sword of State to Humphreys to bear before the President The Solicitor presents the Charge engrossed which being read and signed by him was returned to him to be exhibited And then Adjourned to Westminster-Hall Westminster-Hall Saturday the 20th Afternoon The King was brought in by Thomlinson attended by Hacke and two and thirty Partisans And Cook then exhibited the Charge And the King not owning their Authority was remanded And they Adjourned till Monday Painted-Chamber Monday the 22d Forenoon They approved of what their President had done on Saturday and Resolved That the King should not be suffered to question their Jurisdiction Fol. 50. Westminster-Hall Same day Afternoon Cook prayed That the King
thing to govern absolutely Gentlemen The Imperial Crown is a Word that is significative you shall find in all Statutes primo Eliz. and the first of King James nay even in the Act of Judicial proceedings of this Parliament it is called an Imperial Crown They that take the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy they swear that they will to their power assist and defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preheminences and Authorities granted or belonging to the King His Heirs and Successors or annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm What is an Imperial Crown It is that which as to the Coercive part is subject to no man under God The King of Poland has a Crown But what is it At his Coronation it is conditioned with the people That if he shall not Govern them according to such Rules they shall be freed from their Homage and Allegiance But the Crown of England is and always was an Imperial Crown and so sworn Gentlemen As I told you even now the Imperial Crown is a Word significative that Crown which as to the Coercive part is not subject-to any Humane Tribunal or Judicature whatsoever And truly that this is such an Imperial Crown though I have cited Authorities ancient enough you may find them much more ancient I remember in the Story of William Rufus you shall find it in Matthew Paris and Eadmerus some Question was about Investiture of Bishops and the like the King writes His Letter That c. God forbid I should intend any absolute Government by this It is one thing to have an Absolute Monarchy another thing to have that Government Absolutely without Laws as to any coercive power over the Person of the King for as to Things and Actions they will fall under another consideration as I will tell you by and by Gentlemen Since this is so consider the Oath of Supremacy which most men have taken or should take All men that enter into the Parliament-House they are expresly enjoyned by Statute to take the Oath of Supremacy What says that Oath We swear that The King is the only Supreme Governour within this Realm and Dominions He is Supreme and the onely Supreme and truly if he be Supreme there is neither Major nor Superior I urge this the more lest any Person by any Misconstruction or inference which they might make from something that hath been Acted by the Higher Powers they might draw some dangerous Inferences or Consequences to colour or shadow over those Murtherous and Traiterous Acts which afterwards they committed They had no Authority But as I told you though I do set forth this and declare this to you to let you know that the King was immediately subject to God and so was not punishable by any Perfon yet let me tell you there is that excellent Temperament in our Laws that for all this the King cannot rule but by His Laws It preserves the King and his Person and the peoples Rights There are three things touching which the Law is conversant Personae Res Actiones Persons Things and Actions For the Person of the King He is the Supreme Head He is not punishable by any coercive Power the Laws provide for that The King can do no wrong it is a Rule of Law it is in our Law-books very frequent 22d of Edward the Fourth Lord Coke and many others If he can do no Wrong He cannot be punished for any wrong The King He hath the infirmities and weakness of a man but he cannot do any injury at least not considerable in Person He must do it by Ministers Agents Instruments Now the Law though it provide for the King yet if any of his Ministers do wrong though by his command they are punishable The King cannot arrest a man as he cannot be arrested Himself but if He arrest me by another Man I have remedy against this man though not against the King and so He cannot take away my Estate This as to the Person of the King He is not to be touched Touch not mine Anointed I come to Things If the King claim a Right the King must sue according to His Laws the King is subject to the Laws in that case His Possessions shall be tried by Juries If He will try a man for His Fathers Death you see he will try them by the Laws The Law is the Rule and Square of His actions and by which He Himself-is judged Then for Actions that is such Actions whereby Rights and Titles are prosecuted or recovered the King cannot judge in Person betwixt man and man He does it by his Judges and upon Oath and so in all cases whatsoever If the King will have his Right it must be brought before His Judges Though this is an Absolute Monarchy yet this is so far from infringing the Peoples Rights that the People as to their Properties Liberties and Lives have as great a priviledge as the King It is not the sharing of Government that is for the Libertie and Benefit of the People but it is how they may have their Lives and Liberties and Estates safely secured under Government And you know when the Fatness of the Olive was laid aside and we were Governed by Brambles these Brambles they did not only tear the Skin but tore the Flesh to the very Bone Gentlemen I have done in this Particular to let you see that the Supreme Power being in the King the King is immediately under God owing his Power to none but God It is true blessed be God we have as great Liberties as any People have in Christendom in the World but let us own them where they are due We have them by the Concessions of Our Princes Our Princes have granted them and the King now He in them hath granted them likewise Gentlmen I have been a little too long in this and yet I cannot say it is too long because it may clear misunderstanding so many Poisonous Opinions having gone abroad To come a little nearer If we consider suppose there were the Highest Authority but when we shall consider this horrid Murther truly I cannot almost speak of it but Vox faucibus haeret When we shall consider that a few Members of the House of Commons those that had taken the Oath of Supremacy and those that had taken the Oath of Allegiance that was to defend the King and His Heirs against all Conspiracies and Attempts whatsoever against His and their Persons Their Crowns and Dignities not onely against the Pope's Sentence as some would pretend but as otherwise against all Attempts and Conspiracies not onely against His Person Crown and Royal Dignity nor Pope's Sentence nor onely in order to the Profession of Religion but absolutely or otherwise that is whatsoever Attempts by any power Authority or Pretence whatsoever I say when a few Members of the House of Commons not an eighth part of them having taken these Oaths shall assume upon themselves an Authority an Authority what to do shall assume to
these Sacred Persons that the Sons of Violence should never approach to hurt them For My Lord the very Thoughts of such an Attempt hath ever been presented by all Laws in all Ages and all Nations of the World as a most unpardonable Treason My Lord This is that that brought the two Eunuchs in the Persian-Court to their just Destruction Voluerunt insurgere saies the Text and yet that was enough to Attain them And so My Lord it was by the Roman Laws too as Tacitus observes Qui deliberant desciverunt To Doubt or Hesitate in a Point of Allegiance is direct Treason and Apostasie And upon this Ground it is that the Statute upon which your Lordships are now to proceed hath these express Words If a man doth Compass or Imagine the Death of the King c. Kings who are God's Vicegerents upon Earth have thus far a kind of Resemblance of the Divine Majesty that their Subjects stand accountable to Them for the very Thoughts of their Hearts Not that any Man can know the Heart save God alone but because when the Wicked Heart breaks out into any open Expressions by which it may be judged 't is the Thoughts of the Heart which makes the Treason the Overt-Act is but the Evidence of it My Lords This Care and Caution is not so to be understood as if it were the Single Interest of One Royal Person only The Law doth wisely judge and foresee that upon the Life of the King depends the Laws and Liberties the Estates and Properties the Wealth and Peace the Religion and in Sum the Glory of the Nation My Lords This Judgment of the Law ha's been verified by a sad Experience for when that Blessed King whose Blood we are now making Inquisition for was untimely taken away Religion and Justice both lay buried in the same Grave with Him and there they had slept still if the miraculous Return of Our Gracious Sovereign had not given them a new Resurrection My Lords My Lord Coke in his Comment upon this Statute ha's one Conceit which is somewhat strange I am sure it is very new he seems to think that it would have added to the Perfection of this Law if there had been a time limited for the Party to be accused But certainly the work of this Day has quite consuted that Imagination For here is a Treason that has so long out-faced the Law and the Justice of this Kingdom that if there had been any time of Limitation in the Statute there would have been no Time nor Place left for Punishment And if this Treason had but once grown up to an Impunity it might perhaps have drawn the Guilt of that Innocent Blood and with it the Vengeance due to it upon the whole Nation The Scope of this Iudictment is for the Compassing the Death of the King the rest of the Indictment as the Vsurping Authority over the King's Person the Assembling Sitting Judging and Killing of the King are but so many several Overt-Acts to prove the Intention of the Heart We are not bound under favour to prove every one of these against every particular Person who is Indicted for he that is in at one is guilty in Law of all rest as much as if he had struck the Fatal Stroke it self Nay under favour if we can prove any other Overt-Act besides what is lai'd in the Indictment as the encouraging of the Souldiers to cry out Justice Justice or Preaching to them to go in this Work as Godly and Religious or any other act of all that Catalogue of Villanies for which the Story will be for ever Infamous this may be given in Evidence to prove the Compassing and Imagining the King's Death The conclusion of this Indictment alledges the Fact done to be to the great Displeasure of Almighty God and to the great Disgrace of the People of England A Truth so clear and known that it can neither be heightned by any Aggravation or lessend by any Excuse As for the Fact it self with the Manner of it I shall not need to open it at large for these things were not done in a Corner every true English Heart still keeps within it self a bleeding Register of this Story only my Lords in the way to our Evidence with your Lordships favour this I think may be fit to be said First for the year 1648. for that was the Fatal year of this King and beyond that year we shall not now enquire I say whatsoever in the Year 1648. could have been done by a Parliament to save the Life of a King was done in this Case They opened the way to a Treaty in spight of the Army and while these Sons of Zerviah who were too hard for them were engaged in Service in the Remoter Parts they hastened the Treaty as much as was possible the Debater upon His Majestie 's Concessions were Voted a good ground for Peace notwithstanding the Remonstrances of the Army still flew about their Ears and notwithstanding the Oppositions of a fearful and unbelieving Party of the House-of Commons whom the Army had frighted into an Awful and a Slavish Dependance upon them And when nothing else could be done for Him they were so true to the Obligations they lay under that they resolved to fall with Him and did so For the Army who saw the Treaty proceed so fast made as great hast to break it They seize upon the blessed Person of our Sacred King by Force and bring Him to London and here they force the Parliament shut out some Members imprison others and then called this wretched little Company which was left a Parliament By this and before they had taken upon them the Boldness to dissolve the House of Peers they pass a Law and Erect forsooth an High Court of Justice as they call it a Shambles of Justice appoint Judges Advocates Officers and Ministers sit upon the Life of the King Now they Speak out and Expound their own Declarations and tell us what that was which before they had demanded in obscure Terms when they called for Justice against all Delinquents Now they speak plainly what they mean and call this blessed King this glorious Saint the grand Delinquent Haec Acies victum factura Nocentem est My Lords When they had thus proceeded to appoint their Judges Officers and Court then they call this Person their onely Liege Lord and Soveraign to the Bar and by a formal Pegeantry of Justice proceed to Sit upon Him Arraign Try Sentence Condemn and Kill I had almost said Crucifie Him whom they could not but know to be their King And all this against the clearest Light the sharpest Checks and most through Convictions of Conscience that ever men resisted And yet in this moment of time such was the Majesty and Innocene of our Gracious Soveraign that the People followed Him with Tears in their Eyes and Acclamations in their Mouths God save the King even then when the Souldiers were ready to fire upon
the Hand-writing of the Prisoner at the Bar The Instrument being shewed him Mr. Farrington I did not see him write it my Lords but I believe it to be his for I have often seen his Hand-writing It is his hand so far as possibly a man can know any Person 's hand that did not see him write Mr. Harrison I desire to see the Instrument Which being shew'd to him he said I believe it is my own Hand Councel That 's the Warrant for summoning that Court that he owns his hand too Court Shew him the other Instrument That being for Execution of the Sentence Mr. Harrison it being shew'd him I do think this is my hand too Councel If you think it the Jury will not doubt it That 's the Bloody Warrant for Execution And we desire they may be both read Mr. Harrison My Lords do these Learned Gentlemen offer these as being any Records Councel No but as your own hand-writing Mr. Harrison If you do not read it as a Record I hope your Lordships will not admit of any thing of that kind against me Councel He knows that a Letter under his hand and Seal may be read in a Court We do not offer it as a Record but prove it by Witnesses that it is your hand-writing Court You have Confessed these to be your hands Whether they are Records or no whether Papers or Letters they may be read against you You signed the Warrant for Convening together those which you called The High Court of Justice and you signed the other Warrant for putting the King to Death You do Confess these two things We do not see what further Use may be made of them Court You might observe how the Indictment was for the Imagining Compassing and Contriving the King's Death To prove that there must be some Overt-Act and a Letter under the Partie's Hand is a sufficient Overt-Act to prove such Imagination to that end these are used Mr. Harrison I do not come to be denying any thing that in my own Judgment and Conscience I have done or Committed but rather to be bringing it forth to the Light Court Sir you must understand this by the way this you must take along with you That these are read not as any thing of Authority in themselves or as used to any other purpose but as an Evidence of the Fact against you Take that along with you The two Bloody Warrants for Trial and for Execution of His Majesty were here read the later of which is as followeth At the High Court of Justice for the Trying and Judging of Charles Stuart King of England Jan. 29. 1648. WHereas Charles Stuart King of England is and standeth Convicted Attainted and Condemned of High Treason and other High Crimes and Sentence upon Saturday last was pronounced against him by this Court to be put to Death by the severing his Head from his Body of which Sentence Execution yet remaineth to be done These are therefore to will and require you to see the said Sentence executed in the open street before White-hall upon the marrow being the 30th day of this instant Moneth of January between the hours of ten in the Morning and five in the Afternoon of the same day with full effect And for so doing this shall be your sufficient Warrant And these are to require all Officers and Souldiers and other the good People of this Nation of England to be assistant unto you in this service To Colonel Francis Hacker Colonel Hunks and Lieutenant-Colonel Phayre and every of them Given under our Hands and Seals Sealed and subscribed BY John Bradshaw Lord President Jo. Hewson Per. Pelham Thomas Grey Oliver Cromwel Edward Whalley John Okey Jo. Danvers Mich. Livesey Jo. Bourchier Hen. Ireton Thomas Maleverer Jo. Blakestone Jo. Hutchinson Will. Goff Thomas Pride Hen. Smith Peter Temple Tho. Harrison Isaac Ewer Val. Wanton Simon Meyn Tho. Horton Jo. Jones Jo. Moor. Hardress Waller Gilbert Millington Geo. Fleetwood Jo. Alured Rob. Lilburn Wil. Say Rich. Dean Rob. Tichbourn Hum. Edwards Dan. Blagrave Owen Roe Will. Puefroy Adrian Scroop James Temple Aug. Garland Edmond Ludlow Hen. Marten Vincent Potter Will. Constable Rich. Ingoldsby Will. Cawley Joh. Barkstead Anth. Stapeley Greg. Norton Tho. Challoner Tho. Wogan Jo. Ven. Greg. Clement Jo. Downs Tho. Wayt. Tho. Scot. Jo. Carew Miles Corbet Mr. Wyndham Gentlemen of the Jury We have done our Evidence and you must know Gentlemen that the principal Point of the Indictment is for Compassing Imagining and Contriving the Death of his late Majesty of Glorious Memory There lies the Treason So saies the Statute of the 25th Ed. 3d. It hath nothing of Killing the King there but of Imagining and Compassing the Death of the King The going about it that 's the Treason as hath been learnedly opened to you The rest are but Overt-Acts If there be such an Imagination or Compassing the Death of the King once declared though no fruit at all follow it is Treason Here certainly you have a very full Evidence given We shew you a Consultation this is one Overt-Act which would do the work if there were nothing else I must tell you and that with Submission to my Lords the Justices if they had advised and gone no further that had been Treason in the Letter of the Law They Convened and met together and suppose then they had absolved and acquitted him do you think they had absolved themselves from Treason With reverence be it spoken if they had acquitted him they had been guilty of Treason Assuming a Power to put the King to Death is an Overt-Act declaring such an Imagination You see this Prisoner was no ordinary Actour in it his Hand is in at all Games Taking of Him Imprisoning of Him bringing Him to London and setting Guards on Him You see also his Malice Let us Blacken Him for they knew His Innocency would Shine forth unless it was blackened by their Imputations He Sate many times as your hear and Sentenced Him and Assented to that Sentence by standing up and likewise by Concluding the Catastrophe of that sad beginning of Sufferings his making a Warrant for his Execution and accordingly you know what did follow I think a clearer Evidence of a Fact can never be given then is for these things Here the Spectatours Hummed Lord Chief Baron Gentlemen This Humming is not at all becoming the Gravity of this Court. Let there be free-speaking by the Prisoner and Counsel It is more fitting for a Stage-Play then for a Court of Justice Mr. Harrison It is now time my Lords to offer what I have to say Have these Learned Gentlemen offered what they will say Councel We have no more till he hath given us occasion not for Evidence of the Fact Mr. Harrison My Lords The matter that hath been offered to you as it was touched was not a thing done in a Corner I believe the sound of it hath been in most Nations I believe the Hearts of some have felt the
he is very much to be reproved Shall he pretend that one House nay the eighth part of a House for so it was can Condemn a King when both Houses cannot condemn one man in spight of the King I desire my Lords it may pass with a due Reproach and a Sentence upon it Lord Chief Baron It is true your Questions are but one Point You pretend the Parliament's Authority and when you come to speak of it you say the Commons of England They were but one House of Parliament The Parliament what is that It is the King the Lords the Commons I would fain know of you where ever you read by the light you say you have in your Conscience that the Commons of England were a Parliament of England that the Commons in Parliament used a Legislative power alone Do you call that a Parliament that sate when the House was Purged as they call it and was so much under the Awe of the Army who were then but forty or forty five at most Then you say It was done by Authority of them You must know where there is such an Authority which indeed is no Authority he that confirms such an Authority he Commits a double offence therefore consider what your Plea is If your Plea were doubtfull we should and ought and would our selves be of Councel for you That which you speak concerning Conviction of your own Conscience remember that it is said in Scripture that they shall think they did God good service when they slay you as it is in St. John He hath a great deal of Charity that thinks that what you did was out of a Conscientious Principle It was against the Light of noon-day and common practice You make your self a Sollicitor in the Business Let us blacken him as much as we can I have not touched at all upon the Evidence I will not urge it now I say you justifie it upon Convictions of Conscience and pretend it upon Authority A thing never known or seen under the Sun that the Commons nay a few Commons alone should take upon them and call themselves the Parliament of England We have been cheated enough by Names and Words there is no colour for what you say I do think and hope my Brethren will speak to this Case that none of us do own that Convention whatsoever it be to be the Parliament of England There was another aggravation at this Time that this Pretended Authority usurped that Power the Lords were then sitting You had not taken this usurped Power to dissolve these Lords No you did this Act in dispight of the Lords you had sent up an Ordinance to the Lords and they rejected it and thereupon these Members took it upon themselves Amongst those there were some Negatives and those Members were under the Awe and Power of your Forces at that time What you Plead the Court are of Opinion tends to the subversion of the Laws for you to usurp Power over the People without their Consents to call this the People We never knew the like before But the Parliament of England was the King Lords and Commons For you to speak of this Power and Justifie this Power is an Aggravation adding one Sin and Treason to another We shall tell you that neither both Houses of Parliament if they had been there not any single Person Community not the People either Collectively or Representatively had any colour to have any Coercive Power over their King And this Plea which you have spoken of it ought to be over-ruled and not to stand good Mr. Annesley I do the more willingly speak to this Business because I was one of those that should have made up that Parliament that this Prisoner pretends to I was one of that Corrupt Majority as they called it that were put out of the House He cannot forget that at that time there were Guards upon both Houses of Parliament to attend them that were of their own appointment and that those Guards were forcibly removed by the Prisoner at the Bar and his Fellows and other Guards put there who instead of being a Defence unto them when those Commons stood at the Door were by them threatned Yet the Lords and Commons of England in Parliament Assembled a full House of Commons did resolve notwithstanding what was aforesaid that the Treaty in the Isle of Wight was a Ground for Peace Afterwards the Major part of the House of Commons having resolved on this sent it up to the Lords that very day when they were Adjourned there were Forces drawn down to the House of Commons Door and none suffered to come into the House but those that they pleased All those that had a mind for Peace that minded their Duty and Trust and Allegiance to their King were seized on by this Gentleman and his Fellows When this was done what did he and those Fellows do They sate and put a check upon all that should come in None must come in but those that would renounce their Allegiance and Duty to their King and the People for whom they served and then declared against that Vote which had been passed upon Debate of twelve or fourteen hours and then to call this an House of Commons nay the Supreme Authority of the Nation he knows is against the Laws of the Land For the House of Commons alone cannot so much as give an Oath It hath not power of Judicature of Life and Death this he knows well to be according to the Laws of England He knows that no Authority less then an Act of Parliament can make a Law and he knows an Act of Parliament must be passed by the King Lords and Commons I wonder much to hear a Justification in this kind by one that knows the Laws of England so well There will none of the Court allow that that was a Parliament The Majority of that House did all disavow it These things have been already discoursed of I shall onely say that he knowing the Laws so well I hope he shall suffer for trangression thereof Mr. Hollis You do very well know that this that you did this horrid detestable Act which you Committed could never be perfected by you till you had broken the Parliament That House of Commons which you say gave you Authority you know what your self made of it when you pulled out the Speaker Therefore do not make the Parliament to be the Author of your black Crimes It was innocent of it You know your self what Esteem you had of it when you broke and tore it in sunder when you scattered and made them hide themselves to preserve them from your Fury and Violence Do not make the Parliament to be the Authour of your Crimes The Parliament are the three Estates It must not be admitted that one House part of the Parliament should be called the Supreme Authority You know what that Rump that you left did what Laws they made Did you go home to advise
with your Countrey that chose you for that Place You know that no Act of Parliament is binding but what is Acted by King Lords and Commons And now as you would make God the Author of your Offence so likewise you would make the People guilty of your Opinion But your Plea is over-ruled To which the Court assented Mr. Harrison I was mistaken a little Whereas it was said the Points were one I do humhly conceive they were not so I say what was done was done in Obedience to the Authority If it were but an Order of the House of Commons thus under a Force yet this Court is not Judge of that Force I say if it was done by one Estate of Parliament it is not to be questioned Court It was not done by one Estate They were but a Part nay but an eighth Part. Denz Hollis It was not an House of Commons They kept up a Company by the power of the Sword Do not abuse the People in saying It was done by the Supreme Power Councel My Lord if it were an House of Commons neither House of Commons nor House of Lords nor House of Lords and Commons together no Authority upon Earth can give Authority for Murthering the King This that he alledgeth is Treason my Lord this that is said is a clear Evidence of that which is charged there is only this more in it he hath done it and if he were to do it again he would do it Lord Chief Baron It is clear as the Noon-day that this was not the House of Commons Suppose it had been an House of Commons and full and suppose which far be it from me to suppose they should have agreed upon such a Murtherous Act for the House of Commons to do such an Act it was void in it self nay any Authority without the House of Lords and King is void You plead to the Jurisdiction of the Court whether we should Judge it or no. Yes I tell you and proper too We shall not speak what Power we have The Judges have Power after Laws are made to go upon the Interpretation of them We are not to judge of those things that the Parliament do But when the Parliament is purged as you call it for the Commons alone to Act for you to say that this is the Authority of Parliament it is that which every man will say Intrenches highly upon his Liberty and Priviledge And what you have said to your Justification what doth it tend to but as much as this I did it justifie it and would do it again which is a new Treason The greatest Right that ever the House of Commons did claim is but over the Commons Do they claim a particular Right over the Lords Nay over the King Make it out if you can but it cannot possibly be made out What you have said doth aggravate your Crimes It is such an approvement of your Treason that all Evidences come short of it King Lords and Commons is the Ground of the English-Law Without that no Act of Parliament binds Justice Mallet I have been a Parliament-Man as long as any man here present and I did never know or hear that the House of Commons and Jurisdiction over any saving their own Members which is as much as I will say concerning the Parliament I have heard a Story of a Mute that was born Mute whose Father was slain by a Stranger a man unknown After twenty years or thereabouts this Mute-man fortuned to see the Murtherer of his Father and these were his Words Oh! here is he that slew my Father Sir The King is the Father of the Country Pater Patria so saith Sir Edward Coke He is Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Common-wealth Sir What have you done Here you have cut off the Head of the whole Common-Wealth and taken away Him that was our Father the Governour of the whole Countrey This you shall find Printed and Published in a Book of the greatest Lawyer Sir Edward Coke I shall not need my Lord to say more of this Business I do hold the Prisoner's Plea vain and unreasonable and to be rejected Justice Hide I shall not trouble you with many Words I am sorry that any man should have the Face and Boldness to deliver such words as you have You and all must know That the King is above the Two Houses They must propose their Laws to him The Laws are made by Him and not by Them by their consenting but they are His Laws That which you speak as to the Jurisdiction you are here Indicted for High Treason for you to come to talk of Justification of this by Pretence of Authority your Plea is naught illegal and wicked and ought not to be allowed As to having of Councel the Court understand what you are upon Councel is not to be allowed in that Case and therefore your Plea must be over-ruled Mr. Justice Twisden I shall agree with that which many have already said onely this You have eased the Jury you have confessed the Fact I am of the same Opinion that you can have no Councel therefore I over-rule your Plea if it had been put in never so good Form and Manner Earl of Manchester I beseech you my Lords let us go some other way to work Sir William Wild. That which is before us is Whether it be a matter of Law or Fact For the matter of Law your Lordships have declared what it is his Justification is as high a Treason as the former For matter of Fact he hath confessed it I beseech you My Lord direct the Jury for their Verdict This Gentleman hath forgot their Barbarousness they would not hear their King Court No Councel can be allowed to Justifie a Treason that this is a Treason you are Indicted by an Act of the 25th of Edw. 3d. That which you speak of the House of Commons is but part of the House of Commons they never did nor had any power to make a Law but by King Lords and Commons and therefore your Plea is naught and all the Court here is of the same opinion if they were not they would say so therefore what you have said is over-ruled by the Court. Have you any thing else to offer Mr. Harrison Notwithstanding the Judgment of so many Learned ones that the Kings of England are no ways accountable to the Parliament The Lords and Commons in the beginning of this War having declared the King's beginning War upon them the God of Gods Court Do you render your self so desperate that you care not what Language you let fall It must not be suffered Mr. Harrison I would not willingly speak to offend any man but I know God is no Respecter of Persons His setting up his Standard against the People Court Truly Mr. Harrison this must not be suffered this doth not at all belong to you Mr. Harrison Vnder Favour this doth belong to me I would have abhorred to have brought him to Account
nothing but indeed to make a new Government which is the highest Treason next to the Murthering of the King in the world To subvert the Laws and to make a few of the Commons nay if they had been the whole to make them to have the Legislative power Mr. Scot if you have any thing in extenuation of the Fact we shall hear you further we cannot L. Finch If you speak to this purpose again for my part I will profess my self I dare not hear further of it It is so poysonous blasphemous a doctrine contrary to the Laws if you go upon this point I shall and I hope my Lords will be of that opinion too desire the Jury may be directed Scot. I thought my Lord you would rather be my Councel it is not my single opinion I am not alone in this Case therefore I think I may justifie my self in it it was the Judgement of many of the Secluded Members to own us to be a Parliament Lord Annesley What you said last doth occasion my rising you seem to deliver my opinion who you know could never agree to what you have alledged truly I have been heartily sorry to hear the defence you have made to day because you know I have had Letters from you of another nature I was very confident to have heard you an humble Penitent this day instead of justifying your self As to that which you say of the Secluded Members owning you to be a Parliament they were so far from it that you know for how many years they lay under sufferings and obscurity because they could not acknowledge that an Authority which was not so You cannot forget the Declaration of both Houses that was published upon a Jealousie that the people had they would change the Government of King Lords and Commons It was far from their thoughts it was called in that Declaration A black scandal cast upon them This Declaration you know was by Order of both Houses affixed in all Churches of England that people might take notice what they held to be the Fundamental Government of this Kingdom King Lords and Commons After this for you to set up another Government and under them to act such things that one would think should hardly enter into the heart of any man You know very well all along they declared themselves faithful Subjects to the King and so would have lived and dyed and you might have had your share of the happiness of that peace if you could have had an Inclination to submit to that which both Houses had resolved when you and others could not bring your hearts to stoop to your Fellow Subjects when you could not submit to that equal rule to take your share with them When Pride carried some so high then was the beginning of your fall and others and none could expect other than what is now come to pass That they should come to that shame and sorrow that this day hath brought upon you I could have wished to have heard nothing but an humble confession of the fault that hath been clearly proved and no Justification of it You have sworn among others to preserve the Laws and People of the Kingdom but you drove away not only the House of Lords but most of the Commons and then to give the name of a Parliament to the Remainder this is a great aggravation of your Treason I think we of the Secluded Members could not have discharged our duty to God and the Kingdom if we had not then appeared in Parliament to have dissolved that Parliament and so by our joynt assent put an end to all your pretences which if we had not done we had not so soon come to our happiness nor you to your miseries Lo. Ch. Bar. The Court hath told you before their opinions in the thing and no further debate is to be allowed in this the Justification of it doth comprehend treason We our selves are not by Law to allow the hearing of it If you have nothing to say for your self I must give direction to the Jury Scot. I humbly crave leave to move the Jury that they bethink themselves and consider of it rather as a special Verdict than of a definitive one I think there is cause of a special Verdict Court If there was need of a special Verdict We are upon our Oaths I should give direction to the Jury What We do We do upon our Oaths and must answer it before God Almighty The Court hath delivered their opinions before that in this Case the Pretended Authority under which you did derive that Power which you did execute that it is no Authority it is void in Law it is a foundation if it were true of subverting all Laws and indeed of all Religion a Power that you assumed to your selves of Judging and Condemning your King that you would countenance such an Authority is a great aggravation of the fault They are Jugdes whether you did Imagine or Compass the Kings Death that is all the Jurors have to do Gentlemen of the Jury Scot. I would know what particular Law I have transgressed in this thing Court The Law of God and Man 25 Edw. 3. Scot. I humbly conceive that reaches not to this Case Court To satisfie you in that the very words of the Statute are If any man do Compass or Imagine the Kings Death it is Treason The Indictment is That you did Imagine and Compass the death of the King if the Fact be proved against you you are within the Statute Scot. You will not say the King shall be a Traytor if he shall Compass the death of the Queen Court The Queen is a Subject Scot. I am not yet convinced Lo. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury Scot. I do plead and claim that I am within the Compass of several Pardons and desire Councel in that particular I do come within the Compass of his Majesties Pardon Lo. Ch. Bar. If you had not gone on to matter of Justification you might have been more heard to this of Pardon but after a Justification then to come for a Pardon which implies a confession of Guilt they are contradictory I must tell you we are now upon point of Law That Proclamation I doubt not but his Majesty will inviolably make good but we are not to judge of that it is nothing to a legal proceeding You are now in a Court of Law it is not to be pleaded in a Court of Law the Kings Pardon in Law must be under his Broad Seal How far you are under that Proclamation care will be taken and what is fitting to be done will be done but it is nothing in the matter of the Charge to this Jury Scot. I desire Councel touching the Statute of 25 Edw. 3. Court You should have done it before you had confessed the Fact Scot. I may do it in Arrest of Judgement Lo. Ch. Bar. Mr. Scot for that of the Kings Proclamation if you be within the benefit and
I interrupted his Majesty Far. I remember that the King laid his Cane upon your shoulders Cook Whether did I the first or the last day demand judgement or that any thing might be taken pro confesso Far. The first day no but after the first day he did several days you did the last day Griffith Bodurdo Esq sworn Coun. Sir you have heard the question give an accompt to my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury of the carriage of the Prisoner at the Bar towards his Majesty during the time of the Tryal Mr. Bod. My Lord I was all the time that the King was brought there before the Court as a Prisoner I was present all the day having a conveniency out of my house into a Gallery that was some part of it over that Court I do remember that the Prisoner at the Bar whom I never saw before that time did exhibit a charge the first day against the Prisoner at the Bar which was the King in these very terms The Prisoner at the Bar the charge I heard it read then I have not seen it since the substance was this That for levying war against the Parliament and people of England and namely at such and such a place killing of the people of England I think Naseby and Keinton field was named in it and divers other places were named in the Charge and the Conclusion was that he had done those things as a Tyrant Traitor Murtherer and a publick and implacable enemy of the Commonwealth But this Prisoner at the Bar did exhibit the Charge and the King did then as you have heard he did plead to the Jurisdiction of the Court The King would fain have been heard but I think they did adjourn for that time The next day he pleaded the same thing I remember the answer that was several times given twice given by Bradshaw to the King thus that the Court did assert their own Jurisdiction The second and third day I do not remember any day after the first but that the prisoner at the Bar did demand judgement for the Kings not pleading and did several times make complaints to the Court of the Kings delays that he intended delays and nothing else Cook Pray my Lord one Question whether my Lord before he heard me speak of demanding judgement against the King whether he did not hear Mr. Bradshaw several times say that the Court owned their Authority and that the matter would be taken pro confesso Mr. Bodurdo I did hear the Prisoner at the Bar desire of the Court that it might be so and I heard the Prisoner tell the King that it must be so Joseph Herne sworn Coun. Mr. Herne tell my Lords what you know of the prisoners carriage at the High Court of Justice as they called it Mr. Herne Upon Saturday the 20th of Jan. 1648. it was the first day His Majesty was convened before them I could not come near the Court only I saw him at a distance I heard nothing but the acclamations of the people crying out God save your Majesty what was done in the Court I know nothing of On Munday I was there and had a conveniency to see and hear what was acted and so His Majesty being come to the Seat appointed for him the prisoner at the Bar being called upon by the then President Bra. he demanded of him what he had to ask of the Court He was then talking with Dorislaus and semeed not to mind the business of the Court His Majesty sitting near takes his stick and thrusts the Prisoner at the Bar upon his shoulder and the Prisoner looking back with a great deal of indignation turned about I did hear Bradshaw speaking to him in these words Mr. Sol. have you any thing to demand of the Court whereupon the prisoner at the Bar did use these or the like words May it please your Lordships I have formerly in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the good people of England exhibited a Charge of High Treason and other high crimes against Charles Stuart the prisoner at the Bar flinging his head back in this manner to him He had there further to require of the Court that he might be demanded to make positive answer by confession or denial if not that the Court would take it pro confesso and proceed according to Justice this was on the first day I was in the Court The President Bradshaw told His Majesty that he heard what was craved in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the good people of England against him by the now Prisoner at the Bar. The King stood up but Bradshaw prevented him in what he had to say telling of him that the Court had given him time to that day to know when he would plead to the Charge His Majesty proceeded to object against the Jurisdiction and said he did demur to the Jurisdiction of the Court upon which the President answered him If you demur to the Jurisdiction of the Court you must know that the Court hath over-ruled your demurrer and you must plead to your Charge guilty or not guilty upon that the King asked their authority and desired he might give reasons against it he was denyed it by the President the President at last was content to tell him that though he was not satisfied with their authority they were and he must but to satisfie him he told him in short they sat there by the supream authority of the Nation the Commons assembled in Parliament by whom his Anceston ever were and to whom he was accomptable then the King stood up by your favour shew me one President Bradshaw 〈◊〉 down in an angry manner Sir saith he we sit not here to answer your Questions plead to your Charge guilty or not guilty Clerk do your duty whereupon Broughton stood up and asked what he had to say whether guilty or not guilty and President Bradshaw said that if he would not plead they must record his contempt His Majesty turned about to the people and said then remember that the King of England suffers being not permitted to give his reasons for the liberty of the people with that a great shout came from the people crying God save the King but there was an awe upon them that they could not express themselves as they would have done I believe Coun. What did Cook say to the Judgement did you hear him press for Judgement Mr. H. Yes I heard these words from the Prisoner at the Bar That if the K. would not plead his Charge might be taken 〈◊〉 Conf. and that the Court might proceed according to Justice Cook One question more whether he often heard me speak those words that it might be taken pro Confesso and to proceed according to Justice Mr. Hern. You desired he might be held to his Plea confession or denial that he might not be suffered to use any words to the Jurisdiction of the Court. Cook Whether he
heard the Charge read Hern. I did not hear the Charge read I was not there the first day I heard you confess you had exhibited a Charge of high Treason against the Prisoner at the Bar which was then the King's Majestie Cook Whether I did not in the Charge conclude that all proceedings might be according to Justice Court Read the Title and last Article of that Charge which was accordingly read and follows in haec verba The Title of the Charge The Charge of the Commons of England against Charles Sewart KING of England of High Treason and other Crimes exhibited to the High Court of Justice The last Clause in the Charge And the said Iohn Cook by protestation saving on the behalf of the people of Eng. the liberty of exhibiting at any time hereafter any other Charge against the said Char. Stew. and also of replying to the answers which the said Char. Stew. shall make to the premisses or any of them or any other charge that shall be so exhibited doth for the said Treasons and Crimes on the behalf of the said people of England impeach the said Charles Stewart as a Tyrant Traytor Murderer publick and implacable enemy to the Commonwealth of England and prayeth that the said Charles Stewart King of England may be put to answer all and every the premisses that such proceedings examinations tryals sentences and judgement may be hereupon had as shall be agreeable to Justice Court Mr. Cook will you have any Witnesses examined touching the question you last asked Cook No be pleased to go on Mr. Baker Sworn Mr. Bak. My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I was at the High Court of Justice as they called it the first second and third daies not to trouble you with the proceedings of of Bradshaw I will tell you what I observed of this Gentleman I have the notes that I took there and pray that I may read them to help my memory which was granted and then proceeded in this manner That day my Lord Mr. Cook told the Court that he charged the Prisoner at the Bar meaning the KING with Treason and high misdemeanors and desired that the Charge might be read the Charge was this That he had upheld a Tyrannical Government c. and for that cause was adjudged to be a Tyrant c. and did then press that the prisoner might give an answer to that and that very earnestly The second day my Lord he told the Court that he did the last day exhibit a Charged High Treason against the Prisoner at the Bar meaning the King and that he did desire he might make answer to it and he told them also that instead of making an answer to the Court the King had delayed the Court but desired the K. might make a positive answer or otherwise that it might be taken pro confesso The third day my Lord he came and told the Court as before that the King had delayed then and then he charged him with the Highest Treasons and Crimes that ever were acted upon the Theatre of England and then pressed that Judgement might be given against him and another expression was that it was not so much He but the Innocent and precious bloud that was shed that did crie for Judgment against the Prisoner at the Bar this my Lord in substance there were other passages Cook Whether before this time he had not heard some thing of an Act or Order proclaimed at Westminster whether there was any other word in effect used in that charge more than in the Proclamation Mr. Baker I did hear of the Proclamation and Charge and the substance of it I have given an accompt of it and I did hear you press upon it very much the Proclamation I heard of it that it was made forthe summoning of the Court but I did not hear the Proclamation made Cook That that was called the Act of the Commons for Trying of the King Mr. Baker I did hear of the Act but did not take notice of it Mr. George Masterson Sworn Counc Mr. Masterson pray inform my Lords and the Jury what you know touching the carriage of the Prisoner at the Bar at the Tryal of his late Majesty Mr. Masterson My Lords and you Gentlemen of the Jury I was present in that they called the High Court of Justice upon the 22 23. and 27. days of January in the year 1648. I shall wave those circumstances which you have heard and many of which I well remember and what I heard likewise between the King who was then a Prisoner and the then President Bradshaw but concerning the Prisoner at the Bar this I very well remember that upon Munday I heard him say he had exhibited a Charge of High Treason against the Prisoner then the King and demanded how that he might plead to his charge I do very well remember that after some passages between the King and the Court the Prisoner at the Bar desired the King might plead to his Charge or else it might be taken pro Confesso I remember upon the last day the day of that fatal Sentence I heard the Prisoner at the Bar demand in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and all the good people of England Judgement upon the Prisoner at the Bar pointing to the King this is all Mr. Burden sworn Councel Do you know who did examine the witnesses against the King and were you examined and by whom Burden By Judge Cook for so he was called in Ireland Councel Did he examine you as a witness against the King did he give you an Oath Burden Yes my Lord and many others Cook This is a new thing I never heard of this before where was it that I examined him I had no power Council No we know that but you were active Court Where was it Cook Whether there were not any others with me in the Room and where it was Burden It was at Westminster-hall within the High Court of Justice Cook Who was there besides me Burden I cannot tell Axtel he was there and I am sure Cook was there Councel Mr. Burden Pray tell my L. the Jury what questions you were examined upon and what they tended to Burden He examined me and gave me my Oath there was eight or nine of us we had been in the Kings Army in former times this Gentleman Col. Axtel brought us in commanded us out of our Company I was in his Company and this Gentleman himself gave us our Oaths he asked us where we saw the King in action I did reply to him and told him I saw him in the Field with his Army he asked me many other questions that I could not tell him he asked me whether I did see the King at Nottingham set up his Standard and I was never at Nottingham in my life these were the questions Mr. Starkey Sworn Court Pray inform my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury what passed between you and the Prisoner at
crimes soever they have committed Except such as by a Free Parliament shall be excepted a legal Parliament called by the Writ of the King which this Parliament is not To that I give these answers First my Lord I do say that this letter of our gracious Soveraign from Breda in it self undoubtedly is no Pardon in Law for Treason that cannot be without the Broad Seal Next a Pardon under the Great Seal in such a form of words as this is would not be a Pardon for Treason for that must not be pardoned by implication but by positive words so in the Case of Sir Walter Raleigh a Commission directed to our well be loved Subject would not pardon the Treason of which he was condemned In the next place this Letter at the most is but a pardon in honour which must always be taken according to the meaning And that the Kings Honour may for ever be sacred I say this Letter doth no way help the Prisoner at the Bar. First it is plain by the very Superscription of this Letter 〈◊〉 which the Declaration was inclosed that it is directed to the Speaker of Our House of Commons in Parliament assembled which cannot possibly be expounded of any other Parliament than that which was then sitting to whose Speaker it was written Secondly the Letter it self says we have left it to you to provide for security and Indempnity and again if there be a â—â—ying sin for which the Nation may be involved in infamy 〈◊〉 cannot doubt but you will be as solicitous to vindicate as we can be And then in this very letter encloseth that declaration upon the penning of which the prisoner so much relies Now lay all together and it is clear the Parliament meant by the Declaration must be the same Parliament which was meant by the Letter and that was this very Parliament whom the King intended to trust both with Indempnity and with the vindication of his Fathers death and to be the dispensers both of mercy and Justice in this particular Another thing is this This very Parliament as the Prisoner observes they did go to the King according to His gracious letter and in the behalf of all the good people of England they did lay hold of the Kings mercy in His letter and Declaration and prayed that this claim by their Speaker in the behalf of all the rest of the Commons of England might be effectual to all purposes and for all persons other than those that should be by themselves afterward excepted according to their requests His Majesty accepts their Petition and makes Proclamation that his Pardon should extend to all but such as they should except what can be more clear and evident than that this is the Parliament which the K. did mean to be the very Parliament to which the Letter should have reference till the Act of Oblivion was passed again the late transactions of these twelve years past had involved so many persons that we could scarce find a man his he had need of mercy nay this very Parliament to which the Letter was written had need of Indempnity and it is probable in the nature of the thing or can it be understood by any man that the King writing to this Parliament and offering them pardon and Indempnity should mean such a pardon and Indempnity as future Parliament to be called by his own Writ should be willing to afford them Whose hearts would have been satisfied with so contingent a security My Lords upon the whole matter by what the King hath said in this Letter and by what the Parlim hath done in pursuance thereof and by what the King hath proclaimed it is to my understanding as clear as the noon day that the honour of the King is not concerned at all in the exemption of the prisoner at the Bar and for the Cases of my Lord of Essex and Southampton which he hath cited they make against him they were condemned because they endeavoured to imprison the Queen and to remove her Councellours of which very fact the Prisoner is in Law guilty too and then the case of King Philip the Husband of Queen Mary makes nothing for him neither unless he will speak out and tell us plainly that because by a former violence the King was made a prisoner he became but like a titular King as King Philip. In the next place he saith my Case is out of the Law I acted as a Councellour in my own particular for my Fee it was avaritia but not malitia nor falso malitiose or Proditorie But he must know that no man hath or can have a lawful calling to pursue the life of his King and the Law implies malice for malitiose and proditorie are not only words of course but of truth too in this case else it were as much as to say that no Councel can be guilty of High Treason than which nothing can be more absurd My Lord for that which he said last for I must omit some things and give him leave to take the advantage of it to stand upon it that the place was a Court such a one it was that he was not answerable for the constitution of it if it were not in a legal sense it was such an order as might bear him out that is with modesty and good manners to justifie High Treason it is not with such insolency as some others before him did it but it amounts to that That an order of a few persons that first made themselves a Parliament and then made a Court of Justice had Officers and met together and perfected so great a Treason I say that this Order to bear him out is impossible He that is a Lawyer he must accompt to the Laws for what he hath done if the authority were not lawful he cannot but know that this which he calls the Parliam was so far from a legal Authority that it was one part of the Treason that he did assist such an Assembly Gentlemen of the Jury this is your own Case here is a charge that is exhibited by the prisoner at the Bar as he saith in the name of all the people of England Look to it for you are some of them if you own it then it may be true what he hath said but I hope you meet here to tell this Nation and all the world that the people of England had no hand in that charge do but consider how that this prisoner at the Bar had hunted the life of the King how he did fish out and examine evidence whether the King set up his Standard at Nottingham was at such a place and such a place to what end is all this but with design of blood Were these things to be produced against the King and then Judgement to be demanded that he may be saved Is it not plainly proved to you by Witnesses how he did exhibit the Charge press it aggravate it desired it might be taken pro
that you did desire Judgement should be given against him and not so much you as the blood that had been shed that cryed for Judgement truly whether that was a Judgement that you intended for acquital that must be left to the Jury You asked because I will repeat it in order as my memory will give me leave whether there was any other words in the charge than was in the Proclamation Mr. Cook Whether there was any other words or no that differed in the Proclamation as it was a great sin and foul fact in the Proclamation so it was as foul in the Charge Master Masterson swears the same too he heard you say the second day you had delivered a charge the day before against the King and that he had delayed his answer you desired he might plead guilty or not guilty the last day that you did in the names of the Commons Assembled in Parliament and the people of England demand Judgement against the King and then another swears those words Judgement against the Prisoner at the Bar which was the King Burden swears you examined him as a Witness against the King in what place he was with the King It seems he was in the King's Army he swears you gave him an Oath it is testimony fit to be believed but however if you did not give the Oath by what you say your self you may be by and asked him the question Master Starkey he tells you that during the Tryal and before the Sentence that you being an old acquaintance of his in Grayes-Inn speaking with him he spake like a friend to you I hear you are up to the ears in this business and whereas you talk of the people there is a thousand for one against it that you should tell him again You will see strange things but you must wait upon God these words of waiting upon God are words of that nature people do use them now adaies when they would do some horrid impiety which hath been the sin of too many it is but a canting language that is the best term I can give it you told him then He must die this was before the Sentence that is to be observed Gentlemen of the Jury you say you did not know of the Sentence you said He must die and Monarchy with him you must here know that some of those persons that sate upon him said the King was a gracious and wise King and as Mr. Cook did say and they were the best words they spoke and I think he thinks so in his conscience but in conclusion He must die and Monarchy must die with him others said they did not hate King Charles but they hated Monarchy and Government but Monarchy was the thing that they would behead I think I have done with the Evidence that was given against you the Indictment it self was read the Overt acts was the meeting propounding consulting about it It appears he was in the Chamber about the Charge that he did propound it he delivered the Charge it appears withal that he demanded Judgement he desired the King might answer or that it might be taken pro confesso these are overt acts to declare the imagination of his heart The answer of Mr. Cook I will repeat it as clearly as I can because nothing shall go to the extenuating of the fact but it shall be spoken Mr. Cook in your answer your defence that you make you set forth the heads of this Indictment and you set them forth very truly the heads are the aggravations of the Indictment the Indictment was the compassing and imagining the death of the King you said it was upon these grounds that you did propound abet and consult the death of the King that you with others did assume power and authority to kill the King that thereupon a person unknown in a Frock did accordingly kill the King You say to the first part if it did not appear that you did advise the death of the King that you were not guilty for that Sir as I told you before taking them either complexly or singly if any of the particulars reached to one of these acts it was enough but it reaches to all you required Judgement against the King as a Traytor and that with a reason and certainly death must follow you say you were appointed to give your advice you had a Proclamation first for Tryal of the King you had the Order of Jan. 10. whereby you were appointed to give your advice if it were so it will be no excuse at all the Proclama gives you no warrant at all he that obeys so wicked a Proclamation it will not save him it appears you were privy to this before the Proclamation if you were not at all when such a thing as this is such a Proclamation and Act and such a manner of Tryal as I believe though you have read very much you never heard of such a thing in our Law or foreign Nations That you thereupon should take upon you to be of Council against the King it aggravates the fact other men may be impudent ignorant but you that were a learned Lawyer your being of Council doth aggravate the thing You say Secondly by Law words will not amount to Treason for that I would not have that go for Law by no means though it be not your Case for you are not indicted for words but words are Treason and Indictments are often for it but the difference is this The Indictment is not for words but compassing and Imagining the death of the King words are evidences of the compassing imagining the Kings death It is the greatest evidence of the imagination of the heart Words do not make a Treason that is if it be by inference or consequence but reductively but if it be immediately I shall say to a man go kill the King by theat which is an absolute immediate necessary consequence to say this is not Treason I would not have that go for Law your Case is not for words but for delivering a Charge the ground that you speak of words may make a Heretick but not a Traytor it was a witty saying but you have no sufficient authority for it these are words put in writing we all know if a man put his words in writing if a man speak Treasonable words and put them in writing they have been several times adjudged Treason and so in my Lord Cook 's 3. Institutes the Case of Williams of the Temple there was a Book of Treason in his own Study of his making and he was indicted for it words put in writing is an express evidence of the imagination of the heart you say it was dictated to you but when words are written in a Charge and your name to it which I had almost forgotten that 's more than words the Witnesses swear the likeness of your hand they do but swear the likeness of your hand no man can swear
instrumental in taking away the Kings life that is being any way instrumental Truly whether it be not instrumental to exhibit a Charge against him or complain of his delayes to ask Justice against him in the name of the people to do all this and desire that the Charge might be taken pro Confesso if this be not instrumental I know-nothing else Sentencing and signing Some signed the Sentence some the instrument for death the next degree of being Instrumental the highest degree of that is to accuse him to deliver in the Charge against him in the name of the people do it again and again be angry at the delayes The next thing is this that you did not do this falso or malitiose but for your Fee and that though there might be avaritia there was not malitia in it it was done by your Profession you were not Magisterial in it you thought the consequences that did follow would not follow If a man does but intend to beat a man and he dye upon it you know in Law it is all one You must understand there is a malice in the Law If a man beat one in the Streets and kill him though not maliciously in him but it is so in Law That you desire to have the benefit of the Kings Declaration that you did put in your petition proving the same that you were a prisoner before that the Commons in behalf of themselves and the people of England they craved the benefit of it which was granted excepting such as should be by Parliament exceptd and that the King should mention a Free Parliament for this it hath been fully answered to you and clearly by Mr. Sollicitor that you are not at all concerned in the Kings Declaration at Breda For first it is nothing in Law it binds in honour and we have given the same directions yesterday upon the like occasion that is that the Kings Declaration binds him in honour and in Conscience but it does not bind him in point of Law unless there were a pardon granted by the Broad Seal the thing is cleared to you what Parliament the King meant by it they were sitting at that time had acknowledged their dutie and allegiance to their King they went ad ultimum potentiae for a free and absolute Parliament whilst the King was absent though the King was away yet notwithstanding the King Declared whom he meant he directed one of those Declarations to our Speaker of the house of Commons and another to the Speaker of our Peers in this case it was loquendum ut vulgus it was owned by him as having the name of a Parliament it was done with great wisdom and prudence and so as it could be no otherwise they that were loyal subjects acting in the Kings absence he consenting to it the King owning that Authority so he was obliged in honour no further than his own meaning and words but there is another Clause in the act excludes all these persons The next thing is this you say the Statute of 25 Edward 3. and it is very true you say if it be any semblable Treason we were not to judge upon that unless they were the Treasons in the Act and it is most true now you would urge but this that this is but a semblable Treason but you are indicted for the compassing and imagining the Death of the King if these Acts did not tend to the compassing and imagining the Kings death I know not what does I am satisfied you are convicted in your conscience The next thing for you have said as much as any man can in such a Cause it is pity you have not a better you say though it was a Tyrannical Court as it is called but such a Court it was and there were Officers you say it had figuram judicii that aggravates the fact to you to your profession There is a difference between a standing Court and that which is but named to be a Court this was but one of a day or two's growth before and you know by whom by some that pretended to be only the Commons your knowledge can tell you that there was never an Act made by the Commons assembled in Parliament alone and you may find it in my Lord Cook that an Act by the Lords and Commons alone was naught as appeared by the Records Sir James Ormond was attainted of Treason the Act was a private Act by the King and Commons alone the Lords were forgot when the Judges came to try it it was void and another in Henry the 6. time you know this was no Court at all you know by a printed Authority that where a settled Court a true Court if that Court meddle with that which is not in their cognizance it is purely void the Minister that obeys them is punishable if it be Treasonable matter it is Treason if murder it is murder so in the Case of Martialsea and in the Common Pleas if a man shall begin an Appeal of death which is of a criminal nature and ought to be in the Kings Bench if they proceed in it it is void if this Court should condemn the party convicted he be executed it is murder in the Executioner the Court had no power over such things you speak of a Court. First it was not a Court Secondly no Court whatsoever could have any power over a King in a coercive way as to his person The last thing that you have said for your self is this that admitting there was nothing to be construed of an Act or an Order yet there was a difference it was an Act de facto that you urged rightly upon the Statute of 11 Hen. 7. which was denied to some God forbid it should be denied you if a man serve the King in the War he shall not be punished let the fact be what it will King Henry the 7. took care for him that was King de facto that his Subjects might be encouraged to follow him to preserve them whatever the event of the King was Mr. Cook you say to have the equity of that Act that here was an authority de facto these persons had gotten the supream power and therefore what you did under them you do desire the equity of that Act for that clearly the intent and meaning of that Act is against you it was to preserve the King de facto how much more to preserve the King de jure he was owned by these men and you as King you charged him as King and he was sentenced as King That that King Henry the 7. did was to take care of the King de facto against the King de jure it was for a King and Kingly Government it was not for an Antimonarchical Government you proceeded against your own King and as your King called him in your charge Charles Stewart King of England I think there is no colour you should have any benefit of the Letter or of the
equitie of the Act. They had not all the Authority at that time they were a few of the people that did it they had some part of the Army with them the Lords were not dissolved then when they had adjourned some time they did sit afterwards so that all the particulars you alledge are against you The last thing was this you say that it having pleased God to restore the King Judgement should be given for example for terrour to others that this could not be drawn into example again why because by the blessing of God peace was restored no probability that if your life was spared that it would be drawn again into example this is the weakest thing you have urged you must know the reason there are two things there is the punishment and example punishment goes to the prisoner but example to the documents of all others God knows what such things may be in after ages if there should be impunity for them it would rather make men impudent and confident afterwards if you have any more to say I will hear you if not I must conclude to the Jury You hear the evidence is clear for compassing and imagining the Death of the King you have heard what he has said and what he hath done he has within and examined Witnesses against the King that he was by at the drawing of the charge where it was drawn you hear he exhibited this charge in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the good people of England and what this charge is it is high Treason and other high misdemeanors you find that he does complain of delays dosagain and again speak of this Charge desire it may be taken pro confesso in the close of all it was not so much he as innocent blood that demanded Justice this was more than was dictated to him You have heard the Witnesses he was perswaded to forbear acknowledged the King to be a gracious and wise King The Oaths alledged against him and you have heard his excuse I have nothing to say more I shall be very willing to hear you further I have not absolutely directed the Jury Cook I do humbly acknowledge your patience in hearing me and that your Lordships have truly and justly stated both proofs and my answer If your Lordships are pleased to lay aside these Acts or Orders or Authority whereby I did at that time truly conscientiously act and did think that it would bear me out if you lay aside that and look upon it as so many men got together without authority and aswell those that were instrumental though not sentencers or signers and that clause in the Act I confess I humbly make bold to say I have not received satisfaction in my judgment those very words of not so much I as the innocent blood cries for justice were dictated to me there was nothing at all left to me because his Majesty did not plead there was no Tryal that which I did was according to the best though it may be according to the weakest part of my judgment I have no new matter L. Ch. Bar. You have said no new matter unless it be worse than before for now you warrant that Authority Cook Do not mistake me my Lord I mean so far as to excuse me in the point of High Treason L. C. B. We delivered our opinions as to that formerly we were of opinion that the acting by colour of that pretended authority was so far from any extenuation that it was an aggravation of the thing the meeting by that authoty was Treason and in them that acted under them and approving of it the making of that trayterous pretended Act making the Proclamation sitting upon it they were all so many Treasons That was the reason why that was urged against you assuming upon you the power that was you approving of their power by acting under them so that there is nothing more to be said Gentlemen of the Jury you have heard the indictment was for compassing and imagining the death of the King you have heard the several Overt acts repeated and whether these are guilty of Treason to deliver in a charge against the K. such a one as that was in these words as against a Traytor Tyrant Murderer and implacable enemy to the Commonwealth in these very words to desire Judgement against the Prisoner then the King at the Bar angry at delayes to desire that the Charge might be taken pro confesso to have it expresly again again to demand Judgement if these be not Overt acts of compassing and imagining the Death of the King that which hath been said by the Witnesses it must be left to you I think you need not go from the Bar. Jury went together Silence is commanded Clerk Are you agreed of your Verdict Jury Yes Clerk Who shall speak for you Jury The Fore-man Clerk John Cook hold up thy hand look upon the Prisoner at the Bar how say you is he guilty of the Treason in manner form as he stands indicted or not guilty Fore-man Guilty Clerk Look to him Keeper Clerk What Goods and Chattells Jury None that we know of The Tryal of Hugh Peters the same 13. of October and at the same Bar. Clerk of the Crown SET Hugh Peters to the Bar he was brought accordingly H. P. Hold up thy hand thou standest indicted c. If you will challenge any of the Jury you must challenge them when they come to the book before they are sworn L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Peters You may challenge to the number of 35 peremptiorily but beyond that you cannot without good cause shewn and you may have Pen Ink and Paper Peters My Lord I shall challenge none Jury sworn 12. Sir Jer. Whitch James Hally Christo Abdy Nich. Rainton Rich. Cheyney Jo. Smith Rich. Abell George Terry Charl. Pickern Jo. Nichol. Fran. Dorrington Anthony Hall Cler. Hugh Peters hold up thy hand Look on the Prisoner you that are sworn c. Sir Ed. Turner to the Jury You have often heard repeated to you that the substantial part of the charge is the compassing and imagining the death of the King and all the rest will be but evidence to prove that imagination against the Prisoner at the Bar whom we will prove to be a principal actor in this sad Tragedy and next to him whom God hath taken away and reserved to his own Judgment and we shall endeavour to prove That he was a chief Conspirator with Cromwell at serveral times and in several places and that it was designed by them We shall prove that he was the principal person to procure the Souldiery to cry out Justice Justice or assist or desire those for the taking away the life of the King He did make use of his profession wherein he should have been the Minister of peace to make himself a Trumpeter of war of Treason and Sedition in the Kingdom He preached many Sermons to the Souldiery in direct
terms for taking away the King comparing the K. to Barabbas He was instrumental when the Proclamation for the High Court of Justice as they called it was proclaimed directing where it should be proclaimed and in what place When the King was brought upon the stage that mock-work he was the person that stirred up the Souldiery below to cry for Justice we shall shew you as he preached at several times upon several occasions still he was in the Pulpit to promote this business the next day after he was brought to tryal he commends it you shall hear all out of the mouth of the Prisoner therefore I say no more call the witnesses Dr. William Young sworn Council Tell my Lords and Jury what the Prisoner at the Bar has declared to you concerning the contrivance of bringing the King to Tryal Dr. Young My L. and Gentlemen of the Jury It was near about and that the Prisoner may remember the moneth of July 1648. since we came first acquainted when he went over to Ireland it was about the Siege of Pembroke Castle but afterwards in the year 1649. we renewed our acquaintance he went over into Ireland with that Usurper the late Protector as he was called after the Town of Wexford was taken coming over he fell sick of the flux and said he received it by infection praying over Captain Horton Coming into Milford that Captain sends a summons to me to come on board that was to fetch this prisoner at the Bar who was sick I found him there groveling upon the deck and sick he was indeed with much difficulty we got him on shore within a very few dayes to the best of my remembrance five days I perfected his cure We became very familiar I observed in him that he had some secret thoughts that I could not well discover neither well understand whereupon I thought it might tend to my security that I should so much sympathize with him to get within him to know his intentions After some weeks for he continued with me ten weeks or near thereabouts some few days rather over than under we grew so familiar that at last I found he began to inlarge his heart to me Many times I should hear him rail most insufferably against the Blood Royal not only against our Martyred King but against his Royal off-spring still as we continued our acquaintance he became more and more open to me so we would sit up discoursing till about twelve or one of the clock at night very often about these unhappy wars late in England At last my Lord I found him that he began to tell me how he came into England and upon what account he came out of New England I shall desire that in regard his discourses were various that I may deliver them orderly they were delivered to me within the compass of ten weeks but the days and weeks I cannot remember First he told me discoursing of New England and the Clergy there and much of the Clergy here in England and of the business here of reformation he told me that for the driving on of this interest of this Reformation he was imployed out of New England for the stirring up of this war and driving of it on this I shall my Lord speak to in the first place and that upon the oath I have taken and secondly he was pleased at another time to acquaint me and that by way of complement complaining then against the Parliament saying that sometime after he was come into Engl. he was sent over into Ireland by the Parliament to receive further instructions to drive on the design to extirpate Monarchy saith he I did dispend a great deal of my own money yet never had that satisfaction from them which they promised me that was they promised me 2 or 3000 l. for my journey and yet they have given me no more but only a small pittance of land out of my Lord of Worcesters estate in Worcester-shire I have seen his letters directed to his kinsman here in London as I take it his name was Parker advising him for the settling of this land and selling it Thirdly my Lord I have observed that by way of vilification of the Monarchical Government I have found him jocundarily scoffing at it and would ordinarily quibble in this manner saying this Common-wealth will never be at peace till 150. be put down I asked him what this 150. was he told me three L's and afterwards interpreted the meaning to be the Lords the Levites and the Lawyers with that said I we shall be like Switzers Tinkers and Traytors Now my Lord we are come to the last particular we discoursing thus frequently and withal he was then a Colonel and had a Commission under that Usurper Oliver and brought over his Commission for raising of Souldiers to foment that War in Ireland that it was so I appeal to the dictates of his own Conscience and whether he did not press me very importunately to accept of a Commission of Major or a Captain he did issue forth two Commissions under his own hand one of them to bring over from Devon-shire two foot Companies unto Cork My Lord because we were militarily affected amongst the discourses of our unhappy wars I know not how it came from him it being near eleven years since and I have had many sufferings incumbent on me so that I may fail in some particulars but in general thus it was we were discoursing concerning our Martyr'd King as then we call'd him and of his Imprisonment in Holmeby-House which I wondered at thus we discourst he told me the story how they had used him at Holmeby and at last came up to this when he was taken away from Holmeby House the Parliament had then a design to have secured O. Cromwel and my self being then in London saith he we having intelligence of it escaped out of London and rode hard for it and as we rode to Ware we made a halt and advised how we should settle this Kingdome in peace and dispose of the King the result was this They should bring him to justice Try him for his life and cut off his Head whether this was the expression of Cromwel I cannot tell but to the utmost of my remembrance and I am mistaken if it was not the advice of Mr. Peters to Cromwel and I believe it because his former relations of his instructions out of Ireland did tend to that effect Mr. Soll. Gen. I will ask you this question we will not press you particularly upon your memory whether Cromwel or Peters said the words do you remember he confessed to you they were agreed upon that matter Young They did consult and agree upon it Peters My Lord I desire to speak a Word his voice being so low he was brought to the second Bar. I am the bolder to speak to your Lordships at this time a word and it is high time to satisfie my conscience if these things were true
Maurice nor any of that rabble excepted out of it And further he said This is the day that I and many Saints of God besides have been praying for these many years Peters Ask him whether he took notes Chase No Sir but it being so memorable a Sermon I took special notice of it I came to my Brothers house at Shoolane and told him said I Brother I have been at White-Hall and have heard the most execrable business that ever was heard in the world by a Minister of the Gospel and I told him the words I observed that Oliver Cromwell did laugh at that time when you were Preaching Tho. Tongue sworn Coun. What do you know of the Prisoners preaching Tongue Upon Jan. 21. 1648. I was at Whitehall where this Gentleman preached and he preached upon this Text 149. Psalm v. 8. To bind their Kings in chains and their Nobles in links of iron in which Text this Peters did much applaud the Souldiers there he said he hoped to see such another day following as the day before and that blessed be God saies this Parson Peters the House the lower House is purged and the House of Lords themselves they will down suddenly this is all that I well remember at that time Upon the 28. of January 1648. next day after sentence of the King I heard Peters preach upon this Text in S. James's Chapel 149. Psalm 6 7 8. 9 verses Let the high praises of God be in their mouth and a two edged sword in their hands to execute vengeance upon the heathen and punishment upon the people To bind their Kings with chains and their Nobles with fetters of Iron To execute upon them the judgement written this honour have all his Saints praise ye the Lord And there he did so saint the Redcoats and so reprobate the poor Kings friends And in the middle of his Sermon he took occasion to produce a Text 14. Esay 18 19 20. All the Kings of the Nations even all of them lie in glory every one in his own house But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch and as the raiment of those that are slain thrust through with a sword that go down to the stones of the pit as a carkass trodden under feet Thou shalt not be joyned with them in burial because thou hast destroyed thy land and slain thy people the seed of evil doers shall never be renowned saies he This I did intend to insist and preach upon before the poor wretch and the poor wretch would not hear me Coun. Who did he mean Tongue His Majesty who was the day before condemned saith he look in your lesser Bibles and you shall find the title is The Tyrants fall Coun. That that was spoken of the King of Babylon the ignominy that was cast upon him he applies it to the King of England Peters Ask him where it was Tongue It was in S. James's Chapel Sunday the 28. of Jan. 1648. in the forenoon Reynold Bowdler Sworn Bowdler That which I have now to say is this I did hear him a few daies before the King was murthered preach in S. Sepulchers Church there he compares the King that was then to dye to Barabbas a murderer and in this manner saith he There is a great company amongst us like the Jews they cry out Let Christ be crucified and let Barabbas be released still comparing the King to Barabbas the murtherer these were his words with many more to the same purpose William Ryder Sworn Coun. Speak what you know concerning the Prisoner Ryder I was at the same time at Church in S. Sepulchers Coun. How long was that before the King dyed Ryder It was very near the Kings death Coun. Was it after the High Court of Justice sate as they called it Ryder About that time it was My Lord assoon as ever he had read the words of his Text which was He shall call his name Emanuel he presently shook hands with his Text and fell as he was wont to news and there he said the great inquiry now is to know what should become of the King let that alone saith he and presently he falls to it again and was pleased to stile the King Barabbas saith he there is a great many of the people had rather Christ should be crucified than Barabbas and here he was applauding the Souldiers and said that Emanuel was written upon the bridles of their horses and he was speaking of the Kings Souldiers saith he I have known eighty thousand of them and not one of them a gracious person Coun. Now we expect the Answer of the Prisoner at the Bar the Indictment hath been fully proved Peters I desire that witness may be admitted which I spoke of his name is Cornelius Glover Coun. We have omitted one evidence we desire Master Walker may be called Mr. Walker Sworn Walker On Sunday after the King was first brought to his tryal out of curiosity I went to hear Mr. Peters at Whitehall after he had made a long prayer saith he I have prayed and preached these twenty years and now I may say with old Symeon Lord now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace for mine eyes have seen thy salvation Afterwards he speaks of the Text of binding their Kings in chains c. then much reviled the King but soft there saith he I must not talk so here I am in the Kings Chapel there is a very remarkable passage in Amos Amos went to preach and Amazia would not let him but Amos would preach the poor wretch would not hear me but yet I will preach Afterwards he speaks of the Major of Exeter that committed the Bishops servant for being drunk saith the Major here is an Act of Parliament for it and I do not see that the Bishop nor his man are either of them excepted out of the Act and saith he in Scripture it is said Whosoever sheddeth mans blood by man shall his blood be shed and I do not find that either King Charles Prince Charles Prince Rupert Prince Maurice or any of that rabble are excepted Coun. Now Mr. Peters you may call your witness Cornelius Glover not sworn Lord Chief Baron Where do you dwell Glover In Pauls Church-yard Lo. Ch. Bar. What is your quality of life Peters A servant of the Kings Lo. Ch. Bar. I do not ask you Mr. Peters Glover I belong to the Post-house Peters Pray hear him speak L. Ch. Bar. What would you have him asked Peters Whether I was out of my Chamber that day the King suffered Lo. Ch. Bar. What say you to that Glover I was come to Mr. Peters a little before that time to live with him as his servant it fell out that day he was ill in his chamber all the morning the Souldiers in S. James's-house were all gone away I had a desire to go see the meeting where they were at Whitehall saith he thou seemest to have a great desire to go and look about thee
it is very sad but if you will go you may I did go over the Park Coun. What time Glover About noon Coun. What hour Glover I do not know I did not stay there the soldiers and the people fill'd the place and I went back again to the chamber I came back again within a matter of an hours time Coun. Was the King dead before you came back again Glover They said he was not when I went home he asked me what was doing I told him there was a great croud I could not come near I staid there an hour and then went out again and still there was a croud and I came back again and M. Peters was in his chamber then Coun. Was he in bed or up Glover I do not remember Coun. How old were you then Glover I am not above 32. or 33. Coun. Was Mr. Peters sick Gl. Yes He was melancholy sick as he used to be L. Ch. Bar. How long have you been at the Post-office Gl. About five years L. Ch. Bar. M. Peters have you any more to ask him Peters I brought him to testifie that I was not out of my Chamber that day and that I was sick L. Ch. Bar. Did you desire to go or did he send you Gl. I did desire to go being newly come to London Lord Ch. Baron This Gentleman though not upon oath is examined and it is only to one particular nothing at all to the main proofs Peters I bring him only to vindicate my self from that aspersion of my being upon the Scaffold L. Ch. Bar. They do not lay the weight of their evidence upon that The Kings Councel have done with their evidence if you have any thing to say you have your liberty Peters May it please your Lordships I will give you an account of the business I lived fourteen years out of England when I came over I found the wars begun I began no war my Lord nor have been the Trumpeter when I came out of the West Indies I fled from the War into Ireland to the Western part there and it was after the Rebellion when some of the Irish had been stirring there I went and spent my time there I was neither at Edge-hill nor Naseby but my Lord after I came over there was War that the people were engaged in I was not here in the beginning of it but was a stranger to the carriage of it When I came into the Nations I looked after three things one was that there might be sound Religion The second was that learning and Laws might be maintained The third that the poor might be cared for and I must confess I have spent most of my time in these things to this end and purpose there was a noise in all parts of some miscarriages in matters of Religion after it was setled I lived in Ireland I must profess for my own part solemnly that my carriage hath been upon these heads For Religion I have through Gods mercies spoke the truths of the Protestant Church upon this account I did stay to see what God might do I was sent over to his Majesty that we might have a little help in point of Excise and Customes and encouragement in learning My Lord this is true that I being here in the Nation and being sent over upon the occasions of the Countrey and not upon any design but this I say I cannot deny it that after I came over and had seen the state of England in some measure I did stir but by strong importunities the Ministers of London deeper than I I am very sorry to hear of my carriage towards the King it is my great trouble I beg pardon for my own folly and weakness I thought God had a great controversie with the Nation and the Lord was displeased on all hands that which some people took to I did take unto I went into the Army I saw at the beginning of it that corruptions grew among them I suppose none can say I have gone aside from any Orthodox truth of the Lord And now to take off the scandal upon me and to the business let me beg of your Lordships to consider whatever prejudices or revenge may take up mens hearts there is a God that knows all God hath a regard to the people of England I look upon this Nation as the Cabinet of the world That that doth concern the business is this my Lord that after this time hither I came and did bear witness to all the world that there was amongst us something that was for better and some thing worse for the Nation I took advice of some great persons concerning the weightiness of it I had neither malice nor mischief in my heart against the King upon this I did engage so far as being invited I went into the Wars and there I found very strange and several kinds of providences as this day hath been seen I do not deny but that was active but not to stir in a way that was not honourable I challenge a great part of the Nations to manifest my carriage among them I shall make it good divers ways I had so much respect to his Majesty particularly at Windsor that I propounded to his Majesty my thoughts three ways to preserve himself from danger which were good as he was pleased to think though they did not succeed and the work died as for malice I had none in me It is true there was a difference amongst us an Army and an Army I never had a groat or penny from O. Cromwel since I knew this place I profess I have had no ends for honour or gain since I set foot upon this shore I challenge any man that belonged to that party whether they had not the same respect from me as my own party I have not persecuted any with malice I will only take off malice L. C. B. Your business is matter of fact Peters I am unskilful in Law this that I offer is to shew that I had no malice in me I was so far from malice that I have a Certificate if worth the reading from one of the Eminentest persons in the Nation to shew I had no malice It is concerning the Marques of Worcester under his Ladies hand beginning with these words I do here testifie that in all the sufferings of my husband Mr. Peters was my great friend c. I have here a seal and then produced it that the Earl of Norwich gave me to keep for his sake for saving his life which I will keep as long as I live L. C. Bar. I am not willing at all to interrupt you or hinder you that which you speak of doing good services is not at all to the point we do not question you for what good you have done but for the evil you have done I hope there is no malice in your heart nor upon the Court nor Jury we and they are upon our Oaths you hear the matter alledged against you pray
actually guilty of putting the King to death nay admitting in charity you had no intent to go as far as you did you are by the laws of Christ and this Nation guilty of high Treason in that you that are a Lawyer know very well and I speak it that you may lay it to your heart in the convictions of your conscience I must say to you as Joshua said to Achan my son give glory to God and confess and it would become you so to do you know very well it is the law of this Nation that no one house nor both houses of Parliament have any coercive power over the King much less to put him to death you know as you cited very well that the imprisoning of the King is Treason You know both of you this is an undoubted truth the rule of Law is that the King can do no wrong that is the King can do no wrong in the estimation of Law he may do some particular Acts as a private person but he can do little prejudice in his own person if he would hurt any it must be by Ministers in that case the Law provides a remedy if he doth it by Ministers they must answer for it The King of England is one of those Princes who hath an Imperial Crown what is that It is not to do what he will no but it is that he shall not be punished in his own person if he doth that which in it self is unlawful Now remember this when you took the oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy I presume you both did so what was your oath of Supremacy It was this that the King was the only Supream Governour of these Realms it goes farther as he was Supream Governour so he was the only Supream Governour that excludes Coordination you swear farther that you will to the utmost of your power defend the King against all conspiracies and attempts whatsoever truly you that were a Lawyer when you had thus sworn your fee could be no excuse against what you had sworn to We know that the King in his politick or natural capacity is not only salus populi but salus Reipublicae The Law hath taken care that the people shall have justice and right the Kings person ought not to be touched the King himself is pleased to judge by the Law you see he doth by Law question the death of his Father he doth not judge it himself but the Law judges it Mr. Peters knows very well he subscribed the 39. Articles of Religion look upon them that were made in 1552. and upon those Articles that were confirmed in 13. Elizabeth the King is there acknowledged to have the chief power in these Nations the medling with the King was a Jesutical doctrine This I speak not that the King should or ought to govern but by the Fundamental laws of the land they that keep within the bounds of the law are happy you that are a Lawyer know this in point of law and you that are a Divine know this in point of Divinity You both know the truth of it and when you have thought upon it I hope you will reflect upon that horrid crime the shedding of Royal Blood You see he had granted all those grievances of the people taken them away secured them for the future and at this very time when this horrid act was done you see he had granted all at the desire of the people he had made those concessions such as were it not in respect of others more than those that treated themselves they thought was more than could be expected by the Nation You that had a hand in the Kings death it falls upon you the guilt of it because you were some of those instruments that assisted those persons that broke the Treaty prepare your selves for that death which you are to die it is a debt which we all owe to nature if in this case there is something of shame comes to you it is that you must take as part of the reward of your sin The only work I have now to do is to pronouce the Judgment and this is the judgment of the Court and the Court doth award That both of you be led back to the place from whence you came and from thence shall be drawn upon a hurdle c. and the Lord have mercy upon your souls Cl. Cryer make proclamation Cryer O yes c. All manner of persons c. and all Jurors and witnesses are to appear at this place to morrow morning at seven of the Clock in the morning upon pain of 100. l. a piece So God bless King Charles c. 15. Octo. 1660. at the Sessions House in the Old Bailey The Tryal of William Howlet Memorandum that the Bill of Indictment against William Hewlet alias Howlet was found at Hickes-hall 12 Octob. instant Proclamation of the Court being made Clerk of the Crown SET William Hewlet alias Howlet to the Bar which was done accordingly Cl. William Hewlet alias Howlet hold up thy hand Thou standest Indicted of High Treason in the County of Middlesex by the name of William Hewlet alias Howlet for that thou c. How sayest thou art thou guilty of the High Treason whereof thou hast been Indicted and art now arraigned or not guilty Hewlet I am not guilty my Lord. Clerk How wilt thou be tryed Hewlet By God and the Country Cl. God send thee a good delivery Set him aside Octob. 15. 1660. Clerk of the Crown Set Axtell to the Bar which was done accordingly Clerk Daniel Axtell hold up thy Hand Axtell Pray my Lord let me have Pen and Ink. L. Ch. Bar. Give Mr. Axtell Pen and Ink. Cler. Daniel Axtell these men that were last called of the Jury are to pass c. if you will challenge them or any of them you must challenge them when they come to the Book before they are sworn L. Ch. Bar. Do you know how many you have liberty to challenge because I would not have you misinformed 35 you may challenge peremptorily and no more Axtell I thank you Lordship L. Ch. Bar. Unless you have any particular cause if so you may challenge more Axtell I confess I am wholly ignorant of the law John Kirke John Smith Thomas Morris Ralph Halsell John Sherecroft Francis Beale Robert Cromwell John Gallyerd John Shelbury George Rithe were called and by the Prisoner challenged Thomas Bide Charles Pitfield Robert Sheppard William Dod Thomas Vsman William Maynerd George Plucknet Samuel Harris John Nicoll of Hendon Henry Marsh Thomas Bishop Thomas Snow in all 12 were admitted and sworn of the Jury Cler. of the Crown If any man can inform my Lords the Kings Justices c. Cl. Daniel Axtell hold up thy hand Look upon the prisoner you that are sworn and harken to your charge you shall understand that the prisoner stands Indicted c. K. Council May it please your Lordships and you Gentlemen that are Sworn of this Jury The High Court
of Injustice that was Erected for Tryal of the late King it had all the formalities of a Court to put in Execution that bloody Act they had their President their Council their Chaplain and their Guards some of their Judges have been already Tryed one of their Council and their Chaplain Now my Lord we come to the Guards and this Gentleman at the Bar that is now the Prisoner He was Commander of that Black Guard that cruel and bloody Guard The Indictment is That he did Imagin and compass the Death of the King there be several overt acts that are mentioned in the Indictment as Evidences of that Imagination as the consultation to bring him to Tryal the Actual bringing him to Tryal and the Bloody Execution upon the Scaffold Our Evidence shall be this That during the time of the Tryal the Prisoner at the Bar did Command the Souldiers in Westminster-Hall himself did keep the Entrance into the Court and when Bradshaw did speak to the King and told him he trifled away time and required his answer to the charge exhibited in the Name of the Commons of England Assembled in Parliament and the good People of England that a Noble person in the Gallery there cryed out it was a Lye saying that above half the Commons disowned it saying where are these good people it is a lye Oliver Cromwel is a Traytor this bloodly Fellow commanded the Souldiers to shoot her he did several times command and encourage the Souldiers to cry out Justice justice and the last day of that horrid Tryal called by them the day of Judgement he likewise commanded them to cry out Execution Execution and when some of them would not do it he had the Valour to Beat them My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury if we prove any of these particulars to demonstrate unto you that he was Guilty of compassing and imagining the King's Death it is equal as if we had proved he did Actually cut off the King's head Mr. Bodurdoe Mr. Nutly Mr. Harrington Sir Purback Temple Mr. Sympson Mr. Baker Mr. Huncks and Mr. Jeoner Sworn Coun. Mr. Symp. tell my Lords and the Jury who had the command of the Souldiers during the Tryal of the King in Westminster-Hall Sym. My Lords as I said before in the Case of Mr. Peters Col. Stubberd and Col. Axtel had the command of the Souldiers below Stairs near that which was called the High Court of Justice Axtell I desire to know his Name my Lord Sym. My Name is Holland Sympson Coun. Did you see him there commanding the Souldiers Sym. There was a kind of a Hubbub in the Court there was a Lady they said it was the Lady Fairfax who at the Exhibiting of the Charge against the King said to be in the Name of the Commons and people of England She spoke out aloud and said it was a lye that not half not a quarter of the people Oliver Comwell is a Rogue and a Traytor they called for a Guard this Gentleman he was called and brought up some Musqueteers and commanded his Souldiers to Present and give Fire against the Lady and commanded her to Unmask Axtell What Lady was it I desire to know Sim. She went by the name of the Lady Fairfax I know not whether it was so or no it was the common report it was she Cl. Mr. H. pray tell my Lord what you know of the Prisoner at the Bar. Huncks My Lord to say positively any thing of the man touching his command I cannot but only that morning the King Dyed he came into the Door of the Room where Colonel Phayre Colonel Hacker Cromwell and my self were Ireton and Harrison lying in bed together in the same Room and then he stood at the Door half in and half out I refusing to Sign an Order for Executing the King as Cromwell ordered me and some little cross Language having passed saith the Prisoner at the Bar Colonel Huncks Iam ashamed of you the Ship is now coming into the Harbour and will you strike Sayle before we come to Anchor This I appeal to your self but for crying out Knock them down Shoot them I know not who it was the Officers cryed Justice and some of the Souldiers but I profess I know not who it was particularly but they cryed Justice and then I fell a trembling for I was afraid of the King but these were the words he used to me will you strike sayle c. Axtell My Lord I desire to ask him a question L. Ch. Bar. Ask him what you will Axtell If I am not in the right I hope your Lordships will direct me L. Ch. Bar. Go on Axtell Col. Huncks where was it Huncks In a little Room in White hall where Ireton and Harrison lay in bed together Axtell Do you know whereabouts Huncks I think I can go to the Room I appeal to your own conscience before all this people Axtell By your favour Sir the Room I perceive you know not and truly Sir My Lord if you please to give me leave because he appeals to my conscience I do appeal to the Great God before whom it may be I may be Arraigned to give an account of all my Words thoughts and Actions I do not remember that ever I had any converse with this man there or met him there or any of that company there that day he was a stranger to me but I wish that you to save your self being in the Warrant for Execution do not make others a Peace-Offiring to save your self the Lord that knows my heart I appeal to him I appeal to your own conscience because you appeal to my conscience I never met you nor saw you there Huncks Have you done then give me leave you say you do not know me I appeal to the same God when Cromwell took upon him to have the Crown have not I said What have you got by being Jehu-like Lord strike me dead here if it be not true Axtell I will not reflect upon him but because he hath appealed to my conscience therefore I speak it it is known Notoriously how Jehu-like you were when you were one of the chief Guards of his Majesty one of the Fourty Halberteers that did oppose every person then for the King had I had time and had not been a close Prisoner as I was there were Witnesses enough Council This after our Evidence is more proper Huncks Spare me not Col. Axtell L. Ch. Bar. Take the Old and Antient course let the Witnesses that are produced for the King be all heard then give your answer to all of them together Axtell My Memory is not very good L. Ch. Bar. You have Pen Ink and Paper L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Axtell is this all that you desire to speak to Col. Huncks Axtell Yes my Lord. L. Ch. Bar. Have you any other Questions Council My Lord we have a few words he Objects as if Col. Huncks were under a danger he is pardoned Axtell I desire to ask
him upon what account these words were spoke Huncks My Lord it was this Cromwell having a Commission which I think I heard read here Colonel Hacker was reading of it My Lord Cromwell he comes to me and by Vertue of that Commission he would have me to write a Warrant for Executing the King I refusing to write that Warrant upon this which he speaks of that standing at the Door if God bless me I will search all the Doors at Whitehall but I will find it out I not doing it I said why should it be offered to me sayes Cromwell thou art a peevish Fellow Cromwell fell a writing assoon as ever he had done that writing he gave Hacker the pen what Hacker writes I know not and upon my refusing this prisoner at the Bar said Col. Huncks I am now ashamed of you The Ship is now coming into the Harbour and will you now strike Sayle before you cast Anchor Council You observe the course of this evidence there was a Warrant or Commission directed to three persons Hacker Huncks and Phaire for Execution of the King Cromwell demanded of this Gentleman Col. Huncks that he should sign a Warrant by Vertue of that other Warrant and this Gentleman refusing it the Prisoner objects this that he to save himself doth witness this against the Prisoner Gentlemen he did refuse the thing have you any thing to ask Col. Huncks Axtell He says Col. Phaire and Hacker were there I do not doubt but they will be so conscientious to vindicate me from all this Charge L. Ch. Bar. If it be any thing that tends to your defence that you will be heard afterwards but have you any Questions to ask Col. Huncks Axtell No more I know nothing of it if I were to dye at this Bar presently Council Sir Purback Temple pray tell my Lords and the Jury your knowledge of the carriage of this Gentleman touching the Tryal of his Late Majesty Sir P. Tem. My Lord being present and engaged by some persons of Honour Servants of his late Majesty to be present when that horrid Murther was acting before this Court of Justice as they called it I was present at all the Tryals of the King and very near him I heard the King demand from Bradshaw by what Authority and Commission they proceeded thus strangely to Try him Then I heard the Lady Fairfax and one Mrs. Nelson my Sister after the exhibiting of the charge in the Name of the Commons Assembled in Parliament and the good people of this Kingdom against Charles Stuart King of England I say I heard the said Lady cry out from a Gallery over the Court Not half the people it is false where are they or their Consents Oliver Cromwell is a Traitor Upon which I heard the Prisoner at the Bar cry out Down with the Whores shoot them which made me take the further notice of him seeing him in Westminster-Hall commanding the Souldiers there I saw him the most activest person there and during the time that the King was urging to be heard he was then laughing entertaining his Souldiers scoffing aloud whilst some of the Souldiers by his suffering and I believe procurement did fire powder in the palms of their hands that they did not onely offend his Majesties smell but enforced him to rise up out of his Chair and with his hand to turn away the smoke and after this he turned about to the people and smiled upon them and those Souldiers that so rudely treated him Then turning himself to Bradshaw said to him and the Court There are some sitting here fixing his Eyes upon some persons near Bradshaw that well knew that if I would have Forfeited or Betrayed the Liberties and Rights of the People I need not have come hither or words to this effect But their Liberties and Rights are dearer and nearer to me than my three Kingdoms nay than my life it self Therefore I desire you to hear me and remember that I am your lawful King that have done you many Acts of Grace and Favour After which this person Mr. Axtell Prisoner at the Bar commanded his Souldiers to cry out Justice which the Souldiers not readily obeying of him I saw him beat four or five of them with his Cane until they cried out with himself Justice Justice Execution Execution which made me turn to a Noble Lord by whom I then stood and said Pray my Lord take notice there is not above 4 or 5 that cry out Justice Justice I heard also of their spitting in the Kings Face and I think no bodies sufferings have been so like those of our Saviour Christ Jesus as his Majesties were After this this persons crying Justice Justice Execution Execution a second time the Court proceeded to pass a Sentence the which his Majesty pressed hard against and told him Sir before you pass that ugly Sentence which I very well understand you are intended to do I desire you to hear me hear me hear me passionately and not affectionately expressing it which they denying the King and the notice of Justice Justice Execution Execution being repeated they proceeded and read that ugly Sentence of Death after which his Majesty was immediately hurried away from the Bar into a common Cedan where he was carried by two common Porters which Cedan I followed to the middle of King's Street where I saw the two Porters in reverence go bare till the Souldiers under the Command of the Prisoner at the Bar beat them and would not suffer them to go bare when they carried him After this the people cried out What do you carry the King in a common Cedan as they carry such as have the Plague God deliver your Majesty out of such Enemies hands In which Street I was forced to leave the sight of his Majesty occasioned by the injuries and hurts I received in my person from the Souldiers under Axtel's command they carrying him through the Streets shouting in triumph A short time after I received an importuate command from a Lady of great Honour a Servant of his Majesties that I would endeavour to find out where the body of the Martyr'd King was and to give her an account where it then was Applying my self to Whitehall after two or threescore Intreaties I was denyed but understanding that money would do it I gave the persons then under the command of Mr. Axtell that then kept it to shew it me half a piece who in a scoffing manner took me by the hand said If thou thinkest there is any sanctity or holiness in it look here where I saw the Head of that blessed martyr'd King lie in a Coffin with his Body which smiled as perfectly as if it had been alive this is the sad account of the martyr'd King and this sad horrid Prisoner Mr. Axtell Axtell My Lord may I ask that Gentleman some Questions L. ch Bar. Yes yes Axtell My Lord He seems to say that I bid the Souldiers cry out for Justice he doth
Whitehall there were some Cavaliers then in the Regiment it was my fortune I came into your Company I wish I never had you commanded more besides my self to be a Witness against the King and Justice Cook took my Examination you brought me in you commanded the Guards that time at Whitehall when the King was upon his Tryal Axtell What more Burden And you commanded Elisha Axtell with a file of Souldiers to take a Boat and go down to the common Hangman that liv'd beyond the Tower to execute the King he is now Shepards Serjeant in Ireland Axtell My Lord I desire to ask him a question he was pleased to say I desired him to be a Witness Bur. Yes Axtell Where was it Burden In the Court at Whitehall Axtell My Lord I have seen the printed List of Witnesses against the King and in that list you shall find no such Name Burden I have been a Prisoner in Dublin by your means Axtell My Lord I hope you will take notice of that Councel Burden do you remember any of his commands to Web to draw up in the Banqueting-house Bur. He commanded Web to draw up in the Banqueting-house during the time of Execution his own company I was one of his own company then Coun. In order to what Bur. For Execution Axtell My Lord is Web here Bur. He is in Dublin Axt. I wish he were here Edward Cook sworn Cook And it please your Honour my Lord the last day of the Tryal of his Majesty I came into Westminster-hall coming where the Court was I did see Col. Axtell the Prisoner at the Bar there with some Musquetiers Coun. What day was this Cook The last day of his Majesties Tryal L. ch Bar. Go on Sir Cook Standing there a little while his Majesty came guarded with some Halberteers when he came by the Souldiers that stood with Col. Axtell his Majesty bowed and afterwards put off his Hat and went up to the Court I could not know what Bradshaw said to him I stood below I heard him say he was brought by the consent of the Commons and people of England there stood a Lady above in a Gallery crying out it is a lye where are the people or their consents Cromwel is a Traytor whereupon Col. Axtell standing by saith he what Drab is that that disturbs the Court come down or I will fetch you down Mr. Nelson sworn Coun. Tell my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury touching the Discourse between you and the Prisoner at the Bar in Dublin Nelson My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury upon a Discourse with the prisoner at the Bar in Dublin 5 or 6 years since upon the platform in that Castle we discoursed of the late Kings having had several reports I desired to know of him who it was that Executed the King thinking he might inform me he was pleased to tell me this saith he the persons that were imployed in that service you know them as well as I do truly Sir not I said I I saw them in Vizards but not their Visage as I know of yes saith he you do know them it is true saith he my self and others were imployed in that affair in order to the Execution but there were several persons came and offered themselves out of a kind of Zeal to do the thing but we did not think it proper to imploy persons whom we did not know but we made choice of a couple of Stout persons pray let me hear their Names said I saith he it was Heulet and Walker I desired to know their reward Truly saith he I do not know whether 30 l. a piece or between them I said it was a small reward for a work of that Nature truly saith he that was all Axt. You named one man I did not hear the other named Nelson I named Heulet and Walker we was one that managed the Execution he told me so and it pleased you Sir Axtell He is pleased to say that in Ireland there was such conference was any body by Nelson No Sir Axt. Did I name any body to you Nel. You named those two persons Axt. Certainly I must invent them then for I had no more knowledg of them then any one here Nel. You told me you were one of them that had the managing of that Affair Councel My Lord we have done with our Evidence those particulars that were first opened to you have rendred the prisoner much a blacker person then we thought we leave him to his defence Axt. May it please your Lordships in the first place because I am ignorant in the Laws I desire to know upon what Statute this indictment is grounded L. ch B. It is grounded upon the statute of the 25th of Edward the Third Axt. My Lords I must acknowledg my ignorance of the Laws being a thing I never studied nor have the knowledg of but I have heard it is the duty of your Lordships and the Judges to be of Counsel for the Prisoner in things wherein he is ignorant in matters of law to make his just defence and therefore my Lord the Indictment it self being matter of law if your Lordships please not to grant me Counsel to speak to matrers of law I humbly pray that your Lordships will be pleased that for want of knowledg formalities punctilloes and niceties of the Law I might not undo my self I have heard by a learned Judg that though the Judg be of Counsel to the King yet by his Oath he is also to be Counsellor to the Prisoner and stands as a Mediator between the King and Prisoner and therefore my Lord I shall beg that humble favour that wherein I shall fall short to make the best improvement of my Plea in matter of law that your Lordships will help me and not take advantages against me as to the niceties formalities and punctilloes of the Law and my Lord this is a resemblance of that Great day where Christ will be Judg and will judg the secrets of all hearts and of all words and of all persons and by him all Actions are weighed knows all our hearts whether there be malice or how it stands in the frame of each heart before him in this place and therefore I hope there will be nothing by prejudging or any thing by precluding to be so black a person as it seemed to be said against me My Lords I must shorten the time and come to speak as to the Authority L. Ch. Bar. As to what Sir Axt. I speak as to the Authority by which or under which I acted I humbly conceive my Lord under favour that I am not within the compass of that Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third for that questionless must intend private persons Counselling Compassing or Imagining the death of the King But you know my Lords the War was first stated by the Lords and Commons the Parliament of England and by vertue of their Authority was forced to be raised and they pretended
by law that the right of the Militia was in them and your Lordships will remember in several Declarations and Acts that was mutually exchanged between his Majesty and Parliament and my Lord that was the Authority the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament raised a Force and made the Earl of Essex Ceneral and after him the Earl of Manchester of the Eastern Association and after that Sir Tho. Fairfax Lord General of the Forces by this Authority I acted and this Authority I humbly conceive to be legal because this Parliament was called by the Kings Writ chosen by the People and passed a Bill they should not be dissolved without their own consents that the Parliament was in being when the Tryal was and a question whether yet legally Dissolved In the fourth place they were not only owned and obeyed at home but abroad to be the chief Authority of the Nation and also owned by Foreign States and Kingdoms sent Ambassadors to that purpose under them did all the Judges of the Land Act who ought to be the Eye of the Land and the very light of the People to Guide them in their right Actions and I remember the Judges upon Tryal I have read it of High Treason Judg Thorp Nicholas and Jermin have declared it publickly That it was a lawful justifiable thing by the Law of the Land to obey the Parliament of England My Lord it further appears as to their Authority over the People of this Nation petitioning them as the supreme and lawful Authority and My Lords as I have heard it hath been objected that the Houses of Lords and Commons could make no Act. Truly my Lord if you will not allow them to be Acts though they intitle them so call them so and obeyed as so by the Judges Ministers and Officers of State and by all other persons in the Nation yet I hope they cannot be denied to be Orders of Parliament and were they no more but Orders yet were they sufficient as I humbly couceive to bear out such as acted thereby And my Lord the Parliament thus constituted and having made their Generals he by their Authority did constitute and appoint me to be an Inferior Officer in the Army serving them in the quarters of the Parliament and under and within their power and what I have done my Lord it hath been done only as a Souldier deriving my power from the General he had his power from the Fountain to wit the Lords and Commons and my Lord this being done as hath been said by several that I was there and had command at Westminster-Hall truly my Lord if the Parliament command the General and the General the inferiour Officers I am bound by my Commission according to the Laws and Customs of War to be where the Regiment is I came not thither voluntarily but by command of the General who had a Commission as I said before from the Parliament I was no Counsellor no Contriver I was no Parliament-man none of the Judges none that Sentenced Signed none that had any hand in the Execution onely that which is charged is that I was an Officer in the Army if that be so great a crime I conceive I am no more guilty than the Earl of Essex Fairfax or the Lord of Manchester Judg Mallet You are not charged as you were an Officer of the Army Axtell My Lords That is the main thing they do insist upon my Lord I am no more guilty than his Excellency the Lord General Monck who Acted by the same Authority and all the People in the three Nations and my Lord I do humbly suppose if the Authority had been only an Authority in Fact and not Right yet those that Acted under them ought not to be questioned but if the Authority commanded whatsoever offence they committed especially that that guided me was no less than the declared Judgment of the Lords and Commons sitting in Parliament they declared that was their right as to the Militia and having explained several Statutes of Henry the 7th wherein the King having enterchanged Declarations with the Parliament the Parliament comes to make an Explanation on that Statute and my Lord it is in Folio 280. wherein they do positively expound it and declare it as their allowed Judgment To clear up all scruples to all that should take up Arms for them saith the Parliament there as to the Statute of 11. of Henry the 7th Chapter the first which is printed at large comes there to explain it in general and comes here Folio 281. and gives this Judgment It is not say they agreeable to Reason or Conscience that any ones duty should be known if the Judgment of the High Court of Parliament be not a Rule or Guide to them In the next place this is the next Guidance Rule and Judgment of Parliament upon the Exposition of this Statute and as they have said in several places was it not too much to take up your Lordships time they are the proper Judges and Expounders of the Laws The High Court of Parliament have taken upon them to expound the Law and said that we Lawyers will give the meaning of the Text contrary to what they have expounded the meaning under their hands in the same Declaration his Majesty is pleased to quit that Statute upon which I stand Indicted the 25th of Edward the Third where they do my Lord expound that very Statute in the Declaration made in 1643. Folio 722. I come to the declared Judgment wherein they did positively say that the persons that do Act under their Authority ought not to be questioned as persons Guilty Folio 727. that is the Exposition that the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament doth make upon the statute Councel My Lord this is an Argumentation of Discourse in justification of his proceedings we desire to know what he will answer as to the Plea Axtell My Lords I have this further to say that if a House of Commons Assembled in Parliament may be Guilty of Treason for the truth is if I Acted Treason that Acted under the Authority of the Lords and Commons in Parliament and of the Commons in Parliament then doubtless they must begin the Treason if the House of Commons who are the collective body and Representation of the Nation all the people of England who chose them are guilty too and then where will there be a Jury to try this concerning the Commons alone I have been over ruled L. ch Bar. If you have any thing to say to the Lords and Commons answer to your charge your charge is nothing of the Lords and Commons but what you Acted when the house was broke and Forced Coun. You cannot but know that there is nothing charged against you for which you can so much as pretend an Authority of the Lords and Commons you know before you could do this Horrid Murther you were the persons that destroyed the Lords and Commons both indeed you Ravel in a
Executioner and such other Acts prove these are in your Commission and you say something I am sure you cannot be ignorant that That very Authority that you do now urge to give life and power to your Actions that you destroyed it laid it in the dust acted contrary to it several ways when the Parliament protested against fetching the King from Holmby as they did when they went on proceeding in the way of peace then came you up to the Bar I think you your self and charged some of the Members first 11 as rotten Members and these Men were forced away this you know your General had no Commission to do and this you know was a Violation of that Power that gave our General the Commission After that when the Treaty was brought on in the Isle of Wight when there was great hopes of peace then you knew the King was hurried thence by Force which the Parliament protested against After that when both the House of Commons and Lords came to consider of one particular that passed they resolved that it was sufficient ground to proceed on for the settlement of peace then did you fall upon these Houses and tear them in pieces and throwing out above 200 suffering only about 40 to remain and they were glad to send for one Member out of Prison to make up a House That which you say of the Supreme Authority and that by Vertue of which you did Act it shews that you did not at all go by any Authority but you followed your own Lusts and therefore do not few these Fig-leaves together which will stand you in no stead if you would apply your self to answer that which you were charged with it were something Axt. I do desire to have no more interruptions then is me◠〈◊〉 making my own Defence My Lord here are many things by way of motive urged to the Jury which is not within the Charge I desire I may have that fair play that nothing may be urg'd but what is in the charge L. Ch. Bar. You give the occasion Mr. Axtell keep to the matter and you shall not be interrupted Lord Hollis I shall be very sorry to urge any thing against you which doth not necessarily follow for what you say touching your Authority I shall shew you have no Authority Axtell My Lord I have the same Commission as the General what I did was not of mine own head I had a Command As for all that hath been charged against me I shall say this I was none of the Court I did not fetch the King from the Isle of Wight nor advised compassed or imagined his Death or sentenced him to Death or signed the Warrant for his Execution or Executed Him I am none of them My Lords and therefore whoever did make any breach upon the House of Commons they were Grandees persons of a greater Quality I was an inferior Officer I was never at the House Bar but upon presenting one Petition to the Parliament from the Army I shall now come to speak to the Evidence which hath been given particularly against me and the first my Lord is Mr. Simpson he saith I had the Commands of the Guards at Westminster-Hall My Lords I have told you already shewn you by what Authority I came thither and that I ought not to refuse if I had according to the laws of War I must have suffer'd death and that is all as to Mr. Sympson only that a Lady he knows not who spake something there L. Ch. Bar. He saith he heard you bid the Souldiers give fire against the Lady Axt. My Lord I must say if there was any Lady that did speak who she was I know no more than the least child here but my Lord to silence a Lady I suppose is no Treason If a Lady will talk impertinently it is no Treason to bid her hold her tongue L. Ch. Bar. A Lady was speaking pertinently enough when she heard Bradshaw say to the King such a Charge is exhibited a charge of High Treason against Him in the Name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the good People of England she said That was a lye not half nor a quarter of the people of England That Oliver Cromwel was a Traytor Then you took upon you to command Souldiers to fire at her and accordingly they levelled the muzles of their Musquets towards her Axtell My Lord as to that particular concerning Oliver Cromwell or any other words concerning the Court I understand them not but if any interruption was made to preserve the peace to desire a Woman to hold her tongue is no Treason To the next particular wherein Col. Huncks saith at a door at a certain lodging where Ireton and Harrison were in Bed together he saith that upon his refusal to sign the Warrant for executing the King I said to him Col. Huncks I am ashamed of you the Ship is now coming into Harbour and will you strike Sayle before we come to Anchor truly my Lord I think all that amounts to nothing if it were so which I deny it for to bring the Ship into Harbor what is that there is no person named Fact named nor Design named and I appeal to my conscience I remember not the time place person or words and I can call for Col. Phayre and Col. Hacker who were there for I desire things may appear right I desire they two persons may be called for their Evidence in that point L. ch Bar. They both are in the same condition Col. Hacker in the prison behind you Col. Phayre in the Tower Mr. Axtell you know the strength of one Affirmative witness I saw such a man and heard such a man say c. is more then if twenty should witness they stood by but did not see him or hear him speak Axt. My Lord he saith only this I saw you at the door going unto Ireton's chamber and said will you strike Sayl c. Truly my Lord he doth not say what or how or any thing I meant there must be according to Sir Edward Cook 's 7th Book of his Institutes that Oracle of the Law he saith That Evidence ought to he as clear as the Sun at noon day All that you can say is this it must be a wide Inference a large Inference I conceive there is nothing in these two witnesses and if the two Prisoners were here they would clear me in this L. ch Bar. If by Law you could have had them you should but I fear if they could be admitted they would not be to your advantage Axtell Then my Lord in the next place Col. Temple is pleased to say that the Lady Fairfax saying something against the Court which in truth as I said before I know not who it was or what the words were he saith I bid Fire against them I did nothing but what I was commanded upon pain of Death to preserve peace and in pursuance of that command from the superior
there may be a favourable construction made of it I humbly leave it with you I did my Duty to pray for the King but had no malice to act willingly against him Clerk Henry Marten Counsel He did both sign and seal the Precept for summoning the Court and the Warrant for Execution sat almost every day and particularly the day of Sentence Marten My Lord I do not decline a confession so as to the matter of Fact the malice set aside maliciously murderously and traiterously Counsel If you have any thing to say to that we will prove it L. Ch. Baron That I may inform you in it there is malice implied by Law malice in the Act it self that which you call malice that you had no particular intention or design against the King's Person but in relation to the Government that will not be to this present business if it should extenuate any thing that would be between God and your own Soul but as to that which is alledged in the Indictment Maliciously Murderously and Traiterously they are the consequences of Law If a Man meet another in the Street and run him through in this case the Law implies malice though but to an ordinary Watchman there is malice by the Law in the Fact if there was no such expressed personal malice as you conceive yet the Fact done implies malice in Law Mr. Solicitor General My Lord He does think a Man may sit upon the death of the King sentence him to death sign a Warrant for his Execution meekly innocently charitably and honestly Marten I shall not presume to compare my knowledg in the Law with that of that Learned Gentleman but according to that poor understanding of the Law of England that I was capable of there is no Fact that he can name that is a Crime in it self but as it is circumstantiated Of killing a Watchman as your Lordship instanced a Watchman may be killed in not doing his Office and yet no murder Lord Chief Baron I instanced that of a Watchman to shew there may be a malice by Law though not expressed though a Man kill a Watchman intending to kill another Man in that case it is malice in Law against him so in this case if you went to kill the King when he was not doing his Office because he was in Prison and you hindred him from it the Law implies malice in this It is true all Actions are circumstantiated but the killing of the King is Treason of all Treasons Justice Foster If a Watchman be killed it is murder it is in contempt of Magistracy of the Powers Above the Law says that contempt adds to the malice Counsel We shall prove against the Prisoner at the Bar because he would wipe off malice he did this very merrily and was in great sport at the time of the signing the Warrant for the King's Execution Marten That does not imply malice Ewer sworn Councel Come Sir you are here upon your Oath speak to my Lords and the Jury you know the Prisoner at the Bar very well you have sometimes served him Were you present in the Painted Chamber January 29. 1648. at the signing the Warrant the Parchment against the King Ewer The day I do not remember but I was in that Chamber to attend a Gentleman there I followed that Gentleman looking at Mr. Marten I followed that Gentleman into that Chamber L. C. Baron After what Gentleman Ewer Mr. Marten my Lord I was pressing to come near but I was put off by an Officer or Souldier there who told me I should not be there I told him I was ordered to be by that Gentleman My Lord I did see a Pen in Mr. Cromwel's hand and he marked Mr. Marten in the face with it and Mr. Marten did the like to him but I did not see any one set his Hand though I did see a Parchment there with a great many Seals to it Sir Purback Temple sworn Counsel What do you know of that Gentleman in his carriage of this Business Sir Purback Temple My Lords I being present in Town when that horrid Murder was contrived against the late King there came some Persons of Honour Servants to the late King to my Father's House Sir Edward Partridge to engage me to join with them to attempt the King's escape In order whereunto they told me nothing would tend so much to his Majesty's Service as to endeavour to discover some part of their Counsels for that it was resolved by Cromwel to have the King tried at the High Court of Justice as they called it the next day and desired me if possible to be there to discover their Counsels whereby the King might have notice and those that were to attempt his escape In order whereunto the next day by giving Mony to the Officer of the Painted Chamber I got in by day light in the Lobby to the Lords House I espied a Hole in the Wall under the Hangings where I placed my self till the Council came where they were contriving the manner of trying the King when he should come before them and after the manner of praying and private consults amongst themselves when their Prayer was over there came news that the King was landed at Sir Robert Cotton's Stairs at which Cromwel run to a Window looking on the King as he came up the Garden he returned as white as the Wall returning to the Board he speaks to Bradshaw and Sir Henry Mildmay how they and Sir William Breerton had concluded on such a Business Then turning to the Board said thus My Masters He is come He is come and now we are doing that great Work that the whole Nation will be full of Therefore I desire you to let us resolve here what answer we shall give the King when he comes before us for the first Question that he will ask us will be By what Authority and Commission do we try him To which none answered presently Then after a little space Henry Marten the Prisoner at the Bar rose up and said In the Name of the Commons and Parliament assembled and all the good People of England which none contradicted so all rose up and then I saw every Officer that waited in the Room sent out by Cromwel to call away my Lord such a one whose Name I have forgot who was in the Court of Wards Chamber that he should send away the Instrument which came not and so they adjourned themselves to Westminster-Hall going into the Court of Wards themselves as they went thither When they came to the Court in Westminster-Hall I heard the King ask them the very same Question that Cromwel had said to them Mr. Solicitor Gentlemen the Prisoner at the Bar confesses his Hand to the Warrant for Executing the King you see by his Servant how merry he was at the sport You see by his Witness how serious he was at it and gave the foundation of that Advice upon which they all proceeded and now he
says he did it not Traiterously I humbly conceive he means it was Justifiable Sir P. Temple At another time I was in Town on a Friday and wanting Horses I went to Smithfield where I saw the Horses of State of his late Majesty to be sold in the Common Market at which I called to the Rider said I What makes these Horses here says he I am to sell them Why said I there 's the King's Brand upon them C. R. and he shew'd them me said I Will you sell these Horses What price he asked me three or fourscore pound a piece said I Who warrants the sale of these Horses says he Mr. Marten and Sir Wil. Brereton Afterwards I heard the Horses were taken into the Mews by the Prisoner at the Bar and Sir Wil. Brereton Counsel Was this before the Trial Sir P. Temple It was in 1642 or 1643. Counsel That 's nothing to this Business Marten My Lord the Commission went in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the Good People of England and what a matter is it for one of the Commissioners to say Let it be acted by the Good People of England Mr. Sol. Gen. You know all good People did abhor it I am sorry to see so little repentance Marten My Lord I hope that which is urged by the Learned Counsel will not have that impression upon the Court and Jury that it seems to have That I am so obstinate in a thing so apparently ill My Lord if it were possible for that Blood to be in the Body again and every drop that was shed in the late Wars I could wish it with all my heart But my Lord I hope it is lawful to offer in my own defence that which when I did it I thought I might do My Lord there was the House of Commons as I understood it perhaps your Lordships think it was not a House of Commons but then it was the Supream Authority of England it was so reputed both at home and abroad My Lord I suppose he that gives obedience to the Authority in being de facto whether de jure or no I think he is of a peaceable disposition and far from a Traitor My Lord I think there was a Statute made in Henry the Seventh's time whereby it was provided That whosoever was in Arms for the King de facto he should be indempnified though that King de facto was not so de jure And if the Supream Officers de facto can justifie a War the most pernicious Remedy that was ever adjudged by Mankind be the Cause what it will I presume the Supream Authority of England may justifie a Judicature though it be but an Authority de facto My Lord if it be said that it is but a third estate and a small parcel of that my Lord it was all that was extant I have heard Lawyers say That if there be Commons appurtenant to a Tenement and that Tenement be all burnt down except a small Stick the Commons belong to that one small piece as it did to the Tenement when all standing My Lord I shall humbly offer to consideration whether the King were the King indeed such a one whose Peace Crowns and Dignities were concerned in Publick Matters My Lord he was not in execution of his Offices he was a Prisoner My Lord I will not defer you long neither would I be offensive I had then and I have now a peaceable inclination a resolution to submit to the Government that God hath set over me I think his Majesty that now is is King upon the best Title under Heaven for he was called in by the Representative Body of England I shall during my life long or short pay obedience to him Besides my Lord I do owe my life to him if I am acquitted for this I do confess I did adhere to the Parliaments Army heartily my life is at his mercy if his Grace be pleased to grant it I have a double obligation to him Mr. Sol. Gen. My Lord this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar hath entred into a Discourse that I am afraid he must have an answer in Parliament for it He hath owned the King but thinks his best title is the acknowledgment of the People and he that hath that let him be who he will hath the best Title we have done with our Evidence Marten I have one word more my Lord I humbly desire that the Jury would take notice That though I am accused in the Name of the King that if I be acquitted the King is not Cast It doth not concern the King that the Prisoner be Condemned it concerns him that the Prisoner be Tried it is as much to his Interest Crown and Dignity that the Innocent be acquitted as that the Nocent be condemned Mr. Sol. Gen. My Lord this puts us now upon the reputation of our Evidence and you may see how necessary it is to distinguish between Confidence and Innocence for this very Person that desires you to have a care how you condemn the Innocent he doth seem to intimate to you that he is an innocent Person at the Bar and yet confesses he did sit upon the King did Sentence him to Death that he signed the Warrant for the Execution and yet here stands that Person that desires you to have a care of condemning Innocence What is this at the bottom of it but that my Fact is such as I dare not call it Innocence but would have you to believe it such Gentlemen of the Jury was it your intention the King should be so tried as this Prisoner moved It will concern you to declare That the People of England do abhor his Facts and Principles every Fact the Prisoner hath confessed himself the sitting in that Court which was Treason his Sentencing was Treason signing the Warrant for Execution was the highest of Treasons Gentlemen all that he hath to say for himself is there was an Authority of his own making whereby he becomes innocent But we hope out of his own Mouth you will find him guilty Gilbert Millington I desire you to hear me I come not hither to dispute but to acknowledg I will not trouble you with long Discourses My Lord it is not fit for wise Men to hear them I am not able to express them I will not justifie my self I will acknowledg my self Guilty My Lord The reason why I said the last day Not Guilty was in respect of being upon the Scaffold and murthering the King and those things but I will wave all things if your Lordship will give me leave and will go unto the lowest strain that possible can be I will confess my self Guilty every way I was awed by the present Power then in being This I leave with you and lay my self at your feet and have no more at all to say but a few words in a Petition which I desire you will please to accept and so I conclude Counsel We do accept this