Honors Pedigree OR THE SEVERAL FOUNTAINES OF GENTRY Being A Treatise of the distinct degrees of the NOBILITIE of this Kingdome with their Rights and Priviledges according to the Lawes and Customes of England By that Juditious Lawyer Sir JOHN DODOREDGE one of his Majesties Judges of the Kings Bench. LONDON Printed for William Sheares at the Signe of the Bible in St. Pauls Church-yard M. D C. LII THE TABLE The severall Dignities Degrees and Titles treated of in this discourse IMprimis of the King 1 Of the Prince 14 Of Dukes and their Patents 36 Of Marquesses 58 Of Earles and their originall 60 Of Viscounts 90 Of Barons in generall 91 The definition or description of a Baron 92 The Etimology and derivation of the word Baron 94 The antiquity of the dignity of Barons and the sundry uses of the name 95 The tenour and proper signification of the word Baron 99 Of Barons by tenure 99 Of Barons by writ 134 Of Barons by Patent 155 Priviledges incident to the Nobility according to the Law of England 162 Certaine cases wherein a Lord of the Parliament hath no pâ—iviledge 200 Of Nobility and Lords in reputation onely 208 Of Noble Women 210 Of Ladies in reputation 234 Of Knights and matters incident to the degree of Knight-hood according to the Law of England 237 Observations concerning a Knight-Batcâ—elour 277 Of Esquires 278 The definition of Gentry or Civill Nobility 285 Of Yeomen 288 A Treatise concerning the Nobility according to the Laws of ENGLAND AS in mans body for the preservation of the whole divers Functions and Offices of Members are required even so in all well-governed Common-wealths a distinction of persons is necessary And the Policy of this Realm of England for the maintenance and government of the Common-wealth of the same hath made a three-fold division of persons That is to say First The King or Soveraign Monarch under which names also a Soveraign Queen is comprized as declared by the Statute thereof made in the first yeer of Queen Mary Anno 5 Parl. Secondly The Nobility which do comprehend the Prince Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons Spirituall and Temporall Thirdly The Commons by which generall words are understood Knights Esquires Gentlemen Yeomen Artifiâ—ers and Labourers But my purpose at this time being onely to speak of the Nobility and especially so much of them as I finde written in the Books of the common Law and Statutes of this Realm This first I have observed That our Law calleth none Noble under the degree of a Baron and not as men of forraign Countries do use to speak with whom every man of Gentle Birth is counted Noble for we dayly see that both Gentlemen and Knights do serve in the Parliament as Members of the Commonalty vide Lamberts Justice of Peace Lib. 4. Cap. 13. Neither do these words the Nobles the high or great men of the Realm imply the Person and Majesty of the King Dier 155. But with the Civilians the King is reckoned among his Nobles Doct. Ridley fol. 93. The Nobility are known by the generall name of Peers of the Realm or the Barony of England for Dukes Marquesses and Earls and all other of the Nobility do sit together in the Kings great Councell in Parliament as Barons and in right onely of their Baronies And therefore by the gâ—nerall names of Barons of this Realm and for the Baronage thereof we do understand the whole Body of the Nobility The Parliament-Robes of Dukes differing nothing from the Barons but they wear the Guards upon their shoulders three or four fold for although Dukes Marquesses Earls and Viscounts in their Creations are attired with Garments of Silk and Velvet yet in the Parliament they use the same as Barons do made with Scarlet with divers differences of white Furre set with Freinges or Edging on their shoulders for there they sit by reason of their Baronies and according to their dignity take their places Thomas Mills fol. 66. And hence it was that those bloody Civill Warres concerning the liberties granted by the great Charter both in the time of King John and H. 3 his sonne persecuted by all the Nobility of this Realm some few excepted are called in our History The Barons Warres Neither have the Spirituall Lords and Peers of the Parliament any other title to that preeminency but because of their ancient Baronies For although originally all the possessions of Bishops Abbots and Pryors were given and holden in Franckalmayn yet shortly after the Norman Conquest most of their Tenures were altered viz. per Baroniam as appeareth by Matthew Parris Anno 1070. 66. and of that Tenure have continued ever since as you may reade by the Consulations of Claringdon in the Raign of Hen. 2. and in Glanvile and Bracton But the Tenure of all Abbots and Pryors were extinguished by the uniting and conveying them to the Crown by the Statute of dissolution of Monasteries made Anno 31 Hen. 8. Cap. 13. And though the Nobility of England in Titles and by certain Ceremonies may be distinguished yet a Baron is in equipage as unto Nobility and priviledges incident to their diguities with Dukes Marquesses Earls Cooks 6. part 53. And it is in ordinary experience That Dukes and others of any high degree of Nobility in cases criminall are tryed by Barons together with many Earls and Viscounts as their Peers and Peers of the Realm Nobilitas generally signifieth and is derived of the word Nosco to know signifying in common phrase of speech both with the Latines and eke with us English-men a generosity of Blood and Degree and therefore one said vir nobilis idem est quod not us per omniâ— c. A Noble-man is he who is known and the Heroicall vertues of his life talkt of in every mans mouâ—h But especially it is applyed and used to expresse the reward of vertue in honourable measure gâ—neris claritatem And this is not to be omitted That the Law doth prohibite any Subject of this Realm to receive Titles of Honor or dignity of the gift or Dâ—nation of a Fâ—rraigne Prince or King or Emperour for it is a thing greatly touching the Majesty of the King and the State of his Kingdom Est jus Majestatis inter insignia summâ— potestatis It is the right of Majesty and amongst the Ensignes of high power vide Cook 7. part 25. 6. And if that mâ—n shall bring an action and in the Writ is stiled by such forraigne title and name of Honour the defendant may plead in abatement of his Writ That he is no Duke Marquesse Earl or Baron whereupon if the plaintiff or demandant take issue this issue shall not be tryed by Jury but by Records of the Parliament wherein he faileth And if an English man be made Earl of the Empire or of any other forraign Nation created into Honour and the King also do make him into any Title of Honour in England he shall now be named in all his judiciall
apparant of the King of England and of such a King who is heir unto the said Prince Edward And such a first begotten son and heir apparant to the Crown shall inherit the said Dukedom in the life of the said King his father with manner of limitation of estate was short excellent and curious varying from the ordinary Rules of the Common Law touching the framing of any estate of inheritance in fee-simple or fee-tail And neverthelesse by the authority of Parliament a speciall fee-simple iâ— in that onely case made as by judgment may appear in the Book aforesaid and the case thereof fol. 27. and 21 E. 3. 41. b. And ever since that creation the said Dukedom of Cornwall hath been the peculiar inheritance of the Kings eldest son ad supportandum nomen onus bonoris to support the name and weight of that his honourable estate during the king his fathers life so that he is ever Duxnatus non creatus a Duke born not created and the said Duke the very first day of his nativity is presumed and taken to be of full and perfect age so that he may sue that day for his livery of the said Dukedom and ought of right to obtain the same as well as if he had been full 21 yeers of age And the said Black-Prince was the first Duke in England after the Conquest for though Bracton who made his Book in H. 3. saith Et sunt sub regâ—duces as before appeareth yet that place is to be understood of the ancient kings who were before the conquest for in Mag. Charta which was made in Anno 9 H. 3. we finde not the name of Duke amongst the Peers and Nobles there mentioned For seeing the Norman Kings themselves were Dukes of Normandy for a great while they adorned none with this honour of Duke And the eldest son of every King after this creation was Duke of Cornwall and so allowed As for example Henry of Munmouth eldest son of H. 4. and Henry of Winsoâ— eldest son of H. 5. and Edw. of Westminster the first son of Ed. 4. and Arthur of Winchester first son of H. 7. and Edward of Hampton first son of H. 8. but Richard of Burdeaux who was the first son of the Black-Prince was not Duke of Cornwall by force of the said creation for albeit after the death of his father he was heir apparant to the Crown yet because he was not the first begotten son of a King of England for his father dyed in the life time of king Ed. 3. the said Richard was not within the limitation of the grant and creation by authority of Parliament made in the 11 yeer of king Edward above mentioned And therefore to supply that defect in the 5. yeer of Ed. 3. he was created Duke of Cornwall by a speciall Charter Elizabeth eldest daughter to king Edw. 4. was not Dutches of Cornwal for she was the first begotten daughter of king Edw. 4. but the limitation is to the first begotten son Henry the 8. was not in the life of his father king H. 7. after the death of his eldest Brother Arthur Duke of Cornwall by force of the said creation for albeit he was sole heir apparant to the king yet he was not his eldest begotten son Cooks 8 part 29. b. and 30. a. And the opinion of Stamford a learned Judge hath been that he shall have within his Dukedom of Cornwall the kings Prerogatives because it is not severed from the Crown after the form as it is given for none shall be inheritour thereof but the kings of the Realm For example whereas by the Common Law if a man hold divers Mannors or other lands and toâ—ements of severall Lords all by knights service some part by priority and ancient Feoffment and other lands by posterity and by a latter Feoffment and the Tenant so seized dyeth his son and heir within age In this case the custody of Wardship of the body and his marriage may not be divided among all the Lords but one of them onely shall have right unto it because the body of a man is intire and the Law doth say That the Lord of whom some part of those lands be holden by priority and by the same tenure of Chivalry shall have it except the king be any of the Lords for them though the Tenant did purchase that land last yet after his death the king shall bee preâ—erred before all or any other the Lords of whom the Tenant did hold by priority And so shall the Duke of Cornwall in the same case have the same Prerogative if his Tenant dye holding of him but by posterity of Feoffment for any tenure of his Dutchie of Cornwall although the said Duke is not seized of any particular estate whereof the reversion remaineth in the king for the Prince is seized in fee of his Dukedom as before is said Iohn of Gaunt the fourth son of king Edward 3. did take to wife Blanch who was daughter and heir to Henry Duke of Lancaster who had issue Henry afterwards king of England so that the said Dutchy of Lancaster did come unto the said Henry by discent from the part of his mother and being a subject he was to observe the Common Law of the Land in all things concerning his Dutchie For if he would depart in Fee with any part thereof hee must make livery and seizen or if hee had made a Lease for life reserving rent with a reentery for default of payment and the rent happen to be behind the Duke might not enter unlesse hee doe make a demand or if he had aliened any part thereof whilest he was with age hee might defeat the purchaser for that cause and if hee would grant a reversion of any estate for life or yeares in being there must also be Attornment or else the grant doth not take effect But after that hee had deposed King Richard the second and had assumed upon him the Royall estate and so had conjoyned his naturall bodie in the bodie Politique of the King of this Realme and so was become King Then the possessions of the Duchie of Lancaster were in him as King and not as Duke For the name of Duke being not so great as the name of a King was drowned by the name of King and by the State Royall in him who was Duke for the King cannot bee a Duke within his owne Realme but out of his Realme hee may And likewise the name of the Duchie and all the Franchizes Liberties and Jurisdictions of the same when they were in the hands of him who had the Crowne and Jurisdiction Royall were gone by thâ— Common Law and extinct for the greater doth distinguish the lesse and after those times the possessions of the Dutchie of LANCASTER would not passe from King Henry the fourth but by his Letters Patents under the great Seal of England without livery of seifin and without Attornment and if he make a Lease for life being Duke
tryall hereof shall not be by Record as in the former case but by a Jury of 12. men and the reason of the diversity is because in this case the Dignity is accrewed unto her by marriage which the Lawyers tearme matter in fact and not by any record Cookes 6. part 53. a. But a noble Woman by Marriage though she take to her a second Husband a man of meane degree yet shee may keepe two Chaplaines according to the Proviso in the Statute of 21. H. 8. c. 13. for and in respect of the honour which once she had viz. at the time of the retayner and every such Chaplaine may purchase lycense and dispensation Cookes 4. part 117. Cowels Instutions lib. tit 10. 15. but her Chaplaines may not be nonresident afterwards And forasmuch as the retayning of Chaplaines by Ladies of great estates is ordinary and neverthelesse some questions in law have beene concerning the true understanding of the said Statute law I thinke it not impertinent to set downe some subsequent resolutions of the Judges touching such matters Anne Baronesse of Mount Eagle in her Widdowhood did retaine two Chaplaines according to the Statute and one of them had but one Benefice and therefore did obtaine a dispensation with a confirmation from the Queene according to the tenour of the said Statute but before he was presented to his second Benefice the Lady did take to Husband Henry Lord Compton whereby she did forsake her former dignity of Baronesse of Mount-Eagle and afterward the said Chaplain did accept a second Benefice and was therunto admitted and inducted and the Judges have resolved that the Chaplain hath done nothing herein but according to the meaning of the Statute and that the Ladies marriage between his Retainer and acceptance of his second benefice was no Countermand Revocation or determination of that Retainer which the Lady lawfully then did make but that she living he might proceed to the filling up of the qualification Causa origio est materia negoti for though the wife of a Noble-man during the covecture cannot by Law rerain a Chaplain to be quallified according to the statute because by Intendment her Husbands Chaplains are sufficient for that Office yet forasmuch as the Retainer was lawfull then she was widdow that being the principall matter shall enable him to take use and benefice after her marriage for though the husband and wife are but one person in Law yet as the Text is sunt animo duo in carne uno Bracton lib. 5. fol. 363 a. And in this case by the death of the Lord Compton her first Retainer was not determined for without any neer Retainer her said Chaplain may take his second benefice and also for that cause so long as the said Chaplains do attend upon their said Lady in her House they shall not be endammaged for Non-residency Cooks 4. part 117. fol. 90 76. That which remains concerning the further exposition of this statute you may read before in the title of priviledge of Lords So long that the wife of a Duke be called Dutchesse or of an Earl be a Countesse and have the fruition of all the Honours appertaining to that estate with kneeling tasting serving and the rest and so long shall a Barons widow be saluted Lady and a Knights wise also by the courteous Speech of England quandiu Maj. aut viduitas vic durant except she happen to relaps with an Adulterer for as the Laws of this Kingdome do adjudge that a woman shall lose her dower in that case viz. west cap. B. F. N. B. fol. 150. H. Perk. fel. 70. Kitchin 162. b. as Ruto Lands and Tenents so justly so doth the Laws of Gentry and Noblenesse give sentence against such a woman advanced to Titles of Dignity by the husband to be unworthy to enjoy the same when she putting her husband out of mind hath subjected her self to another If a Lady which is married come through the Forrests he shall not take any thing but a Dutchesse or a Countesse shall have advantage of the statute de Charta Forest 11. Art during the time that she is unmarried Cromptons Court fol. 167 b. Wheras it is contained in the great Charter amongst other things in the Form which followeth no Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned or deseised of his Free-hold or his Liberties or Free-customs or shall be outlawed or banished or in any wise destroyed nor go upon him but by the lawfull judgment of his Peers or by the Law of the Land In which statute is no mention made how women Ladies of great estate because of their Husbands Peers of the Land married or sole that is to say Dutchesse Countesse or Barronesse shall be put to answer or before what Iudges they shall be judged upon an Inditement of Treason or Fellonyes by them committed or done because wherof it is an Ambiguity in the Law of England before whom and by whom such Ladies so endicted shall be put to answer and be judged by our said Soveraign Lord the King willing to put out such Ambiguities and Doubts hath declared by Authority aforesaid that such Ladies so endicted or hereafter to be endicted whether they be married or sole therof shall bee brought in answer and put to answer and judged before such Iudges and Peers of the Realm as Peers of the Realm should be if they were endicted of any Treasons or Fellonyes done or hereafter to be done and in like manner and Form and in none otherwise Anno 2. H. 6. Cap. 9. Which statute was but a Confirmation or Declaration of the common Law vide Cooks 6 part 52. b. This is a Rule in the civill law si filia R. nubat alicui dom vel Comiti dicetur semp Regalis As amongst Noble women there is a difference of degrees so according to their distinct excellentnesse the law doth give speciall Priviledges as followeth By the statute of 25. E. 3. cap. 2. It is High Treason to compose or imagine the death of the Queen or to violate the Kings Companion The Kings Espouse is a sole person exempted by the common law and she may purchase by Fee-simple or Make leases or Grants without the King she may plead and be impleaded which no other married woman can do without her husband Cook 4 part 23. B. Theol. lib 1. cap. 4. 24. E. 3. 63. vide Bracton 363. a. All Acts of Parliaments for any cause which any way may concern the Queen and her Capacity are such statutes wherof the Judges ought to take recognisance as of generall statutes for though the matter do only concern the Capacity of the Queen yet it doth also concern all the subjects of the Realm for every subject hath interest in the King and none of his Subjects who are within his Lawes in divided from the King being his head and Soveraigne so that his businesse and things do touch all the Realme and as all the Realme hath interest in the King so and
is no heire male at all that may claime the same for then doth this question take place whether the husband of such heire female shall enioy the dignitie in the right of his wife or no wherein wee are to rest upon a resolution had and given in this speciall question which was in this manner In the time of Hen. 8. when Mr. Winbie tooke upon him the stile of Lord Talboys in the right of his wife having none issue by her the said King assisted both by Civill and Temporall Lawyers gave sentence that no husband of Baronesse in her right should use the stile and dignitie untill he had by her a Child whereby he should become Tenant by the courtesie unto her inheritance The speciall reasons that occasioned this sentence were two First it should be inconvenient for her husband this day to bee a Baron and Peere of the Realme and to morrow by the death of his wife to become none and that without the death of the partie Secondly if he had issue by his wife and were intituled to be Tenant by the curtesie of England of the wives land if hee shall not also beare the stile and dignitie of her Barony then should his sonne after the death of his mother dying in the life time of his father bee Baron and Lord without land for so the Father should have the land as Tenant by the curtesie and the sonne the Lordship without Land And thus much said concerning the nature quality and estate of a Baron by writ and for resolution of the severall points and Articles of the question proposed may suffice Barons by Patent which is the third kind of Barons mentioned in the former division of Barons THere is also a fourth meanes of creation by act of Parliament but the first 2. mentiond and this by Patent are most for the honour of the King for thereby the donation doth proceed from his highnes onely as from the fountaine of all honour and dignity but when the creation is by Parliament every one may bee said donator Cookes 8. part 19. A Baron by creation by reason of Letters Patents is that Noble person whom the Kings Maiesty or any of his progenitors Kings of the Realme have created Barons by such their Letters Patents But this manner of creating Barons by Patent began in the Raign of R. 2. who created first Iohn Beauchamp of Holt Baron of Kidderminster by his Letters Patents 8. October anno 11. But Mils saith in 30. H. 6. this was brought in This kind of dignity of Baron shall bee of such countenance in discent or otherwise as shall beelimited in the Habendi in such Letters Patents contained for it may be but for the life of him to whom it is given or for terme de anter vie of some other mans life as some hold opinion in 9. H. 6. 29. for Cujus est dare eius est dispoâ—ere it may be in speciall a generall tayle and this kind of estate tayle was usuall before the Statute made 13. E. 1. by which estate tayle in Lands and Tenements was created as appeareth by the Patent whereby Hubert de Burgo was made Earle of Kent in the time of H. 3. by these words Habend sibi hered suis de corpore Maâ—gaâ—etaeuxoris suâ— sororis Alexandri Regis Scotiâ— procreatis pro defectu talis exitus remaâ—ere rectis heredâ—bus dicti Huberti and that estates in tayle are at this day titles of honour by the Statute of Westm 2. vide Nevils case Cooks 7. part 33. For the better explanation of this kind of dignity the resolution also of certaine questions shall be very requisite Question If a Nobleman and his Progenitors have for a long time been called to the Parliament and be a Baron either by tenure or writ have had in regard thereof a place certaine in Parliament if afterwards the same Nobleman should be created a Baron of that Barony and by the same name by Letters Patents whether shall hee and his heires retaine his old place in Parliament which hee had according to the former dignity or whether shall he lose â—is old place and take a new place according to the time of his creation onely Answer The case of the Lord Delaware received a resolution Coo 11. part â—â—e Lord de la wares case somewhat answerable to this question Tho. Lord Delaware 3. â— 6. being in some displeasure with William West his Nephew and heire who was Father to the now Lord De la ware procured an Act of Paâ—liament by the which the said Wâ—ll West was during his naturall life only clearly disabled to clayme demand or have any manner of right title or interest by discent â—evenue or otherwise in or to the mannor lands tenements or hereditaments title and dignity of Thomas Lord De la wâ—re his Vncle Afâ—er the said Thomas De la ware dyed and the said VVilliam West was in the time of the late Queene Elizabeth restored and afterwards in the 8. yeare of her Raigne was â—teated Lord De la ware by Patent and had place in Parliament according to his creation by Patent for that by the said Act of Parliament in the time of E. 6. hee was excluded to challenge the former ancient Baâ—ony and after hee dyed whether the new Lord Dela ware should take his place to the ancient Barony by writ or according to his Fathers creation by Patent was the question the opinion of the late Queenes Counsell being Her Majesties Atturney Generall and Solicitor were that the acceptance of the new creation by the said William West could not distinguish the ancient dignity in him at the time of his creation but the dignity was at that time by the Act of Parlâ—ament 3. E. 6. in obeyance suspence or consideration of Law and hee thereby utterly disabled to have the same during his life only so as other acceptance could not extinguish that dignity which hee then had not nor could not conclude his hâ—ire who was not disabled by the said Act of 3. E. 6. to clayme the ancient Barony which opinion of theirs was seene and allowed by the resolution of the chiefe Iustice of England and Lord chiefe Baron and so signified unto the Lord Keeper but this is to bee noted by the reasons made for the said resolution that if the said William West had beene Baron and intituled or in possession of the ancient dignity when hee accepted the said creation the Law perchance might have been otherwise but that remayneth as yet unresolved neverthelesse the rule eodem mod quo quid constuitur dissolvitur but by grant which is made a matter in fact a man cannot transferre his title of honour Cook 7. part And thus much concerning the three degrees of Barons within this Realme may suffice to be said in geneâ—all upon this occasion for the better understanding and direction of that which followeth to be handled And in this place I thinke it not impertinent
proceedings onely by such name and title as he hath received from the King of this Realm whose Subject he is and if by the King of England he be not advanced to Title of Honour then shall he bear the name of his Baptism onely and Surname unlesse he be a Knight 20 Ed. 4. 6. Cook 7. part 16. a. A Duke of Spain or of other forraign Nation cometh into England by the Kings safe-Conduct in which also the King doth stile him Duke according to his Creation neverthelesse in all proceedings in the Kings Courts he shall not be stiled by his name of dignity Cook in the last Book before And though the said Noble person be also by the Kings Letters Patents and by his forraign name and title of dignity made Denizen for that is the right name so called because his legitimation is given unto him for if you derive Denizen from Denizee as one born within the Allegiance or Obedience of the King then such a one should be all one with a naturall born Subject wherein a Denizen faileth in many things or if they be naturalized also by the authority of Parliament whereby he seemeth to be in all things made as a Subject born in England yet he shall not be stiled with his forraign title of dignity Cooks 7 part 15. a. And so it is if a Noble man of France â— come into England as Ambassadour and here by lawfull Marriage hath issue a sonne the father dieth the son is by birth a naturall English-man yet he shall not bear the Title of Honour of his father and the cause and reason hereof is Because the title of his Nobility had his originall by a French King and not by any naturall peration which thing is well proved both by authority of Law and experience in these dayes for in the book last mentioned in that leaf is resolved a more stranger case that is albeit that a Postnatus of Scotland or Ireland who is in these dayes a naturall Subject to the King of England or any of his posterity be he the heir of a Noble man of Scotland or of Ireland yet he is none of the Nobility of England But if that Allien or stranger born or Scot be summoned by the Kings Writ to come unto his Parliament and is therein stiled by his forraign stile or by other Title whereunto he is invested within England by the Kings grant then from thenceforth he is a Peer of this Realm and in all Judiciall and legall proceedings he ought to be so stiled and by no other name 39 Ed. 3. 36. And it was the case of Guilbert Humphreyvile Earl of Anger 's in Scotland For it appertaineth to the Royall prerogative of the King to call and to admit any Alien born to have voyce and place in his Parliament at his Parliament at his pleasure although it is put in practice very rarely and seldome time and that for very great and weighty considerations of State And if after such Parliamentary Summons of such a stranger born question do arise and the issue whether he is of that title or no it may well be tryed by the Records which is the onely lawfull tryall in that case Cooks 7. part 15. a 6 part 53. But there is a diversity worthy the observation for the highest and lowest dignities are universall and therefore a Knight in all place soever he received his title of dignity and so ought of right and by Law be named in the Kings Courts 26 Ed. 4. 6. 39. Ed. 3. 36. Also if the Emperour or the King of Denmark or any other forraigne King come into this Realm by safe-Conduct as he ought For a Monarch or an absolute Prince though he be in League cannot come into England without License and safe-Conduct of the King of England but any subject to such forraigne King in league may come into this Realm without License Cook 7. part 21. 6. in this case he shall sue and be sued by the name of Emperour or King other wise the writ shall abate There is a notable president cited out of Fleta where treating of the Jurisdiction of the Kings Court of Marshalsey it is said And these things he may lawfully do by Office that is to say the Steward of the Kings Houshold notwithstanding the liberty of any other although in another Kingdom where the offender may be found in the Kings house according to that which happened â—t Paris held in the 14 yeer of Ed. 1. of one Engleam of Nogent taken in the Houshold of the King of England the King himself being then in Paris with Silver dishes lately stollen at which deed the King of France being present and whereupon the Court of the King of France did claym cognizance of the plea concerning that theft by Jurisdiction of the Court of Paris the matter being diversly debated in the Councell of the King of France at length it was ordered that the King of England should use and enjoy that his Kingly prerogative of his Houshold where being convicted by Sir Robert Fitz-John Knight Steward of the Kings Houshold of the theft by consideration of the same Court was hanged on the Gallows in St Germans fields Cooks 7. part 15. 6. And there by the way may also be noted from the reason in the recited Books alleadged the person of a King in another Kings Dominions is not absolutely priviledged but that he may be impleaded for debt or trespasse or condemned for Treason committed within the said Dominions for it is a generall Law of Nations That in what place an offence is committed according to the Law of that place they may be judged without regard of any priviledge neither can a King in another Kingdom challenge any such prerogative of immunity from Laws for a King out of his proper Kingdom hath no merum Imperium absolute power but onely doth retain â—onoris titulos dignitatis the Titles of Honour and Dignity so that where he hath offended in his own person against the King of the Nation where he is per omnia distringitur etiam quoad personam he may be distrayned even to his own person And the same Law is of Ambassadours ne occasio daretur dolinquendi lest occasion of offence be given like as a sanctuary will save a mans life from man-slaughter but not when man-slaughter is committed within the Sanctuary for then he doth wilfully wave the benefit of all priviledges and prerogatives and neverthelesse it bindeth firm that Ambassadours are called Legats because they are chosen as fit men out of many and their persons be sacred both at home and abroad so that no man injuriously may lay violent hands upon them without breach of the Law of Nations and much lesse upon the person of a King in a strange Land Bracton a Judge of this Realm in the Raign of King Hen. 3. in his first Book 8 saith in effect as followeth There is no respect of persons with God because God