Selected quad for the lemma: duty_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
B26348
|
The prodigal return'd home, or, The motives of the conversion to the Catholick faith of E.L., Master of Arts in the University of Cambridge
|
E. L. (E. Lydeott)
|
1684
(1684)
|
Wing L3525
|
135,459
|
418
|
relying we have only a firm and rational belief of revealed Verities constant and immoveable among all the changes of Sects and Hereticks True it is in every act of Faith there is use of Reason whether it be referred to the Authority of God revealing or the Church proposing For we captivate our understanding to the obedience of Faith because we judge nothing more reasonable than to believe God and we securely rely upon his Church whom he hath promis'd to assist with Infallibility in such proposals But shall we say therefore that Reason is the prime intrinsical Motive of Faith and into which it finally is resolv'd Nothing less For this discourse and approbation of Reason are but necessarily previous and antecedent to our deliberate and rational acts of Faith the acts themselves are acts of the understanding not discoursing but purely assenting Which assent is not for Reasons sake but for Authority Were the last resolution into the judgment of private Reason Faith could not be Divine or Supernatural Reason indeed produces an act of Faith as well in Catholicks as Protestants but with a vast difference For a Protestant believes such a Truth to be from God relying upon his Reason only that it is revealed and this assent is not rational because his ground is deceitful But in a Catholick Reason acts only so far in points of belief as to bring him to Authority declaring such Truths to be sufficiently revealed by Almighty God which he cannot with any reason suspect to be Fallible in such declarations I believe this says a Protestant because my Reason tells me it is revealed and will allow no other judge of this Revelation I believe this says a Catholick because an Infallible Authority assures me iâ— is revealed and my Reason tells me there is no other sufficient ground or evidence for Divine Faith and therefore give up my private judgment to the Church And which of these Principles is more safe and rational let Reason judge Thirdly I demand of these Rationalists whether there be any such thing as Heresy in the World and what it is Oportet esse Haereses 1 Cor. 11. 19. c. There must be Heresies St. Paul hath said it and that 's sufficient And as for what it is 't is well known the Church hath always taught That Heresie is the voluntary Election of some private opinion contradicting the Doctrine of the Church And that he is to be accounted an Heretick who neglecting the Churches Authority with a stubborn mind defends wicked opinions But if we should admit their new definition That Heresie is to contradict any fundamental point expresly contain'd in Scripture In my poor judgment according to such a definition there 's no such thing as Heresie or Hereticks but both Arians Anabaptists Fanaticks c. are as good Catholicks as any Christians of the World For if private Reason be the only judge of the true Sense of Scripture for every one to rely upon these and all other condemned Hereticks the Montanists excepted relying upon the written Word as interpreted by Reason with sober enquiry and real endeavours to find out Truth cannot justly be so reputed The Arians have so much Reason and Scripture too in the bare Letter on their side that take away the Churches Infallibility and universal Tradition interpreting and delivering to us the true sense of it the Controversy would never be decided All places would swarm with Nestorians Eutychians Anti-trinitarians Barengarians Anabaptists c. neither could we condemn them if this Principle be good for doing their duty in following Scripture as the Light of their own private Reason or Spirit dictates to them Let them not say that these and such like are justly condemn'd for contradicting express Scripture against their knowledge and the judgment of their own Reason For they must remember first that themselves do not condemn the Anabaptists upon only Scripture grounds Secondly that it hath been demonstrated that all fundamental points are not so express in Scripture as they imagine And thirdly that 't is most uncharitable to say That all those whom they condemn for Hereticks do against their own knowledge and Conscience contradict the express Word of God and run headlong to hell with their eyes open Can we possibly imagine that among so many Millions of Arians there was not one single person had any Conscience It cannot be denyed but that many Hereticks have and do live Vertuously in the Eyes of the World For who knows not That Satan sometimes transforms himself into an Angel of Light And while they profess and protest that if it was once made apparent to them that their Tenets are against the Word of God they would not one minute persist in them we judge it uncharitable to affirm that notwithstanding the protestations of their sincerity and real though misguided zeal they all wilfully sin against the Light and knowledge of their Consciences We Catholicks indeed assert That sufficient evidences of credibility are produced by us to convince them of their Heretical opinions and dangerous state without Repentance But withall we say That God in his just Judgments which are inscrutable suffers them through strong delusions to believe Lyes in that the Light of Truth is veiled from their Eyes by passion or prejudice or worldly Interest while they so continue and we pray for them in hope that the Father of infinite Mercies will in his good time discover Truth unto them and bring them home unto his Church But for these Rationalists to damn all those whom they esteem Hereticks as contradictors of the Word of God against their Conscience and knowledge is a censure most unreasonable and little beseeming such whose lives are not so Gospel-like but that many Sectaries who differ from them in fundamentals may justly be reputed at least as conscientious and in charity cannot be thought otherwise All which duely consider'd plainly proves that they must either change their Judge of Controversy in points of Faith or give us some new Rule to discover Heresy And withall that if they will stick close to this Principle they must maintain that all the General Councils of the Church even that celebrated by the Apostles themselves were meer tyrannical Usurpations in obliging all Christians to believe and practice according to their Decrees whatever their private Reason could say to the contrary Fourthly in vain and to no purpose hath Jesus Christ instituted Authoritative Overseers and Governours in his Church For the perfecting Eph. 4. 11 12 c. the Saints for the work of the Ministry for the Edification of the Body of Christ till we all come in the unity of Faith c. If every one must acknowledge no visible Authority upon Earth to have any obliging power over him in Doctrines appertaining to God but be his own Teacher in all points of Faith according to the Dictates of private Reason Fifthly If every one be sent to Scripture to compose a Creed for himself
can give no just cause to her Children to separate from her communion except they will say Christ hath not left his Church sufficient means to maintain Unity Besides the Fathers tell them that 't is impossible there should be just cause for any to separate from the Communion of the Catholick Church St. Iraeneus is very plain It is impossible to receive such an injury or provocation from the L. adver haere Governours of the Church as to make a separation excuseable And St. Austin is as positive It is impossible there should be any just cause to make a separation from the Communion of all Nations And therefore Antiquity Epist 48. judg'd a separation from the body of the Church how specious soever were the pretences of the dividers to be a sufficient evidence to prove such formal Schismaticks by the very matter of fact without any other argument I object to you the crime of Schism says the same Holy Father to the Donatists which St Aust cont Petilian you will deny and I will presently prove because you do not communicate with all Nations Upon which grounds if the Ancient Fathers were now living they must of necessity condemn Protestants as well as Arrians or Donatists in their days And thus being condemn'd both by Scripture and Antiquity for Schismaticks I know not what or who can justify their Separation or the continuers and maintainers of it It is not the Votes of a Parliament whom Christ never made Church Governours nor Judges in Controversies in points of Faith 't is not the Acts of a National Synod held by a few Schismatical Bishops when such Councils even of Catholick Bishops may and have erred 'T is not the consent of two Vniversities either for fear or flattery or self-interest renouncing the Papal Authority in England and acknowledging the King Supreme Head of the Church in his Dominions 't is not any or all of these can bear them out and make them innocent Yea these consequent Acts make their Schism far more inexcusable For what in the beginning the height of passion might somewhat extenuate by this solemn deliberation became more voluntary and so aggravated the former malignity However notwithstanding this undeniable prevarication they have patch'd up some Fig-leaves together to cover the nakedness of their Schism and that they are no better I shall endeavour to make appear in the following Sections SECT III. Wherein the Protestants plea that they did not separate from the Church but were forcibly cast out from her Communion and therefore the Schism which is a voluntary recession from the Church not imputable to them is answered SEeing it cannot be denyed but that the first Reformers were bred in the bowels of the Roman Church communicating with her before this unhappy rupture to wipe off from them the odious crime of Schism they lay the fault upon the Catholick Church for casting them out by force from the Communion whereas Schism is a voluntary recession from the Church and theirs was not they not separating themselves but being separated In answer to which I say first that never were any Hereticks or Schismaticks even whom they acknowledge for such in any Age cast out from among the Faithful by Sentence of Excommunication for their contumacy but they might with as much show of reason use the same plea for their justification Secondly how can they impute their separation to the Church when after her utmost endeavours to maintain unity they would by no means be perswaded that it was lawful to communicate with her in Doctrine and Worship herein preferring their own private opinions before the judgment of the whole Christian world But thirdly how frivolous this plea is will most manifestly appear if they will but consider what was acted by themselves wholly antecedent to the censure of the Church That the Church hath just Power and Authority to Excommunicate such of her Subjects who deserve it is confess'd on all sides Yea that she 's obliged to cut off corrupted and incorrigible Members from the body of Christianity lest others be infected with their errours is plain to common sense And that it was the practice of the Church in all Ages to injoyn the Faithful to abstain from Communion with those who pertinaciously maintain'd a different Faith from her no man can doubt who knows any thing in Church-history Now when they had voluntarily receded from the Doctrine and Government of their Catholick Mother or if any compulsion appear'd in the business it was not on the Churches part but from their new Spiritual Head the King when they had demolish'd Monasteries ceiz'd on their Revenues Persecuted the most Conscientious of the Clergy Confiscated the Estates of contradictors and put to death some most eminent for Learning and Piety because they would not prostitute their Faith and Conscience to the Kings assumed Authority in Church Affairs When they had abolish'd the publick Worship of the Church as Superstitious and Idolatrous and cast out most of the Sacraments as prophane and unholy things when they had moulded a Religion according to the policy of State and Interests of the great ones who had added to themselves by taking from the Church When they had forsaken the only certain Rule of Faith and made way for innumerable Sects and Subdivisions which they have found too true by sad experience God lashing them with their own rod that they may see their sin in the glass of their punishment And lastly when to fill up the measure of their sins they remained unrelenting and obstinate in their manifold disorders and miss-called Reformations in the Churches Faith and Discipline when they had done and acted this in a most violent and head-strong manner to the wonder and pity of the understanding World and all possible means being us'd to reduce them to the Catholick Unity from which they were fallen but all in vain The Church then and not Anno 10. Eliz. Reg. 'till then by Authority Christ proceeding according to her duty and constant practice in like cases to the just Sentence of Excommunication They cry out not guilty they are innocent and have done nothing amiss the Schism is not to be laid to their charge who made no voluntary recession from the Church But to the Church who against their wills did cast them out Just as if a Malefactor who hath made himself incapable of Mercy by his unpardonable offences should accuse the Judge as guilty of his death because he pronounces on him the Sentence of Condemnation Is not this a pretty plea to excuse themselves from Schism So bad a cause stands in need of better Arguments to maintain it self SECT IV. Wherein is shew'd the emptiness of their Plea that they did not separate from the Universal but only from the particular Church of Rome BUt seeing there is a palpable Schism in the Church by their new erected Ecclesiastical Government and they cannot make the World believe that the Church of Rome