Selected quad for the lemma: duty_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
duty_n	bind_v	law_n	nature_n	1,568	5	5.4669	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A91185	The fourth part of The soveraigne povver of parliaments and kingdomes. Wherein the Parliaments right and interest in ordering the militia, forts, ships, magazins, and great offices of the realme, is manifested by some fresh records in way of supplement: the two Houses imposition of moderate taxes and contributions on the people in cases of extremity, without the Kings assent, (when wilfully denyed) for the necessary defence and preservation of the kingdome; and their imprisoning, confining of malignant dangerous persons in times of publicke danger, for the common safety; are vindicated from all calumnies, and proved just. Together with an appendix; manifesting by sundry histories and foraine authorities, that in the ancient kingdome of Rome; the Roman, Greeke, German empires; ... the supreame soveraigne power resided not in the emperours, or kings themselves, but in the whole kingdome, senate, parliament, state, people ... / By William Prynne, utter-barrester, of Lincolnes Inne. It is this tenth day of July, ordered ... that this booke .... be printed by Michael Sparke senior. John White.; Soveraigne power of parliaments and kingdomes. Part 4	Prynne, William, 1600-1669.; England and Wales. Parliament. House of Comomns.	1643 (1643)	Wing P3962; Thomason E248_4; ESTC R203192	339,674	255

that We c. out of meere and free will have given and granted to all Archbishops Bishops E●rles Barons and to all free men of this our Realm of England and by this our present Charter have confirmed FOR US AND OUR HEIRS FOR EVERMORE these liberties underwritten to have and to hold to them and their Heirs OF US AND OUR HEIRS FOR EVERMORE c. together with the whole tenour and title of this Charter and the two last Chapters of it All those customs and liberties aforesaid which we have granted to be holden within our Realme as much AS APPERTAINETH TO US AND OUR HEIRS WE SHALL OBSERVE And for this our gift and grant of those Liberties c. our Subjects have given us the fifteenth part of all their moveables And We have granted to them on the other part that NEITHER WE NOR OUR HEIRS shall procure or doe any thing whereby the Liberties in this Charter contained shall be infringed or broken We confirme and make strong all the same FOR US AND OUR HEIRS PERPETUALLY not the Parliament All these I say infallibly demonstrate that this Statute of Magna Charta did never extend unto the Parliament to restraine its hands or power but onely to the King his Heirs Officers Courts of Justice and particular subjects So that the Parliaments imprisoning of Malignants imposing Taxes for the necessary defence of the Realm and seizing mens goods or imprisoning their persons for non-payment of it is no wayes within the words or intent of Magna Charta as Royallists and Malignants ignorantly clamour but the Kings his Officers Councellours and Cavalliers proceedings of this nature are cleerly most direct violations of this Law And that which puts this past dispute are the severall Statutes of 25. Edward 3. cap. 4. Statute 5. 37. Edward 3. cap. 18. 38 Edward 3. cap. 9. 42. Edward 3. cap. 3. 17. Richard 2. cap. 6. and the Petition of right it self all which expresly resolve that this very objected Law of Magna Charta extends onely to the King himselfe his Privy Councell Judges Justices Officers and inferiour Courts of Justice but not unto the supream Court of Parliament which no man for ought I finde ever yet held to be absolutely obliged by it before the Kings late recesse from Parliament The next Statute is that of 34. Edward 1. cap. 1. No tallage nor aid shall be taken or leavied BY US AND OUR HEIRS not the Parliament in our Realme without the good will and assent of the Archbishops Bishops Earls Barons Knights Burgesses and other free men of the Land which the Statute of * 25. Edward 1. thus explains But by the common consent of the Realme The Statute of 14. Edward 3. cap. 21. and Statute 2. cap 1. thus If it be not by common consent of the Prelatos Earles Barons and other great men and Commons of our said Realme of England AND THAT IN PARLIAMENT The Statute of 25. Edward the third cap. 8. thus If it be not BY COMMON CONSENT AND GRANT IN PARLIAMENT The Statute of 36. Edward the third cap. 11. thus That no Subsidie nor other charge be set nor granted upon the Woolls by the Merchants nor by NONE OTHER from henceforth WITHOUT THE ASSENT OF THE PARLIAMENT The Statute of 45. Edward 3. cap. 4. thus It is accorded and stablished That no imposition or charge shall be put upon Woolls Woollfels or Leather oth●r then the custome and subsidie granted to the King WITHOUT THE ASSENT OF THE PARLIAMENT and if any be it shall be repealed and holden for none And the Petition of Right 3. Caroli thus By which Statutes and other good Statutes of this Realm your Subjects have inherited this freedom that they should not be compelled to contribute any Taxe Tallage Custome Aide or other like charge not set BY COMMON CONSENT IN PARLIAMENT Now it is as evident as the noonday sunshine that these Acts onely extend to the King his Heirs Councell Officers inferiour Courts and private Subjects onely and that the Parliament is precisely excepted out of the very intent and letter of them all having free power to impose on the Subjects what Aids Taxes Tallages Customes and Subsidies they shall deem meet by the expresse provision of all these Laws concerning the granting and imposing of Subsidies Therefore by the direct resolution of these Acts the Kings his Councellors present contributions assessements and ransoms imposed on the Subjects are illegall against the letter and provision of all these Acts but the Parliaments and Houses lawfull approved and confirmed by them True will Royallists and Malignants answer who have no other evasion left but this If the King were present in Parliament and consenting to these contributions and taxes of the twentieth part there were no doubt of what you alleage but because the King is absent and not only disassents to but prohibits the payment of this or any Parliamentary Assessments by his Proclamations therefore they are illegall and against these Laws 1 To which I answer First that the King by his Oath duty the ancient custom and Law of the land ought of right to be alwayes present with his Parliament as he is now in point of Law and not to depart from it but in cases of urgent necessity with the Houses free consents and then must leave Commissoners or a Deputy to supply his absence This is not onely confessed but proved by a Booke lately printed at Oxford 1642. with the Kings approbation or permission intituled No Parliament without a King pag. 5. to 16. where by sundry presidents in all Kings Reignes it is manifested That Kings were and ought to be present in their Parliaments which I have formerly cleared If then the King contrary to these Presidents his Oath Duty the Laws and Customs of the Realme the practice of all his Progenitors the rules of nature which prohibit the head to separate it selfe from the body and will through the advice of malignant Councellours withdraw himselfe from his Parliament yea from such a Parliament as himselfe by a speciall Act hath made in some sort perpetuall at the Houses pleasure and raise an Army of Papists Delinquents Malignants and such like against it and that purposely to dissolve it contrary to this very Law of his for its continuance why this illegall tortious act of his paralleld in no age should nullifie the Parliament or any way invalid its Impositions or Proceedings for their own the Kingdoms Peoples and Religions preservation all now indangered transcends any reasonable mans capacity to apprehend 2. The right and power of granting imposing assenting unto Assessements Taxes Subsidies and such like publique charges in Parliament for the publique safety rests wholly in the Commons and Lords not King and is their owne free act alone depending no waies on the Kings assent nor necessarily requiring his personall presence in Parliament This is evident First by the expresse letter of the forecited Acts No Subsidy Tax Ayde

b. Fiftly it is undeniable that the Knights Citizens Burgesses and Commons in Parliament elected by the suffrages of the severall Counties Cities and Burroughs of England do really and legally represent all the Commons and the Lords and they the whole Realm and all the people of England so that what ever Tax is imposed and assented to by them or by both Houses onely without the King who represents no man but Himselfe alone is in point of Law imposed and assented to by all the Commons and whole Realm of England as the recitals in all our Statutes and Law-bookes resolve though the King assent not to it If therefore as our Law-books clearely resolve without dispute and the experience of all Corporations Parishes and Mannors evidenceth past contradiction all Ordinances and Bylaws made for the common good of Corporations Parishioners Tenants of a Mannor and the like by all or the greater part of the Corporations Parishioners Tenants and Taxes imposed by them for the Common good as repairing of Churches High-waies Bridges reliefe of the poore and the like shall binde the rest even in point of Law without the Kings assent Then by the same or better reason the impositions and Taxes now laid upon the subjects by the assent and Ordinances of both Houses of Parliament representing the whole Commons and Realme of England who actually assent likewise to these Taxes and Assessements in and by them must and ought in point of Law to oblige all the Subjects in this case of necessity at least as long as the Parliament continues sitting and this their representation of them remains entire especially being for the necessary defence of the Parliament Kingdome Religion all our lives estates liberties lawes against an invading Army of Papists and Malignants in a case of extraordinary extremity This I shall further cleare by some ancient and late judgements in point Mich. 14 Ed. 2. rot 60. in the Kings Bench William Heyborne brought an Action of Trespasse against William Keylow for entering his house and breaking his chests and taking away 70 pounds in money the Defendant pleading Nor guilty the Jury found a speciall Verdict that the Scots having entred the Bishopricke of Durham with an Army and making great burning and spoyles thereupon the Commonalty of Durham whereof the Plantiffe was one met together at Durham and agreed to send some to compound with them for a certaine summe of money to depart the Country and were all sworne to performe what compositions should be made and to performe what Ordinance they should make in that behalfe and that thereupon they compounded with the Scots for 1600 Markes But because that was to be paid immediately they all consented that William Keylow the Defendant and others should goe into every mans house to search what ready money was there and to take it for the raising of that summe and that it should be suddenly repaid by the Communalty of Durham And that thereupon the Defendant did enter into the Plaintiffs house and broke open the chest and tooke the seventy pounds which was paid accordingly towards that composition And upon a Writ of Error in the Kings Bench it was adjudged for the Defendant against the Plaintiffe that the action did not lie because he himselfe had agreed to this Ordinance and was sworne to performe it and that the Defendant did nothing but what he assented to by Oath and therefore is accounted to doe nothing but by his consent as a servant to him and the Commonalty of Durham therefore he was no trespasser Which case was agreed for good Law by all the Judges in the late Case of Ship-money argued in the Exchequor Chamber though neither King nor Parliament consented to this Taxe or Composition This is the Parliaments present case in effect The King having raised an Army of Papists Delinquents Forraigners Irish Rebels disaffected Persons and actually invading the Kingdom and Parliament with it Hereupon the Parliament were inforced to raise an Army to defend themselves and the Realm against these Invasions For maintenance whereof they at first made use onely of voluntary contributions and supplies proceeding onely from the liberality of some private persons best affected to the publike service Which being xehausted The Lords and Commons considering what a sol●mne Covenant and Protestation themselves had made and taken and the Subjects likewise throwout the Realm to maintain and defend as farre as lawfully they might WITH THEIR LIVES POWER AND ESTATES The true Reformed Protestant Religion c. As also THE POWER AND PRIVILEDGES OF PARLIAMENT THE LAWFULL RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF THE SUBJECT And every person that maketh this Protestation in whatsoever he shall do in the lawfull pursuance of the sam● c. as in the Protestation made by both Houses consents when fullest And considering that the whole Commons and Kingdoms assents were legally and actually included in what they assented in Parliament for the necessary defence of the Realm the Subjects Parliaments Priviledges Rights and the Reformed Religion all actually invaded endangered by an Ordinance of both Houses without the Kings consent then absent from and in open hostilitie against them impose a generall Assessement upon all the Subjects NOT EXCEEDING THE TWENTIETH PART OF THEIR ESTATES And for non-payment prescribe a distresse c. Why this Assessement in this case of necessitie being thus made by assent of both Houses and so of all the Kingdom in them in pursuance of this Protestation should not as legally yea more justly o●lige every particular subject though the King assented not thereto as well as that agreement of the men of Durham did oblige them even in point of Law Justice Conscience transcends my capacitie to apprehend and if the first Case be Law as all the Judges then and of late affirmed the latter questionlesse must be much more Legall and without exceptions M. 32. and 33. Eliz. in the Kings Bench in the Chamberlain of Londons case it was adjudged That an Ordinance made by the Common Councell of London only that all Clothes should be brought to Blackwell-hall to be there veiwed searche● and measured before they were sold and that a penny should be paid for every Cloth for the Officer that did the same and that six shillings eight pence should be forfeited for every Cloth not brought thither and searched was good to binde all within the Citie and that an Action of Debt would lye at the Common Law both for the duty and forfeiture because it was for the publike benefit of the City and Common-Wealth M. 38. Eliz. in the Common-Pleas it was adjudged in Clerks Case That an Ordinance made by assert of the Burgesses of Saint Albanes whereof the Plaintiffe was one for assessing of a certain summe of Money upon every Inhabitant for the erecting of Courts there the Term being then adjourned thither from London by reason of the Plague with a p●nalty to be●l●●yed by distresse for non-payment of this Tax

was good to binde all the Inhabitants there because it was for the publike good Mich. 31. and 32. Eliz. in the Kings Bench William Jefferies Case and Pasch 41. Eliz. Pagets Case it was resolved That the Church-Wardens with the greater part of the Parishioners assents may lay a Taxe upon all the Parishioners according to the quantitie of their Lands and Estates or the number of Acres of Land they hold the Taxe there was four pence an Acre for Marsh-Land and two pence for Earable for the necessary reparation of the Church and that this shall binde all the Inhabitants so as they may be Libelled against in the Spirituall Court for non-payment thereof and no prohibition lieth The like hath been resolved in sundry other Cases And by the Common-Law of England where by the breach of Sea-Walls the Country is or may be surrounded every one who hath Lands within the levell or danger which may have benefit or losse by the inundation may and shall be enforced to contribute towards the repair and making up of the Sea-walls and a reasonable Tax assessed by a Jury or the Major-part shall binde all the rest because it is both for their own private and the common good If the Law be thus unquestionably adjudged in all these Cases without the Kings assent then much more must this Assessement imposed by both Houses be obligatory in point of Law and Justice though the King consented not thereto since the Houses and whole Kingdom consented to it for their own defence and preservation Sixthly This is a dutie inseparably incident by the Fundamentall Law and originall compact of every Kingdom Citie Corporation Company or Fraternitie of men in the World that every Member of them should contribute proportionably upon all occasions especially in Cases of imminent danger toward the necessary charges defence and preservation of that Kingdom Citie Corporation Company or Fraternitie of which he is a Member without which contribution they could be neither a Kingdom Citie Corporation Company Fraternitie or have any continuance or subsistence at all Which Contributions are assessed by Parliaments in Kingdoms by the Aldermen or Common-Councell in Cities by the Master and Assistants in Fraternities and what the Major part concludes still bindes the Residue and the dissent of some though the Major or Master of the Company be one shall be no obstacle to the rest This all our Acts concerning Subsidies Aydes Tonnage and Poundage the daily practice and constant experience of every Kingdom Citie Corporation Company Fraternitie in the World manifests past all contradictions which being an indubitable veritie I think no reasonable man can produce the least shadow of Law or Reason why the Parliament representing the whole Body of the Kingdom and being the supream Power Counsell in the Realm bound both in Dutie and Conscience to provide for its securitie may not in this Case of extremitie legally impose this necessary Tax for their own the Kingdoms Subjects Laws Religions preservations of which they are the proper Judges Gardians and should not rather be credited herein then a private Cabinet Court-Counsell of persons disaffected to the Republike who impose now farre greater Taxes on the Subjects and plunder spoyl destroy them every where directly against the Law of purpose to ruine both Parliament Kingdom Religion Laws Liberties and Posteritie Seventhly It is confessed by all That if the King be an Infant Non-Compos absent in Forraign remote parts or detained prisoner by an Enemy that the Kingdom or Parliament in all such Cases may without the Kings actuall personall assent create a Protector or Regent of their own Election and not onely make Laws but grant Subsidies impose Taxes and raise Forces for the Kingdoms necessary defence as sundry domestick and forraign Presidents in the preceding Parts and Appendix evidence And Hugo Grotius Junius Brutus with other Lawyers acknowledge as a thing beyond all dispute Nay if the King be of full age and within the Realm if a forraign enemy come to invade it and the King neglect or refuse to set out a Navy or raise any Forces to resist them The Lords and Commons in such a Case of extremitie may and are bound in Law and Conscience so to do for their own and the Kingdoms preservation not onely in and by Parliament but without any Parliament at all if it cannot be conveniently summoned lawfully raise forces by Sea and Land to encounter the Enemies and impose Taxes and Contributions to this purpose on all the Subjects by common consent with clauses of distresse and imprisonment in case of refusall as I have elsewhere proved And if in Case of invasion even by the Common-Law of the Realm any Captains or Souldiers may lawfully enter into another mans ground and there encamp muster or build Forts to resist the Enemy or pull down the Suburbs of a Citie to preserve the Citie it self when in danger to be fired or assaulted by an Enemy without the speciall consent of King Parliament or the Owners of the Lands or Houses without Trespasse or offence because it is for the publike safetie as our Law Books resolve Then much more may both Houses of Parliament when the King hath through the advice of ill Councellors wilfully deserted them refused to return to them and raised an Army of Papists and Malignants against them and the Realm now miserably sacked and wasted by them as bad as by any forraign Enemies both take up Arms raise an Army and impose Assessements and Contributions by Ordinances unanimously voted by them against which no Lover of his Country or Religion no nor yet the greatest Royallist or Malignant can with the least shadow of Law or Reason justly except Eightly If they shall now demand what Presidents there are for this I Answer First That the Parliament being the Soveraign Power and Counsell in the Realm is not tyed to any Presidents but hath power to make new Presidents as well as new Laws in new Cases and mischiefs where there are no old Presidents or vary from them though there be ancient ones if better and fitter Presidents may be made as every Court of Justice likewise hath Power to give new Judgements and make new Presidents in new Cases and may sometimes swerve from old Presidents where there were no ancient Presidents to guide them even as Physitians invent new Medicines Chyrurgions new Emplaisters for new Diseases Ulcers or where old Medicines and Balsomes are inconvenient or not so proper as new ones And as men and women daily invent and use new Fashions at their pleasure Tradesmen new Manifactures without licence of King or Parliament because they deem them better or more comely then the old Secondly I might demand of them by what old domestick lawfull Presidents His Majesties departure from the Parliament His Levying Warre against it His proclaiming many Members of it Traytors and now all of them Traytors and no Parliament His unvoting of their Votes

justice preserve the Empire protect Widowes Orphans and all worthy of pitty which when he hath solemnly sworn to perform before the Altar the Princes and those who represent the Empire are demanded whether they will promise to fealty him Neither yet is he first annointed or receives a sword of purpose to defend the Republike or other Ensignes of the Empire before that he shall have taken that Oath From whence verily it is manifest that the Emperour is purely obliged the Princes of the Empire upon condition onely No man will doubt but that the same is observed in the kingdom of Poland who shall understand the ceremonies very lately observed in the Election and Coronation of Henry of Angiers especially the condition propounded to him of conserving both Religions as well the Evangelicall as Roman which the Nobles thrice demanding of him in set forme of words he thrice promised to perform In the Hungarian Bohemian and other kingdomes which would be over-long to recite the very same is done Neither onely where the right of Election hath continued yet entire hitherto but likewise where meer succession is commonly thought to take place the very same stipulation is wont to intervene When the King of France is crowned the Bishops of Laudune and Belvace ecclesiasticall Peers first demand of all the people that are present Whether they desire and command him to be King Whence even in the very forme it self of inauguration he is said To be elected by the People When the people Seem to have consented he sweares That he will universally defend all the Lawes Priviledges and Rights of France that he will not alienate his demesnes and the like I shall here insert the Oath out of Bochellus Mr. Selden and others intirely thus Archiepiscopi Ammonitio ad Regem dicendo ita in the name of all the Clergy A vobis perdonari petimus ut vnicuique de Nobis Ecclesiis nobis Commissis Canonicum privilegium debitam legem atque justitiam conservatis defensionem exhibeatis sicut Rex in Regno suo debet unicuique Episcopo Ecclesiae sibi Commissae Responsio Regis ad Episcopos Promitto vobis perdono quia vnicuique de vobis Ecclesiis vobis commissis Canonicum privilegium debitam legem atque justitiam conservabo defensionem quantum potuero exhibebo Domino adjuanente sicut Rex in suo Regno unicuique Episcopo ecclesiae sibi commissae per rectum exhibere debet Item haec dicit Rex promittit firmat juramento Haec populo Christiano mihi subdito in Christi nomine promitto In primis Vt Ecclesiae Dei omnis Populus Christianus veram pacem nostro arbitrio in omni tempore servet superioritatem jura Nobilitates Coronae Franciae inviolabiliter custodiam ET ILLA NEC TRANSPORTABO NEC ALIENABO Item ut omnes repacitates omnes iniquitates omnibus gradibus interdicam Item ut in omnibus judiciis aequitatem misericordiam praeoipiam ut mihi vobis indulgeat per suam misericordiam clemens misericors Dominus Item de terra mea ac jurisdictione mihi subdita universos Haereticos Ecclesia denotatos pro viribus bona fide exterminare studebo Haec omnia praedicta firmo juramento Tum manum apponat Libro librum osculetur These things though they have been altered and are farre different from the ancient forme of the Oath which is extant in the Library of the Chapter of Belvace to which Philip the first is found to have sworn yet notwithstanding they are plainly enough expressed Neither is the King girt with a sword annointed crowned by the Peeres who even themselves are adorned with Coronets or receives the Scepter or rod of Iustice or is proclaimed King before THE PEOPLE HAVE COMMANDED IT Neither doe the Peeres themselves swear fealty and homage to him untill he shall have given his faith unto them That he will exactly keep the Lawes Now those are that hee shall no● w●ste the publike Patrimony that he shall not impose nor enjoyn customes Taxes Tributes at his owne pleasure Nor denounce warre or make peace Finally that he shall determine nothing concerning the publike affaires but in a publike Councell Also that the Senate the Parliaments the Officers of the Kingdome shall constantly enjoy their severall authorities and other things which have been alwayes observed in the Realm of France Yea verily when he enters into any Province or City hee is bound to confirm their priviledges and he binds himselfe by Oath to preserve their Lawes and Customes Which custome takes place by name among those of Tholouse Dolphenie Britanny Province and Rochel whose agreements with Kings are most expresse all which should be frustrate unlesse they should be thought to hold the place of a condition in the contract Yea Charles the 7. made a peace with Philip Duke of Burgundy whose Father Iohn he had treacherously slain with this expresse clause contained in it confirmed with the Kings own Seale That if he should break this Agreement his Tenants feudataries and subjects present and to come should not be thenceforth bound either to obey or serve him but rather the Duke of Burgundy and his Successours and that they should be freed and absolved from all the fealty Oathes promises obligations and duties whatsoever under which they were unjustly obliged by Charles The like we read between King Lewis and Charles the Bald. Yea Pope Iohn the 22. in the Treaty between Philip the long of France and the Flemmings caused it to be set downe That if the King did infringe the Treaty it might be lawfull for his Subjects to take Armes against him And if was usuall among the first Kings of France in their Treatises with other Princes to sweare that if they brake the Treaties made by them their Subjects shall be free from their obedience as in the Treaty of Arras and others The Oath of the ancient kings of Burgundy is extant in these words I will conserve Law justice and protection to all men In England Scotland Sweden Donmarke there is almost the same custome as in France and verily no where more directly then in Spain For in the Kingdome of Arragon many ceremonies being dispatched between him who represents the justice of Arragon or publike Majesty who sits in an higher Throne and having read the Lawes and conditions which he is to observe who is to be crowned King Who doth fealty and homage to him the Nobles at last speake thus to the King in their owne language We who are as powerfull as you for so the Spanish Idiom imports and can doe more then you have chosen you King upon these and these conditions Betwéen you and us there reignes one greater then you to wit the Iustice of A●ragon Now lest he should think he had sworn those things onely perfunctorily or onely for to observe the old custome these very words are wont to

be repeated every third yeere in the publike Assembly But if he shall grow insolent trusting to his Royall power shall violate the publike Lawes finally shall neglect the Oath he hath taken then verily by the Law it selfe he is deemed excommunicated with that grandest excommunication or Anathema wherewith the Church in former times excommunicated Iulian the Apostate whose force truly is such that no more prayers may be conceiued for him but against him and they themselves are clearly absolved from their Oath and Obligation by that Law whereby a vassall out of duty ought not to obey an excommunicated Lord neither is bound to do it by his Oath which is ratified among them by the Decree both of a Councell and of a Parliament or publike Assembly Likewise in the kingdome of Castle an Assembly being summoned the King that is to be crowned is first publikely admonished of his duty after which most expresse conditions are read which pertaine to the profit of the Republike Then the King sweares that he will diligently and faithfully observe them then at last the great Master of the Knights b●nds himselfe to him by Oath whom the other Princes and Deputies of Cities afterwards follow every one in his order which also is in like manner observed in Portugall Le●n and the other kingdomes of Spain Neither verily were lesser principalities instituted by any other Law There are extant most expresse agreements of the Brabanders of the other people of Belgia Austria Carintha and other provinces made with their princes which verily have the place of conditions But the Brahanders expresly that place might not be left to any ambiguity have expressed this condition For in inaugurating their Duke in ancient conventions wherein there is almost nothing wanting for the preservation of the Republike they being all read over before the Duke they protest openly and plainly to him that unlesse he shall observe them all That it shall be frée for them to chuse another Duke at their pleasure Which conditions he embracing and willingly acknowledging he then binds himselfe by Oath to observe them which was also observed in the inauguration of Philip the last King of Spaine In sum no man can deny but that there is a mutuall binding contract between the King and subjects to wit That he raigning well shall be well obeyed Which verily is wont to be confirmed with an Oath by the King first● afterwards by the people Now verily I demand here why any man should sweare but that he may shew that he speaks from his heart and seriously whether truly is there any thing more agreeable to nature then that those things which have pleased us should be observed Moreover why doth the King swear first at the peoples stipulation or request but that he may receive either a tacit or expresse condition But why is a condition annexed to a contract but onely to this end that if it bee not fulfilled the contract should become voide in Law it selfe But if through default of performing the condition the contract be voide in Law it selfe who may call the people perjured who shall deny obedience to a King neglecting that condition which hee might and ought to fulfil violating that law to which he hath sworn Yea who on the contrary would not account the King saedifragous perjurious altogether unworthy of that benefit For if the Law freeth the Vassal from the bond of his Tenure against whom the Lord hath committed felony or perjury although the Lord truly doth not properly give his faith to his Vassall but his Vassall to him if the Law of the twelve Tables commands a Patron who defrauded his Client to be detestable if the civil laws permit a villain enfranchised an action against the outragious injury of his Lord if in these cases they free a servant himself from his Masters power wheras yet there is only a naturall not civill obligation therein I shall adde out of Dejure Magistratus in subditos ●f in Matrimony which is the nearest and strictest obligation of all other between men wherin God himselfe intervenes as the chief Author of the contract and by which those who were two are made one flesh if the one party forsakes the other the Apostle pronounceth the party forsaked to be free from all obligation because the party deserting violates the chief condition of marriage c. Shal not the people be much more absolved from their Allegiance which they have made to the King if the King who first solemnly sweares to them as a Steward to his Lord shall break his faith Yea verily whether if not these Rights not these Solemnities not these Sacraments or Oathes should intervene doth not nature it selfe sufficiently teach that Kings are constituted by the people upon this condition that they should reign well Iudges that they shall pronounce Law Captaines of warre that they should lead an Army against enemies But and if so be they rage offer injury so as themselves are made enemies as they are no Kings so neither ought they to be acknowledged by the people What if thou shalt say that some people subdued by force the Prince hath compelled to swear to his commands What say I if a Thiefe a Pyrate a Tyrant with whom no society of Law or Right is thought to be should with a drawn sword violently extort a deed from any one Is it not known that fealty extorted by force bindeth not especially if any thing be promised against good manners against the law of nature Now what is more repugnant to nature then that a people should lay chaines and fetters upon themselves then that they should lay their own throats to the sword then that they should lay violent hands upon themselves or which is verily the same thing promise it to the Prince Therefore there is a mutuall obligation between the King and people which whether it be only civill or naturall tacit or in expresse words can be taken away by no agreements violated by no Law re●●●nded by no force Whose force only is so great that the Prince who shall contemptuously break it may be truly called a Tyrant the people who shall willingly infringe it seditious So this grand accute Lawyer determines I shall close up this with the unanimous resolutions and notable decree of the United Netherland Provinces Anno Dom. 1581. declaring Philip King of Spain to be fallen from the Seigniorie of the Netherlands for his Tyranny and breach of Oath which is thus recited by Grimstone and recorded in his generall History of the Netherlands page 658 to 667. In the alterations which happen sometimes in an Estate betwixt the Soveraigne Prince and a people that is free and priviledged there are ordinarily two points which make them to ayme at two divers ends The one is when as the Prince seeks to have a full subjection and obedience of the people and the people contrariwise require that the Prince

and others to call the people to Arms and not onely to defend themselves and others against such a one but plainly to deject him from his Throne For the intire Government of the Realm is not committed by the people to the Prince alone as neither the Bishopprick of the whole Church to the Pope but to every one of the Nobles or Magistrates according to his power For the Nobles as they are called into part of the honour so of the burthen of the Commonwealth which is committed to the Prince as to the Supreme Tutor but to them as Fellow-tutors he having the first they the second place in governing the Republike The Prince swears that he will seek the good of the Realm and all the Nobles promise the same therefore if he doth ill they ought not to do so likewise if the Republike go to ruine they shall not continue For the Common-wealth is no lesse committed to them than to the King so as they ought not onely to do their duty but also to contain the Prince within the limits of his duty For if the Prince doth ought against his Oath they are not absolved from their Oaths but rather then especially ought to manifest their fidelity when the Republike requires it because they were specially instituted for that end as the Ephori and every thing ought to be reputed just when it attains its end Hence Brutus the Tribune and Lucretius the Governour of the City called the people to Armes against Tarquin the proud and by their authority expelled him the Ringdom So the Roman Senate judged Nero an enemy of the Republike and condemned him to the Gallowes punished Vitellius with death ignominiously mutilated and dragged thorow the City and spoyled Maximinus of the Empire setting up Albinus in his place Thus the French by Authority of a publike Councell thorow the care of the Officers of the Realme deprived Childericke the first Sigebert Theodoric and Childericke the third of the government of the Realm Neither is it impertinent to pronounce the same sentence of such a one as was given of Manlius Capitulinus Thou wast Manlius whiles thou diddest cast down the Senons headlong Now because thou art become one of the Senons thou thy selfe art to be precipit●ted from whence thou diddest cast them down But if perchance most of the Nobles collude and connive and being unmindfull of their duty take no care of the people let there at least be one who may admonish and detest the invading Tyrant and take care that the Republike sustain no detrimen For the care of the Republike is no lesse committed to him than to the Prince and his Collegues and he hath plighted his faith to the Republike no lesse than they If many have promised the same thing the obligation of the one is not taken away by the negligence or periury of the other If there be many Trustees Executors or Guardians the negligence default or fraud of some of them doth not discharge or disingage the rest yea unlesse they to their power discharge their trust and Oath they become perfidious yea guilty of the same crime and are subiect unto actions for their neglect as well as the others Therfore those who are bound to the whole Kingdom and Empire as the Peers of France the Electors or to some certain Countey or City which makes a part of the Realme as Dukes Marquesses Earles Constables Admirals and the like are obliged to ayde the whole Common-wealth or that part committed to them against the tyranny of the Prince if they be able c. Thus and much more this Lawyer almost verbatim out of Iunius Brutus I might add to him the like determinations of Henricus Bocerus De jure pugnae hoc est Belli Duelli Tractatus Methodicus Tubingae 1591. lib. 1. cap. 5. 29. p. 141 Justus Eccardus De Lege Regia the last Edition Alhuseius Polit. c. 4. p. 146. to 153. Haenon Disputat polit The Treatise De Iure Magistratus in Subditos where this Position is largely and learnedly debated confirmed both from Law History Theology Reason Hugo Grotius de Iure Belli pacis lib. 1. c. 4. sect 7 to the end p. 87. c. Albericus Gentilis de Iure Belli l. 1. c. 11. p. 84. c. 25. p. 205. l. 3. c. 9. 22. p. 546. 686. with others But since Iunius Brutus compriseth the quintessence of all the rest I shall trouble you onely with his Discourse Vindiciae C●ntr Tyrannos Quaest 3. p. 177. to 106. To passe by his Discourse concerning the resisting of Tyrants who usurp a Dominion without any Title whom every man may justly resist and suppresse and are bound in duty so to doe as he there proves at large I shall only transcribe what concernes them who have a lawfull Title First saith he we ought to consider that all Princes are born men We cannot therefore expect to have only perfect Princes but rather we ought to thinke it well with us if we have gained but indifferent ones Therefore the Prince shall not presently be a Tyrant if he keep not measure in some things if now and then he obey not reason if hee more slowly seek the publike good if he be lesse diligent in administring Iustice or lesse fierce in propulsing warre For seeing a man is not set over men as if he were some God as he is overbeasts but as he is a man born in the same condition with them as that Prince shall be proud who will abuse men like Beasts so that people shall be unjust who shall seek a God in a Prince and a Divinity in this frail Nature But truly if he shall willingly subvert the Republike if he shall wilfully pervert the Lawes if he shall have no care of his faith none of his promises none of Iustice none of piety if himselfe become an enemy of his people or shall use all or the chiefest notes we have mentioned then verily he may be iudged a Tyrant that is an enemy of God and men Therefore we treat not of a Prince lesse good but of the worst not of one lesse prudent but of a malicious and subtile one not of one unskilfull in Law but of a contemner of Law not of an unwarlike one but of an enemy of the people and waster of the Realme A Senate may assist him with prudence a Iudge with the knowledge of the Law a Captain in the skilfulnesse of warre but this man wisheth the Nobles Senators Captain● of Warre one neck that he might cut them off at one stroake neither hates he any more then them The first verily though he may lawfully be removed yet however he may be tolerated the latter contrarily by how much the longer he is tollerated the more intollerable he becomes Moreover as euery thing is not lawfull to a Prince so often times that which is lawfull to the people is not expedient For frequently it may fall out that the remedy which is used may

other cause For as he saith in another place either thou wilt not undertake enmities or labour or cost or else thou art so hindered with negligence sloathfulnesse idlenesse or with thy studies or certaine imployments that thou sufferest those to be deserted whom thou oughtest to protect But while thou sayest thou dost thine owne businesse lest thou mightest seeme to doe wrong to any thou runnest into another kinde of injustice For thou desertest the society of life because thou bestowest on it nothing of thy study nothing of thy paines nothing of thy goods These things Ethnickes Philosophers and Politicians hold truely more piously than many Christians in this age Hence a neighbour is bound by the Lawes of the Romans to take away a servant from a cruell Master But among the Aegyptians he who had casually found a man to be beaten by Theeves or to suffer any injury and had not re●cued him if he could was guilty of death if not hee was bound to accuse the Theeves before the Magistrate Which if he had neglected he was beaten with a certaine number of stripes and punished with a three dayes fast Now if this verily be lawfull in one neighbour towards another yea lyeth upon him out of duty to assist every one he meets against a Theefe shall it not be much more lawfull to a good Prince not onely to ayde and patronize servants against a raging Master or children against a furious Father but a Kingdome against a Tyrant a Republike against the private lust of one man a people a Lord I say against a publike servant and agent Yea verily if he shall neglect it shall not he merit the name and punishments of a Tyrant as the other of a theefe Hence Thucydides saith Not onely those are tyrants who reduce others into servitude but much rather those who when they may repulse that violence take no care to doe it but especially those who will be called the defenders of Greece and the Common Country but yet helpe not their oppressed Country and rightly for a Tyrant is in a sort compelled to retaine violently the Tyranny which he hath violently invaded because as Tyberius said he seemeth to hold a Wolfe by the eares which he cannot retaine without force nor yet let goe without danger Therefore that he may extinguish one crime with another hee commits many wickednesses and is compelled to injure others lest he should be injurious to himselfe But that Prince who idlely beholds the wickednesses of a tyrant and the ruine of the blood of innocents which he may hinder because he doth as it were take pleasure in the gladiatory sport is by so much more criminous than the Tyrant as he who sets sword-players to fight is guiltier than the man-slaying Gladiator as much as hee who slayes a man for pleasure sake is more criminous than he who doth it by constraint or out of feare or necessity If some oppose But it is a fault for any to intermeddle with or thrust himselfe into anothers businesse Terentian Chromes may answer I am a man I thinke no humane thing strange unto me If others that they may seeke lurking holes for their impiety object that there are distinct limits distinct jurisdictions now it is not lawfull to thrust a sickle into anothers Corne Neither truely do I advise that by this pretence thou shouldest invade anothers territories usurpe anothers jurisdiction to thy selfe draw thy neighbours corne into thine owne floore which most doe under this pretext I doe not say that by the example of that arbitrator of whom Cicero thou thy selfe shouldest judge the thing controverted to thy selfe but rather that thou shouldest restraine a Prince invading the Kingdome of Christ containe a tyrant within his limits stretch out an helping hand to an afflicted people and a prostrated Commonweale But thou must do it in such sort that thou mayest not looke after thine owne profit but the good of humane society altogether For since Justice wholly lookes abroad injustice onely regards it selfe thou shalt at last doe this justly if thou shalt have no regard of thine owne profits Briefely if a Prince violently passeth over the fixed limits of piety and justice a neighbour may piously and justly leape over his limits not that he should invade anothers but that he should bid him be content with his owne yea he shall be impious and unjust if he neglect it If a Prince exercise tyranny over the people he may no lesse or lesse slackly assist them than him if the people should move sedition yea he ought to doe it the more readily by how much it is more miserable that many suffer than one If Porsena reduce Tarquin the proud to Rome much more justly may Constantine sent for by the people and Senate of Rome expell Maxentius the Tyrant out of the City Finally if a man may become a Wolfe to a man nothing truely forbids but that a man may be a God to a man as it is in the Proverbe Therefore antiquity hath enrolled Hercules among the number of the gods because he punished and tamed Procrustes Busyris and other Tyrants the pests of mankinde and monsters of the world in every place So also the Roman Empire as long as it stood free was often called The Patrocinie against the Robberies of Tyrants because the Senate was the haven and refuge of Kings People Nations So Constantine sent for by the Romans against Maxentius the Tyrant had God the Captaine of his Army whose expedition the Universall Church exalted with powerfull prayses when yet Maxentius had the same authority in the West as Constantine in the East Likewise Charles the Great undertooke a Warre against the Lombardes being called by the Nobles of Italy to their aide when as yet the Kingdome of the Lombards was long before established and he could claime no right to himselfe over them Likewise when Charles the Bald King of France had by Tyranny taken away the President of that Country which lyeth betweene Seine and Liger Duke Lambert and Jamesius and the other Nobles of France had fled to Lewis King of Germany Charles his Brother by another mother to crave aide against Charles and his mother Judith a most wicked Woman He in a most ample Assembly of the Germane Princes heard these suppliants by whose unanimous Counsell a warre was publickely decreed against Charles for to restore the exiles Finally as there have beene some Tyrants in every place so likewise among all Historians there are every where examples extant of tyranny revenged and people defended by neighbour Princes which the Princes now at this day ought to imitate in curbing the tyrants both of bodies and Soules of the Republicke and of the Church of Christ unlesse they themselves will be named Tyrants by a most deserved right And that we may at last conclude this Treatise in one word piety commands the Law of God to be observed and the Church to be defended