and soule of the church it selfe The veritie and certeintie wherof though it lie in Christ 1. Cor. 1.20 because in him al Gods promises are yea and amen yet the particular applications of the same to our owne harts must come from the powerfull working of the holie spirit But how shall we come to the effectuall feeling of these if the force of the spirit be not shed abrode into our hearts or how can the holie spirit be called the pledge of Gods promises Ephes 1.13 and the earnest penie of our adoption and saluation if that promise of our sauior Christ be not accomplished or how can we find comfort against the feare of death or peace in our consciences against the sight of sinne and iudgement due vnto vs for the same without this Of a truth the remembrance of our dissolution and departure hense this being remooued shall be greeuous and the horrour of hell the iust punishment of our iniquitie will be readie euery houre to ouerwhelme vs. Wee need not stand long vpon this point either this must be true that wee haue the Holie ghost in most abundant measure by the bodilie absence of our sauior Christ giuen to the church as before is said and proued and so a spirituall supplie bestowed vpon vs for a bodiely want that being more excellent than this because the apostle saith that hensefoorth we know no man after the flesh 2. Corinth 5.16 yea though we had knowne Christ after the flesh yet now henseforth know we him no more or else if Christ be heere bodilie present the Holy ghost is not yet come nor the apostles indued with miraculous graces nor the fulnesse of the Gentils gathered in nor the comfort and peace of the church prouided for all which are fearefull to thinke vpon but much more horrible to feele and in deed are quite cleane contrarie to the truth of the word and if we had no more but onlie the second chapter of the Acts of the apostles it were sufficient to ouerthrow the same 6 Sixtlie this assertion dooth not onelie closelie but openlie accuse Christ himselfe of manifest lieng vntrueth who as both the prophets and apostles doo beare witnesse did no sinne Isaiah 53.9 1. Peter 2.22 neither was there any guile found in his mouth He himselfe hath plainlie told vs The poore ye haue alwaies with you Marke 14.7 and when yee will ye may doo them good but me yee shall not haue alwaies And againe elswhere Iohn 14.2 I go to prepare a place for you If this be not blasphemie to doo what we can to taint him with falshood that is both truth it selfe and the author of all truth I know not what is blasphemie And yet this iniquitie staieth not heere for it depriueth vs first of the comfort of the forgiuenesse of sinnes because if our sauiour haue beene tainted with anie manner of iniquitie though neuer so small he cannot be a price and ransome for sin because he that must recommit sinners to God must of necessitie be free from transgression Secondlie it dooth as it were violentlie take and pull from vs the hope that we haue of the heauenlie inheritance For why hath our sauior Christ sundred himselfe for a space from vs as in respect of his bodilie presence not yet leauing vs comfortlesse for he hath giuen vs his spirit to supplie as it were his absence but to the end that we might heereafter in time to come most comfortablie enioye him bothe in bodie and soule for euermore Dooth not hee himselfe say Iohn 16.16 Yet a little while and yee shall not see me and againe a little while and ye shall see me for I go to my father And in another place Though I go to prepare a place for you Iohn 14 3. yet will I come againe and receiue you vnto my selfe that where I am there may yee be also And yet all this notwithstanding superstitious and brainesicke people dare with open mouth affirme that we haue him continuallie with vs here vpon earth and that not in respect of his spirituall power and presence onelie wherevnto we our selues most gladlie yeeld as a verie principall comfort vnto vs in the daies of all our distresses because in that respect as God eternall with his father we beleeue that he filleth all places both in heauen and in earth and is said to be with the beleeuers euen vnto the end of the world Matth. â—3 20 but as in respect of his corporall and bodilie presence also than the which nothing vndoubtedlie can be more false and absurd as hath beene sufficientlie shewed alreadie and plainelie prooued before Now hauing waded thus farre in the trueth and certeinetie of the matter it selfe wee might safelie shut vp and conclude this point but that there remaine sundrie of the aduersaries obiections to be answered wherin I cannot but let the godlie reader vnderstand that I minde not to answer either all of them or manie of them because the most in trueth be friuolous and vaine and it would be ouer tedious to wade into such idle and vnprofitable matter Three there are in deede which because they seeme to be of speciall strength and ordinarie vse I can not let passe Two of them are taken from the words of the text of holie scripture and the third from the omnipotencie and almightie power of our sauiour Christ which though they be common things in deed and such as might as easilie be reiected as obiected because the controuersie is not touching the plaine wordes of the text and the almightie power of Christ as God for be it far from vs to be so absurd as to draw things of such euidency and excellencie into question but we striue rather as for the true sence naturall meaning of the wordes so for the veritie of Christes person and the essentiall properties of either his distincted natures yet we cannot but both for the strengthening of them that be weake and ignorant in the same as also for the discharge of our conscience before God and man but in a word or two as it were make a short but withal a sound sufficient and true answer I hope to euery one of these three seuerallie and by themselues 1 The first place obiected is these words of our sauiour in the gospell after Iohn Except ye eat the flesh of the sonne of man Iohn 6.13 and drinke his bloud ye haue no life in you Weerevnto I answer first that neither these words neither the rest of the chapter can in anie probabilitie or shew of reason properlie be vnderstood of the Lords supper And if we had no more for it but this yet were this sufficient because at that time the supper it selfe was not instituted and ordeined but a long while after as in the euangelists writings dooth plainelie appeare but must rather be referred to our spirituall communicating or partaking with Christ by the meanes of a liuelie
question in controuersie whether this doctrine concerning the reall presence of Christes very fleshe in many or all places at once can stand wyth the truth of Christs flesh whether wee consider it after or before the glorification thereof Now we stoutly and safely deny that Christs fleshe at any tyme can be in many or in all places at once and wee saye that it can not by anye necessary or fitte consequence bee gathered either from this hys walkyng vppon the waters or in that hee entered into the place where hys disciples were the dores being shut or in that hee arose againe the stone of the Sepulchre or Toombe Iohn 20.19 Math. 28.2 Certain reasons alledged for proofe of his assertion not beeing remooued or rolled awaye by mannes handes And of thys wee haue sundrye reasons for firste these myracles seeme rather to bee doone in the waters themselues made harde and firme not onelie vnder Christs feete but vnder Peters also than in Christs owne bodie the like whereof also is to bee saide touching the wall and sepulchre Matth. 14.29 the heape or weight whereof did sodainely yeeld vnto the body of the creator Moreouer though we shold grant that they were to be seene in the very body of Christ yet doth not the withholding of a bodily weight or the withdrawing of it for a time or else this thinnesse as a man woulde say of a bodilie heape either abolish a bodie it selfe sith it dooth at any hand take away the quantitie of a body or implie contradiction as they are woont to say in the schooles But we affirme that a true and very bodie can neither want quantity or circumscriptiblenesse but it shal cease to be a bodie neither can it be at once in one place as circumscribed and in an other place as not circumscribed but that we must of necessitie conclude both that it is a bodie and that it is not a bodie which are assertions meerelie contrarie The summe of all these thinges is this or tendeth to this ende namelie that this opinion of the reall consubstantiation of Christes flesh with bread and wine is most false and vntrue as by meanes whereof the trueth of Christes fleshe is vtterlie abolished Now againe The second reason against consubstantiation See the first before pag. 65. euen by this most weightie argument following may this forgerie and deuise be confuted namelie because it plainlie and wholie standeth vp against the analogie and proportion of faith so little need or iust cause haue the defendors thereof to call vs backe to the power and force of faith Acts. 1.11 Marke 16.19 The scripture witnesseth in manie places that Christes flesh ascended vp aboue the heauens and that there also at this day it remaineth we may not therefore seeke for it in earth otherwise it should not be an ascending but a vanishing away for the time Certeinlie A generall rule no man can trulie be said to come or go vp thither where he now was or to go away descend or be absent from the place where he remaineth Looke therefore in how manie places these things are spoken of Christ according to his flesh and that without anie figuratiue kinde of speech by so manie most strong and inuincible testimonies there is confirmed vnto vs the true taking away of the bodie of Christ from vs and also that reall dotage of the presence of Christes flesh vpon the earth that is to say thys opinion which the Dokits Marcionits mainteine sufficientlie confuted Of these see before pag. 70. As for that that they vrge against vs An obiection answered saieng How absurd is that that Christes flesh is now in heauen and no where else It is easilie answered that we speake no otherwise than Peter Acts. 3.21 Acts. 1.11 yea than the angels themselues haue spoken And though they say further that by this meanes we shut vp Christ as it were in a prison where as yet notwithstanding the right hand of God that is to say his heauenlie power and authoritie whereat he sitteth is euerie where What for all this Answer vs this and tell vs whether that being on the earth absent from heauen for he had not ascended thither where he was then present or whether that being in the virgins wombe or wrapped vp in swadling clothes lieng in the crib he was shut vp in prison Yea sith euerie bodie is conteined in his owne place yea things without bodies are yet notwithstanding included in the proprietie of their nature for onelie the Godhead is infinit what can follow else of this their most absurd argument and reason Absurditie in reason by the aduersaries argument than that all things are full of prisons and prisoners And though we should say that vnder the termes of sitting at the right hand Philip. 2.9 there is meant the verie selfe same thing which the apostle simplie and without trope saith that Christ to wit as he is man hath receiued that is to say a name aboue all names yet it should be no lesse fond and absurd thervpon to gather and conclude the presence of Christes flesh in euerie place A similitude that if we would affirme that the bodie of some king is as large and wide as the bounds of his kingdome are brode But say they Another obiection answered Christ being present gouerneth all things We answer that is true as he is God and yet the person of Christ is not for al that rent in sunder or diuided For euen Christ man being euerie where the Lord is present also euerie where much more in the supper In what respect Christ is present euerie where howbeit not as in respect of the manhood it selfe but as in regard of another that is to say as he is one person not in himselfe as in regard of his manhood but in the verie nature of the Godhead it selfe of which the humanitie was so assumed that it is one subsistence or being togither with it as a little while ago we declared Therefore the man Christ is in deed present to wit as he the selfe same is Christ God and yet the manhood of Christ is not now in anie other place than in heauen The third obiection answered Ephes 4.10 But it is yet further obiected that Christ went vp into heauen to fulfill all things I grant it wherevpon also I gather that hee fulfilled not all things till he ascended and that therefore the definition of the personall vnion taken from habituall grace as they call it of which we haue said some what before is false and fond Yea I gather this further that if he did truelie and in deed ascend that that his flesh was not in heauen before he ascended thither that it ceaseth to be on the earth after that he ascended from thense into heauen But say they he ascended to fulfill or fill all things The same obiection vrged yet answered therfore he filleth
aunsweared as which indeede if it bee well weighed is not onelie vntrue as in respect of it selfe because though glorification implie a most excellent and heauenlie estate dooth not yet for all that destroye the essentiall properties of bodies glorified but most absurde and false also as in regard of vs. For if the glorification of Christs bodie haue remooued or taken awaye that essentiall propertie to witte that it shoulde truelie and indeede bee tied vnto a place then the like shall bee perfourmed and the same effect followe in all the glorified bodies of the faithfull after the resurrection because our Sauiour hath not onelie glorified his owne bodie for himselfe hee rising therein a mightie conquerour ouer death and hell and nowe triumphantlie ruling and raigning in the heauens in all maiestie but for our sakes also hath atchieued that greate honour wee hauing from him this assured promise in his worde Philip. 3.21 that God shal chaunge our base and vile bodies that they may bee fashioned like vnto his glorious bodie according vnto the mightie working whereby hee is able to subdue all things vnto himselfe But to saye that our bodies glorified after the rising againe of the same in the generall day of iudgement shall be euery where a rashe and vncertaine yea a beastlie and blasphemous assertion because it ascribeth that vnto vs which is proper and peculiar onelie to GOD for vnto hym alone it perteineth to fill heauen earth and all places alwayes and at one tyme as infinite places of Scripture doo plainelie prooue therefore this opinion also concerning Christes glorified bodie beeing euerie where or in infinite places at one time must of necessitie be suche likewise 4 Fourthlie it dooth directlye destroy and as it were at one blowe blotte out and deface all those Articles of our moste pretious Faith and Christian religion whych doo concerne Christes assured ascension into Heauen hys maiesticall sitting at the right hande of the Father and his glorious comming agayne from thence together wyth that infinite number of moste playne places of GODS holie woorde that out of the writinges of the Prophetes and Apostles may bee drawen for the proofe of those moste comfortable and necessarie pointes To deale wyth euerye one of these by themselues shortely and in fewe woordes I woulde faine knowe if our Sauiour Christ be here vpon earth in respect of his bodilye power and presence howe hee can iustlie as in regarde of the same hys bodye bee sayde to haue ascended into Heauen Or let them tel vs if hee remaine wyth vs in hys flesh how hee can bee truelye saide in hys manhoode to sitte at the right hande of hys Father in Heauen Or howe it can bee in religion or reason affirmed that our Sauiour shall come from Heauen with great power and glorie to iudge the quick and the dead seeing he is here on earth already The Scripture telleth vs for his ascension Actes 1.9 that in the sight and beholding of the blessed Apostles yea whiles they looked stedfastly towards heauen he was taken vp Let them shew so much for his bodilie abode vpon earth and proue it by such substantiall witnesse and wee are readie to yeelde Besides we knowe by the worde and therefore beleeue it that as he was seene go into heauen Actes 1.10 so shall he come againe but hee was seene to ascend thither bodilie and therefore so shall hee returne from thence againe I suppose they will not saye that our Sauiour had two bodies one that hee tooke wyth him an other that hee left heere for that were to make him altogether monstrous and men scrupulous none knowing in whether of them hee perfourmed the work of their redemption And to saye that that one blessed bodie of his was diuided is as absurde and erronious because it can not be so but that the whole bodie it selfe must be impaired and mangled at the least if not destroyed and so the woorke of saluation ouerthrowne To stand vpon anie naked interpretation touching the right hand of God will not serue their turne for there being nothing meant thereby in this article of our beleefe but the great glorie that is in heauen prepared for the saints and that most excellent blessednesse that belongeth to them whereof our sauior Christ was in a most full measure made by his ascention into heauen as in respect of his humanity absolute partaker what could they gaine Doo they imagine that it would heervpon insue that Christ should be euerie where and by consequent on earth but they are deceiued for why doo they not as well consider the word sitting which implieth locall residence in a place or doo they not know and beleeue that heauen it selfe is not euerie where but locall rather or will they not see that without warrant of the word yea contrarie to the same which in sundrie places opposeth heauen and earth one of them against another or sence of humane iudgement they iumble and confound them togither Reason will lead vs to this that none can be said to goe vp into the place where he is or to come downe from it when he remaineth there And though wee minde not to subiect our sauior speciallie as in respect of his eternall Godhead to humane sence yet by the same we may and ought to be ledde not to destroy the essentiall properties of his manhood Now then whether shall wee beleeue this trueth of the Lord or mens fantasies that go about to peruert our persuasions and deceiue our vnderstandings Let men of the worlde deeme what they lust this is the truth that God hath sanctified vnto vs in his word and I doo stedfastlie beleeue it in my heart and will throgh Gods goodnesse and strength alwaies confesse the same with my mouth that from the very time of Christes ascension into Heauen Acts. 3 2â— The Heauens must conteine his naturall bodie vntill the time that all things be restored that is euen to the worlds end 5 Fiftlie I say that this opinion dooth vniustlie depriue vs of all such spirituall graces and comforts for our consciences as God the father in his sonne Christ by sending the Holie ghost the third person in the deitie hath not onelie promised but in good time wil performe and bestow vpon the whole church generallie and euerie sound particular member of the same yea if we wey it well we shall finde that it is the ruine and bane of the church it selfe both in the whole bodie of it and in the seuerall parts Our sauior himselfe in most plaine and expresse terms faith Iohn 16.7 I tel you the truth it is expedient for you that I go away for if I go not away the comforter will not come vnto you but if I depart I will send him vnto you Hee that knoweth anie thing of truth is well acquainted with this that generallie all the word but most especiallie the comfortable promises conteined in the same be as it were the life
coulde not be spoken of the other without great impietie and vngodlinesse Notwithstanding by reason of the personal vnion excepting alwaies that which is attributed to the whole person and belongeth to both natures as when Christ is called the mediator and such like such things as are proper to the godhead and therefore as wee haue said can neuer be spoken of the manhoode are yet notwithstanding attributed to Christ as man and againe suche things as are proper to man are spoken and that rightlie of God but neuer or at no hand of the godhead The reason is because that the subsistence or being is denominated euen in the concret of one of the natures onelie So by the Sonne of GOD wee doo many times vnderstand 1. Timoth. 3.16 not onely the godhead of the sonne by it selfe but Christ manifested in the fleshe And by the GOD of glorie wee meane GOD become or made man and like wise by sonne of man we meane man assumed or taken of the eternall son of God Whereby it commeth to passe that by reason of that personall vnion some thinges in the concret may bee saide of the whole person which yet notwithstanding in the abstracte 1. Corinth 2.8 doo agree to one of the natures onelie So Saint Paule affyrmeth that the GOD of glorie was crucified which proposition is not true touching whole Christ One and the selfe-same proposition true and vntrue in seuerall senses that is to say if wee regarde or consider Christ as some whole matter consisting of some particulars but not true if wee vnderstand it of all or euery thing belonging to Christ that is to saye if wee seuerally and distinctlye consider his seuerall natures because the name of the GOD of glorie dooth in the abstract agree or belong to the onelie godhead Wherefore this proposition is true in the sense as before whereas otherwise it is a wicked and an vngodlie thing to say that the godhead was crucified Likewise in the creede of the Apostles Symbol Apost we say that wee beleeue in Iesus Christ the onely Sonne of God conceiued borne suffered c all which are truely and christianly spoken And why so Because that by the name of the Sonne of God in the councell we meane not God the word by himselfe alone but GOD manifested in the flesh So the Sonne of man talking with Nicodemus on earth was in heauen Iohn 3.13 the reason is because he that is man is God also and yet the manhoode of christ was at that time no where else Actes 1.11 but on earth euen as nowe also christs flesh being taken vp into Matth. 28.20 heauen and therefore absent from vs that Sonne of man is yet notwithstanding present with vs because the same christ is that true GOD Isaiah 66.1 Actes 7.48 whome neither heauen nor earth can containe Wherefore as these propositions are false the Godhead is the manhoode or the manhoode is the godhead so these are true This man is God and GOD the worde is man Nowe then if man be truely saide to be God by reason of the personall vnion it followeth therevppon that thinges attributed to the manhoode may rightlie be attributed to GOD and on the other side that things attributed to the Godhead may rightly be attributed to or spoken of christ man But let vs now come to the other part of the knowledge that concerneth our saluation that is to christes office This office is declared in his name Matth. 1.21 for he is Iesus that is to say a Sauiour because God the father hath therefore giuen him vnto vs that hee might saue vs to wit from our sinnes Now hee saueth vs by iustifieng vs because eternall life doth of necessitie agree with iustice or righteousnes Wherefore hee giueth vs life in giuing vs righteousnesse and that of his meere and onely grace through the power and effectuall working of his holie spirit One and the selfe-same power of God appeareth in mans creation and mans restitution sauing that this latter in my iudgement and before men though not before God seeme to be the more excellent and hard worke for euen that very selfe-same power of God which laide it selfe open in the creation of man must of necessity manifest it selfe also in restoring of man This is it that I meane as God the father did freelie through his sonne togither with his almightie power which is the holie-ghost create man so the selfe-same god dooth by sauing iustifie and by iustifieng saue man through his owne sin fallen from grace and yet made againe or anewe as it were through his sonne in the powerfull working of the holie spirit For the holy-ghost worketh in vs that instrument which we cal faith by which only we lay hold of christ after that we know him Neither is this faith some simple or bare accident but a habit as they call it in the schooles truelie grafted in vs not by nature but by gods meere and free grace But remember I pray you that by laying holde of Christ I vnderstand the apprehension or taking holde euen of Christ himselfe Two things principallie to be considered in Christ For wee must consider two things in Christ that is to saie hee himselfe god and man and such things as bee in him A fit similitude For example though it may be I confes that the similitude shall not agree in all points if in a casket or boxe I set before a man treasure he that will haue the treasure hidden or shutte vp therein must of necessitie take the casket or boxe it selfe Coloss 2.3 euen so there are in Christ all those treasures of wisedome and vnderstanding yea and to speake all in fewe wordes all those things which are necessarily required to our saluation Wherefore wee must of necessitie haue him that so we may obtaine those things that are in him and by the meanes of them eternall life But tell vs by what instrument wee doo take holde of him as it were by a certaine hand that hee may wholie become ours and wee his Verilie by faith Nowe the holie-ghost is hee who going about to woorke in vs this excellent instrument of faith vseth for that purpose the preachyng of the outwarde worde Roman 10.17 by which worde hee alone properlye woorketh inuisiblye in vs. But that we may the better vnderstand this point lette vs a little compare this naturall instrument of Faith to witte the outward worde with that supernaturall instrument that is the spirite Light of nature may somewhat helpe vs to obtaine naturall things but it can nothing further vs in the vnderstanding and beleeuing of heuenly things The doctor or teacher by speaking teacheth his scholers that which he speaketh For speech is the instrument and meane whereby we lay open the meaning of our mindes one of vs to an other by vnderstanding whereof they to whome wee speake become skilfull in those thinges that wee speake euen
lesse hard sharpe against vs than the verie papistes themselues who will haue the thing signified that is to say the verie bodie of Christ so to be ioined with or vnder or in the bread that in that verie place where that bread is there must also be the bodie of Christ which in like sort is to be vnderstood also touching the wine and the bloud of Christ If a man then should demand where is the verie bodie bloud of Christ in the action of the supper A grosse absurditie or two following consubstantiation if wee will answere according to their opinion we must say that it is truelie and in deed in our hands and in our mouth and therfore certeinelie vnlesse it presentlie vanish away within this bodie of ours with in or vnder the verie signes of the bread the wine being eaten and drunken Now we will shew and that by reasons not fet from humane philosophie as our aduersaries vntrulie say we vse such but from the verie word of God it selfe Two things to be handled viz. the confutation of the aduersaries the maintenance of the truth that this consubstantiation as we may trulie call it is no lesse absurd and erronious than transubstantiation as also that that communion or partaking which out of the pure word of God we propound and teach in our churches is a most secret and diuine matter Wherefore our iudgement is quite cleane contrarie to either of those opinions before rehearsed To begin we hold that such things as are spoken of the sacraments must be vnderstood sacramentallie For what I pray you is or can be more vpright than to haue all thinges spoken rightlie vnderstood and perceiued as the nature of that matter will beare whereof there is question A similitude or two explaning the point he hath in hand Certeinelie such thinges as the lawiers speake touching the law must be vnderstood euen as they are vsed in that verie science of the law and we must needs giue the selfe same iudgement of all things and arts whatsoeuer Such thinges therefore as are taught and deliuered touching the sacraments must be sacramentallie vnderstood What manner of coniunction then is the coniunction or knitting togither of the signe and the thing sacramentallie signified Verilie it is sacramentall The signes therfore and the things are ioined togither by that relation or respect which is betweene the signes and the thinges signified which yet once againe I doo most plainelie declare after this maner When we heare some man speaking vnto vs in the toong we vnderstand the words that come to our eares and strike them doo verie liuelie represent that vnto our mindes for the expressing and signification whereof they were vsed Another similitude For example as soone as we heare the word Rome presentlie wee thinke vpon that citie If a man name Cesar or the emperour Cesar or the emperour presenlie commeth to our memorie The reason whereof verilie is that that is well deliuered and taught in schooles to wit such thinges as are in the voice or words are signes of the affections that are in the soule or minde There is the selfe same consideration to be had of the sacraments for the sacraments are nothing else but visible words that is representing through our eies vnto our mindes things signified as words heard doo by our eares conuey vnderstanding to our minds likewise Therfore these visible sacraments of bread wine bring to passe that when I see and receiue that bread and that wine ioined with the word of God I doo withall conceiue in my mind and vnderstand that bodie that was giuen for me and that bloud that was shed for me as though I were led or carried euen vnto the thing it selfe being present And because I am commanded not onelie to looke vpon these signes with mine eies but also to take them Math. 26.26.27 eat them drinke them therefore dooth the faithfull minde euen lay hold of and applie vnto himselfe those things so signefied as they are deliuered and offered Touching which point we will largelie discourse in the fourth place to wit when we shall come to handle this question how both the signes and the thinges signified are receiued of vs whereas now we onelie dispute or speake touching the sacramentall coniunction of the signes themselues Two errours mainteined by the aduersaries with the thing signified Such as are not content with this sacramentall coniunction fall into a double errour not onelie that they doo in a a great and grosse errour verilie establish a real vnion of the signes with the things signified of which we haue spoken before but also they further adde this that euen in that verie place wheresoeuer the signes are offered to such as come to communicate there is present the flesh and the bloud of Christ that is to say they would haue vs confesse that euen his verie humanitie or manhood is in deed present there and is to be receiued or taken by bodily instruments As for vs we affirme that Christ in respect of his manhood The substance of that we are to know or beleeue touching the coniunction of the signes with the things signified in the Lords supper euen as when he was vpon the earth was no where else but in that verie place where he was conuersant so now he is not anie where else but aboue all heauens into which he ascended and that therefore he is not now togither with the signes offered to the bodie but togither with the signes truelie deliuered and giuen to the beleeuing soule euen as by the word we heare it and by the signe we see it Now it remaineth that we doo by some reasons fet from the word of GOD well wey and consider whether they or we swarue from the truth The first reason Rom. 1.3 Rom. 9.5 Galath 4.4 Philip. 2.7 Hebr. 2.16 Iohn 16.7.28 Matth. 28.20 Acts. 1.9 The holie scripture witnesseth that the sonne of God did personallie take vnto himselfe a true and verie bodie The selfe same scripture dooth attribute vnto the flesh of our sauiour Christ assumed and that both before and after the glorification thereof such things as doo plainelie prooue the truth of a naturall bodie as that he came that he went away that he was sometimes present and sometimes absent These things then doo of necessitie follow the trueth of Christes bodie which if a man take from it he must also needs take away the truth of the manhood of Christ and so come at the length to the heresie of the Marcionits or Dokits Marcionits or Dokits they were called Marcionits of one Marcion whose principall error was this that Christ did not appeare indeed and suffer indeed c. vpon the crosse but in phantasie or ghostlike apparition Concerning Dokitiae see homil 1. before going Tertullian wrote most learnedlie against this Marcion But these things are manifestlie taken away by their opinion who say that
all things We answer that he performed that for which he ascended that is to say he filled or fulfilled the whole mysterie of our saluation which the prophets foretold and the full state whereof as in respect of that for the performance of which Christ came into the world is finished by Christs ascension as it had the beginning of it from his comming into the earth But if we had rather refer these words which also we may do to the frute that followed his ascension into heauen by which not as a seruant but as a sonne he tooke vpon him and entered into the kingdome and gouernment then we shall perceiue that he therefore ascended Iohn 14 2â— that sending downe the Holie ghost he might bestow vpon his church all necessarie gifts for he ascended that he might euen lade men with his graces Ephes 4.8 and heape vp benefits blessings and gifts vpon them which seeing the apostle himselfe speaketh euen in so manie words as it were what man in his right wit would beleeue them that will transfer that to the verie person of Christ which is spoken of the office of his kingdome and the mightie and effectuall power thereof The fourth obiection answered Luke 24.31 But they yet further say he was taken out of their sight or he vanished away from it I grant it but if from hense they may gather this their presence in all places or in manie places or that which they call maiestie euerie where it is woonderfull and pitifull to behold what monstrous opinions in a verie short space haue sprong vp why may not we affirme the same likewise touching Philip Acts. 8.39.40 for he suddenlie did so banish out of the Eunuches eies sight that he was found afterward at Azolus And what was woont sometimes to be tide the prophets themselues appeareth by the example of Elias his disciples 2. Kings 2 3. The fift obiection Acts. 7.35.36 An other place they obiect Stephan saw Christ therefore he was on the earth I denie that for he being on earth saw him set in heauen as the holie historie declareth And to what purpose I pray you should he see him in heauen if he be at his side on the earth So that this miracle is to be considered not in the verie bodie of Christ but in Stephans eies Neither did that rite and ceremonie of the church vsed from all antiquitie whereby men with a loud voice were admonished to haue their hearts lifted vpward saieng Lift vp your hearts The vse of these words Lift vp your hearts in the celebration of the supper tend to any other end but to cause men to mount vp to heauen For to what purpose should that saieng Lift vp be vsed if wee had that in our mouths and in our hands which we seeke for The sixt obiection answered 1. Corinth 15.8 Acts. 9 4.5 c. August in psal 54. Againe Christ was seene of Paule as he went to Damascus Augustine shall answer this for vs. He writing vpon the fourth and fift psalmes saith The head that was in heauen cried alowd for the bodie that was in the earth Much like vnto this forme Acts. 22.17 is that which they yet obiect namelie that Paule saw the Lord when he praid in the temple therfore the Lord was in the verie temple we confesse that he saw him but in a vision or trance It was therfore a spirituall vision neither belongeth it anie whit at all to this present matter in hand and yet though we say it was a spirituall vision we meane not that Paule saw any false or forged thing Hitherto also we must refer other words of the same apostle seeming â—o tend to the same end for they may receiue the same answer likewise The last shift of the aduersaries fullie answered They run at the last to the same starting hole or shift which I call by that name as in respect of them that doo abuse it of the almightie power of Christ And when we set against them this sure ground that God cannot performe somethings then they throw out against vs bitter outcries as though that we were manifestlie and altogither blasphemous and euill men For mine owne part I would require this one thing of them The authors request to the aduersaries standing vpon two parts that they would with an vpright mind suffer such as amongst vs shall answer them and that they would not be caried so friuolouslie yet weaklie the Lord knoweth against such as whose life God be thanked for it freeth them from all suspition of blasphemie The first reason If euerie one denie the power of God that saith there is something which God cannot doo then they certeinelie were blasphemers that said God deceiued God lied and that he could not die Yea but they will say that in as much as these things are not of anie part of his power but rather imbecilities and wants this is not to make GOD weake or feeble but most mightie rather And this certeinelie is the same that long ago amongst others Theodoretus Theodoret did answere the Eutychian heretiks who defended this verie selfe same doctrine by the verie selfe same reason Let vs stay heere then a while and as we say in the prouerbe pitch our staffe for a season It is without all controuersie or doubt that God who at the first made all things of nothing is able vtterlie to turn all things vp side downe yea euen with his verie becke or breath to abolish and destroy them all and yet for all that he cannot effect or bring to passe this that that which hath beene should not be Certeine things that God cannot doo or that some one thing should be and not be at one the selfe same time or that it should at one and the selfe same time be such a thing and not such a thing The reason is because of two contradictorie speeches one of them must of necessitie be false Numbers 23.19 but sith he is God in deed he cannot lie and therefore he cannot either will or do such things as are contradictorie contrary one of them to another Wherefore he shall conuince GOD of lieng and himselfe of follie woosoeuer he be that will cloke and couer Gods almightie power with this deuise by which Christes bodie is circumscriptible and yet it shall in deed togither be present in manie places at once which properlie belongeth to that onelie infinit nature whereby also this is forged framed to wit that the bodie is finite and infinite great and not great yea a bodie and not a bodie The second reason And this I dare aduouch further Whatsoeuer God would once haue without exception to be vnchangeable that cannot be changed by him much lesse can it be abolished or doone away the reason is because God cannot depart from himselfe or be contrarie or vnlike vnto himselfe And I make this without all doubt or
of Christ as they will needes haue it The former of these I grant to wit that by the cuppe should be meant the wine contained in the cup but the latter I denie to wit that that wine should be in substance the very bloud of Christ and this I do deny standing vpon the reasons which I haue before spoken and alleaged But howsoeuer it be whether there be meant therby this wine alone or together with the wine euen the bloud it selfe yet needes must these deadly enimies of tropes and figures acknowledge one figure here to wit a Metonomia of the thing containing for the thing contained yea and that same verie trope of the same figure Synecdoche which wee haue spoken of before wherby it commeth to passe that the wine and the bloud are saide to be the bloud Now then let them tel me how See for the proofe of this Genesis 17.9 without a crope or figure that shall be counted the couenant it selfe by meanes whereof the couenant is established And yet this further I would gladly demaund of them if the bare word or letter being so precisely obserued that reall consubstantiation must of necessity ensue how it can be that this should not followe likewise that the signes beeing not onely distincted but in very deede and truth separated and sundered also the body it selfe shoulde not likewise in deede bee separated and sundered from the bloud Consubstantiation erronious and al that is obiected for iâ— most weake I many times thinking and that earnestly of this one matter to wit why diuers did so greatly vrge this same rule Consubstantiation euen as if it were the principall point of all our religion of a truth nothing could come into my minde but that which was most easie to be confuted As for the that they say An obiection that vnles Christs very body and his very bloud be beleeued to be so present that it may be receiued with the hands and with the mouth or else the bread and the wine shall be but emptie and void signes I say it is of no force In good sooth suppose yee that yee speake the trueth Belike then all the sacraments that the Fathers had The answeare â—â—ken from an absurditie before that Christs flesh was indeede created were voide and of no force Their Sacraments saith Augustine were in signes diuers but in matter equall But in what matter were they equall Euen in Christ the only matter of the sacraments for that same spirituall word that is as the selfe-same writer vpon the 77. August in psa 77 psalme expoundeth it signifieng some spirituall thing was Christ they did eat the same meat that we eat 1. Corint 10.2.3 and did drinke the same drinke to wit Christ that was to be born as we eat and drinke Christ alredy borne who is a spirituall meat and drinke How vntrue therefore is it that the signes are of no force except the thing signified being in deede also present bee coupled and ioyned with the signe 2 A second reson standing vpon comparison of the element of baptisme with the elements of the supper Yea shall we say that the water of Baptisme is an idle signe yet I neuer hard of any man that would say that the bloud of Christ was indeede consubstantiated together wyth the wine But against this they replie saieng the reason or cause of that is because the Lord saide not that that water was his bloud Let vs grant that and yet in the meane while wee haue gained this that the sacrament is not abolished or made of no force though the signe bee in one place and the thing signified thereby bee in an other so that both of them be truly offered and giuen And this much or hitherto haue we spoken of this third point that is to say of the sacramentall coniunction or ioyning of the signe with the thing signified Now the summe of this true and right beleeuing iudgement is this to wit The summe of that which hath bin saide touching the sacramental coniunction of the sigâ— and the thing signified that that is a sacramentall coniunction wherby it commeth to passe that through gods ordinance that which is signified by the signes vsed though nowe it be neuer so farre from vs I meane Christ himselfe as in respect of his flesh is yet notwithstanding through the power of the holie ghost but yet in suche a spirituall sorte and manner as wee shall declare heereafter as truely and verily offered vnto vs and giuen vs to be enioyed of vs as verily as the signes themselues are looked vpon wyth the eies touched with the handes and receiued and perceiued also wyth the mouth But let vs now come at the length The fourth or last part of this discourse to the fourth or last question and points to wit what manner of taking or receiuing there is both of the signs themselues and of the thing signified Concerning the taking or receiuing of the signs there is no controuersie or doubt made of it A syllogisme but that it is naturall and outward because it is manifestly and plainely perfourmed of all them that come vnto it by bodily instruments and meanes The maior But as for the things signified to wit that very flesh of Christ and that very bloud of his they are so receiued and taken euen as they are present and offered The minor But they are present and offered also to our mind and faith because they are nowe as wee haue saide not on earth The conclusion but in heauen and therefore they can not bee taken or receiued otherwise than by our minds and faith Augustine Augustine also speaking well and rightly touching this point after this manner Why preporest thou thy mouth and bellie This foode belongeth not to the bellie but to the minde Beleeue and thou hast eaten Wherevpon also this likewise followeth that all that come to the Lordes table as the same Augustine saith receue the body of the lord Augustine that is to say the sacrament of the Lordes body to wit the bread vsed at may be one euen as thou and I are one And in one worde as you would say to finish the matter if onelie the members of Christ are to be saued then they must needes confesse that wee are thorowe faith truelye grafted into Christ and that euen before wee come to the supper in so muche as no manne can rightlye and orderlye come to the supper which is not nowe already both in baptisme and in the worde That followeth not that the aduersaries fantasie become a member of Christe and therefore is vnited with Christe him selfe And yet it dooeth not heerevppon followe that the institution of the Supper is superfluous by which wee doo not indeede at the first pushe but yet notwithstanding in processe of time doo growe vppe more and more in Christ For him that wee doo alreadye possesse must
this obiection may then haue some place If absurdities or errors be yeelded vnto then they will be infinit no measure of them if by communicating or partaking we vnderstand a reall applieng or mixture of Christes bodie with ours whether it be of the whole with the whole or of the parts with the parts that so the church might in deed be a bodie as it were souldered and glewed togither of innumerable bodies of beleeuers being indeed molten togither as it were with Christes bodie But fie vpon this monster and let vs learne alwaies to driue it far from vs for who perceiueth not that the bodie arising or flowing from this felowship or communicating and belonging altogether to a spirituall life is mysticall Wherfore we are truelie but yet after a spirituall sort and mysticallie become one with Christ himselfe through faith that so from him there may flow into vs true life A similitude And euen as these our members being naturallie ioined with the soule doo receiue from it sence and moouing so should we after a spirituall and vndeclarable maner for great is the mysterie of that spirituall mariage that is betweene Christ and his church Ephes 5.32 as the apostle largelie and lowdlie declareth liue in Christ being ledde and gouerned by his spirit and he againe manifest and declare his powerfull working in vs. Now tell me is this the abolishing of that partaking that wee haue with Christ himselfe or doo we not rather make it a diuine and heauenlie partaking But if with these men we would make it a cōmunicating with the mouth then this partaking or communicating should be no woonderful or excellent matter We cannot approoue of a bodilie communicating or partaking with the mouth because that were to spoile our faith and rob God of his almightie power truth For what I pray you is more naturall and vsuall than if anie thing that is in deed present be deliuered vs to eat we take it in our hands and swallow it down thorow our mouth But that we though as now poore wretches we be placed on the earth not els where should notwithstanding truelie and in deed become the verie members of the flesh and bloud of Christ himselfe who now according to his flesh remaineth in heauen and no where else and should fetch from thence the verie iuice in deed of eternall life notwithstanding that woonderfull great distance of place that is betweene him and vs this I say passeth all mans vnderstanding and is a most euident testimonie both of Gods truth and also of his almightie power And let this suffice also for answer to these slanderers who crie out that wee transforme this holie mysterie into an imaginarie ghost or conceit in that we do attribute all this wholie to our mindes faith If the aduersaries conclusion be true then there will insue therevpon two grosse errors for if they doo trulie conclude this against vs what remaineth then but that we affirme likewise the baptisme of christians to be a certeine vaine fantasie or apparition and their saluation also to be in imagination and not in truth Two similitudes conteining in them arguments from the lesse to the more who die before they can come to be present at or partakers of the Lords supper Now if naturall vnderstanding it selfe and apprehension be so powerfull and effectuall that we being holpē by these faculties become skilfull in so manie things shall not faith that excellent gift of the Holie ghost worke this in vs that wee shall through faith trulie and in deed apprehend take hold of that verie thing which God offereth vs to be receiued by faith though it be neuer so far remooued from vs And sith by the heat of the sun though it be neuer so far distant from vs the whole world is after a sort quickened and made liuelie and strong shall not Christ be able though his flesh and his bloud remaine in heauen so to become in deed our mysticall head that he may powre into vs the iuice of eternall life The conclusion of all But of these matters wee haue spoken thus far My purpose was brethren largelie to discourse of these points because of the slanders of certeine ilwillers that so by this meanes the true and sound doctrine of our churches being made knowne none of them that repaire to this church shuld refuse our assemblies speciallie the holie supper which we mind God willing within few daies to administer but rather that we should euery one of vs religiouslie celebrate this holie banket earnestlie intreating the Lord to restreine troublesome spirits to confirme right beleeuers A godlie praier and to be short to grant vs all this grace that being of one minde in him we may in this world lead an innocent and vnblamable life and at the last be receiued into eternall life and blessednesse by our Lord Iesus Christ to whom with the Father and the Holie ghost be all praise and glorie for euer and euer So be it A SHORT SVMME OF sound doctrine touching the matter of the Sacrament of the Lords supper We haue to consider in Christ our onely Mediatour Foure things to be speciallie regarded in Christ especiallie fowre things that is to saie 1 Christes person 2 His office 3 The gift 〈◊〉 graces which we receiue from him 4 Lastlie by what meanes wee are made partakers of those gifts 1 Concerning Christes person Christ consisting of two natures is yet but one person WE teach affirme that Christ dooth consist of two natures the one the nature of God the other the nature of man making yet notwithstanding but one person of both natures and that so also as the proprieties both in the nature of God and also of man remaine safe and sound and are rightlie distinguished one of them from another Wherein the glorification of Christes bodie standeth And though we confesse the mans nature of Christ to be glorified and that in the cheefest degree one and that no lesse truelie and straitlie than the members are ioined to a naturall body but yet in that maner and after that sort which we will heereafter declare Neither do they please satisfie or content vs wherfore this our ioining with Christ vnto that great mysterie of his incarnation for this is a generall communicating or partaking of his nature with ours but heere we intreat of a particular or peculiar coniunction by which it commeth to passe Ephes 4.13 that his church and congregation groweth vp togither with him And we affirme this coniunction and ioining of vs togither to be the welspring of all the benefits which afterwards are conueied ouer from Christ vnto vs Matth. 3.17 Iohn 17.11 for seeing that the father is well pleased in him alone it is meet that we be truelie made one with him that in him also we may please the father Hense then insueth another sort of giftes and graces that is to
say Christ himselfe with all his benefits to the partaking whereof we are called But notwithstanding some difference there is to wit according to more and lesse as they vsuallie say in schooles First The first difference because that when the sacraments are ioined to the simple word or word alone then it necessarilie followeth that there is a more plentifull declaration of Gods good will towards vs and looke by how much there are more obiects in number and they likewise more euident by so much the more vehementlie or earnestlie they doo mooue and stirre vs vp or at leastwise ought so to doo Secondlie The second difference because although the worde alone propounded generallie vnto all bee afterwardes by the power of faith applied vnto euerie particular faithfull person yet this is not there so plainelie and particularlie expressed as in the sacraments in which Christ is verilie offered particularlie and seuerallie to euerie one wherby it commeth to passe that euerie particular beleeuer is after a certeine maner put into the possession of Christ himselfe Q 6 How is the matter ioined with the signes The signes and the things signified are ioined sacramentallie A By a sacramentall maner which seeing it is proper peculiar to them alone must be declared by a proper definition such a one as is fit for that purpose we therefore define or determine that the sacramentall maner of ioining the matter with the signes Why it is called a spirituall coniunction is spirituall by which epitheton or word we conceiue no imagined or feined thing but principally meane that it specially dependeth of the power of the Holie ghost as we haue alreadie said in the declaration of the formall cause Moreouer by that meanes we shut out all grosse and naturall maner of ioining A similitude for as we know that the signs are vpon earth not else where which thing also no man can or will denie so also we hold and conclude that the matter it selfe that is to say Christ himselfe according to his flesh is contained in heauen and not in anye other place as wee gather out of the Scriptures Luke 24.51 Actes 3.21 Roman 8.34 Coloss 3.1 and all the Fathers of right faith and sound iudgement And yet wee doubt not but that the signes are ioyned with the matter that is to say in that respect or so farre foorth as God dooth not onlie as it were a far off shew the signs of the bodie and bloud of Christ but beside the very signes doth also truely giue vnto vs Christ himselfe to be enioyed and possessed of vs. Whereby also it commeth to passe that in this respect aboue mentioned these things may be truely saide to be ioyned together although by spaces of places they are separated far and wide asunder Notwithstanding we holde that this coniunction is true and certaine The sacramentall coniunction is true and sure in so much as that therefore the name of the thing it selfe that is I saye the body and bloud is indeede figuratiuely but yet very significantly and plainely giuen to the very signes to wit vnto the bread and the wine Secondly to the ende wee maye more fully declare this sacramentall maner of ioyning the matter with the signe wee adde that it is significatiue not as though God did onely signifie vnto vs in the Sacramentes What is called a significatiue coniunction the body and bloud of hys Sonne and also his Sonne hymselfe for no doubt but that also hee dooth truelie giue him vnto vs but wee doo it to this ende least anye man shoulde thinke the matter to bee so coupled with the signes that Christs flesh also shoulde nowe be present in earth though it were after a certaine inuisible and incomprehensible maner We say therefore that Christes bodie and bloud is by so great a space absent from the signes euen as the earth it selfe Curiositie to be auoided speciallie in things we are not skilled in is distant from the most high Heauens or from the seate of the blessed touching which wee minde not at any time ouer curiously to dispute or discourse and into which we knowe and beleeue that Christ ascended that so in all our behalfes and for vs indeede he might obtaine and get that same immortal inheritance Notwithstanding we separat not the thing from the signs either as in respect of God who truely offereth both the one and the other Things must be so ioyned that neither they nor other must be confounded or iumbled together or as in respect of the faithfull who truelie and indeede receiue both But we note the difference of place in the coniunction of the thing and the signes that the trueth of Christes fleshe and of his ascension may be preserued safe and sounde neither yet do we for al that by any meanes make void the Lords supper it selfe Q 7 What is to be thought of these manner of speeches The bodie of the Lord is in or with or vnder the bread or nigh vnto the bread and of all or any other that be of the like sort A As yet wee feare to vse these or suche like manner of speaches because they seeme to take awaye the distaunce of places Two causes why these kindes of speeches are not to be allowed which wee necessarilie establishe and allowe or else they vpholde the vbiquitie of Christes bodie which we maie not graunt at any hand although we confesse that besides the signes the thing it selfe is offered vs of GOD and by the faithfull truely receiued but after that maner which we will declare in the tenth question Notwithstanding it shold seeme A christian yeelding for peace sake but yet with good cautions and exceptions that these termes which are vnder for concordes sake may be admitted but not vnlesse a plaine and manifest interpretation be ioyned withall to wit that these particles are so to bee vnderstoode not as though Christs flesh shoulde be placed vppon earth but that we may knowe that besides the signes themselues which are vppon the earth Christ himselfe whiche is in heauen is truely giuen vnto vs as the signes on earth doo beare witnes Q 8 What ought we to iudge of this manner of sayeng Christ is present in the supper corporallie reallie substantiallie A For the selfe-same cause before alleadged wee doo not vse these formes of speech neither Hard speeches with some qualifications and interpretations may be tollerated for a time notwithstanding it should seeme that they also might bee tollerated or borne withal so that we adde the interpretation following to witte that these things doo not pertaine to that manner of coniunction wherby the thing is ioyned with the signes but serue rather to expresse and declare the matter it selfe that is to say that so wee may vnderstand that by the action of the supper there is established and confirmed in vs not onlie the vertue and power of Christ but chiefly our
very growing vp with christ himself from which we haue affirmed the same to flowe This is the lawe of righteousnes to haue that doone to our selues that we woulde do to others euen as it were from a fountaine because afterwardes wee fetch from him both true life and also all thinges necessarie to saluation Neither would I iudge it to be refused that a like interpretation may againe be ioyned to this our manner of speaking that Christ is spirituallie in the supper least any man shoulde thinke that we separate Christs power from the very flesh of Christ or imagine vnto him a speciall bodie Q 9 What is to bee iudged of this manner of sayeng That Christ is present in the supper and is distributed also by an incomprehensible manner or after a sorte that can not bee vnderstoode A We vse this manner of speech but yet in a far other sense and meaning than some are woonte A corrupt interpretation For vnlesse peraduenture wee be deceiued they seeme to take this saying after this sort as though by a certaine diuine and heauenlie power by reason also of the personall vnion of the flesh with the godhead Christs flesh should be really at one time and together both in heauen and in earth But though we neither deny the omnipotencie of GOD neither the true coniunction of the thing A true interpretation with the signes and of the faithfull with Christ himselfe we do yet notwithstanding by reason of the truth of Christs flesh and his ascension likewise plainly affirme that the body of Christ is nowe verily absent from the world Actes 3.21 shal remaine absent vntill he come to iudge the quick and the dead Neuertheles we confes this mysterie of god to be incompreheÌ„sible beyond our vnderstanding Faith ioyneth things together that be as farre asunder as heauen and earth whereby it falleth out that that which is and remaineth in heauen not els-where that so we may draw life and saluation from him who is trulie offered vnto vs and in deede communicated of vs. For albeit wee knowe first that the Holie-ghost that is to say gods power doth worke this The power of the spirite and of the force of faith and then that as in regarde of our selues all this is to be receiued of vs by the onelye instrument or meane of faith yet the power of the spirit and the force of faith doo exceede all our vnderstanding whereby it commeth to passe also that euen this whole action is verie properly called a mysterie or secret as the Greeks vsed to terme it Q 10 How is the matter or thing of the Sacrament communicated or partaken of vs A The matter of the Sacrament that is to say Christ himselfe is receiued of vs by a spirituall manner thorow faith And wee call that a Spirituall manner of receiuing or communicating Spirituall receiuing what it is not onelie in which Christ his spirite is communicated with vs but also that which is not earthlie or naturall but dependeth of the incomprehensible power of the Holie-ghost by which most straight bond indeede the members are more and more ioyned wyth their head For we exclude and shutte out all powring abroade and mingling of substaunces and also all fitnesse of ioyning together of naturall partes and yet can holde and mainâ—â—ine a true growing vppe of the faithfull with Christ which can not bee hindered by anie distaunce of places for our faith cleaueth vnto the worde of God who indeede performeth that which he promiseth Q 11 In what sense are these speeches To eate the Lords body and to drinke his bloud and other such like to be admitted A We say Eating and drinking referred to Christs bodie and bloud must be figuratiuelie vnderstoode that these manner of speeches do also beloÌ„g to that communicating or partaking whereby wee laye holde of Christ euen in the simple word or in the worde it selfe alone yea wee affirme that they are verye effectuall and significant but so that the wordes of eating and drinking when they are spoken of the taking of the body and bloud of Christ are no lesse figuratiuely to be vnderstoode than if a man should attribute to faith a mouth and teeth Two causes why the holie-ghost vseth borrowed speeches The first Now we alleadge two chiefe causes why the holy-ghost speaketh after that manner one cause is that hee may shew how strait our coniunction with christ is by the meanes of faith for nothing more groweth vp and increaseth with vs than meate and drinke without which no man caâ—â—â—asse ouer his time or spend this life â—he other cause which also properly hath place in the Sacraments is The second that by this way and meanes it may be declared how true the Lorde is in deliuering the matter it selfe which he promiseth by signes as it were by certaine pledges giuen for thereby it commeth to passe that though the onely signes are taken wyth the hand and receiued wyth the mouth yet that also which beside the signes is truely offered and by faith onely spiritually receiued is said to be taken eaten drunken c And for this cause we acknowledge Why we vse not the fathers phrases in the â—upper that the holie Fathers haue vsed manie other forms of speaking not vnlike these which wee notwithstanding will not at this day heedelesly vse but suppose rather that the same are to be mitigated by some profitable and fitte interpretations and the rather bicause of many errors spread abrode by Sathan and many controuersies also by this occasion stirred vp in the church of God Q 12 How are these wordes This is my bodie and this is my bloud to bee expounded A Euen after this maner This The wordes of the institution expounded particularlie and as it were one after an other that is to say this bread this wine is to wit sacramentally for not whatsoeuer is anie thing is by one onely way a thing Nowe the question is heere concerning the Sacraments And wee plainly say sacramentally bicause the Lorde did indeede offer not bare breadâ— and wine only but the true signes of his bodie and bloud neither onely these signes but besides them also his body and bloud to be enioyed possessed of vs euen into euerlasting life which life euerlasting also we drawe from him being communicated vnto vs. Luke 22.19 20. My body and my bloud that is not an imagined bodie or fained bloud but that selfe-same body which was giueÌ„ for vs and that self-same bloud whiche was shead for vs of both which wee are indeede by faith made partakers as the signes doo truely witnes Q 13 What do the wicked or vnbeleeâ—ers receiue The institution of the supper dependeth vpon Gods trueth A We hold and teach that by an agreeing iudgement and holy consent that the institution of the sacrament doth hang vpon the trueth of God therefore that in the
the spirituall graces not onelie offered but giuen also vnto vs therin and this likewise to be wrought in vs though our sauiour be in heauen in respect of his bodie Acts. 3.21 Psalm 39.12 we heere as pilgrims strangers on the earth by the wonderfull vnsearchable working of his holie spirit in vs and by the meanes of a liuelie assured faith both which being knit togither doo easilie ioine togither thinges that be as farre asunder in respect of distance of place as one end of the earth is from the other and as farre asunder as heauen and earth themselues are or else how could we either beleeue the holie catholike church and feele the communion of saints seeing it commonlie falleth out that the members of that holie fellowshippe are sundered one of them from another in respect of great distance of place or be assured that Christes righteousnesse is become ours seeing he is in the heauen and wee on the earth if by faith we did not take holde of the same and applie it vnto our selues Besides if men should imbrace this sacramentarie opinion what were it but to euert as the trueth of Christes promises so the certeinetie and assurednesse of his word who in plaine termes calleth this holie sacrament his bodie Wherfore be it far from vs to approoue of anie such dotage as defaceth the trueth of the word derogateth from Christe and vtterlie destroieth our owne faith than which what can be more horrible to heare or fearefull to thinke 2 The second extremitie is that of consubstantiation some affirming that there is deliuered to the people they receiue togither with the substance of bread the verie substance of Christes verie naturall bodie so that there is as it were an intermingling or mixture of both the substances in the action of the supper But this opinion is iustlie to be disliked and reprooued not onelie because of the absurdities which it hath common with the heresie of transubstantiation whereof we will speake in the next place but also because it is quite and cleane contrarie to common sence reason confounding and iumbling togither two seuerall distinct substances and making the lesse to wit the substance of the bread to comprehend the greater that is Christes humane bodie yea euen his verie Godhead heauen and earth is not able to conteine Besides it dooth vtterlie take away an essentiall propertie of Christes bodie Isaiah 66.1 Acts. 7.49.17.21 for if Christ in respect of his humanitie be like vnto vs in all things sinne onelie excepted Hebr. 4.15 and we know by the light of reason vnderstanding that God hath bestowed vpon vs yea by verie experience that our bodies are circumscriptible and tied to a place it must needs follow that Christ in respect of his manhood or Christ as he is man is and must be tied to a place and not be in euery place as he must needs be if these mens assertions be true which is nothing els in deed but vtterlie to destroy Christs body which also I prooue against them thus Whosoeuer taketh away the essentiall propertie of anie thing taketh away also the verie thing it selfe This proposition is prooued by this marime in logike If the definition of a thing which cheeflie consisteth of the essentiall propertie of the thing be taken away then the thing it selfe also defined falleth away as for example If reasonable liuing creature which is the definition of a man be taken away what shall become of man or where shall he appeare which is the thing defined whereof also there is good reason because the essentiall propertie is it that constituteth or maketh the thing Hitherto the maior proposition as we say in schooles with the proofs thereof Now foloweth the minor or second proposition But these men take away the essentiall propertie of a thing to wit of a bodie which is to be circumscriptible or tied to a place which is in deed an essentiall propertie of the bodie of man and therefore of Christes bodie as hee is man whilest they will haue him as he is man in sundrie places at one time If anie man will denie this it may easilie be prooued both by their owne writinges in sundrie places and also by the definition of a bodie which is a quantitie that may be diuided according to the threefold measuring receiued amongest men that is length breadth and thickenesse and likewise by the description of a place which is defined to be a nighnesse or touching of the thing conteining and the thing conteined The conclusion therfore is that in taking away place from the bodie of Christ which they doo whilest they place it in euerie place whereas in the nature thereof it can be but in one place at one time they doo vtterlie destroie the bodie or humanitie of Christ or at the least confound it so with the Godhead as Eutyches did that they make a confusion whereas in all trueth and vprightnesse there shoulde remaine a distinction of the proprieties of either nature in his blessed person But of this inough in this place because it is somewhat philosophicall and because also in the next section we shall haue occasion to deale with the like 3 The third extremitie is that of transubstantiation mainteined altogither by the Romish catholiks as they will be called who hold that the bread and wine the substance thereof vanishing away and nothing being left but the accidents or qualities thereof as in the bread roundnesse whitenesse c and in the wine rednesse moisture c are changed and that by the power of certeine words spoken by the preest as they name him ouer the elements they are turned into the verie naturall bodie and bloud of our sauior Concerning this point and the branches therof I minde to speake both more particularlie and more fullie because it is one of the popish opinions that greatlie at this present troubleth the christian world and namelie our flourishing isle of England and also because in the daies of persecution heeretofore both within this land and elswhere it hath beene the common knife that the wicked haue vsed to cut the throtes of the godlie withall as it were the hatchet to chop off their heads It may be that in this my poore trauel some may be conuerted from falshood to truth and so be saued in the day of Christ or if that gratious effect followe not in the aduersaries yet I hope the friendes and louers of truth shall by this meanes be somwhat staied that they be not caried away with certaine inticing and inchaunting wordes in the mouths of some seducing spirites whom Antichrist Satans eldest sonne hath thrust into the worlde to peruert men from the truth and obedience of God 1 First for the name of Transubstantiation I feare not to affirme that it is verye newe and neuer heard of before the days of pope Innocent the third who was about the yeare of our Lorde 1205
bee noted in the first place which I am sure also no man of soūd iudgement can well deny that all woords and sayings whatsoeuer must be expounded according to the subiect argument or matter whereof they intreat and therfore these woordes also speaking particularly of the Lordes supper must of necessitie be vnderstoode of the Sacrament of the bodie and bloud of our Sauior Christ exhibited vnto vs in that supper Otherwise wee must saye that Christ spake of one thing and meant an other which as it might be iniurious to our selues wee not knowing which way to take Christes wordes so shoulde it accuse him for want of plaine dealing which dotage differeth not muche from blasphemie against his person Secondlie I would haue this to be remembred that seeing all one and other both we and our aduersaries confes these woordes to be spoken of the Sacrament wee must not gather that the word bodie is otherwise attributed to the bread than the nature and qualitie as a manne would say of sacraments wil beare for thē if we should grant that wee might easilie destroy and ouerthrow al the sacraments that either haue bene or are in the Church of God because in this behalfe or respect there is a like proportion to bee obserued in one as in al and if one be defaced in respect of a wrong sense the rest can hardly or not at all stande vpright For sith the scripture speaking of Sacraments vseth one ordinarie and common kinde of speach to them all what reason can there be shewed that the words in one sacrament being vnderstoode so the selfe-same wordes shoulde not haue the selfe-same sense and meaning in other Thirdly that this is the nature of all sacraments that the elements and rites vsed in the same be true and effectuall not signes onelie but testimonies and pledges also of those thinges for the signifieng and subiecting of which vnto our senses they were ordayned otherwise the nature of a sacrament should be ouerthrowen which consisteth of an outwarde and visible element and of an inward and inuisible grace and wee spoiled of our faith which is not ne ought not to bee occupied about those grosse and earthlie matters but vpon spirituall and heauenly things only And yet when I vse this word signe I woulde not bee taken as though I meant that they are bare vaine or vnprofitable signes such as painters commonly vse to make but euen thus far forth effectuall that it is no more true certaine that we see the same wyth our eies touch them wyth our handes receue them with our mouths and eat them than that it is also as true certaine that the Lord exhibiteth and offereth vnto vs yea and giueth vs also whatsoeuer they represent vnto vs that is the very bodie and bloud of our sauior Christ the fruits effects flowing from the same to be the spiritual food of our soules to the full possession of eternall life These rules being thus then obserued I gather put downe this true and holie sense of these wordes This is my bodie that is to say that the bread which Christ tooke blessed brake and gaue vnto his disciples appointing the same to bee vsed as the element of this action and to bee continued in hys Church in such forme and sort as he did institute it vntill his comming againe is sacramentally and spiritually beeing receiued and eaten by faith a sure signe and an effectuall pledge that Christs body is become the spirituall foode of our soules And I vse these woordes sacramentally and spiritually that thereby I might meete with their grosse slaunder who when they heare of a sign and a thing signified saye that wee doo euacuate and make of no force the Lordes supper No wee are so farre off from holding any such conclusion that wee knowe beleeue and confesse that the faithfull and duelie prepared communicants doo besides the outward signes and elements truelye receiue by the meane of faith after a spirituall sort that which is represented by the outward elements to wit whole Christ with all his giftes and graces And yet for the dooing of this we do not pull Christes bodie out of heauen or else imagine either Transubstantiation or any such like deuise but onely thinke vpon and beleeue the sacramentall coniunction of the signe and the thing signified for those thinges can not stand with the trueth of Christes manhoode as hath beene before shewed neither indeede are they necessarie to saluation because that to the ende we may be made partakers of christ it is not of necessitie required that his bodie shoulde be really present vppon earth but it rather behooueth vs by the power of the Holie ghost and thorowe faith to mount vppe into heauen and there to lay hold of him that wee may sit with him in the heauenlie places which in this life can not bee perfourmed in anye other sorte than in a spirituall maner and thorow faith which faith is begotten and confirmed in vs by the holie-ghost wherevnto hee vseth as instrumentes the preachyng of Gods worde and the administration and participation of the Sacraments by which all our senses are euen as it were prouoked and pressed wholie to possesse Christ himselfe So that you see I doo figuratiuely expounde these woordes and not grosselie wherevnto I am drawne also partlie by the very dealing of the Papists themselues who doo not either in the wine of the supper the other part of this Sacrament eyther in Baptisme the other Sacrament of the church which two alone God hath giuen vnto it acknowledge anie such grosse Transubstantiation of in our corruption we hardly conceiuing it now in our regeneration newe birth so coulde it not haue bin performed in the godhead alone Not that I meane that GOD was not able to haue forgiuen the sinnes of his people and to haue released them from condemnation and restored them to euerlasting life but that GOD could not by suffering because his essence and nature is altogither impassible haue suffered anye thing for our redemption Wherefore for as much as the question betweene the Transubstantiators and vs is not nowe of the presence of Christes deitie in the Sacrament but of the presence of his humane body we say and flatly affirme it also that if we shoulde grant this yet could it no whit at all preiudice vs neither coulde they gaine their cause thereby for vnlesse they can proue Christ as he is man to be omnipotent and euery where which thing they shall neuer bee able to doo they haue saide as much as if they had saide nothing at all But let vs for reasoning sake graunt them this muche that Christ as hee is man were omnipotent euen as GOD the Father or hee himselfe in respect of his Godhead is Dooth it therefore followe that because hee can doo euerie thing hee therefore either will doo the same or indeede dooth it I suppose verilye no. For besides that in Schooles it is commonlie
saide a posse ad esse the consequence or reason is not good which were sufficient aunsweare to this friuolous and vaine obiection mannes reason in the blindnesse and corruption of it beeing endued wyth strength and force enough to aunsweare the same besides this I say wee that are truelie taught of GOD both by his worde and spirite do knowe that though wee beleeue that the Lorde can doo whatsoeuer pleaseth him both in heauen and in earth which serueth wonderfully to magnifie hys almightie power in the exceeding excellencie thereof and greatlie to strengthen our weake faith in the dayes of our calamities and distresses yet notwythstanding we firmelie beleeue that hee will not onelie doo nothing but that hee can not doo anie thing in regarde of vs contrarie vnto that will of his that hee hath reuealed for vs in his word For euen as a manne of might on earth hauing giuen foorth hys speache of assurance in the woorde of a Prince or Christian though perhappes to one farre inferiour to himselfe is yet notwythstanding tied thereby not as in respect of his power for that remaineth as greate after as before but as in regarde of his credite and the persons to whome hee hath by his woorde after a sorte as it were bounde himselfe so is it wyth the Lord to vs-ward And the reason of this is not the abridgement or shortening of his power for be it farre from mortall men to presume in any thing though neuer so litle to restrain the eternal power of the immortall God but because his will and power I meane of the same as they are reuealed to vs by his woorde and particularlie by his promises made vnto vs therin concerning the same be in respect of vs so conioyned and knit together that looke whatsoeuer hee will doo that hee can doo and looke whatsoeuer he can do that hee will doo Oh howe vnreasonable is this that wee will giue earthlie Potentates leaue because of their high callings and excellent wisedome that wee suppose to bee in them nowe and then to hedge in the boundes of their power and authoritie by their woordes at their owne pleasure and will not graunt or yeelde so muche to the Almightie Surelie there is very great and good reason to the contrarie for as for menne by reason of the blindenesse and ignorauncie of their owne heartes they can not well tell when it is good either to straiten or enlarge themselues whereas GOD by reason of the fulnesse of goodnesse that is in him can not choose but doo good whether he inlarge or abridge himselfe But to make all this plaine by one or two examples in steade of manie we are all perswaded that God can not drowne the worlde anie more wyth the waters of an vniuersall floud because wee knowe by his woorde he will not for the more certaine and assured sealing vppe of the same in our heartes and not for anie discredite vnto hym or shortening of hys arme and power hee hath not onelie geuen vs his comfortable and sweete woorde of promise but hath sette his bowe in the cloudes Gen. 9.12 13 c to bee a moste effectuall pledge of the same vnto vs. Agayne wee all doo knowe and beleeue that though GOD in respect both of hymselfe and his almighty power with whome all thinges yea the most hardest are possible can if he would saue all men yet we feare not to saye and affirme that in respect of vs hee can not saue all menne because wee knowe by his reuealed will in his woorde that hee will not saue them all For some as well for the manifestation of hys iustice and iudgement against all vngodlinesse must bee the vesselles ordayned for destruction as well as others also for the declaration of his mercie in sauing whom hee will vesselles of saluation and eternall life And euen the like maie we conclude touching this matter of the Supper namelie that though wee were perswaded or shoulde graunt agaynst all trueth and reason that Christ as hee is GOD might doo what hee woulde or as hee is man might bee euery where yet because hee hath reuealed the contrarye in his woorde and namelie that hee will haue hys bodye to bee circumscriptible and tied to a place to wit Heauen yea which is more to a certaine place in heauen for though Christ as in respect of hys eternall Godhead fill Heauen and earth and the heuen of heuens is not able to conteine him yet in respect of his humane bodie though it be glorified he is must be conteined in some part of the heauens that therefore it can be no iniury at all to him neither any debasing of his omnipotent power to say that now he cannot be bodilie in the sacrament much lesse bodilie in so manie sacraments as be celebrated and ministred in so sundrie and infinit places at one time no more than it is to God the father in saieng that now he cannot drowne the world or saue the reprobat as hath beene before declared Thus much I thinke sufficient and inough to all these obiections being willing heere to finish this present short treatise sauing that I haue thought good in this place to adde euen as a chalenge to the aduerse partie and as matter of necessarie instruction to such as either be simplie ignorant for as for the malicious blinde it is almost impossible to reclame them or doo alreadie in some measure see the truth these three points following 1 First that I am readie in all holy loue largelie to answer anie thing that christianlie shall be further obiected concerning this question I say christianlie obiected for if anie shall either curiouslie or captiouslie propound anie thing I thinke it most conuenient rather to leaue such in their owne follie for a season till it shall please God at some one time or other euen extraordinarilie as it were to make them to see the same if it shall so please him than to spend time and to trauell in fatisfieng of their vaine curiosities 2 Secondlie that though this point of transubstantiation brought in by papists be great and grosse concerning the matter of the supper yet that they faile not alone heerein which might perhaps make their heresie lesse heinous but holde manie moe errors concerning that point some of them as palpable if not more grosse and blasphemous than this and some of them lesse To pursue them all and in a large sort I minde not at this present because it hath beene alreadie performed by men of great excellencie the Lord may heerafter giue a more fit occasion yet I will rehearse touch a few desiring the godlie reader with all holie wisdome to consider both of them and the rest of that sort 1 First in that they make it a sacrifice propitiatorie as they call it for the quicke â—nd the dead by which they doo not oneâ—ie scorne God deride men whilest they make men beleeue that God will be pleaâ—ed with
subiect to the law of God neither indeed can be 2 By faith I meane not only a generall beliefe of all the canonicall books of the old new testament or a grounded knowledg alone of the points principles of christian religion the truth thereof for many wicked men proceede so farre and the Apostle Iames telleth vs Iames 2.19 that the diuels beleeue and tremble but an assured perswasion and particular application as of al these things whatsoeuer that the Lord hath reuealed in his worde so speciallie of his promises contained in the same concerning either this life or the life to come for though our faith do generally respect the whole word yet is it most specially directed to the promises that god hath made vs in Christ 2. Corinth 1.20 in whome all the promises of God are yea and amen euerie particular person beeing fullie assured and certainelie perswaded of this that as the Lorde hath doone and promised the same to and for others so hath hee doone and promised it particularlie to and for himselfe So that we may plainely perceiue that this faith is necessarie to euery one that shall communicate both because that otherwise they being on the earth can not take hold of Christ in heauen and stedfastly apply him and all his merites to themselues that so he may become the spirituall foode of their soules norishing them in the most certaine hope of eternall saluation for faith is it by which alone they may appropriate vnto them selues particularlie Christ Iesus and all his graces to the assured feelyng of the free pardon and full forgiuenesse of all their sinnes on the one side and the imputation of Christs righteousnesse on the other side and also that thereby they may bee fullie certified in their owne consciences that that which they doe either in the administration or participation of that holy action or Sacrament of the Lordes bodie and bloud is acceptable before GOD and profitable to them selues because without fayth it is impossible to please hym Hebrues 11.6 Roman 14.23 and agayne Whatsoeuer is not of faith that selfe same is sinne which properties indeede or effectes rather if a man surelye haue they shall make his fayth to differ from all the vaine imaginations and swimming conceipts of diuels and wicked men whatsoeuer 3 By repentaunce I vnderstande a holie alteration and chaunge of oure mindes for good reason is there that where sinne begynneth from thence also shoulde proceede our conuersion or turnyng to GOD consisting of a sincere hatred of all our former sinnes and iniquities whatsoeuer both generall and particular and of a sounde loue of all righteousnesse and well-dooing both generall and particular all which must in vs proceede from the right reuerence and louing feare of the maiestie of almightie God in our heartes which holie affection dooth euerye daye by little and little worke in vs the forsaking of our selues and the subduing of the sinfull lustes and affections of our owne flesh to the end we may wholie resigne and giue ouer our selues to be guided and gouerned by the spirite of God in the sincere seruice and worship of his maiestie and in the Christian performaunce of the holie dueties of charitie one of vs towardes an other wee our selues not onelie standing vppe and striuing against our generall iniquities but also against our particular sinnes yea against these speciall transgressions that most preuaile in vs against the good will of our God whereby no doubt God shall be greatly glorified whilest hee maketh his mightie power to appeare in strengthening our woonderfull weakenesse against some particular wickednesse and wee our selues shall reape comforte assuring our selues of this that hee that hath strengthened vs against some one sinne will also assiste vs against other and so make the good woorkes that he hath begunne in vs Philip. 1.6 perfect euen vntill the day of Christ So that hereby wee may see that he which feeleth himselfe truelie and vnfainedlie changed in the affections of his minde for his former iniquities not onelie loathing his sinnes but euen himselfe for his sinnes sake and carrieth with him this holy purpose neuer thorow gods assistaunce to committe the same or anie suche like against GOD or men maie not onely be assured of his vnfained repentaunce and so by consequent of the forgiuenesse of his sinnes but also wyth boldenesse and yet notwythstanding with reuerence in respect of GOD and with humblenesse of minde in respect of hymselfe may drawe neere to the partaking of those holie mysteries 4 By loue which is the thing that concerneth men I doo not onelie vnderstand the vnfained pardoning and forgiuing of others that haue anie manner of waie trespassed agaynst vs but also sound reconciliation after offences committed one of vs towardes an other yea I meane further by loue which properlie is an inward affection of the heart the sincere and outwarde testifieng of the same by woordes deedes countenaunces and other meanes as the Lorde shall geue occasion and our abilitie serue to expresse the same and that not vnto our friendes onelie Matth. 5.46 47. for what great thing doo wee if wee loue them that loue vs But generallie to all men though vnto some in greater measure Galat. 6.10 as to the housholde of faith our wiues children and parents c and to some in lesse measure as to those that bee yet wythout and bee somewhat further off by nature and kinred yea and to our ennemies also which is somewhat more against which because wee doo whollie striue while wee are in the corruption of oure nature and bee woonderfullye backeward to the same euen then when GOD hath in some measure aduaunced our regeneration in vs there lieng lurking wythin vs the cinders of Hatred and Dis-like readye to breake foorthe into a flame as occasion and matter shall bee ministred wee shall doo verye well to gather as many reasons to induce vs to the practise thereof as possibly wee can that so by them as it were by strong cordes wee may be drawen and tied as a man would say to the execution of the same First therefore wee haue GOD in sundry places of his woorde layeng that duetie vppon vs Matth. 5.44 Luke 6.27 24. To loue them that hate vs to blesse them that cursse vs and to pray for them that persecute vs. Secondlie wee haue his owne example concurring wyth hys commaundement hee practising the same to vs that hee would haue vs to doo to others namelie louing vs when wee were and are his ennimies Roman 5.10 Matth. 5.45 1. Iohn 4.10 Thirdlye wee haue the example of our Sauiour Christe cloathed with one nature accomplishing the same praying also to the Father to forgiue them Luke 23.34 that putte him to death And least anie man shoulde thinke that that which Christe did in this case woulde not bee perfourmed in and by them eyther by reason of Christes singular excellencie or the difficultie and
impossibilitie of the thing it selfe the Lorde hath in the fourth place for the ouercomming of that temptation sette before vs sundrie of his seruaunts who beeing men like vnto vs in all respects Actes 7 6â— haue yet notwythstanding in the dayes of their flesh doone the same as we see particularlie in Stephan Fiftlie the verye Sacrament it selfe and the elements in the same leade vs thereto 1. Corinth 10.17 For wee that are manie are one bread and one bodie because wee are all partakers of one bread at the Lordes boorde euen as that bread wee eate of there is made of manie graines and yet maketh but one loafe Lastlie our owne good shoulde carrie vs forward to this because thereby wee prouide well for our selues that so wee might feele the forgiuenesse of our sinnes before GOD our Sauiour telling vs in plaine wordes Matth. 6.14 That if wee doo forgiue men their trespasses our heauenlie Father wil also forgiue vs. And though it bee true that wee can and doo greatlie aggrauate other mens sinnes against vs as for example hee hath taken away my good name he hath spoiled me of my goodes hee hath killed my father husband children and a thousand suche like and what hainous offences be these Yet if GOD woulde geue vs grace vprightlie to looke into our owne sinnes committed eyther agaynst other men or Gods owne maiestie wee shall finde that wee haue good cause offered to be ready to remitte For if men offend vs wee doo in as great points offend others And though that were not true yet wee cannot denie but that wee doo more highlie displease Almightie GOD than men can or doo displease vs and that not onelie in the notoriousnesse of our sinnes but euen in a dailie and continuall course of iniquitie and in an infinite multitude of transgressions also What a fearefull thing will this bee in our owne heartes that wee woulde gladlie haue God mercifull vnto vs in forgiuing most greeuous and innumerable transgressions and wee will not remitte small offences and sinnes seldome tymes committed By this wee doo nothing else but cast awaie the sure seale and earnest pennie as it were that our sinnes are forgiuen vs before GOD and refuse a certaine pledge that our praiers and all other good things that come from vs are in Christes obedience accepted in his sight yea and moste iniuriouslie treade vnder our filthie feete Gods worde Gods example Gods sacraments and many other tokens of his grace and lastlie pull vpon vs a fearful vengeance from God to be manifested in this life and in the life to come And therefore I beseeche all the godlie that haue care of their saluation to looke heedilie to this point Meditation which is the second thing and is to be vsed speciallie in the tyme of the celebration of the Lordes Supper consisteth chieflie in these points to wit in regarding the outwarde elementes of the Lordes Supper that is to saye the breade and the wine and in considering the rites vsed in and aboute the same as the breaking of the Breade and the pouring foorth of the Wine and so forth For though the outward things are not the matters that wee shoulde stand vppon yet because by them it pleaseth the Lorde as it were by the hand to leade vs vnto right excellent thinges namelie by them to sette foorth vnto our Soules the crucifieng of Christes bodie the sheading of his bloude and so foorth and all for our transgressions that therefore they shoulde not bee sleightlie passed ouer wythout verye deepe and due consideration of the same And then because wee must not stay below on the earth nor be busied in beholding of earthlie things onelie but must by faith rise vp to heauen as it were there to behold the abundant riches of Gods spirituall graces offered and giuen to the faithfull in with by the outward elements we are throghlie to wey what great mercies the Lord setteth before vs in that holie and spirituall banket which though partlie for the woorthinesse of the giuer and partlie also for the excellencie of themselues as also by the want and weakenesse of our blinde and dull vnderstanding they cannot be sufficiently conceiued much lesse vttered may yet in my mind be brought into these foure points following as most materiall and principall 1 God setteth before our eies in that holie action first Christes death and passion togither with the benefits effects which we reape thereby and namelie the remission and full forgiuenesse of all our sinnes togither with the imputation of Christes righteousnesse vnto vs and the assured possession of eternall life for we doo no more verilie behold the bread broken and the wine poured foorth in our bodily sight and presence than wee do or ought by the eie of our faith to beholde the bodie of Christ crucified and his bloud shead vppon the crosse for the forgiuenesse of our sinnes neither are wee more fullie or particularlie put in possession of the bread and wine when wee haue eaten and druncke the same than wee are of Christ and all his merits then when by a liuelie and stedfast faith we lay hold of him and the most excellent graces that in him are offered vnto vs applieng them all particularly to our own souls which yet that they might be more effectually pledged vppe in vs it pleased the Lord to appoint not onlie that the bread should be broken and the wine poured foorth but that euery one of vs should seuerallie by him selfe and for him selfe take it eate it and drincke it c that so wee might bee in the more full and assured possession of hym and his graces 2 Secondlie the Lorde pledgeth out vnto vs therby that ful and spirituall nourishement that through Christ we haue both in the outward and inward man euen to the hope and fruition of eternall life for euen as verilie as that bread and wine dooth seeme to strengthen our out-ward manne so euen as verilie yea more verilye by much dooth Christe and is graces nourishe our soules yea I saye more verilie because that though some part of the bread and wine wee receiue bee turned into our healthfull and profitable nourishment and is become as it were part of our substaunce yet some of it also passeth thorowe the panch into the priuie but Christe remaineth alwaies a most holie and sound nutriment vnto our soules no parte of him vanishing awaye but hauing rather this effecte in vs that hee is not onely turned into our substance as the bodilie elements are in respect of our outward man but rather wholie turning vs as a man would say into his most holie and blessed substance he being not onelye a plentifull but a pleasaunt nourishment also bringing alwaies with him that effect to our soules that the outwarde elements doo to our bodies namelie giuing them all spirituall strength and inwarde comfort Iohn 15.5 because without him we haue nothing nor can doo anie thing 3
Thirdlie by this meanes the Lorde propoundeth vnto vs the mysticall vnion that is betwixt Christ and his church we and hee making but one bodie of his holie congregation hee being the head thereof and we the particular members by which also as we are instructed in our holie dueties towardes him we attempting nothing that may tend to the preiudice hurte or griefe of our holie head but endeuouring euerye thing that maye be good and acceptable before him so we comfortablie conceiue the great and continuall care hee hath for vs hee performing more effectuallie by much the duety of headship vnto his spirituall bodie the church than a naturall head dooth or can to a naturall bodie namelie not onelie in deuising for the good thereof both in generall and in particular but also in yeeldyng sence and moouyng vnto the whole bodie and euerie seuerall member thereof yea quickening the same and geuing together wyth the vnderstanding of heauenlie care and conscience yea some measure of strength and power to walke therein Ephes 3.12 so that He dwellyng in oure heartes by Fayth wee are therby not onelie become members of his bodie of his flesh and of his bloud but also he maketh vs zealous prepared and frutefull in euerie good worke both towards the Lord and one of vs towards an other 4 Fourthlie and lastlie the Lord deliuereth vnto vs in the vse of his supper that holie vnitie and agreement both outward and inward of bodie and mind that is and ought to be knowne felt and continued amongst all the members of his church whatsoeuer or wheresoeuer they be For euen as the bread that we are partakers of is made of many graines yet maketh but one loafe as we see as the wine that we drinke at the Lords table is made of manie grapes and yet maketh but one wine so all the faithfull people not onlie of one place parish but dispersed through out the whole earth notwithstanding that some through the riches of Gods mercies haue atteined more graces than other some make in deed but one holie bodie of the church Neither doth our being of seuerall members one of vs to another anie more hinder our growth in this same spirituall fellowship than the varietie of mēbers in a naturall body hindereth the constituting and making of the whole bodie it selfe nay rather as we may well perceiue it furthereth the same for as the whole cannot be said to be whole but in respect of all the parts whereof it consisteth no more can this whole or holie bodie of the church euerie particular congregation throughout the world concurring to the establishing thereof and yet so notwithstanding that the name church may as rightlie be attributed to euerie seuerall societie of the faithfull as the word earth to euerie part of the earth or to speake of the elements of the supper the word bread and the word wine to euerie part of the bread wine vsed in the same The third and last thing is that which I called before action and is to be performed as generallie all the daies of our life so particularlie and speciallie after the receiuing of the Lords supper And though this come in the last place yet is it not a matter of the least importance nay rather it is of such great weight that the former without it be little auailable for euen as in all humane sciences knowlege though it be neuer so exquisit is without action practise commonlie counted but a vaine conceit so in spirituall vnderstanding that is muche more true because if a man knowe neuer so muche of Gods mercies and meditate neuer so deeply in the same yet if that by the same he be not lead as it were by the hand both humbly to praise God for them and hartily praie vnto him for the continuance and increase of them with grace to embrace them and to vse them well it is to himselfe and others as if it were nothing Now this matter that we call action consisteth 1 First in earnest praier vnto God not onelie for a cleare sight of the graces offered bicause we are blind to perceue them but also for a liuely and continuall feeling of the same because we doo easilie choake and smother them vp yea for the plentiful fructifieng of the word of God and his sacraments in our heartes because wee our selues bee barren and ill ground and can hardlie bring foorth good fruit though we haue haue very much cost and labor bestowed vpon vs. And this duetie must be performed not for the time present alone as whilest we are in the publike exercises or for the day of communicating onelie returning afterwards as filthie swine to our former wallow or vncleane dogges to our vomite againe for alas what will that auaile vs but to a more fearefull iudgement and iust condemnation because wee continue in sin abuse the meanes of our sanctification and purging but euen for the whole race and course of our liues that as there is no day nor houre of a day going ouer our heades wherein wee stand not in neede of some blessing from the Lorde so there should few times escape vs wherein we would not do to God this duty that we beleeue to be acceptable to him bicause he hath commanded it and so profitable vnto our selues bicause it reacheth vnto euerie part and period or state of our whole life 2 Secondly in humble thankesgiuing as for all the vnestimable riches and treasures of grace and goodnesse generallie which it pleaseth him in his Church and namelie by the vse of his word and sacraments not onelie to offer but also to bestow vpon his people so specially for the death and obedience of hys Sonne the blessing of all blessings that is to saye the most excellent blessing the Lord bestowing thereby vppon vs all graces both bodilie spirituallie bodilie as the sanctification of all his creatures vnto vs which otherwise we continuing in our sinnes as we must needs haue doone if Christ had not died for vs should haue bin vncleane vnto vs and spirituall as the forgiuenesse of our sins the imputation of Christes righteousnesse which we must of necessitie beleeue because otherwise God may as well-condemne vs for want of righteousnesse as for our notorious transgressions and manie such other particulars before recited And that we may be the better prouoked to this great dutie of thankfulnes it shall be good for vs not onelie to alot vnto our selues sometime in euerie day wherin we will take a view so far foorth as we can of all the graces of God both generall and particular bestowed vpon our selues others but also deeplie to consider first the person that giueth the same who is the Lord of heauen and earth mercifull no doubt euen vnto thousands of generations to them that loue him and keepe his commandements secondlie the excellencie of the things bestowed which besides that they are bodily and spirituall temporal and