Selected quad for the lemma: duty_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
duty_n	body_n	part_n	soul_n	1,351	5	5.0190	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A49581	A compendium of the art of logick and rhetorick in the English tongue Containing all that Peter Ramus, Aristotle, and others have writ thereon: with plaine directions for the more easie understanding and practice of the same.; Dialectica. English	Ramus, Petrus, 1515-1572.; R. F.; Aristotle.	1651 (1651)	Wing L433; ESTC R215450	104,257	346

general A. From the general proposition and assumption Q. How is it speciall A. From one of the generals only Q. And how is it proper A. From both propers Q. What are the kinds of the simple syllogisme A. The simple syllogisme is contracted by parts or explicated Q. What is contract A. Contract is when the argument for the example is so subjected to a particular question that the antecedent may be understood to affirm each part and in the assumption Q. Give an example A. Certain confidence is vertue as constancy certain confidence is not vertue as boldnesse Q. Shew the force of this example A. This argument is understood to go before each part of the question as if it were expressed constancy is a vertue and confidence and therefore certain confidence is a vertue also boldnesse is not a vertue and yet it is confidence and therefore some confidence is not a vertue So in the use of disputing the Master of the syllogisme draweth the judgement neither is it set forth otherwise And by this exposition the beginning of the syllogism is expounded by Aristotle so that the syllogisme in its full judgement is more clear and manifest CAP. 11. The first kinde of the simple explicated Syllogisme Q. What is the explicated Syllogisme A. The explicated Syllogism is whose parts are explicated Q. What are the proprieties in this explicated Syllogisme A. Two first the proposition is generall or proper secondly the conclusion is like to the antecedent or the the weaker part Q. What are the kinds of it A. The kinds are two-fold Q. What is the first A. The first is where the argument always followeth the negative in the other part Q. Shew some Syllogisme of this kind A. GEN. 1. Ce A troubled man useth not his reason well sa But a wise man useth his reason well re A wise man is not therefore troubled Q. Produce the example of some Orator for this Syllogisme A. This judgment is so brought forth of Cicero Tusc. 3. And when saith he the eye is troubled it is not honestly affected to the fulfilling of its duty and the rest of the parts as also the whole body when it is moved from its state wanteth its office and function so a troubled mind is not honestly affected to fulfill his duty But the duty of the mind is to use reason and a wise man is always so affected that he useth reason most excellently he is therefore never troubled Q. Give example of another generall Syllogisme A. GEN. 2. Ca A mortall thing is compound me A soul is not compound stres A soul therefore is not mortall Q. Produce the authority of some Ancient avouching this Syllogisme A. Cicero judgeth the soul to be immortall by this syllogisme Tusc. 1. For we cannot doubt saith he in our minds unlesse we be perchance ignorant in physicall things but that there is nothing knit to soules nothing connexed nothing copulate nothing joyned nothing double which when it is so can surely never be parted nor divided nor severed nor drawn asunder therefore neither perish for perishing is as it were a departure and separation or breach of those parts which before the perishing were joyned together Q. Give an example of a speciall syllogisme A. SPEC 1. Fe A pale man is not couragious sti Maximus is couragious no. Maximus therefore is not pale Q. Produce authority for this syllogisme A. But this judgment Ovid. concludeth De Pont. 3. El. 3. Paleness and sloth are not in the high mind Rather with vipers them on ground we finde In highest things thy minde excels we see No name I finde t' express the wit of thee Some miseries do taste hurt and outworn Are made to feel sharpe pricking of the thorn Yet thou art wont to help complaining men Amongst which number pray let me be then Q. Shew another example of the speciall syllogisme A. SPEC 2. Ba A dancer is Lecherous ro Murena is not Lecherous co Murena therefore is no dancer Q. Produce some Orator for this syllogisme A. Cic. pro Mur. For no man almost being sober danceth unlesse perchance he be mad neither alone nor at a moderate and honest banquet for dancing is the companion of untimely banquets pleasant places and many delights Thou snatchest that from me that it is necessary that vices should be thou leavest that whereby this removed this vice ought not to be at all no filthy banquet no love no gluttony is shewed and when we finde not all these things which have the name of pleasure and vices there thou canst not finde lechery nay thinkest thou to finde a shadow of lust in such Q. Avouch some other authority after the like manner A. After this manner of judgement Ovid de Trist. 1. concludeth triply whil'st he sets forth the excuse of his verses They that make verses should not merry be Our time is clouded with adversity They that write verses should enjoy their ease The seas the windes with winter fierce me presse Good poets should not fear but I feare death I dread lest swords do take away my breath Then what is here a right judge will admire If reading them they satisfie's desire Q. Give example of proper syllogisms A. PRO. 1. Agesilaus is not painted by Apelles Alexander is painted by Apelles Alexander therefore is not Agesilaus Q. Give another example of a proper Syllogism A. PRO. 2. Cesar oppressed his countrey Tullius opressed not his countrey Tullius therefore is not Cesar. CAP. 12. The second kinde of the simple explicate Sollogism Q What is the second kinde of the explicate Syllogisme A. The second kinde of the explicate Syllogisme is when the argument goeth before in the proposition the affirmative followeth in the assumption Q. Give an example of an affirmative generall after this kinde A. AFF. GUN Bar Every just thing is profitable ba Every honest thing is just ra Every honest thing therefore is profitable Q. Produce some Orator avouching this Syllogisme A. Thus Cicero concludeth Offic. 2. The Philosophers truly with great authority severely soundly and honestly do distinguish these three confused kindes by cogitation For whatsoever is just that also they think to be profitable also whatsoever is honest that is just from whence ariseth That whatsoever is honest that is also profitable Q. Give an example of a Negative Generall Syllogisme A. NEG. GEN. Ce A fearfull man is not free la A covetous man is fearfull rent A covetous man therefore is not free Q. Prove this by some Poet. A. It is thus concluded and judged by Horace Epist. 1. Who freer is he that as servant dwelleth Or he that in his monies love excelleth I do not see he that desires doth fear And he that fears his freedom doth not bear Q. Give another example of this kind of Syllogisme A. Ter. in Eu. concludeth and judgeth this That which is void of counsell cannot be governed by counsell Love is void of counsell It cannot therefore be governed by