Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n king_n land_n scotland_n 4,504 5 8.4214 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A75445 An answer to the Solemne League & Covenant; presented to the publick view of all loyall subiects in England, Scotland, and Ireland; in the twelfth year of the reign of our most gracious sovereign Lord Charles by the grace of God, of England, Scotland, France and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, &c. Published according to order. 1660 (1660) Wing A3448; Thomason E1045_3; ESTC R207947 9,622 16

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

AN ANSWER To the Solemne League Covenant PRESENTED To the publick view of all Loyall Subiects in ENGLAND SCOTLAND and IRELAND In the twelfth year of the Reign of our most Gracious Sovereign Lord CHARLES BY THE Grace of God of ENGLAND SCOTLAND FRANCE and IRELAND KING Defender of the FAITH c. Published according to Order LONDON PRINTED for GEORGE HORTON 1660. AN ANSWER TO THE Solemn League And Covenant WHether is this Covenant so grounded upon holy Scripture so conformable to the Laws of the Land yet in force and so consonant to former Oaths and Protestations that a religious Christian and Loyal Subject may without scruple of Conscience and danger of ensnaring his soul enter into it I answer negatively And although I had more then once made a Covenant with my self Rebus sic stantibus ôr rather jacentibus never to question this Covenant which the Authority of bath Houses and Piety and Learning of the Assembly of Divines hoth commended as the Soveraign Remedy of all the Maladies of the times yet because my Conscience tells me that it hath not approbation from the Three that bear Record in Herven I dare not conceal those Reasons which at the first made me doubt of the lawfulness of it and in the end put it out of doubt The Reasons propounding the naked truth without any cloathing of Art or ornament of Rhetorick are these Andi non phalerata sed fortia Not to take advantage of the preposterous order in setting down the parts of this Covenant wherein he that runneth may read a double Solecism For in it the Church of Scotland precedeth the Church of England and the Liberties of the Subject are set before the Royal Prerogative and Imperiall Dignity of the Prince Surely such a sacred and venerable Evidence of fidelity is a publick Covenant made by two Nations and signed by the Name of the great Jehovah that in it both matter and method phrase and order ought to be maturely advised on and not only every period and line but every word and syllable therein to be exactly scan'd before the Conscience of millions of men be charged with it If we cannot brook or keep out hands from tearing a List Catalogue or Register wherein they who are many degrees below us are yet ranked above us and named before us can his Majesty take it well at our hands that we should accept of a Covenant hand over head wherein the members are set above the head and his Soveraign Majesty slighted and that not only by misplacing his person but limiting and restraining the preservation of his Person and Authority to the defence of the true Religion and maintenance of the Liberties of the Kingdoms What is this but to indent with our Soveraign and capitulate with our head as Ochan sometimes did with the Emperor Frederick Defende gladio ego defendam te argumentis Defend me with thy Sword and I will defend thee with my Pen If his Majesty will defend our Faith we will bear faith to him if he will keep safe our Pendants we will safeguard his Crown Which limitation I except at not that I doubt but that there is and ought to be a mutualitie between King and Sub●ect and that if he either desert the true Faith or infringe the Laws and just Liberties of his Subjects for which he pawned his Faith at his Coronation God will call him to an account for it but this doth not discharge us of our Allegiance to him Though he keep not touch with us yet we may not break with him for he is as Tertullian gives him his true dimensions according to the golden reed of the Sanctuary Solo Deo minor caeteris omnibus major and consequently questionable for his breach of faith before none but God Alas what a fickle estate and lamentable condition were Princes in if upon pretence that they defend not that Religion which the people believe to be true or maintain not those Liberties which they challenge as their birthright their royall Crownes may be exposed to rapine and their sac●ed persons to violence Not to dive into the depths of State not anxiously to enquire into the reason which moved the first contrivers and projectors of this League to set it on foot at this present and presse it with all earnestness I am perswaded that none will deny that their main scope and aime therein was to engage our brethren of Scotland in the present quarrell for pulling down Episcopacie and setting up the Presbyterie and by this National and solemne League to strengthen their partie and foment the late unnaturall War which drained the Wealth of the Kingdome and was like to draw out the life-blood also Nemo tenetur divinare say the Canonists neither will I take upon me the office of a Prophet to foretell the Catastrophe of these Tragedies Yet sure I am this Queen of all Islands never received such prejudiced and wrong nor ever was so near the brink of destruction as when she drew in forraign Forces to defend her self against homebred Enemies and I pray God we experimentally interpret not the mysterie of Pharoahs dream concerning the lean kine which eat up the fat and yet were never a whit the fatter If there be a decree of Heaven that these two Nations shall be drowned one in anothers blood for the crimsons sins of both not yet repented of yet let not us draw this most fearfull judgement upon both Kingdomes by the cord of an oath But to argue syllogistically No Subjects living under a Christian Prince who is a professor of the true Religion and a Defender of the Orthodox Faith may enter into a publick and solemne Covenant for the reformation of Religion without the consent much less against the express command of their Soveraign For such disobedience and sleighting of their King cannot stand with the duty they owe him of fear and Loyalty injoyned Prov. 24.21 My Son Fear the Lord and the King Eccles 8.1 I advise thee to take heed to the mouth of the King to the word of the oath of God Rom. 13.1 Let every soul be subject to the higher powers whosoever resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation V. 4. If thou do evil fea for he beareth not the sword in Vain Prov. 16.14 The wrath of the King is the Messenger of death Prov. 19.12 The Kings wrath is like the roaring of a Lion 1 Pet. 2.13 Submit your selves to every ordinance of man for the Lords sake whether it be to the King as Supreame v. 17. Fear God honour the King Nor with the Prayers of the Church made for him that we may serve honour and humbly obey him in God and for God Not with the principles of right Reason for the King is the supreme head of the Church and Commonwealth under Christ and all his Subjects conjuncti●● in Parliament or divisim are but Members of the same
Covenant we play fast and loose say and unsay and overthrow the nature of an Oath and take Gods name in vain The Schools and ancient Doctors constantly maintain that it exceedeth even Divine Omnipotency to reconcile Contradictions which are amongst those many things St. Augustine speaketh of which God therefore cannot do because he is Omnipotent But there are apparent Contradictions in this Covenant and Gordion knots which cannot be untied For First It is said in the Preface that the Noblemen Bar●●s c. enter into this Covenant according to the commend●●le practice of these King oms in former times and yet Mr. N●●e in his Speech published by special order of the House upon ●he very day the Covenant was read and sworn unto and subcribed by the honorable House of Commons and Reverend As●●mbly of Divines Sept. 25. saith p. 12. That such an Oa●● for matter persons and other circumstances hath not been in any age or Oath we read of in sacred or humane stories And Mr. Coleman in his Sermon commanded to be Printed by the Commons of the House of Parliament Sept. ult 1643. pag. 18. Ask your Fathers consult with the aged of our times whether ever such a thing were done in their dayes or in the dayes of their Fathers before them And in his Epistle Dedicatory An Oath if vain makes the Land to mourn an Oath if weighty makes it rejoyce This is a new thing and not done in ou● Land before and I hope will have a new effect not seen by our people before We are to swear in the first branch That we will really and constantly endeavour the preservation of the Reformed Religion in the Church of Scotland in Doctrine Worship Discipline and Government and yet in the same branch we swe●r to endeavour to bring the Churches of God in these three Kingdoms of which Scotland is one to the nearest conjunction and uniformity in form of Church-Government according to the Word of God and the example of the best Reformed Churches But this cannot be done if Scotland be preserved in her present Directory for Worship Discipline and Government for the Government in the Church of England Ireland Denmark Swethland Poland Saxony and in all the Churches of the East not subject to the Pope is Episcopal and that is proved to be most conformable to the Word of God by the writings of Bilson Downham Armagh never yet answered by any We swear in the same branch That we will endeavor to reform the Doctrine of the Church of England according 〈◊〉 Gods Word and yet preserve the Reformed Religion in sco●Sco●land in Doctrine whereas the Doctrine of the Church of e●●E●●land and Scotland is all one as appears by the Confession of the one and Articles of the other All the difference ●etween the Church of England and Scotland is concerng Discipline and Liturgie not Doctrine as it is distinguised from them We swear in the second branch That We will endeavour the extirpation of of Prelacy and Schisme whereas Prelacy hath been ever and is the special if not only mean to extirpate Schisme If Prelacy be taken away saith St. Jerome ad Luc. and the preeminencie of one Presbyter above another Tot Schismata erunt quot Sacerdotes That is to extirpate Church Government by Archbishops Bishops c. and yet in the third b●anch we swear to preserve the Rights and Priviledges of the Parliament and Liberties of the Kingdoms among which liberties of the Kingdom of England and priviledges of the Parliament are the contents of Magna Charta and Petition of Right in which the Government of Archbishops and Bishops and the Rights and Priviledges of the Church are comprised In the third branch we swear to preserve and defend his Majesties Person and Authority without any diminution of his just Power and greatness and yet in the sixth Article we swear to assist and defend all those that enter into this League and Covenant in the maintaining and pursuance thereof Whereas it is known by their daily practise that they levie Arms against the KING Seize upon his Forts Ships Magazines and Revenues How can a man take away the Kings Munition and Castles and yet not weaken his power How can a man forcibly encounter and discomfit an Army raised by the KING'S Power and yet not diminish his power How can a man take away his Revenues Houses Parks c. and not diminish his greatness How can he give him Battle and yet Defend his Person Therefore before we enter into this Covenant to make up all the breaches in the Church and Common-wealth we must make up the breaches in the Covenant it self before we reconcile and unite the three Kingdoms we must endeavour to reconcile the contradictions in this our Oath and Solemn League Either this League and Covenant confirmed by Oath is free and voluntary or forced and Compulsory If it be free and voluntary Why is there annexed a most severe penalty to be inflicted upon all those who refuse to enter into it before the first of March If it be forced and compulsory how is it a Covenant especially with God who respecteth not our words but our hearts If it be a const●ained Oath imposed upon us whether we will or no then it is a heavy yoke laid upon the Conscie●ce inconsistent with our Christian Liberty and the requiring it of us is not like to procure a blessing from Heaven to the Land but to pull down the vials of Gods vengeance upon it If Tertullian could say Non est Religionis Religionem cogere it is no rel●gious act to force Religion we may swear that such a constrained Oath is no way acceptable to God Well it may be tea●med in ou● language a League or Covenant but in the Language of Canaan it is not so For Berith a Covenant comes from Bara which signifieth eligere saith Buxtorfius that is to chuse Neither is it any act of vertue in Aristotles School for virtus est habitus electivus a habit whereby we exercise our free choice None ought to swear to that he knoweth not for an Oath must be taken in judgment truth and righteousness Jer. 4.2 A man cannot swear in Judgement or judiciously who knoweth not that to be true in an assertory Oath and honest and righteous in a promissary which he sweareth unto For if that be false to which he sweareth he is perjured and if be a dishonest thing thing which he promiseth to do he is unrighteous Besides it it great precipitancy and rashness to enter into a Covenant blindfolded and to swear to maintain that we understand not But the subjects of England at least for the major part know not what the Scotch Discipline Government or Worship is which notwithanding by this Covenant they are bound to preserve even with the hazard of their Fortunes and Lives FINIS