all things We answer that he performed that for which he ascended that is to say he filled or fulfilled the whole mysterie of our saluation which the prophets foretold and the full state whereof as in respect of that for the performance of which Christ came into the world is finished by Christs ascension as it had the beginning of it from his comming into the earth But if we had rather refer these words which also we may do to the frute that followed his ascension into heauen by which not as a seruant but as a sonne he tooke vpon him and entered into the kingdome and gouernment then we shall perceiue that he therefore ascended Iohn 14 2â— that sending downe the Holie ghost he might bestow vpon his church all necessarie gifts for he ascended that he might euen lade men with his graces Ephes 4.8 and heape vp benefits blessings and gifts vpon them which seeing the apostle himselfe speaketh euen in so manie words as it were what man in his right wit would beleeue them that will transfer that to the verie person of Christ which is spoken of the office of his kingdome and the mightie and effectuall power thereof The fourth obiection answered Luke 24.31 But they yet further say he was taken out of their sight or he vanished away from it I grant it but if from hense they may gather this their presence in all places or in manie places or that which they call maiestie euerie where it is woonderfull and pitifull to behold what monstrous opinions in a verie short space haue sprong vp why may not we affirme the same likewise touching Philip Acts. 8.39.40 for he suddenlie did so banish out of the Eunuches eies sight that he was found afterward at Azolus And what was woont sometimes to be tide the prophets themselues appeareth by the example of Elias his disciples 2. Kings 2 3. The fift obiection Acts. 7.35.36 An other place they obiect Stephan saw Christ therefore he was on the earth I denie that for he being on earth saw him set in heauen as the holie historie declareth And to what purpose I pray you should he see him in heauen if he be at his side on the earth So that this miracle is to be considered not in the verie bodie of Christ but in Stephans eies Neither did that rite and ceremonie of the church vsed from all antiquitie whereby men with a loud voice were admonished to haue their hearts lifted vpward saieng Lift vp your hearts The vse of these words Lift vp your hearts in the celebration of the supper tend to any other end but to cause men to mount vp to heauen For to what purpose should that saieng Lift vp be vsed if wee had that in our mouths and in our hands which we seeke for The sixt obiection answered 1. Corinth 15.8 Acts. 9 4.5 c. August in psal 54. Againe Christ was seene of Paule as he went to Damascus Augustine shall answer this for vs. He writing vpon the fourth and fift psalmes saith The head that was in heauen cried alowd for the bodie that was in the earth Much like vnto this forme Acts. 22.17 is that which they yet obiect namelie that Paule saw the Lord when he praid in the temple therfore the Lord was in the verie temple we confesse that he saw him but in a vision or trance It was therfore a spirituall vision neither belongeth it anie whit at all to this present matter in hand and yet though we say it was a spirituall vision we meane not that Paule saw any false or forged thing Hitherto also we must refer other words of the same apostle seeming â—o tend to the same end for they may receiue the same answer likewise The last shift of the aduersaries fullie answered They run at the last to the same starting hole or shift which I call by that name as in respect of them that doo abuse it of the almightie power of Christ And when we set against them this sure ground that God cannot performe somethings then they throw out against vs bitter outcries as though that we were manifestlie and altogither blasphemous and euill men For mine owne part I would require this one thing of them The authors request to the aduersaries standing vpon two parts that they would with an vpright mind suffer such as amongst vs shall answer them and that they would not be caried so friuolouslie yet weaklie the Lord knoweth against such as whose life God be thanked for it freeth them from all suspition of blasphemie The first reason If euerie one denie the power of God that saith there is something which God cannot doo then they certeinelie were blasphemers that said God deceiued God lied and that he could not die Yea but they will say that in as much as these things are not of anie part of his power but rather imbecilities and wants this is not to make GOD weake or feeble but most mightie rather And this certeinelie is the same that long ago amongst others Theodoretus Theodoret did answere the Eutychian heretiks who defended this verie selfe same doctrine by the verie selfe same reason Let vs stay heere then a while and as we say in the prouerbe pitch our staffe for a season It is without all controuersie or doubt that God who at the first made all things of nothing is able vtterlie to turn all things vp side downe yea euen with his verie becke or breath to abolish and destroy them all and yet for all that he cannot effect or bring to passe this that that which hath beene should not be Certeine things that God cannot doo or that some one thing should be and not be at one the selfe same time or that it should at one and the selfe same time be such a thing and not such a thing The reason is because of two contradictorie speeches one of them must of necessitie be false Numbers 23.19 but sith he is God in deed he cannot lie and therefore he cannot either will or do such things as are contradictorie contrary one of them to another Wherefore he shall conuince GOD of lieng and himselfe of follie woosoeuer he be that will cloke and couer Gods almightie power with this deuise by which Christes bodie is circumscriptible and yet it shall in deed togither be present in manie places at once which properlie belongeth to that onelie infinit nature whereby also this is forged framed to wit that the bodie is finite and infinite great and not great yea a bodie and not a bodie The second reason And this I dare aduouch further Whatsoeuer God would once haue without exception to be vnchangeable that cannot be changed by him much lesse can it be abolished or doone away the reason is because God cannot depart from himselfe or be contrarie or vnlike vnto himselfe And I make this without all doubt or
saide a posse ad esse the consequence or reason is not good which were sufficient aunsweare to this friuolous and vaine obiection mannes reason in the blindnesse and corruption of it beeing endued wyth strength and force enough to aunsweare the same besides this I say wee that are truelie taught of GOD both by his worde and spirite do knowe that though wee beleeue that the Lorde can doo whatsoeuer pleaseth him both in heauen and in earth which serueth wonderfully to magnifie hys almightie power in the exceeding excellencie thereof and greatlie to strengthen our weake faith in the dayes of our calamities and distresses yet notwythstanding we firmelie beleeue that hee will not onelie doo nothing but that hee can not doo anie thing in regarde of vs contrarie vnto that will of his that hee hath reuealed for vs in his word For euen as a manne of might on earth hauing giuen foorth hys speache of assurance in the woorde of a Prince or Christian though perhappes to one farre inferiour to himselfe is yet notwythstanding tied thereby not as in respect of his power for that remaineth as greate after as before but as in regarde of his credite and the persons to whome hee hath by his woorde after a sorte as it were bounde himselfe so is it wyth the Lord to vs-ward And the reason of this is not the abridgement or shortening of his power for be it farre from mortall men to presume in any thing though neuer so litle to restrain the eternal power of the immortall God but because his will and power I meane of the same as they are reuealed to vs by his woorde and particularlie by his promises made vnto vs therin concerning the same be in respect of vs so conioyned and knit together that looke whatsoeuer hee will doo that hee can doo and looke whatsoeuer he can do that hee will doo Oh howe vnreasonable is this that wee will giue earthlie Potentates leaue because of their high callings and excellent wisedome that wee suppose to bee in them nowe and then to hedge in the boundes of their power and authoritie by their woordes at their owne pleasure and will not graunt or yeelde so muche to the Almightie Surelie there is very great and good reason to the contrarie for as for menne by reason of the blindenesse and ignorauncie of their owne heartes they can not well tell when it is good either to straiten or enlarge themselues whereas GOD by reason of the fulnesse of goodnesse that is in him can not choose but doo good whether he inlarge or abridge himselfe But to make all this plaine by one or two examples in steade of manie we are all perswaded that God can not drowne the worlde anie more wyth the waters of an vniuersall floud because wee knowe by his woorde he will not for the more certaine and assured sealing vppe of the same in our heartes and not for anie discredite vnto hym or shortening of hys arme and power hee hath not onelie geuen vs his comfortable and sweete woorde of promise but hath sette his bowe in the cloudes Gen. 9.12 13 c to bee a moste effectuall pledge of the same vnto vs. Agayne wee all doo knowe and beleeue that though GOD in respect both of hymselfe and his almighty power with whome all thinges yea the most hardest are possible can if he would saue all men yet we feare not to saye and affirme that in respect of vs hee can not saue all menne because wee knowe by his reuealed will in his woorde that hee will not saue them all For some as well for the manifestation of hys iustice and iudgement against all vngodlinesse must bee the vesselles ordayned for destruction as well as others also for the declaration of his mercie in sauing whom hee will vesselles of saluation and eternall life And euen the like maie we conclude touching this matter of the Supper namelie that though wee were perswaded or shoulde graunt agaynst all trueth and reason that Christ as hee is GOD might doo what hee woulde or as hee is man might bee euery where yet because hee hath reuealed the contrarye in his woorde and namelie that hee will haue hys bodye to bee circumscriptible and tied to a place to wit Heauen yea which is more to a certaine place in heauen for though Christ as in respect of hys eternall Godhead fill Heauen and earth and the heuen of heuens is not able to conteine him yet in respect of his humane bodie though it be glorified he is must be conteined in some part of the heauens that therefore it can be no iniury at all to him neither any debasing of his omnipotent power to say that now he cannot be bodilie in the sacrament much lesse bodilie in so manie sacraments as be celebrated and ministred in so sundrie and infinit places at one time no more than it is to God the father in saieng that now he cannot drowne the world or saue the reprobat as hath beene before declared Thus much I thinke sufficient and inough to all these obiections being willing heere to finish this present short treatise sauing that I haue thought good in this place to adde euen as a chalenge to the aduerse partie and as matter of necessarie instruction to such as either be simplie ignorant for as for the malicious blinde it is almost impossible to reclame them or doo alreadie in some measure see the truth these three points following 1 First that I am readie in all holy loue largelie to answer anie thing that christianlie shall be further obiected concerning this question I say christianlie obiected for if anie shall either curiouslie or captiouslie propound anie thing I thinke it most conuenient rather to leaue such in their owne follie for a season till it shall please God at some one time or other euen extraordinarilie as it were to make them to see the same if it shall so please him than to spend time and to trauell in fatisfieng of their vaine curiosities 2 Secondlie that though this point of transubstantiation brought in by papists be great and grosse concerning the matter of the supper yet that they faile not alone heerein which might perhaps make their heresie lesse heinous but holde manie moe errors concerning that point some of them as palpable if not more grosse and blasphemous than this and some of them lesse To pursue them all and in a large sort I minde not at this present because it hath beene alreadie performed by men of great excellencie the Lord may heerafter giue a more fit occasion yet I will rehearse touch a few desiring the godlie reader with all holie wisdome to consider both of them and the rest of that sort 1 First in that they make it a sacrifice propitiatorie as they call it for the quicke â—nd the dead by which they doo not oneâ—ie scorne God deride men whilest they make men beleeue that God will be pleaâ—ed with
Thirdlie by this meanes the Lorde propoundeth vnto vs the mysticall vnion that is betwixt Christ and his church we and hee making but one bodie of his holie congregation hee being the head thereof and we the particular members by which also as we are instructed in our holie dueties towardes him we attempting nothing that may tend to the preiudice hurte or griefe of our holie head but endeuouring euerye thing that maye be good and acceptable before him so we comfortablie conceiue the great and continuall care hee hath for vs hee performing more effectuallie by much the duety of headship vnto his spirituall bodie the church than a naturall head dooth or can to a naturall bodie namelie not onelie in deuising for the good thereof both in generall and in particular but also in yeeldyng sence and moouyng vnto the whole bodie and euerie seuerall member thereof yea quickening the same and geuing together wyth the vnderstanding of heauenlie care and conscience yea some measure of strength and power to walke therein Ephes 3.12 so that He dwellyng in oure heartes by Fayth wee are therby not onelie become members of his bodie of his flesh and of his bloud but also he maketh vs zealous prepared and frutefull in euerie good worke both towards the Lord and one of vs towards an other 4 Fourthlie and lastlie the Lord deliuereth vnto vs in the vse of his supper that holie vnitie and agreement both outward and inward of bodie and mind that is and ought to be knowne felt and continued amongst all the members of his church whatsoeuer or wheresoeuer they be For euen as the bread that we are partakers of is made of many graines yet maketh but one loafe as we see as the wine that we drinke at the Lords table is made of manie grapes and yet maketh but one wine so all the faithfull people not onlie of one place parish but dispersed through out the whole earth notwithstanding that some through the riches of Gods mercies haue atteined more graces than other some make in deed but one holie bodie of the church Neither doth our being of seuerall members one of vs to another anie more hinder our growth in this same spirituall fellowship than the varietie of mēbers in a naturall body hindereth the constituting and making of the whole bodie it selfe nay rather as we may well perceiue it furthereth the same for as the whole cannot be said to be whole but in respect of all the parts whereof it consisteth no more can this whole or holie bodie of the church euerie particular congregation throughout the world concurring to the establishing thereof and yet so notwithstanding that the name church may as rightlie be attributed to euerie seuerall societie of the faithfull as the word earth to euerie part of the earth or to speake of the elements of the supper the word bread and the word wine to euerie part of the bread wine vsed in the same The third and last thing is that which I called before action and is to be performed as generallie all the daies of our life so particularlie and speciallie after the receiuing of the Lords supper And though this come in the last place yet is it not a matter of the least importance nay rather it is of such great weight that the former without it be little auailable for euen as in all humane sciences knowlege though it be neuer so exquisit is without action practise commonlie counted but a vaine conceit so in spirituall vnderstanding that is muche more true because if a man knowe neuer so muche of Gods mercies and meditate neuer so deeply in the same yet if that by the same he be not lead as it were by the hand both humbly to praise God for them and hartily praie vnto him for the continuance and increase of them with grace to embrace them and to vse them well it is to himselfe and others as if it were nothing Now this matter that we call action consisteth 1 First in earnest praier vnto God not onelie for a cleare sight of the graces offered bicause we are blind to perceue them but also for a liuely and continuall feeling of the same because we doo easilie choake and smother them vp yea for the plentiful fructifieng of the word of God and his sacraments in our heartes because wee our selues bee barren and ill ground and can hardlie bring foorth good fruit though we haue haue very much cost and labor bestowed vpon vs. And this duetie must be performed not for the time present alone as whilest we are in the publike exercises or for the day of communicating onelie returning afterwards as filthie swine to our former wallow or vncleane dogges to our vomite againe for alas what will that auaile vs but to a more fearefull iudgement and iust condemnation because wee continue in sin abuse the meanes of our sanctification and purging but euen for the whole race and course of our liues that as there is no day nor houre of a day going ouer our heades wherein wee stand not in neede of some blessing from the Lorde so there should few times escape vs wherein we would not do to God this duty that we beleeue to be acceptable to him bicause he hath commanded it and so profitable vnto our selues bicause it reacheth vnto euerie part and period or state of our whole life 2 Secondly in humble thankesgiuing as for all the vnestimable riches and treasures of grace and goodnesse generallie which it pleaseth him in his Church and namelie by the vse of his word and sacraments not onelie to offer but also to bestow vpon his people so specially for the death and obedience of hys Sonne the blessing of all blessings that is to saye the most excellent blessing the Lord bestowing thereby vppon vs all graces both bodilie spirituallie bodilie as the sanctification of all his creatures vnto vs which otherwise we continuing in our sinnes as we must needs haue doone if Christ had not died for vs should haue bin vncleane vnto vs and spirituall as the forgiuenesse of our sins the imputation of Christes righteousnesse which we must of necessitie beleeue because otherwise God may as well-condemne vs for want of righteousnesse as for our notorious transgressions and manie such other particulars before recited And that we may be the better prouoked to this great dutie of thankfulnes it shall be good for vs not onelie to alot vnto our selues sometime in euerie day wherin we will take a view so far foorth as we can of all the graces of God both generall and particular bestowed vpon our selues others but also deeplie to consider first the person that giueth the same who is the Lord of heauen and earth mercifull no doubt euen vnto thousands of generations to them that loue him and keepe his commandements secondlie the excellencie of the things bestowed which besides that they are bodily and spirituall temporal and
For though the artificer or handicrafts man doo nothing but by his instrument or toole An apt similitude yet for all that the artificer and his toole are not vnited into one subsistence or being this is my meaning that that it dooth or worketh is not therefore vnited with that by which he dooth or worketh for the dooer and the instrument of doing are two seuerall and distinct things So the smith or carpenter is not vnited with his hammer or mallet Iohn 1.3 Hebr. 1.1 The father created all things through the sonne as the holie scripture witnesseth Now because the father created all things through the sonne shall it therevpon follow that the father and the sonne are personallie vnited togither No verilie For they are and that in deed distinct persons Wherfore neither in the effusion or powring out of powerfull graces nor in the communicating of their powerfull working togither can the personall vnion be well described Let that rather remaine sure that I haue said to wit that that vnion may rightlie be called personall Personall vnion what it is by which it commeth to passe that one person of two natures the natures properties of either nature remaining safe sound becommeth one subsistence or being of which two natures one that is to say the nature assumed or taken hath his being in the assuming or taking nature because if either of them did subsist or had it being of it selfe they should be two persons Moreouer before we take in hand to handle the matter it selfe we must also declare how from this personall vnion insueth that which the old writers and fathers were woont to call communicating of the properties for if both the natures themselues and the properties thereof doo remaine safe and sound then there remaineth likewise vnto either nature these proper attributes or things ascribed vnto them and therefore it should seeme that it cannot be attributed to one nature which is proper and peculiar to the other And yet the scripture so speaketh as when it saith that God suffered Acts. 20.28 yea and we our selues are taught so to speake in the apostles symbole or creed when we say I beleeue in Iesus Christ the onlie sonne of God who was conceiued borne suffered cruâ—ified buried c. Certeine rules are to be obserued for the right vnderstanding of the communicating of proprieties That we may well know and vnderstand this matter we must earne to distinguish the things attribuâ—â— to either nature If we will speake â—â—â—perlie and truelie we say that things attributed to either of the natures must most properlie and in deed be attributed to be same The first rule And this is the first rule Wherefore we affirme that Christ as in respect of his Godhead is the eternall sonne of God is infinite is euerie where is eternall is the creator of all things cannot die is inuisible c. All which things are truelie and properlie attributed tâ— that nature of the son of God which is vâ—ited to flesh Now these things are proper to his humane nature or manhood that it had a beginning that it was conceiued by the Holie ghost that it suffered and at the last rose againe Now from whence commeth this difference Verilie from this that the natures remaine safe sound and vnconfounded least if in the personall vnion they were confounded that which were spoken of ones nature should be attributed to the other And the second rule is this The second rule Certeine things are attributed to or spoken of Christ according to his person and not as in respect of his natures thaâ— is to say such thinges in deede as respâ—ct the person and are attributed to his aâ—d person which cannot yet be spoken sâ—uerallie of either of his natures as for example if I say Christ is the mediator thâ—t word mediator neither to the Godheâ—d by it selfe nor to the manhood by it selâ—e or apart from the Godhead but to that whole person of Christ for he is a mediator according to either nature and â—hese things attributed togither to Christ are personall that is to say respect his whole person which vnlesse we confesse we shall fall into the heresie of Nestorius and his partakers And yet in the meane while this such like are so the works of the whole person Leo. One sort of heretiks had both these names because they held that Christ had but one will one nature and not two wils or two natures answering to his two natures that notwithstanding either of the natures doth distinctlie bring with it his proper peculiar worke to this common deed of redemption mediation c. as Leo teacheth in that his famous and woorthie epistle which also we must know and beleeue least we should fall into that other heresie of the Monothâ—â—its or Monophysits And yet the knoâ— is not vntied nor the matâ—er dispatched Therefore we are principalie to marke yet a certeine other maner oâ— speech touching Christ which as it is tâ—ue in respect of the whole person These darcke termes are expounded afterwards by the author himselfe denâ—minated either of the concrets so it cannâ—t without great impietie be attributed 〈◊〉 either of the natures considered by themselues or in the abstract as for example when we say God to wit the word 〈◊〉 sonne redeemed the church by his bloâ—d so we doo rightlie beleeue and say thâ—t God suffered and died Acts. 20.28 which that vngodâ—ie man Nestorius denied For vnlesse God had beene he that suffered for vs his sufâ—ering could not haue brought saluation vnto vs. Wherefore we say that God was â—â—rne suffered dead and rose againe And againe on the other side we say that the sonne of man was in heauen when he spaâ—e on the earth with Nicodemus Iohn 3.13 And â—his we affirme euen by this rule following to wit The third rule that whatsoeuer words or termes are proper to either of the natures that is to say the Godhead or the manhood they may be changed in the concret but not in the abstract Abstract and what he meaneth thereby But some man will say What is it that you call the abstract We call the very forme it selfe being by thought seuereâ— from the matter an abstract as for example If I doo in my mind comprehend no some iust man or other but some iustice or righteousnesse of a man which also hath place in other predications Iusticâ— therefore or righteousnesse shall be a câ—rteine abstract that is to say a thing câ—â—sidered by it selfe and not in the subiect or particular partie wherein it is Concret and what he meaneth therby And â—he concret shall be the matter or man hiâ—selfe as a iust man to wit he that is â—ndued with that iustice or righteousnes Sâ— in Christ we consider in the abstract tâ—o natures the manhood and the Godheaâ— but in the concret we comprehend him God man Therefore let Godhead
coulde not be spoken of the other without great impietie and vngodlinesse Notwithstanding by reason of the personal vnion excepting alwaies that which is attributed to the whole person and belongeth to both natures as when Christ is called the mediator and such like such things as are proper to the godhead and therefore as wee haue said can neuer be spoken of the manhoode are yet notwithstanding attributed to Christ as man and againe suche things as are proper to man are spoken and that rightlie of God but neuer or at no hand of the godhead The reason is because that the subsistence or being is denominated euen in the concret of one of the natures onelie So by the Sonne of GOD wee doo many times vnderstand 1. Timoth. 3.16 not onely the godhead of the sonne by it selfe but Christ manifested in the fleshe And by the GOD of glorie wee meane GOD become or made man and like wise by sonne of man we meane man assumed or taken of the eternall son of God Whereby it commeth to passe that by reason of that personall vnion some thinges in the concret may bee saide of the whole person which yet notwithstanding in the abstracte 1. Corinth 2.8 doo agree to one of the natures onelie So Saint Paule affyrmeth that the GOD of glorie was crucified which proposition is not true touching whole Christ One and the selfe-same proposition true and vntrue in seuerall senses that is to say if wee regarde or consider Christ as some whole matter consisting of some particulars but not true if wee vnderstand it of all or euery thing belonging to Christ that is to saye if wee seuerally and distinctlye consider his seuerall natures because the name of the GOD of glorie dooth in the abstract agree or belong to the onelie godhead Wherefore this proposition is true in the sense as before whereas otherwise it is a wicked and an vngodlie thing to say that the godhead was crucified Likewise in the creede of the Apostles Symbol Apost we say that wee beleeue in Iesus Christ the onely Sonne of God conceiued borne suffered c all which are truely and christianly spoken And why so Because that by the name of the Sonne of God in the councell we meane not God the word by himselfe alone but GOD manifested in the flesh So the Sonne of man talking with Nicodemus on earth was in heauen Iohn 3.13 the reason is because he that is man is God also and yet the manhoode of christ was at that time no where else Actes 1.11 but on earth euen as nowe also christs flesh being taken vp into Matth. 28.20 heauen and therefore absent from vs that Sonne of man is yet notwithstanding present with vs because the same christ is that true GOD Isaiah 66.1 Actes 7.48 whome neither heauen nor earth can containe Wherefore as these propositions are false the Godhead is the manhoode or the manhoode is the godhead so these are true This man is God and GOD the worde is man Nowe then if man be truely saide to be God by reason of the personall vnion it followeth therevppon that thinges attributed to the manhoode may rightlie be attributed to GOD and on the other side that things attributed to the Godhead may rightly be attributed to or spoken of christ man But let vs now come to the other part of the knowledge that concerneth our saluation that is to christes office This office is declared in his name Matth. 1.21 for he is Iesus that is to say a Sauiour because God the father hath therefore giuen him vnto vs that hee might saue vs to wit from our sinnes Now hee saueth vs by iustifieng vs because eternall life doth of necessitie agree with iustice or righteousnes Wherefore hee giueth vs life in giuing vs righteousnesse and that of his meere and onely grace through the power and effectuall working of his holie spirit One and the selfe-same power of God appeareth in mans creation and mans restitution sauing that this latter in my iudgement and before men though not before God seeme to be the more excellent and hard worke for euen that very selfe-same power of God which laide it selfe open in the creation of man must of necessity manifest it selfe also in restoring of man This is it that I meane as God the father did freelie through his sonne togither with his almightie power which is the holie-ghost create man so the selfe-same god dooth by sauing iustifie and by iustifieng saue man through his owne sin fallen from grace and yet made againe or anewe as it were through his sonne in the powerfull working of the holie spirit For the holy-ghost worketh in vs that instrument which we cal faith by which only we lay hold of christ after that we know him Neither is this faith some simple or bare accident but a habit as they call it in the schooles truelie grafted in vs not by nature but by gods meere and free grace But remember I pray you that by laying holde of Christ I vnderstand the apprehension or taking holde euen of Christ himselfe Two things principallie to be considered in Christ For wee must consider two things in Christ that is to saie hee himselfe god and man and such things as bee in him A fit similitude For example though it may be I confes that the similitude shall not agree in all points if in a casket or boxe I set before a man treasure he that will haue the treasure hidden or shutte vp therein must of necessitie take the casket or boxe it selfe Coloss 2.3 euen so there are in Christ all those treasures of wisedome and vnderstanding yea and to speake all in fewe wordes all those things which are necessarily required to our saluation Wherefore wee must of necessitie haue him that so we may obtaine those things that are in him and by the meanes of them eternall life But tell vs by what instrument wee doo take holde of him as it were by a certaine hand that hee may wholie become ours and wee his Verilie by faith Nowe the holie-ghost is hee who going about to woorke in vs this excellent instrument of faith vseth for that purpose the preachyng of the outwarde worde Roman 10.17 by which worde hee alone properlye woorketh inuisiblye in vs. But that we may the better vnderstand this point lette vs a little compare this naturall instrument of Faith to witte the outward worde with that supernaturall instrument that is the spirite Light of nature may somewhat helpe vs to obtaine naturall things but it can nothing further vs in the vnderstanding and beleeuing of heuenly things The doctor or teacher by speaking teacheth his scholers that which he speaketh For speech is the instrument and meane whereby we lay open the meaning of our mindes one of vs to an other by vnderstanding whereof they to whome wee speake become skilfull in those thinges that wee speake euen
the spirituall graces not onelie offered but giuen also vnto vs therin and this likewise to be wrought in vs though our sauiour be in heauen in respect of his bodie Acts. 3.21 Psalm 39.12 we heere as pilgrims strangers on the earth by the wonderfull vnsearchable working of his holie spirit in vs and by the meanes of a liuelie assured faith both which being knit togither doo easilie ioine togither thinges that be as farre asunder in respect of distance of place as one end of the earth is from the other and as farre asunder as heauen and earth themselues are or else how could we either beleeue the holie catholike church and feele the communion of saints seeing it commonlie falleth out that the members of that holie fellowshippe are sundered one of them from another in respect of great distance of place or be assured that Christes righteousnesse is become ours seeing he is in the heauen and wee on the earth if by faith we did not take holde of the same and applie it vnto our selues Besides if men should imbrace this sacramentarie opinion what were it but to euert as the trueth of Christes promises so the certeinetie and assurednesse of his word who in plaine termes calleth this holie sacrament his bodie Wherfore be it far from vs to approoue of anie such dotage as defaceth the trueth of the word derogateth from Christe and vtterlie destroieth our owne faith than which what can be more horrible to heare or fearefull to thinke 2 The second extremitie is that of consubstantiation some affirming that there is deliuered to the people they receiue togither with the substance of bread the verie substance of Christes verie naturall bodie so that there is as it were an intermingling or mixture of both the substances in the action of the supper But this opinion is iustlie to be disliked and reprooued not onelie because of the absurdities which it hath common with the heresie of transubstantiation whereof we will speake in the next place but also because it is quite and cleane contrarie to common sence reason confounding and iumbling togither two seuerall distinct substances and making the lesse to wit the substance of the bread to comprehend the greater that is Christes humane bodie yea euen his verie Godhead heauen and earth is not able to conteine Besides it dooth vtterlie take away an essentiall propertie of Christes bodie Isaiah 66.1 Acts. 7.49.17.21 for if Christ in respect of his humanitie be like vnto vs in all things sinne onelie excepted Hebr. 4.15 and we know by the light of reason vnderstanding that God hath bestowed vpon vs yea by verie experience that our bodies are circumscriptible and tied to a place it must needs follow that Christ in respect of his manhood or Christ as he is man is and must be tied to a place and not be in euery place as he must needs be if these mens assertions be true which is nothing els in deed but vtterlie to destroy Christs body which also I prooue against them thus Whosoeuer taketh away the essentiall propertie of anie thing taketh away also the verie thing it selfe This proposition is prooued by this marime in logike If the definition of a thing which cheeflie consisteth of the essentiall propertie of the thing be taken away then the thing it selfe also defined falleth away as for example If reasonable liuing creature which is the definition of a man be taken away what shall become of man or where shall he appeare which is the thing defined whereof also there is good reason because the essentiall propertie is it that constituteth or maketh the thing Hitherto the maior proposition as we say in schooles with the proofs thereof Now foloweth the minor or second proposition But these men take away the essentiall propertie of a thing to wit of a bodie which is to be circumscriptible or tied to a place which is in deed an essentiall propertie of the bodie of man and therefore of Christes bodie as hee is man whilest they will haue him as he is man in sundrie places at one time If anie man will denie this it may easilie be prooued both by their owne writinges in sundrie places and also by the definition of a bodie which is a quantitie that may be diuided according to the threefold measuring receiued amongest men that is length breadth and thickenesse and likewise by the description of a place which is defined to be a nighnesse or touching of the thing conteining and the thing conteined The conclusion therfore is that in taking away place from the bodie of Christ which they doo whilest they place it in euerie place whereas in the nature thereof it can be but in one place at one time they doo vtterlie destroie the bodie or humanitie of Christ or at the least confound it so with the Godhead as Eutyches did that they make a confusion whereas in all trueth and vprightnesse there shoulde remaine a distinction of the proprieties of either nature in his blessed person But of this inough in this place because it is somewhat philosophicall and because also in the next section we shall haue occasion to deale with the like 3 The third extremitie is that of transubstantiation mainteined altogither by the Romish catholiks as they will be called who hold that the bread and wine the substance thereof vanishing away and nothing being left but the accidents or qualities thereof as in the bread roundnesse whitenesse c and in the wine rednesse moisture c are changed and that by the power of certeine words spoken by the preest as they name him ouer the elements they are turned into the verie naturall bodie and bloud of our sauior Concerning this point and the branches therof I minde to speake both more particularlie and more fullie because it is one of the popish opinions that greatlie at this present troubleth the christian world and namelie our flourishing isle of England and also because in the daies of persecution heeretofore both within this land and elswhere it hath beene the common knife that the wicked haue vsed to cut the throtes of the godlie withall as it were the hatchet to chop off their heads It may be that in this my poore trauel some may be conuerted from falshood to truth and so be saued in the day of Christ or if that gratious effect followe not in the aduersaries yet I hope the friendes and louers of truth shall by this meanes be somwhat staied that they be not caried away with certaine inticing and inchaunting wordes in the mouths of some seducing spirites whom Antichrist Satans eldest sonne hath thrust into the worlde to peruert men from the truth and obedience of God 1 First for the name of Transubstantiation I feare not to affirme that it is verye newe and neuer heard of before the days of pope Innocent the third who was about the yeare of our Lorde 1205
aunsweared as which indeede if it bee well weighed is not onelie vntrue as in respect of it selfe because though glorification implie a most excellent and heauenlie estate dooth not yet for all that destroye the essentiall properties of bodies glorified but most absurde and false also as in regard of vs. For if the glorification of Christs bodie haue remooued or taken awaye that essentiall propertie to witte that it shoulde truelie and indeede bee tied vnto a place then the like shall bee perfourmed and the same effect followe in all the glorified bodies of the faithfull after the resurrection because our Sauiour hath not onelie glorified his owne bodie for himselfe hee rising therein a mightie conquerour ouer death and hell and nowe triumphantlie ruling and raigning in the heauens in all maiestie but for our sakes also hath atchieued that greate honour wee hauing from him this assured promise in his worde Philip. 3.21 that God shal chaunge our base and vile bodies that they may bee fashioned like vnto his glorious bodie according vnto the mightie working whereby hee is able to subdue all things vnto himselfe But to saye that our bodies glorified after the rising againe of the same in the generall day of iudgement shall be euery where a rashe and vncertaine yea a beastlie and blasphemous assertion because it ascribeth that vnto vs which is proper and peculiar onelie to GOD for vnto hym alone it perteineth to fill heauen earth and all places alwayes and at one tyme as infinite places of Scripture doo plainelie prooue therefore this opinion also concerning Christes glorified bodie beeing euerie where or in infinite places at one time must of necessitie be suche likewise 4 Fourthlie it dooth directlye destroy and as it were at one blowe blotte out and deface all those Articles of our moste pretious Faith and Christian religion whych doo concerne Christes assured ascension into Heauen hys maiesticall sitting at the right hande of the Father and his glorious comming agayne from thence together wyth that infinite number of moste playne places of GODS holie woorde that out of the writinges of the Prophetes and Apostles may bee drawen for the proofe of those moste comfortable and necessarie pointes To deale wyth euerye one of these by themselues shortely and in fewe woordes I woulde faine knowe if our Sauiour Christ be here vpon earth in respect of his bodilye power and presence howe hee can iustlie as in regarde of the same hys bodye bee sayde to haue ascended into Heauen Or let them tel vs if hee remaine wyth vs in hys flesh how hee can bee truelye saide in hys manhoode to sitte at the right hande of hys Father in Heauen Or howe it can bee in religion or reason affirmed that our Sauiour shall come from Heauen with great power and glorie to iudge the quick and the dead seeing he is here on earth already The Scripture telleth vs for his ascension Actes 1.9 that in the sight and beholding of the blessed Apostles yea whiles they looked stedfastly towards heauen he was taken vp Let them shew so much for his bodilie abode vpon earth and proue it by such substantiall witnesse and wee are readie to yeelde Besides we knowe by the worde and therefore beleeue it that as he was seene go into heauen Actes 1.10 so shall he come againe but hee was seene to ascend thither bodilie and therefore so shall hee returne from thence againe I suppose they will not saye that our Sauiour had two bodies one that hee tooke wyth him an other that hee left heere for that were to make him altogether monstrous and men scrupulous none knowing in whether of them hee perfourmed the work of their redemption And to saye that that one blessed bodie of his was diuided is as absurde and erronious because it can not be so but that the whole bodie it selfe must be impaired and mangled at the least if not destroyed and so the woorke of saluation ouerthrowne To stand vpon anie naked interpretation touching the right hand of God will not serue their turne for there being nothing meant thereby in this article of our beleefe but the great glorie that is in heauen prepared for the saints and that most excellent blessednesse that belongeth to them whereof our sauior Christ was in a most full measure made by his ascention into heauen as in respect of his humanity absolute partaker what could they gaine Doo they imagine that it would heervpon insue that Christ should be euerie where and by consequent on earth but they are deceiued for why doo they not as well consider the word sitting which implieth locall residence in a place or doo they not know and beleeue that heauen it selfe is not euerie where but locall rather or will they not see that without warrant of the word yea contrarie to the same which in sundrie places opposeth heauen and earth one of them against another or sence of humane iudgement they iumble and confound them togither Reason will lead vs to this that none can be said to goe vp into the place where he is or to come downe from it when he remaineth there And though wee minde not to subiect our sauior speciallie as in respect of his eternall Godhead to humane sence yet by the same we may and ought to be ledde not to destroy the essentiall properties of his manhood Now then whether shall wee beleeue this trueth of the Lord or mens fantasies that go about to peruert our persuasions and deceiue our vnderstandings Let men of the worlde deeme what they lust this is the truth that God hath sanctified vnto vs in his word and I doo stedfastlie beleeue it in my heart and will throgh Gods goodnesse and strength alwaies confesse the same with my mouth that from the very time of Christes ascension into Heauen Acts. 3 2â— The Heauens must conteine his naturall bodie vntill the time that all things be restored that is euen to the worlds end 5 Fiftlie I say that this opinion dooth vniustlie depriue vs of all such spirituall graces and comforts for our consciences as God the father in his sonne Christ by sending the Holie ghost the third person in the deitie hath not onelie promised but in good time wil performe and bestow vpon the whole church generallie and euerie sound particular member of the same yea if we wey it well we shall finde that it is the ruine and bane of the church it selfe both in the whole bodie of it and in the seuerall parts Our sauior himselfe in most plaine and expresse terms faith Iohn 16.7 I tel you the truth it is expedient for you that I go away for if I go not away the comforter will not come vnto you but if I depart I will send him vnto you Hee that knoweth anie thing of truth is well acquainted with this that generallie all the word but most especiallie the comfortable promises conteined in the same be as it were the life
Christes flesh is now also and that in deed and verilie present both into the heauens into which he ascended and in the earth likewise and that also in all places in which that bread and that wine is deliuered or giuen to such as come to receiue it I will say nothing of them that are not ashamed to affirme that Christes flesh euen from the verie first moment of the personall vnion was togither and in deed present both in the crib and in the heauen yea euerie where present To this first of all they answere The aduersaries obiection that Christes bodie cannot without great wickednesse be made subiect to the law of nature for that bodie that was taken into the vnitie of the person hath receiued farre other vnmeasurable giftes and graces But heere I beseech you wey well what we answer The answer We confesse that there is great regard to be had of that same grace and gift of the personall vnion by which wee cannot but confesse that the manhood of our sauior Christ was so highly exalted that onelie the Deitie or Godhead excepted according to which he is euen greater than himselfe it hath atteined and gotten a name which is aboue all names that is to saye Philip. 2.9.10 that all things created are subiected vnto the same yet for all that that followeth not heerevpon which these men coldlie suppose or fondly imagine for this is the question now betweene vs whether Christes manhood do in deed place it selfe euerie where or in manie places togither at one time to be receiued with our hands and mouth and not what it hath obteined from another or in respect of the other nature to which it is personallie vnited but rather whether this proprietie which in deed is proper to the Godhead alone be in the manhood to wit to be euerie where or in diuers places at one and the selfe same season Schoole men faile manie times in terms but now and then hit the matter And this is that matter which the schoolemen haue by a barbarous word if you respect terms but not by an vnfit word if men will wey the matter called by the name of habitual grace Now this difference being alreadie put downe which skarslie anie vnlesse they be altogither most contentious will denie we say that such doo in deed euacuat Christ or make him of no force as denie Christes flesh Though Christ man be not euerie where yet Christ God and man is euerie where as in respect of another that is to say not in it selfe but according as it is ioined to another to wit so farre foorth as it is personallie vnited with the person of the word to be truelie and in deed euerie where much lesse will wee denie him to be present in that place wheresoeuer in the worlde his supper is administred For whie should wee denie that concerning christs flesh which in a certaine measure hath place in al bodies yea euen there where som one whole thing is become or made one after an other sort than by personall vnion A similitude A tree or a house is many times saide to be in a riuer whereas yet notwithstanding the vpper part either of the one or of the other appearing aboue the water or riuer and being considered in it selfe is indeed in the aire and not in the water in like sort I am said to sit in this seat or chaire whereas yet notwithstanding I sit but in one part of my bodie onelie Likewise I am saide to speake whereas onelie the tongue considered in and by it selfe speaketh The reason and trueth of these speeches dependeth vpon this that a tree a house a man c is one selfesame whole thing compacted and made of his seueral partes For otherwise that coulde not be truely affirmed or saide of two things in deede separated and sundered one of them from an other Application of the similitude So a man may truely affirme whole christ to be euerie where and therfore much more with the bread in the supper and yet no otherwise but so farre foorth as Christ is considered as some one whole substance and beeing and so also as the proprieties of the natures bee not by this meanes confounded But the whole of Christe that is to saye euerye thing belonging to Christ can not therfore for all that bee sayde to bee anye where else than to bee conuersant in one place at one and the selfe-same time for that can no more be spoken of Christs humanitie in it selfe vnlesse wee will with Eutyches and Brentius Eutyches Brentius confounde the proprieties of either nature than this my hande can bee saide to sitte or these my feete may be said to speake If there be any that vnderstande not these things I beseech them to learne to vnderstande the same and to haue more regarde and consideration both of themselues and of others throgh whose sides they would if they could destroy the truth it selfe He turneth that vpon the aduersaries which they obiected against the truth To come to the point They doo not spotle the manhoode of Christ of that his infinite maiestie who teach that fleshe of his to be the flesh of the Sonne of God but they rather that transfourme and chaunge him who is God and man in one person and make him but to beare or cary God or the godhead neither yet do they spoile the manhood of his maiestie or bring him backe vnto the state and condition of other men which according to the grace that they call habituall that is to saye cleauing to the verie flesh of Christ as if it were to his peculiar subiect or matter wherevnto it shoulde sticke doo acknowledge it to bee vnspeakablye more high and excellent than all other thinges whatsoeuer wythout exception excepting onely the godhead of the worde according to which he himselfe is greater than himselfe as we said before but they indeede bring it to nothing or into some image or signe in their owne conceipts at the least who while they goe about to attribute supernaturall thinges vnto him attributing yet notwithstanding vnnatural things to him or thinges against nature do of necessity destroy and ouerthrowe euen mans nature it selfe for that ceaseth to be humane which hauing lost the essentiall proprieties thereof must needes cease to be the which before it was But we wil incounter with thē by an other reson If this verilie be to diminish Christs glorie and to debase his maiestie to affirme that hee can not indeede be at one time in manie places howe much more then must this be the debasing of hym to say that hee was mortall yea that hee did indeede die And yet wee see that this is that which the Apostle alleageth for the commendation of the most excellent loue that the Sonne of GOD carried towardes vs Rom. 5 6 7 8 c Philip. 2.8 which was yet so muche the more great and excellent by
howe much he did the more debase himselfe Nowe then if the reall taking of all infirmities vppon himselfe sinne onelie excepted hath taken nothing at al from his glorie Hebr 4.15 or impaired and lessened the same how much lesse hath this doone it that he hath for euer taken together with verie flesh the verie proprieties of flesh and that vnchangeably and without confounding But they obiect further Another obiection The answeare thereto that they meane not to abolish those proprieties Thē they must needes attribute contrarie thinges to one and the self-same subiect that altogether in one and the self-same respect to wit to be circumscribed and tied to a place which is the naturall propertie of an instrumentall body The aduersaries absurditie aswel against reason as religion and yet notwithstanding at one and the self-same time to be both in heuen and in innumerable places or else euerye where if you will in earth and so one and the selfe-same flesh shall haue a quantity sette it and also bee without quantitie that is to say shal be both a bodie and not a bodie And what is this else I pray you but to make euery thing of anie thing as wee commonlie say but let vs heare what they do yet further obiect The third obiection They will haue that time that went before the glorofieng of our sauior Christs flesh to be distinguished from that time in which that his fleshe was receiued vp into glorie We grant it An answeare thereto taken from a double absurditie but withall we say that if this reall coniunction of the flesh with the bread doo depend of the glorification of Christes fleshe it can haue no place in that first institution of the supper because this fleshe was not as then glorified but rather most nie to debasing humbling Besides this flesh is offred vnto vs at this present to be partaken by vs not as glorious or glorified The transfiguration of Christ mentioned Math. 17.2.3 c feareth not the aduersaries but that I may so speake euen as it were hanging vppon the crosse Against this exception they oppose and set the miracle of Christes transfiguration But what agreement is there betwixt these two things For of a truth nothing vnnaturall or against nature fel out in the transfiguration neither was there any thing there done that did destroy or ouerthrowe the essential proprieties of christs flesh euen as righteous men shal not therfore or then cease to be very men when they shall shine as the sun Daniel 12.3 or brightnes of the firmament or stars But to be euery where or in many places at one time is a property so cōtrary to al things created as which are indeed finite that it belongeth onely vnto the godhead alone because that alone is infinite To conclude we do in one worde as it were Glorification and wherein it standeth answeare thus Glorification tooke not from Christs body a corporal or bodilie nature that is to say quantity or circumscriptiblenes but it abolished the infirmitie weaknes therof which weaknes he for a time tooke vppon him Nowe by the worde infirmity or weaknesse wee meane not any essential proprietie in christes flesh but that onely which sin brought into mans nature yet altogether without the spot or taint of sin as it was in christ This is that I meane where Christs flesh is saide to bee infirme and weake before the glorification of it that is not spoken in respect of the Godhead to the which hee alwayes hath bin is and shall be inferior but in consideration of that great glory into which afterwards that his flesh was exalted yet so that there must alwayes remaine safe and sound as I haue said heretofore those proprieties of which the very truth of the body it selfe consisteth amongest which quantity and therfore circumscriptiblenes obtaineth so excellent notable a place Cyrillus that Cyrill feareth not to affirme that God hymself could not possibly bee euery where if hee were partaker of quantity They affirme Christes bodie to be euery where He calleth them so because they set themselues against nature and reason Iohn 20.27 Therfore these mē I mean both Vbiquitaries and Antiphisitae hauing opēly denied the quantity of Christs flesh must either gette them to Eutyches his tents and take part with hym or if out of the words of Christ who after hys resurrection willeth some to beholde feele him they wil prooue that he hath not put off the quantity of hys fleshe then they must shewe vs that Christes fleshe accordyng to the quantity thereof can be at one tyme euerye where or in manye places whych euen the godhead it selfe if it haue quantitie can not perfourme as Cyrill openly and truly writeth whose authoritie otherwise these men doo most especiallie abuse for this reall presence of Christ in the sacrament of the altar yea they must prooue that the Angelles lied when they saide Matth. 28.6 Hee is risen hee is not heere For whatsoeuer distinction they may vse if wee can shewe a place where Christes flesh is not then wee are sure it can not be euery where and if it can not bee euerye where then neither can the whole flesh it selfe be at one time and together in manie places Hence also it may appeare Brentius and his followers howe absurde and vnreasonable Brentius his opinion is and those that followe him Philip. 2.6 7. who attribute these wordes of the Apostle The forme of God and the forme of a seruant to the onely humanitie or manhood of Christ in it selfe For they vnderstand by the forme of God that their owne forgerie and deuise of all maiestie and all presence as they call it with which as they saye the flesh of Christ was verily in it selfe indued from the very first moment of the personall vnion which it pleased him for a time not to make manifest and this is it they meane by the worde humbling and abasing And the forme of a seruant they call that state and condition He confuteth Brentius and such as maintaine him as vsurpe the place of the Philippians or rather falsely interpreting it in which it pleased him to remain so often as he wold not vse the forme of God Very well saide surelie if a man wil attribute to one subiect or matter two essentiall forms what shall he els doe but confound one and two together and make them both one And what is that else but to bee mad outright Then it remaineth that by this worde or terme forme these men vnderstand neyther the godhead it selfe nor the manhood but a diuers conditiō and state of this his manhood as which inwardly in it selfe was beautified and adorned with all the powerfull graces effects of the godhead powred into the same and yet that he did not alwaies manifest and disclose them But if this be true Two absurdities or errours we must learn
question in controuersie whether this doctrine concerning the reall presence of Christes very fleshe in many or all places at once can stand wyth the truth of Christs flesh whether wee consider it after or before the glorification thereof Now we stoutly and safely deny that Christs fleshe at any tyme can be in many or in all places at once and wee saye that it can not by anye necessary or fitte consequence bee gathered either from this hys walkyng vppon the waters or in that hee entered into the place where hys disciples were the dores being shut or in that hee arose againe the stone of the Sepulchre or Toombe Iohn 20.19 Math. 28.2 Certain reasons alledged for proofe of his assertion not beeing remooued or rolled awaye by mannes handes And of thys wee haue sundrye reasons for firste these myracles seeme rather to bee doone in the waters themselues made harde and firme not onelie vnder Christs feete but vnder Peters also than in Christs owne bodie the like whereof also is to bee saide touching the wall and sepulchre Matth. 14.29 the heape or weight whereof did sodainely yeeld vnto the body of the creator Moreouer though we shold grant that they were to be seene in the very body of Christ yet doth not the withholding of a bodily weight or the withdrawing of it for a time or else this thinnesse as a man woulde say of a bodilie heape either abolish a bodie it selfe sith it dooth at any hand take away the quantitie of a body or implie contradiction as they are woont to say in the schooles But we affirme that a true and very bodie can neither want quantity or circumscriptiblenesse but it shal cease to be a bodie neither can it be at once in one place as circumscribed and in an other place as not circumscribed but that we must of necessitie conclude both that it is a bodie and that it is not a bodie which are assertions meerelie contrarie The summe of all these thinges is this or tendeth to this ende namelie that this opinion of the reall consubstantiation of Christes flesh with bread and wine is most false and vntrue as by meanes whereof the trueth of Christes fleshe is vtterlie abolished Now againe The second reason against consubstantiation See the first before pag. 65. euen by this most weightie argument following may this forgerie and deuise be confuted namelie because it plainlie and wholie standeth vp against the analogie and proportion of faith so little need or iust cause haue the defendors thereof to call vs backe to the power and force of faith Acts. 1.11 Marke 16.19 The scripture witnesseth in manie places that Christes flesh ascended vp aboue the heauens and that there also at this day it remaineth we may not therefore seeke for it in earth otherwise it should not be an ascending but a vanishing away for the time Certeinlie A generall rule no man can trulie be said to come or go vp thither where he now was or to go away descend or be absent from the place where he remaineth Looke therefore in how manie places these things are spoken of Christ according to his flesh and that without anie figuratiue kinde of speech by so manie most strong and inuincible testimonies there is confirmed vnto vs the true taking away of the bodie of Christ from vs and also that reall dotage of the presence of Christes flesh vpon the earth that is to say thys opinion which the Dokits Marcionits mainteine sufficientlie confuted Of these see before pag. 70. As for that that they vrge against vs An obiection answered saieng How absurd is that that Christes flesh is now in heauen and no where else It is easilie answered that we speake no otherwise than Peter Acts. 3.21 Acts. 1.11 yea than the angels themselues haue spoken And though they say further that by this meanes we shut vp Christ as it were in a prison where as yet notwithstanding the right hand of God that is to say his heauenlie power and authoritie whereat he sitteth is euerie where What for all this Answer vs this and tell vs whether that being on the earth absent from heauen for he had not ascended thither where he was then present or whether that being in the virgins wombe or wrapped vp in swadling clothes lieng in the crib he was shut vp in prison Yea sith euerie bodie is conteined in his owne place yea things without bodies are yet notwithstanding included in the proprietie of their nature for onelie the Godhead is infinit what can follow else of this their most absurd argument and reason Absurditie in reason by the aduersaries argument than that all things are full of prisons and prisoners And though we should say that vnder the termes of sitting at the right hand Philip. 2.9 there is meant the verie selfe same thing which the apostle simplie and without trope saith that Christ to wit as he is man hath receiued that is to say a name aboue all names yet it should be no lesse fond and absurd thervpon to gather and conclude the presence of Christes flesh in euerie place A similitude that if we would affirme that the bodie of some king is as large and wide as the bounds of his kingdome are brode But say they Another obiection answered Christ being present gouerneth all things We answer that is true as he is God and yet the person of Christ is not for al that rent in sunder or diuided For euen Christ man being euerie where the Lord is present also euerie where much more in the supper In what respect Christ is present euerie where howbeit not as in respect of the manhood it selfe but as in regard of another that is to say as he is one person not in himselfe as in regard of his manhood but in the verie nature of the Godhead it selfe of which the humanitie was so assumed that it is one subsistence or being togither with it as a little while ago we declared Therefore the man Christ is in deed present to wit as he the selfe same is Christ God and yet the manhood of Christ is not now in anie other place than in heauen The third obiection answered Ephes 4.10 But it is yet further obiected that Christ went vp into heauen to fulfill all things I grant it wherevpon also I gather that hee fulfilled not all things till he ascended and that therefore the definition of the personall vnion taken from habituall grace as they call it of which we haue said some what before is false and fond Yea I gather this further that if he did truelie and in deed ascend that that his flesh was not in heauen before he ascended thither that it ceaseth to be on the earth after that he ascended from thense into heauen But say they he ascended to fulfill or fill all things The same obiection vrged yet answered therfore he filleth
say Christ himselfe with all his benefits to the partaking whereof we are called But notwithstanding some difference there is to wit according to more and lesse as they vsuallie say in schooles First The first difference because that when the sacraments are ioined to the simple word or word alone then it necessarilie followeth that there is a more plentifull declaration of Gods good will towards vs and looke by how much there are more obiects in number and they likewise more euident by so much the more vehementlie or earnestlie they doo mooue and stirre vs vp or at leastwise ought so to doo Secondlie The second difference because although the worde alone propounded generallie vnto all bee afterwardes by the power of faith applied vnto euerie particular faithfull person yet this is not there so plainelie and particularlie expressed as in the sacraments in which Christ is verilie offered particularlie and seuerallie to euerie one wherby it commeth to passe that euerie particular beleeuer is after a certeine maner put into the possession of Christ himselfe Q 6 How is the matter ioined with the signes The signes and the things signified are ioined sacramentallie A By a sacramentall maner which seeing it is proper peculiar to them alone must be declared by a proper definition such a one as is fit for that purpose we therefore define or determine that the sacramentall maner of ioining the matter with the signes Why it is called a spirituall coniunction is spirituall by which epitheton or word we conceiue no imagined or feined thing but principally meane that it specially dependeth of the power of the Holie ghost as we haue alreadie said in the declaration of the formall cause Moreouer by that meanes we shut out all grosse and naturall maner of ioining A similitude for as we know that the signs are vpon earth not else where which thing also no man can or will denie so also we hold and conclude that the matter it selfe that is to say Christ himselfe according to his flesh is contained in heauen and not in anye other place as wee gather out of the Scriptures Luke 24.51 Actes 3.21 Roman 8.34 Coloss 3.1 and all the Fathers of right faith and sound iudgement And yet wee doubt not but that the signes are ioyned with the matter that is to say in that respect or so farre foorth as God dooth not onlie as it were a far off shew the signs of the bodie and bloud of Christ but beside the very signes doth also truely giue vnto vs Christ himselfe to be enioyed and possessed of vs. Whereby also it commeth to passe that in this respect aboue mentioned these things may be truely saide to be ioyned together although by spaces of places they are separated far and wide asunder Notwithstanding we holde that this coniunction is true and certaine The sacramentall coniunction is true and sure in so much as that therefore the name of the thing it selfe that is I saye the body and bloud is indeede figuratiuely but yet very significantly and plainely giuen to the very signes to wit vnto the bread and the wine Secondly to the ende wee maye more fully declare this sacramentall maner of ioyning the matter with the signe wee adde that it is significatiue not as though God did onely signifie vnto vs in the Sacramentes What is called a significatiue coniunction the body and bloud of hys Sonne and also his Sonne hymselfe for no doubt but that also hee dooth truelie giue him vnto vs but wee doo it to this ende least anye man shoulde thinke the matter to bee so coupled with the signes that Christs flesh also shoulde nowe be present in earth though it were after a certaine inuisible and incomprehensible maner We say therefore that Christes bodie and bloud is by so great a space absent from the signes euen as the earth it selfe Curiositie to be auoided speciallie in things we are not skilled in is distant from the most high Heauens or from the seate of the blessed touching which wee minde not at any time ouer curiously to dispute or discourse and into which we knowe and beleeue that Christ ascended that so in all our behalfes and for vs indeede he might obtaine and get that same immortal inheritance Notwithstanding we separat not the thing from the signs either as in respect of God who truely offereth both the one and the other Things must be so ioyned that neither they nor other must be confounded or iumbled together or as in respect of the faithfull who truelie and indeede receiue both But we note the difference of place in the coniunction of the thing and the signes that the trueth of Christes fleshe and of his ascension may be preserued safe and sounde neither yet do we for al that by any meanes make void the Lords supper it selfe Q 7 What is to be thought of these manner of speeches The bodie of the Lord is in or with or vnder the bread or nigh vnto the bread and of all or any other that be of the like sort A As yet wee feare to vse these or suche like manner of speaches because they seeme to take awaye the distaunce of places Two causes why these kindes of speeches are not to be allowed which wee necessarilie establishe and allowe or else they vpholde the vbiquitie of Christes bodie which we maie not graunt at any hand although we confesse that besides the signes the thing it selfe is offered vs of GOD and by the faithfull truely receiued but after that maner which we will declare in the tenth question Notwithstanding it shold seeme A christian yeelding for peace sake but yet with good cautions and exceptions that these termes which are vnder for concordes sake may be admitted but not vnlesse a plaine and manifest interpretation be ioyned withall to wit that these particles are so to bee vnderstoode not as though Christs flesh shoulde be placed vppon earth but that we may knowe that besides the signes themselues which are vppon the earth Christ himselfe whiche is in heauen is truely giuen vnto vs as the signes on earth doo beare witnes Q 8 What ought we to iudge of this manner of sayeng Christ is present in the supper corporallie reallie substantiallie A For the selfe-same cause before alleadged wee doo not vse these formes of speech neither Hard speeches with some qualifications and interpretations may be tollerated for a time notwithstanding it should seeme that they also might bee tollerated or borne withal so that we adde the interpretation following to witte that these things doo not pertaine to that manner of coniunction wherby the thing is ioyned with the signes but serue rather to expresse and declare the matter it selfe that is to say that so wee may vnderstand that by the action of the supper there is established and confirmed in vs not onlie the vertue and power of Christ but chiefly our
very growing vp with christ himself from which we haue affirmed the same to flowe This is the lawe of righteousnes to haue that doone to our selues that we woulde do to others euen as it were from a fountaine because afterwardes wee fetch from him both true life and also all thinges necessarie to saluation Neither would I iudge it to be refused that a like interpretation may againe be ioyned to this our manner of speaking that Christ is spirituallie in the supper least any man shoulde thinke that we separate Christs power from the very flesh of Christ or imagine vnto him a speciall bodie Q 9 What is to bee iudged of this manner of sayeng That Christ is present in the supper and is distributed also by an incomprehensible manner or after a sorte that can not bee vnderstoode A We vse this manner of speech but yet in a far other sense and meaning than some are woonte A corrupt interpretation For vnlesse peraduenture wee be deceiued they seeme to take this saying after this sort as though by a certaine diuine and heauenlie power by reason also of the personall vnion of the flesh with the godhead Christs flesh should be really at one time and together both in heauen and in earth But though we neither deny the omnipotencie of GOD neither the true coniunction of the thing A true interpretation with the signes and of the faithfull with Christ himselfe we do yet notwithstanding by reason of the truth of Christs flesh and his ascension likewise plainly affirme that the body of Christ is nowe verily absent from the world Actes 3.21 shal remaine absent vntill he come to iudge the quick and the dead Neuertheles we confes this mysterie of god to be incompreheÌ„sible beyond our vnderstanding Faith ioyneth things together that be as farre asunder as heauen and earth whereby it falleth out that that which is and remaineth in heauen not els-where that so we may draw life and saluation from him who is trulie offered vnto vs and in deede communicated of vs. For albeit wee knowe first that the Holie-ghost that is to say gods power doth worke this The power of the spirite and of the force of faith and then that as in regarde of our selues all this is to be receiued of vs by the onelye instrument or meane of faith yet the power of the spirit and the force of faith doo exceede all our vnderstanding whereby it commeth to passe also that euen this whole action is verie properly called a mysterie or secret as the Greeks vsed to terme it Q 10 How is the matter or thing of the Sacrament communicated or partaken of vs A The matter of the Sacrament that is to say Christ himselfe is receiued of vs by a spirituall manner thorow faith And wee call that a Spirituall manner of receiuing or communicating Spirituall receiuing what it is not onelie in which Christ his spirite is communicated with vs but also that which is not earthlie or naturall but dependeth of the incomprehensible power of the Holie-ghost by which most straight bond indeede the members are more and more ioyned wyth their head For we exclude and shutte out all powring abroade and mingling of substaunces and also all fitnesse of ioyning together of naturall partes and yet can holde and mainâ—â—ine a true growing vppe of the faithfull with Christ which can not bee hindered by anie distaunce of places for our faith cleaueth vnto the worde of God who indeede performeth that which he promiseth Q 11 In what sense are these speeches To eate the Lords body and to drinke his bloud and other such like to be admitted A We say Eating and drinking referred to Christs bodie and bloud must be figuratiuelie vnderstoode that these manner of speeches do also beloÌ„g to that communicating or partaking whereby wee laye holde of Christ euen in the simple word or in the worde it selfe alone yea wee affirme that they are verye effectuall and significant but so that the wordes of eating and drinking when they are spoken of the taking of the body and bloud of Christ are no lesse figuratiuely to be vnderstoode than if a man should attribute to faith a mouth and teeth Two causes why the holie-ghost vseth borrowed speeches The first Now we alleadge two chiefe causes why the holy-ghost speaketh after that manner one cause is that hee may shew how strait our coniunction with christ is by the meanes of faith for nothing more groweth vp and increaseth with vs than meate and drinke without which no man caâ—â—â—asse ouer his time or spend this life â—he other cause which also properly hath place in the Sacraments is The second that by this way and meanes it may be declared how true the Lorde is in deliuering the matter it selfe which he promiseth by signes as it were by certaine pledges giuen for thereby it commeth to passe that though the onely signes are taken wyth the hand and receiued wyth the mouth yet that also which beside the signes is truely offered and by faith onely spiritually receiued is said to be taken eaten drunken c And for this cause we acknowledge Why we vse not the fathers phrases in the â—upper that the holie Fathers haue vsed manie other forms of speaking not vnlike these which wee notwithstanding will not at this day heedelesly vse but suppose rather that the same are to be mitigated by some profitable and fitte interpretations and the rather bicause of many errors spread abrode by Sathan and many controuersies also by this occasion stirred vp in the church of God Q 12 How are these wordes This is my bodie and this is my bloud to bee expounded A Euen after this maner This The wordes of the institution expounded particularlie and as it were one after an other that is to say this bread this wine is to wit sacramentally for not whatsoeuer is anie thing is by one onely way a thing Nowe the question is heere concerning the Sacraments And wee plainly say sacramentally bicause the Lorde did indeede offer not bare breadâ— and wine only but the true signes of his bodie and bloud neither onely these signes but besides them also his body and bloud to be enioyed possessed of vs euen into euerlasting life which life euerlasting also we drawe from him being communicated vnto vs. Luke 22.19 20. My body and my bloud that is not an imagined bodie or fained bloud but that selfe-same body which was giueÌ„ for vs and that self-same bloud whiche was shead for vs of both which wee are indeede by faith made partakers as the signes doo truely witnes Q 13 What do the wicked or vnbeleeâ—ers receiue The institution of the supper dependeth vpon Gods trueth A We hold and teach that by an agreeing iudgement and holy consent that the institution of the sacrament doth hang vpon the trueth of God therefore that in the
vtterlie ouerthrowe and destroy the nature of a sacrament which as all men knowe and confesse must euer consist of two partes to wit of visible elements and inuisible graces the trueth whereof appeareth not onely by the generall consent of all men as before is alleadged but also by the particular viewe of all the Sacramentes mentioned in the olde or newe testament But this trueth is not onely defaced and laid euen wyth the ground but swalowed vp also and as it were broght to nothing if so be it that the nature and substance of the elements bee either chaunged or vanish awaie in this matter of the lords supper as some affirme and hold the things represented by the same come in their place The reason wherof is plaine and euident to witte that the one parte of the Sacrament namely the visible signe is then and there absent And therefore it must of necessitie followe that not onelie the nature of a Sacrament is destroyed but by consequent also the Sacrament it self because the nature of a thing being taken away the thing it selfe can not stand or continue for the nature is it whereof the thing it selfe consisteth Yea this also falleth out vpon it that those men that in the pride and vanitie of their owne hearts inlarge the number of Sacraments aboue them that christ hath left vnto his church publishing to the worlde that there are seauen where indeede there are but two In the true and naturall vse of the worde Sacrament are founde not onelie to bee clippers of the Lordes coine but vtter defacers of his holie ordinaunce in taking from the Churche whatsoeuer they pretend to the contrarie one of those that Christ hath left to the same for the comforte thereof beeing founde likewise by this meanes not onelie presumptuous against Christ but iniurious also to the people in spoiling them of so great consolation So fruitfull in vngodlinesse is the euill weede of corrupt doctrine Indeede if the signe of the sacrament and the thing signified by the same were thinges contrary they might haue some shew of reason for this vnmeasurable affection but forasmuch as wee all knowe them to be not things contrary but diuers no doubt but they not onely may but do very well stand together the one of them beeing so farre from destroying or defacing of an other that they in a most louing consent agree and concurre together to the setting foorth of Gods glorie and the spirituall good and comforte of hys children Wherefore I saye it cannot be auoided but that they doe very ill that do thus malapertlie disioyne and put in sunder such things as God hath most wiselie ioyned and glewed as it were fast together 2 Secondlie I affirme that this doctrine is woonderfullie iniurious vnto the glorified bodie of our Sauiour not onely whilest it fetcheth him from heauen the place of all such blessednesse as can not be conceiued much lesse spoken of into the earth the place of all vnspeakeable miseserie and wretchednesse which yet is not all this circumstaunce further aggrauating the error of this vniust assertion that they make the blessed body of Christ our Lord and god subiect to the call of a mortall and miserable creature the priest I meane as they name him as though if he bade go it should go or if he commaunded it to come it shoulde come c But also whilest it maketh it to be rent and torne in peeces not only with the teeth of good mē a matter which our nature abhorreth both in respect of the rawnes of it also in respect of the substāce of it for we are not Anthropophagi that is eaters of mans flesh but euen with the teeth of the wicked and vngodlie also which euen for this cause if there were no more is most vntrue and false because that then they shold liue for euer Iohn 6.54 in as muche as all that eate his fleshe and drincke his bloude haue this promise that they haue eternall life And yet these wicked menne cease not heere but proceede to further impietie some of the chiefest among them affirming though in deede others are not so resolute in it by whyche also wee may see that there is not so muche vnitie or consent amongest Popishe diuines and doctors as they pretend that mice rattes dogges hogges and other vnreasonable creatures falling vpon consecrated hostes and deuouring the same doo vndoubtedlie eate the blessed bodie of our Sauiour And if they staied heere their sinne were somewhat lesse but this is not all the mischiefe that falleth out in this behalfe for whereas in trueth and christian religion the bodie of our Sauiour Christ is now immortall and in immortall glorie as Gods worde and the articles of our Beleefe agreeing wyth the same doo plainelye teache vs these menne subiect it to putrefaction corruption and wormes by reason of the long reseruation thereof and at the last to consuming in the fire a fact of most horrible crueltie if it were Christes flesh but no maruaile though they deale so wyth him when they handle hys Saints as hardelie as that commeth vnto which thing experience of all ages dooth sufficientlye prooue because it maye not otherwise bee made awaye as they themselues confesse if it be once taken wyth hoarinesse mouldines or such like If any man doubt of the truth and certaintie of these points obiected against them lette hym but reade their owne workes and hee shall see the matter sufficientlie cleared Yea I suppose that the verye aduersaries themselues will not growe so shamelesse as to denie that which with a full mouth and in the open Sunne light hath beene published by the best of their side And if they woulde or shoulde yet wee haue the liues and the leaues the wordes and the workes in sentence and sense for manner and matter to charge them wythall and to throwe this dung into their faces 3 Thirdly I say that by consequent it dooth most cursedly confounde if not vtterlie subuert and ouerthrowe the humanitie of our Sauiour with his Godhead whilest that which indeede and all trueth is proper and peculiar to the eternall Deitie onely for example to be euerie where which can not agree to anie but to GOD alone as both reason and religion will sufficiently perswade if wee will giue eare vnto the same is yet notwythstanding most blasphemouslye attributed and ascribed to his manhoode which as hath beene already shewed before and shall more plainelie if GOD will be prooued heereafter is and must of necessitie since the time of his moste glorious ascension into Heauen and sitting at the right hande of the maiestie of GOD his Father the very onelie seate and throne as it were of his bodilie residence bee circumscriptible and tied to a place As for that which they are woont vsuallie to obiect for the impeachement of this trueth and the establishement of their owne errour beeing taken from the glorification of our Sauiours bodie is easily beaten backe and
and soule of the church it selfe The veritie and certeintie wherof though it lie in Christ 1. Cor. 1.20 because in him al Gods promises are yea and amen yet the particular applications of the same to our owne harts must come from the powerfull working of the holie spirit But how shall we come to the effectuall feeling of these if the force of the spirit be not shed abrode into our hearts or how can the holie spirit be called the pledge of Gods promises Ephes 1.13 and the earnest penie of our adoption and saluation if that promise of our sauior Christ be not accomplished or how can we find comfort against the feare of death or peace in our consciences against the sight of sinne and iudgement due vnto vs for the same without this Of a truth the remembrance of our dissolution and departure hense this being remooued shall be greeuous and the horrour of hell the iust punishment of our iniquitie will be readie euery houre to ouerwhelme vs. Wee need not stand long vpon this point either this must be true that wee haue the Holie ghost in most abundant measure by the bodilie absence of our sauior Christ giuen to the church as before is said and proued and so a spirituall supplie bestowed vpon vs for a bodiely want that being more excellent than this because the apostle saith that hensefoorth we know no man after the flesh 2. Corinth 5.16 yea though we had knowne Christ after the flesh yet now henseforth know we him no more or else if Christ be heere bodilie present the Holy ghost is not yet come nor the apostles indued with miraculous graces nor the fulnesse of the Gentils gathered in nor the comfort and peace of the church prouided for all which are fearefull to thinke vpon but much more horrible to feele and in deed are quite cleane contrarie to the truth of the word and if we had no more but onlie the second chapter of the Acts of the apostles it were sufficient to ouerthrow the same 6 Sixtlie this assertion dooth not onelie closelie but openlie accuse Christ himselfe of manifest lieng vntrueth who as both the prophets and apostles doo beare witnesse did no sinne Isaiah 53.9 1. Peter 2.22 neither was there any guile found in his mouth He himselfe hath plainlie told vs The poore ye haue alwaies with you Marke 14.7 and when yee will ye may doo them good but me yee shall not haue alwaies And againe elswhere Iohn 14.2 I go to prepare a place for you If this be not blasphemie to doo what we can to taint him with falshood that is both truth it selfe and the author of all truth I know not what is blasphemie And yet this iniquitie staieth not heere for it depriueth vs first of the comfort of the forgiuenesse of sinnes because if our sauiour haue beene tainted with anie manner of iniquitie though neuer so small he cannot be a price and ransome for sin because he that must recommit sinners to God must of necessitie be free from transgression Secondlie it dooth as it were violentlie take and pull from vs the hope that we haue of the heauenlie inheritance For why hath our sauior Christ sundred himselfe for a space from vs as in respect of his bodilie presence not yet leauing vs comfortlesse for he hath giuen vs his spirit to supplie as it were his absence but to the end that we might heereafter in time to come most comfortablie enioye him bothe in bodie and soule for euermore Dooth not hee himselfe say Iohn 16.16 Yet a little while and yee shall not see me and againe a little while and ye shall see me for I go to my father And in another place Though I go to prepare a place for you Iohn 14 3. yet will I come againe and receiue you vnto my selfe that where I am there may yee be also And yet all this notwithstanding superstitious and brainesicke people dare with open mouth affirme that we haue him continuallie with vs here vpon earth and that not in respect of his spirituall power and presence onelie wherevnto we our selues most gladlie yeeld as a verie principall comfort vnto vs in the daies of all our distresses because in that respect as God eternall with his father we beleeue that he filleth all places both in heauen and in earth and is said to be with the beleeuers euen vnto the end of the world Matth. â—3 20 but as in respect of his corporall and bodilie presence also than the which nothing vndoubtedlie can be more false and absurd as hath beene sufficientlie shewed alreadie and plainelie prooued before Now hauing waded thus farre in the trueth and certeinetie of the matter it selfe wee might safelie shut vp and conclude this point but that there remaine sundrie of the aduersaries obiections to be answered wherin I cannot but let the godlie reader vnderstand that I minde not to answer either all of them or manie of them because the most in trueth be friuolous and vaine and it would be ouer tedious to wade into such idle and vnprofitable matter Three there are in deede which because they seeme to be of speciall strength and ordinarie vse I can not let passe Two of them are taken from the words of the text of holie scripture and the third from the omnipotencie and almightie power of our sauiour Christ which though they be common things in deed and such as might as easilie be reiected as obiected because the controuersie is not touching the plaine wordes of the text and the almightie power of Christ as God for be it far from vs to be so absurd as to draw things of such euidency and excellencie into question but we striue rather as for the true sence naturall meaning of the wordes so for the veritie of Christes person and the essentiall properties of either his distincted natures yet we cannot but both for the strengthening of them that be weake and ignorant in the same as also for the discharge of our conscience before God and man but in a word or two as it were make a short but withal a sound sufficient and true answer I hope to euery one of these three seuerallie and by themselues 1 The first place obiected is these words of our sauiour in the gospell after Iohn Except ye eat the flesh of the sonne of man Iohn 6.13 and drinke his bloud ye haue no life in you Weerevnto I answer first that neither these words neither the rest of the chapter can in anie probabilitie or shew of reason properlie be vnderstood of the Lords supper And if we had no more for it but this yet were this sufficient because at that time the supper it selfe was not instituted and ordeined but a long while after as in the euangelists writings dooth plainelie appeare but must rather be referred to our spirituall communicating or partaking with Christ by the meanes of a liuelie