Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	french_a	king_n	realm_n	4,667	5	8.8307	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A46779	Severall papers lately vvritten and published by Iudge Ienkins, prisoner in the Tower viz. 1. His vindication. 2. The armies indempnity [sic]: with a declaration, shewing, how every subject ought to be tryed for treasons, felonies, and all other capitall crimes. 3. Lex terræ. 4. A cordiall for the good people of London. 5. A discourse touching the incoveniences of a long continued Parliament. 6. An apologie for the army.; Severall papers lately written and published by Judge Jenkins, prisoner in the Tower.	Jenkins, David, 1582-1663.	1647 (1647)	Wing J608; ESTC R217036	64,480	98

his Parliament shall declare otherwise they are the very words of the Law 3. Pars instit Pag. 22. 2. pars instit Pag. 47 48. 4. pars instit P. 23.48.29 King and Commons King and Lords Commons and Lords cannot declare any other thing to be Treason then there is declared as appeares by the Lord Cooke in the places cited in the Margin A Law-booke published by order of the House of Commons this Parliament 3. Pars instit cap. Treason Pa. 9 10 12. Mr S. Iohn the Sollicitor in his Speech upon the araignment of the Earle of Straford Printed by order of the House of Commons p. 7. 13. as appeares in the last leafe of the second part of the Institutes published likewise by their Order The Resolutions of all the Judges of England upon the said Statute of the 25. Ed. 3. as appeares in the said third part of the Institutes Chap. High-Treason have been that to imprison the King untill he agree to certaine demands is High-Treason to seize his Ports Forts Magazine for Warre are High-Treason to alter the Lawes is High-Treason The word King in the Statute of 25. Ed. 3. cap. 2. must be understood of the Kings naturall person for that person can only dye have a wife have a sonne or be imprisoned The Privilege of Parliament protects no man from treason or felony 4. Pars instit c. Parl. p. 25. howbeit he be a Member much lesse can they protect others Those who cannot protect themselves have no colour to make Ordinances to protect others who are no Members The Statute of 11. 11. M. 7. cap. 1. Hen. 7. cap. 1. doth by expresse words free all persons who adhere to the King The Army by an Act of Indemnity free themselves from all those dangers Stamford l. 2. fol. 99. 18 Ed. 3. Statutes at large 144. 20 Ed. 3. c. 1. 11. Rie 2. c. 10. 4 Pars instit Pag. 23.48.29 which an Ordinance can no more doe then repeale all the Lawes of the Land the whole and sole power by Law to pardon all Treasons Felonies c. being solely and wholly in the King as is cleared by the Statute of 27. H. 8. c. 24. and the Law of the Land in all times Having shewed the danger of the Army by the Law of the Land next consider the Ordinance of the Lords and Commons published the 22. of May last for their Indemnity By the ensuing discourse it doth appeare they have no Indemnity at all thereby The Indemnity proposed by the Ordinance is for any Act done by the authority of the Parl. or for the service or benefit thereof and that the Judges and all other Ministers of Justice shall allow thereof This Ordinance cannot secure the Army for these reasons I. Their Judges are sworne to doe justice according to the Law of the Land 3. Pars instit Pag. 22. 2 Pars instit 47 48. 1. Pars instit 193. Princes case ● ●●perte and therefore the Judges must be forsworne men if they obey it because an Ordinance of both Houses is no Law of the Land and no man can beleeve they will perjure themselves so palpably and visibly in the eye of the world II. All trials for Treasons Felonies Robberies Magna Charta cap. 29. 25. Ed. 3. cap 4. 28. Ed. 3. cap. 3. 37. Ed. 3. cap. 8. 42. Ed. 3 cap. 3. and such like Capitall offences are by the Law of the Land to be by indictment of a Jury appointed out of the Neighbourhood where the offence was done There is no common Jury-man but understands what the Law is in these cases as well as the best Lawyers and the Law makes the Jury Judges of the fact whereby the souldier is left to their mercy whom he hath offended as some of them have lately had wofull experience Declaration of the Army presented at Warden and Printed by the appointment of the Officers subscribed and thereupon doe rightly apprehend their danger Now no man can thinke that the Jurors will perjure themselves to acquit the souldiers for robbing and plundring of the Countries and thereby utterly destroy their owne Rights and Properties III. If the Judges conceive as they may that the taking of other mens horses or goods is not by the Authority of Parliament or for the service and benefit thereof the souldier dyes for it they may say to steale or rob any man of his goods is not for the Parliaments service but against it which was alwayes the sence of the people and doubtlesse the Jurors will not thinke otherwise IV. This Ordinance is restrained to the authority 4. Pars instit pag. 1. 3. Pars instit pag. 22. 1. Pars instit pag. 1. 28. H. 8. s●l 11. Dier 38. H. 8. sol 60. 12. H. 7.20 1. Pars instit 159. Princes case 8. reports service or benefit of the Parliament The Lords and Commons make no more a Parliament by the Law of the Land then a body without a head makes a man for a Parliament is a body composed of a King their head the Lords and Commons the Members All three together make one body and that is the Parliament and none other And the Judges may ought and I beleeve will according to their Oathes proceed as not bound at all by this Ordinance For it is restrained to the Authority of Parliament ●●vice or benefit thereof whereas the two Houses are not the ●●●liament but only parts thereof and by the abuse and misunderstanding of this word Parliament they have miserably deceived the people V. This Ordinance is against their Ordinances which expresly prohibit plundring 28 Aug. 1642. Col. of Ord. first part 565.592.605 severall Ordinances and so there is one Ordinance against another whereby their Judges have an out-let to proceed on the one or the other and thereby the Army hath no manner of security VI. The word Parliament is a French word howbeit such Assemblies were before the Norman Conquest here signifies in that Language to consult treat 1. Pars iastit 109. 1 Pars instit 110. 4 Pars p. 49. that is the sense of the word Parler in the French Tongue The Writ whereby the two Houses are assembled which is called the Writ of Summons of Parliament at all times and at this Parliament used and which is the warrant ground and foundation of their meeting is for the Lords of the House of Peeres the Judges and Kings Councell to consult and treate with the King that is the Parler of great concernments touching 1. the King secondly the defence of his Kingdome thirdly the defence of the Church of England It cannot be a Parliament that will not Parle with their King but keep him in prison and not suffer him to come to them and parle and therefore the Law and sence and reason informing every man that is no manner of Parliament the King with whom they should parle being so restrained that they will not

parle with him The Army hath no manner of security by this Ordinance For their indemnification referres to that which is not in being untill the King be at liberty VII It is more then probable that their Judges before the last circuite had instructions to the effect or this Ordinance The Common Souldiers sccond Apology 6. Grievances of the Army published 15. May last Three grievances of Col. Riche's Regiment but they the Judges making conscience of their Oath laid aside the said Instructions and ought and may and it is beleeved will no more regard this Ordinance then the said instructions What was done in the last circuite the Army well knowes touching many of their fellow-souldiers VIII The Houses in their first Proposition to his Majesty for a safe and well-grounded peace sent to Neweastle to desire a pardon from his Majesty for themselves they who desire a pardon cannot grant a pardon common reason dictates this to every man and therefore that the Army should accept an Indemnity from them who seeke it for themselves or should conceive it of any manner of force is a fancy so that no man in the whole Army but may apprehend that it is vaine and a meere delusion IX His Majesty by his gracious Message of the 12. of May fast the 22 of the same hath offered an Act of Oblivion and a generall pardon to all his people this done the Law doth indemnifie the Army without all manner of scruple for any thing that hath beene done for it is an Act of Parliament when the King and two Houses concurre and bindes all men There is no safety by the Ordinance There is safety by an act of Parliament And will not reasonable men preferre that which is safe before that which is unsafe X. His Majesty by his said Letter agrees to pay the Arreares of the Army I am sure that it is a publique Debt and the chiefest and the first that by the two Houses should be paid and before any Divident or Gratuities bestowed among themselves for their Bloud Limbes and Lives have put and kept the both Houses at rest in the power they have So by this concurrence of his Majesty for your indemnity and for your Arreares The Army have not an Ordinance or the Publique Faith but the Law of the Land to make sure unto them their Indemnity for all Acts and for their Arreares and therewith also bring peace to the Land XI The Kingdome and people generally desire these things To such an Army just and reasonable things must not be denyed the things formerly proposed are most just and reasonable you may have them if you will if you will not you render this Kingdome miserable Mr Pyms Speech against the Earle of Strafford p. 16 Sixt consideration Printed by the command of the House of Commons wherein you will have your shares of miseries The head and the body are such an incorporation as cannot be dissolved without the destruction of both The Additional Ordinance of both houses passed the fifth of June instant for the fuller indemnity of the Army makes nothing at all to the matter 1. For that it extends not to Felony Homicide Burglary Robbery or any other capitall crime which is the maine businesse insisted upon and most concerneth the Souldiers security II. The both Houses in the said Additionall Ordinance say that it is expedient that all offences be pardoned and put in oblivion Pardon and Oblivion cannot bee understood to bee for a time but for ever and they themselves confesse that an Ordinance is not binding but pro tempore which with the most advantagious Interpretation can be but a reprieve or delay of the execution of the Law and therefore that cannot pardon or put in oblivion by their owne shewing But the Law of the Land is 27. H. 8. c. 24. and so it hath constantly been practised in all times that no persons of what estate soever have any power to pardon Treason Felony or any other offences but the King onely who hath the sole and whole power to pardon all such crimes whatsoever And in the same manner an Ordinance is of no Authority at all to take away the right of private mens actions by any evidence it can give In truth all the evidence that this Ordinance will give is that it records to posterity nothing but a lawlesse and distempered time For remedy therefore I say againe it is a certaine truth This Kingdome without an act of Oblivion and a generall Pardon and the payment of Souldiers arreares and a meet regard had to tender Consciences will unavoidably be ruined June 10. 1647. David Jenkins Prisoner in the Tower of London Sundry Acts of Parliament mentioned and cited in the Armies Indemnities set forth in words at large for the better satisfaction of such as desire to be rightly informed 25. Edw. 3. Chap. 2. A Declaration what offences shall be adjudged Treason VVHereas divers opinions have been before this time in what case Treason shall be said in what not The K. at the request of the Lords and of the Commons hath made a Declaration in the manner as hereafter followeth That is to say When a man doth compasse or imagine the death of our Lord the King or of our Lady the Queen or of their eldest Son and Heire or if a man do violate the Kings companion or the Kings eldest daughter unmarried or the wife of the Kings eldest sonne and heire or if a man do levie war against the Lord our King in his Realme or bee adherent to the Kings enemies in his Realm giving to them aid and comfort in the Realme or else-where and thereof be probably attainted of open deed by people of their condition And if a man counterfeit the Kings great or privie Scale or his Money and if a man bring false money into this Realm counterfeit to the money of England and the money called Lusburgh or other like to the said money of England c. 11. Hen. 7. Cap. 1. None that shall attend upon the King and doe him true service shall bee attainted or forfeit any thing THe King our Soveraign Lord calling to his remembrance the duty of allegiance of his Subjects of this his Realm and that they by reason of the same are bound to serve their Prince and Soveraign Lord for the time being in his wars for the defence of Him and the Land against every rebellion power and might raised reared against him and with him to enter and abide in service in battell if case so require and that for the same service what fortune ever fall by chance in the same battell against the minde and will of the Prince as in this Land sometime passed hath been seen that it is not reasonable but against all lawes reason and good conscience that the said Subjects going with their Soveraigne Lord in wars attending upon him in his person or being in other places by his commandement within this

Spencers did either that the King may be removed for misdemeanours or reformed per aspertè or that the Subject is bound to govern in ayde of him we only say that his power is distinguishable from his person and when he himself makes a distinction betwixt them commanding one thing by his Legall Writs Courts and Officers and commanding another thing extrajudically by word of mouth Letters or Ministers we are to obey his power rather then his person 5. We take not from the King all power of pardoning Delinquents we only say it is not proper to him quarto modo For if the King pardon him which hath murthered my sonne his pardon shall not cut me off from my appeale and 't is more unreasonable that the Kings pardon should make a whole State which hath suffered remedilesse then any private man So if the King should deny indemnity to these which in the furie of Warre have done thing● unjustifiable by the Lawes of Peace and thereby keep the wounds of the State from being bound up 't is equitable that an Act of Indemnity should be made forcible another may And if this will not hold yet this is no good consequence the King is absolute in point of pardons therefore he is absol●●e in all things else and the Parliament hath no power to discharge Delinquencies therefore it hath no power in other matters 6. The Parliament hath declared the King to be in no condition to govern but this must not be interpreted rigidly and without distinction for if the King with his sword drawn in his hand and pursuing the Parliament and their adherents as Rebels be not fit for all Acts of Government yet 't is not hereby insinuated that he is divested of the habit or right of governing If he be unqualified now he is not unqualified for the future if he may not doe things destructive to the Parliament he is not barred from returning to the Parliament or doing justice to the Parliament This is a frivolous cavil and subturfuge 7. We sweare that the King is our supreme Governour over all persons and in all Causes but we doe not sweare that he is above all Law nor above the safety of his people which is the end of the Law and indeed Paramount to the Law it selfe If he be above all Law or liable to no restraint of our Law then we are no freer then the French or the Turks and if he be above the prime and of Law common fafety then we are not so free as the French or Turks For if the totall subversion of the French or the Turk were attempted they might by Gods Law imprinted in the Book of Nature justifie a self-defence but we must remedilesty perish when the King pleases to command our threats Besides how atchieved the King of England such a Supremacie above all Law and the community it selfe for whose behoofe Law was made If Gods donation be pleaded which is not speciall to him or different from what other Kings may pretend to● then to what purpose serve our Laws nay to what purpose serve the Laws of other Countries for by this generall donation all Nations are condemned to all servitude as well as we If the Law of this Land be appealed to what Books hath Mr Ienkins read where hath he found on t that Lex Regia whereby the people of England have given away from themselves all right in themselves Some of our Books tell us that we are more free then the French that the King cannot oppresse us in our our persons or estates by imprisonment denying justice or laying Taxes without our consents other Books tell us that the safety of the people is the supreme Law and that the King hath both God and the Law for his Superiour But all this is nothing to learned Mr Ienkins 8. We admit that no Acts of Parliament are compleat or formally binding without the Kings assent yet this is still to be denyed that therefore without this assent particularly exprest the two Houses can doe nothing nor have any virtuall power at all no not to examine Mr Ienkins nor to doe any other thing of like nature though in order to publick justice and safety I have done and wish Mr Ienkins would call in and lick up againe his black infamous execrable reproaches so filthily vomited out against the Parliament To the first I Was examined by a Committee appointed by the House of Commons I say and said that the House of Commons have no power to examine me for that it is no Court every Court hath power to examine upon Oath this power the House of Commons never claimed The Court of Pie-powders Court-Baron Hundred Court 5 H. 4. c. 3. 3 H. 6.46 1 H 6.43 35 H. 6.5 County Court and every other Court of Record or not of Record hath power to examine upon oath and an examination without Oath is a communication only examination in Law is upon Oath There is no Court without a power of tryall the House of Commons have no power to try any offence Sir Anthony Maynes case Cook 5. pars Reports Lit. 2. lib. Sect. 194.6 H. 4.1 nor ever practised it by Bill Inditement Information Plaint or Originall to deduce it to tryal nor to try it by Verdict Demurrer or Examination of Witnesses upon Oath without which there can be no condemnation or judgement and that which can attaine to no reasonable end the Law rejects as a thing inutile and uselesse Sapiens incipit a fine The Writ Whereby they are called gives them power A● faciendum consentiendum to what to such things Que ibidem de communi Consilie ordinari contigerint 4 pars instit fol. 4. 9. viz. in the Parliament This makes nothing at all for a Court for the House of Commons that consilium which that Writ intends is cleared partly by the Writ for chusing Knights c. For the King by that Writ is said to resolve to consult and treat with the Prelates and Peeres of the Kingdome for and touching the great concernments of the Common-wealth for the King never sits in the House of Commons and this also is made evident by the Writs to the Prelates Peeres Iudges and to his Councell at Law the words in their Writ are To appear and attend the Parliament consilium impensuri the one doth consulere the other facere consentire The House of Lords where the King sits in person 7. H. 6.28 1 H. 7.20 13. E. 3. ca. 5. 4 pars instit pag. 21. assisted by his Lords Judges Serjeants Atturney Sollicitor Masters of the Cnancery is a Court of Record to many purposes set down in the Books of Law and the Statutes of the Land and that Court is only in the House of Lords where the Kings sits A Court must either be by the Kings Patent Statute Law or by the Common Law which is common and constant usage the House of Commons hath no Patent to be a

and the subversion of the Law and Land laying taxes on the people never heard of before in this Land devised new oathes to oppose forces ray fed by the King not to adhaere to him but to them in this Warre which they call the Negative Oath and the Vow and Covenant By severall wayes never used in this Kingdome they have raised monies to foment this warre and especially to inrich some among them namely first Excise secondly Contributions thirdly Sequestrations fourthly Fift parts fiftly Twentieth Parts fixtly Meale-money seventhly Sale of Plundered goods ●ightly Loanes ninthly Benevolences tenthly Collections upon their Fast-dayes eleventhly new Inpositions upon Merchandizes twelvethly Guards maintained upon the charge of private men thirteenthly Fifty Subsidies at one time fourteenthly Compositions with such as they call Delinquents fifteenthly Sale of Bishops lands c. From the Kings party meanes of subsistance are taken 1 R. 3. cap. 3. ●ract li. 3. c. 8. Stanford 192. Sir Ger. Fleetwoods Case 8. pars Cook 7. H. 4 last lease before any indictment their Lands seized their goods taken the Law allows a Traytor or Fellon attainted Necessaria sibi familie sua in vict●● v●stitu where is the Covenant where is the Petition of light where is the liberty of the subject First We have ayded the King in this warre contrary to the negative oath and other votes Our warrant is the twenty fifth of Edward the third the second Chapter and the said resolutions of all the Judges Secondly Wee have maintained the Commission of Array by the Kings Command contrary to their votes We are warranted by the statute of the fifth of Henry the fourth and the judgement of Sir Edward Cooke the Oracle of the Law as they call him Thirdly We maintained Arch-Bishops and Bishops whom they would suppresse Our warrant is Magna Charta and many statutes more Fourthly we have maintained the booke of Common prayer they suppresse it Our warrant is five acts of Parliament in Edward the sixt and Queene Elizabeths time 5. Pesch● 35. Elizabeth inter placita Coronae in Banco Regis New booke of Entries sol 252. Penry for publishing two scandalous Libels against the Church government was indicted arraigned attainted and executed at Tyburne Fifthly We maintained the Militia of the Kingdome to belong to the King they the contrary Our warrant is the statute of the seventh of Edward the first and many statures sithence the practise of all times and the custome of the Realm Sixthly We maintained the counterfeiting of the great Seale to be high Treason and so of the usurpation of the Kings Forts Ports Shipping Castles and his Revenue and the Coyning of money against them We have our warrant by the said statute of the twenty fifth of Edward the third Chapter the second and divers others since and the practise of all times Seventhly We maintaine that the King is the only supreme govermour in all causes They that his Majesly is to be governed by them Our warrant is the statures of the first of Q. Eliza. Chapter the first and the fifth of Q. Elizabeth the first Eighthly 9. Ed. 4. sol 4. Wee maintaine that the King is King by an inhaerent birth-right by nature by Gods law and by the lay● of the Land They say his Kingly right is an 〈…〉 Our warrant is the statute of the first of King Ja●●● Chapter the first And the resolution of all the Judges of England in Calvins case Ninthly We maintain that the politick capacity i● not to be severed from the naturall They hold the contrary Our warrant is two flatures viz. ●xilium Hugonis in Edward the seconds time and the first of Edward the third Chapter the second and their Oracle who hath published it to posterity that it is damnable detestable and execrable Treason Calvins case pars 7. fol. 11. Tenthly we maintain that who aids the King at home or abroad ought not to be molested or questioned for the same they hold and practise the contrary our warrant is the statute of the eleventh of Henry the seventh Chapter the first Eleventhly We maintain that the King hath power to disassent to any Bill agreed by the two Houses which they deny Our warrant is the Statute of the second of Henry the fift and the practise of all times the first of King Charles Chapter the seventh the first of King James Chapter the first Twelfthly We maintain that Parliaments ought to be holden in a grave and peaceable manner without ●●ults They allowed multitudes of the meanest sort of people to come to Westminster to cry for Coll. of Ord. fol. 31. Justice when they could not have their will and keep guards of armed men to wait upon them Our warrant is the Statute of the seventh of Edward the second and their Oracle Thirteenthly We maintain that there is no state within this Kingdome but the Kings Majesty and that to adhere to any other State within this Kingdome is high treason our warrant is the Statute of the third of King James Chapter the fourth and the ●●enty third of Queen Elizabeth Chapter the first Fourteenthly We maintain that to levy a warre to remove Councellours to alter religion or any Law established is high Treason They hold the contrary One warrant is the resolutions of all the judges of England in Queen Elisabeths time and their oracle agrees with the same Fifteenthly We maintain that no man should be imprisoned put out of his Lands but by due course of Law and that no man ought to be adjudged to death but by the Law established the customer of the Realm or by act of Parliament They practise the contrary in London Bristol Kent c. Our warrant is Magna Charta Chapter the twenty ninth the Petition of right the third of King Charles and divers Lawes there mentioned We of the Kings party did and do detest Monopolies and ship money and all the grievances of the people as much as any men living we do well know that our estates lives and fortunes are preserved by the Lawes and that the King is bound by his lawes we love Parliaments if the Kings Judges Counsell or Ministers have done amisse they had from the third of November 1640 to the tenth of Ianuary 1641 time to punish them being all left to Justice where is the Kings fault The law faith the King can do no wrong 11 pars Cooks Reports Magdalen Colledge Cale that he is medicus Regni pater patriae sponsus regni qui per annlum is espoused to his Realm at his Coronation The King is Gods Lieutenant and is not able to do an unjust thing these are the words of the Law One great matter is pretended that the people are not sure to enjoy the acts passed this Parliament A succeeding Parliament may repeal them The objection is very weak a Parliament succeeding to that may repeal that repealing Parliament That feare is endlesse and remedilesse for it is the