Henr 6. Fitzh processe 72. The great question was whether the plaintiff should have such a Scire facias against the sheriff or a writ of Detinue but it was not adjudged but by the consent of the parties the demâ—urrer was waived and issue taken Note that in the very case there was a non suit at Surrey Assizes upon issue taken upon the avowry for damage feasant and such issue is not expressed in the writ for which the writ is not good Quaere tamen Note where the pledges were sufficient at the time of the taking c. and afterwards in the Terme it was tried at the bar and found for the Defendant notwithstanding that the plaintiff gave in evidence that one of the pledges was insufficient because he should have replyed that I.S. one of the pledges was not sufficient at the time of the taking c. Iac. rot 2752. It is thus contained Surr. ss It was commanded the Sheriff whereas Edmund Travers was summoned to be in the Court of the Lord the King now before his Iustices here to wit at Westminster to answer Rich. Ray of a plea wherefore he the thirtieth day of August Anno of the Lord the King now of England the nineteenth at Deptford in a certain place there called H. took the cattell to wit three Geldings four Oxen five Cowes seventy sheepe and one Calfe of the same R. and them unjustly detained against sureties and pledges c. of which said taking and unjust detaining of the cattel aforesaid the same Richard Raye another time to wit the one and thirtieth day of August Anno 19. abovesaid without our writ levied a certain plaint against the same Edmond Travers before R. M. Knight late Sheriff of the county of Surrey in his County Court then held at Guildford in the same County of Surrey and then and there in the same County Court aforesaid found to the then sheriff of the sayd County of Surrey Pledges as well to prosecute his plaint as for the Return of the cattell aforesaid to the same Edmund or the price of them if returne of them should be adjudged to the said Edmund to wit certain R.R. and R.K. upon which said pledges the same then sheriff of Surry afterwards to wit then at the petition of the said R.R. the cattell aforesaid according to the Law and Custome of the Realm of the Lord the King of England to the same Richard Raye caused to be replevied the Record of which said plaint afterwards by Writ of the said Lord the King to the sheriff of the sayd County of Surrey in due manner sent here to wit at Westminster aforesaid was had and the same R. Ray afterwards in the same Court of the Lord the King here being solemnly called came not but made Default by which afterwards to wit in Michaelmas Terme Anno 19. abovesaid in the same Court of the Lord the King here it was considered that the same Richard Ray and his pledges to prosecute should be thereof in mercy let the names of the pledges be enquired of and that the same Ed. Travers should go thereof without day c. And that he should have Return of the Cattell aforesaid whereupon by writ of the said Lord the King it was commanded to the late sheriff of Surrey that he should without delay make returne of the cattell aforesaid to the said Edmond Travers and should not deliver them at the complaint of the sayd Richard Ray without the writ of the said Lord the King which should make expresse mention of the said judgment and in as much as that precept of the Lord the King should be executed he should make to appear to the Justices of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster in Cro. sancti Trinitatis Anno Regis nunc 20 And the same late sheriff of Surrey to the Justices of the said Lord the King here to wit at Westminster aforesaid at that day returned that before the coming of the said writ to him therein directed the cattell aforesaid were eloyned by the same R. Raye to places to him unknown so that hee could not make returne of the cattell aforesaid to the said Edmund Travers as by the said writ to him it was commanded c. whereupon it was commanded to the same Sheriff of Surrey that of other cattell of the said R. Ray to the value of the cattell aforesaid first taken hee should take in Withernam and should deliver them to the said Edmund Travers to keep to him untill he could cause to be returned to the said Edmund Travers the cattell before taken and that he should put by sureties and safe pledges the same R. Ray that he should be before the Iustices of the said Lord the King here to wit at Westminster Tres Trin. then next following to answer as well the said Lord the King for the contempt as to the said Edmund Travers for the damages and injuries to him in this behalfe done and the said sheriff of Surrey to the same Iustices of the Lord the King at Westminster at that day returned that the same R. Ray had no goods nor chattells in his Bayliwick which he could take in Withernam nor had any thing in his bayliwick by which he m ght be attached according to the Exigency of that writ as by the Record and proceedings therein in the same Court of the Lord the King here remaining manifestly appeareth whereupon the sayd Lord the King to the same then sheriff by another writ of his had commanded that by honest c. he should make known to the same R. R. and R. K. his pledges that they should be here at this day to wit in Cro. Animarum then next following to shew if any thing c. wherefore the cattell aforesaid ought not to be delivered to the same Edmund Travers for the same cattell of the same Richard Raye by the same Edmund Travers so before taken and now by him eloyned as they as aforesaid became pledges And now here at this day came the said Edmund Travers by Henry Millet his Attorney and offered himselfe the fourth day against the same R.R. and R. K. pledges in the plea aforesaid and they being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now returneth that they have nothing c. nor are found c. And whereupon the same Edmund Travers of having the Return of the cattell aforesaid hath been a long time delayed wherefore he supplicateth to the said Lord the King to exhibit Iustice to him and that the statutes of the Lord the King of his Kingdom made for the bettering of the same may remain stable the Kâ—ng will for the benefit of his Leige people by speediest remedies consonant to the same Statutes be assistant The sheriff is commanded that by honest c. he make known to the said R. M. late sheriff of the same County of Surrey who took the pledges aforesaid in form aforesaid that he should be here at this day A
of the Rolls of our chancery allowed c. Entry of a writ of attachment of priviledge in the Common Bench for an attorney of the same Bench in debt against 2 severall persons severally M 19 Iac. rot 2948 Brownlow Lincolne ss The Sheriff was commanded that he should attach T B. clerk and L E clerke so that hee should have them here upon Satturday next after the morrow of all Soules to answer R Clarke Gent. one of the Attornyes of the court of the Lord the King of Common Bench here according to the liberties and priviledges c. in a plea of Debt severally And now here at this day came the said Robert in his proper person and offered himselfe against the said T and L in the plea aforesaid and they came not and the sheriff to wit T T Esquire now returneth that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed tooke the bodies of the same T and L. whose bodyes the same sheriff hath now here ready as by the said writ it was commanded him Cedi corpus returned and because the same sheriff the bodies of the same T and L now here at this day hath not ready therefore the same sheriff to wit the same Tho. T Esquire in mercy c. and he is fined by the Justices here at forty shillings and it is commanded to the same sheriff that he have here upon Wednesday next after 15 san Martini the bodies of the same T and L whom c. to answer to the same Robert in the plea aforesaid and the same sheriff to wit T.T. Esquire now returneth that the said T. and L. are in prison of the Lord the King at his Castle of Lincolne so languishing that he could not have their bodies here at this day without perill of death as by the said writ it was commanded him c. And hereupon in the same Court of the King here on the behalfe of the said Robert it is testified that the same T and L are sound and whole and able to travell therefore it is commanded the same sheriff that he or his under sheriff be here upon Wednesday next after eight dayes of Saint Hillary bringing with him the same T and L whether they be found or infirme to answer to the same Robert in the plea aforesaid and that he omit nothing herein under the penalty of 20 l. which if he shall not do the sheriff shall know he is to loose c. Duces recum awarded under the penalty of 20 l. Procedendo H 35. H. 8. Rot. 318. ss A Procedend awarded in a plea of lands to be removed out of an inferiour Court by Recordare Whereupon the cause aforesaid being seen alleaged by the same B. to remove the Plaintiff aforesaid in the writ aforesaid above specified It seemeth to the justices here that cause to be in sufficient in law to remove the plaint aforesaid out of the Court of the said Elizabeth B. nor but that the Bayliff of the said E. B of her mannor of B. with the Soke aforesaid in the court of the same E. B. and upon the plaint aforesaid ought to proceed c. Therefore it is considered that the said Brian notwithstanding the said Writ to the said sheriff to Record and remove the plaint aforesaid before directed he may proceed in the plaint aforesaid with effect And to the parties aforesaid exhibit full and speedy justice therein according to the Law and Custome of the Lord the King of England and the Court aforesaid c. M 8. H. 4. Rot. 114. Procedendo Rege inconsulto In a Sci. Fac. the Tenant pleads an attaint of the predecessor of the demandant by act of Parliament that the Tenements of the demandant came to the Kings hands and prayeth judgment si Rege in consulto c. And the King sent his writ de procedendo therein directed to the Justices that the Tenant plead de novo with the demandant c. H 13. Jac. Rot. Brownlow London ss A Procedendo after much debate granted upon a speciall return made upon a Hab. cor upon the custom of London concerning Prentices their ages and their Indentures between them and their Masters Indenture void if the Prentice be not of the age of fourteen years when he was bound An Habeas Corpus upon the privileges in the Bench for Martin Slater was directed to the Mayor Aldermen and sheriffs of London retornable immediatly before Henry Hobert Knight and Baron Cheife Justice c. Test 28. Nov. 13. Iac. by H. Hobert Execution c. ss London ss we I. Kt. Mayor of the said City of London and of the same City Aldermen and W. I. and I. G sheriffs of London to H. H. Knight and Baronet Chief Justice of the Lord the King now of the common Bench at this time in the precincts of great S. Bartholomew London do certifie that c. Prohibition BE it remembred that the 20. day of November the same Terme came here into the Court I. L. in his owne person and gave the Court here to understand Prohibition to the Court of Stanneries in the County of Cornw for holding plea of maters which contcern the Stanneries Suggestion That whereas by the lawes statutes of the Realme of the Lord the King of England it is provided that Keeper of the stanuaries of the Lord the King and of the court of the Stannaries within the counties of Devon and Cornewall or Keeper or Keepers of his place for the time being may not nor shall not hold pleas before him in the Court of Stannaries aforesaid unlesse arising between the Stannators whilst they work in the stannaries and between them and other Forreigners of any trespasses plaints or contracts made within the places wherein they work within the Stannaries neverthelesse certaine I. C. Gent. Administrator of the Goods and Chattles which were of I. C. his Father not being a Tinner in any of the stannaries aforesaid not ignorant of the premisses but indeavouring and intending very much to vex and disturb the same I against the lawes of the Realm of the Lord the King of England In the stannary court of the Lord the King of F in the said county of C before the Substeward of the Stannary Court aforesaid or deputy or Keeper of his place in the Court aforesaid or any of them in a certaine plea of Account by plaint by the said I. C. the same against the said L. in the same Court levyed upon supposall that the said L. was receivour of the monies of the said I. C. the Father and to have received of the monies of the said I.C. the Father in his life time 20 l. of one I. M to render an account thereof to the said I. C. drew into plea And the same L. to appeare in the said Stannery Court of F. aforesaid by occasion of the premisses and to answer the said C. of and upon the premisses
untill the debt aforesaid be levied and upon a judgment that the first recorder is satiâ—fied he shall have such a Scire fac against the first creditor to remove him and to have the lands delivered upon the second extent 38 E. 3. 12. 6. whereas it was considered that in the Court of the Lord the King here that Edward B. Knight should have execution against Thomas Coney late of c. otherwise called c. aswell of a certaine debt of 80 l. which the same Ed. otherwise in the Court of the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England here to wit in Mich. Term An. of the Reigne of the said Lady the Queen 39. and 40 had recovered against him as of 50 s which to the same Ed. in the same Court were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of the detayning of that debt whereof he is convicted And the same Edward afterwards came into the Court of the Lord the King now here and by the statute in such case provided chose to be delivered to him all the goods and chattles of the said T. besides his Oxen other necessaries for the plough likewise the moyety of all his lands and Tenements in the County of Staff to hold as his Free Tenements to him and his assignes according to the statute aforesaid untill he had levyed the debt and Damages thereupon whereupon the King by his writ commanded the sheriff of Staff that all the goods and chattles of the same T. besides his Oxen and necessaries of his Plough and likewise all his lands and Tenements in the County of Staff whereof the same T. in Cr. Anim. An. of the Reigne of the late Queen 39. or at any times afterwards was seised or possessed without delay he should cause to be delivered to the said Edward by a resonable price and extent to hold to him the goods and Chattles aforesaid as his proper goods and Chattles And also to hold the moyety aforesaid as his Free Tenement to him his assignes according to the Form of the statute aforesaid untill he had levied the debt Damages aforesaid thereupon and in asmuch c. the sheriff should make to appeare here in Crast Anim. An. Regni Rs. nunc 9 and the same sheriff here then returned that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed had take a certain Inquisition before him at Stafford in the same County of Staff the 22. day of October last past by the Oath of 12. c. by which it was found that the same T. after the Judgment in the same Writ specified given to wit the 20 day of November before the taking of the inquisition aforesaid was seised in his Demesne of Fee of and in the Mannor of W. Coney with its Rights members and appurtenances in the said County of Saff of the yearly rent in all issues besides reprizes 40 s. and recite the return of the inquisition word for word untill in all issues besides reprizes 20 s. And further by the Inquisition aforesaid it is found that the same T. C. at the time of giving of the judgment in the Writ aforesaid specified or at any time afterwards untill the same day of taking of the inquisition aforesaid had no other or more land or Tenements nor any goods or Chattels in the same County of Stafford to the knowledge of the Jury of the Inquisition aforesaid further the same sheriff then there returned that he by vertue of the Writ aforesaid the moyety of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid above mentioned to be extended to the same Edw. B. according to the exegency of that writ he could not cause to be delivered for that the Mannor aforesaid and all other the premisses with the appurtenances by vertue of an other writ of Extent and Liberi fac to him before therein directed the eight day of January last past to one H P. made to be delivered All and singular which premisses with the appurtenance in the hands of the same H. yet are and remaine by occasion thereof And as to any further execution of the said writ nothing by the said sheriff was further acted therein As by the Record thereof in the Court here remayning manifestly appeareth although after the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid the 8. day of November An Regni of the said Lord the King now of England the 9 th abovesaid it is satisfied to the said Humphery by the said T. Coney of his debt and Damages in the said other Writ specified And although also the said Edward be not yet satisfied of his Debt and Damages aforesaid Notwithstanding the same Humphery yet keepeth possession of the lands and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances Generall avermant of satisfâ—ction as by the information of the said Edward the King understandeth And the same Lord the King being willing to do to the said Edw what is just and consonant to reason doth command the sheriff that by honest c. he should make knowne to the said Humphery that he should be here at this day to wit Cr. S. Trin to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same Humphery whereas he is satisfied of the Debt and Damages aforesaid in Form as aforesaid The possession of the Mannor Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances he would hold or ought and row here at this day came aswell the said Edward by Iohn Richards his attorney as the same Humphery by R. G. his attorney and hereupon the same E. prayeth judgment and that the same H. from his possession of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances may be removed And that the said Edward into the possession of the moyety of the same Mannor and Tenements with the appurtenances may be restored so that the moyety of the same to the said Edward according to the extent aforesaid may be delivered c. ANd the said Humphery reserving to himself all and every advantatages and exceptions Speciall imparlance aswell to the Writ as to the declaration a-aforesaid prayeth license thereof to imparll untill Oct. S. Mich. and hath it c. the same day is given to the said Edward B. here c. At which day here came aswell the said Edward as the said Humphery by their attornies aforesaid And hereupon the same Edw as before prayeth judgment and that the said H. from his possession of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances may be removed and that the moyety of the same Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the said Edward according to the Extent aforesaid may be delivered c. And the same Humphery nothing in Bar or delay of the judgment aforesaid saith whereby the same Edward remayneth against the same H. therein without defence Therefore it is considered that the same Humphery from the possession of the mannor Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances be removed c. And that the moyety of the same Mannor and Tenements
or Coppice called Weston Wood aforesaid and also the third part of the profits of the Mannor-Court of Weston upon the green aforesaid Tythes of wood Third part of the profits of Mannor Couâ—t 3d part of the the advowson of the vica ridge of W. and of one Close called Cow-lease c. And also the Advowson of the vicaridge of the Church of Weston aforesaid to hold to the said Countesse and her assignes in severalty by metes and bounds in the name of her whole Dower to her out of the Hundred Mannor Tenements Rectory and Advowson aforesaid after the death of the sayd Francis late Earl of Berks her late Husbandhapning as by the sayd Writ to him it was commanded c. The like assignment of Dower between the same parties upon the same Roll. Summons ss JUry of twenty four Knights of the Neighbour hood of T. ven recogn if the Jury by whom a certain inquisition was lately summoned in the Court of the Lady the Queen Entry of a writ of summons in an attaint executed and awarding of a resummons against the defendant hab corp against the grand Iury and Distring against the petii jury before the Iustices of the said Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster by writ of the Lady the Queen and afterwardr before the Beloved and faithfull of the said Lady the Queen R. C. Knight Cheif Iustice of the Lady the Queen assigned to hold pleas before the said Queen and G. G. Esquire Attorney Generall of the said Lady the Queen Justices of the said Lady the Queen assigned to take the Assizes in the County aforesaid by writ of the said Lady the Queen of Nisi prius by Form of the statute c. at Stonystratford in the County aforesaid taken between R M. Gent. plaintiff and I.Y. of T. c. and R. W. of T. c. of a certain Trespasse to the same R. by the said I. and R. done as it was said made a false oath as the same R. greivously complaining hath shewed to the said Lady the Queen or not And now here at this day to wit in Octab sancti Hillarii came the same R. M. by T. his Attorney and the said I. Y. and R.W. summoned c. 4 Die pl. being solemnly called came not and of them the sheriff now returned that he summoned Summons returned c. therefore let the same I.Y. and R W. be resummoned that they be here 15. Pas to hear the sayd Iury of twenty four Knights and also J. Jugram I. S. I. S. c. twelve Iurors of the first Inquisition aforesaid being called came not and of them the sheriff now returneth that every one of them is severally attached by pledges J Denn and R Fenn Hab. corp Iur. 24 Milit. Therefore they in mercy c. therefore the Iury of twenty four Knight aforesaid is respited here untill the said Terme Distring Iur. prim inqisitionis c. and that the sheriff have then and there the bodyes of the same Iury of twenty four Knights to make the said Recognizance c. their Lands c. and that of the issues c so that he may have their bodies here at that Terme to heare the Recognizance the same day is given to the same R.M. here c. P 8. Jac. rot 1938. Brownlow Lincoln ss Entry of a writ of summ and resumm in attaint and Distring awarded against the grand Iury the party and the petit Iury. Iury of twenty four Knights of the Neighbourhood of W. vid. Recogn si Jur. by whom a certain inquisition was lately summoned before the Lord the King at Westminster by Bill without the writ of the said Lord the King between Henry Earl of Lincolne one of the Peeres c. of England and Ed. Dymock Knight of certain Trespasses and contempts against the Forme of the statute De scandalis magnat therein lately made and provided and afterwards before the beloved and faithfull Peter Warburton Knight one of the Iustices of the Lord the King of the Common Bench and Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King of the same Bench Iustices of the said Lord the King assigned to take the Assizes in the County aforesaid by writ of the said Lord the King De nisi prius by Forme of the statute therein made and provided P 4. Eliz rot 532. Cerciorare to certifie a retorn whereupon an attaint is brought The grand jury the Defendant and the petit Jury make default Quaere the sheriff returns not the writ Resummons awarded against the grand Jury parties and petit Iury. at the Castle of Lincolne in the County aforesaid taken made a false Oath as the said Earl to the said Lord the King now greiviously complaining sheweth or not And now here at this day to wit Tres Sept. Pasch here came the sayd Earle by his Attorney aforesaid and as well the Iurors of the Iury of twenty four Knights aforesaid as the same E. D. and also Lawrence Coddington of C. with eleven other Iurors of the first inquisition aforesaid being solemnly called came not therefore let the same jurors of the jury of twenty four Knights be resummoned that they be here in Octab. Sancti Trinitatis to make the jury of twenty four Knights and that jury of twenty four Knights is respited here untill that Terme and as well the said E as the said jurors of the first inquisition aforesaid are resummoned that they may be here at the same time to hear the said Iury of twenty four Knights the same day is given to the said Earle here c. At which day here came the said Earle by his Attorney aforesaid and the sheriff did nothing therein nor sent the writ thereof therefore as before let another writ thereof be made returnable here 15. Michaelis the same day is given to the said Earl here c. At which day here came the said Earle by his Attorney aforesaid and as well the sayd Edward as the said twelve jurors of the first inquisition aforesaid resummoned Al. resum awarded c. 4 Die pl. being called came not c. and also the jury of twenty four Knights aforesaid likewise being called came not therefore that jury of twenty four Knights is respited here untill Cr. sancti Martini and the sheriff is commanded that he distrain as well the sayd jury of twenty foure Knights that they be then here to make the jury of twenty foure Knights aforesaid A Distring awarded See the like between the parties aforesaid M 9 Iac rot 3127. Br. as the same Edward as the same Iury of twelve jurors of the first inquisition aforesaid that they be here at the same time Auditur Recognitionem illam c. the same day is given to the said Earle here c. and it is to be known that a writ thereof the Iustices here in Court that same Terme have delivered a writ thereof to R. S.
Deputy sheriff of the County aforesaid in Forme of Law to be Executed c. by proclamation thereof made according to the forme of the statute c. Entry of a summons in a Qâ—ar imp with the essâ—ine and an attachment awarded for default H 2. Jac. rot 192. North. G C. Esquire by his Attorney offered himselfe the fourth day against Thomas Bishop of the Burrough of Saint Peter otherwise Peterburrough and William B. his Clarke that they permit him to present a fit person to the Church of W. which is void and belongeth to his gift c. and they came not and they had therein day to wit the same Bishop by essoine here untill in Octab. Sancti Hillarii last past and the said W. hath day therein by his Essoine here untill this day to wit in Octob. Pur B. Mariae after they were summoned c. judgement that they be here 15. Pasch c. H 10. Jac. rot 20. Wollaston Eber. ss Speciall entry of a summons in quare Imp. and the she iff returns tarde and an al sum awaâ—ded It was commanded the sheriff that he summon by good summoners George bishop of C. E. C. Gent. I.T. Clark that they should be here at this day in Oct. Pur. B. Mariae to answer M W. Knight and F. S. Esquire of a plea that they suffer them to present a fit person to the Church of S which is void and belongeth to their gift and now here at this day came the same M. and F. by their Attorney and the sheriff to wit C.H. Knight now returneth that that writ was delivered to him so late that for the brevity of time hee could not execute it as by the said Writ it was commanded him therefore as before it is commanded to the said sheriff that he summon by good summe oners thsame Bishop E. and I. that they be here 15. Pas to answer to the same M. and F. in the plea aforesaid c. P 11. Iac. rot 20. Wellaston ss It was commanded the sheriff Entry of an al sum â—n a quar imp â—n feverance and an attachment awâ—rded against the defendant as otherwise the King had commanded the said sheriff that he should summon by good summoners G. Bishop of E. E. E. Gent. and I. T. Clerke that they should be here at this day to wit 15. Pasch to answer as above And now here at this day came the same Marmaduke by A. B. his Attorney and the said F likewise plaintiff c. the fourth day of the plea being solemnly called came not and hereupon the same M offereth himselfe the fourth day against the said Bishop E and I in the plea aforesaid and they came not and the sheriff now returneth that he had summoned c judgement they be attached that they be herein Cro. Trin. and it is commanded to the same sheriff that hee summon by good summoners the same F. that he be here at the said Terme to follow against the said Bishop E and I his plea aforesaid together with the said Marmaduke if c. Surrender H 1 Iac. rot 1699. Brownlow ss Surrender of a Philizers office see the old book of entries f 442 title de office and officers Be it remembred that the thirteenth day of February that same Terme came here into Court Edward Pytt Knight Philizer in the same Court as well of London as of the County of Middlesex Huntington and Cambridge in his proper person and of his own accord surrendred into the hands of Edmund Anderson Cheif Iustice of the Lord the King of the Bench here his office of philizer aforesaid to the use of Iames Pyt Knight whom the said Cheife Iustice as the Custome is freely admitted to the same Office to hold occupy and have to him as his free Tenement according to the custome of the Court aforesaid in the whole time aforesaid used and approved The oath and presently the same Iames Pytt upon the taking of his corporall Oath as the custome is well and faithfully to behave and carry himselfe in the office aforesaid Put into possession put and constituted him into the corporall possession of the same Office to hold occupy and have the same in forme aforesaid with the Fees and profits incumbent to the said office and anciently due and accustomed c. SEE Hill 13. Iac. rot 732. the like in Ady and Maydwell H 10. Iac. rot 3279. in Gulston and Mill. T 28. H. 8. rot 511. Surrender by Pateshal Philizer of Essex and Hertford T 22. Iac. rot 2085. Surrender by the Philizer of Norfolke Lambe to Thelwall M. 28. H. 8. rot 108. T. 33. H. 8. rot 1. T. 3. and 4. Philip and Mary rot 904. T. 1. C. Reg. rot 958. Grant of the office of the Philizer of W. made by H. P. after the death of Plumstead by the Lord Hobart Supersedeas Supersedeas to a Cap. iâ— Withernam quia inconsult emanavit and aver elongat returned thereupon and a cap Withernam awarded for the Defendant against the plaintiff upon a writ of Plur. repleg Aver elongat returned upon the plur replevin Câ—pias in With rnam of the Ca tell of Defendant awarded for the plaintiff 3. El. Dyer fol. 189. pl. 12. P 8. Edwardi 4. rot 106. Surrey ss Be it remembred that the Iustistices here in Court the fourteenth day of May that same Terme delivered here to W.F. Deputy sheriff of the County aforesaid a certain writ of the Lord the King now closed directed to the said sheriff under forme of Law to be executed which said Writ the same W. opened here in Court the Tenor whereof followeth in these words Edward by the grace of God King of England and France and Lord of Ireland to the sheriff of Surrey greeting Whereas lately by our Writ as more times we have commanded you that justly and without delay you should replevy to W.W. and T. M. his cattell which I. L. took and unjustly detained as he saith or that you your selfe should be before our Iustices at Westminster 15 Trin. last past to shew wherefore you have contemned to execute our commands so often to you therein directed and then to our said Iustices at Westminster at the same 15 Tr. hast returned that those cattell aforesaid were enlarged to unknowne places by the same I. so that you could not have sight of them and that you could not replevy the said Cattell to the said W. and T. wherefore we have commanded you that you should take of the cattell of the said I in your Bailiwick to the value o the saâ—d cattell of the said W and T in Withernam and shouldest deliver them to the said W and T to be kept untill the said Cattell of the said W and T you could redeliver to the same W and T and in as much as you shall execute this our precept Pone Def. ad respondend of the taking of the cattell with a repleg fac of
further of our more abundant and speciall grace certain knowledge and meer motion and for the laudible service to us and our dear Sister the Lady Eliz. late Queen of England And also for all things to the republique heretofore in the Administration of justice performed for us our heires and successors we give and grant to you the said George K. one Annuity or annuall Rent of a hundred pounds of lawfull monie of England yearly to you the said George Kingesmill and your Assignes for and during the naturall life of you the said George Kingesmill to be paid at the receit of our Exchequer our Heirs and Successors by the hands of our Treasurer and Chamberlain and of our Heirs and Successors for the time being out of our Treasury in the hands of our Heirs or Successors from time to time hapning to be at the four Feasts c. by equall portions yearly to be paid during the naturall life of you the said George K. Wherefore we will and by these Presents firmly enjoyning we command as well to our T. C C. and Barons of our Exchequer our Heirs and Successors for the time being as to all and singular other our Officers and Ministers and all our Heirs and Successors whatsoever for the time being to whom it shall belong in this behalf that they and every of them upon the sole demonstration of these our Letters Patents or the Inrolement of them without any Writ or Warrant from us our Heirs or Successors to be prosecuted or obtained the said Annuity of a hundred pounds by the year to the said E. K. and his Assignes they should pay and deliver in form as abovesaid or should cause to be paid and delivered And that these our Letters Pattents or the Inrolement of them shall be as well to the said Treasurer C â— and Barons of our Exchequer aforesaid and of our Heirs and Assignes As to all and singular other our Officers and Ministers our Heirs and Successors whatsoever for the time being to whom in this behalf it shall belong a sufficient Warrant in this behalf for that no expresse mention of the true yearly value or of the certainty of the Premisses or of any of them or of any other Gift or Grants by us or any of our Progenitors to the said George Kingesmell before these times made in these Presents be not made or any Statute or Ordinance Provision Proclamation or Restriction to the contrary thereof before now be had made done ordained or provided or any other thing cause or matter whatsoever in any thing notwithstanding in Testimony c. Amercement The Sheriff amerced for making of an insufficient return upon a Writ in wast M. 19. H. 8. Rot. 260. At which day here came the said Elizabeth by her Attorney aforesaid whereupon the Premisses being seen and by the Justices here sully understood It seemeth to the Justices here that the return of the Writ aforesaid is insufficient in Law for that in the same return no mention is made that the said Sheriff in his proper person came to the places aforesaid wasted Therefore the same Sheriff to wit H. A. Esquire in mercy And he is fined by the Justices here at twenty shillings And as before let another Writ be made thereof to the said Sheriff in form aforesaid returnable here in 8. S. Trinitatis c. The Sheriff is amerced for not returning of a Capias utlagat E. 12. Iac. Rot. 2243. ss Edw. R. Esquire Sheriff of the County aforesaid for that he returned not here into the Court a certain Writ of Capias utlagat against P. P. at the Suit of T. T. in a plea of Debt returnable before the Justices of the said Lord the King here 1. die c. that same term in mercy and is fined by the Justices here at ten pounds The Sheriff amerced for not returning of a Cap. sat after severall daies given him by the Court. ss I. P. Esquire for that that at severall daies to him given by the Court here he returned not the Writ of the Lord the King of Capias ad satisfaciendum for forty pounds for debt and sixty pounds for damages to the same Sheriff directed to satisfie M.T. Knight Plaintiff against E. D. of c. Gent. returnable here Mense Mich. that same term in mercy And is fined by the Justices here at a hundred and three pounds six shillings eight pence c. The Marshall of â—he Court of Common Bâ—nch foâ— that he attended not up on the Iudge upon the Ess in day is fined twenty pounds M. 10. Eliz. Kot primo Whoteley ss It is considered by the Court for that that Andrew Billesly Marshall of the Court aforesaid kept not the day of Essoynes here in Court S. Trinitatis that same term nor attended upon Humphrey Brown Knight oâ—â— of the Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench here then at that day being for the receiving of the four Essoynes of the same Cro. S. Trinitatis And also further because those things which appertained to his Office of Marshall in that behalf were not done Therefore the same Andrew in mercy and is fined by the Justices at twenty pounds Appearance LOndon ss It was commanded the Sheriffs Entry of an appearance upon an attachment of priviledge in discharge of an Obligation made to the Sheriff for his appearance and baile in Court to the Action T. 3. Car. Reg. rot 2002. H. 19. Jac. rot 1. c. Brownlow the like E. t y of the appearance that they should attach T. F. so that they might have him here at this day to wit upon Saturday next after the morrow of the holy Trinity to answer I. C. one of the Attorneys of the Court of Common Bench of the Lady the Queen here according to the liberties and priviledges of the same Court for such Attorneys and other Ministers of the same Bench from the time whereof no memory is extant used and approved in the same in a plea of Trespasse And the Sheriff now returneth that he is attached And now here at this day came the said T. in his proper person and saith that he and divers other persons of his friends at his request who are bound by their writing obligatory to the said Sheriffs of London in a great summ of monie that he should personally appear here this day to answer to the said I. in the plea aforesaid And as well for his indempnity as for his security aforesaid prayeth that his appearance by the Justices here at this day may be recorded c. whereupon the appearance of the said T. at this day is recorded c. And hereupon came here into the Court certain N. F. of c. and W. S. of c. and undertook and both of them undertook in the summ of a hundred pounds for the same T. and the same T. being likewise present in Court in his proper person Entry of the Recoâ—nizance upon the
three aâ—e s given him to do it T 2 Car. Regis Rot. 841. Brownlow Berks. ss John B. Sheriff of the County aforesaid for that he in Easter Terme last past at the severall dayes that same Terme by the Court of the Lord the King here to him given as in the bill of pleas this Terme it doth appear hath not returned to the Court here a certain Writ of the said Lord the King of Habeas Corpus issuing on of the Court here and to the same Sheriff directed and delivered to be executed in form of Law against one I W Esquire at the suit of R. B. Esquire in a plea of Debt of two hundred pounds returnable before the Iustices here Quinque pas last past in mercy c. And he is fined by the said Justices here for the said four defaults at twenty five pounds c. H 43. Eliz. Rot 451. Prisoner in the Fleet brought to the barr by Hab corp at the petition of an estranger a who brought Writ in debt against him and he is demanded by the Justices that he would appeare to the said writ who said he wâ—n duâ—â— therefore processe of Ouâ— lawâ—y is awarded against him ss It was commanded to the Warden of the prison of the Fleet that he should have here at this day to wit upon Satturday next after Octob. S. Hillar the body of W. A. Esquire in the prison of the said Lady the Queen under the custody of the said Warden detained to do and receive what the Court of the Queen here shall consider of him and now here at this day came here into the Court H. T. by A.S. his Attorney and brought here into Court a certain Originall Writ in Debt upon demand of an hundred and twenty pounds directed to the Sheriffs of London and before the Justices of the Lady the Queen here returnable against the said Walter by the name of W A. Esquire of Tomby in the County of Lincolne Esquire and prayeth that the said Walter may appeare to his sayd Writ whereupon by the same Warden of the Prison aforesayd brought here to the bar present in Court in his own proper person being spoken to saith that hee will not appear to the Writ Therefore let processe be made against the sayd Walter upon the Originall Writ aforesaid c. T 25 El. rot 860. G against I.C. like Hab. corp and such an Originall and demand who saith that he is not the same person against whom the said G. brought the said originall writ and that he wil not appear c. Therefore let further processe be made against the said I. C. late of L Gentleman against whom the sayd Originall VVrit was brought upon the said Originall and the sayd I.C. who is now brought to the Barr is sent back to the prison under the custody of the Warden for the occasion that he is therein detained there to remain c. H 13 Jacorot 588. Entry of a Capias ad respodend and thereupon a Non inventus returned and a Habeas Corpus to the Warden of the Fleet is awarded received such a day and then thus and now here at this day came the said Defendant in his proper person under the custody of the Warden aforesaid brought to the Barr who being demanded if he would appear to the said Writ or not sayd that not Therefore let processe of Outlawry be made c. M 5. Jac. rot 2254. Fleet ss Entry of an Habeas corpus of a prisoner committed to be Fleet by the Commissioners in causes Ecclesiasticall and his enlargement without baile It was commanded to the Warden that he should have here to wit at Westminster immediatly after the receit of this Writ the body of Anthony Rooper Knight in the prison aforesayd under his custody detained by whatsoever name he is reputed together with the day and cause of taking and detaining of the said Anthony that the same Justices here viewing the cause may cause to be done what of right and according to the Law and custome of the Realme of the Lord the King of England The like for Langton P. 8. Jac. rot 819. The lik for Melton there rot 1939. The like for Throckmorton T. 8. Jac. rot 1675. But they entred into a Recognizance of a 100 l. iâ— the Bench to appear from day to day P. 9. Jac rot 1510 P 8. Jac. rot 1939. ought to be done And no where at this day to wit on Satturday next after Octab. Martini that same term came the same A in his proper person under the Custody of the same Warden brought here to the Bar and the same Warden then returned that before the coming of the Writ to wit the ninth day of October last past the sayd A.R.M. rendred themselves to the prison aforesaid before committed by vertue of a certaine Warrant dated the thirtieth day of I last past which followeth in these words These are in his Majesties name straightly to charge you by vertue of his Highnesse Commission for causes Ecclesiasticall under the great Seal of England to us and others directed That herewith you receive and take into your custody the body of Sir Anthony Rooper Knight and him safely detaine prisoner at this our Commandement untill we shall give you order for his enlargement signifying unto you That the cause of his commitment is for that there being a certain cause referred unto us by his Majesties especiall direction betwixt him the said Sir A.R. and I.B. Vicar of B. for that he detaineth wrongfully from the said Vicar a certain yearly pension due unto him from the said Sir A. R being called before us after ful hearing of the cause in the presence of the said Sir A. R. and of his Councill three or four severall times and at last adjudged by us to pay the said pension he having some time of deliberation given unto him by us to consider therof hath notwithstanding obstinately disobey our said Order and doth so still persist and this shall be your Warrant in that behalfe given at Lambeth this thirtieth day of Iune 1607. And that this was the cause of taking and detaining of the said Anthony in the prison aforesaid the body notwithstanding of the said A he hath now here ready as by the said Writ it was commanded him c. whereupon the premisses being seene and by the Justices here fully examined and understood Judgment by the Court. it seemeth to the said Justices here that the said cause of Commitment of the sayd A. to the prison of the Fleet aforesaid in the Returne aforesaid above specâ—fied to be insufficient in Law to detain him the said A in the prison aforesaid or to deprive the said A from his priviledge of the Court of the Lord the King here therefore the same Anthony is dismissed from the prison aforesaid by the Court here and the same Warden is fully discharged by the Court here of such custody c. T 18 Iac.
in Labours Suits Delayes and Expences be thereof levied c. and in as much c. hee make appear here 15. Trinitat c. Mittimus T 3. Jac. rot 24 10. Entry of a Mittimus of the Record and proceedings Which was removed out of another Court by a certiorare out of the Chancery and sent to the Justices of the Bench. The Lord the King sent to his Iustices of the Bench here his Writ closed in these words James by the Grace of God c. To his Justices of the Bench greeting The Record and proceedings in a certain plaint which was in the Court of our Honor and Castle of Windsor before our deare Cosen and Counsellour Charles Earle of Nottingham of the noble Order of the Garter Knight Admirall of England Constable of our honorable Castle aforesaid and keeper of the whole Forrest of the same or to his Deputy of Keeper of his place there without any writ between William R. Esquire and J. M. Gent of cattell of the same W. taken and unjustly detained as is said by Jo. Trevor Knight Deputy of the same County by vertue of our writ of Certiorare to you into our Chancery certified we send you in these presents inclosed commanding you that the Records and proceedings of the plaint aforesaid being inspected you further do therein at the prosecution of the same James what of right and according to the Law and custome of our Realme of England is to be done Teste c. James by the grace of God c. To our dear Cosen c. greeting we willâ—ng for certain causes to be certified by the Record and proceedings in a certain plaint which is before you in our Court of the Honour and Castle aforesaid without out writ between W.R. Esquire and I Moor of cattell of the same W. c. we command you that the Record and proceedings in the plaint aforesaid with all things touching the same by whatsoever names the parties aforesaid in the said plaint are distinguished to us into our Chancery wheresoever it shall then be under your seale without delay you distinctly and plainely send and this VVrit c. Note Nota. That if the Record had been sent to the Justices of the common Bench they could not have proceeded upon the Tenor of the Record but upon the Return sent c. H 17 Eliz rot 939. Nota. Cause certified into the Bench was removed by a procedendo because the monies in the plaint amounted not to 40 s. T 20 Jac rot 3371. Brownlow The Lord the King c. The Tenor of the Record and proceedings c. We send to you inclosed in these presents and so recite the Certiorare which is we willing for certaine causes to be satisfied upon the Tenor of the Record c and the plaint c And now here to wit at Westminster in Cr. Trin. that same Term came as well the said Plaintiff by T. R. his Attorney as the said Defendant by F. M. his Attorney and the Writs and Return aforesaid being seen and by the Justices here fully understood and examined to the said Iustices here it sufficiently appeareth that the Court here upon the Tenor of the Record aforesaid cannot proceed Therefore it is considered that the said Mayor and Burgesses of the Burrough of N aforesaid in the plaint aforesaid according to the Law and custome of the Burrough aforesaid at the prosecution of the said William may proceed with effect and to the parties aforesaid full and speedy Iustice therein according to the custome of the Court aforesaid may exhibit c. betweene C. and A. Ne Exeat Regnum Ne exeat Regnum M 7. H. 6. rot 600. or 606. Security found that he depart not the Kingdome Nvsance Selde M. 8. Car. Regis rot _____ To the Sheriff of Middlesex greeting whereas of late we have made publick Proclamation amongst other things that none should erect any Walls whereupon _____ might be super added within our City of London or the Subburbs of the same or within the distance of three thousand paces of any of the Gates of the same City or from the Palace of Westminster license from our Commissioners assigned to oversee the buildings in those parts not before had Notwithstanding Thomas Ford late of the parish of Saint Andrew Holborne in your County Yeoman contemning our commands promulgated license of our Commissioners not before had in a certaine Feild in the Parish of Saint Clements Danes without Temple Bar London Selde on the south part of the ancient Inne called Clemants Inne of a long time appointed for the Residence of men incumbent in the study of our Lawes a certain wall to which _____ may be superadded of Brick Lime and Sand to erect and part of the same Feild intendeth to inclose as an ally or common place to bowle in And the foundation of the same Wall hath now laid and more Brick Lime and Sand for further progresse in the same Wall hath here also put and hath ready as it is said and if that place should be also inclosed It would happen that the Students of that Inn incumbent in the same in the study of our Lawes with the Clamors and noise of men resortng to that place would be so much disturbed that they could not Follow their Studies We to observe our commands and willing to regard the quiet and tranquility of the students aforesaid that they should not be diverted from their Studyes Command you that you omit not for any liberty of your county but that you command the said Thomas on our behalfe that from further building of the wall aforesaid he be altogether superseded and the wall begun and the Foundation of that wall by him in the place aforesaid put he cause to be demolished upon the danger to follow Test 19. Nov. Car. T. C. C. S. Cartwright Originall M 18. H 8. Rot. 2. ss An originall Writ out of the Chancery at the Suit of the party directed to the Justices of the Common Bench to stifying that he is a Lord of the Parliament that they should make no other proces against him onely such as are made against the Peeâ—s of the Land The Lord the King sent to his Justices of the bench here his writ closed in these words Henry the 8. by the grace of God c. To his Justices of the Common Bench Greeting we command you that if Edward Sutton of Dudly in the County of Staff Knight be impleaded before you at the suit of any one in a personall action you cause so to be made against him such Proces and no other in the action aforesaid as ought against Lords Peeres Earls and Barons of this our Kingdom of England which ought to come to our Parliaments upon our summons or any of them as according to our Lawes and Customes of the Realm of England ought to be made Because we record the same Edward one of the