Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	chancellor_n	great_a	seal_n	2,853	5	8.3166	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A29745	A brief remonstrance of the grand grievances and oppressions suffered by Sir William Courten and Sir Paul Pyndar, knts., deceased as also by their heirs, executors, administrators, and creditors : humbly represented to both Houses of Parliament, prorogued to 21 October 1680 : faithfully collected out of several courts of record, orders of counsel, and treaties of peace and common alliance : with several remarks thereupon for the improvement of naviagation, trade, and commerce / by John Brown.	Brown, John, of London.	1680 (1680)	Wing B5025; ESTC R27230	34,787	30

Upon the Complaints of the Commons of England in Parliament an Act passed in the 4th Year of Henry the 5th whereby a remedy was provided for their more speedy Relief in all Cases of Spoyls and Depredations against Leagues Amities Truces and safe Conducts the parties grieved having liberty thereby to Address themselves to the Keeper of the Privy Seal for the time being for Letters of Request who upon Manifest proofs and Evidence of the wrong appearing shall grant Letters of Request in due form if so required for Restitution and Reparations from the parties that did the Injury that is to say from the Prince State or Supream Power which if not made in a convenient time prefixed that then the Lord Chancellour of England shall make to the party grieved Letters of Marque or Reprizals under the Great Seal of England in due form of Law And by a Statute in the 14th Edw. 4th It was Enacted Established and Confirmed that all Statutes and Ordinances against Offences Injuries Damages and Losses done by Breakers of Leagues Amities Truces and safe Conducts shall be in full Force and Effect By which Statute-Law wherein every Subject of England hath an Interest the Lord Privy Seal and Lord Chancellour are bound to grant the said Letters Respectively Ex Officio of Common right they being upon their Oaths to do their Office Iustly otherwise it would be a Uiolation of their trust And therefore without Satisfaction and Reparations first had and obtained in the Case of Courten for the Debt of 151612 l. and Damages the Chancellour cannot legally pass any Act Supersedeas or Proclamation under the Great Seal of England to Revoke or make void the said Letters Patents or to suspend the Execution thereof being the effect and fruit of several Acts of Parliament for Relief of particular Subjects that were Spoyled and Injured against Leagues of Common Amity and Truces Whereas in the High Court of Chancery his Lordship cannot Relieve any Person whatsoever Stranger or Denizon against a Statute-Law Grotius and the Learned Selden agree that after a Depredation Committed by the Subjects of one Nation to those of another and that the Damage hath been Stated and Letters of Request Issued forth and Iustice denied or delayed that Immediatly such Damage becomes a National Debt to the particular Persons Injured and by the Laws of Nations it ought to be recovered and Paid therefore Remedy is provided by the Laws and Statutes of England accordingly When an Authority passeth by the Kings Grant to such injured Persons of Common Right coupled with an interest to Levie and Recover the Debt and Damages when once the Power is Granted as the Law directs the same cannot by any subsequent Act of the King be Bound or Suspended without satisfaction to the Parties Grieved and the reason is plain because such a Grant and Execution upon it is no Breach of Peace or common Alliance between Princes and States And it 's against the Honour and Interest of the King both at Home And Abroad to diminish his own Prerogative and Royal Grant before satisfaction obtained the Patent being published for a President in several Languages amongst all the Neighbouring Nations Answer to the Second Question THat the private Interest of the Subjects of either side upon Debts Accounts Covenants or any civil Contract in Merchandizing upon the Land cannot be in any Measure comprized or comprehended within any Article of the Treaty at Breda under the notion of Offences Injuries Damages and Losses Therefore they cannot fall under that Construction or forced Interpretation of those Words which were intended naturally to Arise from Spoyls and Depredations terms that ought to have been used in the said Articles but that the transgressors would Pallitate Spoyls and Depredations by the names of Losses Injuries and Damages and the two Subsequent Articles being relative to the third having a Dependance upon the said Offences Injuries Damages and Losses no particular or private Debt and Damage can fall under that construction otherwise all English-mens Money in Holland and Consequently all Dutch mens Money in England gotten into the Hands of Bankers on either side might have been confiscated But the Wars being Proclaimed for General Reprizals between the King and States particular Men Traded each with other notwithstanding It was therefore an Apparent Breach of the Laws of Common Amity and of the Alliance with the Crown of England for the States of Holland on the 10th of September 1676. to send their Express Order in Writing to the ordinary Courts of Iudicature in Amsterdam and the Hague interdicting and Prohibiting the Iudges from Granting any Process or doing any Iustice against Jacob Pergens at the Suit of several English-men for Debts due upon Bills Bonds and Covenants for repayment of Moneys gotten into his Hands under several trusts After this Solemn Debate and Resolution upon those two Points in Question were over a grand Objection was raised by the Civil Lawyers then Present which was Answered as follows in Order Obj. THat a Soveraign Prince having the power of Peace and War in his Hands being the Sole Arbiter thereof may make use of a private Interest for the publique Necessity as Sole Legislator in such Cases Answ. St. Augustin sayes that all Humane Laws are Righteous Decrees agreeing with the Natural and Eternal Law and that there is no Law Iust or Legitimate except it agree with them both All Power being confined within the Bounds of Equity and Reason there is no Plea or Bar to be allowed against the Law of Nature which is Immutable It 's Granted that God Almighty having trusted Soveraign Princes with the Government for the Protection and Preservation of their Subjects in their Goods and Properties It if be just the Supream Power hath sufficient Authority to Restrain any particular Mans Right for every Mans Good yet it was ever found most reasonable in all Ages that when a private Interest was Sacrifized for a Common good a recompence was made for the private Damages out of the publick Purse Cicero Tertullian and other most Learned Authors do all agree in this point Verum etsi nostrae tempore necessitatis Patriae conferre debeamus tamen jure naturae congrui ut Communis salus Communis utilitas periculum non unius duntaxat aut alterius sed Communibus impensis jacturis periculisque comparetur BY the Law of Nature if a Soveraign Prince and State enter into a Contract one with the other upon certain Conditions the Contract is viod if the Conditions are not performed To clear this point we need not go far for Presidents the King of Great Britain having declared both the former Treaties in the year 1662. and 1667. With the States General to be void upon that account The States having been refractory in the performance of Agreements concerning Poleroon and in making reparation for other matters As even the Treaty at Breda was Pronounced null and void upon the like score about Surrinam c. Whereby

Sir William Courten and Sir Paul Pyndar K t s Deceased with their Wills annexed and Thomas Coppin Esq on the behalf of themselves and divers others Interested and Concerned Sheweth THat in Pursuance of two several Orders of the Council-Board Dated the 24th of July 1677. Your Petitioners and other Proprietors Interested have often attended with their Councel Learned in the Law to be heard concerning relief for the matters therein contained according to Iustice and Common Right Humbly Praying that the Ambassador of the States General Resident in England might have notice thereof to make what Defence he could by his Advocates or others against your Petitioners just Complaints but to this day your Petitioners could not be heard although several times were Assigned for that purpose Your Petitioners do therefore most Humbly Pray that Your Majesty would be most Graciously pleased to appoint a Peremptory Day that your Petitioners may be heard at the Council-Board and that the Dutch Ambassador may have notice thereof from one of the Principal Secretaries of State with Copies of the said Orders to make what Defence he can by his Advocates or others if he please that Right may be done according to the Merits of the Cause And Your Petitioners shall ever Pray c. George Carew Thomas Coppin THe said Petition being Ordered to be Read and Sir Philip Lloyd Clerk of the Councel having Read the same accordingly on the 12th day of May 1680. The Lord High Chancellour was pleased to tell Mr. Carew that he should not be heard but that He and others that offered to put the said Letters Pattents or any Commissions derived from thence in Execution should be Hanged as Pirates And notwithstanding the said George Carew informed the Councel-Board that two or three Ships were out upon the Coast of Spain and other parts in Pursuance of certain Articles and Agreements between him and the Creditors yet nothing would prevail for a hearing upon the Petition or upon the former Order of Councel aforesaid but this new Order was made Ex parte upon a Memorial given in by the Dutch Ambassador stuft with Impertinent falsities as follows At the Court at White-Hall the 12 th of May 1680. Present The Kings most Excellent Majesty His Highness Prince Rupert Lord Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Chancellor Lord President Duke of Albemarle Marquess of Worcester Earl of Ossory Lord Chamberlain Earl of Bridgwater Earl of Sunderland Earl of Essex Earl of Bathe Lord Bishop of London Mr. Hide Lord Chief Justice North. Mr. Finch Mr. Secretary Ienkins Mr. Chancellor of the Exchequer Sir Thomas Chicheley Mr. Godolphin THis day a Memorial presented to His Majesty by his Excellency the Ambassador Extraordinary from the States General of the United Provinces was read in Council setting forth how that according to Information given upon Oath Sir Edward Graves K nt and George Carew Esq were Equipping and Arming a small Frigat called the Mary under the Command of Tyrence Byrne to be imployed against the Subjects of the States General and particularly to surprize and seize the Ship called the Emperour wherein a part of the said Lord Ambassadors Equippage was Imbarqued in order to his return to his own Country which Equipping and Arming was by colour of a Commission or Letter of Reprizal bearing date the 29th of May in the 17th year of His Majesties Reign that now is and granted in favour of the Creditors of Sir William Courten and others And praying that the said Letters of Reprizals might be Revoked His Majesty considering that the said Commission was Suspended by His Majesties Proclamation bearing Date the 10th of August 1666. for divers great and notable Misdemeanors committed in Execution thereof and that by the Treaty of Peace and Alliance made with the States General of the United Provinces at Breda the 21 of July 1667. It is agreed that all Suits and Pretentions that the Subjects of His Majesty or the States General might or could move or prosecute one against another for any matter or thing before the Date of the said Treaty shall remain void Obliterated and Disanulled and that all Letters of Reprizal Marque or Countermarque both general and particular are by the said Treaty Inhibited and Revoaked which said Treaty was restored in its former Uigour and Confirmed by a Subsequent Treaty made at Westminster in the Month of February 167 3 4. By which Treaties all Letters and Commissions of Reprizal are intirely Revoaked and Annulled His Majesty likewise foreseeing of what Mischievous Consequence it would be to all his Loving Subjects if the States General upon the Execution of the said Letters of Reprizal contrary to the meaning of the said Treaties and after the anulling of them by the same should Grant Letters of Countermarque against the said Subjects and their Goods to the hindring of Commerce and the Ruine and Dammage of many particular Men although unconcerned in the Case of such Reprizal His Majesty doth therefore hereby Order Sir Creswel Levins His Majesties Attorney General to prepare the Draught of a Supersedeas to pass the Great Seal of England whereby the said Letters of Reprizal may be in due form of Law Superseded Revoked and Declared to be void and Determined to all effects and purposes whatsoever to the end the States General may rest satisfied of his Majesties care to have his Treaties duly executed and that it be made known and may appear of Record to all his Loving Subjects that the said Letters of Reprizal are Revoaked and Declared void to the end also that none may hereafter presume to Act by vertue thereof and if any do that they may be proceeded against as Pirats acting without Commission and as Infractors of the Peace and Alliance between His Maiesty and the States General A true Copy Ex. FRANCIS GUYN IT may be remarqued from hence what Dangerous consequences would attend the Subjects of England in their Estates and Properties if such an Order of the Councel-Table should be of force to Supersede a Iudicial Grant upon Record under the Great Seal of England without a Scire facias or hearing the Parties or to Discharge and Release particular Mens-Rights and Interests in the Hands of Forreigners upon private and Land-Contracts in Trade and Commerce without any Restitution or Satisfaction for the same Under such presidents no Man can be safe It 's very remarkable that civil Actions and Pretences for several Matters and Things were not Obliterated or made void by the Treaty at Breda as appears by several Presidents of both sides in the Courts of Judicature at the Hague Amsterdam and Middleburgh viz. By the cause in the Supream Court of Judicature between James Boeve and the Heirs of Peter Boudaen depending many years before the Treaty at Breda and prosecuted several years after to a Definitive Sentence and by other actions in Zealand that had long depended before the Treaty in the Zerick-sea which were prosecuted afterward by Sir William Lower John Monson and Roger