Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	king_n	long_a	time_n	3,013	5	3.3704	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A90251	Vox plebis, or, The peoples out-cry against oppression, injustice, and tyranny. Wherein the liberty of the subject is asserted, Magna Charta briefly but pithily expounded. Lieutenant Colonell Lilburne's sentence published and refuted. Committees arraigned, goalers condemned, and remedies provided.	Overton, Richard, fl. 1646.	1646 (1646)	Wing O636A; Thomason E362_20; ESTC R201218	54,600	73

their liberty then whlle they have continually maintained it And having once gotten possession of their ancient rights they will watch them so carefully and with such strength and vigour as that they will hardly be surprized again or their rights any more wrested from them As it fell out in the case of the Romane State when the Romanes having freed themselves of the government of the Tarquins their hertditary Kings the Nobility began to take upon the the rule of the people by the exercise of the like or greater tyrany the the Tarquins had done the people being inforced by a necessity of their preservations created Tribunes as Guardians of the publick liberty whereby the insolence and Arbitrary power of the Nobilty was restrained and the people re-estated in their ancient liberty which continued inviolable to them for the space of 800. yeares after 300. yeares oppression of the Nobility to the great honour and renown of their Nation and exceding enlargement of their Common-wealth Now as concerning the liberty which the people of this Common-wealth doe and of right both divine and humane ought to challenge it consists of these particulars following Liberty of conscience in matters of Faith and Divine worship Liberty of the Person and liberty of Estate which consists properly in the propriety of their goods and a disposing power of their possessions As touching liberty of Conscience it is due of Divine right to the people of God since that the conscience is a Divine impression or illumination in the soule of man which God instills into the heart by faith whereby man is instructed to worship him in Spirit and Truth and it is as it were the ingraven Character of the mind wil of God in the soul of man not passive nor consisting of bodily substance therefore it is not to bee constrained or inforced to submit to any other rule then what the Creator by his revealed will according to the Scriptures hath imprinted in it And for that cause is onely to bee accountable to him whose image it is as being the onely competent Judge of his owne will As touching the liberty of our persons That is founded not onely in Divine Law but in Nature ulso and as protected by the municipicall and known Lawes of this Kingdom For as God created every man free in Adam so by nature are all alike freemen born and are since made free in grace by Christ no guilt of the parent being of sufficiency to deprive the child of this freedome And although there was that wicked and unchristian-like custome of villany introduced by the Norman Conquerour yet was it but a violent usurpation upon the Law of our Creation Nature and the ancient Lawes of this Kingdome and is now since the clearer light of the Gospel hath shined forth by a necessary harmony of humane society quite abolished as a thing odious both to God and man in this our Christian Common-wealth Now that the liberty of mens persons hath ever been a thing most pretious in the eyes of our Ancestors and right deare and of most tender regard in the consideration and protection of the Law if we doe but consider the originall Lawes of this Realme the proceedings of our Ancestors in the Acquisition and defence of their just liberties and the continuall vigilance of them in making and ordaining good Lawes for their necessary preservation we shall easily find that there hath not been any earthly thing or more weighty and important care to them then the preservation of their Liberties To prove this Andrew Horn a learned man in the ancient Lawes of this Kingdome in his Booke called The Marrow of Justice written in the reigne of King Edward the first fol. 1. saith That after God had abated the Nobility of the Brittons he did deliver the Realm to men more humble and simple of the Countries adjoyning to wit the Saxons which came from the parts of Almaigne to conquer this Land of which men there were fourty Soveraignes which did rule as Companions and those Princes did call this Realme England which before was named The Greater Britaine These after great warres tribulations and pains by long time suffered did choose amongst them a King to reigne over them to governe the people of God and to maintain and defend their persons and their goods in quiet by the Rules of Right and at the beginning they did cause him to sweare to maintaine the holy Christian Faith and to guide his people by right with all his power without respect of persons and to observe the Lawes And after when the Kingdome was turned into an Heritage King Alfred that governed this Kingdome about 174. yeares before the Conquest did cause the great men of the Kingdome to assemble at London and there did ordain for a perpetuall usage That twice in the yeare or oftner if need should be in time of peace they should assemble at London in Parliament for the government of Gods people that men might live in quiet and receive right by certain usages and holy judgements In which Parliament faith our Authour the rights and prerogatives of the Kings and of the Subjects are distinguished and set apart and particularly by him expressed too tedious here to insert Amongst which Ordinances we find That no man should be imprisoned but for a capitall offence And if a man should detain another in prison by colour of right where there was none till the party imprisoned died hee that kept him in prison should bee held guilty of murder as you may read pag. 33. And pag. 36. hee is declared guilty of homicide by whom a man shall die in prison whether it be the Judges that shall too long delay to do a man right or by cruelty of Goalers or suffering him to die of Famine Or when a man that is adjudged to doe penance shall be surcharged by his Goaler with Irons or other pain whereby he is deprived of his life And pag. 140. That by the ancient Law of England it was Felony to detain a man in prison after sufficient Baile offered where the party was plevisable Every person was plevisable but hee that was appealed of Treason Murder Robbery or Burglary pag. 35. None ought to be put in the common prison but onely such at were ATTAINTED or principally APPEALED or INDICTED of some capitall offence or ATTAINTED of false and wrongful imprisonment So tender hath the ancient Lawes and Constitutions of this Realme been of the liberty of their Subjects persons That no man ought to be imprisoned but for a Capitall offence as Treason Murder Robbery or Burglary And if for these offences yet ought he to be let to Baile which to deny were felony in case the prisoner were plevisable which is if he were not appealed indicted or attainted Nay you see it was Felony to detain a man in prison by colour of right when there was none Neitherwas the law tender of the persons of Innocents bailable

goods which law is since confirmed by the statute of 14. E. 3. c. 9. with some inlargement as to under-keepers of prisons and the penalty of the law and that Gaolers having done this have been hanged for it you may read 3. E. 3. 8. Northampton Fitzh pl. Cor. 295. and else-where but this for a taste to them Wee now come to shew what fees are due to them The Mirrour of Justice p. 288. tells us that it is an abusion of the law that prisoners or others for the to pay any thing for their Entries into the Goale or for their going out this is the common-law there is no fee due to them by the common law See what the statutes say The State of Westm 1. c. 26. saith that no Sheriffe or other Minister of the King shall take reward for doing their Offices but what they take of the King if they do they shall forfeit double to the party grieved and be punished at the will of the King Under this word Minister of the King are encluded all Escheators Coroners Gaolers and the like soe Sir Edward Cook 2. part of his Instistitutes p. 209. affirms and agreeable is Stamf. pl. Coron 49. a. Nay by the statute of 4. E. 3. c. 10. Gaolers are to receive theeves and felons taking nothing by way of fees for the receipt of them so odious is this extortion of Gaolers that very theeves and felons are exempt from payment of fees And we find in our Law-bookes that no fees are due to any Officer Gaoler or minister of Justice but only those which are given by Act of Parliament for if a Gaoler will prescribe for any fees the prescription is void because against this Act of Parliament made 3. E. 1. being an Act made within time of memory and takes away all manner of pretended fees before and wee are sure none can be raised by colour of prescription since and therefore we find by the bookes of 8. E. 4. f. 18. That a Marshall or Gaoler cannot detain any prisoner after his discharge from Court but only for the fees of the Court the Court being not barred by this statute of Westm 1. afore-mentioned and if he doe he may be indicted of extortion and agrecable to this is the book of 21. H. 7. f. 16. where amongst other things it is held for law that if a Gaoler or Guardian of a prison takes his prisoners upper garment Cloak or money from him it is a trespasse and the Gaoler shall be answerable for it this is a note for the Gentleman-Porter of the Tower so that we may undeniably conclude that there is no fee at all due to any Gaoler or Guardian of a prison from the prisoner but what is due unto him by speciall Act of Parliament And if a Gaoler or Guardian of a Prison shall take any thing as a fee of his prisoner he may and ought to be indicted of extortion and upon conviction to be removed from his office And if his prisoner by constraint menasse or dures be enforced to give him money he may recover that money against the Gaoler again in an Action of the case to be brought against him as his Bayliffe per accompt rendre And it is fit to be remembred also that whilest prisoners are in custody having nothing of their own to maintain them being either despoyled of their estates or goods by plunder sequestration long lying in prison or otherwise That the prisoners in all the Kings prisons should be maintained at the Kings charge out of the Kings Revenues according to the old law of the Land Bracton said thus Prisones imprisonati antequam convicti fuerint de terris suis desseisiri non debent nes de rebus suis quibuscunque spoliari sed dum fuerint in prison● debent de proprio in omnibus sustentari doneo per judicium deliberati vel condemnati fuerint which we English thus Prisoners detained in prison ought not to be disseised or put out of their lands and free-holds nor spoyled of their goods before they be convicted but they ought to be maintained of their own goods and estates in all things they want untill by judgment they are either acquitted or convicted Nay we say further that if prisoners have not whereof of their own to live theyought to be maintained according to their qualities out of the Kings revenue and at his charge whose prisoners they are and this is according to the fundamentall lawes of the Land and is a liberty inheritable belonging to the free-born subjects of England but if wee look into the prisons of these said times Oh! what horrible oppressions extortions cruelties and most unchristian-like tyrannies are exercised and practised upon the free-born subjects of England in all prisons within the kingdome by these sons of Belial these ravening Harpies and tormenting Gaolers whom we may properly call the Divels Deputies that rack even the very bowels and feed upon the very livers of their prisoners sucking away the very blood that should give life to their bodies from them what lamentable cryes sighes and groanes doe wee hear from every corner of this kingdome especially of this City from the poor starved oppressed life-wearied prisoners shut up inclosed in the Dungeons and Prisons in all places What horrible lamentations imprecations and curses are uttered and sent up to God Almighty in anguish of mind and bitternesse of spirit by these poor prisoners their wives and children not onely against their tormenting Gaolers but also against those Priests of the body politique those Country-Committees who have turned the wives and children of poor prisoners a begging and sent them up to sterve in Prisons and Dungeons under the hands of mercilesse Gaolers with their distressed Husbands and Parents having not only their goods and free-holds taken away from them which by law should be their support in prison but what also they beg or borrow is extorted from them by these ravening mercilesse and oppressing Gaolers and their Ministers We therefore the free-born people of England having seriously weighed and considered with our selves that by these lordly powers and sentences executed upon us by that sentence of the house of Peers upon Lieut. Col. John Lilburn a free-born English-man and one that hath so often with his sword in his hand for the redemption and reviving of our declining liberties adventured his lite in the field against the Royall intruders and out of hatred and detestation to the execrable and odious oppressions of Cōmitteemen Gaolers and other inferiour Ministers of this present State having an earnest desire and resolution to enjoyour liberties which with our dearest bloods and with the losse of so many lives of our dear brethren and vast expence of treasure wee have purchased and being of nothing so much affected and enamoured as to live under the happy and flourishing estate of this ever renowned Parliament the most honourable Commons whom we have chosen intrusted for us to sit at Westm.

the Parliament or any other that sits in the Lords house by Writ Et non ratione nobiliatis can be a tryer of a Lord of the Parliament or challenge this priviledge of tryall in case of Treason Fellony or other capitall offence But a Noble-man of the Parliament shall not have this priviledge either upon an Indictment of Praemunire or upon an Appeale of Fellony at the suit of the party or in any Civill-Action either concerning the right of Lands or of other Possessions or in any personall Action brought by a Common-person against a Lord of the Parliament as appeares unto us by the Bookes of 1. H. 4. f. 1 13. H. 8. f. 12. 10. E. 4. fol. 6. This tryall of Noble-men by their Peers at the Kings Suit is not upon Oath as in the case of common persons for the Peers are not sworn before the Lord Steward before whom this tryall must bee had but they are to be charged by the Lord Steward super fidelitatibus ligeantiis Dom. Regi debitis that is upon their faith and allegeance due to the King and if they acquit the Peer or Noble-man upon whom they passe the Entry is Willelmus Comes E. cateri Antedicti pares inst●nter super fidelitatibus ligeantiis dicto D●m Regi debitis per praefarū Senescallū ab inferiori usque ad supremum separatim examinati dicunt quod Wil. Dom. Dacre nox est Culp and so was the Entry in the case of the Lord Dacres 26. H. 8. Spilmans Reports and Cookes Instit 3. part p. 30. If a Noble-man be indicted of Treason Felony or Murder and cannot be found he shall be outlawed by the Coroners of the County and in case of Clergy no Noble-man shall have more priviledge then a common-person where it is not specially provided for them by Act of Parliament as by Stamford pl. Cor. p. 130. is made manifest out of all which we gather that a Nobleman hath this priviledge of tryal as well per lege terra as by this Charter and that anciently legale judicium parium or lawfull tryall of Peers for all manner of persons aswell Noblemen as Commons was vere-dictum duodecim proborum legalium hominum de vicineto a verdict of 12. good and lawfull men of the Neighbour-hood that is of the Commons of England so still remains saving only in this excepted case by the Great Charter which shewes that there can be no legale judicium or lawfull judgment but it must be per legem terrae or according to the Law of the Land which is the other branch of this judgment as to the Commons of England Now to prove that legale judicium parium or lawfull judgment of a mans Peers or Equals is by verdict of 12. men and not otherwise for the word Peers vinvocally signifies both Let us consult both the judgment of Parliaments in this point and the fundamentall lawes of the Land And first for the opinions of Parliaments in this point we finde that by the statute of 25. E. 3. c. 4. None shall be taken by petition or suggestion made to our Lord the King or to his Councell unlesse it be by indictment or presentment of his good and lawfull people of the same neighbour-hood 42. E. 3. c. 3. It is assented and accorded for the good governance of the Commons that no man be put to answer without presentment before Justices or matter of Record or by due processe and Writ originall according to the old law of the Land and if any thing be done frō henceforth contrary it shall be void in law and holden for errour and to say one word for all there are above 50 statutes now in print and in force that warrant this tryall or legale judicium parium suorum or tryall by a mans Equals or Peers made since the Great Charter in severall cases the citing of which statutes for prolixity we avoid And that this manner of tryall was the old law of the Land wee are here to make it appear that this manner of tryall is according to the law of the Land and that there is none other wherein we are to observe this distinction that this legale judicium or lawfull judgment is two-fold The one is of the matter of Fact The other is of matter of Law That which is of matter of Fact is to be tryed per legale indicium parium or a lawfull tryall of a mans Peers That which is of matter of Law is to be tryed by the Judges or Justices of the Land authorized thereunto by the Kings lawfull Commissions To prove that there is no other lawfull Judgment of our Peeres or Equals As touchiug the matter of Fact we are to examine the foundation of this Common-wealth and the originall constitutions thereof We find that King Alfred having reduced this Kingdome of England into an Entire-Monarchy divided it into 38. Counties and each County into severall Hundred and Mannors The Counties were put under the government of Earles who substituted under them Viscounts or Sheriffes for the quiet government of the people the Hundreds and Mannors subordinately under the severall Lords of them The Sheriffes had two Courts to wit the Sheriffes-Tourn and the County-Court The first for offences against the peace of the Land The latter for entry and determination of civill-causes between party and party In the first indictment or presentment of offences was made per-Enquest that is by Juries In the second the Free-suiters that is men of the neighbor-hood The like was done in the leets or viewes of Frankepledge and Hundred-Courts in the Hundreds The like proceedings was in the Leets and Court-Barons of Mannors in those Courts There was no condemnation or judgment given but by the Enquirie of good and lawfull men of the neighbor-hood This every book of the Law tells us for more particular satisfaction read Horn f. 8. and fore-ward These Courts were formed after the modell of the greater Courts of the Realme the Kings-Bench and Common-pleas where greater jurisdiction was as to the matter to be enquired of but no variation originally in the manner of proceeding only the jurisdiction of the Court of Kings-Bench and Common-Pleas in tryals of actions ad dampnum 40. s. flowed over the whole Kingdome The other Courts were confined to their severall limits and might not exceed 40. s. damages these were the originall Courts of the Kingdome and the legale judicium parium or lawfull judgment of Peers was only tryall by Jury of Equals before this great Charter From which tryals this clause is inserted into it and by an inviolable right of law continues in force even to this day as every free subject of England by experience knowes and as every book of our law proves into us the verdict of the Jury in criminall causes being the judgment of Attainder and in civill causes a condemnation as Stamford pl. Cor. p 44. and ali other bookes prove And to leave every man without