Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	drink_v	eat_v	show_v	5,113	5	5.5114	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A17145	An apologie for the religion established in the Church of England Being an answer to T.W. his 12. Articles of the last edition. In this impression recognized and much inlarged. Also answers to three other writings of three seuerall papists. By Ed: Bulkley Doctor of Diuinitie.; Apologie for religion	Bulkley, Edward, d. 1621?; Wright, Thomas, d. 1624. Certaine articles or forcible reasons.	1608 (1608)	STC 4026; ESTC S106872	215,308	282

deliuering to the Corinthians the supper of our Sauiour Christ according to the institution which he had receiued of Christ deliuered not onely the bread but also the Cup to the whole Church of Corinth which I suppose you will not say were all Priests 1. Cor. 11. 25 26. 27. This Cup is the new Testament in my bloud As often as yee shall eate this bread and drinke this Cup yee shew the Lords death till hee come Wherefore whosoeuer shall eate this bread and drinke the Cup of the Lord vnworthily shall bee guilty of the body and bloud of the Lord. Paschasius expoundeth these words thus Bibite ex hoc omnes hoc est tam ministri quam reliqui credentes Drinke ye all of this that is to say both ministers and the rest that beleeue The glosse as it is alledged Cassan de vtraque specie by Cassander thus Bibite ex hoc omnes scilicet sine personarum acceptione Drinke yee all of this that is all without respect of persons So doth Chrysostom Omnibus vnum corpus Chrysost in 2 Cor. hom 18 Theoph in 1. Cor. 11. proponitur poculum vnum One body and one Cup is propounded to all So saith Theophilactus Tremendus calix pari cunctis conditione traditus est The fearefull Cup is in like sort deliuered vnto all Yea this absurd exposition of theirs is contrary to the practise of the Primitiue Church and to all antiquitie as might bee shewed and of some Papists is confessed But to proceede and to shew how they handle other places I will ioyne two places togither because they doe often alleage them together to prooue the Popes supremacie ouer the whole Church of God dispersed ouer the whole world The one Hosea 1. 11. Then shall the Children of Iudah and the Children of Israel be gathered together and appoint themselues one head The other place is Iohn 10. 16. There shall be one fold and one shepheard These places bee alleaged Ioan. de Paris de potest regia Papali ca 3. by Pope Pius the second Epist 288. by Iohannes de Parisijs by D. Harding c. expounding the same not of D. Hard. confut Apolog. cap. 3. d●●s 2. Christ but of the Pope to be this one head and one shephard The which what a priuat and false exposition it is I neede not greatly to shew it is so plaine and apparent The Hieron in Oseam cap. 1. first place of Hosea Saint Hierome expoundeth thus Haec omnia fient quia magnus est dies seminis Dei qui interpretatur Christus i. All these things shall come to passe because it is the great day of the seede of God which is expounded not the Pope but Christ so also doth Frier Lira Congregabuntur filij Iudae idest Apostoli c. There shall assemble Nicol Lira in Oscam cap. 1. together the Children of Iuda that is to say the Apostles and the Children of Israel that is to say the heathen conuerted together that is to say in one Church and shall appoynt vno them-selues one head that is to say one Christ So doth S. Augustine de ciuitate Dei lib. 8. cap. 28. Whose words for shortnes sake I omit The other place is so plaine that a Cobler by hearing or reading of it may perceiue that our Sauiour Christ spake it of himselfe and not of the Pope He saith I am the good shepheard and knowe Ioh the 10. 14. mine and am knowne of mine I lay downe my life for my sheepe Other sheepe I haue also which are not of this fold them also must I bring and they shall heare my voyce and there shall be one sheepefolde and one shepheard Therefore doth my father loue me because I lay downe my life that I might take it againe Who is so blind as seeth not these words to be spoken of our Sauiour Christ him-selfe and not of the Pope Yet that doughty or rather doltish Doctor Iohannes de Paris●●s is not ashamed to say that it is not to bee vnderstoode of Christ but of some other Minister which should rule in his place His words be these Congregabuntur filii Iuda filii Vbi supra Israel vt ponant sibi caput vnum Ioan. 10. fiet vnum ouile vn●s pastor Quod quidem de Christo intelliginon potest sed de alio aliquo ministro qui praesit loco eius i. The Children of Iuda and the Children of Israel shal be gathered together and shall appoynt them-selues one head and Ioh. 10. There shall bee one fold and one shephard which cannot bee vnderstood of Christ but of some other minister that must rule in his place Behold the absurdity of this saying and exposition and let this cauiller who in his questions and challenge so disdainefully despiseth our learning consider what a blind ignorant and vnlcarned Doctor and writer this was that so absurdly expoundeth this place and contrarily to the plaine words denieth them to be vnderstood of our Sauiour Christ and blasphemously attributeth that vnto the Pope which is onely proper and peculiar to Nic. Lir● in Ioha cap. 10. Iesus Christ Frier Lira was of better iudgement who writeth thus Fiet vnus pastor idest Christus i. There shall be one pastor that is to say Christ I will shew another place or two in like manner expounded for the proofe of the same matter In the booke of the ceremonies of the Church of Rome the which I wish were in English that our English Catholikes might see the goodly ceremonies and orders of the Church it is thus written Papa in nocte Lib. 1. Caerem titul 7. natiuitatis domini benedicet ensem quem postea donat ●●cui principi in signum infini ● potentiae pontifici collatae iuxta illud data est mihi omnis potestas in coelo in terra Item dominabitur à mari vsque ad mare à flumine vsque ad terminos orbis terrarum i. The Pope in the night of the feast of Christs Natiuitie blesseth a sword for a signe of the infinit power giuen to him which hee afterward bestoweth vpon some Prince according to that saying All power is giuen to me both in heauen and in earth also He shall rule from the sea vnto thē sea and from the flood vnto the ends of the world Are not these sayings thinke you finely expounded of the Pope whereof the one our Sauiour Christ himsefe spake In Concil L●teron sub Le● 1● pag. 671. and the other the Prophet Dauid prohesied of Iesus Christ him-selfe And the former of these places Stephen the Archbishop of Patraca applied vnto Pope Leo the 10. in the Councell of Lateran in the audience of the Pope him-selfe who thankefully accepted it and suffered it to be published and printed and so to this day was neuer by any Papist disliked By these places any man may discerne and iudge whether this Romish prelate be not that

If you mislike any thing in this confession confute it if you know any of vs that maintaine any diuers doctrine dissenting from this name them produce their sayings and quote the places But you say that these whom you tearme puritanes peremptorily affirme that Christ is God of himselfe and not God of God So that he receiueth not his diuinity from his father I answere that if wee consider of Christ absolutely in respect of the essence he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God of himself to whom all things do agree which are spoken of the diuine essence by it selfe but if we consider of him in respect of his person he is not of himselfe but sonne of the father yet coëternall and coëssentiall So saith Saint Augustine Christ us ad se deus August hom de tempor 38. dicitur ad patrem fil●us dicitur Christ in respect of himselfe is called GOD and in respect of the Father is called sonne S. Basil saith that it was an vndoubted principle of diuinity in al ages 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The God-head to bee begotten neither of it him-selfe nor of Lib. contra Eunomium any other but to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vnbegotten And that Christ is God of him selfe I proue it thus Hee that is Iehoua is God himselfe Christ is Iehoua ergo Christ is God of himselfe The first proposition cannot be denyed for God is called Iehoua because he hath his being of him-selfe and all others haue their being of him And that Christ is Iehoua I thinke you will not deny and if you doe it may easily be proued For he that appeared to Esaias the Prophet cap. 6. and is there called Iehoua verse 3. is said of Saint Iohn Job 12. 41. to be Christ in these words These things said Esaias when he saw his glory and spake of him That which Esaias cap. 18. 13. 14. speaketh of Iehoua Saint Paul Rom. 9. 33. expoundeath of Christ The Angell that appeared to Moses in the Exod. 3. 27. bush is called Iehoua but Christ who is called the Angell of the couenant and the Angel of the great councell was that Angell ergo Christ is Iohoua And so consequently is God of himselfe And therefore Epiphanius whome I trust you will not terme a Puritan calleth Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 GOD Epipha haeres 69. of him-selfe The Fathers of the Nicene councell in calling Christ God of God did thereby signifie that he is coëssentiall and of the same substance with the Father and not as you falsely affirme that hee receiued his diuinitie of his Father which is in effect to make Christ no God For it is proper to God to be of himselfe The deitie is the diuine essence which is one and singular and the same wholy in the Father in the Sonne and in the holy Ghost And so we acknowledge a Trinity of persons and a vnitie of essence that is one onely God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Saint Basil c. it is Lib. 2. contra Eunomium manifest that the names of Father and Sonne doe not signifie the essence but the proprieties of the persons So Damascene saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The De orthodox fide lib. 3. cap. 11. dietie signifieth the nature or essence the word Father the person And the essence is wholy in the Father wholy in the Sonne and wholy in the holy Ghost as euen your great Master of the sentences Peter ●umbard confesseth so that Peter Lumb lib. 1. dist 5. cap. ● the Father is God of himselfe the Sonne God of himselfe the holy Ghost God of himselfe and not three Gods but one true and immortall God And therefore with Athanasius wee worshippe a vnitie in Trinitie and Trinitie in vnitie Here in your margent you say that D. Bucley contendeth to prooue it in his answere to this article albeit hee vnderstand not the reason heere aleaged for if hee did hee were too absurd to denie it What D. Bucley hath prooued let the Godlie Reader consider and iudge manifest it is that you haue not here disprooued any thing by him alleaged your bare assertion is not to bee accepted You are not yet to bee taken for Pythagoras of whome his schollers sayd ipse dixit hee hath said it absurd be they that haue such conceite of you to beleeue your bare assertions without any demonstrations The fift article which you say those whom you disdainfully call Puritaines doe deny is the descension of Christ into Hell Can you shew and name any such puritanes which omit this article either in rehearsing it or in expounding it as you haue done the second commaundement of God I am sure you cannot Why doe you then say that they deny it forsooth because they receiue not your exposition of it to wit that Christ descended in soule to hell and was there as long as his body was in the graue and there harrowed Hell and deliuered thence Catechis Trideat pag. 69. In Act. 2. the patriarkes and all iust men there houlden in bondage vnto his death as your Rhemists write And doe all that teceiue not this exposition deny this article Then did your owne Doctor Durand deny this article who held Durand in 3. A. 27. 4. 3. 10. P●cus Apol. quaest ●●● Th● Aq●● 3. quaest 52. and published in writing that Christs soule did not in respect of the substance and essence thereof but by effect efficacy and operation descende into Hell Then did Iohn Picus that learned Earle of Mirandula and Cardinall Cai●tane whom the Pope sent into Germany to suppresse Luther deny this article who concurre and agree with Durand yea I might say that then either Saint Cy●rian or Ruff●n denied this article who expoundeth it of Christs buriall But you say that these nameles Puritans defend that Christ suffered the paines of Hell vpon the crosse whereby they bl●sp●eme most horribly that sacred humanitie as if Christ had d●spaired of his saluation as if GOD had hated him and hee had hated GOD c. I answere that this doctrine of Christs suffering the paines of Hell vpon the crosse is not so desperate as your collections thereof are false and blasphemous What desperatnes or absurditie is this that Christ our Sauiour not in respect of himselfe but in that hee became our suretie and tooke vpon him our debts and bare our sinnes in his body vpon the wood as Saint Peter saith did beare and indure in his humanity 1. Pe. 2. the wrath of GOD and the paines and torments which our sins had deserued to deliuer vs from the wrath of GOD which wee by our sinnes had prouoked and from the said paines and torments which wee had merited We are not to thinke that Christ did suffer onely an externall and corporall death for then he had shewed greater weakenes then many meere naturall men haue done who with great courage and cheerefulnesse haue gone vnto Luke 22. 44. ●ers