from God and they that take this Augustine to be the Father of their Faith had need beware whom they take for Grandfather The names of his fellow workmen that were more eminent than the rest but Inferiour in parts in all probability to him their leader were Mellitus Justus Paulinus and whereas ignorance usually is as harmless as it is dull and flegmatick theirs was high and pernicious active and politick and Harpy-like inferiour to none in the dextrous suiting of their temptations to the several inclinations of the party who was to be brought about to serve their turnes His insolent swelling pride as Mr. l Perambulation of Kent p. 79 Lambard taxes it appeared towards the Brittish Bishops who intended him a respectful meeting beyond what he could merit for his honesty going about to erect a new Bishoprick in a Diocess that did not belong unto him as an Altar against Altar and upon another Altar against all Laws and Canons Being sure of one Archbishorick by the Conversion of Ethelbert King of Kent carrying a great stroak in it who was as good as preconverted by others m Polyd. Virg. lib. 4. p. 63. ministry before he sent for Augustine though Bede conceal that matter The next mark was another Archbishoprick for Paulinus that of the York where Elthelfred and Edwin the one elder the other younger are to be won to serve their Church by different Lures Old Ethelfred is toll'd out by his ambition and zealous enmity against Christianity to seise and destroy the borders of the Brittains in the first place and himself in the next Young Edwin is brought over to the Christian Faith by carnal attraction and a n Bed lib. 2. c. 9. marriage with King Ethelbert's Daughter and the addition of pre-acquaintance in dreams between him and Paulinus to dispose him to Christianity not unlike those between o Ibid. Paul and Ananias Act. 9. but in their Truth for Edwin could be no stranger to the Christian Faith being brought up from the Cradle to ripe years as p Histor Britt Galfr. the Brittish History relates Bede not disagreeing l. 2. c. 12. with Prince Cadwalhan of the same Age whom Bede calls Carduella or Cedwalla furious enemies afterwards to one another thanks to Augustine to the loss of many thousand lives sometimes the one and sometimes the other prevailing and killing and burning all before them Edwin in the end going by the worst and Paulinus q lib. 2. c. 20. forc'd to quit his new Archbishoprick and return with young Edwin's Queen to Canterbury q lib. 2. c. 20. Carduella non pepercit religioni eorum exortae jam c. Cadwalhan not sparing to root up his new plantation Northward for the reason before cited out of Bede And yet this old part of their Ministry in match-making and bestowing mens Kingdoms from them upon others to the disturbance of Nations and sometimes of themselves the Church of Rome is not out of love with to this day And had it not been for a subtile r Bed l. 2. c. 2. Miracle of Laurentius the whole plantation of these Italian adventurers had gone presently to wrack For London soon expell'd these Forreign propagators with Mellitus their new Bishop who never durst return any more Bede smothers the true reason of this usage and sayes in one place that Seberts Children then the Princes of London did it because Mellitus denyed them being unbaptiz'd the pure white ſ Idem c. 5. bread of the Eucharist which their eye long'd for to tast as if they had been inur'd but to brown-bread before In †Idem c. 6. another place Londonienses excludunt Mellitum Idololatris pontificibus servire gaudentes The Londoners sent him away preferring Heathenish Idolatry before the Roman Religion As if the Saxon Pagans of London had not the like noble disposition for the Truth as the Kentish but those had more Grace than these But takes no notice of the Majority of the people of London being Ancient Brittains reduc'd by treaty and Christians therefore by consequence which was a reason they had a Brittish Archbishop and Clergy residing amongst them from the beginning of Christianity and after the Saxon Invasion for an Age or two till they were †M. Westmin 586. expell'd to make room for Monk Augustine Who did not welcome Augustine himself though coming with his Pall from the Pope to be an Archbishop amongst them which is the reason Malmsbury intimates of his setling at Canterbury u G. Malmesb. de Gestis Pontif lib. 1. where he was better welcome and very probably was the fear and jealousy that mov'd him to make Laurentius his successor at Canterbury in his life time against the Canons to secure the succession least the Primacy after his death should devolve where it was before and who but London could raise this fear because of old Right Much less therefore would they welcome Mellitus as a bare Bishop over them or contribute to their own degradation as well as the Sacriledge and Schisme Bede therefore is right as to the fact though not the cause that the Londoners sent him on going which is confirmed by Malmesburie's x Idem Epis◠Lond. lib. 2. Penu◠ria Potestatis that Ealbald had not power enough to keep him there which cannot be understood of the opposition of the Sebarets who were his Cousins y Ibid. and at his Devotion but more probably of the body of the City as Christians better principled But then Eadbald who succeeded Ethelbert apostatizing from his Fathers Faith had like to have blasted the remaining part of his Nursery left at Canterbury had not Laurentius I say step'd in with a miracle being sorely z Bed l. 2. c. 6. scourg'd all over black and blew by St. Peter as he lay in Church the whole night before for having some thoughts himself to follow Mellitus and Justus Bishop of Rochester his Companions who in despair of doing any good here were resolv'd to go for France The sight and story whereof made a new alteration and a present compassion in the well meaning King and Justus and Mellitus to return to England shortly after but all to little purpose Edilred King of Mercia not many years after viz. Anno 676. coming upon them Maligno a Idem lib. 4. c. 12. exercitu with a Malignant Army for Mercia had now and before received the Christian Faith from Brittish Teachers laid all Kent wast saith Bede and demolish'd b Idem Ibid. all their Churches and Monasteries to the ground with the like irreverence to their Italian Religion as Carduella or Cadwalhan had in the North and the City of Rochester was destroyed in the same common ruine and calamity b Idem Ibid. Putta its Bishop retiring and ending his dayes with Sexwulf Bishop of Mercia His Church being destroyed and plunder'd of all it had Feigned Miracles like hot waters with the intemperate may a little
denied by our Adversaries themselves that the Christian Faith was first introduced to our Brittain by Joseph of Arimathea who buried our Saviour in his own new Tomb Math. 27.60 who landed here with other followers of our Saviour shortly after his Resurrection and Diu ante-long before Eleutherius his time saith (a) Baron T. 2. An. 183. p. 240. Polyd. Virgil lib 2. p. 37. Barronius fixing it to the 35 year of Christ where after he had preach'd the Gospel in this Country he ended here his days and quotes an English M.S. in the Vatican Library for one of his Authors and Sanders and Cressy and Pitseus and the rest of the Roman Catholick writers upon this Subject allow this story so that habemus confitentes reos we have such a testimony for the proof of our first point as in wordly Tribunals is counted fatall and conclusive the confession of the Adverse party And it is to be wondred of such men that they should be so ill advised as to yield such a Truth so easily to such a prejudice to their Cause but what then should become of the credit of so many holy Monks Relations and Revelations touching the Monastry of Glastenbury and not only the devout visits of Faganus and Dwywanus and Austine and Paulinus sent hither from the Pope to preach the Gospel which proves Christian Religion as well as that Old Church to have been here in their belief and perswation long before their Arrival hither but the many Divine Revelations from Angels and the Virgin Mary and Christ himself about the building and dedicating that Ancient Church It 's safer therefore with our Romish Authors and a less inconvenience of the two to confess this fact and yield the cause than question the credit of so many Miracles and Supernaturall Revelations enough to spoil and overthrow their Church whose errours are chiefly supported and confirmed by such devices and extol the wisdom of Protestants that rely on no Divine Visions but those recorded in Scripture But others are swayed much more by other Evidences so many Charters of Kings as well Brittish as Saxon and Norman several extant to this day given to this Monastery upon the account and acknowldgement of its undoubted Antiquity and priority to all other Churches in this Land or in this part of the world The Charter of King (e) Usher de Primordiis p 122. Henry the Second in the year 1185. where it is affirm'd of it Fons Origo totius Religionis Angliae pro certo habetur And recites the Charters of former Kings touching the place of William the 1. and 2. and Henry his Grandfather and those Ancienter of Edgar and Edmond and Edward and Alfred and Bringwalch Kentwin Baldred Ina Inclyti Arthuri the famous Arthur Cudred and many other Christian Kings all diligently perus'd and read before him and the Charter of Edward the third in the third year of his Reign to the like effect both perus'd by the Renowned Vsher The first Church in the Kingdom of Brittain saith King Ina counted the Principal in this Kingdom ab Antiquo from Ancient time saith Edgar built by the Disciples of Christ where in all agree And (g) Monasticon Anglican the Tombs of so many Abbots and Saints and Bishops and Kings counting it Honour to be there Interr'd and King (h) Usher p. 117. Arthur in particular whose Tomb and inscription after the burning of the Abby was there found about the year 1200. say the best Historians of (f) Idem p. 124. those times But the bringing of this Tradition to publick test and examination in several (i) Usher p. 23. 175. General Synods of Europe gives it much great reputation where the Embassadors of England in the Controversie about the Dignity and Precedency of England with France who derive their first conversion from Dionysius the Areopagite converted by St. Paul at Athens Act. 17.34 and with Spain or Castile who ascend higher for their founder to James the Brother of John kill'd by Herod Act. 12. yet claim'd Priority to England before either of them from Joseph of Arimathea's landing and preaching here statim post i Usher p. 23. 175. Passionem Christi immediately after the Passion of our Saviour and the weakness of the exceptions of the Advocates of the adverse part may be seen in the great Vsher with answers to them where requisite which Controversie was first set on foot in the Council of Pisa in the year 1409. next in the Council of Constance in 1417. between the Embassadors of France and England in the Council of Sena 1424. before Pope Martyn the fift between us and French and Spaniards together 1434. between the Embassadors of England and Castile again which passages have so prevail'd with Cressy that he hath no scruple left but one and that not against the Fact and body of the story but against the time and earliness thereof k Cressy Eccles Histor he can not hastily believe that Joseph arrived here so soon wherein yet he is to be commended by that party for his watchfulness for the Honour and Prerogative of the Church of Rome in apparent danger of being overthrown by this Church if the date and time as well as the substance of the story be once granted and evinced For if Joseph arrived here in the 35 year of Christ as Baronius guesses or the 36. as others for where some differr it to 63. m Spelman Concil p. 12. Sir H. Spelman conceives the figures displaced 63 for 36 and our Saviour suffered in the 34 of his age it follows that Joseph repaired hither immediately after the Resurrection in the 21 or 22. that is to say the last or last year saving one of Tiberius his Reign Christ being Crucified in his 20 th n Helvic Chron. whom Caligula succeeded Regning three years and ten Months And â— Claudius after him thirteen years and eight months And n Helvic Chron. Nero after Claudius another thirteen years and eight months And St. Peter's arrival at Rome is not so much as pretended by them of Rome to be before the second year of Claudius which yet Protestants can never grant finding him in those years to be in Palestine and Papists can never prove but that he came to Rome about the 12 or 13 year of Nero they have tradition more favourable for them and more reconcilable to his other abodes and Martyrdom It is consequent here upon that the Christian Faith was in Brittain before St. Peter ever came to Rome for as many years as are between the latter end of Tiberius and the second of Claudius in their own account that is for about seven years and in the account of all others for as much time as Intervenes between the end of Tiberius and the 12 or 13 year of Nero that is that the Church of Brittain is manifestly Senior and Ancienter in the Faith than the Church of Rome by thirty years complete
e Bed l. 1. c. 26. Bertha had so prepar'd Luidhardus her Chaplain who attended her was well able to consummate and to Baptize the King whom he had no doubt instructed in the Faith before which he was far more qualified to do than Augustine was or could be having not the Tongue nor that guift of Miracle What came this Monk so many Miles hither for was it for the souls health of the Saxons and to Preach the Gospel to them in conjunction with the Brittains as he here pretends he should have us'd some likely means towards the attaining of this end better ingratiated himself with the Brittains than to pick quarrels about trifles and tonsures and inconsiderable Ceremonies against the General e Bed lib. 1. c. 28. Instructions of his Pope honoured them with his communion as did Bertha and Luidhardus hinder'd confederacies with Pagans against them as did f Antiyuitat p. 34. Palladius in Scotland or as Leland Roundly and solidly reproves this Italian Hypocrisie and zeal of him and his Pope in the judgement of the learned and eloquent f Antiyuitat p. 34. Arch-Bishop Parker supposed to be the Author of Antiquitates Ecclesiasticae debuerat Gregorius admonuisse Saxonas gentem perfidem ut si sincerè Christianismum admittere vellent Britanniae Imperium quod contra Sacramentum militiae per tyrannidem occupaverant justis Dominis as possessoribus restituerent Pope Gregory by his Augustine ought to have admonished the Saxons who were a perfidious Nation that if they intended to embrace the Christian Faith in sincerity and to any purpose they should restore the Scepter of Brittain to the right Lords and owners who had hir'd them for their service and defence from whom on the contrary they wrested it by force and perjury against the Faith and honour of Souldiers But Cressy objects quiet Possession for 4 or 5 descents fron Hengist as if Emrys or Aurelius Ambrosius and Vther Pendragon and Arthur as well as Young Vortimer had made no re-enties But this seemed as unsuccessful Divinity with Augustine as to desire the leave and liking of the Brittains to be Arch-Bishop of Canterbury over their heads or to be ordained and consecrated by the Brittish Bishops in order thereunto which he so far shunned that he went over Seas to France as far as Arles to g Bede lib. 1. c. 28. Etherius Arch-Bishop there to receive his consecration for Arch-Bishop of England and that saith Bede by the special directions of Pope Gregory which compar'd with the former passage of the same Pope concerning Brittain never having had a Pall from Rome and consequently never being Subject to or depending upon that See and their subsequent indefatigable Industry after Augustine's Plantation and succession was extinct of thrusting new Arch-Bishops from time to time and undervaluing all our Brittish consecrations manifestly proves the bottom of Romes design upon England that it was not Edification but Empire that was ever there aim though with the ruin of this Ancient Church if it could no other ways be compassed so Augustine had the face in a Synodical meeting of the Brittish Bishops near Worcester as before to require the Brittains to joyn with him assuming now to be an Arch-Bishop here against leave and Law and Canons to Preach the Gospel to the Saxons which was his pretext and Artifice to hook in their allowance and approbation of his unjust and Schismatical usurpation which subtile Proposal was difficult to be granted or denied but either with the Inconvenience of betraying their Church and Country and Christian communion by the Canons of the Church if they yeilded to joyn with him or having the odium of witholding the Gospel from the Saxon Pagans if they refus'd which is the true rise and State of this Infernal calumny rais'd again the Brittains of their denying to Preach the Gospel to the Saxons which induc'd the worthy and Reverend Author afore mention'd h Bed l. 2. c. 2 to conclude this meeting to have been contriv'd for a snare to get words of Indignation from them to provoke the Pagan Saxons to form a War against them to ruin the remainder of the Brittish Clergy in Wales and to cover the combination with Prophesie to Father the murder upon God to make it justice 3 And accordingly Ethelbert as Bede acknowledges h Bed l. 2. c. 2 provok'd Ethelfred King of Northumberland the chief Patron of Paganism and Enemy of the Christian Faith against them upon the score of the high words that passed between them and Augustine at that meeting and it is as easy to guess who informed and incensed his new convert King Ethelbert from his denunciation of War against them upon the place though in the form of Prophesie and Divine Revelation Si pacem cum fratribus accipere nollent bellum ab hostibus forent accepturi no small evidence with considering men i Antiquitates Ecclesiast p. 47. non conscius sed causa Belli p. 48. of this Apostles having a chief hand in the Barbarous ensuing murders and long and bloudy Wars and devastations that followed which he could so certainly fortell for these and other Saxon Kings coming with united forces against Brochwael Scythrawg Prince of Powys not so well provided for them and soon putting him to the rout at Legecestria saith Bede that is Westchester Wales being then larger than now it is and by the Brittains called Caerleon from a Roman Legion that quartered in that City sell in the next place upon the Monks that were with him in his Army and slew of them 1250. no more but fifty of them escaping Their assisting with their Prayers being made a pretence for this hostile usage by the Kings so saith Bede But the Norman Ancient M. S of Trivet in Spelman i Spelman Cnncil p. 112. saith that they were found in the City k Wheeloc not in c 2. l. 2. Bede and every one of them put to the Sword in cold bloud because they were Brittains the Latine copies of Bede add this to be done after the death of our Augustine but there is no such clause in any of the Saxon Manuscripts l Monachi pacem petentes crudeliter occisi H. Lhuid fragm Brit. p. 58. and Bishop Jewel finds Augustine's hand to several Charters signed some years after this Massacre committed in m M. Westm An. 603· 603. whereas our Augustine acording to our best Chronologers dyed not n Spelman Concil p. 93. till 613 so that He might well be present at the place of their slaughter o Jewel defense part 5. c 1. p. 438. If it was not according to some in 613. the same year that he dyed which was a bloudy Legacy encouraging their Executioners Whereby we have a tast of the Roman forgeries while they were masters of our Records and Manuscripts Nothing that seemed to make for their Church have they neglected to insert without either Art or Colour
their Antiquity and first Establishment for want of sueing out their Palls from Rome then by the same reason the whole Primitive Church of Christ for 300 years before Marcus or 500. before these Investures by Palls came to be in full mode and fashion was no lawful Church had no lawful Officers neither Patriarchs nor Metropolitans nor Bishops c. no more than the Brittish And then the Issue between us and Rome is come to this disjunction If Rome be the true Catholick Church by the vertue of its Palls The Primitive Apostolical Church that wanted this Churchifying Livery was no Church If the Primitive Apostolical Church was a true Catholick Church which none but Antichrist will deny then the Church of Rome by their own new Principles is no Catholick Church So that by the self-same character and measure whereby they wrongfully Unchurch'd our Brittish and Impiously by consequence Unchurch'd the whole Primitive Church to boote by their own Law and sentence as it were by a judgement upon them they Pall-mall have justly and deservedly Vnchurch'd themselves Having thus evicted them by their own Principles out of their Usurped right and title to the name and being of a Church much less the Catholick Church and wrested from them their Patriarchal flag and claim of Supremacy over our Brittish Churches upon which of our own Metropolitan Sees we ought to reare and fix this Ensign of Primacy as its Ancient Right and Honour is both a hard question to decide and no question at all in diverse respects For if the question be of Fact where the Primacy was lodg'd and seated whether at York or London or Caerleon ar-Wysc it is hard to determine it there being so much from Antiquity to be alledg'd for each For York there is this to be said Not only that at the Council of Arles Eborius Arch-Bishop of York Subscribes before the other two but that York was the Seat of the Roman Emperours when they resided here and the Praetorium of Brittain and in all consequent probability the Seat of the Brittish Patriarch or Primate therefore And the place of Constantine's Birth as our Embassadours argue in the Council of Constance for the right of Precedency against France n Usher p 175. Domus Regalis Angliae inter plures sanctos palmites c. The Royal house of England amongst many other holy branches not easy to be numbred is certainly known to have brought forth St Helena and her Son Constantine the Great who was born at York And our Embassadours in the Council of Basil against the like pretence of Castile or Spain urge o Usher p. 990. Constantinum illum magnum qui primus c. That Constantine the Great who was the first Christian Emperour who ordered so many Churches to be built over all the World contributing vast treasures thereunto was born at Perterna in the City of York Which name is conjectured to be retained to this day in the Vicar's Chorall's buildings there which is call'd p Monast Angl. part 1 p. 171. Bederne which with Christ-Church adjoyning stil'd in old Charts St. Trinity-Church in the Kings Court is conceived to be part of the old Imperial Palace by the great Arch-Bishop Vsher and Bramhall and to add to their conjecture the word in the Brittish signifies the same as Praetorium with little allowance to the alteration made by time and by different Language For Penteyrnas is the Brittish word for Praetorium signifying as much as the q Dictionar Cambrobrit Dris Davies Pen caput teyrnas Regnum Head of the Kingdom or Empire which the Embassadors cite Perterna and is since retainâ—d in Bederne and perhaps in Bedhran the next Street adjoyning to their Minster q. d. their Perterna or old Pallace Now the great Metropolitan or Patriarchal Sees of Christendom whether Antioch or Constantinople c. have not more nor so much to offer in behalf of their several Primacyes within their several preeincts nor Rome it self with Truth and soberness than York for the Primacy of Brittain For the best and chiefest title is from the Seate of the Empire and chief prefecture ingeniously so acknowledged by the Council of Constantinople and Chalcedon wherein York is equal and several wayes before them in Seniority or Dignity or both being the primâ— See of Brittain and with Antioch it self co-temporary in the Faith as the English Embassadors alledg'd in the Council of Basil whose Chair is acknowledged by the consent of all Antiquity to be founded by St. Peter 7 years before that of Rome but far out-vying it for the lustre of both Royal and Imperial dignity and Christian Primogeniture But Rome hath two other broken titles out of both which she feign would make up one good one as he that made two heyres of half bloud to be equal in right with one of the whole that of St. Peter's Rock whereon the Church that is the Roman as they begg the question was founded and the other of Constantine's Donation as his gratuity for his Baptism by the first were all their canting Interpretations true which have been often sufficiently baffled they can have no more right than Antioch which was alike founded by St. Peter by their own Confession and other more certain evidence than Rome can produce for her chair which is as it were of the second venter yet Brittain was never Subject to Antioch but Equal and Co-ordinate much less to Rome though agreeing more in Customs and Communion with the one than with the other yet such is the disease and unreasonable pride of Rome that she exalts her self above both And St. Peter is brought to rob not Paul alone but Peter And the Junior Daughter to claim Precedency and Birth-right against the Senior and the crack'd suspected Patent to be a better and firmer title than the true and undoubted Neither is the other pretence from Constantine's guift more vail'd against Brittain were it true which many of themselves are asham'd off For suppose he had been Baptiz'd by Pope Sylvester at Rome and not in the River Jordan as most believe especially the Greeks and Platina dissents not about the latter end of his dayes as the Custom then was for surer remission of sins against any new crimes and forfeitures and that he had resigned Rome and its Territories to the Pope withdrawing to Constantinople out of Reverence to him as to a greater man and the Dignity of Roman Senators who were equal to Kings to his Cardinals and all his Robes and Ensigns of Empire with an Universal Supremacy over the Churches of Christendom as the Donation r Photii Nomocan Tit 8. c. 1. recites yet sure not without some exception at the lest touching Brittain not only because he could better part with his own Civil rights than with the old Ecclesiastical Rights of Churches enjoyed from Christ before Magistrates became Christian and in future Councils submitted to Christian Emperours for honour while Christians but because Brittain
p 70. Magistrates have no Supremacy here neither Bishops and Curates who are only Ministers and Stewards p. 71 102. The Harmony between Christ in the hearts of Preachers and of Hearers p. 72. The conscience of another is not our Rule but our own p. 72. Every conscience is to judge for it self of truths and guides p. 73. So many Souls so many Kingdoms Ibid. Atheism destroys God 〈…〉 himself but in the soul of the Atheist Ibid. God 〈…〉 … rserces and consciences p. 74. The Apostles app … d to conscience in every man which the Pope would â—eign suppress p. 73. 74. How Rome invades Christ's Soveraignty herein and neglects its own duty p. 74. 75 76 77 78. SECT III. Christian Kings are the Sovereigns of the out-side of the Church though not of its inside p 78.79 And Vicars of Christ in their Territories and Fathers of the Church p. 80. The outside of the Church is secular p. 82. 83. Of the Pope's encroachment upon Kings both in their Temporal are Ecclesiastical Supremacy p. 83. 84. seq Several Roman Catholick Gentlemen disclaim the first p. 85 an address to such p. 86. The Pope hath no Ecclesiastical Supremacy in Brittain but only our Kings and they as Christians p. 87. seq The Pope Originally had no Supremacy over the Church of Millain so near his own doors p. 88. The Original Supremacy of Christian Bishops sets as do the stars in the day when Kings become Christian like the Suns rising p. 88. 89. Yet keep still in the Firmament and shine in the day in case of an Eclipse or Antichristian Apostacy p 89. A soul depriv'd of Superiours is under Christ alone Ibid. Great Loyalty and disloyalty in chusing right or wrong Soveraigns p. 90 and the errour therein greater or lesser Ibid. Instances of Gods mind that men should be under Rulers of their own flesh and bloud rather then under Forreigners p. 91. Mitre Subject to the Crown not the Crown to the Mitre p. 93. And St. Peter no where more abused than at Rome ibid. p. 191 Kings loose no Supremacy or Prerogative in becoming Christians p. 95. Kings Supreme in the Jewish Church p. 95. 96. seq and by consequence in the Christian which is New Israel p. 94. 100. Of the Limits of Temporal and Spiritual Governours and whether Bishops are greater in their chairs or Pulpits p. 102 seq of maintenance due to the Clergy and the difference of tâ—mes and dispositions when God or the World is in the heart p. 107. seqq How great a bâ—essing from God Kings are to moderate between the excesses of the Roman Clergy and the defects of Protestant Laity p. 112. In the World there is difference of degrees in the Church all are fellow-servants under Christ their Lord. p. 113. How St. Ambrose and Theodosius did both the parts of Servants in suspending and submitting Ibid. Kings have power to regulate the outside of the Church And the Divine Law commands obedience to their human p. 114. 115. The manifest difference between the Internals where Christ alone is Legislator and the Externals of Religion where Kings have Jurisdiction p. 115 116. Romish Arts to wrest the Ecclesiastical Supremacy from our Kings p. 116. 117. seq Deserters of Romish errours though but in part are not to be discouraged p 118. Israel could not be cursed nor weakned but by dividing them from God How Balaams method hath been used in England p. 119. The true recreation of Princes p. 120. 121. SECT IV. The sum of Rome's pretences and Brittain's defences being the chief heads of the subsequent discourse p. 123. seq The Brittish Church proved to be Ancienter than the Roman from the confession of their own Writers and by better Arguments p. 127. and how many years Senior to it p. 136. The Gospel planted at Rome from Brittain before the Arrival of the Apostles or any other Christians and the tradition of Joseph of Arimathea corroborated p. 312. 313. Of precedence claimed in General Councils by our Embassadors upon this Seniority p. 1â—9 SECT V. Scotland a gainer in their Faith by Dioclesian's persecution here p. 136. Ireland and Germany by the Saxon Invasion p. 141 Sect. 10. The Brittains ever kept their Religion amidsts Persecutions and Invasions p. 423. and propagated it a broad amongst their Enemies p. 137. 138. The yoak and errours Rome thrust upon us were restored to it again at the Reformation when we were at the worst we were as Orthodox as Rome which corrupted us p. 142. SECT VI. Eleutherius his Epistle pre-supposes Christian Religion to be in this Isle p. 143. It is not in the least probable the Brittains received any Baptism froâ— Rome why p. 144. 145. Rome vainly ambitious of the Honour of Baptizing the first Christian King and Emperour p 146. Of Geoffry of Monmouth and the Welsh M. S. whence he Translated his History both corrupted by the Arts of Rome p. 146. Buchanan's zeal in vindicating the same of King Arthur p. 147. K. Lucius very probably was Baptized by Timotheus the Son of Claudia Ruffina p. 147. and of her Brittish name The Religion of Rome to be suspected why an Intimation to the Irish p. 149. 150. SECT VII The Scottish and Pictish Churches agreed with the Brittish in all Doctrines and traditions and opposition to Rome's Innovations p. 151. The Brittish Church was Scriptural in its Doctrine Episcopal in its Government Oriental in its traditions p. 152. Whether Popery be Hên-Fsydh p. 15â— Abbot Dunawd and the Brittish Clergy give a meeting to Monk Augustine p. 153. Christs example and submission to Superiours and General Councils a further Rule with the Brittains p. 153. 155. Of Pelagius or Morgan His heresie spread here not by him but from France Lupus and Germanuâ— serviceable by â—heir Neutrality to suppress it amongst the Brittains remaining in England under the Saxons p. 157. but fully suppressed in Wales by St. David p. 157. The Easter Controversie consisted of two parts Doctrinal and Astronomical How days and months are and are not to be observed by Christians p. 158. 159. Easter the first Lords day other Sundays 52. Octaves thereof by Christ's Institution p. 160. 161. Wednesdays and Fridays fasts upon the score of the Passion as Easter and Sundays Festivals upon the score of the Resurrection p. 161. The Church or New Israel bound by the decalogue and other reasons to observe these Christian Sabbaths Ibid. Why the Eastern Churches conform'd with the Jews in the observation of Easter p. 162. The stiffness of the Roman to the contrary proves their first Popes to have derived their succession from St. Paul and not from St. Peter p. 162. 163. A conjecture of the true reason of the Roman fast on Saturday contrary to Catholick tradition Ibid. The Bishops of Jerusalem had more to pretend from Antiquity to be Judges of Controversies in the Christian Church than Rome p. 164. Brittain more a follower of St. Peter and the East than Rome p. 165 Constantine in
the faith by Brittish Ministry before the arrival of Monk Augustine p. 255. 256 seq King Aurelius Ambrosius and Arthur zealous in propagating the faith amongst them p. 256. 257. How zealous Etbelfred was for Heathenism p 259. How God moulded the Brittains into several conditions for the Conversion of the Saxons p 260. 261. Bede taxed of partiality p. 261. 214 215 2â—8 The remainder of the English converted by Brittish Ministry proved out of Bede himself p. 263. By the assistance of King Cadwalhan or Cedwalla and Oswald and miraculous Providences regarding the Innocent bloud shed at Bangor p. 264 265 Of Oswalds Bishops Aidan Finan and Diuma and their Countrey and Principles and Brittish names p. 266. seâ—q The place of Oswald's death how remarked by providence p 2â—â— 271. 26 Counties of the North and â—â—â—rcia and East Saxon with the City of London entirely recovered to the faith by the Oswaldian Clergy and the Church of Rome had not the least hand nor finger nor pretence to offer for their conversion p. 271 seq 276. The English and Brittiâ—h Princes after some descents became friendly till Rome and Auâ—ustine interposed p 273 27â— Great numbers of Brittish Christians in the West-Saxon Kingdom conceal'd by Bede That Territory recovered to the faith by them and by Irish ann French Ministry agreeing in faith and communion with the Brittains and by Oswald's Interest and how Rome's help was nothing p. 277. seqq The like of the 4 Counties of the East-Angels p. 280. seq and South-Saxons and the Isle of Wight p. 284. seq The Roman faith in England reduced within the bounds of Kent and thence eradicated p. 286 287 205 207. The Romish Church with its See of Canterbury exstinct for 15 years till the entrance of Theodore a Graecian to be Archbishop there p. 289. The Ptimacy in Licbfeild p. 290. Archbishop Parker's Argument from old Saxons Laws and Homilies of the English having their first faith from the Brittains and not from Rome p. 291. seq To which the Brittish intermarriages with the Saxon Infidels which was their sin was by Providence made useful p. 204. SECT X. Augustine but Rector of Christ Church Canterbury or at best a naturalized Brittish Bishop by their own Principles p. 295. 296. a President of the Pope's over-ruling for the right of a Native against a Forraigner after 600 years possession p. 297 This Controversie at an end if popes would do as they would be done by or stand to their own Decisions p. 298 Brittain how great a Mother Church in Europe p. 298. The Northern Nations converted by the Germans the Germans by English and Irish all from Brittain and God's regard to the Martydom at Bangor p. 299-305 Rome had its first faith from Brittain before the arrival of the Apostles thither p. 306. seq The first Christian Congregation was in our Claudia Ruffina's House converted into a Temple which is therefore their Mother Church and not St. Peters built afterwards by our Constantine p 313 Alcuinus and Rabanus Maurus Charlemagne's Doctors their Brittish Names p. 305 315. The French if not the Gauls owe their Faith and Learning to Brittain p. 315 317 318. What words the Brittains borrowed from the Latine and what the Latine from the Brittains and why p 316 317. The Modern Roman Faith is from the Goths and why 3â—8 The resort was from Gaul to Brittain heretofore for Philosophy and Religion as much as now from England to France for meaner Accomplishments p. 318 319. Exceptions against our plantation of the Faith in Germany answered and that Rome more hinder'd than help'd p. 31â— seq The Saxons had their Learning and Characters from the Brittains p 320. Three marks of nearer Cognation to the East in our Brittains than other Western Nations p. 321. Evidences that the Ancient Greeks had their Philosophy and Letters from this Isle p. 320 3â—â— Of the Original of Peter-pence and the Colledge of Rome least the Saxons should be further instructed by the Brittains and the dismal Ignorance that ensued p. 325 326. Where was the Roman Church in England for 600 years before Monk Augustine What Rome contributed to the German Conversion p. 329 332. If Popery be a good Religion Rebellion is no great sin p. 331 332. What was true and sound in Religion Germany had it from Brittain p. 332. Charlemagne in the Franckford Council against the second Council of Nice and Pope Adrian condemned Image Worship and owed his Orthodoxy therein to Brittain p. 332 333. The Canons of that Council imbezeld and suppress'd by the Roman Hereticks as they did other Records p 333 334 335. Saxons more mild to the Brittish Clergy in Lhoâ—gr after the first Brunt till Rome's entrance p. 334 How Nations â—avour of the Faith of first Planters p. 335. How Brittain was like to the great Primitive Church in being dayly kill'd by Heathens and defil'd by Hereticks p. 336. The Agreement of the Roman Principles with Audius the Apostle of the Goths p. 336. The Female Sex have a right to Supremacy over most Churches by the Roman plea p. 337 Upbraiding Cancels Courtesies why and the Romanists destroy their pretended merits a clear offer made to them p. 338 339 340 341. The Romanists insisting upon the merits of Monk Augustine become responsible for his wrongs to this Church p. 341. How disingenious and unreasonable they are in their imputation of Schism to us p. 342. How under the Roman Usurpation Ordinations here were valid to the Brittains and yet Schismatical and null as to the Romans p. 343 344. No slavery to be shaken off by indirect means the benefit and reward of Patience p. 345. How unworthy it were to return voluntarily under the yoak of Rome ibid. SECT XI Rome promotes its Dominion 1. By giving away the rights and Kingdoms of others p. 346. 2. By politick Matches Popery recovered in England by Oswi's marrying K. Edwins Sister p. 347. seq 3. And Archbishop Theodore introduc'd p. 349 350. How he us'd Archbishop Ceadda p. 351. 4 By preferments to Ambitious parts and of Wilfrid's ill end and faults and omen at his Birth p. 349 351 352. 5. By Ignorance conâ—rary to its first pretences p. 352. seq An address to the Irish wherein they are to be commended and wherein bewail'd 354 355 356 357 358. The Papists ascribe the Priviledges of Jerusalem above to their own Church p. 359 King Cadwaladrs going to Rome out of Devotion a Monkish sorgery and fully refuted p. 359 360. Bede averse to the Brittains 361. 6. How they defeated our Princes of their Church Rights p. 362. Their opposition from our Norman Kings and from Henry the 8th set out in a comparison p. 363 SECT XII Kings can better assert their Rights with the Sword than Popes their Usurpations by Excommunication p. 364. None ought to envy our Restoration nor especially any that have suffered by Tyrants p. 365. More of the Rule of Communion and separation p. 367. Regulated Conscience is no private