Selected quad for the lemma: duty_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A17571
|
The altar of Damascus or the patern of the English hierarchie, and Church policie obtruded upon the Church of Scotland
|
Calderwood, David, 1575-1650.
|
1621
(1621)
|
STC 4352; ESTC S107401
|
125,085
|
228
|
of conjunction and dissolution in the word the Church is to see that that order and these caveats bee observed which are contained in the word For it may fall out that both in binding up of marriage they may commit incest and in dissolving without a just cause may offend also It is the Churches duty to prevent and remove such offences But of other lawes civil and municipal they are not executors These lawes which are divine are of a mixt nature These which are civill belong onely to the civill Magistrate The Churches part is transferred to the cognisance of officials to whom it doth not belong And therfore Beza concerning this abuse writeth thus Sed quorsum hoc ad officiales promotores procuratores totam denique illam procorum colluviem quae Ecclesiam Dei iâ—mprideÌ„ devastat quorsum hoc ad illa non Ecclesiae tantuÌ„modo Christianae verumetiaÌ„ universi mundi de But what maketh this sayth he for officialls promoters Proctors and all that filth of swine which now a long time doth waste the Church of God What is this to these shamefull staines not onely of the Christian Church but also of the whole world Further beside the Churches part which is to take heed to offences and breach of Gods law they have taken the Canon law for the rule of their proceedings both in spousalls mariages and divorces And thirdly have taken in debts and dowries goods and chattels which are accessorie to marriage to judge upon and this must be called Ecclesiasticall cognisance Lastly these causes are of such weight that they are not to be committed to the skill or conscience of one base officiall It is observed by the author of the Assertion for Christian policie that mens inheritances many times hang in suspence upon question of lâ—gitimation or illegitimation of their children to be allowed or disallowed by the Canon law and that many Knights Esquires and Gentlemen doe complaine and bewaâ—le the stealing away and mariages of their daughters neeces neere kinswomen or wards Couples have been married and lived together 4 6 or moe yeares as man and wife and upon a new and sudden dislike and discontentment or upon a surmised precontract pretensedly proved by two suborned witnesses by vertue of the Canon law the husband was adiudged no husband the wife no wife Another example he relateth of one solemnly maried to a wife and after by reason of a precontract solemnly divorced from the same wife and compelled by censures of the Church to marry her for whom sentence of precontract was adjudged and yet authorized by the same consistorie about ten or twelve yeares after the divorce to resummon recall and rechallenge his first wife she having a testimoniall out of the same consistorie of her lawfull divorce and being againe solemnly maried to another husband Licences of mariage have been granted out of their Ecclesiasticall Court with a blanke So the partie licenced was enabled if it had been their pleasure to marry another mans wife or his wives sister Many moe grosse absurdities are there alledged by thâ— learned authour which the Reader will sâ—arce beleeve But I omit them and many other things which might be sayd anent the particulars set down in this Table Succesâ—â—on to the goods of the deceased is either or him who hath made his testamâ—nt or who hath died intestate The first 〈◊〉 her universall when the plea is for proving or improving the testament exhibited or particular when the suit is for to obtain a cerâ—ain legaâ—ie The sâ—cond is either properly when no testament is made or by way of inâ—estate as when there is none who will take upon them the burthen of executorie In either of the cases the action is either to obtaine the administration of the goods and that eitheâ— simply or with the later will annexed that it may be fulfilled or witâ— the tutorship and to the use of the Minâ—râ— or else the action is against him that ingyreth himselfe into the administration and intrometteth with the goods of the deceased not being inabled with any warrant Causes testamentarie and their appendicles are meere civill and temporall and therefore do not belong to spirituall Courts It is by the grant of Kings not by Ecclesiasticall right that Church consistories have medled with such causes Because Bishops were supposed to bee men of good conscience and that they would be carefull to see the later will of the deceased performed then others therefore they were reserved to Episcopal audience and cognisance of Ecclesiasticall Courts But this respect was not founded upon Gods word For we must not looke so much to conscience as to a lawfull calling or else all civill causes pleaded before a Iudge should be referred to Church-men because of their supposed good conscience And the truth is it is but supposed indeed For a Bishop or pastor that will medle in matters impertinent to his calling hath but a bad conscience Such a man will never make conscience of it more then another religious Christian. And what conscience they made of the matter may bee seene in that they transferred that which was committed to their trust to a base Officiall who hath as bad a conscience as the Bishop himselfe and badder if badder may be And as for skill in deciding such causes no man will deny but the civill judges are more able to cognosce and determine in them then Church-men By the common law sayth Lindwood these causes were not committed unto the Church but by the free grant of Princes And therefore in the lawes alledged by him approbation and insinuation of testaments are forbidden Clergiemen Et ratio redditur in juribus illis allegatis quia opprobrium est clericis si peritos ostendere velâ—â—t rerum for â—enseâ—â—â— May not matters of legacies and bequests of goods as well as of lands bee determined in remporall Courts Cannot the Iudges in temporal courts discerne upon proofes and other presumptions whether the testator was of perfect memorie or distracted as they doe in questions of lunacie madnesse or idiocie in men living Can they not define of two wills which is the first which is the later will whether the legacie remaine or bee recalled whether it bee pure or conditionall If a creditor may recouer his debt due by the testator in the teÌ„porall Court what should hinder a legatarie to recover his legacie in the same Court This poynt is made cleare and amplified in the Assertion of true and Christian Church policie To conclude then probates of wills committing of Administrations sequestrations of the goods of the intestate recovering of legacies taking up of inventaries c. belong not to a Church Consistorie and it is a very great abuse that such Consistories should be called Church consistories and that spirituall censures should bee put in execution by them Ecclesiasticall dues and rights are 1. tithes which are either Praediall Personall or Mixt. Praediall tithes are such as come of the
of Shires from Synodes to Nationall Assemblies they must step up a Popish ladder by Archdeacons Officials Bishops Deane of Arches Archbishops saving that at the top of the ladder they finde the Prince for the Pope to whom they must not appeale nor yet to any greater Councels of many reformed or unreformed Churches or to an oecumenicall Councell whatsoever they talke of Generall Councels Now the causes convoyed by these subordinate appellations are all Ecclesiasticall causes agitated in the Ecclesiasticall Courts Of which causes wee are to treat in the third chapter These which belong to Canons or Ecclesiasticall lawes concerne either the making of them or the administration and execution of them or the relaxation of them As for the making of them 1. in that the Prince may make new lawes anent ceremonies and rites with advice either of his Commissioners in causes Ecclesiasticall or of the Metropolitan 2 Synod provinciall or nationall may not be convocated without the Princes writ direct to the Metropolitan 3. Nothing may be treated or determined in the Synode till the Prince first be made privie and give assent 4. Nothing shall have the force of a law till the Royal assent of the Prince be given to those things which the Synod shall think good to decree Beza in his 8. Epistle to Grindal Bishop of London confesseth that he trembleth and shaketh at the first of these heads And in very deed it may turne upside down the whole government of the Church and outward forme of Gods worship overthrow the one and deface the other Did not the Bishops affirme at the examination of Barow that the Queen might establish what Church government it pleased her Highnes Because they dare not affirm that Princes may change any thing that is unchangeable by divine law therefore they make many unchangeable things both in government and externall ceremonies in Gods worship to bee changeable that they make a change at their pleasure and may bring in all that ever was hatched by the Antichrist a Popish Church government significant rites and symbolicall toyes and ceremonies For what may a corrupt Prince and a corrupt Metropolitan or some few corrupt commissioners not challenge for changeable Nay even rites of order and comelines and lawes of things indifferent for a religious use should be considered by the lawfull and ordinary assemblies of the Church how they agree with the generall rules prescribed in the word how they will edifie the Church how God shall be glorified Christian charitie entertained order and comelines preserved For we must not consider things indifferent onely in â—heir generall kinde but in their particular and circumstantiall use which if we permit to Princes they may abuse indiffereÌ„t things to the great hurt of the Church Synods ought not to be convocate without the Princes privitie or the warrant of the law in generall but if the Prince be wilful in denying his assent and the Church be in extreame danger ready to be overwhelmed or greatly disturbed with heresies schismes divisions enormities we may use the benefit of the law and if the law of man be wanting yet the Church should not cease from doing her dutie and exercising that power which is granted her by Christ who hath also promised his presence when but two or three are convened in his name Salus Ecclesiae suprema lex esto The power of Christian Princes in the Church is cumulative to aid her to execute her power freely not privative to deprive and spoile her of any power Christ hath granted to her And by the same reason the Church may entreate determine and strengthen her decrees and constitutions with Ecclesiasticall censures and punishments notwithstanding the Prince will not assent approve ratifie the Canons of the Church nor confirme them by his lawes and fortifie them with temporal punishments Prudence I confesse is required in the Church to weigh the case of necessity when to put this â—er power in practise As for the administration and execution of lawes in that the Prince may 1. visit the Ecclesiasticall state and their persons 2. reforme redresse and correct them and whatsoever sort of heresies schismes errours abuses offences contempts and enormities of any whomsoever 3. to assigne nominate and authorize when and as often as it is his pleasure such persons being naturall borne subjects as he shall think meet 1. to exercise and execute all manner of jurisdictions privileges and preeminences in any wise touching or concerning any spirituall or Ecclesiastical jurisdiction 2 to visit 3 to reforme correct and amend all such excesses or defects whatsoever which by any maner of Ecclesiasticall power authority or jurisdiction might been have been reformed ordered corrected amended or restrained The Princes power in visiting reforming and correcting abuses enormities errours heresies c. may be seen as in a liuely picture in the high commission to be not onely a temporall power but also a spirituall to inflict Ecclesiasticall censures punishments For the Prince could not communicate this power to his Delegate Commissioners except he claimed it to himselfe as Principall For none can transferre that to others which he hath not himselfe It must follow therefore that the Princes power is Ecclesiastical not onely in respect of the object and matter whereupon it worketh as heresies errours abuses c. but also formally in respect of the manner to wit by inflicting Ecclesiasticall censures and punishments unlesse we will affiâ—me that suspension deposition excommunication are not Ecclesiastical but civill punishments and censures which were absurd We shall entreat of the power of the high commission in the next chapter severally by it selfe As for the relaxation of the Canons or lawes in that 1. first for ever when as they are altogether abrogated by the Prince 2. for a time onely as when hee granteth remission of any crime or transgression of the Canons for times by gone and to come when both infamie is abolished and the transgressor is restored to his former state 4. When the grace of the Canon is granted for time to come to any certaine person upon speciall occasion the cause being tried which grace they call dispensation which is for the most part done when the faculties of this kinde granted by the Archbishop of Canterbury upon whom this office doth lye by statute are confirmed with the great seale of England or when if he without just cause refuseth the Chancellour of England granteth them primarily according to the statute made thereanent If the Prince may abrogate the canons of the Church without consent of the church in vain were the Canons of the Church made Or that the Church may not abrogate any canon when they finde it proveth inconvenient is as great an inconvenience In vaine likewise are canons strengthened and guarded with censures and punishments and the black markes of infamie set upon heynous crimeswith the legall effects thereof if the Prince may abolish the crime as simoniacall paction or any the like