Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n henry_n john_n richard_n 3,685 5 8.3395 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A69998 Certaine observations concerning the office of the Lord Chancellor composed by the Right Honorable and most learned Thomas, Lord Ellesmere, late Lord Chancellor of England ; whereunto is annexed a perfect table and a methodicall analysis of the whole treatise. Egerton, Thomas, Sir, 1540?-1617. 1651 (1651) Wing E359; ESTC R4472 72,038 136

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Patent by them signed and also with the Masters of Requests which have the oversight and admitment of all such Writs and Patents as are to be sealed and moreover in every Parliament of France there is by the King of France established a Chancery wherein is placed a Keeper of the Seale a certaine number of Secretaryes as in the former which are said subscripti in sublevamen Cancellarij propter multitudinem negotiorum in Cancellaria Curia Regis affluentium and likewise as are in the Great Chancery there is one Audiencer one Comptroler and one Referendary or Recorder The Chancellor if he doe exercise his Office hath for wages by the yeare eighteen thousand French livers and having a Keeper of the Seale substituted he received twelve thousand Livers and six thousand Livers are assigned unto him principally for the entertainment of the Masters of Requests which do ordinarily dyne at the Lord Chancelors Table in their turne of quarters he hath also besides his wages many other rights and duties as at the entry of Kings into Cityes he hath a garment of cloth of Gold and yearly he hath certain Elles of Velvet a certain number of lights and an allowance of Wax the Chancellor ought not nor may not passe any writing under Seale contrary to the deliberation and determination of the Privy Councell neither whereof any doubt is moved by any Master of Requests of the household but he ought to send the same to the Councell for a resolution Of those which have accesse to the Seal we may place in order next to the Chancellor the Master of Requests which are appointed him for surveyors and examiners of such writings as passe the Seale especially of Patents and Commissions and all other persons whatsoever are forbidden to enter at Sealing time saving the Kings Secretaries the Audiencers the Comptroller the Procurator Generall which is ordained in the said Chancery and the C●afewax By this appeareth the name and some part of the Office of the Chancellor of France to be given by Cha●lemain more than one hundred years before the time of Edward the Confessor in whose dayes began the name of our English Chancellors according to the assertion of Florentius Wigornensis for that the aforesaid Edward having spent a great part of his Age in Normandy was the first that brought the use of the Seale from thence and with it the name of him that had the charge thereof and that is the Chancellor in whom Leafricies the Britain is named the first Chancellor But saving correction I must be of that opinion of the Normans we did not learn our manner of sealing not onely for that I have seen the Copies of our Kings Patents before those dayes with Ego I●a Ego Aluredus c. subsignavi which indeed may be al one with subscripsi according to 40th Law in the Digests lib 50. But surely I have either seen the very points of the Saxony Danish Seale or else they were counterfeit to no profitable purpose Let other men give what credit they will to the collection of Chancellors by Mr. Thinne in the new addition to Mr. Hollinsteeds Chronicle lately Published For my owne part I am neither of experience nor judgment to impugne it But under the authority of allowable writers I shall set downe and that shortly what I have gathered in so few daies as I have therein bestowed of the present estate of our Modern Chancellor and herein some particulars of the Court of Chancery and first in mine opinion he is the same Chancellor that was Rembaldus to holy Edward and Mauritius to William the Conquerour whose office was to make and seale the instruments that passed from the Prince as writeth Lupanus and as for the former mentioned Chancellors before this time they seem more kindly cheif Secretaries than to exercize the present Office of Chancellors For howsoever I am induced probably to conjecture that before Edward the Confessor there was use of Sealing as I have said so have I no warrant to allege for a great Seale of the King to passe the Instruments whereof the charge was committed to the Chancellors the which as I take it may be reputed the originall of his office and this his originall office was not altered by the aforesaid Conqueror in the erection of the College of Scribes or notaries neither his name changed as I conceive the words of Pollydore where he saith that Ejus Collegij Magistrum vocavit Cancel larium qui paulatim supremus effectu● magistratus of qualis hodie habetur But I suppose that authority was also given him by sealing and making certain Writs originalls the forme whereof was for the most part produced out of Normandy but not the granting of all originalls because that by Glanvill it is affirmed that many of them did beare Teste of himself viz. Ranulpho Ganvilla who was chief Justice many yeares after and this by the way is to be remembred that in the name of Chancellor our ancient Histories may easily deceive us for some were called Cancellarij Regis and others Cancellarij Regni and of those which had this great Sea● of the K. in their charge and custody Some were termed Chancellors and Seale bearers also that had no partakers of their office such a one was the same Rembaldo to the aforesaid Edward and many others some were Keepers of the Great Seale and that solely Q●i Custodiam sigilli Regli acciperent Cancellarii vices acturi officium c. as saith Mathew Paris of John Maunsell although there may be perceived some small difference betweene a Keeper of the grev Seale and a Vice Chancellor for of Vice-Chancellors also I finde two sorts the one as I take it exercising the Office of a Chancellor in matters of Justice and such a one was Malus Catulus in the time of Richard the First another which was chiefe Secretary as it seemed unto the Chancellor to write the Patent of the Prince and such a one was Sywardus whose name I have seen subscribed to a Charter of Edward the Consessor Ego Sywardus Notorius ad vicem Rambaldi Regis Dignitatis Concellarij subscripsi The first sole Keeper of the Great Seale I take to be Symon the No●man who had the Seal delivered unto him in the 23d year of the Raigne of King Hen. 3d. and shortly after also taken from him againe when he was also banished the Court for that he would not seale the Patent whereby Thomas Earl of Flanders might aske 4d for every sack of Wool that went out of England into Flanders But that the Authority of the Lord Keeper was beforetime some way inferiour to the Authority of the Chanceller that may seem by the Act of Parliament which was made Anno 5 Eltz that did equall the power of the one with the other sometimes also the Chancellor of England had a Keeper of the seale subscribed to him and so was Ranulphus the Chancellor and Richard the Chaplaine keeper
of the Great Seale both at one instant to Henry the first Sometime there were two Keepers of the Great Seale and both at once as were Jefferey le Templer and Iohn de Lexinton notwithstanding that Ralph Nevill remained Cancellor of whom infra Sometime the great Seale was delivered unto 3 at once as by Edward the 2d to Will Melton and 2 others joyned with him for a certain time to execute all such things as were to be done therewith during the Kings pleasure The election or creation of Chancellors and Keepers c. was of more than one sort and also of Men of divers degrees and qualities Sometimes and for the most part the Chancellor was elected by the King Durante bene-placito and put in power of his Office by the Delivery of the Seale and sometimes the Chancellor was made by Patent to hold that place or office during his life as Walter Grey Bishop of Chester in the time of King John and others some and the most part were elected by the King onely some had Patents of the King and were confirmed Chancellors by consent of the three Estates as were Ralph Nevill Bishop of Chester in the time of King Henry the third with whom the Prince being offended as reports Mathew Paris and demanding the Seale at his hands he refused to yield the same unto him affirming that as he had received it by the common consent of the Nobility so he would not without like Warran resigne the same And in the dayes of the same King it was told him by all his Lords spiritual and Tempotall that of ancient time the election and dispofition of the chief Justice Chancellor and Treasurer belonged to the Parliament an● although the King in displeasure did take the sea● from him and delivered the same to the custod● of others yet did the aforesaid Nevill remain● Chancellor notwithstanding and received the profits thereof to whom the King would hav● restored the Seale but he refused to receiv● it And hereupon may be gathered that the Keeper of the Seale is not Vice-chancellor in every respect An●●et us note by the way three several Parent● were granted unto this Ral●h Nevill aforesaid w● whereby he is ordained to be Chancellor and the third for the custody of the Scale all remaining among the Records in the Tower in hae●●erba Henricus Rex c. Archiepiscopis Episcopis c. Sciatis nos dedisse concess●sse ●a● charta nostra confirmasse Vene Pa●●● Randolpho Cicestrensi Episcopo Cancelldria● nostram hahend ●●nend to●o ●●mpore vitae suae cum omnibus p●rtinent libertatihus ●●●eris consuetudinibus ad praedictam Cancellariam nostram habeat bene in pace libere 〈◊〉 integre honorifice cum ●●●●bus exitus libertatibus omnious all●s ad eam per●inentibus sicut Cancellar Regn. Angl. praedecessor nostror ea melius quietius liberius integrius hab●ere hijs Testibus c. datum per manum nostram 12. F●br Anno Regni nostri 11. His second Patent was of this Forme Henricus Dei gratia c. Archiepiscopis Episcopis c. Sciatis nos concessisse et ●ac Charta nostra confirmasse pro nobis et haered nostris venerab. pri. Randolpho Cicistrensi Episcopo Cancellario nostro Cancellariam Angliae toto tompore vitae suae cum omnibus pertin. libertatibus liberis consuetudinibus ad praedict Cancellariam pertinen quare volumus et firmit praecipimus pro nob is et haered nostris quod praedictus Episcopus habeat ipsam Cancellariam toto tempere vitae suae cùm omnibus pertinent libertat et liberis consuetudinibus ad praedictam Cancellariam pertin. sicut praedictum est Testibus c. Datum per manum meum apud Westm. quarto die Maij An●o regni nostri decimo septimo This is the transcript of his third Patent the same day and yeare Henricus Dei gratia c. Archiepiscopis c. Sciatis ●os concessisse et hac charta nostra confirmasse venerab. patri Randolpho Cicestr Episcopo cancellar. nostro custodiam Sigilli nostri toto tempore vitae suae cum omnibus pertin. libertat et consuetudinibus ad praedict. custod pertinent Ita quod sigillum illud Portat et custodiat in propria persona sua quamdiu voluerit vel per aliquem virum discretum sufficientem idoneum assignatsuum qui quidem assignat nob fidelitat faciat de fideli servitio de sigillo nostro loco suo fideliter Custodiendo aut quam custodiam praedicti sigilli recipiat 〈◊〉 si forte idem assignat ●suus discesserit vel vitam suam mutaverit vel ob causam rationalem per nos vel per ipsum Cancellar amotus fuerit vel ipse assignat sigillum illud ulterius portare noluerit idem Cancellarius loco illius assignat substituat alium virum discretum sufficientem idoneum substituat Item quod fidelitatem faciat nobis de fideli servitio suo de praedicto sigillo loco suo fideliter custodiend antiqua Carstiaca sigilli praedicti recipiat sicut praedictum est quare volumus firmiter praecipimus quod praedictus cancellar. habeat custodiam c. hiis Testibus c. Datum per manum nostrum apud Westm. quarto die Maii Anno Regni nostri decimo septimo Sometimes the Chancellors of England were elected by the Nobility as Nicholas of Eli was made Chancellor by the Barons But this seemed a usurpation by them for they were afterwards the most of them most sharply chastised and the said Nicholas deprived by Hen. the 3 d. disdaining to have Officers of that estate appointed him by his Subjects Sometimes the Chancellors were created out of the Nobility as Richard Nevill Earle of Salisbury in the time of Hen. the 6. Henry Bourchier Earle of Essex in the time of Edw. the 4. the Lord Wrotesley the Lord Rich c. Sometimes they were enobled after their advancement to that Office as Richard Scroope Knight created Lord of Boulton and Michael de la Pool● created Earle of Suffolk in the time of Rich. the 2. Sometimes they were the Sonnes of Noblemen and Princes children as Henry ●eauford sonne of John of Caunt c. in the time of Hen the 4. Sometimes of base and meane parentage as Wolsey Cardinall c. Sometimes Archbishops and Clerkes were ordained Chancellors whereof the first Archbishop was Walter Hubert Archbishop of Canterbury in the time of King John to whom a Nobleman said in scor●e That he had often seen a Chancellor made a Bishop but he never before saw an Archbishop made a Chancellor where of is to be noted that many of the former Chancellors were not Bishops when they were elected to that Office but afterwards promoted to their Bishopricks upon which promotions many of them did yeeld and surrender up their Authority of Chancellors and to this purpose maketh the testimony of Thomas Walsingham who writeth
of Queen Mary when he went to Calice leave the Seale with the Marquesse of Winton the which lesson he might learne by the chastisement of Cardinall Woolsey who carried the same beyond the Seas to Calice where he left it with Doctor Taylor Mr. of the Rolls to keep untill his returne out of the French Dominions Yet may there be other occasions also for the which the Chancellour may commit the same to other mens custody as did Robert Thorpe Chancellor in the time of Edw. 3. at his going hom to his owne house hee left the great Seale with foure of the Guardians or Masters of the Chancery to keep and ufe as need required Further for the keeping of the Seale wee may remember that as the King himselfe doth deliver the same unto the Chancellor so may he not surrender it to any other but to the same King or to his Successor To this purpose saith Thomas Walsingham that Sir Richard Scroope having very solemne Messengers sent unto him from Rich. 2. and that in the Kings displeasure to demand the Great Seale to be committed unto them His Answer was The Seale I am ready to resigne not unto you but unto him which gave me the same in custody Nec erit medius portitor inter me illum sed ego restituam illud manibus suis qui mihi propriis non alicujus manibus commisit illud Et ita pergens ad Regem sigillum quidem retradidit se fidelem Regi s●cut hactenus repromisit ●fficiaturum tamen se futurum sub ●llo in posterum denegavit c. Yet seemeth it not so necessary that the Chancellor deliver it with his owne hands For it is written that R. Baldolke Chancellor upon the death of Edw. 1. did send the great Seale to Ed. 2. And Thomas Rotheram was shrewdly blamed for that he rendred the Seale to the Queen Widdow to whom it did not appertaine after the death of Edw. 1. and in the circumstance of the delivery thereof we may also note this difference that the Chancellour hath heretofore received an Oath with the receipt of the same although the Keeper of the sease doth receive it without oath for so it is Recorded that Rich. 2. Manibus suis propriis received the Seale Et ineontinenter praedictus Dom. nost dictum magnum Sigillum suum in Bago sic inclusum venerab. in Christ patri Edoard Episc. Exon. cujus sacrum de officio cancellarii bene fideliter faciend excereend ib. recepit in praesentia c. liberavit The forme or fashion of this Seale is usually altered upon every succession the print whereof is directed by the pleasure of the Prince the validity thereof I dare not to dispute for that on the one side it is said by the Justices in the reports of the 18. and 19. of this Queene that a Patent under the Great Seale is good though the Chancellour have not warranty to make it And on the other side the History is not forgotten of the Duke of Northumberland who alleged as is reported the Great Seale for his Warrant c. which was not accepted and moreover is recorded in the time of Hen. the 6. a confirmation of such Deeds c. as had past the Great Seale viz. Henry by the Grace of God c. To our Chancellor of England greeting All such Grants as that sith the tenth yeare of our Reigne untill this time you by force and vertue of Bills with our owne hand and by Letters under our Signet of the Eagle and Armes and also by Bills endorsed by our Chamberlains hand and Clerks of our Coun●ell have made our Letters Patents under our Great Seale wee hold them firme and stable and of as great strenght c. as though you had for them our Letters of Privie Seale c. long before which time there was a Statute made in the 2. yeare of Edw. 3. viz. it shall not be commanded by the Great or Little Seale to delay or disturbe common right and though such commandment doe come the Justices therefore shall not cease to doe right in any point and by the Statute of Articles super Charia cap. 6. It is forbidden that from thenceforth should passe under the little Seale any Writ that concerneth common Law And long after this time also viz. 2. 3. Phil. and Mary cap. 20. It is ordained That the King under the Great Seale of England may unite Lands to the Duchy of Lancaster but for the manner of renewing the Seale the defacing and bestowing of the old with the Proclamation and notification of the ne we may observe the ancient manner out of these words remaining in the Tower of the time of Edward the First viz. Rex Vic. Ebor. salu●em Quia pro regimine Regni nostri quoddam magnum Sigillum de novo fecimus fabricari differenetam in circumferentia ●uam in diversi● sculpturis ex utraque parte sigilli sigillo a quo hucusque utebamur volumus quod eidem novo sigillo a quarto die praesen● mensis Octob fides prebeatur dictum antiquum sigillū●umpa●u● deinde post p●aedictum q●ar●um diem aliqua brevia seu litera nullaetenus consignentar impressionem dicti sigilli novi in cera alba tibi duximus transmittendam tibi praecipimus quod in pleno Comitatu tu● mercatis feriis locis aliis in balliva tu a ubi expedere videris dictam impressionem ●stondi pace fieri facias omnibus singulis ex parte nostra injungend quod b●ev brevis literis chartis dicto novo sigilo consignatis fidem praebeant aliqua brevia seu literas post praedictum quartum diem antiquo sigillo signat non recipiant nec eis utantur quoquomodo volumus tamen quod brevia literae chart praedicto antiquo sigillo ante praedictum quartum diem consignat in suo robore perseverent eis fides praebeat prout decet Teste Rege apud Nottingham tertio die Octobris c. Eodem modo mandatum est singulis Vicecom per Angliam and further Memorandum quod die Dominiea viz. quarto die Octob. Anno Regni Ed. primo Eliens Episcop cancellar. ipsius Regis in Camera sua in Priorat de Lenta juxta Nottingham in praesen clericor de can●el●ar aliorum tuuc ibidem existen protulit in quodam panno lineo sigillo suo consignat quoddam magnum sigillum ipsius Regis de novo fabricatū asseru●t quod voluntas ipsius Regis fuit quod extunc omnia brev. lit et c●artae ipso novo sigillo consigna●en quod anti● Sigil rumperat et diae Lunae prox sequen in praesentia ipsius Regis in Cam. sua in Castro de Not. dict. antiq. Sigil praecipiente ipso Rege ruptum fuit in m●ltas pecias idem Cancellarius pecias illas dedit Richar Spigurnello ipsius cancellar. dictum novum
Feoffor is made good by the common Law release before it took effect but by conscience 1 R. 3. 54 One make a Feofment to the use of his last will and Testament and declareth by his Testament that the Land shall be to the use of his VVife for Life and afterwards to the use of Revoke his Son in tail in this case he may change his VVill and the uses at his pleasure because it is referred to his Testament per Bradwell capit Iust. communis banci Fetchlers Inglefield Iust. in communi Banco 19 H. 8. 11. 30 H. 86. Feofment 47. 55 If I do covenant with I. S. that when he shall infeof one of three Acres I and my Heirs and Assignes will stand seised of other Lands to his use If I make a Feofment unto me that hath no notice of this use yet it I. S. do infeof me of their Acres the Feoffee shall be seised to the use of I. S. because it is a Springing use and the land is charged with that use in whose hands soever it come but if I have feoffed and they sell the said land to me that hath no notice of the use there the second Feoffees shall be seised to their own use 30 H. 8. 6. Feofments al use 50. 56 If I do buy lands and the Seller executeth an Estate unto me habendum imperpetuum without saying to my Heir the meaning of the Bargain being that I shall have the Fee-simple if the Seller do refuse to make further assurance I may compell by sub poena per Audley Cancell temp. H. 8. liber qui dicitur fundamentum legum Angliae B. consc. 25. 57 The Feoffee upon trust sold away part of the Lands and received money for it and the rest he kept and took the profits and dyed the Feoffor per Bill in Cancell recovered against the Feoffees Executor the money received the value of the profits per decretum in Cancell ex assensu omnium Iustic. aliorum de Concilio Regis praesentium pet. in Cancell de Anno 34 H. 6. CHAP. III. Of Copy-holds TEnant at will by Copy of Court Roll shall have a sub poena against his Lord if he put him out of his Ten●men● per Kirkby Magistrum Rotulornm Pool Serjeant in Canc. 32 H. 6. 21. Stat. sub poena 2. Note Littleton Serjeant said that he saw once that Tenant by Copy Court Roll sued a sub poena against his Lord and it was holden by the Justices that he should recover nothing but Daaby chief Justice of the common Pleas said that the Judgement was so given because he sued to have recovered the Free-hold whereunto he being a Copy-holder could have no right 7 E. 4. 19. sub poena 6. Tenant per Copie 10. CHAP. IV. Of Chattels Real ONe being bound in a Statute Merchant paid the money without having a Release and notwithstanding the Conusee sued Execution the Question was whether the Chancellor might grant a sub poena against the Conusee Fairfax Iust. and Hussey chief Justice of England said that he might not for it were no reason that the Testimony of two VVitnesses should defeat a matter of R●cord Came●a Scacc. 22 E. 4. 6. Richard Reade had Execution of certain Lands upon a statute Merchant and the Debtor sold the Land to Sir William Capell who recovered the same by Default with Voucher against the Debtor whereupon William Capell entered and the Termor sued a sub poena and it was holden that if Reade had no remedy to falsifie this recovery then he should be restored in the Chancery by sub poena because it was done by Covin per Cancell Hussey Brian cap. Iust. 7 H. 7. 11. 12. b. consc. 8. b. Faux Recovery 25 If a Recovery be had against the Lessor and the Lessor for years do not pray to be received if by that means he have no remedy at the common Law he shall have remedy in the Chancery so that he were in Prison or beyond Sea or had any reasonable cause of his Default per Conisby Keble Serjeants but quaere it he had no such cause 7 H. 7. 10. If one make a Lease for years or grant his Lease for years to a use this grant and use is good notwithstanding the statute of Ann. 3 H. 7. cap. 15 uses 7. because the statute maketh onely these Gifts of Chattels void which were made to defraud Creditors 3 M. 16. Feofments al use 60. CHAP. V. Of Chattels Personals IT was agreed upon between I. S. and I. D. that I. D. should have certain Debts due unto I. S. by divers persons and I. D. did enter into Obligation to I. S. for the Government of certain summs in consideration of the same Debts and because there were but things in Action and that I had no remedy to recover the Debts by the common Law therefore I. D. sued a sub poena against I S. to be discharged of the Obligation by conscience and for so much as it appeared that by his Contract no Duty could rest in I. D. therefore it was decreed that I. D. should bring in the Obligation by conscience for so much it appeared that by his Contract no Duty could rest in I. D. therefore it was decreed that I. S. should bring in the Obligation to be cancelled or else release to I. D. per Canc cum opinione omnium Justiciar 37 H. 6. 13. b. Barr. 75. 6. consc. 4. 2 Sir Thomas Brown being possessed of certain Goods was attainted of Treason which Goods came to the hands of Iohn Brown the King by Patent gave the Goods unto Walwine and Walwine sued a sub poena against Iohn Brown for the Goods who came into the Chancery by Jenney his Counsel and demanded Judgement of the sub poena for that a sub poena doth not lie but where the party hath no remedy by the common Law and in this case the Complaintiff may have an Action of Detinue for the King might have had the like Action to whom it was answered by Greefield being the Complaintiffs Counsel that the King himself can have no Action by the common Law for Goods forfeited untill the Goods have been seised to his use or else that the Goods be proved to be his by matter of Record and yet the King hath Election to sue for them in what Court he will and so may his Patentee also the Grantee can have no Action for the Goods at the common Law without having had possession seeing they were granted to him as things in Action and the Court held that the sub poena did lie very well and John Brown was commanded to bring in an Inventory of the Goods against the next day or else to be committed to the Fleet in Cancell 39 H. 6. 26. b. conse. 6. A Clerk