Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	ireland_n	parliament_n	statute_n	2,883	5	8.7954	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A59386	Rights of the kingdom, or, Customs of our ancestors touching the duty, power, election, or succession of our Kings and Parliaments, our true liberty, due allegiance, three estates, their legislative power, original, judicial, and executive, with the militia freely discussed through the British, Saxon, Norman laws and histories, with an occasional discourse of great changes yet expected in the world.	Sadler, John, 1615-1674.	1682 (1682)	Wing S279; ESTC R11835	136,787	326

their limitations by our Laws their Title by Succession or Election at the Common Law If Bracton or if Fleta may be Judges of this Question they will tell us that in their times our King was Elective Non a Regnando dicitur sed a Bene Regendo ad hoc Electus est And again ad haec autem Creatus Rex Electus ut Iustitiam faciat Universis Not only Created but Elected it is where they treat of Iudges and of Iurisdiction And of our Saxon Ancestors the Mirror is very plain that they did Elect or chuse their King from among themselves Eslierent de eux un Roy à reigner sir eux and being Elected they did so and so Limit him by Oath and Laws In this we might appeal to Tacitus of our Ancestors For theirs who did both Elect and Bound their Kings and Generals Reges ex Nobilitate Duces ex Virtute sumunt and of their King he saith the Power was so bounded that he could not call it Free Nec infinita aut libera Potestas and that in Conciliis Their Kings Authority was in perswasion rather than Command Suadendi potius quam jubendi potestate Caesar seemeth to conceive they had no King or fixed Common Governour in time of Peace but for War saith he they Choose out Generals qui Bello praesint ut vitae necisque habeant Potestatem In our Brittish Ancestors he found a King but by Election of a great Common-Council by whose consent he observeth that Cassivelane was chosen King and General against his Landing Summa Imperii Bellique administrandi communi Concilio permissa est Cassivellauno and again Nostro adventu permoti Britanni hunc toti bello imperioque praefecerant That the Brittans agreed much with the Gauls in their Customs I do not deny but I know not why this should make the Gauls to be the Elder Brothers as some teach us because our Britain is an Island Yet it may be much disputed if not proved that it once was joyned to Gaul or France in one Continent for which we might produce some of the old Poets and others before Twine and Verstegan However it is clear enough from Caesar and Pliny that the Gauls were much moulded by the Brittish Druids although they seemed more Polite in Iuvenal's time and afterwards being more Frank they afforded a Christian Queen to Ethelbert and the Model of a great School to Sigesbert which yet must not wrong Alcuinus who from hence moulded the University of Paris if we may Believe all that write of Charlemaign And if we add Strabo to those cited before we shall find they Chose both Generals and all great Magistrates When they had a King the Crown passed by Election and was so limited that Ambiotrix one of their Kings acknowledged Ut non minus in se Iuris Multitudo quàm ipse in Multitudinem So in Caesar. Their Common-Council much consisted of Equites and such perhaps our Knights of Shires Electi de plebe and Druydes their Clergy who did over-rule them all by their Banns and Sacred Oak Misleto as if it had grown in Dodona's Grove Their grand Corporation was dissolved by Roman Edicts in Gaul by Claudius as Seneca Suetonius but in Rome by Tiberius if not Augustus in Pliny but Vopiscus keepeth a Druydess to presage the Empire to Dioclesian when he had killed the Boar and Ammianus may afford them in Rome in Iulian or Constantius But in Scotland or Ireland they remained longer if we may believe their Annals of Columbanus and of William the Irish Abbot But in Dioclesian's time Amphibalus the famous Brittan fled from Rome to his Friend St. Alban who dyed for him in his Cloaths it is said but we find him Condemned by Law and styled Lord of Verulam Prince of Knights and Steward of Brittain in his Shrine and Iacob de Voragine ' Ere long we find him made a Bishop in the Holy Isle and there he did Succeed the Brittish Druyds and his Scholars were enow with their Blood and Carkasses to make the name of Litchfield But the turning of Druyds into our Bishops in Lucius's time is no more certain I think than that those were the Flamins or Arch Flamins of whom we hear so much of late but of old few or none relate it but only Monmouth The Name of Flamin came to Brittain from the Grecians or the Romans who had Druyds from the Brittans where they were most Sacred Priests at first but three but when every God and Godded Man or Daemon had his Flamin they became extreamly innumerable Yet the first three still kept their Distance Place and Seniority from whence the Phrase of Arch-Flamin which yet I dare not assert to have been in Brittain or to be so much as known in the time of Lucius or the name of Archbishop But of this Sir Henry Spelman of Lucius's Epistles in Gratian and Mr. Patrick Young on Clements Epistle to the Corinthians But Fenestella with his Names of Bishop Arch-Bishop Cardinal Patriarch Metropolitan c. is now come out with another Title of a later Age than he that lived in Tiberius But to return to our Brittish Druyds moulding the State and yet they would not speak of State but in or by a Common-Council as was touched before in the Militia and among these the same Caesar will tell us that there was a chief or President but chosen by Deserts and not by a blind way of Succession Si sint Pares plures suffragio adlegitur nonnunquam etiam armis de principatu contendunt Nor is it probable the Brittans should be great Patrons of Monarchical Succession which could hardly well consist with their Gavelkind which is not only in Kent but in divers other Places of England and in Wales from the Brittans as we may learn from Parliament in 27 Hen. 8. and in K. Edwards Statute of Wales with Littletons Parceners And his Commentator makes it one mark of the ancient Brittans and from them also to Ireland and from the Brittish Gavelkind do all the Children yet among us part their Fathers Arms of which also the great Judge on Littletons Villenage But on the Parceners he deriveth the Crowns descent to the Eldest from the Trojans to the Brittans so indeed do many others with Monmouth and Basingstock Yet our Best Herald the Learned Cambden will deride the Story of the Trojans coming hither but his many Arguments to prove the first Inhabitants to be a Kin to the Gauls do no more convince me that the Trojans might not come hither afterwards than that the Normans did not come because the Saxons were before them I repeat nothing from Gyraldus Cambrensis Matthew Paris Hoveden Huntingdon or others who derided Monmouth till they were convinced by some Brittish Writers which themselves found besides all the Greek and Latin Authors cited by Virunnius Leland Sir John Price and divers others that I say nothing of the Scottish Chronicles or of the Learned man that shewed King

And a while before the Abbot was made a Bishop at London petente Milone Constabulario favore Populi utriusque Ordinis that is the Lords and Commons or rather the Clergy and Laity In Huntingdon we read of Robert Arch-Deacon of Leicester about this Time Elect Bishop of Lincoln Rege Clero Populo summo gaudio annuente And a while after he shews us the King at London in a full Parliament disputing the grand question of Appeals with the Romish Legate For such Appeales saith he had not been used in England till That Henry of Winton the Legate had cruelly intruded them Malo suo crudeliter intrusit The Monk of St. Albans borroweth from him and sometimes repayeth with interests As in that Statute for Priviledge of Churches and Church-yards with all the Clergy so that none but the Pope could absolve from violence done to such in which they all agree he added also another Act of the Parliament that Plowes in the Field with Husbandmen should enjoy the same Peace or priviledge as if they were in a Church-yard His Geffry de Mandevil Consul or Comes was a very great man de magna villa For he speaks of his Princeps Militiae and of another that was his Magister peditum But in Henry of Huntingdon we find him at length clapt up in Prison but scarcely secundum jus Gentium Rex cepit eum in curia sua ex necessitate magis quam ex honestate Hoveden hath of him the like expressions adding also that from a Baron he had been raised to the degree of a Consul that is an Earl For in him the Earl of Flanders is Consul Flandrensis and the Earl of Anjou Consul Andegavensis This was he that come to be Hen. the 2d who at his Landing being Duke of Normandy coyned money which passed here by the name of the Dukes coyn Nor only he but Omnes potentes tam Episcopi quam Comites Barones suam faciebant monetam and of this Nubrigensis Which may be compared with the Saxon Laws of King Ethelstan and others As K. Hen. monetag common In the same Huntingdon we also read that by the Mediation of Theobald of Canterbury and Henry of Winton the King was so reconciled to this Duke and Earl Henry that they never more discorded also that the Duke was made Iusticiarius Angliae next under the King omnia Regni Negotia per eum terminabantur But in Polydore we find this Pacification made by Parliament Cujus Authoritate pactio facta est Matthew Paris is so full of Law Terms that I could beleive him in this to allude to the Law Fines and Recoveries For at this peace he telleth how the Kingdom was again Recovered And after a disgression to Merlins Prophesie in which the phrase of Vice-comites may be duly considered he concludeth thus a War that had raged 17 years together was now quieted by such a Time hoc fine quievit To which he adds that famous story of the Souldier that in this Vacation made a Voyage to St. Patricks Purgatory And by that occasion he relates the best description of Hell or Hellish Torments that I remember in any Historian of credit With which may be compared divers others in the same Author But that which is added at the Souldier return to the King may be added also to what is observed before touching Irelands dependance on England For the same Souldier was again sent by King Stephen into Ireland to be Assistant as an interpreter to Gilbert who had a grant from hence to found an Abbey in Ireland Whither he also carried this Souldier speaking Irish and with Tears he would often relate his Voyage to Hell Which is so recorded and asserted by divers Religious men To K. Stephen's Militia we may also refer that which so many Historians Record of his damning the Hidage or Danegeld Which yet was not his Act but the Parliaments that did Elect and create him King We must discuss it more fully ere long but now for Danegeld we may assert it to be expressed in his very Coronation Oath on which he was admitted One of the clauses was that he should for ever desist from that which had been paid to some of his Predecessors singulis annis And Wendover or Paris express no more But in Hoveden and Huntingdon Dane-geld is expresly specified which both affirm to be then at 2 s. the Hyde They agree also with others That this was again specified in Parliament at Oxford Where the King did again confirm his Coronation Oath Matthew of Westminster doth also Record that of these promises or Oaths he made a Charter which seemeth to be that Charter which the great Reporter in his 8th part affirmeth to be yet found in an old MS. de antiquis Legibus And that the said Charter among divers other things doth expressely confirm the Laws of K. Edward and of K. Henry Nay the Monk of St. Albans affirmeth that in Parliament Congregatis Regni magnatibus he did there solemnly promise to meliorate the Laws or make them better as they should desire or require juxta voluntatem Arbitrium singulorum which we may consider again upon occasion Nor must I omit that much of this very Charter is yet to be read in Print in an old Monk that lived in King Stephen Time and those particulars for confirmation of all good Laws and in special those of King Henry with divers other things that are worth perusal It is in the Monk of Malmsbury but a little after the Letters written to the Pope about King Henries death confession absolution and Anoynting by the Elders according to what was let to the Church by the Apostle St. Iames as in those Letters is more fully expressed Which may be added to that before of the Church Elders Polydore telleth us that in full Parliament at Oxford King Stephen did abolish that which had been oft exacted for Hydage per singula jugera and that he intreated another Parliament to carry on that War which by their Advise and Councel had been undertaken in the Name of Common Wealth Reipublicae Nomine vestro cum Consilio tum Consensu susceptum est and his desire to them was so to act in Person that the People might not be burthened with Taxes And at his end Virgil addeth that for all his continual Wars he did exact little or no Tribute from the People So that the Parliament it seems did wholly manage his Militia From a long Storm at Sea we are now come into a quiet Port and a calm Haven such were the Thoughts Expectations and Hopes of All in Henry the 2d We have his Laws in Print in several places and his Lawyers known enough For who needeth to be told of Glanvil in his Reign of whom before and much I might add from divers others besides Hoveden Who by occasion of that Judges Name hath not only given us a Copy of St. Edwards Laws but hath also asserted their confirmation by

of Almain The Learned Author of the late Peleg among divers other Brittish words hath found a new Etymology for the Name of Britain which notwithstanding Brith for Colour or Painting and Bretas in some Greek Poets for a Picture or a Painted Brat he would have to be called by the Phaenicians Berat Anac or the Field of Tin and Lead To which I may add the Northern Sea called of old the Phronean Ocean or the Sea of Saturn whom they feigned to lye asleep in the Bottom of that Sea bound by Iupiter in a Golden Pumice of which Plutarch Eusebius Ptolomy and divers others and of this the Author of the Veyl or Mask of Heaven Of which I must speak but little only this for a Clavis The Scene is the little World or Isle of Brittain Thule some appendant to that Crown or Scotland whose troubles of 1639. are shadowed in the night work called Scotos or Darkness Saturn the Scottish Genius and Mercury the Clergy but in special the late Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Iupiter the Son of Saturn or a great Scottish Lord lately on the Scene that was first sent to reconcile Saturn but he turned Retrograde Mars the Genius of War and in special the great General against Saturn or the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland Venus seemeth to be Queen Mother of France then alive in England Phoebus and Phoebe need no gloss Imperii fata plain enough to those that know that Dialect But Phoebe might have there seen before this Parliament that Peace had been her Work and should have been her Happiness nor is it yet too late or wholly past Habent etiam sua fata Reginae and there is a silent Patience which may Conquer more than all the World can get by Force Who will unmask the Chymical Part which the Poets also Veiled in their Fables of Saturn bound by Iupiter in Golden Pumice and it may be possible that future Ages may be brought to see or know the Treasures in our Chronian Ocean and the meaning of that Riddle In the mean time he that can improve the Sympathy of Mars and Venus or remove the Antipathy of Saturn and Mercury or can bind Saturn by Iupiter and by the Mediation of Phoebe can reconcile all to Phoebus or can live on Herbs may have little need I hope to flatter any But to return to our British Ancestors How Cordiel and Guintoline were Created populi Iussu Archigal Ennianus or others Deposed is observed by divers I shall only add that Proceres and Magnates here are rendred Estates People or Commons in Grafton and Chaucer or the old Fructus by Iulian of St. Albans Molmutius first did wear a Crown of Gold they say he did deserve it for to him we owe divers of our Common Law Principles nay and that for more than is found in Monmouth as I touched before And upon him the Patrons of Succession build a fixed Monarchy which was not such it seems before nor since if we may believe those we can hardly disprove that from this time begin the petty Princes plurimis Regulis supremam Mandandi Iudicandi Authoritatem And themselves divide the Crown between his two Sons Brennus the British Thunderbolt to Rome and some do carry him as Lightning to Delphos while his Brother Belin did return and dye in peace and first of British Kings was burnt to Ashes yet he lived here in Bilingsgate and Key besides his famous Ways or Streets his own and Fathers Laws which with the Mertian came to us through Alfred But we need not go to his Daughter Cambra for the first Affinity between the Brittans and Sicambrian Francks or Gaulish Germans Come we now to Cesar's time Lud is alive in Ludgate London as before he did amend the Laws but by a Common-Council And such Council did reject his Sons and Chose Cassivelane as Caesar doth agree with British Authors He did summon one that slew his Kinsman to appear and submit himself to Judgment Sententiam quam proceres Dictarent subire But the famous Androgeus protected him in London being then the Governour pleading the Custom and priviledge of that City which had also then a Court to hear and determine all the Pleas of Citizens or Quicquid aliquis in Homine suos clamaret and that also by Ancient Prescription ex Veterum traditione Which from Monmouth Virrunnius Ponticus and others may be compared with the Laws of the Confessor for Troinovant or London and its weekly Hustings and Ardua Compota and Ambigua placita Coronae and for the Courts of the whole Kingdom there whence it is called Caput Regni Legum Which may also be compared with that of the Mirror for Parliaments to be in London by ancient Laws which is here expressed Iuxta veteres Consuetudines bonorum Patrum Predecessorum omnium Principum Procerum Sapientum seniorum Regni very full and clear Parliaments of all Estates That which is added of those Courts to sit and hold wherever the King was is British also as well as Saxon. So the Laws of Howel Dha the Good in the Chronicles of Wales but larger in Sir Henry Spelman Ubicunque Sacerdos Destein Iudex ibi Dignitas Curiae Aula Regia licet Rex absens sit and this is one Reason why the King was never Nonsuit because he was supposed present in all Courts and yet his Atturneys Ulterius non vult had the effect of a Nonsuit But for London and its Antiquity before Rome Stephanides a Monk as old as K. Henry the first now in Print may be compared with Tacitus Ammianus Marcelinus nay with Caesar also for the Trinobantes although some think he never saw this City But the Charters of K. William and Hen. the first are in Print so also of Richard the first and K. Iohn in Hoveden and others which yet must not perswade us that Sheriffs were then first Created here For Counts or Viscounts are as old as Counties and the Brittish Authors speak of Dukes of Troynovant such was Androgeus and pro Consulibus vice-comites in Fitz-Stephen and Willielm de Einford vice-comes de London Ioannes Subvicecomes in the Book of Ramsey Wallbrook Case in Hen. the first that I may say nothing of William the Chamberlain de Londonia of whom before in Hen. 1. which may be premised to the Famous Quo Warranto brought in Edward the Second But to return to our British Kings I cannot deny but some Authors do Record the Crown as by Act of Parliament settled on the Heirs of Cassivelane but themselves also can shew us the very next King brought in by Election not from Cassivelane and that both of Lords and Commons too if we may believe Chaucer or the old Fructus Temporum This Theomantius many of their names are Greek was Duke of Cornwall when he was Elected King He doth yet live in a Famous Son great Arviragus whom the Roman Poet and so many others praise he did amend the Laws

quo Lanfrancus diratiocinatur and the conclusion that he was to hold his Lands and Customs by Sea and Land as free as the King held his ezcept in three things si regalis via fuerit effossa arbor incisa juxta super eam ceciderit si homicidium factum sanguis in ea fusus fuerit Regi dabit alioquin liber a Regis exactoribus In the same Author were read of a Great Counsel at London in that Normans Reign and of another at Glocester where the Arch Bishop of York jubente Rege et Lanfranco consentiente did consecrate William Bishop of Durham having no help adjunctorium from the Scottish Bishops subject to him which may be added to that before of Scotland belonging to the Province or Diocesse of York Nor can I abstain from the next paragraph in the same Author how Lanfranc did consecrate Donate a Monk of Canterbury ad Regnum Dubliniae at the Request of the King Clergy and people of Ireland Petente Rege clero populo Hiberniae which with divers others might be one Argument for the Antiquity of Irish Parliments and their dependance on England long before King Henry the Second For which I might also cite King Edgars Charters Oswalds Law and divers Historians of his times But the Charters mention Dublin it self and yet our Lawyers are so Courteous as to free Ireland from our Laws and Customs till towards the end of King Iohn and some of them conjecture that the Brehon Law came in again and that our Parliament obliged them not till Poynings Law in Henry the seventh But to return to our Norman King I need not beg proofs of Parliaments in his time at least not to those who know the Priviledge of antient Demesne which therefore is free from sending to Parliaments and from Knights Charges and Taxes of Parliament because it was in the Crowns not only in King William but before him in King Edward and the Rolls of Winchester for which the old Books are very clear with divers Records of Edward the third and Henry the fourth besides natura brevium That I say nothing of the old Tractat. de antiquo Dominico which is stiled a Statute among our English Statutes And besides all the late Reports or Records I find it in the Year Books of Edward the Third that he sued a Writ of Contempt against the Bishop of Norwich for encroaching on Edmondsbury against express Act of Parliament By King William the Conqueror and by the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and all the other Bishops Counts and Barons of England It is 21 of Ed. 3. Mich. fol. 60. Title 7. Contempt against an Act of Parliament This might well be one of the reasons why the great Judge giveth so much credit to the old Modus of Parliament as it was held in the time of King Edward the Confessor which as the antient copy saith was by the discreet men of the Kingdom recited before King William the Norman and by him approved and in his time used I have cited it before and compared it with Irish Modus which my much honoured friend Mr. Hackewil one of the Masters of Chancery hath under his hand attested from the Great Seal and Charter of Henry the fourth which himself hath seen reciting a former Charter of King Henry R. Angliae Hiberniae conquestor Dominus who sent the same Modus into Ireland Where himself or his Son Iohn sans terre had no great work to reduce them to the civility of Parliaments To which they had been long before accustomed and the Roll saith communi omnium de Hibernia consensu teneri statuit c. nor doth the division of the Irish-Shires seem so lately setled as some have thought although I may not dissent from the great Patron of Civill and Ecclesiastical Learning the late Primate of Ireland Touching that Irish Modus I have very little to add to the fourth part of the great Institutes in several places I shall now only observe that both these old Modi of Parliaments do agree in this Custom of the Kingdom that the King should require no Ayd but in full Parliament and in Writing to be delivered to each in degree Parliament And both they agree that every new difficult case of Peace and any war emergent within or without the Kingdom vel Guerre emergat in Regno vel extra ought to be written down in full Parliaments and therein to be debated which may be considered by all that will argue the Militia To which also we may add one clause of the Jewish Laws of their great Sanhedrim to whom they retain the power of Peace and War especially where it is Arbitrary and not meerly defensive in which the Law of nature maketh many Magistrates and this might with ease be confirmed from the Laws and Customs of all Civil Kingdoms in all ages But I must not wander from our English Laws I had almost forgotten that which should be well remembred Although many would perswade us to seek our Laws in the Custumier of Normandy it is not only affirmed in the Great Reports but also asserted by Guil de Rovell Alenconien and proved by divers Arguments in his Commentaries on that Grand Custumier that the Normans had their chief Laws from Hence As had also the Danes in the time of Canute for which we might have more proof and witness than the Abbot of Crowland So much even strangers did Love and Honour old English Laws Of King William the Second Sirnamed Rufus I shall speak but little for I must discuss his Election and Coronation Oath in a fitter place Some footsteps we find of his Parliaments in divers Wigornensis and Hoveden tell us that when he would have constrained the Scottish King ut secundum judicium Baronum suorum in curia sua Rectitudinem ei faceret Malcolm did refuse to do it but in the Confines or Marches Where he could not deny but the Kings of Scotland were accustomed rectitudinem facere regibus Angliae But he then said it ought to be by the Iudgement of the Parliaments of both Kingdoms secundum judicium utriusque Regni primatum And I find the like Record cited on Fortescue from Godfrey of Malmsbury But Huntingdon and Matthew Paris also relate that the same King Malcolm did submit both to do Homage and to swear Fealty to our English King and Paris addetth a pretty Story of King Malcolms overlooking Treason But again to King William Of his Errors in Government I shall only say that if Edom did really signified Red as hath been thought I could believe that all Historians speaking of Adamites then oppressing the People might allude to the near affinity between Edom and Rufus for Red. For this was his Sirname of King William the Second Henry the First is yet alive in his Laws and Charters Not only in Wendover with other Historians but among the Rolls and Records yet to be seen in the Exchequer They are now in Print

tenens to the Sheriff and he standeth when the King dieth When also so many think there is no Sheriff but it may be more considered I must not stay in the Court of Peepoudres incident to every Fair or Market as a Court Baron to a Mannor although it be a Court of Record and a Writ of Error lyeth on its judgment for which Iones and Hall's Case in the 10th Part of Reports and in the 4th Institutes I need not speak of Writs of Error from the Common Pleas to the Kings Bench from the King's Bench to the Exchequer-Chamber and from thence as from the King's Bench also to the Parliament or of the known Statute of Henry the 6th making it Felony to steal withdraw or avoid Records or any parcel of Record But of no Records is the Law more punctual than in of extraordinary Cases of Oyer and Terminer which were more private oft and less fixed being transient on emergent Cases which yet being heinous seemed to require most exact Records especially because there might be Appeal so just and needful if the Judges exceeded but one tittle of their Commission If it were discontinued or expired then the Indictment and all Records were to meet in their proper Center at the King's Bench but in other Cases Records of Oyer and Terminer were sent into the Exchequer So in Edw. the 3d. As in Elizabeth Results on charitable uses and the like were to the Chancery by Act of Parliament The great Seal was the Soul to inform and actuate the Body of Records in all exemplifications from the Rolls in all Writs Pattents or Commissions and the rather also that by this nothing of moment might be hudled up but duly weighed and considered while it passed so many hands and judgments as it should before the Sealing Nor shall I add that an Act of Parliament it Self is not pleadable in a Court of Record but from Record or under the Seal whence the old custom was to remove the Records of Parliament by a Writ of Certiorari into the Chancery thence by the Lord Chancellor into the Kings Bench and thence by a Mittimus into the Common Plea and Exchequer with an usual Writ commanding all the Courts to keep and observe such Acts of Parliament which of Old were Proclaimed by the Sheriffs and were put under the Seal as we may see by the Proclamation now printed among the Statutes of Edw. the 3d. and they were not hudled into Print in those Days not of such vertue in Print as on Record and under the Seal For there were not then such Printers or Copiers that without much caution our fore-Fathers durst trust with all their Lives and Estates which by one dash of a Pen the change of a not a with a to a for or a from might be soon destroyed or enslaved Much less then should a Court of Record be Created but by Record yea and that be shewed under the Seal also For when the Seal was moulded our Ancestors ordained that no Jurisdiction should be grantable but under the Seal which should be known and obeyed by all the People as the Mirror discourseth at large In Edw. the 4th it was resolved by all the Judges in the Exchequer-Chamber that no man could be a Iudg or Iustice by Writ which was also Sealed but by open Pattent or a publick Commission But the Lord Chief Iustice of England hath of late no such Commission or Pattent yea a Sealed Writ and of Old he was also Created by Pattent till about the end of King Henry the 3d. if good Authors deceive me not It seemeth also somewhat disputable whether he were not included in the Statute of Henry the 8th for Commissions to the Judges by Letters Pattent under the Seal However the words are plain enough for Iustices of Eyre which of Old were also by Writ as those of Oyer and Terminer but now not to be but by Comission or Pattent under the Great Seal Which Commission should also be read and shewed in Court lest there be some kind of Demurrer or exception unto jurisdiction which hath been in some Cases at the Kings Bench and may be by Law to all now Judges by special Commission except it be produced under the Seal if the old Books deceive us not who do do not onely ascribe all jurisdiction to the Seal but in all legal exceptions ever admit of that to the Iudg if he be a Party or have not jurisdiction or be otherwise incompetent That the Parliament also will never Erect or Create any Court of Record but by Record and open Commission under the Great Seal I do the rather believe because the Seal is so proper and peculiar to the Parliament being made by common consent of which the Mirror and others at large and by such common consent used and committed to the special care of the Chancellor or Lord Keeper of England as he was called for keeping that which our Fathers esteemed as the Kingdoms Key or Clavis It is well known how King Henry the 3d. was brought to acknowledg That among all great Officers the Lord Keeper or Chancellor did especially belong to the Choice of the Parliament and Ralph Nevil among others refused to yield up the Seal to the King when it was demanded saying that he had received it by the Common Councel of the Kingdom and without their Warrant he would not deliver it of which both Matthew Paris and Matthew of Westminster From the continual use of this Seal in Parliament it is the Law and Custom of the Kingdom that the Lord Keeper shall have place in Parliament still to be there with the Sael although he be often no Peer and have no Vote but for making and Sealing of Charters Pattents Commissions and Writs framed by Parliament For although the Register made or continued by Parliament be now so full that there be little need yet the framing of New Writs was a great work of Old Parliaments as appeareth in the Books and Statutes as in that of Westminster the 2d de Casu consimili And as if the Parliament had made no Laws at all but onely New Writs the Old Modus brancheth out all the Laws of Parliament into Originals Iudicials and Executives which all know to he the Division of Writs Those especially de Cursu drawn by the Cursitors for Brevia Magistralia were let to be framed by the Masters of Chancery as appeareth at large in Bracton and Fleta and in the Oath of the Six Clerks or other Clerks of Chancery in Ed. 3 with that of Ed. 1. de casu continili in which Statute it is asol provided that if the Masters could not agree in framing such a new Writ they might if they saw cause respit the Parties till the next Parliament that so it might be formed by Advice of all the great Lawyers of the Kingdom Yet besides this of making and sealing of Writs there was another work and great use of the Masters of Chancery