shall begin his reign until his apearing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in flaming fire mentioned 2 Thes 1. 8. which assertion I conceive to be exceedingly injurious against the divine and humane Nature of Christ and also contrary to the Holy Scriptures For to deny the Kingdom of the Son or Word considered before or without his incarnation in his pure Divinity is all one as to deny his God-head for who can doubt but that he who is the Creator and the only and eternal God both doth reigne and hath reigned from the beginning of the World and shall reigne until the end thereof and after also to eternity and that he hath and doth govern all things in Heaven and Earth working together with the Father as himself saith The Father Ioh. 5. 17. worketh hitherto and I work and both these work by the Holy Ghost which is the Spirit of both The Kingdom of the God head is by divines thus distinguished 1. The Kingdom of power which even Heathens acknowledged in their supposed God O qui res â—ominumque Deumque Virg. Aen. â— Aeteruis Regis Impâ—riis fulmine terris 2. The Kingdome of grace whereby he reigneth in the hearts of the people inclining them to obedience by the Scepter of his Spirit against their carnal inclinations either lucriferous or voluptuous for this wee dayly pray Thy Kingdom come thy wâ—ll be done as on the contrary Satan or Sin is said to reign in the disobedient drawing them to evil 3. The Kingdom of Glory in Heaven in respect whereof the Son is expresly called The Psal 24. 7. King of Glory This I presume no Christian will deny But our question now is not concerning the Son as he is in his single and pure divinity or as he is God the Word or the Son of God But we must now consider him as he is The Son of Man and since his incarnation as he is Emanuel or the Word made flesh or the Anoynted of God or Christ for the pure God-head can not be anoynted because it is the anoynting neither could the Son of God be called Christ until he was incarnate nor can Christ be said to reign until he was made Christ that is until the Son of God by his humane nativity became the Son of Man For though the Son of God hath been a Son from eternity yet he was not Christ or Anoynted from eternity but his unction and title Christ began then as the Apostle saith Gal. 4. 4. When the fulness of time was come God sent forth his Son made of a Woman By this double consideration of Jesus wee may perceive the reason why the Scripture distinguisheth between God and Christ as 2 Tim. 4. 1. I charge thee before God and the Lord Jesus Christ and why we so often read The Lord Christ and the Christ or Anoynted of the Lora as Act. 4. 26. Ps 2. 2. The Lord Jesus in respect of his God-head is called Christus Dominus and the same Lord Jesus in consideration of his humane nature assumed is called Christus Domini i. e. he is both the Lord Christ and The Christ or the Anoynted of the Lord. So that we may truly say The Son of Man is the Christ or the Anoynted of himself as he is the Son of God These considerations being premised Our Question of Christs Kingdom is thus to be stated QUESTION Whether our Lord Iesus Christ ever yet had or now hath any Kingdom in and over this World FOr if it may appear that Christ formerly had and still hath a Kingdom here there will be no need of his corporal descending from Heaven in this fag end of the World to take possession of that which he had before and still retaineth Answer The answer to this question is That Christ now reigneth on earth and hath so done ever since he was Christ that is from the time that The word was made flesh that he reigneth in this world though his Kingdom is not of this world because it is not a visible reigning after a worldly way but in a heavenly manner he beareth not the Sword Material but a Spiritual Sword he raiseth not Armies of men but commandeth Legions of Angels his strong hold is Heaven his prison is Hell as 1 Pet. 3. 19. his Jaylors Divels his executioners Plagues Famines Winds Storms Serpents Wild-beasts evil Angels Sicknesses Deaths Temporal and Eternal his Laws are mild written in Milk the easie yoak of the Gospel his tribute and taxes are faithfulness and obedience his Kingdom doth not invade or disturb other worldly Kingdoms but establisheth them for he refused a worldly Kingdom when it was offered and refused to judg or arbitrate in a petty title of inheritance between two brethren much less will he in this world judg the grand titles of Monarchies and great possessions to be taken from the rightfull possessors to the use of Pretended Saints Let us see what the Scriptures say concerning the Kingdom of this Emanuel here on earth Isaiah saith of Christ as of a child born whom Isa 7. 14. he called In manuel which must needs be meant of the Son of God considered as incarnate That the government shall be upon his shoulders of the increase of his government and peace there shall Isa 9. 6. 7. be no end upon the throne of David and upon his Kingdom to order it from henceforth for ever Surely Davids throne must be upon this earth although it signifie the Church whilest it is Militant Consider we next what David himself saith concerning this Son of David in that memorable passage Psal 89 I have sound David my servant Psal 89. 20. 27. 29. 36. I will make hiâ— my first born higher then the Kings of the earth his Seed will I make to endure for ever and his Throne as the dayes of Heaven and as the Sun before me The David here meant must needs be this Son of David that is Christ who is often called David as Jâ—r 30. 9 They shall serve the Lord and David their King whom I will raise up and Ezech. 34. 23. My servant David shall feed them so Hos 3. 5. The children of Israel shall seek the Lord their God and David their King These Prophecies must needs be meant of Christ because the old David was dead before any of those Prophets were born Christ is called David because he was to be the Son of David and so is called by his Fathers name as o her children now are and the prophecies must needs be understood of the Man Christ because by his manhood only he is the Son of David and not otherwise nor can these sayings be verified of any other seed or Son of David Besides These speeches can not be meant of any worldly temporal Kingdom of David for that was taken of Davids posterity long before the birth of Christ and this David himself foresaw and confessed in the same Psalm But thou hast cast off thine Anoynted Thou hasi
Hoc praestat timor Dei ut alios timores contemnamus and St. Ambros speaking of the burning of the Martyr Laurentius saith e Ambr. Serm. 19. n. 41 Maâ—or slamma intrinsecus est The fear of God overcometh all humane fears and the fire of Gods Spirits within us wherewith our hearts burn is more ardent then the flames of Tyrants as cruel Antiochus was told by a Martyr f Ioseph de Macab Ignis tuus frigidus est O Magister crudelitatis i. e. That the Tyrants fire was but cold in respect of this Heavenly flame Thus doth the Scepter and Kingly power of Christ appear most in our weakness and this is the method of his Kingdom in this world But of the carnal domineering insulting ruffling and ranting Kingdom which Millinarians dream of Christ saith My Kingdom is not of this World SECT III. Of Christs Kingdom and Acts in Heaven of his Melchisedechical Priest-hood there The manner of his intercession Advocate-ship and Mediatorship for us in Heaven That it is not by sacrificing or praying for us there What Priestly act he there performeth WE are next to inquire whether Christ since his ascensioÌ„ hath any Kingdom or Dominion in HeaveÌ„ what he hath done there all this while for the English Socinian Commenter on the Hebrews tells us that this Epistle is a The Preface a. 3. the History of Christ in Heaven which is true in part although himself have depraved it but so are also other parcels of Scripture as may thus appear in his ascension he was attended and proclaimed King by Angels as Justin. Origen Jerom. Ambros and Chrysost understand these words Ps 24. 7. Lift up your Psal 24 heads O ye gates or O ye Princes and the King of glory shall come in for although as he is the Son of God or God the Word he was in Heaven before yet his humane nature was not there before his ascension as is well expressed by b Ruf. in Symb. apud Cyp. Ruffinus Ascendit ad Coelos non ubi verbum Deus ante non fuerat sed ubi verbum caro factum ante non sedebat being there he is said to have a Throne and that for ever and Heb. 1. 8. ever Ps 45. 6. a Throne is Kingly but this Throne is also on the right hand of God so it is the highest Throne thence he is said to give gifts unto men Eph. 4. 8. as The Holy Ghost at Pentecost was by him shed Act. 2. 3. So he gave Apostles Prophets Evangelists Pastors and Teachers Eph. 4. 11. to those more gifts are added Gifts of healing helps in government diversities of tongues 1 Cor. 12. 28. besides many other sanctifying graces to holy men and women He â—hewed himself to be in Heaven and at the right hand of God to the Protomartyr Act. 7. 56. out of Heaven he spake to Saul and restrained him from persecuting Act. 9. He is called a Priest an High-Priest and a Bishop he maketh intercession for us in Heaven Rom. 8. 34. Heb. 7. 25. He is our Advocate with the Father 1 Joh. 2. 1. And our Mediator 1 Tim. 2. 5. c. What Act of Priest-hood and what kind of intercession Christ performeth for us in Heaven and what is meant by his session at the right hand of God we will inquire anon but first his Kingly authority is to be shewed After the Passion and Resurrection of Christ and before his ascension he said All power is Mat 28. 18. given unto me in Heaven and in Earth These words are weighty The giving is meant only of a gift to his humanity thus That all power in Heaven and Earth which was naturally in the Son or Word before his incarnation is now by the God-head even his own God-head communicated to his humane nature being personally united with his divine nature so that now the Emanuel or Christ or the Word made flesh hath all power in Heaven and Earth the whole power of the God-head is in him There is nothing done by God either in Heaven or Earth but what Jesus Christ doth because there is none other God but that God which he is for he is the one and only God The Father and the Spirit are with him but one God whatsoever the Father doth he doth it by the Son and whatsoever the Son doth he doth it from the Father and by the Spirit and whatsoever the Spirit doth he doth it from the Father and the Son Christ saith The Ioh. 5. 17. Father worketh and I work this because the works of one are the works of both He saith again I can of my self do nothing 30. this he said because the Father and the Son are one therefore the works of the Son are the works of the Father also This is to be understood of the Essential or Absolute works of the God head but not of the Personal or proper works of each several person he saith again The Son can do nothing of himself but what he 19. seeth the Father do This is not so to be understood as if the Father did first perform a work to be as a Sampler or pattern for the Son to work by and then the Son after him should perform such another work but that the very same individual work of the Father is also the work of the Son for example The Father made the world so did the Son make the same world If this work be not the one and self same work of the Father and the Son then as Austin argueth a Aug. in Ioan. tract 20. Da mihi alterum mundum quem fecit Filius you can not shew me two worlds one of the Fathers making and another of the Sons making Indeed before the incarnation of the Son all the power in Heaven and earth was in the pure God-head residing in the Father Word and Spirit But since the Word or Son was incarnate all that power is communicated by the same God-head to the Son incarnate who is thereupon called Christ and Emanuel There is now none other King of glory but that God which is in Christ St. Iude calls him both The only Lord God and our Lord Iesus Christ Iude 4. Ioh. 5. 22. 27. therefore himself saith That the Father hath committed all judgment to the Son that is to Christ and this Son shall therefore in the end in his assumed and visible nature judg the world If it be said that his humane nature is a creature and therefore must always be subject to his God-head we answer that it is true but nevertheless the Emanuel i. e. The Divine and Humane Nature joyntly govern all things for so the body of a King is subject to the soul or will of the King yet the King consisting of a Body and Soul with both ruleth If it be said that the Father and the Holy Spirit do also reign and govern all things as well as the Son though neither the Father
hand of the God-head and so at the right hand both of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost that is The Son of Man is advanced to sit at the right hand of the Son of God or thus Mans nature in Christ is advanced above all Angels and Arch-angels and above all Creatures in Heaven and Earth and under the Earth and above all infernal powers and that it is in honour and power immediatly next to the supream God-head The mis-understanding of those words in the Creeds which mention Christ's sitting on the right hand of the Father hath occasioned a great abuse in mens apprehension for hereupon they haâ—e Phansied Three Seats in Heaven one for the Father and another for the Son on the right side of the Father and under both a third Seat for the Holy Ghost whereby they have advanced Christ above the Holy Ghost but we are well assured that it is both against our Christian Faith and also impossible that any one Person in the Trinity should be above the other because all are Coêqual and it is as impossible that any Creature should be above God the Creator for the humane nature of Christ is that which only is so advanced and that nature is a Creature This abuse was foreseen by St. Paul as may be thought and therefore by him care was taken to prevent it by those words He hath put all 1 Cor. 15. 27. things under his feet that is All creatures are by the God-head made subject to the man Christ it follows But when he saith all things are put under him it is manifest that he is excepted which did put all things under him that is Although all creatures are now under the Man Christ yet neither the God head nor any Person therein are under Christ his Manhood is next in glory to God but in no wise above him or any Person in the Trinity The Fathers also took notice of this abuse and wrote against it Origen upon these words Sit thou at my right hand adviseth a Orig. in Mat. Tract 23. Ne describas sensibiles sessiones aut Cathedras Sedentes humano Schemate Patrem Filium est de Regno Christi and after him Austin tells us upon the same occasion b Aug. de fide Symb. Tale Simulachrum Deo in Templo Christiano collocare vel etiam in corde nefas est i. e. That we should not describe the Father and the Son sitting on seats as men do for the sitting of Christ signifieth only his Dominion such a Portraiture in a Christian Church or but in our very thoughts is unlawful Thus they Fourthly What is meant by the right hand of God This phrase is not proper but figurative and mystical because no person in the God-head hath-hands except the Son who only is incarnate and he it is that is said to sit Therefore the right hand of God must signify 1. Power 2. Happiness 3. Glory Christ saith Mat. 26. 64. you shall see the Son of Man sitting on the right hand of power The Psalmist saith At his right Ps 16. 11. hand are pleasures for ever more The Apostle Râ— â— 5. Eph. 1. 21. Philip. 2. 9. tells us Christ is over all far above all principalities and powers That to him every knee must bâ—w This implieth a Kingly Majesty by the ceremony of bowing the knee The full meaning is that Christ is placed above all creatures next to the God-head and hath fulness of Power Happiness and Glory There can not be invented a better expression of Christs glory then by this phrase of the Right hand of God for it implyeth both a Soveraignty above all others and yet a subordination to the God-head as Psal 45. 9. Vpon thy right hand did stand the Queen this because the Queen is above all the Kings people but yet not above the King So Solomon placed his mother on his right hand 1 King 2. 19. When we say Christ is subordinate to the God-head we must be understood to speak onlâ— of his humane nature for when we speak of the whole person of the Emanuel then with the Apostle we say it is no robbery to affirm him to be Philip. 2. 6. equal with God If he had been said to sit on the Left hand men possibly might imagine some Creature higher then Christ for whom the right hand was reserved but this is the right hand and highest seat it can not be said to him friend go up Lu. 14. 10. higher Or if it had been said as it is Act. 7. 56. That Christ was standing at the right hand of God without any other mention of his sitting it might have been suspected that he stood as a minister or officer only but this sitting implieth Authority and Supremacy over all Creatures for To which of his Angels said he at any Heb. 1. 1â— time Sit thou on my right hand By all which promises I trust it appeareth that Christ is the Supream Lord and King over all the World and all Creatures in Heaven and Earth and therefore surely he hath a Kingdom on earth If it be yet further demanded why this Throne of Christ is not placed on earth seeing the right hand of God that is his omnipotent power is every where as well on Earth as in Heaven and why Christ did not continue his visible residence and bodily presence here on earth as he now doth in Heaven To this we Answer First There is now no need of his bodily presence on earth seeing he hath not withdrawn the Presence of his God-head of which he said Mat. 28. 20. I am with you alwayes even unto the end of the World which Austin thus expresseth a Aug. in Ioh. Tract 50. Corpus coelo intulit Majestatem mundo non abstulit nam secundum Majestatem semper nobiscum est i. e though his body be absent yet his God-head or Majesty is with us which is the most noble part of Christ for therefore Divines call his God-head his Majesty because this word signifieth the supremacy Majesty is the Title of the Supream Magistrate we say The Kings Majesty and so when the supremacy was in the Consuls at Rome and when it was in the People then was this title given to each respectively we read both of b Tul. Orat. Majestas Consulis and Majestas Populi The God head of Christ is his Supream Majesty for The head of Christ is God 1 Cor. 11. 3. And yet his body which is in Heaven is not divided or separated from his God-head which is with us for his Divine and humane natures are eternally and inseparably united and joyntly govern all as the body of the Sun is in the Firmament of this material Heaven yet by his influence and beames moderateth the seasons on earth and so doth Christ though bodily in Heaven by the influence and beams of his Majesty govern all things here below Secondly Christ
in all plentie of meats and other worldly and carnal pleasures and delights just as Turks do now believe and that all earthly possessions shall be theirs that other men which are not Saints shall either be slain or at the best so many of them shall be reserved as may serve for vassalage to be triumphed over and to do all kinds of drudgery works for the Saints Thus a Aug. de Civ lib. 20. c. 7. de Haeres haer 8. Lact. de Div. prae lib. 7. c. 24. Austin and Lactantius state this fabulous and hereticall phansie of Cerinthus Papias Nepos and Apollinarius which was so plausibly propounded that some of the Fathers were much taken therewith as Irenaeus Tertullian Lactantius and Austin himself for a time while he was also a Manichaean their reasons were grounded upon some dark passages in the Prophets and upon the 20. Chap. of the Apocalips which I think was never understood by man since the death of the writer thereof but that which most concerns the business now in hand against the Son of God is that argument which Mr. Ios Mede late of Cambridg hath used in his Commentary upon the Revelation cap. 20. which is both in his own Latine edition and also in the English Translation thereof which I am necessitated to take notice of in this place because I do not find that this argument hath yet been answered which is the strongest and most dangerous that ever any Millinarian used and for ought I know yet this argument was never used by any but only Mr. Mede who was a man of most profound learning and of a gracious religious and sober life who although he published this doctrine yet he did it with great modesty and humility and also with submission to the judgment of the Church But it was printed in a troublesome time viz. 1642. when the learned Church-men had hardly leisure to examine it or not power to correct it and surely little did this worthy man think what evil use some men would make of it The argument is this in Mr. Mede's own words Regunm quod neque ante Domini nostri Mede in Apocal c. 20. p. 277. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nec post ultimam resurrectionem est futurum id necessario inter utrumque est concludendum nam post ultimam resurrectionem Christus Regnum tradet patri 1 Cor. 15. 24. Ergo novum non inibit Which is thus Englished by Mr. Rich More the learned translator of that Book pag. 122. That Kingdom which neither shall be before the appearance of our Lord nor after the last Resurrection is necessarily to be concluded between them both For after the last Resurrection universal Christ shall deliver up the Kingdom to the Father that he may be subject to him who subdueth all things to himself as is said 1 Cor. 15. 24 25. 26. 27. 28. So far is he from being said then to enter upon any new Kingdom that he is to lay it down and deliver it up to his Father This argument is grounded upon one certain truth viz. That Christ must have a Kingdom which can not be denied But it is also grounded upon two untruths i. e. That Christ shall corporally return to this earth before his coming to the universal judgment 2. That Christ shall have no Kingdom after the last judgment These two are false grounds or at least are reducible to that fallacy which by Logicians is called Petitio Principii i. e. when that is presumed to be granted which is the main question and in no wise to be granted Now if it may appear that Christ must have a Kingdom after the final judgment and that eternally in Heaven then there wil be no need of his corporal descending and appearing on this earth before the last judgment for any establishment or management or for proving of his Kingdom because he shall have a Kingdom though not on earth or although he do not corporally so come as the Milliniarians expect What the meaning of those words of the Apostle is which mention Christs delivering up the Kingdom and the subjection of the Son we shall examine anon but certainly they do not in the least signifie the ending or abolishing of Christs Kingdom or any abasing or subjecting of his Divine Person for to affirm that Christ shall cease to be a King and that he shall turn subject must be confessed by all learned and true Christians to be not only heretical but also blasphemous against the Eternal God-head of the Son of God and it is utterly against the Scripture and sure word of God for this very word Subject was the argument of Arius and his Sect against the God-head of Christ which is here used against the Eternal Kingdom of Christ as we read in a Epipha haer 69. Epiphanius Certainly he that is the Eternal God must also reigne Eternally and if he must cease to reigne he must also cease to be God The Psalmist often tels us The Lord reigneth or the Ps 93. 97. 99. Lord is King And that the Kingdom of God the Son is eternal without any resignation thereof or any subjection of his Divine Person both in this world and the next is plentifully declared both in the old and new Testament as first in that saying of Daniel which Mr. Mede alledged against this truth Dan. 7. 14. There was given him a Kingdom that all People Nations and Languages should serve him his Dominion is an Everlasting Dominion which shall not pass away and his Kingdom that shall not be destroyed First here is a Kingdom over the world or over all nations 2. A Kingdom everlasting and least men should imagine that the Everlastingness of it was meant only for its continuance till the end of the world he addeth 3. Which shall not pass away as the world will pass away and which shall not be destroyed as the world must be destroyed This Prophecy of Daniel concerning Christs Kingdom is confirmed in the Gospel by the words of that Heavenly Angel Luc. 1. 33. He shall reigne over the house of Jacob for ever and of his Kingdom there shall be no end Here is an ever over Iacob that is his Church And that his reigning may not be thought to be only in the Church Militant the Angel addeth Of his Kingdom there shall be no end if no end then surely it must not end with the world The same Doctrine is declared by the Apostle concerning the same Son of God Heb. 1. 8. which he received from the Psalmist Psal 45. 6. Thy Throne O God is for ever and ever here are two evers One to signifie the ever of this World and the other to signifie the ever or eternity of the other World So Austin noteth upon the doubling of this word ever In seculum b Aug. in Psal 71. seculi est quantum hoc seculo durat quod post hujus seculi finem promittitur i. e. These two
nor the Holy Ghost were incarnate we answer that it is true that all the Three Persons equally govern and we further acknowledg that neither the Person of the Father nor the Person of the Holy Ghost are incarnate but only the Person of the Son yet we beleeve that the whole God-head and essence of the Father and of the Holy Ghost is incarnate in the Person of the Son This was affirmed by Christ when he said The Father is in me and I in him Ioh. 10. 38. and John Baptist had said before That God hath given him the Spirit not by measure Ioh. 3. 34. and St. Luke saith that Jesus was full of the Holy Ghost and St. Paul saith Col. 2. 9. In him Lu. 4. 1. dwelleth all the fulness of the God-head bodily whereby it appeareth that the Dominion of Christ doth not in any wise exclude the Dominion of the other Divine persons although St. Jude calls Christ the only Lord God yet this word only doth not barr the Lordship or God-head of the Father and Holy Ghost because as our good rule in Logick teacheth us That Propositio exclusiva non excludit inclusa Next concerning the Priesthood of Christ he is said to be a Priest for ever after the order of Heb. 7. 17. Melchisedech if for ever then he must be a Priest in Heaven but if so then the Socinians tell us that Christ can not be the supream God because the supream God can not be a Priest This cavil I have met with before and answered a Lib. 2. c. 15. out of Arstin That Christ is a Priest only as he is the Son of man as incarnate and Emanuel but not as he is the Son of God or God the Word and so Prosper also resolved this doubt upon those words Thou art a Priest b Prosper in Psal 109. Non quatenus ex patre sed quantenus ex Matre natus est Sacerdos i. e. Christ is a Priest not as he is the Son of his Father but as he is the Son of his Mother But we are further told by the Socinians That Heb. 7. 1. p. â— 16. c. Christ was not a Priest till he was dead and that then his Priesthood began that the expiatory or satisfactory offering of Christ was not performed on the cross or on earth but in Heaven This they affirm because they will not beleeve that our Redemption was wrought by the death of Christ so blasphemously do they vilipend the blood of Christ whereas indeed the ultimate expiation or satisfaction consisteth in the death of Christ answering to the very words of the Covenant viz In the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely dye and therefore the Apostle Gen. 2. 17. Rom. 6. 23. saith The wages of sin is death now if Christ dyed for us on the Cross he there also performed the expiation and paid the ransom for if the expiatory sacrifice were to be performed in Heaven then must Christ have suffered death in Heaven but the Apostle tells us that after his resurrection he dyeth no more This foul blasphemy Rom. 6. 9. is near a kin to that of Origen which St. Jerom reports a Hier. Epist 59. c. 4. That Christ was to suffer in the Air for the salvation of Divels and to suffer in Heaven also because we read of Spirituall wickedness in Heavenly places that so the inhabitants Eph. 6. 12. of al regions might be saved through Christs passions Thus he It being granted that Christ is now a Priest in Heaven it would be inquired of what order or kind his Priesthood is there in this we are certified that it is a Priesthood for ever and that it is after or according to the Priesthood of Melchisedech that is Christ is such a Priest in Heaven as Melchisedech was on Earth and therefore Christ in Heaven doth such Priestly acts as Melchisedech did on earth For Christ whilest he was on earth was a Priest but here his Priesthood was Aaronical i. e. like unto Aarons Priesthood because Christ did offer a bloody sacrifice even his own body and blood on the Altar of the Cross which he gave for a ransom for us Mat. 20. 28. For a propitiation Ro. 3. 25. for our Justification Ro. 5. 9. for our Redemption Eph. 1. 7. Col. 1. 14. to bear our sins in his own body 1 Pet. 2. 24. that is to undergo the punishment for our sins paying the ransom of his own self for us 1 Tim. 2. 6. This bloody sacrifice of Christ was typified and only signified by Aaron offering the bodies and blood of Beasts But the sacrifice of Christ on earth was also unlike Aarons because Aaron offered beasts but Christ offered himself Aaron might not offer human blood nor might Christ offer the blood of Beasts whereupon it is said Heb. 8. 4. That Christ on earth could not be a Priest because he could not offer gifts according to the Law that is he could not offer Levitical Sacrifices of Beasts as the Legal Priests did because he was not a Son of Aaron or of the Tribe of Levi. But he might and did offer his own humane blood which was the Substance whereas the blood of Beasts offered by Aaron was but only the shadow Therefore they that tell us that Christ may not be called an Aaronicall Priest because he was not a Son of Aaron may as well tell us that he may not be called The Lamb because he was not literally a Lamb taken out of the Sheep-fold The truth is this As the Lamb was Ex. 12. 5. but the shadow of Christs Passion so the Priesthood of Aaron was but the shadow of Christs Sacrificing Priesthood This Sacrificing Priesthood of Christ ended at his death so that he is not any more to be sacrificed but his Melchisedechical Priesthood and only that order of his Priesthood must continue for ever St. Austin saith of the Iews a Aug. in Psa 109. Iudaei vident jam periisse sacerdotium secundum Ordinem Aaron non agnoscunt Sacerdetium secundum ordinem Melchisedech This reproof toucheth not only Jews but Romanists and Socinians The Iews expect a restitution of their Temple and Aaronical or Levitical Sacrifices Romanists say Christ is daily Sacrificed on their Altars Socinians say that Christ Offereth Sacrificeth himself Com. on Heb. 9. v. 12. p. 168. in Heaven not considering that his Priesthood is only like Melchisedech's now which was not a Sacrificing Priesthood for we find not that any Sacrifice was offered by Melchisedech on earth neither may Christ our Melchisedech be thought in any wise to offer Sacrifice in Heaven But of this more anon If Christ being in Heaven doth there Sacrifice for us it must also be granted that he there prayeth for us because no Sacrifice can be rightly performed without prayer but no good Christian may imagine that the mediation of Christ in Heaven is by way of prayer neither can we find in
any form of prayers used by the Christian Church that ever it was said Domine Jesus ora pro me Lord Jesus pray for me was never said nor never will be in any Church Catholick therefore the Apostle when he mentioneth Christs praying writeth circumspectly as it were on purpose to prevent this error saying Heb. 5. 7. That in the dayes of his flesh he offered up prayers thereby limiting the time of Christs praying to be before his death Indeed we find often mention of his prayers on earth by all the four Evangelists but not one of them Mat. 14. 23. Mar. 6 46. Luc 22. 32. Ioh. 14. 16. speaketh of any prayer of Christ after his resurrection nor any Apostle mentioneth his praying after his Ascension The Socinians would have us beleeve that Christ Sacrificeth or prayeth in Heaven because themselves do not beleeve that Christ is the Supream God for one of their arguments against his God-head is this That the Supream God doth not pray Therefore because Christ prayed they say he is not God This was an old cavil of the Arians and was often answered by the Fathers as I have partly shewed before One saith b Iustin Mart. n 32. Quaest ad Orth Christus crebrius orabat ut inde homo esse appareret because as another saith c Theod. in Ro. 8. 34. ut Deus non perit sed suppeditat So Chrysostom answered d Chrys Hom. 32. Antioch Christus orabat ut homo nam Deus non orat and Austin often e Aug. in Ps 20. Ps 34. Ps 87. Secundum quod verbumest non orat sed exaudit humanitas interpellat Divinitatem and again Habes Majestatem ad quam ores humanitatem quae oret prote orat verbum caro factum and in another place Christus oravit non secundum formam Dei sed secundum forman servi i. e. Christ prayed only as he was man as he was made flesh as he was in the form of a servant his God-head did not pray But is prayed unto c. If it be demanded why Christ doth not pray in Heaven as he did on earth before his death We answer 1. He prayed before his death because till then he had not paid our ransom by his precious blood and death 2. Because he had fully satisfied the Justice of the God-head before his Ascension even to the utmost farthing therefore after this satisfaction there could be no need or use of further praying 3. When he ascended he took possession of Heaven not only for himself or for his own proper humane nature but also for and in the behalf of his whole mystical corporation and every member thereof therefore now no need of praying for that for neither do we petition for things that are already granted and by us obtained and possessed Our Saviour after his meritorious life and perfect obedience Active and after his satisfactory death and thereby his perfect obedience passive whereby the Covenant and Law was fully performed and executed had no cause at all in his own or our behalf to petition but might and did justly challeng Heaven as due to himself and in him to his whole body and every member thereof But then if Christ do not pray for us it would be inquired what the meaning is of those Scriptural words which signifie his acts and demeanour in Heaven and seem to imply his praying as when he is called a Priest Heb. 7. 17. should not a Priest pray So he is called our Advocate 1 Joh. 2. 1. and our Mediator Rom. 8. 3 4. 1 Tim. 2. 5. And he is also said to make intercession for us Rom. 8. 34. To this we answer First For his Priesthood in Heaven that it is a Priesthood only according to the order of Melchisedech Heb. 6. 20. Therefore it must correspond to that Priesthood only and no other now we find not any act of Priesthood performed by Melchisedech but only Blessing of Abraham Gen. 14. 19 for there is no mention of his praying or sacrificing Therefore the only Priestly act of Christ in Heaven is blessing the children of Abraham And this he doth not verbally or affectionately only but really and effectually by pouring down manifold blessings favours and graces and wonderfully protecting and supporting his Abrahamites or Church here on earth in all assaults and persecutions Secondly For his intercession The Original 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 7. 25. which doth not signify any supplicating intreating or oral pleading for us but only that in Heaven he is for us or standeth and is present or appeareth for us as is expressed by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 9 24. i. e. To appear in the presence of God for us that is to be ready and at hand to succour us yet not by way of supplication for his intercession is real not oral he claimeth Heaven as due to himself and in him to all the memmers of his body mystical and this by vertue of his obedience active and passive He there presenteth the first fruits that is his own holy body and soul which he took from man as free from all matter of reprehension immaculate and innocent because he was incarnate he performed the Law and suffered death for us he overcame Death and Hell and ascended and sitteth at the right-hand of the God-head so that he is not now a petitioner for but a possessor of all glory and power and hath earned Heaven both for himself and us It is said of him Heb. 12. 24. That his blood speaketh better things then that of Abel blood doth not speak literally or orally but as Abels murther did really require vengeance on Cain so the blood of Christ doth really require acquitment of us by his full satisfaction to Divine Justice and this standing or appearing is that by which he is said to offer himself in Heaven Heb. 9. 25. Thirdly When he is called an Advocate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Joh. 2. 1. and a Mediator 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Tim. 2. 5. This Mediation and Advocateship of Christ in Heaven doth not consist in verbal mediating and pleading for us as Advocates in Courts do for the Holy Ghost is also called Paracletus Joh. 14. 26. yet no man will say that he pleadeth for us verbally or by intreating Rom. 8. 26. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gal. 4. 6 and praying no more doth Christ because Divine Justice is not satisfied by praying for if prayers or verbal pleadings could serve our turn then Christ's prayers on earth had beē sufficient to have procured our Salvation and so might have freed him from his bitter Passion and Death Indeed before his Passion he mediated for us Precario by the intercession of prayer but now after the Consummatum est that he hath performed all that the God-head required to be done and thereby hath brought salvation for us and fully paid for it his Mediation
plura quam scio and Non me pudet ut fatear nescire quae nescio i. e. Those things which we understand not in holy Scripture are far more then what we do understand Neither are we ashamed to acknowledg our ignorance Neither should any Christian be abashed to acknowledg his ignorance in these profound Mysteries lest by falsly boasting of knowledge they may truly discern blindness as some who because they would not be thought to be pur-blind pretend to see what they do not S. Paul saith 1 Cor. 14. 38. If any be ignorant let him be ignorant This he said not to discourage ignorant people from acquiring knowledge but to restrain the ignorant from boasting of more knowledg then they have So Beza very pertinently expoundeth those words Ignarus suam ignorantiam Bâ—za in loc agnoscat nos imperiti locum peritorum occupent i. e. That ignorant and unlearned men should hold and esteem themselves to be so and not usurp the places and Offices of the skilful This is good Counsel for some in these times I wish our gifted-Donatist-Sermon-makers would consider it Now what particular Doctrines the Christian Doctors confessed to be too hard for them and incomprehensible by their learning is next to be shewed CHAP. 3. More concerning our ignorance in Points Theological Of Predestination and of the Trinity The presumption of some men in their over-much boldness in handling those Mysteries SAint Peter tells us that in S. Pauls Epistles some things are hard to be understood 2 Pet. 3. 16. Rom. 11. 16. and so S. Paul himself acknowledged when he cryed O the aepths of the riches and wisedom of God that his judgments are unsearchable and his ways past finding out it is evident also that the Apostles themselves were both ignorant and unbeleeving for a long time concerning the Mystery of the Death and of the Resurrection and of the Kingdom of Christ until the Holy Ghost descended on them at the Feast of Pentecost No marvel then if the greatest Theologs in the world are yet to seek in many matters of our Religion Who knows in what state place or condition souls departed are although some confidently talk of Lymbus and Purgatory who can tell when Christ will return from Heaven unto earth except our new Millenarians will teach us What man living understandeth the Apocalyps Bodinus tells that when Calvin was asked his opinion of it he answered that he knew not what so obscure a Writer meant for though Bod. Method c. 7. it be called a Revelation as having been made known to the holy Writer thereof yet by others it is accounted Obvelatio a veiling of Mysteries Some are confident that there shall be a general conversion of the Jews and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some indeavours are now in hand in order to it because the Apostle saith All Israel shall Rom. 11. 26. be saved yet how many Millions of Jews have departed this life in their infidelity since St. Paul wrot As for the meaning of those words learned Origen thus writeth a Orig. in Ro. lib. 8. cap. 1â— Quis ille Israel sit Deus solus novit unigenitus ejus si qui amici ejus sunt ad quos dicat i. e. None knoweth but God and those to whom he telleth it Concerning the grievous passions of Martyrs and the Pressures of other holy men Salvinus saith b Salv. de â—ub lib. 1. Quare Deus talia patiatur non est humane imb cilitatis cognoscâ—re i. e. Why God permiteth such oppression man cannot finde out How have those words of Christ Joh. 6. and Mat. 26. Except ye eat the flesh of Son of the man c. And Take eat this is my body how have they exercised and posed the Christian world both of reformed and unreformed Catholicks and so have even the words and form of Consecration of the Eucharistical Elements Finally how hath the Doctrine of the Sabbath in the fourth Commandment tortur'd both our own and other Theologues which Epiphanius and Austia expounded so as to be understood of Christ and verily except Christians do so apprehend it we cannot render a sufficient reason of our rejecting the Jewish Sabbath but if therein we understand Christ to be the Sabbath Then we may boldly say with Austin c Aug. cont Adimant c. 3. Sabbatum non est repudiatum a Christianis sed intellectum i. e. That Christians do not reject the Sabbath but do more truly understand it then the Jews do or did which I wonder that our Reforming Teachers do not hint now especially when we are become so strict Sabbatizers on the eighth day Touching the difficulties in the Doctrine of the holy Trinity and of Predestination and other Misteries Let us see what the ancient and most learned Divines thought Austin saith d Aug. confes l. 13. De Tem. Ser. 189. Soliloq c. 31. De verb. Apost Ser. 20. Trinitatem quis non loquitur quis intelligit Angeli in caelo Trinitatem scire non possunt diunt Quis est Rex gloriae And Trinitas tua tibi soli integre nota est quis cognovit te nisi tu te and so he concludeth Tu ratiotinare ego mirer tu disputa Ego credam i. e. Many talk of the Trinity but who understands it The Angels in Heaven do not comprehend it for they said Who is the King of glory The Trinity is known only to God for who hath known him but himself therefore Psal 24. 8 whilst others argue and dispute I will only admire and beleeve Thus he As concerning the Mystery of Gods Predestination and Election Origen inquiring why Jacob was loved and Esau hated before they Ro. 9. 13. were born thus answereth e Orig. in Gen. Homil. 12. Supra linguam nostram est dicere supra auditum vestrum i. e. That it was above his Eloquence to declare and his Auditors knowledg to understand Thus this Learned man acknowledged his insufficiency in these high Mysteries although at another time he tells us f Rapit nos desiderium ad ea quae magis obscura sunt disserenda Orig. in Num. ho. 13. That he had a more earnest desire to study and handle the greater difficulties in Scripture then the easier parts So we finde in Austin and Prosper many such passages whereby they acknowledg their nescience in such high matters As 1. Why an Infant at the very birth of it was found to be possessed with a Devil 2. Why one obtaineth the grace of Christianity and Baptism and another not 3. Why God punisheth one and forbeareth another when both are in the same fault 4. Why God granteth not the grace of Perseverance to some unto whom he hath given the grace of Christian Charity 5. Why he suffereth the children of some holy men to depart out of this life without Baptism or any knowledg of Christianity and yet so disposeth that the children of his very enemies and
Hypostases the Stations or Mansions of the God-head wherein it dwelleth and resideth for ever for this reason it is said Joh. 10. 38. The Father is in me and I in him i. e. The God-head of the Father is in in the Son and the God-head of the Son is in the Father and the God-head of the Father and the Son is in the Holy Ghost One God-head is communicated to all the Persons But it cannot be said that the Person of the Father is in the Son because the Persons are incommunicable wherefore as young Logicians reading or hearing of Vniversals and by their senses perceiving no things but Individuals upon inquiry where to finde these Genera Species they are taught that the residence or existence of Universals is only in particulars so young Christians are to know that the Abiding Mansion and Residence of the God-head is only in these Three Persons no where else If it be said that the God-head is every where and therefore not to be limitted or confined to residence in the Three Persons To this we answer that although it is certainly true that the God-head is every where yet the Existence or Residence of the God-head in the Three Persons doth not exclude it from any place nor confine or limit it within any bounds or in the least hinder its Vbiquity for albeit the God-head is really present in all places and more also although all places are contained inclued in the infiniteness of the God-head yet this God-head is no where but where it resideth in the Three Persons for these Three Divine Persons are also every where The Prophet saith of the Father Do not I fill Heaven and Earth And the Psalmist saith of the Spirit Joh. 10. 38 Jer. 23. 24. Psalm 139. 7. Joh. 3. 13. Whether shall I go from thy Spirit c. And the Son of God saith of himself The Son of man which is in Heaven and this he said in respect of his Divine Person when his body was not in Heaven but upon the Earth And when he was about to ascend into Heaven even then he said Lo I am with you always even unto the end of the world Mat. 28. 20. Neither doe those other passages in Scripture any way contradict the Ubiquity of the Divine Persons as when it is said Ex. 19. 20. The Lord came down upon Mount Sinai and of Sodom Gen. 18. 21. I will go down now and see c. And in the Gospel where it is said of the Father and the Son Joh. 14. 23. We will come unto him and make our abode with him As if the God-head or Divine Persons were not there before But these Speeches are to be understood of Gods appearing or manifesting himself in such places or to such persons where he is always really present but doth not alwayes shew or manifest his presence And in this the Ancient Expositors agree Chrysostom saith a Chrys Serm. de Spirit To. 6 Divinitas non migrat a loco in locum sed est de apparentia corporea i. e. God doth not go from place to place but those sayings signifie his visible appearance in some assumed body So St. Ambrose upon those words Gen. 3. 8. God walked in the Garden b Ambr. de Paradiso c. 14. Ambulatio Dei est praesentia apparens i. e. The walking of God signifieth only the appearing of his presence where he was truly present before and after them Fulgentius more home and cleerly saith c Fulg. ad Thrasim l. 2 Substantialiter ubique est Trinitas sed adventus Descensus sâ—gnificant manifestationem ejus i e. The Trinity is really or substantially every where but when it is said they came or descended these words signifie that God manifested his presenee there This is the reason of that Scripture-phrase so often used of the Lords appearing as Gen. 17. 1. The Lord appeared to Abram to signifie that God then manifested his presence there where he was before although he did not there appear before to Abraham This I trust is enough to shew the meaning and full importance of this considerable and weighty word Hypostasis Now touching the Coeternity of the Three Persons both the old and new Hereticks deny it for the Arians said d Athan in Decret Nicaen Concil Pater non semper Pater nec filius semper filius i. e. That God the Father was not always a Father and that the Son was not always a Son But St. Austin often opposed this Error and thus expressed his determination e Aug. de Temp. Serm. 131. 181. Deus non anteà Deus caeperit esse posteà pater sed sine initio Deus semper pater semper fuit pater semper habuit filium i. e. God was not first God and afterwards Father but ever God and ever Father he was always a Father and had always a Son Indeed Tertullian noteth that God was not always to be stiled * Tert. cont Herm. Dominus i. e. Lord though always God and Father and he observeth that in Scripture God is not called Lord until man was made And true it is that although the Father be from Eternity the Father of the Son or Word yet he could not be called either the God or the Lord of the Son but upon supposition of the Sons Incarnation and therefore not until man was created for as soon as man was made the Son of man was in the Loins of Adam John Crellius thus intituled his Book which he wret against the Trinity De uno Deo Patre i. e. Of One God the Father If his meaning were hereby to acknowledg God-head and Paternity to be Coeternal then it must needs follow that God must have an Eternal Son othewise he cannot be an Eternal Father for so St. Basil noteth g Bas cont Eunom l. 4. Si pater ante filium erat cujus pater erat si non filii i. e. If the Father were before he had a Son whose Father was he if not the Sons And although he be an Eternal Father of his Eternal Son yet he cannot be called the Eternal God or Lord of the Son as Epiphanius hath evidently shewed by distinguishing these two Appellations of Father and God thus h Epiph. in Ancor Deus vocatur Pater Filii propter aeternam generationem and Deus propter incarnationem i. e. God is truly called the Eternal Father of the Son because the Son was begotten from Eternity but he is called the God or Lord of the Son in respect only of the Incarnation of the Son just so the holy Psalmist speaketh cautelously in shewing that the Father cannot be called either the God or the Lord of the Son but only with respect had to the humane generation of the Son Psal 22. 10. Thou art my God from my Mothers belly as I have formerly shewed elsewhere King Solomon delivereth the very same Doctrine of the Coeternity of the
Father and the Son under the name of Wisdom Prov. 8. 22. The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his way before his works of old I was set up from everlasting I was brought forth just so doth the Psalmist express the Eternal generation of the Son Psalm 1103. Ex utero ante Luciferum genui te so was the old reading of those words in Jerome and Austin Brought forth and from the womb these words signifie that by Wisdom the Son is meant and the mention of the Womb of the Father doth signifie that this Son is of the same substance with the Father as children of the womb are of the same substance with their Parents and Before the morning Star signifieth that the Son was before time or any other Creature And that it may appear that by Wisdom the Son of God is meant the words of the Apostle will declare 1 Cor. 1. 24. where he calleth Christ The wisdom of God And as the Psalmist tells us that God made all things in wisdom So the Gospel tells us who this wisdome is viz. The Son The Word The Father created all things but he created them by the Son which St. John expresseth in these words Joh. 1. 3. All things were made by him that is by the Son or Word and this St. Paul doth clearly apply to Christ Col. 1. 16. For by him were all things created that are in Heaven and that are in Earth visible and invisible whether they be Thrones or Dominions or Principalities or Powers so that even the most glorious Arch-Angels and Angels are but the Creatures of this Son of God and this Wisdom of God Finally These men that tell us That God hath not always a Son may as well tell us that God had not always Wisdom But as they dare not deny the Wisdom of God to have been from Eternity so neither can they without very great impudence deny the Word or Son of the Father to have been from everlasting I will conclude this Chapter with the words of St. Basil who thus argued against the Anti-Trinitarians out of the words of St. John k Basil Hom. 16. To him that shall say There was a time when the Son or Word was not you may answer If this speech be true which the Gospel delivereth In the beginning was the Word I pray when was that time when he was not CHAP. IIII. Of the Holy Ghost That he is one of the Three Divine Persons and that he is to be prayed unto which is shewed both both by Warrant of Scripture and by the practice of the Primitive Christians and of the Church of England wherein he is confessed in Creeds and invoked in Baptisms and Doxologies THe Macedonian Hereticks confessed the Divine Personality of the Father and the Son but they denied the Person of the Holy Ghost and there are some among us who although they will not openly deny the Divinity and Person of the Holy Ghost yet they are doubtful and suspensive therein And this because they cannot or will not finde that any Prayers in Scripture are used or directed to the Holy Spirit as they are both to the Father and the Son They finde the Son of God praying to the Father Father into thy hands I commend my Spirit And Forgive them Father they know not what they do They Luk. 23. 46. 34. find also St. Stephen praying to the Son Lord Act. 7. 59. Jesus receive my Spirit For the satisfaction of such as these who are neither maliciously nor obstinately wedded to this error I will endeavour to shew both the Personality of the most Holy Spirit and also that he is to be prayed unto and both these by the evidences and precedents of holy writ and by the practice of our of our owne Church and also of the Primitive Christians First That the Holy Ghost is a Divine and distinct Person in the Trinity as well and as truly as either the Father or the Son We find that the Scriptures record and report many diverse actions and operations of the Holy Ghost which must needs be the performances of a Person for He appeared as a Dove And as fiery Tongues He teacheth He leadeth into all truth He brought into the Apostles memories whatsoever Christ had said He decreed in a Council Acts 15. He forgiveth sins by the Apostles by whom he was received and entertained for that purpose Joh. 20. 22. He is an Advocate or Comforter He distributeth gifts He spake by the Prophets and in the Apostles He calleth and maketh Ministers Act. 13. 2. And Bishops Act. 20. 28. where the very Original word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which I know not why our Translators rendred Overseers when in other places they Translated the very same word Bishops which is the very Text word without any alteration but only as it is formed to out English Idiom In a word this Holy Spirit is produced by St. John as a witness that Jesus is the Christ 1 John 5. 6. Secondly for Prayer We say that the Scripture doth evidently set down a Warrant and a Precedent of Prayer to the Holy Ghost which you will finde if you observe the words of St. Paul 2 Cor. 13. 13. The Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the communion of the Holy Ghost be with you This is a Prayer and here is not only a mention of the Holy Ghost but indeed all these words Grace Love and Communion do relate principally if not only to the Holy Ghost for the Spirit is the Grace and the Love of the Father and the Son and the grace of Jesus and the Love of the Father are conveyed unto us only by the Communion and Inspiration of the Holy Spirit The Spirit is the Conduit of them and the Cement or Ligament by which our conjunction fellowship Union or Communion is wrought and by which we are joyned and united in one Mystical body or corporation with the whole Trinity and this is the meaning of that saying of St. John Baptist concerning the Baptism of Christ He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost for those that are Mat 3. 11. baptized into Christ are by this Spirit united to him in one mystical body and so become One with him and by this Union with Christ they are united with the whole Trinity and therefore there is mention of the Holy Ghost in the formal words of Baptism because our Union is wrought only by this holy Cement of the Spirit for this reason it is that the Apostle prayeth for the Communion of the Holy Ghost Communion signifieth a mutual union of the Spirit with us and of us with the Spirit Communio is as much as Counio or uni◠cum The Scriptures are so plentiful in precedents of Prayers to the Holy Ghost that you may find them at least in thirteen of St. Pauls Epistles and at the beginning of every one of them for thus we read Rom 1. 7. Grace
minded first of our Adoption by the Son of God and whereby we say Our Father and it was by the best Primitive Christians dayly used and of such reverend esteem by the faithful that none might presume to use it until they were Christened that is until in Baptism they had received the Sacrament of Adoption as we are informed by e Chrys Hom. Antioch 58. Aug. de Temp. Serm. 126. Theod. Haeret. Fab. lib. 5. Chrysostom Austin and Theodoret. It may go for a Riddle that this Prayer is not only omitted but Preached and declaimed against by those men that would have us beleeve that Christ will come down from Heaven corporally and raign here upon earth with his Saints that is with themselves a thousand years before the last judgment which Doctrine if these men do beleeve and desire his so coming it may be wondred why they refuse to pray Thy Kingdom come In this they seem not to be their Crafts-masters because this omission giveth occasion to the other party to suspect that these Saints do not themselves believe this Millinarian fancie which they pretend and also that they do really fear lest Christs Kingdom should indeed come Because if his Kingdom come then his Will must be done On earth as it is in Heaven that is Cheerfully willingly and charitably according to his own Evangelical precepts without Blood-shedding or Rapine then no covetousness no hypocrisie no slandering or malicious lying and envying wil take place and then there wil be a restitution of all things Acts 4. 21. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. a re-establishment or restoring so that all ill gotten possessions must be parted withall and the wrong-sufferer and wrong-doer shall have their rights This is the grand Jubile Christs coming hath in Scripture a double signification 1. By his Spirit ruling in our hearts this is his Kingdom of grace and the Kingdom of God which is within us 2. It signifyeth his coming in particular judgment in wrath and vengeance upon a sinful and rebellious people neither of these do necessarily imply his corporal coming Verily it is not unprobable that Christs Kingdom may come upon us in this Land and that speedily and before his final judgment by reason of our grand impieties I mean his coming in wrath and vengeance to bruise us with his Rod of iron mentioned Ps 2. 9. for so he came to the Jews at their last and terrible destruction of which Kingdom John Baptist spake Mat. 3. 2. Repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand The Axis layd unto the root of the Trees as if he had pointed to the Roman destroyers whose Ensign of Magistracy was an Ax and some after our Savior tels them of their hewing down Mat. 7. 10. Mat. 42. 34. This generation shall not pass till all these things be fulfilled i. e. that some then alive should live till the destruction of Jernsalem should be finished And when he foretold that Peter should be crucified even then he said of St. John If I will that he tarry till I come what is that to thee the meaning was that Christs coming in vengeance Joh. 21. 22. upon that City and Nation should be before the death of St. John as indeed it was for he lived many years after the destruction of Jerusalem In this sence Christs Kingdom may come and his Reigning as a King justly taking revenge and punishing his rebellious people and we may justly fear that this Kingdom is already begun among us for our crying sins even the sins of the Afflicting as well as the afflicted party I do well remember that at the beginning of our late wars an order from the Parliament commanded the London Preachers to declare in their Pulpits that these troubles came upon this Land for the sins thereof Neither should those men who are imployed in executing the wrath of God upon others think that themselves are Gods favorires or Saints any thing more for this because they may find that most wicked men have been so ordained by God and by him acknowledged to be his instruments of vengeance for of the idolatrous King of Assyria God saith Isa 10. 5. O Assyrian the rod of my anger the Psalmist also observeth Psal 17. 13. The ungodly is Gods Sword and Austin tells us more also Aug. in Ps 36. Serm. 1. De peccatore fecit Deus flagellum ei dedit honorem Potestatem i. e God useth the sinner as a scourg and moreover he giveth him both honour and power even Attila the cruel Scythian Tyrant called himself Flagollum Dei i. e. the rod of God And no marvel for Beares Lyons Fiery Serpents Winds and Storms Frogs Flies Caterpillers Thunder and Lightnings Famines Pestilences and evil Angels are used by God to execute his wrath yet these are not Saints indeed as Origen saith b Orig. in Iosh Hom. 4. Peccatori omnis creatura hostis est i. e. every creature may be an enemy and scourg to a sinfull people and to put it out of doubt the Prophet Ieremie tells us of The Hammer of the whole earth Ier. 50. 23. which both c Aug. in Ps 97 glos ord in loc Austin and the Gloss affirm to be meant of the Devil Neither will any man say that the Roman Idolaters were Saints although God permitteth and prospered them with victorious success in subduing the Iews because they did not attempt that war with any intent of serving God but to serve their own lusts and coveteousness and surely successfulness in causes unwarrantable and ungodly which an heathen man did call d Sen. in Here. Eur. Prosperum Scelus is so far from excusing or ingratiating us with God that it argueth a greater wrath and curse of God upon us as Prosper noteth e Prosp Sent. 42. Quando malè vivis si parcit Deus mag is irascitur in Psal 65. Aug. Nihil est infelicius felicitate peccantium qua mala voluntas nutritur i. e. Nothing is more unhappy then the happiness and success of a sinner because thereby he is hardned in wickedness I confess something may be said for the Saint-ships of such instruments of wrath even from the mouth of God reported Ierem. 22. 7. where in St. Ieroms translation Hier. in Jeremiam c. 22. Sanctus vocatur Nabuchodonosor omnis ejus exercitus Sanctus Numa Mart. lib. 11. Epig. 16. Sanctissima Sibylla virg in lib. 6. it is thus read of Nebuchadnezzar Sanctificabo Super te interficientem virum i. e. That God would Saintifie or prepare a slaughter-man against the King of Iuda so in this sence Nebuchadnezzar was a Saint or a Set-apart Neither can Tyrant-Persecutors or usurpers in their dominions unrighteously acquired justly use the Ancient stile of lawfull Christian Princes viz. Gratia Dâ—i But yet they may truly write Permissione Divina because God doth permit the worst of men to usurp yet without any allowance or gracious acceptance of his And surely it is a great
evers are for continuance of this world and for that which is promised after the end of this world But then it must be inquired what is meant by Christs delivering up the Kingdom And in what sence it is said that Then shall the Son himself be subject To which inquiries the reader may find a full and I trust a satisfactory answer in my former book printed An. Dom. 1655. Lib. 2. c. 10. If he peruse the tenth chapter of the second book intituled The God-head of Iesus Christ which I shall not need to reherse in this place fully but only briefly to touch First Christs delivering up the Kingdom doth not signifie his relinquishing or resigning but only a presenting of his Kingdom that is his Church his Spouse his Members and Elect so saith the Expositer c Aug. de Trin. l. 2. c. 8. Non sic tradet ut adimat sibi i. e. he will not so deliver it up as if he had deprived himself of it Just so the Father is said to have delivered all things to the Son Luc. 10. 22. as he was man and the head of his Church yet for all this delivering the Fathers Dominion over all did not cease As when a Prince committeth a Province to the Goverment of one of his Captains the Prince doth not thereby lose his Soveraignity as the Father delivered his people to the Son to be governed so that the Son re-deliver the same people to the Father but in better condition then he found them for he will present them righteous holy pure just and free from all sin or matter of reproof Christ received them to govern and he governed them so well that in the end he will present them to the just God-head to be rewarded and crowned The Church on earth whilst it is Militant is said to be Black and comely Cant. 1. 5. viz. Black by reason of some pollutions of sin and Comely because it is adorned with many graces but when Christ shall present it to the Father at the end of the world it shall be delivered up Comely and not Black So that this delivering is only a presenting of his Church which is his Kingdom as good Students after their labours are presented to the University as Candidates to be rewarded with the honour of Degrees or as Queen Esther when she was purified was so Esther 2. presented to King Ahasuerus This is all that reasonably can be gathered from the phrase of Delivering up the Kingdom Secondly The Subjection of the Son is thus to be understood We know that Christ as he is man is called the head of the Church Ephes 5. 23. And the Church is called The body of Christ Col. 1. 18. of this great body all holy Christians with Christ himself are members and parts for the head is but a part of the whole body so that Christ the head and all his Saints and members are joyntly but one mystical body or Corporation and so but one Christ So we read We are members of his body of his flesh and of his bones Ephes 5. 30. And Ye are all one in Christ Jesus Gal. 3. 28. from these and the like sayings the Ancient Fathers collected this true and excellent Doctrine That Christ the head together with all his members or Church are to be accounted but one Christ which they called Christum universum and Christum totum and Christum diffusum and Christum plenum and Plenitudinem Christi i. e. The universall whole diffused and the full Christ or fulness of Christ as I have formerly shewed at larg Now when the Apostle saith that Then shall the Son himself be subject 1 Cor. 15. 28. his meaning is only this that all the members of Christ and so the Whole Christ shall be at the resurrection fully and compleatly and perfectly subject and obediently plyable to the will of God for then all the holy members of Christ shall be delivered up or presented to God pure spotless quit and free from all the dominion of the World the flesh and the Devil which before during this mortal life had some power in them whilst they were militant and in war by the Spâ—rit against the flesh but then Christ shall have put down all Rule all Authority and Power of sin so that they shall not be any longer militant but triumphant so that then and not till then the whole Christ that is not only himself as head but all his members with him shall be perfectly obedient and subject in all things to the God-head For before this delivering up or presenting this Kingdom or Church The whole Christ or whole body of Christ as it never yet was so it never will be compleatly and perfectly subjected to the will and rule of God because all the members of Christ will not till then be fully obedient for although Christ as he is man and as he is considered only by himself in his own particular humane person without relation to us was ever obedient and subject to the God-head yet this subjection of his particular self was only in capite i. e. a subjection of one part the head only but at the Resurrection when he shall present and deliver up this his Kingdom or Church then both head and members and so the whole Christ shall be perfectly and wholy subjected Finally although Christ himself as he is the Son of Man and in the form of a servant was ever subject yet the same Lord Jesus as he is the Son of God and in the form of God Philip. 2. 6. he thought it no robbery to be equal with God and therefore as he is God the Word or the Eternal Son of the Eternal Father in this consideration of his divine Person he never was nor ever shall be subject Indeed his Man-hood or Man-head is subject but in Christ there is another head and that is his God-head as we read 1. Cor. 11. 3. The head of Christ is God This head of Christ shall never bow it self to any but all knees shall bow to it Rom. 14. 11. Philip. 2. 10. for by this head he is said to be Over all God blessed for ever Rom. 9. 5. and by vertue of his head it it said Heb. 1. 6. 8. Thy Throne O God is for ever and ever and Let all the Angels of God worship him This I trust is enough for clearing this doubt SECT II. Of Christ's Kingdom over all the world and every Creature that it ceased not at his death That neither the Roman Consistorie nor Presbyterian vestry can be called Christs Throne How it is in this World and yet not of this World That the Policy of Christs Kingdom is altogether unlike and diverse from Worldly policies Mr. Mede's argument above mentioned is grounded upon another false supposition besided the former alledged viz. That Christs Kingdom is not yet commenced or begun or that Christ hath not yet reigned as a King either in Heaven or Earth nor
or Advocation is Authoritative in Plenitude of power so that now the presenting of his glorious Person in Heaven is a sufficient Advocate his performance of the Law together with his Passion Death are the Plea and the tongues that effectually move for us because the vigor and efficacy thereof is and for ever will be looked on by the God-head as a full satisfaction to Divine Justice which Doctrine is singularly expressed by the great Apostle Ro. 8. 3. Who shall lay any thing to the charg of Gods elect It is God that justifieth it is Christ that dyed That is risen again who is at the right hand of God who also maketh intercession for us of which Right hand we are next to consider SECT IV. Of Christ's Session at the right hand of God The difference between the right hand of God and the right hand of the Father with the abuses of that Article why Christ withdrew to Heaven Of the rebuilding of Jerusalem and the Temple of the Iewish Monarchy and their Pseudo-messiah or the great Anti-Christ NO one Phrase in Scripture doth more express the Kingly and omnipotent power of Christ in Heaven and in Earth then this of his sitting at or on the Right hand of God for the understanding whereof I shall offer to the consideration of the Reader the four questions following First What it is in Christ that is so exalted To this we say That Christ consisteth of two ingredients viz God head and Man hood and that this sitting at the Right hand is not to be understood of his God-head but of his Man-hood as he is the Son of Man the Son of David the Son of the Virgin-Mother for by this humane nature he became passible subject to poverty hunger and thirst weariness injuries buffetings scourging and death therefore as by this part only he is said to be humbled to death the Death of the Cross so in this part only may he be said to be exalted for by his God-head he ever was at the Right hand of God and God over all blessed for ever As he Rom. 9. 5. is God the word he can not be said to be exalted but as the word was made flesh It is our nature only that the Son of God ennobled and carried to the right hand of God and we have shewed before that the prophecies of Christ's exaltation were said only of the Son of David that is of Christs humane nature for otherwise he is not the Son of David If it be said that we may not seperate his God-head from his Man-hood for this is to make two Persons of one and was the heresie of Nestorius To this we answer That it is true that the two natures of Christ neither can nor may be severed or divided asunder by any Real separation but yet they may and must be distinguished separated or abstracted mentally or Mathematically as School-men say that is we may in our mind consider one part alone without considering the other although both do really consist together as a Mathematician considereth the longitude of a body without considering the matter of it So we in this exaltation of Christ consider only his humane or assumed nature This is the judgment of the Ancient Church delivered by Theodoret a Theo. Dialog â—â—confu Sede De homine Christo dicitur i. e. That this Sitting is meant only of the Man Christ Secondly Who it is that so exalted Christ Whether the Person of the Father only or the Person of the Holy Ghost or whether the Son exalted himself To this we answer that the whole God-head and every Divine Person therein exalted Christ even the God-head of the Lord Jesus exalted the Manhood of the same Lord Jesus for there is but one God-head in all the Three Persons therefore all the Three Persons exalted the humane nature of the Son This truth the Scripture often sheweth though something mysteriously for David saith of Christ The Lord said unto my Lord sit Psal 110. 1. thou at my right hand That is The God-head of the Son of God said to Christ for David calls Christ His Lord only for this reason because the Lord Christ was to be the Son of David by taking flesh from David for otherwise how is not the Lord that said it Davids Lord as well as the Lord to whom it was said This is that Scripture wherewith Christ posed the Pharisees If David call him Lord how is he his Son David Mat. 22. 45. calls Christ The Lord in respect of his God-head but he calls the same Christ his Lord because he was to be the Son of David by his assumed humane nature His Divine Nature was Davids Lords his humane Nature was Davids Son The same David had said before of Christ God thy God hath anoynted thee with the oyl of gladness The meaning is that the God-head Psal 45. 7. of Jesus was to be the Anoynter and the Oyl and Unction of Jesus and therefore the God-head is called his God because the Lord Jesus by his God-head anoynted Christ or The Son of God anoynted and exalted the Son of Man So Christ on the Cross said My God my Mat. 27. 46. God why hast thou forsaken me Now did Christ speak to his own God-head The Son of Man spake to the Son of God which he therefore calls his God The forsaking here mentioned is not so to be construed or understood as if now in this agonie his God-head had quite departed from him or that the union of the God-head and Manhood were then dissolved far be it from us to think so but the meaning is that his God-head did now expose and give up and deliver the Manhood to death and left it to the will and fury of that People The God-head suspended and with-held protection from the manhood and did not send Legions of Angels to deliver him although the God-head was still united with the Manhood Thirdly At whose Right hand Christ is said to sit Whether at the Right-hand of one or of all the Persons of the Trinity This I conceive requisite to be examined because all our Liturgical Symbols or Creeds mention Christ's sitting at or on the Right-hand of the Father which is certainly true because every Person in the Trinity is the Creator and therefore the Father of all Creatures although only the Person of the Father is to be acknowledged to be Father of the Word or Son of God But yet this Symbolical expression doth not so cleerly declare this Mystery as the words of the holy Scriptures do wherein Christ is never said to sit at the right hand of the Father but at the right hand of God Now the right hand of God is the right hand of every Person in the God-head and not only the right hand of the Person of the Father So that the meaning of this sitting of Christ must be this That the humane nature of Christ is advanced to sit at the right
himself gave a reason of his withdrawing from Earth â—oh 16. 7. It is expediert for you that I go away for if I go not away the Comforter will not come unto you This he said not as if he could not on earth give the Holy Ghost but because the infirmities of men would not be in a capacity to entertain him so as they should for he gave it before his ascension but their minds were otherwise busied They were so fond of his bodily presence that they thought nothing could be done to them for their benefit without it for they dreamed of his Earthly Kingdom even just at his ascension Act. 1. 6. as Jews and Millinarians now do this earthly monarchy so filled their thoughts that they were not capable of the Comforter they thought Christ could not reign except his body were present so that his God-head was not considered but altogether neglected The holy Woman Martha greatly erred in this very thing when she said Lord if thou hadst been Ioh. 11. 21. here my brother had not died as if Christ could not cure him or raise him except he were bodily present To cure them of this fond conceit Christ withdraws to Heaven as a Mother withdraws her presence from a too fond Child and as light and food are sometimes withheld from Frantick men for their good for this cause it may reasonably be thought that Christ performed some miraculous cures on earth when he was not corporally present thereby to teach men the omni-presence of his Divine Spirit for so he cured the Centurious Servant not going to Mat. 8. 13. Ioh. 4. 50. the place where he was and also the Noble mans sick Son although he did not go down to him at Capernaum as the Noble man desired To these reasons many other are added by Divines which are frequent and obvious in their writings I shall not need here to rehearse them These premises being true and all of them matters of Faith it may be wondred that any Christian should dream of removing the Court Royall of Christ from Heaven to this base and beggerly earth Faustus the Manichean thought more honorably of Christ then so and said a Aug. cont Faust l. 20. c. 2. Mat. 17. 20. That the Son of God resideth in the Sun therefore the Manichees adored the Sun They who can believe this monstrous Article of Christs removeal to dwel upon this earth have need of a greater Faith then that which can remove Mountains And yet I do not think it unprobable but that before the end of this world there will be some such thing attempted as Jews and Millinarians phansie concerning this Earthly Monarchy of Messiah the Jews possibly may be congregated to their old country Jerusalem and the Temple there may be rebuilt and that People may be the most potent upon earth Their Captain or Leader that shall so congregate them may by them be thought and beleeved to be their long-expected Messiah Those Christians that then shall joyn with the Jews and their Leader may be thought by themselves and by the Jews to be Proselite-Saints and so together they may have a Sovereignty over all other worldly Princes These things are not impossible But then when this attempt shall rake effect their great Captain will not be the true Messiah or Christ but a Pseudo-Christ such as the Jews have often heretofore been abused by nor will this Monarchy be the mild and righteous reigning of Christ whose Kingdom is not of this world But verily it will be that which the Primitive Christians so much feared even the Bloody Tyrannous and formidable raging of the Grand Antichrist so Origen thought b Orig. in Mat. Tract 29. The desolation of Jerusalem must last till the consummation of the World Si aedificabitur Templum aedificabitur illi qui extollitur supra omne quod dicitur Deus i. e. If Dan. 9. 27. 2 Thes 2. 4. ever the Temple of Jerusalem be re-built it will be for him that extolleth himself above all that is called God Thus he The Monarchy of Antichrist whensoever it comes must be set up by the sword His Pallace Royal and Hypocritical Temple must be built in blood Our own c Fitzstephen Stow. Speed Historians tel us that the Tower of London built by the Conqueror was cemented with Lime tempered with the blood of Beasts But this Babel must be cemented with the blood of men and the Tyrant himself will be such as the crafty and cruel Emperor Tiberius is described to have been d Suet. in Tib. c. 57. 59. Lutum sanguine maceratum i. e. a Lout like clay tempered with blood of whom also it was foretold Regnabit sanguine multo i. e. that his reign would be bloody so will be the dominion of the Grand Hypocrite who will be not only a blood-sucker but a blood-supper a man of blood a destroyer and drunken with blood The primitive Christians did so conceive of this Pseudo-Christ or Antichrist and therefore they prayed for the continuance of the Roman state though persecutors because they thought Antichrist could not come till that state was dissolved and they also prayed e Tert. Apol. c. 32. c. 39. Pro mora finis i. e. That the judgment of the world might be deferred because Antichrist was not to come till the day of judgment was near at hand for they feared to adventure the perseverance of their Faith to the tryal of such cruel forces The apprehension of the persecution of this Antichrist inclined some to think that it should be Nero raised from the dead as f Aug. de Ci. vit lib. 20. c. 19. Austin reports So Chrysostome thought g Chrys Serm. de 2. Adventu Christi That St. Paul meant Nero by those words 2 Thess 2. But Theodoret affirmed that this Last and greatest Antichrist shall be the Divel appearing in the shaâ—e of a man and pretending himself to be the Messiah h Theod. Haeret. Fab. l. 5. In the mean time as there have been before so there will be yet many Antichrists who will outwardly profess Christ as members of the Church as Austin saith a Aug. in 1. E. pist Ioh. Tract 3. Multi Antichristi intus sunt nondum foras exierunt Such are by St. Bernard called Christiani Antichristiani i. e. Antichristian Christians of which sort more anon Finaly as all Petty-Antichrists have had preachers suborned to deceive and mislead the vulgars so also will the Grand Antichrist St. Jerom called Sabinianus who was an Adulterer and a scardâ—lous Deacon a Hier. Epist 48. Novum Apostolum Antichristi i. e. a new Apostle of Antichrist Prosper saith as much of the Great Antichrist b Prosper de Promis p. 3. c. 11. 13. Antichristus habebit suos praecones mendacii pseudoprophetas i. e. That he will have his false Prophets and Preachers of lyes St. Jerom further addeth That Antichrist will assume to himself a Legislative power
precious not an Unicorn if any were not an Elephant nor any other foul not an high neckt Swan nor a proud Peacock The Church Catholick in correspondence thereunto had their limited liturgies and set forms of publick prayer as we find in all ages since the dayes of the Apostles none might publickly in the Congregation offer the stang or wildfier of his own phansie but was confined to the form prescribed that so the congregation might knowingly joyn therein No such thing as long tedious Elephantine and tautological Orizons practized as of late as if men on purpose slighted the advice of Christ against Pharisaical long prayers Mat. 6. 7. 23. 14. This by the way Now for conclusion of this question concerning the correspondence of Christ in Heaven with the High Priest in the Sanctuary I desire the learned Reader to peruse the whole passage in that great Festival of Atonement described Levit. 16. and then judg whether there be any mention at all of the High Priests Sacrificing in the Sanctum Sanctorum he will find that the Sacrifice was by him offered not within but without the sanctuary at the Great Altar so was the Sacrifice of the body and blood of Christ offered not within the Sanctuary of Heaven but on the Gross which was his Altar on earth the denial whereof containeth more poyson then a plain Christian is aware of If our Commenter had been contented to affirm only this That Christ presenteth his holy body in Heaven which was besprinkled with his own blood here on earth wee would willingly agree with him therein for certainly his Passion on earth is and ever will be looked on in Heaven and considered by the Godhead as a full satisfaction and expiation for all his members and will ever be present and fresh in the sight of God For if Christ had not fully satisfied the Divine Justice and paid the full price of our redemption at his death he could not have ascended into Heaven nor sate at the Right Hand of God but must still have been held in Prison by death as other dead men are because he was indebted by the Covenant as being a surety for man But now that our surety is freed and out of Prison there is no doubt but that the debt was fully paid before his releasment This is all that I shall need to relate concerning the History of Christ in Heaven for if all could be written as St John said of him upon Earth The World it Ioh 21. 25. self would not contain the Books By what hath been said I trust the Reader perceiveth That neither the Intercession nor Advocateship nor Mediatorship nor Priest-hood of Christ in Heaven doth in the least derogate from his Almighty power and Soveraignty both in Heaven and Earth For his Priest-hood there is Melchisedechical and that was a Royal or Kingly Priest-hood I fear that I have wearied the Reader in this long Chapter which though I have marked for the Tenth he may justly call it Caput Decumanum CHAP. XI More of Millinarism of the dreadful consequences thereof of new Saints and the new Elect and new Meek that these Titles unduely placed are abuses of the Holy Ghost The Conclusion BY what hath been said the Reader may in part perceive what evil consequences attend this Millinarian Doctrine even to the denial of the eternal Kingdom of the Son of God in Heaven and verily if it take place it probably may extend to the demolishing of all earthly Monarchies and to the dissipating and levelling of most private mens interests and taking away properties of Estates and that Meum and Tuum which hath been so much agitated and instead thereof as one said to bring in a Suum that is to settle all earthly goods and possessions upon those men that call themselves Saints and which is worse upon the Millinarian principles it may proceed to the bloody Massacres of many millions of people in the World and at best to the vassallage and slavery of those that escape death which will be a woful restitution of the long expected liberty of the Subject and such as Plutarch observed at â—lut in vita â—yllae Rome that after the outragious fury of Marius when Sylla succeeded the people saw there was a change but yet no freedom from oppression but a proceeding from naught to worse and as one saith a Terent. in Heaut Deteriores omnes sumus licentia as if some men did construe this liberty to signify a licentiousness for one party to do whatsoever they please against another and to quite themselves from all subjection to Magistrates and Laws both humane and Divine such revelling and domineering will not become the mild Kingdome and easie Yoâ—k of Christ nor can such hard task-masters be accounted raigning Saints but Saints Rampant nor can the exorbitant litenciousness of one party be called publick liberty Upon those words Psal 119. 125. I am thy Prosper in Ps 119. Servant Prosper thus confesseth Neque enim mihi bene cessit quando esse volui liber meus non servus tuus i. e. That it never was well with him since he would take his own liberty and not be Gods Subject We now perceive the reasons why some Preachers have heretofore taught the people 1. That wicked man have no right to the Creature 2. That God cannot see sin in the Saints Gangren haer 43. 52 153. that know themselves to be in Grace 3. That Christ shall live again on this Earth and put down Monarchies 4. That all the Earth is the Saints 5. That with them there ought to be a community of goods be like they so expound the Article of the Communion of Saints Now we can guess at the cause why we have of late such a numerous Canonization and Apotheosis or Apocolocyntosis of Saints for if all the Earth must be in the possession of Saints only what Earthly man will not at least pretend to be a Saint although in old time as Theodoret tells us men called Saints b Theod de Cur Graec affe lib 3. Luc 4 6. Hagios quasi Ageos because they were not earthly minded If Satan had not lyed when he said that all Kingdoms of the World were at his dispose he might have hired a great part of mankind to stand for his designs but Satans rewards of his Servants are in another Kingdom indeed one of the Romane Saints St Francis was voted at Rome to that place in Heaven which Lucifer lost but if this Millinarian Tyranny be put into practise some for their great deserts may hereafter dispute with Beelzebub for the upper hand in his infernal principality for as there are many Saints in Heaven which are not registred in the Catalogue of Saints on Earth as Erasmus said so Mr Fox reporteth as the saying of St Jerome that many are reverenced for Saints on Earth who are now tormented in Hell when our English Becket was Sainted at Rome one
Rogerus a Norman at a disputation in Paris concluded that the said Becket for Speed in Hen. 2. his rebellion was damned so Bellarmin reported out of a more Ancient Writer Sulpitius that one who had been a long time worshipped as a Saint did by an apparition confess that he had been a great Robber and that he was executed Bell de Sanct. To 2 lib. 1 c 7. for his villanies and that he was damned This new Sainting is but an imitation and revival of an old Heretical Policy of magnifying those men or things that might conduce to the advancement of their false Religiosities So we read that the Hereticks called a Epiph. Hae r 38. Caiani Sainted and honoured Cain because he prevailed against Abel so as to kill him for by this Success they pretended that Cain was fovourred and assisted by that God who was stronger then the God of Abel The same hereticks did also honour Judas as a great Benefactor to mankind because he had betrayed Christ to death as in order to the redemption and salvation of man There were also some Gnosticks who proceeded so far as to worship a very Serpent in honour and memorial of that Serpent which they said was the Author of knowledge or new-light to our Mother Eve yet these also called themselves Christians but the Church called them Ophitae i. e. Serpentarians and so the Manichees most blasphemously affirmed that the Serpent which deceived Eve was Christ as b Aug Har. 17. St Austin writeth at which strange blindness or impudence he wondred and said c Id cont Faust l 15 c 9. O Haeresis Ebâ—ia sed non vino i. e. that it was an heresy drunken but not with wine But these Hereticks had a fifth Gospel which they called d Epiph haec 38. The Gospel of Judas out of which surely they learned these unholsome Doctrines Those Manichees were a Sect of as ill Doctrine and as bad demeanor as any for they taught that there are two Gods one good the other bad and they forbade any relief even to bread and water to be given to any indigent people except they were of their own Sect yet these Manichees had their Saints also whom they called Electos and Electas by the same token that in the night of the Manichean Vigils when certain Women met in a room to keep those wakes then came the Electi Manichaeorum Aug. de Morib Manich. l. 2. c. 19. and one of them put out the light then was one of those Woman forced and ravished in the dark she knew not by whom of such Elect the Scripture speaketh where mention is made of the Chosen Charets of Pharaoh Exo. 14. Ibid de Temp. Serm. 90. 7. and of the Election of Judas John 6. 70. they were Elect the first ad malitiam a Diabolo the second Ad tentationem per Diabolum as Austin saith There is also now a days a dangerous Ibid in Ps 55. flattery practized in ascribing the title Elect to some Women or Widows that are rich you may be sure although as yet no signs of God's Election have appeared in them but the contrary St Paul describes holy Widows by 1 Tim. 5. trusting in God continuing in Prayer night and day well reported of for good works lodging of strangers washing the Saints feet relieving the afflicted c. But these Flatterers place that salvation of Elect Lady quite contrarily on malicious busy-Bodyes on the afflicters of good and innocent men for which they both labour and rejoyce on such as wax wanton and are of ill report and live in pleasure of such St Jerome writeth to the noble Virgin Eustochium e Hier. Epi. 22. cap. 6. Plena adulatoribus domus clerici ipsi precia accipiunt Salutandi vident sacerdores suo indigere auxilio hinc eriguntur in superbiam Castae vocantur and Nonâ—ae post caenam dubiam Apostâ—los somniant i. e. Their houses are frequented by Flatterers some needy Clerks take pay of them for the Salutes-poor Priests make then so proud that they must be called Chast and very Nuns and although they feed high and deliciously yet in opinion of their Holiness in the night they dream of the Apostles as if they appeared to them in visions Thus he Such as these are to be exhotted to make their Election sure to themselves by an Holy Christian Charitable and innocent conversation rather then to suffer themselves to be flatteted into Hell by such Self-ended Hypocrites It is surely a great abuse and blaspemy of the Holy Ghost who is the Author of all Sanctification to fasten the appellation Saint upon such persons as have no holiness in them except Covetousness Rapine Malice Envy and Hypocrisy may be called Sanctifying graces That Scripture which our Millinarian Saints alledge for their right to wordly possessions will in no wise fit them Math. 5. 6. The Meek shall inherit the Earth It is confessed hereby that inheriting Saints must be meek it would be examined what the word meek importeth and also what Earth or Land is there meant 1. Meek signifies those that are mild gentle patient and peaceable therefore not the furious cruel blood-thirsty and war-making man Blessed are the Peace-makers Mat. 5. 9 Mar. 5. 5. Luâ— â— 30. but variance and strife are the works of the flesh Gal. 5. or of the Divel as himself confessed that his name was Legion Marc. 5. 9. where a Latine Word is used in the Greek Text alluding thereby to the Roman Legions as may reasonably be thought 2. The Earth or Land there promised is not the Low-Country of this Earth for this is a Aug in Psal 26 Terra morientium i. e. the Land of the Dying but it is the Land of the living Psal 142. 5. True Saints know that they have no continuing City here below but their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. that Phil 3 20. common-wealth Kingdom or Country whereof they are to be inhabitants is Heaven and that is their Land of promise Neither will that Pharisaical or comparative righteousness amount so high as to Sanctification such as God I thank thee that I am not as other men The non-Saints are accused as being Luc. 18 11. Swearers Cursers Drinkers and cruel man-slayers and the Saints are also recriminated for as great Crimes but here an Aposiopesis is necessary There is a sin which in Scripture is called b Gen. 18 20. Peccatum Clamans i. e a crying sin but in other Writers the same sin is called Peccatum mutum and c Isych in Levit l 5 c 18 ineffabile i. e. the dumb sin which perhaps may be reproved impune when those man are dead who will not indure the reproof thereof whilst they are living Great sins there are doubtless on both sides St Jerome thus writes to Sabinianus his accuser d Hier Epi 48. Nunqnid vitia mea virtutes tuae sunt mecum age
paenitentiam The vices of one party are not the vertues of the other therefore t' were best for both to amend But yet the sins of those that profess such great holiness are more abominable in them then in others and especially when they are dogmatically asserted as if they were warranted and approved by God St Jerome mentions a Hier. Epi. 22. Virgil Aen. 3. Sanctam Superbiam and in the Poet there is Aura sacra fames i. e. holy covetousness The Pelugians twitted the Cat holicks as if they taught b Aug cont Iul l. 6 c 6. Piae fraudes apud Ambros de Jacob lib 2 c 3. Concupiscentiam sanctificatam but falsly for no outward profession of Saintship can Sanctifie Rapine Murther Sacriledge and the like but these sins are represented far worse in the sight of God when they are found in professors of heavenliness and mortification It is said that the Fox will fain himself to be dead c Epiph. in Physiol c. 19. that so he may catch and deavour birds that come within his reach and we know what great mischiefs have been acted by some seeming mortified men even to the deavouring of the Estates of Orphans and Widows when they have been trusted as fiduciaries We read of a foul d Aug ad frat in Erem hom 48. found in a dead mans Skull and of late we are informed e Mr Hoels Epist that a Serpent was found in the heart of a dead English man an ill sign as that learned and industrious Gentleman thought of venemous and Serpentine designs in the hearts of some seeming-mortified men that is the sin which the Apostle calls Ephes 6. 12. Spiritual wickedness in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 heavenly places Astronomers tell us of a Serpent in Heaven and of the Head Eph 6 12. and Tail of the Dragon there So doth the Apocalips mention a Dragon seen in Heaven Rev. 12 3. whose Tail arew the third part of the Stars of Heaven Surely no under-moon earthly or under-under-earth plot is so likely to take effect as an Heavenly pretence and Holy wickedness as one saith Parva sunt mala Sen. in Medea Act. 4. Et vile telum est ima quod tellus creat Caelo petam venena Descendat Anguis c. How easily are poor people deceived when Satan appears like an Angel of Heaven or like an Holy Prophet and in the mouth of his false Prophets a Zech. 13. 3. speaketh lies in the Name of the Lord how plausible are the promises of Reformation of Religion in Doctrine and manners and this with a Sacred Covenant with solemn fasts and humiliations how acceptable is the expectation of the extirpation of Popery and superstition of the establishment of a learned Godly and painful ministery of the propagation of the Gospel and of new light But how will men be deceived if instead of new lights they must have lightnings and the Sons of lightning instead of the Sons of Thunder Thunders do no harm lightnings do all the mischief Christ saith I beheld Satan as lightning Luc. 10. 18. fall from Heaven new lights in Heaven or new Stars are false Stars and but blazing Comets which Wisemen say do alwayes portend Calamities we have many true Stars fallen or drawn from Heaven by the Dragon's Tail as if that particular sign of Christs coming to judgment were already fulfilled St Jerome calls the Apostles b Hier. Epi. Exeget 14â— Excussores from those Scripture passages Mat. 10. 14. and Act. 13. 15. Never in this Land were seen so many Reverend Godly Learned and truly Apostolical Preachers that now may justly shake the dust off their feet which surely will one day without Repentance be laid to the charge of the occasioners The Britans in old time used to say that the Speed in Hen. 3. Sect. 71. Irish Saints were very angry and implacable Saints because 5 Earles of Pembrok the Sacrilegious Sons of a Sacrilegious Father who had robbed a Bishoprick in Ireland all dyed issueless But what may the Irish say of English Saints who have taken all Bishops Lands from them and from others and have already made entry upon earthly possessions as if they did really believe this millinarian Fable This may perhaps be the cause of such uncharitableness as these Saints practise against others in hating oppressing and spoiling them and excluding them from admission into Society with these Saints as if they were affraid to have too many Saints of their Communion least their earthly Land of Promise should not be large enough for all indeed our English Zediack or rather this Epicycle of our British Orbe may seem too little for their vast appetites because the present He and she-Saints will surely beget other young Saints who they say must partake in this inheritance Arnobius writing against the Heathens conceit of Male Female Deities tells them that if it be so indeed then doubtless they will still beget some young Gods and Goddesses for Nondum Senuerunt Jupiter and Mars i. e. Gods cannot be disabled by age Iuven. Sat. 6. and then a Arnob. con Gent. l. 3. Dijs plena essent omnia nec Caelicaperâ—nt multitudinem eorum i. e. Not only this Earth but Heaven also would be too little for them The Roman Satyrist also though an heathen derideth this error for saith he in the Golden age before Saturn left his Kingdome there were fewer Gods then now Nec turba deorum Talis ut est hodié contentaque sidera paucis Iuvena Sat. 13. Numinibus misérum urgebant Atlanta minori Pondere c. i. e. That the multitude of new begotten Gods was a great incumbrance to Heaven it self and so will be the multiplying of reigning Saints to the Earth Augustus Caesar made a sumptuous Feast but for twelve Persons hee s and shee s and himself sate down with them apparrelled in such robes as the Roman Gods then ware and this Feast was therefore called b Suet. in Aug. c 70. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. the Feast of twelve Gods yet the people murmured and said frumentum omne Dij comederunt that these few had consumed all provisions it seems the heathens Goddifying was very chargable as also was the Romish Canonizing of Saints in later times for the old Romans were so provident as to forbear Consecrating or Sainti-fying any of their Emperors untill they were dead as when Basianus the Emperor had slain his Brother Geta to cover the murther he gave order that Geta should be Goddifyed using these words b Spartian in Geta c 1 Sit Divus dum non sit vivus and this also is the now-Roman Policy not to Canonize any until they be dead for living Saints would be chargable and therefore it may be thought great prudence not to take in too many into the Communion of living Saints least the Commons should be Gal. 6 10. too scant for them all for the Charity of new Saints