The Spirit of the Lord Jehovah Luke 4.18 Isai 61.1 That these three are intended vers 8. is set down in Holy holy holy as alluding to Father Son and Spirit as appears plainly in saying 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Jehovah Elohim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word doth specifie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be alluded to Elohim because Gen. 1.1 In the beginning the Elohims create the heaven and the earth Again it is clearly exprest that glory honour and praise is given to him that is the Elohims the Father Son and Spirit equally 1. And the Son sits with the Father in his throne Rev. 3.21 which he doth not if not set out in the Sardine appearance the Lamb is dead 2. Several appearances are not properly applied to the blessed being of God who is without shadow of change but as they serve to set out the Elohims in God 3. As for the Lamb Rev. 5.6 he is as slain in the throne that is he is as dead to and not capable of the glory proper to the Divine being of Jehovah Elohim And as for the Holy Spirit it is called God Acts 5.3 4. as I have cleared in my exposition on that place Phil. 3.3 For we are the circumcision 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 those that worship the Spirit God It is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Rom. 1.9 And those taught of the Spirit are said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 taught of God And because the variety of Gods speech by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God may more clearly appear I conceive it necessary to instance the same more largely 1. 1 Pet. 1.1 2. is expressed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God the Father which is that which is called the first person in the Trinity 2 Cor. 1.2 2. Jam. 1.27 Pure religion and undefiled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and distinguisheth between Jehovah God in which Son and Spirit gone forth and the Father abiding in Jehovah Col. 3.17 proves the distinction more clearly Whatever ye do in word or deed do all in the Name of the Lord Jesus giving thanks to God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Father by him If by God be one thing meant and the same with that of the Father or by Father the same with God 1. Why are they both exprest Frustra fit plura quod fieri potest per pauciora 2. Or why are they not always both exprest Col. 1.12 Giving thanks to the Father who hath made us meet c. 3. Or why are they thus dis-joyned by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here and not elsewhere in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. Why is there an article to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when Father and God are distinguisht and not an article when God the Father as of the same thing is spoken of as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so to Jehovah ha El Haggibbor to the Son distinct El Gibbor 5. To 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there is an article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for emphasis as signifying Jehovah but not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because it is for diminution the Father being but one of the Elohims and having but his portion with the Son and Spirit in the essence of God And so speaking of God the Father he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unless 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 between as a diminutive 6. Indeed he sets the article before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Eph. 3.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Father because vers 15. all fatherhood in heaven and earth is named from him Matth. 23.9 One is your Father which is in heaven As Father he is most excellent 7. Clearly in this speech of God the mystery of God is revealed Col. 2.2 That their hearts might be comforted being knit together in love unto all riches of full assurance of understanding to the acknowledgement of the mystery 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the God and Father and the Christ So that as the Father and Christ are distinguished by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so God and the Father 1. And saith that the mystery is in God and the Father as well as in God and in Christ 2. In the word God is comprehended the Spirit and Son and the Father exprest as one in God because without an article added to the distinction as Christ hath 3. To understand by God the Father onely and by the Father God onely is to deny the Son and to unthrone the Spirit and to take their being God from them which thus understanding the Scriptures alone preserves to them And as for the Trinity that Mr. Biddle grounds from Ephes 4.4 5 6. One Spirit one Lord one God and Father of all c. 1. That Spirit is not said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but spirit onely and indeed alludes to Christs humane spirit of which it is said If any have not the Spirit of Christ he is none of his So 2 Cor. 13.5 2. For as that one body is Christs or Christ mystical so the Spirit of that body mystical is Christs by which they are of one faith one minde c. and the spirit by which men received Baptism which was not the holy Spirit as appears 1 Cor. 12.13 compared with Acts 8.12 15 16. 3. As the spirit and body respect the Church and are one made one by that one spirit as the Father and Son are one in that one essence of God 4. As there is one body and spirit in the Church so there is one Lord over it which Lord is not the Son of God but that made Lord that died and suffered death Acts 2.36 in whom men are to believe as that he is the Messiah of God and into whose name Jesus men are to be baptized and to have sins remitted therein There is one God that is Jehovah vers 6. in which the Trinity is comprehended of Father Son and Spirit as God is the Father of all and not as the Father of the Son Jesus Christ for here he is so the Father as he is the Father of all and not in a peculiar manner as Father of Jesus Christ by generation but by creation and generation In creation Father Son and Spirit are Father of all indefinitely Gen. 1.1 6. The Trinity must be three of one nature essence and being or they are not fit to be joyned together A God a Man an Angel nay a man meer man above an Angel is a very strange Trinity and no less then robbery to make equality in them 7. Indeed Matth. 3.16 hath the Father speaking as a Father to the Son as his Son not Jesus Christ as man and the Spirit of God which indeed is the Trinity or Elohims in Jehovah This one thing I desire may be considered that the holy Spirit is said to be Spirit of God as Jehovah and the Spirit of the Father and the Spirit of the Son Now as it is the Spirit
THE DIVINITY Of the TRINITY CLEARED By wiping off the false Glosses put upon several places of Scripture By Mr. John Biddle In his book intituled The Apostolical and true Opinion touching the holy Trinity c. Written by a very Learned man lately deceased Take heed how ye hear Luke 8.18 Take heed what ye hear Mark 4.24 Try all things hold fast that which is good 1 Thes 5.21 LONDON Printed by J.C. and are to be sold by Edw. Blackmore at the Angel in Paul's Church-yard 1654. To my noble and ever honored Friend Colonel William Sydenham a late member of Parliament Noble Sir COntentions have been great and high of old and still are so about the equality or inequality of the Son of God with the Father even to the Anathematizing one the other when both that is a truth that the Arrians and the Arminians hold viZ. That the Son is less then the Father and that which the Protestants hold is no less a truth viz. that the Sonne is equall with the Father which being understood and observed according to the mind of God is holy and good but men exceeding in diminishing the Sonne in his Essence and exalting him in his emanation the truth being hid is the cause of the controversie and men have thereby come to subvert the faith of many The greatest the grossest and yet the most subtil way thereto hath been laid of late by Mr. John Biddle in that book of his called The Apostolical and true Opinion concerning the holy Trinity revived which the sooner I have wrote against because from the year 1647. he gloryes no man of the many learned he hath contested with hath given an answer to one Argument satisfactorily yea and that he hath long waited on the learned for an answer and can receive none That he hopes some one will and that himself is in the case a doubting Spirit and so a man convinceable and not to be rejected from all which with the bond of the Gospel that tyeth me to contend for the faith I am induced to commend this insuing Treatise to the World and first to you to whom I acknowledge my self and mine to owe very much and to God for you who I believe will not fail to satisfie your laying out from the least Cup of water to the greatest good you do for his to whom I commend you to be kept for ever being as I am bound to be Yours in the service of the Gospel John Brayne September 20. 2653. I first viewed Mr. Biddles book about Sept. 3. 1653 SIR PRovidence directed to my hand that Novel piece of yours Intituled The Apostolical and True Opinion concerning the holy Trinity In which to the Reader you glory that you have contested with sundry learned men and that they all have not been able to produce a satisfactory answer to so much as one Argument And then in the preface to your faith you call the truth of God touching three Persons in one God by the term of Opinion and say that it is as the bottom corrupting all Religion which in a most blinde way of Nature you seek to demonstrate from the being of Creatures because Apostle an universal predicated of three makes three Apostles if a man will make use of reason in his Religion By which blinde rule being led you call it an ignorant refuge of distinguishing the Essence and Persons of God yea a wretched and an unheard-of distinction in Scripture But your comparing the way and being of God with that of man God a Spirit and infinite Man a Creature finite were good it had never been heard arguing thus in your second Article of Faith from Phil. 2.7 The Sonne cannot be equal to God then he must have the same essence in number or a different one not the same in number otherwise it 's not equality but identity as equality in stature must differ in number though the same in kinde You say in your fourth Article The Trinity cannot consist of three Persons in one God but God himself is one of the three Persons which is absurd and say it is not onely the source of almost all the errors among Christians c. But it will appear your declining the same doctrine is the source of multitudes of errors in your booke and the overthrow of the faith of many by your supposed Trinity of one God one Man one Angel But if men observed your reasoning about God how carnal it is they would avoid trusting you For the natural Man discerneth not the things of God nor can he Never man spake so of God from the Earth as you have done confining his being to ours proving and denying his by ours who have not seen him nor known him But in opposition to all your reasonings and Sophistry 1. Consider God Deut. 6.4 sayes Hear Israel preparing the People to attend to what he sayes of himself against whatever any deceiver of the World should say of him that men be not deceived by them 2. He sayes by Moses Johovah our Elohims is one Jehovah Whence note deny it if you can Jehovah and Elohims are the same as Jehovah Ehhad one and as Elohims more then one yea or two because in the plural not in the dual number 2. These many because three Elohims are one Jehovah a word derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be and implyes relation to his essence 3. To say Jehovah is one so one as to deny the Elohims is to deny Jehovah this place of all others discovering God most clear to the people of that State and proves the Father Son and Spirit one God to us even in our State 4. This very text wipes away all the gross and vile aspersions you have asperst the most pure truth of the blessed God with 2 Scrip. Gen. 11. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In the beginning Dii creavit the Gods hath created which according to your reasoning is non-sence which may make you rise and say How can three be one or one be three so how can this be sence but 1. In the Elohim a noun plural joyned to a verb singular is excellently declared the unity of these Elohims in essence 2. For that estate as equal not in essence onely but in name and nature they have one common name of Elohims after in the State of the Gospel set forth by names of the Father Sonne and holy Spirit 3. They are indefinitely said to create that common name and not the Father more then the Sonne or Sonne then the holy Spirit 4. So that God the Creator of Heaven and Earth Acts 17.24 is the Elohims and not God the Father onely which to say is Heresie as appears by these Scriptures compared nor is it proper to say Jehovah did it but the Elohim John 13. 5. It is not said Jehovah as one created but the Elohims because that the outgoings of God manifested themselves in the creation as Elohims as Father Sonne and Spirit in redemption Prov. 8.22
found him in figure as man Joh. 1.46 Philip tells Nathanael We have sound him whom Moses wrote of in the law and the prophets 5. He humbled himself in the humane figure or sumitted himself being made obedient to death the death of the cross 1. He submitted himself to death Joh. 10.18 No man taketh my soul from me but I lay it down of my self I have authority to lay it down and I have authority to take it again This command I received from my Father 2. He was obedient the Father commanding him to do it did it though he could avoid it 3. He humbled himself in it because he had not sinned and death is the wages of sin onely so that he that hath no sin ought not to die 4. He was obedient to the death of the cross because that death of all other was an accursed death Gal. 3.13 Now from these that I may stop the mouth of the adversary and the gainsayer 1. He in that he was equal with God and as God to be a servant of the Divine nature it 's said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he emptied himself Therefore 2. He as man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he humbled himself to death 1. This he as God was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the form of God 2. As man he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in figure man as man 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he is found in form as man 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he is existing or being in the form of God 1. As God he took on him the form of a servant having emptied himself to do it that he might become so 2. As man he became obedient to the death the death of the cross Conclusion What is said of the Divine nature cannot be applied to men or angels 2. What is said of the Humane cannot be applied to the Divine 3. Hence it is said Therefore God Jehovah not the Father alone hath exalted him the man that humbled himself to death the death of the cross and he hath the name that is the Soveraignty as Lord in the Church 4. In this exaltation of the man Jesus the Son of God had no hand because he emptied himself that is in this work he ceased to act as Elohim though in Jehovah because united to himself it being the work of the Father and Spirit herein to glorifie the Son and not the Son to glorifie himself John 17.1 Joh. 8.54 If I glorifie my self my glory is nothing it is the Father that glorifieth me whom ye say is your God Sayes Mr. Biddle Was his divine nature idle that time Resp No it was then emptying it self a work hard for man to do What then think you Is this to be looked on as done in God a work the world will say is not to be done of him is God and be God John 5.17 The Father works and I work the Son in the work of Redemption works a distinct work from the Fathers when in the Creation they wrought together 6. This example was manifest as Mr. Biddle would have it before he was commanded sent and did the works he did in the name of him that sent him and not in his own name But to clear this point more fully John 16.27 The Father himself loveth you because ye have loved me and have believed that I came forth from God Here the Father is the Elohim God Jehovah whence they believed that the Son came from 2. Ver. 28. I came forth from the Father and came into the world Note He is said to come forth from Jehovah and from the Father as two things intended by the holy Spirit 1. In which was indeed his emptying himself 2. Had he abode with Jehovah as the Father did he could not have been emptyed 3. Had he abode with the Father as he was with the Father he could not have been a servant it being that state that is opposed to the state of Sons and condition of Sonship John 17.5 4. He came forth therefore Jehovah and the Father were not prejudiced by his so coming forth and by his serving no he glorified him 5. His coming forth from God proves he was in God and God as Jehovah is God again he came forth from the Father who was so in God and with God as the Father was John 1.1 2. 6. Hence the coming forth from God is the signifying of his emanation to be from an uncreated estate and being and that this very uncreated estate and being came into the world as into a state or being contrary to that he came from being a created estate which comprehends Angels and all creatures contained in Heaven as well as the Earth being part of the World 7. This word world in special respects the manhood of Christ which indeed is the Microcosme or the Worlds Representative having in it self in its Spirit an off-spring of God and in the body a being of earth joyned in one 8. In this coming forth from God and from the Father he made himself less then the Father who came not forth from God 9. No creature ever is said to come forth from God Jehovah nor none but the Elohim the Father Son and Spirit are ever said to be in him So now the Elohims are said so to be in him as to be him and he to be them the Creatures are said to be God as contentum in continenti but not in his being so as that himself cannot be without them nor are the most glorious Creatures ever said in their very being to come forth from God 10. In that he came into the World or Man he yet made himself more inferior to the Father John 18.37 he is spoke of as man born and as God by his coming into the World to witness to the truth Conclusion he in man is the same he that came forth from God and the Father into the World 2. He is spoken of distinctly from God and the Father in his coming forth from him as from man in his coming into the world Isaiah 9.6 In the child born is the humanity in the Son given the divinity set forth of the Son John 3.16 The third Testimony by which as by three witnesses this truth is fully confirmed Heb. 2.6 He took not on him ought of Angels but he took the seed of Abraham In which is signified 1. That he that took the seed of Abraham was able to have took the nature of Angels on him had it been his will and pleasure 2. Had he took the nature of Angels to him it had been inferior to him that took it as the nature of man he took was to him The Faker and that he took to himself was not the same nature he that took was greater than that was taken by him 4. This is the ground why the Scripture useth that expression in many places Of whom Christ according to the flesh came Rom. 9.1 signifying Christ had another way of coming then that according to
how vain is it to argue That the Spirit goeth from one place to another and is not infinite and cannot be God I hope Mr. Biddle will not say that the holy Spirit of God was confined to that dove-like shape if not what is all that he hath asserted therein When Jehovah Elohims are said to descend Gen. 11.7 do they therefore go from one place to another in their essence Again the Spirit of God is not said to come into the world as the Son is said he being not joyned to any nature created as angels or men much less may he be said to be a creature or a part of the world as all creatures are whatever The very expression of God Joel 3.1 Acts 2.17 It shall come to pass says Jehovah in the last days I will pour out of my Spirit on all flesh proves that what is said of it is not said of any Angel or other created Spirit it being not in their nature or being to be so poured out who in us is still the Spirit of God distinct from our spirits As for Mr. Biddle's saying he was sent by a man he must first prove Jesus Christ the Son of God is meer man which is petitio principii and then that he is less then the man Christ And to be sent to see them in which as the Son he humbled himself and was less then the Father less then the Son who sent him Joh. 14.26 And then he heard from him as man when the Word indeed says He shall take of mine but not He shall hear of me Joh. 16.14 and in vers 13. What he shall hear that he shall speak it is not said What he shall hear of me in which there is theft from the Spirit This hearing of the Spirit is not a hearing of creatures in the way of man though our hearing helps to demonstrate it symbolically My purpose is to be brief herein consider well I pray 2 Cor. 2.3 the Corinthians are an epistle of Christ written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God of which Spirit they were Ministers and by which they were quickned vers 6. Vers 8. their Ministery is called the ministery of the Spirit that reveals truth teacheth leadeth sanctifieth comforteth assisteth and helpeth infirmities in a word helps to profit by preaching and assists in prayer to Jehovah Now lest this spirit should be thought to be the humane spirit of Christ as in many places of Scripture or a created spirit vers 17. The Lord is the Spirit By 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the New Testament is meant either Jehovah or Christ but it appears that by the Lord here is meant Jehovah who is that Spirit called The Spirit of the living God vers 3. and that ministreth vers 8. and therefore concludes Where the Spirit of Jehovah is there is liberty Vers 8. he clears this saying We all with open face beholding the glory of the Lord are changed from or changed into the same image from glory to glory even as of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lord the Spirit 1. See vers 3. the Epistle is Christs written with the Spirit of the living God on which is the rise of the Apostles speech and the Lord Christ and the Lord the Spirit distinguished 2. So here is the Lord Christ in the 18 verse into whose image men are changed as distinct and admits not place for his Spirit of holiness and everlasting Spirit 3. The Lord the Spirit that is Jehovah the holy Spirit of whom this change is thus made in men as the efficient cause thereof 4. Vers 8. The means how it 's effected and that is by the ministery of the Spirit In which we may see that the holy Spirit of God is the Lord Jehovah though in his ministery and though not called the holy Spirit yet the Spirit of God which Mr. Biddle distinguisheth from God Who yet humbled himself not onely in beholding things above but in beholding things on earth so as to come forth from the Father to see them Joh. 14.26 And Joh. 16.13 he speaks not of his own but what he hears He glorifies Jesus Christ the Son of God to man Joh. 16.14 In a word he is sent to carry on the work of God in saving man The Father had begun the Son had furthered and now he comes to finish it ministring life and power to the means appointed by the Lord Jesus to be used in the revealing the Lord therein in power which is called 2 Cor. 3.8 the ministry of the Spirit All which undertakings of the Spirit do not destroy his Deity nor being no more then that of the Sons undertaking for man nor is there apparent in what he doth to destroy it as in what the Son did who came out from God and from the Father into the world when it is not said so of the Spirit who though he ministreth is Jehovah the Spirit Object But says Mr. Biddle There is but one Lord therefore the Lord the Spirit is the Lord Jesus Resp There is indeed by way of eminencie but one man made Lord of God that is Jesus Christ 2. This denies not Jehovah to be Lord and so not the Lord the Spirit who made Jesus Lord and Christ I remember Mr. Biddle makes use of Joh. 17.3 This is eternal life that they may know thee the onely true God and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent Now says he here is no mention of the Spirit to be God nor of the knowledge of him to be eternal life Resp 1. By God is meant here Jehovah Father Son and Spirit 2. It is but onely Jesus Christ intended as distinct from the Son spoke distinctly of vers 1. 2. 3. But if any plead the Son was sent and intended here yet the Spirit is not excluded from Jehovah who came not forth from God though from the Father and the Son because as yet not distinctly sent forth the Spirit not coming forth until Christ was ascended Joh. 16.7 and 7.39 4. But say they this was spoken to the Father onely as the onely true God True not excluding the Spirit and Son onely this he abode in the excellent glory the Son came forth and the Spirit was to come forth 5. By Father is not simply meant that hypostasis in Jehovah called the Father but Jehovah that Elohim begetting the Son nor the Son that hypostasis of the Son the Elohim but the Son Jehovah is begotten in Jehovah the Father yet all one Jehovah in which the Father and Son are one and the Father in the Son and the Son in the Father Joh. 14.11 Joh. 10.30 6. To know the Father to be an Elohim in Jehovah is to know him to be the onely true God as Jehovah and to know the Son and Spirit to be Elohims in Jehovah is to know them to be the onely true Jehovah And this is no Barbarism for Gen. 19.23 And Jehovah made fire and brimstone rain on Sodom and