Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	justice_n	sir_n	thomas_n	2,590	5	8.4692	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A53380	A display of tyranny, or, Remarks upon the illegal and arbitrary proceedings, in the courts of Westminster, and Guild-Hall London from the year, 1678, to the abdication of the late King James, in the year 1688, in which time, the rule was, quod principi placuit, lex esto : the first part.	Oates, Titus, 1649-1705.	1689 (1689)	Wing O35; ESTC R16065	100,209	272

very Nature and shewed so much Venom as would make one think the whole mass of his Blood were corrupted Here is malice against the King malice against the Government malice against both Church and State malice against any man that bears any share in the Government indeed malice against all mankind that are not of the same perswasion with those bloody Miscreants Here is the sanctifying of Traytors justly executed Here is the Sainting of two horrid Conspirators the Lord Russell that blessed Martyr my Lord Russell that good man that excellent Protestant he is lamented and here is Mr Sidney Sainted and what an extraordinary man was he 't is a shame to think that such bloody Miscreants should be Sainted and lamented 'T is high time for all mankind that have any Christianity or sense of Heaven or Hell to bestir themselves to rid the Nation of such Caterpillars such monsters of Villany as these are These Letters tell you God would be sure to raise up Instruments but what Instruments do they mean Instruments of Rebellion and Faction and Sedition which they most falsly call his own Work. The question is whether the Defendant be guilty of writing these Venomous Malicious Seditious Factious Tumultuous Letters of which you have as full and plain proof as can be made And as to his publishing them can you think that he would write all this Malitious Stuff to put them in his Pocket but you have it sworn that the Defendant said they were sent to the Post-House Then the Jury immediately gave in their Verdict that the Defendant was Guilty of the Offence and Misdemeanor charged in the Indictment as no doubt they resolved to do before they heard one word of the matter The Judgment upon this Verdict was that the Defendant should pay 10000 l Fine and be Imprisoned till paid and to find Sureties for the good Behaviour for Life Accordingly he was committed for the Fine to the King's Bench and continued a Prisoner four or five years which satisfied not but Graham and Burton those Instruments of Rapine and Oppression broke in upon his Estate and besides the Waste and Destruction made they levyed to their own Use and the King 's about 6000 l. Notes upon the Proceedings against Sr Thomas Armstrong at the King's Bench the 14 th of June 1684. Before the Lord Chief Justice Jefferies Justice VVithens Justice Holloway and Justice VValcot SR Thomas Armstrong having been Out-lawed upon an Indictment of high Treason and betrayed and brought from Holland was Committed to New-gate upon the 10 th of June 1684. by the Warrant of Sidney Goldolphin Esq principal Secretary of State And upon the 14 th of June being brought to the King's Bench Bar Sr Robert Sawyer Attorney General moved the Court for an award of Execution upon the Outlawry Whereupon he was Arraigned on the Outlawry viz. that he had been Indicted of high Treason for conspiring against the King's Life and the Government That for not appearing to plead and try that Indictment he stood Outlawed and thereby Attainted of the Treason And it was demanded of him what he had to say why Execution should not be awarded against him Sr Thomas urged that he was beyond Sea at the time of the Outlawry and desired that he might be Tryed To which the Chief Justice answered We have nothing to do but to award Execution Sr Thomas desired that the Statute 6. Edward 6. might be read which gives the Person Outlawed for Treason a year to reverse it if he were beyond Sea and desired that Counsel might be assigned him The Chief Justice ordered the Statute to be read to which the Attorney General assented but said Sr Thomas would not find it to his purpose it was read to this effect That all process of Outlawry for Treason against Offenders being beyond the Seas shall be effectual in the Law but it provides that if the Party shall within a year yield himself to the Chief Justice and offer to traverse the Indictment he shall be received to traverse and being found not Guilty he shall be acquitted of the Outlawry and of all Penalties and Forfeitures by reason thereof Then the Attorney General said Sr Thomas now I suppose will shew he yielded himself to your Lordship and added that before he went out of England he might have rendred himself and been Tryed if he had pleased Sr Thomas Armstrong answered I have been a Prisoner the year is not yet out I now render my self and do conceive I am within the Benefit of the Statute and do desire it The Chief Justice replyed we are of another opinion we cannot take notice of it there is no doubt nor difficulty at all in the thing and applying to Richardson said Captain Richardson you shall have a rule for Execution on Friday next Then Sr Thomas offered to the Court that one in that place had the benefit of a Tryal offered him and that was it that he desired for he thanked God his Case was quite another then his That he knew his own Innocence And so did They too otherwise he had not been denyed a Tryal and desired to make it appear by a Tryal To this the Chief Justice answered that which you speak of was the Grace and Mercy of King who may if he please extend the same to you but we are satisfied that according to Law we must award Execution upon this Outlawry Thereupon Mrs Mathews Sr Thomas's Daughter said My Lord I hope you will not Murder my Father for which being Brow-beaten and checkt she added God Almighty's Judgments light upon you Then the Attorney General said that he would acquaint the Court with one thing in reference to what Sr Thomas had said That the King did indeed indulge Holloway so far as to offer him a Tryal and perhaps might have some reason for it but affirmed that the Prisoner deserved no sort of Indulgence or Mercy and then in effect went on to give Evidence against him saying that it appeared that after the disappointment to the meeting at the Rye by the New-market fire Sr Thomas was one of those who engaged to destroy the King by the way upon his hasty coming then to Town and affirmed that this did appear upon a full and clear Evidence and that when he was taken beyond Sea Letters of Communication with Foreign Ministers and other people were found about him The Chief Justice knowing a more expeditious way of murdering this Gentleman said he would not meddle with evidence telling the Attorney that that was not their business and no doubt they were both conscious that they had not evidence where with to convict him and said we have nothing more to do but to award Execution Sr Thomas still insisted that he was within the Statute that he was Out-lawed while he was beyond Sea and that the twelve Moneths not being past he ought to have the Law and demanded no more Thereupon the Bloody-Monster in a most insolent and

the Church of England and who are now for calling him back These were Men who would have finished the Ruin of the Nation in the Dissolution of its antient and well Established Government and in the Blood of its best Patriots They gloryed in calling themselves Tories their Guide and Patron did in their name thrust out stigmatize all the sober and moderate Men of the Church of England with the Name of Trimmers bestowed upon them this Apothegme That a Trimmer is worse than a Rebel Whoever recurs to the Original of that Name in the Observators will find that it pointed at first at two honourable and never to be forgotten Protestants of your Neighbour County the late Lord Townshend and Sr John Hobart of Norfolk and quickly after Dr Fowler Mr Smithee and many other Reverend Divines of the Church of England fell under that Denomination Now surely 't is not a Crime to call such Men as these by the name which they appropriated to themselves and 't were Foolish to esteem Men of their practices to be of any Religion In some cases a Man ought not to be over-patient and it must move any one to hear a Learned Lawyer at the Bar at the time when Popery had actually ascended the Throne in this manner to caress a Tory-Jury Gentlemen I cannot but with much Sorrow remember to you and I know you all remember it too well that there was a time when the City of London was so far corrupted that it was become a Refuge and Sanctuary for high Treason when there was no Justice to be had for the King there when Men lodged themselves within those Walls as a Protection for their Conspiracies We all remember the time when Indictments were perferred and a plain Evidence given to a Grand-Jury even to the publick satisfaction of all that heard it and yet they have refused to find the Bill and not only so but were so abetted by the Rabble that it was scarce safe for the Judges to sit upon the Bench These are things none of us can forget but must be perpetually remembred to the shame of the Authors and Contrivers of them And must it not provoke a Man to hear the following Doctrine from the Pulpit upon the sad occasion of the good Lord Russell's death of whom one of the best Divines now living did truely say that an Age would not repaire that loss to the Nation viz. Cuting of Throats would have been counted only a Scotch way of Triming and the destruction of Princes to be no more but a perfecting the History of the Reformation They who cannot rise up to all the heights of Conformity can yet strain a point upon occasion and rise up to all the heights of Rebellion and Barbarity and had not God marvelously interposed these squeamish Conscience Traytors would have shewed the truth of this Is it not astonishing at this day when the Parliament hath declared that my Lord Russell Colonel Sidney and Sr Thomas Armstrong were murdered to heare an Irish Arch-Deacon who fled hither upon the score of Religion and is a Principal Manager of our Charity to the Irish Protestants publickly ridicule the death of the first two by telling us in an upbraiding way these are your Martyrs and affirm that the last dyed justly and according to Law Would such men as these satisfie the World of their Ingenuity and Repentance these extravagancies undoubtedly ought to be put into utter Oblivion now that Heaven has wrought for us a most signal and miraculous deliverance but which is to be lamented those very Men who carryed us to the very brinck of destruction are not onely remorseless but many of them do make it their business by drinking Popish Healths wishing success to their Arms and spreading false Newes to infect and debauch the Kingdom especially the City and to traduce maligne and undermine the Government under which the divine Providence has so mercifully placed us and therefore they who have given such high provocations and done so much mischief and do still remain impenitent ought not to esteem themselves unkindly used by some tart expressions Sr That I may be just●…ied with you who I am sure would believe the best of every Man and make the best of all things I have said much more then I did intend upon this occasion and hope you will forgive it You have very signally and heartily lent and laid out your self in your Countries service that service was not onely difficult and hazardous but it had proved fatal had not Heaven interposed for your deliverance and therefore all true Lovers of old England's welfare must wish that no false Insinuations may lessen you in the esteem of Good Men you have been a publick Good and that obliges me to be Sir Your Honourer and Most Obedient Servant February 10. 1689. The CONTENTS REmarks upon Dr Otes his Tryal pag. 1. Vpon the Tryal of Reading p. 38. Vpon the Tryal of Knox and Lane p. 45. Vpon the Tryal of Tasborough and Price p. 53. Vpon the Proceedings against the Earl of Shaftesbury p. 64. Vpon the Tryal of Stephen Colledge p. 92. Vpon the Tryal of Thompson the Printer Payne and Farwell p. 117. Vpon the Tryal of the pretended Guildhall Riot p. 127. Vpon the Tryal of my Lord Russell p. 155. Vpon the Tryal of Colonel Sidney p. 185. Vpon the Tryal of Sr Samuel Barnardiston p. 207. Vpon the Proceedings against Sr Thomas Armstrong p. 215. Vpon Mr Papillon's Tryal with Sr William Pritchard p. 228. Vpon the Tryal of Alderman Cornish p. 245. REMARKS upon the Tryal of Dr Titus Otes upon an Indictment for Perjury at the King's Bench Bar at VVestminster before Sr George Jeffryes Baron of Wem Lord Chief Justice Whom the House of Commons had recommended to the King by this Vote and an Address thereupon November the 13th 1680. Resolved That Sr George Jeffryes Recorder of London by traducing and obstructing Petitioning for the sitting of this Parliament hath betrayed the Rights of the Subject Ordered That an humble Address be made to his Majesty to remove Sr George Jeffryes out of all publick Offices Mr Justice Wythens Who was advanced to a Seat upon that Bench by the following Vote of the House of Commons October 29. 1680. Resolved That Sr Francis Wythens by promoting and presenting to his Majesty an Address expressing an Abhorrence to Petition his Majesty for the calling and sitting of Parliaments hath betrayed the undoubted Rights of the Subjects of England And this Order thereupon Ordered That Sr Francis Wythens be expelled this House for this high Crime and that he receive his Sentence at the Bar of this House upon his Knees from Mr Speaker Which he received accordingly Mr Justice Holloway late Recorder of Oxford whose part in the dispatching Stephen Colledge advanced him to this station And Mr Justice Walcot the best of all the four but as poor as Sr R. Wright and by consequence a fit Tool to serve the

purposes of that Juncture THat the Conspiracy to introduce Popery and Arbitrary Government in England took life in the Year 1660. and was from that time carried on is now little doubted by any English-man who was not a well-wisher to it We are not to question the late King Charles the second 's dying a Papist and 't is as true that he so lived but upon his Restoration that the Duke's turn might be served he must not then declare An Act of Parliament was made to forbid our talking of it under most severe Penalties Then another Act put the Sword into his Hands by Vesting the Militia solely in him The Pulpits of the Kingdom generally speaking were filled with Gentlemen who had imbibed the Doctrine of passive Obedience and Non-Resistance An Oath was imposed That it was not lawful upon any pretence whatsoever to take up Arms against the King or against any commissionated by him About two thousand sober and pious Ministers were thrust from the Churches and Corporations and many of them into loathsome Goals for Non-conformity to that Oath and to a few slight and as they judged unwarranted Ceremonies and the best Members were thrown out of all the Corporations of England by a pretended Regulation much more early then that of the late King James Matters being thus ripened and the Nation sufficiently dehauched by the Court-Example what was wanting but an actual execution This the Conspirators well knowing as they did that the famous City of London was the chief if not the only obstacle to their Hellish design a Resolution was taken to destroy it which they effectually accomplished discovery of this horrid Villany being made not to mention anything of the worthy Sr Robert Brookes Chair-man of the Committee of Inspection into the firing of London Hubert a poor French Papist being thereof Convict the House of Commons knowing that such a contemptible Varlet was not alone in that Fact resolved to take him the next day into Examination for discovery of his Accomplices and Directors but to prevent it that Wretches Mouth was stopt at Tyburn in the Morning before the House met I am conscious that there are Persons now in being who do not only pretend to doubt of this part of the Popish Plot the burning of London but of the Plot it self I shall therefore here subjoyn the Sence of one of the best Houses of Commons which ever met at Westminster January the 10th 1680. Resolved That it is the Opinion of this House that the City of London was burnt in the Year 1660 by the Papists designing thereby to introduce Arbitrary Power Popery into this Kingdom It may also be here observed that at this as at every other juncture when any Popish Plot was near the point of Execution The Papists had constantly the Fanaticks at hand to answer for their Villanies without doubt the Burning this Nest of Hereticks had been concerted both at Paris and at Rome and the time for puting it in execution approaching In April 1666 a Fanatick plot is brought upon the Stage seven or eight were Condemned at the Old-Bayly for Ploting to kill the King and to Burn the City upon the 3 d day of September then following For a more full account of this the Reader is referred to the London Gazette of April the ●0 th 1666. Numb 48. The whole Kingdom bring alarmed and put into a serment by this accursed Enterprize the Plot was post-poned however it was kept alive and the unwearied Conspirators carried it on and in the Year 1678 the blow was ready to be given but then by the Providence of the Almighty Dr Otes detected their Machinations He gave his first Information thereof to that worthy and never to be forgotten Justice of the Peace Sr Edmundbury Godfrey of which the Conspirators having notice for the stifling so fatal a discovery they in a most barbarous manner hurried him out of the World and did with effronted Impudence attempt to perswade the World to believe that that Gentleman was Felo de se but Heaven bringing that matter to light and his Murderers to justice The Plot maugre all oppositions and discouragements began to be searched into and was made out beyond contradiction by some loose Letters and Papers found in the House of Colman the Duke of York's Secretary who had early notice of the discovery and thereupon had carried his most material and as it may be reasonably concluded he thought all Papers which might endanger him or his Master's Cause to the Chamber of Mr Wright a Profligate Lawyer of Lincoln's-Inn where they were burnt for which assistance and good service Wright was afterwards preferred to sit by turns in every of the Courts of Westminster and at length to the place of Lord Chief Justice of England then whom a Person more scandalous and ignorant was never in any Age placed there Well Colman was indicted the Plot proved by Dr Otes and other Witnesses thereby by his own Papers he was convicted and executed as were by degrees several others but for the sake of the Duke and of the Roman Catholick Cause the game must be retrived in order thereto fit Engines were employed some of the Clergy who had long asserted that Popery was more tolerable than Presbytery with their guide the Observator made it their business to decry the Evidence of the Plot impudently affirming as in particular did one Scotred a grand Jury-Man in the Isle of Ely who at the time of the Assizes there began the Pope's health to his Brethren of the Grand Jury That there was no Popish but a Presbyterian Plot. A great part of the unwary and loose Church of England Men throughout the Kingdom appeared to be infected with this mad Doctrine so that to offer Instances thereof may seem impertinent however I shall take the liberty to inform the Reader that upon complaint to the Judge sitting in Court in September 1679. of the above-named Scotred's discourse and drinking the Pope's health a Justice of the Peace then upon the Bench fell upon the Person who made that complaint with great rage and swore By the Name of God there is a Presbyterian Plot. To this I shall only subjoyn that which will be a more authentick Evidence of what is above asserted viz. October the 28th 1680. In the House of Commons Resolved That it doth appear by the evidence this day given to this House that Sr Robert Can is guilty of publickly declaring in the City of Bristol in October 1679. That there was no Popish Plot but a Presbyterian Plot. Ordered That Sr Robert Can a Member of this House be committed to the Prison of the Tower and that he be expelled this House Ordered That Sr Robert Yeomans be sent for in Custody to answer for publickly declaring in Bristol That there was no Popish Plot but a Presbyterian Plot. These easie mis-guided Gentlemen were Disciples of famous Parson Thompson of Bristol whose Breath infected that great City

Mr Robert Masters whom he recommended to the Jury as a Gentleman of an undoubted toping Reputation and he swore that Mr Colledge in discourse with him had justified the Proceedings of the Parliament of 1640. And that the last Westminsters-Parliament was of the Opinion with that Parliament And that he the said Masters having in a pleasant way saluted Colledge by the name of Colonel he said don't mock me I may be one in a little time Then Sr William Jennings testified That Mr Colledge was shewing a Picture to a Crowd of seven or eight or ten People at Oxford and gave one of the Pictures to him which he gave to Justice Warcup That the next day he saw Colledge sell a yard of Blew Ribbon with the Words No Popery No Slavery workt into it Note how doth this stand with the A. General 's Suggestion about the Ribbon given for a Signal to a Parliament-man in the Coffee-House for 2 s. who tyed it upon his Sword. That Mr Colledge upon the day of the Dissolution of the Parliament told him that Mr Fitz. Gerald had spit in his face and that they went to fifty Cuffs and that he told Mr Colledge that his Nose bled and he thereupon replied I have lost the first Blood in the Cause but it will not be long before more be lost After some Contrasting with the Judges and King's Council The Prisoner spoke to this effect I don't question but to prove this one of the most Hellish Conspiracies that ever was upon the face of the Earth an absolute Design to destroy all the Protestants of England that have had the Courage to oppose the Popish Plot In which no Man of my Condition has done more than I have done I was bred a Protestant have so continued and by the Grace of God will dye so 'T is the greatest Nonsence to believe that I would say these things to persons whom I could never hope would conceal my Treasons having discovered their own I had been a Fool a Mad-man to discover them to Papists Priests and Irish-Men Men ready to starve for Bread. Had I declared a design to seize the King when he was here at Oxford they neither would nor ought to have concealed it I declare as God is my Judge that had I had a design to seize the King I know not of one Man upon the face of the Earth to have stood by me Parliament-Man or other I have a Soul that must live to Eternity I would not call God to Witness to a Lye to save One Thousand Lives This is a Villainous Conspiracy and if it take place against me God knows how far it may go This is the 17 th or 18 th Sham Plot of the Papists against the Protestants If they can make me a Traytor they will try it upon others and so hope to Sham off their own Treasons Then the Prisoner called his Witnesses Mr William Shewin testified that Turbervile told him the week before at Charing Cross that there would be strange things at Oxford against Colledge and he would lay ten to one ☞ that Mr Bethel and Mr Wilmore would be Hang'd at Christmas and that he would lead Mr. Bethel by the Gold-Chain about Fleet-Street Mr Hickman testified that he over-heard Haynes say to a Papist who Lodged in Hickman's-House God Damn me I care not what I Swear nor whom I Swear against for it is my Trade to get Money by Swearing Mrs Hall and Mary Richards her Servant testified That Haynes acknowledged that he was employed to turn the plot upon the Protestant Dissenters Mr Whaley testified that about 6 years ago Haynes stole a Silver Tankard from him Mr Lun testifyed that soon after the London Grand Jury had brought in their Ignoramus upon the Indictment against Mr Colledge Haynes in discourse about it fell very foully upon that Jury and said he would do the Earl of Shaftesbury's business and help the King to Money enough out of the Fanaticks Estates And that upon the last Munday Haynes told him that e'er long the King should have Sheriff Bethel's Estate Mr Broadgate testified that Turbervile told him that the King's evidence were slighted and vilified and that he was tempted with great offers to disown the Popish Plot and to turn to the other side Dr Otes being called produced to the Court a Petition to the Common Council of London signed by Turbervile c. wherein they acknowledged that they had been tempted to retract deny the Evidence they had given about the Popish Plot and the Dr. testified that Turbervile denyed to him that he had given evidence to the London grand Jury against Colledge declared that he could not give any evidence against him That the Dr. afterwards charging him with it He said that the Protestant Citizens had deserted them and God damn him he would not starve The Dr. further testifyed that upon a quarrel between Colledge and Smith at Richard's Coffee-House he heard Smith swear God damn him he would have Colledge's Blood. That Dugdale had told the Dr. that he knew nothing against any Protestant in England that afterwards the Dr. charging him that he had gone against his Conscience Dugdale said that he was necessitated to it for he could not otherwise get Money and confessed that Colonel Warcup promised him a place in the Custom-House Mr Samuel Smith and Mr Thomas Gardener testifyed that Smith the Witness did several times declare to them that he believed a Popish Plot but not any Protestant Plot. Bolron and Mowbray testified that Smith endeavoured to suborn them to Swear against Sr John Brookes of Yorkshire and Bolron added that Smith would have suborned him to witness against the Earle of Shaftesbury and Colledge teling him what he should say and that if he managed it rightly he should be made for ever And that he had heard Haynes declare that he knew nothing of a Popish Plot nor of a Presbyterian Plot but that he did not care what he swore and would swear any thing to get money and would be of that Religion which had the strongest party Then Mr Everard testified That Smith told him very lately that he knew of no Presbyterian or Protestant Plot and that Justice Warcup would have perswaded him the said Everard to have sworn a Presbyterian Plot. That Haynes told him that he was drove by necessity to swear against Protestants for he had but short pay And that the Irish-men's swearing against the English was justly fallen upon them for their Injustice in outing the Irish of their Estates The Prisoner after he had called these and many other Witnesses whose evidence though material I do for brevity sake omit to transcribe spoke thus My Lord I have no flourishes to set off my Defence I cannot take the Jury nor the Court with Oratory My Lord They have sworn desperately against me and it appears they have contradicted one another It has been proved that this was a design That they were tampered