thereof it is recited and specified above alleged which matter the aforesaid Henry Lindley doth not deny nor to the same any waies answereth but that averment to admit utterly refuseth the said Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is for the said Lord the King that now is demandeth Judgment and that the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances made be revoked and annulled and that the said Manors with the Appurtenances into the hands of the Lord the King that now is be taken and seised c. And because the Court of the Lord the King that now is here will avise off and upon the premises before it proceedeth to Judgment thereof day is given as well to the aforesaid Henry Hobert Knight Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. as to the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele before the said Lord the King that now is in the said Court here untill in 8. days of St. Hilary next c. wheresoever c. to hear their Judgment thereof because the said Court hereof thereof not yet c. At which day of 8. days of Saint Hillary that is to say at Westminster aforesaid come as well the aforesaid Henry Hobart Knight Attorney General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. in his proper person as the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele by their Attorny aforesaid and upon this the Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is as at first demandeth Judgment and that the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the appurtenances in form aforesaid made be revoked and annulled and that the said Manors with the Appurtenances into the hands of the Lord the King that now is be taken and seised c. And because the said Court of the Lord the King that now is here will farther avise before that it proceed to Judgment thereof day farther is given as well to the aforesaid Henry Hobert Knight Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. as to the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele here untill in 15 days of Easter next c. wheresoever c. to hear their Judgment thereof because the said Court of the Lord the King that now is here thereof not yet c. SCIRE FACIAS Easter Term. 2i Eliz. Râ—t 1. The Record of the Case of Mark Steward vouched in Co. 9th part in Sr. Georege Reynels Case fol. 99. b. MEmorandum that Thomas Bromley Knight Chauncellor of the Queen Monday next after the Morrow of the Ascension of our Lord this Term before the Lady the Queen at Westminster by his own hand delivered here into the Court a certain Record before the Lady the Queen had in her Chancery in these words Pleas before the Lady the Queen at Westminster in the Term of Easter in the yeer of the Reign of Elizabeth by the grace of God Queen of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. the 21th Middlesex ss It is manifest that the Lord Philip and the Lady Mary late King and Queen of England Sister of the Lady the Queen that now is for them the Heirs and Successors of the said Lady Queen Mary by the Letters Patents of them the said late King and Queen Philip and Mary made under the great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the 23th day of September in the 3. and 4th yeer of the said late King Philip and Mary gave and granted to one Mark Steward gen the Office of Sergeant at Arms of them the said late King and Queen Philip and Mary attendant upon her Chauncellor of England for the time being and made ordayned and appointed by the said Letters Patents him the said Mark their Sargeant at Arms to have and enjoy the said Office to the said Mark for the Term of his life and that the said King Philip and Queen Mary for them the Heirs and Successors of the said Queen Mary by the same Letters Patents gave and graunted to the said Mark for the exercising and occupying the said office aforesaid the wages and Fee of 12. pence by the day To have hold and receive yeerly the said wages and Fee of 12. pence to the said Mark for the Term of his life of the Issues and profits of the Hamper of the said late King Philip and Queen Mary by the hands of the Clerk or Keeper of the aforesaid Hamper for the time being yeerly to be paid as by the said Letters Patents amongst other it more fully appeareth By colour of which Letters Patents the said Mark was seised of the Office aforesaid as of Freehold for the term of his life And whereas also it is found by a certain Inquisition Indented taken at VVestminster in the County of Middlesex the 24th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th before Kalph Hurlestone Esquire John Muthal Esquire Francis Folyat Esquire and John Stratham Gent. By virtue of a Commission of the said Lady the Queen that now is to them and to one John Goodman directed by the Oaths of 12. men That the said Mark did not serve in the said Office of Sergeant at Arms according to the effect and Tenor of the aforesaid Letters Patents to him made from the 8th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is unto the first day of February then next past before the Inquisition aforesaid but for all that time absented himself from that Office as by the said Inquisition retorned in the Court of the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen as in the files of Record there remaining it appeareth And now at this day that is to say the 7th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now iâ— the 21th coâ—eth the aforesaid Mark Steward into the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen â—ow is at Westminster by Edward Cockel his Attorny and complaineth that â—y reâ—â—on and colour of the Inquisition aforesaid himself to be unjustly removed from the exercising and holding of his said Office aforesaid Because By Protestation that the said Inquisition is not sufficient in Law to â—â—â—â—ve him the said Mark from the exercising of his Office aforesaid â—o â—â—e shewing of his right in this behalf the said Mark saith that the 〈◊〉 Lady the Queen that now is long after the making of the said Letters Patents that is to say the last day of Nov. in the yeer of her Reign the 〈◊〉 at Westminster in the County oâ— Mâ—ll gave liâ—â—nsâ—â—oth â—said Mark 〈◊〉 hâ—â—self from the exercising his Office during the pleasure of him â—â—â— said Mark until he was commanded by her the said Lady
Trinity Term Aº 6 to of King James Calvins Case Co. 7. part Fol. 1. a. IAmes by the Grace of God of England Scotland Erance and Ireland King defender of the Faith c. To the Sheriffe of Middlesex Greetings Robert Calvin Gent. hath complained to us That Richard Smith and Nicholas Smith unjustly and without Judgement have disseized him of his Freehold in Haggord otherwise Haggerston otherwise Aggerston in the Parish of St. Leonard in Shorditch within 30. years now last past and therefore we command you That if the said Robert shall secure you to prosecute his claim Then that you cause the said Tenement to be reseised of the Chattels which within it were taken and the said Tenement with the Chattels to be in Peace untill Thursday next after 15. dayes of Saint Martin next coming and in the mean time cause 12. free and legall men of that venew to see the said Tenement and the names of them to be unbrevicted and summon them by good summonors that they be before us where ever we be in England ready thereof to make Recognition and put by suerties and pledges the aforesaid Richard and Nicholas that then they be there to hear the Recognition and have there the summons the names of the Pledges and this Writ Witness my self at Westminster the 3. day of November in the year of our Reign of England France and Ireland the 5th and of Scotland the one and fortieth For 40. s. paid in the Hamper KINDESLEY THe Assise cometh to Recognize If Richard Smith and Nicholas Smith unjustly and without Judgement did disseise Robert Calvin Gent. of his Freehold in Haggard otherwise Haggerston otherwise Aggerston in the Parish of St. Leonard in Shorditch within 30. years now last past And whereupon The said Robert who is within the age of 21. years by John Parkinson and William Parkinson his Guardians which the Court of the said King hereto this have joyntly and severally specially are admitted Complaineth That they disseised him of the Messuage with the Appurtenances c. And the said Richard and Nicholas by William Edwards their Attorney come and say That the said Robert ought not to be Answered to his Writ aforesaid because they say That the said Robert is an Alien born the 4th day of November in the Reign of the King that now is of England France and Ireland the third and of Scotland the 34th At Edenborough within his Kingdom of Scotland aforesaid and within the Alleagiance of the said Lord the King of the said Kingdom of Scotland and without the Alleagiance of the said Lord the King of his Kingdom of England and at the time of the birth of the said Robert Calvin and long before and continually after the aforesaid Kingdom of Scotland by the proper Rights Laws and Statutes of the same Kingdom and not by the Rights Laws and Statutes of this Kingdom of England was Ruled and Governed and yet is And this he is ready to aver and thereupon prayeth Judgement If the said Robert to his said Writ aforesaid ought to be answered c. And the aforesaid Robert Calvin saith That the aforesaid Plea by the aforesaid Richard and Nicholas above pleaded is in sufficient in Law to him the said Robert to Answer and to Barre him to have his Writ aforesaid that the said Robert to the said Plea in manner and form pleaded needeth not nor by the Law of the Land is holden to Answer and this he is ready to aver hereof prayeth Judgement and that the said Kichard and Nicholas to the aforesaid Writ of the said Robert do Answer And the said Richard and Nicholas for as much as they sufficient in matter in Law to him the said Robert to Answer have to his Writ aforesaid in Barr above have alleged which they are ready to aver which matter the aforesaid Robert doth not gainsay nor to the same doth in any ways Answer but the said Averment altogether to admit refuseth as at first demandeth Judgement if the aforesaid Robert to his Writ aforesaid ought to be admitted c. And because the Court of the Lord the King here are not yet avised of giving her Judgement of and upon the premises day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lord the King at Westminster untill Monday next after 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear there Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lord the King here thereof are not yet c. And the Assise aforesaid remain to be taken before the said Lord the King untill the same Monday there c. And the Sheriff to distrein the Recognitors of the Assise aforesaid And before to make view c. At which day before the Lord the King at Westminster cometh as well the aforesaid Robert Calvin by his Guardians aforesaid as the aforesaid Richard Smith and Nicholas Smith by their Attorney aforesaid and because the Court of the Lord the King hereof giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day hereof is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lord the King at VVestminster untill Monday next the morrow of the Assension of our Lord to hear their Judgement because the Court of the Lord the King here are not yet c. And the Assise aforesaid remain further to be taken until the same Monday there c. At which day before the Lord the King at VVestminster cometh as well the aforesaid Robert Calvin by his Guardians aforesaid as the aforesaid Richard Smith and Nicholas Smith by their Attorney aforesaid c. And because the Court c. Upon which Seen and by the Court of the Lord the King here all and singular the prepremises fully understood and diligently looked into and examined and mature deliberation hereof being had because it seemeth to the Court of the Lord the King that now is here that the Plea aforesaid of the said Richard Smith and Nicholas Smith above pleaded is not sufficient in Law to the aforesaid Robert Calvin to have Answer to his Writ aforesaid to Barr Therefore it is considered by the Court of the Lord the King that now is here That the aforesaid Richard Smith and Nicholas Smith to the Writ of the said Robert further Answer c. Michael 25. and 26. of Queen Elizabeth Rott 144. Assise Dowmans Case C. 9th part Fol. 1. a. THe Assise came to Recognise if Edward Vavasor Esquire George Vavasor Gent. Richard Coats John Lawson William Musgrave Robert Thissylwood and Robert VVard unjustly c. Disseised Thomas Dowman Esq and Elizabeth his wife of their Freehold in Spaldington VVillitoft and Southcate within 30. years now last past c. And whereupon the said Thomas and Elizabeth by Henry Cressey Their Attorney complain That they disseised them of 6. Messuages 300. Acres of Land 100. Acres of Meadow and 200. Acres of pasture with their appurtenances c. And the aforesaid Edward George Richard John Robort Thyssylwood and Robert VVard by Edward Latimer
here untill from the day of St. Michael in one Moneth then next following At which day here cometh as well the said Owen as the said John by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this further prayeth liecnce thereof to imparl here c. Until from Easter day in 15. dayes and hath it c. And the same day is given to the said Owen here c. At which day of 14. dayes of Easter came as well the aforesaid Owen as the aforesaid John by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this The said Owen prayeth that the aforesaid John to his Writ and Declaration aforesaid answer And the said John Drury saith That he for any thing before alleged from having execution of his Debt and Damages against him the said Owen ought not to be barred or delayed Because he saith That after the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the aforesaid Owen out of the custody of the aforesaid Sheriff of Surry to have escaped and before any further execution against the aforesaid Owen by him the said John by Colour of the Judgement aforesaid was sued forth and had that is to say in the Term of St. Michael in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid out of the aforesaid Court of the said Lord the King that now is of the Bench here upon the Outlawry as is before said pronounced Issued forth a certain Writ of the said Lord the King of Capias utlagatum against him the said Owen At the Sute of the said John then to the Sheriff of the County of Midd. directed By which Writ The Lord the King commanded the aforesaid Sheriff of Midd. That he should not omit for any Liberty of his County but that he take the aforesaid Owen by the name of Owen Bray late of Cobham in the County of Surry Gent. Outlawed in the aforesaid County of Sussex the aforesaid 19th day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid at the Sute of him the said John by the name of John Drury Doctor of Law Of a Plea of Debt whereof he was convicted if he should be found in his Baliwick and him should safe keep c. So as he have his Body here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid in the aforesaid morrow of All Souls the self same Term of St. Michael in the yeer aforesaid to do and to receive what to the Court of the said Lord the King thereof should consider in that behalf At which morrow of All Souls here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Owen by William Brown then his Attorny And the Sheriffs that is to say George Bolles and Richard Farrington then Sheriffs of the aforesaid County of Midd. then here sent That the aforesaid Owen was not found c. And upon this the said Owen then prayed the hearing of the Writ of Exigent upon which the said Owen at the Sute of the said John Drury aforesaid in form aforesaid stood Outlawed And it was then read to him in these words JAMES by the grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King defender of the Faith c. To the Sherifs of Sussex greeting We command you that you put in Exigent Owen Bray late of Cobham in the County of Surry Gent. from County in County until according to the Law Custom of our Kingdom of England he be Outlawed if he shall not appear And if he shall appear then that you him take cause safely to be kept so as you have his body before our Justices at West in the morrow of the Holy Trinity to satisfie to Iohn Drury Doctor of Law as well of a certain debt of 200. pounds which the said Iohn in the said our Court before our Justices at Westminster Recovered against him as of 33. shillings and 4. pence which to the said Iohn in the same our Court were adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of the detaining the same Debt whereof he is Convicted And sent to our Justices at Westminster in 8. dayes of St. Hillary That the aforesaid Owen is not found in your Baliwick And have here this Writ witnesse Edward Coke at Westminster the 25th day of Ianuary in the yeer of our Reign of England France and Ireland the 5th and of Scotland the 41. Which being read and heard The said Owen said That he of the Outlawry aforesaid ought not to have him charged because the said Writ of Exigent had not any certain day of Retorn these words Saint between the word morrow and Trinity not having any signification as by the Writ aforesaid then it appeared And for the same Cause the said Owen then prayed Judgement and that the Outlawrie aforesaid in form aforesaid pronounced and had be annulled made void and altogether holden for nought Upon which the Writ aforesaid then being seen And by the Justices here then fully understood To the same Justices it then appeared That the Allegation of the aforesaid William Brown in discharge of the aforesaid Owen of the Outlawry aforesaid was true Therefore then it was considered in the said Court here that the said Owen by occasion of the Outlawry aforesaid should not be be molested or troubled but should go thereof acquitted c. as by the Record thereof in the said Court here remaining fully appeareth And so the said John Drury saith That there is not any such Record of the Outlawry aforesaid as the said Owen by his Writ and Declaration aforesaid above supposeth And this he is ready to aver whereupon he prayeth Judgement if he from execution of his Debt aforesaid and damages aforesaid against the aforesaid Owen ought to be barred c. and the aforesaid Owin saith that the aforesaid plea of the aforesaid John in form aforesaid above pleaded is not sufficient in Law to the said John his execution by Colour of the Iudgment aforesaid to have and maintain and that he to that plea in manner and form aforesaid above pleaded needs not nor by the Law of the Land is bound to answer and this he is ready to aver wherefore for default of sufficient plea of the aforesaid John in this behalf the said Owen as at first prayeth Iudgement and that the said John from his execution by colour of the Iudgment aforesaid be barred and that the said Owen be thereof charged c. and the aforesaid John in as much as he sufficient matter in Law to him the said John his execution by colour of the Iudgment aforesaid against the said Owen to have and maintain above hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the said Owen doth not deny nor to the same any waies answereth but the said averrant altogether refuseth as before prayeth ludgement and execution of his Debt and damages aforesaid against the said Owyn to him to be adjuged c. and because the Iustices here will avise
possession then held made the aforesaid Edward Fowler was seized of and in the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee Tail And so thereof being seized the issues and profits thereof all his life took and had and the same to the uses and intents in the Testament of the said John Barton the Elder above expressed applyed and converted And that the aforesaid Edward so thereof being seised afterwards that is to say the 28 th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the late King Henry the 8th the 32. at Buckingham aforesaid of such his estate dyed thereof seized After the death of which Edward Fowler The said Messuage and 6. Acres of Pasture parcel c. descended to the said Gabriel Fowler as Son and Heir of the body of the said Edward Fowler lawfully begotten By virtue of which the aforesaid Gabriel into the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture parcell c. with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten the reversion in Fee simple thereof to the right Heirs of the said John Barton the Testator expectant unto the uses in the said last Will of the said John Barton the Testator expressed to be performed and the aforesaid Gabriel Fowler the issues and profits thereof to the uses and intents in the said Testament of the aforesaid John Barton the Testator to be performed limitted received disposed and converted from the time of the death of the said Edward Fowler within 5. years next before the first year of the Reign of King Edward the 6 th that is to say untill the 4 th day of May in the year of the Reign of the late King Henry the 8 th the 37 th By colour of which aforesaid premises and by force of a certain Act of Parliament of the said King Edward late King of England the 6 th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of November in the year of his Reign the first begun and from thence continued untill the 24 th day of the same November then next following then and there holden concerning Colleges Free Chapels Chauntries Fraternities Guilds and other spiritual promotions made and provided The aforesaid late King Edward the 6th immediatly after the Feast of Easter next following after the making of the said Act of Parliament was seised of and in the aforesaid Messuage and the aforesaid 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other things in the said Testament as is aforesaid given and appointed in his demesn as of Fee in the Right of his Crown of England if the Law so in this case requireth and that afterwards the said late King dyed of the said Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture so seised if the Law of England so requireth without Heir of his body begotten after whose death the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other descended to the Lady Mary late Queen of England as Sister and Heir of the said late King Edward the 6 th If the Law of England in this case requireth By which the said late Queen Mary was seised of the Messuage aforesaid and of the aforesaid 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. amongst other in her demesn as of Fee in the right of her Crown of England if the Law this requireth and he said late Queen Mary afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. dyed so hereof seised if the Law of England in this case requireth without heir of her body issuing after whose death the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other descended to the said Lady the Queen that now is as Sister and Heir of the aforesaid late Queen Mary if the Law of England in this case requireth By which the said Lady the Queen that now is was of the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other seised in her demesn as of Fee in the right of her Crown of England if the Law of England so thereof requireth And the Jurors aforesaid further say upon their Oaths aforesaid That after the aforesaid Act of Parliament aforesaid in the year of the Reign of the late King Edward the 6th the first made The aforesaid Gabriel Fowler occupied the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture with the appurtenances parcel c. continâ—ed and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Feetail if the Law of England in this case requireth it having issue of his body lawfully begotten one Richard Fowler and so thereof seised continued the occupation aforesaid if the Law of England requireth it and afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of May in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 18 th at Buck. aforesaid of such his estate dyed thereof seised if the Law of England requireth By colour of which the Messuage aforesaid and 6. Acres of pasture aforesaid with the appurtenances parcel c. descended if the Law requireth to the aforesaid Richard Fowler as Son and Heir of the said Gabriel By colour of which the said Richard Fowler afterwards and before the time in which c. into the Messuage and 6. Acres of Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances parcel c. entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Feetail that is to say to him and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten if the Law of England this requireth and the said Richard Fowler of the Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture aforesaid with the appurtenances parcel c. so being seised if the Law of England this requireth The said Richard after and before the time in which c. that is to say the 10th day of March in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 33th at Buckingham aforesaid By his writing bearing date the same day and year with the Seal of the said Richard sealed and to the Jurors aforesaid in Evidence shewed for a certain sum of money in the said writing specified if the Law of England this requireth enfeoffed Francis Dayrell and Edward Dayrell Gen. of the Messuage and 6. Acres aforesaid with the appurtenances parcel c. amongst other To have to the said Francis and Edward their Heirs and Assigns for ever By virtue of which the said Francis and Edward in the Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture aforesaid parcel c. entred and were thereof seised in their demesn as of Fee if the Law of Engl. this requireth so being thereof seised if the Law of Engl. this requireth The said Francis and Ed. afterwards before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say
Westminster aforesaid dyed of such his Estate thereof seised After whose death The Reversion of the aforesaid Manor of Abbottesley with the Appurtenances whereof c. descended to the Lord Edward late King of England the 6th as Son and Heir of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8 th By which The said late King Edward the 6 th was seised of the Reversion of the said Manor with the Appurtenances as of Fee and right and so thereof being seised The said late King Edward the 6 th afterwards and before the time in which c. at Westminster afores dyed of such his estate therof seised with out issue of his body issuing After whose death the Reversion of the aforesaid Manor of Abbottesly with the appurtenances descended to the Lady Mary late Queen of England as Sister and Heir of the said late King Edward the 6 th By which the said late Queen Mary was seised of the said Reversion as of Fee and right and so thereof being seised the said late Queen Mary afterwards and before the time in which c. at Westminster aforesaid dyed of such her Estate thereof seised without issue of her body issuing After whose death the said Reversion did descend to the said Lady the Queen that now is as Sister and Heir of the aforesaid late Queen Mary By which the said Queen that now is was seised of the said Reversion as of Fee and right and the said Lady the Queen that now is so thereof being seised and the aforesaid Walter Walsh the Son of the aforesaid Manor of Abbottesley whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee tail in form aforesaid being seised The said Walter afterwards and before the time in which c. at Abbottesley aforesaid dyed of such his Estate thereof seised After whose death The said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. did descend to one William Walsh his Son as Son and Heir of the body of the aforesaid Walter VValsh the Son issuing By which the said William afterwards and before the time in which into the said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his body issuing and so thereof being seised The said William afterwards that is to say the third day of July in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30 th at Abbottesley aforesaid by his Indenture of Bargain and Sale between Robert then Earl of Leicester By the name of the Right Honourable Robert Earl of Leicester Baron of Denbigh of the both most Noble Orders of the Garter and Saint Michael Knight Lord High Steward of her Majesties Houshold Lord Chief Justice of Oyer and Terminer of all the Forests of her Majestie and Chaces by South Trent and one of her Majesties most Honourable Privy Councel of the one Part And the afores Willi. Walsh by the name of Will. Wash of Witley in the County of Worcester Esq of the other party made afterwards the 8 th day of the said Month of July according to the form of the Statute in that Case made and provided in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster aforesaid in the said County of Middlesex then being in due manner of Record Inrolled One part of which Sealed with the Seal of the said William Walsh the said Richard Bushopp here in Court sheweth forth whose Date is the same third day of July in the 30th year aforesaid For and in consideration of a certain sum of Money to the said VVilliam by the aforesaid Earl of Leicester then and there before had paid bargained and sold to the said Earl of Leicester The Wood aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. To have and to hold to the said Earl of Leicester his Heirs and Assigns for ever By colour of which aforesaid Bargain and Sale and Inrolment thereof The said Earl of Leicester into the Wood aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised The said Earl of Leicester afterwards that is to say the 5 th day of Septemb. in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th aforesaid at Abbottesley aforesaid dyed of such his Estate thereof seised without issue of his body issuing After whose death the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances descended to Ambrose then Earl of Warwick as Brother and Heir of the aforesaid late Earl of Warwick By which The said Ambrose Earl of Warwick into the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee and so thereoâ— being seised The said Ambrose Earl of Warwick afterwards that is to say the 24th day of January in the year of the Reign of the â—â—d Lady the Queen that now is the 32th at Abbottesley aforesaid By his Indenture between him the said Ambrose Earl of Warwick by the name of the Right Honourable Ambrose Earl of Warwick of the most Noble Order of the Garter Knight of the one part and Edward then Earl of Bedford and William Russel Knight Charles Morrison Knight Ambrose Copinger Esquire by the names of the Right Honourable Edward Earl of Bedford William Russell Knight Charles Morri on Knight Ambrose Copinger Esq one part of wch sealed with the Seal of the said Aâ—brose Earl of Warwick the said Richard Eushop here in Court brings whoâ—e date is the same day and year For and in consideration of the natural entire and cordial love and affection which the aforesaid Ambrose Earl of Warwick then had and bore to his most dear and beloved then wife the said Ann Countess of â—arwick in the Information aforesaid above named Daughter of the Right Honourable Francis Earl of Bedford deceased Grandfather of the said Edward then Earl of Bedford and Father of the said William Russel as for and in consideration of a Mariage before that time had between the aforesaid Ambrose then Earl of Warwick and the aforesaid Lady Ann now Countess of Warwick then his wiâ—e and for and in consideration of the encrease of the Joynture of the said Ann before that time made in the respect of the aforesaid Mariage in consideration also of the better advancing of the said Ann after the death of the said Ambrose then Earl of Warwick if shee the said her beloved husband should survive to support and sustein her Honourable Estate and to pay such debts which the said Earl owed at the time of his death and also such Legacies as the said Earl by his last Will in writing should bequeath The said Earl Covenanted and agreed for him his Heirs Executors and Administrators to and with the aforesaid Edward Earl of Bedford William Russell Charles Morrison and Ambrose Copinger their Heirs and Assignes and every of them That immediatly from and after the Sealing and delivery of the
the proper Hands of diverse of the Lords of his Privy Council sealed That none nor any person w 〈…〉 soever should kill or put to sale any Flesh for Victuals in the time of Lent then next following contrary to the Lawes and Statutes of this Realm And that all Mayors and other Head Officers in Burroughs and Towns Corporate within this Kingdom of England in the beginning of the time of Lent then next coming or before should cause all Victualers Inn Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse-keepers within the precinct of their Jurisdiction to be bounden to the Lord the King by Bond that they should not dâ—esse any Flesh for Vâ—ctuals all the said time of Lent then next following And whereas afterwards that is to say the 20th day of February in the 12th yeer aforesaid One John Clement then and yet Mayor of the Burrough of Plymouth aforesaid according to the duty of his Place and in Obedience of the said Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King sent to all the Victualers Inn-Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse-keepers aforesaid within the precinct of the Burough aforesaid that they become bound by their Writing to the use of the said Lord the King according to the Tenor and Exigency of the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the saâ—d Lord the King the due Execution of the Ordinance aforesaid in that behalf required and endeavored within the Burrough aforesaid The aforesaid James Bagg well knowing the premises and continuing his evil disposition and intent aforesaid At Plymouth aforesaid endeavoured and attempted to hinder and make void the due Execution of the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King And to that purpose the same 20th day of February at Plymouth aforesaid to diverse Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid and other of the Kings leige People then being and having then and there speech with the aforesaid James Bagg of and upon the businesse aforesaid openly and publickly spake and uttered these words following that is to say Master Mayor meaning the said John Clement doth more herein than he need and more than he can well Answer Meaning that the said John Clement in requiring the aforesaid Victualers Inn-Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse-Keepers to become bounden to the use of the said Lord the King according to the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King had done more than was needful and more than he could well Answer By reason of which speech diverse Victualers Inn Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse Keepers dwelling within the aforesaid Burrough utterly refused to be bounden to the said Lord the King according to the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King and farther we certifie that the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty of the Burrough of Plymouth and their predecessors time whereof the memory of men is not to the contrary had and used to have within the Burrough aforesaid a certain Custom of Wine called Wine-weight otherwise Wine Wite payable by every Taverner selling Wine within the Burrough afores of which Custom of Wine aforesaid the Mayor and Comminalty from the whole time aforesaid quietly and peaceably were possessed of until the aforesaid Ja. Bagg the 29th day of Nov. in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 4th at â—lym afores perfidiously maliciously practised with William Benâ—ly and Thomas Lyde being Taverners and Sellers of Wine within the Burrough aforesaid to them revealing divers secret counsels concerning the common profit of the Burrough aforesaid and them the said William and Thomas then and there perswaded that they no more should pay the aforesaid custom of wine called Wine-weight otherwise Wine-wite nor any summ of money for the same to the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty which very day the 29th day of November in the 4th yeer aforesaid the aforesaid James Bagg being then one of the 12. Chief Burgesses of common Council of the Burrough aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid perfidiously and maliciously spake to the said William Bently and Thomas Lyde these words that is to say you need not pay the Money meaning a certain Farm by them the said William and Thomas for the Custom aforesaid before then to â—he aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty payable for the Wine-weight any longer except you list for it is not due unto them By reason of which perfidious and malicious words the aforesaid William Bently and Thomas Lyde utterly refused to pay and yet do refuse and by reason thereof diverse Strifes and Controversies are risen and hereafter are like to arise betwixt the aforesaid William Bently and Thomas Lyde and the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty for the Custome of Wine aforesaid and the Farm aforesaid to the great damage and prejudice of the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie that the aforesad James Bagg the first day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 12th and diverse other days and times then before at Plymouth aforesaid persidiously said to diverse Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid and to other the leige people of the said Lord the King upon Communication between them and the aforesaid James Bagg then before had of and concerning the liberties and Privileges of the Burrough aforesaid that he the said James Bagg would overthrow and make void the Charter of the Town aforesaid meaning the Charter aforesaid by the aforesaid Late Queen Elizabeth to the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty as before is said granted And that he the said James the liberties privileges of the Burrough aforesaid would call in question and the same Privileges and Liberties overthrow And further to the Lord the King we Certifie that afterwards that is to say the 17th day of April now last past the aforesaid James Bagg in the said Writ named for the Causes aforesaid by the Mayor and Comminalty of the Burrough aforesaid from the Office of one of the Chief Burgesseâ— and Magistrates of the Burrough aforesaid was amoved c. John â—lement Mayor SCIRE FACIAS Pleas before the Lord the King that now is in his Chancery at Westminster in the County of Middlesex Hillary Term in the yeer of the Lord King JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King the 3d. and of Scotland the 39th fol. 1. The PRINCES Case THE Lord the King that now is sent his Close Writ to the Sheriff of Cornwall directed in these words JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King defender of the Faith c. To the Sheriff of Cornwall greeting Whereas in the Statute in the Parliament of the Lord Edward late King of England the 3d. in the yeer of his Reign the 11th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex holden made amongst other things it was Enacted by Authority of the said Parliament That the Eldest Son of the King
King Henry the 8th afterwards at Westminster aforesaid died the said Edward late Prince being the Son and Heir of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th And the said Edward late Prince to the said King Henry the 8th in the aforesaid Kingdom of England by right of Inheritance succeeded and King of the aforesaid Kingdom of England by the name of Edward the 6th King of England came to be And afterwards the said Edward the 6. late King of England at Westminster aforesaid dyed without Heir of his body begotten the Lady Mary late Queen of England being his Sister and heir of the said late King Edward the sixt and the aforesaid Lady Mary to the said late King Edward the sixt in the aforesaid Kingdom of England by right of Inheritance succeeded and became Queen of the aforesaid kingdom of England and afterwards the said Queen Mary at Westminster aforesaid died without heir of her body begotten the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England being Sister and Heir of the aforesaid late Queen Mary the aforresaid Lady Elizabeth to the said late Queen Mary in the aforesaid kingdom of England by right of Inheritance Succeeded and became Queen of the kingdom of England And afterwards the said Queen Elizabeth at Westminster aforesaid dyed without Heir of her Body begotten We then and yet being Cosin and Heir to the said late Queen Elizabeth and we succeeded the late Queen Elizabeth in right of Inheritance in the same Kingdom of England and became and now are King of England and now the most Excellent Prince Henry our Eldest Sonn now Duke of Cornwell hath requested us that whereas the aforesaid Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England by her letters Patents Sealed with the great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the second day of May in the yeer of her Reign the 37th granted at Gellio Merick then Esquire now Knight now deceased and Henry Lindley then Esquire now Knight the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances to have and to hold to them the said Gellio Merick and Henry Lindley and their Heirs for ever as in the Letters Patents thereof more fully it is conteyned And whereas the aforesaid Manors of VVest Taunton Trelowia and Landalph to the aforesaid Dutchy as is said annexed and united to the same now Duke by Colour of the gift grant and union aforesaid by the authority of Parliament aforesaid belonged and yet ought to belong and were member and parcel of the same Dutchy and yet are as the said pious Prince and Duke by waies and means convenient is ready to shew That we would the said Letters Patents aforesaid of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph as before is said made revoke and annull and the said Manors with their appurtenances seize into our hands that we cause the said Manors to the said now Duke as members and parcel of the Dutchy aforesaid to have and to hold according to the form and effect of the guift grant and union aforesaid to be delivered We willing to do in this behalf what is Just Command you that by good and Lawfull men of your Bayliwick you give warning to the aforesaid Henry Lindley Knight and John Hele Knight Serjeant at Law Tenants of the said Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph and also to whosoever other or others are Tenants of the said Mamors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph or any of them that they be before us in our Chancery in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary next coming whensoever it shall be to shew what for us and themselves they have or can say Wherefore the Letters Pattents aforesaid of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the appurtenances as before is said made ought not to be revoked and annulled and the said Manors with the appurtenances into our hands be seised as before is said to the now Duke as members and parcel of the Dutchy aforesaid according to the form and effect of the gift grant and union aforesaid to have and to hold to be delivered and to do and receive what our said Court then and there shall further grant in this behalf Witness my self at Westminster the 18th day of November in the yeer of our Reign of England France and Ireland the third and of Scotland the 39th and now at this day that is to say the aforesaid 8 dayes of Saint Hillary before the said Lord the King that now is in his said Court of Chancery here cometh Edward Coke Knight Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who prosecuteth in his behalf for the said Lord the King in his proper person And Francis Godolphin Knight being Sheriff of the County of Cornwell now sendth here the Writ aforesaid served executed in form following the 21. day of Dec. in the 3d. yeer aboves by virtue of the writ afores to him directed that he gave warning by Joh. Edgecombe Wal. Blant good Lawfull men of his Bayliwick to the afores Hen. Lindley Kt. and also the same day and yeer by the said good and Lawfull men he gave warning to the aforesaid John Hele Knight and to one Warwick Hele Knight Tenants of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph above mentioned to be before the said Lord the King that now is here at this day to shew do and receive what that Writ in it requireth and demands And the aforesaid Henry Lindley Knight John Hele Knight and Warwick He le Knight the 4th day of pleas being called by Richard Wilkinson their Attorny come and pray Licence to Imparl and it is graunted to them c. and upon this day is given to the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele before the said Lord the King in the said Court here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid until in 8. dayes of the Purification of the blessed Mary then next c. wheresoever c that is to say to the aforesaid Henry John and Warwick to imparl and then to answer c. The same day is given to the aforesaid Edward Coke Knight the Atorney General of the Lord the King that now is who c. then to be here c. At which 8. days from the Purification of the blessed Lady Mary before the said Lord the King in the said Court here that is to say at VVestminster aâ—oresaid come as well the aforesaid Edward Coke Knight who c. in his proper person as the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele by their Attorney aforesaid and upon this the said Henry John and Warwick by their Attorney aforesaid pray farther License thereof to imparl before the said Lord the King that now is in the said Court here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid until in 15. days of Easter then next following c. wheresoever c. and then to answer c. and have it c. and the same
said late Queen after the beginning of her Reign was or then after should be intituled by any Attainder Escheat Conveiance or Assurance whatsoever and in which Letters Patents Grants or Writings no Estate Tail then before made or supposed to be made was recited or from henceforth should be and the Reversion or Remainder thereof expectant in the said Letters Patents Grants or Writings granted or mentioned to be granted or any defect of certainty or ill computing mistaking rating or setting forth of the yeerly value or rate of the premises or yeerly Rents reserved of and for the premises or any parcel thereof mentioned or conteined in the same Letters Patents aforesaid or other Writings or for that that the premises then were or any part thereof valued at a greater or lesser value in the said Letters Patents or Writings than the said Manors Lands Tenements and other premises then were or were in yeerly value or any misnaming or not true naming of Town Hamblet Parish or County where the said Honors Manors Lands Tenements Rents Hereditaments and other the premises and every part thereof or any parcel thereof lay or were or any defect of true naming of the Lands Tenements or Hereditaments or any parcel thereof or of the Nature Kind Quality or Quantity of the aforesaid Possessions or Hereditaments or of any parcel thereof or any default of true naming of any Corporation or any default of Attornment Livery or Seisin or any ill naming of any the late Tenants of the aforesaid Honors Manors lands Tenements and Hereditaments or of any part thereof so sold granted or given or any ill naming of any person or persons Bodies Politick or Corporate who any time before the making of such Letters Patents were or then after should be proprietors of the premises or any any part thereof to the contrary notwithstanding as by the said Act amongst other things it more fully appearh And the said John Hele and Warwick further say That the said late Queen Elizabeth never had any Son And that the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Liâ—dley were at and before the time of the making of the said Leters Patents so as before is said made Subjects of the said late Queen Elizabeth and born at Westminster aforesaid All and singular which The said John Hele and Warwick are ready to aver Whereupon they demand Judgement if the said Letters Patens of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances so as before is said made ought to be revoked and annulled or the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances or any of them ought to be seized into the Hands of the Lord the King that now is c. And the aforesaid Henry Hobert Knight Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is who c. present in Court in his proper person As to the aforesaid Plea of the said Henry Lindley above in form aforesaid pleaded for the said Lord the King saith That the said Henry Lindley ought not be admitted to plead That there is not any such Record of any such Act of Parliament of the aforesaid Lord King Edward the 3d. made Nor that there is any such Record of the aforesaid Charter of the said late King Edward the 3d. by Authority of Parliament made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias thereof is recited and specified Because he saith That the said Lord King JAMES now King of England saw the Inrollment of the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the said late King Edward the 3d. and of the aforesaid Charter of the said late King Edward the 3d. in the Rolls of the Chancery of the King that now is within his Tower of London in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. the 11th inrolled upon Record there remaining The Tenor of Inrollment of which Act of Parliament and Charter aforesaid the said JAMES now King of England by his Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England sealed here in Court by the aforesaid Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is for the said Lord the King that now is now brings in Court bearing date at Westminster aforesaid the 5th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of England France and Ireland the 3d. and of Scotland the 39th Exemplified amongst other things Which Exemplification as to the Inrollment of the aforesaid Act of Parliament and Charter aforesaid followeth in these words JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. To All to whom these present Letters shall come greeting We have seen the Inrollment of a certain Charter bearing date the 17th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the 11th To his well-Beloved and Faithful Edward Earl of Chester his Eldest Son granted in the Rolls of our Chancery within the Tower of London remaining of Record in these words Edward by the Grace of God King of England Lord of Ireland and Duke of Aquitain To the Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earls Barons Justices Sheriffs Provosts Ministers and all Bayliffs and his faithful People Greeting Amongst other the tokens of Honour of our Kingdom we esteemed it the chiefest that the Order of Dignities and Offices of our Kingdom be fortified with the best and strongest Counsels Therefore there being many degrees of Inheritance in our Kingdom where by descent the Inheritance according to the Law of this Kingdom to Co-heirs and Parciners and for want of such issue and such like events the same came to our Hands We therefore desiring to beautifie our Kingdom and in best manner to defend our Kingdom and the holy Church thereof and our Subjects and Kingdoms against the endeavors and Adversaries thereof and considering and looking that Peace between us and Subjects be maintained and to dignifie the Places of honour of our Kingdom And taking into our consideration the person of our well-Beloved and Faithful Edward Earl of Chester our Eldest Son and taken to Honour the same our Son the name and Honour of Duke of Cornwall with the common consent and counsel of the Prelates Earls Barons and others of our Counsel in this present Parliament at Westminster upon Monday next after the Feast of Saint Mathew the Apostle last past being assembled we have given and made him Duke of Cornwall and girt him with a Sword as behoveth And that there may be no doubt hereafter what or how much the same Duke or other Dukes of the same place who for the time shall be in the name of the said Dutchy ought to have Our Will is that all in specialty which to the said Dutchy doth beloug be inserted in this our Charter Therefore for us and our Heirs we have given and granted and by this our Charter confirmed to the same our Son under the name and Honour of Duke of the said Place The
the Queen that now iâ— to serve in his Office aforesaid By virtue of which License of the said Lady the Queen to the aforesaid Mark as afore is said the said Mark by the whole time of his absence specified in the Inquisition aforesaid And 〈◊〉 the â—â—â— Mark for further shewing of his Right saith That he now is and alwâ—â—â—â—om the aforesaid time of removing him from the Exercising of his Offiâ—â— aforesaid was ready and often time offered himself to serve in his Office aforesaid And that as yet from the time of the License of the said Lady the Queen of absenting himself to the said Mark made the said Lady the Queen that now is had not commanded him to serve in his Office aforesaid Without that that the said Lady the Queen that now is hath any other Right or Title in or to the Office aforesaid than as before above it is alleged And without that That there is any such Record besides the Record of the Inquisition aforesaid which makes or shewes or can make or set forth any Title of the said Lady the Queen that now is in or to the Office aforesaid All and singular which the said Mark is ready to aver as the Court here shall award and therefore he demandeth Judgement and that to the possession and exercising of his Office aforesaid together with the Wages and Fee aforesaid and to the issues and profits to the said Office due and belonging from the time of his removing from the said exercising of his Office aforesaid be restored c. And Gilbert Gerrard Attorny General of the Lady the Queen that now is who prosecuteth for the said Lady the Queen in this behalf saith That by any thing by the said Mark Steward above in pleading alleged The said Lady the Queen of her Right and Title in or to the Office aforesaid ought not to be barred Because he saith That the said Lady the Queen did not give License to the said Mark to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid at the pleasure of him the said Mark until he were Commanded by the said Lady the Queen to serve in his said Office aforesaid in manner and form as the aforesaid Mark in his shewing of his Right to the Office aforesaid above alleged And this the said Attorny of the said Lady the Queen that now is for the said Lady the Queen prayeth it be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid Mark likewise Therefore day is given before the said Lady the Queen that now is in the Morrow of the Ascension of our Lord wheresoever she should be in England to do and receive what was just in the premises And it is commanded to the Sheriff of Middlesex That he cause to be here before the Lady the Queen at that day 12. good and lawful men of the Vicinage of the City of Westminster who are not of Kindred or Affinity of the said Mark To Recognize upon their Oath more fully the truth of the premises At which Morrow of the Ascension of our Lord before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come as well the aforesaid Gilbert Geâ—rad who prosecutes c. as the aforesaid Mark Steward by John Manning his Attorny And the Sheriff retorns the names of 12. whereof none c. Thtrefore it is commanded to the Sheriff That he do not omit c. but that he destrein them by all their Lands c. And that of the Issues c. And that he have their Bodies before the Lady the Q. in 8. dayes of the Holy â—rinity wheresoever c. To Recognize in form aforesaid c. And the same day is given as well to the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as to the aforesaid Mark Steward c. At which 8. dayes of the â—oly â—rinity before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as the aforesaid Mark by his Attorny aforesaid And the Jurors of the Jury aforesaid being called likewise come And upon this publick Proclamation is made for the Lady the Queen as the use is That if there be any one who will inform the Justices oâ— the Lady the Queen here the Serjeant at Law of the Lady the Queen or the Attorny General of the Lady the Queen or the Jurors aforesaid oâ— the premises that he come and should be heard And Edward Anderson one of the Serjeants of the Lady the Queen at Law to do this offered himself By which it is proceeded to the taking of the Jury aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid now there appearing who to say the truth of the premises chosen tryed sworn say upon their Oath That the Lord Philip and the Lady Mary late King Queen of England by their Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England made bearing date at Westminster the 23th day of September in the yeers of the Reigns of the said late King and Queen the 3d. and 4th Gave and granted to the said Mark the Office of Serjeant at Arms attending upon their Chancellor of England for the time being and made him the said Mark their Serjeant at Arms aforesaid made Ordained and Constituted by the said Letters Patents for the term of his life To have and enjoy the said Office to him the said Mark for the term of his life And moreover the said late King and Queen gave and granted by the Letters Patents aforesaid for them the Heirs and Successors of the said Queen for the exercising and holding of the Office aforesaid the Wages and Fee of 12. pence per diem To have hold and perceive yeerly the said Wages and Fee of 12. pence the day to the said Mark for the term of his life of the issues and profits of their Hamper of their Chancery by the Hands of the Clerk or Keeper of the said their Hamper and the Heirs of the aforesaid late Queen for the time being At the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and Easter by equal portions yeerly to be paid together with all other Profits Commodities Emoluments Allowances and Advantages to the said Office any way anciently belonging due and accustomed And the said Mark Steward brings here in Court the Letters Patents aforesaid which followes in these words Philip and Mary by the Grace of God King and Queen of England Spain France both Cicilies Jerusalem and Ireland Defenders of the Faith Archdukes of Austria Dukes of Burgondy Milain and Brabant Earl of Haspurge Flanders and Tiroll c. To All to whom these present Letters shall come Greeting Whereas our most dear Brother Edward late King of England the 6th by his Letters Patents made under the Great Seal of England bearing date at Greenwich the 8th day of April in the 4th yeer of his Reign of his special Grace certain Knowledg and meer Motion as also with the Advice and Consent of his Council had given and granted to his well-Beloved Richard Hatchman Gentleman the Office
holden assigned and calling before them the Barons of the Exchequer aforesaid and the reasons of the Judgement aforesaid of the said Barons being heard Because it seemeth to the aforesaid Keeper of the Great Seal of England and to the aforesaid Tresurer with the Counsel of the Justices aforesaid That in the Record and Processe aforesaid and also in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid it is manifestly erred Therefore it is granted by the said Keeper of the Great Seal of England and the aforesaid Tresurer That the Judgement aforesaid be conversed and annulled And that the aforesaid Richard Bushopp of the Entry Intrusion Trespasse and Contempt aforesaid be convicted And that the aforesaid Richard Bushopp be amoved from the possession of the premises And be Attached by his Body wheresoever c. To make fine with the Lady the Queen for the aforesaid his Trespass and Contempt whereof in form aforesaid he is convicted And that the Record aforesaid be sent back into the Exchequer aforesaid for the Execution therof for the aforesaid Lady the Q. to be done according to the form of the Statute aforesaid thereof made Therfore it is agreed by the Barons here That the Writ of the Lady the Queen that now is issue forth out of the Court here to amove the aforesaid Richard Bushopp from the possession of the premises aforesaid And to attach the aforesaid Richard by his body wheresoever c. to make fine for the Trespass aforesaid and contempt whereof in form abovesaid he is convicted retorneable here in 8 dayes of Saint Michael and it is commanded to the said Sheriff of the said County of Worcester that him the said Richard he amove attach in the form aforesaid Monstrans de Droit C. 1. part Digges Case fo 157. a. England ss Memorandum That Thomas Egerton Knight Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England Tuesday next after 8. dayes of St. Hillary this Term before the Lady the Queen at Westminster by his own proper Hands delivered here into Court a certain Record before the Lady the Queen in her Chancery had in these words Pleas before the Lady the Queen in her Chancery at Westminster in the County of Middlesex of the Term of Easter in the veer of the Reign of our said Lady Elizabeth by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the Faith c. the 40 th THe Lady the Queen that now is sent her writ closed to the Sheriff of Sussex directed in these words Elizabeth by the grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith c. To the Sheriff of Sussex greeting c Whereas by a certain inqusition Inacted taken at Dartford in our County of Kent the 8th day of November in the year of our Reign the 35th before Edward Fenuer one of our Justices to pleas before us to be holden assigned William Sydley Justinian Champnes Edward Cook Esquiers and William Kneaplock Gent. Deputy of our Escheator of our County aforesaid by virtue of our Commission to them and others in that behalf directed to enquire after the death of Thomas Digges Esquire by the Oaths of good and lawfull men of the County aforesaid amongst other things It is found that the aforesaid Thomas Digges in the same commission named was seised in his demesn as of Fee amongst other things of and in the Manor of Owtelmestone with the appurtenances and in all Lands and Tenements with the appurtenances to the same belonging and appertaining lying and being in the said County of Kent and of 110 Acres of Land Meadow Pasture and Wood with the appurtenances called Estendown and Beacondown lying and being in Barham and Kingstone in the said County of Kent and of and in the Manor of Yoke and Yokes Court and Fokeham and in all Messuages Lands Tenements and Hereditaments to the said Manors belonging and appertaining lying and being in the said county of Kent and of 40 Acres of Land Wood and Pasture called Throuhgly Close and Tyllers in Barham aforesaid which late were purchased of William Boyes Gentleman by way of Exchange and of 2 Acres of Land and Wood lying and being in Wemingswold in the aforesaid County and farther by the Inquisition aforesaid it is found that Thomas Arch. Bishopp of Canterbury being seised in his demesn as of Fee as in the right of his Arch Bishoprick of Canterbery aforesaid of and in the Manor of Bishopps Born with the appurtenances in the said County of Kent by an Act of Parliament at Westminster in the County of Middlesex in the yeer of the Reign of Henry late King of England the 8th the 34th made and provided amongst other things it is enacted established that one Thomas Culpeper Esq should have hold and enjoy by authority of the said Act aforesaid to him and his heirs of the bodie of him the said Thomas of the bodie of one Elizabeth somtimes his wise deceased lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the remainder thereof to the Heirs of the bodie of the aforesaid Elizabeth and for default of such issue the remainder thereof to the right Heirs of one William Hante for ever the aforesaid Manor of Bushops born with the appurtenances in the said County of Kent and then parcel of the possessions of the said Arch-Bishop to hold the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things of the aforesaid Lord the King his Heirs and Successors in Capite by the 20th part of a Knights Fee and the Rent of 38 shillings by the yeer By virtue of which Act of Parliament the said Thomas Culpeper entred into the aforesaid Manor with the appurtenances and was thereof seised as the â—aw required and so being thereof seised the same Thomas Culpeper by sufficient conveyance and assurance in Law conveyed and assured the aforesaid Manor of Bishopsborn with the appurtenances to one Anthony Awcher Knight to have and to hold to him and his heirs By virtue of which the said Anthony Awcher Knight in the aforesaid Manor of Bishopsborn with the appurtenances entred and was there of seised in his demesn as of Fee the estate of which Anthony Awcher of and in two parcels of Land and Wood with the appurtenances called the Haute and Reed conteyning by estimation 60 Acres of Land late were purchased by Christopher Digges Father of the aforesaid Thomas Digges in the said Commission named lying and being in Barham aforesaid and in Bourn of which he died seised the said Thomas Digges was of the aforesaid parcels of Land Wood with the appurtenances seised in his demesn as of Fee which parcel of Land and Wood with the appurtenances called the Haute and Reed at the time of the making and ordeyning of the said Act of Parliament time whereof the memory of men is not to the contrary were parcel of the said Manor of Bishopsborn the said Tho. Digges of the Manors Lands and Tenements other the premises aforesaid with the
as is aforesaid That then it shall be lawful to every or to any of my aforesaid Sons or Daughters for default of payment of the sums or sum due unto them or any of them by way of Annuity as is aforesaid into the Lands and Tenements and other Hereditaments above limited to my Eldest Son aforesaid and to his Heirs Males as aforesaid to enter and destrein and the destress there so taken lawfully with them or any of them to lead drive or carry away until every of them shall be fully satisfied and paid Item I will That after the decease of Martha my Wife if then my Eldest Son aforesaid or the Heir Male of his Body lawfully begotten then living shall be of the full age of 22. yeers That then the said Eldest Son or his Heir Male aforesaid shall have the aforesaid Lordship of Yoke and the Manors of Falkham with their Appurtenances and the Lands aforesaid bought of Mr. Awcher and had in Exchange of Mr. Boys to him and the Heirs Males of his Body lawfully begotten for ever And if then my Eldest Son aforesaid or his Heirs Males as is aforesaid shall come of the full age of 22. yeers Then I will that the yeerly Profits and Revenews of the abovesaid Lordship of Yoke and Manor of Falkham with their Appurtenances and the Lands aforesaid bought of Mr. Awcher and had in Exchange of Mr. Boys aforesaid until my sayd Eldest Son or his Heir Male abovesaid shall come to the full age of 22. yeers shall go and be imployed towards the payment of my Debts Legacies Payments and Annuities aforesaid Item I will That if it happen my Eldest Son aforesaid or his Heir Male aforesaid to depart this transitory world without Heirs Males or Male of his Body lawfully begotten Then for lack of such Heir Male All and every the aforesaid Lordship Manors Lands Tenements with the Appurtenances Rents Services and Hereditaments other than such as are appointed to be sold and for the Poor as aforesaid shall be and remain to his next Eldest Brother then living and to the Heirs Males of his Body lawfully begotten for ever paying yeerly to every of his Brothers my Sons then living until every of them shall be of the full age of 24. years 4. pound of lawful mony of England and to every of his Sisters my Daughters then living five Marks of lawful mony in such manner and form and so long as is afore specified Item I will That all and singular the abovesaid Lordships Manors Lands and Tenements with the Appurtenances Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments whatsoever in the County of Kent or else where other than such as afore specified to be sold by Thomas Ovington aforesaid and willed to my Eldest Son aforesaid as is afore specified for lack of Heir Male of the Body of any my aforesaid Sons shall successively remain from Brother to Brother and to his Heir Male paying yeerly for so long to his Brothers and Sisters as is aforesaid And if it fortune all my said Sons depart this transitory world without Heirs Males or Male of their or his Body lawfully begotten Then for lack of such Heir Male I will all the aforesaid Lordship Manor Lands and Tenements with their Apurtenances Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments in the Parishes of Leneham Frinsted Harrisham aforesaid shall be and remain to my Daughters aforesaid and to their Heirs for ever Item I will That all other my Lordships Manors Lands and Tenements with their Appurtenances Rents Reversions and Services and other Hereditaments in Barham aforesaid for lack of Heirs Males or Male of the Body of any of my Sons lawfully begotten shall remain to Thomas Digges one of the Sons of Leonard Digges Esq late in the Parish of Sutton in the County of Kent aforesaid and to the Heir Males or Male of his Body lawfully begotten for ever And for lack of such Heir Male to remain to James Digges another of the Sons of the said Leonard and to the Heirs Males or Male of his Body lawfully to be begotten for ever and for lack of such Heir Male to remain to the Right Heirs of me the aforesaid Christopher Digges another of the Sons of the aforesaid Leonard and to the Heirs Males of his body lawfully begotten for ever and for lack of such Heir Male to remain to the right Heirs of me the said Christopher Digges for ever As by the Testament and last Will aforesaid amongst other things more fully appeareth And that afterwards and before c. that is to say the second day of February in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th the aforesaid Christopher the Father at Barham in the County aforesaid dyed of the Manors Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid in the Monstrans de droit within written specified with the appurtenances mentioned so as aforesaid as the â—aw requireth seised And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oâ—th aforesaid That the aforesaid Martha Digges wife of the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father him the said Christopher Digges her Husband over lived and that the aforesaid Martha afterwards that is to say the 4th day of May in the 19. year afores aâ— Barham aforesaid dyed And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid â—hâ—mas Digges Father of the aforesaid Posthumus Digges in the Inquisition and Monstrans de droit named and the aforesaid Tho. Diggs in the Indenture afâ—rel here first specified named were one and the same person not other nor divers and that the Manors Lands and Tenements in the Inquisition aforesaid specified and the Manors Lands and Tenements in the Indenture aforesaid here first mentioned and comprised are the self same Manors Lands and Tenements not others nor divers And that the aforesaid Lands Tenements wherof the uses by the aforesaid Indenture bearing date the 6th day of May in the 12th year aforesaid are revoked are not the Manors Lands and Tenements in the aforesaid Monstrans de droit specified nor any parcel thereof And thâ—t the uses of the Manors Lands and Tenements in the aforesaid Monstrans de droit specified nor any part thereof by the aforesaid second Indenture here within specified was not Revoked annulled or mentioned to be by the same revoked or annulled and that the aforesaid Manors Lands and Tenements whereof the uses by the aforesaid Indenture bearing date the 20th day of September in the 13th year aforesaid mentioned to be by the same Indenture Revoked and annulled are the same Manors Lands and Tenements in the Monstrans de droit within written specified and not other nor divers But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found The said Christopher Digges the Father dyed seised of the Manors Lands and Tenements in the Monstrans de droit within written specified in his demesn as of Fee as in the aforesaid Monstrans de droit it is supposed or not the Jurors
the 22th day of June in this present 9th yeer of his Reign over England upon the humble Sute of the said Thomas to give License Power and Authority to him the said Thomas Sutton to place found and erect an Hospital and Free-school in the House called the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith field in the County of Middlesex And like License Power and Authority for him the said Thomas Sutton at any time during his life to ordain appoint and place a Master of the said Hospital And that the said Hospital should be called by the name of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esq And where furthermore by the said Letters Patents The Master of the said Hospital for the time being is ordained and appointed to be one of the 16. Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the said Hospital And that the same 16. Governours are by the said Letters Patents incorporate to purchase and take Lands to them and their Successors for ever for the maintainance of the said Hospital by the name of the Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and the onely costs and Charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire as by the said Letters Patents amongst other things more at large may appear By reason whereof there must be a Master made before such time as the said Thomas Sutton can convey the Lands intended by the said Thomas Sutton to be conveied for the maintaiance of the said Hospital unto the said Governours according to the said Letters Patents Now the said Thomas Sutton minding the performance of the said charitable Act hath according to the power given him by the said Letters Patents and by these presents doth place nominate constitute and appoint his Right trusty and Well-Beloved John Hutton Clerk the first and present Master of the said Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire To have and to hold the said Office Room and place of Master of the said Hospital to him the said John Hutton from henceforth during the good will and pleasure of the said Thomas Sutton In witnesse whereof the said Thomas Sutton hath put his Hand and Seal dated the 13th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of our said Sovereign Lord JAMES by the Grace of God King of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. And of Scotland the 45th And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of all and singular the premises aforesaid in form aforesaid being seized Afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of England c. the 9th abovesaid made a certain Indenture between him the said Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire of the one part And the Right Reverend Father in God George â—ord Arch Bishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England The Right Honourable Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England The Right Honourable Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of â—lie Edward Coke Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Common-Pleas Henry Hobert Knight and Baronet the Kings Attorny General that now is John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of St. Paul in London George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of the Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and John Hutton Clerk By the name of the Reverend Father in God George Arch Bishop of Canterbury Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of Elie Edward Coke Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Court of Common-Pleas Henry Hobert Knight and Baronet Attorny General of the Lord the King John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of the Court of Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and John Hutton Clerk Master of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and at the onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire the first and present Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire of the other part made and within 6. Moneths then next following that is to say the 4th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord JAMES now King of England the 9th abovesaid in the Court of Chancery of the Lord the King that now is at Westminster aforesaid then being in due manner of Record inrolled according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided And whereof one part sealed with the Seal of the said Thomas Sutton to the Jurors aforesaid was shewed in Evidence bearing date the same day and yeer The Tenor of which Indenture followeth in these words This Indenture made the first day of November in the yeer of our Lord God 1611. and in the yeers of the Reign of our Sovereign Lord JAMES by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. that is to say of England France and Ireland the 9th and of Scotland the 45th Between Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire of the one part And the most Reverend Father in God George now Arch Bishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England The Right Honourable Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England The Right Honourable Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Right Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Right Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of Elie Sir Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Sir Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Court of Common-Pleas Sir Henry Hobart Knight and Baronet Attorny General of our Sovereign Lord the King John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London