opinion is not much different who feign that Christ entred Hell that he might triumph there as a Conquerour Both opinions are repugnant to the story of the Gospel For whereas Christ otherwayes in respect of his Deity is every where his soul being recommended into the hands of his Father by himself whilst he hung on the Cross his body being laid up in the grave it must needs be false that Christ did locally go down to Hell Besides whereas God doth professe that he is their God after death Exod. 3.6 there can be nothing more absurd than that the souls of the Fathers should be detained in that limbus or prison Peter witnesseth 1 Ep. 3.19 that Christ preached to the Spirits of old that were disobedient but this is to be understood of that preaching which was before the flood by Noah being furnished or instructed for this purpose by the Spirit of Christ. Neither is there any ground for that fiction of Christs triumph in Hell both because he triumphed not before his resurrection as also because Heaven was the fit place of his triumph not hell Again whereas the word Scheol sometimes signifieth the grave and sometime Hell the place of the damned hence it is that the phrase of Christs deâ—cent into hell hath divers meanings in Scripture for either it is the same thing that is to be buried Ps. 16.10 Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell Or it is the same that is to fall into extreme tortures anguish 1 Sam. 2.6 The Lord bringeth down to hell and bringeth out Psal. 18.4 The sorrows of hell compassed me about Oâ— else it signifieth the state of them who are oppressed and swallowed by death Ps. 49.14 Like sheep they lie in hell death gnaweth upon them Isa. 14.11 c. The first exposition hath no place in the fourth Article of the Creed for it is unlikely that in so brief an Epitome of Faith there should be any tautology or that a plain speech should be declared by a darker In the second the inconvenience of a disordered narration seems to resist to wit that Christs extreame sadnesse and anguish of minde are rehearsed to be after his death But Calvin makes the matter plain shewing that the order of things and not of time is observed so that there are two members of that Article the former is of the tortures of the body the latter of the internall tormâ—nâ—s of the minde They who maintain the third exposition do chiefly urge the order of passages both because the detention of Christ in the grave is the last degree of humiliation as also because by this means the degrees of his joyful exaltation to answer the sufferings of Christ to wit his Resurrection answers his Death the Sepulture his Ascension to heaven his descending to hel the sitting at his Fathers right-hand Now as this opinion is not disliked so the former is not rashly to be rejected nor should we dispute contentiously in this matter seeing this claus of Christs descent to hel was not alwayes added to the fourth Article as the Nicenâ— Creed and divers others do witness So that this may remain firm that neither his spiritual agonies in his soul nor his three dayes detention in the grave ought to be separated from his sufferings XVIII· For the form or manner of his passion He suffered 1. Truly 2. Holily and innocently 3. Voluntarily These three things are to be well observed For if he had not truly suffered he had not satisfied if he had not suffered holily and innocently we could not have a perfect High Priest Heb 7.26 If lastly he had not voluntarily submitted himself his sacrifice had been compulsory not free hence he saith Heb. 10.7 Behold here I am to do thy will ô God XIX The generall end of Christs passion is the glory of God and chiefly the manifestation of his wrath against sin as also of his justice and mercy besides the declaration of the Divine and Humane nature But the proper and speciall end is Satisfaction for our sins XX. In the end and use of every particular Passion a regard is to be had of that Analogie in which the Expiation is compared with the sin and the passion with the punishment which we should have suffered For example He sustained most gâ—ievous tortures in his soul and body both that the sins of soul and body mâ—ght be expâ—ated as also that we might be deliveâ—ed from those spiritual and corporal pain which eternally we should have suffered His death upon the crosse was execâ—able partly that he might expiate the sins by which we deserv'd to be accursed partly that he might free us from that curse and damnatâ—on He was buried to â—estifiâ— that our sins were buried with him and that he might sanctifie our graves in which as is in prisons we were to be detained untill the horrible day of judgment by turning them into sleeping places His three dayes detention in the grave teacheth that we had deserved that for our sins death had eternaly reigned over us if his ignominious detention had not also satisfied for this punishment XXI They do annihilate the end and fruit of Christs passion who say that he suffered only for this that he might be an example to us 'T is true that Christ by suffering hath left us an example but the mean fruit of his passion is the satisfaction for our sins The Socinians acknowledge Christ a Saviour onely in these things 1. In that he preach'd celestial Truth 2. that he confirmed it 3. That he was our example in his passion and Resurrection 4. In that at length he bestows life eternal on us But when we alleadge testimonies out of Scripture concerning Christs death for us they elude them by saying that he died for us that is for our good but not for us that is in our place or stead But this most pestilent Heresie is refuted by these subsequent Arguments 1. Because he so died for us that he gave his life as the price of redâ—mption for man Mat. 20 28 who gave himself a ransom for all 1. Tim 2.6 that he is said to redeem us with his pretious blood 1 Pet. 1.18 19. You are saith he redeemed Now who knows not that it is one thing to be an example of salvation and freedom and another thing to pay a ransom for any for he that satisfieth not for his slave or in his stead how doth he pay a ransome for him 2 Because he died so for us that he was made sin for us 2 Cor. 5.21 That he took our sins upon him and he bore the punishment due to our sins Isa. 53.4 Is then the taking of anothers sin upon him and the suffering of the punishment due to another onely the shâ—wing of an example and not to satisfie and to be punished in his stead 3. If the sacrâ—fices of the Old Testament were offered by the priests for the people or in their stead then Chrâ—sts sacrifice also was
and his posterity As out of a venemous root nothing can proceed that 's wholsome so all that are come of Adam naturally are born guilty of that primitive sin X. That primitive sin therefore is not only personal but natural also because by it whole Nature is destroyed of which also Adams prosterity is held guilty to wit all that are naturally sprung from Adam Christ then is excepted from this guilt for he was born of Adam but not by Adam not by naturall generation but by the vertue of the Holy Ghost XI As therefore the Person infected Nature so afterward Nature infected the Persons XII We religiously believe that our first Parents were received into favour by God CHAP. X. Of Original Sinne and Free-will THat Sin which is derived from the first or primitive Sin is either original or actual original Sin is that native corruption derived into the whole man and to the whole race of man naturally descending from Adam whereby man having utterly lost his freedom to good becomes prone to evil The RULES I. This sin in Scripture is named by way of excellency Sin and the Body of sin Sinful-sin Inhabiting-sin The law of our members The Old-man Flesh II. It is called also Concupiscence Rom 7.7 I had not known lust or concupiscence unlesse the Law had said thou shalt not covet or lust or Jam. 1 14 15. III. Therefore the Papists doe erroniously exempt it from being a sin reckoning it among the works of God By the name of Concupiscence is understood either that natural faculty of desire which was in man even before his fall or that corruption which naturally adheres to it as it is in it in the first act and as it inclines man onely to evill IV. The proximate cause of Original sin is the guilt of the first sin in respect of which it is a most just punishment from God to wit a part of that death which God threatened to man V. Although the soul is immediately infused by God into man yet being united to the body it is made guilty presently of the first sin imparted to the whole man and therefore is infected with Original contagion VI. Neither for this cause doth Original sin cease to be sin in that it is not wittingly nor willingly committed for it is sufficient that the irregularity of our nature is present though spontaneousnesse be absent VII From this Original sin except Christ alone no man is free not the blessed Virgin Mary Neither is it only in Infants but it is in the Embryo scarce as yet conceived and before the birth and it appears still more and more as the rapacity of Wolves shews it self in their whelps Psal. 51.7 Behold I was borne in iniquity and in sin hath my mother conceived me 2 Cor. 5.21 For he hath made him to be sin for us who knew no sin VIII Original sin doth consist not onely in an impotency and inaptitude to goodnesse but also in pronenesse to evill neither is it onely the amission of Original good but also the immission of the contrary evill IX By Original sin our natural gifts are corrupted but supernatural are utterly lost X. The Vnderstanding remained but darkened the Will remained but depraved the inferiour Appetite remained but altogether vitiated XI Hence it is that in natural and civil actions an irregenerate man can do no good without special grace XII Without this special grace no excellent thing could be performed by the Gentiles XIII Whatsoever good then that was which they did it was mixed with much vanity so that their chief vertues were in Gods sight but glorious enormities XIV For those are not good works which are good in themseâ—ves but which are done well A work is said to be good either univocally or equivocally univocally so such a work is simply good in respect of all circumstances equivocally a work is good in it self but withall vitious either in respect of the subject or object or means or the end for if we look upon the actions of the Gentiles we shall finde that they aimed more at their own than at Gods glory in them XV. Although the affections of the wicked are kept in by God as with a Bit yet they are not healed XVI But supernatural gifts were utterly lost to wit the claritie of the intellect the rectitude of the will and the conformity of the appetite with reason XVII Hence there is no principle of knowledge or performance of spirituall things in us either in act or in possibility XVIII They seek then the house in the ashes who ascribe to an unregenerate man free-will or other faculties by which he may do well or prepare himself to his own conversion or to the acceptation of Gods grace For this is the errour of Pelagians and Semi-pelagians XIX Mans will remained free from coaction but not to good and evill XX. Yea it is free to evill onely and therefore deserves rather to be called servile than free As for the understanding the natural man comprehends not the things that are of Gods Spirit 1 Cor. 2.14 If you look upon the will the imagination of mans heart is onely evill Gen. 8.21 Finally the Scripture cries out that the whole man having lost his spiritual life lieth dead in sin Ephes. 2.1 Col. 2.13 XXI Although this sin is pardoned in the sanctified Parents notwithstanding by generation it is tansmitted to posterity The reason is because the corruption dwelling in us is not altogether taken away by pardon although the guilt be done away and as faith is the gift not of generation but of regeneration so man not as he is regenerate but as man begets man even as seeds being winnowed from the ears chaff and husks do spring up again with the same CHAP. XI Of actual Sin SO much of Original sin Actual sin is whereby Gods Law is broken by thoughts desires words or deeds The RULES I. According to the diversity of circumstances there are diverse sins II. From the efficient cause sin is either of publique or of private persons as they are in more or less dignity III. From the matter which are things thought desired said or done IV. From the form it is either of commission or omission V. From the end it is either of incogitancy or of affectation and against conscience and that rather of malice than of infirmity or contrarily rather of infirmity than malice VI. From the subject it is of the soul chiefly or of the body or of both VII From the object it is either committed against God or our neighbour VIII Sin committed against God is either with a kind of unwillingness or with a full desire this later sin the Scripture cals the sin against the holy Ghost and to death Matth 12.32 1 John 5.16 IX The sin against the Holy Ghost or to death is when one is convicted in his conscience by the testimony of the Holy Spirit resisteth notwithstanding the same
for the worâ— wrought the force is in Gods promise rather than in the prayer VII The Object to which prayer is directed is the whole Trinity yet so that 〈◊〉 the persons conjunctly or either of them sâ—â—verally is called upon That the Father is to be called upon is not doubted The Son is called upon by Sâ—epher Act 7.59 yea all the Angels worship him Heb 1.6 The Holy Ghost is called upon with the Father and Son by Iohn Rev. 1. â— 5. And that Angelicâ— hymne Holy holy hoâ—â— c. Isa. 6.3 c. applied to the Son 〈◊〉 12.41 and to the hoâ—ly Ghost Act. 28 2â— 26 c. VIII The object for which we pray 〈◊〉 the living not the dead and such as sin 〈◊〉 not to death For God will not be intreated for those who sin unto death 1 Ioh. 5 16. For the dead we must not pray because they are either damnâ—â— or blessed if damneâ— our pâ—ayers are fruâ—â—les if blessed needlesâ— IX The object against which we pray are Gods open Enemies We ought not presently to pray for their eternal destruction but we are to besâ—ech God that with his mighty hand he would humble and convert them otherwise eternally to plague them if they wil not be converted The imprecations of the Prophets are not to be imitated by us rashly for it is hard to discerne those who sin to death and those of whom we have good hope X. Prayers should be joyned with an humble confession of our sins with a true and firme confidence and a constant purpose of repentance XI External gestures decently used avail much both to excite and to testifie the devotion of our souls So much of the parts of that form whereby God wil be worshipped of us the outward helps follow whereof are Fastings and Vows Fasting is an abstinence from meat and drink undertaken for a time that the lasciviousness of the flesh may be subdued and God with the greater fervency may be called upon The RULES I Fasting is either forced or voluntary That is the poor mans for want of meat this of them who want not meat The voluntary Fast is either Natural Civil or Ecclesiastical Natural is that which is undertaken for healths sake the Civil is that which is enjoyned by the Magistrate in some publique affairs Ecclesiastical is that we define II. Ecclesiastical fasting is private or publique III. Private is that which one injoyns to himself or his family for some private causes Examples are Iob 1.5 2 Sam. 3.35 and 12.16 Nehem. 1.4 IV. Publique is that which is commanded by the Magistrate or the Church for some publique causes especially when calamities are at hand Examples 2 Chron. 20. Hest. 4. V. In a true Fast the manner and end are to be considered VI. For the manner true fasting â— Consisteth not in choice of meats but in abstinence from all meats 2. Not in external abstinence from meat but in abstinence from sin Isa. 58.6 c. Joel 2 12. VII There ought to be no other end of Fasting but onely to give our selves more earnestly to prayer and divine worship to beat down the lasciviousnesse of the flesh to witnesse our humility before God and our repentance before our neighbour VIII Fasting is not tied to certaine times as in the Old Testament but ought to be undertaken freely upon urgent causes and necessity So much for Fasting A Vow is a promise made in a holy manner to God of things lawful to witnesse our readinesse to serve God The RULES I. A Vow in this place signifieth a religious promise not prayers or desires II. A Vow is either general or particular That is of things commanded and is required of all men such is the Vow ef Baptisme this is of things lawful and is undertaken for some private cause that is a part of divine Worship this is only a help thereto III. A particular Vow is considered in its efficient matter form and end IV. For the efficient they are excluded from making a vow who want as yet the use of judgment and reason 2. Who are not Masters of themselves but are either subject to Parents or Husband Numb 6. V. The matter of a Vow is a thing lawful and in our power VI. The form consisteth in the deliberation of the minde in purpose of the will and in the promise either internal or external also VII The end is to testifie thankfulnesse of minde or to exercise some private discipline A Vow of the first kind is when one that hath escaped a sicknesse or danger doth consecrate to God somthing by Vow as a token of his gratitude A Vow of the latter sort is when one by Vow abstains from something in it self lawful yet dangerous to hâ—m as Wine c. VIII The subject to whom we ought to Vow is God onely IX A Vow before it is made is arbitrary but being lawfully made it is to be kept Psal. 76.12 Vow and pay unto the Lord your God Hitherto of the true manner of worshiping God to which are contrary the intermission of it and fals worship And this is threefold in respect of the object for either it is not commanded by God or else it is expresly prohibited by him or being commanded is directed to some other end The manner of worshipping of God not commanded is called Wil-worship to wit a worship devised by man's brain Paul opposeth this kinde of worshipping God to Christian Liberty Col 2.20.21 22 23. Therefore if you be dead with Christ you are freed fâ—om the ruâ—diments of this world Why as though living in the World are you subject to ordinances touch not taste not handle not which all are to perish with using after the commandments and doctrines of men which things have indeed a shâ—w of wisdome in wil-worshâ—p and humiliâ—y and nâ—glecting of the body not in any honour to the satisfying of the flâ—sh Such are those ceremonies-brought in by Popeâ—y in Baptisme c and their five Sacraments by them devised canonical hours beads and the Latine tongue in Prayer Fasts placed rather in choise of meats than in abstâ—nence chiefly Leâ— fast the Vows also of poverty Monkish obedience and Religious continency The Vow of poverty is impious for whereas man by Gods command should eat his bâ—ead in the sweat of his face by such voluntary poverty this command is sleighted No better is the Vow of obedience for by it man who is redeemed by the precious blood of Christ is made a slave to money and is drawn off from his lawful calling As for the Vow of Continency it is rash for it is a rare gift and by thâ—s Vow many under pretence of chastity are intangled in the snaâ—es of Satan The manner of Religious worship forbid by Gods Word is idolatry and worship of Saints Idolatry is whereby an Idol is made kept and religiously worshipped There be two kindes of Idolatry one is when that which is not God is accounted and worshipped for God
not be taken subjectively but causatively for there is knowledge in us because the soul is the subject of knowledge but this knowledge or performance of spiritual things is not of us or from us for of our selves we cannot think a good thought Again when it iâ— said here that the principle of this knowledge is not in us the meaning is that the priâ—e or chief principle is not in us for that is grace yet the secondary or subordinate principle of knowâ—edge is in us that is the minde Lastly it is said here that this principle is not in us either in act or in possibility we must not conceive that here is meant possibility passive for there is in us a power to receive spirituall knowledg when it is infused or else 〈…〉 stones but here is meant an active possibility for we are noâ— agents but patients in the fâ—â—st act of our conversion so that there is no power not possibility in us to illuminate our own minds or to rectâ—fie our own wil. a Mat. 5 22. b Mat. 13.42 c Luk. 16.28 d 1 Pet 3.19 e Rev 9.1 f Rev. 20.15 g Rev. 21.8 a Esa 66 â—4 b Rom 2.9 * A. R. Therefore all men are bound to obey the moral Law not because it was given by Moses for so the Iews were onely tied to it but as it is the Law of nature * A. R. It is said here that Ignorance is attributed to Christ This cannot be meant properly for it was not fit there should be ignorance in him who came to cure our ignorance And if ignorance be the want of that knowledge which ought to be in us it must needs be sin in whomsoever it is There is a difference between these two phrases not to know and to be ignorant for ignorance is the privation of knowledge which is a habit that was not in him in whom were hid all the treasures of wisdome and knowledge And so Peter Joh. 21. and all the Disciples Ioh. 16. confesse that Christ knew all things But not to know signifieth the suspension of the act of knowledge onely which can be no privation in him that hath the habit To wink is not to be blind for he that winks hath the habit of sight which a blind man wants Again to know in Scripture is sometime to make known as Gen. 22. Now I know that thou fearest me that is I have made it known So not to know is not to make known by the rule of contraries So Christ knew not the last day that is he made it not known or he did not know that day to reveal it So when Christ is said to increase in knowledge is not meant that he was ignorant but that he attained to the knowledge which he had before after another manner than he did before that is experimentaly now habitually before * A. R. The Nativity is of the nature as of the Terminus but of the Person as of the Subject for the Person is begot and so is the Nature this terminative that subjective * A. R. Christs passions were truly satisfactory if 1. We consider the greatness of his love 2. The greatness and multitude of his sufferings 3. The dignity of his Person 4. The holiness of his life * A R. In Christs death the Personal Union was not dissolved This is true and the reason is because the gifts of God are without repentance now the Hypostatical Vnion is the greateâ—t of his gifts which could not be lâ—st without sin and sin could not be in him who came to save sinners its true Christ seems to grant a dereliction when he saith My God my God why hast thou forsaken me But these words do not shew any dâ—reliction or dissolution of the personal union in death for Christ spake them whilst he was alive they onely shew that Christ was left to tread the wine-presse alone and yet he was not alone for the Father is with me saith he Christ was alone and forsaken in respect of Deliverance but not alone nor forsaken in respect of the divine presence and assistance without which he could not have performed that great work of our redemption In that the Father left him in the hands of his enemies and did not deliver him he might be said to forsake him But it may be objected that Christs soul was the medium of the union between the Divinity and Christ body This medium being gone how could the extremes cohere I answer in this union the soul was the medium of congruity not of necessity for the Divinity was united to Christs body in the Virgins womb before the soule was infused or else he could not have been conceiv'd by the Holy Ghost So might the Divinity be united still to the body after the soul was separated The soul indeed being a spirit was a fit medium to unite the Deity to the body but not absolutely necessary * A. R. Christ was subject to the Law that he might free us from the curse of the Law 2. That he might take away from the Iews occasion of calumniating 3. To shew he was the end of the Law 4. That by his example he might invite us to keep the Law * A. R. It is said here that Christ obtained his exaltation by his obedience not by the way of merit It is true that Christ as God cannot merit Nor 2. did he merit the grace of union as man for that was infinitely more than man oâ— Angels could merit Nor 3. did he merit by the act of freewill in his conception that plenitude of grace and knowledge which was infused into him Nor 4. did he merit any thing which was not due to him in respect of the Personal union Yet we may not deâ—y but that he merited whatsoever honour was conferred on him before his death and likewise his exaltation after his resurrection for so the Apostle sheweth that because Christ humbled himself and became obedient to the death of the crosse therefore God exalted him Phil. 2.9 10 11. He shall drink of the brook in the way therefore shall he lift up his head Ps. 107. Therefore S. Austin in Joh tract 104 cals Christs humility the merit of his glory and his glory the reward of his humility This glory then was Christs due both in respect of the personal union and also in respect of merit for why may not a thing â—e due in a double respect a Matth. 3.11 I baptise you with water b Matth. 21.25 The baptisme of Iohn that is all his ministry both of doctrine and baptisme whence was it and Act. 18.25 Appollo knew only the baptisme of Iohn c Act. 1.5 ye shall be baptised with the Holy Ghost Matth. 20.22 d Can ye be baptised with the Baptism whâ—rewith I am baptised * A. R. The outward matter of Baptism is water I will here adde the reasons why water is used in Baptism 1. Because the dipping in water represents Christs death burial
Christ did manifest it selfe in the state of his Humiliation chiefly by miracles yet this was little in comparison of that glorious manifestation of him in his exaltation In the state of Humiliation he performed his Prophetical office not only mediately by sending Iohn Baptist his Herauld before and by the Apostles whom he called but also immediately to his lost sheep especially of Israel by preaching to them the heavenly Truth with great constancy patience and efficacy both of his doctrine and miracles But his Sacerdotall office he administred in this state making a most full satisfaction and an humble intercession for us The satisfaction of Christ is that whereby he being subject to the Law for us did undergo the curse due to our sins and performed most perfectly obedience to the Law which was required of us and so hath freed us from the curse and hath restored us to life This consisteth in suffering the pains and in perfect justice in that is seen cheifly his passive in this his active obedience I do purposely adde this restriction that we may not think his active and passive obedience so to differ as if the suffering of â—he punishment consisted only in his passive obedience and his perfect justice only in his active for they differ not in time seeing both of them continued from the first moment of his incarnation till his death Nor do they differ in subject because the same obedience in a different respect is both active and passive and consequently Chriâ—â—â— obedience is an active passion and a passive action for as passion is a receiving of the punishment it is called passive obedience but as it is a testimony of his great love it may be called active Neither is the division of obedience into active and passive a division into parts but onely a distinction taken from the end to wit the twofold satisfaction for punishment and for life eternal The curse upon the transgressoâ—s of the Law requires the former Deut. 27.26 The promise of life under the condition of perfect obedience and righteousness requires the latter Lev. 18.5 Therefore we are said Analogicaly by that one and most perfect satisfaction of Christ both to be freed from the punishment because he suffered the punishment for us and to be invested in the right of life eternal because he fulfilled the Law for us The suffering of punishment is whereby he undertook upon himself the punishment due to us and offered himself of his own accord a holy Sacrifice to God for us This consisteth both in the sufferings which went before his great and last Passion but especially in this last agonie The RULES I. No part of Christs Passion must be excluded from his Satisfaction The reason because he did not suffer for himselfe in any thing but all for us II. Therefore those innumerable sufferings which Christ endured until his last journy to Jerusalem are not to be separated from the price of Christs redemption for although the Passion of Christ which went before his last agony might be called a preparative to his death yet it is indeed an integral part of satisfaction As it cannot be denied that the payment of an hundred pounds by him who oweâ—h divers tuns of gold is an integral part of the paymenâ— although iâ—â—e but a smal sum in respect of the whole and principal debt III. Yet the Scripture synecdochically and by way of excellency doth describe his last passion as the price of our redemption and his death or oblation on the altar of the cross as an expiatory sacrifice Of this see the 9. and 10. chapter to the Heb IV. The principal efficient cause of this passion was the holy Trinity the ministring causes were Christs enemies both Iews and Gentiles V. the Person that suffered for us is not the Father nor the Holy Ghost but the Son of God VI. Although God is rightly said to suffer yet the God-head suffered not God suffered in the flesh not with the flesh VII The sufferings of Christ were divers of which there were three ranks to wit some before his death death it self and some after death VIII Of those that went before his death some were internal some external IX The internal were his sadnesse anxieties and tortures proceeding from the fiercenesse of Gods wrath and the conflict he had with that tentation of dereliction which cast him into that bloody sweat and made him cry out My God My God why hast thou forsaken me X. But although he wrestled with the tentation of dereliction yet he fell not into desperation neither did he yield to the tentation but overcame it by a strong confidence in his God The undoubted argument of his victory was this that in his greatest agony he failed not to call God his God XI His external sufferings were the tortures of his body which he endured in a manner in all his members senses for his head was torn with throns and beat with reeds his face was defiled with spittle and bruised with buffeting his ears were wounded with scoffs and railings his eyes were troubled with the mourning of his Mother and his disciples his tongue was scorched with thirst and poisoned with vinegar and gall his body was stript and torn with whipping and the same was fastned to the Crosse his hands and feet being pierced with nailes and was hanged between Thieves his sinews were racked and his side was pierced with a lance XII The Cross was chosen to die on which was no ordinary kinde of death but an accursed one for of old it was made execrable by the mouth of God Cursed is he that hangeth on a Tree Deut. 21.23 XIII In Christs death the Personal Vnion was not dissolved the soule indeed was severed from the body but neither of them from the Personality or Hypostasis of of the sonne of God XIV The sufferings that followed his death were not joyned with any pain yet they wanted not disgrace or ignominie such was his burial and the three dayes lying in the grave XV. His burial was a part of his sufferings whereby Christs body no other ways than the carcasses of other men was cast into the grave XVI His three dayes detention or stay in the grave is the last degree of his Humiliation at which time his soul being translated to Paradise his body was detained under the pains and bands of death as if he had been altogether overcome and swallowed up by it his enemies in the mean while triumphing over him as if he had been quite cut off Acts 2.24 Whom God raised having loosed the sorrows of death XVII When mention is made of Christs descent into hell in the fourth Article of the Creed it is demanded of what part of Christs passion that must be understood That opinion of the Papists concerning Christs local descent into Limbus Patrum or the place of the Fathers and their delivery from thence is fabulous and very ridiculous from which their
of the Old Testament will be clearer than these of the New for the Passeover represents Christs death clearer than the Bread in the Lords Supper But we must know wherein the clarity of a Sacrament consisteth chiefly to wit not in external signes onely but in the Sacramental word Now are not these words very clear This is my body which is given for you This is my blood which is shed for you There is nothing so plain concerning Christs death in the Passeover Besides it is false that the killing of a Lamb was a clearer signe because many more and obscure ceremonies were added to the killing of the Lamb as also because the breaking of Bread the pouring out of VVine and the receiving of both do most clearly represent the breaking of Christs Body the shedding of his blood and the participation of both VI. In vain do the Pontificians reckon among the Sacraments of the New-Testament Confirmation â—enance Extreme Vnction Ordination of Ministers and Matrimony Three thnigs are required to a Sacrament 1. That it be instituted by God under the Covenant of Grace 2. That it may have an external Symbol ordained by God 3. That the Promise of grace may be annexed to it Now these three belong only to Baptisme and the Lords Supper and not to any of the rest Confirmation is a Popish ceremony in which the Bishop or his Suffragan having asked certain questions of the party baptized concerning the Heads of Religion besmears him with a little oyntment putting a linnen cloth on him not to be removed by the witnesses before the third day and he cuffs him the better to remember the matter and that he may be sufficiently furnished with the holy Ghost against Satans tentations But where in Scripture do we read of the institution of this Sacrament and of its ceremonies where is the Promise We may more truly call this the Popes excrement than a Sacrament and that mark which the Beast puts upon the forehead of his worshippers Rev. 13.16 Therefore impiously do they prefer this Sacrament to Baptism for they teach plainly that Baptism is perfected by it and that in this there is a greatâ—r measure of spiritual gifts than in Baptism and whereas any Priest or Pastor may administer Baptism yea any Lay man or woman Confirmation must onely be performed by the Bishop or his Suffragan Penance is a Sacrament with them in which the sinner having given tryall of his repentance is absolved by the Priest We indeed acknowledge that repentance is enjoyned to sinners and that power of absolving is given to Ministers though they feign a far other penance and absolution as shall appear hereafter But in the mean while there is no outward symbol instituted by God which hath a promise neither can these words I absolve thee be in stead of a symbol as Bellarmine would have it Extream Unction is a Sacrament amongst them in which the Priest having rehearsed some Letanies anointeth the party that is dying with hallowed oyl of the Olive in those parts of the body where the seats of the five Senses are and this he doth after the parties confession and absolution to the end he may recover his health if it be expedient for him and that the remainder of his sins after he hath received the other Sacraments may be wiped away Christ indeed promised his Disciples that the sick on whom they were to lay their hands should recover Mar. 16.18 Iames also commanded that the sick should be anointed after imposing of hands and prayer by the Elders which ceremonies were not Sacraments but voluntary rites joyned with miracles which together with the gifts of miracles are expired Therefore between extreme Unction and this there is no similitude For that I may say nothing of that magical exorcism with which the oyle is hallowed it is certain that in the Apostles time not onely dying people as now in Popery but any also that were sick were anointed Ordination is a Sacrament among them in which the Bishop alone or his Suffragan layeth his hands upon the Minister and delivereth to him with solemn words a Book a Platter a a Pastoral staff c. using also the ceremonies of Unction Shaving and imprints on him an indeleble character to confer Justifying grace Whereby he might rightly use the power of the Keyes Now although Ministers may be ordained by imposition of hands and prayers after the example of the Apostles yet this Imposition is a thing indifferent but for the Popish ceremonies they are partly Jewish as anointing partly Heathenish as shaving expresly forbid Lev. 19 27 Marriage is no Sacrament of the Covenant of grace both because it was instituted before the fall as also bâ—cause it is Common to all that are wiâ—hin and wâ—thout the Covenant yet we deny not but that Marriage is a representation of that spirituall wedlock between Christ and his Church but if for this it were a Sacrament then there should be so many Sacraments as there be Parables and Allegories Hence divers Schoolmen have denyed this to be a Sacrament And in what esteeme it is among the Papists appears by this that they make an irreconcileable war betweene Marriage and Oâ—dination and forbid Marriage in their Clergy as if it were an unclean thing CHAP. XXIII Of Baptisme BAptisme is the first Sacrament of the new Testament in which the Elect being received into the family of God remission of sins and regeneration in Christ's blood and the Holy Ghost are confirmed by the outward sprinkling of water The RULES I. The word Baptisme signifieth a dipping and aspersion or washâ—ng That it signifieth aspersion appears in Mar. 7.4 And when they come from the Market they eat noâ— except they be wâ—shâ—d II. Here are four appellations of Baptisme to be considered â— The Baptisme of water 2. Of light or doctrine 3. Of the Spirit or gifts of the Spirit 4. Of blood or martyrdom III. Christ our Lord is the principal efficient cause but the instrumental is the Minister lawfully called IV. Therefore we hold not that baptism lawfull which is administred by any private man or a woman as in Popery For if in earthly Commonwealths that is not accounted of which a private man doth without command how much lesse can Christ be pleased with such disorder in his Church V. The outward matter is water But for oil salt spittle and other things which Papists joyn to this element belong rather to the profanation than administration of baptism VI The internal matter is Christ with his death buriall and resurrection with other benefits VII It 's external form consisteth partly in actions partly in words VIII The action is the aspersion of water which is used for dipping The dipping in and rising out of the water was a clear symbol of Christs burial and resurrection But because of the weaknesse oâ— Infanâ—s in cold countries we use sprinkling which probably was used by the Apostles when they baptâ—zed
in privaâ—e families IX It is not much materiall whether one aspersion or three be used so it be void of superstition and that it be not performed drop by drop or by the finger but so that the symbol may answer the sprinkling or washing X. The word by which Baptism is to be administred is to be comprehended in Christs institution especially in these words I baptise thee in the name of the Father of the Sonne and of the Holy Ghost XI The Latine tongue in Baptisme and the superstitious consecration or exorcisme of the water are repugnant to the form of Baptism XII The internal form consisteth in the analogy of aspersion and remission of sins as also of regeneration or sanctification In this Baptism answers the legal aspersions by which likewise remission of sin by the blood of Christ was shaddowed Water also as it cleanseth from filthinesse and moistneth the Plants doth adumbrate regeneration whereby we dye to sin and live to righteousness See Rom. 6. v. 1. c. XIII The end of Baptisme besides those which are common to it and the Lords Supper is the sealing of our regeneration and of our reception or ingrafting into the family of God XIV The subject of Baptisme are all that be in the Covenant even the children of those who are reckoned among the number of the Covenanters This rule is grounded 1. on Christs command Matt. 19.14 Suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me they ought not then to be kept off from Baptism whom Christ will have to be brought to him The words used in this place and Luke 18.15 Of little children and infants are emphaticall 2. On the reason alledged by Christ Mat. 19.14 For of such is the kingdome of heaven For if to them the kingdome of heaven and the Covenant of Grace belong the seale of the Covenant must needs appertain to them also but they are capable of this Covenant Gen. 17.7 I will be thy God and of thy seed Act. 2 v. 39. To you and to your children is the promise made 3 On the analogy of circumcision for with this Sacrament Infants were initiated 4. On the example of the Apostles who are saâ—d to baptise whole families Act. 16.15 33. It were a foolish thing to apply that rule 2 Thess 3.10 If any will not work let him not eaâ— to Infants so perversly doe the Anabaptists wrest the places of Scripture to a contrary meaning in which those that are of years are commanded to be taught before they are baptised XV. Infants have both Faith and Reasâ—n although not in the fruit yet in the seed and root though not in the second act yet in the first though not by an outward demonstration of the work yet by the inward virtue of the holy Spirit XVI But concerning the Infants of Infidels the case is otherwise who are not born of Parents even so much as either of them a Believer for they are not to be baptized till they be of discretion and are able to testifie their Faith XVII The Baptisme of Bels is a horrible profanation of the Sacrament and joyned with abominable idolatry XVIII As naturally we are born before we eat so baptisme is before the Lords Supper XIX Baptisme is not to be iterated if the essentials thereof were used Hence it is that our Church ratifies the Baptisme of the Popish Church not as it is abused there but as it is administred in the name of the Holy Trinity XX. Baptism is necessary not absolutely but in respect of â—hrists command neither must we feign such a necessity as permits any other besides the minister to baptise or to cause us think they are excluded out of heaven if they die unbaptised XXI The Baptisme of Christ and of John are in effect the same The Pontificians deny that Iohn's baptisme was instituted by God against these plain testimonies Mat 21.25 Luke 3.2 and 7.30 Joh. 1.33 Neither matters it that Iohn distinguisheth between his baptisme and Christs Mar. 1.8 For there the oppâ—sition is not between baptisme and baptisme but a comparison onely between thâ— office of the Minister in Baptisme and Christ for the Minister giveth the Symbol but Christ the thing signified They say that such as were baptised by Iohn were rebaptised Act. 19.1 c. If they were rebaptised by the Apostle we gather that they were not rightly baptised by some who were imitators of Iohn neither yet can we find out of the text that they were rebaptised for those words v. 5. are not Lukes concerning Paul but Pauâ—'s concerning Iohn and his disciples therefore thâ—s place favoureth neither Papist nor Anabaptists CHAP. XXIV Of the Lords Supper THe Lords Supper is the other Sament of the New Testament in which Christians that are of age receive spiritually Christs body and blood sealed to them in the reception of Bread and Wine according to Christs institution The RULES I. The Lords Supper is called metonymically the Eucharist or Thanksgiving Sinâ—xis or a collection the Lords Table the New Testament and Synecdochically the Breaking of Bread II. It hath the same efficient causes that Baptisme hath III. The outward matter thereof or Signes are Bread and Wine IV The Supper is lame without both Sgnes and to rob the people of the Cup is Sacriledge Matth 26 27. Drink ye all of this 1 Cor. 10.16 The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the Communion of Christs blood And 11. v. 26. As â—ften as you shall eat this bread and â—rink of this Cup you declare the Lords death V. The inward matter is Christ with all his satisfaction and merit VI. As it is Iewish Superstition to use unleavened Bread so the Popish Penny Wafers are superstitious reliques VII It s outward form consists in Actions and Words VIII The Actions are the breaking of Bread and powring out of Wine the distribution of both signes and the receiving thereof with the hand and mouth IX The word is the whole institution containing the Eucharist the command and the promise but the promise cheifly X. Therefore it is impiety to think that the bread is turned into Christs body only the bare accidents remaining by the low mumbling ef these five words For this is my body and that with one breath and the Priests intention XI The internal forme consisteth in the Analogie of the sign and the thing signified in which by Bread and Wine are signified Christs body and blood as spiritual meat and drink but by the breaking of Bread and powring out of the Wine are represented the breaking of his body or crucifixion and shedding of his blood and lastly by the distributing and receiving of both the applying of Christs death XII The breaking of Bread is not a thing indifferent For Christ made use of this himself and commanded it to be used saying do this which he himself explained adding This is my body which is broken for you From this the Supper is so called by this also
The instrumental cause of this is Faith III The matter or subject are faithful men IV. The matter about which this is conversant are the Law the service of sin and death affliction of conscience in things indifferent and mens commandments V The form is expressed by divers conditions as the objects are various VI. We have shewed above in the doctrine of the Law how we are freed from the Law VII We are not quite in this life free from the inherence of sin in us but we are freed from the guilt and dominion of it from that by justification from this by sanctification Rom. 6.12 Let not sin therefore reigne in your mortal bodies that you should obey sin in the lusts thereof VIII From indifferent things that is such as are neither commanded nor prohibited we are so freed that our conscience is not bound to keep or break them Rom. 14 2.3 For one believeth that he may eat all things another who is weak eateth hearbs let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not and let not him that eateth not condemn him that eateth IX Now in these cases a special care must be had of Faith and charity of faith lest we take things not indifferent for indifferent of charity lest we offend our weak brother Of Faith Paul spakes Rom. 14·23 He that doubteth if he eat he is already condemned because he eateth not of faith but what is not of faith is sin of Charity cap. 14. ver 1. He that is weak in the faith receive you but not unto doubtfull disputation c. X. The same care of liberty is about mens commandements for our conscience is not obliged to those things which are against Gods commands or being adiaphorous are obtruded as necessary but we must not for conscience refuse obedience to those things that are consonant to Gods command XI The end of this liberty 1. Is true consolation arising out of our freedom from sin death and solicitude in things indifferent 2. The service of righteousnesse which indeed is true liberty 3. The true worship of God free from superstition or the scandal of our neighbour XII Contrary to Christian liberty is the â—iberty of the flesh and wantonnesse Jud. v. 4. there are some men crept in now of old ordained for this condemnation ungodly men turning the grace of our God into wantonnesse CHAP. XXIV Of the coming of Christ and Resurrection of the flesh which go before the last Iudgement HItherto of the State of Grace now follows the State of Glory To this belongs the doctrine of the last Judgment The parts whereof are three 1. Of its Antecedents 2. Of the Judgement it self 3 Of the Consequents thereof The Antecedents are Christs coming and the Resurrection of the flesh Christs last coming is his return from Heaven to which he ascended to judge the Earth The RULES I. It is most certaine that Christ will returne to Iudgement This was revealed even in the Patriarks times Iud. v 14 Enoch also the seventh from Adam prophesied of these saying Behold the Lord commeth wiâ—h ten thousand of his Saints to execute judgement upon all and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him The rest of the Scripture is full of such testimonies Psal. 50 3 c. Dan. 12. Matt. 24. and 25. Act. 17. Rom. 2. and 14. 2 Cor. 5.10 1 Thess 4. and 5. 2 Pet. 3. Rev 19 c. II. Although no man knows the time of Christs coming exactly in respect of the day and hour yet there are signes set down by Christ and his Apostles showing that that day is not far off III. These Signes are either common or proper IV. Those are common which were to signifie both the destruction of Ierusalem and Christs last coming Such were those predictâ—ons of Christ Mat. 24.4 5. c. when he speaks both of his own comming and of the destruction of Ierusalem as the type thereof to wit False Prophets false Christâ— wars pestilence famine earthquakes persecutions for Christs sake treacheries want of faith and charity c. V. The proper signes are extream security and impiety the revealing of Antichrist and his destruction by the breath of Christ mouth The ruine of Rome with the forsaking and burning of the Whore VI To these signes some adde A visible and generall uniting of the Iews to the Church of Christ which they teach must be expected in the last times This opinion is plausible if it were found in Scripture The Prophetical testimonies which they alledge were fulfilled in the Apostles times when upon the breaking down of the partition-wall the Jews and Gentiles were united into one body In the Revelaâ—ion we find nothing that doth solidly confirm this opinion Their chief hold is in that of Rom. 11.25.26 For I would not breâ—hren â— that yee should be ignorant of this mysterie lest â— should be wise in your own conceit that blindness in part is happened to Israel until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in and so all Israel shall be saved The Apstles scope in this is to dehort Christians from insulting over the Jews that are rejected because they themselves are called The reason is because by their ruine the gentiles have received salvation ver 11. Yet so that all hope of reconciliation is not cut off from the Jews ver 1â— Nor are they exempted from being rejected who being Christians onely in name are puffed up in their mindes ver 20.21 That former passage of the rejection of the Jews which was not altogether without hope of pardon doth shew in a mystery that the Jews were not totally but in part onely rejected not in respect of time for it was to last onely awhile but in respect of that part of the Jewish Nation which contains the Reprobates so that the meaning is this blindness hath hapned not to all the Jews but to a part only that is to the Reprobates Neither have these words until the fulness of the Gentiles come in this meaning that there shall be such a plausible calling of the Jews after the fulness of the Gentiles is come in For there is nothing more usual than that thâ—se particles till or untill and while being denyed or affirmed signifie the same that never or alwayes As we shewed above c. 19. Neither doth that which the Apostle subjoyns v. 26. hinder anything this interpretation And so all Israel shall be saved For by the name of all Israel he understands the elect which indeed are the true Israelites as above c. 9.7 c. he sheweth And also in the following places v. 28. c. 11 he explains saying As concerning the Gospel they arâ— Enemies for your sakes but as touching the Election they are beloved for their fathers sakes The summe of the whole place is this the rejection of the Iews Nation
in part whereby blindnesse shall remain upon the Reprobates doth no wayes prejudice the elect of that same Nation but they also and so all Israel shall be saved See Calvin on this place VII The signe of Christs presence shall be doubtlesse an incredible brightness and majestie in which he shall appear For he shall come in the cloudes of Heaven Matth. 26.64 with incredible glory Matth. 25 31. accompanied with the whole army of his Angels â—ib with a great shout and voice of the Archangel 1 Thess. 4.16 By reason of his brightness the Sun and and moon shall be darkned as lesser lights by the greater and Stars shalâ— fall from Heaven that is they shall seem to fall from Heaven and the powers of Heaven shall be shaken Mat. 24.29 c. Mar. 13.24 c. yea at his sight Heaven and earth shal seem to fâ—ie away Rev. 20 11 Thus of Christs coming The resurrection of the dead is whereby the bodies of the dead shall be raised but the bodies of those that remain alive shall be changed and shall be again united to their souls by an indissolveable union The RULES I. The Resurrection called by the Greeks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is First or Second That is a resuscitation from the death of sin to the life of righteousnesse This is a revocation from death corporal to life Rev. 20.6 Blessed and holy is he who hath part in the first resurrection II. The Scripture proves the Resurrection of the dead by testimonies examples types and reasons III. Though the Resurrection of the dead is above nature and mans corrupt reason yet it is neither against nature nor against right reason For right reason teacheth that the dead can be raised and shall be raised That is gathered from his omnipotencie this from his justice For as it is just that some sins be punished after this life so it is just likewise that what was the companion of sin should be the companion of pain IV. The general efficient cause of the Resurrection is the whole Trinity the particular is Christ our Lord. Christ is the efficient cause of this three ways 1. As God 2. As the Judge of the world 3. As Mediator The first two wayes he is the efficient cause of resurrection both in the elect and in the reprobate but the third way he is the cause of the resurrectâ—on of the faithful by his merit efficacie and inchoation V. The matter is the same numerical body that man had in this life Besides Iobs testimony Iob 19.26 the reason annexed to the third Canon taken from Gods justice proves this VI. The form consisteth in the reunion of body and soul and restoring of the dead to life and in the sudden change of those that remain and in their freedom from corruption 1 Cor. 15.51 VII The end is the declaration of Gods justice and mercy of that in raising the wicked to condemnation of this in raising the godly to life eternal Dan. 12.2 Joh. 5.28.29 VIII In the Resurrection the godly shall be freed not only from corruption and bodily defects but shall be crowned also with glory 1 Cor. 15 42 43 44. It is sowed in corruption it is raised in incorruption it is sowed in dishonor it is raised in glory it is sowed in weakness it is raised in power it is sowed a natural body it is raised a spirituall body CHAP. XXXV Of the last Iudgement SO much of the antecedents of the last Judgement The Judgement it self is that most glorious act whereby Christ shall judge the whole Word The RULES I. The certainty of the last judgement is proved by the same arguments by which we proved the certainty of Christs comming and of our resurrection II. The general efficient principal cause is the whole Trinity the particular is Christ our Lord in the assumed humane nature but glorified III. The chief power of Iudicature shall be in Christ for to him all power is given and from whom no appeal can be made to any superiour IV. This Iudge shall be visible and conspicuous to all both in respect of his brightnesse and majesty in which he shall appear as also of his humanity But so that his sight shall be terrible to the wicked joyfull to the godly V. The instrumental cause are the Angels whose service he shall use both in gathering together those that are to be judged and in separating the godly from the wicked Matth. 22.31 And he shall send his Angels with a great sound of the Trumpet and they shall gather the elect from the four winds and 25 32. And all Nations shall be gathered bâ—fore him and he shall separate the one from the other as the shâ—pherd separates the sheep from the goats VI. The matter shall be all men who must appear before Christs tribunal Rom. 14.10 2 Cor. 5.10 VII But the gody shall be judged one way and the wicked another way For they shall be judged but not condemned these shall be judged and condemned In this sense the Scripture denieth that the faithful shall be judged Ioh 3.18 and 5.29 VIII Neither matters it that the wicked are said to be judged already For it is one thing to be judged in private another in publike and openly IX The form is expressed by the manner of proceedings in the Courts of justice to which belongs 1. The cognisance of the cause 2. The pronouncing of the sentence 3. The execution thereof X. The cognisanse of the cause is expressed by the similitude of records or books in which their works are registred Rev. 20.12 And the Books were opened c. By these Books are meant partly Gods omniscience and partly mens conscience X. The wicked shall be judged according to and for their works but the godly according to the works of their faith but not for their works Hence Rev. 20.12 Another Book is said to be opened which is â—he book of life That we might know That our salvation depends not on our works but on Gods eternal grace whereby we are written in the Book of life XII The infidelity and impiety of the wicked shall be so laid open before their eyes in their own conscience that they shall not be able to deny or gain-say any thing Psal. 50. â—1 I will reprove thee and set these things in order before thine eyes Matth. 12.36 But I say unto you whatsoever idle word 〈◊〉 shall speak they shall give an accâ—unt thereof in the day of judgment XIII Although the Elect shall remember their sins yet they shall be so fiâ—ed with the joy of the Spirit that the remembrance thereof shall not sad them XIV Both Reprobate and elect shall hear the sentence of the Iudge to the one it shalâ— be full of horror to the other full of comfort Mat 25 34. Come ye blessed of my Father possess the Kingdom prepared for you from the beginning of the world and v. 41. Go ye cursed