Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n bishop_n church_n year_n 4,537 5 4.8354 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A64558 Remarks on the preface to The Protestant reconciler in a letter to a friend. S. T. (Samuel Thomas), 1627-1693. 1683 (1683) Wing T974; ESTC R25646 26,707 64

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

as lawful Nay I do not discern what consistency there is between one part of the Preface and another part between the allowing the fore-mentioned mutations as reasonable and necessary Pag. 82. and 93. and this passage Pag. 89. which implies they are neither necessary nor reasonable For there he says we do heartily and sincerely desire Vnion with our Brethren if it may be had on just and reasonable Terms but they must not think that we will give up the Cause of the Church for it so as to condemn its Constitution or make the Ceremonies unlawful which have been hitherto observed and practised in it if any Expedient can be found out for the Ease of other mens Consciences without reflecting on our own if they can be taken in without Reproach or dishonour to the Reformation of the Church I hope no True Son of the Church of England will oppose it Now whether the fore-mention'd dispensings with and Retrenchments of our Church-Orders and Practices upon the fore-mention'd Reason and Argument for the sake of Union with them whom he is pleas'd to call Brethren be not so far a giving up the Cause of the Church as to condemn its Constitution and to make the Ceremonies unlawful which have hitherto been observed and practised in it I leave you to judge as also whether the taking in Dissenters upon such Terms will not necessarily reflect reproach and dishonour upon the Reformation of that Church which at her first Reforming thought fit to retain and impose those Constitutions and Ceremonies as just and reasonable and as such hath ever since continu'd them without imagining that continu'd Imposition inconsistent with Christian Wisdom or with any regard that 's justly due to the Scruples and Exceptions of troublesome men relating to the Administration of Sacraments in a Christian Church To which troublesome Men the Dr. is pleased to give the Title of Brethren more than once in the later end of the Preface which is it self in my Opinion too absurd a contradiction to that Book whose main design is to prove them Schismaticks He tells us Pag. 364. That 't was the great Wisdom of our Church not to make more things necessary as to Practice than were made so at the Settlement of the Reformation but whether there be sufficient reason to alter those Terms of Communion which were then settled for the sake of such whose Scruples are groundless and endless I do not says he take upon me here to determin And I wish he had not taken it upon him in the Preface especially to determin it so much to the Reproach and Dishonour of our Church as to imply she hath hitherto been guilty of Transgressing the Obligation of Christianity in not making those Alterations for the sake of Union with such Persons whose Scruples are groundless and endless and which as himself Affirms p. 372. might be remov'd by a little Impartiality and ●lue consideration there being no depth of Learning no subtilty of Reasoning no endless quotation of Fathers necessary about them but the dispute lies in such a narrow compass that men may see light if they will And why ours or indeed any Church should be Reproached as Defective in Christian Wisdom for not complying with such humersom Persons or not altering her Constitutions for the sake of such wilfully blind and perverse Dissenters I confess I do nor understand Now these Premises being duly consider'd do I think abundantly justifie the first charge and make it too reasonable to adhere to this conclusion that the Doctors Preface hath destroyed what he had said for our Church in his Book And in reference to the other charge that the Preface has effectually destroy'd that Church of England which the Doctor had taken pains to defend in his Book The same premises do really contribute so much to the making it good that for ought I see no more need to be added to that End than the bare application of them to that Censure and to the Doctor 's own Notion of the Church of England For he asserts p. 249. of his Book that the National Church of England diffusive is the whole Body of Christians in this Nation consisting of Pastors and People agreeing in that Faith Government and Worship which are Establish'd by the Laws of this Realm And Pag. 302. All Bishops Ministers and People taken together who profess the Faith so Establish'd and worship God according to the Rules so Appointed make up this National Church of England And this is the Church of England which the Doctor has taken pains to defend in his Book If therefore the Church of England takes its denomination not only from the Profession of that Faith but also from its consent in Worshipping God according to such and such Rules he that would destroy those Rules will consequently destroy that Church which is denominated such and diversified from other Churches by its embracing and adhering to those Rules But it appears from the premises that the Doctor 's Preface would have several considerable Alterations made of those Rules and that upon such an account and for such reasons as do consequentially destroy that Order and those Rules of Worship that are Established by Law and therefore that Preface does effectually destroy that Church of England which he had taken pains to defend in his Book These are all the things says the Dr. which appear to me reasonable to be Allowed in order to an Vnion and which I suppose may be Granted without detriment or dishonour to our Church And says this Writer these are all I plead for in this Book But 1. there is this little difference between these Authors The Reverend Dean supposes they may be Granted but this Author endeavours to prove they ought to be Granted 2. Though that Author mentions only such and such things as appearing to him reasonable to be Allowed yet to make them appear so to others he urges an Argument which will infer it as reasonable to dispense with a great many other things not mention'd And so though this Author pretends that these are all he pleads for in his Book yet the Arguments he makes use of if they prove any thing prove it the duty of our Governours to dispense with a great many more Constitutions even all that enjoyn any Indifferents whereby our Brother is offended Chap. 3. And therefore whereas he adds here As for those who deny the lawfulness of Lyturgy and the right Constitution of our Churches and who would be exempted from the Jurisdiction of their Bishop and set up Congregations separate and independent upon him I know not how to plead for them without pleading for Schism Confusion and Disorder I doubt his Arguments will if they prove any thing prove it as unlawful for Governours to impose a Lyturgy and require Obedience to Episcopal Government as to impose Ceremonies For I am confident he is very sensible that a great many whom he seemed to account weak Brethren are mightily offended
less than this will suffice to make this or any other Testimony pertinent and adequate to this Authors attempt For which reason therefore his next Testimony from the Declaration of King Charles the Second is as insignificant to his purpose as this For neither in that from Breda nor in the other concerning Ecclesiastical Affairs does his Majesty Acknowledge it his Duty at that time not to impose the use of the Ceremonies on Tender Consciences nor if he had would it thence follow either that it is or that his Majesty thinks it his duty now to gratifie them by such an Indulgence and yet even this also is requisite to make Testimonies pertinent to our Authors design which as himself words it p. 4. of his Book is to prove that things indifferent which may be changed and altered without Sin or violation of Gods Laws ought not especially under our present Circumstances to be imposed by Superiors as the Conditions of Communion or as Conditions without which none shall minister in sacred things Besides who that has any sense of the measures and obligations of Loyalty or so much as Civility can think it tolerable in any man especially in a Church-man as this Author is said to be to treat the King at this rate and to urge this Declaration in the behalf of Dissenters now when t is so well known that his Majesty himself thought fit to vacate it within two years after its publication by consenting to the Act of Parliament for Uniformity which Act acquaints us that his Majesty had duly considered the Book of Common-Prayer as then framed which re-imposed the use of the Ceremonies and had fully approved and allowed the same and recommended it to that Parliament that the said Book should be Appointed to be used under such Sanctions and Penalties as the House of Parliament should thing fit From which Approbation and Consent of his Majesty we ought to conclude that he was then made very sensible how unworthy the Dissenters were of that Liberty which he at first designed them and how mischievous 't would prove to the Concerns both of Church and State and that 't was neither just nor reasonable it should be allowed them And accordingly that Act assures us that nothing conduceth more to the setling of the Peace of this Nation nor to the honour of our Religion and the Propagation thereof then an universal Agreement in the Publick Worship of Almighty God An excellent determination this and a very golden sentence and yet this Gentleman pretends humbly to conceive the quite contrary p. 8. and to think that the united Judgement of the whole Nation cannot frame a better or a more unexceptionable Expedient for a firm and lasting Concord then the Liberty indulged by the Kings Declaration which required neither Ceremonies nor Subscription nor Oath of Canonical Obedience But I confess he speaks there of an Expedient for a firm and lasting Concord of these distracted Churches by which expression what the man means would perhaps be worth the knowing and the rather because the word Churches is printed in a different Character A suspicious man may reasonably enough conjecture that he honours the Conventicles of Separatists with the Name of Churches in opposition to Canon 10. before cited if not what Churches in England are so distracted as to render his unexceptionable Expedient necessary to their Concord But is not that a very pleasant Question which he puts p. 9. If as the Kings Royal Word assures us the Reverend Bishops in the Year 60. did think such Concessions made by his Royal Person and Authority to allay the then present distempers very Just and Reasonable and cheerfully would conform themselves thereunto why should we now conceive they should be of another mind in 82 To which Question I Answer seriously 1. That the Kings Royal Word as quoted by this Writer p. 6. does not assure us that the Bishops did then think so but only that his Majesty had not the least doubt but that they would think so However on supposition he had quoted the Kings Words truly p. 39. I Answer 2. We may well conceive it because his Majesty himself was of another mind in 62. and appears now to be of the same mind he was then being so far from indulging that he commands the Laws to be vigorously executed against Dissenters But does this man indeed fancy that the Case and Reason of things is the same now in 82. that those parts of the King's Declaration which he has quoted represent it to have been in 60 Has he the Simplicity to believe himself or the Confidence to desire others to believe that the Dissenters are as innocent now as that Declaration acquaints us his Majesty then found those whom he Confer'd with Can he tell us where these Presbyterians are now to be met with who shew themselves as it seems those did at the time there spoken of Persons full of Affection towards the King or Zeal for the Peace of the Church and State and neither Enemies to Episcopacy nor Liturgy but modestly desire such Alterations in either as without shaking the Foundations may best allay the present distempers or can he tell us where those men of other Persuasions are now to be found who all approve Episcopacy and a set Form of Lyturgy p. 6. Nay have not the Leaders of several Parties sadly demonstrated themselves to be men of a quite contrary temper since the discovery of the Popish Plot some employing the best Reason some the best Wit they had others the most ungodly Arts that a lying slandring spiteful malicious humor could supply them with to the prejudice of our Church and its Constitutions and to the rendring not only its Ceremonies but also its Episcopacy and Lyturgy Odious and Ridiculous But whatever others may possibly think of our Bishops and their averseness from condescending in matters of Ceremony this Prefacer p. 9. prosesses to think with the Reverend Dean of Canterbury that we have no cause to doubt but the Governours of our Church are Persons of that Piety and Prudence that for Peace sake and in order to a firm Vnion among Protestants they would be content if that would do it not to insist on little things but yield them up to the infirmity or importunity of those that differ from them Which Passage having been long since ingeniously descanted upon in a Polio-Pamphlet whose Title I cannot now call to mind I shall let it pass but not without this Profession that I hope there is now no one Bishop nor would-be-Bishop Living who would yield and yield and yield up so much of the Church-Constitutions to Dissenters till he has left the Dissenters nothing to yield up to the Church In p. 10. the Learned and Judicious Judge Hale is brought in as a Favourer of Condescension to moderate Non-conformists and as one who drew up a Bill for Comprehension of some and a limited Indulgence to others And this we are told upon