his minion to put away his wife a goodly young Ladie daughter of Isabell his father's sister and to marrie another openly to her disgrace And in the last evil Parlament hee made would needs have all absolute autoritie granted to 6 or 7 his favorites to determine of all matters Grieved with these exorbitant indignities the more or better part of the Realm called home by their Letters Henry 4. deposed Richard 2. by Act of Parlament by his own confession of unworthie Government and his voluntarie resignation of the Crown to the said Henry by publick instrument All this without blood-shed And in almost all this Edmund L. D. of York the head of that familie together with Edward Duke of Aumale his eldest son and Richard Earle of Cambridge his yonger the Grand-father of Edward 4. assisted the said Henry That Henry 4. had more right to Succeed unto Richard 2. than Edmond Mortimer heir of Clarence much more any other King Richard 2. deposed the question is Whether Edmond Mortimer then alive his Father Roger being slain in Ireland a little before Nephew removed of Lionel Duke of Clarence or Henry Duke of Lancaster son of John of Gant should have Succeeded in right For Henry is alleged his being neerer to the former King by two degrees and proximitie of Blood though not of the elder Line is to be or hath been preferred in these cases 2. His Title came by a Man the others by a Woman not so much favored by Law nor Reason 3. The said Edmond being offered the Crown by Richard Earle of Cambridge who had married his Sister Anne and other Noblemen at Southampton he judged it against equitie discovered the Treason to Henry the fifth by whose command those Noblemen were executed 1415. Thirty years after which Richard Duke of York son of the aforesaid Earle and Anne for Edmond her brother died without issue set his Title on foot And whereas Roger Mortimer Father of this Edmond was declared Heir apparent by a Parlament 1382 that was done by Richard 2. from the hatred he bore to John of Gant and his son Henry rather than for the goodness of the others Title the cause whereof was Because immediately after the death of the Black Prince divers learned and wise men held opinion That John of Gant eldest son of Edward 3. then living should rather succeed than Richard jure Propinquitatis This made the old King Edward 3. confirm the Succession to Richard 2. by Parlament and the Oaths of his Uncles and made the yong King Richard 2. hold first and his son in jealousie and hatred ever after as distrusting the likelihoods of their Title Declaration of the Heir Apparent in the Princes life being Partial no sure president Partial establishing of Succession by Parlament is no extraordinary thing with Princes which yet most commonly have been to little purpose So did Richard 3. cause John de la Pole Earle of Lincoln and Son to his sister Elisabeth Dutchess of Suffolk to be declared Heir apparent thereby excluding his Brother Edward's four Daughters c. So did Henry 8. prefer the issue of his yonger sister before that of his elder So did Edward 6. declare the Lady Jane Gray his cozen Germain removed to be his Heir and Successor excluding his own two sisters Such say they was the aforesaid Declaration of Roger Mortimer by Richard 2. to as little purpose as from little equity Uncle preferred before the Nephew divers times Contra Sect. 83. That John of Gant should have in right succeeded his father rather than Richard himself as neerer to his father is proved by the course of divers Kingdoms where the Uncle was preferred before the Nephew 1. In Naples much about the same time Robert before Charles the son of Martel his elder Brother 2. In Spain Don Sancho Bravo before the Children of Prince Don Alonso de la Cerda from whom the House of Medina Celi is discended by sentence of Don Alonso the wise and of all the Realm and Nobility Anno 1276. 3. In the Earldom of Arthois Mande before Robert son to her Brother Philip by sentence of Philip le Bel of France confirmed by the Parlament of Paris and by his Successor Philippes de Valois whom he the said Robert had much assisted in the recovery of France from the English 4. In Britanie John Breno Earle of Montfort before Jane Countess of Bloys Daughter and Heir of Guy his elder brother by sentence of Edward 3. and the State of England who put him in possession of that Dukedom 5. In Scotland where albeit Edward 1. of England gave sentence for John Baliol Nephew to the elder Daughter excluding thereby Robert Bruse son to the yonger yet that sentence was held to be unjust in Scotland and the Crown restored to Robert Bruse his son whose posterity holds it to this day 6. The like whereof in Naples Lewis Prince of Taranto son to Philip prevailed before Joan the Neece of Robert aforesaid who was Philip's elder brother though Philip died before Robert because he was a man and a degree neerer to his Grand-father than Joan. 7. And in England it self Henry 1. preferred before William son and Heir of Robert of Normandie his elder brother And King John preferred before Arthur D. of Britanie the son and Heir of his elder brother Geoffrey because he was neerer to Richard his brother then dead than was Arthur Which Right of his the English inclined still to acknowledge and admit and thereupon proclaimed him King notwithstanding that the French and other Forrein Princes of stomach opposed themselves against it King John rightfully preferred before his Brother Arthur Against this last King Richard when he was to go to the Holy Land caused his Nephew Arthur to be declared Heir apparent to the Crown thereby shewing his Title to be the better Answ 1. It was not by Act of Parlament of England for Richard was in Normandie when he made it 2. Richard did it rather to repress the amhitious Humor of John in his absence 3. This Declaration was never admitted in England but renounced by consent of the Nobility in his absence 4. Richard himself at his return disadvowed it appointing John to be his Successor by his last Will and caused the Nobles to swear Fealtie unto him as to his next in blood The Opinion of Civil Lawyers touching the Right of the Uncle and Nephew Contra Sect. 83. This Controversie divided all the Lawyers in Christendom Baldus Oldratus Panormitanus c. for the Nephew Bartolus Alexander Decius Alciatus Cujatius c. for the Uncle Baldus himself at length concludeth That seeing rigor of Law runneth only with the Uncle being properly neerest in blood by one degree and that only indulgence and custom permitteth the Nephew to represent his Father's place whensoëver the Uncle is born before the Nephew and his elder brother dieth before his Father as in the case of John of Gant and Richard 2. he may be
to Odo for recompence the State of Aquitaine with title of a Duke Ralph 1. in the place of Charles the simple This Charles through his simplicitie beeing allured to go to the Castle of Peronne in Picardie was made there prisoner and forced to resign his Kingdom unto Ralph King of Burgundie And his Queen Algina or Ogen daughter of King Edward the elder of England fled with her little son Lewis that shee had by him into England unto her Uncle K. Adelstan And Charles through miserie died soon after in the said Castle of Peronne Lewis d'Outremer son to Charles the Simple established But this Ralph dying also three years after the States of France called out of England Lewis therefore named d'Outremor and crowned him And hee was a good King and reigned 27 years Hugh Capet to the prejudice of Charles of Lorrayne Louys d'Outremer left two sons Lothaire who succeeded him and Charles whom hee made Duke of Lorrayne Lothaire had a son named Louys who was King after him but died without issue And so the crown was to have gon by succession to his Uncle Charles Notwithstanding the States of France for mislike they had of his person did put him by and chose * Hugo Capetus Earl of Paris who by approbation of the Common-wealth was crowned and his race endureth until this day Hugh Capet his title not by usurpation And all the French Chronicles do justifie this title of Hugo Capetus against Charles Nangis an ancient and diligent writer of the Abbey of S. Denis defendeth it in these words Wee may not grant in any case that Hugh Capet may bee esteemed an Invador or Usurper of the Crown of France seeing the Lords Prelates Princes and Governors of the Realm did call him to this dignitie and chose him for their King and Sovereign Lord Upon which words Belforest saith For in very truth wee cannot by any other means defend the title of Hugh Capet from usurpation and felonie then to justifie his coming to the Crown by the consent and will of the Common-wealth A speech used by the Ambassador sent from the States of France to Charles of Lorrayne after his exclusion Here is to bee noted somwhat out of the speech which the Ambassador sent by the States of France after their election of Hugh Capet to Charles of Lorrayne did use unto him as followeth Every man knoweth Lord Charles that the Succession of the Crown and Realm of France according to the ordinarie Laws and Rights of the same belongeth unto you and not unto Hugh Capet now our King but yet the very same Laws which do give unto you this right of Succession do judg you also unworthie of the same for that you have not endeavored hitherto to frame your life and manners according to the prescript of those Laws nor according to the use and custom of your Countrey of France but rather have allied your self with the Germane Nation our old enemies and have acquainted your self with their vile and base manners Wherefore seeing you have forsaken and abandoned the ancient virtue sweetness and amitie of the French wee have also abandoned and left you and have chosen Hugh Capet for our king and have put you back and this without any scruple or prejudice of our consciences at all esteeming it far better and more just to live under Hugh Capet the present possessor of the Crown with enjoying the antient use of our Laws Customs Privileges and Liberties than under you the inheritor by nearness of blood in oppression strange customs and crueltie For even as those which are to make a voiage in a ship upon a dangerous sea do not so much repent whether the Pilot which is to guide the stern bee owner of the ship or no but rather whether hee bee skilful valiant and like to bring them in safetie to their way's end or to drown them among the waves even so our principal care is that wee have a good Prince to lead and guide us happily in the way of Civil and politick life which is the end why Princes were appointed For that this man is fitter to bee our King And so Charles was excluded and the Frenchmen thought themselvs secure in conscience for doing the same which God also hath seemed to confirm with the succession and happie success of so many noble and most Christian Kings as have issued out of this Line of Hugo Capetus unto this day Examples of the Third Rank Henry 1. to the prejudice of his elder Brother Robert In this Third Line Robert Hugh Capet his son who succeeded him had two sons Robert and Henry whereof the younger was admitted and Robert put back partly becaus hee was but a simple man in respect of Henry and partly for that Henry was greatly favored and assisted in this pretence by Robert Duke of Normandie Lewis 6. like to bee dis-inherited for the hatred of his father K. Philip 1. When Philip 1. son to this Henry was deceased the people of France were so offended with his evil life and Government as that his son Louis le Gros was like to bee dis-inherited for his sake if som of his partie had not caused him to bee crowned in hast and out of order at Orleans for preventing the matter Charles 8. for his father Lewis xi So the State of France had once determined to put back Charles afterwards the Eight from his succession for the hatred they bare to his father Lewis the XI if the said father had not died while the other was very young Examples of England Divers changes of Races in England For England it hath had as great varietie and changes in the race of their Kings as any Realm in the world For first after the Britains it had the Romans of whose and their own blood they had Kings again of their own After this they had them of the Saxon and English blood and after them of the Danes and then of the Normans and after them again of the French and last of all it seemeth to have returned to the Britains again in K. Henry 7. for that his father came of that race Examples before the Conquest Egbert 1. before his nearer in blood To pass over the ancient ranks of the British Roman and Saxon races until Egbert King of the West-Saxons and almost of the rest of England besides who therefore is said to bee properly the first monarch of the Saxon blood and first commanded that Realm to bee called England as ever since hath been observed this man Egbert beeing for his prowess in jealousie to his King Britricus was by him banished into France where he lived a Captain under the famous King Pepin till that Britricus dying hee returned into England where though hee were not the next by propinquitie of blood yet as Polydor saieth omnium consensu Rex creatur and proved the most excellent King that ever before the Saxons had Adelstan
this Reign drew all England into factions and divisions the States in a Parlament at Wallingford made an agreement that Stephen should bee lawful during his life onely and that Henry and his off spring should succeed him and Prince William King Stephen's son was deprived and made onely Earl of Norfolke King John to the prejudice of his Nephew Arthur This Henry 2 left Richard Jeffrey and John Richard sirnamed Coeur de Lyon succeeded him and dying without issue * John was admitted by the States and Arthur Duke of Britaine son and heir to Jeffrey * excluded who coming afterward to get the Crown by war was taken by his Uncle John who murthered him in prison Louys Prince of France to the prejudice of King John and King John's son afterward to the prejudice again of Louys But som years after the Barons and States of England misliking the government of this King John rejected him again and chose Louys the Prince of France to bee their King and did swear fealtie to him in London depriving also the young Prince Henry John's son of 8 years old but upon the death of King John that ensued shortly after they recalled again that sentence disannulled the Oath and Allegiance made unto Louys Prince of France and admitted this Henry * to the Crown who reigned 53 years The Princes of York and Lancaster had their best Titles of the autoritie of the Common-wealth From this Henry 3. take their first begining the two branches of York and Lancaster In whose contentions the best of their titles did depend upon the autoritie of the Common-wealth For as the people were affected and the greatest part prevailed so were they confirmed or disannulled by Parlament And wee may not well affirm but that when they are in possession and confirmed therein by these Parlaments they are lawful Kings and that God concurreth with them For if wee should deny this point wee should shake the states of most Princes in the world at this day The Common-wealth may dispose of the Crown for her own good And so to conclude As propinquitie of blood is a great preheminencie towards the atteining of the Crown so doth it not ever binde the Common-wealth to yield thereunto and to shut up her eies or admit at hap-hazard or of necessitie any one that is next by succession but rather to take such an one as may perform the dutie and charge committed For that otherwise to admit him that is an enemie or unfit is but to destroy the Common-wealth and him together What are the principal points which a Common-wealth ought to respect in admitting or excluding of any Prince that pretendeth to succeed wherein is handled largely also of the diversitie of Religions and other such causes CAP. IX Seeing the Common-wealth is to know and judg of the matter no doubt but God doth allow of her judgment HEe who is to judg and give the sentence in the things is also to judg of the caus for thereof is hee called Judg So if the Common-wealth hath power to admit or put back the Prince or pretender to the Crown shee hath also autoritie to judg of the lawfulness of the causes considering specially that it is in their own affair and and in a matter that depend's wholly upon them for that no man is King or Prince by institution of Nature but only by authoritie of the Common-wealth Who can then affirm the contrary but that God doth allow for a just and sufficient cause in this behalf the only Will and Judgment of the Weal-publick it self supposing alwaies that a whole Realm will never agree by orderly way of Judgement to exclude the next Heir in Blood without a reasonable Cause in the sight and censure The Pope is to obey the Determination of the Common-wealth without further inquisition except it be in Cases of injustice and Tyranny And seeing that they only are the Judges of this Case and are properly Lords and Owners of the whole business we are to presume that what they Determine is just and lawful though at one time they should Determine one thing and the contrary at another as they did often in England being led at different times by different motions and it is enough for every particular man to subject himself and obey simply their Determination without further inquisition except he should see that Open Injustice were done therein or God manifestly offended and the Realm endangered Open Injustice if not the true Common-wealth but some Faction of wicked men should offer to Determine the matter without lawful authoritie God offended and the Realm endangered where it is evident that he that is preferred will do what lieth in him to the prejudice both of God's glory and of the Common-wealth as if a Turke or some notorious wicked man and Tyrant should be offred to Govern among Christians Whence the Reasons of Admitting or Receiving a Prince are to be taken Now to know the true Causes and principal Points which ought to be chiefly regarded as well by the Common-wealth as by every particular man in the furthering or hindering any Prince we must return to the End wherefore Government was appointed which is to defend preserve and benefit the Common-wealth because from this Consideration are to be deduced all other Considerations for discerning a good or evil Prince For that whosoever is most likely to defend c. his Realm and Subjects he is most to be allowed and desired as most conform to the end for which Government was ordained And on the contrary side he that is least like to do this deserveth least to be preferred And this is the Consideration that divers Common-wealths had in putting back oftentimes Children and impotent People though next in blood from succession Three Chief Points to be regarded in every Prince And here shall be fitly remembred what Gerard recounteth of the King of France that in his Coronation he is new apparrelled three times in one day once as a Priest and then as a Judge and last as a King armed thereby to signifie three things committed to his charge first Religion then Justice then Manhood and Chivalrie which division seemeth very good and fit and to comprehend all that a Weal-Publick hath need of for her happie State and Felicity both in soul and bodie and for her end both supernatural and natural And therefore these seem to be the three Points which most are to be regarded in every Prince Why it is here principally treated of Religion For the latter two because they have been often had in Consideration in the Changes aforesaid and Religion whereof then scarce ever any question or doubt did fall in these actions rarely or never And because in these our dayes it is the principal Difference and chiefest Difficultie of all other and that also it is of it self the first and highest and most necessarie Point to be considered in the Admission of a Prince therefore it
by her came to bee exstinct as it was in the children of H. 6. there is no reason but the issue of his daughters those that claim by Portugal Sect. 23 should succeed at least in the inheritance of that Duchie The Crown of England to John of Somerset son to John of Gant But for the right and title to the Crown of England which came by John of Gant himself third son of Edw. 3 and eldest that lived when hee died John Earl of Somerset though begotten out of matrimonie yet afterwards legitimated Sect. 25. his eldest son by Katharine Swinford was to inherit before the Ladie Philippe his sister by the Ladie Blanche The first reason of Portugal against Somerset Against which the favorites of Portugal allege divers reasons 1. Beeing born out of Wedlock and in Adulterie Sect. 25. and continuing a bastard many years hee could not bee made legitimate afterwards by Parlament to that effect of Succession to the Crown before Q. Philippe of Portugall and her children born before his legitimation who thereby had vim acquisitam as the Law saith which could not bee taken away by any posterior Act of Parlament without consent of the parties interessed Second Reason John King of Portugal married the Ladie Philippe with condition to enjoy all prerogatives that at day were due unto her which was six or seven years before his legitimation For Don Alonso and Don Edwardo the two sons of the said John and Philippe were born in the years 1390 and 1391. And John of Gant married Katharine Swinford and legitimated her children in the years 1396 1397. Third Reason The marriage of John of Gant with Katharine Swinford helpeth litle to better this legitimation which by the rules of the Common and Civil Laws is but a bare deposition for their children were Spurii begotten in plain Adulterie not in fornication onely and consequently the Privilege that the Law giveth to the subsequent mariage of the Parties by legitimating such children as are born in simple fornication where the parties are single cannot take place here nor can any legitimation equal much less prefer the legitimated before the lawful and legitimate by birth The Fourth Reason alleged by the Favorers of Portugal against the Issue of John of Somerset When Henry 6. and his son were extinguished and Edw. 4. usurped the Crown there remained of the Ladie Philippe Alfonse the Fift King of Portugal her Nephew of John of Somerset Margaret Countess of Richmond his Neece The Question is which of these two Competitors of the Hous of Lancaster and in equal degree from John of Gant and Henry 6. should have Succession by right immediately after the death of Henry 6. Alfonso say they for three Reasons First hee was a man and Margaret but a woman though shee came of the man and hee of the woman 2. Hee descended of the lawful and eldest daughter shee of the younger brother legitimated 3. Hee was of the whole blood to H. 6. and shee but of the half In which regard hee was to bee preferred at least in all the interests of Succession which were to bee had from Henry 4. onely and were never in his father John of Gant which were many as his right gotten by arms upon the evil government of the former King his Election by Parlament and Coronation by the Realm c. see for the rest Sect. 35. 43. Besides when King Richard 2. was dead hee was next in degree of propinquitie unto him of any man living as hath before been proved Sect. 36. CAP. IX The Genealogie and Controversies of Portugal 76. The Genealogie of Portugal Emanuel had by one wife six children 1. John 3. hee John that died in his father's time hee Sebastian slain by the Moors in Barbarie 2. Isabel Grandmother to the present King of Spain 3. Beatrix Grandmother to the Duke of Savoy 4. Lewis father of Don Antonio lately deceased in England 5. Henry Cardinal and after King 6. Edw. father of Mary Duchess of Parma who hath two sons Ranuntius Duke of Parma and Edward a Cardinal and father of Katharine Duchess of Bragança yet living whose Issue is Theodosius Duke of Bragança Edward Alexander and Philippe young Princes of great exspectation Five pretenders unto the Crown of Portugal Sebastian beeing dead Henry son of Emanuel succeeded who beeing old unmarried unlikely to have issue before him was debated the right of five Pretenders to the Succession of that Crown vid. Philippe of Spain Philibert Duke of Savoy the Duke of Parma his mother beeing then deceased Don Antonio and the Duchess of Bragança the three first by their Deputies the fourth Anthonio by himself and for himself the fift by her husband the Duke and his learned Council Of these the Duke of Savoy was soon excluded becaus his mother was younger sister to K. Philip's mother and himself younger then Philippe Don Antonio a Bastard and excluded Don Antonio was also rejected and pronounced a bastard by the said King Henry for many reasons 1. Hee was taken to bee so all his father's life time and that without question 2. Certain Decrees coming out from Rome in the time of Julius 3. against the promotion of bastards hee sued to the said Pope to bee dispensed withall 3 His father Don Lewis hath oftentimes testified by word and writing that hee was his Bastard and signified asmuch in his last will 4. It is likely that if Lewis had married his mother who was base in birth and of the Jewish as som stories affirm hee would have made som of his friends and kindred acquainted therewith as a matter so much important to them to know which hee never did though the King avowed himself was present with him at his death 5. If hee had been legitimate why did hee not pretend the Succession before the said King next after the death of Sebastian beeing son to his elder brother as well as was Sebastian 6. Whereas hee had produced witnesses vid. his mother sister with her husband and two others to prove that his father before his death had married with his mother in secret the said K. Cardinal affirmed that upon their examination hee had found they were suborned by Anthonio becaus they agreed not in their reports and becaus som of them confessed they were suborned whereupon hee hath caused them to be punished If not why not Duke of Lanc. Seeing that in England wee hold the said Don Anthonio for true King of Portugal I see not how wee can deny his children their right at least to the Duchie of Lancaster whereof whosoëver is right heir of Portugal should bee rightest heir Sect. 70. Allegations to prove the Duke of Parm's right That hee represented his mother and shee her father Lo. Edward who had hee been alive had carried it from his elder sister Elisa K. Philip's 2. mother consequently his issue to bee preferred before hers 2. Against the Duchess of Bragança that his mother was the elder sister therefore
either for Valor Prowess length of Reign acts of Chivalrie or the multitude of famous Princes his Children left behind him was one of the noblest Kings that ever England had RICHARD 2d Richard the 2d Son to the black Prince of Wales for having suffered himself to be misled by evil Counsellers to the great hurt and disquietness of the Realm was deposed also after 22. years reign by a Parliament holden at London the year 1399. and condemned to perpetual Prison in the Castle of Pomfret where he was soon after put to death and in his place was by free Election chosen the noble Knight Henry * Duke of Lancaster who proved afterwards so notable a King as the world knoweth HENRY 6th Henry 6th after almost 40. years reign was deposed imprisoned and put to death also together with his Son the Prince of Wales by Edward 4th of the House of York And this was confirmed by the * Commons and afterwards also by publick Act of Parliament because the said Henry did suffer himself to be over-ruled by the Queen his Wife and had broken the Articles of Agreement made by the Parlament between him and the Duke of York and solemnly sworn on both sides the 8th of Octob. 1459. though otherwise for his particular life he were a good man and King Edward 4th was put in place who was one of the renownedest for Martial Acts and Justice that hath worn the English Crown RICHARD 3d. This man having left two Sons his Brother Richard Duke of Glocester put them to death and being the next Heir Male was authorised in the Crown but Deposed again afterwards by the Common-wealth which called out of France Henry Earle of Richmond who took from him both life and Kingdom in the Field and was King himself by the name of Henry 7. And no man I suppose will say but that he was lawfully King also which yet cannot be except the other might lawfully be deposed If the said Deprivations were unjust the now Pretences are unlawful Moreover is to be noted in all these Mutations what good hath succeeded therein to the Common-wealth which was unjust and is void at this day if the Changes and Deprivations of the former Princes could not be made and consequently none of these that do pretend the Crown of England at this day can have any Title at all for that from those men they discend who were put in place of the deprived If Kings established may be Deprived much sooner Pretenders And if this might be so in Kings lawfully set in Possession then much more hath the said Common-wealth power and authoritie to alter the succession of such as do pretend Dignitie if there be due reason and causes to the same Wherein consisteth principally the lawfulness of Proceedings against Princes which in the former Chapter is mentioned What interest Princes have in their Subjects Goods or Lives How Oaths do Binde or may be Broken by Subjests towards Princes And finally the difference between a good King and a Tyrant CAP. IV. 1. Objection against the Assertions in the last Chapter BUt although by Nature the Common-wealth hath authoritie over the Prince to chuse and appoint him at the beginning yet having once made him and given up all their authoritie unto him he is no more subject to their correction but remaineth absolute of himself As every particular man hath authorised to make his Master or Prince of his inferior but not afterwards to put him down again howsoever he beareth himself towards him 2. Objection When the Children of Israël being under the Government of the High Priest demanded a King of Samuel he protesting unto them Well quoth he you will have a King hearken then to this that I will say Hoc erit jus Regis qui imperaturus est vobis He shall take away from you your Children both Sons and Daughters your Fields and Vineyards c. and shall give them to his servants and you shall cry unto God in that day from the face of this your King and God shall not hear you for that you have demanded a King to Govern over you Assertions of Bellay Yea Bellay and some other that wrote in flatterie of Princes in these our days do not only affirm That Princes are lawless and subject to no accompt or correction whatsoever they do But also That all goods chattels possessions and whatsoever else commodities temporal of the Common wealth are properly the Kings and that their Subjects have only the use thereof so as when the King will he may take it from them by right Answer to Bellay his First Assertion But for the first That Kings are subject to no Law Is against the very Institution of a Common-wealth which is to live together in Justice and Order for if it holdeth so insteed of Kings and Governors to defend us we may set up publick murtherers ravishers theeves and spoylers to devour us Then were all those Kings before mentioned both of the Jewes Gentiles and Christians unlawfully deprived and their Successors unlawfully put up in their places and consequentlie all Princes living at this day are intruders and no lawful Princes Answer to Bellay his Second Assertion Of the second saying also That all temporalities are properly the Princes and that Subjects have only the use thereof no less absurdities do follow First it is against the very first principle and foundation of the Civil Law which at the first entrance maketh this division of Goods That some are common by Nature to all men as the Aër the Sea c. Others are publick to all of one Citie or Countrie but yet not common to all in general as Rivers Ports c. Some are of the Communitie of a Citie or Common-wealth but yet not common to every particular person of that Citie as common Rents Theaters the publick hous and the like Some are of none nor properly of any man's Goods as Churches and Sacred things And some are proper to particular men as those which every man possesseth of his own Besides it overthroweth the whole nature of a Common-wealth maketh all Subject to be but very slaves for that slaves and bondmen in this do differ from freemen that slaves have only the use of things without property or interest and cannot acquire or get to themselves any dominion or true right in any thing but it accreweth all to their Master Lastly If all Goods be properly the King's why was Achab and Jezabel so reprehended and punished by God for taking away Naboth's vineyard Why do the Kings of England France and Spain ask Money of their Subjects in Parlament and that termed by the names of Subsidies Helps Benevolences Loans Prests Contributions c How have the Parlament oftentimes denied them the same Why are there Judges appointed for matter of Suits and Pleas between the Prince and the People Why doth the Canon Law inhibit all
bastard-brother to the prejudice of his his lawful Edmond and Aldred This Egbert left a son named Elthelwolfe or Adelwulfe or Edolf who succeeded him and had four sons Ethelbald Ethelbert Ethelred and Alfred who were all Kings one after another and for the most part most excellent Princes specially Alfred the last of all whose acts bee wonderful Hee left a son as famous as himself which was Edward the elder who dying left two lawful sons Edmond and Aldred and one illegitimate named Adelstan which being esteemed to bee of more valor then the other two was preferred to the Crown before them and was a Prince of worthie memorie Hee brought England into one perfit Monarchie having expelled utterly the Danes and quieted the Welchmen Conquered Scotland and brought their K. Constantine to do him homage Restored also Luys d'Outremer his nephew to the kingdom of France Aldred to the prejudice of his Nephews Edwin and Edgar This Adelstan dying without issue his lawful brother Edmond was admitted who left two sons Edwin and Edgar but for that they were yong they were put back and their Uncle Aldred preferred who reigned with the good will and prais of all men Edgar to the prejudice of his elder brother Edwin Aldred dying without issue his elder Nephew Edwin was admitted to the Crown but yet four years after hee was deposed again for his leud and vitious life and his younger brother Edgar admitted in his place who was one of the rarest Princes that the world had in his time Stow saith hee kept 3600 ships in this Realm Canutus Dane to the prejudice of Edmond and Edward Englishmen This Edgar had by his first Wife Egilfred Edward called the Martyr and by his second Alfred Etheldred Which Alfred to the end that her Son might Reign caused Edward to be slain and so Etheldred came to the Crown though with much contradiction moved in hatred specially of the murther of his Brother This Etheldred was driven out of this Kingdom by Sweno King of the Danes who possessed the Realm and dying left a Son Canutus with whom Etheldred returning after the death of Sweno made an Agreement and Division of the Realm And so died leaving his eldest * Son Edmund Iron-side to succeed him who soon after dying also left two Sons Edmund and Edward but the whole Realm to Canutus who pretended it to be his by a Covenant made between Iron-side and him That the longest liver should have all and so with the Realm took the two Children and sent them over into Swethland And was admitted not only by the consent of the Realm but allowed also by the Sea of Rome And he lived and proved an excellent good King and after twenty years Reign died much mourned by the Englishmen Harald Bastard preferred to his lawful Brother Hardicanutus This Canutus left a base Son named Harald and a lawful one named Hardicanutus But Harald was by the more part of Voices chosen before his lawful Brother Hardicanutus preferred before his neerer in Blood After the death of Harald Hardicarnutus was chosen without any respect either to Edward the Confessor Alured Sons to Etheldred that were in Normandy or to Edmond and Edward Sons to his Son Iron-side that were in Sweathland though in proximitie of Blood they were before him Alured and Edward the Confessor before Edmond and Edward their eldest Brother's Sons But this Hardicanutus dying without issue Alured second son to Etheldred by his second Wife against the priority both of his Brother and his Nephews that were in Swethland was called to be King but being murthered by the way by Goodwin the Earl of Kent his elder brother Edward the Confessor was admitted yet before Edmond and Edward sons to his elder brother Iron-side And the said Edward the Confessor was a most excellent Prince and Reigned in Peace almost twenty years Harald 2. to the prejudice of Edgar Edward being dead without issue The States made a great Consultation whom they should make King and first of all excluded him that was only next by Propinquitie of blood which was Edgar eldest son to Edward the Out-law son to Edmond Iron-side because he was a Child not able to Govern the Realm And Harald son to the Earle Goodwin by the Daughter of Canutus was admitted William Duke of Normandie his Title by Election But William Duke of Normandie pretended to be chosen before by * Edward the Confessor with the consent of the Realm which though no English Authors do avow it cleerly seemeth notwithstanding very probable Because the said William had at his Entrance many in England that did favor his pretence and that as Gerard saith At his coming to London he punished divers by name for that they had broken their Oaths and Promises in that behalf Moreover by alleging his Title of Election he moved divers Princes abroad to favor him in that action as in a just quarrel which it is not like they should have done if he had pretended only a Conquest or his Title of Consanguinity which could be of no importance in the world Among others Pope Alexander 2. whose Holiness was greatly esteemed in those dayes did send him his Benediction and a precious Ring of Gold with a Hallowed Banner St. Anthoninus Archbishop of Florence commended his enterprise But howsoever he got the Victory and God prospered his Pretence and hath confirmed his off-spring in the Crown more than these Five hundred years Examples after the Conquest William Rufus and Henry 1. to the prejudice of their elder brother Robert William the Conqueror left three sons Robert William and Henry and by his Will the Kingdom to William named Rufus forsom particular displeasure against his elder son who being at his fathers death absent in the war of Jerusalem was put back although the most part of the Realm was inclined unto him and William Rufus by the persuasion of Lanfrake Archbishop of Canterbury was established in the Crown And hee dying without issue his younger brother Henry against the right also of his elder brother Robert absent again in the war of Jerusalem did by fair promises to the people and the help of Henry Newborow Earl of Warwick and Maurice Bishop of London get the Crown wherein God did so prosper him that his said brother Robert coming afterwards to depose him of it hee took him prisoner and kept the Crown King Stephen preferred to Henry 2. his nearer in blood and Henry again to Stephen his issue This King Henry left a daughter which had of Jeffrey Plantagenet Duke of Anera a son named Henry whom Henry his Grandfather caused to bee declared Heir apparent in his daies But yet after his deceas becaus Prince Henry was but a childe the State of England did choos Stephen Earl of Boulongue and son to Adela the Conqueror's daughter putting back both Henry and his Mother But again for that