Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	follow_v	king_n	scotland_n	2,694	5	8.4812	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A34950	A journey into the country being a dialogue between an English Protestant physitian and an English papist : wherein the proper state of the popish controversy is discoursed : with reference (only) to the government of England in church and state, in some answer to Peter Walsh, and pursuant to the directions of a person of honor.	Creamer, Charles, b. 1632?	1675 (1675)	Wing C6867; ESTC R24786	31,884	48

A JOURNEY INTO THE COUNTRY BEING A DIALOGUE Between an English PROTESTANT Physitian AND AN English PAPIST WHEREIN The proper State of the Popish Controversy is discoursed With Reference only to the Government of ENGLAND in Church and State In some Answer to Peter Walsh and pursuant to the Directions of a Person of Honor. Papa stupor Mundi non Deus non Homo sed utrumque Gloss in proem Clem. Moscan de Rom. Pont. l. 1. c. 11. LONDON Printed for Henry Brome at the Gun at the West-end of St. Pauls M DC LXXV THE PUBLISHER TO THE READER THIS ensuing Discourse seems to be wrote about the time when by Proclamation Papists were not to reside within ten Miles of London and 't is not yet out of Season nor will be till our Controversies with the Papists be throughly and truly stated after which it cannot be long ere they be ended I see not how English men have to do with the Romish Church or State their Laws Doctrines or Discipline therefore while they have been exercising us with Disputes about those things they had two Ends viz. Either to lead us into some Precipice or to Lap-wing us from the proper tendency of our Enquiries which in truth is our home Concerns and so a Controversy only between English Papists and English Catholicks called Protestants for Distinction with reference to their Prince who governeth by Laws diverse from all the Nations of the World and so is not to be argu'd out of his Right by any Parallel from other Kingdoms But as a Person of Honour hath lately begun so this Author has set forward the proper Contest still meaning between English Papists and English Protestants the latter of whom affirm as follows 1. That the King of England is Emperour and sole Monarch of England and established by a Law diverse from all other Nations 2. That the Church of England has all the Rights of a Patriarchal See from which lies no Appeal to any other Patriarch 3. That all Church Authorities and Jurisdictions with reference to this life and the ends of Government are rightfully derived from the King of England being naturally in him as a mixt Person and Custos utriusque tabulae according to Rom. 13. 4. That he is a Traytor that denyes this or affirms any forreign Prince Prelate or Potentate to have any Jurisdiction in England c. or diminishes the Kings Legal Style 5. There was naturally no difference between Church and State as to Jurisdictions until Christian Monarchs divided Jurisdictions and delegated Civil and Ecclesiastical Persons to take Conusance and judge of Causes separate and those Jurisdictions are called Civil and Ecclesiastical in respect of the Delegates only and not in respect of the Causes whereof they take Conusance and Judge 6. The King hath power naturally within his Dominions by such his delegates respectively to declare what are Articles of Faith according to Scripture and not otherwise and to make and interpret Laws for the Government of Church and State to appoint Forms of Worship and Discipline not against the word of God to add to such Laws Sanctions to punish Offenders against such Laws 7. These Rights and Powers of the King are Inherent in him as Essential Flowers of his Crown as antient as the Crown it self in which his Subjects are so interessed with reference to their Propriety in his personal Government by Original Constitutions as the King cannot by any rightf●l Act he can do grant them away to any Forreign Power Person or Potentate or to others but by way of delegation as to the declarative and executive Part. 8. What ever of these Rights and Powers any King of England has at any time allowed to the Pope has been so allowed against the Fundamental Law of the Land and so was utterly void and not obliging to any Successors Kings of England c. 9. That all Papists denying the Jurisdiction of the Pope here both in Civil and Ecclesiastical matters yet holding Communion with the Church of Rome in matters of worship against our established Laws are grievous Offenders 10. That passive Obedience is no Obedience In as much as true Obedience must be spontaneous intire active and with respect to the Law of Nature antecedent to the Kings Command which injoyns intire Obedience to the Kings lawful Command for the Lords sake not barely for the Command sake 11. That the King cannot dispense with or free the Subject from such natural Obedience but only from the penalty added by and annexed to his Command 12. That the King cannot tolerate here the Exercise of the Popish Worship the same being superstitious and idolatrous and against the Established Laws 13. That no English man whatsoever how far so ever they pretend to differ from or disown the Pope can give reasonable security for the Preservation of the Peace of the Church or State by them unless they swear due Allegiance to the King and by Oath declare his Supremacy in the Church and by that Oath renounce all the Popes Authority whatsoever over them and his Power to dispense with that Oath and that they will be obedient to all the Kings Laws 14. That an English man in Priests Orders from the Church of Rome ●xcommunicated or censur'd by tha● Church and yet holding Communion with that Church i● not to be trusted here although he takes the Oaths above mentioned In as much as he is of no Church being wilfully divided from ours and by Censure divided from the other and so disobedient to all Governors a lawless and perjured Person and so in a present State of Damnation nor is any Romish Priest to be trusted here though he takes the said Oaths in as much as he hath taken a former Oath to the contrary not renounced 15. That since no English understanding Papist doth absent or at any time hath absented from our Communion and Worship out of pure Judgment and Reason But purely by reason of the old inhibition of the Pope in Q. Elizabeth's time for before that they joyn'd with us and were called Church Papists and at the same time they in opposition to our Kings Laws do so firmly yield to that Inhibition and disobey several other Commands of the Pope even in some matters of Faith It 's refer'd to the wisdom of the King with the advice of his said Delegates whether such co 〈…〉 ious Offenders be with any safety to be tolerated or even con●iv'd at here 16. That the Church and Court of Rome are so incorporated together that if Communion with that Church be admitted or tolerated here it must necessarily be introductory of that Courts Vsurpation 17. That there are now great differences of opinion among the English Papists themselves with reference to the Pope And if they were all of the mind with the most moderate Pretenders yet what Security can be given that they will alwayes be so or that they shall be succeeded by others of the same Judgment or is it

own sakes principally and for the Kings sake only inasmuch as they hoped for more Indulgence from a merciful Prince then from a Herd of men who could not be content to shave their Fathers beards but must cut their throats Yet Sir I am satisfied It s true that you as you say Owe great Allegiance to the King but I never could be satisfied that ye paid so much nor no more then utmost necessity compell'd from you and I am now in greater dissatisfaction by the story of the ten Miles and no more Pap. You may still Sir rest under the same dissatisfaction and must so do until you understand throughly the Distinction I before mentioned Phy. As for your distinction of the Church of Rome and Court of Rome Papist what ever was intended by the Inventer of the Knack I take it to be a 〈◊〉 Notion set up to stifle due Reflections on old Errors for most certainly an English Papist as Papist abstracted from doctrinal opinions is a Traytor to the King of England Pap. Hold Sir you intend not to quarrel me on the road sure and begin with such rude Language Phy. Pray why may not I call an English Papist Traytor as well as you call an English Protestant Heretick the crimes are both Capital Pap. If you understood any Distinction you would answer your self Phy. You crie Distinction Distinction Court of Rome Church of Rome but what is all that to the Church of England I suppose the Author of that so much magnified Distinction might mean tha● by n●● being of the Court of Rome he may hold That the Pope ha● not right to any temporal Jurisdiction in our Kings dominions but that our King is absolute Monarch there that 's something indeed and diversifies him from a de fide man and Jesuit who hold the contrary But yet he by being of the Church of Rome must hold that the Pope has right to some spiritual jurisdiction within our Kings Dominions which to affirm is to take away part of his Imperial Crown and as 't is against all truth so by the Laws of this Realm is Treason besides while he holds the Pope Head of the Church and so infallible he obeys him well who believes not what he says For while the Church of Rome Papist sayes our King is lawful King of England Scotland and Ireland he gives the Lye to his Infallible Holiness who has continued the old Interdiction of these Kingdoms the Excommunication of our Kings and has declared our King to have no right to his Kingdoms And therefore in anno 1662. as well from Cardinal Barberin as from the Popes Nuncio at Brussel a severe Reprimand was sent to the Irish Nobility who had subscribed a Remonstrance testifying their Allegiance to our present King the Pope declaring it as an Injury to the Faith and a denying of his Supremacy And in anno 1648. when the Papists to prevent banishment declared That the Pope cannot absolve them from their Obedience That he cannot depose any Heretical as 't is call'd Magistrates that he cannot dispense with Oaths made with such Hereticks This was at Rome condemned as Heretical the Parties summoned to appear at Rome and Censures and Prisons prepared for them and in the same Case is your Man of Distinction with the Irish Papists for subscribing their formulary to that purpose so that I see nothing from your distinction to arise but a Monster of Aequivocal generation an Hermophrodite in Religion part Romish part English Catholick whose seminal Vertues are to exert themselves as either powers prevail Pap. I verily believe that the Catholicks of the Church of Rome are good Christians and true Roman Catholicks though they are not of the Court of Rome and they indeavour to reform that Church and distinguish it from that Court Phy. You say well distinguish for it may be distinguished in Notion but can never be separated in Deed the Court and the Church of Rome being so interwoven and although some few Straglers thus distinguish yet in reality all our Contests concern the Court of Rome in that all the interest of that Church is dependent on that Court and they are incorporated together so that if we should ever joyn in Communion with that Church we must in a little time submit to the Usurpation of that Court. Jurisdiction of Church and State being in the same hands cannot be severed unless some Sir Salomon among you can divide Pope Cardinal Prelate as great Salomon would have done the Child which the two Mothers claimed And as to your irregular and feeble Indeavors to reform that Church Pray by what Authority do your true English-Roman Catholicks endeavour to reform the Roman Catholick Church For your Confessors tell you at the first Principle that ye must believe as the Church believes yet they themselves believe not so but would reform that Church in its Articles of Faith Pap. Sir they know well enough what they have to do and we believe them who have good Authority to instruct us in our belief Phy. You have said all that is permitted to silly misled Ignaro's to say But have a care and inquire after such Reformers who in single private Capacities unauthoritatively undertake Reformation of Churches At one time undertaking the Reformation of the Romish and British Churches Our Church was reformed by due Authority according to the most antient Laws of this Realm It having all the Rights of a Patriarchal See But can a few Renegado-dandi-prat Papists think to unhinge a Church or State under a pretence of Reformation These Reformers of yours I fear prompted our late Pretenders to Reformation who first would reform the Court then the established Church by Presbytery then Presbytery by Independent then Independency by Subdivisions of Atomical Sects till with Quaker and Millenaries Government was reformed quite out of doors such Reformers as is said are like the Hobling Erastian and run like Badgers with variating and unequal Motions and if they can keep where the ridge of secular Power goes highest their Reformation turns into Rebellion and Papist Reformers are as various and divers from their Church of Rome aye and from themselves Pap. You mistake us much for the Reformers I mean go not about to reform the whole Church or to unhing it but to reform in their private Practises and Judgments and teach us so Phy. They are good Members of that Church in the mean time that are wiser then their whole Church not only to differ from their Church in their private Practises and Judgments but to teach all others to do so too Right Roman Catholicks I 'le warrant them Pap. What pray do you think of Father Paul who wrote the Council of Trent so disadvantagiously to the Romish Interest and yet he died a steady Catholick of the Church of Rome Phy. I 'le tell you what I think of him I think first That he was no English man and so nothing to our purpose for I have nothing to