if Grace be defiled so soon as we are the subjects of it or so soon as it is given unto us or wrought in us then how comes it by this defilement it must either be from some change or it remains what it was if it be from some change that it is defiled seeing that this defilement must be moral then it must partake of the nature of Sin and if so it must cease to be Grace and if it do and become Sin as it must if it partake of moral pollution then in whom will mortifying and sanctifying Grace be found If Grace remain what it was and it was pure and good as granted as it had the Spirit as its Author then how comes it to be defiled I do not deny but there is Sin and much Sin where Grace is but then that this Sin pollutes Grace so soon as it is given and so it becomes morally defiled and partakes of the nature of Sin this I cannot reach for I think that what is morally evil must be sin and what is morally polluted must either be sin or sinful and to say sinful Grace and Holiness sounds harsh But it may be said doth not a true Christian exalt and set up his grace above Christ in a time of temptation to spiritual pride because of his grace if the temptation prevail I Answer in a time of temptation to pride if the temptation prevail a Person that is a Christian doth exalt and set up himself but he cannot be said to set up and exalt his grace above Christ hereby nor indeed doth he exalt grace at all because this exalting and high esteem of himself is a depressing of his grace and a putting a stop unto its exercise whereby he should exalt Christ so that grace cannot be the cause of this his pride for it is against its nature but the suppressing of grace or a putting a stop to its exercise by the prevalency of the contrary corruption So then you I say a Man cannot be proud of his grace I answer he cannot be proud of his grace that hath his grace in exercise because a Person is never more humble nor is God in Christ ever more exalted by him than when grace in him is most exercised for it is of the very nature of true grace to depress self lay low the Creature and exalt God and Christ so that the more of grace and the exercise of grace and the more of this But may not a Christian be proud of the exercise of grace I Answer he may be lift up in himself and proud of himself after the exercise of grace not that this exercise is the cause hereof it may be an accidental occasion but then it is the abuse both of grace and the exercise of it The truth is Christians if you would be secured from spiritual pride be kept humble labour to be much in the exercise of grace fear not that the exercise of grace should lead you to rest either in it or in your self for it is against the very nature of it the more of the exercise of grace the more doth the Soul take up its rest in God through Christ It is very strange in some Men O say they you must cast away all your graces and sincere duties and account them as dung and rest wholly upon Christ and his Righteousness just as though there was such an inconsistency and opposition betwixt Christ and the graces of his Spirit and Holy Obedience as that Christ and his Righteousness could not be relied upon and trusted to for acceptation except we laid by grace and sincere duty as useless here when for my part it is a matter quite beyond my reach to know how or with what or in what to rely upon Christ and his Righteousness for my acceptation without grace and the exercise of it in holy duties for think I if I rely upon Christ and his Righteousness I must have some way in which and something by which I must thus rely or how can I But it is like somâ— Men will have neither if both grace and sincere duty must be accounted and cast away as dung here O but say they you must beware of resting upon your grace and sincere duties for your acceptation and so of making a Christ of them I Answer for my part I do not fear this if I have but the truth and exercise of grace for God hath given grace and draws forth grace into exercise for this very end that Persons should rest upon and trust unto Christ's M diation for their acceptation and sure I am grace where it is in act will act according to its nature and this is to lead the Soul that hath it towards God in Christ as its center and rest and therefore if some Persons will amuse themselves and others unnecessarily I cannot help them but I shall pray the Lord to measure my Faith and quicken Grace and grant me the free exercise of it in every duty and then I know I shall be humble advance Christ and rest upon him as my only Mediator to obtain for me the grant of all saving good both Grace and Glory For in whose Hearts soever the Lord is pleased to suppress Pride Hypocrisie and Formality and keep them humble sincere and lively in the practice of Piety it is not possible but such should depend upon Christ both for pardon for the iniquities which attend their best duties and also for their acceptation for whose Hearts so ever are kept humble sincere and lively in grace and so in obedience such Persons cannot chuse but see and know their own sinfulness nothingness spiritual emptiness as considered morally in themselves and so on the contrary admire and adore the grace of God in Christ Jesus by the Holy Spirit for any thing of distinguishing grace and love towards their Souls and is this some resting in themselves and in their own graces and duties The grace and love of God in Christ Jesus certainly is the most highly advanced in Heaven and what is the reaâ—on but because their grace is perfected in the Spirits of just Men hence therefore the nearer any Soul upon Earth comes towards this Heavenly perfection by the growth and exercise of grace the more humble that Soul will be and the more God in Christ will be adored and glorified in and by that Soul John 15. 8 Herein is my Father glorified that ye bear much fruit so shall ye be my disciples So that while some Persons caution others against resting in their grace I say beware of Pride Hypocrisie and formality and endeavour after the growth and exercise of grace and then no danger while grace is in its growth and exercise I wish it be not the case of many Professors that while they are pretending highly to advance the Lord Jesus and to rest in him and trust solely unto him they do not content themselves much with formality and take little care to see they have that
be saved and thine House Therefore the Reason given is of no force for the strict Imputation of Christ's righteousness 7. Christ's righteousness say they must be our only personal justifying righteousness because it is that which God accepts on our behalf I Answer If they mean that God accepts the righteousness of Christ on the behalf of Believers so as to account it a sufficient satisfaction for them and the merit of all good which they partake of and that for which he accepts all their sincere duties I grant them the whole But if they mean God so accepts it on their behalf as to account it to be the very righteousness of their Persons by which their Persons are righteous according to the Law of Innocency this I deny and they can never shew any solid proof for what they affirm 8. Christ's righteousness say they must be our only personal justifying righteousness because Christ was a publick Person standing in the place and stead of all those that should believe in him so that all that he did and suffered are to be looked upon and are reputed by God as done and suffered by them and consequently are imputed to them I Answer That Christ did sustain the Person of a Mediatour for the making atonement and purchasing reconciliation I grant but that he sustained the Person of all those as a sinner that should after believe in him this I deny seeing then he should have been accounted the offending party and so as such had been incapable of purchasing and making peace betwixt the offending and offended For he that is accounted guilty and so an offender should have needed a Mediatour and reconciler for himself but this Christ did not therefore to tell of Christ's being a publick Person in this Sense is false and not only so but destructive of his Office as Mediatour and so also of his Satisfaction and Merit as is manifest And whereas it may be said How could he have suffered if by the Law he was not accounted guilty and an offender I Answer The Law did not account Christ as guilty or an offender nor did it ever condemn him but on the contrary it accounted him a righteous Person not considering him at all as a Mediatour or Surety and justified him as a fulfiller of it both in Nature and Life and therefore he was under no obligation at all by the Law of Innocency to Suffer but the obligation was from the Law of Redemption or Mediation by his own free and voluntary susception according to the paction betwixt him and the Father The just suffered for the unjust that he might bring us to God If just then by what Law was he just He that is just in Law by that Law that accounts him just as such he cannot be accounted guilty or an offender but Christ was just in the account of the Law of Innocency Hence therefore that which they would gather from Christ's being a publick Person must fall with its foundation for neither the Law nor God by the Law did account that Christ did so personate Sinners as to reckon what he did and suffered they did and suffered What Christ did and suffered it was accounted to be done and suffered for us but not accounted to be done and suffered by us for if so then God should accept satisfaction immediately from us and not from Christ and God must account us immediately to have merited and not Christ i. e. Christ should only be accounted by God as the means whereby we satisfied his Justice and merited Life for our selves for if all that Christ did and suffered be by God reputed as done and suffered by us then I ask for what end for that which was done and suffered by Christ was satisfactory and meritorious now if Christ obeyed and suffered for this end that God might account what he did and suffered to be done and suffered by us then Christ must have obeyed and suffered for this end that God might have satisfaction from us and that we by his means might merit a right to Life Can they prove this thinkest thou Reader 9. Christ's righteousness say they must be our only personal justifying righteousness because we cannot be justified by it any other way than by God's imputing it to us as such I Answer If this be so there must be no Justification of a Sinner at all for no Sinner is nor can be formally personally righteous with Christ's righteousness and therefore God doth not account him to be so as hath been proved above 10. If we may truly be said to be dead and crucified with Christ to be quickned with Christ to have risen again with Christ to sit in heavenly places in or with Christ c. then may we be said to have fulfilled the Law with Christ also and consequently the fulfilling of the Law by Christ is imputed to us and accounted ours I Answer The Scripture it is granted saith concerning true Believers that they are dead and crucified with Christ c. But what are they said to be so properly and personally Did they lay down their natural lives with Christ and aâ—ise in his rising again unto a corporal and glorified Life Or did God account them so to have done in Christ when he knows they did not If not as is plain then the meaning is by way of efficacy and likeness Christ indeed hath merited the Holy Spirit and this Spirit is given for the sake of his Merits unto his People by the power and efficacy of which Spirit sin is mortified the Heart crucified to the World and the Soul made alive to God raised from a Death in Sin to a Life of Grace and Holiness and the affections are set upon things above where Christ sits at the right hand of God from whence results a Christian assimulation or likeness to Christ in his Death Crucifixion Resurrection Ascention and Exaltation But what ground from hence to draw such an inference i. e. that we have fulfilled the Law in Christ's fulfilling of it Plain it is no ground at all but the consequence leans to that false supposition that what Christ did and suffered God accounted us to have done and suffered which beside what hath been said already if true then God must account us if Believers to have been born of a Virgin in a Stable to have been circumcised to have disputed with the Doctors in the Temple at Twelve years of Age and to have been subject to Joseph and Mary as our Parents to have been baptized by John the Baptist to have wrought Miracles c. in Christ But who will say this if none then all must hold the thing supposed formerly by many must be false and if they will let the notion go the consequences are none of theirs 11. Christ's righteousness say they must be our only justifying righteousness because all are and continue Sinners while they live and therefore cannot be personally righteous but by God's accounting Christ's righteousness
Christ hath purchased Titus 2. 14. Who gave himself for us that he might redeem us from all iniquity and purifie unto himself a peculiar People zealous of good Works This I have also proved that what is required on our part Christ hath also purchased and if Christ have purchased all that which constitutes the Covenant i. e. God's gracious promises and grace to enable us to perform the duties required to give us a right to and interest in the above mentioned benefits then let the Reader judge whether he be of the foundation that holds Christ hath purchased the Covenant or he that denies it It is through Christ furthermore that Souls have right to Pardon and Life upon true Faith as God upon the account of his Meritorious Righteousness and all prevailing Intercession communicates still further and further aids of Grace for Believers perseverance As Faith and Repentance are required by the Gospel to our initial Justification or right to Christ and the benefits of Pardon and Life through him so perseverance in Grace is required to our continued and final Justification He that endureth to the end the same shall be saved And Christ hath merited persevering Grace John 10. 10. The thief cometh not but for to steal and to kill and to destroy I am come that they might have Life and that they might have it more abundantly Ephes 5. 25 26 27. Husbands love your Wives even as Christ also loved the Church and gave himself for it That he might sanctifie and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word That he might present it to himself a glorious Church not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing but that it should be holy and without blemish Heb. 2. 19. For it became him for whom are all things and by whom are all things in bringing many Sons unto glory to make the Captain of their Salvation perfect through sufferings From what hath been said we shall Observe That none of Mankind now can be accounted righteous and so have Justification by the Law that injoins sinless perfect Works for if so we must in the account of the Law be sinless and perfectly righteous And if so it must either be by having such a Righteousness of our own but this cannot be there being no meer Man that hath such a sinless perfect Righteousness of his own as this Law requires or Secondly It must be by having such a Righteousness of anothers but this cannot be for there is no Righteousness of another that can answer the Law of Innocent Nature but Christ's and this Law neither doth nor can account us sinless and perfectly righteous with Christ's Righteousness for if it should or could account us perfectly righteous by accounting the Righteousness of Christ in it self to be ours or accounting us perfectly to have obeyed and fulfilled it in Christ's Obedience It must account us to be thus righteous either absolutely or upon performance of some condition by it required If upon the performance of some condition it must either be the condition it required of sinless Man which is personal perfect and perpetual Obedience and if we could perform this we should not need Christ's Righteousness at all for there had been no necessity of Christ's Righteousness if Man had continued to have performed a personal perfect Righteousness or it must be upon the performance of the condition of a sincere Repentance and Faith But the Law of Innocent Nature reveals not and therefore cannot prescribe such a condition upon the performance of which it will account us perfectly righteous through or by Christ's Righteousness for if it did 't is evident there would have been no need of God's publishing the new Covenant or of promulgating the Gospel If it account us to be thus righteous absolutely without any condition at all then it either accounts all Mankind to be perfectly righteous by Christ's perfect Obedience or only some part of Mankind if it account all Mankind to be perfectly righteous through Christ's Righteousness then all must have Justification or a right to Life and none of Mankind must perish and if so then we must have universal Salvation If it account only some to be perfectly righteous with Christ's Righteousness then it must consider them either as Elect or non-elect if it do not consider them as Elect then the forementioned consequence is established If it consider them as Elect then the Law of Works must consider them as Sinners and so make provision for the Salvation of some and none for the Salvation of others that which I do not know any that will undertake to prove But if it should be granted that the Law of Innocent Nature absolutely without requiring any condition of them should account the Elect righteous upon Christ's perfect Obedience or fulfilling of it then it must follow that Christ's sufferings are a meer nullity and there is no need of them for if upon Christ's active Obedience the Law do account all the Elect sinless and perfectly righteous which it must do if it account them righteous personally with Christ's Righteousness and justifie them as such who have perfectly obeyed Christ's perfect Obedience then it cannot require suffering too seeing that it only calls for suffering in case it have not the actual Obedience it requires And it must follow further that there is no need of a Covenant of Grace nor Repentance and Faith commanded therein if the Law of sinless Works do account us perfectly righteous in Christ's perfect obeying it for us But none of these things can be as is plain if Persons will lay aside prejudice and consider And if so that cannot be sound and true which some have affirmed that Christ and we are one Legal Person or that Christ and Believers are one Person in Law Sense the Law accounting that what Christ did they did But it may be said when Persons become true Believers then the Law of Works 〈◊〉 them righteous with the Righteousness of Christ this is as much as to say the Law of Works justifies upon Persons performing of the condition of the Gospel and it knows nothing of nor doth it prescribe any such condition and so if it justifie it must justifie upon terms unknown and therefore unprescribed in it self and thus it is made a sort of a blind justifying Instrument SECT IX Faith described and explicated in order to our Justification by it HAving shewn how it is through Jesus Christ that God doth assert and will maintain our right to Pardon and Life I shall proceed to shew what Faith is which is the thing required to give us right John 3. 16. Acts 13. 39. Acts 16. 31. An acute Author gives us this Description of it 't is a believing acceptance of Christ a Saviour it is a short one but yet a full one for it implies First Assent Secondly Consent and Thirdly our resolved following of Christ in his way trusting and relying upon him whatever we meet withal First It
sinless Righteousness even the Righteousness of Christ that must justifie because no other Righteousness can be adaequate to the Law and we say the same with them that if we are justified by the Law of Innocency no less than a perfect sinless Righteousness would avail us here but we are not as hath been made appear but by the Gospel and though I affirm that Faith is our personal justifying Righteousness according to the Gospel Law yet it doth not follow from hence that Believers shall stand upon their points with God in judgment according to his strict Justice no they must say with David Psalm 143. 2. And enter not into judgment with thy servant for in thy sight shall no Man living be justified But I say upon conformity to the Law of Grace they have interest in Christ the Mediatour and a right to his Righteousness upon which they do depend and trust for the satisfaction of God's offended Justice and the answering the violated Law for the procuring of their acceptation with God and a grant of all saving promised good so that as to process in judgment my thoughts are that Believers shall not personally plead at all but Christ as their blessed Advocate for them But then this he will do for them as such who have been and are found recti in curia Evangelica right in the Gospel Law which still I say is and shall be the Rule of Judgment Rom. 2. 16. In the day when God shall judge the secrets of Men by Jesus Christ according to my Gospel and so justified by this his fixed constitution The ground I have is Matth. 25. from Verse 34 to 41. Whereas some that they may hold their ungrounded and unscriptural notions do confidently affirm that our Faith Repentance and sincere Obedience hath only the place of an Evidence I do not deny the Obedience of Faith to be an Evidence but then I must not confound but distinguish of its primary and secondary use and office and the result of both Christ saith John 15. 14. Ye are my friends if ye do whatsoever I command you Dare any Man say they were friends actually before any subjection to Christ if not was not this their subjection a conformity to the Gospel so far as revealed And is there any conformity to the Gospel without Obedience to its commands And is there any Obedience to the commands of the Gospel in truth which is not the obedience of faith Those who will contradict let them prove and then take the cause If they cannot then they must give us leave and if they will not we must make bold to take it it being allowed by one that is greater than they to distinguish of the Obedience of Faith as it constitutes us friends through Christ's Mediation continues us friends and as it is an evidence resulting from both where God is pleased to give the light Say some Job when accused by his friends for being an hypocrite pleads his own Righteousness as much as any But as to Justification thereby before God he speaks otherwise Job 9. 20 21. If I justified my self mine own mouth shall condemn me if I say I am perfect it shall also prove me perverse Though I were perfect yet would I not know my Soul I would despise my life Now will this or the other really and in it self justifie a Person from the charge of hypocrisie before Men that will not so far justifie him from the charge or accusation in God's account when a Person is falsly accused of hypocrisie as Job must not he so far as he hath a discovery of his sincerity plead this to justifie him against that accusation and if he be sincere is he not so in God's account and so clear of that predominant hypocrisie of which he is accused and doth not God so far as he accounts a Person clear of a false accusation justifie him Let Persons who contradict prove if they can That sincerity will only justifie a Person from the charge or accusation of hypocrisie before Men while yet the accusation stand◠in full force before God and he accounts the Person who is in himself sincere to be a downright hypocrite The meaning then of the above quoted Text in Job seems to be this If I justifie my self as one unjustly afflicted by God this very Justification of my self and charge uttered against God would be sufficient to condemn me if I say I am in a strict sense legally perfect and so have no Sin for which God may correct me this very boasting would prove me perverse and sinful yea though I were perfect yet would I not know or look upon my self as such an one whom God might not deal withal as he pleased considered as absolute Lord and owner Now to argue from this Text according to this clear Exposition that Faith is no qualifying matter of right to Christ Pardon and Life is no better than to argue à bacculo ad angulum ut patet attendenti From what I have affirmed above i. e. That there is no danger of a Soul 's resting in duties where true Faith is in exercise seeing the exercise of Faith will lead that Soul to rest in Christ and God in and through him for acceptation it hath been inferred that such as have throughly imbibed this opinion are if unregenerate in the snare of Satan almost secure from conviction And if this be so then these Men who draw up such a conclusion from the Doctrine have this to prove look where they will find a proof that whoever holds that there is no danger of a Soul 's resting in duty where true Faith is in exercise c. he is in the snare of the Devil if he be unregenerate and like to be for this Doctrine will keep him there And if this Doctrine be it that will keep an unregenerate Person in the snare of the Devil how can any one be out of his snare that holds it for if it be the Devil's snare he that holds it must needs be in it If then a Person have been regenerate before yet according to this assertion if he imbibe this Doctrine it brings him back into the snare of the Devil so that he must fall from grace falling from a regenerate state and I for my part by these Men sentenced to the black Pit and in their account there is no hope for me but by the grace of God in Jesus Christ I do not dread their Sentence This intus existens prohibens alienum is very much to be lamented at this day seeing it opposeth manifest truth I suppose the consequences that I have deduced from the common Doctrine of Justification are very offensive to some and they call them absurd But I say again whosoever they be that holds Christ's Righteousness in it self to be their very personal formal justifying Righteousness the inferences are natural from the Notion and whereas they are called absurd the contradiction betwixt the abovesaid Doctrine
and question whether he do or know for where is the Man that ever affirmed that God reckoned that we did and suffered in our own Persons what Christ did and suffered I am sure the Scripture asserts the contrary saying he trod the winepress alone and there was none with him As to that which he calleth a false charge thou mayst Reader look back unto his 12th Article and see if it be not true of himself however there saith he it is the acts works doings and obedience of this blessed Mediatour that are imputed and counted to the Elect for their justifying Righteousness so that from hence he may judge If God doth account the very acts works â—oings and obedience of Christ as Mediatour to the Elect for their justifying Righteousness how it can be avoided but he must reckon them to have in Christ performed those acts works doings and obedience of Christ the Mediatour and what are they to whom God doth reckon those acts works doings and obedience of Christ the Mediatour but their own Persons doth God account Christ's acts works doings and obedience to such as are no Persons God indeed accounts what Christ did and suffered for the good and in the place and stead of and poor lost Sinners But then doth he account them in their own Persons in the sense of any Law to have obeyed and suffered in Christ which he must do if he account the very acts works doings and obedience of Christ as Mediatour unto them as this Man saith for if God do impute the very acts works doings of another in obeying and suffering unto me and reckon them as mine in themselves then he must either account me to have performed those very acts works and doings in that others obeying and suffering or he must not If he do then the charge is true and just against himself I mean this Man who is so brisk and confident If he do not then how can they in Law sense be imputed and reckoned to me as mine in themselves I suppose the mistake of this Man is here when I speak of Persons in a Legal sense he would have me understood in a Physical sense only and whether he do this on set purpose or from ignorance I know not But â—urther having proved that that which he calls a false charge is true of himself from his own assertion I shall inform him of another and that a Person in his day of worth and learning who saith Christ stood in a double relation for us unto God First Of a Surety Seâ—ondly Of a common Person And a common Person saith he with or for another he goes for is one who represents personates and acts the part of another by the allowance and warrant of the Law so as what he doth as such a common Person anâ— in the name of the other that other whom he personates is by the Law reckoned to do and in like manner what is done to him as being in the others stead and room is reckoned as done to the other Mr. Tho. Goodwin in his Treatise of the support of Faith from Christ's Resurrection Cap. 2. Now let any judge if what he saith in this matter be not the same with that which he calls my false charge And in his Application Cap. 4. Sect. 3. saith he Christ was considered and appointed by God as a common Person both in what he did and in what was done to him so as by the same Law what he did for us is reckoned or imputed to us as if we our selves had done it and what was done to him tending to our Justification and Salvation is reckoned as done to us 22. I believe saith he that in this weighty point of Justification such an one naming me is one with the Papists Arminians Socinians and Quakers and against the châ—â—f of those counted Orthodox since the Reformation as Luther and worthy Calvin of old c. And Thomas Goodwin Dr. Owen and Mr. Chancey of later times I Question not if this Man had been acquainted as he should what I hold in this point and such as go under the names he mentions that he durst not have made this an Article of his Faith But what will not malignity say and leave all without proof as this Man doth this Article of his Creed It is like he expects his testimony should be received without any more to do and here he is saying as they did in Jeremiah's time come let us smite him with the tongue and I do expect if any thing come forth that will bear the name of a reply to this of mine it will be railing language much what of the same complexion with this though indeed if this Man had offered any likely proof for the truth of this his charge as I do where I apply any of these names I should not so have called it When therefore he hath made it good 1. That I hold Justification by an inherent Righteousness which is a conformity to the Law of sinless perfect Works or that Faith is a meritorious Righteousness or that Christ merited that we by Grace or Duty might merit Let him make it good 2. That I hold that the 〈◊〉 credere or the very act of Faith justifies i. e. as an act Or 3. That I hold that Christ did not purchase the Covenant of Grace or that I deny Christ's Merit and satisfaction and place grace or sincere duty in the room and place of Christ's Meritorious and Satisfactory Righteousness 4. And when he hath made it good that I hold I need no more to answer the Law of Innocency or to free me from the curse and condemnation of it and procure Salvation for me but what is inherent and a walking accordingly When he hath proved I say that I hold all these above mentioned things then I will confess he believes a truth concerning me But so long as he doth not and that because he cannot I must say he believes a lie until he retract and acknowledge he hath wronged me in saying I am one with the Papists Arminians Socinians and Quakers in this point of Justification Touching those he saith I am against in this his Article I have this to say whatever unwary expressions our Reformers and others that follow their Phrase may have left in their Writings with which so far as their notion did agree it was not sound yet to me it is out of doubt that as to what is the main in this point and respects especially the practick part both Luther Calvin and the rest of our Reformers as such never held that any Man or Woman ever had I speak of the Adult actual interest in Christ and right to Pardon and Life while remaining in a state of Impenitency and Unbelief and Rebellion against God And if not then wherein am I against them in this point If it be said but where will you find in their Writings that Faith is imputed or that it is our formal justifying Righteousness