Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n church_n doctrine_n papist_n 3,425 5 8.5667 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A60055 A short answer to a malicious pamphlet called, A reply written by John Gadbury, the King of England's juggler, and astrologer in ordinary to the Pope, to help on the work. Partridge, John, 1644-1715. 1680 (1680) Wing S3559; ESTC R39538 24,418 26

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Murdered 300000 Protestants in the Kingdom of Ireland Here Gadbury falls to his old way of quibling again and gravely tells you That it must be either lawful or unlawful if the latter all good men will bewail the Misfortune but if the former he would very fain know how men acting under a lawful Authority and not going beyond their Commission can be guilty of Murder So that at the first dash the Fellow tells us that they were Murdered by Order and says that it is not Murder if they do not go beyond their Commission Here he shews himself a right Saint of Rome and a Casuist for the Devil The meaning of his words is no less than this that if any Popish King shall give a Commission to his Banditi Jamsaries or Murderers to cut the Throats of all his Protestant Subjects if they do not go beyond that Commission and cut the Throats of more than all then it is no Murder Why because he tells you it is done by a Lawful Authority and this calculated for the Meridian of England So that you see he is not for denying the thing nor the person but justifies it to be Lawful because done by Commission And then asketh how I will prove it or whether I can shew any one of the Commissions c. In answer to this There needs no other proof that the Massacre in Ireland was done by Authority than the late Kings Letter to the Court of Claims in behalf of the Lord Antrim the Chief Commander in that horrid Murder Where he tells them that the forementioned Lord had done nothing but what was by the Order of his Father the Royal Martyr and his pious Queen Besides when the charitable Collections were made in London and other parts for the relief of the distressed Protestants that had escaped the Murderers hands and were sent away in order to go for Dublin they were all stopt at Chester and there rotted and perished under the Wall of that City Now by whose power this was done I will leave to the Readers Judgment and for its truth 't is beyond all question Now Countrymen is not this a good warning to Protestants to look to themselves seeing they are told by so notorious a Papist as John Gadbury is that the cutting the Throats of 300000 Protestants in pursuance of the Kings Commission is not Murder Page 6. Of the Murder of Sir Ed. Godfrey at Somersethouse How now Jack what deny that Murder to be in Somersethouse thou dost act thy part as if thou hadst been a Papist these 40 years an absolute Juggler what hath thy new Religion so suddenly inspired thee with its Master-piece of Impudence Thou out-dost all thy Wafer-Godmakers for they perswade us to believe but a little kind of a Cheat about Conjuring Bread and Wine into Flesh and Blood by the vertue of hoc est corpus that is Hocus Pocus but thou dost endeavour to out-face a Truth that no man but those concerned in it can have any cause to question The King Lords and Commons Judges Juries and all unconcern'd persons that have ever heard the Evidence are assured of its truth beyond the least doubt But thou armed with Pardon Pension Guilt and Impudence dost declare to the world that thou wouldest be of any side for Mony. And for Prance's pleading guilty to an Indictment of Perjury I wonder you are not ashamed to mention it if you consider that we know he was hired to do it and that by the Priest at White-hall c For I saw the Letter in his own hand that was sent to him by the order of his Wife 's two Brothers both Popish Priests and others of that Tribe in Which they promised his Pardon and that he should again live like a Man if he would come over and tell the truth about that Murder he then being at Amsterdam upon this he said That to tell the truth in their sense was to forswear all he had swore before and desired Ged to renounce him if all he had sworn about Godfrey 's Murder were not true and that if he should ever deny it he desired us all that were then in Company which were about five or six to call him perjured Rogue and let him deny this if he can Thus Reader you see what stress they lay on the Perjury of this poor deluded Rascal Yet neither he nor this man nor their Wafer-Godmakers themselves have hitherto been able to give better Answers and Arguments to desprove it but to say they are mere Stories And for the vizzanded Villains he speaks of one of them is well known namely the then Queens Confessor who there brandished his Sword on the Scaffold for joy the King was beheaded Page 7. Since that Pious Prince Charles the Second dyed a Roman Catholick and yet Head of the Church of England Here my Friend at the first dash doth confess that pious Prince did dye a Roman Catholick Really the old Gentleman is mightily obliged to him for his kindness to tell it so impudently that he lived a Hypocrite and died an Idolater For it is well known he did communicate three times every year with the Church of England in the Sacrament And yet by this Man he is affirmed to be a Roman Catholick Now confider if he was a Papist Do you think he was not a precious pious Head of a Protestant Body and the Church of England in a fine condition to be protected and defended from Popery by a Prince of that perswasion and the Holy Sacrament of our Lord is by the Lords Annointed made a Decoy to cheat the People into the belief that he was a Protestant But my Adversary says that the Traytors plotted against him while he was not declared to be a Papist and mentions the Rye-house Truly Jack if you did not know or at least believe he was a Papist then you were a very ignorant Fellow for it was was well known that he was so at his first coming into England in the year 1660. And when he talks of the Rye-house Plot he says The King 's precious Life was in danger Why was it more in danger at that time than when Jack Gadbury was in the Meal-Tub scouring Dangerfields Kettle with Mrs. Celier to prepare him for the Murder of that pious King c. I think not but besides the Fanaticks did but talk of killing him but the Papists did it effectually In the conclusion my Adversary takes care that I may know what the Church of England is and therefore directs me to a Treatise called Good Advice c. written by William Pen the pretended Quaker who is a Socinian as appears by his Sandy Foundation shaken where he downright denys the Trinity and a Papist as all men may judg by his Promotion and Favour at White-hal at this time of day so that I am like to be well informed of the Doctrine of the Church of England by such a Fellow as this is And to be plain with
A Short ANSWER TO A Malicious Pamphlet called A Reply Written by JOHN GADBURY the King of England's Juggler and Astrologer in Ordinary to the Pope to help on the work THis Gadbury being a new Convert to Popery hath to admiration armed himself with a vast Stock of Impudence and Villany and these being joined to Folly and Lying makes the Fellow the more Eminent and Notorious as if these qualifications were inherent principles to his new Religion And now he appears barefaced in defending Popery pretending to write a Reply by way of Answer to an Almanack for the Year 1687 designedly writ to ridicule and oppose that Lying Religion And this Reply of his is nothing else but a bundle of lies and forgeries to abuse the Author of that Almanack without the least ground imaginable to give Popery a Recommendation to the World and to vindicate the villanous Agents in the present design of Subverting the Government and Religion of England And in this Answer I shall omit the taking notice of the major part of his Nonsense and Lies as being not worth my pains nor the Readers time to examine and imploy these few Pages to examine and refute those things that are more remarkable the rest being easie and obvious to every impartial man and in the first place I will give you a Character of the Fellow that you may thence guess at his Credit in every thing else that he pretends like a Champion to defend Ex pede Hercules First then This Fellow was by his Father brought up in the Doctrine of the Church of England while he was young and in this he continued for some years but after he came to London as he tells us in his Doctrine of Nativities he shook off that and went among the Presbyterian and Independent Congregations and followed them so long that he says in that Book they made him almost mad by preaching up the Doctrine of Free Grace So that he then began to think of inquiring after a new Religion And the first that he pitcht upon and best pleased his vicious Inclinations was that prophane Persuasion called Ramters Familists or sweet Singers of Israel a sort of profuse debauched Atheists at that time very numerous and to this he was Converted or as the Cant then was Begotten in the Faith by Abiezer Cope whose Piety and Reverence to a Deity may be guest at by this Expression of his who when he was committed to Newgate by the Parliament for spreading his damnable Heresie and being brought to the Prison door he set his Arms on kembo and said Be thou opened thou Everlasting doors and let the King of Glory come in And by the way as he was carried to Prison our Juggler hung on his Coach-side to beg his Blessing calling him Father and in this pious profession Jack grew in a short time so good a Proficient that at London-wall being more than half drunk he undertook to preach his Text being these Words And Jephthah was the Son of a Harlot Judges xi ver 1. This Religion after some time grew out of Fashion with our Juggler and then he was again upon the hunt for a new one and as it happened Cromwel had then taken upon him the Government and Jack began to think of learning the Art of Whineing that he might Cant at Whitehall for he is certainly as all Sycophants are always and in all times of the Government side be it never so base and lawless And to this end he began to ingratiate himself there and make friends to Cromwel that he might be permitted to dedicate his Doctrine of Nativities to him but in this he was prevented to his great grief and I am credibly informed that he had promised all that a base Fellow could to be a Creature in that Government to the best of his power but was not accepted Cromwel being dead and the King likely to return he then began to set up for a Church of England-man and Loyalty complaining of his hard usage in the time of Rebellion and then it was Charles the Martyr at every word In this Course and Cant he went on for some years railing at the Rebels in defence of the Church of England as now he doth at the Church of England in defence of Popery till he was taken notice of by the men then in Power In the Year 1666 he removed to Westminster and turned a Whitehall Broker which in plain terms is a Pimp in which Profession he did mighty well And having used the Trade a few Years and found the Inclination of the Court he began to abuse Parliaments among those he durst trust of whom I was one we then being intimate to cry up the Kings Absolute Power and ridicule all and every thing that was against Popery which indeed at that time was a great Argument to me that Popery was growing upon us for I then thought he spoke the true Language of Whitehal And now the Fellow began to grow intimate with Popish Priests in whose Company I have been with him he then hoping to make me as very a R as himself to accomplish which and bring me off from my Principles he would often tell me that Religlon was nothing else but a Cheat a Bugbear and a meer trick of State. About the Year 1677 and forwards he then being intimate with that worthy Matron Mrs. Cellier Midwife to the Popish Plot and his Kinswoman whose Narrative he afterwards writ she came to him to ask an Astrological Question and that was Whether Dangerfield was fit to be trusted or not Trusted to do what to Kill the King. No No but to know whether Dangerfield was fit to be trusted to get in her Husbands Debts who was a Bankrupt and had never a penny owing to him But this was the sham Question that she told the Council to excuse her self So Dangerfield was trusted and his business was to Kill the King and this by Gadbury's direction as you may see at large in Danger-fields Depositions In 1679. our Squire was for that committed to the Gate house where he used in my hearing to rail often against his Cozen Cellier calling her Whore and Bitch and said she had ruined him and had undoubtedly been hanged if he had come to his Tryal which to prevent he sent a large Bribe to Sir T. D. to desire him to procure his Pardon But that Gentleman's honesty and integrity was above Bribery and besides he knew by what he had confest before the Council too much of his Villany to be concerned in his Pardon and so refused Then he sent 100 Guinea's to the late Lord Angle-say to beg the same thing of him to which his Lordship condescended and by his Endeavour his Pardon was past and he pleaded it in Westminster-Hall the Hillary Term following and so escaped hanging at that time and when he came out of Prison he was by the Papists presented with 200 pound for his faithful Service in the Cause because
you Jack I doubt you are out in your Topick in this point as well as in your Head of the Church But I perceive by your pious Opinion that the Grand Seignior will make as good a Head of the Church as any of them all and then too I am sure you will be on the Government side if possible you can you are so good a Christian Page 8. Since James the Second took the Coronation Oath c. Here the Fellow mounts the high Rope again and tells us that it is true The King did take the Coronation Oath but it was by his own free choice and might have chused whether he would or not But let me tell him that this is a gross Lye for it is not Condescension and Choice in the King to take it but an Indispensible duty neither are the Subjects obliged to take the Oath of Allegiance till he hath taken that For as he swears to preserve them in their Rights and Priviledges so they swear to stand by him in the Execution of the Laws so that the Oath of Allegiance and the Coronation Oath are Reciprocal and Equally binding And the King is defective in divers points of his Duty and Power till that is performed and done And let me tell you Mr. Jack the Subjects have a Right as well as the King and both by the same Law. And if the King refuseth to be a King by Law there is neither reason nor necessity for them to swear Obedience for the Obedience due to him as King by Law doth also oblige him by the same Law to protect them in their Lives Liberties and Estates So that it is unreasonable that the Law should force the Subjects to swear to obey and maintain a Prince in his Right and not compel him to give them assurance by Oath that they shall enjoy theirs also And if it were otherwise it would shew great weakness in the Legislators of England to bind the one and leave the others to his Will when the Government of both is by Compact But I perceive my Friend John builds his opinion on Filmore such another sorry Sycophantizing Fellow as himself who hath many flourishes and words and but very little Law and less Reason and Honesty However he and Jack together would form a most admirable sort of Government for a Kingdom or Nation to be governed by Dragoons and converted by Booted Apostles Thus you may see what a special Englishman our Friend is and a hopeful Casuist that can guard and defend their tottering Cause with nothing but Lyes Page 9. Since Judge Street 00000000000 Tresilian How now Jack What are you turned Advocate for Westminster-Hall are those Benches supply'd with such Ignorant Fellows that they must make use of a Scribler to defend them with Arguments of downright Impudence This is a fine Credit for your Law and your King. Well Jack you tell us of a Riddle and that you have been the Oedipus to unfold it And you say the eleven Cyphers with Tresilian at the end of them shews that eleven of the twelve Judges must be hanged Why really Jack you are in the right for that is the meaning of it and it doth not only shew the merit and fate of the Villains but it is also a piece of Prophecy that will shortly be accomplished But pray observe When the Fellow hath unfolded the Riddle and told them that hanging is their due lest they should faint under the Consideration of their destiny and think themselves into their Graves and cozen Tyburn He licks them up with some Oyl of Fool and calls them Loyal Judges and Reverend Sages and then perks up with a strain of his accustomed Impudence and asketh what they have done Done ye Slave What have they not done to make themselves compleat Traytors in all kind of Villany and Treason that lyeth within the Sphere of their power and action First They have by their Suffrage given the King a power Superior to Law for which Crime Tresilian was hanged For it is one thing to connive at the Non-execution of the Laws and another to take away their Obligatory Force one thing to supercede a Law wherein his own benefit is concerned and another to dispence with Laws made for the Safety and Security of the Kingdom Religion and Subjects and this they have done in giving their Opinions that the King may dispence with all Law as he sees good You may remember Jack that when Richard the Second had pick'd a pack of Judges for his purpose suppose such as these or not quite so bad and those were Tresilian Belknappe Holt Fulthorp De Burgh Lockton and others the Duke of Ireland the King's Creature with the rest of his Consorts formed the then design into ten Queries under the power of which being granted they intended to manage and carry on their cursed Plot and on the 25. of August in the eleventh year of the King in Nottingham Castle the said ten Queries were propounded to the foresaid Judges to which they all consented and when they had signed and sealed according as they were desired Belknappe broke out into this Expression and said Now I want nothing but a Ship a nimble Horse or an Halter to bring me to the death I deserve for my Treason against the Nobles of the Land. Which ten Queries and the thirty four Articles of Treason which they were after charged with you may find Printed in the Life of Richard the Second which are too long here to insert And when you have considered both their Crimes you will say that the Judges under James the Second have outdone those of Richard the Second and yet this Man asketh what they have done Secondly They have used their utmost endeavour to bring in Popery they have not only connived at the base Actions used to encourage the Popish Party in their present damnable designs to overthrow the Government and alter Religion but have also given advice and direction for the doing of it and visibly shewed their Endeavour by encouraging base and unjust Prosecutions Fining Hanging c. all those that have stood in the way of it And when any such Cause came to be tryed where the Defendant was looked on as an Enemy to the Government as they usually call all those that they are minded to ruin they never used to consult Rastal Pulton or Keble c. in the true Law that did relate to the merit of the Cause But took their direction from the Lord Kings-will Sir John doe-it and Sir William ' Tis-well all of them great Lawyers at White-hall And is not the Defendant or Prisoner in a fine Condition in such a Case as this But that which leaves them without excuse is that they know the Laws which are made and still in force against Popery against all those that are reconciled to the Church of Rome and those that do but assist in any thing that concerns the promotion of the See of Rome in England Thirdly
him upon what direction he Astrologically dyed and with a great deal of sop-gravity he told him that it was the Physicians chereby intimating that the Physicians had murdered him which was very disingenious of him to blame those Gentleman that used their utmost endeavour to preserve him but indeed he could give no true account of his death Astrologically nor really any at all tho he dyed upon the operation of six or seven Directions and therefore he was obliged to make use of any Sham to stop the Gentlemans mouth that asked him In Page 32. he shews his Skill in Astrology where he denies that the part of Fortune can be directed for l●●e Pray Mr. Gadbury what direction kill'd Charles the first of England I know your Answer for you can make no other but this that he suffered upon the Direction of the Ascendent to the Square of Mars if so why did not the Ascendent to the Square of Mars kill in the Earl of Essex his Nativity Like Causes like Effects for none of your Shams shall pass upon me can you resolve this point now with all your Skill And in the Earl of Strafford's Nativity you make the Midheaven to the body of Saturn kill and the Sun is giver of Life Yet in the Nativity of the Princess Royal the Mid-heaven to the body if Mars gives Marriage is not this fine Stuff And in the Case of Henry the Eighth and Queen Mary neither the body nor the opposition of Saturn would kill are not you ashamed of this Nonsence if you are not you may But I shall expose you and your Collection in a treatise by it self in which Case I will use you very kindly but in the mean time pray tell us fairly in print what Direction it was that kill'd that worthy Gentleman Sr. Frech Hollis He that you promised him he should live some decades of years and he was shot to pieces within fix Months after Just so you will cheat the Papists and your Master too for the part of Fortune is Hileg in his Nativity and so it was in his Fathers Pray tell us by what Rules in Astrology you predicted the Queen of England should be brought to bed of a Boy in the year 1686. Did not the Devil and the Priests deceive you that bout I suppose it was a Whitehal Scheam which you judged that by perhaps of the same mans setting as that was which you predicted the taking away the City of Londons Charter by though you laid the sham on an Eclipse of the Moon you know Now when you have considered all this Nonsense Sham and Cheat how can you have the impudence to pretend to be Master and Teacher of any other Astrology than a false one and who do you think will believe you Fools excepted Likewise in the same Page 32. he is so notoriously bold as to deny my quotations from Ptolomey that is lib. 3. Chap. 12. de parte Fortunae and Chap. 13. Quot sint Prorogatores The first of which he says treats of de Impedimentis Infirmitatibus Nati c. and the second de qualitatibus Animae Nati Now I will appeal to all those Gentlemen that have that worthy Author by them of the best Impression which is that of Melancthon who is in the truth He or I for if the 12. and 13. Chapters of the third Book of Ptolomeys Quadripartite doth not treat the one departe Fortunae and the other de Prorogatoribus then I never have read that Book in my whole life But I suppose this Fellow hath cheared himself with the Translation of Camerarius which is the worst in being but it is indeed good enough for him for if he had a better he knows not what use to make of it Now you that are able to examine this Case and judge it will see what a strange Fellow I have here to do with for the two Chapters he there alledgeth are the 17. and the 18. of that third Book In Page 33. he tells us that he was there about to lay by his pen but upon new Considerations fresh Matter came in and my prevarications and abuse of art makes him enter into a long preamble about the Conjunctions of Saturn and Jupiter of which he gives you a very lame account but it serves to those that do not understand better but to what purpose he luggs them in I know not neither can I apprehend any occasion for them in his pretended answer to that Alman In Page 40. he brings in the Palladium of Rome to shew you that it is under no such misfortunes as I pretend to say it is neither says he is there any reason for it in the figure he produceth in the first place I never spoke any thing as to the Buildings and Foundations of Rome but the Cheating Crew that there resides for it is not against the stone Walls that I shoot but the Murder Idolatry and Villany of those that pretend to be the Head Members and Body of that cursed Antichristian Society who prophanely call themselves the Church of Christ and Christians for in the same Houses there might good pious People dwell were these removed or destroyed and Rome may be Rome when the Pope and all his Lewd Buggering Clergy are gone But if Gadbury pleaseth to consider the present Affairs between the King of France and the Pope and how dreadfully that Storm threatens the Holy See if it goes forward I suppose he will not be so impertinently positive in his Judgment from the Palladium now as he was at the writing of that Malicious Pamphlet Again let him with this also consider how the Lords Inquisitors and Cardinals did handle the Pope in the Affairs of Molinos I think this is an untoward Omen to the Grandeur of the Infallible Power lodged in the Pope as they say Which is further aggravated by that slight they put upon his Bull at Colien all which considered together tells us that either the Palladium is a false position or else the Prophetical Interpreter thereof gives a Lying Judgment to delude the Papists c. Rome stands 't is true unable to defie One Monarch's Fury or our Prophesy In Page 42. the Fellow tells us that the Heavens shew glorious things not only to England and Rome but to all Christcadom to the advancement of the true Religion and the depression of Heresy and Schism This Heresy that he here speaks of is the Protestant Religion and the 〈◊〉 of the Church of England which you see he hath here 〈◊〉 to destruction and ruin for which they are infinitely obliged to 〈◊〉 and the true Religion to be advanced and established is Popery in which this Fellow is imbarked In Page 46. he says Dangerfield was fetcht out of prison by a kind-hearted old Woman which was Mrs. Cellier the pillory'd Popish Midwife Well Jack did She release him from thence for pure Charity 's sake or not No he was to be her Stallion to kill the King and to
get in her Husband's Debts Nay then I think he was to earn his Deliverance and She knowing that he had been whip'd and pillory'd before as you say He was gave Her assurance enough that He was fit for the design She released him for People of an equal Share of Sence of Reputation or Honesty always delight in each others Company Like the Proverb Similis simili gaudet He goes on and tells us that I have bounded the Happiness of England and that it shall terminate in October 1688. but this is false For I conclude that the Glory and Happiness of England the Protestant Religion and Church of England will then begin to appear and suddenly after thrive and flourish again to the Eternal sorrow and grief of Jack Gadbury and all his cursed Faction that so much desire and delight in the ruin and destruction of the Protestants and Protestant Religion But like a Fool He tells the World there that I threaten the King with Poyson when I mention the Spanish Apple I perceive the Fellow is Ignorant what the meaning of an Orangien Apple is and if he be let him be so still till the Judgment of God comes upon them And at last he hits on the great Mystery and tells us that I have forgot my self and foolishly talk of things to happen several years after we are all destroyed Now who He means by the word we I cannot perfectly tell I suppose he means the Papists for he cannot be so impudent after all these villanies and abusive Language to the Church of England and Protestants crying up Popery and railing at its Enemies calling them Traytors and Rebels c. to believe any man will think him a Protestant tho he says he is or to shroud himself under that title for security For in his Station and to the best of his power he hath been as ill a man as any among them no disparagement to others But if he means we Papists I do not doubt of seeing them destroyed either in person or power or both and this in a shorter time than the man thinks of and after that to see those other Effects of the conjunction that will happen in those years that doth succeed the time of their opposition which like the conjunction is a triple one and are in the year 1692. and 1693. from Sagitary and Gemini and doth particularly concern London c. The CONCLUSION NOw by way of Conclusion I will first be so kind to Mr. J. Gadbury as to give him half a dozen Astrological operations in his own Nativity which he is not able to perform himself And secondly I will give him some good advice fit for one that is under such times and circumstances as he himself is which I hope will reform him Since his coming out of the Gatehouse prison in the year 1679. he hath had several eminent directions the chief of which were the mid●●en to the mine of the Sun and Venus but now the case is altered and he hath in the years following some of a contrary nature and ●●ect to operate as you may here see Moon ad quad Mercur mdo dd Arcus 60 48 61 ye 2 mon. Ascend ad Corp Jovis Arc 61 48 62 ye 2 mon. Sol ad par Satur in Zodiaco Arc 64 3 64 ye 10 mon. Luna ad quadr Solis mdo dd Arc 65 31 66 ye 4 mon. Luna ad par Martis motu rapto Arc 65 56 66 ye 9 mon. Sol ad oppositi Saturni Arc 68 57 70 ye 2 mon. The Ascendent to the body of Jupiter is a good direction but it is so attended that it will lose much of its Lustre for besides those before and after it in that very year the Moon comes to the body of Mars Square of Mercury and Square of the Sun all Secundary and therefore it cannot be so great as it would have been otherwise But for the four last directions here mentioned I must tell him that they will put all his Popish Politicks and pious ver tues into exercise and it will be well if he keeps out of his old Lodging at the entrance into the Palace yard again And yet I dare assure him that none of these directions will kill him they only give trouble or travel Secondly seeing the Stars will be so cruel and unkind to their great and only Secretary and Minion Dr. Jack I would advise him to lead a godly righteous and sober life which he never did yet and by that means prepare himself to undergo and receive the fury of these angry Stars The best way I can advise him is to run over his beads twice a day more than ordinary whip himself harder and more on good Fryday hear Mass frequently and go as often as may be to Father Peters to Confession and this being done there is no doubt of his being a Saint and as good a Christian as Pope John the twelfth Raviliack or Guido Vaux And my friend being come to this pitch of piety fit to receive instructions I would advise him to repent of all his villanies against the Laws and Subjects of England in raving to have the Test repealed in which case I do recommend to his consideration the Letter of the Pensimaris Fagel where he is assured that the true Heir to the Crown of England is really against setting up Popery and Repealing the Test which I hope every true Englishman will take notice of and the rather because one and twenty moneths is not an age His shaming the fire of London for which let him read Sir Robert Brooks's report to the Committee His Justifying the murder of the Protestants in Ireland and denying that the Papists murdered Sir Edmundbury Godfrey with many more which I hope so religious a man as this is will lay to heart and heartily repent of When thou sawest a thief thou consentedst with him and hast been partakers with Adulterers These things thou hast done and I kept silence thou thoughtest that I was altogether such a one as thy self Psalm 50. Mars in oppo●●●●●● to the 〈◊〉 and Saturn in the same Aspect with the Sun. 〈…〉 one 〈◊〉 Knave and Treader Collec Genitu Aph. 87. This 〈◊〉 was made by J. Gadbury and it takes place in his own Nativity FINIS