Selected quad for the lemma: duty_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
duty_n	church_n	good_a	holy_a	1,129	5	4.2899	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A96714	Antinomians and familists condemned by the synod of elders in Nevv-England: with the proceedings of the magistrates against them, and their apology for the same. Together with a memorable example of Gods iudgments upon some of those persons so proceeded against.	Winthrop, John, 1588-1649,; Weld, Thomas, 1590?-1662,	1644 (1644)	Wing W3094; Thomason E251_10; ESTC R212499	69,974	70

beleevers in common 1 John 5.13 to distinguish the persons of beleevers from unbeleevers the water is annexed to the Spirit and bloud 1 Iohn 5.8 Errour 76. The Devill and nature may be cause of a gracious worke Confutation 76. The words are unsavoury and the position unsound for taking gracious according to the language of the Scripture gracious words Luke 4.22 Let your speech be gracious gracious words are such as issue from the saving grace of Christs Spirit indwelling in the soule which neither the Devill nor nature is able to produce for Christ professeth Iohn 15.3 4. Without me yee can doe nothing nothing truly gracious Iohn 3. What ever is borne of the flesh is flesh and Rom. 7.18 In my flesh dwels no good truly spirituall and gracious Gen. 6.5 Every imagination of the thoughts of a mans heart are evill and that continually Besides the Devill is that evill and wicked one onely wickednesse an adversary to Gods grace and glory that which is contrary to corrupt nature and the hellish nature of Satan and above the power of both they cannot be the causes of gracious works Errour 77. Sanctification is so farre from evidencing a good estate that it darkens it rather and a man may more clearely see Christ when he seeth no sanctification then when he doth the darker my sanctification is the brighter is my justification Confutation 77. This is contrary to the Scripture of truth which rather giveth the name of light to sanctification and holinesse and even for this use to cleare our justification 1 Iohn 1.6 7. For the holy Ghost concludes as from a cleare and infallible promise and proposition that if we walke in the light as he is in the light then doth the bloud of Christ cleanse us from all sinne meaning that then and thereby it appeareth that it is done as by the contrary unholinesse and unholy walking is like darknesse which obscureth all the goodly presumption flourishes and hopes of an unregenerate man vers 6. For this purpose 1 Iohn 5.8 the water of sanctification is made a witnesse now the nature of a witnesse is not to darken and obscure matters in question but to cleare them and Psal 51.10 11 12. when David saw his heart so uncleane and his spirit so altogether out of order his justification was not then brighter for then he should have had the joy of his salvation more full and not so to sinke as that he begs it might be restored to him as implying that his joy for the present was wanting to him Errour 78. God hath given sixe witnesses three in Heaven and three in earth to beget and build justifying faith upon Confutation 78. This expression answers not the patterne of wholesome words for if this position be taken thus God hath given all these sixe witnesses both to beget and also to build justifying faith upon it is contrary to Scripture for God hath not given all these fixe witnesses to beget justifying faith because the water of sanctification which is one of the sixe doth not goe before justifying faith but followeth after it for our hearts are justified by faith Acts 15.9 Errour 79. If a member of a Church be unsatisfied with any thing in the Church if he expresse his offence whether he hath used all meanes to convince the Church or no he may depart Confutation 79. Contrary to the rule of our Saviour Matth. 18. If thy brother offend convictingly admonish whence it is evident that in our carriage towards a private brother we must convince him before admonish him much lesse separate from him Therefore our carriage towards the whole Church must upon greater reason be with like prudence and tendernesse whence the argument followes thus An offence taken before conviction will not beare an admonition much lesse separation from a brother or Church but the offence in the question propounded is such Ergo. Errour 80. If a man thinke he may edifie better in another congregation then in his owne that is ground enough to depart ordinarily from word seales fastings feastings and all administrations in his owne Church notwithstanding the offence of the Church often manifested to him for so doing Confutation 80. It is contrary to the condition and station of a member of the body in which he stands 1 Cor. 12.27 A member must not put it selfe from the body upon its owne thoughts as the admission of a member was by the consent of the whole so likewise must his dismission be It is contrary also to the duty of a member Ephes 4.16 there must be an effectuall working in every part for the edification of the whole which this departure from the administration of all the holy ordinances in the Church will necessarily hinder It is contrary also to the good of the whole Church and the rule which the Lord hath appointed for the preservation thereof 1 Cor. 14 33. God is not the author of confusion and therefore not of this practise which will certainly bring it for if one member upon these his imaginations may depart why may not ten yea twenty yea an hundred Why may not the Pastor upon such grounds leave his people as well as they him considering the tye is equall on both parts Error 81. Where faith is held forth by the Ministery as the condition of the covenant of grace on mans part as also evidencing justification by sanctification and the activity of faith in that Church there is not sufficient bread Confutation 81. This position seemeth to deny faith to be a condition at all or at all active and so if condition in this place signifie a qualification in man wrought by the holy Ghost without which the promises doe not belong to men this is contrary to Scripture for John 6.48 Christ is the bread of life and yet in the same chapter faith is held out as a condition of the covenant by the Ministery of Christ himselfe and the activity of it is held forth in these words Verily I say unto you unlesse yee eate the flesh and drinke the bloud of the Sonne of man you have no life in you and who so eateth c. As for the lawfulnesse of evidencing justification by sanctification if it be understood of that sanctification which is by faith in Christ it is contrary to the intent of the whole Epistle of John besides many other places of Scripture which yet hold forth bread sufficient if by sufficient is meant that doctrine which in its right use is wholsome and good food for it was written that their joy might be full yet the evidencing of justification by sanctification is expressely held forth chap. 1. vers 7. where he saith If we walke in the light as Christ is in the light we have fellowship one with another and the bloud of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sinne by walking in the light in opposition to walking in darknesse spoken of before verse 6. Sanctification is evidently meant and this is

to looke to holinesse of life or Testimony of the same Confutation 65. This is contrary to Rom. 1.7 and the inscriptions of divers Epistles being directed to Saints and Saints by calling and 1 Cor. 14 33. Churches of the Saints Acts 2. the members there were said to repent before they were admitted and 1 Cor. 5. the incestuous person should not then have beene cast out for want of holinesse and Paul could not be received into communion without Testimony Acts 9 26. Error 66. To lay the brethren under a Covenant of works hurts not but tends to much good to make men looke the better to their evidences Confutation 66. If that bee done ungroundedly it is contrary to Isa 5.20 where woe is pronounced to such as call good evill c. and Ezek. 13.22 that make such hearts sad as the Lord would not have sadded and it is against the rule of the Covenant 1 Cor. 13. besides it may trench upon the devils office in accusing the Brethren and then it will be good to tell untruth good to breake house and Church Communion then good to break nearest relations then good to bite one another and good to offend the little ones Matth. 18. Errour 67. A man cannot evidence his justification by his sanctification but he must needs build upon his sanctification and trust to it Confutation 67. First this is contrary to 1 John 3.18 19. where the holy Ghost saith that by unfained and hearty love we may have assurance and yet neither there nor any where else would have us trust to our sanctification so vers 7. He that doth righteousnesse is righteous as he is righteous Secondly if poverty of spirit which emptieth us of all confidence in our selves may evidence a mans justification without trusting to it then may sanctification without trusting to it but the former is true therefore also the latter Thirdly if it be an ordinance of God to evidence our justification by our sanctification then we may doe this without trusting to it but that is apparent from 2 Pet. 1.10 Ergo. Errour 68. Faith justifies an unbeleever that is that faith that is in Christ justifieth me that have no faith in my selfe Confutation 68. This is contrary to Hab. 2.4 For if the just shall live by his faith then that faith that justifies is not in Christ So John 3. ult He that beleeveth not the wrath of God abideth on him it is not anothers faith will save me Errour 69. Though a man can prove a gracious worker in himselfe and Christ to be the authour of it if thereby he will prove Christ to be his this is but a sandy foundation Confutation 69. This is contrary to these Scriptures John 14.21 and 28. He that keepeth my commandements is he that loveth me and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father and I will love him and will shew my selfe unto him 1 John 3.14 We know that we have passed from death to life because we love the brethren and 1 John 5.12 He that hath the Sonne hath life therefore he that can prove that he hath spirituall life may assure himselfe that hee hath Christ Errour 70. Frequency or length of holy duties or trouble of conscience for neglect thereof are all signes of one under a Covenant of workes Confutation 70. This is contrary to these Scriptures 1 Cor. 15.58 Be abundant alwayes in the worke of the Lord if the faithfull in Christ Jesus be commanded to abound alwayes in the worke of the Lord that is holy duties then frequency in holy duties is no signe of one under a Covenant of workes but the former is true therefore also the latter as also 1 Thes 4.17.18 Psal 55.17 Evening and morning and noone will I pray and make a noyse and he will heare me and elsewhere Seven times a day doe I praise thee Psal 119.146 Psal 1.2 So also contrary is the third branch to these Scriptures 2 Cor. 7.8.11 the Corinthians were troubled in conscience and sorrowed that they had neglected the holy duties of Church censure towards the incestuous person and Isa 64.7 and 8. Cant. 5.2 Rom. 7.19 I doe not the good I would which he lamenteth and complaineth of Errour 71. The immediate revelation of my good estate without any respect to the Scriptures is as cleare to me as the voyce of God from Heaven to Paul Confutation 71. This is contrary to John 14.26 He shall teach you all things and bring all things to your remembrance c. whence we reason thus If the Spirit reveale nothing without concurrence of the Word then this revelation of the Spirit without respect to the Word is not cleare nor to be trusted but the Spirit doth reveale nothing but with respect to the Word for John 14.26 If the office of the Spirit be to teach and to bring to remembrance the things that Christ hath taught us Esay 8.20 what ever spirit speakes not according to this Word there is no light there Errour 72. It is a fundamentall and soule-damning errour to make sanctification an evidence of justification Confutation 72. This is contrary to these Scriptures Rom. 8.1 They that walke after the Spirit are freed from condemnation and are in Christ and so justified so 1 John 3.10 In this are the children of God knowne c. Errour 73. Christs worke of grace can no more distinguish betweene a Hypocrite and a Saint then the raine that fals from Heaven betweene the just and the unjust Confutation 73. This proposition being generall includes all gracious works and being so taken is contradicted in the parable of the sower Matth. 13.20.21 22. where the good ground is distinguished from the stony by this that it brings forth fruit with patience so Hebr. 6.9 there is something better in the Saints then those common gifts which are found in Hypocrites Errour 74. All verball Covenants or Covenants expressed in words as Church Couenants vowes c. are Covenants of workes and such as strike men off from Christ Confutation 74. First this is contrary to Scripture Esay 44 5. One shall say I am the Lords another shall call himselfe by the name of the God of Jacob Rom. 10.10 With the mouth confession is made to salvation Secondly contrary to reason for then the Covenant of grace is made a Covenant of workes by the writing reading and preaching of the same for they are verball expressions of the Covenant on Gods part as Church Covenants verbally expresse our closing herewith Errour 75. The Spirit giveth such full and cleare evidence of my good estate that I have no need to be tried by the fruits of sanctification this were to light a candle to the Sun Confutation 75. This opinion taken in this sense that after the Spirit hath testified a mans good estate the person need not to be tried by the fruit of sanctification is contrary to the scope of the whole first Epistle of Saint John where variety of arguments are propounded to all